Podchaser Logo
Home
Bow Tie Law eDiscovery Podcasts

Joshua Gilliland

Bow Tie Law eDiscovery Podcasts

A daily Business and Education podcast featuring Joshua Gilliland
Good podcast? Give it some love!
Bow Tie Law eDiscovery Podcasts

Joshua Gilliland

Bow Tie Law eDiscovery Podcasts

Episodes
Bow Tie Law eDiscovery Podcasts

Joshua Gilliland

Bow Tie Law eDiscovery Podcasts

A daily Business and Education podcast featuring Joshua Gilliland
Good podcast? Give it some love!
Rate Podcast

Best Episodes of Bow Tie Law eDiscovery Podcasts

Mark All
Search Episodes...
Discussion of adequate privilege logs in In re Abilify (Aripiprazole) Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 3:16-md-2734, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 213493 (N.D. Fla. Dec. 29, 2017) and and strategies for using review applications. 
Case law summary of Radiologix, Inc. v. Radiology & Nuclear Med., LLC, No. 15-4927-DDC, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86964 (D. Kan. May 24, 2018).
A discussion of Echavarria v. Roach, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216021 (D. Mass. Dec. 26, 2018) on the production organization requires under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 34(b)(2)(E)(i) and the difference with 34(b)(2)(E)(ii).
Audio recording of my new CLE on Protecting Fictional Characters, presented at the Orange County Bar Association, on June 26, 2017. Here is the program description: Owners and creators of fictional characters run the gambit in protecting their
Audio recording of my new CLE on Protecting Fictional Characters, presented at the Orange County Bar Association, on June 26, 2017. Here is the program description: Owners and creators of fictional characters run the gambit in protecting their
Case law discussion of Hawa v. Coatesville Area Sch. Dist., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37675, where the Defendants sought 80% cost-shifting for their discovery costs based on purported undue burden because the data was not reasonably accessible.
Case law discussion of Hawa v. Coatesville Area Sch. Dist., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37675, where the Defendants sought 80% cost-shifting for their discovery costs based on purported undue burden because the data was not reasonably accessible.
One of the first cases applying Rule 37(e) for the destruction of text messages is Living Color Enters. v. New Era Aquaculture Ltd. S.D.Fla. Mar. 22, 2016, No. 14-cv-62216-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN) 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39113. Attorney Chris Dix from S
Early Case Assessment was a fireball in the night in eDiscovery marketing, then was outshined by other important eDiscovery topics, from litigation holds to predictive coding. Dave Cochran from Planet Data joined me for this sponsored podcast t
My friend Tom O'Connor sat down with me at Michael Arkfeld's eDiscovery Conference at Arizona State University to discuss the new Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Join us to hear our eDiscovery adventures.
A summary of Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang’s thoughtful opinion of the new Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in Kissing Camels Surgery Ctr., LLC v. Centura Health Corp. (D.Colo. Jan. 22, 2016, Civil Action No. 12-cv-03012-WJM-NYW) 2016 U.S. Dist
Neda Shakoori, Esq., of McManis Faulker, met with me to discuss the 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Neda shared her thoughts on how lawyers can engage in proportionality analysis; early discovery before the meet and con
A summary of Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. v. Ironshore Specialty Ins. Co. (W.D.Wash. Dec. 23, 2015, No. C14-1443RAJ) 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171576, where Judge Richard Jones defined "meaningfully cooperating" in discovery in a discovery dispute
A discussion on the California eDiscovery Duty of Competency in Formal Opinion 2015-193, focusing on how to be competent in each stage of discovery.
Katie Cullen Montgomerie from Fookes Software joined me to discuss email in discovery. We discussed the different types of metadata in email, different file types of email, and the importance of email status in litigation. Katie also explained
Howard Reissner, CEO of Planet Data, joined me to discuss how courts are becoming increasingly more insistent on handling, collecting, and producing mobile and cloud data. Howard shared his thoughts on the demands being placed on law firms and
What is necessary to successfully challenge a production format that is only Bates labeled, but does not contain an index? The answer is more than claiming the production does not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 34(b)(2)(E)(i).
How does a Court balance proportionality between asymmetrical parties? City of Sterling Heights Gen. Emples. Ret. Sys. v. Prudential Fin., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110712 is an excellent example of balancing the proportionality interests between a
Case summary of Intermarine, LLC v. Spliethoff Bevrachtingskantoor, B.V., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112689, *5-6 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2015). Does Dropbox (or any close storage company) have to provide a PMK witness to testify in every case they prod
A case study of privilege logs in United States v. Louisiana, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100238, *3 (M.D. La. July 31, 2015). The podcast covers the requirements for an effective privilege log, best practices for review, and tips on using a review a
Mike Wade, Chief Technology Officer for Planet Data, sat down with Josh Gilliland to discuss the complexities of processing metadata from mobile devices in part three of the Planet Data series. Mike explained how metadata from mobile devices is
Brad Berkshire and Russ Capps from Planet Data join Joshua Gilliland to discuss mobile forensics. Both discuss collection best practices, strategies, and how they would approach the following hypothetical: Executive at start-up uses personal
Hearsay is an out of court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Are read receipt emails hearsay? If they are, are the messages party admissions? I discuss these issues and more from Fox v. Leland Volunteer Fire/Rescue Dep’t I
Hearsay is an out of court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Are read receipt emails hearsay? If they are, are the messages party admissions? I discuss these issues and more from Fox v. Leland Volunteer Fire/Rescue Dep’t
Drew Lewis, Esq., and Joshua Gilliland, Esq., discuss the meaning of the Rio Tinto Plc v. Vale S.A., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24996, 8 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2015), the new Predictive Coding and TAR case by Judge Andrew Peck. The podcast addresses the
Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features