Dan and James discuss the recently proposed "transparency audit", why it received so much blowback, and the characteristics of successful reform schemesThe specifics...The computational research integrity conference (https://cri-conf.org/)The transparancy leaderboard (https://etiennelebel.com/cs/t-leaderboard/t-leaderboard.html) proposed by Curate Science (https://curatescience.org/app/home)Our episode with Chris Jackson (https://everythinghertz.com/111), that James mentionedWhat about a transparency leaderboard for instiutions?What are the characteristics of grassroots reform schemes that worked?Other links- Dan on twitter (www.twitter.com/dsquintana)- James on twitter (www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)- Everything Hertz on twitter (www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast) - Everything Hertz on Facebook (www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)Music credits: Lee Rosevere (freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)Support us on Patreon (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) and get bonus stuff!$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month Episode citationQuintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2021, April 5) "129: Transparency audits", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/JRNP8