Dan and James chat about science journalism with Brian Resnick (@b_resnick), who is a science reporter at Vox.com.Here’s what they cover:Should scientists be worried that their work will be misrepresented when talking to the media? [0:58]How Brian approaches science journalism [8:53]It’s ok to challenge the assumptions of science journalists [16:57]How do you write a great headline? [19:13]How does Brian appraise the quality of research? [29:50]Should psychiatrists (or journalists) diagnose the US President? [32:50] Stories in science that no one knows the answer to [36:58] How to promote your research without going via your institution’s media department [40:24]The best way to pitch your research to a science journalist [44:25]How pre-preprints are great for research addressing current events [48:45]How scientists can improve their science communication writing [53:15]Dick jokes in science writing — yes or no? [54:30]What has Brian changed his mind about? [56:37]Brian’s book recommendation [58:05]Links:Brian’s pieces at Vox - https://www.vox.com/authors/brian-resnickThe twitter poll that Dan was referring to - https://twitter.com/kylejasmin/status/960065733551181824?lang=enThe Weeds podcast episode on the Goldwater rule - https://art19.com/shows/the-weeds/episodes/72d4c65f-2d2a-4925-8bb6-7d6ca93cb561 Brian’s email - [email protected] on Twitter - https://www.twitter.com/b_resnickBooks mentioned:We have no idea - https://www.amazon.com/We-Have-No-Idea-Universe/dp/0735211515Does it fart? - https://www.amazon.com/Does-Fart-Definitive-Animal-Flatulence/dp/0316484156/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8Find us on Twitter:https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcasthttps://www.twitter.com/dsquintanahttps://www.twitter.com/jamesheathersMusic credits: Lee Rosevere freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/ Special Guest: Brian Resnick.