Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:11
Yo!" Dude, smoothies are
0:14
such bullshit. What? What? What?
0:19
Welcome to Mike's Hot Takes! Dude. I've
0:22
been fucking lied to! Everyone is telling me to drink
0:24
smoothies. They're like... Because, you know, I like drink too much
0:26
coffee in the morning, and then I go to the gym,
0:28
and then I'm like... dead, tired, and
0:30
I'm just like a black hole for like three hours.
0:32
Yes. And they're like, try a smoothie instead of breakfast.
0:34
And so now I'm drinking smoothies. And
0:36
I drink a smoothie, and then like 30
0:39
minutes later, I'm fucking starving! No, smoothies are
0:41
delicious. Yeah, they're great. But the idea that
0:43
they're gonna stay with you is... Yeah. ...false.
0:45
We're back to my... my beefs with soup
0:47
and salad. It's like, why? What's the
0:49
point of this? I wanna be
0:52
done eating. I wanna go do things other than
0:54
eating. Do you wanna go grab a spoon of
0:56
peanut butter now? No, I think it's good, actually.
0:58
I think I'm... I think I'm at my best
1:00
when I'm only running on like coffee, Tums, and
1:03
well-butrin. I did see a
1:05
sticker this weekend that just said, at
1:07
my best when I'm at my worst. Oh,
1:09
that's pretty fun. I do feel like that
1:12
is what you described. Well, maybe we
1:14
have a tagline. Maybe we have a tagline.
1:16
Maybe that's it. No, I got a... I
1:18
got a tagline for us. Don't worry about
1:20
it. You thought about it in advance? I
1:22
thought about it while I was falling asleep.
1:24
So it might be terrible. All right, give
1:26
it... Give it to me. Hi, everybody. And
1:28
welcome to the SASS report. Wait,
1:31
what? Are we not talking about
1:33
the CAS report? Oh, god.
1:38
Jesus Christ. Okay,
1:42
no more before you go to bed. Aubrey,
1:44
no more dream journal. Fucking taglines.
1:46
No more thinking of it in
1:48
advance. Oh
1:51
my god. You
1:53
know what? We're trying. We're doing our best. Are
1:55
we? Is that our best? I'm
2:02
Michael Hopps. I am Aubrey Gordon. If you
2:05
would like to support the show, you can
2:07
do that at patreon.com/maintenance phase. Michael
2:10
Aubrey. Today we're
2:12
continuing our conversation about Rapid
2:15
Onset Gender Dysphoria. Yes. Yes.
2:18
So Aubrey, do you want to
2:20
recap us on what we learned
2:22
last episode? Rapid Onset Gender
2:25
Dysphoria made its
2:27
way into the news cycle, sounding
2:29
very legitimate and diagnostic and so
2:31
on and so forth. But last
2:34
time we learned that its origin
2:36
was in basically like
2:39
transphobic message boards. Yes.
2:41
And that the primary
2:43
sort of storytellers around
2:45
this were parents who
2:47
appeared to be having a profoundly
2:49
transphobic response or at the
2:51
very least, like high levels
2:54
of discomfort. Yes. With
2:56
their own kids having
2:58
come out as trans. Yes. Last
3:01
week's episode was essentially a
3:03
bizarre human centipede story where
3:05
there's these parents whose kids
3:07
come out as trans to
3:09
them and they
3:11
essentially speculate, oh, I
3:13
don't think she's really trans. I think
3:16
she's being pied piperd by the
3:18
Internet and her peers and the culture
3:20
around her. And so I'm
3:23
just going to assume that this is some sort
3:25
of like fake temporary thing. And if
3:27
I resist it long enough, she will drop it. And
3:30
despite there being essentially no evidence for
3:32
this, this narrative starts to appear in
3:35
the mainstream media. Eventually,
3:37
we have a poster abstract in
3:39
an academic journal where a researcher
3:41
named Lisa Littman does what looks
3:44
like an exploration of this phenomenon,
3:46
but it's actually just a survey
3:49
of the same pretty small number
3:51
of parents. So that doesn't really
3:53
tell us anything about the phenomenon
3:55
itself. It only tells us about
3:57
the perceptions and beliefs of these
3:59
parents. I would be very upset
4:01
if there was research into gay people
4:04
and the way that they got their
4:06
data was by like asking James Dobson.
4:09
Why did you ask the gay people who were
4:12
right there, huh? So we are now going to
4:14
doodle-loo back to 2018. This
4:17
is the first time we get mainstream,
4:20
quote unquote, evidence for
4:22
rapid onset gender dysphoria.
4:25
This is the publication of the full
4:27
version of that very, very brief study
4:30
we talked about last episode by Lisa
4:32
Littman. This is basically just an anonymous
4:34
survey of a bunch of parents. Lisa
4:36
Littman posted recruitment advertisements on these three
4:39
anti-trans websites, asked parents to fill
4:41
out the survey, and then they held it out.
4:43
There's 90 questions. That's it. That's the whole study. Gotcha.
4:45
So there's going to be a lot of debate and
4:47
discourse about this article, which we will get into.
4:50
But one of the most striking things
4:52
about going back to the research for
4:54
this episode is how almost all of
4:56
the documents that this movement cites
4:59
as part of its kind of evidence base for
5:01
this narrative, how just
5:04
openly low rent and
5:06
transphobic they are. Oh, God. So
5:09
we are going to read some excerpts from
5:11
the study. This is an excerpt from the
5:13
results section where she
5:15
is talking about parents describing
5:18
the experience of hearing their
5:20
kids come out to them as trans. Eighty
5:23
one percent of the parents answered
5:25
affirmatively that their child's announcement of
5:27
being transgender came, quote, out of
5:30
the blue without significant prior evidence
5:32
of gender dysphoria. Almost
5:34
a third of respondents noted that their child
5:36
did not seem gender dysphoric when they made
5:38
their announcement. This one's so weird. Dude, it's
5:40
like, oh, they didn't they didn't seem like
5:42
they had gender dysphoria when they told me
5:44
they're trans. Did you believe it? Yeah.
5:46
Yeah. Did they really
5:48
sell it? I didn't seem gay when I told
5:51
my parents I was gay. That's not that's not
5:53
really for them to decide. This goes back to
5:55
the post that we read last time around, right?
5:57
Which is just like they didn't
5:59
seem like. they were deeply unhappy
6:01
and tortured by their own body.
6:03
We're like, whatever it was, right?
6:05
People are looking for like a deep sense
6:07
of suffering. Also, I was lying. I did
6:09
seem gay when I told my parents I
6:12
was gay. But you seemed gay at every
6:14
moment. I see that every moment of my
6:16
entire life. Family photo that I've seen. I
6:18
can hear our parents butting
6:21
and, you seemed real gay.
6:23
You actually did seem super gay. All
6:25
right. 69%
6:29
of respondents believed that their child was
6:31
using language that they found online when
6:33
they quote unquote came out. Come out
6:35
in scare quotes. I had never seen
6:37
that before I started researching this. Oh man,
6:39
this was all over our many,
6:42
many, many anti-LGBT testimonies. Oh
6:44
yeah. Oh, coming out. Coming
6:46
out. Oh, god. Of
6:49
the 51 responses describing reasons why
6:51
respondents thought their child was reproducing
6:53
language they found online, the top
6:55
two reasons were that it didn't
6:57
sound like their child's voice and
6:59
that the parent later looked online
7:02
and recognized the same words and
7:04
phrases that their child used when
7:06
they announced a transgender identity. One
7:09
parent said, quote, it seemed different from
7:11
the way she usually talked. I remember
7:13
thinking it was like hearing someone who
7:15
had memorized a lot of definitions for
7:18
a vocabulary test. Another
7:20
respondent said, the email my child sent
7:22
to me read like all the narratives
7:24
posted online almost word for word. The
7:26
obvious explanation here is that like if
7:28
your parents are kind of conservative or
7:30
a little bit anti-trans, you're going to
7:32
Google like things to say to them
7:34
for the coming out process. Also, like
7:36
maybe that's something you come across and
7:38
looking to talk to your parents about
7:40
it. It also might be stuff that
7:42
you come across in like figuring
7:45
out your own identity stuff. Totally. There are
7:47
lots and lots of ways that this could
7:49
come to be that don't mean like,
7:52
Oh, no, invasion of the body
7:54
snatchers. I actually think the study
7:57
is very useful and very interesting
7:59
because. It's a portrait
8:01
of parental anxieties. Yes. It
8:04
says in these respondent answers, it says
8:06
it mirrors language
8:09
that I found online afterwards. So
8:11
it's like their kids come out to those trends, they
8:13
then immediately go on the internet and they're like, where
8:15
is she getting this stuff? They basically
8:17
self radicalize, right? They find these videos, they
8:20
find tumblers, they find other things online, and
8:22
then they start thinking that their kid is
8:24
like some sort of automaton. My kid has
8:26
been taken from me. I feel completely hooked
8:28
on this idea of like, what does it
8:31
mean to say something gender dysphorically?
8:33
Yeah, yeah, I know. Oh yes,
8:35
that is a statement of gender
8:37
dysphor... Got it. She was doing
8:39
the John Wayne voice the whole time
8:41
she posted. Seems a little, she kept
8:43
saying, pardon her? I don't know why
8:45
she did that. Da-ha, da-ha. So we're
8:48
gonna read one more excerpt, and like this
8:50
is, this is just unbelievable,
8:52
okay? Okay, the groups targeted for
8:54
mocking by the friend groups are
8:56
often heterosexual people and non-transgender people.
8:59
Sometimes animosity was also directed
9:02
towards males, white people, gay
9:04
and lesbian, non-transgender people, aromantic
9:07
and asexual people, and quote
9:09
unquote, TERFs. Don't
9:14
respond, don't respond. Don't unquote me,
9:17
the writer of this. Sorry. Ha
9:19
ha ha ha ha. One
9:23
participant explained, quote, they are
9:25
constantly putting down straight white
9:27
people for being privileged, dumb
9:29
and boring. Boring. Another
9:34
participant elaborated, in general,
9:36
cisgendered people are considered
9:38
evil and unsupportive, regardless
9:40
of their actual views on the topic. I
9:42
fucking love this. Regardless of their actual
9:45
views. They call you transphobic, regardless of what
9:47
you believe. What do you believe? My daughter's not
9:49
trans. Yes, Emily, well. Ha
9:52
ha ha ha. To be
9:54
heterosexual, comfortable with the gender you
9:57
were assigned at birth, and non-minority
9:59
places you. in the most evil
10:01
of categories with this group of
10:03
friends. Statement of
10:05
opinions by the evil cisgendered
10:08
population are considered phobic and
10:10
discriminatory and are generally discounted
10:12
as unenlightened. Another
10:15
participant said, quote, I
10:17
hear them disparaging heterosexuality,
10:19
marriage and nuclear families.
10:22
What? Another participant said on
10:24
my daughter's Tumblr blog, she
10:26
has liked or favorited or
10:28
reposted disparaging comments about those
10:30
who aren't transgender or seem
10:32
to misunderstand the transgender identity.
10:35
Boy, if you are digging through
10:37
your kids' Tumblr likes, dude, that's
10:39
that's exactly where my brain went.
10:41
I was like, this is a
10:43
level of like self radicalization
10:46
that is really alarming. Yeah. Later in
10:48
this paper, it says also
10:50
as evidence that, you know, my daughter is being
10:52
taken from me or whatever, says she edited her
10:54
diary. I was just about to
10:57
make a diary joke about. She thinks
10:59
I'm invading her privacy, which I wouldn't
11:01
know if I didn't have to read
11:03
her diary all the time. Yeah. If you're
11:05
looking for someone who's being radicalized on
11:07
the Internet, may I introduce you to
11:09
a mirror? No, I mean,
11:11
that's also the social contagion thing is also fascinating,
11:13
too. Right. Right. Because it's clear that these parents
11:15
are like whipping each other up and like, you
11:17
know, they're posting, you know, quote unquote research that
11:19
shows that like trans people don't really have high
11:21
suicide rates, blah, blah, blah. Some of these
11:24
stories from the parents are like honestly
11:26
very sad. It's like these these parents who
11:28
essentially choose like online forums over
11:31
their relationships with their own kids. A lot of
11:33
them are just not in contact with their kids
11:35
anymore because they can't handle just
11:37
saying we love you no matter what.
11:39
I actually think there's something a little
11:41
bit more insidious even than like they're
11:44
positing that all trans identities are fake.
11:46
That's not what they're positing. They're
11:48
positing that all trans identities are
11:50
subject to the approval of cis
11:53
people. So this is actually the
11:55
explicit project of this study. I
11:57
am going to send you an
11:59
excerpt from the. conclusion. The conclusion
12:02
of this exploratory study is that
12:04
clinicians need to be very cautious
12:06
before relying solely on self-report when
12:08
adolescents and young adults seek social,
12:11
medical, or surgical transition. Adolescents and
12:13
young adults are not trained medical
12:15
professionals. When
12:18
they diagnose their own symptoms based on
12:20
what they read on the internet and
12:22
hear from their friends, it is quite
12:24
possible for them to reach incorrect conclusions.
12:27
It is the duty of the clinician,
12:29
when seeing a new adolescent or young
12:31
adult patient seeking transition,
12:34
to perform their own evaluation and
12:36
differential diagnosis to determine if the
12:38
patient is correct or incorrect in
12:40
their self-assessment of their symptoms and
12:43
their conviction that they would benefit
12:45
from transition. If a patient is
12:47
correct or incorrect in their self-assessment,
12:51
it also says, this is a couple paragraphs
12:53
later, the patient's history being
12:55
significantly different than their parent's account
12:57
of the child's history should be
12:59
seen as a red flag that
13:01
a more thorough investigation is needed.
13:04
This was an entry point to
13:06
weakening abortion protections in the U.S.
13:08
was parental notification. And that's essentially
13:10
what they're advocating here, right? It's
13:13
actually good for these kids if you
13:15
out them to their parents who they
13:17
probably haven't told for a fucking reason.
13:19
There's also the thing that we see
13:21
in a lot of reactionary movements where
13:23
the demands of the reactionaries
13:25
are things that are already in place, right?
13:27
They're like, we think kids should be assessed
13:30
before they get hormones and surgery. It's like,
13:32
yes, they are. Right. The barriers
13:34
to getting hormones and surgery as a minor are
13:36
extremely high and you can't
13:39
transition without parental permission already. All of
13:41
this really hinges on the idea that
13:43
like, legal minors
13:46
who are transgender have
13:49
an undue amount of social power
13:51
and influence and need to be
13:54
checked. Yeah, we're sick of coddling
13:56
these trans kids as
13:58
a society. It's too much. Enough is
14:00
enough. But then, OK, but then my
14:02
favorite thing about this study, not only
14:04
just how kind of like honest face
14:06
janky it is, is like essentially every
14:08
other study of this kind,
14:11
while trying to generate evidence
14:13
of rapid onset, gender dysphoria, it
14:16
ends up generating evidence of the
14:18
opposite. So as one of the
14:20
questions to these parents, it's like,
14:22
when did your kid come out? Did your kid go to
14:24
a gender clinic? Did your kid change their hairstyle? Blah,
14:27
blah, blah. So there's 256 parents
14:29
who fill out this survey. Only 11% of
14:33
their kids ended up getting hormones. 2.7%
14:36
ended up getting puberty blockers. And 2%
14:38
ended up having surgery. So if it
14:40
were the case that people are tricking
14:42
doctors into giving them this care, if
14:44
it were the case that doctors themselves
14:46
were like tractor-beaming kids through all
14:48
these medical procedures, we would see way
14:51
more than 10%, 15% of kids getting
14:54
gender-affirming care. I also think this is
14:56
where it reveals, the whole sort of
14:59
endeavor reveals itself to be less about
15:01
concern and more about concern trolling, right?
15:04
It's certainly not about the
15:06
ins and outs of what
15:08
health insurance covers, or
15:10
what doctors are permitted to do, any of
15:12
that kind of stuff. This is all just
15:14
ways of like eating around the edges of
15:17
like a much bigger thing that
15:19
they're trying to eliminate, which is the health care
15:21
for trans people. Yeah. I
15:23
mean, this episode, like all episodes that
15:26
we do, is a extended sub-tweet of Brexit.
15:28
This is exactly what happened with Brexit too. They're like,
15:31
all we're asking for is like a slightly
15:33
updated arrangement. And then like every single time
15:35
they get what they want, they just push it farther and farther
15:37
and farther. And they've ended up with like
15:39
the hardest imaginable Brexit. And like you can't negotiate
15:41
with people who are not actually saying things
15:43
in good faith. They're saying what they know you
15:45
will agree to. And the minute you agree to it,
15:48
they'll push you to the next quote unquote reasonable ask.
15:50
And that's what's happened in like the
15:52
UK. I was gonna say something specific, but it's just
15:54
the UK at this point. Yeah, the whole thing. The
15:57
whole thing. All of it. So this
15:59
article... comes out in August of 2018
16:02
in November of this year, Lisa
16:05
Litman, the author of the paper,
16:07
presents it at the annual meeting
16:09
of the American Academy of Child
16:11
and Adolescent Psychiatry and
16:14
there's a description of
16:16
her presentation which we're only reading because
16:18
I think it's extremely funny. Following
16:21
Dr. Litman's presentation, there was
16:23
no applause. Sorry. Got
16:26
her. Okay. Got her. Okay.
16:33
Following Dr. Litman's presentation, there
16:35
was no applause before several
16:37
audience members launched into questions.
16:40
Some were more civil than others, but
16:42
pretty much all were critical. One
16:45
audience member pointedly asked Dr. Litman
16:47
what she had previously studied in
16:49
her research OB-GYN public
16:51
health issues and whether
16:54
she has worked with any transgender patients
16:56
in the past, she has not. Narrator
16:58
voice. Narrator voice. Her?
17:06
Another questioner at the end repeatedly asked
17:08
her, why did you do this study
17:11
and what's wrong with taking on a
17:13
different gender identity to which she would
17:15
only say that we should keep open
17:18
the possibility that there may be social
17:20
contagion occurring. I
17:22
love that the questions are just like, why? Why?
17:25
Why? Why are you doing this? Like, you're just
17:27
like sputtering. What if
17:30
it's neutral, but what if it's happening
17:32
because of social contagion? You're
17:35
just describing like fashion at this point.
17:37
Wow, we may be, why
17:39
else would people be wearing cargo pants
17:41
right now? So I think this is
17:43
a good summary of the kind of
17:45
academic response to this. And
17:47
before you know it, there start to
17:50
be more formal methodological critiques in various
17:52
journals. So the main thing is that
17:55
Litman is trying to identify
17:57
a phenomenon among kids that
17:59
does The
20:00
previous title of the paper, the original title,
20:02
was Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria
20:04
in Adolescents and Young Adults, a Study
20:06
of Parental Reports, and the updated title
20:09
is Parent Reports of Adolescent and Young
20:11
Adults Perceived to Show Signs of a
20:13
Rapid Onset of Gender Dysphoria. What
20:15
I find so frustrating about this is
20:18
that Littman herself and a lot of
20:20
conservatives do like this weird victory lap
20:23
about this statement, we've reached the
20:25
conclusion that the study and the
20:28
resultant data represent a valid contribution
20:30
to the scientific literature. Like the
20:32
thing they say before the butt, essentially. Because
20:36
oftentimes what you see, what you see in kind
20:38
of debates about this in like reply guy world
20:40
is that you're like, yeah, the study's like discredited
20:42
and then people will be like, well, it wasn't
20:44
retracted. Well, okay. This
20:47
is like a movie poster where
20:49
the quote from a critic is
20:51
just like watchable. Yeah, it is
20:53
so damned with faint praise.
20:55
There's also an unbelievably tedious
20:58
thing where originally Brown University,
21:00
where Lisa Littman was employed, puts out
21:02
a press release saying like, our researcher
21:04
has a study that found these things.
21:07
And after these
21:10
major corrections to the paper, Brown
21:12
then deletes the press release from
21:14
its website. So there's all this
21:16
like outcry. And the president of Brown
21:19
releases a statement saying, we
21:21
respect the academic freedom of everybody who works
21:23
at Brown. We don't
21:25
want to sort of spread messages that
21:28
might cause harm to the transgender community.
21:30
We're leaving up the study. Like we're
21:32
not retracting the study. We're not deleting
21:34
it from anything. We're just deleting the
21:36
press release. Ultimately, I don't know, relatively
21:38
minor thing, but the right goes
21:40
ballistic. Ben
21:43
Shapiro writes a piece
21:45
for the Daily Wire called a
21:47
Brown University researcher released a study
21:49
about teens imitating their peers by
21:51
turning trans. The left went insane,
21:54
so Brown caved. The left
21:56
went insane. Quillette has, as
21:59
a former. Dean of Harvard
22:01
Medical School, I question Brown's failure
22:03
to defend Lisa Lippmann. They did
22:05
defend her. Fox News
22:07
has Brown U censors gender
22:09
dysphoria study, worried that findings
22:12
might invalidate the perspectives of
22:14
transgender community. The study, you can
22:16
go look at the study and read the study. Nothing
22:18
has been censored. But I think this
22:21
Brown University little dust up thing
22:23
is indicative of one of the big
22:26
shifts that starts happening over the course
22:28
of the next couple of years, after
22:30
2019, is that the
22:33
anti-trans movement starts
22:35
to become increasingly
22:37
conspiratorial. This whole kind
22:39
of narrative, when you think about it, it
22:41
already kind of is a conspiracy
22:43
theory in that it requires you to
22:45
believe hundreds of doctors
22:47
are giving these irreversible procedures
22:49
to kids with no assessment
22:51
because they're so blinded
22:54
by their SJW trans
22:56
ideology that they don't even care. You're
22:59
already in a conspiracy mindset. And
23:01
then this whole thing of Brown
23:03
University censored the research. And the trans
23:05
activists are coming after us. It creates
23:08
this thing that we see in other
23:10
conspiracy theories where everything becomes about these
23:12
meta debates, about you can't even ask
23:14
the questions anymore. When
23:16
you look at sort of anti-trans rhetoric and these
23:19
organizations of parents or whoever it is, they
23:21
spend a huge amount of time on like,
23:24
she tried to publish her research. But then
23:26
it was censored. Whether or not it was
23:28
censored is kind of irrelevant to whether or
23:30
not the narrative holds up on the merits.
23:33
People's work can be censored for political reasons,
23:35
but it can also be censored because it's
23:37
bad. Research on flat
23:39
earth also gets censored. This
23:41
actually appears in a later interview with one of
23:43
the people who's kind of leading this crusade. He
23:45
says, researchers who have touched
23:48
this topic have been punished for their
23:50
curiosity. Just ask Lisa Littman. Ultimately, her
23:52
paper on the subject resulted in unnecessary
23:55
correction by the journal to publish it
23:57
and the loss of Littman's academic. He
30:01
was slightly taken aback that I, a psychologist,
30:03
wanted to meet him. What? I don't
30:06
know. But he also appeared
30:08
slightly flattered. He told me
30:10
his name was Edwin. Edwin is
30:12
a feminine man, one of
30:14
the most feminine men I have ever met.
30:17
I do not ask Edwin about his childhood because
30:20
I do not need to. I
30:22
already know that Edwin played with dolls
30:25
and loathed football, that his
30:27
best friends were girls. There
30:29
is some chance that if I ever
30:32
see Edwin again, his name and appearance
30:34
will be changed to those of a
30:36
woman. Even for a
30:38
gay man, Edwin's appearance and manner
30:40
are exceedingly feminine. He
30:43
would stand out in a gay bar, but
30:45
he'd receive little romantic attention there. First of
30:47
all, how do you know? Yeah, what is
30:49
this weird dig at Edwin? Ugh, god. Yeah,
30:52
I mean, gay men are misogynistic as fuck on this
30:54
stuff, but when straight people talk about this shit, I'm
30:56
like, take Edwin's name out of
30:59
your mouth. Also, femmes are getting laid. Don't worry
31:01
about it. Wait, I have to take off my
31:03
carpal tunnel splints. Hang on, hang on. Femmes
31:06
are getting laid. Femmes.
31:08
He is near the boundary of male
31:10
and female, and someday he may cross
31:12
it. If he does,
31:15
one primary motive will be lust.
31:18
One cannot understand transsexualism
31:21
without studying transsexual sexuality.
31:24
Transsexuals lead remarkable sex lives.
31:27
Those who love men become women
31:30
to attract them. Jesus Christ. Do
31:32
I know? Those who love women
31:34
become the women they love. Although
31:38
transsexuals are cultural hot
31:40
commodities right now, writers
31:42
have either been too
31:45
shallow or too squeamish
31:47
to give transsexual sexuality the
31:49
attention it deserves. No
31:52
longer. Also, trans writers
31:54
have not been too shallow or
31:56
too squeamish to write about transsexuality.
31:58
That's been happening. the
34:01
fucksaw incident. What? And
34:05
I was like, Mike, you have 180 pages of notes. Don't
34:08
open a bunch of other tabs. Don't
34:10
find out what the fuck the fucksaw
34:12
incident was, but I didn't have the
34:14
strength. You and I know why we do
34:16
this show. I didn't have the strength. Finding
34:18
out about fucksaws. It's
34:23
a non-zero factor. Okay, and then all
34:25
day I'm thinking about it, and I'm
34:28
like, what is the fucksaw incident?
34:30
What is it? Also,
34:33
I would just say anything
34:35
involving a fucksaw is
34:37
an incident. I need it. My definition.
34:40
I need it. I need it. It's
34:45
not like a quiet evening with the fucksaw. Sunday
34:49
afternoons. What the fucksaw?
34:54
Oh no, Michael, I might be
34:56
destroyed. Do you want to know
34:58
what the fucksaw incident was? I don't
35:00
know if I can take it. Okay. Okay,
35:02
so 2011, he's a teacher at Northeastern, and
35:07
he teaches about sexuality. He does
35:09
sexuality classes. And so he's doing
35:12
an optional lecture on kink, the
35:15
kink community. And so he brings in
35:17
two kinky people. I
35:20
thought the fucksaw was gonna be a joke
35:22
name or something that a student came up
35:24
with. This is what the kink performers call
35:26
it. So it's a saw, like a saw
35:28
blade, you know, that you use for like
35:30
home construction. But if you
35:32
take off the saw and you put on
35:34
a dildo, then it's like a dildo
35:37
like going in and out. I'm doing this with my
35:39
hand right now. You can't see it. Oh, sure. So
35:41
it's like a jackhammer. It's like a dildo jackhammer, basically.
35:44
And so apparently they're having this
35:46
class and they're describing having sex
35:48
with this woman with the fucksaw.
35:51
And one of them is like, you know, we actually
35:53
have the fucksaw with us right now. Should
35:56
we demonstrate this? Hello,
36:00
students, I happen to have my fucksaw
36:02
on me. It's
36:08
in my civic outside. Give me a second.
36:11
I brought it to school. Then they
36:13
go out and they get the
36:16
fucksaw. I love this. This
36:18
man like uses
36:20
the fucksaw on this woman and
36:22
brings her to like numerous orgasms.
36:24
You're this is made up. This
36:26
is fucking real. This is made up. This
36:28
becomes like a whole big thing. And like the whole country
36:31
is like clowning on this professor who like let
36:33
this happen because apparently they're like, is this cool?
36:35
And he's like, yeah, yeah, whatever. We're all adults
36:37
here. There's eventually
36:40
an interview with him in Salon where
36:43
they're like, what is
36:45
like the deal with this whole outcry? And he's
36:47
saying like it's not a big deal because it's like
36:49
an optional lecture. All the kids in
36:51
college are adults. And he says it
36:54
took no more than 10 minutes of
36:56
the hour long presentation. So
37:01
it's one fucking six. Amazing. Of
37:03
the thing of 10 minutes of
37:06
this woman just having orgasm after orgasm.
37:08
Watching somebody have sex in a lecture
37:10
hall for 10 minutes is a long
37:13
amount of time. So boring,
37:15
honestly, after the first one.
37:18
Like how much fucksaw do we need? So
37:21
that's that's J. Michael Bailey.
37:23
Jesus hell. That's our guy. That's
37:26
our guy. I was
37:28
like a weird long day about
37:30
the fucksaw. We're keeping it.
37:32
Good. I love that you're like,
37:35
this is totally inappropriate for a
37:37
university. Let's just dedicate 25 minutes
37:39
of our podcast. I wanted to
37:41
be exactly one sixth of our podcast the way that
37:43
it was one sixth of the lecture. Oh, I think
37:45
that's fair. I want to keep
37:47
structural integrity. How many of the lecture
37:49
halls full of students are we going
37:52
to reach? Yes. So back
37:54
to the reason why we're talking about the fucksaw. This
37:57
2023 article that is attempting to prove the existence
37:59
of rapid onset. gendered dysphoria. One
38:01
of the authors is the fucksaw guy, Jay
38:03
Michael Bailey. The other author
38:06
is a woman named Susanna Diaz. And the
38:08
way that the study comes about is Jay
38:11
Michael Bailey goes to a conference
38:13
organized by Susanna Diaz. And he's
38:16
talking to her about this website
38:18
that she founded called Parents of
38:20
ROGD Kids. She mentions
38:23
that she has all of this data.
38:25
She has a survey that she has
38:27
sent to the users of this site.
38:29
And that is the basis of this
38:31
study. So right off
38:33
the bat, you can tell that
38:35
this has exactly the same problems
38:37
as the previous study, right? This
38:39
is just essentially a sketchy online
38:41
survey. And it's recruited
38:43
parents who already believe in the concept of
38:46
rapid onset gender dysphoria. So of course, they're
38:48
going to report that they've seen it in
38:50
their kids. That's why they're on this website.
38:52
But the kind of amazing thing is that
38:55
both of those factors are even worse
38:57
in this study. So first of all,
38:59
the data is even sketchier, because
39:03
Susanna Diaz is not her real name. Jay
39:05
Michael Bailey says that like, Oh, because the
39:07
trans activists were so mean to Lisa Lippmann,
39:09
she has no choice but to use a
39:11
pseudonym. He says, my co
39:13
author Susanna Diaz doesn't go by her
39:16
real name. I don't even know it,
39:18
despite having met her in person once
39:20
and spoken with her many times. She
39:22
uses a pseudonym to protect her family,
39:24
especially her daughter, whom Susanna believes has
39:26
rapid onset gender dysphoria. This
39:28
is just a lady who founded this website
39:31
and then says that she surveyed people. But
39:33
there's very little information about the sort of
39:35
methodology and like logistics of the
39:37
survey. And secondly,
39:39
this website that she founded parents
39:42
of ROGD kids, I mean, the
39:44
previous study also recruited parents from
39:46
these anti trans websites. This
39:48
website makes fourth wave now
39:50
look like P flag. So if
39:53
you go to the like our position,
39:55
like the basic about us statement
39:57
on their website, it says our position
40:01
1. Identifying as the opposite gender is
40:03
not normal. Oh, good. In most cases,
40:05
it's a symptom of severe psychological pain
40:08
or dysfunction, or an attempt to resolve
40:10
some other issue. 2.
40:12
Our children are subjected to strong
40:14
cultural influences that promote transitioning. 3.
40:17
The gender-affirmative model is a form of conversion
40:19
therapy. What? I know. Sorry. Dude,
40:21
this is the rhetorical equivalent of a fuck
40:24
saw. Okay, okay. There were fuck sawing us.
40:26
Not in the good way. 4.
40:29
The current standard of care, the gender-affirmative model,
40:31
is unproven. 5. Our
40:33
gender dysphoric children, youth, and adults
40:35
are being experimented on. 6.
40:38
The gender-affirmative model prolongs suffering and
40:41
causes further trauma. 7.
40:43
Professionals who accept an individual
40:46
self-diagnosis and propose medical intervention
40:48
are negligent. Jesus Christmas. 8.
40:51
Medical intervention for gender dysphoria should
40:53
be a last resort. So this
40:55
is very openly an anti-trans
40:58
organization. As you know, my
41:00
brain is broken in such
41:02
a way that it can
41:04
only be treated by recreationally
41:06
watching the Montana legislature. Yes.
41:08
And this was a huge,
41:11
huge, huge fight last session.
41:13
Yeah. There were people making these sorts
41:16
of claims about like kids are being
41:18
rushed into transition and but the whole
41:20
time I was watching it, I was
41:23
like, in Montana? Yeah,
41:25
I know. In Montana. Right?
41:28
Like the places where the moral
41:30
panic is the strongest are
41:32
the places where it is also like the
41:35
most disapproved of. It's just
41:38
real nonsense. And it's a real dead
41:41
giveaway that people are just turning off
41:43
their critical thinking brains at all. They're
41:46
just freaked out and their hypothalamuses are like,
41:48
this is the only part of your brain
41:50
that works right now. And so
41:52
we're not going to spend as much time on this as we
41:54
did on the Lisa Lippmann survey, mostly because this is as much
41:57
time on it as we did on the. fuck
42:00
song? No. Mostly
42:05
because this is essentially the same
42:08
thing again, but like even
42:10
jankier. So in
42:12
the sort of consent form, it
42:15
says who should complete this survey?
42:17
You should complete this survey if
42:19
your child, A, had a relatively
42:21
normal childhood without showing any signs
42:24
of discomfort with their gender and
42:26
B, suddenly, seemingly out of the
42:28
blue, decided they identified as the
42:30
opposite gender or some other quote
42:33
unquote gender. Why gender in scare
42:35
quotes is a new one for me.
42:37
Just like the whole concept of it.
42:39
I don't fucking know. And
42:42
then in the recruitment criteria,
42:44
they say that their respondents are
42:47
reporting like they get
42:49
like a median age of rapid onset
42:51
gender dysphoria and they say that the
42:53
range is between three to greater
42:56
than 25 years. So
42:58
like what child at age three is
43:01
doing rapid onset gender dysphoria. How
43:03
would you like is the three
43:05
year old on TikTok? Yeah, they
43:08
say we limited subsequent analyses to
43:10
parent reports on youths whose gender
43:13
dysphoria was reported to begin between
43:15
ages 11 and 21. So why
43:17
are you including people over 18? They're
43:20
not children then. Yeah. Again, this guy's like such
43:22
just like so non credible
43:24
to me. He says
43:27
he says this in interviews afterwards after
43:29
this paper gets a lot of criticism. He
43:31
says we identified 1655 cases of rapid
43:33
onset gender dysphoria, a significant number
43:38
for activists to ignore. You didn't
43:40
identify cases. Yeah. These are
43:42
not cases. You identified parents.
43:44
Yeah. Also that whole like
43:46
for activists to ignore. I'm like,
43:49
A, what are you doing? Yeah. And
43:51
B, like what else have people
43:53
been ignoring? Right? Like again, this
43:55
is the like, unlike some grocery
43:58
stores, you'll never find. You're
44:01
sort of like trying to
44:04
insinuate that anyone who is
44:06
supportive of trans people is
44:08
like ignoring data or willfully
44:10
shutting down some kind
44:13
of like more science driven conversation. But
44:15
you're not making the implicit explicit, right?
44:17
You're sort of like doing these big
44:19
broad gestures to be like, you know
44:21
how they are. And it's like, no,
44:23
you have to tell me how they
44:25
are. There's then we're
44:27
not going to go into it, but
44:30
like, there's been a whole tedious, like
44:32
debate thing. And this paper is eventually
44:34
retracted. The reason why it's retracted is
44:36
because they never got ethics approval. Oh,
44:39
Jesus, always a good fucking sign. The
44:41
funny thing is too, is like on the
44:43
kind of broader and more substantive critiques, he's
44:46
like, well, the limitations section of the paper,
44:48
like said these weren't representative, which
44:51
like, I guess, but also you can't just
44:53
publish a super shitty study and then have
44:55
limitations be like, well, the study is super
44:57
shitty. So
44:59
after this happens, the paper is
45:02
retracted. You then get another tedious
45:04
wave of like someone published an
45:06
article that questioned the trans orthodoxy
45:08
and they were canceled. He
45:11
writes like two different first
45:14
person accounts, one of which
45:16
for Barry Weiss's website. You got to give
45:18
me a trigger warning before I know it's
45:20
bad. Don't say it three times. You know,
45:23
the headline is my research on gender dysphoria
45:25
was censored, but I won't be. Oh, Lord.
45:27
If rapid onset gender dysphoria was real, you
45:29
would be talking about the real evidence for
45:31
it. You would be pointing us to evidence.
45:34
You wouldn't be talking about like this guy's
45:36
paper was retracted. This guy's like super jank
45:38
balls. Paper was retracted. Well, I think part
45:40
of like what's at the core of what's
45:43
happening here is a thing that
45:45
I thought about a lot as an organizer, which
45:47
is what happens when people
45:49
believe that their discomfort has to
45:51
be resolved in order for other
45:54
people to do other things with
45:56
their own lives. Right. Yeah. wrote
54:00
an article for Barry Weiss's blog
54:02
called, I thought I was saving
54:04
trans kids, now I'm blowing the
54:06
whistle. And this was part
54:09
of a kind of a media rollout that
54:11
also included a sworn affidavit that she filed
54:13
with the Missouri Attorney General. And
54:15
in this affidavit and in this article,
54:17
she basically says that like kids were
54:19
being rushed through processes, they're barely getting
54:21
seen by psychologists, and yet the doctors
54:24
are like, we think you're trans, here's
54:26
some hormones. But once she files this,
54:28
once it goes public, people start noticing
54:30
that she's making some implausible
54:32
claims in this affidavit as
54:34
well. So at one point,
54:36
she says that a kid
54:38
comes in identifying as a communist
54:41
attack helicopter, human, female,
54:43
maybe non-binary, and was put
54:46
on hormones. And I
54:48
don't know if you know this, Aubrey, but this thing
54:50
of I'm an attack helicopter, it's like
54:52
a really well-known right-wing meme. It's
54:54
something that right-wing people say to
54:56
basically invalidate trans people, like, oh, you identify
54:59
as a woman, well, I identify as an
55:01
attack helicopter. It's all the bumper stickers that
55:03
say, my truck identifies as a Prius or
55:05
whatever. Yeah, it's the one fucking joke. They
55:07
only have one fucking joke, right? And so
55:10
this attack helicopter thing strikes people
55:12
as like, was this maybe someone
55:14
who was joking or maybe this whistleblower
55:16
like read it on a website and
55:18
like thought it was real or something,
55:20
like something weird is going on. But
55:22
then to me, the far more implausible
55:24
claim that she makes in this article
55:26
and in this affidavit, she says the
55:28
clinic routinely issued puberty blockers or cross-sex
55:30
hormones without parental consent. If those kids
55:32
are under 18, that's extraordinarily
55:34
unlikely. If this was true,
55:36
I mean, it's a very
55:38
risky strategy for
55:41
this clinic, right? Because you're opening yourself up to
55:44
litigation. And there's also the question of like insurance
55:46
and kind of the administration of the American healthcare
55:48
system that someone is paying for these procedures. And
55:51
so the parents are getting a bill from a
55:53
gender clinic for a shot of
55:55
puberty blockers every three months and
55:57
they're not noticing, right? And also
55:59
their kid is visibly transitioning. Every
56:03
single person who works in health care is like,
56:05
I don't think so. As usual, this
56:07
is something that, of course, there's this big victory
56:10
lap of, you're finally have to admit
56:12
that these clinics are pushing kids through. But
56:14
then local reporters start looking around and saying,
56:16
well, OK, this person alleges that a ton
56:18
of kids are pushed through procedures. Well, let's
56:20
find some of them. Let's go talk to
56:23
people. And so a local reporter finds almost
56:25
two dozen parents of kids who were seen
56:27
at the clinic, and every single one of
56:29
them says that they don't agree with the
56:31
characterization of this whistleblower at all. It took
56:34
a long time, and they were really thoroughly
56:36
assessed, and were happy with the procedures.
56:38
And they even talked to some kind of like anti-trans
56:40
parents who were like, yeah, we didn't think that our
56:42
daughter was trans at all, but we don't think that
56:44
she was rushed through anything. We think that they went
56:46
really, really slow. And eventually, she didn't get care, partly
56:49
because we weren't happy with it. So
56:52
it's like, they just can't find anybody.
56:54
And to this day, as far as
56:56
I know, not a single individual
56:58
named person has come forward and said,
57:00
yes, this happened to me at this
57:02
clinic. All we've had is numerous people
57:04
come forward and say, no, this isn't
57:06
my experience at all. It's really fascinating
57:08
to me that not really anywhere in
57:11
the sort of storytelling of this stuff.
57:14
Does anyone go, I think this person might
57:16
just be really uncomfortable with trans people? Yeah,
57:18
yeah, yeah. And as I always say, I'm
57:20
not going to litigate what is in this
57:23
person's heart. I'm not going to speculate
57:25
about their motives or what they really believe or whatever. But
57:27
in her own affidavit and in this Barry
57:30
Weiss article, she routinely misgenders kids that come
57:32
to this clinic. Jesus Christ. It's pretty really,
57:34
really, really low bar. It's also
57:36
just like a sign of a fucking gremlin
57:38
of a person. Dude, I know it's so
57:40
easy. If you introduce yourself
57:42
to me as Michael, hi, my
57:45
name's Michael. I wouldn't be like,
57:47
Mikey, Emdog. What
57:50
does your birth certificate say? You
57:52
wouldn't do that. That's weird. You're
57:54
being weird. The third rake stepping.
57:56
I hadn't even heard of this
57:58
one before I started researching this
58:00
episode. but in March of 2023,
58:02
there was something called the WPATH
58:04
files. So WPATH
58:06
is the World Professional Association of
58:08
Transgender Health Providers. It's basically like
58:11
the AAP or the Endocrine Society
58:13
or whatever for like trans medical
58:15
providers. And basically, I'm not
58:17
going to go through a whole fucking
58:19
300 page document, but the introduction basically
58:22
presents it as like we have leaked
58:24
documents from inside WPATH where they're admitting
58:26
that they're rushing kids through these procedures,
58:28
right? The only problem is, first
58:32
of all, these are not internal WPATH
58:34
chats. This is not a private forum.
58:38
So our friend Evan Urquhart has like looked
58:40
into this in more detail and found that
58:42
like this is a professional forum where anybody
58:45
can pay $225 and like participate in it.
58:50
It's like a moderated forum for like health professionals. Oh
58:52
no, it's your voters pamphlet where you're
58:54
like, look man for 800 bucks. Anybody
58:57
can put a statement in here. And
58:59
then the other significantly
59:01
larger problem is that if you
59:04
actually read the evidence, like the
59:06
leaked evidence that they amass, it
59:08
again proves the opposite of what
59:10
they're saying. So if you get to
59:12
the actual leaks, like the actual text parts where they're
59:14
like, we got it, this is it. The
59:17
first example of this is
59:19
a doctor in Brazil posts on the forum. It's
59:22
kind of like a Reddit thing. He's like posting
59:24
a question. He says, look, I've
59:26
got a patient who identifies as trans and
59:28
they're 14 years old and they want genital
59:30
surgery. What should I do? One
59:32
of the replies is a doctor
59:34
who says, I wouldn't do it. Tissue
59:36
too immature, dilation routine too critical. Okay,
59:39
so don't do it. Another person
59:41
posts, we at GS Montreal would
59:43
not undertake a surgery at 14. Genital
59:46
surgery is delayed until the patient is 18.
59:49
Okay. Then there's another post,
59:51
which is like much longer, more detailed, where
59:53
it's somebody saying, look, in my entire like
59:55
30 year career as a
59:58
gender affirming care practitioner, I've only
1:00:00
done. maybe like four or six
1:00:02
genital surgeries on people under 18 and
1:00:04
they were in like very specific circumstances.
1:00:06
These were basically kids who wanted the
1:00:08
surgery before they went off to college
1:00:10
and they wanted it to be in the summer so
1:00:12
they could have like the recovery time and kind of
1:00:15
start fresh in college. But like that's something that's done
1:00:17
with like a tremendous amount of care and that's not
1:00:19
something that we do lightly. And like I wouldn't recommend doing
1:00:21
this unless you like really know the patient and like definitely
1:00:23
don't do it at 14. So
1:00:28
someone asked can I do surgery on a young
1:00:30
kid and everyone was like no. And
1:00:34
they just present this as if like well we've proven
1:00:37
they're giving surgery to young kids. We
1:00:39
got them folks. I don't think we have
1:00:41
statistics about how many people under 18 get
1:00:43
general surgeries and it's like so
1:00:45
close to zero you might as well fucking round
1:00:47
it down to zero. It's like basically people are
1:00:49
not getting these procedures under 18. So
1:00:53
Michael I'm so tired. Dude it's exhausting
1:00:55
right. And again you get this fucking
1:00:57
victory lap. It just sucks to see
1:00:59
all this shit playing out and be
1:01:01
like okay cool so
1:01:03
this is gonna be you know the
1:01:05
fabulously wealthy trans community is gonna be
1:01:08
fucking spending their money. Yeah no kidding.
1:01:10
And all their fucking advocacy time beating
1:01:12
back this fucking bullshit. It's also so
1:01:14
frustrating to do this like pretty recently after
1:01:16
we just did this with the gay marriage
1:01:18
debate. Fucking honestly. It's like do
1:01:20
you really need a trans cousin? Really
1:01:23
we have to start from scratch with this? Really
1:01:26
sad and frustrating and demoralizing and the
1:01:28
people who are doing it really
1:01:31
think that they are bringing up reasonable and
1:01:33
good points. And they're forcing us to make
1:01:35
a series of tedious podcast episodes talking
1:01:37
about fucking methodology again. Yeah
1:01:41
Michael's being forced constantly. I'm not doing
1:01:43
this to win internet beefs Aubrey I'm
1:01:46
doing this for science. But
1:01:48
then the thing is that I mean this is the
1:01:50
really dark part of the episode so please bear with
1:01:52
me. The really sad thing
1:01:54
about this is that despite all of
1:01:57
this just years long rake stepping this
1:01:59
this strategy is working. So over
1:02:01
the last couple of years, we've seen an
1:02:03
unprecedented legislative assault on trans people. 21
1:02:05
states have banned trans kids in
1:02:07
sports. 11 states have
1:02:10
banned LGBT content in
1:02:12
schools. Six states have
1:02:14
banned trans people using the bathroom they
1:02:16
want to use. Florida just banned
1:02:19
gender identity cards. So if you want to change
1:02:21
your driver's license, so it says female, they're not
1:02:24
letting you do that anymore, which is just an
1:02:26
unbelievable dick move. It's just so shitty.
1:02:28
There's nine states now are
1:02:30
legislating pronoun use and are making
1:02:32
it illegal for teachers to use kids preferred
1:02:34
pronouns if it doesn't match their birth certificate.
1:02:37
Jesus God almighty. Do you want
1:02:39
to hear the galaxy brain
1:02:41
justification for these? No,
1:02:44
God, what is it, Michael? You
1:02:46
say no, but I'm just going to keep
1:02:48
going regardless. I was just waiting to see
1:02:50
the formality to hear. I understand. I'm asking.
1:02:52
The consent on this show is fake. Look,
1:02:58
I'm going. All right. Let
1:03:01
me proceed. You're like this little wind
1:03:03
up chattering teeth. Once he starts,
1:03:07
there's no, you just got to let him fall
1:03:09
off the edge of the table or just run
1:03:11
out of hands or whatever. So the
1:03:13
justification for banning social transition is
1:03:16
that most kids who socially transition
1:03:18
go on to puberty blockers and most kids
1:03:20
who go on puberty blockers go into hormones.
1:03:22
But that's an argument that
1:03:24
most of the people who socially
1:03:26
transition are trans and they're actually
1:03:28
pretty firm in their identity, relatively
1:03:30
young. They know young, but somehow
1:03:32
transphobes have galaxy brains themselves into
1:03:34
this idea that this is like
1:03:36
putting them on a medical pathway
1:03:38
and that this is like bewitching
1:03:40
them and like keeping them trans
1:03:42
against their wishes and this weird
1:03:44
inversion, this like Darvo nonsense where
1:03:46
it's like, well, there's stigma
1:03:49
against detransitioning. What? So we
1:03:51
have to actually make sure that they feel
1:03:53
comfortable detransitioning as if parents who
1:03:55
are like, we affirm your trans identity, but
1:03:59
when they say, Mommy, I'm sis, they'll be like, fuck
1:04:01
you. That's
1:04:03
why so many kids are homeless.
1:04:05
It's like, what the fuck are
1:04:07
we talking about? Dude, Darvo is
1:04:09
such a good analogy for what's
1:04:12
happening here. For
1:04:14
folks who are unfamiliar, Darvo deny attack reverse victim
1:04:16
and offender. Yes. The thing is, I didn't actually
1:04:18
know that. I just have a friend named Darvo
1:04:20
and she sucks. So just saying this is a
1:04:22
job. Oh, shit. That's what I meant. OK, OK,
1:04:24
OK. It's a lady named Darvo.
1:04:26
Yeah. The
1:04:30
doctor was a woman, you know. Stop
1:04:34
making me giggle during dark shit. Do you
1:04:36
understand my job? But
1:04:39
like, I think it was such a good
1:04:41
example because honestly, like part of what people
1:04:43
are so like whipped up about right now
1:04:46
is children, their parents and
1:04:48
their health care provider making
1:04:50
decisions about what kind of
1:04:52
health care they ought
1:04:55
to access. Yeah. Right.
1:04:57
Like it is such a deep Darvo shit
1:04:59
that you're like, sorry, like
1:05:01
a kid in, I
1:05:04
don't know where Modesto, California
1:05:06
got some health care that they wanted and you're
1:05:09
this bent out of shape about it. So we're
1:05:11
also, of course, seeing this wave
1:05:13
of bans on gender affirming care. And
1:05:15
like it really is
1:05:17
hard to convey like how serious these
1:05:20
laws are. So this is
1:05:22
from a New York Times article. Last month,
1:05:24
Florida joined at least four other states that
1:05:26
make providing gender affirming care a felony. Florida's
1:05:29
law penalizes doctors who violate the
1:05:31
law with up to five years
1:05:34
in prison. Jesus fucking hell, dude.
1:05:36
It also changes child custody rules
1:05:38
to treat transition care as equivalent
1:05:40
to child abuse. Yikes. The this
1:05:43
rapid onset gender dysphoria narrative is
1:05:45
central to the passage of these
1:05:47
laws. In Florida, they have like
1:05:49
a long kind of briefing,
1:05:52
like allegedly studious document that goes along with
1:05:54
the law where they're kind of laying out
1:05:57
the evidence base, which refers to Lisa Littman's
1:05:59
papers. In
1:06:01
Georgia, a congressman reads Lisa
1:06:03
Lippman's study into the record. Jesus
1:06:05
fucking Christ. I also got obsessed
1:06:08
with this evidence brief, frequently asked
1:06:10
questions thing that was submitted to
1:06:12
the Utah legislature that
1:06:15
has numerous explicit references to
1:06:17
rapid onset gender dysphoria and
1:06:20
also includes a bunch of
1:06:22
testimonials from D-transitioners.
1:06:25
The first one is by somebody named Ashira and
1:06:28
she says, I was about 17 when I
1:06:30
heard the word for transgender. All I
1:06:32
did was Google gender therapist in Calgary
1:06:34
and that was how that happened. After
1:06:36
like three sessions, I got my permission
1:06:38
slip or whatever for transitioning medically for
1:06:40
hormones. And so I started in 2013
1:06:42
on testosterone and it wasn't until 2015
1:06:45
or 2016 actually
1:06:47
that I had any surgery. And then the
1:06:49
link to it is a link to YouTube.
1:06:51
And if you watch like just a little
1:06:53
bit longer after this, the person interviewing her
1:06:56
is like, oh, so how old were you
1:06:58
when you transition? And she's like, oh, 23 or 24.
1:07:01
Fully a legal adult. They also
1:07:03
have somebody who in the
1:07:05
document, it says, Billy Burley took cross-sex
1:07:08
hormones and getting surgeries to change his
1:07:10
outward appearance after a difficult childhood and
1:07:12
being sexually assaulted by his swim coach.
1:07:14
He did his best to live as
1:07:16
a woman, but ultimately the truth
1:07:18
of his biology won out. So
1:07:21
I followed the link, which goes to sort
1:07:24
of like a born again ministry website.
1:07:27
He's kind of a little bit vague on the details,
1:07:29
but he's like, I never felt comfortable in my body.
1:07:31
And then in college, I fell in love with someone
1:07:33
and then I was denying it.
1:07:35
And after five or six years in
1:07:37
a failed marriage, I finally decided to
1:07:40
transition. And I'm like, I don't, I
1:07:42
don't think all this happened before he was 18. Guys,
1:07:44
we have other policy
1:07:46
interventions. If someone before 18
1:07:48
has a six year failed marriage, it appears
1:07:50
to be in his thirties or his late
1:07:52
twenties that he transitioned boy. Oh boy. The thing
1:07:55
that I really want to stress here, and
1:07:57
I know I do this on the show
1:07:59
all the time. This
1:22:00
is like totally fucking anecdotal everything.
1:22:03
But like that could just as easily
1:22:05
be trans students seeking
1:22:07
out other trans students because they sort
1:22:09
of like have a sense that
1:22:11
they're kind of on the same page in some
1:22:14
important way. This is like all
1:22:16
the fucking gay kids at your school who came
1:22:18
out after high school and you're like yeah no
1:22:20
shit. There's also I'm man we can't go into
1:22:22
every single one of these but I was
1:22:24
putting these paragraphs in categories and
1:22:27
one of my biggest categories was
1:22:29
just like general jankiness. So in
1:22:32
this section it says clinicians and
1:22:34
parents reported that gay students are still
1:22:37
being stigmatized and bullied in school and
1:22:39
there's sometimes a perception that there is
1:22:41
less validation for them than for trans
1:22:43
pupils. What are we doing this
1:22:46
shit again? This is another bizarre fucking conspiracy
1:22:48
theory that trans folks always trot out that
1:22:50
gay kids are saying that they're trans because
1:22:52
like it's easier to be a trans person
1:22:54
than a gay person. Which is also
1:22:56
wild because in our continuing like journey
1:22:58
to the way back machine a
1:23:01
very standard response to queer people coming
1:23:03
out in the 90s was like so
1:23:06
you think you're a woman or so
1:23:08
you think you're a man. Yeah. You're
1:23:10
just finding reasons not to listen to
1:23:12
us and I wish that you could
1:23:14
just get right with that that is
1:23:16
what's happening within you right. Yeah. Because
1:23:18
it's like real clear from the outside
1:23:20
that like most transphobes
1:23:22
and homophobes don't really
1:23:24
deeply know the difference between
1:23:27
those two identities. There's also this is also the
1:23:29
part where the misogyny
1:23:31
at the heart of this also comes out. There's
1:23:33
something very weird how this whole movement says that
1:23:35
it's like we're out to protect girls right and
1:23:37
like fairness and women's sports and all this kind
1:23:40
of stuff. But then the only other piece of
1:23:42
evidence for rapid onset gender dysphoria
1:23:44
is there's more kids coming to the clinics
1:23:46
and most of those people are assigned female
1:23:49
at birth. That's like the only other piece
1:23:51
of evidence that they can point to. And
1:23:53
this report has so much
1:23:55
stuff about how like girls are
1:23:57
mentally unstable. It says Liberty
1:24:00
is an intense period of rapid change
1:24:02
and can be a difficult process where
1:24:04
young people are vulnerable to mental health
1:24:06
problems, particularly girls. Girls reported
1:24:08
more hours of social media use than boys.
1:24:10
Forty-three percent of girls used social media for
1:24:12
three or more hours per day, compared to
1:24:15
22 percent of boys. Girls
1:24:17
were more likely to have low self-esteem, to
1:24:19
have body weight dissatisfaction, to be unhappy with
1:24:21
their appearance. Girls were more likely
1:24:24
to report fewer hours of sleep than boys, and
1:24:26
to report experiencing disrupted sleep more often or most
1:24:28
of the time. Again, it's not
1:24:30
really saying what it means, but it's like, yeah,
1:24:32
girls are like so, I guess,
1:24:35
like sleep deprived and mentally ill that
1:24:37
they all think they're trans? Girls
1:24:40
were more likely to be diagnosed
1:24:42
with neurasthenia and hysteria. Girls
1:24:46
were more likely to report
1:24:48
a menacing figure hidden in the yellow wallpaper
1:24:50
of the room where there could find it.
1:24:53
What are we doing? I'm hitting my desk.
1:24:56
This is another thing that I just don't
1:24:58
find all that mysterious. I think the
1:25:00
super basic fact is that young
1:25:03
girls are kind of allowed to experiment
1:25:05
with gender presentation in a way that
1:25:07
young boys typically aren't. I
1:25:09
think what's happening is that if you're trans and
1:25:11
you're assigned female at birth, your
1:25:13
parents are going to kind of let you experiment and
1:25:15
maybe let you wear boys' clothes. Whereas
1:25:18
if you're assigned male at birth and you're like, oh, I
1:25:20
want to wear mom's dress or something, or I want to
1:25:22
grow my hair long, parents are going to be like, fuck,
1:25:24
no, you don't. Like school dress
1:25:26
codes or school uniform codes allow for
1:25:29
girls to wear pants, but do not
1:25:31
allow for boys to wear skirts. And
1:25:34
in terms of like the repercussions, right? If
1:25:37
you are a person who has attended a Trans
1:25:39
Day of Remembrance event, you have heard the reading
1:25:41
of the names, you have maybe
1:25:43
seen photos of people who passed.
1:25:45
Those are overwhelmingly trans women and
1:25:47
they are overwhelmingly trans women of
1:25:49
color. There's just a lot
1:25:52
of garbage. I think it's also important
1:25:54
though to mention that it's not just
1:25:56
trans kids that have it really tough. It's
1:25:58
also really tough for
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More