Podchaser Logo
Charts
Consumed by Caregiving

Consumed by Caregiving

Released Monday, 25th November 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Consumed by Caregiving

Consumed by Caregiving

Consumed by Caregiving

Consumed by Caregiving

Monday, 25th November 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Harvard Business School Executive Education develops

0:03

leaders who make a difference in

0:05

the world. In their

0:07

programs, experience the power of fresh

0:09

perspectives and connect with a world

0:11

of new ideas. Learn

0:14

more at hbs.me slash

0:16

learn. That's hbs.me

0:19

slash learn.

0:28

You're listening to Women at Work from Harvard

0:30

Business Review. I'm Amy Gallo. And

0:32

I'm Amy Bernstein. Toward the end of 2023,

0:36

our producer Amanda saw a LinkedIn post

0:38

from one of our former guests, Marty

0:40

Bloodsoe, that made her eyes go wide.

0:43

Marty had titled the post,

0:45

A Pretty Big Year, in

0:47

all caps, and justifiably so.

0:51

In January, the older of her two

0:53

children, a freshman in high school, was

0:55

still coming through a major depressive episode.

0:59

At the time, Marty was the executive

1:01

director of the Kids Mental Health Foundation,

1:03

so she knew enough about the disorder

1:05

to quickly coordinate professional support. By

1:08

March, happily, her teenager was in a

1:10

better place mentally and emotionally. But

1:13

Marty wasn't. She had resigned

1:15

from her job because she was burnt

1:17

out, just like so many parents straining

1:19

to manage their kids' anxiety or depression

1:22

or anger while also keeping up

1:24

at work. As exhausted

1:26

as she was, she immediately started

1:28

applying to leadership roles elsewhere, hoping

1:30

that changing workplaces would reenergize her.

1:34

Between Zoom calls with people in her

1:36

network, she cried and napped. A

1:39

month into that routine, the landlord of the house

1:41

she'd been renting decided he was going to

1:43

move in, which meant that Marty and her kids

1:45

had 60 days to pack up and

1:47

leave. That's when her

1:49

plans to bounce right back into the

1:52

workforce really started to fall apart. Yeah,

1:55

I remember it as very chaotic

1:58

and out of my control. They

2:00

spent 12 weeks at her mom's house before

2:02

she found a new house within the same

2:04

school district that would fit them and

2:07

her fiancé and his daughter. The

2:09

last day of the move, her

2:11

fiancé slipped and tore his patellar

2:13

tendon. An injury that requires surgery

2:16

and a 16-week-plus recovery? Then

2:18

her mom, who lived nearby, needed

2:20

emergency cataract surgery, then retina surgery, as

2:22

well as a couple of dental

2:24

surgeries. Then one kid was

2:26

struggling to see well, another was struggling to

2:29

breathe well. Each of these

2:31

problems required multiple doctors' visits and

2:33

a considerable amount of Marty's time

2:36

and attention. The

2:38

grind left her utterly and completely

2:40

spent. Maintaining all the

2:42

standards, the orthodontist appointments, getting the

2:44

oil changed, following up on bills,

2:46

making sure the mail got forwarded,

2:48

renewing everybody's prescriptions, driving my fiancé

2:50

to physical therapy, driving my mom

2:52

to eye recheck appointments, and doing

2:55

all kid driving since those two

2:57

were my backup drivers. Juggling

2:59

summer camp for my 10-year-old, signing

3:02

up, paying for, and then attending

3:04

summer softball league for my oldest.

3:06

Coordinating at-home counseling three times a week

3:09

to continue supporting my kids' mental health.

3:12

And then planning a year-end wedding and

3:14

brunch to celebrate our newly blended family.

3:18

That sounds like a happy one, but we

3:20

actually thought we'd have to reschedule the wedding

3:22

because of the torn patella tendon and the

3:24

crutches and the knee brace, and

3:26

we would have lost a lot of money had we done that.

3:29

He ended up being okay enough to walk down

3:31

the aisle and got through their first dance. And

3:34

then it was the time of year for open enrollment,

3:37

and I was trying to Cobra Continue

3:39

one set of benefits, figure out enrollment into

3:41

another set of benefits because we had a

3:43

qualifying event, which was very exciting, but

3:46

also the paperwork

3:48

was mind-blowing. And

3:50

then there was more driving. I

3:52

kept thinking, is this really my life?

4:00

Wisconsin, says this grind, this

4:02

ever-expanding, relentless set of responsibilities,

4:04

is the norm for lots

4:06

of us in the U.S.

4:09

Once women take a step back in

4:11

the workforce, it can be very easy

4:13

to fall into that default caregiver role

4:16

and also leads to choices that then make

4:18

it easier for you to be seen as

4:20

the one who is logically most responsible for

4:22

other types of care that comes down the

4:24

line. Jessica writes about

4:27

the slippery slope in her book,

4:29

Holding It Together, How Women Became

4:31

America's Safety Net. She's

4:33

here to help Marty make sense of

4:35

that pretty big year, as Marty called

4:37

her LinkedIn post, or more like a

4:39

year plus away from paid work. They're

4:42

both here to help those of you

4:44

who've ever been consumed by caregiving understand

4:46

the forces that got you there. Here's

4:49

my conversation with them. And

4:51

I'll be back afterwards to chat with you about it.

4:57

Marty, you started looking for a new job

4:59

as soon as you resigned. How

5:01

did you set out? What did you

5:03

want to accomplish each week? And then

5:05

tell us what actually happened. I

5:08

wanted to spend an hour

5:10

or two a day on LinkedIn, you know,

5:13

looking around at folks in my

5:15

network, what they were up to, following

5:17

companies that might be in

5:19

my line of work that I wanted

5:21

to stay in and working

5:24

on all the things that it takes today

5:26

to get a job because you

5:28

need multiple versions of your resume so

5:30

they can get past AI bots

5:33

that are screening. You need your

5:35

elevator speech of what you're looking for and what

5:37

you can do. And I wanted

5:39

to be consulting. I really felt like, gosh, I

5:42

can look for a job and I can bill

5:44

out at my hourly rate and then this really

5:46

won't feel like too much of

5:48

a bump. But

5:51

your time wasn't spent just on

5:53

finding your next job, right? No,

5:56

not at all. In fact, it was amazing

5:58

how the hours. got eaten up.

6:01

I was packing

6:03

to move, moving and unpacking for quite

6:05

a bit of that time. I moved

6:07

twice in the time that I wasn't

6:10

working. Once in with my mother

6:12

and of all the

6:15

ridiculous things I spent time doing at

6:17

that point, I remember posting on Facebook

6:19

to one of my networks, hey, I

6:21

have 13 beautiful house plants that are

6:23

in great shape. I'm moving in with my

6:26

mother, she has a cat. Can anybody watch

6:28

these house plants for 10 weeks? And

6:30

of course, the woman who volunteered lived 30 minutes

6:33

away. So I literally found myself

6:36

arranging care for my house plants.

6:39

I was doing all kinds of things that

6:41

dropping off kids, picking up kids. For a

6:43

while there we were in summer vacation, which

6:45

is hell for working parents. It was a

6:48

different schedule every week. And

6:50

it just felt like every time

6:52

I would sit down, my phone

6:54

would ping or somebody would need me and the

6:56

week would be gone. Jessica,

6:59

help us understand this in the broader

7:01

context. I mean, this is not an

7:03

unfamiliar story to you. Why does this

7:06

happen to women like Marty? Yeah,

7:08

so other countries have invested in

7:10

policies that help people manage

7:13

their care needs and responsibilities. They

7:15

have policies that allow people to live with dignity, to

7:18

access economic opportunities and to contribute

7:21

equitably and sustainably to a shared

7:23

project of care. In

7:25

the US, we instead tell people that they

7:27

should be able to take care of themselves

7:29

and their families without relying on the government

7:32

or even their employers for support. But

7:34

the reality is that we

7:36

can't just DIY society. Some

7:38

people, maybe most obviously children,

7:40

but also people who are sick, people

7:43

who are elderly, can't fully take care

7:45

of themselves and some jobs don't pay

7:47

enough to allow people to take care

7:49

of themselves as well. So

7:51

acknowledging these realities would essentially destroy the

7:53

solution of a DIY society. But in

7:56

the US, we essentially managed to maintain

7:58

this illusion. by relying on women to

8:00

fill in the gaps, to be that

8:02

social safety net for our families and

8:04

for our community and even for our

8:07

economy, essentially by taking care of the

8:09

people who can't take care of themselves.

8:12

And we get women to do that

8:14

work in part by grooming them for

8:16

caregiving roles from the time they're old

8:18

enough to hold a baby doll, but

8:20

also by pushing them into caregiving roles

8:22

and then denying them any support in

8:25

meeting those roles. And like Marty talked

8:27

about, in those situations, it becomes very

8:29

easy for women to become the default

8:31

caregivers for their families. If you are

8:33

a woman in a household where

8:35

you are often because of gender pay gaps earning

8:37

less than your male partner, if

8:39

someone has to sacrifice their paid work hours, you're

8:42

probably going to do it. And

8:44

then once you step into that default caregiving

8:46

role, like Marty was saying,

8:48

the visibility of that work as

8:50

a caregiver as the default, then

8:52

that had compiled with the choices

8:54

that default caregivers have to make

8:56

to accommodate their caregiving responsibilities makes

8:58

it seem sort of logical and

9:00

natural for women who are in

9:02

that default position to take

9:04

on even more of the responsibility

9:07

for care as those care needs kind

9:09

of increase over time. So

9:11

Marty, having read the book and having heard

9:13

what Jessica just said, how does that shape

9:15

or reshape the way you think about what

9:18

happened in your own life? It

9:20

felt like it connected a lot of

9:23

disparate feelings and

9:25

concepts for me. From

9:27

an intellectual standpoint, I sort of felt a

9:29

light bulb, like it's not

9:32

just me. It's truly

9:34

the fact that the minute somebody

9:36

sees a female with

9:38

quote unquote time on her hands, watch

9:41

out. Right. How

9:43

did that mess with your

9:45

self-esteem, with your own sort of

9:48

concept of who you are, Marty?

9:51

I think it was very psychologically

9:54

destabilizing, if that's

9:57

a way to explain it. I felt gaslit.

9:59

but kind of by myself

10:02

and the people around

10:04

me. It was like, oh, you

10:07

had two or three full-time jobs. We're gonna

10:09

take one away. And then

10:11

the other two are going to fill in a lot

10:13

of that room, but don't forget, you

10:15

should be trying to replace the third full-time job

10:17

with another full-time job. And

10:20

the beginning of my

10:22

job search, I looked back through all of

10:24

my cover letters and I

10:26

was applying for executive director,

10:29

CEO, roles in

10:31

mental health organizations, in

10:33

child-focused organizations. And

10:36

then I would sort of think to myself, what

10:38

am I thinking? How in the world, if they

10:40

called me tomorrow to interview for this, how would

10:42

I even manage it? Let's

10:45

say they offered it to me. Who's gonna go pick

10:47

up the plants when it's time to move them back

10:49

to the house? I know that I can't ask anybody

10:51

else to do that. And if I did, it would

10:54

probably be another woman who would fit it into the 57,000

10:56

things she has to do. And

10:59

so I kind of started to

11:02

back off the level of

11:04

what I felt like I could look for. I

11:07

stopped going to the top

11:10

of the org chart openings and

11:13

I started looking for director, associate

11:15

director, senior

11:17

manager type titles. Now, these

11:20

are titles I haven't held in my own career in 15 years,

11:24

but I thought maybe I'm

11:26

not going to be able at this time

11:29

of my life to deliver what it takes

11:31

to be at the top of an org

11:33

chart because clearly

11:36

everybody needs me. And

11:40

even the people around me who benefited from

11:42

it, I don't think we're sitting around going,

11:44

wow, we're so lucky that you are caring

11:47

and doing all these things. And

11:49

I often think, oh my God, what if I had

11:51

been working? What if you had been working? So

11:54

play that out for us. What if you had been

11:56

working full-time? I mean, I think.

12:00

Maybe it would have had to be

12:02

either a role

12:04

where I could say, look for the next whatever,

12:07

six months I'm going to have to work part

12:09

time or I'm going to have to use some

12:12

short-term disability and some, you

12:15

know, FMLA or somehow construct

12:18

a scenario where I can give you part of

12:21

the time, hopefully still quite a bit of the

12:23

value, but I just cannot

12:25

be available the way I would normally

12:28

be or would like to be. But

12:31

I wonder sometimes, you know, certainly had I been

12:33

in a new job in that sort of time

12:35

where you're learning so fast and you're trying to

12:37

meet everybody and you're trying to prove yourself and

12:39

get settled, that would have been a total, a

12:42

total disaster. So it

12:45

would have had to be somewhere, you know, where I'd

12:47

been a while where they had those kinds of time

12:49

benefits, where I had an understanding manager. I mean, you

12:51

cannot, you cannot overemphasize the

12:53

importance of the individual manager and how

12:56

they can make that viable or not

12:58

viable. And at

13:01

the end of the day, I still

13:03

might've lost my job because I just

13:07

hit kind of a wall of,

13:10

of contribution. And I think that's one of

13:12

the things that I often reflect on when

13:14

we talk about balance, work-life balance. I'm often

13:16

like, okay, fine. Let's just

13:18

say that you get your

13:20

partnership and your parenting and your working

13:23

and your self-health in some sort of

13:25

balance. But if you, the person, are

13:27

the fulcrum in the middle, I have

13:30

a feeling you're pretty worn down on all sides.

13:32

Yeah, because it seems to me, I mean, I

13:35

struggle with picking up my dogs from daycare

13:37

at the end of the

13:39

day. So I don't know how you have

13:41

made it through the kinds of demands you've

13:44

had to face, but it

13:46

seems to me that it's always work-life

13:48

imbalance all the time. educators.

14:00

They combine real-world experience and

14:02

a variety of distinctive teaching

14:04

approaches to create an exceptional

14:07

learning environment. In their

14:09

programs you'll experience the power of

14:11

fresh perspectives and connect with a

14:14

world of new ideas. Learn

14:16

more at hbs.me slash

14:19

learn. That's hbs.me

14:21

slash l-e-a-r-n.

14:28

Hi, it's Amy G. If

14:30

you identify as queer I hope you'll consider

14:32

contributing to an episode we're working on about

14:35

what it's like to be out at work

14:37

these days. Like when people

14:39

make assumptions about your personal life. Assuming

14:42

you're straight for instance or misgendering

14:44

you. How do you handle it?

14:47

What sort of community have you found with

14:49

other queer colleagues? Respond to

14:51

these questions and a few more at hbr.org/podcast

14:55

survey. You

14:57

can be as anonymous as you want. Your

15:00

responses will help us create

15:02

an episode that reflects the

15:04

complexity, resilience, and insight of

15:06

queer women navigating today's workplaces.

15:09

Marty, your experience kind

15:12

of flies in the face of the advice all

15:14

of us got in Lean In.

15:17

I'm wondering how you think

15:20

about that. Lean

15:22

In was published at a funny time in

15:24

my career in that I had one

15:26

young child and I thought I could

15:30

I thought I could sustain the pace

15:32

I was living forever. I thought I

15:34

could probably lean in. I bought the

15:36

DIY guilt of

15:38

Lean In. The come on girls

15:41

ask for the next thing. Take the next project. Take

15:43

the risk. I guess I would

15:46

say by the time some of the

15:49

societal feedback

15:53

to that concept had really started to

15:55

get loud about it's not just leaning

15:57

in and it's really not that easy

15:59

for so many. many women. By that

16:01

time, I had another child. And

16:03

I thought, yeah, you know what? I actually kind

16:06

of want to rethink that because I don't want

16:09

to lean in any further. Not

16:11

only at work, but I didn't even want to lean in anymore

16:13

at home. I wanted to lay down. I was

16:15

like, can we stop leaning and take

16:17

a rest here? So it

16:19

does fly in the face of all of it. So

16:22

Jessica, you know, what Marty is saying,

16:24

I think, is kind of a more

16:27

universal experience. And I'm wondering, from your

16:29

perspective, is there a

16:31

narrative that's taking the place of lean in? And what

16:33

is it? I mean, unfortunately, the

16:35

lean in narrative, I would argue is still very

16:37

much with us, even if you know, some people

16:39

have pushed back against the specific notions of the

16:42

book, for example, I think there's still

16:44

very much this expectation. Many of

16:46

the women that I talked to for my research,

16:48

you know, first time mothers or those who are

16:50

just starting out in their careers, still very much

16:53

feel this pressure to to have it all to

16:55

try to be at all to chase every opportunity.

16:57

And also to to set an

16:59

example for other women as well, you know,

17:01

to be that leader in the workforce, while

17:04

also being that Pinterest perfect mom at

17:06

home. If anything, it feels like,

17:08

you know, the only narrative that is threatening

17:10

to unseat lean in at this point is

17:12

maybe the tradwife narrative, in part because of

17:14

how unsustainable you know, it is to lean

17:16

in, especially over the long term. And I

17:18

think that is part of where the

17:20

I talk a little bit about in my book about how some

17:23

young women are leaning into the

17:26

idea of being a housewife instead of leaning

17:28

in at work, in part because they realize

17:30

that it is so unsustainable. And they see

17:32

one of the things that lean in did

17:34

was to deeply devalue the work of care,

17:37

and to ignore both the value that that

17:39

brings to families and communities, and even the

17:41

joy that many of us can get from

17:43

doing that care work, particularly when we have

17:45

the time and the energy to do it

17:48

well. And so I think if anything,

17:50

what we need is to go back to an older

17:52

narrative that has actually been around even longer than lean

17:54

in, which is essentially the one that the feminists gave us

17:56

in the 1960s and 1970s. And that really got

18:00

co-opted by the corporate world when it came

18:02

to messages like Lean In. To give an

18:05

example, black feminist writer and activist Bell

18:07

Hooks was one of the vocal critics

18:09

of the Lean In message, drawing on

18:11

her long body of work on these

18:13

topics. She wrote a critique in

18:16

2013 of Lean In. She

18:18

said, Sandberg sees women's lack of

18:20

perseverance as more of the problem

18:22

than systemic inequality. She effectively uses

18:24

her race and class power and

18:26

privilege to promote a narrow definition

18:28

of feminism that obscures and undermines

18:30

visionist feminist concerns. And essentially,

18:32

she's pushing back against this notion that

18:35

we should try to do this so

18:37

individually. And really, that's part of what

18:39

my goal is to do with my own research

18:41

too, is to help un-gaslight women, to tell women

18:44

that guilt and stress

18:46

are not normal or necessary parts

18:48

of womanhood or parts of motherhood.

18:50

I mean, essentially, we can help

18:52

women to see that they have been tasked

18:54

with serving as a social safety net in

18:57

a society that has forced them to make

18:59

do without the support that they need. And

19:01

my hope is that I can show them

19:03

how women's self-help culture in particular kind of

19:05

deludes us into thinking that if we're struggling

19:07

to manage it all, that it must be

19:09

because we made the wrong choices, because we

19:11

didn't lean in, didn't wash our

19:13

face, didn't get out of our own heads, didn't

19:15

let that shit go, to use some other popular

19:17

book titles, for example. And I mean,

19:20

in reality, it's that we are being pushed

19:22

into doing this work that we are being

19:24

kind of worked over time and underpaid on

19:26

projects that other people have designed for their

19:28

own gain, and certainly not for ours. And

19:30

so I think this is a place where

19:32

one of the core messages of the feminist

19:34

movements of the 1960s and 70s is that

19:36

we really have to

19:38

hold it together collectively, and not on

19:40

our own. It's about recognizing that we

19:43

are strongest when we work together. And

19:45

we are strongest when we fight for those

19:47

who are most marginalized among us, as

19:50

opposed to trying to just individually get

19:52

ahead as far as we can, because

19:54

that's an easy way to fall into

19:57

the delusions and the divisions that are

19:59

designed to keep us scrambling as opposed

20:01

to seeing how investments in stronger policies,

20:04

for example, could better support us all.

20:07

AMT. And at the heart

20:09

of what you just said is

20:11

the acceptance that there are indeed

20:13

systemic inequalities and inequities, right? CM.

20:16

Yes, very much so. And I think

20:18

those often get overlooked in these conversations

20:21

in the sense that in our DIY

20:23

society, all of us have an incentive

20:25

to push as much risk and responsibility

20:27

for care as possible onto someone else

20:29

downstream. And for men, they're often economically

20:32

in the most privileged positions to be

20:34

able to do this, to leverage their

20:36

higher salaries, their bigger titles, to get

20:38

the women around them to do more

20:41

of that work of care, to persuade

20:43

their wives, to persuade their administrative assistants,

20:45

to persuade their colleagues and coworkers, to

20:47

do more of that work that isn't

20:50

as economically profitable so that

20:52

they can focus on doing that most profitable work

20:54

themselves. Now, for women, those

20:56

who are in the most privileged positions

20:58

can offload some of that work also

21:00

by pushing it on to oftentimes women

21:03

from systematically marginalized groups who have very

21:05

little choice but to do the underpaid

21:07

work of childcare, of home healthcare, of

21:10

food service, of house cleaning. Though, of course,

21:13

we can never outsource all of the care

21:15

responsibilities. It often takes a great deal of

21:17

management on the back end as well. But

21:20

this creates a sort of morality trap

21:22

in the sense that oftentimes getting ahead

21:24

for individual, relatively privileged women means exploiting

21:26

someone else. So,

21:28

you've talked, Jessica, about how the

21:31

really hard work of care, of childcare,

21:34

family care, gets pushed on to women

21:36

routinely. I wonder how you deal with

21:38

it in your own life. You have

21:41

kids, right? I do. I

21:43

have a 10-year-old and a 7-year-old. And I think

21:45

it has varied very much depending on the support

21:47

level that I've been able to access and certainly

21:49

the level of support that my husband has been

21:52

able to provide given his work situation as well.

21:54

I mean, when my oldest daughter

21:56

was born, we were living in Indiana. And at

21:58

the time, my husband had just started a new

22:00

job. job. I was a relatively new assistant professor

22:02

and I had access to paid

22:04

leave, to paid family leave, but my husband didn't.

22:07

And so I ended up home with my daughter for

22:09

the first almost six months. And then

22:11

what ended up happening though is we hoped to

22:13

get her into childcare when I had to go

22:15

back to teaching. But like many people, you know,

22:17

we ran into a sort of childcare crisis in

22:20

the sense that the first spot that we could

22:22

find for full time childcare wasn't open until my

22:24

daughter was a year old. So I spent that

22:26

first semester back teaching, cobbling together a few hours

22:28

a week of childcare from college students who would

22:30

watch my daughter while I was teaching and trying

22:32

to finish my first book, trying to do

22:35

my research and really nothing got done. I mean, I was worried

22:37

I wouldn't get tenure. I was worried I wouldn't be able to

22:39

keep my job. I wasn't sure how

22:41

things would go with my relationship because things were

22:43

so unequal and stressful. At the time,

22:45

I remember there was one point where I was

22:47

so exhausted that I slammed my bathroom door in

22:49

my bedroom and it's like a pocket door and

22:52

I managed to slam my fingers in the process

22:54

and lost two fingernails because I was just so

22:56

exhausted and stressed out during those early years. And

22:58

so it was not an easy

23:00

time. And you know, certainly things got better when

23:03

I was able to get my kids into full

23:05

time childcare. And certainly when my husband

23:07

was in a position by the time our

23:09

second kid was born, he had access to

23:11

six weeks of paid family leave. And it

23:13

made a world of difference, but it was

23:15

hard in terms of navigating those times, even

23:17

for those of us who are relatively privileged

23:19

in the process. Jessica, I keep coming back

23:21

to the employer as a

23:24

potential solution. Do you think that's

23:27

naive of me? I

23:29

think about wellness benefits or

23:31

even the idea as simple

23:34

as making parental leave non-gendered,

23:36

same amount of time for either

23:38

parent or care subsidies

23:40

or backup care, you know, accounts where

23:43

they can book a backup babysitter and

23:45

pay with a copay. Some

23:47

of this stuff is out there in the HR

23:50

world. Do you think it's going to

23:52

go anywhere? I

23:54

think there's two parts to this answer here

23:56

in the sense that yes, there are things

23:59

that employers can be doing. and should be

24:01

doing to make life easier for caregivers. And

24:03

that those kinds of investments can go a

24:05

long way in making life easier. Things

24:08

like access to healthcare, access to support

24:10

with childcare, to access to support with

24:13

flexible work policies, that these can make

24:15

a difference and can make life easier

24:18

when it comes to the ability

24:20

to combine full-time paid work and

24:22

caregiving responsibilities. At the same time,

24:24

I think we have to be careful about trusting

24:26

employers to be the ones to solve

24:29

this problem, particularly on their own.

24:31

What we know, for example, is that

24:33

when it's up to employers, like with

24:35

things like healthcare, oftentimes the

24:37

benefits of that kind of a system go

24:39

disproportionately to the most privileged workers in our

24:42

economy, in part because they're the ones who

24:44

have the power and the privilege to demand

24:46

better benefits when it comes to healthcare, when

24:48

it comes to which workers have access to

24:51

paid family leave, when it comes to which

24:53

workers have access to childcare

24:55

benefits or access to decent retirement

24:57

benefits, that those are disproportionately the

24:59

most privileged workers in our economy, and

25:01

that it's the workers who are the

25:03

most precarious, who are disproportionately women, and

25:05

especially women of color in our society,

25:07

are the ones who are often most

25:09

disadvantaged when it comes to access to

25:11

those kinds of benefits. And so I

25:13

think we have to be wary of

25:15

treating employers as capable of solving this

25:18

problem on their own. And I think

25:20

we have to recognize that that's a

25:22

function of the fact that even well-meaning

25:24

employers, ones who want to put in

25:26

place those benefits for their workers, face

25:28

profit pressures that often discourage them from

25:30

giving workers the support that they really need

25:32

to live healthy, happy, and productive

25:35

lives. And this is a place

25:37

where policymakers can step in to

25:39

essentially help take the burden off

25:41

of employers. We know that

25:43

other countries have shown that policies are

25:46

things that allow people to live with

25:48

dignity, to access economic opportunities, and to

25:50

contribute equitably and sustainably to a shared

25:52

project of care, both allowing

25:55

people to have the well-being and the time

25:57

and the energy and the education to contribute

25:59

to the work. workforce, but then also having

26:01

the protection from paid work to keep

26:03

it from demanding so much of our

26:05

time through access to things like paid

26:07

leave and paid vacation time, and even

26:09

things like 35-hour work weeks or four-day

26:11

work weeks. That balance of

26:13

policies can leave people not only better

26:15

off in a sort of health sense

26:17

or a mental well-being sense, can avoid

26:19

burnout, but can also lead to better

26:21

productivity, can make workers more successful in

26:23

their jobs in the end. So this

26:26

is a place where we need to

26:28

think critically about is the system working

26:31

and is this emphasis on employers as

26:33

the only solution the right way

26:35

to go? Man, I want to

26:37

put all that on a very large poster.

26:42

Because it's so interesting when we talk about healthcare,

26:45

I mean, there was a piece from the maternal

26:47

stress project several months ago in the New York

26:49

Times that said, child care is healthcare. Just

26:52

quit calling it a social service or

26:54

even a personal thing to solve. It

26:56

is healthcare. And when women

26:58

are stressed by the precarity of it

27:01

and the inconsistency of it, even

27:03

coming back from COVID is not consistent, or

27:05

you're on a waiting list like you said,

27:07

Jessica, I mean, that stress can last for

27:09

years. And this is a place where

27:11

I would say really the push could and

27:13

should be to move away from employers and

27:16

to say, how can we make these universal

27:18

policies instead in ways that you know, things

27:20

like healthcare, if we had universal healthcare, that

27:22

wouldn't have to be something that employers worry

27:24

about when it comes to competing for workers.

27:26

If we had universal affordable childcare, that again,

27:28

wouldn't have to be something that employers had

27:30

to worry about when it came to figuring

27:32

out, you know, can employees afford to live

27:35

in my community because there's no childcare here.

27:37

And so these are things that

27:39

we can solve systemically with childcare.

27:41

We had national childcare, national public

27:43

affordable childcare during World War Two.

27:46

And this is how we got mothers to

27:48

enter the workforce to be the Rosie the Riveters.

27:50

We've proven that it's possible here. And yet

27:52

we dismantled that policy, in part because we didn't

27:55

want to have to pay the higher taxes

27:57

that would have been needed to expand and

27:59

maintain that system over time. And so I think

28:01

this is a place where we have proven

28:03

that these kinds of care-based

28:05

services are most effective when

28:07

they are universal. And one of the ironies

28:10

of that too is that when these kinds

28:12

of benefits are universal, there's less stigma in

28:14

using them in the sense that right now,

28:17

yes, childcare we know is great for

28:19

women, but women also feel guilty using

28:21

childcare in part because we treat it

28:23

as a benefit for women and not

28:25

also as a benefit for kids and

28:27

for society. We know that kids, you

28:29

know, kids benefit tremendously from access to

28:31

childcare when it comes to developmental benefits,

28:33

the cognitive benefits, the social benefits, and

28:35

the benefits of having less stressed out

28:37

parents in terms of the quality of

28:39

parenting that they can provide. And yet

28:41

we maintain these stigmas and this, you

28:44

know, I talk in the book about

28:46

how there's a long history of fear

28:48

mongering around childcare, trying to persuade mothers

28:50

that kids aren't safe with childcare providers.

28:53

But I think the reality is that the vast majority

28:55

of kids in these situations are better off than they

28:57

could be with a much more stressed out parent at

28:59

home. And so this is a, you know, a situation

29:01

where investments in that kind of care can help de-stigmatize

29:04

it and can help it be more

29:06

sustainable for all. And I think

29:08

it's important to point out that a lot

29:10

of people don't work for companies.

29:12

They work for themselves. So

29:14

that argues for the universal care policies

29:17

that you're talking about, Jessica. But

29:20

we're talking about care, not just for

29:22

children, we're talking about care for

29:25

parents, for relatives who

29:27

cannot take care of themselves. Marty,

29:29

you've cared for your, for your

29:32

fiance, you've cared for your mother.

29:34

What policies, Jessica, would

29:37

you recommend to

29:39

take care of caregivers all

29:41

the way around? And this

29:43

is another place where, where public investments in

29:46

care can help to make sure that the

29:48

kinds of care services are available, whether they're

29:50

childcare services, whether they're home healthcare services, whether

29:52

they are nursing home care facilities, whether they

29:54

are afterschool care for kids, you know, things

29:57

along those lines. When we invest

29:59

in those kinds of policies, we're going to

30:01

be able to do that. at a universal

30:03

level and when we put a decent level

30:05

of funding behind them, we can ensure that

30:07

they provide not only the high quality of

30:09

care that people need, but also that the

30:11

work of caregiving is sustainable. And we have

30:13

examples, you know, things like Washington State has

30:15

the Wacares program, which is putting in place

30:17

publicly funded long-term care insurance for everyone within

30:19

the state. Or, you know,

30:21

places like Minnesota that have invested in

30:24

universal affordable childcare to take the burden

30:26

off of individual families and individual employers.

30:29

Jessica, given that those policies aren't

30:32

entirely available, how do

30:34

women prepare themselves for

30:36

the caregiving that they're gonna be called

30:39

on to do? It's so unpredictable. Yeah,

30:42

I mean, one of the things I try

30:44

to do with my work is to un-gasulate

30:46

women, to essentially help to prepare them for

30:48

this idea that the messaging in our society,

30:50

I talk about the sort of myths that

30:52

we use to delude Americans into believing that

30:54

we don't need a social safety net and

30:56

to keep us divided, you know, by race

30:58

and class and gender and politics and religion

31:00

in ways that kind of keep us thinking

31:02

about ourselves as opposed to coming together to

31:04

demand the kind of safety net that could

31:06

better support us all. And I think this

31:08

is a place where helping women to not

31:11

blame themselves, to recognize that this is a

31:13

system that is stacked against them, but

31:15

also to help them stay hopeful, because

31:17

that's not a particularly hopeful message. And

31:19

to remember that we are strongest together

31:21

and that this is a place where

31:23

we can be using the energy that

31:26

we do have to say, okay, you

31:28

know, who are the other women around

31:30

me and how can we be collectively

31:32

organizing in ways that can demand better

31:34

policies, better support from our employers, from

31:36

our communities, from our policy makers, because

31:38

essentially, I mean, yes, individual women can,

31:42

to some extent, hold it together on their

31:44

own. But what that risks enforcing is this

31:46

idea that I talk about in some of

31:48

my research that kind of good choices can

31:50

save women, that if women just pursue

31:53

the right career path or find the right partner or

31:55

live in the right community, that

31:57

they will be able to protect themselves from

31:59

falling in love. into these kinds of

32:01

expectations from becoming the default caregiver or from

32:04

having to face these kinds of inequalities,

32:06

when the reality is that even, you know,

32:08

as in Marty's case, good choices can't

32:10

necessarily always save women. And

32:12

oftentimes those kinds of good choices also require

32:14

a great deal of privilege to make. And

32:17

so I think helping women to remember that we are

32:19

working in a system that is not designed for us

32:21

and that if anything is designed against us and

32:24

to see how really it'll take us coming together

32:26

and finding allies, you know, to be able to

32:28

fight for the kind of system that would better

32:30

support us all. Harvard

32:34

Business School Executive Education develops leaders who

32:36

make a difference in the world. They

32:39

bring together executives with varied

32:42

backgrounds from influential organizations around

32:44

the globe. The viewpoints

32:46

of a diverse peer group inspire

32:48

deep learning and challenge your thinking.

32:51

In their programs, you'll experience the

32:53

power of these fresh perspectives and

32:55

connect with a world of new

32:58

ideas. Learn more

33:00

at hbs.me slash learn.

33:03

That's hbs.me slash

33:05

l-e-a-r-n. So,

33:12

Marty, you are now back

33:14

at work full time. Yeah. How

33:16

did that shift go? How did you do it? It

33:18

didn't go well. It

33:21

didn't go badly. It's

33:24

amazing to me how still

33:28

when push comes to shove, I

33:30

am the one typically who accommodates.

33:34

We enrolled our high schooler in a school

33:36

that's quite far away from our home. It's

33:39

a long drive and it's through the

33:41

city and there's construction and traffic jams

33:43

and there are days where I would

33:46

really rather not do that at both ends of

33:48

my work day. I

33:51

shouldn't even say ends at the middle third and

33:53

second third of my work day because school is

33:55

of course shorter than work. same

34:00

time, I find that where

34:04

I work now, people are willing to say,

34:06

okay, that's fine. Go be

34:08

there at the right time. Get

34:10

your student home. I get them home in

34:12

a timely way so they can get on another class on Zoom.

34:17

And so I juggle the time. And

34:19

so last night that looked like I worked 90 minutes

34:22

at home in the evening while my

34:25

kiddo was on their Zoom class. And this morning I worked

34:27

60 in the

34:29

morning before I got the youngest on the bus.

34:31

So there is flexibility

34:34

in the sense of I'm being trusted

34:36

to get the work done where and

34:38

when and how I can do it.

34:41

But there is no reduced workload. There

34:44

is no transportation option

34:46

for my child or

34:49

even letting my child take their Zoom class

34:51

at the high school building and stay there

34:53

all evening, those kinds of things. In fact,

34:55

I said this morning, I said, your school

34:57

really needs a co-working office right there. If

35:00

I could drive you, drop you, take all my

35:02

calls, pick you up and leave, we'd be an

35:04

hour and a half ahead. So

35:07

I think to me that idea

35:09

of co-locating some things and

35:12

making it possible for people to

35:14

study and work and eat

35:16

and get services done all in the

35:18

same place, it didn't

35:20

really take off after the pandemic like I

35:22

thought, hoped it would. And I know there's

35:24

a lot of neighborhoods that aren't built for

35:26

that. They just are not set up to

35:29

have those kinds of things together. But

35:31

it really splits people's lives up when

35:33

they have to commute to

35:36

everything. And more

35:38

often than not, it's the moms in the drop off

35:40

line. And it's utterly

35:42

exhausting. So

35:46

Jessica, I wonder having heard what

35:48

Marty's dealing with now every day,

35:50

if there's anything you can offer

35:52

her. Is there context, is there

35:54

advice that would help her out

35:56

here? I mean, I think

35:59

this is again a place for everyone. I'm hesitant

36:01

to put the onus of responsibility onto individuals in

36:03

part because that's the message that we've been sold

36:05

so long is, you know, if you just make

36:07

these right choices, you can find some seven step

36:10

plan that will get you out of the stress.

36:12

And I think, unfortunately, what I can offer is

36:14

is solace to some extent in the sense that

36:16

you're not alone in this kind of struggle, that

36:18

this is a system that is not designed

36:21

to help us, that is designed to

36:23

extract from us and to get as

36:26

much from us as possible while leaving

36:28

as little behind as is necessary to

36:30

survive, but not necessarily thrive. And

36:32

this is what we're up against. And I think

36:34

what maybe does give me hope and maybe can

36:37

offer Marty some hope is that I think we

36:39

are at a moment kind of politically and socially

36:41

where there is growing recognition of

36:43

these challenges and growing recognition of

36:45

the need to do something

36:47

about the care crisis that we are facing,

36:49

because I think we've reached a tipping point

36:51

where it has become deeply unsustainable,

36:53

where this is not just affecting those who

36:56

are in the most precarious position, but where

36:58

even those with extremely high levels of privilege

37:00

are struggling to make it through day to

37:02

day. And I think this has shown us

37:05

how unsustainable this is. And I'm hoping that

37:07

this will lead to policy momentum to change

37:09

both at the individual level of employers, but

37:11

also at the broader societal level. And we're

37:14

seeing some states move in that direction, which

37:16

I'm hoping will provide a testing ground to

37:18

show that these kinds of changes can be

37:20

made at a broader level to put us

37:22

in a place where we're actually able to

37:25

get the care that we need for ourselves and the

37:27

support that we need to care for others and to

37:29

have that better negotiation of the

37:31

parts of our lives, as opposed to maybe

37:34

the balance that might be too elusive to

37:36

get. Yeah,

37:39

we've got a long way to go, but

37:42

there's hope if the right people can

37:44

hear the message and hear

37:46

the need. Indeed, indeed. Well, I

37:48

want to thank you both, Marty,

37:51

for sharing your story and Jessica

37:53

for sharing all your insight and

37:55

wisdom. Really appreciate it. Thank

37:57

you. Thank you. All

38:00

right, Aimee, you heard our

38:02

conversation. What struck you? I

38:05

mean, so many things. Obviously, of

38:07

course, deep, deep empathy for

38:10

Marty and what she went through. You wouldn't

38:12

wish a year like that on your worst

38:14

enemy. And I think as a

38:17

woman who relates to being the person

38:19

in many people's lives who keeps things

38:22

running, like a

38:24

kid having an unclear illness, I

38:26

just could immediately think of the

38:28

four conversations that involved with

38:30

the doctor and waiting for the callback and

38:32

stepping out of a meeting. The

38:35

sheer number of logistics that Marty has

38:37

had to deal with, never mind the

38:39

emotional content, is just so intense.

38:42

For me, what I really chimed

38:44

with was this idea that if

38:47

one ball drops, they're all gonna drop,

38:49

you know? And I kept thinking as

38:51

I was listening to the conversation, how

38:54

many women are bending

38:57

time every day just

38:59

to find the hours to do their

39:01

job? And you add

39:03

in these caretaking responsibilities, whether it's

39:05

for dogs, children, parents, husbands. Spouses.

39:08

Right, yeah. Like plants, you

39:10

know, we can talk about the plants in a moment,

39:12

but like all of this

39:14

caretaking is goes

39:16

unacknowledged. And it's supposed to be in

39:18

the curves of

39:21

the rest of the things that we do.

39:23

Well, and I mean, everything Marty was dealing

39:25

with was legitimately

39:28

urgent. Yeah, except maybe the plants. Maybe the

39:30

plants, exactly. And I have to say, I

39:33

literally said out loud, Marty let the

39:35

plants die. Plant murderer. Yes,

39:38

but you know what? Marty probably loves those

39:40

plants. Who cares? Like stop judging which balls

39:42

she's choosing to keep in the air. That's

39:45

her choice. And I think

39:48

the message is not, hey

39:50

women, let's stop our perfectionism. Let's drop

39:52

some of the balls. It's

39:56

how do we help build

39:59

a society it doesn't

40:01

feel like everyone's building a

40:03

house of cards. I

40:05

actually have this pretty extreme

40:08

example, this woman I know,

40:10

and I'll be careful to preserve her privacy,

40:12

but- So her name's in the show now?

40:14

Yes, her name in LinkedIn provost. Okay,

40:16

sure. But she's

40:18

married, she and her husband have the same job, they

40:20

have two young kids, and she

40:23

and I see each other every few years, and the

40:25

last time I saw her, I was like, how are

40:27

you managing? And she said, we're not.

40:30

I just refuse to accept any

40:33

expectation from my husband

40:35

or from society. Our house

40:37

is a mess, our kids don't have clean clothes,

40:40

oftentimes we're cobbling together crackers for dinner,

40:42

the school has to chase us down

40:44

for every permission slip. She's like, I'm

40:46

sure everyone at my work and

40:48

in my life thinks we're a disaster, but I

40:50

refuse to do the perfectionist way. And

40:53

I'm like, what are you doing with all the time when you're

40:55

not being perfectionist? She's like, I'm reading. She

40:57

gets to read novels. Oh, wow. And

40:59

she comes from a pretty unconventional family that's challenged

41:01

a lot of society's expectations. So

41:03

I think this is a path she's slightly

41:06

comfortable with, but she recognizes

41:09

that to outsiders who have

41:11

bought into society's expectations, that

41:13

it looks bonkers. I

41:17

mean, I think every time I've signed something

41:19

for Harper or like show up for something,

41:22

I think, oh, my friend is not doing

41:24

any of that. I

41:26

think there's a lot to be learned from your

41:28

European friend. Yeah. I loved Marty's

41:31

sort of offhand suggestion that the school

41:33

have a co-working space. Oh, I like

41:35

that idea. I was like, this is

41:37

brilliant actually, because it was such a

41:39

good metaphor for everything Jessica was talking

41:41

about, right? How do we make the

41:44

system just easier on all

41:46

of us in a collective way? And one

41:49

piece of homework I'm taking, and

41:51

I think I hope some of our listeners will

41:53

as well, is to read Jessica's book and

41:56

really understand what she

41:58

calls this DIY society. how

42:00

it's come to exist

42:03

and I mean she has solutions

42:05

in there policy level solutions of

42:08

how we can change it. And the

42:10

link to Jessica's book will actually

42:13

be in the show notes. Yes she

42:15

wants to be found. That's

42:23

our show. I'm Amy Gallo. And

42:25

I'm Amy Bernstein. HBR

42:28

regularly publishes articles with advice

42:30

for managing work and family.

42:32

One we recently published is

42:34

a superb roundup called Your

42:37

Employees Are Also Caregippers. Here's

42:39

how to support them. Women

42:43

at Work's editorial and production

42:45

team is Amanda Kersey, Maureen

42:47

Hoek, Tina Toby-Mac, Rob Eckhart,

42:49

Erica Truxler, Ian Fox, and

42:51

Hannah Bates. Robin Moore

42:53

composed the theme music. Get in

42:55

touch with us by emailing womenatwork at

42:58

hbr.org.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features