Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hey College Football fans Joel Klatt here and
0:02
over on my podcast the Joel Klatt
0:04
show We discussed the best teams players
0:06
and storylines in all of college football
0:08
any questions Then send them in to
0:10
the Joel Klatt show mailbag and I'll
0:12
answer them tap the banner to follow
0:14
the Joel Klatt show on Spotify Better
0:18
to face the Columbus crew in the
0:21
semi-final round beginning in two weeks It's
0:23
a giveaway by Calendary, Brandon Vasquez
0:25
buries it And
0:30
it's history
0:32
repeating itself
0:35
in a
0:38
horrific way
0:41
for an
0:43
MLS team
0:46
in Monterey
0:49
Hello Sunshine, I'm Alexei Lawless
0:51
and welcome to the State of the Union podcast where
0:53
we look at the beautiful game on and off the
0:55
field through the lens of red white and blue colored
0:57
glasses. This show will be talking the
0:59
new romantics, US women's
1:01
national team champions at again, goalkeeper
1:04
redemption stories, Messi in Miami being
1:06
dwarfed, the OJ Bronco chase, UCL
1:08
goal fest, Suarez being Suarez, MLS's
1:11
own goal, World War II in
1:13
color, club world cup nominations and
1:15
so much more. But first joining
1:18
me as always my friend, my
1:20
colleague, my guiding light, David Masea, soccer
1:22
savant and a Fox soccer researcher and
1:25
writer extraordinaire. Masea, how you doing on
1:27
this Thursday, April 11th in the year
1:29
2024? I'm doing
1:31
well. What a great idea to play the John
1:33
Strong call from the Brandon Vasquez goal last year.
1:35
Yeah, we're mixing it up. You know, when you
1:38
hit play on the State of the Union podcast,
1:40
if you have followed us over the years, you
1:42
know that we've tried some different things and especially
1:44
this week, which is going to be something that
1:46
we're going to talk about. It was a monumental
1:49
type of moment and we
1:51
want to talk about that and other things too. So we're trying
1:53
some different things when it comes to the way
1:56
that we give you the State of the Union.
1:58
Have you watched anything, my friend? Do
2:01
you remember a show called the regime that
2:03
I mentioned a couple of weeks back? Vaguely.
2:05
Oh yeah, you were not impressed with
2:07
it. It was supposed to be comedic or at least
2:09
dark a little bit and it wasn't quite in the
2:12
mark for you if I remember correctly. Correct.
2:15
I thought it was 10 episodes. I was
2:17
going to watch five and if I wasn't liking it
2:19
I was going to bail at that point. And then
2:21
I came to find out it was only six episodes.
2:23
So after I watched five I figured I might as
2:25
well just watch the last one which
2:27
I did a couple of days ago. And it
2:29
didn't redeem itself in the sixth, right? Episode? You
2:31
know, I don't like to talk about things that
2:33
I didn't like. I leave that to you.
2:36
But I have no choice here. This show
2:38
was incomprehensibly bad. When you consider the pedigree
2:40
in front and behind the camera I am
2:42
shocked. I was excited for this. Some of
2:44
the reviews I read were positive but no
2:47
bueno. Well you know I'm sure it
2:49
was done with the best of intentions and these
2:51
things happen. What do I have
2:53
for you? Well I got two things. One that
2:55
I actually did watch. World War II
2:58
in color. I know that's a thing that you watched
3:00
before. And the road to victory it's on Netflix there
3:02
and it colorizes a lot of stuff that
3:04
you have seen and some stuff that you haven't seen
3:06
but it's a really good look
3:08
back, a historic look back documentary on
3:11
World War II and it goes to the entire battle
3:16
on both sides. And I thought it was really
3:18
interesting. I thought they did a good job. I like
3:20
that, what they're doing it. I know you're kind
3:22
of messing with the past in terms of the
3:24
colorization that goes on but I think it was
3:26
done in this case correctly
3:29
I guess if it can be called correctly.
3:32
And it was fun to see the footage obviously
3:34
in a very different light, literally in a different
3:36
light with the color there. The other thing is
3:38
did you watch this show a while ago? I
3:40
think I asked you about The Last of Us.
3:43
I did. I couldn't
3:45
remember if you mentioned it but it
3:48
was vaguely in the back of my mind. So I
3:50
was clicking through some different things and
3:52
I happened upon it and this is where I
3:54
get in trouble is sometimes I just start something
3:57
without actually going to look at it and as
3:59
anybody's... that has listened to the show knows that I
4:02
need to be able to binge it from start to finish. And
4:04
so I watched the first episode and I
4:07
kind of got into it, zombie apocalyptic type
4:09
of thing genre out there.
4:12
And then I come to find out when I finally
4:14
looked it up, which I should have done
4:16
initially, that this is only the first season.
4:18
There's another season that evidently is being filmed
4:20
right now that will be out, I'm assuming,
4:22
later on this year or next year at
4:24
some time. So I'm going to have to
4:26
stop watching The Last of Us because as
4:28
you know, it doesn't fill my criteria. And
4:30
Sean Sullivan has raised a pretty interesting question.
4:33
You apply this rule to movie franchises as well. Would
4:35
you not watch a movie if you know that there
4:37
are sequels coming? Interesting.
4:40
No, I think, yeah.
4:43
Well, back when I was growing up, back in
4:45
the 1900s, back in the previous century,
4:48
Maas Si, well, it wasn't
4:50
as blatant that there were going
4:52
to be multiple movies. You
4:55
kind of did something and you didn't
4:57
necessarily see around the corner that it
4:59
was going to become a franchise. Now
5:02
they plan for it and usually it
5:04
happens. So yeah, I still think that
5:06
a movie in and of itself should
5:08
be able to stand alone. And
5:11
therefore, yeah, I mean,
5:13
movies that end and
5:16
it's not ending, that would drive
5:18
me crazy. You know, I am
5:20
starting to employ your approach. There
5:22
are two TV shows out right now, Shogun
5:24
and Manhunt that I'm very interested in. Yeah,
5:27
you're talking about the Manhunt one, yeah. Yeah, it's
5:29
about the search for John Wilkes- Almost done though,
5:31
right? Lincoln. It's based on an excellent book that
5:33
I read a few years back. But in
5:36
both cases, Manhunt and Shogun, they're releasing the episodes
5:38
week to week. I am waiting for all of
5:40
them to drop so I can binge them. So
5:42
your approach does apply to me as well sometimes.
5:44
Okay, good, good. I think it's smart. You
5:46
know, I don't want to be beholden to the man or
5:48
the woman out there that's putting these out. So,
5:51
let's get this candle. Let's do it. All right, where
5:53
should we start? We begin with the
5:55
US Women's National Team. On Tuesday night, they
5:57
won the She Believes Cup by beating-
6:00
Canada on penalties in Columbus. It
6:02
was 2-2 after 90 minutes. Adriana
6:04
Leon and Sophia Smith each scoring twice.
6:07
And then in the shootout, Alyssa Nair
6:09
made three saves and converted her kick.
6:11
This was the final match under Twyla Kilgore.
6:15
Emma Hayes arrives in June. The Olympics are in
6:17
July. Overall thoughts? Overall,
6:20
winning is better than losing. However
6:22
it ends up happening. And this is a
6:24
team that has built, let's
6:26
be honest, their entire image. On
6:30
being champions and having that moment at the
6:32
end where they are able to raise a
6:35
cup and claim a title. And
6:37
yet this is another one in a long
6:39
list. And when they don't, it is a
6:41
story in and of itself. So back to
6:43
winning ways. I don't think anybody within the
6:45
US Women's National Team program are going to
6:48
break their arms patting themselves on the back
6:50
for winning the She Believes Cup. I thought
6:52
it was a much more competitive type of
6:54
game against Canada than certainly the last one
6:56
that we saw that was underwater. And
6:59
let's be honest, while this game, the
7:01
rules were you went right to penalties after 90 minutes. Canada
7:04
hit the crossbar right at the end of
7:07
the game and the US very easily could
7:09
have lost this game. But they didn't. They
7:11
go into penalties. And again, we see how
7:13
important Alyssa Nair is. And again, this theme
7:17
that will become apparent later on in the show of
7:20
goalkeepers and the redemption. Because
7:22
she was at fault on a goal
7:25
coming out and failing to clear it and
7:27
basically gifting Canada
7:29
a goal. But she came back,
7:31
not only made her penalty, but
7:33
also saved penalties. And she is
7:35
just she's money. I think when
7:37
you look at the old guard,
7:39
she is absolutely somebody that I
7:42
think is going to continue on and should
7:44
continue on. And specifically because she's a goalkeeper
7:46
and can do that. And you
7:48
want her back there because she's
7:52
there's an argument to be made that she's the
7:55
best goalkeeper in US soccer history. And
7:57
yet, I think that there are people that
7:59
will say you. Yeah, but and hope and
8:01
Brianna and the list goes on and
8:03
on and on but she just keeps
8:05
racking up wins Individually with
8:08
the team and even at
8:10
a point where this team we all know has
8:12
taken steps back Hopefully to go steps forward. She
8:15
still stars Listen there over hope
8:17
solo. That's a take It's
8:19
not a crazy take out there. I think that there are
8:21
certainly people out there that do it and What
8:24
a listener suffers from and it's not
8:26
her fault It's who she is that
8:29
she's not a big over-the-top type of
8:31
personality in a team that
8:33
is known for Huge
8:35
personalities. She is very
8:37
reserved. She is very quiet. She just
8:40
goes about her business and again That's
8:42
not fair to judge her on that but
8:44
certainly when you compare to someone like hope
8:46
solo That's it's an apples and oranges type
8:48
of type of character and
8:50
personally personality out there But yeah, I
8:53
absolutely think that you can argue that
8:55
she is the best goalkeeper and US
8:57
women's national team history For
8:59
me, the biggest development is Jaden Shaw at the
9:01
10 with three forwards in front of her We
9:03
saw that from the start against Japan and then
9:05
in the second half against Canada It'll
9:08
be interesting to see if Emma Hayes buys into
9:10
that as a base formation or it's only something
9:12
to be used in certain Situations, but wherever you
9:14
put her I said this on our
9:16
last pot I'm gonna repeat it. It's becoming harder and
9:18
harder to justify a US lineup without Jaden Shaw in
9:21
it or a US
9:23
lineup with Alex Morgan
9:25
in it Can
9:27
you justify that? It's
9:30
increasingly tough if McCario and Swanson recover
9:32
their pre-injury form Yeah champagne problems as
9:34
we said last show This is all
9:36
good stuff and I do think that
9:38
you know in this age where now
9:41
we've seen multiple Assistant coaches take these
9:43
teams whether it's the men's team the
9:45
national team Handing it
9:47
off in a better situation than before I
9:49
think is your job and your responsibility And
9:51
again, we don't know how much Emma Hayes
9:53
has made and has been influencing it But
9:55
she has to have been influencing from the
9:57
outside, but well done to Twyla. Thank
9:59
you for your work and now
10:01
she hands it off to Emma and it's
10:04
her responsibility going forward starting with the Olympics.
10:06
She's the female BJ Callahan. Exactly. Whoever is
10:08
not in his job anymore over there in
10:10
Saudi Arabia or wherever he was. Incidentally.
10:13
Oh sorry, that was Anthony Hudson. Anthony
10:16
Hudson, excuse me. Corbin
10:18
Albert came on for Jayden Shaw in
10:20
the 75th minute. Remember,
10:23
this is a player who started five of the six
10:25
matches at the Gold Cup, played very well and has
10:27
continued to play well for her club team PSG. She
10:30
didn't start either game with the She Believes Cup. It
10:32
defies credulity to think that it was purely
10:35
tactical. It obviously had something to do
10:37
with the social media controversy. I think Twyla Kilgore
10:39
felt like it was best for everyone involved
10:41
if she took a backseat in these two games. But
10:44
I think this will all blow over by June and
10:46
July and Emma Hayes will be able to pick her
10:48
team base purely on soccer reasons. And
10:50
then Corbin Albert becomes an interesting part of
10:52
this equation because she was an emerging star
10:54
in the midfield. And so if you play Jayden
10:56
Shaw's a 10, you have to lose one of
10:58
your midfielders for how you fit that puzzle. It
11:01
could be fascinating. This is why Emma's
11:03
being paid the big bucks is to figure out how
11:05
to fit all of this on the field. And look,
11:07
it can only be 11. We've talked about this with
11:09
the men's national team. When you start taking out some
11:11
of these pieces, what ends up happening
11:14
is yeah, you're kicking yourself for not being able
11:16
to have some of this talent on the field.
11:18
But the other side of it is depth. And
11:20
the other side of it is when things go
11:22
wrong. And as good as this
11:24
US team, I think, can be. There will be moments
11:26
when it goes wrong and Emma has to fix it.
11:29
So you can look down the bench and she
11:31
can have some quality going in. But this type
11:33
of competition for spots is
11:35
a good thing. This type of reset
11:38
for this team with all of these players and
11:40
many of them that we're talking about that haven't
11:43
been there before have had very limited time with
11:45
this national team. These are all
11:47
these are all good things. I get out
11:49
with the old, separate listen there and then
11:52
with the new. We also
11:54
found out that Zambia will be the third
11:56
team in the US as Olympic group along
11:58
with Germany and Australia. We now know
12:00
the three group games the US will
12:02
play at the Olympics. Is that the
12:04
order of games too? So we face
12:06
Zambia first or whatever? Zambia
12:09
is the opening game. Okay. All
12:11
right. So I mean that's a
12:13
good team to face at the beginning of the
12:15
Olympics. But this is a
12:17
group in the Olympics that will
12:19
test this new US
12:22
women's national team. And again, as I
12:24
said before, while I want to win
12:26
championships and I want to be holding the
12:29
trophy, whether it's a big tournament or a
12:31
small tournament, I think there have to
12:33
be bigger fish to fry and you have to
12:35
see the long term. And that long term is
12:38
ultimately getting back and winning a World Cup for
12:40
Emma relative to what we see in the Olympics
12:42
this summer. All right. So
12:44
successful, successful, successful. And congratulations
12:46
to this group on
12:48
winning yet another one. How
12:51
many have they won? They probably won a bunch of them, right? All
12:54
right. Yes. So
12:56
the Konkaka champions cup, the semi-finals
12:58
are set. We began this
13:00
edition with 10 MLS teams and six
13:02
league MX and it's three, one league
13:04
MX in the semis. We covered all
13:07
four quarterfinal second legs this week on
13:09
FS1. Let's go through each
13:11
of them individually and then we'll circle back to some big
13:13
picture of talking points. Kuba,
13:15
America, after beating New England for
13:17
Nilla Gillette, hammer them
13:19
again, five, two at the Azteca to complete a
13:21
nine, two aggregate triumph. The good news from an
13:24
American point of view, Alex and they have scored
13:26
in both legs. He's playing very well right now,
13:28
but a pretty embarrassing showing by the revs. The
13:31
revs aren't a good team. Okay. Whether
13:33
it's internationally or in MLS, they're not a
13:36
good team right now. It means to be
13:38
seen as they can be better, but this
13:40
wasn't a complete and utter failure for the
13:42
New England revolution relative to Konkaka champions cup.
13:45
Pachuca beat Herediano 2-1 at
13:47
home to complete a 7-1 aggregate
13:49
triumph. So one semifinal will be
13:51
Pachuca against America. All
13:53
the drama this week was on the other side of
13:55
the bracket. First, the good from an MLS perspective, Chigatas,
13:58
Columbus, they had played to a 1-1. draw
14:00
in Ohio, they played to another 1-1
14:02
draw in Mexico with the same goal
14:04
score Geniac and Rossi. The Geniac goal
14:07
came thanks to a horrific mistake by
14:09
Columbus goalkeeper Patrick Schulte, but we eventually
14:11
went to penalties and Schulte redeemed himself
14:13
denying Geniac and Guido Pizarro the crew
14:15
advance. Okay, so first I'm
14:17
going to start with the
14:19
overall positive of this. You are looking
14:21
at arguably the best team in Major
14:24
League Soccer, coached
14:26
by the best coach arguably in Major
14:28
League Soccer in Wilfred Nancy. And so
14:30
that they found a way through says
14:33
a lot about how good they are and I
14:35
think justifies a lot of the
14:38
way that we look at the Columbus crew going
14:40
forward. And now all of these eggs from an
14:42
MLS perspective are in this basket, but this is
14:44
a pretty good basket to put your eggs in
14:47
when you're talking about quality and when
14:49
you're talking about balance of
14:52
a team. This particular
14:54
game was was
14:56
nuts and it went the
14:58
entire spectrum of emotions and
15:00
performances. You mentioned Schulte and this
15:02
gets back to you
15:05
know again these goalkeepers that throughout
15:07
the game have moments of great
15:09
success and great failure and starting
15:12
off not being good. And well
15:16
Patrick Schulte. All right,
15:18
you make a mistake and to
15:20
his credit and to Wilfred Nancy's
15:22
credit because he talked about it after the game,
15:25
he understood and everybody understood that this was
15:28
a mistake that could become
15:30
the defining moment of the game if
15:32
you let it and yet they had
15:34
the fortitude built over time and the
15:36
confidence that has been instilled in them
15:38
individually and collectively to push
15:41
on so much so that
15:44
I ultimately think Columbus was the
15:47
better team in that game. Now it took them a
15:49
while to get there. This
15:51
does go back to something
15:53
bigger picture that we've talked about before
15:55
Massey in the world in which we
15:57
live in, in the soccer world in
15:59
which we live in and how much
16:01
it has evolved over time
16:04
or quote-unquote evolved. And
16:06
this is, you know, I called it, you
16:08
know, the new romantics. And
16:11
whether it's the players or whether it's
16:13
the coaches or whether it's even the
16:15
fans out there, this
16:18
expectation of playing
16:20
out of the back. And again, I have
16:23
no problem playing out of the back.
16:25
Some of the most beautiful soccer can
16:27
be accomplished by successfully playing out of
16:29
the back. And I
16:31
fully recognize that the risks and
16:34
the reward equation is
16:36
drastically different than when I was
16:39
playing. People do things nowadays
16:41
in soccer, as I said before, that
16:43
you would be fired on the spot
16:45
for doing back in my day. However,
16:50
if you are playing out of the back, you
16:53
are taking risks that haven't been
16:55
taken in the past in order to gain the
16:57
benefits. Fine. But if you
16:59
are unable to do so, and if you
17:01
want to die on that hill, which is
17:03
what we saw numerous times yesterday,
17:07
I think it is problematic. And I think
17:09
it comes from coaching and
17:11
saying, yes, I want you to do this. And yes,
17:14
you can blame me. All right, fine.
17:17
If you are the coach, whether it's Wilford
17:19
Nancy or Tata Martino, anybody else out there,
17:21
and you are telling your team, this is
17:23
how we are going to play, come hell
17:25
or high water, then you have
17:27
to accept the responsibility that your players are going to
17:29
do that. And if and when it
17:31
happens that they are not able to do so in
17:33
the most important point, then it is
17:36
on you. And Wilford Nancy
17:38
can sit back and say, yeah, but this is how
17:40
we do it. And I am a romantic, and this
17:42
is what I believe is in good soccer. And I
17:44
would rather lose playing like this than
17:46
win being rudimentary and being
17:48
caveman-esque and kicking the ball
17:50
away and living to fight
17:52
another day. And that's why
17:54
I get frustrated at times. I
17:57
know I was sitting next to Rob Stone and
17:59
Stu Holden. At times, it's incredibly
18:01
frustrating because you are trying to be
18:03
something that you are not. I'm not
18:05
saying in the future you can't be
18:07
that, but right now you're not, and
18:09
you're not doing what is right in
18:11
that moment for what the game needs.
18:13
How am I wrong, Russ? I agree
18:16
with you. I've always interpreted playing out
18:18
of the back as if you have a choice
18:20
between going long and going short, you choose to
18:22
go short. But sometimes there is no choice. Everybody's
18:24
short is covered. And this idea that you have
18:26
to force it from hell or high water, I
18:29
don't agree with. We've even seen Pep Guardiola manage
18:31
Manchester City, not be above Ederson, sending a
18:34
long ball to the strikers if that's the
18:36
right play in that situation. So yeah, some
18:38
of the decision making we saw the
18:40
last couple days, I agree with you with head scratch. But I
18:43
don't blame the players. And
18:45
yet, I'm kind of jealous.
18:47
I would love to have been given that autonomy.
18:49
I would love to have been given that freedom
18:51
to be able to play out of the back
18:53
in these risky type of situation situations. But again,
18:56
the coaches are saying this is how
18:58
we have to play. And
19:00
maybe Schulte or others that we're going to
19:02
talk about, or even a listener, whoever, maybe
19:06
in that moment, the seed has
19:08
been planted. And they know, you know what, I have to
19:10
get I have to find a way to get out of
19:12
this position. And they believe that I can get out of
19:14
this position. I have to play that small thing. I have
19:16
to pull a cray in my six yard box. If I'm
19:19
a goalkeeper, I have to do that. Well,
19:22
then it's on the then it then it is on
19:24
the coaches. And if and
19:26
when it happens, we shouldn't blame the players.
19:29
You know, what the coaches are going to
19:31
do is say, yes, but I give them
19:34
the responsibility because I believe that they can
19:36
do it. And too often, I
19:38
think what we're seeing, again, is players
19:42
and teams saying, we are at a
19:44
certain level, when they are not even
19:47
close to being on that level, because
19:49
that's what we equate with real football.
19:51
That's where you equate with sexy football.
19:53
That's what we create with. We
19:56
equate with romantic football. I can't believe you
19:58
got me to say football. All
20:00
is lost. I will say
20:02
if you analyze these two legs and their
20:05
totality, Columbus was good value for their advancement.
20:07
They played well, but what gave it an
20:09
air of fortune was some
20:11
of the chances that Tigres missed in the
20:13
first half of that second leg. The crew
20:15
were all over the place defensively, bad giveaways,
20:17
poorly executed offside traps, and we're
20:19
so accustomed to seeing MLS teams get punished in Mexico
20:21
for that. It was pretty unbelievable that they got to
20:24
halftime only up, only down one nil, and then they
20:26
were able to improve from there. But
20:28
they found a way through, and that
20:30
is the mark of a good team.
20:32
Obviously, they needed penalties. A lot of
20:34
people wanted to remind me I was
20:36
getting texts about how MLS
20:39
Next Pro has
20:41
used penalties as the deciding factor
20:43
when there are ties. And so
20:46
there's a generation of MLS Next
20:48
Pro players that are coming up
20:50
that have had many more opportunities
20:53
to be in situations where they're hitting
20:55
penalties. And I've
20:58
said before, it is not a coin
21:00
toss. It is not a flip of a coin.
21:02
It is not a crapshoot. It is a skill
21:05
and an art, and ultimately
21:07
Columbus were much better. And
21:09
redemption time, Schulte comes to
21:11
the rescue. For about 24 hours there, MLS
21:14
fans got their swagger back because Columbus
21:16
went through. You had a motivated Messi
21:19
facing Monterey, and you thought, well, if
21:21
they move on, then it's 2-2 in
21:23
the semis, and it would guarantee an
21:25
MLS finalist. So this whole negative MLS
21:27
narrative would go away. But it
21:29
was not to be because Inter Miami laid an
21:31
absolute egg in Monterey. They had lost the first
21:34
leg 2-1. They lost the second leg 3-1. Brandon
21:37
Vazquez scored the first goal, taking advantage
21:39
of a horrific giveaway by Drake Callender.
21:41
So you'll have occasion to go on
21:43
the same rant again. Same thing. Just
21:45
plug in Drake Callender, plug in Inter
21:47
Miami, plug in Tatsumartino. But
21:50
ultimately, they didn't win. And so this was
21:52
the beginning of the end. Then
21:54
Berterami and Gallardo scored in the second
21:57
half. Diego Gomez pulled one back late.
22:00
all the talk about poking the bear
22:02
and Messi's gonna have fire in his eyes,
22:04
he wandered around completely disinterested, it was
22:06
one of the worst matches I've ever seen
22:08
him play, so ours wasn't much better, Jordy
22:10
Alba got himself sent off, so a terrible
22:13
night for Intermian. Well it just confirms that
22:15
there is a difference between poking a bear
22:17
and poking a dwarf, right? So this is
22:19
a situation where Messi
22:22
and company didn't show up, and
22:25
the field wasn't good, I get
22:27
that, but that's not an excuse, all right?
22:30
But they better get their crap together down
22:32
there because 2026 is coming and that
22:34
is a venue for 2026, and it was, you know,
22:36
it was all over the place, you could tell it
22:38
was very very soft, but it was the same for
22:40
both teams. I
22:42
thought the beginning of the game,
22:44
Inter Miami was completely in control,
22:47
certainly a possession, but they weren't
22:49
creating a whole lot, there weren't
22:51
a lot of moments of magic
22:53
from Messi, he had one
22:55
opportunity that you would bet he would have
22:57
gotten at least on goal, he sailed it over the top,
23:00
but this was an
23:02
Inter Miami that did
23:04
not collectively or individually, and
23:06
some of the stars that we have, show
23:09
up in the most important
23:11
moment, and again, time and
23:14
time again, if you look at these goals, this
23:16
Inter Miami team playing out of the back, and
23:18
I said on air, there
23:20
are some Barcelona legends on this
23:23
team, Inter Miami, but
23:25
this is not Barcelona, and
23:28
yet again, the risky passes, and if
23:30
you're Monterey, you're looking around
23:32
going, yeah, we'll take this, no
23:35
problem, you want to give us this
23:37
gift, you want to play these risky
23:39
passes out, fine, not only will we
23:41
eat that up, but we'll eat it
23:43
up in dangerous areas, and then we
23:45
will make you pay, and so consistently
23:47
and unnecessarily shooting themselves in the foot
23:49
when it comes to Miami from a
23:51
playing out of the back perspective, and
23:53
then not creating anything up top. Alright,
23:55
so big picture, we've had 14 matches
23:58
in this edition of the Konga Cali. champions
24:00
cut between League MX and MLS teams.
24:02
MLS has not won a single one.
24:04
Nine wins and five draws for League
24:06
MX. They've outscored MLS 33 to 10
24:09
in those games. They prevailed in
24:11
six of the seven two-legged
24:13
ties, the only exception being Columbus would
24:15
advance on penalties after a pair of
24:17
draws. So that's leading to a lot
24:19
of hand-wringing today, a lot of discussion.
24:21
Tata Martino said after last night's match,
24:23
until MLS relaxes its many roster rules
24:26
in order to build more robust squads
24:28
where player absences, injury suspensions aren't as
24:30
difficult to overcome, League MX will have
24:32
an advantage. Henry Bushnell wrote an article
24:34
today on Yahoo to that effect. You
24:36
talked about it last night. So what
24:39
are your thoughts? Okay, so
24:41
you know we talked about the fact that
24:43
MLS plays with one foot behind their back
24:45
and everybody understands this. Tata, everybody understands this.
24:48
I would love to change it. I love
24:50
to spend other people's money. We all love
24:52
to tell rich people how to spend their
24:54
money, especially when it comes to a game
24:58
entertainment that is soccer. But it is
25:00
a reality.
25:02
And again, you're not telling the MLS owners
25:05
anything that they don't know. But when
25:07
it comes to, for example, last night
25:09
when Brandon Vasquez scores a goal. Now Brandon
25:12
Vasquez is an MLS killer. All right, so
25:14
he's gone through Cincinnati, now he's gone through
25:16
Miami, and there's a possibility he'd go through
25:18
Columbus. This is a player
25:20
that did not want to go and
25:22
play in League MX. That wasn't his ultimate
25:25
goal. He wanted to stay.
25:28
He was a talented player in Major League
25:30
Soccer. He was a star. Commissioner
25:33
Don Garber for years has talked
25:35
about MLS being a league of
25:37
choice. Well, if MLS
25:40
is to be a league of choice, it not
25:42
only has to be a league of choice of talent
25:44
coming in from the outside, but talent
25:47
has to be rewarded and
25:49
accommodated that
25:51
choose MLS from the inside. And that's what Brandon Vasquez
25:53
was. But because of the mechanisms, because
25:55
of the restrictions, because of the reality,
26:00
And by the way, the reality that has made it
26:02
the most successful American professional soccer league in
26:04
history. But because of
26:06
that reality, Brandon Vasquez
26:08
is now taking
26:10
down MLS teams. MLS has become
26:13
the architect of their demise. And
26:15
so it's on them. They
26:17
have no one to blame, but themselves,
26:19
they could change it overnight. If they
26:22
wanted to, they don't want to. And
26:24
find that is their business decision, but
26:27
they will continue to not fight
26:30
on an even playing field. And
26:32
so Tata Martino is absolutely right. And in the
26:34
past, we've just said, well, that's no excuse. Find
26:36
a way to get it done. And that's what
26:38
Wilford Nancy has done. But think of as
26:41
well as they have done, given all the
26:43
challenges, think if they were actually given the
26:45
opportunity to have an equal playing field, my
26:48
goodness, that would be wonderful to see, but
26:50
they don't want to do it and it's, and it's on them. Although
26:53
news this week coming out
26:56
of the MLS board of
26:58
governors meetings, they approved some
27:00
changes, the relaxing of restrictions on
27:02
the combined number of designated players
27:04
and under 22 initiative signings,
27:07
doubling in the number of contract buyouts allowed
27:09
per season and increasing the amount of general
27:12
allocation money teams receive when players are transferred
27:14
out of the league. So there is some
27:16
movement on that front. That's great. It's still
27:18
too complicated. Just let people spend what they
27:20
want and let's go on. Have a, have
27:22
a, you know, have a floor, have a
27:24
ceiling if you want. And the real, the
27:26
real problem with MLS right now is that
27:28
it, and Tata Martino said this is that
27:30
it's, it's top heavy and Columbus
27:33
has actually done a better job of spreading it
27:35
out. Now I know it's not as sexy when
27:37
it comes to signing big names, but when you
27:39
have your designated players and you're paying them all
27:41
this money and then the rest of the team
27:44
isn't making even close to that amount of money,
27:46
that's, you know, that's a problem for MLS from
27:48
a, from a business structure standpoint,
27:50
but obviously it impacts the competitive side,
27:52
uh, on the field right now. And
27:54
again, we're telling people how to spend
27:56
their money out there and the success
27:58
that they have had. But it goes back to
28:00
what I said about 2026 and wanting
28:02
to do big bold things and we'll talk a little bit more
28:05
about That later in the show. Yeah, we
28:07
got an ask Alexi question about the Club
28:09
World Cup next year And the u.s by
28:11
hosting it gets an extra spot and who
28:14
might that go to? So I have a
28:16
feeling we'll bring up intermiami again in
28:18
that discussion down there But they now have
28:20
to turn the page to mls. They
28:22
really wanted to win this konkaka of champions
28:24
cup Because of that birth to
28:26
the Club World Cup So you wonder where they are
28:29
mentally now where they do have leagues cup later in
28:31
the year But for now, it's just a slog of
28:33
the mls regular season this upcoming weekend. They are away
28:35
to skc They
28:38
go they evidently are going directly to kansas
28:40
city and skc is playing this game in
28:42
uh, What's the football stadium there that I
28:44
used to play in? Uh, Can
28:46
barrel head barrel head? Yes, my goodness. I can't believe
28:48
I forgot forgot that so they've you know Messy's
28:51
coming into town. They can sell a lot of tickets.
28:53
They can make a big deal about it However,
28:56
oh by the way tata martino, you
28:58
didn't make a single sub last night Everybody's waiting
29:00
for you to do something. You didn't do anything
29:02
You just folded your arms and said this is
29:04
it and he just kept everybody playing out there.
29:06
And so now messy has played midweek
29:10
after travel on a
29:12
very soft field It
29:15
would not surprise me in the least if
29:18
come saturday or sunday was the game
29:20
saturday sunday But anyway, uh this weekend
29:22
over at arrowhead that the good folks
29:24
of kansas city Are not given
29:26
the treat that they all paid for which was
29:28
to see arguably the greatest player player In
29:30
the world played the game saturday game Now in
29:32
your opening when you teased all the topics we were
29:34
going to discuss you did mention louise soir as I
29:36
blew pass it Do we want to discuss his petulance
29:38
last night? The problem is
29:41
it's louise soiris and soiras is going to soiras,
29:43
right? And for those that didn't see there was
29:45
a moment in last night's game That I cannot
29:47
believe for the life of me was not reviewed
29:49
Well, it probably was reviewed by var and then
29:51
just said well, it's soiras and it's a different
29:53
grading structure but What
29:57
what it looked like to me was soiras
29:59
grabbed the defense defender's arm in the box
30:02
and try to rip it off. It
30:04
was very, very, well, it's
30:07
very, very strange if you're not Luis Suarez. But
30:11
when Luis Suarez is into the game
30:13
and he's scoring and he's being dangerous
30:15
and he surprisingly has been very much
30:17
that in MLS so
30:20
far, that's great. But it
30:22
just takes a second for that dude to click and
30:24
he just does some very, very bizarre stuff and he
30:26
was lucky to continue on the field last night. Yvonne
30:29
Bartone was strangely subdued last
30:32
night. He was the referee in that match. He's
30:34
known for allowing his matches to
30:36
descend into chaos and overreferring and pulling out
30:38
red cards at every turn. Don't you agree
30:41
that last night he was weirdly calm and
30:43
trying to keep pace? Maybe he was just
30:45
then recognizing that there was the possibility of
30:47
the crazy Messi showing up and all that
30:50
kind of stuff. One last
30:52
thing before we move on. We showed
30:54
footage of David Beckham at a Monterey
30:56
restaurant getting absolutely mobbed. I
30:58
was discussing this with our boss, Zach Kenworthy.
31:00
Could you argue that in Messi and David
31:02
Beckham, Inter Miami have two of the five
31:04
most famous sportsmen in the world right now? Yeah.
31:09
I mean, if you look
31:12
at the most
31:14
famous people in the world, it would be
31:16
interesting if you put together a list out
31:18
there. We've talked about the Donald Trumps and
31:20
stuff like that, but Messi for sure would
31:23
be in that top 10, I
31:25
would think. That line
31:27
outside the Inter Miami hotel to
31:29
get a glimpse at Messi that we showed. It's a show,
31:32
man. It is a show and people want to see it.
31:35
We talked about it on the show last
31:37
night. We're just
31:39
coming off this Caitlin Clark stuff and
31:42
what was his name? Prime, Dion and stuff like
31:44
that. As I said before, the only reason that
31:46
I watched women's basketball was because
31:48
of Caitlin Clark. The only reason why many
31:50
people are going to these games is
31:53
to see Messi. He transcends
31:55
the sport. He brings people into the
31:57
tent and he is looked at as
31:59
a guy. God everywhere that he
32:01
goes. And so this type of reception and
32:03
David Beckham obviously is a, and has been
32:05
a name for decades now and
32:08
not just soccer world, but in
32:10
celebrity world. So it's no surprising. And it
32:13
is kind of like a
32:15
world tour of the biggest band in the world when
32:17
Inter Miami
32:19
now goes domestically or internationally. Made me think
32:22
of the last dance or Chicago Bulls during
32:24
Michael Jordan's last season, every city they went
32:26
to, it was crazy. Any
32:28
other MLS games you want to highlight? I should say
32:30
Inter Miami away at SKC and Sean Sullivan did put
32:32
in the run at Arrowhead and we both somehow missed
32:34
that. So, Oh, there we go. Yeah. We should probably
32:37
read his run down every once in a while. One
32:39
more game to mention top of the table clash in
32:41
the West Vancouver will host the galaxy, the galaxy looking
32:43
to bounce back from that El traffic code to see. And
32:46
Vancouver coming off a big win last weekend.
32:48
So they're, they're feeling good right there. Shout
32:50
out also to the New York
32:52
Red Bulls. And you know, they're sitting top
32:54
of the, the East
32:56
over there and really, I
32:59
guess kind of quietly given what, what
33:01
they are, they host Chicago. And so
33:03
they could continue, continue on. I think
33:05
a couple of shows ago, I said,
33:07
I'm not quite yet ready to anoint
33:09
them and give them elite status, but
33:12
they keep going the way they're going. And that's, that's good
33:14
news for the red side of New York over there. All
33:17
right. But anyway, there'll be a lot of
33:19
MLS stuff going on this, this weekend. I'll
33:21
be sitting in front of my MLS
33:24
360 watching as we talked about last show.
33:27
Adam Inman, a colleague of ours at Fox, who's
33:29
a big galaxy fan and an avid listener of
33:31
this pod. He was appalled by your take on
33:33
the Buanga penalty last week. He couldn't believe it.
33:35
He thought it was a dive.
33:37
Correct. Yeah, whatever.
33:40
I mean, I, yeah,
33:43
we talked about it before. Adam's
33:45
a good man, but he's, you know, delusional.
33:48
All right. What now? That is it.
33:50
All right. Let's take a quick break.
33:52
And we come back. Ooh, some champions
33:54
league action goals galore. I'm going. Hey
33:57
college football fans joke that year and over on
33:59
my. podcast, the Joel Klatt Show, we
34:01
discussed the best teams, players, and storylines
34:03
in all of college football. Any questions?
34:06
Then send them in to the Joel
34:08
Klatt Show mailbag and I'll answer them.
34:10
Tap the banner to follow the Joel
34:12
Klatt Show on Spotify. Okay.
34:15
Welcome back. There was all sorts of action when
34:17
it comes to, uh, you wait
34:19
for Champions League, Mosse, where to start
34:21
goals galore. Yeah. The quarterfinals are off
34:23
and running. It was an incredible couple
34:25
of days. Let's begin Tuesday at the
34:28
Emirates. Arsenal Bayern Munich finished 2-2. Saka
34:31
scored first for the Gunners, then Gennabry made it
34:33
1-1. Harry Kane from the
34:35
penalty spot 2-1. And then
34:37
in the second half, two subs combined, Jesus
34:39
to Trosard 2-2. Some
34:41
controversy at the end. Let's go there first.
34:44
Saka, Neuer. Did you think that was a
34:46
penalty? Uh,
34:52
he drags the leg, right? Is that what we're
34:55
screaming and yelling about here? Is that what the
34:57
situation is? Correct. Yeah.
35:01
I think he drags the leg in
35:03
an unnatural, well, in an
35:05
unnatural way. Okay. Again,
35:08
as I said before, many times, it's
35:10
not his responsibility to avoid contact. It's
35:12
not his responsibility to take a different
35:14
route. It's not his responsibility to jump
35:17
over a leg, but it's
35:20
one thing to go to feel it and
35:22
good players feel it. It's another
35:24
thing to actually kind of kick
35:26
out and in doing
35:28
so, initiate the contact there
35:31
because whether it's Neuer or anybody else,
35:34
players that are defending, they have a right
35:36
to occupy a space. And
35:38
when you in this instance, then
35:40
encroach in on their space, I
35:43
think it completely changes the dynamic and the complexion
35:45
of what you're calling there. So yeah, I thought
35:47
it was a little bit, uh, a little
35:50
bit much, but I don't, I don't blame him for doing it.
35:52
Yeah. I do not think it was a penalty at all.
35:54
I thought Saka kicked Neuer. So, uh, to
35:57
me, when you saw the replay, it wasn't even debatable. But
35:59
did you think that. The result ultimately was
36:01
fair. Yes.
36:05
Uh, of, of the match overall. Yeah. I thought
36:07
Byron was better. I find Byron. I'm saying we
36:09
let one get away here. Yeah,
36:11
perhaps. Our song got off to a good start. Saka made
36:13
it one, no Ben white should have made a two nil.
36:15
And then a mistake by Gabrielle, which
36:18
led to the. Good Abre goal really turned
36:20
the tide. Our stone never recaptured the fluency
36:22
they had in those first 15 minutes or
36:24
so. Um, and so yeah, uh, Byron
36:26
could feel like they should have won that game. They had
36:29
an incredible chance late with come on hitting the post. Oh
36:31
my God. Um, so now we go back to
36:33
Munich. I still think this is a 50 50. I
36:35
think our snow are very capable of going there and getting
36:37
a result. Uh, do you lean Byron at all? Or you
36:39
say 50 50? I
36:42
lean Byron. Yeah. I think
36:44
that while they will feel
36:46
they lost one there,
36:48
I, you know, and
36:50
again, I think that
36:52
Byron just has this aura
36:55
and it's got to have been stoked up from a
36:58
forgettable league season and talk about putting
37:00
all eggs in one basket. This
37:03
is it. And there's, there's still, there's
37:05
still really good. And yeah, so I'm
37:07
going to go with my own. Also on
37:09
Tuesday, round Madrid and Manchester city played
37:11
to a three, three draw, lots of
37:13
fireworks early. Bernardo Silva with a cheeky
37:15
free kick got past Luna and one
37:17
nil city. Then Kama Venga
37:19
took a shot that deflected off Ruben Diaz
37:22
one, one, and then Venetius to
37:24
Rodrigo on the break to on round Madrid. This is
37:26
all in the first 15 minutes. Then
37:28
in the second half, two incredible strikes by
37:31
Foden and Vardio made it three two city,
37:33
but a beautiful Valverde Valley made it three
37:35
three. Yeah. This, this had
37:37
everything you mentioned in the Guevara goal.
37:40
I mean, he's never going to hit
37:42
that again. And he was as surprised
37:44
as anybody there. Some wonderful goals, some
37:46
suspect goals. Did you think who's
37:48
at fault on the, uh, on the free kick goal? The
37:51
wall, the goalkeeper. Yeah.
37:54
I think you called it cheeky. Yes. Um,
37:56
I think the wall needed to be set up better.
38:00
Yeah, yeah, it's it's inexcusable
38:02
for something like that to happen and
38:05
They should all be ashamed that they get paid
38:07
money to actually play professional soccer a
38:10
few thoughts on this one Manchester City
38:12
is the better team the fact that Ramadhan played
38:14
on the counter the whole time is evidence of
38:16
that But I will say there was a middle
38:18
chunk of this game last 20 minutes or so
38:20
the first half first 15 minutes of the Second
38:22
half when it was 2-1 round Madrid and they
38:25
had all the best chances City
38:27
really played with fire there on a different day around we
38:29
did have their finishing boots on they could have broken that
38:31
open Gone up like 4-1 and then that would have been
38:33
a big hill to climb from Manchester City So I do
38:35
think they dodged the bullet there and they ended up getting
38:38
a pretty good result in the end It
38:40
was I mean from a neutral
38:42
standpoint It's fun because it's a lot of
38:44
goals and it's back and forth and there's
38:46
no real defense and there's no real rhyme
38:49
or reason To it. I'm I'm sure whether
38:51
you know, it doesn't matter Either
38:54
side probably looked at it when they're gonna look at
38:56
it this week and say that's not necessarily that we
38:58
want to do Or something that we can count on
39:00
going forward, but I'm
39:03
still gonna go ultimately with City But
39:06
it's amazing you know some of these teams that
39:08
we hold and put on a pedestal and they
39:10
you know all the Technique and
39:12
the tactics and stuff like that when
39:15
it ends up being kind of like a street ball
39:17
type of game like that We go out. This is
39:19
this is great But there's no way
39:21
that these coaches drew that up like this now
39:23
Yeah, a couple of thoughts on City one good
39:25
one bad The good so Foden has leveled up
39:28
this season and is now one of the best
39:30
players in the world He
39:32
had a shot minutes before his goal From
39:35
that same spot that he shot right at looning and
39:37
it felt like a golfer taking a practice swing You
39:39
knew if he got another chance from there was gonna
39:41
go in the upper corner and it did what a
39:43
sensational goal from him Do you think it's just a
39:46
logical type of progression and evolution for him? Or
39:48
is it something that has happened? I mean
39:50
it's interesting because he stuck it out there
39:52
through some years where he wasn't playing as
39:54
much as people wanted him to while others
39:56
Like Sancho and Cole Palmer decided they didn't
39:58
want to wait unless city at an early
40:00
age to go somewhere else. So it's interesting the different
40:03
paths you can take and for a phone you have
40:05
to say it's now paying off because he's full potential.
40:07
But you're looking at him as one of the elites
40:09
in the world. Oh, absolutely, he's incredible. And then on
40:12
the downside, Erlan Holland. I think
40:14
everybody right now is struggling to reconcile this. Look,
40:16
goals win games and when you have a
40:18
guy that is adept at scoring it as he is,
40:21
he's obviously a valuable commodity, but he's
40:23
so limited and it gets exposed in some of these
40:25
games that can we really consider
40:27
this guy one of the handful best players in the
40:29
world? What do you mean
40:32
he's limited in that he's predictable? Yeah, and he's just
40:34
so reliant on service. You have all these other players
40:36
in the field that you see can conjure up things
40:38
on their own while Holland, if you don't get him
40:40
the ball in his spots, he
40:42
barely touches it and you don't even notice he's out.
40:45
But this should not have come as a surprise to
40:47
anybody. I mean, it's not like he's forgotten to do
40:49
it. And to your point, I can agree because when
40:51
you talk about, look at
40:53
some comps out there, Lewandowski, even
40:55
he who is certainly reliant on
40:57
service, he does some individual
40:59
things that you say, all right, well, that's
41:01
something that Erwin Holland has. And I'm not
41:03
saying that Erwin Holland hasn't had individual moments.
41:05
Sometimes he'll get out in open space and
41:07
he'll be able to take players on one
41:09
on one. And that's something doing alone, but
41:12
I understand what you're saying, but you're
41:14
not, you're giving up on him? No, I
41:16
just think he's a specialist. Like I'm trying to
41:18
reconcile the fact that I can both
41:20
think he's gonna be the best center forward in the
41:22
world for the next 10 years, but there's never gonna
41:25
be a day that I'm gonna think he's the best
41:27
player in the world because I'm just always partial
41:29
to somebody that's got a bit more
41:31
to his game and it's creative. And so that's
41:33
just how I view these goalscoring
41:35
center forwards. I don't know. I mean, is
41:37
that crazy? It's not
41:39
crazy, but I think what you've reconciled
41:41
is that this is who he
41:43
is. So there's no change
41:46
or growth. He
41:49
can't be something that he's not and you don't see
41:51
him having something else. I don't know
41:54
because there was one match late last season against Arsenal
41:56
at home where he all of a sudden, his link
41:58
up play was excellent. He was skipping. around the fenders
42:00
so he has it in him. It's one game but
42:02
nevertheless that one game is stuck in my head and
42:05
it makes me think that there is more to his
42:07
game if he wanted to really develop it so I
42:09
don't know, we'll see. Mossy wants more
42:11
from him. I can appreciate that because
42:14
it'd be easy to just say well this is
42:16
who he is and either you like him or
42:18
you don't but that's it. He's never gonna get
42:20
any better but you believe there's still an opportunity
42:22
for him to be better. As for the second
42:24
leg, Kevin De Bruyne did not play due to
42:27
illness and Kyle Walker did not play due to
42:29
injury, they're both expected back at the Etihad
42:31
next week so I think Edge, Manchester City,
42:33
I expect them to go through. Yeah, especially
42:35
with a non-puking Kevin De Bruyne, that'll
42:37
be a good thing. You know, when
42:40
the lineup sheet came out and I saw that
42:42
De Bruyne wasn't in it, you
42:44
know how Pep can sometimes overthink these big games.
42:46
Oh really? It did actually cross my mind that
42:49
he had just left them out but then I
42:51
checked on X and saw that he was ill. Oh
42:53
my God, that would have been nuts. Where
42:56
to now? We go to
42:58
Wednesday where we had another great game,
43:00
Barcelona with a 3-2 away win over
43:02
PSG at the Pac de France. Rafsina
43:04
scored in the first half, then PSG
43:06
scored twice early in the second half,
43:08
then Bele and Vicina, but
43:10
then Barcelona, a sensational goal to make
43:13
it 2-2. The pass from Pedri and
43:15
the volley from Rafsina and then Christiansen
43:17
off a corner 3-2 so
43:19
great result for them, they are in the driver's
43:21
seat to advance. Okay, so what kind of nutty
43:23
this is this, Masi? How is this possible that
43:26
Barcelona is able to conjure up this type of
43:28
performance, everything that we have said about that, what
43:30
they are, more importantly, what they aren't in this
43:33
version of it and not
43:35
only that, but in Paris
43:37
against PSG. How is that possible?
43:39
You know, with Barcelona doing what they're doing since
43:41
Shavi announced he's leaving and even the Bayern result
43:43
with Tuchel in the same boat, my dad joked
43:45
with me that this is the departing manager bounce.
43:48
Well, we don't have to really
43:50
listen to the dude anymore because he's going anyway, so
43:52
we'll just do what we want. Yeah.
43:54
Well, all right. You know, speaking of
43:56
managers, Luis Enrique in
43:58
his press conference... before
44:00
this match. He was asked,
44:03
who embodies Barcelona's spirit and identity more?
44:05
You or Shavi? And everybody expected him
44:07
to give some diplomatic answer and he
44:09
said me without question. I love it.
44:12
But then they were hugging before the game
44:14
so I don't think Shavi took it in
44:16
a bad way. It's fine. I mean ultimately
44:18
we've got the well not the last laugh
44:20
but certainly this laugh here today. So now
44:22
what happens in the return? I think Barcelona
44:24
go through. I will say
44:27
Mbappe was oddly subdued in that first leg.
44:29
Did not play well. We know he's leaving
44:31
in the summer. He had kind of a
44:33
LeBron game five against the Celtics in 2010
44:35
kind of vibe to him. I
44:37
don't know what that was about. So you're going to
44:39
bet on him not returning to form? Well they certainly
44:41
need him in the second. Like I saw a great
44:43
post on X. If you
44:45
had told me that there were going to be 18 goals
44:47
in the Champions League this week and Mbappe and Holland would
44:49
not score a single one of them and you wouldn't believe
44:51
it. I'm still gonna stick with
44:54
PSG. Alright and then finally. And
44:56
then finally Atletico Madrid claimed a 2-1 home
44:58
win over Dortmund. They scored early when Coble
45:01
and Mattson made a mess out of playing
45:03
out of the back. Rodrigo de Paul capitalized
45:05
so it doesn't just happen in CONCACAF. We
45:07
see it in UEFA as well. Listen the
45:10
new romantic effect is all over. It is
45:12
global. Everybody wants to be a part of
45:14
it. And then Samuel Lino
45:16
made it 2-0 and Atletico had chances to
45:19
break this wide open. They didn't take
45:21
advantage and then they got punished for it
45:23
late. Sebastian Haller made it 2-1 and Julian Brandt
45:25
actually hit the woodwork in stoppers times. It was
45:27
almost 2-2 but Dortmund with
45:29
that Haller goal still very much in this tie. But
45:34
do you think Dortmund
45:36
is still in this? I
45:39
think Dortmund is still in this but Atletico will go
45:41
through. Yeah me too. I agree with you there. What
45:44
else? Do we have any Europa action? Yes
45:47
some terrific quarterfinal first legs this
45:49
week in that competition as well.
45:52
Roma went to the San Sito and
45:54
beat AC Milan 1-0. Mancini with the
45:56
goal in the first half. Polisic started.
45:58
Musa an unused Oof. Well,
46:02
that's not good for AC Milan
46:05
and Christian Polisic. Listen, got a
46:07
yellow two and not
46:10
good for Musa there, but great for
46:13
Mancini to get that
46:15
big, big goal. And
46:17
Roma continued their resurgence under De Rossi,
46:19
who's been a big improvement over Jose
46:21
Mourinho. I know the Mourinho fanboys don't
46:23
want to hear that, but... It's
46:27
like night and day, right? Yes. I
46:29
know who's happy with this result. Who's that? Jack,
46:31
apparently, is a Roma fan who worked on our
46:33
pot. I just found that out today. He's been
46:35
keeping this quiet. Yes. And he
46:37
came in today and he was screaming
46:39
and yelling. So, interesting. Well, I
46:41
mean, his perfect day would be Roma winning, but
46:43
Christian Polisic playing and doing well. That's
46:46
usually how it goes. And Michigan doing something where
46:48
he's a big Michigan fan. That's how him and
46:50
I bond. Michigan being docked points for doing something
46:52
illegal. Michigan actually played tonight in the Frozen Four,
46:55
so Jack does have something to watch. The
46:58
equivalent of the Final Four. Any other Europa stuff?
47:00
Yes. Atalanta went to Enfield
47:02
and smacked Liverpool around 3-0, Skamaka with two
47:04
goals. I'm reading Keith Costigan's post on X.
47:06
I've never seen him go after Klopp like
47:09
this. We were out coached. Wrong lineup.
47:11
Bad subs. Keith is beside
47:13
himself. Really? Yeah. He's
47:15
all over Klopp? I thought Klopp was
47:18
untouchable. Yep. Evidently not. Well,
47:20
I mean, they just got their ass handed
47:22
to. Wow. That
47:24
is a... That is amazing. Now,
47:27
how does this affect big picture quotient and
47:30
all that kind of stuff? Does this possibly
47:32
impact us? Yes. If Atalanta were
47:34
to eliminate Liverpool, that would be a big feather in
47:36
Serie A's cap. They're in good shape to get that
47:38
fifth place to be a champion. Which
47:41
could be good news for Sean Sullivan's
47:43
Bologna or Jack's Roma. They're both in
47:45
that mix. Thanks, Klopp. Yes. Leverakusen
47:47
incidentally scored twice late to beat Wesam
47:50
2-0 at home and Benfica
47:52
beat Marseille 2-1. In
47:55
terms of the weekend in Europe, let's go to
47:57
the Premier League, the title race there. Manchester.
48:00
City will host Luton town Liverpool will
48:02
host Crystal Palace and Arsenal will host Aston Villa
48:04
So they're all at home. Arsenal have the toughest
48:06
game of the three I mean,
48:08
yeah so much so I mean you got to feel that peps
48:11
gonna arrest some players against Luton I would think I
48:13
would think so. Yeah, right All
48:15
right. Yeah, I don't Yeah,
48:19
so who Liverpool you think has the Wait,
48:22
you said Liverpool has the most difficult Arsenal has
48:24
the most Arsenal. Yeah, Aston Villa. Yeah, I
48:27
still think they all find ways through I
48:29
agree. I think all three win this weekend.
48:31
We dropped down a level to the championship
48:33
We had some midweek action Norwich played to
48:35
a 2-2 draw away to John T Whitehead
48:38
Sheffield Wednesday Josh Sargent with a goal in
48:40
that one while Coventry Suffered a 2-1 defeat
48:42
away to Southampton. How'd you write missed a
48:44
penalty in that game? Oh, no That's
48:47
not good, but it is good for Josh
48:49
Sargent I mean, I don't want to be
48:51
blase that we just constantly seems like every
48:54
week you're talking about Josh Sargent scoring another
48:56
goal This is wonderful.
48:58
I mean he
49:00
is a goal scorer, but he's improved and
49:04
The consistency in which to use scoring Again,
49:08
just irritates me that he was
49:10
hurt this last window But I I would love
49:12
to see him this summer and see what this
49:14
new version of him looks like in the national
49:16
team The center forward battle for the US is
49:19
so interesting last night. We did Monterey Intermae I
49:21
could not help but watch Brandon Vasquez through that
49:23
lens and Analyze his movements and how it would
49:25
compare to the other center forwards in the mix
49:28
and how he would gel with Pulisic Rain and
49:30
companies so, you know, you can't help but think
49:32
that reality show just bring them all in Let's
49:34
just see what happens and the best man standing
49:37
So Norwich five points clear
49:40
of Coventry for that last promotion playoff spot
49:42
in this upcoming weekend Norwich away to Preston
49:44
Coventry away to Birmingham Finally,
49:46
we mentioned that lever accused
49:48
and beat West Ham today in the Europa
49:50
League There's still unbeaten in all competitions this
49:53
season and this upcoming weekend They can wrap
49:55
up their first ever Bundesliga title. They host
49:57
Werde Bremen if they win. They are the
49:59
champions April 11th, we're gonna
50:01
have a champion incredible Wow That's
50:04
pretty impressive the last time somebody other
50:06
than Bayern Munich won the Bundesliga title
50:09
It was Borussia Dortmund in the 2011-12
50:12
campaign. They clinched it in April of
50:14
2012 and just to put that into
50:16
some Perspective in April of 2012 Sean
50:18
Sullivan and Kat were still college students
50:21
at Tennessee Aaron Schechter
50:23
was like 12 or 13 years
50:25
old preparing for a bat mitzvah So
50:27
long time ago Wow, that is a that
50:30
is a long time. What year you say
50:32
that was? 2012 I
50:34
was still I was still at ESPN
50:40
Getting ready for I guess.
50:42
I don't know maybe a euros or something like that.
50:44
I don't know all sorts of stuff was going on
50:46
back then Doesn't seem that
50:49
long ago. It really wasn't that long ago anything else my
50:51
friend. That is it All right. Let's take
50:53
another quick break when we come back. It's time for a selection
50:56
Okay, welcome back It's time for ask Alexi that part
50:58
of the show where you send in your comments questions
51:00
and concerns and you can do it on The social
51:02
media platforms out there and keep in mind that our
51:04
handle is SOTU with Alexi and
51:06
use that hashtag ask Alexi or you can
51:08
call into our State of the Union podcast
51:10
hotline Which is six five seven five four
51:12
nine two two nine seven six five seven
51:14
five four nine two two nine seven masi
51:17
What are the folks want to know today? First
51:19
up a voicemail. Let's take a listen right now Hey
51:24
Alexia Masi, it's Josh from Atlanta. Hey,
51:26
love the pod So Masi's
51:28
probably heard about the college football Super
51:30
League. They're talking about proposing. I only
51:33
bring this up because The MLS
51:35
guys they're working with MLS guys to
51:37
build a similar model Where
51:40
the schools own the league like the kind
51:42
of like the teams on the league in MLS
51:45
One really interesting things about this college football
51:47
Super League that think translates possibly to
51:50
the MLS is Talking
51:53
about having like most of the teams can't
51:55
get relegated But
51:57
there's a couple spots each year
52:00
that the lower division, they can come up
52:02
and some of these schools that are
52:04
up can go down. My
52:07
question for you guys is, do
52:09
you think this is something that could maybe work in the MLS? Like
52:12
we have 30 teams, they're locked in, but
52:15
the MLS buys the U.S.L. or buys the
52:17
second division, whatever, and then one
52:19
or two teams come up each year. Is
52:21
there any possibility of that working?
52:25
I know it's not like anything in the world that
52:27
exists, but I thought it was an interesting idea and
52:29
would love to hear you guys take on it, thank you. All
52:32
right, thank you, Josh from Atlanta. Massey, can you
52:34
just distill it down a little bit so I
52:36
understand my little brain as it
52:38
relates to this football possibility and translating it
52:41
to a soccer situation? So a lot of
52:43
people think the NCAA is no longer equipped
52:45
to run college football. Are
52:47
you one of those people? I have a lot
52:49
of issues with the screen. Particularly
52:52
in their handling of sign stealing controversy.
52:56
But so the idea is all the schools
52:58
would band together and they would create this
53:00
super league and they would
53:02
have different tiers and there would be 70 schools that would be
53:04
guaranteed to always be in the first tier, but then there'd be
53:06
another 50 or so that could get promoted
53:09
and relegated between the first tier and the second
53:11
tier. And the teams in the first
53:13
tier would be divided into divisions. And then depending on
53:15
how you fair in those divisions, you advance the playoffs.
53:18
So they would basically organize themselves and
53:20
render the NCAA obsolete. Okay,
53:23
so I certainly don't know
53:25
a whole lot about the football situation, but
53:27
when it comes to the NCAA, from
53:30
what I see and what I feel
53:32
and what I sense is to your
53:34
point, it
53:36
is heading in the direction
53:38
of being irrelevant. And so
53:41
there is absolutely a case to be made
53:43
for something new and improved,
53:45
quote unquote better to come along and take
53:47
the place, given all the
53:50
changes and the dramatic changes that we have
53:52
seen over there in college sports. As
53:55
it relates to how American
53:59
soccer and In this case, you're talking about
54:01
MLS, you've mentioned coming together with USO.
54:04
I've talked a long time about this
54:07
ramp up to 26 and
54:09
the opportunity and the moment that soccer
54:11
has in the United States, and we'll
54:13
throw Canada into, and Mexico for that
54:15
matter, relative to 2026, but
54:18
this moment to do things and
54:20
to do big, bold,
54:23
dare I say, arrogant things. Because
54:26
if you're not going to do it now, then
54:28
when? Go big or go home relative to 26.
54:31
This applies to anybody in the soccer space
54:33
out there. When
54:36
it comes to a potential
54:39
league like this, a
54:43
lot of people out there, a lot of zealots
54:45
out there when it comes to promotion, relegation will
54:47
argue, well, this is just intra-league promotion,
54:49
relegation, and it's a bastardized version,
54:51
but at least it's something. I
54:53
do think that at some point,
54:55
all of these teams, and obviously
54:57
next year, MLS will become 30
54:59
teams. If you were to add
55:01
all the USO teams, it would be this goliath
55:05
of a league. You
55:08
would have to find something to
55:11
separate out the different divisions
55:13
and possibly to incorporate it.
55:16
But the way you're explaining it to me, there
55:18
are certain protections, and I know when the original
55:20
Super League idea came out,
55:23
there were going to be these untouchable
55:25
types of teams. I
55:27
think that's hard. I think it's hard to
55:31
split that baby, if you will,
55:34
and have teams that are protected.
55:36
But the argument is, the only way
55:39
this gets done if people do insulate
55:41
and protect themselves, and the
55:43
big dogs out there are going to do
55:45
it in perpetuity going forward.
55:47
But you still have the opportunity for
55:49
others, if and when they have their
55:51
moment, to rise. Am I framing that
55:53
correctly? Correct. Yeah.
55:56
I mean, I would love nothing more
55:58
than... the MLS
56:01
owners, which by the way we said, they
56:03
met right around the corner here in Los
56:05
Angeles. And as you mentioned, they've changed some
56:07
rules. I don't consider them necessarily big, bold
56:09
and arrogant to come out tomorrow and say,
56:12
we're buying a U.S.L. It's all
56:14
being branded MLS from top to finish.
56:16
We have three different divisions, one, two,
56:18
three. There is
56:20
promotion, relegation within. There
56:23
are parachute payments. Everybody is
56:25
made hold and it's one
56:27
big MLS ecosystem going
56:29
forward. But I also would
56:31
say that there is a
56:34
sleeping giant and an existing infrastructure in
56:36
the college soccer game that
56:38
has been not
56:40
untapped because in the past it was
56:42
tapped but now it has almost become
56:44
obsolete. And I would love to find
56:46
a way to regenerate that and
56:49
to use it and whether it's a
56:51
feeder system, a developmental type of system
56:53
or who knows, maybe
56:55
it becomes part of that new type
56:58
of pyramid that you have when
57:00
it comes to the level. So there's a lot
57:02
of creative different things that can be done that
57:04
don't completely throw the baby out with the bathwater
57:07
when it comes to the existing structure even though
57:09
some people don't like it out there
57:11
but also make it more
57:13
inclusive and in doing so make it
57:15
more interesting because ultimately this is about
57:17
attracting people into watch soccer to be
57:19
involved in soccer. And the more interesting
57:21
you make it, the more competitive you
57:23
make it, the more entertaining you make
57:26
it and the bigger
57:28
I guess you make it given relative to how
57:30
big the United States is and Canada is the
57:32
better off you're going to be. On
57:35
the topic of college sports, we mentioned this
57:37
in our last pod so just to put
57:39
a ribbon on it, congratulations to the UConn
57:41
Huskies, they beat Purdue to win the NCAA
57:43
men's basketball championship that made
57:45
some people in our control room very happy,
57:48
Sean and Kat hate Purdue so they rooted
57:50
hard for UConn and also Erin Schechter won
57:52
her pool by virtue of UConn winning the
57:54
title. Question for you now, and
57:56
I was with Rob Stone carpooling in the other
57:59
day, do you consider... UConn now
58:01
a Blue Blood. Absolutely.
58:03
Six national titles in 25 years is
58:08
incredible. They've forced their way into that
58:10
aristocracy of the sport. They've been more
58:12
successful than the Kentuckys and Kansas and...
58:15
But there's no official criteria. People just
58:17
said this is the group of Blue
58:19
Bloods, whatever? Correct. They had won a
58:22
lot and said... Yeah, it's
58:24
similar to European soccer. You have your Real
58:26
Madrid's and Manchester United's and Bayern Munich's. If
58:28
some club that
58:30
you didn't previously think was on that level, all of a sudden
58:32
won a bunch of Champions League titles, at some point you'd have
58:34
to say they belong in that group now and UConn is absolutely...
58:37
So in this scenario UConn, I know
58:40
they're talking football here, but if they did
58:42
it basketball-wise they would be protected from any
58:44
type of relegation. And
58:47
you know John Calipari left Kentucky
58:49
to go to Arkansas. Kentucky made
58:52
a run at UConn's coach Danny Hurley and
58:54
he has apparently turned them down. So even
58:56
more satisfying news for UConn, they're now at
58:58
the level where their coach is turning down
59:00
Kentucky. He stores through and through. Kentucky is
59:03
like the Real Madrid of college basketball. Wow.
59:05
That's pretty big deal. Times have changed. Times
59:07
have changed. I wonder what Erin will do
59:09
with her winning. She presumably earned
59:11
a lot of money by winning this pool. Well, I mean
59:14
usually what you do is you save a
59:16
portion of it yourself and treat yourself and I
59:18
think that's justified. Well, and the rest you
59:20
usually spend on people that you like and
59:22
you respect that limits the pool
59:24
here. So you and I will
59:27
not be getting any gifts. No, of course
59:29
not. Next up we have a question on X.
59:32
Glenton Richards asks, for the expanded Club World
59:34
Cup in 2025, as host nation the
59:36
US is allowed to nominate one team to play in
59:39
the tournament in addition to the Seattle Centers.
59:41
If you could pick any team for that slot, which would you
59:43
choose and why? Oh man. Now typically
59:45
in the Club World Cup, in previous
59:47
versions of it, the host nation,
59:49
their reigning domestic champion got that
59:51
slot. So in MLS's case it
59:53
would mean the 2024 MLS
59:56
Cup winner. But there
59:58
is this cynicism out there. that
1:00:00
they want to get Inter Miami in there any
1:00:03
way they can. So they're going to wait and see
1:00:05
what Inter Miami does this year. If they win the
1:00:07
league's cup or the supporters' shield or the MLS cup,
1:00:09
whatever they do, MLS will then determine that that's who
1:00:11
gets that slot. Obviously, Inter
1:00:13
Miami qualifying by virtue of the Conger Kaft Champions
1:00:15
Cup went by the wayside last night. So
1:00:19
this is an interesting question, Glenn. So
1:00:24
if my goal is to make the
1:00:26
biggest and most positive
1:00:28
impact using the platform
1:00:30
that is the club World
1:00:32
Cup. And when I say my goal, it
1:00:34
would be my MLS goal, right? Because
1:00:39
what we talked about earlier, you're
1:00:42
looking at Columbus Crew
1:00:44
right now as arguably the
1:00:47
best team in Major League Soccer. And
1:00:50
so from a pure competitive
1:00:52
standpoint, they certainly
1:00:54
would be a team that I would
1:00:56
have no problem inserting
1:00:59
into that tournament and being very
1:01:01
confident that they would do well and that
1:01:03
they would equip themselves well relative to, you
1:01:06
know, their brand, which is Columbus and
1:01:08
the brand of MLS and I guess
1:01:11
by extension, American soccer and certainly American
1:01:13
professional soccer. But keep in mind that
1:01:15
this is happening a year from now. And
1:01:18
whether it's some of the world rule changes that
1:01:20
you mentioned earlier, whether it's, I think, an
1:01:23
improvement and a continued improvement and a doubling
1:01:26
and tripling down when it comes to Inter
1:01:28
Miami. I think Inter Miami is going to
1:01:30
look very, very different come the summer of
1:01:32
2025. And
1:01:35
like it or not, again, don't kill the
1:01:37
messenger. But an Inter
1:01:39
Miami doing well in
1:01:42
the 2025 Club World Cup for
1:01:45
the brand of MLS and for
1:01:48
American soccer is
1:01:50
much more impactful than
1:01:52
the Columbus Crew doing well. And
1:01:54
I know there's people screaming and yelling right there saying,
1:01:57
oh, my God, no, but the Columbus Crew can actually
1:01:59
win in. Inter Miami can't win it. My point is
1:02:01
I think that they will
1:02:03
get to a point where they're a comp
1:02:05
for the Columbus crew. That's not that
1:02:07
the Columbus crew can also improve that
1:02:10
I would still feel more comfortable in
1:02:13
getting the biggest bang for your buck with
1:02:15
a messy and inter Miami running around
1:02:18
in a club world cup. So yes,
1:02:21
for the greater good, I would
1:02:23
say inter Miami, I would pick as the team
1:02:25
going through and to your point, I know there's
1:02:27
a lot of people from a financial
1:02:30
perspective that would love to
1:02:32
have that happen. Yeah, I mean, Glenton is framing
1:02:34
it as if they can just pick a team. I
1:02:36
think they're going to have to nail down a criteria.
1:02:39
I don't think you can just wait and then decide
1:02:41
we want to send such and such team. I think
1:02:43
they're going to have to determine at some point that
1:02:45
it's the MLS cup winner or the supportership winner. You
1:02:47
know that you have to have won something I think
1:02:49
to get in there. But if you are sitting in
1:02:51
Don Garber's chair and they came to you
1:02:54
and said, look, just give us two teams. Yeah, inter Miami would
1:02:56
for sure be one of them. Right now, would
1:02:59
would Seattle be one? Oh,
1:03:03
you're saying even if you just start from scratch. Yeah,
1:03:06
if you're just starting from scratch and say,
1:03:08
look, we're having this tournament, you get to
1:03:10
send two teams, Don Garber, for the good
1:03:12
of your league doing what's
1:03:14
best for your league. Who are
1:03:16
the two teams that you're sending? I think probably
1:03:18
Columbus and inter Miami. Yeah.
1:03:21
No. And by the way, Columbus could
1:03:23
qualify if they win this Conga Calf Champions Cup. Exactly.
1:03:26
And and Philadelphia has a path to
1:03:28
getting in. Monterey won the 2021 Conga
1:03:31
Calf Champions League. So they're already in it. If
1:03:33
they were to win this edition, then it goes
1:03:35
to the next team with the highest coefficient. I
1:03:38
read somewhere that that would be Philadelphia. So if
1:03:40
you're a Philadelphia fan, you're rooting for Monterey right
1:03:42
now. That's oh my goodness.
1:03:44
That's right. All right. I guess it's strange,
1:03:47
strange things. But look, good
1:03:49
question there, Glenn. I appreciate it. And let us
1:03:51
know what you think of Glenn's question. What what
1:03:53
two teams or what one team, given
1:03:56
that Seattle is going, would you pick if you were in
1:03:58
charge in order to make. the biggest impact, not
1:04:00
to satisfy you from an individual perspective, but if
1:04:02
you were in that chair and you were able
1:04:04
to pick, let us know who you would pick.
1:04:08
Anything else, Massey? That's it. All
1:04:10
right, let's go to One for the Road. It's the end of our show
1:04:12
and at the end of each and every show I do give you my
1:04:15
One for the Road. We are coming
1:04:17
to you on Thursday, April 11th.
1:04:19
We woke up today to the
1:04:21
news that O.J. Simpson, former football
1:04:23
player, former TV personality, actor, all
1:04:25
that kind of stuff and I
1:04:29
guess now a former murderer passed
1:04:32
away. For those
1:04:34
that remember back in
1:04:36
1994, O.J. Simpson
1:04:38
was in the high
1:04:41
speed or low speed, excuse me, Bronco
1:04:43
Chase as he
1:04:45
was allegedly running from the
1:04:47
law, from this craziness that he
1:04:49
was involved with. It
1:04:51
overlaps with so many different sports
1:04:54
stories, including yours truly
1:04:56
and the U.S. Men's National Team that at
1:04:58
the time was getting ready to kick
1:05:00
off the 1994 World Cup. Keep
1:05:05
in mind the 1994 World Cup was in the
1:05:08
United States. For the U.S.
1:05:10
our first game was in Detroit in
1:05:12
my old stomping grounds about 15 minutes
1:05:14
away from where I grew up and
1:05:18
it was at the Pontiac Silverdome.
1:05:20
So the
1:05:23
night of the chase,
1:05:26
if you will, the Bronco Chase, and
1:05:29
the Bronco Chase happened
1:05:32
on June 19th, excuse
1:05:35
me, June 18th if I'm not mistaken, 1994.
1:05:38
Sorry, June 17th, I want to
1:05:40
make sure I get this right. We played
1:05:42
on the 18th but the Bronco Chase was the
1:05:44
night before which was on June 17th, That
1:05:50
night we were all in our hotel
1:05:52
room getting ready for the next day where we're
1:05:55
going to play a World Cup game and
1:05:58
we all finish our meal. We head
1:06:00
back to our rooms and word
1:06:03
is out. We're watching on our television
1:06:06
that this chase is happening.
1:06:08
Now keep in mind the game is not only the
1:06:10
next day, but it is at 11 a.m. in
1:06:13
the morning in order to accommodate European
1:06:15
time. So that's an early game,
1:06:17
early kick, which means that we have to get
1:06:19
up early, which means we were trying to go
1:06:22
to bed as early as we could.
1:06:24
But it was impossible. The entire
1:06:26
country was just
1:06:29
sitting there in front of their
1:06:32
televisions, watching this slow speed chase
1:06:34
in the Bronco happen on all
1:06:36
the California freeways, including those
1:06:38
of us that were on the team. At
1:06:41
the time, as we all know, I was
1:06:43
a roommate of Eric Winalda. I was
1:06:45
the only one that could put up with him on the
1:06:47
team. But the day
1:06:49
before, he had he had had
1:06:53
a bottle of a sports drink that she'll
1:06:55
remain nameless and he had
1:06:57
an allergic reaction. They didn't
1:06:59
know it was a sports drink, anything. And
1:07:01
so they were worried that he would infect
1:07:03
me with whatever he had. And so they
1:07:06
put him in a single room. And I
1:07:08
went and roomed with Brad Friedel, our former
1:07:10
colleague, wonderful goalkeeper. And
1:07:12
I'll never forget sitting with laying
1:07:14
down in our double beds there
1:07:17
in Pontiac, Michigan, and
1:07:19
watching this Bronco chase
1:07:21
happen. Like
1:07:24
so many millions were also across
1:07:26
the country and looking at
1:07:28
the clock and then looking at the television, looking at the
1:07:30
clock and saying, son of a.
1:07:33
This this is going to keep me from getting
1:07:35
the sleep that I need before the biggest game
1:07:37
of my life, the World Cup, the next day.
1:07:40
Now, this was such a convergence of so
1:07:42
many different things, including many things in the
1:07:44
sports world that ESPN has
1:07:46
an incredible documentary that documents all
1:07:49
of the things that were happening
1:07:51
at that moment or getting ready to happen.
1:07:53
The World Cup had already had
1:07:55
already kicked kicked off. But when I think of
1:07:57
O.J. Simpson and I think of that Bronco chase.
1:08:00
I think of sitting there next to Brad Friedel watching
1:08:03
it up in Pontiac, Michigan Getting
1:08:05
ready to go and play our game
1:08:07
that next that next morning is something
1:08:09
I can never forget I know for an entire
1:08:11
generation It's one of those moments where you know
1:08:14
exactly where you were when that was happening I
1:08:16
just the correction on something you called him a
1:08:18
murder. He was found not guilty actually. Oh, that's
1:08:20
true. Okay Well to each their own but I
1:08:23
did get invited by a friend today to an
1:08:26
event tomorrow night at the Egyptian theater It's
1:08:28
the 15 year anniversary of
1:08:30
ESPN launching the 30 for 30 series Really?
1:08:33
So there's gonna be a panel with a
1:08:35
bunch of filmmakers and ESPN execs and they're
1:08:37
gonna show clips from several 34 30s including
1:08:39
the One you just alluded to the June
1:08:41
17 1994 one So I'm
1:08:43
thinking of going to this because it's gonna be pretty interesting
1:08:45
now in the wake of OJ passing away But yeah
1:08:48
now it's an incredible sports day. You had the
1:08:50
Bronco chase you had Knicks Rockets NBA
1:08:52
Finals You had the New York Rangers parade
1:08:54
after they won the Stanley Cup You had the
1:08:56
start of the World Cup you had Arnold Palmer
1:08:58
playing his final round at the US Open Ken
1:09:01
Griffey Jr. Hits three home runs in a in
1:09:03
a major league baseball game So yeah, and ESPN
1:09:05
did an incredible job of capturing all that to
1:09:08
me This is that's like a top 5 30
1:09:10
for 30 for me along with like the two
1:09:12
escobars and there's a couple others But well, I
1:09:14
mean the the actual OJ documentary. I think is
1:09:16
one of the great ones in history. Absolutely
1:09:18
OJ made in America That's the greatest thing ESPN
1:09:20
has ever done. It's one of the best a
1:09:22
transcend sports It was one of the best documentaries
1:09:24
period I've ever I couldn't I mean I talk
1:09:26
about binging. I just could not Watching
1:09:29
that that was that was
1:09:31
insane. My goodness Anything
1:09:33
before we go much that is it. All
1:09:36
right. Well, thank you for hanging with us today and
1:09:39
Just facing us on and off the field We
1:09:41
appreciate that you're downloading and reviewing and watching and
1:09:43
rating and doing all the different things whether you're
1:09:45
listening to it in your car Or whether you're
1:09:48
watching on Spotify or YouTube out there all
1:09:50
different platforms We thank you for doing that
1:09:53
If you want to get in touch with us as
1:09:55
we mentioned you can use that ask election hashtag on
1:09:57
social media or Again,
1:10:00
it's X5754922976. Have
1:10:03
a wonderful weekend. Enjoy
1:10:06
all the soccer on and off the field or
1:10:08
whatever you're doing out there. See you again next
1:10:11
week. And until then, and as always my friends,
1:10:13
besides the... ...the
1:10:30
Joel Cladd Show on Spotify.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More