Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
We're driven by the search for. Better. But
0:03
when it comes to hiring, the best
0:05
way to search for a candidate isn't
0:07
research at all. Don't surge match with
0:09
Indeed. If you need to hire, you
0:12
need indeed indeed is your matching and
0:14
hiring platform with over three hundred and
0:16
fifty million global monthly visitors according to
0:18
in the data, and a matching engine
0:20
that helps you find quality candidates fast.
0:23
Ditch the busy work use indeed for
0:25
scheduling, screening and messaging so you can
0:27
connect with candidates faster. Leveraging over one
0:29
hundred and forty million. Qualifications and
0:31
Preferences every day. Indeed, Matching Engine
0:34
is constantly learning from your preferences
0:36
so the more you use indeed
0:38
the better. It and listeners of
0:40
this show will get a seventy
0:43
five dollars sponsor job credit to
0:45
get your jobs more visibility. And
0:47
indeed.com/lawless Just go to indeed.com/lawless right
0:49
now and support our show by
0:52
saying you heard about Indeed on
0:54
this podcast Indeed, Dot Com slash
0:56
Lawless Terms and conditions apply. Need
0:59
To Hire You Need Indeed! Don Garber, hope you're
1:01
listening right now. If it bleeds, it leads.
1:03
If it's pink, it leads. And if it's
1:05
messy, you're damn right, it leads. Hello
1:21
sunshine. I'm Alexi Lalas and welcome to
1:23
the State of the Union podcast, where
1:25
we look at the beautiful game on
1:28
and off the field through the lens
1:30
of red, white, and blue colored glasses.
1:32
This show will be talking a US
1:34
women's national team rebound, Florida pink, snow
1:36
game, referee drama, skiing, dune, MLS rebrand,
1:38
the US men's national team AI version,
1:40
American playing time, and so much more.
1:42
But first joining me is always my
1:44
friend, my colleague, my guiding light, David
1:46
Mossi, a soccer savant and a Fox
1:49
soccer researcher and writer extraordinaire, Mossi, how
1:51
you doing on this Monday, March 4th
1:53
in the year 2024? I'm
1:56
doing well. We have a blockbuster show
1:58
today. We have all sorts of stuff.
2:00
stuff. And even though you might not
2:03
believe it, we actually get together and talk about the show
2:05
before we do it. There was all sorts of stuff that
2:07
we're trying to cram in there, but we will endeavor
2:10
to get all of it in because there was all
2:12
sorts of stuff that happened. How was your weekend, my
2:14
friend? Did you watch anything, do anything of interest? I
2:17
did. I teased this on our last
2:19
podcast. I did go see Dune 2
2:21
this weekend, which I thought was absolutely
2:23
terrific. Two thumbs
2:25
up, great. Better than the last
2:29
one of this series, of this modern
2:31
era. Even better than the last one,
2:33
which I liked as well. And Sean Sullivan concurs. We
2:35
were texting about it. He saw it as well, and
2:37
he's fired up about it. Yeah. Okay.
2:39
You saw it in the theater, right? Correct. And
2:41
the senior experienced producer Sean was telling us that
2:43
he was in one of those theaters, maybe
2:46
the IMAX or whatever, where your
2:48
seat shakes and you experience it as
2:51
well as visually. I saw
2:53
it that way as well. You did. Okay. Cool. So
2:55
two thumbs up over there. Okay. I'll see it. I
2:57
don't know if I'll go to the... Yeah, maybe. We'll
2:59
see. We'll see. I don't have
3:01
anything necessarily to talk about when it comes
3:03
to what I watched, but as I mentioned
3:05
last show, I went skiing this weekend. I
3:07
was in Beaver Creek, Colorado. And for those
3:09
that have listened and watched this show over
3:11
the years, you will know that last
3:14
year I attended this incredible event, the
3:16
American Airlines Celebrity Ski Weekend, which is
3:19
just an incredible weekend, incredible event that
3:21
raises money for cystic fibrosis. Last
3:25
year was my first time skiing ever. And
3:27
they take you down the mountain and you're
3:30
skiing. There's a race. There's all these kinds
3:32
of things. So this is my second time
3:34
skiing. So I ski once a year, and
3:36
it is at the American Airlines Celebrity Ski
3:38
Weekend to raise money for cystic fibrosis. And
3:40
keep in mind that when it comes to
3:43
cystic fibrosis, way back in the 80s,
3:46
the life expectancy was in the teens. And now
3:48
here we are in 2024. And
3:51
a lot of these folks with
3:53
cystic fibrosis live into their 50s. So
3:56
the end is in sight, but they
3:58
keep raising money. Unlike
4:00
a lot of other diseases out there,
4:02
unfortunately, you can see how quickly success
4:05
has been achieved, but they still got a long
4:07
way to go. And wonderful people, including Rob Stone
4:09
was there, Carli Lloyd, our Fox
4:12
family when it comes to Urban Meyer, Mark
4:14
Ingram II, he was there skiing
4:16
for the first time ever. Not only was he
4:18
incredible, low center of gravity, big muscles when it
4:20
comes to the running
4:23
game that he has, but he also
4:25
went down the actual course, finished it,
4:27
didn't fall, got his time recorded. So
4:29
the star of the weekend was, without a
4:31
doubt, Mark Ingram, our colleague over
4:33
there when it comes to college football. So
4:35
fun weekend. I'm
4:38
getting better at skiing, but I certainly would not
4:40
claim to be a skier, especially since I just
4:42
do this kind of once a year. But it
4:44
was fun. All right, should we light this candle,
4:46
my friend? Let's do it. Where should we start?
4:48
We begin with the US Women's National Team.
4:50
They are back on track. They've
4:53
picked up a comprehensive 3-0 quarterfinal
4:55
win over Columbia at the Gold
4:57
Cup. Lindsey Horan from the penalty
4:59
spot, Nye Swanger, and Jaden
5:02
Shaw with the goals. The US setting
5:04
up a semifinal date with Canada on
5:06
Wednesday. This was obviously
5:08
a much more comprehensive type of
5:10
performance. The result stands for itself.
5:13
They kicked the crap out
5:16
of Columbia. And this was
5:18
a Columbia team that, if you remember them
5:20
from the World Cup, had gone to the
5:22
quarterfinals, if I remember correctly. And this is
5:24
a team that has fight and bite, almost
5:26
too much so when I'm looking at Columbia
5:28
and I was standing a great
5:30
talent like Linda Cacedo. But
5:33
it's almost as if the Columbia Women's National
5:35
Team would rather fight than actually win the
5:37
game. And if they spent as much energy
5:39
and resources into actually playing the game as
5:41
they do to wanting to kick
5:43
people and to fight people, they might do
5:45
a whole lot better. The US
5:48
was the better team on the day, and
5:50
it was wonderful to see them rebound from
5:52
that historic loss to Mexico, which was they
5:54
got played off the park when it comes
5:56
to Mexico. So
5:58
a couple of things. I think
6:00
that we are seeing the emergence of a
6:02
star not just for the future But right
6:05
now when it comes to as you mentioned
6:07
Jenna nice longer over there on the left
6:09
hand side Wonderful left foot a true left
6:11
back and crystal done is gonna go
6:13
off and be a legend But I think that time
6:15
has come to transition to Nice
6:17
longer and I think that she's gonna be a
6:19
force to be reckoned with going forward when it
6:21
comes to that that left hand side this was
6:23
a team with I Know
6:26
we saw it say this a lot but this was
6:28
a team that with bite with With
6:32
desire and this is a team
6:34
that I think a lot of people out there
6:36
that are still looking Sideways at
6:38
this US from this national team over the
6:40
last couple years and certainly over the since
6:42
the World Cup This is
6:45
a team that you can root for this is a team
6:47
that is exciting and this is a team that ultimately gets
6:49
the result But does it in a way that draws you
6:51
in when you mentioned the rising
6:53
star? I thought you were going Jaden Shaw
6:55
because she has also been a breakout Star
6:58
in this tournament and you look at
7:00
the US's options up front also on
7:02
Sunday Katharina Makario scored in her first
7:05
game back after an almost two-year injury
7:07
layoff She scored for Chelsea who are
7:09
managed by Emma Hayes Ironically enough if
7:11
Makario is as good as she was
7:13
before the injury Mallory Swanson comes back
7:16
from her injury Well, you've got Sophia
7:18
Smith Trinity Rodman and now Jaden Shaw
7:20
the options up front are ridiculous and
7:22
they started Alex Up top
7:24
and I think when Makario comes back and
7:26
you know this force that's coming back into
7:29
the national team program They're gonna be a
7:31
lot of different options, but Alex played well
7:33
in this in this game But
7:35
I don't think that she is going to be the go-to
7:37
when it comes to a number nine I don't know if
7:40
she's ultimately going to be on the the Olympic team. Keep
7:42
in mind There's only 18 players that are allowed on the
7:44
Olympic team So that's kind of where this group right now
7:46
with the additions that are gonna come back are fighting for
7:48
one of those very very Selective
7:50
type of spaces when it comes to the team, but
7:52
it was it was it was a good result and
7:54
they move on I don't know
7:56
if it necessarily makes that Mexico game Complete
8:00
anomaly. I think there were some warning signs out
8:02
there. But again, I go back to and you
8:04
know, you mentioned Jaden Shaw
8:06
and nice longer It's
8:09
not just play the kids but it's it's
8:11
move on and and in
8:14
doing so I think you're going to have you
8:16
know foster this new generation You're gonna bring
8:19
a lot more people in that are excited
8:21
about a new generation doing something different And
8:23
I think you're still going to get the
8:25
results and this was evident here today They
8:28
might get a shot at revenge versus
8:30
Mexico because the other semi-final is Mexico versus
8:32
Brazil Mexico beat Paraguay in a 3-2 thriller
8:34
in the quarterfinals Brazil hammered Argentina 5-1 at
8:37
least we can beat him on the women's
8:39
side Still and so fast.
8:41
I mean, you know, they still got to get
8:43
there, right? No, no I'm saying Brazil beating Argentina
8:45
on the women's side. It was a little quip
8:48
about Brazil. Oh, yeah And our inability to beat
8:50
our gentlemen say And
8:52
so the other semi-final be Mexico Brazil also on Wednesday
8:54
also in San Diego So do you want Brazil in
8:57
the finer you want another shot at Mexico fast? You
8:59
got to get past Canada. That's correct, right?
9:01
Okay Do
9:03
I want Brazil or Mexico? I want it for the ability to
9:06
show that Hopefully
9:09
that Mexico game that they lost was an
9:12
aberration But I also want
9:14
it because it's us Mexico It's and even even
9:17
though this is you know The women's side of
9:19
the game there is still a rivalry and certainly
9:21
that game other day the other day fueled the
9:23
fuel the fire So yeah, I don't I don't
9:26
want Brazil on Mexico Canada beat Costa Rica in
9:28
extra time in their quarterfinal Costa Rica team that
9:30
advanced thanks to a coin flip Did you follow
9:32
this after the group? Oh, I try to follow
9:34
it. So can you explain it because you're the
9:37
savant over there Yeah at the
9:39
conclusion of the group stage Costa
9:41
Rica and Puerto Rico finished tied
9:44
on everything They obviously were
9:46
in different groups so they didn't play each other head-to-head but
9:48
they finished tied on goal difference goal scored and Points
9:51
and all the rest and so yeah According to
9:53
the rules that came down to a drawing of
9:55
lots and all the years I've been covering tournaments
9:57
at Fox I always check the regulations beforehand. I
9:59
always see way down there drawing of lots and part
10:01
of me always roots for it to come down to
10:03
that just so we could experience that here at Fox
10:05
and we haven't been able to but it
10:08
did happen at the school. I can imagine
10:10
how badly I never experienced it but how
10:12
badly it must suck to not go on
10:14
if you're the team that actually loses because
10:16
of literally a coin toss. Oh
10:19
my goodness. Alright so anyway happy days
10:21
are here again when it comes to the
10:23
US Women's National Team. Moving on in terms
10:25
of the the tournament here and this is
10:27
the type of team this is the type
10:30
of performance this is the type of result
10:32
that we expect and want and unfortunately over
10:34
the last few years this is the type
10:36
of performance that we have not been given.
10:38
But if this is a harbinger of things
10:40
to come wonderful wonderful wonderful
10:43
wonderful so onward and upward
10:45
for the US Women. Just to recap they've played
10:47
four games in this tournament they won the three
10:49
you did not attend they lost the one you
10:52
did attend. Yes exactly exactly so I will stay
10:54
away from the semi-final and final. Yeah.
10:56
Alright should we move on to MLS?
10:58
Yes the second weekend of the season
11:01
lots of storylines we picked out some of the more
11:03
notable games. Inter Miami with a
11:05
5-0 demolition of Orlando Luis Suarez and
11:08
Lionel Messi each with two goals. Florida
11:12
is pink my friend as good as Inter
11:15
Miami were. Orlando was as
11:17
bad so opposite ends of
11:19
the spectrum however I think that this
11:21
was a real message that Inter Miami
11:23
sent to their own fans
11:25
but also
11:28
to others out there and a lot
11:30
of people who are not quite and
11:32
still might not be yet convinced as
11:34
to how good this Inter Miami team
11:36
is. I'm not still I'm not
11:39
yet I don't think
11:41
that I can give them elite status yet
11:43
in the league but this is pretty
11:45
impressive through albeit only three games here.
11:48
Luis Suarez scoring scoring
11:50
two that's a that's a big
11:53
deal because I think myself and many others
11:55
looked at him and looked at him as
11:57
a potential liability now he still may become
11:59
a liability. And his first goal that
12:01
he scored was this stumbling, bumbling, typical Luis Suarez
12:03
type of goal. Took it well, ultimately, but how
12:05
the ball ultimately got to his foot, and you
12:08
take your chances, and you know the soccer guy
12:10
has some smile upon you, and he did finish
12:12
it well. This is, so this is good for
12:14
him, this is good for Inter Miami, and let's
12:16
be honest, this is good for MLS. I
12:19
thought both were sensational center forward goals.
12:22
Stop sensational, come on. The tackle was
12:24
made where 99.9% of the time he
12:26
gets stripped of the ball. By
12:29
the way, trying to beat somebody one on one,
12:32
and then the ball just kind of falls
12:34
into his pathway. And he finished it, he finished
12:37
it great. So I did not think that that
12:39
goal was just the most amazing thing that you're
12:41
talking about. He then scored another that
12:43
was chalked off because of a marginal offside. He was involved
12:45
in other goals, got an assist, so I thought it was
12:47
a pretty great performance for him. You know, it's interesting, on
12:50
Saturday morning, Tim Vickery, who's
12:52
an English journalist who covers South American football and
12:54
is based in Brazil, he wrote a column about
12:56
Suarez bringing up the exact same issue that I
12:58
brought up on our last podcast. It's almost like
13:00
he listens to us. He
13:02
mentioned that in Brazil, people are dismissive
13:05
of MLS, and if Suarez
13:07
were to perform much worse in MLS than he did
13:09
in Brazil, how would Brazilians reconcile that? And he said
13:11
through two games, it's early, but he hasn't looked great.
13:13
And then he goes out and drops that performance. So
13:15
we'll see what he does moving forward.
13:18
But that is an interesting subplot to Luis Suarez this
13:20
season. And look, while we
13:22
led with the U.S. women's national team from
13:24
an MLS perspective, we're leading with Messi and
13:26
Inter Miami. I don't know if that's lazy,
13:28
Mossy, but it's how we're rolling. And by
13:30
the way, the postgame on Apple, which I
13:32
watch, the first 15 minutes,
13:34
because I looked at it, were devoted
13:36
entirely to Inter Miami and
13:39
to Messi. All right, Don
13:41
Garber, I hope you're listening right now. If
13:43
it bleeds, it leads. If it's pink, it
13:45
leads. And if it's Messi, you're damn right,
13:47
it leads. It is interesting, though,
13:49
there is some shot and fraud going on. Some people
13:51
are put off by this whole Inter Miami thing. They
13:53
don't want to believe it's going to be this easy.
13:55
And so they put a lot of stock in the
13:58
preseason results and also that performance against the galaxy. last
14:00
weekend, but this was
14:02
a bad day for those people because they
14:04
looked every bit the juggernaut that they're purported
14:07
to be. Also this is your look, you're
14:09
considering them elite. I am. Okay,
14:11
cool. Let me look. Again, this
14:13
is fun to watch and this creates incredible
14:15
amount of content and attraction when Messi is
14:17
doing well, when Inter is doing well. They
14:19
are going to have their ups and downs
14:21
going forward and whether it's the team or
14:24
whether it's your friend Luis Suarez he's going
14:26
to too. I'm not wishing it because I
14:28
like goal-scores and I like him and I
14:30
like big bold personalities and he is without
14:32
a doubt one of them in the game.
14:35
They did make an interesting move.
14:37
They've traded DeAndre Yedlin to Cincinnati,
14:39
Yedlin joining Myles Robinson there, some
14:41
people wondering if that's opening the
14:43
door for yet another former Barcelona
14:45
or its current Barcelona player but
14:48
Sergio Roberto could potentially be arriving
14:50
to fill that right back slot
14:52
but that was a notable move by Inter Miami.
14:54
Yep. Another American out. We're
14:57
going to talk about actually the phenomenon
14:59
of Americans playing in Major League Soccer
15:01
later on in the pod here but
15:03
they don't yet have someone to replace
15:05
him there. So on
15:07
the surface and initially this
15:09
looks like a win yet another win when
15:11
it comes to to Cincinnati unless they replace
15:13
him with somebody of better stature and better
15:15
ability going forward which they certainly possibly could
15:17
but right now there is kind of a
15:19
hole over there but you don't do something
15:21
unless you have something planned. Also
15:24
this weekend Real Salt Lake with
15:26
a 3-0 home win over LAFC
15:29
Gomez got to Arango got the other against
15:31
his former club. This match was played in
15:33
blizzard like conditions much to the chagrin of
15:35
Steve Turundalo who said afterwards it was an
15:37
absolute joke we had to play today the
15:39
game could have and should have been called
15:41
off it was an absolute disgrace to play
15:43
I don't understand why on earth we'd count
15:45
a game like that. Okay.
15:48
Whether it's Steve Turundalo or anybody else
15:51
in this position he or
15:53
she has to protect as a coach here
15:55
she has to protect the players And
15:57
has to make it look like this.
16:00
Was an anomaly. This is
16:02
a throwaway type of performance
16:04
and game and result relative
16:06
to be. Adds
16:08
to the weather. I
16:11
thought that this snow game. In
16:13
Salt Lake. Was. Awesome! I.
16:16
Thought it was unique. And.
16:19
I thought ultimately it was pretty
16:21
interesting. And it was interesting
16:23
to see. These. Players in
16:25
this. Environment This adverse environment.
16:27
And I've said this before: Sports and
16:29
this is what I'm about. Soccer, but
16:31
sports in general. Like. Life.
16:35
Isn't always perfect, It isn't always
16:37
easy. It is and always ideal.
16:40
And the ability that players in all
16:42
sports. The ability that
16:44
they have to adjust and to adapt. Is.
16:47
A skill and it's something to be valued just
16:49
like trapping the ball or passing the ball or
16:51
shooting the ball. And. In that you
16:53
toss know the other day. We.
16:55
All Salt Lake had that skill.
16:58
And L A X F C didn't. Am
17:01
I saying that This is Annette. Experience.
17:05
Or. A circumstance that
17:07
you are going to confront. A
17:10
week in week out basis. Know. I'm
17:12
not by any stretch of the imagination. But.
17:14
In this moment you have to. Like I said,
17:17
I. Just. In. The wig that
17:19
you actually play the game. And
17:21
so I can value and I
17:23
can praise Father Must ronnie company
17:26
over there and Rsl. Who. Saw
17:28
this situation recognized a potential opportunity
17:30
because they have the talent and
17:32
skill to a just as opposed
17:34
to their ah their competition out
17:36
there that. You. Know
17:38
and I I was some. Over
17:40
the years must you know? I've talked about. The.
17:42
roofing of stadiums and the potential for
17:44
that to change not just the business
17:47
but also changed the competition and kind
17:49
of creates a consistency creates an ideal
17:51
the problem is that it costs a
17:53
lot of money to put roofs are
17:55
not on stadiums and see you're not
17:57
going to be able to do that
17:59
going for And so there's a lot of people that look
18:01
at this as a romantic notion of
18:03
hey, this is an outlier But it's something wonderful
18:05
that's gonna be celebrated and when you talk about
18:08
games this year in Major League Soccer in
18:10
2024 This is going to
18:12
be pointed to because it is so unique because it is
18:14
so different and again I don't want it to be the
18:16
norm But every once in a while, you know
18:19
You have these situations especially relative to weather and
18:21
you could make the same argument that Steve Ferendle
18:23
is making when it comes to a game That's
18:25
played in the rain or a game
18:27
where it's blistering hot and there's plenty of
18:29
those that happen in the summer And it
18:31
does change the quality. It does change the
18:33
ability to have a Situation
18:36
and a field in this case that
18:39
is conducive if you will to
18:42
what normally happens But
18:45
and I get why Steve Sorendle is staying that saying
18:47
that but I completely disagree Yeah There's
18:49
two issues that prompt Postponents in situations like this
18:51
health and safety of not only the players but
18:53
also the fans in the stands and also we've
18:55
seen when it rains Enough and the field gets
18:57
flooded if the ball isn't moving and it's getting
19:00
stuck in puddles and it reduces the game to
19:02
such a farce That sometimes they postpone it you
19:04
didn't have an issue with either one of those counts
19:07
here you thought there was still like a Viable
19:09
game to be played even in those so first off go back
19:12
to the health and safety If people
19:14
are getting frostbitten in this in the stadium
19:16
because it is so it's because it's so
19:18
cold First off you can anticipate cold. Okay,
19:20
so if you're in the stadium, I'm assuming
19:23
that you are preparing for a potential cold
19:25
situation I don't want anybody to
19:28
experience hypothermia or
19:30
get frostbitten whether you're on the field or
19:34
Or off the field, but when people talk about safety,
19:36
I'm assuming that's what they're talking about I mean,
19:38
what else are they talking about? Player
19:41
sliding that normally wouldn't happen when you're sliding because
19:43
that certainly can happen, you know, you talk about
19:45
oh by the way the The
19:48
artificial surfaces that teams play on Steve
19:50
Terundal you could insert artificial surface and say well
19:53
This isn't the game because the ball bounces differently.
19:55
So there's a million different things that you can
19:57
argue against but I just didn't
20:00
have a problem with this game. And evidently,
20:03
Steve Terrendel and Pablo Mastriani met before
20:05
the game with the referees and they
20:07
determined, yes, we're going to play this
20:09
game. And then as the game progressed
20:11
and the snow started coming down, yes,
20:13
the circumstance changes, but you're
20:15
already in it. So as far as RSL was
20:17
concerned, we're in it to win it. We
20:20
do sometimes see in these like Green Bay Packers
20:22
games when it's freezing cold, you do have these
20:24
nut jobs in the stands without their shirt or
20:26
rank enough beer. So fans don't always come prepared
20:29
for the cold. Yeah, and there's a lot of
20:31
people, again, that looked at it from a romantic
20:33
notion as, hey, this was awesome. This
20:35
was something to be remembered, not just
20:38
in terms of the result, but there we talk about
20:40
the snow. Classy Co years back, and even the game
20:42
that we had in Minnesota just a few years back
20:44
when it comes to the national team. So this
20:46
has happened before. So I'm
20:49
sorry, Steve Terrendel and L.E.F.C. Suck it up, Buttercup,
20:51
figure it out. I could see Sean Sullivan being
20:53
that kind of guy that would go to a
20:56
game in freezing temperature and not wear a shirt
20:58
and drink enough beers to be able to kind
21:00
of jump around. Absolutely, Sean would be there without
21:02
his shirt screaming and yelling. The
21:04
other LA team fared well this weekend. The Galaxy
21:06
with a 3-1 away win over San Jose, Paintsill
21:09
with a goal and an assist to Jovalich, Ricky
21:11
Poosh on the score sheet as well. The Galaxy
21:13
have a little something going on right now. They
21:16
do, and so the question after the game, and
21:18
rightfully so, is, are the Galaxy
21:20
back? Because we've been talking about,
21:23
you would be amazed, Mossy. I talked to a
21:25
bunch of people over the weekend that are
21:27
based in Los Angeles, and they
21:29
were talking about the LAFC and
21:32
LA Galaxy dynamic. And I've said
21:34
this before, but what's
21:36
been most disappointing from a Galaxy
21:38
perspective, and I obviously have a history and
21:40
a past with the Galaxy, what's been most
21:42
disappointing to me is that while
21:44
I thought when LAFC came into market, they were
21:47
gonna light a fire under the Galaxy's ass to
21:49
not just compete, but say, no, no, no. This
21:51
nouveau riche coming into our market is not going
21:53
to pass, and we're going to up our game.
21:55
And they didn't, they went the opposite way. And
21:57
doing so, by the way, they lost market, they
21:59
lost. business and a lot of people
22:01
with the new stadium and the successful
22:04
team. So the question is, is this
22:06
version in 2024, once again under Greg
22:08
Vani, who has been given a very
22:10
long leash, is this the return to
22:12
greatness that I think a
22:14
lot of people, well not everybody
22:16
wants, but certainly people are expecting given
22:19
the LA Galaxy's history. They're back in
22:21
that this is a very very small sample size
22:24
and it's been very very good and so I
22:26
think you can be cautiously optimistic that this is
22:28
going to be a better season for the Los
22:30
Angeles Galaxy. You mentioned Pencil, who I think is
22:32
the real deal and gives that
22:35
width, but in a much
22:37
more effective and ruthless way than
22:39
who was the guy before, Cabral,
22:41
or you know that side of
22:44
the field and he's a lot more lethal and
22:46
so far so far so good.
22:49
But the Galaxy has been built
22:51
on being great, winning trophies, being
22:53
champions, being titles, being elite, and
22:57
doing it with a bravado and a
22:59
swagger. That's going to take a little
23:01
longer to get back to. Portland,
23:03
DC, United, finished 2-2. Portland jumped out
23:05
to a two elite thanks to Gols
23:07
Baspry and Moreno, but then Click
23:09
from the penalty spot made it 2-1 and
23:11
Fletcher the teenager made it 2-2. This
23:14
was such an interesting game because we talked
23:16
before about how both of these teams, Portland
23:18
and DC, had it easy in the first
23:20
week and this would be a much better
23:23
type of competition. And
23:25
look, you're flying across country. Benteke evidently
23:28
scratched right before the game so
23:30
they did this without Benteke who we know had
23:32
the hat trick in the first game. So hats
23:34
off to DC for coming back and Portland out
23:37
of the gates it was great. Everybody's screaming and yelling, they're cutting
23:39
the logs up, they're doing all that kind of stuff and then
23:41
they took the foot off the gas and they let this DC
23:44
team back in. So
23:46
I don't know if I thought I was going
23:48
to get a better idea of what these teams
23:50
are and yet I'm still left scratching my head
23:52
as to how good or not
23:54
bad but how mediocre they may be
23:57
going for it. But if to
24:00
nothing at home in that type of environment and now
24:02
you let DC come back in. You got to be
24:04
kicking yourself right now. So that's a lost report as
24:06
far as I'm concerned and a huge win for DC
24:08
going across country getting a point in
24:10
that fashion. SKC Philadelphia 1-1 of
24:13
all terror scored for SKC in
24:15
the first half, Badoya equalized late
24:18
in second half stoppage time, too late for
24:20
Peter Vermees. He felt like the game should
24:22
have been over by then and also in
24:24
the build-up to that goal there was a
24:26
throw-in that should have gone SKC's way and
24:28
went Philadelphia's way. So that this was the
24:30
replacement ref's controversy of this weekend. Yes. To
24:33
be fair, I didn't think there was
24:35
a lot of controversy other
24:38
than manufactured controversy and that's a whole other subject. I
24:40
think there's a lot of people actually
24:42
out there that
24:45
are not secretly, I think even publicly, wanting
24:48
the refs to mess up because
24:50
they have ulterior motives and
24:52
interests out there. I don't think anybody,
24:55
I don't think anybody should want the referees to mess
24:57
up. I don't think that they had a bad weekend,
24:59
but this is, it's a mistake. But
25:03
when it comes to mistake, you don't have
25:06
to be a replacement referee to make a
25:08
mistake as was evidenced multiple places around the
25:10
world this weekend. In this situation, as applies
25:12
to the other things that I know you
25:14
want to mention here, if
25:16
you are sporting KC and Peter Vermees
25:18
out there, you
25:21
can go back and you can complain and
25:23
blame the throwing. You
25:26
can go back and you can complain when it comes
25:28
to time. But
25:31
the reality is, is you didn't
25:33
close up shop and you didn't do the job.
25:35
And by the way, you didn't do it at home. And
25:38
because you didn't, you lost
25:41
out on two points there. It's not because
25:43
of the referee. It's because
25:45
you weren't mentally and physically tuned
25:48
in and turned on in the
25:50
most important moments of the game.
25:53
A mistake is going to happen. Whether you have Colina
25:56
referring the game or whether you have
25:58
a 10-year-old who's
26:00
in his or her first refereeing
26:02
capacity, refing a game. Mistakes are
26:05
going to happen from referees. In
26:07
this case, right there, it's easy for Peter
26:09
Rermis to blame the mistake. Just to fend
26:11
better and finish out the game. Yeah,
26:14
we're gonna revisit refereeing in the next
26:16
segment when we talk Forrest Liverpool and
26:18
Valencia Real Madrid. I'll save my stoppage
26:20
time rant for Valencia Real Madrid. But
26:22
as far as MLS, I know this
26:24
caught your attention, this athletic piece about
26:26
how MLS broadcasters are approaching the replacement
26:28
rest. Yeah, so the
26:30
good folks over there at the
26:32
athletic, and they're wonderful
26:35
over there, and they get a lot
26:37
of scoops over there. So they reported,
26:39
let me make sure this was Jeff Ruder over
26:41
there, that MLS
26:44
had advised the talent,
26:46
which is what you call people on
26:48
television, that are broadcasting the game in
26:51
a memo that was sent around. They advised all of
26:53
these men and women that broadcast the game on the
26:55
weekend that, quote, fans
26:58
tune in to watch and listen to the
27:00
game. The memo read, in part,
27:03
quote, they aren't focused on the officials,
27:05
therefore, we don't believe it is necessary to
27:07
belabor the point during the match. It is
27:10
best to mention the situation in the pregame
27:12
and move on, end of quote. Now, what
27:15
this memo referred to was the
27:17
ongoing back and forth and negotiation
27:19
and the lockout of the
27:21
referees when it comes to Major League Soccer, which is
27:23
why we have talked about replacement referees over the last
27:25
couple of weeks. Now, a
27:28
lot of people looked at this and
27:30
screamed and yelled about it. I
27:33
didn't think this was that big a deal when it
27:35
comes to Major League Soccer, in that it's
27:38
your business and you want to put
27:40
your best foot forward. And this type
27:42
of memo or directive, I
27:44
think that you could apply this and
27:46
this would happen in numerous situations when
27:48
you have a company, an
27:50
entity out there that is trying to
27:52
put its best foot forward in this
27:55
situation. And so I don't think that this
27:57
is beyond the pale. I don't think that this is problematic. I'm
27:59
a less... going to do what they need to do
28:01
to put out the best product when
28:04
it comes to their game. So
28:06
I didn't think that was such a big
28:09
deal, but I wanted to mention it out
28:11
there because it is an ongoing challenge
28:14
and it could turn into an ongoing
28:16
problem because the more this goes on,
28:18
the more opportunity there is for
28:20
mistakes to be made and for
28:23
those mistakes to be equated
28:26
with the replacement referees. Whether
28:29
it's true or not, and we'll talk a little bit
28:31
more about that later, whether it's true or not,
28:33
they are going to be blamed. The replacement
28:35
referees are going to be blamed for mistakes.
28:38
It's if those mistakes would happen no matter
28:41
what that it gets lost in
28:43
this conversation right now. But
28:46
from a referee perspective and the ones that
28:48
are being locked out right now, they may
28:50
even benefit from the longer this goes on
28:53
because just by the amount of games, there
28:55
are going to be mistakes and they, in
28:57
terms of the replacement referees, are going to
29:00
get blamed. And there is this
29:02
general trend in sports media. I've read
29:05
multiple think pieces about this. The relationship
29:07
between networks and sports leagues is becoming
29:09
one of partners who are promoting a
29:11
product. I know ESPN has been
29:13
criticized at times for the way they treat the
29:15
NBA. We've been criticized at times for the way
29:17
we treat some of our properties. I
29:19
know the world, soccer talks to the world, are always ready
29:21
to pounce on stuff like that, but I just think it's
29:23
a general trend of the way sports media is going. Well,
29:26
first off, the people that pounce, especially
29:28
those that work for big corporations or
29:30
big entities out there, big companies out
29:33
there, they're being hypocritical
29:35
because there are directives that come all the
29:37
time from the top and from the leadership
29:39
in terms of messaging, in terms of what
29:41
you want to do, in terms of what
29:43
you can do and what you can't do.
29:46
So screaming and yelling about it,
29:48
unless you're, I guess,
29:50
a complete body
29:52
unto yourself and you answer to no one
29:54
out there, we all have
29:56
bosses. And we all, like I said, have directives
29:58
out there. And I don't
30:00
think that that's necessarily a problem. I think we
30:02
all understand it and we put
30:05
it into our assessment of what we are
30:07
watching. And so when you're watching an Apple
30:10
production and you're watching MLS
30:12
out there, the understanding
30:14
coming from the athletic here that these
30:16
men and women have been told, hey, listen, don't
30:18
dwell on it. Does that
30:20
change your experience?
30:22
Is that a problem that they're not
30:24
bringing it up every two minutes? No,
30:28
it's not a problem. You know it. If
30:30
you want to talk about it, go ahead and talk about
30:32
it. If you want to scream and yell about it, go
30:35
ahead and scream and yell about it. If you don't want
30:37
to partake in this when it comes to the product that's
30:39
being put out there because of this specific reason, then
30:41
don't partake in it. Very
30:44
quickly, Liga Mex this past weekend, Cuba,
30:46
America with a 5-1 win over Atlas
30:48
Zendejas with two goals there. Chivas
30:50
got drilled 3-0, awaited Cruz-Asu, Cade
30:52
Cowell started, was replaced by Chicharito
30:55
in the second half. Then
30:57
Monterey with a 3-0 home win over Pumas,
31:00
Brandon Vasquez with a beautiful goal, his sixth
31:02
in all competitions. How great
31:04
has it gone for Brandon Vasquez over there in terms
31:06
of just what he's doing,
31:08
obviously from American perspective and the stock.
31:12
It is kind of nice too, we were talking
31:14
earlier about this dynamic
31:16
of leagues and how
31:18
protective we are and how sensitive we are. Luis
31:22
Juarez comes over here and what it says or what
31:24
it doesn't say about that league. Now
31:26
you have Brandon Vasquez going over there
31:29
and scoring consistently and just eating
31:31
it up and a couple years
31:33
ago he was phenomenal. It wasn't
31:35
great last year and wasn't scoring
31:37
at will right there. So Monterey,
31:40
what does this say about MLS
31:42
versus Liga Mex? MLS
31:45
is at least as good and arguably
31:47
better. Alright, anything else my friend? We
31:50
talked about MLS, we talked about Liga Mex.
31:52
So naturally next we go to the CONCACAF
31:54
Champions Cup, the round of 16 gets
31:56
on their way this week. We have 3
31:58
MLS versus Liga Mex. matchups, Philadelphia
32:01
Pachuca, Orlando City Tigres,
32:04
and Cincinnati, Monterey, Brandon Vasquez
32:06
facing his former team. We
32:08
also have two all-MLS matchups,
32:10
Nashville, Inter Miami, Houston vs.
32:12
Columbus, and a tasty all-Mexican
32:14
affair, Chivas, America, Cal vs.
32:16
Andejas, the Super Classico. So yeah, this competition
32:18
is really going to start to percolate here.
32:20
Yeah, I don't even know where to... I
32:23
mean look, the Chivas America thing, that's
32:25
awesome. I'm really interested in the Nashville
32:27
Miami, given what we've talked
32:30
about, what Miami is and Mossy's very
32:33
quick pronouncement that they
32:35
are the elite and the cream of the crop
32:37
when it comes to Major League Soccer. Of all
32:40
the trophies they're going for this season, to me
32:42
this is the likeliest one because it's only eight
32:45
games and it's early in the season. They haven't
32:47
put a lot of miles on those legs, so
32:49
if they prioritize this, I think they're the favorites
32:51
to win it. And again, if you
32:53
win it, I get so confused sometimes. But as
32:56
you win it, they... You go to
32:58
that expanded Club World Cup next year.
33:00
Wonderful. All right, so all sorts
33:02
of stuff midweek when it comes to MLS
33:04
and League MX. And a programming note, the
33:06
following Tuesday, we have
33:09
a triple header on FS1, round of 16 second
33:12
legs. We're going to do Pachuca,
33:15
Philadelphia, Columbus, Houston, Antigua's Orlando City.
33:17
I know you're involved with John
33:19
Strong's, Tuhold and Keith Kosigan. Kobe
33:22
Jones, Moe Duh, Johnny Arai and Brad
33:24
Wymer producing. Zach Kenworthy coordinating. I'll be there. It's
33:26
going to be kind of getting the band back
33:28
together tonight at Fox. Exactly. It's been too long.
33:30
It's been feast or famine with us, and so
33:32
I'm ready to feast, my friends. So that'll be
33:34
fun Tuesday. All right, anything else? That is it.
33:36
All right, let's take another quick break. Let's take
33:38
our first quick break, and when we come back,
33:41
ooh, we head abroad to recap a
33:43
huge, huge weekend for US Men's National
33:45
Team players over there in Europe and
33:47
other schools. See ya. Okay,
33:50
welcome back. Let's head around and
33:52
check out some games over there in Europe, and
33:54
especially the ones that involved some US Men's National
33:56
Team players. Should we start over there in Italy?
33:58
Yes, on Friday, AC Milan. claim
34:00
the one nil away win over Lazio
34:02
Okafor with a late goal. Crazy game
34:04
in which Lazio had three players sent
34:06
off and Christian Pulisic was directly involved
34:09
in two of those red cards. In
34:11
the 50th minute Pellegrini committed
34:14
a foul on him and picked up a yellow.
34:16
Then seven minutes later Taty Casallanos
34:18
is down on the ground and so Pellegrini
34:20
who had the ball wanted to play it
34:22
out of bounds. Pulisic didn't realize that he
34:24
stole the ball from him and dribbled
34:27
towards the goal. Pellegrini reached out and
34:30
grabbed him and got himself a second
34:32
yellow and a red card. Lazio were
34:34
absolutely livid and then in stoppage time
34:36
when Duzy had the ball Pulisic grabbed
34:39
him, committed a foul and when Duzy
34:41
shoved Pulisic off of him and onto
34:43
the ground but the referee then gave
34:45
Guinduzi a second yellow and a red
34:48
card. The incident with Pellegrini was a
34:50
real talking point here in the post-game
34:52
press conference. Stefano Pioli passionately defended Pulisic
34:54
against charges that it was unsportsman behavior.
34:57
He received death threats on social media afterwards.
34:59
His teammates are rallying around them so crazy
35:01
stuff. I mean
35:03
where do you start with this game? So first off as
35:06
an actual result this is a great result for Milan
35:09
going to Rome and beating Lazio so
35:12
congratulations to Christian Pulisic. Christian
35:14
Pulisic was such a protagonist
35:16
in this and such a pest in
35:18
this is wonderful. Now
35:21
specifically on the play and this is
35:23
a bigger discussion here it
35:26
drives me nuts. I
35:28
love Christian Pulisic for a number of
35:30
different reasons but this particular play made
35:33
me love him even more because
35:35
in this instance what you
35:37
saw was what players
35:39
and what teams and what soccer should
35:42
be in that you play to the
35:44
whistle. Too often there are players that
35:46
take it upon themselves to
35:49
decide when the game should start or
35:51
finish and then they hide
35:53
behind this injury or
35:56
what they perceive as an injury and oh
35:58
above the game and this is in
36:00
the spirit of the game and this is being
36:02
a true professional and
36:05
all of that. I looked at this
36:08
and I have absolutely no sympathy
36:10
for Lazio. Absolutely
36:13
none. Christian Polisic did what
36:15
any player not any
36:17
player, but what players should do. And
36:20
in that moment you
36:22
can look around and say, oh no, we've stopped playing,
36:24
we're not doing that. No. You just
36:27
keep playing. Because in
36:29
this game, as you know Masi, if
36:31
I had a nickel for every single time somebody
36:33
came up and told me, well
36:36
why are they rolling around? Why are they faking it? I don't
36:38
have an answer to
36:40
that. And so in this day and
36:42
age where I think it's even become at times
36:44
worse, I
36:48
love that Christian Polisic, and in
36:50
this case Milan, said no, we're just going to
36:52
play. And if the referee blows the whistle to
36:55
stop the game, that is because that referee is
36:57
in the position to do so and has been
36:59
given not just the
37:01
right, but the responsibility to
37:03
blow it. And if they don't do
37:06
it, game on my friend. And
37:08
that's what Christian Polisic said and I love him
37:10
for it. I agree 100%. If
37:12
a player is down on the ground injured, it should be at
37:14
the referee's discretion whether you stop the game or not and if
37:16
he doesn't blow the whistle, you keep playing. It shouldn't be incumbent
37:18
on the players on the field to decide whether the injury is
37:20
serious enough to kick the ball out of bounds and then you
37:22
have to give it back to them and then
37:25
the game situation matters. A
37:28
team is more apt to be sportsmen if
37:30
they're winning and it's earlier in the game versus
37:32
if they're losing late. So you get into all
37:34
that nonsense and so just leave
37:36
it up to the referee. Exactly.
37:38
There are no saints in this
37:40
game, Asi. There are only sinners
37:43
and often times we see the
37:45
sinner hiding behind that saint when
37:47
it comes to the
37:49
stoppage of the game and the belief
37:52
that the players should be able to decide that.
37:54
They kicking the ball out of bounds and all
37:56
that kind of stuff. It just drove me crazy.
37:58
The referee is there. To make
38:00
that this decision and determination like you said,
38:03
so let them do that and just keep
38:05
playing Also
38:07
this weekend Napoli claimed a 2-1 home
38:09
win over Juventus But at Scalia scored
38:11
in the first half then Kiesa equalized
38:13
late But Raspadori scored the winner
38:15
even later. Wes and McKinney did not play because
38:17
that shoulder injury Timmy Wayak came on as a
38:20
sum Do we have
38:22
a timeline yet on on Western McKinney because
38:24
we talked about his shoulder situation here I
38:26
don't think it's gonna be long term But
38:30
it's you know when I see Weston
38:32
Mc-or what now when I see Juventus play and
38:34
play without Weston McKinney It just it's
38:37
not the same and from a result results perspective
38:39
It's obvious you need Weston on the field in
38:41
order to win you wonder why Shawn Sullivan is
38:43
winning awards He got in my ear right away
38:45
gave me the Western news guys at the Delos
38:47
sport reporting They hope he's back for the next
38:50
game. There we go. There we go. So listen
38:52
Juventus needs Weston McKinney that he's American is
38:55
just you know a part part of the
38:57
story All right. What else we
38:59
go to the era divisie a
39:01
next PSV Feynord finished to two
39:03
Destin Tillman started peppy was an
39:05
unused sub Tillman scored a sensational
39:07
goal Santi Jimenez on the score
39:10
sheet for Feynord alright,
39:12
so Alec Tillman Sensational
39:16
a nutmeg and then okay nice finish. That's
39:18
it as good as Luis Suarez I
39:22
Will say I'm Malik Tillman. He's on
39:24
loan from Bayern Munich You
39:27
wonder if he's played well enough this
39:29
season at PSV for Bayern to give him another shot
39:31
there now this is
39:34
Do you think that this is a bad result for PSV? No,
39:38
this keeps them ten points in front
39:40
and they remain unbeaten. Remember they're vying
39:42
for an invincible. Okay. All right All
39:44
right. Yeah, convinceables in that they haven't
39:46
lost. Correct. Got it. Should we go
39:48
over the to England? Yes,
39:50
we go to the championship first Norwich with
39:52
a 1-0 win over Sunderland Josh Sargent with
39:54
another goal He's now up to 11 goals
39:57
and 15 championship matches this season
40:00
Yes, and now you got Josh Sargent who's killing it right
40:02
now in Wonderful and scoring
40:04
goals we mentioned early with Brandon Vasquez
40:06
doing what he's doing You
40:09
know Pepe coming in and out and getting his goals and
40:11
playing Who's missing out
40:13
there? Oh, what's balligan balling you better keep up
40:16
my friend. I will mention him in a minute
40:18
I'm starting to see the first
40:20
sergeant transfer rumors. I read Brentford
40:22
this weekend Ivan Tony
40:25
probably gonna leave this summer. They've already
40:27
signed this Brazilian Igor Tiago from
40:29
Club Bruges She's played a lot of money for him,
40:31
but Vettilin. They're also interested in sergeant Well,
40:33
there's nothing more valuable than goals in
40:35
the game And there's nothing more valuable than the
40:38
people that score goals and whether you're a big
40:40
old red-headed American or anybody else people will come
40:42
Calling when you do it on a consistent basis,
40:44
which is what our friend Josh Sargent is doing
40:47
Now we stay in England but move up
40:49
a level to the Premier League Nottingham
40:51
Forest suffered a 1-0 home defeat to
40:53
Liverpool Gio Reina did not
40:55
play because of a minor injury and obviously neither did
40:57
Matt Turner who was on the bench the
41:00
Liverpool goal deep in stoppage time Darwin
41:02
Nunez and there was some controversy in
41:04
the lead-up to it because Conaté
41:07
picked up a head injury while Forest had
41:09
the ball the game was stopped and then
41:11
when it restarted They gave the ball to
41:13
Liverpool. So our colleague Mark Clattenberg who evidently
41:15
works for a forest as a referee analyst
41:17
I didn't even know that was a thing.
41:19
It's a brave new day for Well
41:22
done for being able to carve that
41:24
I guess new job out that
41:27
exists out there Yeah, he's talking about farce
41:29
launching some sort of protest. We know that
41:31
never leads to anything But nevertheless, we talked
41:33
in the opening segment about replacement referees catching
41:35
a lot of grief You're
41:38
wondering why the actual referees Don't
41:41
face the same criticism quote-unquote the best league
41:43
in the world How is it possible that
41:45
an error was made like this? How is
41:47
it possible that these these referees at the
41:49
highest level that have all of this experience?
41:52
Are able to go on the field and make
41:54
such an error. How is it possible? They're
41:56
not even replacement referees. Oh my goodness
42:00
I will say this back to the Mark Clattenberg
42:02
thing. If this job is something that takes
42:04
hold and other teams are doing this, it's
42:07
basically you're just doing it to have
42:09
somebody advocating
42:11
for you out there publicly to
42:14
maybe just the situation to maybe get a point
42:16
here or a call here along the way and
42:18
who knows maybe to these teams they got a
42:20
lot of money, maybe it's worth them to have
42:22
something something like that. Again,
42:25
in this situation a mistake was made
42:28
and ultimately you
42:31
can go back which is certainly what
42:33
not only the players but the owner
42:35
of the forest did, you can go
42:37
back and blame the mistake over
42:39
there. But there's still a lot that has
42:41
to happen before that ball goes
42:43
in the net whether it's for Nottingham Forest
42:45
or whether it is for Sporting KC over
42:47
there. There's a lot of stuff that can
42:50
be done to snuff out the
42:52
fire and to recognize and smell the
42:55
potential for problems along the way that
42:57
wasn't done. And we can just keep
42:59
rolling it back until you find a
43:01
situation where you feel aggrieved and
43:04
say well that's the reason why the ball went in the
43:06
net, that's the reason why we tied the game, that's the
43:08
reason why we lost the game. On
43:11
Sunday Manchester City claimed a 3-1 win
43:13
over Manchester United in the Derby. United
43:15
actually took the lead in the first
43:18
half, Rashford with a sensational strike and
43:20
in the second half Foden equalized with an
43:23
equally sensational strike then Foden again made it
43:25
2-1, Holland in stoppage time sealed it, 3-1
43:27
the final for the citizens. So
43:29
I think a couple of things come out of this game. One
43:32
and not that he's just bursting
43:35
on the scene or anything but Phil Foden and
43:37
what he has I guess
43:39
become and matured into and
43:43
especially in light of all the other stars that have
43:45
been bandied about when it comes to Man City and
43:47
others out there, this was kind of his game. I
43:51
saw a lot of people talking online
43:53
and social media out there about how important
43:55
he has become and how great he has
43:57
become and look he's doing it. on
44:00
a field with Erwin Holland and the Broynas
44:02
and these types of the players out there.
44:04
So I think this was his game. You
44:07
can't say it's a coming out type of game because
44:09
he's been there all along, but he grabbed a hold
44:11
of this game with both hands and showed why he
44:13
is one of the great players in
44:16
the world. I think the other side of that story
44:19
is just how poorly Manchester United played.
44:21
Notwithstanding the wonderful goal from Rashford, and
44:23
that's a whole other conversation of what
44:25
Rashford is and what he isn't, but
44:28
in the same way that I talked about finally
44:30
seeing a better version of the US
44:33
Women's National Team that came out this weekend, you're
44:36
waiting for that better version of Manchester
44:38
United to come along and it is
44:40
yet to materialize. And it was graphically
44:42
illustrated how it is yet to materialize
44:44
in this game. Now we have
44:47
the Euros this summer. I keep thinking about that England
44:49
team with Harry Kane doing what he's doing at Bayern,
44:51
Jude Bellingham doing what he's doing at Real Madrid, Saka
44:54
and Foden having the seasons there, having Declan Reiss at
44:56
Arsenal, and even Rashford who hasn't had a great season
44:58
still shows you these flashes of how good he is.
45:00
It is scary. Yeah, they're stocked. They are stocked. And
45:03
they'll be one to watch and they will rightly be
45:05
the favorites whether it comes to the Euros and if
45:07
they continue on and this continues to progress, then certainly
45:09
in 2026. So in the Premier League
45:11
Liverpool at 63, City at 62, we're
45:14
taping this on Monday morning, Arsenal face Sheffield
45:16
United later today. If they handle their business, they'll be at
45:19
61. The Premier League,
45:21
all things being equal, is already the most
45:23
entertaining league and they have by far the
45:25
best. So next week,
45:27
Liverpool host Manchester City later in the month,
45:29
City host Arsenal. So it's really gonna start
45:31
popping off here in the next few weeks.
45:33
We've seen in the past where Man City
45:36
have gone on streaks and really rattled off a
45:38
bunch of points. And there's still some really big
45:41
games to be had here. Do
45:43
you see missteps? Are
45:45
they just inevitable? Because these are three
45:47
pretty money types
45:49
of teams when it comes to their results. And will it
45:52
really just come down to whenever they're
45:54
playing each other in those types of moments? Yeah,
45:56
I don't- Next points, they call it work. I
45:58
don't see either City or Liverpool. pull dropping
46:00
too many more points. I think it's going to
46:02
be an incredible eyeball to eyeball race between those
46:04
two. And I had dismissed Arsenal and
46:07
their ability to keep up with those two, but I'm
46:09
even wondering about them, the way they're playing. They might
46:11
be in there until the end too. So it's going
46:13
to be absolutely incredible. It's fun. It's
46:15
a fun title race. It's one that I think
46:17
other leagues would love to
46:20
have, but oftentimes oftentimes don't. And to your
46:22
point, the rich get richer in terms of
46:24
the eyeballs and the popularity and the entertainment.
46:26
And there it is. All right, what else?
46:29
Next up, UEFA Champions League round the 16
46:32
second legs this week on Tuesday. Bayern Munich
46:34
play host Alazio needing to overturn a one-nil
46:36
deficit. I mentioned the Premier League has by
46:38
far the best title race. It is over
46:40
in Germany. Bayern stumbled again this past weekend.
46:43
They drew Freiburg while Leverkusen handled their business
46:45
against Cologne. It is a 10-point gap with
46:47
10 to play. So it is over there.
46:49
So all Bayern have to play for the
46:51
rest of the season is trying to win
46:54
the Champions League. It may not even get
46:56
passed around on the 16. Is that enough?
46:58
Because obviously, like you said, they put all their eggs
47:00
in this UCL basket here.
47:04
They're down one nothing. Playing at
47:06
home. What do you got? Bayern,
47:08
Alazio. I think Bayern will advance.
47:10
Oh, I do too.
47:12
So I'm there with you. All right.
47:14
Then next one. Then also on Tuesday,
47:17
Raoul Sociedad hosts PSG, Sociedad looking to
47:19
overturn a two-nil deficit. The interesting note
47:21
on PSG is this past weekend, they
47:23
were away to Monaco to finish. No,
47:26
no. Balagan started for Monaco, by the
47:28
way. Mbappe started, was subbed off at
47:30
the half, got changed in
47:32
the dressing room and watched the second half from
47:34
the stands with his mother. That situation gets weirder
47:37
by the day. Wow. When you run into your
47:39
mother, then you don't think I'm good. Oh boy.
47:41
Oh boy. We talked about it last week about
47:44
this punitive way that they are going about it.
47:46
But I kind of like the pettiness. All
47:50
right. So you got Sociedad, PSG, PSG
47:52
leading two-nup and going to Sociedad.
47:55
I'll say PSG, but I wouldn't put a pass on
47:57
to screw this up. Really? I'm not even going to
47:59
qualify. It's weird fun. Yeah, then Real
48:03
Madrid will host Leipzig around legit with a
48:05
1-0 aggregate lead you would expect them to
48:07
finish off Leipzig there But
48:10
the big story with round Madrid is what happened
48:12
this past weekend. They were away to Valencia They
48:14
went down to nil then Vinicius scored twice to
48:16
make it to two and then
48:18
deep in stoppage time Real Madrid
48:20
earned a corner and the referee evidently indicated that
48:22
the corner was going to be the last play
48:24
of the game But then the corner
48:27
was always sort of half cleared and Raheem Diaz
48:29
put it right back into the box Bellingham
48:31
headed it in for what he thought was the winner But
48:33
the referee blew the whistle for the end of the game
48:36
while the ball was in the air And so
48:38
Real Madrid were absolutely furious Bellingham complained so
48:40
much. He got a red card He's gonna
48:42
be suspended for upcoming games. But again, it's
48:45
triggered this larger debate about stoppage time I talked
48:47
about it with my father this morning and
48:50
of all the things that non soccer fans
48:52
asked me about with this sport this is
48:54
the one I have the hardest time defending
48:56
the ambiguity at the end of the game
48:58
is Ridiculous as to when
49:00
a game is gonna no other sport has this The
49:03
New York Times wrote a column about it today and the guy
49:05
suggested I think it was a pretty good suggestion that When
49:08
the referee indicates how much
49:10
stoppage time is gonna be played from
49:12
that point forward You put that amount
49:14
of time on the scoreboard and any
49:16
stoppage after that the referee Indicates
49:19
that you stop the clock right there and then
49:22
you started again when play resumes And
49:24
so everybody knows they can see the clock they can see
49:26
when the game is gonna end You can do a countdown
49:28
like every other sport three two one boom end of the
49:30
game We have to do something I fad
49:32
instead of worrying about blue cards, which by the way, it
49:34
sounds like they're gonna scrap That's a
49:36
conversation for another day This is something you need
49:38
to fix this ambiguity as to when a game
49:41
is gonna end is leading to so much controversy
49:43
and I'm sorry It's correctable MLS had
49:45
the right idea when they first started the league and
49:47
then they sort of got peer pressured into Conforming with
49:49
how the rest of world does it but remember how
49:51
the clock used to count down and the referee would
49:54
stop the clock Whenever there was any sort of stoppage
49:56
and started again. I'm sorry that this this is something
49:58
that needs to be addressed question for you. Were
50:01
these replacement referees that were being used? No, they
50:03
were not. They were the real referees, the
50:06
experienced referees, the men and women
50:08
that have studied and
50:10
have had all of this game time and
50:13
in this moment. Oh my
50:15
goodness. I do think that a
50:17
proper compromise is to in that
50:19
moment, not during the first
50:22
90, but in that moment actually make it
50:24
stop time so everybody can see it. We've
50:26
talked about how in MLS stadiums right now,
50:28
at least the clock is now visible because
50:31
that ambiguity they talk about. And let's be
50:33
honest, the confusion that people have. Now there
50:35
is a part of me that
50:37
kind of likes the fact that
50:39
it is a unique aspect of soccer.
50:42
I know it's a frustrating aspect of soccer
50:44
for you and for many others there, but
50:47
the fact that all of that
50:49
power is in that one person
50:51
at that time to just kind
50:53
of arbitrarily say, well, this is
50:55
the point where I
50:57
feel that it's been fair in
50:59
terms of the time that I have. That might be
51:01
too much power for any one individual and it might,
51:03
if it's a whole lot more clarity when it comes
51:06
to stop time with a clock there. So I would
51:08
advocate for that. That's just, that's smart. And I think
51:10
that that would be something that a lot of people
51:12
would jump on to. I don't know who would push
51:14
back on something like that. And the historical
51:17
reference everybody is making is in Brazil's opening
51:19
match against Sweden at the 1978 world cup,
51:21
the score was 1-1, Zico
51:24
headed in a corner at the end of the game and
51:27
the referee blew the whistle for the end of the game
51:29
while the ball was in the air. And
51:31
that result, that game finishing tied versus Brazil
51:33
winning made it where Brazil ended up
51:36
in the same side of the bracket as Argentina and
51:38
affected the whole rest of the tournament and
51:40
how it played out. Argentina ended up winning that world
51:42
cup. But so yeah, I saw Gary Lineker referenced that
51:44
on X and in the New York Times article, they
51:46
referenced that that's kind of, everybody was old enough to
51:48
remember it. That's kind of where their mind goes when
51:50
they see an incident like that. Yeah. I mean, again,
51:52
it kind of goes back to what we were talking
51:54
about in terms of playing to the whistle. And
51:56
this is something that coaches and parents and people
51:58
have talked about for years. playing to
52:01
the whistle. But you're on the field when it's, when
52:03
again you don't know, and it's not just in
52:06
the stands, the players don't know when it's going
52:08
to actually happen, and you're screaming and yelling at
52:10
the referee saying, blow it, blow it, it's done,
52:12
do it now, do it now, and then
52:15
they might decide that it's going to happen in
52:17
the middle of a cross or they might decide.
52:19
Now most referees try to find
52:21
a neutral or benign type of moment
52:23
to blow it, so there's not that
52:25
type of blowback. But if and when
52:27
somebody actually adheres to, albeit
52:30
their own personal clock that they are keeping,
52:33
it's hard to blame them. I mean, they are
52:35
going by the letter of the law, literally the
52:38
laws in the game, that give
52:40
them that autonomy to make that decision. So
52:43
I don't know. I think to your point, we
52:45
get the stop clock on
52:48
the field, you can even sponsor the stop clock sponsored by
52:50
whoever it is and make some money out of it and
52:52
have a whole lot of clarity on and off the field.
52:55
Man City also in action this week and the
52:57
champs like they host Copenhagen, they have a 3-1
52:59
aggregate lead, so they will finish
53:01
off Copenhagen and for sure advance there. All
53:03
right, so we're Real Madrid and Man City to go
53:05
on there. Yep. All right, let's take another quick break.
53:07
When we come back, it's time for Ask Alexi. Okay,
53:11
welcome back. It's time for Ask Alexi, that part
53:14
of the show where you send in your comments,
53:16
questions, and concerns. And keep in mind that out
53:18
there on the social media platforms, our handle is
53:20
S-O-T-U with Lexi. Use that hashtag Ask Alexi out
53:22
there on the social media platforms, or you can
53:25
call into our State of the Union podcast hotline,
53:27
which is 657-549-2297. That's 657-549-2297.
53:30
Masi, what other folks want to know this show? First up, Mike on X asks,
53:38
is there any possibility of MLS going through
53:40
a rebrand whether they buy U.S.L. or not?
53:43
Oh my goodness. So I had mentioned, I don't
53:45
know, a few weeks back about big
53:48
type of bold actions. And one of the things
53:51
that I talked about was MLS buying
53:55
and acquiring, if you will, in terms
53:57
of an asset, U.S.L. And
53:59
become a all MLS with everything that
54:01
happens and kind of bringing everything into
54:03
one tent and one brand. So
54:06
whether they buy it or not, we
54:09
have in the past seen MLS
54:11
rebrand and when you talk about
54:13
a rebrand there could be the
54:15
aesthetic rebrand and that
54:17
comes down to your brand,
54:20
your mark, your logo, whatever you want to talk it
54:22
for people that are watching they can see our old
54:25
MLS logo which was of
54:28
a time as a lot of brands are
54:31
and while some of them become timeless, MLS
54:34
didn't feel that this was what
54:36
they needed going forward and it was you
54:38
know a 90s type of artwork
54:40
and aesthetic when it comes
54:43
to Major League Soccer and they moved on
54:45
to something better, something that was actually had
54:47
the ability to be used by in multiple
54:49
ways and was much more functional going forward.
54:52
What didn't change was
54:54
Major League Soccer. Now
54:57
and when you're talking about
54:59
rebrands the potential to actually
55:02
rebrand the actual league in
55:05
terms of what it is called that could be
55:07
on the table. I don't see that
55:09
happening. While we have seen teams, many
55:11
teams rebrand in terms of what
55:13
their team name is and very few of the
55:16
originals still exist, for the
55:18
most part when it comes to what Major
55:20
League Soccer is an MLS. It's
55:22
a known league around
55:25
the world and I think it would be problematic to
55:27
go and change it although who knows you could you
55:30
know call it football or something like that
55:33
or an association which we know
55:35
is where soccer comes from it. So you
55:37
could do creative things but I don't think
55:40
that it would be prudent from a
55:42
business perspective changing what Major League Soccer
55:44
is. Whether people like or don't like
55:46
MLS they still recognize when you say
55:49
Major League Soccer when you say MLS
55:51
what it is and globally which is
55:53
very very important to to
55:56
Major League Soccer. But it does bring up I
55:58
see a whole lot of ideas about what
56:01
MLS and I
56:03
guess soccer in general looks like going forward.
56:05
We've talked about how important 2026. Um,
56:09
and I guess it's a good time also to mention that
56:11
the U S open cup, some news
56:13
that we've talked about over the last couple of
56:15
weeks and the back and forth. And
56:18
MLS is threatening to withdraw all of
56:20
their teams and their first teams. When
56:22
it comes to the open cup, it
56:24
has been, I guess settled
56:26
right now in that you open cup going forward
56:28
here in 2024, at least now for this year.
56:32
And for this version is going to have
56:34
eight full MLS teams. Now keep in mind,
56:36
the MLS next squads, uh,
56:38
will participate, uh, as well,
56:41
um, for, uh, for other teams, but it means that
56:43
the full teams for a lot of MLS teams are
56:45
not going to be now there's a lot of people
56:47
that are talking about this as a capitulation and this
56:50
is, uh, the United
56:52
States soccer Federation saying, uh,
56:54
whatever you want MLS. Now, what
56:57
it sounds like from the outside to
56:59
me is that nobody got everything that
57:01
they wanted and so nobody
57:03
is completely happy. And a lot of times
57:05
when you're talking about a deal that
57:08
kind of marks a fair deal
57:10
given in particular, these circumstances and keep
57:13
in mind, the United States
57:15
soccer Federation, they need
57:17
major league soccer and
57:20
MLS is a more
57:22
powerful entity MLS leverage that power to,
57:24
you know, to their benefits. In this
57:26
type of situation. And so
57:28
I guess it really comes down to what kind
57:31
of responsibility a league in this
57:33
case, MLS or could be any other league has
57:35
to the Federation. And that's where a lot of
57:37
the discussion, uh, the discussion is, but this
57:40
continues to be a work in process, a work
57:42
in progress. And this
57:44
is not done. There will continue to be
57:46
changes. So you're asking originally about a
57:49
rebrand. I think the sport is going to
57:51
look different off the field and look different
57:53
on the field going forward. That is, that
57:55
is inevitable. They're throwing
57:57
stuff at the, uh, at the wall. saw
58:00
this over there in New England, speaking of one of the
58:02
original team names, the New England
58:05
Revolution. They
58:08
have tried to get into this tradition
58:11
that exists now in multiple markets and in
58:14
multiple stadiums for teams of having a pregame
58:16
where you bring up a celebrity or a
58:19
special guest and have them do something. They
58:21
can smash a hammer
58:23
on this and that. Well, New
58:25
England, given where they are and the history and
58:27
the historic sense, they
58:29
decided to do this tossing out
58:32
of a box of tea, obviously
58:34
in reference to the Boston Tea Party
58:36
and all that history around there. Well,
58:40
it didn't quite come off the way
58:42
I think that they wanted in that
58:44
it was very dry and didn't have
58:47
the panache that others do when they're
58:49
ringing the bell up in Montreal or
58:51
the sledgehammer over there in Atlanta and that
58:53
kind of stuff. It
58:56
reminded me of, I don't know if you've been
58:58
following this crazy Willy Wonka experience that
59:00
they tried to put on that was just so
59:03
bare bones and horrible that it
59:06
actually made incredible headlines around the
59:09
world. Especially when it
59:11
comes to New England, and this is a kind of
59:13
a rebrand or an addition to the brand when it
59:15
comes to things that they are doing and trying to
59:17
establish tradition. Sometimes you want tradition to
59:20
happen organically and sometimes you got to kind of foster
59:22
it. So I don't fault
59:24
them for trying something, but I think
59:26
in this moment it just didn't come off the way
59:28
that they wanted. Who knows? Maybe they're
59:30
smarter than all of us and the bad
59:32
press is better than the no press that
59:34
normally would accompany something like this. But this
59:37
is the New England Revolution. They have people
59:40
that are on the side of this and they have since I
59:42
was playing back in 1996 when the league
59:44
kicked off, musket men. People with
59:47
muskets on the side dressed up
59:49
in historic American garb that
59:51
shoot muskets. Just give
59:53
the special guest or the celebrity up there
59:56
a musket and have him or her shoot
59:58
that. Now that's a cool thing. That's
1:00:00
something that I will watch. That's something that you
1:00:02
can put video and you can have it be
1:00:04
viral and If
1:00:06
we're gonna do something, let's do that Or if you're
1:00:08
gonna if you're if you're dead set on having the
1:00:10
tea party thing then figure out a
1:00:13
way to make it better I think our
1:00:15
friend Taylor Twelman suggested a kiddie pool at the
1:00:17
very least so that the tea lands in
1:00:19
what is the representation Of the the
1:00:22
Boston Harbor over there Anyway
1:00:25
thoughts on this I've rambled on enough Yeah
1:00:28
on the revolution I've talked about how much
1:00:30
domestic travel I want to do this year
1:00:32
I've thought about going to Boston and Experiencing
1:00:36
some of the revolutionary stuff Paul Revere's house
1:00:38
the Freedom Trail Boston Tea Party Boston Massacre,
1:00:40
etc So the concept is cool. I agree
1:00:42
with you. The execution wasn't great and Taylor
1:00:44
Twelman a revolution legend is Criticizing
1:00:47
it so they got to listen to him Yeah
1:00:49
on the open cup the biggest casualty
1:00:51
this whole situation is Stu Holden
1:00:53
has resigned from the open committee
1:00:57
Yeah, I know I know hey listen it's the
1:00:59
best thing that he possibly couldn't do he gets
1:01:01
his get his life back and it was not
1:01:03
going in the way that he wanted if you
1:01:06
if you heard him on the show and And
1:01:08
you could certainly read between the lines in terms of
1:01:10
how that that is going some news breaking as we
1:01:13
come on air here Right. Yes regarding
1:01:15
the MLS all-star game We're
1:01:18
gonna go back to the MLS versus League
1:01:20
MX Format for this year
1:01:23
I've advocated for East versus West but to me this
1:01:25
is the next best thing. I do like this MLS
1:01:27
versus League of MX We covered a couple of these
1:01:29
for Fox. I certainly like it
1:01:32
better than bringing over a European club so to
1:01:34
me, this is actually a positive news, I think
1:01:36
this is the best of both worlds because you
1:01:38
get a competitor
1:01:41
in this instance It's League MX
1:01:44
that is still having to put together a team
1:01:46
as opposed to oftentimes when you're playing a
1:01:48
team And I know that they are often
1:01:50
in preseason when they're playing The
1:01:53
MLS all-stars, but it's hard to just
1:01:55
put a group of 11 players or
1:01:57
22 players together and with with no
1:01:59
training to no training and then go on
1:02:01
the field. And the
1:02:04
MLS All-Stars have been
1:02:06
at a disadvantage because of that playing
1:02:08
against some of these teams. I know that
1:02:10
they're in preseason, but they are still teams and there's an
1:02:12
idea and a philosophy in the way that they play. So
1:02:14
in this case, it kind of evens it out and it
1:02:17
does it with a league
1:02:20
and a fan base out there that we know
1:02:22
MLS has been trying to court,
1:02:24
that we know the partnerships and the
1:02:26
history that exists between these two leagues in the
1:02:29
past now and certainly going on in the future.
1:02:31
So I think this is great and this is something that I
1:02:33
will watch. Next
1:02:36
up, we have a voicemail. Let's take a listen
1:02:38
right now. Hey, boys. This
1:02:40
is Nick. I'm from Alabama.
1:02:42
Getting over, getting sick. But
1:02:47
I've got, I've noticed this trend, like
1:02:50
with a lot of the teams in MLS
1:02:54
is that we hardly have any Americans
1:02:57
on the roster. LASC
1:02:59
is one of the teams that's
1:03:01
quite outrageous with this, in my
1:03:03
opinion, with only long enough to
1:03:07
get the right back name.
1:03:10
But I thought
1:03:12
MLS was to have to be a development league
1:03:14
for the national team. And why
1:03:16
are teams
1:03:18
allowed to do this? Do we not have any roster
1:03:20
rules? I don't know. I guess
1:03:23
not. But things are ridiculous to me. Okay.
1:03:27
Thank you, Nick from Bama. I think
1:03:29
I'm torn on this, Mosse. And I
1:03:32
am, as people that have listened or watch,
1:03:34
you know that I'm a capitalist and I
1:03:37
believe that MLS has a responsibility to MLS
1:03:39
and to MLS alone and to do the
1:03:41
things on and off the field that are
1:03:43
able to grow the business. I
1:03:46
will say this to you, Danny. Earlier,
1:03:49
sorry. Nick, sorry. Nick
1:03:51
from Bama. Nick from Bama. I will say this to you.
1:03:54
Earlier in the pod, Mosse, we were talking about
1:03:57
this juggernaut and this wealth of
1:03:59
talent. that a team like England has.
1:04:03
Now this is happening at a time where
1:04:05
there have been fewer and fewer England
1:04:08
eligible players and English players playing in,
1:04:10
but it is not arguably, it is
1:04:12
the most popular league in the world
1:04:15
in the EPL. So just because you
1:04:17
don't have a lot of players
1:04:19
from the country that
1:04:22
the league is from playing, doesn't
1:04:24
preclude you from having a good national team. However,
1:04:27
I do think that it is a little apples and
1:04:29
oranges when it comes to what America is and
1:04:31
what America wants to be when it comes to soccer. The
1:04:35
reason that I said
1:04:37
Danny is because I wanted to mention Danny McLaughlin over
1:04:39
there at Run Repeat. And
1:04:42
this is a study that they did last summer that
1:04:45
looked at the minutes played by
1:04:47
Americans in Major League Soccer and
1:04:49
the dramatic change. And from a
1:04:51
US perspective, a dramatic decrease in
1:04:54
minutes from Americans. So
1:04:57
over the last decade,
1:05:00
there's been a decrease of 29.53%. And
1:05:06
over, well, since 1996, when the
1:05:08
league started, there's been a decrease of 43.58% since
1:05:12
the first season of Major League Soccer.
1:05:14
So there are less and less minutes
1:05:16
from Americans, if
1:05:19
you will, that are playing
1:05:21
in Major League Soccer. Now that's
1:05:23
not necessarily a bad thing because
1:05:26
the other side of it is, is I
1:05:28
truly believe that the league has
1:05:30
become more competitive. And there has
1:05:32
been more talent that has been brought
1:05:35
in, and let's be honest, they've been able to
1:05:37
bring in because of the changing of
1:05:39
the rules. And this gets back to your question
1:05:41
though, Nick, about what the
1:05:43
responsibility is of Major
1:05:45
League Soccer to American soccer. And
1:05:49
if they become an incredible league, incredibly
1:05:51
successful, make a lot of money, and
1:05:53
they're popular all around the world globally,
1:05:55
but they do it by using all
1:05:58
imported talent. Is
1:06:00
that a good or is that a bad thing? Now the
1:06:03
capitalist to me would argue that you know what? You give
1:06:05
the people what they want and that's really
1:06:07
where the rub is because there are plenty
1:06:09
of people out there that
1:06:11
equate foreign talent with
1:06:14
quality and that's just
1:06:16
going to change with time. But
1:06:19
the reality is that people
1:06:22
will buy tickets, people will get more
1:06:24
excited when a player is
1:06:26
coming in from the outside than when you
1:06:28
are developing a player from the inside. And
1:06:31
so ultimately Nick from Bama over
1:06:34
there, I still think that
1:06:37
MLS talks about having a responsibility to
1:06:39
the American player and they don't just
1:06:41
talk about it because let's be honest,
1:06:43
the pathways and the opportunities that they
1:06:45
have created over the years are incredibly
1:06:48
beneficial and incredibly positive and
1:06:50
fundamentally have changed the trajectory
1:06:52
of young American players here.
1:06:57
And we mentioned the numbers there, it's
1:07:00
gotten less and less over the years.
1:07:02
While there's more teams and therefore more
1:07:04
opportunities, the actual numbers of minutes have
1:07:08
decreased. But I still believe in
1:07:10
the American player. I still believe
1:07:13
that the American player will find those
1:07:15
pathways and will find those opportunities and
1:07:17
will ultimately, when it comes down to,
1:07:19
they will compete. And I also believe
1:07:21
that the American soccer market will
1:07:24
recognize and value and celebrate
1:07:27
talent that is developed in
1:07:30
country and talent that is starring
1:07:32
for in this case, their MLS teams. But
1:07:35
this could apply to USL2. But
1:07:39
ultimately, I don't think necessarily Nick
1:07:42
that this is a bad thing.
1:07:44
There are finally, I'll say this before I turn
1:07:46
it over to you Massey, there are rules and
1:07:48
regulations in place that do, quote unquote, foster
1:07:51
and encourage domestic
1:07:53
talent and protect against
1:07:56
what you're mentioning, where you can have all
1:07:59
players. that are coming in from the outside.
1:08:01
But let's be honest, all it takes is a green card
1:08:04
and you are not counted and you
1:08:06
are able to play. And so we
1:08:09
will see teams
1:08:11
that field entirely players that
1:08:14
have come in from the outside and
1:08:16
don't have any domestic talent on their
1:08:19
rosters and on their starting 11s. And
1:08:22
is that a good or a bad thing? Well,
1:08:24
for MLS, it might be a good thing. For
1:08:27
soccer in the United States, it might not be a
1:08:29
good thing. And I guess that's that bigger question of
1:08:32
how much responsibility do you think MLS
1:08:34
has to the future of American soccer?
1:08:37
Well, first off, feel better, Nick. He's under
1:08:39
the weather as he let us know. There's
1:08:41
speculation on our control mess to whether that's
1:08:43
Nick Saban from Alabama, the legendary coach who
1:08:46
just retired. Well, it wouldn't surprise me if he
1:08:49
listens and participates in coming in. I
1:08:51
mean, Nick Saban, what a great career. So many memorable
1:08:53
moments. My favorite Nick Saban memory is when he lost
1:08:55
the Rose Bowl to Michigan this past season. But
1:08:59
as to this question, the premise
1:09:02
is correct. I've talked about this.
1:09:04
I even asked Taylor Twelman a question about it when
1:09:06
we had him on last year. It seems like the
1:09:08
transfer strategy for MLS is it's
1:09:10
a selling league when it comes to Americans, a
1:09:12
buying league when it comes to foreigners. Now,
1:09:15
it should be noted, Mexico has made
1:09:17
a concerted effort to try to keep Mexican players
1:09:19
in league of Mexico. And a lot of people
1:09:21
think it's been to the detriment of their national
1:09:23
team. So you do wanna strike a balance there.
1:09:25
But yeah, it is interesting. The last 10 MLS
1:09:28
MVPs have all been foreigners. It
1:09:30
would be nice if there were a few more
1:09:32
prominent Americans in the league as well. Yeah, it's
1:09:34
all about finding that right balance. But it also
1:09:37
ultimately stems back to the reality of what
1:09:39
soccer is and what soccer isn't in the
1:09:41
United States. You know, I mean, while
1:09:44
we've seen when it comes to hockey and
1:09:46
when it comes to basketball, a huge influx
1:09:48
and increase in foreign talent and some incredible
1:09:50
talent coming in, I don't
1:09:52
think that if it was all
1:09:54
domestic talent playing in either the NHL or
1:09:56
the NBA, I
1:09:59
don't think that they would necessarily... miss a beat.
1:10:01
From a competitive standpoint they have had
1:10:03
to use the world and
1:10:05
go out there and scout and bring
1:10:07
in talent around the world and it's
1:10:09
resulted in incredible players and incredible teams
1:10:11
but because those sports are of and
1:10:15
historically of these countries when you're talking about the
1:10:17
US and Canada I think it would be
1:10:19
different but soccer as we know we are
1:10:22
coming to it later than others and
1:10:25
we have all of the other competing sports out there
1:10:27
and so the perception
1:10:30
of what we are and the perception of
1:10:32
what players outside are what the sport is
1:10:34
outside is very different relative to those other
1:10:36
sports that you mentioned. Alright anything else
1:10:39
Mossy? That is it. Alright let's take a quick
1:10:41
break when we come back at the end of our show and I'll
1:10:43
give you my one for the road. Okay
1:10:45
welcome back it's the end of our show and at the
1:10:47
end of each and every show I give you my one
1:10:49
for the road you know the the industry of jerseys
1:10:52
kits whatever you want to call them uniforms
1:10:54
out there it just continues on and it
1:10:56
it's like catnip to American
1:10:59
soccer fans out there and soccer
1:11:01
fans around the world and the
1:11:03
changes are well documented and the
1:11:05
intrigue and the drama and trying
1:11:07
to get a hold of what
1:11:09
teams whether it's national teams or club
1:11:11
teams are going to look like as a sport in and
1:11:13
of itself so I thought
1:11:15
I'd talk a little bit about what the
1:11:17
potential is here so the folks over
1:11:19
there at footy headlines have evidently they
1:11:21
have a scoop over there they have
1:11:24
figured out what the 2024 home
1:11:26
and away uniforms for the US men's national
1:11:28
team are going to be for those that
1:11:30
are watching you can see them up here
1:11:32
in our our screen. Ah
1:11:35
okay I mean if this ends up being it I
1:11:37
am you know there's
1:11:39
a time where I like simple and
1:11:42
clean but it also has to
1:11:44
pop and while the
1:11:46
white version I guess the home
1:11:48
version it would be is simple and clean
1:11:50
it just doesn't pop in the way that
1:11:52
I wanted there is a classic look
1:11:55
to it but it's not classic enough and then
1:11:57
you have I guess maybe a return to the
1:11:59
bomb pop era when
1:12:01
it comes to the blue one, I guess we'll call it that. The
1:12:04
problem with this one is that, yes, it's
1:12:06
plain, but it's not very exciting, and the
1:12:08
excitement is supposed to be generated by the
1:12:10
bomb pop. But the bomb pop is down
1:12:12
low, and the potential for it
1:12:14
to get obscured just by where it is, or you're
1:12:16
tucking in your shirt, all that, that concerns me. But
1:12:18
again, until you actually see it on the field, you
1:12:21
don't know if it's going to work. But
1:12:24
there is a whole industry out there of
1:12:26
people who think that they can do the
1:12:28
job better than Nike or
1:12:30
Adidas or any of
1:12:32
these huge apparel companies out there. And
1:12:35
in this day and age of AI
1:12:37
and the constant discussion and
1:12:40
the concern as to what AI is going to
1:12:42
be, what it isn't going to be, how it
1:12:44
can be used for good purposes and bad purposes
1:12:46
out there, it does give us an opportunity to
1:12:48
do some different things. So
1:12:50
what ended up happening is people have
1:12:53
their own versions and their
1:12:55
own designs. And I'll tell you what, there
1:12:57
are some incredibly creative people out there. Now,
1:12:59
they don't always have, nor should they, all
1:13:01
of the information at their disposal. And so
1:13:03
while it's easy to say they should do
1:13:06
something like this or this is good, the
1:13:09
practical ability to do it might
1:13:11
be limited. Anyway, US men's national
1:13:14
team versus haters, US MNT versus
1:13:16
haters used AI to generate this
1:13:18
jersey for the US men's national
1:13:21
team. And they asked everybody out there, including
1:13:23
me, what we thought. I
1:13:26
love this. I love this jersey
1:13:28
for a couple of different reasons. One,
1:13:31
it pops. It is
1:13:33
unique. And two, it is
1:13:36
uniquely American. And I've
1:13:38
talked about this over the last couple of years, and
1:13:41
maybe just the times that we live in have made
1:13:43
it much more front and center. But
1:13:47
I love teams, and in
1:13:49
this case, we're talking about the US soccer team,
1:13:52
that lean into, for lack of a better
1:13:54
word, the American-ness. And
1:13:56
can it be looked at as over
1:13:59
the top? and braggadocious
1:14:02
and dare I say arrogant? Yeah,
1:14:06
but I love that and that's what
1:14:08
I want. It can't be too American for
1:14:10
me. And again, maybe it's the
1:14:12
era in which you live in where, let's
1:14:15
be honest, the flag and red, white and blue
1:14:17
and stars and stripes, at times it's been weaponized
1:14:20
and villainized out there. And I wanna,
1:14:22
I guess, take it back. I wanna
1:14:24
capture it and I wanna
1:14:27
use it for, in this case, what is
1:14:29
good. And going
1:14:31
forward, we've talked
1:14:33
about the denim over the years and how that
1:14:35
has resonated. Going forward,
1:14:38
I want something that lives
1:14:41
up to that denim. I
1:14:45
want something that is comparable
1:14:49
and maybe a little bit of an homage to what 94
1:14:51
was. And I think
1:14:53
that our country, I think
1:14:55
the time demands
1:14:58
it. And I think
1:15:00
that it would be incredibly successful.
1:15:02
When I say successful, not only
1:15:04
resonates, but even from a practical
1:15:07
perspective, sell a lot. I think
1:15:09
America and Americans are
1:15:11
thirsty for America in
1:15:13
all different types of representations out
1:15:16
there. I think that we have become exhausted
1:15:19
of fighting our
1:15:21
Americanness, if you will. And
1:15:24
in the same way that we have talked about U.S.
1:15:27
Women's National Team winning back supporters,
1:15:32
this, it can be done in a much
1:15:34
different ways. And the aesthetic going forward of
1:15:36
our U.S. Men's National Team, obviously leading
1:15:38
up to 2026, our U.S.
1:15:40
Women's National Team with all they are doing, even
1:15:43
that, that can help
1:15:45
unite. And in a time
1:15:47
and in a country where we are so divided, we
1:15:50
know sports is often used to unite
1:15:52
and teams can unite. And
1:15:55
the way that you look, you want people to grab ahold of
1:15:57
it. And you want people to be proud
1:15:59
of it. And you want something that screams, you
1:16:01
know what? This is not
1:16:03
just America, but this is an America that I
1:16:05
am proud of. Even with all of
1:16:08
the problems that we have. Certainly,
1:16:10
I'll be the first one to admit, we are less
1:16:13
than perfect. But it
1:16:15
is still like country. And in
1:16:18
the sports perspective, these teams go on
1:16:20
the field representing our country. All of
1:16:22
our differences, all of our disagreements, and
1:16:24
yes, all of our flaws out there.
1:16:27
And the more that it screams
1:16:29
America, I think the better off
1:16:32
it is. So if these end up being
1:16:34
the jerseys, fine. But
1:16:36
I don't think it's leaning into
1:16:38
America enough. And I will say
1:16:40
this to finish off. If it's
1:16:43
not leaning into America, because
1:16:45
you're scared to do it, then
1:16:47
that angers me. And that saddens me that
1:16:49
that is what has happened to our
1:16:52
country. Where, whether it's
1:16:54
an apparel company or anybody else, they're scared.
1:16:57
To be more America. They're scared to be more
1:16:59
red, white, and blue. They're scared to be more
1:17:02
stars and stripes. Anyway, Mossy,
1:17:04
that's my one for the road. Anything before we go. That
1:17:07
is it. Nothing? You got nothing? No,
1:17:10
I mean, I prefer the understated look with kids.
1:17:12
So some of the ones you showed to me
1:17:14
were a little too busy, a little too much
1:17:16
going on there. There I say a little too
1:17:18
American. Wow. Wow.
1:17:22
We could go on for hours. I don't think you can
1:17:24
be too American, my friend. All right, listen, thank you. Thank
1:17:26
you, Mossy. You're wonderful, by the way. Thank you, everybody, for
1:17:28
reviewing and downloading and subscribing. I know we went a little
1:17:30
bit long today, but like we said, we came in and
1:17:33
we were just full of all different things that we wanted
1:17:35
to talk about. We didn't even get to all the stuff
1:17:37
that we talked about, but we appreciate you hanging out. If
1:17:39
you hung out to the end. And if you didn't,
1:17:41
you know, you should, because there's some good stuff that
1:17:43
happens all the way through. That keep reviewing, downloading, subscribing,
1:17:45
rating, doing all the different things that you do, whether
1:17:47
you're listening or whether you're watching out there or whether
1:17:50
you're listening and watching at the same time, whether you're
1:17:52
listening at regular speed, whether you're listening at double speed.
1:17:54
It doesn't really matter. We love the fact that you
1:17:56
are along for the ride when it comes to the
1:17:58
State of the Union. We'll talk to you
1:18:01
again later on this week and until then,
1:18:03
and as always my friend, Thighs the Day.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More