Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
The last thing you want to hear while listening to your
0:02
favorite podcast is another gimmicky
0:04
ad. NJM feels the same way. It's
0:07
why they provide award-winning service without
0:09
the use of mascots or repetitive jingles.
0:12
And when you upgrade to NJM, you could
0:14
even save on your auto insurance. Better
0:17
service than possible savings? Sounds like
0:19
a win-win. No jingles or mascots,
0:21
just great insurance. NJM. mjm.com
0:24
slash podcast for a quote to see how much you
0:27
could save on your auto insurance.
0:29
Tonight on all
0:32
in. I have nothing to hide. I
0:34
have a constitution to uphold. NBC
0:37
News confirms Mike Pence has been ordered
0:39
to go under oath.
0:41
Mike was foolish and he was
0:43
weak. A former vice president is
0:45
compelled to give sworn testimony
0:48
about his boss's coup. Tonight,
0:50
Barbara McQuaid and Harry Lippmann on
0:52
what this means for the criminal case
0:54
against Trump and Senator Sheldon
0:56
Whitehouse on what it means for the rule of law. Then,
1:00
how do you stop gun violence from killing
1:02
kids in schools? It's a horrible,
1:05
horrible situation and we're
1:07
not going to fix it. Criminals are going
1:09
to be criminals. Tonight, the maddening
1:11
reality of a political party
1:13
that has given up the awful truth
1:15
of the cult of the AR-15 and author
1:18
Jeff Charlotte on his new book describing
1:20
what he calls America's slow
1:22
civil war. But all in starts
1:24
right now.
1:29
Good evening from New York. I'm Chris Hayes. Donald
1:32
Trump cannot stop losing the courts.
1:35
Today, yet another federal judge
1:37
ruling against the ex-president, and now
1:39
the man that Trump's angry mob wanted
1:41
to hang, is ordered to share
1:44
what he knows under oath.
1:46
This
1:46
afternoon, a judge with the U.S. District
1:48
Court for D.C. ruled that Mike
1:50
Pence must cooperate with a subpoena
1:53
from special counsel Jack Smith as
1:55
part of Smith's investigation into Donald Trump's
1:57
attempt to overturn the 2020 election.
2:00
Notably, the judge ruled that
2:02
Pence will not have to testify about
2:04
matters pertaining to his role as president
2:06
of the Senate on January 6 itself, but
2:09
he will have to provide testimony about Trump's
2:11
attempted coup more broadly, as well
2:13
as any potential illegal actions by the
2:16
ex-president.
2:17
Now, Pence has previously vowed to fight
2:19
this very subpoena all the way to Supreme
2:21
Court if need be, so it is likely he will
2:23
appeal the ruling that we'll see. But
2:25
as of now, it stands. And of course,
2:28
this order from a federal judge comes less
2:30
than a week after a separate federal judge
2:33
ruled that someone else close to Trump must
2:35
comply with one of Jack Smith's subpoenas. Remember
2:38
last Wednesday, a federal appeals court
2:40
took the rare step of piercing attorney
2:43
client privilege,
2:44
upholding that lower court decision, determining that
2:46
Trump's lawyer Evan Corcoran must testify
2:49
as part of Smith's separate investigation
2:52
into the ex-president's mishandling of classified
2:55
documents.
2:56
And that moved fast because Corcoran
2:58
then subsequently spoke with investigators
3:00
for more than three hours last
3:03
Friday. Mike Pence finds
3:05
himself in a similar position. Now it's a familiar
3:07
position for anyone around Donald Trump facing
3:09
down a subpoena. Now as
3:12
I've said many times in this show, Donald
3:14
Trump's efforts to subvert American democracy,
3:18
to end the constitutional republic as we know it,
3:20
culminating in the violent deadly insurrection in January
3:22
6th, was the most malevolent act
3:24
of a presidency full
3:25
of 11 acts. If there is one thing for which
3:28
he should be held to account, it is that.
3:31
And Mike Pence had a front-road seat to
3:33
nearly all of it. That is why
3:35
the special counsel's office is so doggedly
3:38
pursuing Pence's testimony. By
3:40
January 6, Pence marked the end of
3:42
the road for Trump's coup. Everything
3:45
else had already failed. His lawsuits were thrown out
3:47
of court. His efforts to pressure state
3:49
legislatures and election officials had gone nowhere.
3:52
Trump was becoming increasingly desperate, and that
3:54
is why, much like Corcoran,
3:57
Pence is such an important witness. In
4:00
some cases, and in crucial moments in
4:02
that period, Pence is the only witness.
4:05
Because the January 6 deadline got
4:07
closer and closer, Trump tried to pressure him
4:09
alone to go along with the coup
4:12
behind closed doors. There
4:15
is no doubt that President Trump's
4:17
pressure campaign on Vice President Pence
4:19
was significant. On the morning of
4:22
January 6, President Trump called the
4:24
Vice President from the Oval Office and demanded
4:26
that he overturn the results of the election. Numerous
4:30
witnesses told the Select Committee
4:32
about the invective that President Trump leveled
4:35
at his own Vice President.
4:37
Something to the effect, this is the
4:40
word he's wrong. I made the
4:42
wrong decision four or five years ago. And
4:45
the word that she relayed to you that the
4:47
President called the Vice President, I
4:49
apologize for being impolite, but do
4:51
you remember what she said? Her father called
4:54
him
4:55
the P word. By
4:58
that time, Trump knew his scheme to have
5:00
Pence throw out the results of
5:02
an election was illegal. John Eastman
5:04
had already told him so. Pence, to his
5:07
credit, had already told Trump he wasn't going to go along
5:09
with the scheme after some maybe initial waffling.
5:11
But Trump didn't care, right? He wanted any
5:14
means necessary to stay in power against
5:16
the will of the American people, against the
5:18
foundational conceit of the
5:20
American constitutional republic. And so he was pushing
5:23
it
5:23
anyway, both in private and in public.
5:26
All Vice President
5:28
Pence has to do is send it back
5:30
to the states to recertify.
5:34
And we become president and
5:36
you are the happiest people. And
5:43
I actually, I just spoke
5:45
to Mike,
5:46
I said, Mike, that doesn't take courage.
5:48
What takes courage is to do nothing.
5:52
That takes courage. and then we're stuck
5:54
with a president who lost the election
5:57
by a lot And we have to live with that
5:59
for four more.
6:00
years. We're just not going to let that happen.
6:03
We're
6:03
not going to let that happen. Now, today's
6:05
ruling likely did not come as much of a surprise
6:07
to Pence's team. They've been making noises that they were expecting
6:10
this. Last week, sources presumably close
6:12
to the former vice president told the Washington Post,
6:14
quote, Pence's advisers have privately accepted
6:17
the possibility the former vice president
6:19
might have to testify against
6:21
his former boss and likely political
6:24
rival during an election season. And
6:26
Pence himself addressed the ruling just
6:28
a few hours ago.
6:30
How they sorted that out and what other testimony
6:33
might be required, we're currently
6:35
reviewing. But look, let me be clear. I
6:39
have nothing to hide. I have a constitution
6:42
to uphold. I upheld the constitution
6:44
on January 6th. I believe
6:46
we did our duty
6:48
that day under the Constitution of
6:50
the United States. And in this matter, I thought it was important
6:53
that we stand on that constitutional principle
6:56
again.
6:57
For those who were not counting, that was four
7:00
references to the Constitution, 25 seconds, which
7:02
I guess as far as justifications
7:05
go is good.
7:07
But again, as you heard, Pence is remaining tight-lipped
7:09
about how he intends to proceed, although he
7:11
didn't rule out the possibility of testifying. You notice
7:13
that. Of course, anyone
7:16
who has been following politics at all understands that
7:19
he's walking something of a delicate tightrope, obviously
7:22
Mike Pence, the people around him, Mike Pence wants to be president,
7:25
right? Understand that Donald
7:27
Trump not just being indicted, but
7:30
actually being convicted for his crimes
7:33
would likely help Pence's own political ambitions.
7:36
Certainly would, I think, clear the way of
7:38
the front-runner, the Republican primary. But of course,
7:41
everyone also understands, certainly Mike Pence, the
7:43
people around him, that he can't seem too eager
7:45
about it or he'll risk alienating Trump supporters,
7:48
who by the way are already alienated. So
7:51
it remains to be seen what exactly happens
7:54
next.
7:55
I'm joined now by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat
7:57
of Rhode Island. Senator, you know...
8:00
So there are some fairly
8:02
novel constitutional questions at
8:04
issue here. It's a relatively
8:07
unprecedented set of circumstances. Obviously
8:10
what Donald Trump did in the election
8:12
was unprecedented, the pressure he put on his
8:14
vice president, the vice president being subpoenaed
8:17
by a special counsel. What's your reaction to
8:19
this federal
8:20
court ruling saying you've got
8:22
to talk under oath?
8:25
I think it's a lot of good news. it signals
8:28
that the federal investigation
8:30
into the insurrection is
8:32
alive and well. It's not just the Mar-a-Lago
8:35
documents because it involves
8:37
Pence's role presiding over the Senate
8:40
on that fateful day. Second,
8:43
although the decision is
8:45
sealed, it appears that the only
8:47
protection Pence got
8:49
was under the speech and debate clause protecting
8:51
legislators, which is great
8:54
for the rule of of law because an
8:56
expansion of the executive privilege doctrine to cover
8:59
this would have a very
9:01
poor effect on congressional oversight. And
9:04
third, it looks a lot like if you're the
9:06
vice president and you're getting instructions
9:09
from Trump on what you're supposed to do,
9:11
that looks pretty executive. So
9:14
it's, I think pretty likely that
9:16
the testimony that Jack Smith
9:18
is seeking
9:20
will be available to him in the grand
9:22
jury and it won't be protected the speech
9:24
and debate laws protection that
9:26
the order apparently provided.
9:29
Yeah, we should say that there is some interesting
9:32
sort of constitutional
9:36
grafting happening in the complaint
9:38
by Pence's
9:41
people basically saying he's got one foot
9:43
in Article 1, where he's the president
9:45
of the Senate, he's got one foot in Article 2, wherever
9:48
you need him, he can skip over to the other side
9:50
so you can never touch him. If
9:52
it's the legislature asking, I got executive
9:55
privilege, if it's the executive asking, I got
9:57
speech and debate clause, Nobody can ask
9:59
me anything.
10:00
and that did not work. No, that's
10:02
exactly right. It was clever, you know, proper
10:04
for the attempt. But my next question
10:06
of you, I guess, is given your
10:09
feelings about this current 6-3
10:11
conservative majority in the court, I mean, there
10:14
are novel constitutional issues. It does seem like Pence
10:16
is likely to appeal to this. Do you have confidence
10:18
that this straightforward ruling will
10:21
stand?
10:24
Well, you know, he can continue to appeal
10:26
it, but we've seen the courts get pretty impatient
10:28
with the success of appeals in
10:30
an ongoing investigation. With respect to
10:33
Trump's lawyer, the appellate
10:35
court flipped that reversal, the
10:37
decision to uphold the district
10:39
court around in no time at all.
10:41
It's like an overnight ruling. So
10:44
I don't think he's gonna buy a whole lot of time.
10:47
And I can't really say much more about the decision
10:49
without reading it, except for the
10:51
fact that he has to testify being
10:53
really good news and executive privilege
10:56
not covering it, being good news for all
10:58
Americans because it allows separation
11:00
of powers, congressional oversight
11:02
to flourish. You said something I
11:04
want to come back to because it hinted
11:06
at a view I'd like you to sort of
11:09
say more about, about the
11:11
Mar-a-Lago case being important
11:14
and Jack Smith pursuing that, but
11:16
the sort of, I don't know, central
11:18
primary importance to the life of the nation,
11:20
to our shared understanding of what American
11:23
democracy is, to the rule of law, about
11:25
the ex-president's attempts to end
11:27
America's self-governance in
11:29
the form that we know it.
11:31
Do you think
11:34
there is a central importance to that? Do you
11:36
think about these various cases and legal
11:38
threats in a sort of tiered fashion in
11:40
which that to you is the one that you
11:42
feel most strongly about?
11:46
Yeah, I think the New York one is the least
11:49
interesting. The Mar-a-Lago documents
11:51
one is more interesting. The
11:54
insurrection case is really, really
11:56
interesting and significant because not only
11:59
is it a very significant
12:00
a case on the merits because of what happened
12:02
that day. But you also have the overlay
12:04
of Fannie Willis's case in Georgia, which is looking
12:06
at the same thing.
12:08
And the evidence converges around that
12:10
funny little character, Jeffrey Clark,
12:13
who was operating in the
12:15
Department of Justice, apparently
12:17
on behalf of Trump, seeking to become
12:19
Trump's attorney general, if you can believe
12:22
it, by interfering more
12:24
in the Georgia election. So it gets
12:27
really interesting is if the Jack Smith
12:29
federal investigation and
12:31
the Fannie Willis Georgia investigation
12:33
end up supporting one another.
12:35
You've been very
12:38
outspoken about both
12:40
the Supreme Court and larger
12:43
structural issues you see at play, two
12:45
of them being the sort of lack of an
12:47
ethics code. Justices
12:50
don't have to mandatorily recuse or they
12:52
don't have to abide by the Article three
12:54
code of ethics that applies to other judges, and
12:57
two, that sort of dark money that has
12:59
flowed into institutions
13:01
around the court,
13:02
parties that are attempting to get favorable ruling
13:05
from the court. And I wonder, because of that, ask your response
13:08
to something I think you tweeted about today, reporting
13:10
that conservative actress group led
13:12
by Virginia Ginny Thomas, of course, the wife
13:15
of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, collected
13:17
nearly $600,000 in anonymous donations to
13:22
wage a cultural battle against the left over
13:24
three years, a Washington Post investigation,
13:26
found do you think we should know
13:28
who donors are to that kind of organization?
13:31
Yeah,
13:33
without a doubt, because there's more to it than
13:35
just that. The thing
13:37
that made much of those donations
13:40
anonymous was a thing called Donors
13:42
Trust, which has been called the Koch
13:45
Brothers Dark Money ATM. It's
13:47
where you go to launder your identity
13:50
off a donation.
13:52
So somebody is behind that
13:54
and the fact that it's donors trust is a pretty big
13:56
fingerprint. Trust also
13:59
shows up.
14:00
in the effort to pack the court
14:03
with the right-wing justices. For instance,
14:06
in 2019,
14:08
Donors Trust funneled $7 million
14:12
into the Federalist Society in one year,
14:14
in one year, $7 million into
14:17
the Federalist Society, while it was
14:19
the epicenter of the
14:21
secret, wheeling and dealing that took place
14:24
to get Gorsuch and then Kavanaugh
14:26
and then Barrett onto the court. So
14:29
the idea that this is not connected,
14:31
$600,000 to the justice's wife,
14:34
when the exact same group has done $7 million
14:38
to the court packing scheme, there's
14:40
a lot more here to look into. Senator
14:42
Sheldon Whitehouse, thank you for making some time with us tonight.
14:46
My pleasure. Coming up, what can
14:48
Gwyneth Paltrow's ongoing litigation about
14:50
a skiing accident teach us about the
14:53
many Trump investigations?
14:54
Barbara McCoy and Harry Lippmann join me on what we should
14:57
make of the latest details. Next.
15:00
There's
15:03
a trial going on right now. You've probably heard a bit about
15:05
it because it involves Gwyneth Paltrow and a
15:07
retired optometrist. It's
15:09
about a skiing incident that took place seven years
15:12
ago. Incident happened on a bunny
15:14
slope in Park City, Utah, back
15:16
in February 2016. Terry Sanderson
15:18
claims that Paltrow crashed
15:21
into it.
15:21
And he's suing her for $300,000 in damages. Gwyneth
15:25
Paltrow says that he skied
15:27
into her, and she's countersuing for
15:29
a dollar and legal fees. Both
15:31
of them finally have their day in court. They are
15:33
getting to tell their side of the story. And
15:36
there has been something really fascinating
15:38
about listening to people describe in detail
15:41
what happened in a few instances just
15:43
a moment seven years ago.
15:47
I was skiing, and two skis came
15:49
between my skis, forcing
15:51
my legs apart, and then there was
15:53
a body pressing against me and
15:56
there was a very strange grunting
15:58
noise.
15:59
I got hit. in my back so
16:01
hard. And I'm right at my
16:03
shoulder blades. And it felt like, and
16:05
was perfectly centered. And the
16:08
fists and the poles were right there
16:10
at the bottom of my shoulder blades. Serious,
16:13
serious smack. Never been
16:16
hit that hard. And I'm flying. I'm
16:18
absolutely flying.
16:20
Obviously, those are mutually exclusive accounts. What
16:22
happened? She says he went to her. He
16:24
says she went to him. Now, the
16:26
thing to keep in mind, again, This all
16:28
happened in 2016. It's
16:31
a lifetime ago. The same
16:33
year, coincidentally, that Stormy
16:35
Daniels got a hush money payment on behalf of Donald Trump.
16:38
Both events happened in the same year
16:40
and are just now being litigated.
16:43
It's a reminder, it can feel like there's a kind of time
16:45
vortex around Trump causing everything
16:47
to move at a glacial pace, but in some ways
16:49
it's an illusion caused by the
16:52
pace of the news on the one hand contrasted
16:54
with the pace of the American legal system.
16:56
Legal system, as Gwyneth
16:58
Paltrow can tell you, moves pretty
17:00
slowly. Skiing incident happened
17:03
in 2016. The first suit was filed
17:05
three years later, and the case has been
17:07
winding its way through the legal system ever
17:09
since and now a trial in 2023.
17:13
When you are in the business of covering Trump,
17:16
sometimes on a daily basis, as I am, it
17:19
just seems impossibly attenuated. But
17:22
whether it is the Stormy Daniels payment or the January
17:24
6th investigation, the classified documents case
17:26
or the Georgia grand jury in the grand scheme of things,
17:29
court proceedings, that is, things
17:31
are actually moving quite briskly. Barbara
17:34
McQuaid is a former US Attorney for the Eastern District
17:36
of Michigan. She is now a professor at the University of Michigan
17:39
Law School, Harry Lippmann, former Deputy
17:41
Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department, and
17:43
a former US Attorney for the Western District
17:45
of Pennsylvania, and both join me now. I
17:48
wanna start on this basic
17:50
timing point, Barbara, because
17:53
I have been seeing the
17:55
viral clips from the Paltrow trial, which
17:57
are fascinating. and it
17:59
keeps... striking me how long a delay
18:02
there is between the incident that happened and now finally
18:04
working this way to court. Now, civil proceedings are different.
18:06
Obviously, what's happening with Donald Trump, particularly with Jack
18:08
Smith, is fairly unprecedented, an ex-president
18:11
being investigated.
18:12
But when you look at the time scope of these investigations,
18:16
does it feel to you like actually
18:18
kind of roughly normal, like fairly accelerated,
18:20
or does it feel like it's dragging on? You
18:23
know, it actually feels kind of normal to
18:25
me, Chris, but I think it's because I've been
18:28
jaded by years in the legal system
18:30
where things move so incredibly
18:33
slowly. That is one of the things that
18:35
friends say to me most frequently when they're watching
18:37
news about Trump is how incredibly slowly
18:40
it moves. I do think that Donald Trump has
18:43
deliberately tried to slow things down because
18:45
he knows that that can serve to his advantage,
18:48
appealing every decision possible, stalling,
18:51
delaying, refusing to cooperate. And
18:53
I think that from talking to jurors, they
18:56
recognize that the lengthy passage
18:58
of time can diminish the credibility
19:00
of witnesses in people's memories, the same common
19:02
sense point that you just made. So prosecutors
19:05
do not think of delay as their friend. And
19:07
I think that is the reason that some defendants
19:09
will work as hard as they can to drag things out.
19:11
And there's been lots of lots of efforts
19:13
to delay on the part of Trump on
19:16
in terms of the federal,
19:18
the sort of portfolio of Jack Smith, Harry.
19:21
It's pretty clear from the way that that
19:24
office moved on Corcoran, who's the lawyer who
19:26
was ordered to testify last week,
19:28
district court judge ruling, an appellate
19:30
court that was ready to move at breakneck speed, in
19:32
fact, requiring
19:35
a filing at 6 a.m. the next morning, and
19:37
then for Corcoran to come in, that there's
19:40
some sense, at least in the federal court system
19:42
and on Smith's side, that time is
19:44
of the essence. Do you anticipate something
19:47
similar with whatever happens with the Pence
19:49
decision here?
19:51
So first, lightning speed, just
19:53
as you say. I agree with Barbara that the pace
19:56
that we've otherwise seen is basically
19:58
not out of joint. And in
20:01
an interesting way, the legal system kind of, it
20:04
settles disputes, but an auxiliary function
20:06
is to almost provide like a social judgment on
20:08
the recent past. But it's a very
20:11
important question as to Pence. There are actually
20:13
two different claims, Chris, in Pence.
20:15
One was brought by Trump, it was executive
20:17
privilege. That one ought to go up and
20:19
down very quickly. It's already been
20:21
rejected four times. Pence himself,
20:24
at the end of the day, Judge Boseburg, the
20:26
new chief judge who by the way is
20:28
excellent, He has
20:30
to be essentially right. There can be
20:32
no speech or debate protection for
20:34
Pence's one-on-one discussions
20:36
with Trump on the 6th or even
20:39
weekly after the election. So
20:42
the line that he drew is gonna be upheld.
20:45
However, will the Court of Appeals or
20:47
the Supreme Court bite on just
20:49
trying to delineate it more clearly because
20:52
it is an area that there
20:54
isn't much learning in? That'll be the
20:56
question. And to compare again with Corker,
20:58
and that was a very progressive
21:00
panel, and you saw their exasperation.
21:02
The question is whether the court of appeals will say, hmm,
21:05
we wanna think about this, but at the end of the
21:07
day, they will hold against him, and he
21:09
will have to testify. Yeah,
21:11
the question is how long is the day that you
21:13
come to the end of? That's right, always. Which
21:16
is always the question. And there's also obviously,
21:18
as you said, Barbara, this isn't just, I mean,
21:20
part of it, I think, is the natural pace
21:23
of legal life, And
21:26
but as well, the fact that Trump always
21:28
seeks to delay exit. To that
21:30
point, his lawyers have
21:32
filed this motion down in Georgia, right? So we've
21:35
got the Georgia grand jury that sit there, they've produced
21:37
their report. The
21:39
DA there used the term imminently
21:42
in court to describe
21:44
when decisions will be made. We await
21:47
what that means. But they have now
21:49
until May 1st to respond to Trump's
21:52
lawyers' efforts to quash grand jury final
21:54
report into his alleged attempt
21:56
to overturn the 2020 election defeat. How
21:59
much is that?
22:00
sort of sticking point or
22:02
hurdle from moving forward down there?
22:05
Yeah, it's definitely going to delay things. I
22:07
mean, this is a blatant effort to throw sand
22:09
in the gears. I've never seen this before, where
22:11
somebody says the grand jury process is
22:14
illegal, unconstitutional, deeply flawed,
22:17
and requiring Fonny Willis to
22:20
move off everything she's doing and instead
22:22
of focusing on investigating the case, now
22:24
file a response to this. It
22:26
may very well be that she feels the need to resolve
22:28
this before she files an indictment because she
22:30
doesn't want to do anything that makes a
22:32
mistake now that could be a reversible
22:35
appeal years down the road. And so
22:37
it seems likely to me that this will put things
22:39
on hold for her, get this thing
22:41
decided before she seeks
22:43
an indictment. So imminence is
22:45
on hold.
22:47
So that's on hold. And then we've got this word
22:49
today about New York. Again, I think
22:51
there was a little bit of a psyching
22:54
out that the ex-president himself did saying I'm going
22:56
to be arrested on Tuesday, which was apparently
22:58
based on nothing, which again should not be surprising,
23:01
that he would just make something up ex nilo. He
23:04
does that all the time. He does it 50 times a day. It
23:07
did create a kind of expectation. Our
23:10
own reporting here at NBC News is that
23:12
the grand jury is not expected to meet on Wednesday. Expected
23:15
to return on Thursday. Here matters separate from the chart
23:17
hush money case, which puts us
23:20
in the Vladimir an
23:22
estrogen position of just sitting
23:24
and waiting, Harry. Yeah.
23:26
Although, yeah, so
23:29
first of all, I want to double back to Georgia because what Trump
23:32
has done so effectively over the last several years
23:34
is move for a stay from the Supreme
23:36
Court to freeze proceedings. He hasn't
23:39
done that in Georgia. There's no reason that Fawny
23:41
Wells couldn't bring an indictment tomorrow and
23:43
have this separate challenge,
23:45
the special grand jury process still go
23:47
forward. So his cunning has consisted
23:50
precisely in being able
23:52
to exploit and get stays, which now it doesn't
23:54
look that's what the Corcoran
23:56
actual litigation
23:58
was about. but you gotta stay.
24:00
No, Peter Navarro, remember him, old guy?
24:02
He just got ordered to testify
24:04
and the court said today, you may not get
24:06
a stay. So that is the effective
24:09
end of the line. With the DA, we
24:11
don't know what final housekeeping
24:14
details he's looking at. I just
24:16
want to reiterate that my basic
24:18
feeling is that none of them approach
24:21
with all we've had before, a serious
24:23
augury of reversing feel. That
24:26
case I think is moving to indictment. This
24:28
week, next week,
24:30
that's in Bragg's mind. All
24:32
right, Barbara McQuaid, Harry Lippmann, thank you
24:34
both. Still ahead, new
24:36
details on the weapons of war that were used to
24:38
kill six people, including three children
24:40
in a Nashville school. Congresswoman Alyssa
24:43
Slotkin joins me on the necessary steps to protect
24:45
America's kids, next.
24:49
The last thing you wanna hear while listening to your
24:51
favorite podcast is another gimmicky
24:54
ad. NJM feels the same way. It's
24:56
why they provide award-winning service without
24:58
the use of mascots or repetitive jingles.
25:01
And when you upgrade to NJM, you
25:04
could even save on your auto insurance. Better
25:06
service and possible savings? Sounds like
25:08
a win-win. No jingles or mascots,
25:10
just great insurance. NJM. Visit
25:13
NJM.com slash podcast for a
25:15
quote to see how much you could save on your auto
25:17
insurance.
25:19
The culture is diverse. The
25:21
culture is strong and resilient. The
25:23
Culture is AAPI Women.
25:26
Join MSNBC's Katie Fang as
25:28
she hosts a dinner party with groundbreaking Asian
25:30
American and Pacific Islander women who are shaping
25:33
American culture. Featuring political strategist,
25:35
Huma Abedne, award-winning novelist
25:37
Min Jin Lee, and an interview with comedian
25:40
and actress Margaret Cho. The Culture
25:42
is AAPI Women. Sunday
25:44
at 10 p.m. Eastern on MSNBC
25:47
and streaming on Peacock.
25:52
Today we got new surveillance footage from
25:55
police from inside a private elementary school
25:57
in Nashville, Tennessee. It shows
25:59
the moment. Yesterday morning, when a heavily armed
26:02
20-year-old former student shot through the
26:04
locked glass doors of the school and
26:06
started a room for the corridors.
26:08
Now, within 10 minutes of the first call to police,
26:10
officers were on the scene. Their
26:12
body camera footage seen here shows them
26:15
racing through the school, where they eventually confronted
26:17
and fatally shot the shooter,
26:20
but not before the shooter was able to kill six
26:22
people. Those people are Cynthia
26:24
Peek, substitute teacher Catherine Kuntz,
26:27
the head of school, Hill, the school
26:29
custodian, 9-year-old
26:30
Evelyn Deakhouse, 9-year-old
26:34
Hailey Scruggs, and 9-year-old William
26:36
Kinney. As you
26:39
can see in the footage, the shooter was carrying
26:41
two AR-style weapons, something that we've come
26:43
to expect in these situations. Coincidentally,
26:45
the same day that this atrocity
26:48
happened,
26:49
The Washington Post published two articles
26:52
examining the outsized impact the AR-15 has
26:54
had on American life.
26:56
One article uses three-dimensional renderings to show
26:59
exactly how AR-15s and
27:01
weapons like them are so much more destructive and
27:03
lethal than regular handguns.
27:06
The
27:06
other tracks how gun propaganda
27:08
has fueled the rise of the AR-15 to become
27:10
the best-selling rifle in the U.S.
27:13
And yet still, on the same day as well,
27:16
that a shooter was murdering children and
27:18
adults at school, the ATF was
27:20
in Georgia to conduct what appears to be a routine inspection
27:23
of gun store similar to what health inspectors do for
27:25
restaurants, only be confronted and
27:27
stopped by Georgia Republican Congresswoman
27:29
Marjorie Taylor Greene.
27:31
As all this happens, Republicans appear to
27:34
be shrugging their shoulders and
27:36
moving on. While Democrats are
27:38
increasingly loudly and forthrightly specifically
27:41
calling for a return to the assault weapons ban of the
27:43
1990s. Congresswoman
27:46
Alyssa Slotkin is a Democrat in Michigan, as well
27:48
as a candidate for Senate there in 2024. She
27:50
is reintroducing gun violence legislation
27:52
tomorrow, and she joins me now. Congresswoman,
27:57
I have noted the President's calling
27:59
for an
28:00
assault weapons ban, this is seems
28:02
to be reaching
28:04
a kind of consensus crescendo among Democrats.
28:07
Where do you stand on it? I mean,
28:09
we voted on an assault weapons ban
28:11
in the last Congress. It was actually bipartisan
28:14
at that time. There were two Republicans who voted with
28:16
us. Neither of
28:18
those congressmen are still in Congress now.
28:22
So I think, to
28:24
be honest, I grew up in Michigan
28:26
with guns. I grew up on
28:28
my family farm. We always had guns. I
28:30
carried a Glock and an M4, a semi-automatic
28:34
in three tours in Iraq. So
28:36
I grew up in that world.
28:39
But I think at this point, there
28:41
just has to be a decision made by everybody.
28:44
Right now, the number one killer of kids under 21
28:46
in America is gun violence.
28:48
We either decide to do something about that
28:51
as a society or we don't. We
28:53
either decide to legislate.
28:54
We either decide to sort of say we're not going to accept
28:57
that kids are being killed in their sanctuaries or
28:59
we say publicly we don't care. And
29:01
I think for me, as someone who's
29:04
had two school shootings in her district
29:06
in 16 months, I know where
29:08
I stand on this and I certainly know where most Democrats
29:10
stand. What are
29:11
your conversations like with the folks
29:13
that survived those two incidents?
29:15
I know that you have had to.
29:18
I've talked to many members of Congress who have
29:20
very profound and I think in some cases
29:23
kind of transformational relationships with people that
29:25
have survived these sorts of incidents. and I'm curious
29:27
what your experience has been.
29:28
Yeah, I mean, to be honest, I have a press
29:31
conference tomorrow when we have young people
29:33
from Oxford High School here with us
29:35
and their family, and we have people
29:38
from Michigan State University coming with
29:40
us to be with us. And I think, you
29:42
know, I think we're just gonna come to a point where
29:44
so many Americans have had a personal experience
29:47
with gun violence, either they and themselves
29:50
or someone they love, that it's just gonna
29:52
change the feeling on the
29:54
ground about this issue and push it where it needs
29:56
to be. In the meantime, I challenge
29:58
any of my...
30:00
colleagues who are rejecting
30:02
any kind of conversation on gun safety, to
30:04
have a conversation with a 17-year-old who
30:07
survived a gun, you know, an incident
30:09
in their school or in their community, and
30:11
who are saying, like, what are you doing to protect
30:14
me? What are you going to do to protect
30:16
me in my school? And the answer
30:18
is nothing, because if I do anything,
30:20
it somehow threatens my political career.
30:23
I dare them to have the actual conversations, because
30:25
when you are engaging with real people, It's impossible
30:28
to ignore the issue.
30:30
Do you think it is an issue that there's
30:33
possibility for persuasion on? I
30:37
do. I mean, I think I really felt things change after
30:39
the Michigan state shooting in Michigan
30:42
because we have 50,000 students. That means, you know, 100,000 parents,
30:46
thousands
30:46
of more family, so many
30:49
alumni in our state, right, who
30:51
had been there. And so I started to get calls from
30:53
my Republican mayors and local representatives
30:56
from people who said, look, if someone
30:58
comes for my gun, I'm going to push back
31:00
and I'm not going to accept that. But please, let's
31:03
find something to do to protect our babies. And
31:06
I think the feeling on the ground is
31:08
changing. And the last people to get the memo
31:10
are the elected representatives in Washington. I think
31:13
that they're not reading the situation. They're not feeling
31:15
how things are changing. And I know in Michigan, we're
31:17
about to pass actual gun safety
31:19
legislation. So it's going to play
31:22
out in real time in my very
31:24
sort of swing, politically divided
31:27
state.
31:28
Congresswoman Alyssa Slocken, who does
31:30
represent Swing District, is a statewide
31:32
candidate for office now for Senate. Thank you very much. Thank
31:35
you.
31:36
Still to come, Republicans revealed their strategy
31:38
to combat gun violence in America, which is
31:40
just do absolutely
31:42
nothing. If
31:44
you think Washington's going to fix this problem, you're
31:47
wrong. They're not going to fix this problem. They
31:49
are the problem. It
32:00
is time for us to move
32:02
beyond thoughts and
32:06
prayers. Remind
32:09
our lawmakers of
32:11
the words of the British statesman
32:15
Edmund Burke, All
32:18
that is necessary for
32:21
evil to triumph is
32:25
for good people to
32:28
do nothing. This
32:30
morning, the Chaplain of the United States
32:32
Senate opened the day's session with a pointed
32:35
message that it is not acceptable
32:37
to shrug your shoulders at the murder of children,
32:40
which has become the kind of go-to move
32:43
for most Republicans, not just in
32:45
this one, in the wake of mass shooting after
32:47
mass shooting in this country.
32:49
The reaction has been no different after six people,
32:51
including three nine-year-old children,
32:54
were gunned down at a Nashville elementary
32:56
school yesterday.
32:58
In fact, a lawmaker from Tennessee, Republican
33:01
Congressman Tim Burkett, even took
33:03
the rhetoric a step further.
33:06
It's a horrible, horrible situation, and
33:09
we're not gonna fix it. Criminals are
33:11
gonna be criminals, and my daddy fought in the Second World
33:13
War, fought in the Pacific, fought the Japanese, and
33:15
he told me, he said, He said if somebody
33:18
wants to take you out and doesn't mind losing
33:20
their life There's not a whole heck of a lot you can do about
33:22
it. What should be done to protect
33:25
people like your little girlfriend being safe at school?
33:28
Well, we homeschooled But
33:30
you know, that's our decision. Some people don't have that option
33:32
and frankly some people don't need to do it They don't
33:35
have to It just
33:36
suited our needs much better
33:39
What can you do really right? That
33:42
attitude, well, bad things happen, nothing you
33:44
can do about it. It's become
33:47
a sort of perverse default on
33:49
the right in the face of the just ongoing
33:53
incomprehensible tragedy that is gun
33:55
violence in America. I mean, there
33:57
were more than 20,000 gun-related deaths. the
34:00
U.S. last year, and that excludes
34:02
suicides. We had nearly 650 mass
34:05
shootings, the second highest number on record
34:07
after 2021. We are, and
34:09
this has been said a million times on this program and others, unique
34:12
among our peers. The U.S. has far and away
34:14
the most firearm homicides among high-income
34:17
nations, 4.4 for every 100,000
34:19
residents. The
34:22
problem has been getting worse in recent
34:24
years. deaths hit a 30-year high
34:26
in 2021 before seeing, thankfully,
34:29
a slight decline last year. And now,
34:32
guns are the leading cause of death for
34:34
American children surpassing car
34:36
accidents and cancer. We
34:38
know that gun violence has also played a role
34:41
in the precipitous decline in life expectancy
34:44
in the U.S. Between 2019
34:46
and 2021, life expectancy dropped by a total of 2.7
34:49
years. And that's not
34:51
just gun violence, right? This has been
34:53
affected by a whole bunch of other factors, from
34:55
overdoses largely driven by fentanyl,
34:57
primarily, to of course the COVID
34:59
pandemic, to an increase in maternal mortality,
35:02
a rocketing up in
35:03
car crashes. Second,
35:07
only to the urgency of our climate crisis, which
35:09
is the number one priority. This, that
35:11
chart, this decline in our
35:13
life expectancy is the central challenge,
35:16
I believe, for our representatives, indeed for all
35:18
of us as citizens. It is an astounding
35:21
scandal, the richest country
35:23
on earth,
35:24
a country that views itself as the
35:26
greatest country on earth. It's just sitting
35:29
back and watching this happen,
35:32
especially conservative Republicans who have adopted
35:35
this attitude that basically
35:38
American life is cheap. I'll
35:42
never forget Governor Mississippi, Kate Reeves, one
35:44
of the few Republicans to just come out and say this worth
35:46
rightly. During the pandemic in August
35:48
of 2021, we had these fights again, about what
35:51
we should do to keep Americans safe.
35:53
Much of the country grappling with precautions
35:55
and sacrifices to try to protect vulnerable
35:57
people. Governor Ries told attendees at a fun
36:00
is your quote, when you believe in eternal life,
36:02
when you believe that living on this earth is but a
36:04
blip on the screen, then you don't have to be so
36:06
scared of things.
36:09
You die, you die. Conservative
36:13
Republicans like Tate Reeves and Tim Brackett of Tennessee
36:15
really do seem to think that's fine. Whether
36:18
the cause is a deadly respiratory virus that
36:21
preys on the sick, the elderly or
36:23
AR-15s, mowing down
36:25
children in their classrooms.
36:27
What should be done to protect people
36:30
like your little girl from being safe at school?
36:33
Well, we homeschool her. But
36:35
that's our decision. Some people don't have that option
36:37
and frankly some people don't need to do it. They don't
36:40
have to. They just suited our
36:42
needs much better. You good?
36:43
Yeah. Thank you.
36:46
The last thing you want to hear while listening to your
36:48
favorite podcast is another gimmicky ad.
36:51
NJM feels the same way. That's why
36:53
they provide award-winning service without the use
36:55
of mascots or repetitive jingles. And
36:59
when you upgrade to NJM, you can even
37:01
save on your auto insurance. Better service
37:03
than possible savings? Sounds like a win-win.
37:06
No jingles or mascots, just great insurance.
37:08
NJM. Visit NJM.com
37:11
slash podcast for a quote to see how much you
37:13
can save on your auto insurance.
37:15
Hi, I'm Tom Yamas, and for
37:17
me, the news is so much more than a headline.
37:20
It informs and inspires and
37:22
it still matters to cover you
37:25
have to be in it will take you to the front
37:27
lines of the story where it's actually happening
37:29
with NBC News journalist on the ground
37:31
from all over the world we cover what
37:33
you need to know and bring your news feed
37:36
to life in prime time and streaming
37:38
live it's your news playlist join
37:40
me for top story weeknights at 7 Eastern
37:43
on NBC News now.
37:48
It's weeks
37:50
like this where the fetishization of guns
37:52
in right wing politics seems even more ghastly
37:54
than normal.
37:56
this obsession has become so fully normalized,
37:58
It's an unremarked. a remarkable part of conservative
38:01
politics. Here's just one example
38:03
to choose among many. Republican
38:05
Congresswoman Lauren Boberg, her claim
38:07
to fame, the thing that helped launch her into politics,
38:10
was her ownership of Shooter's Grill
38:12
in Rifle, Colorado, a restaurant where staff
38:15
carried firearms openly.
38:17
Writer Jeff Charlotte visited Shooter's before
38:19
it closed last year for his new book, Undertote
38:22
Scenes from a Slow Civil War.
38:24
A chapter is excerpted in a new Vanity
38:27
Fair article, which recounts, among
38:29
other things, conversation with a fellow shooter's
38:31
customer, David G. Things,
38:33
said David G, are going down the hole fast.
38:36
How will I know when things are going down the hole,
38:38
I asked. You get into city areas,
38:40
you'll see the people, which people? The instigators.
38:43
I'd see them fighting in the streets. When I say it's
38:45
going down the hole fast, I'm talking about that.
38:47
I'm talking about those of us who have less tolerance
38:50
for the instigators. So some will
38:52
resort to, let's just say, other
38:54
methods. Jeff Charlotte,
38:57
author of that fantastic new book, joins me
38:59
now. Jeff, this book,
39:02
which is a remarkable piece of work, I'm working
39:04
my way through it, one
39:06
of the central themes is the
39:09
obsession with violence, this kind of apocalyptic
39:12
waiting for violence, and the view of
39:14
guns, not in the context of sports,
39:17
certainly, and not even the context, really, of I need to protect
39:19
my own home, but explicitly as
39:21
arming oneself
39:24
a violent struggle to come? Yeah,
39:27
I've been reporting on right-wing movements in the United States
39:30
for 20 years and traveling back
39:32
and forth across the country. Since January 6,
39:34
I've seen more guns than in
39:37
all the years before that. And
39:39
it's not just places like Shooter's Grill,
39:42
which is sort of leading with guns, but churches, churches
39:45
that have their own militias. The first militia
39:47
church I went to, I thought was a fluke.
39:49
And then I started to realize that churches were arming
39:52
up with the expectation
39:54
of civil war. But
39:56
I think that's different than the gun
39:59
culture of the past. Doomsday prepper of
40:01
the fringe has become a mainstay
40:03
of right-wing culture
40:05
the subtitle of books scenes
40:07
from a slow civil war was a very evocative
40:09
phrase and I You know, I always
40:12
I'm worried
40:14
about calling something into being by naming
40:16
it right? I think
40:18
Why that term did
40:21
you wrestle with using that on the books cover what
40:23
do you mean by a slow civil war I?
40:25
I did. I've been resisting
40:27
terms like civil war and before
40:30
that fascism for a long time. I'm cautious.
40:32
History moves slowly. Yet,
40:35
I think at the moment, the slow civil
40:37
war, you could call it a kind of cold war, but
40:39
there are casualties. In Nashville, Tennessee,
40:41
there were casualties. Women who are
40:44
bleeding out for lack of reproductive rights
40:47
are casualties. nearly 20 states
40:49
that are criminalizing queer
40:52
kids like my own. Those
40:55
places are making casualties.
40:57
In terms of the gun culture, when you have
41:00
weekly skirmishes where oathkeepers,
41:04
3%ers, Proud Boys
41:06
showing up with AR-15s outside
41:09
of libraries, schools, hospitals,
41:13
we're at a simmer now. We are at a simmer.
41:16
That doesn't make it inevitable. I don't think we have to call him
41:18
to being. But I think we have to be aware
41:20
of the threat level,
41:23
as some of the right wingers would say.
41:25
You have a chapter
41:28
in there about Ashley Babbitt, who of course
41:30
is the woman who was shot and killed as she
41:32
attempted to vault through a broken window
41:35
into the chamber of the house by a Capitol
41:37
police officer. She has become a kind
41:39
of martyr figure for many on the far right,
41:41
including to Donald Trump, who
41:44
has celebrated her. The
41:46
mother of Ashley Babbitt met with Representative
41:49
Kevin McCarthy's staff. Tell me about what you
41:51
learned about the sort of culture
41:53
around
41:54
Ashley Babbitt and her death. Well,
41:57
as soon as I saw Ashley Babbitt killed and...
42:00
And she's often spoken of as unarmed, but
42:02
she wasn't. She was carrying a pretty
42:04
nasty little knife. That's the knife on the cover. That's
42:06
the evidence photo. As
42:09
soon as I saw her death on January
42:12
6th, and you could see the hands of the
42:14
police officer who killed her, and he was a black man.
42:17
And because I'm an American and I study American
42:19
history and mythology, I knew what the right was going
42:21
to do with that. And sure enough, within
42:23
days, they were telling the same old story,
42:26
the lynching story. They were aging
42:28
Ashley back, making her a martyr.
42:30
They would say she was smaller, younger,
42:32
almost as if whiter, as if a
42:34
little white girl. There's a lot
42:36
of people speak of the right as a death cult. But
42:38
I think in some ways, we can understand it as
42:40
an innocence cult. They want to be innocent of history,
42:43
innocent of race. And Ashley Babbitt
42:45
served as this whiteness martyr.
42:48
So now you have this situation where the Proud
42:50
Boys hand out challenge coins with Ashley's
42:52
face on it. There are Ashley Babbitt flags. And
42:57
one more in the name of love tweets Representative
43:00
Paul Gosart, retooling a
43:03
U2 song for Martin Luther King for
43:05
Ashley Babbitt. Hashtag say her name,
43:07
they say, retooling a hashtag
43:10
created for black women for Ashley
43:12
Babbitt. I went to a rally where
43:15
Ashley Babbitt's mother spoke, turned into a brawl
43:17
between Proud Boys and counterprotesters. Black
43:20
Lives Matter protesters were chanting Black
43:23
Lives Matter. It was the birthday of Breonna Taylor.
43:26
And the Ashley Babbitt crowd started
43:28
counter-chanting,
43:30
Ashley Babbitt. And that was their answer
43:32
to Black Lives Matter, one white
43:34
woman. Jeff
43:36
Charlotte, as you said, you've been reporting on this.
43:40
You're one of my favorite nonfiction writers anywhere.
43:42
Just an incredible writer and incredible reporter.
43:45
And this book is, I think, among
43:47
your best work ever. It's called The Undertow,
43:50
scenes from a slow civil war. You can get it wherever
43:53
books are sold. Thank you so much.
43:56
Thank you, Chris. 8 o'clock
44:00
on MSNBC. Don't forget to like us on Facebook.
44:02
That's Facebook.com slash All
44:04
In With Chris.
44:06
weeknights
44:33
at 7 Eastern on NBC News Now.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More