Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
At Bet365, we don't do ordinary. We believe
0:02
that every sport should be epic. Every goal,
0:04
every game, every point, every play. From the
0:07
moments that are legendary to the ones that
0:09
fly under the radar. Whether it's a game-winning
0:11
goal in the final seconds of overtime, or
0:13
a shot on the goal in the first
0:16
period. Whatever the sport, whatever the moment. It's
0:18
never ordinary at Bet365. 21
0:21
plus only. Must be President Ohio. If you or someone you know has
0:23
a gambling problem and want help, call 1-800-GAMBLER. Terms
0:25
and conditions apply. Tonight
0:28
on All In. We will not
0:30
walk away. We will not bow
0:33
down. The Biden speech defies expectations.
0:36
So at odds with every day
0:38
Joe, the AP affectionately called it
0:41
feisty. And Democrats
0:43
drive home the contracts. That
0:45
was an embarrassment last night. Get
0:47
lost. You're a joke. Tonight,
0:51
the evidence that the incumbent is on the run
0:53
is not a joke. Tonight, the evidence that the
0:55
incumbent is on the right path. Plus,
0:58
why even MAGA World is befuddled
1:00
by the Republican response. Right
1:04
now, the American dream has turned
1:06
into a nightmare. And
1:08
why the President's supreme confrontation could
1:11
be an even bigger deal than it looks. And
1:15
with all due respect, Justices, you're about to
1:17
realize just how much you get in the right way. All
1:21
In starts right now. Good
1:27
evening from New York. I'm Chris Hayes. If there was
1:30
ever any doubt the general election is here, it became
1:32
absolutely clear in just the first 30 seconds,
1:35
our President Joe Biden's State of the
1:37
Union address last night. Biden
1:39
came to the stage as the nominee
1:42
of his own party, facing his predecessor
1:44
running yet again. And from the very
1:46
first moments, Biden set the stakes of
1:49
an existential battle over the future of
1:51
American democracy. A battle
1:53
represented by the man holding the presidency
1:55
against the man who previously held it
1:58
and lost it And then fomented. The
2:00
violent coup to try to retain it. It
2:03
was an aggressive prosecution the case right out
2:05
of the gates. He was aided by the
2:07
facts, a republican parties and the right wing
2:09
media. Certainly and honestly, a lot of the
2:11
mainstream media. Has spent the
2:13
past few years, particularly the past few
2:15
months caricaturing Joe Biden as impossibly feeble
2:18
and daughter and. Will. He did
2:20
not look that way last month. Present
2:22
seems to relish the constant outburst,
2:24
interjections and hackles from Republicans in
2:26
the chamber. On. My absolute
2:28
favorite moments happen before the speech started
2:31
as Buttons made his way into the
2:33
chamber shaking hands. Before
2:35
he made this face smarting
2:38
first film and Marjorie Taylor
2:40
Greens Matter Get Up. It's.
2:43
Like the face of a grown up pretending
2:45
to be scared by a six year olds
2:47
Halloween costume. Oh it is. Scary
2:49
Ghost. But. Once you
2:51
got to the podium and this me started,
2:54
he used every opportunity to his disposal to
2:56
remind voters at home that on a range
2:58
of key issues from Ukraine to January Six
3:00
abortion rights to Obama Care. Democrats.
3:03
Found the right side of public opinion. Republicans.
3:06
On the wrong so. If
3:11
we stand with Ukraine. Provide.
3:18
The. Now. This
3:21
is. As you please been blocked. By.
3:23
Those who want to walk away from
3:25
our of world leadership. My first as.
3:29
A former republican president. So student
3:31
code? do whatever the hell you
3:33
want. My predecessor and some you
3:35
hear seek to bury the truth
3:38
about universes. I will not do
3:40
that. This is
3:42
a mobile to speak the truth in the
3:44
buried allies many of you and a saber.
3:47
And my predecessor a promising to pass
3:49
a national Bad Reproductive Freedom. My.
3:51
God what freedom else was? you take away.
3:56
Senate or Congress to force the right to
3:58
choose. I promise you. I'll restore.
4:00
Roe V Wade is a law
4:03
land again. My predecessors. Many
4:05
this chamber. Wanna. Take those
4:07
repr scripts and drug away by repealing.
4:10
Affordable. Care Act. I'm
4:14
not mad and happen. At
4:17
every turn, the message was clear:
4:19
Democrats oppose to his aggression. Republicans
4:21
apparently do not. Democrats support American
4:24
democracy. Republicans apparently do not. Democrats
4:26
support reproductive freedom. Republicans clearly do
4:28
not. All culminating
4:30
in a very telling exchange and perhaps
4:33
the number one political priorities for the
4:35
Republican party. Pass. Through
4:40
Ways to Go. Republicans concert
4:42
so screwed and get more tax breaks
4:44
to the Wilson. I will
4:46
watch the throne. You
4:50
guys know one another. Sincerely not I
4:52
say. I can
4:55
substantiate your plan once well
4:57
as soon as and accept
4:59
another two trillion dollars to
5:01
the Superbowl. That's good to
5:03
hear. They. Are gonna
5:05
try to cut another two trillion dollars for the
5:07
super wealthy? One, the Trump tax cuts expire, and
5:09
twenty twenty five. It's a huge part of the
5:11
agenda. Doesn't Buy was reminding
5:13
voters all thirty two million of them who
5:16
tuned in last night. Of
5:18
the most unpopular moment of dolphins
5:20
presidency other than the days after
5:22
January Six, when Trump and Republicans
5:24
in Congress for through that massive
5:26
tax cut for the wealthy and
5:28
corporations. With. The only actual
5:30
republican policy victory on domestic policy of
5:32
Trump's tenure novels the biggest piece of
5:35
legislation. Despite their local protestations last night,
5:37
he is exactly what they will do
5:39
again should they retake control of Congress
5:41
in the White House. They. Are
5:44
I will give this. Smart. Enough
5:46
not to openly campaign on
5:48
it because they know that
5:50
cutting taxes for the wealthy.
5:52
Further, cutting taxes for corporations
5:54
is an unbelievably unpopular political
5:56
position. The. Fact
5:59
that matters everyone to pay. The Texture American
6:01
Politics knows this election. This campaigns
6:03
can be hard fought. Can
6:05
be a very close general election. I
6:07
think barring some unforeseen changes circumstances, Joe
6:10
Biden, the Democrats say some truly serious
6:12
challenges ahead. No doubt you've read about
6:14
them. The. Last,
6:16
I wasn't. some ways a display of what
6:18
their greatest strengths are the advantages. And
6:21
it's this. They are on the
6:23
right side of the policy specific
6:25
something the actual tangible things of
6:27
governing. Of nearly every,
6:30
not every, put nearly every
6:32
salient issue before voters. Especially
6:35
through an abortion rights. And
6:37
as a result, there's this incredibly energized and
6:40
mobilize base of tens of millions of people
6:42
who been showing up for basically every special
6:44
election across America. Sea
6:47
Sauce in the majors. Twenty twenty two
6:49
and twenty twenty three to do whatever
6:51
they can to seen swine, reproductive freedoms
6:53
into law to beat back those. Who.
6:56
Supported of those restrictions.
7:00
And that by Mars the voters who
7:02
show up to vote in off your
7:04
special elections even a midterms, they're already
7:06
incredibly motivate big tend not to be
7:08
the ones of you'd be for persuaded
7:10
for the voters on the margins who
7:12
will decide the selection. And honestly,
7:14
the fate of the future trajectory of
7:16
what we call American democracy. A
7:19
lot of them just aren't paying attention to
7:21
politics. They. says of thing.
7:25
Today we saw a example was an anecdote
7:27
from Democratic pollster So in the Lakes about
7:29
a focus group she held with swing voters
7:32
weight as the voters about Trump's upcoming January
7:34
six court cases quote figure out what court
7:36
cases around January Six and Lake said well,
7:38
you know the insurrection that he was the
7:41
one that provoked at the go Oh yeah,
7:43
kind of forgot about that. Now.
7:46
I want to be clear here. Like. There's.
7:48
Lots of things I don't pay attention to. I've
7:51
got this job and a to ask me about those things.
7:53
I was on the exact same way. But.
7:57
There's. tons of examples of this stuff texas
8:00
article summarizing focus groups with independent voters last
8:02
spring. Quote, in Michigan, a woman was asked
8:04
how the two parties differ on abortion and
8:07
how she would describe each party's position. I'm
8:09
not sure the woman answered. I really haven't basically heard
8:11
anything about which party is leaning towards it and which
8:14
one isn't. If I had to guess, I
8:17
would say Democrat would probably be against
8:19
abortion and Republican probably before it. That
8:22
same article shares another anecdote from her voter
8:25
in North Carolina. Quote, a participant said she
8:27
wasn't sure where the party stand on abortion
8:29
and had been surprised Roe v. Wade was
8:31
overturned under a Democrat. Okay,
8:34
but did Joe Biden have a say in whether
8:36
or not was overturned? The focus group moderator asked.
8:39
No, but he helped get the Supreme Court
8:41
judges where they are, the one responded. The
8:44
moderator then informed the woman the most recent
8:46
judges came in under Donald Trump. I
8:49
mean, again, it might seem obvious to those
8:51
of us who are hyper engaged in politics,
8:54
but all this stuff is super opaque to
8:57
literally millions of millions of voters, many
9:00
of whom have just started paying attention to
9:02
the upcoming election, aren't really even going to
9:04
tune in fully for a while. So this
9:08
is crucial, right? This was what I really took
9:10
away from last night, the path that Biden this
9:12
campaign recognized as people started to
9:14
pay attention to this campaign to be proactive
9:16
about telling voters what
9:18
the two parties stand for, what
9:21
the Democratic Joe Biden Kamala Harris
9:23
agenda looks like, what the
9:25
Trump Republican Party agenda looks like.
9:28
And judging by last night, they're going to
9:30
do so confidently knowing they are on the
9:33
right side of a whole host of issues.
9:36
John Favreau was the mastermind behind several
9:38
State of the Union speeches while he
9:40
served as President Obama's chief speech writer.
9:42
He's now the co-host of POD Save
9:44
America and co-author of the upcoming buck,
9:46
Democracy or Else, How to Save America
9:49
in 10 Easy Steps. Tim Miller is
9:51
the former communications director for Jeb Bush's
9:53
campaign 2016. Now a writer at large
9:55
for the bulwark. He also hosts a
9:57
podcast there because who doesn't these days
9:59
and both. Join me now. John,
10:03
I keep thinking about the fact the first five
10:06
minutes of that speech. Here's how I think
10:08
about it. And as someone who actually did this, I want
10:10
to get your response. So what was striking to me is
10:13
you package together three things that you're
10:15
just on the right side of 60-40
10:18
splits, or 65-35. Putin's
10:21
aggression was jam-6
10:23
and political violence bad, was
10:26
overturning row bad. And there was no
10:28
real conceptual coherence to it, other
10:30
than out of the gate, I'm going to plant
10:32
a flag on these things that I know I've
10:35
got the wind at my back up. Yeah,
10:40
I mean, like you said, there are all the most
10:42
popular issues for Biden, or issues where he's got 60-65%
10:45
of the public on his side. But
10:48
also, the entire thesis
10:50
of his campaign and his presidency
10:52
has been defending democracy and defending
10:54
freedom. And I thought it
10:57
was interesting, right off the bat, he said
10:59
that he was there to wake up this
11:01
Congress and alert the American people that this
11:03
is no ordinary moment. And I think if
11:05
your message is that democracy hangs in the
11:07
balance at home and overseas,
11:10
you've got to act like it. And I
11:12
think why Joe Biden succeeded last night
11:14
is because he showed that urgency that
11:17
has to come along with believing that
11:19
saving democracy is the cause of your presidency,
11:21
the reason you're running for a second term,
11:23
and what the country needs right now. So
11:25
it was interesting that he started that. He
11:29
was gonna get a bunch of applause, at
11:31
least for a lot of the, from some
11:33
Republicans on Ukraine, certainly on some of the
11:35
January 6th stuff, or at least he was
11:37
going to make them feel deeply uncomfortable or
11:39
look embarrassed if
11:42
they didn't clap for some of that. I gotta
11:44
say, because I think I tend to
11:46
be sort of, I don't know,
11:48
I just, at a human level, I empathize
11:50
with people that I see up there, Tim,
11:52
I was thinking about, Mike Johnson just like,
11:54
you could just watch the internal
11:56
monologue of like, no, no.
11:59
We're not clapping. We're not. Are we? We're
12:02
clapping. We're clapping. Like he just, he did
12:04
not know. There was like a few moments
12:06
where it was like free the Israeli hostages.
12:08
It was like, Oh, we're doing it. Everything
12:10
else. He didn't seem, he seemed really unsure
12:12
of. And I think that the lack of
12:14
surety in some ways points to some of
12:17
the difficulties of his position
12:19
in the Republican party's position, which is
12:21
like it's Donald Trump's party.
12:23
You can't, you can't be deciding what to
12:25
clap for or not clap for. Yeah.
12:29
Well, I'm a masochist, so I did not feel
12:32
bad for him. I was really enjoying that section
12:34
and I rewound and just spent a little while
12:36
just watching my job that actually get
12:39
some pleasure on a Thursday night. Yeah,
12:41
look, I think it was tough, right? You could
12:43
tell the hit internal monologue on some of the
12:45
stuff, particularly on the Ukraine section, which comes right
12:47
up the top, which is
12:49
traditionally, he would have been somebody that
12:51
would have clapped for saying, Hey, we're going to give arms
12:53
to our allies. And he did. Yeah,
12:58
he did, but he kind of did. Right. It's this
13:00
half hearted clap. He's working around a little bit, you
13:02
know, Kamala, the vice president is standing
13:04
up. He doesn't stand up. He kind of, you can
13:07
tell he's trying to deciding to. So
13:09
I think that that tells you that, right. This
13:11
is a lot of the members of this party
13:13
are kind of lost. They're unsure on their footing,
13:15
right? Because we don't exactly know what I'm supposed
13:17
to do on the issue of Ukraine. That's why
13:19
it's a good issue for Biden, because he's dividing
13:21
the other side. And just strategically speaking, I have
13:24
to say, I felt very seen by the first
13:26
20 minutes of that speech last night. Generally
13:28
speaking, I guess John could correct me
13:31
on this. The presidents don't like micro
13:33
target state of the unions to minority
13:35
factions of the other party. But
13:38
that's what I didn't seem to do. The
13:41
first 20 minutes was Nikki Haley voters come
13:43
to me. I woke out of Putin. I'm
13:45
going to quote Reagan. January
13:47
6th was that. Yeah,
13:50
that's a great point. And that is another part
13:52
of sort of that you unifying that. I also
13:54
thought the you know, the sort
13:56
of bread and butter, you know, the bread
13:58
and butter economic policy. the Democratic Party,
14:01
John, which is again, that's, you know, that's
14:04
a standard part of being a Democratic president, giving this
14:06
speech. But it was particularly pointed
14:08
and particularly aggressive. And I thought particularly interesting
14:10
in terms of presidential
14:13
campaigns are so much about salience, right? Like which
14:15
issues are people ranking higher and lower? And one
14:17
of the levers you have as presidents is try
14:19
to raise the salience. And for
14:21
him to talk about like tax cuts
14:23
and Obamacare, that stuff has been lower
14:25
on the salience meter in
14:27
the media conversation, all these things, like it's very
14:30
intentional also to meet cues a little bit of
14:32
what this campaign is going to be about. It
14:37
has, but what's really high in
14:39
salience is people's concerns about the
14:42
lingering effects of inflation, right? So inflation has come down,
14:44
prices are high, costs are still feeling high to a
14:46
lot of people. And so in
14:49
his economic section, you know, what did he
14:51
propose? A billionaire's tax and
14:54
making sure that like big companies can pay a little
14:56
bit more. And in order
14:59
to make sure that
15:01
healthcare is cheaper, childcare is cheaper,
15:03
housing is cheaper. And
15:05
so to actually, he was really trying to
15:07
address the concerns, I think, of people who
15:09
are still worried about high prices. And
15:12
that's also going to be the best contrast with
15:14
Donald Trump and something that Donald Trump and the
15:16
Republicans don't want to talk about in the campaign
15:18
because Trump's proposed another huge tax cut for the
15:20
rich. And we haven't even talked
15:23
about this a lot, but Trump has proposed
15:25
across the board tariffs that are going to
15:27
slap a 10% tariff on just about anything
15:29
you buy that's made overseas. And that's going
15:31
to just make inflation skyrocket. I
15:34
want to ask you, Tim, about the members
15:36
of this House caucus. I mean, it's
15:39
clearly the case that there's not a lot
15:41
of control that leadership has. If
15:43
they did, if leadership had control, Mike
15:45
Johnson wouldn't be sitting there. It would have been
15:47
the guy they elected, Kevin McCarthy on the 12th
15:49
ballot. It's still very striking to me that they
15:52
can't overcome. There was
15:54
all this reporting that like they're going to tell him
15:56
not to heckle and clearly like they understand it doesn't
15:58
really look that good. Just the fact
16:00
that Kant says something sort of profound to me about
16:02
the state of the party. Yeah,
16:06
I mean, not only can they not control
16:08
them, even the members themselves are incentivized to
16:10
act work. I know,
16:12
Dr. Johnathan Martin at Politico would have pointed this out, like
16:14
Troy Nels in 2021, in
16:17
the first day of the union, is there
16:19
wearing a mask in a suit, asking Joe
16:21
Biden to work with him on criminal justice
16:23
reform. Yesterday, he's in like a Chippendale bow
16:26
tie and a never surrendered Donald Trump mugshot
16:28
shirt. Right. And so, you know,
16:30
this is for the members, their incentives are going
16:32
the way towards being crazy. And, you know, I
16:34
don't there's no leverage. What leverage does Mike
16:36
Johnson have over these people? All of their
16:38
incentives are to get fundraising, to get on
16:40
Fox, to get on Newsmax, to be popular
16:43
with the base voters, is
16:45
to do the crazy stuff, the
16:47
stuff that turns off swing voters.
16:49
This is like the fundamental bind
16:51
that Republicans have found themselves in
16:53
in swing states. And so, you know,
16:55
Mike Johnson is the weakest speaker
16:57
in history, certainly in modern
16:59
history. Right. Like he can't get literally
17:01
anything passed without Democrats. So there's not
17:03
a they could not come up with
17:06
a bill, I guess a bill, you know, naming
17:08
a post office after Donald Trump. He could probably
17:10
do. But besides that, you know, he doesn't he's
17:12
unable to pass anything within the conference. So he
17:14
has no power to control it. Yeah,
17:16
Troy Nels is great. I don't know if we I don't
17:18
think we have images of him. But someone
17:21
pointed out that when he was in a
17:23
mask in a suit talking to Joe Biden, he
17:25
was in a district that was a Trump
17:27
plus one district. He got redistricted in the
17:29
Texas gerrymander into a Trump plus 16 district. And
17:31
it's literally like a before and after you
17:33
would see like this is what this is
17:35
what it looks like when you're in a Trump
17:38
plus one district. And then like Chippendale's
17:40
bow tie, your words never surrender shirt.
17:42
That's the Trump 16 district. In some
17:44
ways, like that's the trajectory of
17:47
a lot of the Republican Party in a nutshell. John
17:49
Favreau, Tim Miller. Thank you very much. Coming
17:54
up, the bipartisan panning of the Republican
17:56
response to the State of the Union.
18:00
I want to make a direct appeal
18:03
to the parents out there and
18:05
in particular to my fellow
18:07
moms we see you, we
18:11
hear you, and
18:13
we stand with
18:15
you. That all went
18:17
wrong for Alabama's Katie Britt. That's next. The
18:23
International Rescue Committee is a critical
18:25
organization working in more than 50
18:27
countries responding to the world's worst
18:29
humanitarian crises. The IRC serves people
18:31
whose lives have been upended by war,
18:34
conflict, and natural disasters. Responding within 72
18:37
hours after an emergency strikes, they
18:39
stay as long as needed. Right
18:41
now in places like Afghanistan and
18:43
Ukraine families are experiencing adverse winter
18:45
weather like heavy rain, frigid temperatures,
18:47
and snowfall on top of war,
18:49
hunger, and displacement. Many makeshift camps
18:52
are unable to withstand extreme weather
18:54
conditions. Some people are living without
18:56
reliable electricity while others can't afford
18:58
to buy fuel for the heat
19:00
source they do have. Donations help
19:02
the IRC provide families with the
19:05
resources they need to recover and
19:07
rebuild their lives including essential winter
19:09
items like emergency food, shelter, fuel,
19:12
medicine, blankets, winter gear, and cash
19:14
assistance. For example, even just a
19:16
$14 donation can provide a temporary
19:19
shelter for a displaced family. Donate
19:21
today by visiting rescue.org/rebuild. On
19:28
paper, Senator Katie Britt was an
19:30
excellent choice to deliver the response to the State
19:32
of the Union. At 42
19:34
years old, she's the youngest Republican
19:36
woman ever elected to the Senate,
19:38
the first woman senator from Alabama.
19:40
She's a mother of two, she's married to
19:43
a former NFL player, she's widely considered
19:45
to be a rising political star with
19:47
genuine political acumen. Senator Lindsey
19:49
Graham of South Carolina even suggested that quote,
19:51
she represents the future of the Republican Party.
19:54
The party clearly expect her to knock it out
19:56
of the park. New York Times
19:58
reports that a close ally of Senator Britt
20:01
sent talking points to conservative influencers ahead
20:03
of the speech, suggesting words
20:05
of praise, including, quote, she came off
20:07
like America's mom. She gets it. They
20:10
compared a response to Ronald Reagan's famous
20:12
Bertalan Wall speech and described as reminiscent
20:14
of his message of that shining city
20:16
on a hill. Before
20:18
she uttered a single word, the author of
20:20
these talking points declared that Britt's speech was
20:23
pitch perfect. For the first
20:25
60 seconds or so the speech had seemed fine.
20:28
She was smiling at her kitchen table talking
20:30
about the future of America, but
20:33
it quickly took a real turn. We
20:37
see you. We
20:40
hear you. And we
20:43
stand with you. Daily
20:46
Beast described the speech as, quote, bizarrely delivered
20:48
with an over the top dramatic cadence that
20:50
left political operatives and observers struggling to make
20:52
sense of it. The performance
20:54
was so bad that Republicans, some Republicans
20:57
watched the high profile speech with a
20:59
grimace. According to one strategist,
21:01
everyone's effing losing it. It's one of
21:03
our biggest disasters ever. Rolling
21:06
Stone was inundated with messages,
21:08
absolutely torturing Brits of surly
21:10
over dramatic rebuttal. A
21:12
Trump advisor wrote, quote, what the hell
21:15
am I watching right now? Republican pollster
21:17
called it creepy. And the senior house
21:19
congressional aide described as cringe inducing to
21:21
watch and likely destined to be turned
21:23
into a lame Saturday Night Live skit
21:25
this weekend. I think it's a fair prediction, though.
21:27
Might not be lame. The
21:29
conversation was similar in social media where
21:31
conservative activist Charlie Kirk received a lot
21:33
of replies to his post asking his
21:35
followers if they liked Britt's speech. Alan
21:37
Sanders compared it to a B grade
21:39
Hallmark movie moment with an unknown actress
21:41
playing the lead. Stacy in
21:44
the USA wrote very babysitter reading
21:46
a bedtime story like Zion 45
21:48
said, reminded me when a person
21:51
spoke on Sesame Street and
21:53
on Real America's Voice, the right wing hosts were
21:56
stunned into silence. God
22:00
bless you and may
22:02
God continue to bless
22:04
these United States of
22:07
America. I
22:22
don't, I'm
22:24
sure she's very, I'm sure she's very nice.
22:28
And I don't want to, I don't want to get like
22:30
over the top here, but that
22:33
is the, everything about
22:35
that on a night like tonight is wrong.
22:38
Reaction that may best represent the Republican
22:41
party came from the senior center from
22:43
Alabama, former football coach, Tommy Toverville. Well,
22:47
considering the circumstance, I think, I thought she did
22:49
very well. Uh, and you know, she's a
22:51
mom, uh, she's a housewife. She's
22:53
around people, uh, at a
22:55
young age. That
22:59
housewife is
23:01
his colleague, the first female
23:03
Senator from the state of Alabama. And
23:06
remember the clear intention of choosing Katie
23:08
Britch to deliver the response was to
23:10
counter the deficit Republicans are facing among
23:12
women voters and anger about their abortion
23:14
policy. I don't
23:17
think they quite accomplished that last night. It's
23:22
a decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme
23:24
court majority wrote the following and
23:26
with all due respect justices, women
23:29
are not without electoral electoral power,
23:32
excuse me, electoral or political power.
23:35
You're about to realize just how much you get. Those
23:39
bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have
23:41
no clue about the power of women,
23:44
but they found out when
23:46
reproductive freedom was on the ballot, we won in
23:48
2022 and 2020 and we'll win
23:50
again in 2024. Last
23:54
night, president Biden made it clear that he's
23:56
running on restoring reproductive rights in America, protecting
23:58
IVF across the country. fighting
24:00
the Republican agenda to implement a
24:02
national abortion ban and to sign
24:04
legislation that would enshrine and protect
24:06
abortion rights nationally. Because
24:09
Joe Biden and the Democratic Party are both committed
24:11
to this on principle. It's a bedrock part of
24:13
the party's DNA at this point. Their voters demanded.
24:16
They also understand these issues are central
24:18
to voters and that their position on
24:20
it is overwhelmingly popular. Alexis
24:23
McGill-Johnson is the CEO and president
24:25
of Planned Parenthood and she
24:27
joins me now. It's good to have you here. In
24:31
your position as CEO of Planned Parenthood, your
24:33
reaction just to the speech last night to
24:35
the emphasis on abortion rights? Well,
24:37
in my position and in the room where
24:39
it was incredibly electric. I happen to be
24:41
a guest of Senator Schumer, but one in
24:43
10 of the House
24:45
Democrats' guests were leaders of reproductive
24:48
rights. They were providers. They were
24:50
CEOs of Planned
24:53
Parenthood. They were patients. They
24:55
were in there talking, engaged
24:57
in a conversation, watching the president
24:59
say, I want to
25:01
restore Roe to the law and land and I
25:03
would challenge him, not just restore Roe. I think
25:06
we want to actually build Roe back better and
25:08
make sure that we make it more expansive, inclusive
25:10
and national right. It
25:13
was an incredible moment and opportunity
25:15
because he connected reproductive rights and
25:17
freedom to the fight for
25:19
democracy, which ultimately was his big
25:21
message last night. One thing that's
25:24
become clear, I think, is
25:26
there is an interesting tension in the Republican
25:28
Party on this. They haven't figured out how to talk
25:30
about it. I think the political
25:33
professionals and the savviest understand that they're
25:35
just totally underwater on this issue and
25:37
the less said about it, the better.
25:40
But it's also something that genuinely does animate the grassroots.
25:42
I mean, it's not they're not making it up. It's
25:45
not like some like congee. You know what I mean?
25:47
It's not like there's someone's paying them to care about
25:49
this. They care about it. This
25:51
is just on Thursday. Iowa Republicans passing
25:53
a personhood bill that critics there say
25:56
could threaten IVF care in the same way that finding
25:58
the Alabama Supreme Court did. They passed a A person
26:00
would build a state house on Thursday night, would
26:02
make it a felony to cause the death of
26:04
an unborn person that has all sorts of implications.
26:09
What do you think about the
26:11
fact that they still have their foot on the gas? I
26:14
mean, it's very perplexing, right? I mean, we've seen 35 personhood
26:16
bills in 16 states. And
26:20
whether or not this is actually their
26:22
grassroots is what I would question. Because
26:24
we have the majority of Americans supporting
26:26
reproductive freedom in every state. I think
26:29
it's... Well, you can do it with a
26:31
minority though. I mean, a vanguard is a powerful
26:33
thing. No, but that's the thing. But I think
26:35
when you were talking about their grassroots, we're really
26:37
talking about a tyranny of the minority of folks
26:40
who are continuing to elect people and hold them,
26:42
but only because they are safe in these gerrymandered
26:44
districts. It's not the majority of who their base
26:46
is, right? Because we wouldn't have a Kentucky, you
26:49
wouldn't have a Montana, you wouldn't have a Michigan
26:52
even, in fact, or Kansas if
26:54
we weren't seeing a cross party
26:57
bipartisan desire to see
26:59
that. So I don't understand why they're
27:01
doubling down. It honestly makes no sense
27:03
because these bans have proven that they
27:05
are criminalizing miscarriage, they're making pregnancy unsafe,
27:08
these stories are coming out. And of
27:10
course, they're running for them because real
27:12
people are talking about the real implications
27:14
of them and they don't have a
27:16
real legislative solution around it. One
27:19
of the things I thought of last night is one
27:21
way out that the president was very clear like send
27:23
me a bill. If you send me a Congress that
27:25
will protect abortion rights, I will sign that bill into
27:27
law. On the other
27:29
side, there's talk about Donald Trump's musing about
27:32
what the national ban is going to be and how many weeks,
27:34
whether it's an odd or even number, seems like an important thing
27:36
for him. One of the things that's
27:39
striking about that is just so many of the horror stories
27:41
we've heard are from women who
27:43
had to have abortions for medical reasons
27:45
past whatever the proposal
27:47
for a national ban would be. I
27:50
think that's a function of people not really understanding how
27:52
pregnancy works. Right. And building a lot
27:54
of that. It seems like a lot of that. Right. And
27:58
it's quite odd. But I
28:00
think what the president did last night was
28:02
really demonstrate the threat. The Republicans
28:05
have been running on a national abortion ban,
28:07
because that is, to your point, what they
28:09
believe their grassroots are saying. And so
28:11
they are running to the right on reproductive
28:13
freedom. That is not where the majority of
28:16
Americans are. And I think what
28:18
the president presented last night was a
28:20
clear contrast, that he
28:23
linked abortion rights to IVF as
28:26
part of a full spectrum of reproductive health
28:29
care and understanding that that is what people
28:31
need. It's whether and when we get
28:33
to decide whether or not we want to be parents, and
28:35
also now how. So one thing
28:37
I think the savvier members of
28:39
politicians will do in this
28:41
election is try to just avoid the issue. Or
28:44
they will say, no, I don't support a national ban, or
28:46
try to sort of skate away from it. I wonder how
28:48
important you think it is to affirmatively stick
28:50
to it. I mean, one of the things the
28:52
president was doing was pinning it to them. And
28:54
I think this is, just to be clear for
28:56
anyone watching this, if you
28:58
are opposed to abortion rights, the
29:01
Republican Party has a lot to offer you. And
29:03
if you support the Democratic Party, this is one
29:05
of those places where it's not like there are
29:07
some issues where, oh, are the parties that far apart?
29:09
This is probably one of the most black and white, right? I think
29:11
it's clear. And I don't see the bobbing and
29:14
weaving happening among the Democrats. Actually, I see
29:16
more Democrats being more vocal about the Democratic Party. I
29:18
don't think they're bobbing and weaving at all. No, I think they are 100%. I
29:21
think what's happening on the Republican side is
29:23
they are realizing that what they have on
29:25
record, they can't scrub. They're trying to scrub
29:28
their websites. They're trying to, as the kids
29:30
say, get rid of the receipts. But we
29:32
have them, right? Because we have the Wayback
29:34
Machine. We understand really what they have stood
29:36
for and why. And they're trying
29:39
to run away from that because they don't
29:41
know how to talk about it. I want to
29:43
offer you a thesis that I would like to hear
29:45
your response to. There
29:48
are some people who say, some pollsters
29:50
who say, that the salience, how important,
29:52
how front of mind abortion is to
29:54
voters writ large, has declined to post-dobs.
29:57
That it's incredibly important right after dobs. It's
29:59
clearly very important in 22 and it's declined. Do
30:01
you agree with that? Do you contest that? No,
30:04
you... I actually find
30:06
it insulting, right? I find the idea that people are
30:08
polling on the idea that we have
30:11
somehow forgotten that this freedom has been taken away
30:13
from us and that we can't hold
30:15
multiple ideas together is actually kind of insulting. That we
30:17
can't care about the economy, that we can't care about
30:19
climate, that we can't care about what's happening in the
30:21
Middle East and all of a sudden like, be like,
30:23
oh, abortion rights is now
30:26
down here. Right. Right? Let me understand
30:28
that the choice around our freedom that
30:30
affects our daily lives, right? Whether... Everything.
30:34
whether or not I'm gonna send my child to school there,
30:36
whether or not... Whether you're gonna travel to Texas
30:39
when you're 21 weeks pregnant to give a lecture.
30:41
Like, I mean, like you're not even moved there.
30:43
No. Just make
30:45
everyday decisions to get on a plane and decide
30:47
how you are gonna be and how you're gonna
30:49
show up. When you watch a state like Texas
30:51
and Idaho say, we want the right to sue
30:53
to let you die because we don't wanna give
30:55
you abortion care. Like, that's the kind of thing
30:58
that I think is, you
31:00
know, is so critically crazy. And then you
31:02
see Alabama show up with IVF on the
31:04
other side and you say, okay, yes, all
31:06
of these things are connected with respect to
31:08
reproductive freedom. And it is
31:10
top of mind for so many people who are just
31:12
like, I can't believe we are back
31:14
here. So no, I disagree with the thesis. I think
31:16
that we have kept this top of mind. You can
31:18
see that in the rage and you can see that
31:20
every time reproductive freedom is on the ballot, we continue
31:23
to fight. Final question for you is about
31:25
the national implications. The other thing I
31:27
think is it would be very clear that in states where
31:30
it's, you know, your
31:32
vote in this state will protect it or not,
31:34
right? Like that's the clearest possible. You
31:37
think quickly that that's gonna translate to national
31:39
politics as well. I think we saw that in Virginia,
31:41
right? Yes, we could say that in Ohio. You could say
31:43
that in Michigan and other places. We saw it in Virginia
31:45
and that worked. Alexis McEel Johnson, thank
31:47
you so much. Thank you. Still to come
31:50
why President Biden started his state the
31:52
union address on foreign policy, the significance of
31:54
that choice, Ben Rhodes, is here to
31:56
explain, head. We
31:59
got another day of. NBA action so it's
32:01
time for your Banduel to make their best.
32:04
You know
32:06
the new customers who bet $5 get $150 back in bonus bags if you win. Make
32:12
every night a watch carry the
32:14
game in Banduel. 21
32:17
players are present in their higher, personal 9 real money,
32:27
and you can win $500 back in the $500 free
32:30
game. The
32:33
jewelers at bluenile.com have got sparkled down to
32:35
a science with
32:38
beautiful lab-grown diamonds worthy of your
32:40
most brilliant moments. Their lab-grown diamonds
32:42
are independently graded and guaranteed identical
32:45
to natural diamonds, and
32:48
they're ready to ship to your door. Go to bluenile.com and
32:50
use promo code WELCOM to get $50 off your purchase of
32:52
$500 or more. bluenile.com
32:56
for $50 off bluenile.com. More
33:04
than 32 million people watched Joe Biden's
33:06
State of the Union address last night according
33:08
to Nielsen ratings. That is almost 5 million
33:10
more than the number who watched Biden last
33:12
year. 32 million in this day
33:14
and age is an enormous number. But
33:17
here's an interesting catch. Only
33:19
5% of those viewers were under 35. In
33:22
part because this year the speech was taking place
33:24
in possibly the most fractured
33:26
media landscape in history. We've
33:29
seen layoffs and shutdowns, absolutely
33:31
decimating newsrooms. More and more
33:33
people are getting their
33:35
news from an increasingly unreliable internet
33:37
of social media apps. A
33:40
plurality of young voters are being
33:42
informed and frequently misinformed by TikTok
33:44
and Instagram. And there's, I gotta
33:47
say, a ton of great stuff on TikTok and Instagram. I
33:49
use them both and enjoy them. In fact, on both
33:51
of them you can follow me at Chris L. Hayes
33:53
if you just can't get enough of me talking. There's
33:57
also a ton of junk. And as
33:59
it gets harder to say... informed democracy becomes
34:01
a potential casualty. Few
34:04
people know this as well as journalist
34:06
Ben Smith, the former BuzzFeed news editor
34:08
in chief who now runs the Jiddle
34:10
News Platform Semaphore. The newest
34:12
episode of my podcast, Wise is Happening,
34:15
he sat down with me to talk about
34:17
our fractured media landscape and how difficult it
34:19
is now to find out just
34:22
what people are learning from where, going
34:24
into this pivotal election cycle. Media
34:27
is such a hard business. Journalism is such
34:29
a hard business, such a hard way
34:32
to make money. My son
34:34
had the internship at one point in a
34:36
company that operates car washes, and
34:38
he would come back and just be like,
34:40
do you know what a good business car
34:42
washes are? Like, oh, in the media, all
34:44
you guys talk of is breaking even, like,
34:46
these guys are all wildly profitable. Readers, viewers
34:48
really feel this sense that they're not getting
34:50
the thing they want. They're getting right now
34:53
flung all sorts of fragmentary, kind of polarizing
34:55
information at them. And so
34:57
there's a real advantage to starting from
34:59
scratch and just saying, like, what
35:01
would you as a consumer want? I
35:03
feel perhaps irrationally optimistic about this stuff.
35:06
But I think there's a lot of, I mean, although it
35:09
is, there's something scary and new about
35:11
being unable to see what everybody else is talking about
35:13
and thinking about. There's also something
35:15
nice about it, and sometimes you poke into those spaces
35:17
and you're pleasantly surprised by how thoughtful
35:19
people have been. Sometimes, sometimes
35:22
you feel opposite. It was just a
35:24
fascinating conversation. And you can listen to
35:26
that full episode right now
35:29
by scanning that QR code on your screen
35:31
with your phone, or you
35:33
can search for why is this happening
35:35
wherever you get your podcasts. One
35:41
of the many striking things about President Biden's
35:43
State of the Union address last night was
35:45
the unorthodox choice to lead right off the
35:47
bat with foreign policy, hammering Republicans
35:50
on their failure to send additional aid
35:52
to Ukraine in the fight against Russia.
35:56
If anybody in this room thinks Putin will stop
35:58
at Ukraine, I assure you. you he
36:00
will not. If
36:20
we stand with Ukraine and
36:23
provide the weapons of music
36:25
for the former fall. That
36:28
is how he started the night. Later
36:30
on President Biden returned to foreign policy
36:32
to address Israel's war in Gaza. I
36:36
know the last five months have been gut wrenching
36:38
for so many people, for the
36:40
Israeli people, for the Palestinian people, and
36:43
so many here in America. Israel has
36:45
the right to go after Hamas. Israel
36:47
also has a fundamental responsibility though, to
36:50
protect innocent civilians in Gaza. As
36:59
you can hear in that carefully crafted
37:01
phrasing, Israel's response, the October 7th terror
37:03
attacks, and the ongoing humanitarian devastation in
37:05
Gaza as a result of Israel's retaliation
37:08
there, is arguably the most complicated foreign
37:10
policy issue for President Biden to address
37:12
right now. Because there are
37:14
so many different audiences for it, both
37:17
domestically and internationally. Joining
37:19
me now, someone who understands that complexity firsthand,
37:21
Ben Rhodes served as Deputy National Security Advisor
37:23
to President Obama, where he helped write all
37:25
seven of Obama's State of the Union addresses,
37:27
plus his first speech to a joint session
37:29
of Congress. He's now co-host of Pod Save
37:31
the World. Ben, I want to
37:33
start and get your reaction to the choice to
37:35
begin on Ukraine aid and Putin right off the
37:37
bat, which, you know, a lot of folks say,
37:40
look, you always begin on the economy, you always
37:42
begin on domestic issues. What do you think of
37:44
that choice? Were you surprised? Yeah,
37:47
it's very unusual, Chris. I mean, usually the
37:49
best real estate is at the front of the
37:51
speech and you use that for what Americans
37:53
care about. The economy, the domestic policies that
37:55
impact their lives. I think
37:57
what that choice said is number one. They
38:00
know that this is a winning issue for
38:02
them, that Americans are disgusted, frankly, by the
38:04
way that Donald Trump is sided with Putin
38:07
and undermined our allies. But also
38:09
Ukraine in some ways is a domestic issue
38:11
because it's tied to the danger that Donald Trump
38:14
poses. Leading with it
38:16
was really as much about the danger
38:18
and radicalism of Donald Trump as it
38:20
was about a foreign policy issue. He
38:23
was using it and you saw Mike Johnson kind of disappearing
38:25
into his seat there. He's using
38:27
it to kind of highlight the Republican
38:29
Party is not your father's Republican Party,
38:31
but your Republican Party has become something
38:34
different and dangerous and distinct even from
38:36
Ronald Reagan. And so in
38:38
a weird way, it was a foreign policy
38:40
issue, but it was also making a point
38:42
about democracy and the radicalization of the Republicans.
38:45
I don't think there's any question
38:47
that the most difficult political issue
38:50
for him among the Democratic Party
38:52
coalition by far is Israel and
38:54
Gaza. I knew there would be
38:56
a section on the speech. I can imagine if
38:58
you were putting yourself in the shoes of writing that, how
39:00
difficult that would be, because there really are different
39:03
constituencies within the party, within the
39:05
nation that just don't agree
39:08
on this fundamentally. What
39:10
did you think about that section? Well,
39:13
first of all, it's notable that he put Ukraine at the
39:15
front and he kind of stuck this at the back. That
39:17
tells me that they know that this has not been
39:20
a good issue for them politically or policy wise in
39:22
this country or around the world. But
39:24
then it was kind of carefully constructed. You're right. He
39:27
was trying to speak to these different audiences. He's
39:29
trying to reassure those who want
39:31
to hear his pro-Israel bona fides and the way
39:33
that he kind of led into it. But then
39:35
he kind of wanted to hit these marks about
39:37
concern for the Palestinian people. However,
39:39
on that score, I was frankly
39:41
pretty disappointed, Chris, because nobody believes
39:43
that the Israeli government under Bibi Netanyahu is
39:46
listening to him. So when he
39:48
says Israel has a responsibility to protect
39:50
Palestinian civilians, Israel has a responsibility to
39:53
let assistance in. Well, he's been saying that
39:55
for months. And frankly, the Israeli government's been
39:57
ignoring him and doing the opposite. announcement
40:00
that he made building this kind of pier
40:03
off the coast of Gaza to provide humanitarian
40:05
assistance, that it'll take a couple of months
40:07
just to set up while people are already
40:09
suffering famine-like conditions in Gaza. It just shows
40:12
you how much they're not changing the paradigm
40:14
and trying to exert leverage on Israel to
40:16
get assistance in. It'd be a lot faster
40:18
to drive a bunch of trucks into Rafa
40:20
than to build a floating pier, but
40:23
you're not going to get the Israeli government to do
40:25
that unless you're willing to apply pressure. It's
40:27
just a change of tone or policy in
40:30
the speech. There's a waiting for
40:33
Godot aspect to this. I feel
40:35
like having covered this since October 7th, both
40:37
the initial attack
40:40
on Israel itself, the horrifying
40:42
aftermath, the trauma, the continued
40:44
trauma of the Israeli
40:46
society awaiting the hostages whose whereabouts are
40:48
unknown and fate is unknown, along
40:51
with the just sustained brutality
40:53
of the reality on the
40:55
ground in Gaza. We
40:57
basically have been covering the same thing over and over, right?
41:00
That the US is four square
41:02
behind Israel at the state to state
41:05
level. It's shipping
41:07
arms to Israel. It is supporting them
41:09
in whatever way it can. Then
41:12
lots of words
41:14
coming from the White House about we're concerned
41:16
about humanitarian casualties. That
41:19
just basically has been going.
41:22
Why is that the equilibrium? I guess someone who
41:25
had this job of trying
41:27
to negotiate communicating on this, what is your
41:30
understanding? Because it also seems to me to
41:32
be pleasing no one just for a political
41:34
standpoint. Why is that
41:36
the equilibrium here? Yeah,
41:39
I have to tell a lot about this too, Chris. I
41:41
think the reality is, look, their theory from
41:43
the beginning was, and they said this, you
41:46
hog Bibi and he literally flew to Israel
41:48
and hugged Bibi, and you counsel him in
41:50
private to try to get him to
41:52
do things that he might not otherwise want to do. I
41:55
think what's been very obvious to people is that Bibi doesn't
41:57
want to do what Joe Biden is counseling to do.
42:00
that he's looking to the far right of his
42:02
coalition to stay in power, that frankly, he
42:04
doesn't care if he undermines Joe Biden, doesn't
42:06
seem to particularly care about the humanitarian circumstance
42:08
in Gaza. And so to really
42:10
change, to really shift to
42:12
a posture of not giving full square
42:15
support to Israel, not expediting military assistance,
42:17
considering things like conditioning military aid, considering
42:19
things like voting for a ceasefire at
42:21
the UN, you'd have to be acknowledging
42:24
that the approach that you were doing
42:26
isn't working. And that's hard
42:28
for any White House to do. It's a big
42:30
shift because they've been trying to have this be
42:32
an evolution. We're leaning on BB to change. We're
42:35
trying to get this into a ceasefire and negotiation.
42:37
And the reality is that BB
42:39
can't achieve his objectives either with this military
42:41
operation. They're not rescuing the hostages through the
42:43
use of military force. They may
42:45
be putting the hostages in danger. They're not
42:47
going to defeat Hamas, as he says,
42:50
because in fact, what they're doing is they're
42:53
essentially turning the Palestinian
42:55
population deeper and deeper against them, and
42:58
never mind the rest of the world. And
43:00
so I think that the where the administration
43:02
finds itself is they'd have to kind of
43:04
admit that what they're doing hasn't been working.
43:06
I think the reason that they need to
43:08
do that is substantively and morally because of
43:10
the dire circumstances, but also politically. Chris,
43:13
I mean, if you look at those numbers in Michigan, that
43:15
were kind of dismissed, well, that could swing the
43:17
election. And what an irony, what a terrible tragic
43:19
irony it'd be if the Democratic
43:21
president's support for BB Netanyahu ends up
43:24
being a decisive factor in the swing
43:26
states. Yeah, we should also
43:28
just say that like, it's not just
43:30
Michigan, there's also Minnesota or 20 percent,
43:32
but also remind people all the time,
43:34
there's there's different sides of this issue.
43:36
And right now, he's sort of not
43:38
winning either over like he's very underwater
43:40
on the issue in total, like, like,
43:42
the longer it goes, the more he
43:44
is just underwater on this issue, just
43:46
purely political, practical terms.
43:49
Ben Rhodes, thank you very
43:51
much. Appreciate it.
43:54
That does it for all in you can catch us
43:56
every weeknight at eight o'clock on MSNBC. Don't forget to
43:58
like us on Facebook. That's Facebook. dot com
44:00
slash all in with Chris. At
44:03
Bet365 we don't do ordinary. We believe that
44:05
every sport should be epic. Every goal, every
44:07
game, every point, every play. From the moments
44:10
that are legendary to the ones that fly
44:12
under the radar. Whether it's a game-winning goal
44:14
in the final seconds of overtime or a
44:16
shot on the goal in the first period.
44:19
Whatever the sport, whatever the moment. It's never
44:21
ordinary at Bet365. 21 plus
44:23
only. Must be President Ohio. If you or someone you
44:25
know has a gambling problem and wants help call 1-800-GAMBLER.
44:27
Terms and conditions apply.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More