Podchaser Logo
Home
Republicans react to Katie Britt’s SOTU response

Republicans react to Katie Britt’s SOTU response

Released Saturday, 9th March 2024
 1 person rated this episode
Republicans react to Katie Britt’s SOTU response

Republicans react to Katie Britt’s SOTU response

Republicans react to Katie Britt’s SOTU response

Republicans react to Katie Britt’s SOTU response

Saturday, 9th March 2024
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

At Bet365, we don't do ordinary. We believe

0:02

that every sport should be epic. Every goal,

0:04

every game, every point, every play. From the

0:07

moments that are legendary to the ones that

0:09

fly under the radar. Whether it's a game-winning

0:11

goal in the final seconds of overtime, or

0:13

a shot on the goal in the first

0:16

period. Whatever the sport, whatever the moment. It's

0:18

never ordinary at Bet365. 21

0:21

plus only. Must be President Ohio. If you or someone you know has

0:23

a gambling problem and want help, call 1-800-GAMBLER. Terms

0:25

and conditions apply. Tonight

0:28

on All In. We will not

0:30

walk away. We will not bow

0:33

down. The Biden speech defies expectations.

0:36

So at odds with every day

0:38

Joe, the AP affectionately called it

0:41

feisty. And Democrats

0:43

drive home the contracts. That

0:45

was an embarrassment last night. Get

0:47

lost. You're a joke. Tonight,

0:51

the evidence that the incumbent is on the run

0:53

is not a joke. Tonight, the evidence that the

0:55

incumbent is on the right path. Plus,

0:58

why even MAGA World is befuddled

1:00

by the Republican response. Right

1:04

now, the American dream has turned

1:06

into a nightmare. And

1:08

why the President's supreme confrontation could

1:11

be an even bigger deal than it looks. And

1:15

with all due respect, Justices, you're about to

1:17

realize just how much you get in the right way. All

1:21

In starts right now. Good

1:27

evening from New York. I'm Chris Hayes. If there was

1:30

ever any doubt the general election is here, it became

1:32

absolutely clear in just the first 30 seconds,

1:35

our President Joe Biden's State of the

1:37

Union address last night. Biden

1:39

came to the stage as the nominee

1:42

of his own party, facing his predecessor

1:44

running yet again. And from the very

1:46

first moments, Biden set the stakes of

1:49

an existential battle over the future of

1:51

American democracy. A battle

1:53

represented by the man holding the presidency

1:55

against the man who previously held it

1:58

and lost it And then fomented. The

2:00

violent coup to try to retain it. It

2:03

was an aggressive prosecution the case right out

2:05

of the gates. He was aided by the

2:07

facts, a republican parties and the right wing

2:09

media. Certainly and honestly, a lot of the

2:11

mainstream media. Has spent the

2:13

past few years, particularly the past few

2:15

months caricaturing Joe Biden as impossibly feeble

2:18

and daughter and. Will. He did

2:20

not look that way last month. Present

2:22

seems to relish the constant outburst,

2:24

interjections and hackles from Republicans in

2:26

the chamber. On. My absolute

2:28

favorite moments happen before the speech started

2:31

as Buttons made his way into the

2:33

chamber shaking hands. Before

2:35

he made this face smarting

2:38

first film and Marjorie Taylor

2:40

Greens Matter Get Up. It's.

2:43

Like the face of a grown up pretending

2:45

to be scared by a six year olds

2:47

Halloween costume. Oh it is. Scary

2:49

Ghost. But. Once you

2:51

got to the podium and this me started,

2:54

he used every opportunity to his disposal to

2:56

remind voters at home that on a range

2:58

of key issues from Ukraine to January Six

3:00

abortion rights to Obama Care. Democrats.

3:03

Found the right side of public opinion. Republicans.

3:06

On the wrong so. If

3:11

we stand with Ukraine. Provide.

3:18

The. Now. This

3:21

is. As you please been blocked. By.

3:23

Those who want to walk away from

3:25

our of world leadership. My first as.

3:29

A former republican president. So student

3:31

code? do whatever the hell you

3:33

want. My predecessor and some you

3:35

hear seek to bury the truth

3:38

about universes. I will not do

3:40

that. This is

3:42

a mobile to speak the truth in the

3:44

buried allies many of you and a saber.

3:47

And my predecessor a promising to pass

3:49

a national Bad Reproductive Freedom. My.

3:51

God what freedom else was? you take away.

3:56

Senate or Congress to force the right to

3:58

choose. I promise you. I'll restore.

4:00

Roe V Wade is a law

4:03

land again. My predecessors. Many

4:05

this chamber. Wanna. Take those

4:07

repr scripts and drug away by repealing.

4:10

Affordable. Care Act. I'm

4:14

not mad and happen. At

4:17

every turn, the message was clear:

4:19

Democrats oppose to his aggression. Republicans

4:21

apparently do not. Democrats support American

4:24

democracy. Republicans apparently do not. Democrats

4:26

support reproductive freedom. Republicans clearly do

4:28

not. All culminating

4:30

in a very telling exchange and perhaps

4:33

the number one political priorities for the

4:35

Republican party. Pass. Through

4:40

Ways to Go. Republicans concert

4:42

so screwed and get more tax breaks

4:44

to the Wilson. I will

4:46

watch the throne. You

4:50

guys know one another. Sincerely not I

4:52

say. I can

4:55

substantiate your plan once well

4:57

as soon as and accept

4:59

another two trillion dollars to

5:01

the Superbowl. That's good to

5:03

hear. They. Are gonna

5:05

try to cut another two trillion dollars for the

5:07

super wealthy? One, the Trump tax cuts expire, and

5:09

twenty twenty five. It's a huge part of the

5:11

agenda. Doesn't Buy was reminding

5:13

voters all thirty two million of them who

5:16

tuned in last night. Of

5:18

the most unpopular moment of dolphins

5:20

presidency other than the days after

5:22

January Six, when Trump and Republicans

5:24

in Congress for through that massive

5:26

tax cut for the wealthy and

5:28

corporations. With. The only actual

5:30

republican policy victory on domestic policy of

5:32

Trump's tenure novels the biggest piece of

5:35

legislation. Despite their local protestations last night,

5:37

he is exactly what they will do

5:39

again should they retake control of Congress

5:41

in the White House. They. Are

5:44

I will give this. Smart. Enough

5:46

not to openly campaign on

5:48

it because they know that

5:50

cutting taxes for the wealthy.

5:52

Further, cutting taxes for corporations

5:54

is an unbelievably unpopular political

5:56

position. The. Fact

5:59

that matters everyone to pay. The Texture American

6:01

Politics knows this election. This campaigns

6:03

can be hard fought. Can

6:05

be a very close general election. I

6:07

think barring some unforeseen changes circumstances, Joe

6:10

Biden, the Democrats say some truly serious

6:12

challenges ahead. No doubt you've read about

6:14

them. The. Last,

6:16

I wasn't. some ways a display of what

6:18

their greatest strengths are the advantages. And

6:21

it's this. They are on the

6:23

right side of the policy specific

6:25

something the actual tangible things of

6:27

governing. Of nearly every,

6:30

not every, put nearly every

6:32

salient issue before voters. Especially

6:35

through an abortion rights. And

6:37

as a result, there's this incredibly energized and

6:40

mobilize base of tens of millions of people

6:42

who been showing up for basically every special

6:44

election across America. Sea

6:47

Sauce in the majors. Twenty twenty two

6:49

and twenty twenty three to do whatever

6:51

they can to seen swine, reproductive freedoms

6:53

into law to beat back those. Who.

6:56

Supported of those restrictions.

7:00

And that by Mars the voters who

7:02

show up to vote in off your

7:04

special elections even a midterms, they're already

7:06

incredibly motivate big tend not to be

7:08

the ones of you'd be for persuaded

7:10

for the voters on the margins who

7:12

will decide the selection. And honestly,

7:14

the fate of the future trajectory of

7:16

what we call American democracy. A

7:19

lot of them just aren't paying attention to

7:21

politics. They. says of thing.

7:25

Today we saw a example was an anecdote

7:27

from Democratic pollster So in the Lakes about

7:29

a focus group she held with swing voters

7:32

weight as the voters about Trump's upcoming January

7:34

six court cases quote figure out what court

7:36

cases around January Six and Lake said well,

7:38

you know the insurrection that he was the

7:41

one that provoked at the go Oh yeah,

7:43

kind of forgot about that. Now.

7:46

I want to be clear here. Like. There's.

7:48

Lots of things I don't pay attention to. I've

7:51

got this job and a to ask me about those things.

7:53

I was on the exact same way. But.

7:57

There's. tons of examples of this stuff texas

8:00

article summarizing focus groups with independent voters last

8:02

spring. Quote, in Michigan, a woman was asked

8:04

how the two parties differ on abortion and

8:07

how she would describe each party's position. I'm

8:09

not sure the woman answered. I really haven't basically heard

8:11

anything about which party is leaning towards it and which

8:14

one isn't. If I had to guess, I

8:17

would say Democrat would probably be against

8:19

abortion and Republican probably before it. That

8:22

same article shares another anecdote from her voter

8:25

in North Carolina. Quote, a participant said she

8:27

wasn't sure where the party stand on abortion

8:29

and had been surprised Roe v. Wade was

8:31

overturned under a Democrat. Okay,

8:34

but did Joe Biden have a say in whether

8:36

or not was overturned? The focus group moderator asked.

8:39

No, but he helped get the Supreme Court

8:41

judges where they are, the one responded. The

8:44

moderator then informed the woman the most recent

8:46

judges came in under Donald Trump. I

8:49

mean, again, it might seem obvious to those

8:51

of us who are hyper engaged in politics,

8:54

but all this stuff is super opaque to

8:57

literally millions of millions of voters, many

9:00

of whom have just started paying attention to

9:02

the upcoming election, aren't really even going to

9:04

tune in fully for a while. So this

9:08

is crucial, right? This was what I really took

9:10

away from last night, the path that Biden this

9:12

campaign recognized as people started to

9:14

pay attention to this campaign to be proactive

9:16

about telling voters what

9:18

the two parties stand for, what

9:21

the Democratic Joe Biden Kamala Harris

9:23

agenda looks like, what the

9:25

Trump Republican Party agenda looks like.

9:28

And judging by last night, they're going to

9:30

do so confidently knowing they are on the

9:33

right side of a whole host of issues.

9:36

John Favreau was the mastermind behind several

9:38

State of the Union speeches while he

9:40

served as President Obama's chief speech writer.

9:42

He's now the co-host of POD Save

9:44

America and co-author of the upcoming buck,

9:46

Democracy or Else, How to Save America

9:49

in 10 Easy Steps. Tim Miller is

9:51

the former communications director for Jeb Bush's

9:53

campaign 2016. Now a writer at large

9:55

for the bulwark. He also hosts a

9:57

podcast there because who doesn't these days

9:59

and both. Join me now. John,

10:03

I keep thinking about the fact the first five

10:06

minutes of that speech. Here's how I think

10:08

about it. And as someone who actually did this, I want

10:10

to get your response. So what was striking to me is

10:13

you package together three things that you're

10:15

just on the right side of 60-40

10:18

splits, or 65-35. Putin's

10:21

aggression was jam-6

10:23

and political violence bad, was

10:26

overturning row bad. And there was no

10:28

real conceptual coherence to it, other

10:30

than out of the gate, I'm going to plant

10:32

a flag on these things that I know I've

10:35

got the wind at my back up. Yeah,

10:40

I mean, like you said, there are all the most

10:42

popular issues for Biden, or issues where he's got 60-65%

10:45

of the public on his side. But

10:48

also, the entire thesis

10:50

of his campaign and his presidency

10:52

has been defending democracy and defending

10:54

freedom. And I thought it

10:57

was interesting, right off the bat, he said

10:59

that he was there to wake up this

11:01

Congress and alert the American people that this

11:03

is no ordinary moment. And I think if

11:05

your message is that democracy hangs in the

11:07

balance at home and overseas,

11:10

you've got to act like it. And I

11:12

think why Joe Biden succeeded last night

11:14

is because he showed that urgency that

11:17

has to come along with believing that

11:19

saving democracy is the cause of your presidency,

11:21

the reason you're running for a second term,

11:23

and what the country needs right now. So

11:25

it was interesting that he started that. He

11:29

was gonna get a bunch of applause, at

11:31

least for a lot of the, from some

11:33

Republicans on Ukraine, certainly on some of the

11:35

January 6th stuff, or at least he was

11:37

going to make them feel deeply uncomfortable or

11:39

look embarrassed if

11:42

they didn't clap for some of that. I gotta

11:44

say, because I think I tend to

11:46

be sort of, I don't know,

11:48

I just, at a human level, I empathize

11:50

with people that I see up there, Tim,

11:52

I was thinking about, Mike Johnson just like,

11:54

you could just watch the internal

11:56

monologue of like, no, no.

11:59

We're not clapping. We're not. Are we? We're

12:02

clapping. We're clapping. Like he just, he did

12:04

not know. There was like a few moments

12:06

where it was like free the Israeli hostages.

12:08

It was like, Oh, we're doing it. Everything

12:10

else. He didn't seem, he seemed really unsure

12:12

of. And I think that the lack of

12:14

surety in some ways points to some of

12:17

the difficulties of his position

12:19

in the Republican party's position, which is

12:21

like it's Donald Trump's party.

12:23

You can't, you can't be deciding what to

12:25

clap for or not clap for. Yeah.

12:29

Well, I'm a masochist, so I did not feel

12:32

bad for him. I was really enjoying that section

12:34

and I rewound and just spent a little while

12:36

just watching my job that actually get

12:39

some pleasure on a Thursday night. Yeah,

12:41

look, I think it was tough, right? You could

12:43

tell the hit internal monologue on some of the

12:45

stuff, particularly on the Ukraine section, which comes right

12:47

up the top, which is

12:49

traditionally, he would have been somebody that

12:51

would have clapped for saying, Hey, we're going to give arms

12:53

to our allies. And he did. Yeah,

12:58

he did, but he kind of did. Right. It's this

13:00

half hearted clap. He's working around a little bit, you

13:02

know, Kamala, the vice president is standing

13:04

up. He doesn't stand up. He kind of, you can

13:07

tell he's trying to deciding to. So

13:09

I think that that tells you that, right. This

13:11

is a lot of the members of this party

13:13

are kind of lost. They're unsure on their footing,

13:15

right? Because we don't exactly know what I'm supposed

13:17

to do on the issue of Ukraine. That's why

13:19

it's a good issue for Biden, because he's dividing

13:21

the other side. And just strategically speaking, I have

13:24

to say, I felt very seen by the first

13:26

20 minutes of that speech last night. Generally

13:28

speaking, I guess John could correct me

13:31

on this. The presidents don't like micro

13:33

target state of the unions to minority

13:35

factions of the other party. But

13:38

that's what I didn't seem to do. The

13:41

first 20 minutes was Nikki Haley voters come

13:43

to me. I woke out of Putin. I'm

13:45

going to quote Reagan. January

13:47

6th was that. Yeah,

13:50

that's a great point. And that is another part

13:52

of sort of that you unifying that. I also

13:54

thought the you know, the sort

13:56

of bread and butter, you know, the bread

13:58

and butter economic policy. the Democratic Party,

14:01

John, which is again, that's, you know, that's

14:04

a standard part of being a Democratic president, giving this

14:06

speech. But it was particularly pointed

14:08

and particularly aggressive. And I thought particularly interesting

14:10

in terms of presidential

14:13

campaigns are so much about salience, right? Like which

14:15

issues are people ranking higher and lower? And one

14:17

of the levers you have as presidents is try

14:19

to raise the salience. And for

14:21

him to talk about like tax cuts

14:23

and Obamacare, that stuff has been lower

14:25

on the salience meter in

14:27

the media conversation, all these things, like it's very

14:30

intentional also to meet cues a little bit of

14:32

what this campaign is going to be about. It

14:37

has, but what's really high in

14:39

salience is people's concerns about the

14:42

lingering effects of inflation, right? So inflation has come down,

14:44

prices are high, costs are still feeling high to a

14:46

lot of people. And so in

14:49

his economic section, you know, what did he

14:51

propose? A billionaire's tax and

14:54

making sure that like big companies can pay a little

14:56

bit more. And in order

14:59

to make sure that

15:01

healthcare is cheaper, childcare is cheaper,

15:03

housing is cheaper. And

15:05

so to actually, he was really trying to

15:07

address the concerns, I think, of people who

15:09

are still worried about high prices. And

15:12

that's also going to be the best contrast with

15:14

Donald Trump and something that Donald Trump and the

15:16

Republicans don't want to talk about in the campaign

15:18

because Trump's proposed another huge tax cut for the

15:20

rich. And we haven't even talked

15:23

about this a lot, but Trump has proposed

15:25

across the board tariffs that are going to

15:27

slap a 10% tariff on just about anything

15:29

you buy that's made overseas. And that's going

15:31

to just make inflation skyrocket. I

15:34

want to ask you, Tim, about the members

15:36

of this House caucus. I mean, it's

15:39

clearly the case that there's not a lot

15:41

of control that leadership has. If

15:43

they did, if leadership had control, Mike

15:45

Johnson wouldn't be sitting there. It would have been

15:47

the guy they elected, Kevin McCarthy on the 12th

15:49

ballot. It's still very striking to me that they

15:52

can't overcome. There was

15:54

all this reporting that like they're going to tell him

15:56

not to heckle and clearly like they understand it doesn't

15:58

really look that good. Just the fact

16:00

that Kant says something sort of profound to me about

16:02

the state of the party. Yeah,

16:06

I mean, not only can they not control

16:08

them, even the members themselves are incentivized to

16:10

act work. I know,

16:12

Dr. Johnathan Martin at Politico would have pointed this out, like

16:14

Troy Nels in 2021, in

16:17

the first day of the union, is there

16:19

wearing a mask in a suit, asking Joe

16:21

Biden to work with him on criminal justice

16:23

reform. Yesterday, he's in like a Chippendale bow

16:26

tie and a never surrendered Donald Trump mugshot

16:28

shirt. Right. And so, you know,

16:30

this is for the members, their incentives are going

16:32

the way towards being crazy. And, you know, I

16:34

don't there's no leverage. What leverage does Mike

16:36

Johnson have over these people? All of their

16:38

incentives are to get fundraising, to get on

16:40

Fox, to get on Newsmax, to be popular

16:43

with the base voters, is

16:45

to do the crazy stuff, the

16:47

stuff that turns off swing voters.

16:49

This is like the fundamental bind

16:51

that Republicans have found themselves in

16:53

in swing states. And so, you know,

16:55

Mike Johnson is the weakest speaker

16:57

in history, certainly in modern

16:59

history. Right. Like he can't get literally

17:01

anything passed without Democrats. So there's not

17:03

a they could not come up with

17:06

a bill, I guess a bill, you know, naming

17:08

a post office after Donald Trump. He could probably

17:10

do. But besides that, you know, he doesn't he's

17:12

unable to pass anything within the conference. So he

17:14

has no power to control it. Yeah,

17:16

Troy Nels is great. I don't know if we I don't

17:18

think we have images of him. But someone

17:21

pointed out that when he was in a

17:23

mask in a suit talking to Joe Biden, he

17:25

was in a district that was a Trump

17:27

plus one district. He got redistricted in the

17:29

Texas gerrymander into a Trump plus 16 district. And

17:31

it's literally like a before and after you

17:33

would see like this is what this is

17:35

what it looks like when you're in a Trump

17:38

plus one district. And then like Chippendale's

17:40

bow tie, your words never surrender shirt.

17:42

That's the Trump 16 district. In some

17:44

ways, like that's the trajectory of

17:47

a lot of the Republican Party in a nutshell. John

17:49

Favreau, Tim Miller. Thank you very much. Coming

17:54

up, the bipartisan panning of the Republican

17:56

response to the State of the Union.

18:00

I want to make a direct appeal

18:03

to the parents out there and

18:05

in particular to my fellow

18:07

moms we see you, we

18:11

hear you, and

18:13

we stand with

18:15

you. That all went

18:17

wrong for Alabama's Katie Britt. That's next. The

18:23

International Rescue Committee is a critical

18:25

organization working in more than 50

18:27

countries responding to the world's worst

18:29

humanitarian crises. The IRC serves people

18:31

whose lives have been upended by war,

18:34

conflict, and natural disasters. Responding within 72

18:37

hours after an emergency strikes, they

18:39

stay as long as needed. Right

18:41

now in places like Afghanistan and

18:43

Ukraine families are experiencing adverse winter

18:45

weather like heavy rain, frigid temperatures,

18:47

and snowfall on top of war,

18:49

hunger, and displacement. Many makeshift camps

18:52

are unable to withstand extreme weather

18:54

conditions. Some people are living without

18:56

reliable electricity while others can't afford

18:58

to buy fuel for the heat

19:00

source they do have. Donations help

19:02

the IRC provide families with the

19:05

resources they need to recover and

19:07

rebuild their lives including essential winter

19:09

items like emergency food, shelter, fuel,

19:12

medicine, blankets, winter gear, and cash

19:14

assistance. For example, even just a

19:16

$14 donation can provide a temporary

19:19

shelter for a displaced family. Donate

19:21

today by visiting rescue.org/rebuild. On

19:28

paper, Senator Katie Britt was an

19:30

excellent choice to deliver the response to the State

19:32

of the Union. At 42

19:34

years old, she's the youngest Republican

19:36

woman ever elected to the Senate,

19:38

the first woman senator from Alabama.

19:40

She's a mother of two, she's married to

19:43

a former NFL player, she's widely considered

19:45

to be a rising political star with

19:47

genuine political acumen. Senator Lindsey

19:49

Graham of South Carolina even suggested that quote,

19:51

she represents the future of the Republican Party.

19:54

The party clearly expect her to knock it out

19:56

of the park. New York Times

19:58

reports that a close ally of Senator Britt

20:01

sent talking points to conservative influencers ahead

20:03

of the speech, suggesting words

20:05

of praise, including, quote, she came off

20:07

like America's mom. She gets it. They

20:10

compared a response to Ronald Reagan's famous

20:12

Bertalan Wall speech and described as reminiscent

20:14

of his message of that shining city

20:16

on a hill. Before

20:18

she uttered a single word, the author of

20:20

these talking points declared that Britt's speech was

20:23

pitch perfect. For the first

20:25

60 seconds or so the speech had seemed fine.

20:28

She was smiling at her kitchen table talking

20:30

about the future of America, but

20:33

it quickly took a real turn. We

20:37

see you. We

20:40

hear you. And we

20:43

stand with you. Daily

20:46

Beast described the speech as, quote, bizarrely delivered

20:48

with an over the top dramatic cadence that

20:50

left political operatives and observers struggling to make

20:52

sense of it. The performance

20:54

was so bad that Republicans, some Republicans

20:57

watched the high profile speech with a

20:59

grimace. According to one strategist,

21:01

everyone's effing losing it. It's one of

21:03

our biggest disasters ever. Rolling

21:06

Stone was inundated with messages,

21:08

absolutely torturing Brits of surly

21:10

over dramatic rebuttal. A

21:12

Trump advisor wrote, quote, what the hell

21:15

am I watching right now? Republican pollster

21:17

called it creepy. And the senior house

21:19

congressional aide described as cringe inducing to

21:21

watch and likely destined to be turned

21:23

into a lame Saturday Night Live skit

21:25

this weekend. I think it's a fair prediction, though.

21:27

Might not be lame. The

21:29

conversation was similar in social media where

21:31

conservative activist Charlie Kirk received a lot

21:33

of replies to his post asking his

21:35

followers if they liked Britt's speech. Alan

21:37

Sanders compared it to a B grade

21:39

Hallmark movie moment with an unknown actress

21:41

playing the lead. Stacy in

21:44

the USA wrote very babysitter reading

21:46

a bedtime story like Zion 45

21:48

said, reminded me when a person

21:51

spoke on Sesame Street and

21:53

on Real America's Voice, the right wing hosts were

21:56

stunned into silence. God

22:00

bless you and may

22:02

God continue to bless

22:04

these United States of

22:07

America. I

22:22

don't, I'm

22:24

sure she's very, I'm sure she's very nice.

22:28

And I don't want to, I don't want to get like

22:30

over the top here, but that

22:33

is the, everything about

22:35

that on a night like tonight is wrong.

22:38

Reaction that may best represent the Republican

22:41

party came from the senior center from

22:43

Alabama, former football coach, Tommy Toverville. Well,

22:47

considering the circumstance, I think, I thought she did

22:49

very well. Uh, and you know, she's a

22:51

mom, uh, she's a housewife. She's

22:53

around people, uh, at a

22:55

young age. That

22:59

housewife is

23:01

his colleague, the first female

23:03

Senator from the state of Alabama. And

23:06

remember the clear intention of choosing Katie

23:08

Britch to deliver the response was to

23:10

counter the deficit Republicans are facing among

23:12

women voters and anger about their abortion

23:14

policy. I don't

23:17

think they quite accomplished that last night. It's

23:22

a decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Supreme

23:24

court majority wrote the following and

23:26

with all due respect justices, women

23:29

are not without electoral electoral power,

23:32

excuse me, electoral or political power.

23:35

You're about to realize just how much you get. Those

23:39

bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have

23:41

no clue about the power of women,

23:44

but they found out when

23:46

reproductive freedom was on the ballot, we won in

23:48

2022 and 2020 and we'll win

23:50

again in 2024. Last

23:54

night, president Biden made it clear that he's

23:56

running on restoring reproductive rights in America, protecting

23:58

IVF across the country. fighting

24:00

the Republican agenda to implement a

24:02

national abortion ban and to sign

24:04

legislation that would enshrine and protect

24:06

abortion rights nationally. Because

24:09

Joe Biden and the Democratic Party are both committed

24:11

to this on principle. It's a bedrock part of

24:13

the party's DNA at this point. Their voters demanded.

24:16

They also understand these issues are central

24:18

to voters and that their position on

24:20

it is overwhelmingly popular. Alexis

24:23

McGill-Johnson is the CEO and president

24:25

of Planned Parenthood and she

24:27

joins me now. It's good to have you here. In

24:31

your position as CEO of Planned Parenthood, your

24:33

reaction just to the speech last night to

24:35

the emphasis on abortion rights? Well,

24:37

in my position and in the room where

24:39

it was incredibly electric. I happen to be

24:41

a guest of Senator Schumer, but one in

24:43

10 of the House

24:45

Democrats' guests were leaders of reproductive

24:48

rights. They were providers. They were

24:50

CEOs of Planned

24:53

Parenthood. They were patients. They

24:55

were in there talking, engaged

24:57

in a conversation, watching the president

24:59

say, I want to

25:01

restore Roe to the law and land and I

25:03

would challenge him, not just restore Roe. I think

25:06

we want to actually build Roe back better and

25:08

make sure that we make it more expansive, inclusive

25:10

and national right. It

25:13

was an incredible moment and opportunity

25:15

because he connected reproductive rights and

25:17

freedom to the fight for

25:19

democracy, which ultimately was his big

25:21

message last night. One thing that's

25:24

become clear, I think, is

25:26

there is an interesting tension in the Republican

25:28

Party on this. They haven't figured out how to talk

25:30

about it. I think the political

25:33

professionals and the savviest understand that they're

25:35

just totally underwater on this issue and

25:37

the less said about it, the better.

25:40

But it's also something that genuinely does animate the grassroots.

25:42

I mean, it's not they're not making it up. It's

25:45

not like some like congee. You know what I mean?

25:47

It's not like there's someone's paying them to care about

25:49

this. They care about it. This

25:51

is just on Thursday. Iowa Republicans passing

25:53

a personhood bill that critics there say

25:56

could threaten IVF care in the same way that finding

25:58

the Alabama Supreme Court did. They passed a A person

26:00

would build a state house on Thursday night, would

26:02

make it a felony to cause the death of

26:04

an unborn person that has all sorts of implications.

26:09

What do you think about the

26:11

fact that they still have their foot on the gas? I

26:14

mean, it's very perplexing, right? I mean, we've seen 35 personhood

26:16

bills in 16 states. And

26:20

whether or not this is actually their

26:22

grassroots is what I would question. Because

26:24

we have the majority of Americans supporting

26:26

reproductive freedom in every state. I think

26:29

it's... Well, you can do it with a

26:31

minority though. I mean, a vanguard is a powerful

26:33

thing. No, but that's the thing. But I think

26:35

when you were talking about their grassroots, we're really

26:37

talking about a tyranny of the minority of folks

26:40

who are continuing to elect people and hold them,

26:42

but only because they are safe in these gerrymandered

26:44

districts. It's not the majority of who their base

26:46

is, right? Because we wouldn't have a Kentucky, you

26:49

wouldn't have a Montana, you wouldn't have a Michigan

26:52

even, in fact, or Kansas if

26:54

we weren't seeing a cross party

26:57

bipartisan desire to see

26:59

that. So I don't understand why they're

27:01

doubling down. It honestly makes no sense

27:03

because these bans have proven that they

27:05

are criminalizing miscarriage, they're making pregnancy unsafe,

27:08

these stories are coming out. And of

27:10

course, they're running for them because real

27:12

people are talking about the real implications

27:14

of them and they don't have a

27:16

real legislative solution around it. One

27:19

of the things I thought of last night is one

27:21

way out that the president was very clear like send

27:23

me a bill. If you send me a Congress that

27:25

will protect abortion rights, I will sign that bill into

27:27

law. On the other

27:29

side, there's talk about Donald Trump's musing about

27:32

what the national ban is going to be and how many weeks,

27:34

whether it's an odd or even number, seems like an important thing

27:36

for him. One of the things that's

27:39

striking about that is just so many of the horror stories

27:41

we've heard are from women who

27:43

had to have abortions for medical reasons

27:45

past whatever the proposal

27:47

for a national ban would be. I

27:50

think that's a function of people not really understanding how

27:52

pregnancy works. Right. And building a lot

27:54

of that. It seems like a lot of that. Right. And

27:58

it's quite odd. But I

28:00

think what the president did last night was

28:02

really demonstrate the threat. The Republicans

28:05

have been running on a national abortion ban,

28:07

because that is, to your point, what they

28:09

believe their grassroots are saying. And so

28:11

they are running to the right on reproductive

28:13

freedom. That is not where the majority of

28:16

Americans are. And I think what

28:18

the president presented last night was a

28:20

clear contrast, that he

28:23

linked abortion rights to IVF as

28:26

part of a full spectrum of reproductive health

28:29

care and understanding that that is what people

28:31

need. It's whether and when we get

28:33

to decide whether or not we want to be parents, and

28:35

also now how. So one thing

28:37

I think the savvier members of

28:39

politicians will do in this

28:41

election is try to just avoid the issue. Or

28:44

they will say, no, I don't support a national ban, or

28:46

try to sort of skate away from it. I wonder how

28:48

important you think it is to affirmatively stick

28:50

to it. I mean, one of the things the

28:52

president was doing was pinning it to them. And

28:54

I think this is, just to be clear for

28:56

anyone watching this, if you

28:58

are opposed to abortion rights, the

29:01

Republican Party has a lot to offer you. And

29:03

if you support the Democratic Party, this is one

29:05

of those places where it's not like there are

29:07

some issues where, oh, are the parties that far apart?

29:09

This is probably one of the most black and white, right? I think

29:11

it's clear. And I don't see the bobbing and

29:14

weaving happening among the Democrats. Actually, I see

29:16

more Democrats being more vocal about the Democratic Party. I

29:18

don't think they're bobbing and weaving at all. No, I think they are 100%. I

29:21

think what's happening on the Republican side is

29:23

they are realizing that what they have on

29:25

record, they can't scrub. They're trying to scrub

29:28

their websites. They're trying to, as the kids

29:30

say, get rid of the receipts. But we

29:32

have them, right? Because we have the Wayback

29:34

Machine. We understand really what they have stood

29:36

for and why. And they're trying

29:39

to run away from that because they don't

29:41

know how to talk about it. I want to

29:43

offer you a thesis that I would like to hear

29:45

your response to. There

29:48

are some people who say, some pollsters

29:50

who say, that the salience, how important,

29:52

how front of mind abortion is to

29:54

voters writ large, has declined to post-dobs.

29:57

That it's incredibly important right after dobs. It's

29:59

clearly very important in 22 and it's declined. Do

30:01

you agree with that? Do you contest that? No,

30:04

you... I actually find

30:06

it insulting, right? I find the idea that people are

30:08

polling on the idea that we have

30:11

somehow forgotten that this freedom has been taken away

30:13

from us and that we can't hold

30:15

multiple ideas together is actually kind of insulting. That we

30:17

can't care about the economy, that we can't care about

30:19

climate, that we can't care about what's happening in the

30:21

Middle East and all of a sudden like, be like,

30:23

oh, abortion rights is now

30:26

down here. Right. Right? Let me understand

30:28

that the choice around our freedom that

30:30

affects our daily lives, right? Whether... Everything.

30:34

whether or not I'm gonna send my child to school there,

30:36

whether or not... Whether you're gonna travel to Texas

30:39

when you're 21 weeks pregnant to give a lecture.

30:41

Like, I mean, like you're not even moved there.

30:43

No. Just make

30:45

everyday decisions to get on a plane and decide

30:47

how you are gonna be and how you're gonna

30:49

show up. When you watch a state like Texas

30:51

and Idaho say, we want the right to sue

30:53

to let you die because we don't wanna give

30:55

you abortion care. Like, that's the kind of thing

30:58

that I think is, you

31:00

know, is so critically crazy. And then you

31:02

see Alabama show up with IVF on the

31:04

other side and you say, okay, yes, all

31:06

of these things are connected with respect to

31:08

reproductive freedom. And it is

31:10

top of mind for so many people who are just

31:12

like, I can't believe we are back

31:14

here. So no, I disagree with the thesis. I think

31:16

that we have kept this top of mind. You can

31:18

see that in the rage and you can see that

31:20

every time reproductive freedom is on the ballot, we continue

31:23

to fight. Final question for you is about

31:25

the national implications. The other thing I

31:27

think is it would be very clear that in states where

31:30

it's, you know, your

31:32

vote in this state will protect it or not,

31:34

right? Like that's the clearest possible. You

31:37

think quickly that that's gonna translate to national

31:39

politics as well. I think we saw that in Virginia,

31:41

right? Yes, we could say that in Ohio. You could say

31:43

that in Michigan and other places. We saw it in Virginia

31:45

and that worked. Alexis McEel Johnson, thank

31:47

you so much. Thank you. Still to come

31:50

why President Biden started his state the

31:52

union address on foreign policy, the significance of

31:54

that choice, Ben Rhodes, is here to

31:56

explain, head. We

31:59

got another day of. NBA action so it's

32:01

time for your Banduel to make their best.

32:04

You know

32:06

the new customers who bet $5 get $150 back in bonus bags if you win. Make

32:12

every night a watch carry the

32:14

game in Banduel. 21

32:17

players are present in their higher, personal 9 real money,

32:27

and you can win $500 back in the $500 free

32:30

game. The

32:33

jewelers at bluenile.com have got sparkled down to

32:35

a science with

32:38

beautiful lab-grown diamonds worthy of your

32:40

most brilliant moments. Their lab-grown diamonds

32:42

are independently graded and guaranteed identical

32:45

to natural diamonds, and

32:48

they're ready to ship to your door. Go to bluenile.com and

32:50

use promo code WELCOM to get $50 off your purchase of

32:52

$500 or more. bluenile.com

32:56

for $50 off bluenile.com. More

33:04

than 32 million people watched Joe Biden's

33:06

State of the Union address last night according

33:08

to Nielsen ratings. That is almost 5 million

33:10

more than the number who watched Biden last

33:12

year. 32 million in this day

33:14

and age is an enormous number. But

33:17

here's an interesting catch. Only

33:19

5% of those viewers were under 35. In

33:22

part because this year the speech was taking place

33:24

in possibly the most fractured

33:26

media landscape in history. We've

33:29

seen layoffs and shutdowns, absolutely

33:31

decimating newsrooms. More and more

33:33

people are getting their

33:35

news from an increasingly unreliable internet

33:37

of social media apps. A

33:40

plurality of young voters are being

33:42

informed and frequently misinformed by TikTok

33:44

and Instagram. And there's, I gotta

33:47

say, a ton of great stuff on TikTok and Instagram. I

33:49

use them both and enjoy them. In fact, on both

33:51

of them you can follow me at Chris L. Hayes

33:53

if you just can't get enough of me talking. There's

33:57

also a ton of junk. And as

33:59

it gets harder to say... informed democracy becomes

34:01

a potential casualty. Few

34:04

people know this as well as journalist

34:06

Ben Smith, the former BuzzFeed news editor

34:08

in chief who now runs the Jiddle

34:10

News Platform Semaphore. The newest

34:12

episode of my podcast, Wise is Happening,

34:15

he sat down with me to talk about

34:17

our fractured media landscape and how difficult it

34:19

is now to find out just

34:22

what people are learning from where, going

34:24

into this pivotal election cycle. Media

34:27

is such a hard business. Journalism is such

34:29

a hard business, such a hard way

34:32

to make money. My son

34:34

had the internship at one point in a

34:36

company that operates car washes, and

34:38

he would come back and just be like,

34:40

do you know what a good business car

34:42

washes are? Like, oh, in the media, all

34:44

you guys talk of is breaking even, like,

34:46

these guys are all wildly profitable. Readers, viewers

34:48

really feel this sense that they're not getting

34:50

the thing they want. They're getting right now

34:53

flung all sorts of fragmentary, kind of polarizing

34:55

information at them. And so

34:57

there's a real advantage to starting from

34:59

scratch and just saying, like, what

35:01

would you as a consumer want? I

35:03

feel perhaps irrationally optimistic about this stuff.

35:06

But I think there's a lot of, I mean, although it

35:09

is, there's something scary and new about

35:11

being unable to see what everybody else is talking about

35:13

and thinking about. There's also something

35:15

nice about it, and sometimes you poke into those spaces

35:17

and you're pleasantly surprised by how thoughtful

35:19

people have been. Sometimes, sometimes

35:22

you feel opposite. It was just a

35:24

fascinating conversation. And you can listen to

35:26

that full episode right now

35:29

by scanning that QR code on your screen

35:31

with your phone, or you

35:33

can search for why is this happening

35:35

wherever you get your podcasts. One

35:41

of the many striking things about President Biden's

35:43

State of the Union address last night was

35:45

the unorthodox choice to lead right off the

35:47

bat with foreign policy, hammering Republicans

35:50

on their failure to send additional aid

35:52

to Ukraine in the fight against Russia.

35:56

If anybody in this room thinks Putin will stop

35:58

at Ukraine, I assure you. you he

36:00

will not. If

36:20

we stand with Ukraine and

36:23

provide the weapons of music

36:25

for the former fall. That

36:28

is how he started the night. Later

36:30

on President Biden returned to foreign policy

36:32

to address Israel's war in Gaza. I

36:36

know the last five months have been gut wrenching

36:38

for so many people, for the

36:40

Israeli people, for the Palestinian people, and

36:43

so many here in America. Israel has

36:45

the right to go after Hamas. Israel

36:47

also has a fundamental responsibility though, to

36:50

protect innocent civilians in Gaza. As

36:59

you can hear in that carefully crafted

37:01

phrasing, Israel's response, the October 7th terror

37:03

attacks, and the ongoing humanitarian devastation in

37:05

Gaza as a result of Israel's retaliation

37:08

there, is arguably the most complicated foreign

37:10

policy issue for President Biden to address

37:12

right now. Because there are

37:14

so many different audiences for it, both

37:17

domestically and internationally. Joining

37:19

me now, someone who understands that complexity firsthand,

37:21

Ben Rhodes served as Deputy National Security Advisor

37:23

to President Obama, where he helped write all

37:25

seven of Obama's State of the Union addresses,

37:27

plus his first speech to a joint session

37:29

of Congress. He's now co-host of Pod Save

37:31

the World. Ben, I want to

37:33

start and get your reaction to the choice to

37:35

begin on Ukraine aid and Putin right off the

37:37

bat, which, you know, a lot of folks say,

37:40

look, you always begin on the economy, you always

37:42

begin on domestic issues. What do you think of

37:44

that choice? Were you surprised? Yeah,

37:47

it's very unusual, Chris. I mean, usually the

37:49

best real estate is at the front of the

37:51

speech and you use that for what Americans

37:53

care about. The economy, the domestic policies that

37:55

impact their lives. I think

37:57

what that choice said is number one. They

38:00

know that this is a winning issue for

38:02

them, that Americans are disgusted, frankly, by the

38:04

way that Donald Trump is sided with Putin

38:07

and undermined our allies. But also

38:09

Ukraine in some ways is a domestic issue

38:11

because it's tied to the danger that Donald Trump

38:14

poses. Leading with it

38:16

was really as much about the danger

38:18

and radicalism of Donald Trump as it

38:20

was about a foreign policy issue. He

38:23

was using it and you saw Mike Johnson kind of disappearing

38:25

into his seat there. He's using

38:27

it to kind of highlight the Republican

38:29

Party is not your father's Republican Party,

38:31

but your Republican Party has become something

38:34

different and dangerous and distinct even from

38:36

Ronald Reagan. And so in

38:38

a weird way, it was a foreign policy

38:40

issue, but it was also making a point

38:42

about democracy and the radicalization of the Republicans.

38:45

I don't think there's any question

38:47

that the most difficult political issue

38:50

for him among the Democratic Party

38:52

coalition by far is Israel and

38:54

Gaza. I knew there would be

38:56

a section on the speech. I can imagine if

38:58

you were putting yourself in the shoes of writing that, how

39:00

difficult that would be, because there really are different

39:03

constituencies within the party, within the

39:05

nation that just don't agree

39:08

on this fundamentally. What

39:10

did you think about that section? Well,

39:13

first of all, it's notable that he put Ukraine at the

39:15

front and he kind of stuck this at the back. That

39:17

tells me that they know that this has not been

39:20

a good issue for them politically or policy wise in

39:22

this country or around the world. But

39:24

then it was kind of carefully constructed. You're right. He

39:27

was trying to speak to these different audiences. He's

39:29

trying to reassure those who want

39:31

to hear his pro-Israel bona fides and the way

39:33

that he kind of led into it. But then

39:35

he kind of wanted to hit these marks about

39:37

concern for the Palestinian people. However,

39:39

on that score, I was frankly

39:41

pretty disappointed, Chris, because nobody believes

39:43

that the Israeli government under Bibi Netanyahu is

39:46

listening to him. So when he

39:48

says Israel has a responsibility to protect

39:50

Palestinian civilians, Israel has a responsibility to

39:53

let assistance in. Well, he's been saying that

39:55

for months. And frankly, the Israeli government's been

39:57

ignoring him and doing the opposite. announcement

40:00

that he made building this kind of pier

40:03

off the coast of Gaza to provide humanitarian

40:05

assistance, that it'll take a couple of months

40:07

just to set up while people are already

40:09

suffering famine-like conditions in Gaza. It just shows

40:12

you how much they're not changing the paradigm

40:14

and trying to exert leverage on Israel to

40:16

get assistance in. It'd be a lot faster

40:18

to drive a bunch of trucks into Rafa

40:20

than to build a floating pier, but

40:23

you're not going to get the Israeli government to do

40:25

that unless you're willing to apply pressure. It's

40:27

just a change of tone or policy in

40:30

the speech. There's a waiting for

40:33

Godot aspect to this. I feel

40:35

like having covered this since October 7th, both

40:37

the initial attack

40:40

on Israel itself, the horrifying

40:42

aftermath, the trauma, the continued

40:44

trauma of the Israeli

40:46

society awaiting the hostages whose whereabouts are

40:48

unknown and fate is unknown, along

40:51

with the just sustained brutality

40:53

of the reality on the

40:55

ground in Gaza. We

40:57

basically have been covering the same thing over and over, right?

41:00

That the US is four square

41:02

behind Israel at the state to state

41:05

level. It's shipping

41:07

arms to Israel. It is supporting them

41:09

in whatever way it can. Then

41:12

lots of words

41:14

coming from the White House about we're concerned

41:16

about humanitarian casualties. That

41:19

just basically has been going.

41:22

Why is that the equilibrium? I guess someone who

41:25

had this job of trying

41:27

to negotiate communicating on this, what is your

41:30

understanding? Because it also seems to me to

41:32

be pleasing no one just for a political

41:34

standpoint. Why is that

41:36

the equilibrium here? Yeah,

41:39

I have to tell a lot about this too, Chris. I

41:41

think the reality is, look, their theory from

41:43

the beginning was, and they said this, you

41:46

hog Bibi and he literally flew to Israel

41:48

and hugged Bibi, and you counsel him in

41:50

private to try to get him to

41:52

do things that he might not otherwise want to do. I

41:55

think what's been very obvious to people is that Bibi doesn't

41:57

want to do what Joe Biden is counseling to do.

42:00

that he's looking to the far right of his

42:02

coalition to stay in power, that frankly, he

42:04

doesn't care if he undermines Joe Biden, doesn't

42:06

seem to particularly care about the humanitarian circumstance

42:08

in Gaza. And so to really

42:10

change, to really shift to

42:12

a posture of not giving full square

42:15

support to Israel, not expediting military assistance,

42:17

considering things like conditioning military aid, considering

42:19

things like voting for a ceasefire at

42:21

the UN, you'd have to be acknowledging

42:24

that the approach that you were doing

42:26

isn't working. And that's hard

42:28

for any White House to do. It's a big

42:30

shift because they've been trying to have this be

42:32

an evolution. We're leaning on BB to change. We're

42:35

trying to get this into a ceasefire and negotiation.

42:37

And the reality is that BB

42:39

can't achieve his objectives either with this military

42:41

operation. They're not rescuing the hostages through the

42:43

use of military force. They may

42:45

be putting the hostages in danger. They're not

42:47

going to defeat Hamas, as he says,

42:50

because in fact, what they're doing is they're

42:53

essentially turning the Palestinian

42:55

population deeper and deeper against them, and

42:58

never mind the rest of the world. And

43:00

so I think that the where the administration

43:02

finds itself is they'd have to kind of

43:04

admit that what they're doing hasn't been working.

43:06

I think the reason that they need to

43:08

do that is substantively and morally because of

43:10

the dire circumstances, but also politically. Chris,

43:13

I mean, if you look at those numbers in Michigan, that

43:15

were kind of dismissed, well, that could swing the

43:17

election. And what an irony, what a terrible tragic

43:19

irony it'd be if the Democratic

43:21

president's support for BB Netanyahu ends up

43:24

being a decisive factor in the swing

43:26

states. Yeah, we should also

43:28

just say that like, it's not just

43:30

Michigan, there's also Minnesota or 20 percent,

43:32

but also remind people all the time,

43:34

there's there's different sides of this issue.

43:36

And right now, he's sort of not

43:38

winning either over like he's very underwater

43:40

on the issue in total, like, like,

43:42

the longer it goes, the more he

43:44

is just underwater on this issue, just

43:46

purely political, practical terms.

43:49

Ben Rhodes, thank you very

43:51

much. Appreciate it.

43:54

That does it for all in you can catch us

43:56

every weeknight at eight o'clock on MSNBC. Don't forget to

43:58

like us on Facebook. That's Facebook. dot com

44:00

slash all in with Chris. At

44:03

Bet365 we don't do ordinary. We believe that

44:05

every sport should be epic. Every goal, every

44:07

game, every point, every play. From the moments

44:10

that are legendary to the ones that fly

44:12

under the radar. Whether it's a game-winning goal

44:14

in the final seconds of overtime or a

44:16

shot on the goal in the first period.

44:19

Whatever the sport, whatever the moment. It's never

44:21

ordinary at Bet365. 21 plus

44:23

only. Must be President Ohio. If you or someone you

44:25

know has a gambling problem and wants help call 1-800-GAMBLER.

44:27

Terms and conditions apply.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features