Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Do you own or rent your home? Sure
0:02
you do. And GEICO knows it can
0:04
be hard work. You know it's easy
0:07
bundling policies with GEICO. GEICO
0:10
makes it easy to bundle your homeowners or
0:12
renters insurance along with your auto
0:15
policy. It's a good thing too. because
0:17
you already have so much to do
0:19
around your home. Go to geico dot com,
0:22
get a quote, and see how much you could save.
0:24
It's geico easy. visit
0:26
geico dot com today. That's geico
0:29
dot com.
0:29
Hey,
0:31
it's Anderson Cooper. I want to take a few
0:33
minutes to introduce you to a new podcast from
0:35
my friend and colleague, Adi Cornish. It's called
0:37
the assignment. And Adi's with
0:39
me now to talk about the program and also talk to
0:41
me about my experiences making all there is because
0:43
before I started even making all
0:46
there is, audio was the first person I talked
0:48
to about and really the only person I
0:50
talked to about podcasting. So
0:53
I'm it's such pleasure to be able to talk to her about
0:55
her new podcast and stick around
0:57
after the conversation to hear the first episode.
0:59
How's it going?
1:00
Hey. How are you? I'm
1:01
good. I'm good.
1:02
I love talking to you
1:05
now at the end
1:05
of your process. Yes.
1:07
because I I caught you originally
1:09
made the middle to end. It was
1:11
in I
1:12
started making recordings in my mom's face,
1:14
but I hadn't actually, like, taken
1:16
a step into forming it into
1:18
a podcast, I don't think.
1:19
So you've already done it in
1:22
kind of
1:23
memoir form. Mhmm. You've already
1:25
talked about it in your medium
1:27
of choice which we'll talk about. What
1:29
was it that you thought this could do
1:31
for it? Like taking it on an audio? Was
1:33
it just having the tapes?
1:35
It was more I mean, honestly, I didn't
1:37
really think about I mean,
1:39
when I started, I didn't plan on making
1:41
a podcast. I was just sad in
1:43
my mom's apartment going through her things and
1:45
I'd been reading Victor Frankel's man
1:48
served for meaning and he
1:50
he had talked about narrating
1:52
himself through situations and
1:55
not to compare my situation all to his, obviously.
1:57
But It's something I've done
1:59
in my head a lot, like distance myself
2:01
from something to narrate to to get
2:04
through things and narrate myself through them sort
2:06
of observe myself as a human being
2:08
doing something. And so that's how
2:10
I started making recordings and then decided
2:13
that it's ridiculous that
2:15
I don't know anybody else talked
2:17
about going through their parent stuff,
2:19
and I don't know who you've been called to
2:21
talk about going through my mom's stuff. And
2:24
so I thought I should just start
2:27
doing that. And and I'm too shy
2:29
to actually, like, call up people and just
2:31
ask them for advice on, like, I would
2:33
never call Stephen Colbert and say, hey, can
2:35
we talk about, you know, this thing I'm going through
2:37
in my life? but to be able to say to somebody,
2:39
you know, I'd like to interview you about this. It
2:42
was for you, what what
2:44
what
2:44
is the assignment, first of all? Well,
2:46
I mean, one of the reasons why I wanted
2:48
to talk to you is because the assignment does something
2:50
similar to what you did, which is you
2:53
talk to people about their personal
2:55
experience. Mhmm. And I think in the
2:57
news business, we're really used to
2:59
kind of bringing someone
3:01
on as an anecdote And then
3:03
we're like, okay, go back to your life
3:05
while we get back to the rest of the
3:07
news -- Right. -- sentence caps. And
3:09
I really felt
3:11
like, you know, some of the best conversations
3:13
I've had while reporting
3:15
were with those people
3:17
in that experience. And how can
3:19
I expand that is this the
3:21
right medium to expand that and to, like,
3:23
let that breathe a little bit? I I listened
3:25
to the the only fans episode.
3:28
Yeah. This is one coming up folks. And what
3:30
what I loved about it was And just to give people
3:32
the background, we're going to be speaking
3:34
with what I call the original gig workers,
3:36
but some people in the only fan's
3:39
People have sort of migrated into
3:41
the business of, I guess, what you would call
3:43
sex sex work online. Yeah.
3:45
Yeah. Actually, I know a couple of only
3:47
people who have, like, been very successful and
3:49
only fans. I don't know the well, but
3:51
I I know that. That's what everyone says.
3:53
I know it's super. Yeah. No.
3:56
My my well, anyway,
3:58
it's a long But
3:59
immediately, you can tell
4:02
the approach is, like, from the inside out.
4:04
It's it's as you said, it's not sort of
4:06
just having some voices in
4:08
to illustrate a point and then moving
4:11
on,
4:12
sort of it's all crafted around
4:14
these voices it's like you've
4:17
taken the innards and you've pulled them outside,
4:19
and it's it's very compelling
4:21
in that way. It gets at something that
4:23
I liked about your show, which is
4:25
the intimacy of it -- Mhmm. -- which in
4:28
your case I think comes from the subject matter.
4:30
It's incredibly hard to talk to people
4:32
about the things you spoke to them about.
4:34
But this leads me to my question,
4:36
which is about intimacy. In
4:39
our discussion about which is the more
4:41
intimate What do you mean? had a dinner. Yes. I let's
4:43
just say what happened. when when
4:45
I didn't I didn't really know I didn't I mean, I
4:47
knew what his work, but I didn't know personally when we
4:49
met. We ended up having a dinner together
4:52
that was a very ended up being a very long
4:54
dinner after show one night. And because
4:56
I asked a lot of questions. And it but it was
4:58
great. And it was just a very it
5:01
was a really great dinner and I
5:03
really liked her and But
5:05
it came out of me being like, I don't know how to
5:07
do TV. I
5:08
don't know what I'm doing. Tell me
5:10
what you do to make this feel
5:12
less crazy. because what to me
5:14
in a studio, a TV studio, it's
5:17
lights giant monitors
5:19
with your own image
5:20
being broadcast back at you.
5:22
People speaking in your ear -- Yes. -- this camera
5:24
guy, that camera guy, a
5:25
desk And
5:27
then the anchor,
5:28
so to speak, I think I really fully understood
5:30
the concept of the anchor in all of
5:32
that. It's just the anchor of
5:34
it. Whereas, you know, public media,
5:36
we're like, we're hosts. Right. It's like this intimate
5:38
little party. And so I
5:40
was saying
5:41
it's not intimate at all. See,
5:43
it's driving me crazy. Right. I view
5:45
television differently. I do think television can be
5:47
extraordinarily intimate. I think there's, you
5:50
know, it's I think you get I think people get
5:52
get stuck looking into the camp looking
5:54
at the camera lens and that piece of
5:56
glass and they get stuck in the front of the
5:58
camera. Someone once
6:00
said to me, your producer, David Borman,
6:02
was talking to me a long time ago
6:04
about, you're not looking at the front
6:06
of the camera, you're looking into the back of the
6:08
camera. you're looking through through
6:10
the camera through the back of the camera.
6:12
And Which now I'm always trying to
6:14
do, you should see me with my realized
6:16
searching around. But you don't wanna be searching.
6:18
You just wanna be reaching
6:21
through. So how was it different? You're sitting
6:23
down with people and having, you
6:25
know, you have to be vulnerable in
6:27
the conversation you were having as well. I'm
6:29
finding that as I'm doing the assignment. I
6:31
have to share more
6:34
than I have in the past where I've been
6:36
more
6:38
a a distanced
6:39
observer in a way -- Yeah. --
6:42
because you know what it's like when you're reporting and
6:44
you're trying to get people to talk,
6:46
you have to give of yourself. So
6:47
did you find this space any
6:49
how did you find this space different?
6:52
You know, I don't know. III
6:54
thought the the
6:57
intimacy of being in the room with somebody was
6:59
really interesting. and
7:01
different than a television interview. I mean,
7:03
in television, there are there
7:05
are more things going on in one's mind, at least
7:07
in my mind, during an
7:09
interview. I mean, there's questions about light you
7:11
know, there's question about lighting, there's questions
7:13
about sound. If I'm shooting a story
7:15
in a place where something you
7:17
know, I I've been in situations
7:19
of in a children's hospital
7:22
in Mirati Nysha, in a
7:24
malnutrition crisis. with dying
7:26
children and there is the
7:28
horror of what you are seeing and the
7:30
sadness of it. And at the same time
7:32
part of your mind is also
7:35
thinking of is the sound
7:37
recording is the sound person recording
7:40
the sound properly and getting the sound
7:42
of fluid
7:44
dripping the IV or the
7:47
this person's breath coming in
7:49
and raspy breath coming in and coming
7:51
out, all these things which are horrible to
7:53
think about in that moment and yet they're also
7:55
part of television production.
7:58
in in recording for for the podcast. I
8:00
don't think there is that same level
8:02
of it's
8:03
just you in the microphone, so there's not There's
8:06
not a lot of movie So I'll tell you my dirty
8:08
secret, which is sometimes I am editing
8:10
people in my head -- Yeah. -- because I'm so
8:12
used to conversation having to
8:14
be
8:14
edited down. Mhmm. And,
8:17
you know, people are discursive and and
8:19
they go off and and this
8:21
has been really exciting because it's force
8:23
me to come out of my own
8:25
head the way you're talking about. Like,
8:27
stop trying to edit and manage
8:29
this conversation that you're in and
8:31
just be in it. Yeah.
8:32
I mean, do you is there something of
8:34
the conversations you've had? Is there something a
8:37
moment that stands out to you? For
8:39
me, like, in our opening episode
8:41
about these activist parents
8:43
who have run for election and now
8:45
on school boards. For me,
8:47
it's the moment where they
8:49
themselves have to
8:52
pause and think. And
8:54
you hear a little bit
8:56
like you hear that silence,
8:58
which is very powerful while they
9:00
say, well,
9:01
is that what I mean? You
9:03
know,
9:03
and it's very rare that we let
9:06
people have the grace or space
9:09
to think. Right?
9:11
It's like, don't do that because if you fault her,
9:13
you know what I mean? Like, you could go viral.
9:16
And there is a moment where I'm
9:18
kind of pressing them about whether
9:20
or not they kind of want to roll back
9:22
school policies. and
9:24
they and it's interesting, we end up
9:26
going back and forth over just the phrase
9:28
rolling back. And to me,
9:31
that is
9:31
so revealing. The
9:37
perception is that people
9:40
in your position are
9:41
trying to roll back certain
9:43
policies, whether
9:45
that is discussions around social
9:47
issues, etcetera. Do you see
9:49
yourself as rolling back excess?
9:52
No. I don't. I I think, unless
9:54
you're talking about just maybe over the
9:56
last
9:57
five or six years, That's what
9:59
I'm referring
9:59
to. But but, I mean, I'm
10:01
talking about the activism in the
10:04
classroom where the teacher is bringing their
10:06
own political So
10:08
the answer sounds like is yes. Yeah. Anticipate
10:11
rollback. I thought you meant, like, roll it
10:13
back to I I don't know.
10:15
So
10:16
let me reask. At
10:18
this point, would you like to see
10:20
a rolling back of classroom
10:22
discussions? based on the current
10:24
events of the last five years. So
10:26
LGBT issues for one,
10:29
certainly how race and history are discussed
10:31
in the classroom. It's certainly
10:33
another. I think what we would hope to
10:35
be done is just to adhere to the
10:37
standards of providing each
10:39
side without bias. So
10:41
if
10:42
you wanna but do you see why I'm asking?
10:44
Like, if if you feel like something has
10:46
gone to excess -- Yeah. --
10:47
it sounds to me like the remedy is to
10:50
pull back.
10:50
or you could say that they
10:53
haven't been following what
10:56
Let's
10:58
say, you
10:59
got people going on the extremes,
11:01
you know. So And you wanna roll
11:03
those people back? Yeah. I don't know. I don't know. I don't
11:05
know if rolling back is the
11:07
Right term. I'm I'm I have to
11:10
agree with Amy. It's about getting back to
11:12
basics and teaching the
11:14
standards. What's
11:15
so
11:19
interesting
11:19
to me about that is that
11:21
we are in this age where everything if
11:24
people are talking at each other and in
11:26
bumper sticker slogans and
11:28
people have the slogans down,
11:30
but when you actually just sort of try to
11:32
lower the temperature and actually
11:34
listen to what somebody's saying and respond to them
11:36
as a human being and sort of
11:38
start to just explore what they're
11:40
saying, it's disarming
11:42
to people and sometimes they don't
11:44
know how to
11:46
put away the bumper sticker slogan and actually
11:50
express what they actually think or or
11:52
even explore what they actually think. Yeah.
11:54
And they're
11:55
people are on guard a little bit, you
11:58
know, and rightly so. Their words can be
11:59
weaponized against them, etcetera.
12:02
And The
12:03
goal of the conversation, at least
12:05
my opinion, is not to
12:06
change minds. You know, I don't have
12:08
that kind of sense of just like the power of
12:11
conversation. It's
12:11
more like What would this
12:14
conversation be like if we actually listened a
12:16
little bit? You might come away
12:18
with different understanding. You might come
12:20
away
12:20
with a better understanding of
12:23
how to talk to people you disagree
12:25
with, which battles to fight over the course of
12:27
a conversation. and how
12:29
to open some doors instead of
12:31
close them. And I'm hoping
12:33
to make the strange familiar.
12:34
Right? Like, that there will be a lot of communities
12:36
that people hear from and
12:37
that they'll go I did not think I had anything
12:39
in common with a sex worker,
12:41
you know, or like I did not. I
12:43
didn't know what was
12:44
going on for gender affirming care
12:46
doctors. Like I've only seen it in headlines,
12:48
I think we've got a lot of interesting shows
12:51
coming out.
12:52
You can check out the assignment wherever
12:54
you get your podcasts and follow, so you
12:56
won't miss any episodes.
13:01
Thanks,
13:01
Anderson.
13:03
What
13:03
does hybrid work mean to
13:05
you? For some, it means working from
13:08
anywhere with anyone at any time.
13:10
For others, it means the chance for
13:12
opportunity, flexibility and dependability.
13:14
Cisco is making hybrid work simple,
13:17
secure, and consistent for each of
13:19
us. So
13:19
log in and connect knowing that
13:22
someone is making sure everything
13:24
is safe for you and everyone
13:26
everywhere even here. Because
13:28
nobody makes hybrid work, work
13:30
better. Cisco,
13:31
the bridge to possible.
13:33
Hey, Joey. I just wrapped
13:35
up the podcast series I was listening
13:37
to, and I'm looking for something new that
13:39
will also Expand
13:41
my mind. You got any suggestions?
13:43
Oh, yeah. I definitely have one
13:45
for you. It's from CNN and it's called
13:47
chasing life. with doctor Sanjay
13:49
Gupta. This season's all about unique
13:51
sensory experiences, like
13:53
people who can taste colors or folks who have a
13:55
hard time recognizing faces. There's
13:57
even an episode about how psychedelics can
13:59
help treat depression. Well, thanks.
14:02
Chasing life sounds like a podcast I need to
14:04
follow. Where can I get it? Bob, you can
14:06
listen to chasing life, add free
14:08
on Amazon music. It's included with
14:10
Prime. Alright? Chasing life, add free
14:12
on Amazon music included with
14:14
Prime. I'm following
14:15
now.
14:19
Okay.
14:19
Before we start, a little bit of personal
14:21
history. My
14:22
mother was an elected school
14:24
board member. In my
14:25
small hometown outside of Boston, this was
14:28
back in the mid nineties, That
14:30
meant she spent long nights
14:32
at meetings in salary fights
14:34
with teachers unions or
14:36
with parents angry
14:38
over a lot of things, fast
14:40
forward to today, and I have a kindergartener. And
14:42
I can't get these images out of my
14:44
head of parents Raging at
14:46
school board members last year.
14:48
Thank
14:51
you for your
14:51
time. Your
14:54
time is up.
14:55
My time is never up because
14:56
I am in school. This
15:02
wave of parent activists
15:04
were upset about how schools handled the
15:07
pandemic, handled teaching
15:09
gender identity, handled issues
15:11
of race, diversity, is
15:14
a code word for anti
15:17
white. Since
15:17
when did the public school system take it upon
15:20
itself to become the moral authority from which
15:22
our children learn their values?
15:23
After
15:25
so much deception, radical
15:28
politics, and eruptions of violence,
15:30
we are pulling our son today from this
15:32
school district. who will be taking
15:34
responsibility.
15:36
But the thing is it wasn't some
15:39
pandemic
15:39
induced moment. It's the latest
15:41
chapter in a long running movement.
15:43
And the
15:44
historians who study this stuff say school
15:46
battles are really just proxy fights.
15:49
what
15:49
it means to be American.
15:51
So I wanted to know more about
15:54
these activist parents. What
15:56
drove them to activism? And
15:58
now that they have
15:59
power, what
16:01
do they plan to do with it? We
16:03
need more critical thinking. We need to be teaching
16:05
our kids to think for themselves and to have their own
16:08
opinions and we need to be supportive of that.
16:10
Unless a parent thinks it's
16:12
inappropriate, then
16:12
they can make a phone call to a tip line. Right?
16:15
And say, I didn't like the way that went down.
16:17
Well, and that's a discussion to be had between
16:19
the school board and the parent. and
16:21
it's uncomfortable, but we need to be
16:23
having discussions.
16:23
I'm Adi
16:26
Cornish. This is the assignment.
16:30
I'm not
16:30
gonna pretend that the parents rights
16:33
movement is new. I grew up
16:35
outside of Boston in the decade
16:37
after the school busing crisis.
16:39
when parents angry over mandatory integration
16:43
fueled riots in the late seventies.
16:45
And I was part of a voluntary
16:47
busing program. so I get it.
16:49
Covering education over the years, I
16:51
found that most of these stories
16:53
were really about power.
16:55
The analogy that works for me is the family dinner.
16:58
Adam Lattz is a historian of education
17:00
at Binghamton University, and he
17:02
studies the power struggle over what belongs in
17:04
the classroom. We think about schools
17:06
as America's dinner table where
17:08
everyone comes and has to sit down
17:10
and has to get along for
17:12
a certain amount of time. It makes sense that this is
17:15
where all the underlying tensions,
17:17
all the long festering angerers
17:20
get expressed from time to time.
17:22
And without going too far down, the
17:24
historian rabbit hole, one of the
17:26
most interesting of those times he told us
17:28
about wasn't BOST in
17:30
nineteen seventy four, but Kanaw
17:33
County in nineteen seventy four, that's in West
17:35
Virginia. And that's where a school board
17:36
fight about so called multicultural
17:40
tech spokes, spiraled into a
17:42
boycott. But the violence continued. And
17:44
bombings. Then, shattered
17:46
windows, chairs, scattered
17:48
about. What was left of
17:50
missus Catherine Albright's first grade
17:52
room at Midway Elementary School at
17:54
Campbell's Creek West Virginia.
17:57
Alright.
17:57
But let me back up because like I
17:59
said, it all started with textbooks.
18:02
Three hundred and twenty five of them. By
18:04
the way, I'll do it, so not give and respond
18:06
ability for me to educate my children. Now
18:08
that's from a school board meeting. It was on
18:10
June twenty seventh
18:11
nineteen seventy four in Cannott
18:13
County. We feel that in no way, Cannott's
18:16
type of literature, benefit, and further our
18:18
children's education. We do
18:20
not want any
18:21
teachers to assign
18:22
any of this material
18:25
at any time for any of our
18:27
children to read.
18:30
West Virginia. It recently tried to
18:33
modernize its curriculum. And remember this was
18:35
a tumultuous time in the US
18:37
with civil rights and women's
18:39
rights and the Vietnam War all in
18:41
the mix And around the
18:43
country, there was a
18:45
progressive push, not only to
18:47
integrate classrooms, but also to
18:49
integrate reading lists. the word they use
18:51
at that time, a more multicultural set of
18:53
authors for literature. So
18:55
for example, they intentionally include more
18:58
black authors but they also included
19:00
authors that wrote non
19:02
traditional poetry, so like e e
19:04
Cummings. The school board had been
19:06
prepared to approve these new books suggested
19:08
by the state, but there was one
19:10
member who objected. And her
19:12
name
19:12
was Alice Moore. We've got to
19:14
let them know that the parents, want a boy to let
19:16
their children are studying in move. Sweet Alice
19:18
says she came to be known in the controversy. She
19:21
was an experienced conservative
19:23
activist, and she ran for school
19:25
board because she wanted to make
19:27
schools more traditional, more conservative, in
19:29
her words, more American and patriotic.
19:32
After Alice more
19:32
objected to the new curriculum, rumors
19:36
spread through the county. And
19:37
there was no Facebook at the time, but
19:39
there were paper flyers passed
19:41
around by parent groups And
19:43
these flyers claimed the new books promoted
19:45
reverse racism and
19:47
criminality. Let's call it
19:49
fake news nineteen seventy four.
19:51
So in June, the school board meeting
19:53
was packed. It was in a gymnasium
19:55
and the windows of the gymnasium were packed.
19:57
You know, people were
19:59
sticking their their heads in to
20:02
try to cheer and
20:03
see. There were more than a thousand
20:06
people, parents, teachers, pastors,
20:08
representatives from groups like
20:09
the West Virginia Civil Liberties
20:11
Union. And then here comes the part that's
20:13
gonna sound familiar. We absolutely
20:16
refuse to have the liberal point of
20:18
view pushed upon our children. We
20:20
declare all the taxpayers
20:22
We pay your salary with the
20:25
judicial office. The under
20:27
signed citizens and
20:29
taxpayers of cannot County, whereby
20:31
petition the Board of Education to
20:34
deny the use of certain
20:36
textbooks in the schools of
20:38
this county.
20:41
I have seen two
20:44
If you
20:46
listen close, you can hear the boos on the
20:49
tape there. The
20:51
audience cuts in so often that the chairman
20:53
keeps threatening to the rim.
20:56
After three hours
20:59
of back and forth, they decide to
21:01
buy most of the textbooks. and
21:03
the vote is three to two. But there
21:05
was no way
21:06
that fight was gonna end just like that.
21:08
Now with the history of this
21:10
county,
21:10
has a real strong,
21:12
powerful tradition of of labor
21:15
activism. So when
21:17
school politics got
21:19
heated, the people in Cannock County, you
21:21
know, as as labor
21:24
activists, but also as minors, They
21:26
had not only traditions of of boycotts
21:29
and picket lines, but they had
21:31
also things like dynamite, and they
21:33
used it. Things
21:34
more or less moved in that
21:36
chronological order.
21:38
You had nearly ten thousand people
21:40
stay home during the boycotts.
21:42
kids, bus drivers, truckers, yes,
21:44
coal miners, and then someone
21:46
grahiied Nazi symbols onto
21:49
school buildings. some people took
21:51
shots at school buses on their way
21:53
to pick up the students who were still
21:55
going to school. And
21:57
then, the
21:58
bombs. planted
21:59
at three
21:59
elementary schools and
22:02
dynamite thrown into a school board
22:03
building. In Canal County, West Virginia,
22:06
there was violence today in the
22:08
continuing demonstrations against the use of controversial textbooks
22:10
in the schools. The Charleston Gazette
22:12
said in an editorial today, the
22:14
county is near anarchy.
22:16
Okay.
22:18
So
22:19
we aren't at this point yet,
22:22
but the argument about parents'
22:24
rights It's back. And argument about political
22:27
indoctrination in the classroom is
22:29
back. And as more
22:31
progressive ideas about race
22:33
and gender take hold in the mainstream. Some
22:37
conservatives have felt their grasp on the
22:39
definition of
22:39
what it means to be an American
22:41
slip. And
22:42
in the past few years, we've seen an increasing
22:44
number of parents elected to school boards
22:46
who want to focus on their
22:48
right to
22:49
determine how we should teach our nation's
22:52
history and how and
22:54
if schools should talk about
22:56
race and gender. So next we're
22:58
gonna hear from two people the
23:00
center of it.
23:01
It makes it sound like we're gonna go
23:03
back to Jim Crow laws or something like
23:05
that. It just sounds like this negative
23:08
connotation when actually all we want to
23:10
do is have
23:12
school be a place where you're
23:14
focused on reading,
23:17
writing, arithmetic. More
23:20
in a
23:21
minute.
23:23
In today's
23:25
work world, it's not just about
23:27
finding solutions to recover in the face of
23:29
change. It's about continuing to
23:31
thrive, innovate, and collaborate,
23:34
despite our adversities. Cisco
23:36
helps you make hybrid work work
23:38
for each individual and team, simply
23:41
securely and consistently. So
23:43
log in and connect knowing that someone
23:45
is making sure everything is safe for
23:47
you and everyone everywhere
23:50
even here.
23:50
because nobody makes hybrid work work
23:53
better.
23:53
Cisco, the bridge to
23:55
possible. I
23:58
think I
23:59
i think speak for most parents right now
24:01
that have decided to stand up and speak out
24:03
my school board meetings being called domestic
24:06
terrorist. You know, I'm a
24:08
mom. I'm a small
24:10
business owner. I
24:11
just want to be able to
24:13
advocate for my children.
24:16
That is April Carney.
24:17
She's about to be sworn onto her
24:20
local
24:20
school board in Daval County,
24:22
Florida.
24:22
She and a bunch of other people earned
24:24
the endorsement of Florida governor Ron
24:27
DeSantis who is, like, not
24:29
subtle about where he stands on
24:31
culture war issues in the classroom. Florida
24:33
is the
24:34
state where woke goes to
24:37
die.
24:38
Amy Coffey also recently
24:40
elected to her local school board. This
24:43
was in Lansing, Kansas, and she's
24:45
gotten criticism for some of the stance that she's
24:47
taken as well. immediately since
24:49
I had questioned critical
24:51
race theory, and I had spoke at
24:53
the school board. I was immediately, you
24:55
know, being called a racist
24:57
and message things that I was a racist
25:00
and it got pretty
25:02
nasty, but we just I just tried to stay
25:04
strong. I worried about my
25:06
daughter.
25:06
I worried that they would maybe call her
25:08
a racist at the high school because of
25:10
that. Amy Coffey has been on
25:12
the board since January. her
25:14
governor who is a Democrat actually vetoed a parent's
25:17
rights bill there and then her
25:18
district passed their own version
25:21
anyway. So
25:22
this year, both April
25:24
in Florida and Amy in Kansas,
25:27
while they started the school year in,
25:29
let's say, changed environments.
25:31
I
25:31
actually think we had one of our best
25:33
starts to the school year yet, so
25:36
I'm very happy with that. In
25:38
April,
25:38
what about you? I have to agree. I think that
25:40
we are off to a great start. I
25:43
think there's a very comfortable, transparent
25:45
feeling going on in the beginning
25:47
school year this year. I feel like you guys
25:49
are both on the edge of smiling. Are you
25:51
feeling good? Yes. Yes.
25:54
Bay
25:54
vaguely victorious. Neither
25:57
of these two women had run for office before
25:58
they ran for school board. But
26:00
then twenty twenty hit
26:02
and school closures
26:04
gave them a new perspective.
26:06
This is April. I have
26:09
to say, you know, we were we were
26:11
only closed for a short period of time
26:13
here in Florida from March till the
26:15
end of that school year. And
26:17
I have to say that was
26:19
just enough for me to get a tidbit
26:21
of how hard it is to be
26:24
an educator. It was a struggle.
26:26
It was frustrating. I had said
26:28
to my husband and I said, you know, I really hope
26:30
he go back to school next year because I don't
26:32
wanna ruin my relationship with my
26:34
two girls. you know, I'm
26:34
not an educator. That's not what I do for
26:37
a living. And so I think
26:39
it put parents
26:39
in a pickle. Amy,
26:41
I hear you nodding. I don't know if you have a question
26:44
for April or a story to
26:46
share with your sixteen year old.
26:48
For
26:48
her, it was the social isolation from
26:50
not being in school and then
26:52
the depression that sunk in.
26:54
It really affected the
26:56
mental health, I think, of the
26:59
kids. So but then all of a sudden, you're
27:01
home, you're feeling a little bit
27:03
helpless. What makes you
27:05
decide You
27:05
know what? I need to, like, do
27:07
something
27:08
about what I am
27:09
seeing. I see problems that I wanna do something
27:12
about it. This is
27:13
April. For me, it was
27:16
actually when we
27:17
opened back up the following year.
27:20
We went through a whole process. Our our
27:22
district went through whole process of
27:24
online board meetings with
27:26
the superintendent. I didn't feel like
27:28
I was being listened to when I would stand up
27:30
at school board meetings and speak for my
27:32
three minutes. So, you know, if
27:34
you have a school board meeting where
27:36
sixty five parents stand up and
27:38
say, we no longer want our
27:40
child to be forced to wear
27:42
a mask, and then they vote
27:44
against you. That's how you
27:46
feel like you're not being listened to.
27:48
I also
27:48
spoke at our school board meeting
27:51
too. before I was elected,
27:53
and they sent out the survey
27:55
to the parents to ask if they
27:57
wanted their children to go back to in
28:00
school learning. and over
28:00
eighty percent responded saying
28:02
that they did
28:03
want their kids to go back and then
28:05
they weren't going to vote for them to go
28:07
back five days a week. They just disregarded that.
28:11
Amy also spoke up at another school
28:13
board meeting about Critical Race
28:15
Theory. The school district was arguing
28:17
that they were not using the legal theory taught at
28:19
the college level, but that they wanted to
28:21
take a comprehensive look at slavery
28:23
in the US. Amy
28:26
worried that would include materials from the
28:28
New York Times sixteen nineteen
28:30
project. And then there was this one book
28:32
in particular
28:32
that really bothered It was being
28:34
used at the school approved social
28:37
justice club. It was
28:38
this book is anti racist.
28:41
and
28:41
it had clear
28:45
CRT, you know, ideals in that
28:47
book. Yeah. I think this is a book by
28:49
Tiffany Jewel. This
28:50
book is anti racist, and and the full
28:52
title
28:52
is twenty lessons on how to wake up,
28:55
take action, and do the work. It's it's
28:57
very much
28:57
an activist book. and
28:59
have a teacher child, you know, to do that in different ways.
29:02
And which part of
29:02
it to you is the most objectionable? Well,
29:06
it was a partisan book that the
29:08
country is inherently racist
29:10
and formed on racist ideals
29:13
and that if you're not
29:15
anti racist, racist. I mean, it was a
29:17
very strong book that I think. What
29:19
I want
29:20
is to keep that out of
29:23
the classroom. focus
29:24
on the core curriculum.
29:26
There are
29:27
so many things now that
29:28
fall under that
29:30
category, like one of criticisms
29:32
about some of the bills about
29:34
what to teach in classrooms is that
29:36
they're so wide open to interpretation.
29:39
Mhmm. Like, what is the circumstance where someone
29:41
can talk about race or
29:42
racism in the classroom and who decides
29:45
that? One
29:45
part with ours is that our
29:49
parents, if they they can object
29:51
to in a learning material in our
29:53
principal rights, if the
29:55
material they feel that that harms
29:57
their beliefs, values their prints So
29:59
in some
29:59
instances, it may be that the lesson
30:02
is still taught, but their
30:04
child does a different lesson. And part of our
30:06
parent's bill writes also does say that
30:08
the weeks spec the teacher
30:10
and educator of each child that
30:12
they will endeavor to present the
30:14
facts without distortion, bias,
30:16
or personal prejudice. and who decides that.
30:19
So if it's
30:19
if there's a history of slavery in the country, is
30:21
that a fact? I mean, you should be
30:23
teaching about slavery, of course.
30:25
but you could, you know, you
30:27
you wouldn't, I guess, when you would throw
30:29
in your own personal bias
30:32
or prejudice is when you would
30:34
say that for
30:35
instance,
30:36
like how the sixteen nineteen project did.
30:38
Howard Bauchner: Yeah, April, I don't know if you want
30:40
to help here. Obviously, in Florida, this has
30:43
been talked about a lot. What your
30:45
sense of what's the dividing line?
30:47
I
30:47
think that in the classroom, when you're
30:49
opening for discussion, you're presenting the facts, I
30:51
think that you have to be able as an educator
30:54
to talk about both
30:56
sides of the topic.
30:57
Right? I mean, I think that you need
31:00
to be able
31:00
to sit there and moderate your
31:03
students and open them up to
31:05
critical thinking. What do you feel about
31:07
this? What do you think was
31:08
wrong that happened, you know, during slavery
31:11
in our country. Do you
31:13
feel that we are growing from that
31:15
experience? Do you feel the opposite? I
31:17
think that that's the issue. But
31:19
under these parent bills of right, like,
31:22
can they do
31:23
that? Or have you created a
31:25
scenario we're raising those kinds of
31:28
questions is subject to challenge by
31:30
a parent who feels they're inappropriate
31:32
to ask. I don't feel
31:35
that that's the case. I
31:37
think that the issue at
31:39
hand is that there's only one
31:41
side that's being spoken about.
31:43
It's not being presented
31:45
in a well rounded manner.
31:47
Right. You've got to teach the history without
31:49
teaching any of that other kind of context
31:51
or how do you think about it? Well, it just
31:53
that falls into how it
31:55
is being taught, whether it's being taught.
31:57
With bias, are you teaching
31:59
American history with
32:02
the overarching theme that
32:04
this is a racist country, it's
32:07
still a racist country, or are
32:09
you teaching just
32:11
what has happened and let the
32:13
child form their own ideas on what
32:15
has happened throughout history
32:18
and the changes that have been made
32:20
and that have occurred
32:22
good or bad since then and
32:24
let them form their own opinions
32:26
through critical thinking. The
32:28
perception is that
32:31
people in your position are trying to
32:33
roll back
32:34
certain policies. whether
32:36
that is discussions around social
32:38
issues, etcetera. Do you see
32:40
yourself as rolling back excess?
32:43
No, I don't. I I think unless
32:45
you're talking about just maybe over the last
32:47
five or
32:48
six years? That's what
32:50
I'm referring to. But mean,
32:52
I'm talking
32:53
about the activism in the classroom
32:55
where the teacher is bringing their own
32:58
political answer sounds
32:59
like is yes. Yeah. Anticipate
33:01
rollback. And I thought you meant, like, roll it
33:03
back to I I don't
33:06
know. So let
33:07
me re ask,
33:09
at this point, would you like to
33:11
see a rolling back of classroom
33:14
discussions? based on the current
33:16
events of the last five years. So
33:17
LGBT issues for one, certainly
33:20
how race and history
33:22
are discussed in the classroom. It's certainly
33:24
another.
33:24
I think what we would hope to
33:26
be done is just to adhere to the
33:29
standards of providing each
33:31
side without bias. So if you wanna
33:32
but do you see why I'm asking? Like,
33:35
if if you feel like something has gone to
33:37
excess -- Yeah. -- it sounds to me like
33:39
the remedy is to pull back.
33:42
or
33:42
you could say that they haven't
33:44
been following what
33:49
Let's see.
33:50
You got people going on the extremes,
33:52
you know. So And you wanna
33:54
roll those people back? Yeah. I don't know. I
33:56
don't know. I don't know. Rolling back is the
33:59
Right term.
33:59
I'm I'm I have to agree with Amy. It's
34:02
about getting back to basics and
34:04
teaching the standards. So
34:06
getting
34:06
back is the term you'd prefer to use. Yeah.
34:08
I think it's
34:08
back to basics. We need like I said, we
34:10
have so much learning loss that's happened
34:13
because of the pandemic. Right. But
34:14
either way, it's a it's a going back of something. You
34:17
want to draw back on what's happened. Yeah.
34:19
I think we need to focus on
34:20
what's important and that's
34:23
you know, educating our children to
34:25
be able to graduate from
34:27
high school. Why
34:28
are you guys scared to say this? And I
34:30
I'm not
34:31
picking on you. I I'm genuinely
34:33
confused. If you've both seen an excess,
34:35
you've seen something go too
34:37
far. Why the
34:39
fear around saying let's
34:42
pull back from a thing that's gone too far. Well, it
34:44
makes it sound like you wanna roll
34:46
back to the times when you
34:49
know, like, we're gonna go back to Jim Crow
34:52
laws or something like that. It just sounds like
34:54
this negative connotation
34:56
when actually all we want to
34:58
do is
34:59
have school be a place
35:01
where you're focused on
35:03
reading, writing
35:06
arithmetic, We're focusing on all of these other issues that
35:08
could be addressed at home
35:11
with the parents. Well,
35:13
thank you
35:13
for letting me dig
35:14
into that. I always wanna make sure that
35:16
I'm totally clear on what's being said to me,
35:19
so I'm not misconstruing things. I
35:21
don't want to lose sight of kids in
35:24
this. I asked students
35:26
what they thought of political battles
35:28
finding their way into the classroom.
35:31
I gave them no direction on what
35:33
political battle that
35:34
might be. And
35:36
here is one of them.
35:38
How is it that my existence
35:41
is
35:41
a threat to
35:43
other people because
35:44
my existence in my identity,
35:47
my sexuality, my
35:49
gender, that's me. and
35:50
the same goes for everybody else in
35:52
this world.
35:53
And no one else should
35:54
have the right to try to silence
35:58
me or silence anyone else no matter how young, how
35:59
old. It's such an important
36:02
part of myself and I know that
36:04
for other trans kids. It is
36:06
a important thing for them too. And
36:08
I think the fact that
36:10
we can't even express that in
36:12
schools or we're supposed to be safe where
36:14
we are encouraged to grow and be
36:16
ourselves. I just think that that is
36:18
completely
36:19
unacceptable. What do you hear in the
36:21
voice of a student like that? I
36:23
think that we're putting
36:24
these kids under a microscope.
36:29
And I actually think that by
36:31
drawing more attention to
36:34
the struggles they're going through,
36:37
it's actually putting more pressure
36:39
on them. I
36:40
have a friend of mine who
36:42
whose son is gay. and has
36:44
come home and said, mom, it's
36:48
all
36:48
day, every day. It's nonstop.
36:51
I feel like I'm being singled
36:54
out, and I really just
36:56
wanna be with my peers and
36:57
go about my school day.
37:00
And so
37:00
I
37:02
think there's a way to be
37:04
inclusive
37:04
without making it a spectacle. And
37:06
I think that's
37:07
what it's become
37:10
And in turn, it's actually having a negative effect
37:12
on these kids that are struggling with their
37:14
gender identity. And I think if
37:16
there was less focus on
37:19
it during the school day and more focused on academics and
37:21
just being a kid, I think
37:23
it might lessen lessen
37:24
the pressure for her. I
37:27
feel I feel for her. I do empathize
37:29
with her. Here's
37:30
what else
37:32
students are hearing. for
37:35
instance, Florida governor Ron DeSantis. Right? He
37:37
was speaking before the moms for
37:39
Liberty Summit over the
37:41
summer in July. and here's
37:43
a sample of that speech. We
37:46
also drew a line in the sand
37:48
and said, you know, in the state
37:50
of Florida, A parent should be
37:52
able to send their kid to
37:54
kindergarten without having woke gender
37:56
ideology shoved down their
37:57
throat. We're not
37:59
gonna have some first grader be told
38:02
that, you know, yeah, your parents named
38:04
Giuliani. You were born a
38:06
boy, but maybe you're really
38:08
a girl.
38:09
What's your response to
38:10
that? And and I'll start with you April because
38:12
you were among the candidates that
38:14
he supported. I think that
38:16
a five year old
38:18
who still believes in Santa Claus and
38:21
the Easter bunny doesn't need to
38:22
be taught about gender ideology. I
38:25
think once you go through puberty and you
38:28
start to figure out who you are and your
38:30
hormones start to even out,
38:32
then yes. If that's how you're feeling and if it was
38:34
my child, I'd be completely accepting of
38:36
that child. But I think at that
38:38
age, it's not necessary in
38:40
the classroom. House
38:43
Bill fifteen fifty seven is about age
38:45
appropriate curriculum. Not one
38:47
place in that
38:48
bill, does it mention anything
38:52
about
38:52
singling out children for their,
38:55
you
38:55
know, persuasion. Right. I
38:57
mean, it doesn't help
38:58
if the governor goes out and it's like, we're
39:00
gonna
39:01
stop this being shoved down your throats,
39:03
it's just being woke.
39:04
Like, that language is not. I mean,
39:06
correct me if I'm wrong, does that language feel as
39:08
careful as you guys are being?
39:11
know, I think I
39:12
think he's speaking for a lot of parents
39:14
that are tired. Yeah. I just think that
39:16
I think that he's, you know, he's a dad
39:19
too. He's got
39:19
three young children. And
39:22
there's a
39:23
there's a lot of
39:24
folks out there that just do not agree
39:27
with what's going on. and
39:28
we can be accepting and
39:31
inclusive of everyone without
39:32
the out putting such
39:35
a microscope
39:36
over it.
39:38
and
39:38
that's what's happened and it's being picked up by the media and it's being
39:41
picked up on social media and
39:43
it's being portrayed in pushed
39:45
and pushed and pushed and it's all you
39:48
see. And what is
39:50
I just wanna make sure I'm following. That life's
39:53
style, the lifestyle of
39:55
the LGBTQ community.
39:58
It's
39:58
it's that's what you choose to do,
39:59
and that's how you feel in your heart, and that's
40:02
who you are. That's
40:04
completely acceptable, but
40:06
it doesn't mean that the rest of the
40:08
world has to be just like you. I
40:11
just cannot stop me for a second. Just I wanna ask you in
40:13
particular because you're in Florida. What
40:15
people are seeing
40:17
is a Governor backing, right, some two
40:19
dozen candidates. And I
40:20
you can correct me if
40:22
I'm
40:22
wrong. You you actually had to say
40:25
that you agree with his agenda.
40:28
Mhmm. This is something he's speaking about
40:32
nationally. It does not seem like it's just
40:34
about helping out parents.
40:36
He's backing candidates. It seems
40:40
very political. Well, I
40:41
think that, you know, the reason why he and
40:44
the first
40:44
lady decided to do this is
40:46
because people just
40:47
simply weren't paying attention at
40:49
down ballot races. but
40:51
it's not that it's a political. Like, we are
40:53
looking at a political movement. Yeah. I
40:55
mean, well, I think it's it's apparent
40:57
movement is what it is. Amy, can
40:59
I ask you about this as well? You
41:02
ran explicitly as a conservative.
41:04
Yes. The idea
41:06
that politics we're not already in that and that it's bringing it
41:08
in, I would disagree
41:10
with,
41:10
because it has already been in
41:13
there, the NEA. the
41:15
teachers unions across the country
41:18
are highly political. Right.
41:20
This is the National Education Association.
41:22
So to you, it is about bringing
41:25
mean, you have an ideology as well. You're not you're
41:27
saying that you're not pretending you don't.
41:29
No. I'm not. I'm not pretending I don't.
41:32
But what I would like in
41:34
that
41:34
ideology as a conservative viewpoint
41:36
of that is to keep
41:40
the politics out of schools that
41:42
I know that I run as a conservative,
41:44
but that's one of the conservative
41:46
views is that we so you can see how that's
41:48
hard
41:48
square. Right? Like, just as an average
41:51
voter. Well, you have lots of political people
41:53
saying they're being a political and they
41:55
all want control of your students
41:57
and syllabus. Right? Like, it seems it seems
41:59
all
41:59
political. I can see
42:02
how you you
42:02
might feel that way on the
42:06
other side, but I feel Not other side, but, like, objectively.
42:08
Right? Like, if someone says, I
42:10
am a conservative, I want to run
42:12
for this position that's usually
42:15
considered non partisan because I believe that my
42:17
ideology brings something to this. It
42:19
is explicitly political. Well,
42:22
it reason why
42:24
I would say that I was a conservative
42:26
is because that way, it it
42:28
shows, you know, your values and
42:31
your views on points so those conservatives
42:33
would have a voice. But as a
42:35
part of a
42:36
school board, I need to listen to all sides
42:38
and that can come back on
42:41
on us too, like, you have
42:43
to watch for both sides being brought,
42:45
you know, into the classroom.
42:47
I don't want the Republican
42:50
side, if you wanna call it that or the Democrat
42:52
side brought in, I want just
42:56
the facts. My
42:57
mom ran for
42:59
a school committee. Uh-huh. This was
43:01
a huge part of my growing up. Yeah. So
43:03
I'm sort of intimately aware
43:06
of how these battles can play out. Right? And I had school friends whose parents
43:08
were teachers and they were in the union and it
43:10
was a whole thing. What I learned
43:12
from that time though was so much of
43:15
this is about control.
43:16
Who is in control? Who gets to draw
43:18
the lines? Who gets to say what is
43:20
appropriate or
43:21
not appropriate? Do you
43:24
feel
43:24
like And especially after we
43:26
started this conversation
43:26
where you said in some ways you felt helpless,
43:29
do you feel like you
43:30
have more control now?
43:33
This is Amy. As far as
43:35
myself, I'm still only one vote out of seven, but I
43:38
do feel like at
43:39
least I can
43:42
assure that parents
43:44
have a voice. And when they bring
43:46
those concerns to me,
43:47
I do have that control where I can
43:49
make that known to the board. and
43:51
and specifically conservative parents.
43:52
Right? I mean, that that was part
43:54
of your campaign to see how it can be a
43:56
voice for you. It is
43:57
the conservative, but I've
43:59
also had two or three recent
44:02
issues that came up these people. They were not
44:04
for what I
44:07
ran for. but they had
44:09
some other issues that needed to be addressed. And I went to bat
44:12
for them. I knew they
44:14
didn't vote
44:14
for me. I knew they didn't agree with me
44:16
on a lot of these issues. In fact, one
44:18
had spoke out on that. But
44:21
I'm happy to say, I
44:23
I can set that as side because I
44:25
have a job to do, you know, as a board member, and it's about the kids. And
44:27
I did that. I mean, honestly,
44:29
I think
44:31
that when you decide to run
44:33
for public office like I did. Do I have my own
44:36
personal
44:36
values? Absolutely. Does
44:38
that mean that I am going to
44:42
be biased when it comes to the overall district
44:44
and what's best for our teachers and
44:46
students? Absolutely not.
44:48
And I
44:50
am so glad that I'm going to get the opportunity to serve community
44:52
and that
44:52
we are going to be able
44:54
to have more robust conversations
44:58
as a school board because now we're gonna have more diversity of
45:00
thought. And I truly believe that when
45:02
you have a more balanced
45:04
school board,
45:05
that those conversations will
45:07
be more
45:10
productive. Going
45:12
forward, what
45:13
do you feel about
45:15
school board races, which in the past
45:17
were at least perceived
45:20
as being kind of uneventful and
45:22
maybe
45:22
and maybe
45:23
apolitical. How do you feel about
45:25
the fact that they
45:27
will become more explicitly partisan.
45:30
I
45:30
would be fine with it
45:32
being either way. Let's face it.
45:34
The country's divided. I mean, our presidential elections
45:37
were very divided. Our
45:40
senate is, you know, almost evenly
45:42
divided. Right? There's division
45:44
all over the country, and I don't think
45:46
it's any shock that there's some in
45:48
the school boards too now. April,
45:50
do
45:50
you feel similarly? Is it okay to have a more
45:52
hyper partisan environment at the school level?
45:55
To some extent,
45:56
yes, because I think again,
45:59
as I
45:59
mentioned about people not
46:02
paying attention to down ballot
46:04
races. We can't just focus on the
46:06
presidential election anymore. the
46:08
local level is it's most important
46:10
and it affects the most important citizens
46:12
of this country and that's our children.
46:15
And so, are there a lot of informed voters out
46:18
there? Yes. Are there a lot that are
46:20
not absolutely.
46:22
And so, To some
46:24
extent, to make it a more
46:26
partisan race, it helps those
46:28
that are low information voters make
46:30
a decision based upon what
46:32
they believe. And
46:34
again, it also It's sort of
46:36
depressing. Like as a parent, I've
46:38
got no. I mean, I've got kids under the
46:40
age of five. Mhmm. and I turn
46:42
on the news and I look out in
46:44
the world and I do see, like,
46:47
conflicts and
46:47
history and they
46:49
need of critical thinking skills, which I very
46:51
much hope to give them. But it sounds like
46:53
you guys are saying, like, don't do that
46:56
in school. Oh, no. I'm a
46:58
I'm a huge That's kind of sending them out in
47:00
the world being, like, wait, can we talk about
47:02
the LGBT issues? I ran out. What do you think
47:04
about racism having more
47:06
critical thinking in the class I think that's
47:08
what we're lacking. We need more critical
47:10
thinking. We need to be teaching our kids to think for
47:12
themselves and to have their own opinions, and we need
47:14
to be supportive of that. unless a
47:16
parent thinks it's inappropriate.
47:18
Then they can make a phone call to a tip
47:19
line. Right? And say, I didn't like the way that
47:22
went down. Well, and that's a discussion to had between the and
47:24
the parent, but we need to be having
47:26
these discussions. And it's it
47:28
needs to happen,
47:29
and it's uncomfortable, but
47:31
we need to be having discussions. I welcome
47:33
parents' commentary. We have to be able to listen
47:36
to one another so that we can come together.
47:38
It's the only way it's ever
47:40
gonna happen.
47:42
That was
47:44
April
47:44
Carney of Daval County,
47:46
Florida, and Amy Coffey
47:49
of Lansing, Kansas.
47:51
The assignment is a production of CNN
47:54
audio.
47:54
Our producers are
47:57
Alex Stern, Madeleine
47:58
Thompson, Jennifer Lai,
48:00
to showcase Samuel and Alison Park. Our senior producer
48:02
is Haley Thomas. Our
48:05
supervising producer is
48:06
supervising producer
48:07
Steve Flicktide. mixing and
48:09
sound design by David Schulman.
48:11
Artwork designed by Nicole
48:14
Pesserou and
48:16
James Andres. and
48:18
our
48:18
technical director is Dan Dezula. Support
48:21
from Adam Levy,
48:22
Osmanor, Sonia
48:24
Tung, Erin Matthewson, Katie Hinman,
48:27
Lindsay Abrams, Tamika Ballens Kalasini,
48:30
Refina Ahmad, and
48:33
Lisa Namuro.
48:35
special thanks to Theo Balchem.
48:37
Abby Swanson is our executive
48:40
producer. I'm
48:40
Adi Cornish. Thanks for
48:43
listening.
48:50
All
48:52
there is with Anderson Cooper is presented by
48:55
Cisco. Collaboration,
48:56
security, networking, cloud,
49:00
and applications are all integral in the new era of hybrid
49:02
work. Cisco is bringing it
49:03
together with agility, efficiency, and
49:06
growth where you
49:08
need it. Cisco
49:08
is making hybrid work simple, secure, and consistent for
49:11
each of us. So log
49:13
in and connect knowing that
49:15
someone is making sure everything is safe for
49:18
you and everyone everywhere.
49:20
Even here,
49:20
because nobody
49:21
makes hybrid work
49:24
work better. Cisco,
49:24
the
49:25
bridge to possible.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More