Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi, this is Andy Katz, host of March
0:02
Madness 365, presented by Grammarly. This
0:05
week on the podcast, tune in as
0:07
we discuss March Madness players, upsets, matchups,
0:09
and bracket busters. Listen to March
0:11
Madness 365 with Andy Katz, presented by
0:13
Grammarly, wherever you get your podcasts. Grammarly
0:16
is a secure AI writing partner that gives your
0:18
team an instant first draft in a few clicks,
0:20
not a few hours. Companies that use
0:22
Grammarly save an average of 19 days per
0:24
employee per year. Grammarly works
0:26
seamlessly across 500,000 apps and websites. Get
0:30
personalized on-brand writing help everywhere your
0:32
team works. Learn what better
0:34
writing can do for your company at grammarly.com. Grammarly.
0:38
Easier said. Done. This
0:41
episode is brought to you by Shopify. This episode
0:43
is brought to you by Shopify.
0:45
Forget the frustration of picking commerce
0:48
platforms when you switch or business
0:50
to shopify. The global commerce platform
0:52
that super as you're selling where
0:55
ever you sell with Shopify. Kill
0:57
Harness the same intuitive features, trusted
0:59
apps and powerful analytics used by
1:02
the world's leading brands. Sign up
1:04
today for your one dollar per
1:06
month trial period at shopify.com/tech all
1:09
lower. That's shopify.com/ Tech. Hello
1:15
everyone and welcome to our report. Here's what's
1:17
coming up. I
1:23
would also like to be able to use some of
1:25
my cash to get elected. The Trump conundrum. I
1:27
speak to Anthony Scaramucci, his
1:30
former defender and short-lived spokesman, about
1:32
the evolution of MAGA and how to
1:34
stand up for democracy. Then, I get
1:36
quite nervous and I get a bit
1:39
more sweary when I'm nervous. Wicked Little
1:41
Letters movie star Olivia Colman and director
1:43
Thea Sharrock on the power of language
1:45
and the real-life scandal that gripped a
1:48
nation. Thus, asking
1:50
about the facts of someone's life can often be
1:52
a dead end. Asking how
1:54
they feel about their life invites
1:56
them to say something meaningful and real.
2:00
author Charles Dooley talks to
2:02
Walter Isaacson about how to
2:04
have a great conversation. Welcome
2:26
to the program everyone. I'm Christiane Amanpour
2:28
in London. President Biden has given
2:30
an Oval Office address about the
2:33
Baltimore Bridge that was struck by
2:35
a cargo ship and collapsed. Search
2:37
and rescue is still going on and
2:40
some people remain unaccounted for. Here's what
2:42
Biden had to say. People
2:44
of Baltimore want to say, we're with
2:46
you. We're going to stay with you
2:48
as long as it takes. And like
2:50
the governor said, you're Maryland tough, you're Baltimore
2:52
strong, and we're going to get through this
2:55
together. And I promise we're not leaving. Indeed,
2:58
the president vowed that federal funds
3:00
would pay for the whole rebuild.
3:03
Getting that bridge and the port and
3:05
those dependent jobs back up and running
3:07
is crucial for President Biden. It goes
3:09
to the heart of the economy as
3:12
well. Meantime, his opponent in the
3:14
upcoming presidential race, the former president Donald
3:16
Trump spends much of his time in
3:18
court defending himself against a
3:21
series of criminal charges, fines,
3:23
and upcoming trials. Trump
3:25
made history, of course, when he
3:27
became the first U.S. president to
3:29
be impeached twice, and now he's
3:32
making history again, becoming the first
3:34
former president to be criminally
3:36
prosecuted. On April 15th, Trump
3:38
is set to face trial in Manhattan on
3:41
charges of paying hush money to
3:43
cover up an affair with Stephanie
3:45
Clifford, a.k.a. Stormy Daniels. Clue to
3:47
form, Trump says he's the victim
3:50
of persecution, using those lines to get
3:52
the mag of faithful to fork over
3:54
their cash for his campaign and his
3:56
defense. Trump faces three other
3:59
criminal indictments. including over attempts
4:01
to overturn the 2020 election. But
4:04
for now, only the Manhattan hush money case
4:07
looks set to go to trial before
4:09
November. Anthony Scaramucci was
4:11
once a dedicated Trump supporter and
4:13
spent a notorious 11 days as
4:16
the White House communications director. But
4:18
since 2019, he's opposed the
4:20
former president's reelection and he's now
4:23
joining us from Las Vegas. Anthony
4:26
Scaramucci, welcome to the program. You
4:28
know, we want to talk
4:30
to you because it's important for,
4:32
I think, everybody in the United
4:35
States and watching around the world to
4:37
try to understand how to
4:39
inform their own thinking about
4:41
a potential second
4:44
Trump presidency. And
4:46
since you were there for a good, good
4:48
long time, we thought we'd start by
4:50
asking you based on what he has
4:53
already done in office. But first, I
4:55
want to start with the trials. As
4:57
we mentioned, what's just happened, he was given
4:59
a bit of a lifeline yesterday. The amount
5:01
of bond that he was told, like nearly
5:04
half a billion dollars was reduced. On the
5:06
other hand, he was told that a court
5:08
date on a different charges would actually
5:10
be coming on April 15th. So
5:13
where do you think he stands politically
5:15
and, you know, with his
5:17
faithful right now? Well,
5:21
I think with his faithful, he's quite strong.
5:23
I just think if you look at the
5:25
data and the numbers, they may
5:27
be louder than before, but they're smaller.
5:29
And if you go to the
5:31
rallies, you'll see that the rallies are smaller. And
5:34
if you look at registrations in
5:36
the Republican Party, Christiana, they're down.
5:39
So the combination of those two things do
5:41
not fold well for the president. As
5:44
it relates to his mindset, you
5:46
know, he'll take one day at a time.
5:48
He's a very good compartmentalizer, but
5:51
this is wreaking havoc on him because
5:53
he's got the money he's got to put
5:55
up. It's not clear that he has
5:57
that money. Of course, when he says he has it,
6:00
that's probably... tell that he doesn't have it. And
6:03
then he's got the criminal proceeding coming up,
6:05
and he knows that his former lawyer,
6:07
Michael Cohen, went to jail for
6:09
that very same fact set. So
6:12
that's going to be a difficult case for him as
6:14
well. And last
6:16
but not least, he's not raising money. And
6:19
so President Biden has a surplus
6:22
differential of about $45 million right
6:24
now. And
6:26
although Mr. Trump does have a
6:28
small cadre of billionaires that are
6:30
going to support him, he doesn't
6:33
have the widespread net that,
6:35
say, a Governor Mitt Romney had in 2012, or George
6:38
W. Bush had, say, in 2000 or 2004. He
6:44
don't Trump, as I said, uses
6:46
these trials and these charges and
6:48
these indictments to say that he
6:50
is the victim. He is the
6:53
persecuted by political opponents.
6:55
And that obviously fires up his base.
6:58
Just explain to us, is there a precedent?
7:00
Well, we know there's not a precedent
7:02
for impeached presidents and those facing criminal
7:05
charges. But in terms of money and
7:08
euro finance here, is
7:11
it allowed to use campaign
7:14
donations and the like to, for
7:16
instance, help with legal bills? So
7:21
the way that would work in the United States
7:23
is that you would have to put it in
7:26
the president's political action committee. And
7:28
so he now has his daughter-in-law
7:31
taking charge of the RNC. And
7:34
in the fine print, when you're sending money
7:36
to the RNC, it says, well,
7:38
the first stop for that money is going to
7:40
be the president's political action committee. And
7:42
it may be used for his legal
7:45
fees. And so as long as
7:47
you're disclosing what the money is
7:50
going to be used for, in the United States,
7:52
you can use the money for those reasons.
7:54
And of course, what Mr. Trump
7:56
did after the election, he lied
7:58
about the election results. He had
8:00
a very large group of people in
8:02
the US believing in election denialism, including
8:06
his friend, Romney McDaniel.
8:09
And what he did was he raised a ton of money
8:12
off of that big lie. And
8:14
he's used a lot of that money for his
8:16
current legal fees on these four different
8:18
cases. So you can use
8:20
the money. But the danger
8:23
for him, and I think he knows this, his
8:25
Facebook ads are down about 85%. His
8:27
Instagram ads are virtually nonexistent.
8:31
And if he doesn't get up on the
8:33
airwaves and in social media and scale, he's
8:36
not going to reach enough people to
8:39
beat President Biden. And so remember, this
8:41
will be down to a few swing
8:43
states. President Biden will
8:45
win the popular vote. Mr. Trump has never
8:47
won that. But it'll be a
8:49
battle in three or four swing states. And
8:51
without the advertising, it's going to be very
8:53
hard for him. So people
8:56
certainly abroad anyway who are looking on and
8:58
who like to read the American tea leaves
9:00
say, well, look at the swing states. In
9:02
some of them, his polls are higher than
9:05
President Biden. And they say,
9:07
wow, look at how convincingly he
9:09
won all the primaries and the
9:11
caucuses leading up to him being
9:13
the official candidate. What would
9:15
you say about that in terms
9:18
of a general election? Well,
9:22
three things. I think he's ahead in the
9:24
polls because he's had way more media exposure
9:26
than President Biden. He just went
9:28
through the primary season for the Republicans.
9:31
And of course, the incumbent president didn't
9:33
have to do that. The
9:35
second thing I would say is if you
9:37
really analyze that data, there's
9:39
approximately 25%
9:42
of the Republicans that voted for
9:44
Nikki Haley when they exited
9:47
the polls and they were asked, well, would you
9:49
vote for Mr. Trump? That
9:51
number was a negative. The
9:54
word was a negative. And so the point being,
9:57
if you don't get the crossover vote,
9:59
You. Really can't win the presidency. Us
10:02
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did
10:04
not get that crossover vote for
10:06
Bernie Sanders of Iraq. Obama did
10:08
just that. Crossover. Vote from
10:11
Sen. Clinton and so. Are
10:13
and of course Mister Trump got
10:15
that cross both from the his
10:17
fellow republicans in Twenty sixteen. But
10:19
I think that theories. Several.
10:21
Things that are going to happen as we get towards
10:23
the fall. There's a very large group of us. That.
10:25
Of work for the or the President
10:27
is sort of like a Trump Recovery
10:30
you did if you well it includes
10:32
people like secretary. as for General Millie
10:34
or a General John Salley. Built.
10:36
Bar there's a whole host of us. John
10:38
Bolton. Who. Are going to
10:40
go out there and passionately explain to the
10:43
American people the systemic danger of Mister Trump.
10:45
On I think that. The. Problem The
10:47
European Sab with all of this. Is
10:50
that Europeans in general have
10:52
more hereditary memory. Of
10:54
the scourge of Fascism and the
10:56
destruction. That Fascism. Caused
10:59
on the Continent. Of course,
11:01
the United States are We have waited that
11:03
Franklin Delano Roosevelt was able to put down
11:05
the first. America. First movement.
11:08
Which. Was led by people like Charles
11:10
Lindbergh and Father Kaufman Cetera, It's
11:12
a we don't have the hereditary
11:14
memory. We don't have the field
11:16
trip going to places which were
11:18
destroyed. As a result of
11:21
Fascists leaders declaring war on
11:23
Western liberal democracies. Are and
11:25
I think it's a little bit of a problem
11:27
for the country or but again they'll be a
11:29
very large group of us com the fall. Out
11:32
on the airwaves on the
11:34
campaign, explaining to people, With.
11:36
Systemic danger that down from
11:39
represents. The. The institutions of
11:41
the democracy. And basically to
11:43
the fabric of America, the checks
11:45
and balances system. That. Of need
11:47
people free in this country by a
11:50
large very cross is. Really? Interesting that
11:52
you mention those. Individuals yourself included. Simple:
11:54
Gonna do this because I was going
11:56
to ask you, i'm. In
11:58
the first administration. There were
12:01
a lot of accomplished individuals
12:03
who were put in very
12:06
important cabinet positions. And
12:08
people thought, well, you know, at least I
12:10
hate to say this, there were adults in
12:12
the room and they were able to put
12:14
the, you know, put the brakes on any
12:17
kind of completely crazy behavior. Do
12:19
you think a, are
12:21
there those people and would, would a
12:23
president Trump choose that kind
12:25
of, you know, character to
12:28
be his main cabinet officials in a
12:30
second term? So
12:33
I'm a little bit of a contrarian on this.
12:35
I don't, I don't buy into the punditry argument
12:38
that he's just going to pick loyalists. First
12:40
of all, these aren't well-resuméed
12:43
people, these loyalists. And
12:46
secondarily, Mr. Trump has always been a
12:48
status seeker and he's
12:50
somebody that will want resumes in
12:53
his cabinet. And unfortunately, if he, if he
12:55
does win, and I predict that he won't,
12:58
there will be people that will be gravitated
13:00
to the American government, much the way many
13:03
of us were, where we thought there was
13:05
a call to service to serve the American
13:07
people and not realizing
13:09
the full insanity that Mr. Trump
13:11
represented. So people will do
13:14
that. Obviously, Kevin McCarthy is flying around
13:16
with him on the Trump plane. He
13:18
could potentially be his chief of staff,
13:20
John Paulson, who is a hedge
13:23
fund billionaire, has been
13:25
cited to be potentially the treasury, the
13:27
secretary, secretary of the treasury. So I,
13:30
I don't buy the argument that he'll just be
13:32
loyalist. Mr. Trump doesn't have that
13:34
type of personality. He'll bring in people that
13:36
he thinks are well-resuméed. Okay. Well,
13:39
let's then talk about issues for a moment.
13:41
I will get to you and, and, and
13:44
what you learned in those, in
13:46
the campaign and in those 11 days in the Oval
13:48
Office. But you
13:50
know, let's just go to foreign policy. So
13:52
if I remember rightly when I was covering
13:54
the first term, his, his only term,
13:58
He basically promised to solve the. Israel
14:00
Palestinian. Conflict with the deal of
14:02
the century Ce Said he would end
14:04
the Ayatollahs regime in Iran. By pulling
14:06
out of the nuclear deal and applying maximum
14:09
precious course, None of that happens. He now
14:11
says he could settle the Ukraine was
14:13
in twenty four hours. Nobody as she
14:16
believes. As possible on does
14:18
he have a worldview? That
14:20
shapes of foreign policy and and
14:23
how do you think? People.
14:25
Who saw what happened last summer? Let's not
14:27
even go into Nato. We've we've gone over
14:29
that many, many times. He threatens the sanctity.
14:31
Of Nato's questions, the idea of all
14:34
for One and one for all Article
14:36
Five. Will.
14:39
Either he does have a worldview you
14:41
left out that he was gonna balanced
14:43
budget for years, but he he puts
14:45
seven twenty trillion dollars. On. Top
14:48
of the other budget deficits.
14:50
His worldview or thankfully is
14:52
now well articulated by him.
14:55
About the shrub world view and his acolytes.
14:57
the ban is to bring the United States
14:59
back to the Eighty Nine. To.
15:01
Wallet off. From. The
15:03
rest of the global civilization,
15:05
both physically and metaphorically. And.
15:08
To disavow the David Ricardo
15:10
principle of global trade. And
15:12
so Mister Trump would like to see something like
15:14
what was going on of us. In
15:16
eighty ninety were ninety seven percent of
15:18
the goods and services. That. Were
15:21
manufactured in the Us were consumed
15:23
by Americans. Are you'll have
15:25
a very strong anti immigration stands as
15:27
well. Ah, And it'll be
15:29
a disaster for the global community. Author might
15:31
be a long term. Exacerbate.
15:34
Disaster for the American people are the
15:36
good news is he couldn't really accomplish
15:38
that. and four years. But. The
15:40
real fear is if you know the
15:42
man. He. Will do everything he
15:45
can to expand executive powers. He's.
15:47
Got a very strong team of people
15:49
working for him on his campaign that
15:51
believe in the expansion. Of what
15:54
they're calling unitary executive power. and
15:56
so this is something that we have to fight
15:58
against is really understand the marvel
16:01
of the American Republican system
16:03
are these wonderful checks and balances and
16:05
the separation of powers in
16:08
our Constitution. Mr. Trump deplores that.
16:10
He doesn't really understand it, but
16:12
he'll go after that, and that's why we have to stop
16:14
him. Again, I want to take
16:16
it back to foreign policy because he made
16:18
very grandiose gestures. Not only I remember the
16:21
Helsinki presser in which he seemed to side,
16:23
well, he did side with
16:25
President Putin's view of the
16:27
world against his own intelligence
16:29
community, but he also notoriously
16:31
attacked verbally at the UN Kim
16:33
Jong-un of North Korea, and then went
16:35
to three meetings with him in which
16:37
he promised that the two of them
16:39
had a lovely bromance that was going
16:41
to end the Korean Peninsula
16:44
conflict. But I spoke to, and of
16:46
course didn't happen, the former South
16:49
Korea foreign minister told me that
16:51
the Hanoi summit and all those, you know,
16:53
in 2019 or whatever, she said it was
16:56
a debacle, and this is why. Here's what
16:59
she said. The
17:01
president has tremendous desire,
17:03
intention to do something, but there
17:06
was very little backup at the
17:08
working level. And this is, you
17:11
know, this is the typical Trump
17:13
leadership on these issues. Will, but
17:15
very little follow-up and support from
17:18
the working level. So that's a
17:20
huge lesson when we ever go
17:23
back to a phase of engagement with
17:25
North Korea. So I
17:27
found that quite extraordinary for a chief diplomat
17:29
of a country to say that about a
17:32
former US president. And it's possible that the
17:34
North Korea, I mean, intelligence types in
17:36
the US say this could be another
17:38
major problem. They have nuclear weapons. What
17:43
happens if Trump inserts himself into
17:45
Israel, Palestine or North
17:47
Korea in a second term? What
17:49
do you think would come of it? Well,
17:52
well, well, let's take them separately
17:54
on the North Korean issue. I
17:56
think the State Department has ultimately
17:58
been right. 60 or 70 years
18:01
of this type of engagement that
18:03
we've had with North Korea is the best
18:05
that we could do. And I don't think
18:07
if he tries to re-engage with
18:09
the North Korean dictator that anything positive is going
18:12
to come out of it. The
18:14
Israeli-Palestinian issue, I think,
18:16
is more tender and way more sensitive.
18:19
But remember, Mr. Trump loves Vladimir
18:21
Putin. He speaks about
18:23
him in these grandiose terms.
18:26
He wants to be part of the
18:29
axis of autocracy, which is why he's
18:31
always praising these dictators. We
18:33
have to remember that the Putin regime is very
18:35
close to the Iranians. And
18:37
the Iranians, as you know and I
18:40
know, they have in their constitution the
18:42
exportation of their revolution, but they also
18:44
want to wipe Israel off the map.
18:47
And so his buddy Putin has an
18:49
OZ from the Iranians. And
18:51
Mr. Trump is very, very transactional. All the
18:53
stuff that he said about Israel in the
18:55
past, it's not impossible for
18:58
him to back a truck over
19:00
the Israeli nation or the Israeli
19:02
people. And I think people have
19:04
to understand that about him. He turns on
19:06
everybody. And so this is
19:08
a very dangerous thing. He
19:11
would be horrible for Israel, particularly
19:13
because of this relationship that he wants to
19:15
have with Putin and the
19:17
OZ that Putin has to Iran. So
19:20
I would be very, very worried about this
19:22
from a national security perspective. And
19:25
back to a domestic perspective, and it's a
19:27
big one, it appears that President Trump and
19:29
the Republicans miscalculated when essentially
19:32
by stacking the court they
19:35
caused the reverse of Roe
19:37
versus Wade. And American women and girls
19:39
and many men have voted
19:41
many times against that. Now President
19:43
Trump is talking about how he
19:45
might come down on a national abortion
19:48
ban around 15 weeks. Where
19:51
do you think that issue will land him
19:53
in November? So
19:58
I think this is good news for the
20:00
Democrats. and for the Biden administration, I
20:02
think the dye has already been cast about
20:05
how Republicans feel about this. And no
20:07
matter what Mr. Trump says about the
20:10
IVF situation or the
20:12
abortion situation, I
20:14
believe this suburban families, not
20:16
just women, but men and
20:18
women, are gonna come out and
20:20
cast their votes against him. And
20:23
this will be one of the central reasons. And so look
20:26
at what happened in the midterms. President Biden
20:28
had a much better showing than people had
20:31
anticipated. He outdid President
20:34
Obama and certainly Donald Trump. And
20:38
so for me, I think this is a core
20:40
critical issue that we have to
20:42
explain to the American people going forward. And
20:45
this is the good news about this
20:47
extremism in the Republican Party. It will
20:50
catch up to them in November. I've
20:52
got 30 seconds. I didn't ask you about your
20:54
experience. What about your experience in the White House
20:57
that makes you think this now?
20:59
15 seconds. Just
21:03
the guy's crazy. I don't have enough time
21:05
to explain it all, Christiana. You would need
21:07
a phone book of all the things that
21:09
he's done, but he's crazy. And
21:11
you don't need a leader like that on the global
21:13
stage again. And we're gonna work very, very hard to
21:15
make sure that doesn't happen. Anthony
21:17
Scaramucci, thank you so much for joining us. Hi,
21:24
this is Andy Katz. This is a post of
21:26
March Madness 365 presented by Grammarly. This
21:28
week on the podcast, tune in as
21:30
we discuss March Madness players, upsets, matchups,
21:32
and bracket busters. Listen to March Madness
21:34
365 with Andy Katz presented
21:36
by Grammarly wherever you get your podcasts.
21:39
Grammarly is a secure AI writing partner that
21:41
gives your team an instant first draft in a
21:43
few clicks, not a few hours. Companies that use
21:45
Grammarly save an average of 19 days
21:47
per employee per year. Grammarly works
21:49
seamlessly across 500,000 apps and websites. Get
21:53
personalized on-brand writing help everywhere your team
21:55
works. Learn what better writing can do
21:57
for your company at grammarly.com. Rarely,
22:01
you just said, done. Always
22:30
drive safely. They
23:00
drop, they run as fast as
23:02
they can. It's
23:04
the rush of a people so desperate,
23:06
so hungry, who would
23:08
do anything to feed their children, now
23:10
on the brink of starvation. This
23:13
is what survival in Gaza has come
23:15
to, fighting for food. That
23:19
little bit of aid that makes it into
23:21
the north, where man-made famine now looms.
23:24
People chase parachutes that fell into
23:27
these choppy waters. There's
23:29
desperation that drives them into the sea.
23:32
What they're about to see next is disturbing.
23:35
It's the reality of a war growing more
23:37
cruel by the day. The
23:39
fastest the city emerged with boxes
23:42
of American issues and is ready to eat.
23:45
Others didn't make it out alive. People
23:48
gather around the thin frail body of a man
23:50
who drowned trying to reach that age.
23:53
Twelve people drowned, according to
23:55
paramedics. The
23:57
parachutes fell into the water of Mohammed.
24:00
says, but people want to eat. They
24:02
went into the water and drowned. The
24:04
current was so strong they didn't know
24:06
how to swim. It's
24:09
what you do when you have nothing left to
24:11
lose. A
24:13
man goes in swimming to get food
24:15
for his children. He returns dead. This
24:18
man says, bring us aid
24:20
through the land crossings. Our children are
24:22
dying. We are dying. What are you
24:24
doing? Where is the world? The
24:27
world has been piling up life-saving aid
24:30
into trucks stuck at land crossings,
24:32
seemingly powerless in the face
24:34
of Israel that's accused of using starvation
24:36
as a weapon in this war, a
24:39
charge it denies. It was
24:41
in the international community to resort to
24:43
dropping aid from the sky. Several
24:45
countries carried out aid drops on this day,
24:48
deliveries that have been criticized for
24:50
being ineffective and sufficient and unsafe.
24:55
Earlier this month, another air drop
24:57
disaster, when a parachute failed and
24:59
aid packages came crashing down, killing
25:02
at least five people. It's
25:06
a war that's testing humanity. And
25:08
many say this is what failure
25:10
looks like. Ramana
25:15
Karadzhe reporting there. Now, long
25:18
before Twitter trolls and online hate
25:20
campaigns, there was pen and paper.
25:23
And though the tech may have been a little
25:25
bit more rudimentary, people could be just as
25:27
vicious. And that is the inspiration behind
25:29
a string of anonymous poison pen
25:32
letters and a new comedy called
25:34
Wicked Little Letters. It brings a real
25:36
life scandal that rocked the sleepy town
25:38
of Little Hampton on the English coast
25:41
in the 1920s to the big screen
25:43
now. Here's a clip. The
25:47
mystery of the obscene Little Hampton
25:50
letters is causing widespread distress across
25:52
the nation. It's
26:00
a whodunit, I recently talked
26:02
about it with the Oscar-winning
26:04
star of the film, Olivia
26:21
Colman and director Thea Sharrock.
26:24
Welcome to you both and thanks for being
26:26
on with us. So Olivia
26:29
Colman, you have
26:31
been in our lives with
26:34
many, many iconic roles, you know,
26:36
the Queen and many Queens and
26:38
it's been incredible, Oscars and all the rest of
26:40
it. This is a little film about
26:42
little letters. What inspired you,
26:45
what drew you to this script? I
26:48
just thought it would be fun, quite
26:51
simply. You know,
26:53
sort of sometimes you do a lot
26:56
of heavy work and then something like comes along and you're like,
26:59
yes, that's what I'd like to do now. And
27:01
it was in the UK, which is a plus, so I didn't
27:03
have to be away from my family. And
27:06
I had never heard of this story and to
27:08
find out that it's true, I just, I enjoyed
27:11
it so much and I think that is basically what
27:14
it was. Okay, I'm going
27:16
to get to the story in a moment, but see
27:18
it for you as the director. How did you get
27:20
introduced to it? What made you turn this into a
27:22
movie? Well,
27:25
I was lucky enough to receive
27:28
it, not
27:31
knowing anything about it, except
27:33
for Olivia was already playing the
27:35
lead. So I had no
27:37
idea what the genre was. I
27:39
had no idea it was based on a true
27:41
story. I didn't really know what to expect, but
27:45
I read it with Olivia both in mind
27:47
and I could hear her voice, which was
27:49
a great start. I
27:51
had no expectations of it being anything like
27:53
as funny as it is, which for
27:56
a director to laugh out loud on your
27:58
first reading is pure joy. And
28:00
then to discover after that that it was based on
28:02
a true story. And
28:05
the sort of crazy mishaps that happened
28:07
within it, as
28:09
well as, probably
28:11
the thing that drew me to it most
28:13
of all was A, the comedy, but also
28:15
there's room for fantastic
28:18
performances. In prison, Rosemary,
28:20
and there's some kindred spirits. In prison. No, no,
28:22
not the mergers or the rapists. I'm thinking more
28:24
the drunks and the queers maybe. Just
28:27
trying to find a bright side. The
28:29
unraveling of who this woman
28:31
is. In
28:34
fact, all the characters were already so
28:36
well. Well,
28:38
they were obviously based on real people, but Johnny
28:40
Sweet, the writer, had done the most beautiful job
28:43
of creating both a comedy and
28:45
also a drama. There are incredibly
28:47
intimate vulnerable moments
28:51
inside, you
28:53
know, great moments of comedy. And then on top
28:55
of all of that for it to be real.
28:58
For me, it was a no-brainer. Let's just talk a
29:00
little bit about the storyline. So, Olivia,
29:03
you play a kind of a buttoned
29:05
up lady of the era in
29:07
the seaside town. This very
29:10
gregarious Irish young girl
29:12
comes to the town played by Jesse
29:14
Buckley. You become friends and then you're
29:16
dealing with a string of poisonous horrible
29:18
letters that are being directed to you. And
29:21
it's about who did it. So
29:23
it's pretty hilarious. And there's quite a lot
29:25
of big scenes
29:27
of sort of female confrontations that we
29:29
don't generally see in movies, especially if
29:31
not of that time. Tell us a
29:34
little bit about that. Yes. So
29:38
Edith Swan, who I play on
29:40
the face of it, is pious
29:43
Christian, sort of the perfect woman
29:46
of that time and very
29:48
well behaved, lives still with her parents
29:50
and still weirdly sleeps in the
29:52
same room as her parents. Oh, that's weird. Weird. And
29:55
then Jesse Buckley, who I
29:58
play on the face of, She plays Rose
30:01
Goodlee, who in that
30:03
period, everybody looked at as
30:07
a shocking example of womanhood and an
30:09
unmarried mother. But
30:11
these two women become friends. They sort of
30:13
see each other because we find out that
30:15
behind closed doors, Edith is not having a
30:18
nice time. And
30:20
it's not a particularly loving
30:22
household. And
30:25
this friendship sort of starts
30:27
up, but then something happens,
30:29
which I'm not sure what happened.
30:32
Yeah, yeah. Spoilers, we don't want
30:34
to do spoilers. Okay, I'm going to take it
30:36
from there because this investigation then starts when you
30:38
start getting these poison letters. Those are the
30:40
wicked little letters of the title. And
30:43
Rose, Jessie Buckley, gets
30:45
arrested because she is
30:47
thought to have done this. I
30:50
want to play one of the clips. You
30:52
did it. You did it. You did it.
30:55
You charging her? Under libel, not a small offence. No,
30:57
it isn't. What's the evidence? Motive,
30:59
timeline. You let me out of here. I'm
31:01
exaggerating. Stop. I'm
31:06
taking the f*** out of
31:08
here. Similarities
31:14
in the language. Mm-hmm.
31:18
So I can see you both laughing as you're
31:20
listening and remembering. And I mean, so much of
31:23
it was bleep that we can't figure out
31:25
what the heck is going on. Was there
31:27
a lot of that on set? Are
31:29
you all pretty potty
31:31
mouthed and you were allowed to
31:33
deliver? Shall we tell
31:35
the truth? Yeah, go on, Thea. Olivia's
31:38
incredibly potty mouthed. Is she? So
31:40
Jessie doesn't... Spoilers wouldn't melt in your mouth. And actually...
31:43
Thank you. Um, no,
31:45
we all are. We
31:48
all are. We all like it.
31:50
Proudly. Yeah. Yeah. I
31:53
think it's a nice seasoning of language. And isn't it a bit restrictive
31:55
when you go to try to promote this thing and you
31:57
can't really show? Any
32:00
scenes or talk in that vernacular? Well,
32:04
that's why we don't do lives, Telly. I
32:09
get quite nervous and I get a bit
32:11
more sweary when I'm nervous. I'm really trying
32:13
not to say anything bad now. You're doing
32:15
really well. I really am. You're doing really
32:17
well. Amazing. But I know that
32:19
you can bleep it out. I'm so sorry. What
32:22
are your favorite swear words? Oh,
32:24
now, you see... Can we say it? American
32:26
audiences really aren't keen on my favorite word.
32:29
No. Can you imagine
32:31
what my favorite word is? I'm not going to
32:33
say it. I will be lambasted and pilloried. Well,
32:37
I do maintain that it's actually quite a cultured word
32:39
because Chaucer did use it. Yeah, ******** is my favorite.
32:42
Oh, okay. Well, we'll be bleeping that. Thea,
32:45
do you have one? Yeah, I thought you might. Well,
32:47
I like to counterbalance, so I go
32:49
with bollocks. Okay. I think we can
32:51
keep that one. That's not
32:53
too bad. Okay, thank you. Yeah,
32:56
sorry. See you wins, Olivia. You're
32:58
clean out of luck. I'm going
33:00
to play another scene. It's you
33:02
and Rose outside the houses.
33:04
Here goes it. See
33:12
you, see you, see you, see you, see you, see you. I
33:15
mean it. She was a good lady, your mother. How
33:19
have you been getting on? Oh,
33:21
I've been feeling grand. Thank you. How
33:24
about you? I'm a wee
33:27
bit preoccupied. Yes,
33:29
I see they trumpet me in Parliament. And
33:32
there's a range of opinions. Where
33:35
did you learn to read? A
33:37
local priest taught me. Nissi
33:40
said he was a priest. I asked me to look to
33:42
Morocco in the end. He
33:44
was a fine tutor of letters. How
33:47
about yourself? I
33:49
used to help my father with the sign writing. From
33:52
a very early age. I did all the ones for Glinson's
33:54
Dairy when I was only eight. Oh,
34:01
would you return my patty pants before the
34:03
trial next week? Just
34:06
in case I don't see you for a long while afterwards.
34:18
So we're obviously not going to do a spoiler
34:20
alert. We're not going to say who is
34:22
the writer of these poisonous letters. But
34:24
more seriously, you know, you do play
34:26
women of a certain era, both of you in
34:28
that film. And Olivia, you played
34:30
women throughout many, many eras. You know,
34:33
your roles have been very emblematic and
34:35
iconic. What are
34:38
you saying, I guess, or what is the film
34:40
saying about women of that era and
34:42
the progress? Well,
34:44
I think there's an assumption that women in the
34:46
1920s wouldn't have fawn. I
34:52
love the fact my mum said to me when I was a
34:54
teenager, every generation
34:56
thinks they've invented sex. And
34:58
I think we feel similarly about bad language. But
35:01
there was a huge increase in swearing after the First
35:03
World War, apparently. I think the sort of experiences
35:07
that happened, people thought,
35:11
I need some kind of a release. And so
35:14
language, what am
35:16
I trying to say, language? Well,
35:19
there was also a massive increase in
35:21
poison pen letters, which is where this
35:23
whole thing... It was a release of
35:25
abstractions. Absolutely. So whether it was spoken
35:27
or written, that's where this story came
35:29
from. Yeah. And, Fia, in fact, and
35:31
we sort of said blithely that before
35:33
there was Twitter and trolling and social media,
35:35
there were poison pen letters. So
35:38
this also is very relevant to
35:40
today. Yes.
35:43
Yeah. The obvious comparisons
35:45
are that 100 years
35:47
ago, poison pen letters were happening, which hurt
35:49
people. And there were prison sentences handed
35:51
out. 100 years later, you'd hope
35:53
that we'd have learnt from that. Turns out we haven't.
35:55
And for anything, we've got much worse. And
35:58
there seems to be no repercussions. And
36:00
it's so much easier. That's the big thing. If
36:03
you want to say something, hurt
36:05
somebody, offend somebody, you can
36:07
do it publicly and you can do it in a
36:09
second and it can go out across
36:11
the world. So, you
36:13
know, advancement
36:16
in one sense and what
36:18
feels like no lessons learned
36:20
at all in another, but perhaps that's
36:22
humanity and it's just the way we
36:24
are. And Theo, you began your career
36:26
with amazing theatre here in the UK
36:29
and I wonder whether you see in what
36:31
you've done, not just from where you started
36:33
but where you are now, whether
36:36
roles for women are beginning
36:38
to be taken as seriously as they should
36:40
because women, are they
36:42
considered now big box office draws?
36:46
I would say yes. And actually,
36:48
research suggests that they've always been
36:50
big box office draws, because they
36:52
have chosen to say, don't get me
36:54
started on the pay disparity, but male actors
36:56
get paid more because they used to say
36:58
they draw in the audiences and actually that
37:00
hasn't been true for decades. But
37:03
they still like to use that as a reason to
37:05
not pay women as much as their male counterparts. Yeah.
37:08
In our industry. So that's easier because I want
37:10
to know what, yeah, tell me, do you have
37:12
a pay disparity? I mean, you're an Oscar winning
37:14
actress, Olivia. I'm very aware
37:17
that if I was Oliver Coleman, I'd
37:19
be earning a f*** up a lot more than I
37:21
am. And I'm not saying I'm absolutely
37:24
yes. I'm aware of, I
37:27
know of one pay disparity, which is a 12,000% difference. I
37:31
know, I'll put that that later. Oh,
37:33
gosh. Yes. Do the math. I know. So,
37:35
Thea, on that note, obviously,
37:38
Barbie was the biggest grossing movie
37:40
of the year. And
37:42
yeah, all women all the time, plus the
37:44
fabulous Ken. Do you think that empowers
37:46
people like you to go out with
37:49
these with more of these kinds of scripts?
37:52
I really hope so. And I do.
37:55
I feel as though that there has definitely
37:57
been a change. I would say looking back
37:59
over the. the last 10, 15 years,
38:01
certainly in theatre and in film now
38:04
too, without question, and TV.
38:06
I think you
38:09
come across many more women in
38:13
powerful positions, in decision
38:15
making positions, as
38:17
well as in the creative side of
38:19
things. So for sure, when I was
38:22
kind of growing up within the industry,
38:25
there were hardly ever, I never
38:27
really came across many female
38:29
directors who were also mothers.
38:32
I came across various women who had chosen to
38:34
have children and then felt they couldn't carry on
38:37
with their job, or women who
38:39
had chosen not to have children in order
38:41
to keep going with their job. So that's one
38:43
of the major things that I feel has shifted
38:45
hugely. Well look, on that
38:47
note, Thea Sharrock, Olivia Colman, thank you both
38:49
so much for joining us. Wicked little letters.
38:52
Thank you very much. Thanks for having us.
38:56
And that film is out now in
38:58
the UK, releases in the United States
39:00
this Friday. Well,
39:06
whether it's explicative filled letter writing or
39:08
the kind of political campaigning we discussed
39:11
earlier in the programme, there's one
39:13
skill they both require and that is
39:15
effective communication. Of course, throughout
39:17
history and still today, it's a
39:20
tool of the powerful for both good
39:22
and bad. But it's also crucial
39:24
in all of our daily lives,
39:26
in the workplace, in our personal
39:28
relationships, and more than ever online.
39:30
So how can we communicate better
39:32
and make that a force for
39:34
positive change? Author Charles
39:36
Duhigg explores this question in his
39:38
new book, Super Communicators. And here
39:40
he is speaking to Walter Isaacson.
39:45
Thank you, Christiane and Charles Duhigg.
39:47
Welcome to the show. Thank
39:49
you for having me. So this
39:52
book Super Communicators, it's all about how
39:54
to have a great conversation, how to
39:56
convince people. Tell me, what
39:58
is the point of a conversation? It's
40:01
a great question. The point of a conversation
40:03
is to understand each other, right? It's not
40:05
to convince you that I'm right and you're
40:07
wrong or that you should like me or
40:09
think I'm smart. The point of a conversation
40:11
and a conversation is a success if
40:13
I understand how you see the world and I'm
40:15
able to speak in a way that you understand
40:18
how I see the world. And that means that
40:20
we could walk away from that conversation disagreeing with
40:22
each other and it's still a success. But
40:25
what you talk about is that a conversation
40:27
must make a connection. What do you mean
40:29
by that? What we know about when we
40:32
have conversations is that our
40:34
neural activity becomes similar. And
40:37
that makes sense because when I describe an
40:39
emotion to you or an idea, you actually
40:41
experience that emotion or that idea a little
40:43
bit. Within psychology and neurology,
40:45
this is known as neural entrainment and it's
40:47
a core of how we communicate with each
40:50
other. And so when we make that connection,
40:52
when we have a great conversation, when
40:54
we feel like we're on the same
40:56
wavelength, it feels wonderful because our brains
40:58
have evolved to crave that kind of
41:00
communication connection. You say that
41:02
people are hardwired and some people are
41:04
really hardwired to do these connections. You
41:07
and I have covered a lot of people in
41:09
the tech industry and other things. There are a
41:11
lot of people we know who are not hardwired.
41:13
I mean, even the smartest of them, maybe Elon
41:15
Musk, Bill Gates, I could pick a couple right
41:18
there. Are there certain people
41:20
are hardwired and what can you do if
41:22
you're not hardwired for this? So
41:24
we're actually all hardwired for this, right?
41:26
Even Elon Musk and Bill Gates, even
41:28
those folks who can seem awkward when
41:31
in an unfamiliar setting,
41:35
they are hardwired for conversation and connection as
41:37
much as any of us. So
41:39
consistent super communicators. There was a study done
41:41
asking them if they were always good at
41:43
communication. And what they said was, no, when I
41:45
was in high school, I was unpopular. So
41:47
I had to pay attention to how other
41:49
kids communicated with each other
41:51
or my parents got divorced and I had to
41:54
play a peacemaker between them. And what
41:56
they're really saying is there was a time in my life
41:58
when I had to think about communication. communication. And thinking
42:00
about communication made me better at it. It
42:02
made me recognize that there were these skills
42:04
that would help me connect with other people.
42:07
And whether it's Bill Gates or Elon
42:09
Musk or Barack Obama or Bill Clinton,
42:12
all of those people at times
42:14
have been super communicators because
42:17
they thought deeply about how communication
42:19
ought to occur. And when
42:21
we stop thinking about it, when we let ourselves
42:23
relax and we stop having
42:25
dialogues and just start monologuing, stop
42:27
listening and stop asking questions, we
42:30
can become a bad communicator again. But if
42:33
we understand the skills that make us better
42:35
at communication, if we think deeply about those
42:37
skills, that will
42:40
make us a super communicator regardless of who we are.
42:42
Okay, let's talk about those skills. As you
42:45
say, each of us can develop. Name
42:47
a couple of skills and how people should
42:49
try to develop them. The first is this
42:52
thing known as the matching principle of communication.
42:54
And there's a story in the book about
42:56
this CIA officer who is
42:58
just terrible at his job. He's terrible
43:00
at recruiting overseas spies until he figures
43:02
out how to match people. And matching
43:05
comes from what researchers have discovered that we
43:07
tend to think of a discussion as being
43:09
about one thing, but actually every discussion is
43:11
made up of multiple kinds of
43:14
conversations. And those kinds of
43:16
conversations tend to fall into one of three buckets.
43:18
There's practical conversations where we're talking about plans or
43:20
solving problems. There's emotional conversations where I
43:22
tell you what I'm feeling and I don't want
43:24
you to solve my feelings. I want you to
43:26
empathize. And there's social conversations, which is
43:28
about how we relate to each other. And
43:31
very often, super communicators know that
43:33
you have to be having the same kind
43:35
of conversation at the same time in order
43:38
to connect. So if I come home and
43:40
I start complaining about my day to my wife and I'm having
43:42
an emotional conversation, and she responds with practical advice and says,
43:44
why don't you take your boss out to lunch and get
43:46
to know him a little bit better? That's not going to
43:48
solve the problem for me. In fact, I'm not going to
43:50
be able to hear what she's saying. It's
43:53
only when we're having the same kind of
43:55
conversation, when we match each other, that we'll
43:57
really be able to communicate and then we
44:00
can move from emotional to practical. practical to
44:02
social, back to emotional together. You talk about
44:04
how a CIA spy recruiter figured
44:06
this out. I think his name's Jim Lawler in
44:09
the book. Tell me that
44:11
story. So Jim Lawler is
44:13
this wonderful guy who at 30 years
44:15
old, he was sent overseas by the
44:17
CIA for his first assignment, which was
44:19
to go recruit spies in Europe. And
44:21
he was terrible at it. He kept, he would, he
44:23
would go to these embassy parties and try and buddy
44:25
up to people and they would say things like, I
44:28
know that you're trying to recruit me as a spy.
44:30
I'm going to report you to the authorities if you
44:32
don't stop right now. Now eventually
44:34
there was this woman who came to town
44:36
who worked for her foreign ministry in the
44:38
Middle Eastern country. And so
44:40
Lawler goes up and he introduces herself and he
44:42
gets to know her. He befriends her. And
44:44
eventually he says, I'm working for the CIA.
44:46
Will you work with me? And
44:48
she, she panics. She says, no, look in my
44:50
country, they murder people for that. I can't participate
44:52
in this at all. So
44:55
Lawler goes and he tells his bosses, I tried to recruit this
44:57
woman and it didn't work. And they say,
44:59
look, you're going to get fired, my friend. You
45:01
got to recruit someone. You've been here for almost a
45:03
year. So he convinces this woman
45:05
Yasmin to have one more dinner with him. And
45:08
instead of trying to make arguments to her, instead of trying to,
45:11
to, to charm her or win her over,
45:13
he just decides, look, this is pointless.
45:15
It's not going to work. I'm just going to be as
45:17
honest as I can be. And he
45:19
starts telling her how disappointed he is in himself,
45:21
how, how he understands that she's about to
45:23
go home. And she feels like she's, she's
45:26
wasting her life because he feels like he's wasting his
45:28
life. All he ever wanted to do was
45:31
be a CIA officer. And here he is terrible
45:33
at it. And it's at that
45:35
moment that Yasmin is able to hear what he's saying.
45:38
And she says, I can help you. I
45:41
can become an asset for you. And she ended up
45:43
being the best resource in the Middle East over the
45:45
next 20 years. But Lawler was
45:47
only able to recruit her. She was only able to hear
45:49
what Lawler was saying when he was
45:51
authentic and honest. And when he engaged
45:54
in this reciprocal vulnerability, when
45:56
she shared something about himself, he shared something true
45:59
about himself. And in doing so, they
46:01
were able to forge a connection. And
46:03
this is true for all of us. All
46:05
of us have an instinct towards reciprocal vulnerability.
46:09
When we are vulnerable ourselves, when we hear
46:11
other people's vulnerability, we trust each
46:13
other more, we like each other more, and
46:15
we end up communicating much, much better. Tell
46:17
me how this grew out of your own
46:19
experience. So
46:22
I was made a manager at the New York Times
46:24
at one point, and I thought that I would be
46:26
a great manager because I've had managers my whole life.
46:28
I went to a fancy business school and got an
46:31
MBA. And I
46:33
was okay at the logistics part, but
46:35
I was terrible at the communication part, just
46:37
awful at it. And the same
46:39
thing would happen at home. I would come home and I
46:42
would talk to my wife and I would complain about my
46:44
day and she would suggest some practical
46:46
advice. And instead of hearing her, I would
46:48
get even more upset and say, why aren't
46:50
you supporting me? You're supposed
46:52
to be outraged on my behalf. And what I
46:54
realized is that I
46:56
was not having conversations. I
46:59
was not listening to the other person. I
47:01
was monologuing, right? I was waiting my
47:03
turn to speak. And one
47:05
of the things that we know about conversations
47:07
is that when we ask questions, when we
47:09
ask a special kind of question known as
47:11
a deep question, it tends
47:13
to change a monologue into a dialogue
47:16
because we really listen to the other
47:18
person. And when
47:21
we prove that we're listening, they become more willing to
47:23
listen to us. And so it's
47:25
transformed how I communicate. When I come home now
47:27
and I start complaining, my wife will often say,
47:29
do you want me to listen to you or
47:31
do you want me to help you solve this
47:33
problem together? And it feels wonderful to
47:36
have her ask that. And I try
47:38
and do the same thing. You talk about
47:40
asking the deep question as I can transform
47:42
a conversation. Give me an example what you
47:44
mean by that. A deep question is something
47:47
that asks about our values, our beliefs, our
47:49
experiences. And that can sound kind of intimidating,
47:51
but it's actually as easy as if you
47:53
bump into someone and they're a doctor. Instead
47:55
of asking them, oh, where do you practice
47:57
medicine? Asking, oh, where? What
48:00
made you decide to go to medical school? What
48:02
do you love about practicing medicine? When
48:04
you ask those questions, what you're really asking is,
48:07
tell me who you actually are. Tell
48:09
me something about yourself, about what you care
48:11
about. In general, the principle is,
48:14
asking about the facts of someone's life can often
48:16
be a dead end. Asking how
48:18
they feel about their life invites
48:21
them to say something meaningful and real.
48:24
And they've actually started teaching this in schools
48:26
to teachers. When teachers encounter
48:28
a student who's having a problem, they'll often say
48:30
to them, do you want me to help
48:33
you? Do you want me to hear you? Or
48:36
do you want me to hug you? And
48:38
what they're really asking there is, what kind of
48:40
conversation do you need to have right now? And
48:44
tell me who you are. Tell me what's important
48:46
to you. Because when we get
48:48
asked those deep questions, that's when
48:50
we open up and we start having a
48:52
real conversation. In your book, you have a
48:54
whole lot of wonderful tales and anecdotes, whether
48:56
it be on spies or police. But you
48:59
also have a lot of neuroscience. And you
49:01
say we're in a golden age of
49:03
this neuroscience. Tell me what the
49:05
neuroscience taught you. When we're having
49:08
a conversation, like this conversation right now, what's interesting is
49:10
neither of us are aware of it, but
49:13
our breath, our breath rate has started to
49:15
match each other. Our heart rate is similar.
49:18
And more importantly, what's happening inside
49:20
our brains becomes more and more
49:22
similar. We become what's
49:24
known as neurally entrained. And
49:27
this neural entrainment, it feels wonderful.
49:30
That's why having a great conversation feels so
49:33
good. And what we know is
49:35
that the more entrained we become, the more our
49:37
thoughts become similar, the more
49:39
we can understand each other, the more we
49:41
hear each other. And
49:43
that makes sense because when I explain to
49:46
you what I'm feeling or what I'm thinking,
49:48
and you experience that emotion a little bit
49:50
yourself, or you experience that idea, that
49:54
connection is at the core
49:56
of communication. That's what we
49:58
mean when we say, connected and I communicated
50:01
with that person. We were on the same wavelength.
50:04
And it's actually hardwired into our brains, not
50:06
only to be able to achieve this entrainment,
50:08
but to crave it, to want it. You
50:11
know, the US Surgeon General said that being lonely is
50:13
the equivalent of smoking 15 cigarettes a day.
50:15
And 15 cigarettes is a lot of
50:17
cigarettes. When we are
50:19
connected to other people, when we are entrained
50:21
with them, when we ask some
50:24
questions and we reveal vulnerable things about
50:26
ourselves, when we're authentic together, that
50:28
is when we feel a real
50:31
connection to someone else. That's
50:33
how we become happy and healthy and
50:35
successful in life. I loved
50:37
your previous book, The Power of Habit.
50:39
And I saw some connections between the
50:42
two. Explain what the themes are that
50:44
transfer from the power of habit to
50:46
this book. Yeah, absolutely. And
50:48
thank you for that. And the power of
50:50
habit is really about how we form habits,
50:52
how habits exist within our brains. And
50:55
it's very self-focused. I realized after I wrote The
50:58
Power of Habit, I get emails from
51:00
people who would say, look, this is great.
51:02
It helps me improve my habits. But I've got
51:04
this boss who's driving me crazy. How do I
51:06
change his habits or her habits? And
51:08
of course, the answer is we do
51:10
that through conversation. We do that through
51:13
communication. So what I realized
51:15
is that when we
51:17
talk about conversation communication, when we
51:19
identify these people who are super
51:21
communicators and can connect with almost
51:23
anyone, the reason why
51:25
they're so good at this is not only because they
51:27
think a little bit more about communication, it's
51:30
also because they've allowed those
51:32
communication skills to become habits. And
51:35
our brains are predisposed to make these into habits.
51:37
That's one of the things that The Power of
51:40
Habit tells us is that particularly when it comes
51:42
to communication, because communication is a superpower for homo
51:44
sapiens, we have this ability
51:46
to take these skills around communication and
51:48
make them habits very, very easily. The
51:51
key is that we have to recognize which skills are
51:53
important and we have to practice them. And
51:56
when we practice them, we find that the
51:58
world opens up in ways.
52:01
You say that super communicating
52:03
or communicating is this
52:05
great skill of homo sapiens, which
52:07
sets us apart. And indeed, it's
52:09
what causes us to be a
52:11
social animal, to form societies. And
52:13
yet nowadays, our politics, our societies
52:15
are so torn apart and fraught.
52:17
What can we learn from your
52:19
book that could help our politics
52:21
now? Yeah, it's a great question.
52:23
And there's a chapter in the
52:25
book about this experiment that was
52:27
done, where they brought together gun
52:30
rights advocates and gun control
52:32
activists. And they wanted
52:35
to see if they could just have civil
52:37
conversations. And before the
52:39
conversation started, they taught them this one
52:41
particular skill known as looping for understanding.
52:43
That's really useful in conflict conversations and
52:45
has three steps. The first
52:47
step is ask a question, preferably a
52:49
deep question. The second step is once
52:52
that person has replied, repeat back in
52:54
your own words, what you heard them
52:56
say. And the third step is, ask
52:58
if you got it right. Now,
53:01
the reason why this is so powerful is because it
53:03
proves that we're listening. And you're
53:05
right, we are living in a world right now that seems polarized
53:08
and divided. And it seems like you go
53:10
online and people are just screaming at each
53:12
other rather than having conversations. But
53:15
there is a way around that,
53:18
which is that when we prove to each other that
53:20
we are listening, when we prove to each other that
53:22
we want to understand that my goal is not to
53:25
convince you that you're wrong. And I'm right. My goal
53:27
is to understand how you see the world and explain
53:29
to you how I see the world. That's
53:32
when all of a sudden, we can start making
53:34
those breakthroughs. And the thing is, we
53:36
have been doing this for centuries. If
53:39
you think about the United States and the
53:41
Constitutional Convention, this nation was
53:44
born in people who hated each other,
53:46
coming together for months and having these
53:48
fights and these arguments, but also listening
53:50
to each other, listening well enough that
53:52
they could write a constitution together. We
53:55
are at our best when
53:57
we want to communicate with each other, when we want
53:59
to. to communicate with people who believe different
54:01
things. And part of that
54:04
communication means not only explaining how I feel, but
54:06
asking questions and listening to how you feel.
54:09
And as long as we remember that, as
54:12
a nation and as a world, we will be
54:14
okay. Facebook and other social
54:16
media were invented, they said, to
54:18
connect us, to bring us connections.
54:21
And yet, I now feel
54:23
that maybe the problems we're having, that
54:26
social media isn't great at this notion
54:28
of connection. How do you think it's
54:30
effective? What you're written about? It's interesting
54:32
that that experiment I mentioned with the
54:34
gun control advocates and the gun rights
54:36
folks, they had a
54:38
great conversation face to face. And then they
54:40
went back and they continue the conversation on
54:42
Facebook. And within 45 minutes, people
54:44
were calling each other jack move it did not
54:46
see right and all fell apart once they went
54:48
online. And the reason why is
54:51
because oftentimes we forget
54:53
that different forms of communication have different
54:55
rules. In fact, when telephones
54:57
first became popular about 100 years ago,
55:00
there were all these studies that said, oh, people will never be
55:03
able to have real conversations on the phone because you can't see
55:05
each other. And what's interesting is
55:07
that at the time, they were right. If
55:09
you look at early transcripts of telephone conversations,
55:12
people use them like telegrams, they've sent each
55:14
other shopping lists and stock orders. But
55:17
of course, nowadays, we can have some of
55:19
our most meaningful conversations via the telephone. And
55:21
it's because we've learned the rules of telephones
55:23
without being aware of it. When we talk
55:26
on the phone, we over
55:28
enunciate our words a little bit, we put more
55:30
emotion into our voice, because we know that the
55:32
other person can't see us. These
55:34
are instincts that we've learned in using the
55:36
technology. And digital conversations
55:39
are similar. When I look at
55:41
my teenage kids, they have
55:43
no problem communicating online. In fact, they
55:45
have some of the most meaningful conversations
55:47
via text and emojis. But
55:50
for those of us who grew up in
55:52
a slightly different world, the
55:54
key is to remind ourselves that different forms
55:56
of communication have different rules. If I'm talking
55:58
to you on I can't assume
56:00
it's the same as if we're talking face to
56:02
face. If I'm sending you a text, that's different
56:04
from sending you an email. That's different from giving
56:06
you a call. And
56:09
when we remind ourselves that different forms of communication
56:11
have different rules, it becomes fairly
56:13
obvious what we ought to do in each
56:16
form of communication. We should be more
56:18
polite in emails. We should be less
56:20
sarcastic. We are
56:22
going to make it through this period. And
56:24
digital communication is with us to stay. And
56:27
it's going to get healthier and healthier and healthier. That
56:30
we think and we remind ourselves
56:33
that different forms of communication require different
56:35
skills and different rules. And
56:37
the more we observe and respect us. Charles
56:40
Doog, thank you so much for joining us.
56:42
Thank you for having me. And
56:46
finally tonight, a landmark more than 140
56:48
years in the making. Barcelona's
56:52
La Sagrada Familia, or
56:54
Holy Family, is one of
56:56
the world's great wonders despite never
56:58
actually being finished. A constant
57:00
work in progress. It was designed
57:03
by the legendary Catalan architect
57:05
Gaudi. But by the time of his
57:07
death in 1926, only
57:09
a quarter of the building had
57:12
been completed, slowed down by civil
57:14
war and all sorts of historic
57:16
bureaucratic building codes. Now, officials are
57:19
saying that in 2026, 144
57:22
years since construction began in 1882,
57:26
the Basilica will finally be completed.
57:29
I guess great things do come to those
57:31
who wait. That's it for now.
57:33
If you ever miss our show, you can find
57:35
the latest episodes shortly after it airs on our
57:37
podcast. Remember, you can always catch us
57:40
online on our website and all over social
57:42
media. Thank you for watching and goodbye
57:44
from London. Hi,
57:53
this is Andy Katz, host of March Madness 365, presented
57:55
by Grammarly. This week
57:57
on the podcast tuners, we discuss March Madness... players,
58:00
offsets, matchups, and bracket busters.
58:03
Listen to March Madness 365 with Andy Katz, presented
58:05
by Grammarly, wherever you get your podcasts.
58:08
Grammarly is a secure AI writing partner that
58:10
gives your team an instant first draft in a
58:13
few clicks, not a few hours. Companies that use
58:15
Grammarly save an average of 19 days per employee
58:17
per year. Grammarly works seamlessly across
58:19
500,000 apps and websites. Get
58:22
personalized on-brand writing help everywhere your
58:24
team works. Learn what better writing
58:26
can do for your company at
58:28
grammarly.com. Grammarly, easier said,
58:31
done. CNN
58:33
presents the untold story of the
58:35
Space Shuttle Columbia disaster. Columbia, Houston,
58:38
comm check. We hear nothing. The
58:40
CNN original series, Space Shuttle Columbia,
58:42
The Final Flight, premieres Sunday, April
58:44
7th at nine on CNN.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More