Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
Hello
0:06
Prestigeheads and
0:09
welcome to American Prestige.
0:24
I'm Danny Besner here as always
0:26
with my friend and comrade Derek
0:28
Davison and we are excited
0:30
to bring you the news. Derek, let's start
0:32
with this discussion about a potential Iranian attack
0:34
on Israel, which has, there's been a lot
0:36
of rumors over the past few days as
0:38
of the time of recording, no attack has
0:41
occurred, but what has been going on? Yeah,
0:44
I'm not sure excited is how I would
0:47
characterize it, but yes,
0:50
the US and Israel have
0:52
been commiserating for
0:54
several days now about the possibility of
0:57
an imminent Iranian
0:59
attack on
1:02
either Israel directly or Israeli interests in
1:04
the Middle East in response, of course,
1:07
to the Israeli strike that
1:09
hit what the Iranians claim at least, the
1:11
US is kind of hedging about this, but
1:13
the Iranians say was a consular building
1:16
attached to their embassy in Damascus.
1:19
Later this month, that was on April 1st,
1:21
that killed a number of Islamic Revolutionary Guard
1:23
Corps figures, including a
1:26
senior general. Iran's Supreme Leader
1:28
Ayatollah Khamenei repeated his promise
1:30
to retaliate. In
1:34
this case, the wicked regime made a
1:36
mistake. It must be punished
1:38
and it will be punished. The
1:42
US and Israel have basically been waiting
1:44
for the other shoe to drop as
1:46
a result of that attack, waiting for
1:48
the Iranians to fulfill the repeated promises
1:50
they have made to retaliate
1:52
for it. There
1:55
was some thinking toward the end of
1:58
last week that a response, a reta-
2:00
retaliatory strike might be imminent. They
2:02
were looking at Friday because it was
2:04
the last Friday in the Islamic Holy
2:07
Month of Ramadan. That seemed like a
2:09
candidate for a response. It didn't happen
2:12
on Friday. Then attention
2:14
shifted towards Eid, the
2:16
holiday that marks the end of
2:18
Ramadan. There was some thinking that
2:21
there might be a strike to coincide with
2:23
Eid. That didn't happen either.
2:25
Eid was Wednesday, I believe,
2:27
in Iran and in most
2:29
countries around the world. It's
2:32
a multi-day thing, but still, if you were
2:34
thinking that that was going to be the
2:36
day, then you would have thought probably Wednesday
2:38
something would have happened. Still,
2:42
according to a number of outlets, Bloomberg
2:44
reported this on Wednesday, I
2:46
believe. They put a number of other
2:49
outlets that have reported similar things. The
2:51
Biden administration still thinks
2:53
that a strike is imminent. The
2:57
commander of the US military central
2:59
command, General
3:02
Eric Carrillo, went to
3:04
Israel on Thursday apparently to coordinate
3:07
a potential response to an Iranian action or to coordinate,
3:09
kind of get everybody on the same page in the
3:11
event of some kind of Iranian action.
3:14
He had already been scheduled to go, I
3:16
guess, to talk about that humanitarian aid. Peer,
3:19
the US military's latest boondoggle in
3:21
Gaza, that's a discussion, I guess,
3:23
is off the table right now
3:26
as they focus on this potential
3:28
response. There's still no consensus
3:30
on what form the response might take,
3:32
and it largely depends
3:34
on whether the Iranians are itching
3:37
for a bigger fight or not. I
3:39
think what we've seen over
3:41
the last six months is strongly suggest that
3:43
they are not, which
3:46
probably means that if there's a response
3:48
that does come, it will come proportionate
3:50
to what happened on April 1st. So
3:52
the Iranians will target an Israeli diplomatic
3:55
facility of some kind or
3:57
some sort of Israeli interest
4:00
outside of Israel proper. However,
4:02
Karilla is in Israel and it
4:04
sounds like they are preparing for the absolute worst
4:06
case scenario, which would be a large
4:10
barrage of missiles and or drones fired
4:13
by Iran and probably its
4:15
regional partners Hezbollah, various militias
4:17
in Iraq, etc.,
4:20
toward Israel itself. That kind
4:22
of retaliation would
4:24
almost certainly mean that
4:26
we're headed to a bigger war. It
4:28
would be very difficult to contain this
4:30
conflict at that point. If the
4:32
Iranians respond in some way that is
4:35
less than that, there is still probably
4:37
room for the Israelis
4:39
to get off the
4:41
path to war, although there's no indication at
4:43
this point that they want to. Nevertheless,
4:46
the Biden administration has reportedly been doing a
4:48
number of things to try and tamp this
4:50
down. They've been passing notes in
4:53
study hall to Tehran, basically through
4:55
some intermediaries, the governments
4:57
of Iraq, Qatar, the UAE, Saudi
5:00
Arabia, all of whom
5:02
are trusted US partners but have
5:04
some relationship with Iran
5:06
and some ability to pass messages. They've
5:09
apparently been doing that. I think
5:12
probably the German
5:14
government, the German government may of its own
5:16
accord have kind of publicly said, we're calling
5:18
on the Iranians to be restrained,
5:20
but I think maybe the Biden administration
5:22
might have asked the German government to
5:24
do that. Germany does also have a
5:26
relationship with Iran. Even the Russian government
5:28
has issued a statement, which I'm sure
5:30
was not coordinated with the Biden administration,
5:32
kind of urging the Iranians to temper
5:35
whatever they do next. There's
5:37
probably some discussion, especially
5:40
with Karilla in Israel, about tempering
5:43
the Israeli response to whatever Iran does
5:45
actually do, although as I said, if
5:47
there is a maximal
5:49
response that includes
5:52
an attack on Israel from Iran, so
5:54
something that doesn't even have this sort of plausible
5:56
deniability of like it was Hezbollah that did it,
5:58
or it was a moderate. Wish you did
6:00
it. But if it comes from Iran
6:03
and they attack Israel directly, it's gonna
6:05
be i think impossible to to contain
6:07
that. Ah thanks Eric
6:09
for the grim update as always Ah
6:12
spam from updates. Let's move on to
6:14
Gaza and give us an update on
6:16
the ceasefire talks. Yeah.
6:18
They're not gone well. There was
6:21
a renewed cease fire and renewed
6:23
round a cease fire talks. That
6:26
resumes earlier this week
6:28
in Cairo. Oh, with
6:30
full attendance which was a promising sign
6:32
at the Israeli government sent a delegation,
6:34
Hamas was there. They weren't talking to
6:36
each other directly, but Hamas was in
6:39
Cairo to participate. The
6:41
country's as always the Egyptians as
6:43
always and the United States that
6:45
the administration said. Lambert. Cia
6:48
Director/ De facto Secretary of.
6:51
As it as it has been doing sir out
6:53
these talks. What? Was interesting. In
6:55
addition to the full attendance was
6:57
the a lot of reporting an
6:59
earlier this week out of Out
7:01
of Cairo suggested that the by
7:03
demonstration in the wake of last
7:06
week's of. World's. Central
7:08
Kitchen drone strike that that
7:10
really seem to have made
7:12
Joe Biden for formidably mad.
7:14
And he aimed in light
7:16
of. This. Kind of looming threat
7:19
from Iran or threat that the you
7:21
know this could escalate. Of finally
7:23
into a much bigger regional conflict
7:25
has been taking or had been
7:27
at least taking the lead in
7:29
the talks in a way that
7:31
was not necessarily a parent. In.
7:33
Previous round. So Burns came to
7:36
Cairo with a proposal. In.
7:38
Hands. Ah, He presented
7:40
it to the Israelis have it
7:42
was presented through some an intermediary
7:44
to Hamas and it that's where
7:46
things can have died of a
7:49
or at least appear to have
7:51
died. I guess they're still. Some
7:54
consideration, Hamas issued a statement. On.
7:56
Tuesday. That said, you know if it wasn't
7:58
happy with the purple. Oh but it
8:01
was considering it and would prepare response. I'm
8:03
sure the Israelis will not be happy with
8:05
response in the around around. will go by.
8:08
The. Hold up here. I'm.
8:11
This. This seems to be. A.
8:13
Couple of hold us one still
8:15
is the duration of the ceasefire
8:18
Hamas wants. Six. Weeks with
8:20
a pathway to have a full cease
8:22
fire. The Israelis one six weeks and
8:24
we're done. And or back
8:26
to back fighting. But the other problem,
8:28
which may be more intractable at this
8:31
point, is the issue of hostages. Or.
8:33
The Israeli government is demanding and
8:36
and what's in this proposal from
8:38
from Burns in the Us Either
8:40
ministration, Is. That Hamas will
8:42
release forty living. Israelis.
8:44
Were being held hostage in
8:47
Gaza. The problem is
8:49
Hamas now at yates been suspected for
8:51
sometimes this was the case. The been
8:53
hints at it for some time but
8:56
they've now openly admitted that they don't
8:58
have. Forty. Living hostages
9:00
anymore or who fall into the
9:02
category envisioned or the categories I
9:05
should say envisioned by the ceasefire
9:07
proposal which in his women. Are
9:10
essentially women, an elderly it
9:12
and or infirm man? So
9:15
to get to forty hostages' they
9:17
would maybe have to dip into
9:20
a the sort of the mail
9:22
Israeli soldier category, which they've been
9:24
unwilling to do. they they. Wanted.
9:27
To extract additional
9:30
concessions. From the
9:32
Israelis in return for that category
9:35
of of hostage. So that's a
9:37
big sticking point. It's.
9:39
He raises a lot of concerns, not
9:41
just for the ceasefire. Toxic mean if
9:43
this is is that many hostages had
9:45
died, they can get to forty in
9:47
this category. The slate out in the.
9:50
Repos? Well, that that's kind of frightening
9:52
in terms of just how many hostages
9:54
have actually died, and we don't have
9:57
great insight into that. Obviously, because nobody
9:59
can. Nobody's in Gaza kind
10:01
of keeping track of these people except
10:03
for Hamas which isn't really talking so
10:06
that's. Very. Troubling and day as
10:08
I said, maybe that's the thing that
10:10
that prevents a seaside from for being
10:12
great. There's still a lot of pressure
10:14
here to try and get a deal
10:16
done. I think the Us in particular
10:18
is applying. Pressure. Because it
10:21
views a cease fire as the
10:23
only way. To. Forestall this
10:25
Iranian attack them a becoming the
10:27
Iranians have allegedly a through back
10:29
channels communicate the sense that if
10:32
if a ceasefire was agreed. They
10:35
would temper or maybe even hold off
10:37
altogether. In retaliation so they that
10:39
still lot of pressure try get a deal done.
10:41
I just don't know if it's feasible. it's. Very
10:44
very grim stuff. Derek, let's talk
10:47
about the idea for withdraw. Yes,
10:50
On Sunday the idea withdrew his forces
10:52
some communist which leaves it with only
10:54
one unit I've seen have described as
10:56
a brigade or a division. I'm not
10:58
sure which. Are a in
11:01
in the territory in Gaza at
11:03
all? It's it's occupying this. Nets
11:06
I mean corridor that the
11:08
idea has created to bisect.
11:10
Gaza. Into northern and southern parts either
11:12
would? There was some flurry of interest
11:14
in this earlier in the week of
11:16
the old? Maybe this means you know
11:19
the conflict is shifting, that the Israelis?
11:21
are you not gonna gonna. Reduce.
11:24
The intensity of their operations. I guess with
11:26
the. Consequence. Sort
11:29
of from. Reduction. In casualties
11:31
that that might have ensued again
11:33
as a result of. That.
11:35
Of U C K incident as a
11:37
result of this regional tension as a
11:40
result of the the by demonstration at
11:42
least for a few days seeming to
11:44
to express. A lot of outrage
11:46
in in a very short period of time
11:49
and up at a higher level than its
11:51
previously done with respect to Israel. Again, I
11:53
think that's all performative, but you know, take
11:55
them for what it's worth of these all
11:57
these these things also to coincide it. The
12:01
Israelis have characterized the was role as
12:03
a of basically have a chance to.
12:06
Give those soldiers the arrest or
12:08
to reset their equipment, etc. before
12:11
they headed to Rafa. They still
12:13
insisting that they're planning have a
12:15
full scale. Round. Assault in Rasa
12:17
You a Benjamin Netanyahu even said that.
12:20
Ah, he's got a d t that that
12:22
the idea of has given him a date
12:24
for that attack. He obviously didn't say. Out
12:26
what that date was I they may
12:29
still be. A may still be
12:31
a ways off. of The Israelis continue to
12:33
insist that they're going to try to evacuate
12:35
civilians. Out of rafa before they
12:37
go in which would take weeks and they
12:39
haven't started. so. You know,
12:42
realistically, if they're gonna do that or even
12:44
make at what appears to the outside world
12:46
to be a good faith attempt at doing
12:48
it, That. They're going to need
12:51
some time for that before they have for
12:53
the ready to go in, so I really
12:55
don't know where that stands the. Withdrawal.
12:58
Did allow for. A
13:00
few things that allowed Palestinians who have
13:03
been displaced from Khan Yunis, To
13:05
refer to return. To. Find Eunice,
13:07
most of them. Maybe all of them for all
13:09
I know. Sounds that their
13:12
homes word? To had been completely
13:14
destroyed. Or by the idea to the couldn't
13:16
stay but you know they might have been able to
13:18
to. Take a few belongings or something
13:20
like that, so there was a of a bit of
13:22
a. A temporary relocation least several
13:24
to get blasted by. It's worth mentioning
13:27
also that these a humanitarian truck for
13:29
also a combined by crook that are
13:31
guided and delivered to the comparison six
13:34
and to the private sector here in
13:36
the southern part of the Gaza strip
13:38
but none of this a humanitarian convoys
13:41
had been given the access to reach
13:43
to the other part of Kansas tracks
13:45
The despite the Israeli military decision to
13:48
reopen again the air is a crossing
13:50
and to is to guarantee third the
13:52
flow for humanitarian. supplies to people
13:54
in the north the other concern
13:57
of course is for humanitarian aid
14:00
The Israelis have been citing higher
14:02
numbers of trucks coming into the
14:05
territory, I guess, again, in
14:07
response to the pressure that they
14:09
feel they've been under. There was a, they're
14:11
disputing this with the
14:13
United Nations, which has
14:16
noted this week that
14:18
the Israelis, when they talk about like 400 trucks came in
14:20
today or 450 trucks came in today,
14:22
the trucks are apparently half full
14:25
because the Israeli, the
14:27
IDF insists on that. So
14:30
what's actually getting to the UN, the
14:32
number of trucks, once they get into
14:34
Gaza, they're unpacked and then
14:36
loaded onto, you know, re-loaded, repacked
14:39
and sent onto UN warehouses
14:42
in Gaza. What's actually getting to those warehouses
14:44
is about half the number of trucks that
14:46
the Israelis say they are letting in. So
14:48
it's a bit of a sleight of hand
14:51
trick, I think. The Israelis say
14:53
they're letting 400 trucks in, that's probably
14:55
200 trucks worth of aid, you
14:58
know, which even 400 at this point would
15:00
not be adequate to try and send off
15:03
the famine that is taking place in Gaza.
15:05
Two hundred certainly is far below that. So
15:07
there's a dispute about just
15:09
how much aid is coming in and
15:12
whether this withdrawal is actually allowing for any
15:14
additional aid. The Israelis have promised to open
15:16
new checkpoints and do all these things to
15:18
try and enhance the humanitarian
15:20
access to Gaza. I think that has
15:22
yet to manifest in any real action.
15:25
Thanks, Derek. Could you
15:27
give us an update on what's going on in Myanmar
15:30
where rebels have seized a key border town? Yes.
15:33
All week it's been reported that
15:36
the rebel Karen
15:39
National Liberation Army alongside
15:42
people's defense force, militia fighters,
15:44
the people's defense force, the
15:46
Karen National Liberation Army is
15:48
a long-standing ethnic rebel group
15:50
that's been, you know, at war with the Myanmar
15:52
government for a long time. The
15:54
people's defense forces are these
15:56
local militias that cropped up all
15:59
over the country. after the coup that put the
16:01
military back in power a couple of years ago,
16:04
they are not at least nominally
16:07
connected through the opposition
16:09
national unity government, the government in
16:11
exile. But
16:14
they I think function largely autonomously
16:16
and they work often with these
16:18
ethnic rebel groups that have been
16:21
at this a longer period of time, have more capacity,
16:23
etc. So anyway,
16:25
the Karen National Liberation Army
16:27
and People's Defense Force militia
16:30
fighters have been assaulting the
16:32
town of Miyawadi, which is located along
16:35
the Myanmar Thailand border
16:39
is the largest commercial
16:41
crossing point along that border.
16:44
And it seems as of Thursday
16:46
that they have finally taken the
16:48
town. Now, they had been
16:51
reporting mass
16:54
surrenders by hundreds of Myanmar
16:57
soldiers, hundreds
16:59
more soldiers and others have
17:01
reportedly crossed the border into
17:03
Thailand. The Thai government has been setting up
17:06
or trying to set up some capacity for
17:08
dealing with these people as they flee the
17:10
fighting. The Hunta, the Myanmar
17:12
government, the military Hunta has said
17:14
it's sending aircraft to Thailand
17:16
to pick these people up and take them
17:18
back to Myanmar. But
17:21
for several days, there was still
17:23
resistance despite these mass surrenders and
17:26
evacuations. There had still been
17:28
some resistance by a small, relatively
17:31
small Myanmar military unit plus
17:33
the military was conducting airstrikes
17:35
and that sort of thing. So
17:37
that finally seems to have broken down on
17:41
Thursday with the military unit that was
17:43
still defending Miyawadi fleeing across the border
17:45
to Thailand and rebels apparently
17:47
getting into the town. As I said, this is
17:49
the largest commercial crossing on the Thailand border. It
17:52
is a huge loss for the
17:55
Hunta commercially and
17:57
just in terms of this kind of never ending.
18:00
seeming parade of losses that they
18:02
have now suffered at the hands of
18:04
the rebels, which have been largely
18:06
focused on the Chinese and
18:08
Thai borders. So that's, again,
18:11
cutting revenue off from
18:13
the junta, which will only
18:16
increase its difficulties in terms of fielding an
18:19
army and trying to defend
18:21
itself or to take back territory. American
18:26
Prestige is brought to you in partnership with
18:29
The Nation magazine. Please
18:31
consider becoming a
18:33
subscriber at americanprestigepod.com/subscribe.
18:36
As a subscriber, you'll get access
18:39
to dozens of exclusive bonus episodes,
18:41
including breaking news specials, deep dives
18:43
into regional histories, analysis of movies
18:46
and video games, and much more.
18:49
And if you subscribe at the founder's level, you'll
18:51
be able to claim a year of digital subscription
18:53
to The Nation. Thank you for
18:55
listening. And now back to the show. Let's
19:00
talk about Sudan, where the Iranian drones
19:02
have shifted what's going on on the
19:05
battlefield. Yeah, there was
19:07
a story in Reuters this week about the
19:11
apparent influx of Iranian made
19:14
drones that the Sudanese military
19:16
has acquired. I
19:19
think we talked a couple of weeks ago about the
19:21
fact that the Sudanese military
19:23
had made some rare
19:26
gains at the expense of the Rapid
19:28
Support Forces Group. The RSF has been,
19:30
for most of their conflict, which
19:32
is it, you know, I reached a full
19:34
year at this point, has
19:37
been driving the conflict.
19:39
Its fighters are more
19:41
seasoned, typically, than Sudanese
19:43
military personnel. And
19:45
it's been able to make up for deficiencies
19:47
in things like air power and artillery power
19:50
with its own drones that are
19:53
allegedly probably being provided by the
19:55
UAE. What's happened
19:57
in the last months?
20:00
give or take, I guess, is that the military has
20:02
made some significant
20:04
gains, particularly in the capital region,
20:06
in the city of Onderman, which
20:08
is the sister city of the
20:10
capital, Khartoum. And that's
20:12
apparently, according to this Reuters piece, at
20:15
least in large part because of these
20:17
Iranian drones. They've been using them mostly,
20:19
I think, for reconnaissance. So they've been
20:22
able to get more accurate
20:24
information to target their
20:26
artillery at RSF fighters,
20:28
and that seems to be making
20:31
a fairly significant difference. I think,
20:33
unfortunately, for the
20:35
Sudanese people who really could just
20:38
do with this war ending full
20:40
stop like yesterday, I suspect
20:43
that this revelation
20:47
that the Iranians are building a
20:49
relationship with the Sudanese military that
20:51
could potentially translate into an Iranian influence
20:55
in Sudan after the war, that's only
20:57
going to make the
20:59
UAE panic and
21:02
probably increase its
21:04
support for the RSF. And all this outside
21:06
support at this point just does is extends
21:08
the war. It extends the capacity of these
21:10
two groups to keep fighting each other, and
21:13
that's really the last thing that the
21:15
civilians need there. Let's
21:18
turn to Ukraine, and let's start
21:20
with this brutal attack on a
21:22
major power plant, it seems like
21:24
Russia has struck within Ukraine. Yeah,
21:27
so an overnight Russian drone slash
21:29
missile strike has destroyed the Tripilska
21:32
plant, which is the largest power
21:34
plant in the Kiev region and
21:38
surrounding regions. As far
21:40
as I know, it's just completely shattered the facility.
21:44
That power plant supplies power
21:46
to millions of people who
21:48
are potentially at risk of losing
21:50
power. Apparently, the
21:52
Ukrainians have been able to
21:54
take some steps to
21:57
compensate right now because
22:00
We're not yet in the sort of
22:04
summer months where everybody's got their air conditioning
22:06
on and the demand is at
22:08
its highest. So they've been able
22:10
to compensate somewhat and keep people from entirely
22:12
losing power, although there have been other strikes
22:15
against energy infrastructure in other parts of
22:17
Ukraine that have left people without
22:20
electricity. This seems like
22:22
just a return to what the Russians
22:25
were doing last year, sort of
22:28
over the summer and leading into winter that there
22:30
were a lot of these
22:32
heavy bombardments of infrastructure,
22:35
power and heat
22:38
facilities in an effort to
22:40
sort of leave civilians in
22:43
the dark, leave kind of undercut
22:45
capacity for heating leading
22:48
up, leading into the winter. And
22:51
also the size of these barrages suggest
22:54
that they are an attempt
22:56
to test, let's say, or deplete
22:59
Ukraine's air defense systems. So you just throw up
23:01
a lot of stuff and force
23:03
the Ukrainians to shoot it down with anti-aircraft
23:06
interceptor ammunition that they are running
23:08
out of because support
23:11
from the US and the West
23:13
is not coming in the
23:15
way that it once was. Speaking
23:17
of that, I think let's turn to
23:19
an issue that was sadly
23:22
predictable from the beginning, which
23:24
is that the Ukraine parliament has passed a
23:26
new conscription law. Yes.
23:30
The law is, it
23:33
was just passed on Thursday. I'm still sort
23:35
of reading about it. It
23:38
gives the military greater ability
23:41
to identify, register
23:43
and identify potentially fighting-age
23:46
men. It requires all
23:48
men from 18 to
23:50
60 to carry, to register
23:53
with the military and carry documents
23:55
showing apparently that they have registered
23:57
so that they can be checked by. Ukrainian
24:00
authorities at will,
24:04
they will use this or they may use
24:06
this I guess information and you know it
24:08
seems obvious to identify
24:12
military eligible men and that's
24:16
anybody from 25
24:18
and up that the Ukrainians
24:20
have cut have just recently actually
24:23
reduced the minimum age for service
24:25
from 27 to 25 so
24:27
they will use these documents
24:29
to sort of identify anybody who is
24:32
maybe trying to dodge the draft I
24:34
guess or get out of military service.
24:37
Obviously the Ukrainians are
24:40
struggling to keep up with the Russians in
24:42
terms of manpower, they're going to continue indefinitely
24:44
to struggle to keep up with the Russians
24:47
in terms of manpower and
24:49
this is another way to
24:52
try and enforce conscription
24:54
rules but
24:56
there is sadly a real
24:59
risk that eventually an entire
25:01
generation of Ukrainian men is going to
25:04
be thrown into this war and I
25:06
suspect that reducing the conscription age to 25 is
25:09
only the first step of what
25:11
will be more adjustments to that age
25:13
to come and you're just going to see more
25:15
and more people thrown into this war with you
25:19
know not suggesting there's
25:21
a better way I don't know what I would
25:23
do in this situation but there just doesn't
25:25
seem to be much to look
25:28
for here on the horizon in terms
25:30
of an end to this. Pretty
25:33
sad and tragic news as usual Derek. Why
25:36
don't we talk about Ecuador and actually so
25:39
there's been this raid on the Mexican
25:41
embassy in Quito. Derek,
25:43
do you think that a norm has
25:45
actually changed here or is these just
25:47
two semi-random attacks soon
25:49
after one another? Yeah,
25:52
I mean they're different enough that
25:54
I don't know that you can
25:56
connect the two and I know you're talking about
25:58
the Damascus. attack by
26:01
the Israelis. So there's what
26:04
the Ecuadorian government did on Friday, let's
26:08
say that first, they raided the
26:11
Mexican Embassy in Quito to
26:13
extract former Ecuadorian Vice
26:15
President Jorge Glás who was facing
26:19
corruption charges, he claims they're politically
26:22
motivated, he was seeking asylum, the Mexican
26:24
government earlier in the day on Friday
26:26
had granted his request for asylum and
26:28
then the Ecuadorians went in and
26:31
pulled him out. What's different
26:33
is that the big kind
26:35
of inviolable principle in international
26:37
law with respect to diplomatic
26:39
facilities has to do
26:42
with host country's responsibility to protect
26:45
the sanctity of an
26:47
embassy or a consulate. So
26:49
what the Israelis did when they
26:51
attacked this apparent Iranian consular building
26:53
in Damascus didn't actually
26:55
rise to that level, it didn't rise
26:57
to that level of significance because it
26:59
was a third party, it was an
27:02
attack on a third party and in a third state
27:04
whatever diplomatic facility which
27:06
is not great and those facilities
27:08
still have the same protections
27:10
under international law that any quote-unquote
27:12
civilian facility is supposed to have
27:15
but it's not the same as
27:18
going into an embassy in
27:20
your own country and conducting
27:23
a raid like this which is really just
27:25
like you've thrown the rule book out the
27:27
window. So I don't know
27:30
that one necessarily has anything
27:32
to do with the other but yes
27:34
I mean you could certainly say there
27:37
is a pattern here of disrespecting
27:39
the sort
27:42
of protections or sanctity of
27:44
diplomatic facilities. If I
27:46
stand for anything Derek it's the sanctity of
27:48
diplomatic facilities. I think we all should do
27:50
that and to say you
27:52
know there's been a huge outcry now against
27:57
Ecuador for having done this the Mexican
27:59
government cut off. relations. I
28:01
think the Organization of American States just
28:03
voted to condemn the raid.
28:06
The United States even, which has no real
28:08
truck with the Mexican government, but does
28:10
like Daniel Noboa, the president of Ecuador, because
28:12
he's a good businessman,
28:14
banana kingpin, apparently, pro-business
28:19
guy, so we like him. But
28:21
nevertheless, the United States criticized
28:23
the raid, suggested that it did,
28:25
in fact, breach the 1961
28:28
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which
28:30
is supposed to govern these things
28:32
and obliges host countries to respect
28:34
the integrity of embassies. So
28:36
there's been a lot of outcry. On
28:39
Sunday, Mexican diplomats returning back home
28:42
to an outpour of support. As
28:44
Mexican officials say, their embassy
28:46
in Ecuador will remain closed
28:48
indefinitely. Mexico is now even
28:50
asking the United Nations effectively
28:53
to kick Ecuador out. I
28:55
don't think that's going to
28:57
happen, but that's how far things have gotten. We've
29:02
even seen a number of Latin American countries, even
29:04
countries that you would normally expect
29:07
to line up on Ecuador's
29:09
side here. Mexico is
29:11
this repository of dirty
29:13
leftism, and Ecuador is a repository
29:16
of good, solid pro-business conservatism.
29:19
Even the pro-business conservative governments
29:21
in Latin America seem to be kind
29:23
of shying away from this and criticizing
29:26
the Ecuadorian government for what it's done. Thanks,
29:29
Derek. Let's talk about the new Cold
29:31
War, because Joe Biden
29:33
has just had a meeting with
29:35
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, as
29:37
well as the president of
29:39
the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos. Is Junior actually
29:41
part of his name, or we just
29:44
call him that? No, he's
29:46
Ferdinand Marcos, Jr. Okay, yes, Ferdinand Marcos, Jr.
29:48
So what's wrong there? I just kind of
29:50
dropped the long, long thing, which I have
29:52
to give him credit for, because that was
29:54
dumb. Anyway,
29:57
yeah, so Biden brought...
30:00
Tishida to the White House on Wednesday for
30:02
a formal state visit. They
30:04
had discussions all day
30:07
on expanding, strengthening
30:09
U.S.-Japanese relations, particularly on
30:12
the military front. There
30:14
was a discussion about forming
30:17
some kind of joint
30:20
regional air defense system with
30:22
Japan, the U.S., and Australia
30:25
being involved. There
30:27
was talk of upgrading the
30:29
U.S.-Japanese military alliance
30:31
to put it, let's say, on
30:34
par with the U.S.-South Korean command.
30:36
Part of this is sort of
30:39
meant to, from Kishida's perspectives, were
30:41
meant to kind of ratify his
30:44
efforts to upgrade the Japanese self-defense
30:46
forces, you can put that in
30:48
quotes, into something more resembling
30:50
a traditional military, which of course after
30:52
World War II, we decided Japan shouldn't
30:54
really have one of those, but I
30:56
guess we're going back on that now.
31:00
They did have this discussion. There
31:02
were reports a few days
31:04
ago, the Financial Times I think was the first to
31:06
report this, that they were
31:08
going to discuss, and I don't know if they
31:10
did, I don't actually know if this was part
31:12
of the discussion, but the Financial
31:15
Times reported that they were going to
31:17
discuss expanding AUKUS, which,
31:20
Danny, I know is one of your favorite
31:22
alliances, the U.S., U.K., Australia. That's
31:24
not my favorite. Not my favorite, but yeah. Well,
31:26
okay. I mean, that was
31:29
negotiated a while ago. It's
31:31
organized around the idea of providing
31:33
nuclear-powered submarines, attack submarines,
31:35
to Australia, but there
31:38
are other aspects of it. There's a whole
31:40
second chapter of AUKUS
31:42
that involves collaboration on
31:45
other military technologies that
31:48
supposedly, again, according to the Financial
31:50
Times, the U.S., U.K., and
31:52
Australia want to open up to
31:54
other partners. So the submarine part would just be
31:57
the three of them, but This other
31:59
aspect. the act of the deal they they
32:01
would open up to potential other partners. Japan
32:03
being oh. You. Know sort of
32:06
the top of the list I guess
32:08
to get into this thing on Thursday
32:10
or the to a Kitchen and Biden
32:12
and got together again and this time
32:14
they were joined by. The. President's
32:16
Philippines: Ferdinand Marcos Junior: This is
32:18
the first time apparently that. Those.
32:21
Three countries have all got together leaders
32:23
of those recoveries while gun together the
32:25
same time for a joint summit. Ah,
32:27
I have not yet seen any sort
32:29
of read out as we're recording this
32:31
about what was discussed, but I'm sure.
32:33
I'm. Sure of two things. I'm sure that
32:35
one. They're. Going to mostly talk about
32:37
China and to they will insist after they're done
32:40
that they didn't talk about china. That's the way
32:42
this extended. Mode.
32:44
Derek thank you and were coming to the
32:46
end of our show and I'm sure you'll
32:48
leave us on a happy note. You know
32:50
things he get better with. We just work
32:52
together So why did you tell us about
32:54
what's going on with the climate? Yes,
32:58
We did it again. I mean, we
33:00
we did again. I don't think I
33:02
wasn't sure we could to keep it
33:04
going, but according to the European Union's
33:06
Copernicus Climate Change service, March last month
33:09
was the hottest March ever Recorded was
33:11
a tenth of a degree higher than
33:13
the previous record, which was set in
33:15
March twenty sixteen. And this means for
33:18
ten months in a row now we
33:20
have had the hottest. Whatever month
33:22
that is a ever recorded so
33:24
hot as Marx Harvest February Hottest
33:27
January. December, etc. going all the
33:29
way back. Of they also.
33:31
Copernicus also found that the twelve
33:33
month period from April Twenty Twenty
33:35
Three A through March of this
33:37
year set a new twelve months
33:39
heat record. That of
33:42
topples the previous record which had been
33:44
set. In March when they decided
33:46
that he twelve month period from a.
33:49
March last year or two. February this
33:51
year was the hottest twelve month period
33:54
on record. It will probably be broken
33:56
next month once we have April's the
33:58
average temperature data all now. Well, there
34:01
is some reason to think this streak may
34:03
be breaking soon because El Nino, the El
34:05
Nino that's been partly driving
34:07
this along with
34:10
obviously the effects of
34:12
man-made climate change, is
34:15
apparently going to fade away and
34:17
may turn into a La Nina,
34:19
which is the cooling effect later
34:22
this year. So we may see
34:24
a break in these hottest month ever records.
34:26
But I'm proud of us. We've got 10
34:28
months in a row. I'm hoping we can
34:30
make it to a full year. You
34:33
know, one of the good things is when the earth
34:35
cooks, people don't have to pay back their student loans.
34:37
So you got to look on the bright side. That's
34:39
what I always say. Yeah, I just want to say,
34:42
yeah, you know, throw your mortgage away. Yeah, who cares?
34:45
It's all going to break down. So
34:47
why not? Well, on that happy note,
34:49
see you all soon.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More