Podchaser Logo
Home
Christiane Amanpour on Biden's Iran Dilemma

Christiane Amanpour on Biden's Iran Dilemma

Released Wednesday, 31st January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Christiane Amanpour on Biden's Iran Dilemma

Christiane Amanpour on Biden's Iran Dilemma

Christiane Amanpour on Biden's Iran Dilemma

Christiane Amanpour on Biden's Iran Dilemma

Wednesday, 31st January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

BBC Sounds, music, radio,

0:03

podcasts. Okay, Sarah, here's

0:06

a question for you. I've

0:08

been hearing rumours of a

0:10

democratic plot involving Taylor Swift,

0:12

the Super Bowl-bound Kansas City

0:14

Chiefs, and Vivek Ramaswamy as

0:17

our resident Taylor Swift expert. Can you explain to

0:19

me what the heck is going on? Yeah,

0:21

well, you forgot that actually there's a tie

0:23

between Taylor Swift and the Pentagon as well

0:25

who are acting in concert against Donald Trump.

0:28

Let me try to explain this remarkable

0:30

story to you. It's

0:32

a brand new conspiracy theory that says,

0:34

well, firstly, that Taylor Swift and her

0:36

boyfriend, Travis Kelsey, who plays for the

0:39

Kansas City Chiefs, are not a real

0:41

couple. They're just pretending. It

0:43

has also been orchestrated by elements of the

0:45

deep state to get the Kansas City Chiefs

0:47

into the Super Bowl to give more

0:49

prominence to the couple in

0:51

preparation for them coming out and

0:54

endorsing Joe Biden for president together

0:56

as the most glittering celebrity endorsement

0:58

that you could ever possibly find,

1:00

particularly, of course, if the Kansas

1:03

City Chiefs win the Super Bowl. I imagine

1:05

that's being fixed as we speak at

1:07

the moment. Now, this might sound absolutely

1:09

ridiculous for the very good reason that

1:11

it is absolutely ridiculous, but Vivek

1:14

Ramaswamy, who some people were taking seriously

1:16

in his bid to become the Republican

1:18

nominee for president, he's now dropped out

1:20

and endorsed Donald Trump. He's been tweeting

1:22

about this, suggesting he thinks it's actually

1:25

true. I mean, he disappeared down a

1:27

conspiracy theory rabbit hole a while ago.

1:29

But I mean, this is really quite

1:31

something to believe that, yeah, that this

1:33

is the entire thing has been orchestrated

1:36

to give Joe Biden a bump when Taylor

1:38

Swift gets behind him. Isn't the issue with Taylor

1:40

Swift, though, that she has a

1:42

huge social media following and she did tweet,

1:44

didn't she, about registering to vote? And a

1:46

lot of people did register to vote on

1:49

that day. Or am I making that up? And

1:51

mine are going down some terrible rabbit hole.

1:53

But I mean, basically, in other words, she

1:56

does have a kind of power via social

1:58

media that back in the day. Beyonce

2:02

or various other stars who've

2:05

backed candidates in the past didn't have. I

2:07

think you're absolutely right, Justin. It's not just

2:09

that she can reach people on social media.

2:11

It's the fact that Taylor Swift was kind

2:14

of the first social media superstar in

2:16

that she has this direct link to

2:18

her fan base and her followers.

2:21

She speaks to them, it feels kind

2:23

of intimately over social media. She's

2:25

much closer to them than other

2:28

superstars are with their following. She

2:30

tells them to register to vote, or if she does

2:32

at some point, come out and endorse a candidate. She

2:34

did endorse Joe Biden in 2020. It's

2:37

very possible that a key demographic of young

2:40

voters who might not have been motivated otherwise,

2:42

who might not be very excited, for instance,

2:44

as Joe Biden as a candidate, if

2:47

Tay-Tay says, get out there and vote

2:49

for him, then there's every chance they will

2:51

actually do it because they're so closely bonded

2:53

with their favorite pop star. We

2:55

will move on from Taylor Swift controversies

2:58

on this episode to look at the

3:00

deeply serious question of what's happening in

3:02

the Middle East since three American service

3:04

people were killed at the weekend, what

3:06

America's response is likely to be to

3:08

that. And we'll be talking to the

3:10

veteran CNN journalist, Christiane Amanpour, who knows

3:12

the Middle East intimately well, and she'll

3:14

be giving us her thoughts about

3:16

that. Before we get to that, though, we've

3:18

got a listener question, one for you, I

3:20

think, Anthony. Here is Mark

3:22

in Dublin, who emailed us this excellent

3:24

question. Hello, America's team. I've

3:27

been listening of great interest to your

3:29

coverage of the Republican primaries contest. I

3:32

note that after just two of the 50 states

3:34

have voted for Trump, you appear

3:36

to have written off the sneaky hating. I'm

3:39

assuming every state holds a primary

3:41

vote to pick their nominated candidate

3:43

to represent their party in the

3:46

November presidential election. Therefore,

3:48

the candidate that wins 26 or

3:51

more states goes forward to the November

3:53

election. How can you write off Nikki

3:55

Haley so early on? Well, thanks for

3:57

your question, Mark. And it is a

3:59

good question. As Nikki Haley's people

4:01

will point out, only two states have voted.

4:03

We have 48 more states, plus some territories,

4:05

give or take, that still have to weigh

4:08

in. The challenge is that, one,

4:10

a public opinion poll show

4:12

that Donald Trump is by far

4:14

the most popular candidate among Republican

4:16

voters in all of the upcoming

4:18

states. And if you look at

4:20

these first two states, Iowa

4:23

and New Hampshire, particularly New Hampshire,

4:25

Nikki Haley invested a ton of

4:27

resources, tens of millions of dollars,

4:29

trying to win New Hampshire. She

4:31

campaigned there over and over again.

4:33

The voting demographics of New Hampshire,

4:36

the number of college-educated voters, the

4:38

fact that independent voters could switch

4:40

and vote in the Republican primary,

4:42

the fact that the Republican electorate

4:44

there is somewhat more to the

4:46

middle, all of this set

4:48

up where it was perhaps the best

4:50

state for Nikki Haley, that she had

4:52

the best chance of winning there than

4:55

anything else on the calendar, and she

4:57

still fell short by 11 percentage

4:59

points. So if she couldn't win there, it's

5:01

very hard to look at all these other

5:03

states coming up and see

5:05

any place, even her home state of South

5:08

Carolina, where she has a real

5:10

chance of winning. And a lot of

5:12

these states where she's competing in, if

5:14

she loses even by one percentage point,

5:16

it's a winner-take-all state. So if Donald

5:18

Trump wins that by just a fraction

5:20

of a percent, he will get all

5:22

the delegates and move on, and he

5:24

will just start amassing more and more

5:26

over the course of the weeks ahead

5:28

the delegates necessary to secure the nomination

5:31

for him. So that's kind of why

5:33

we have decided, and I think most

5:35

political experts looking at this have decided,

5:37

that it is going to be a

5:39

very, very uphill climb for Nikki Haley.

5:41

It's not impossible. Something crazy could happen,

5:43

but it is the longest of long

5:45

shots at this point. One of the

5:47

reasons why we shouldn't be entirely sure

5:49

that she's not going to be the candidate is we

5:51

don't know what is going to happen to Donald Trump.

5:53

And I guess that must be her thinking, isn't it?

5:56

That if she can just stay in the race, even if

5:58

she loses these states, as Anthony says, It's almost

6:00

certain that she would lose virtually

6:03

all of the states that are still to vote. But even

6:06

if she were to lose, she would

6:08

still be in the race. And if something

6:10

happened to Donald Trump between now and the

6:12

convention, she could turn, couldn't she, to the

6:15

party and say, look, I am the other

6:17

candidate, so you've got to go to me.

6:19

So there is a kind of, there's a

6:21

reason for her carrying on and for us

6:24

not to entirely dismiss that carrying on. As

6:26

long as she has some money to keep going and

6:29

she enjoys the media attention, there's

6:31

no reason for her to drop

6:33

out unless she has a concern

6:35

that this could totally destroy her

6:37

standing within Donald Trump's movement and

6:39

adversely affect her political prospects going

6:41

forward. But I guess she made

6:43

the calculation that that chip has

6:45

already sailed to some extent and

6:47

she might as well position herself as the

6:49

kind of person who maybe four years from

6:51

now, eight years from now could pick up

6:53

the pieces from Donald Trump's

6:56

movement, fashion a different kind of Republican coalition

6:58

and take the party on. It's

7:00

a risk, obviously, but it's one that she

7:02

seems to have made the decision to take.

7:05

Well, my decision is that it's time, guys,

7:07

that we say welcome

7:10

to America. America,

7:14

America from BBC News.

7:17

Let me start off with two words made

7:19

in America. I'm not running for santa here.

7:21

I'm running for president. I did everything right

7:23

and they indicted me. I can chew and

7:25

walk on at the same time. There is

7:28

no indication of aliens or

7:30

extraterrestrial activity. We will fight the

7:32

woke in education. We will fight the

7:34

woke in the businesses. We will never

7:36

ever surrender to the woke mob. Nobody

7:38

should have to go to jail for

7:40

smoking weed. It's

7:52

Justin in the worldwide headquarters of America's

7:54

in London, England And Sarah Smith.

7:56

They're back in the Washington bureau here

7:58

at the heart of American. Politics

8:00

in Washington, Dc. Beating. Heart

8:02

and it is Anthony sitting next to

8:04

say are also here in Washington Dc

8:07

And in a second we have a

8:09

big into the a Christian Amanpour who

8:11

in case people don't know of her

8:13

is a British Iranian journalist, was the

8:16

Cnn's work for Cnn for decades but

8:18

she is more than that as well.

8:20

She is someone who has worked around

8:23

the world, covered was been bombed and

8:25

source hot but also done a number

8:27

of interviews with people were she has

8:29

herself brought them to account so she.

8:32

Is the kind of person exactly the

8:34

right person to talk to us today

8:36

about America and Iran embassy grub partly

8:38

in Iran. Her father was Iranian, the

8:40

she was born in Britain. She knows

8:42

around wealth and they know how well

8:45

two sets of they will be interesting.

8:47

Sarah non not only because of what

8:49

he says about the United States and

8:51

to Bidens options, etc etc, but also

8:53

because she says all of those things

8:55

with a real knowledge of the area

8:57

and indeed of the country of Iran.

9:00

And. That's what so crucial right now

9:02

is into his should try to anticipate

9:04

what Iran's response will be to whatever

9:06

America does. The we are talking now

9:09

at ten Am in Washington, three Pm

9:11

in London on Wednesday and we anticipate

9:13

that at some point in the near

9:15

future America will take military action. In

9:18

response to the fact that three soldiers

9:20

were killed at the weekend and a

9:22

drone attack that set came from a

9:24

Iranian backed militias, it is inevitable that

9:26

America's gonna have to take action. in

9:29

fact, you Biden said himself. That. We.

9:31

Will respond. We're not entirely sure

9:33

what form that's going to take,

9:35

and the most important thing for

9:37

the White House is to try

9:39

to avoid whatever they do creating

9:42

more conflict in the region. And to

9:44

do that they have to try. To anticipate what around

9:46

response will be and that's why talking to somebody

9:48

who knows the Iranian leadership like to see I

9:50

will be so valuable. Yeah it's a fraught moment

9:53

out of what of eggs i heard her when

9:55

I was traveling with like an earlier this year

9:57

in in the Middle East. Was that preventing the.

10:00

The conflict from spreading throughout the

10:02

region was a central focus of

10:04

American foreign policy. Everywhere I went

10:06

I found leaders who are determined

10:09

to prevent these have with that

10:11

we're facing now from spreading. Doing

10:14

everything possible to deter

10:16

escalation. Prevent a

10:19

wise and. He

10:21

was-in all around from country to country,

10:23

not only talking to leaders, that country

10:25

be talking to leaders who could talk

10:27

to people like the Iranians and these

10:29

militants saw. In Yemen, I Hezbollah

10:31

in Southern Lebanon, In Iraq In

10:34

Syria All these people who are

10:36

stirring the pot and starting to

10:38

attack Us forces to try to

10:40

tamp down on the possibility that

10:42

this could expand and will be

10:45

seen. Since then, I continued strikes

10:47

by the Who, the militants in

10:49

Yemen targeting Western shipping and the

10:51

states respond militarily and now or

10:54

a striker in Northern Jordan that

10:56

has resulted in American deaths and

10:58

as you mentioned, Sarah is going

11:00

to lead to American reprisals. The

11:02

question is how big and how

11:05

much as pulls the United States

11:07

further into once is looking more

11:09

and more like a regional complex.

11:11

Isn't the same time? is trying. To make sure

11:13

this doesn't spread in terms of the

11:16

conflict, the American acts doesn't make that

11:18

worse. There has to be a response

11:20

asmir response and of for American public

11:22

opinions sake as well as to act

11:24

as. A deterrent against this happening

11:26

again and because. There's a lot of

11:28

political pressure on President Biden at the moment

11:31

coming from certain Republicans who are saying it

11:33

is. it is weakness it is in acts

11:35

in that caused this to happen in the

11:38

first place. that they're America hasn't been aggressive

11:40

enough to act as a deterrent against these

11:42

and militant groups daring to try and strike

11:44

American forces. Yeah, it's interesting you say there

11:47

has to be response to the eminent as

11:49

a understand why Santa Mums as he sure

11:51

you're right but. Because I'm in

11:53

in the doesn't actually have to Their response:

11:55

doing nothing was an option. As an option

11:57

they've now ruled out of the kind of

11:59

brew. in doing something. But I think

12:01

a lot of foreign policy experts might

12:03

say that the big risk for

12:06

the president now is that American

12:08

domestic politics turn this into something

12:11

that is more serious

12:13

than it would otherwise be. That's the

12:15

danger of an election year. We're

12:17

joined by Christiane Amanpour. I should say in the

12:20

interests of full disclosure, as they say, that I've

12:22

known Christiane often on, actually for

12:24

decades, first meeting her in the Bosnian

12:26

Civil War, where she was

12:29

not only staggeringly brave, but she

12:31

also was the first example

12:33

I ever saw of someone speaking truth to power

12:35

and doing it in a manner that I

12:38

just couldn't be bothered to do. So

12:40

we'd gone, Christiane, at the end of

12:42

a very long day, which had involved

12:44

a helicopter ride at zero altitude almost

12:46

to avoid anti-aircraft fire. And we'd gone

12:49

to the Bosnian Serb headquarters. And you

12:51

then decided to beard

12:54

Radovan Karajic, the leader of the Bosnian Serbs, and

12:56

tell him what an awful man he was. And

12:58

I was just thinking, number one, this is quite

13:00

a brave thing to do because we're at their

13:02

home. But number two, I just wish you wouldn't

13:04

because I wanted to go to bed. Anyway, you've

13:06

been doing that all your life and it's a

13:08

real pleasure to have you on the podcast. Justin,

13:11

thank you very much. That's a really sweet memory,

13:13

a sweet, I don't know, for me anyway.

13:15

And I tell you what, that whole war

13:17

there, which wasn't really a civil war,

13:19

it was a war of ethnic nationalism

13:22

by the Bosnian Serbs led by that

13:24

guy with his patron, you know, Milosevic

13:26

in Yugoslavia, to clear

13:28

out one ethnic group. And

13:30

for me, I had to speak truth to

13:33

power, but also I learned how to be

13:35

truthful, not just neutral. And

13:37

I also brought all that I learned

13:39

in Bosnia, all the way to

13:41

all the war zones and other things I've

13:43

been covering, including now in Ukraine

13:45

and elsewhere. Yeah. Okay.

13:48

So be truthful, but not necessarily

13:50

neutral about Iran and the US

13:52

now. How do you see this?

13:55

What is going on behind the scenes

13:57

and what is the best resolution to. Well

14:01

in the hopes that when odds

14:03

are outdated by events Ah is

14:05

very difficult to see a resolution

14:07

because this entire prices at the

14:10

moment of both the be plenty

14:12

of crises in the past between

14:14

United States are and Iran but

14:16

this particular one is around. What's

14:18

happening in Gaza? Iran is

14:20

using his proxies in that

14:22

region. And they are dotted all over

14:24

or to speak power or whether they're

14:26

truth to the power of the United

14:28

States and Israel. In other words, stop

14:31

the carnage. In Gaza or this is.

14:33

How would they into response now? do?

14:35

I think that they deliberately set out

14:37

to kill American. Forces? I'm not

14:39

sure it's a very big escalations.

14:41

The edo their lives, There has

14:44

been missiles and groans and all

14:46

sorts of things flying around that

14:48

regents between all sorts of different

14:50

senses of gravity. Whether it's the

14:52

Iran backed militias in Syria, any

14:54

robbed of booties school more than

14:56

a militia as you can see

14:58

right now firing actual miss isles

15:00

as shipping in the or in

15:03

the Red Sea, etc. Ah, weather

15:05

is Hezbollah and Israel facing off

15:07

on the Northern Israeli. Border and

15:09

the continued or Israel from Us

15:11

warfare there's going to launch including

15:13

have must still fiery some rockets

15:15

into Israel which means that Israel

15:17

has not met it's more time

15:20

goal of destroying her mosques Saw:

15:22

how is this gonna end? It's

15:24

hard to tell, certainly they are

15:26

baying for more war in some

15:28

quarters in the United States. but

15:30

interestingly it's interesting. The not the my

15:32

the groups and not Donald Trump. They

15:34

don't want war on there was

15:36

they are more isolationists, but it's

15:38

clearly Biden thinks he has to

15:41

do something to a real stabbed

15:43

his deterrence and to ensure that

15:45

no, you know we'll get Old

15:47

Tree a happy Militia actually kills

15:49

American troops without it becoming a

15:51

major houses bell. I am for

15:53

another war in the Middle East

15:55

I would say, and I think

15:57

it's important with this in context.

16:00

The United States hand is

16:02

Iraq. To Iran when it invaded

16:04

and occupied in two thousand and

16:06

three the big winners out of

16:09

the Us war against Iraq in

16:11

two thousand and Three was Iran

16:13

period. End of story. Yeah.

16:15

And and you know that well,

16:17

and it's become obvious to everyone

16:19

since then. But I suppose in

16:22

that context. In. The Post.

16:24

Iraq War Context Incomes:

16:26

Donald Trump. Saying.

16:29

Of that was a mistake. I wouldn't have fought

16:31

it. I had to cope with the

16:33

world as it was then. And love

16:35

of his supporters now say and I had

16:37

this when I was in in i work

16:40

at a few weeks ago saying you know

16:42

what, the world was safer and our relationship

16:44

with Iran was better actually because each side

16:46

knew what the other. Was. Capable of

16:48

doing when Trump was President and and that

16:50

for Biden is a problem isn't even if

16:52

even in a less put to one side

16:54

I see whether or not that's true. It's

16:57

not true and I think we can't put

16:59

that to one side. We absolutely have to

17:02

expect a tell people that that is

17:04

not true the first thing. That. Donald

17:06

Trump did against the advice of

17:08

all his allies. You member macro

17:10

the President went to the White

17:12

House. Embrace Trump, try to persuade

17:14

him don't pull out of the

17:17

Iran Nuclear Deal. This is the

17:19

only. Constraint. We

17:21

have on Iran this of as he

17:23

was an Obama Administration negotiations with at

17:25

least put and Arms control agreement in.

17:28

Place even if you didn't get everything you wanted. From

17:30

Iran Trump pulled out of it t.

17:32

Claim to his people into the. World that

17:34

he was such a genius that he

17:37

would exert maximum pressure. That became the

17:39

slogan of Americans Iran policies are only

17:41

Ron in order that. He would get

17:43

a better deal. It went nowhere. He

17:46

did not get a better deal now

17:48

Iran, which it hadn't been. for all

17:50

these years could according to the americans

17:52

are experts on on this and the

17:54

people who who watch this could be

17:57

very very close to his they wanted

17:59

to developing a nuclear weapon, pulling

18:01

that trigger, rather than just enrichment and

18:04

the like, which they've upped to an

18:06

enormous degree. In addition, Donald

18:08

Trump failed to come to the

18:10

aid of his allies Saudi Arabia

18:12

when Iran with drones attacked their

18:14

main oil

18:17

facility inside Saudi Arabia. He said, no, I'm

18:19

not going to do that. And

18:21

he, I'm not going to support my allies.

18:23

So this is all a bit weird. But

18:25

he did, if you remember, launch

18:27

the attack on Rassam Soleimani, the

18:29

head of the Huz Force of

18:31

the Revolutionary Guard.

18:33

But that wasn't in Iran. It

18:36

was in Iraq. And yes, Trump

18:38

did not attack Iran, even though many

18:40

of his allies had suggested that he

18:42

should because there were even attacks on

18:45

American servicemen and women back then. Christian,

18:47

you know very well that because this

18:49

is a presidential election year, domestic politics

18:52

are interfering with the decisions that the

18:54

president has to make. And this idea

18:56

that Donald Trump puts forward that his

18:59

strong man presence in the White House

19:01

would deter the kind of attack that

19:03

killed American forces at the weekend, whether

19:06

or not that's true, of course. So

19:08

Joe Biden is now faced with trying

19:11

to make a decision that responds to that as

19:13

well as responding to the facts on the ground,

19:15

trying to thread the needle of saying this

19:17

action will look like a deterrent to stop

19:19

other people trying to attack our troops in

19:22

the region. And it will also look like

19:24

vengeance to a certain degree, but not so

19:26

much that it escalates the conflict in the

19:28

region. Is it possible to achieve all of

19:30

those aims? Look,

19:32

I think it's very important for

19:35

your listeners and viewers to understand

19:37

that whatever Donald Trump says is

19:39

not what is the facts. It

19:42

is really important to tell people that

19:44

he has essentially lied to the world

19:46

and to the American people about foreign

19:49

policy and domestic policy for, you know,

19:51

ever since 2015 when he began his

19:53

first campaign for president. And now he's

19:56

coming back saying that I'm the strong

19:58

man, the only People. Who

20:00

that will appease a be polite Pucci

20:02

and people like Kim Jong own people

20:05

like you know all those people who

20:07

easy I was using paying for it

20:09

is all those people who is expressed

20:12

you know respect for and so I

20:14

think that yes President Biden if it

20:16

was me and is not me thank

20:19

goodness so as to make this very

20:21

very difficult decision I would be very

20:23

troubled by. The as I said

20:25

it earlier. the baying for. A War

20:28

on Iran by certain quarters of

20:30

the extreme right wing. In Congress

20:32

at the same time having to do

20:34

something to as I said, Detour itself.

20:36

I don't want to say what it will.

20:38

Be because I don't know and at but

20:41

I do think yes, he has a digital

20:43

needle to thread on. I think the fact

20:45

that it's happening in an election year is

20:47

difficult, but more to the point I think

20:50

it's not even the election. Yes, For

20:52

me anyway as a as a

20:54

foreign policy of and unsuitable

20:56

award journalists. It's that there's so

20:58

much more in the region now

21:00

they don't know which way to

21:03

zoc their know what to do

21:05

right now. And a not only

21:07

that, you have Donald Trump and

21:09

his allies nixing a board a

21:11

deal that was about to pass

21:13

between the Democrats and and the

21:15

Republicans Which means the Ukraine will

21:17

not get that the weapons it

21:19

needs to actually defend not just

21:21

it's own self and it's own

21:23

democracies, but our democracy and and

21:25

Us national. Security. So this is

21:27

a very very complex and very

21:30

dangerous moment and it is a

21:32

real problem that is being. Models.

21:35

And fake news by by

21:38

the mega when. Now we

21:40

definitely need stoked. By the southern border in the

21:42

way it's being tied into American foreign policy. But just

21:44

before we did, let me ask you this. Sticking with

21:46

Iran and this is a genuine query. I don't know

21:48

the answer to this. When the

21:50

Pentagon is planning some kind.

21:53

Of retaliatory military strike? Is it

21:55

possible at the same time for

21:57

diplomats to be talking to the

21:59

leadership in. Iran and saying, we're

22:01

going to have to take action, you've forced our

22:04

hand, this will

22:06

happen, but please do not

22:08

retaliate. Understand that this is

22:10

us responding to the fact that our troops

22:12

have been killed, this is not us trying

22:14

to escalate the conflict. And can you be

22:16

talking to them trying to calm things down

22:18

at the same time as you're escalating your

22:21

military action? Look, I don't

22:23

know because I'm not in the room, but I do know

22:25

that the Iranians have said, if you attack us,

22:27

whatever you tell us about not wanting a war,

22:29

and remember, well, we'll get to

22:31

this in a minute, the US keeps saying we

22:33

don't want another war with Iran, but if you

22:35

attack us, we're going to retaliate. I mean, that's

22:37

what they've said publicly. What happens,

22:40

what the reaction is from the United States and

22:42

then from Iran, we just don't know yet. But

22:45

it is a very, very difficult situation. And

22:47

there are many experts who are

22:49

calling for proportionality.

22:52

And again, remember that Donald Trump did

22:55

not want to attack Iran when many

22:57

on his right flank said that he

22:59

should over various things. And all the

23:01

way back to the George W. Bush

23:03

administration, when again, Israel and others and

23:08

his own right wing were urging him to

23:10

attack Iran, remember, it was going to be

23:12

Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, you know, and and

23:15

he didn't, because they didn't

23:17

think that that was going to raise

23:20

the security of the American people, national

23:22

security. And let's just not forget, it's

23:25

one thing to be hitting non

23:27

state actors, the Houthis, for instance,

23:29

in Yemen and their bases, the

23:31

Iran backed militias, wherever they may

23:33

be in Iraq, in Syria

23:35

and elsewhere. It's

23:37

another thing to attack a sovereign

23:40

nation with a big military and

23:42

a huge country. And I'm sure

23:45

President Biden is looking at, you

23:47

know, weeks of attacking bases in

23:50

in in Yemen, and seeing no

23:52

response and no no, you

23:54

know, no end to the to the Houthis action.

23:57

So if they having trouble with the Houthis,

23:59

you can imagine that. how it's going to be

24:01

trying to direct firepower to Iran. Look, if

24:03

you want me to bet, I would

24:05

say they're going to choose some kind of other route.

24:08

I may be wrong. But

24:10

since 1979, when the Islamic

24:12

Republic came and basically

24:14

cited America as its enemy, member

24:16

of the Great Satan, America

24:19

has never struck Iran and vice versa. Iran

24:21

has never struck America. So it

24:23

would be a massive new war in the Middle

24:25

East. You know Iran well,

24:27

obviously, and your background,

24:29

your heritage. How

24:32

rational are the

24:34

Iranian leadership? How open

24:36

do you think to

24:39

the world of diplomacy

24:41

and pressure? Very

24:43

rational. I think they're very rational. And you've

24:45

seen that in 46 years. Not

24:48

the politics most of the West likes, but

24:51

they are about survival of their regime

24:53

and the projection

24:55

of whatever power and influence they

24:57

can. So in that regard,

25:01

they would rather survive

25:03

than have any kind of existential

25:05

threat posed on them. Christian,

25:08

you brought up Donald Trump, or we did or

25:11

someone did, and he always comes in to every

25:13

conversation we ever have on an America. I'm conscious

25:15

you've only got two or three more minutes with

25:17

us. I just want to ask you, you've been

25:19

quite outspoken in the past about how Donald Trump

25:22

should be regarded. It looks as if he is

25:24

going to be the nominee from the Republicans. It

25:26

looks as if there is going to be a

25:29

long campaign now, and all of

25:31

us, the BBC, CNN, everyone

25:33

has got to work out how

25:35

to treat him. But

25:38

where do we start, do you think? What are the kind

25:40

of first principles? Well, the

25:42

first thing I think we need to

25:44

do is be truthful, not neutral. This

25:46

is not an equal fight between the

25:48

candidate on the Republican side and the

25:50

candidate on the Democratic side. It is

25:52

not an equal political base. One

25:55

is all about lies and

25:58

conspiracy theories. That's just what he does. You

26:00

know, he's been indicted for

26:02

an insurrection that was aimed

26:04

at violently overthrowing the peaceful

26:07

and legitimate election in the United States in

26:09

2020. That in

26:11

itself, some people believe, should be disqualifying.

26:14

That's the 14th Amendment that a lot

26:16

of people are struggling with.

26:19

But on the other side, I think what we

26:21

have to do as journalists, and we're journalists, we

26:23

cannot do all sides are equal. We

26:26

cannot do neutrality. We cannot do on

26:28

the one hand, on the other hand,

26:30

we have to be absolutely fact and

26:33

evidence based and point out what

26:35

he doesn't says and what the

26:37

effects are and point out the

26:39

Biden record and what the effects are. And right

26:41

now, in terms of domestic

26:43

policy, look, it's really

26:45

tricky overseas right now. I obviously

26:47

understand that Biden is in a

26:49

big bind for the moment over

26:51

Gaza, over certainly over Ukraine, if

26:53

the Republicans don't give the

26:56

weapons, but he's in a big bind. But

26:58

on most of the other policies that he has set

27:01

his mind to, he's had successful legislation,

27:03

he's worked in a bipartisan way

27:05

when it's possible. He tried to

27:07

do, you know, even irritating his

27:10

own left flank to do a

27:12

bipartisan border deal if the Republicans

27:15

Trump pressured even the Senate, the

27:17

so-called sensible Republicans to

27:19

drop it because he wants to run

27:21

on immigration chaos. So I think

27:23

we have to point those things out. And I do not

27:26

think that we can just give this

27:28

person a platform. Don't forget, this is a

27:30

person who wants to shut us all down too.

27:32

He does not want to hear the truth. He

27:35

wants to demonize us as well. So I

27:37

think we have to be incredibly knowledgeable,

27:40

cognizant, aware, and have the

27:42

courage of our journalistic convictions

27:44

to tell it as it

27:47

is. And you

27:49

know, everybody was so excited. Remember during 2019 and

27:52

before that Trump had met Kim

27:54

Jong Un and maybe there was going to be

27:56

a ratcheting down of tensions. I mean, she

27:58

told me it was a... complete debacle, the

28:01

Hanoi summit, which we all covered,

28:03

because there was zero follow-through. Trump

28:05

is about performance, and

28:08

his MAGA people are about

28:10

performance. That is the analysis

28:12

of Republicans on the old

28:14

Republican guard and moderate Republicans.

28:16

That is what they do. They're not interested

28:18

in policy. They're interested in politics. And as

28:20

long as we report that, that's

28:22

what we do, but we can't pretend

28:25

that the current house, for instance, is

28:27

interested in policy, even immigration policy. They're

28:29

interested in politics and in power and

28:31

in performance. Christian, you told me before

28:33

we started, you had a hard out,

28:36

as they say in broadcasting terms, and we've

28:38

reached that hard out. So I'm going to,

28:40

I'm so frightened of you and there are

28:43

consequences of messing you around that

28:45

I'm going to say. I'll do one more

28:47

question from Sarah. Sarah, have you got another?

28:50

Christian, we said we would return to

28:53

immigration and the way it's being tied

28:55

into domestic politics with Republicans in the

28:57

house insisting that they won't fund Ukraine

28:59

and possibly even dragging what's happening into

29:01

the Middle East around a deal on

29:03

the border. But this is one of the

29:05

most intractable issues that there are in American

29:07

politics trying to sort out immigration.

29:11

How much worse is it when it is

29:13

now being drawn into these other international crises?

29:16

So much worse. And the truth

29:18

is, you're right, you know, there has been, there

29:20

have been bipartisan plans to solve

29:22

this each and every time they've

29:25

been torpedoed by politics. And

29:28

it is a big problem, obviously. It's

29:30

a huge problem, not just for the

29:32

United States, which is very visible, but

29:34

all over Europe is a huge problem.

29:36

And it's going to get worse because

29:38

of climate, because of economic fact, all

29:40

the push factors in all the countries

29:42

that we deal with. It is immigration,

29:44

migration. Even here in Britain, you've got the

29:47

debacle of the attempt to deport people

29:49

to Rwanda, which, you know, I mean,

29:51

come on. You can see that the

29:53

politicians are desperate because they deal with

29:56

this politics rather than policy. And

29:58

I'm a person who follows covers

30:00

policy. I'm really not a political reporter.

30:02

So I'm really interested in seeing solutions,

30:05

seeing real world solutions

30:08

and bipartisan attempts to

30:11

solve these things. And

30:14

so now that it's gone

30:16

into the war zones and linked

30:18

to, I mean, it's madness. I

30:20

mean, this is an existential

30:23

crisis for all of us. If Putin

30:25

wins in Ukraine, which

30:28

is not off the cards right now, two

30:30

years into this war, nearly at the two

30:32

year anniversary, this is going

30:34

to open a can of geopolitical

30:37

worms that we can't

30:39

even begin to start imagining. It's

30:42

really an affront and a

30:44

defeat of democracy. It's huge.

30:47

And these guys, do they even know where to

30:50

find Ukraine on a map? I'm

30:52

sorry. It's just not as somebody

30:54

Adam Kinzinger, former Republican, former military

30:56

vet said to me yesterday, the

30:58

Republican Party, particularly the MAGA wing,

31:01

it is not a serious party

31:03

right now. And I'm not being

31:05

political. I'm just being analytical. Well,

31:07

Christian, the sheer breadth of what we've talked to

31:10

you about, I think illustrates everybody just quite

31:12

how busy you are covering all

31:14

of this all around the world. So we really

31:16

do have to let you go. But we are

31:18

genuinely grateful that you were able to join us

31:20

on America. It was a pleasure. Thank you, Sarah.

31:22

Thank you, Justin. Yeah, you're as feisty as you were

31:24

all those years ago in Bosnia, Christian. Never

31:27

slow down. Never slow down.

31:29

See you. Bye. Bye. Well,

31:40

Sarah, a lot to go on there.

31:42

Number one, I mean, my concern, Look,

31:46

I mean, we didn't have time to go

31:48

into this. And Anyway, Christian would have bitten

31:50

my head off if I'd mentioned it. But

31:52

It's not just Trump. It's all Trump's supporters.

31:54

And I Know you've picked this up as

31:56

well. You Talk to perfectly reasonable people who

31:58

don't. Maybe concentrate on foreign. Affairs. But

32:00

but who genuinely think that America

32:02

was safer when Trump was president?

32:05

and they're not going to be

32:07

convinced frankly, by kind of lessons?

32:09

Quite complex lessons about recent diplomacy

32:11

and and recent history. And it

32:13

just seems to me that for

32:15

all of us as broadcasters in

32:18

a way, that's that's the problem.

32:20

Here and I see it. They're not america list

32:22

as either so they want them he actress and

32:25

breaking down vault the fact that the situation are

32:27

but yeah I picked up. Exactly the same

32:29

thing over the last couple of years

32:31

and is born of the historical. Accident.

32:34

That. There were no conflicts in

32:36

which share America.brawl during the time that

32:38

Donald Trump was President and so he.

32:40

Is able to say it's I. Kept

32:42

to out of any of these

32:44

wars I had no wars on.

32:46

The only president is seventy two

32:48

years I didn't have any was

32:50

while simultaneously simplifying foreign policy to

32:52

the point where he can say

32:54

I project a strong image around

32:56

the world. And that acts as a

32:58

deterrent. Jill Biden doesn't So he's He's

33:01

playing into the image of both of

33:03

the man and and oversimplifying it in

33:05

foreign policy terms. But it's something that

33:07

people can understand. And you know, foreign

33:09

policy rarely play as much of a

33:11

part in domestic electoral politics, but but

33:14

horned down to the at. It's.

33:16

Something that people can digest as they

33:18

think about what America projects in the

33:20

world. And that is something that. American

33:22

voters care about. so I mean I

33:24

think it's it. It may not be

33:26

accurate, but it is a clever strategy

33:28

from Donald Trump which is to a

33:30

large extent working. Yeah, the other issues

33:32

of Biden of Courses is electorally from

33:34

the list. His problems: Who's already got

33:36

this problem with with Gaza With people

33:38

who think that is taken the wrong

33:40

cause essential in backing Israel or on

33:42

Gaza but more widely as well that

33:44

what we call the progressive Left, on

33:46

the left in the Democratic Party and

33:48

a lot of students and others who

33:51

they're desperately I will. Vote for them

33:53

and some key states. this actually

33:55

if is he's seen to attack

33:57

Iran. Or. To do things on

33:59

the. Things of which they disapprove. A

34:01

kind of adds to that that difficulty friend

34:03

as an as. Yet. Is being

34:06

interrupted all the time when he makes

34:08

them a campaign. Speeches and events by

34:10

and. Pro Palestinian protesters who are air

34:12

want him to start calling for a

34:14

ceasefire and pay more attention to the

34:16

humanitarian consequences of what's happening in Gaza.

34:18

They feel that that's being ignored by

34:21

the White House snap of course, and

34:23

they would say this, wouldn't they? But

34:25

if you listen to the National Security

34:27

Council spokesperson or people talking for the

34:29

Pentagon, they're very. Insistent that electoral politics,

34:31

opinion polls, any of that kind of

34:33

thing do not come to plays. When

34:36

they're making decisions about military actions that

34:38

they're looking at what's happening on the

34:40

ground, what's the right thing for American

34:42

forces as weighing up obviously the diplomatic

34:44

consequences of it, but not thinking about

34:46

politics. but it's impossible in the year

34:48

like this to look at what's happening

34:50

and for us and. Okay

35:00

folks Moran as in the house and

35:02

I say that with enormous joy because

35:04

the last time I say of our

35:06

anywhere in a hotel in Atlanta Atlanta

35:08

classes yes. As I've I was I learned

35:10

of the last ice be saying Atlanta. Atlanta

35:12

here anyway. says be the best You gave

35:14

his voice night last week. Thank you very

35:16

much for that but is so good to

35:18

have you back live. You are so busy

35:20

on a whole range of things, not as

35:22

Americans seem. Things it is fair to say

35:24

isn't it. Is fair to say. And

35:27

yeah so I can attest back from America and

35:29

well off I saw you. I was in Coffee

35:31

County and I guess back from across the county

35:33

which we need to talk about that was really

35:35

interesting and people have more about that and the

35:37

panorama with day and then I guess that's the

35:39

case in his knee poker series I've been doing

35:41

which is called why do you Hate Me where

35:44

each episode I investigate a different extraordinary case of

35:46

online hey. And the season is the one

35:48

you doing with particular relevance to the

35:50

United States tells is not only about

35:52

this enormously interesting and and frankly most

35:54

terrifying individual case, but also I think

35:57

something about the United States writ large.

35:59

The let's start with what it is

36:01

to to just the facts of what

36:03

you've looked. Admire him investigate. So

36:05

I was schooling on my i get lots

36:07

and lots semesters often lovely ones from America

36:10

is often not Said official concern shows and

36:12

I scrolling through and I had a message

36:14

from a mangled Stewart's and Sue It said

36:16

to me something along the lines of hi

36:18

my on earth I became interested in speaking

36:20

he i'm a survivor of the Las Vegas

36:22

shooting that happened and twenty seventeen and people

36:25

might remember that seating and happened at at

36:27

a music festival am it with a man

36:29

Could Stephen paddock seating people out of a

36:31

hotel window and it was actually the deadliest

36:33

mass shooting by single com and. In Us

36:36

history today am it with a second

36:38

is terrifying events and this man stewart

36:40

his from Northern Ireland with their on

36:42

his honeymoon and when he was that

36:45

he was caught up in this attack

36:47

and luckily him and his wife would

36:49

both. Okay they survived and he

36:51

came out time and he told me soon

36:53

as message he said to me i won't

36:56

tell you about the abuse I experience but

36:58

also about how I fell down the rabbit

37:00

hole with regards to the shooting I lived

37:02

three and so I went out to South

37:05

Us to talk to him and he explained

37:07

to me how ten social media he stopped

37:09

posting because he's worried about gun control in

37:11

America which something we talk about law and

37:14

he as a as some of Northern Ireland

37:16

found it really hard to understand why does

37:18

not stricter gun control in America. Owes.

37:20

The way I could vamp cousins and I

37:22

hope so far away from home. There wasn't

37:25

much supporter and the incident at home so

37:27

my connection to America was fire feel for

37:29

social media platforms that if is years and

37:31

so for me it was just spit know

37:34

your feelings on raw opinions towards things. Cities

37:36

outpacing saying oh I'm this is all about

37:38

where did in a while you guys allow

37:40

that and obviously he's and in I met

37:42

by quite fierce opposition by some people in

37:45

America who really care about them in their

37:47

right right to bear arms, eccentric that dress

37:49

an unsafe. He ended up getting have quite

37:51

bad trolling and and then he was really

37:53

struggling to process of thought that at that

37:55

point and still to be honest now we

37:58

don't really know why this man Stephen. Dick

38:00

good what he did it. It was

38:02

really a really motiveless sheeting. Say to speak, it

38:04

was it. Though there was no clear and obvious

38:07

reason that he had done this and and stood

38:09

on that really hard to cope with, basically because

38:11

he was miles from the Us where this had

38:13

happened, so there was no one could really talk

38:15

states, he tends to social media and he starts.

38:18

Hundred at for answers. What really happened because

38:20

there was no move on? The answer is

38:22

just pull that every thread the see which

38:24

one made the most sense be which one

38:27

probably related to your thera the best And

38:29

that's how you fall into conspiracy theorist. And

38:31

that is denied the mistake you made

38:33

since I searched. For a framework

38:36

that said that explains which

38:38

at a psychological level an

38:40

internal head level. Will.

38:42

Do I sleep for our laws? Such I I

38:44

release could understand six point of the and

38:46

I at think of I'd lived through that

38:48

sitting particularly that one last you don't understand

38:50

why this person has some what they've done

38:52

the you would tend to social media and

38:54

that way to look for answers. I think

38:56

that there's some times and we talked about

38:58

this quite lot but this kind of stigma

39:00

around conspiracy theories that in or you know

39:02

to believe them you have to be silly

39:04

or steal it or not really get this

39:06

title. Run the Pleasantville sat on have a nice. This

39:09

is a very intelligent, very articulate, very

39:11

kind man. He was trying to make

39:13

sense of this traumatic thing that happened

39:16

to him and he turns the social

39:18

media francis and it's not clear what

39:20

happened and say he starts aching This

39:23

one accounts in particular which goes by

39:25

the name of Weg Oag which is

39:27

a pseudonym and it's picture is Nostradamus

39:30

the sixteenth century philosopher and he thought

39:32

following it and this account with putting

39:34

out those documents, police footage or other

39:36

drops. Evidence drops that the police were releasing.

39:39

It also starting to spin these into conspiracy

39:41

theories. Was this actually a government plus of

39:43

some kind? Actually, this was feet. This was

39:46

used to cover up the assassination of the

39:48

Saudi prince or an attempted assassination of Saudi

39:50

prince or was actually helicopters above that was

39:52

shooting people. It wasn't the man in the

39:54

written or was it that that was a

39:57

plans to allow the seating to happen or

39:59

utterly absurd. The had it was never really

40:01

there, someone else did the seating and F

40:03

B I agent and it was all part

40:05

of an attempt to change in a gun

40:08

Rights Know this kinds of stuff and unite

40:10

the most extreme conspiracy theories. The crisis actor

40:12

stuff like believing that you are paid to

40:14

be there or that it was stays in

40:16

some way. It didn't go as far as

40:18

I said. it very much commits to it

40:20

that this was a government plot and he

40:22

was obsessed with this accounts. He told me

40:25

about hours and hours on end sitting in

40:27

his living room in Northern Ireland's obsessing over

40:29

this American account. He has no idea who

40:31

he is and he says scrolling through and

40:33

he's a he's printing off because he's worried

40:36

it's gonna get taken down and he some

40:38

he thinks he's above the conspiracy so soon

40:40

after a year or so realizes this become

40:42

unhealthy, has become paranoid, very isolated and he

40:45

decides to get help and it and has

40:47

therapy in counseling and that really helps in

40:49

process is torment and kind of except that

40:51

maybe he can ever know why this man

40:54

did it and conspiracy theories already a sort

40:56

have sex they're not going to ultimately resolve

40:58

this and that for hims. The conspiracy

41:00

theories while they caused harm upon away as

41:02

a distress they also were a strange ways

41:05

to him of making sense that he now

41:07

sees where he is now as that he

41:09

might not be so so of a piece

41:11

of they all had he not. Kind.

41:14

Of gone through that process of questioning it but.

41:16

What triggered the questioning? Of where he

41:18

was good. Timing Crossing the conspiracy or as

41:20

questioning the conspiracy was when he started to

41:22

think hang on A lot of these narratives

41:25

are kind of conflicting with each other, they

41:27

don't actually make sense and maybe I need

41:29

to look at how I'm feeling right now

41:31

because I think maybe I'm using these of

41:33

my crotch to get saying that it will

41:36

at my crush they would think I'd hold

41:38

on to but actually. Maybe.

41:41

This. Isn't actually helping me in a way that

41:43

I thought it was. Help Me. And it's not

41:45

helping me find the truth out because I'm never

41:47

going to know if any of these plots happened.

41:49

And actually all of the evidence available does point

41:52

to the fact that this man, for whatever reason,

41:54

decided to commit suicide shots of violence. The I

41:56

mention that because facts. Helps

41:59

him and. I'm not sure that facts

42:01

always do help with conspiracy theories. I think

42:03

sometimes people are just not interested or also

42:06

they're involved in the conspiracy theory for

42:08

reasons that are not going to be

42:11

sorted out by them just being bombarded

42:13

by the likes of you with actual

42:15

information. It doesn't work like that. I

42:17

completely agree. So I actually think that the

42:20

what is often besides the point is actually

42:22

the why. And in Stuart's case, the evidence

42:24

only worked when his frame of mind was

42:26

different. And I think that's what's crucial here

42:29

is that it took his family and friends

42:31

and people saying, hang on a second, you're

42:33

becoming really isolated, you're becoming very anxious, you're

42:35

becoming very paranoid. Let's step away from this.

42:37

And it was only on stepping away from

42:40

it and actually sharing. And this is what

42:42

happens so often I find is that people

42:44

have very legitimate questions and concerns or very

42:46

legitimate things that they are terrified about. And

42:48

if you can't make sense of a shooting,

42:51

and I really understand this, I think if

42:53

I was caught up in something like that,

42:55

I'd want to know what happened because I'd

42:57

feel like I could stop it

42:59

happening to me again. Because how can you prevent

43:01

it happening again, if you don't know what happened

43:03

in the first place? So I think, oh, okay,

43:05

right, that does make sense. Because we can't make

43:07

sense of random acts of violence. But the same

43:09

thing happened with 9-11. And still does. I mean, there's

43:11

always you know, better than I do. There's a whole

43:14

conspiracy theory set of conspiracy theories about 9-11 and

43:16

people who are absolutely still convinced by them.

43:18

But again, a lot of it because of

43:21

the psychological need to

43:24

have some sort of explanation

43:27

that is explicable to them. And

43:29

that's it though, the psychological need and

43:31

for Stuart, that psychological need shifted because

43:33

he managed to quell it in

43:35

a different way, which was actually talking

43:38

about the traumatic experience he'd had and

43:40

processing and making sense of that, rather

43:42

than kind of using the conspiracy theories

43:45

to quell his distress, I think. The

43:47

whole of this podcast series is about

43:49

how when we take this stuff offline,

43:52

understanding is possible and forgiveness is possible

43:54

and resolution is possible and we're going

43:56

to do it left, you know, in touch

43:58

friends like It

44:01

was brilliant and now they're sort of

44:03

messaging each other and messaging me and

44:08

it's sort of one of the most, everything I

44:10

investigated was so horrible. It's exposing

44:12

the horrible stuff but then saying, oh look it can have

44:14

a happy ending sometimes, not for the time. In all of

44:16

the episodes I think it does have a happy ending. Okay,

44:18

how do people hear the whole

44:21

podcast? You can go to BBC Sounds where

44:23

of course you can listen to America's and you can

44:25

listen to Why Do You Hate Me. The first two

44:27

episodes are available now and then it will be available

44:29

weekly on a Wednesday so when you're missing America's you

44:31

can listen to it first and then you can listen

44:33

to America's. Thanks Mariela. Thank

44:35

you so much. Now

44:45

one last thing before we go. We've got

44:47

just over nine months until Americans go to

44:49

the polls. The race for the White House

44:51

is already well underway. It's going to get

44:54

really, really busy. So if you want to try

44:56

and keep track of what actually matters in the

44:58

race and why, the BBC is launching a newsletter

45:00

to keep you informed and who else would

45:02

be the author of such a newsletter

45:04

other than our very own Anthony Zertner?

45:06

Exactly. If you're sitting here listening to

45:08

me on America's to say, I really

45:11

want to have Anthony's words sent directly

45:13

to my email inbox, this is your

45:15

chance. Each week I'm going to be

45:17

offering relatively briefly my takeaways

45:19

on what is important in the US presidential

45:21

campaign for that week. But to filter out

45:23

and what to focus on, not just what's

45:25

going on here in the United States, but

45:28

what happens here in the United States, how

45:30

it impacts the entire world because the US

45:32

presidential election really is a global

45:34

news story as well. I'm also

45:36

going to be plucking articles that

45:38

are written by my colleagues, including

45:40

you Sarah at our first issue

45:43

this week to focus on so

45:45

that they have further reading to

45:47

learn more about this campaign and

45:49

the issues behind it. Now, politics

45:51

can be serious business. It

45:53

can also be somewhat fun. And I'm going to

45:55

try to make this a fun email as well,

45:58

not necessarily always talking about Taylor Swift, but. She

46:01

is mentioned actually in this initial newsletter that

46:03

goes out this week. So can I get

46:05

a little Taylor Swift bit where I get

46:07

to contribute some Swissy news each week? Our

46:10

special Taylor Swift correspondent, absolutely. I think that we

46:12

could make that happen. But I'm

46:14

also going to be answering reader questions

46:17

just like Mark from Dublin, but in

46:19

text form. And you

46:21

can write to me and

46:23

I'll be reviewing this inbox

46:26

and hopefully get into your

46:28

questions. The email address is

46:30

uselectionunspun at bbc.co.uk. And

46:35

you can find the link to sign

46:37

up to the newsletter in the description

46:39

of this program on BBC Sound. If

46:41

you prefer the spoken word, you can

46:43

always send your questions to America by

46:46

WhatsApping us on plus four four three

46:48

three zero one two three nine four

46:50

eight oh or americast at bbc.co.uk or

46:52

hashtag America on social media platforms. And

46:54

of course you can hear America first

46:56

and in full as a podcast on

46:59

BBC Sounds. See you all later. Bye.

47:02

America from BBC News.

47:06

Thanks for listening to America from

47:08

BBC News. You can subscribe to

47:10

this podcast on the free BBC

47:12

Sounds app, which is now available

47:14

worldwide.

Rate

From The Podcast

Americast

The authoritative twice-weekly US news and politics podcast from BBC News, Americast investigates the social and cultural issues that define America today.Is Joe Biden too old to win another go in the White House? What does Donald Trump’s latest criminal charge mean for the Republican campaign? And why have issues such as LGBT rights, global warming and the war effort in Ukraine become so divisive across the US political spectrum? From foreign policy to pop culture, Americast keeps you up to date and in the know about the stories that matter with on-the-ground insights from right across the US.Americast is hosted by trusted journalists including the BBC’s North America editor Sarah Smith, North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher, presenter Justin Webb, and disinformation and social media correspondent, Marianna Spring. Joined by special guests each week such as former chief medical adviser to the president, Dr Anthony Fauci, former FBI director James Comey, CNN anchor and author Jake Tapper, Succession actress J Smith-Cameron, and Suruthi Bala and Hannah Maguire from podcast RedHanded, they look at America through an international lens, trying to make sense of the increasingly polarised political debate.Each week on Americast, Marianna Spring also brings listeners the latest update on BBC Undercover Voters, the award-winning investigation into the content that is recommended to US voters on social media. Marianna has created undercover voters – multiple social media accounts belonging to different characters who sit across the US political divide. By tracking the content that is pushed at each of them, this investigation will cover a turbulent time for US politics with speculation over a Trump bid for the presidency and Biden facing domestic and international challenges.GET IN TOUCH:• Join our online community: https://discord.gg/qSrxqNcmRB• Send us a message or voice note via WhatsApp to +44 330 123 9480• Email [email protected]• Or use #AmericastFind out more about our award-winning "undercover voters" here: bbc.in/3lFddSF.

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features