Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
BBC Sounds, music, radio,
0:03
podcasts. Okay, Sarah, here's
0:06
a question for you. I've
0:08
been hearing rumours of a
0:10
democratic plot involving Taylor Swift,
0:12
the Super Bowl-bound Kansas City
0:14
Chiefs, and Vivek Ramaswamy as
0:17
our resident Taylor Swift expert. Can you explain to
0:19
me what the heck is going on? Yeah,
0:21
well, you forgot that actually there's a tie
0:23
between Taylor Swift and the Pentagon as well
0:25
who are acting in concert against Donald Trump.
0:28
Let me try to explain this remarkable
0:30
story to you. It's
0:32
a brand new conspiracy theory that says,
0:34
well, firstly, that Taylor Swift and her
0:36
boyfriend, Travis Kelsey, who plays for the
0:39
Kansas City Chiefs, are not a real
0:41
couple. They're just pretending. It
0:43
has also been orchestrated by elements of the
0:45
deep state to get the Kansas City Chiefs
0:47
into the Super Bowl to give more
0:49
prominence to the couple in
0:51
preparation for them coming out and
0:54
endorsing Joe Biden for president together
0:56
as the most glittering celebrity endorsement
0:58
that you could ever possibly find,
1:00
particularly, of course, if the Kansas
1:03
City Chiefs win the Super Bowl. I imagine
1:05
that's being fixed as we speak at
1:07
the moment. Now, this might sound absolutely
1:09
ridiculous for the very good reason that
1:11
it is absolutely ridiculous, but Vivek
1:14
Ramaswamy, who some people were taking seriously
1:16
in his bid to become the Republican
1:18
nominee for president, he's now dropped out
1:20
and endorsed Donald Trump. He's been tweeting
1:22
about this, suggesting he thinks it's actually
1:25
true. I mean, he disappeared down a
1:27
conspiracy theory rabbit hole a while ago.
1:29
But I mean, this is really quite
1:31
something to believe that, yeah, that this
1:33
is the entire thing has been orchestrated
1:36
to give Joe Biden a bump when Taylor
1:38
Swift gets behind him. Isn't the issue with Taylor
1:40
Swift, though, that she has a
1:42
huge social media following and she did tweet,
1:44
didn't she, about registering to vote? And a
1:46
lot of people did register to vote on
1:49
that day. Or am I making that up? And
1:51
mine are going down some terrible rabbit hole.
1:53
But I mean, basically, in other words, she
1:56
does have a kind of power via social
1:58
media that back in the day. Beyonce
2:02
or various other stars who've
2:05
backed candidates in the past didn't have. I
2:07
think you're absolutely right, Justin. It's not just
2:09
that she can reach people on social media.
2:11
It's the fact that Taylor Swift was kind
2:14
of the first social media superstar in
2:16
that she has this direct link to
2:18
her fan base and her followers.
2:21
She speaks to them, it feels kind
2:23
of intimately over social media. She's
2:25
much closer to them than other
2:28
superstars are with their following. She
2:30
tells them to register to vote, or if she does
2:32
at some point, come out and endorse a candidate. She
2:34
did endorse Joe Biden in 2020. It's
2:37
very possible that a key demographic of young
2:40
voters who might not have been motivated otherwise,
2:42
who might not be very excited, for instance,
2:44
as Joe Biden as a candidate, if
2:47
Tay-Tay says, get out there and vote
2:49
for him, then there's every chance they will
2:51
actually do it because they're so closely bonded
2:53
with their favorite pop star. We
2:55
will move on from Taylor Swift controversies
2:58
on this episode to look at the
3:00
deeply serious question of what's happening in
3:02
the Middle East since three American service
3:04
people were killed at the weekend, what
3:06
America's response is likely to be to
3:08
that. And we'll be talking to the
3:10
veteran CNN journalist, Christiane Amanpour, who knows
3:12
the Middle East intimately well, and she'll
3:14
be giving us her thoughts about
3:16
that. Before we get to that, though, we've
3:18
got a listener question, one for you, I
3:20
think, Anthony. Here is Mark
3:22
in Dublin, who emailed us this excellent
3:24
question. Hello, America's team. I've
3:27
been listening of great interest to your
3:29
coverage of the Republican primaries contest. I
3:32
note that after just two of the 50 states
3:34
have voted for Trump, you appear
3:36
to have written off the sneaky hating. I'm
3:39
assuming every state holds a primary
3:41
vote to pick their nominated candidate
3:43
to represent their party in the
3:46
November presidential election. Therefore,
3:48
the candidate that wins 26 or
3:51
more states goes forward to the November
3:53
election. How can you write off Nikki
3:55
Haley so early on? Well, thanks for
3:57
your question, Mark. And it is a
3:59
good question. As Nikki Haley's people
4:01
will point out, only two states have voted.
4:03
We have 48 more states, plus some territories,
4:05
give or take, that still have to weigh
4:08
in. The challenge is that, one,
4:10
a public opinion poll show
4:12
that Donald Trump is by far
4:14
the most popular candidate among Republican
4:16
voters in all of the upcoming
4:18
states. And if you look at
4:20
these first two states, Iowa
4:23
and New Hampshire, particularly New Hampshire,
4:25
Nikki Haley invested a ton of
4:27
resources, tens of millions of dollars,
4:29
trying to win New Hampshire. She
4:31
campaigned there over and over again.
4:33
The voting demographics of New Hampshire,
4:36
the number of college-educated voters, the
4:38
fact that independent voters could switch
4:40
and vote in the Republican primary,
4:42
the fact that the Republican electorate
4:44
there is somewhat more to the
4:46
middle, all of this set
4:48
up where it was perhaps the best
4:50
state for Nikki Haley, that she had
4:52
the best chance of winning there than
4:55
anything else on the calendar, and she
4:57
still fell short by 11 percentage
4:59
points. So if she couldn't win there, it's
5:01
very hard to look at all these other
5:03
states coming up and see
5:05
any place, even her home state of South
5:08
Carolina, where she has a real
5:10
chance of winning. And a lot of
5:12
these states where she's competing in, if
5:14
she loses even by one percentage point,
5:16
it's a winner-take-all state. So if Donald
5:18
Trump wins that by just a fraction
5:20
of a percent, he will get all
5:22
the delegates and move on, and he
5:24
will just start amassing more and more
5:26
over the course of the weeks ahead
5:28
the delegates necessary to secure the nomination
5:31
for him. So that's kind of why
5:33
we have decided, and I think most
5:35
political experts looking at this have decided,
5:37
that it is going to be a
5:39
very, very uphill climb for Nikki Haley.
5:41
It's not impossible. Something crazy could happen,
5:43
but it is the longest of long
5:45
shots at this point. One of the
5:47
reasons why we shouldn't be entirely sure
5:49
that she's not going to be the candidate is we
5:51
don't know what is going to happen to Donald Trump.
5:53
And I guess that must be her thinking, isn't it?
5:56
That if she can just stay in the race, even if
5:58
she loses these states, as Anthony says, It's almost
6:00
certain that she would lose virtually
6:03
all of the states that are still to vote. But even
6:06
if she were to lose, she would
6:08
still be in the race. And if something
6:10
happened to Donald Trump between now and the
6:12
convention, she could turn, couldn't she, to the
6:15
party and say, look, I am the other
6:17
candidate, so you've got to go to me.
6:19
So there is a kind of, there's a
6:21
reason for her carrying on and for us
6:24
not to entirely dismiss that carrying on. As
6:26
long as she has some money to keep going and
6:29
she enjoys the media attention, there's
6:31
no reason for her to drop
6:33
out unless she has a concern
6:35
that this could totally destroy her
6:37
standing within Donald Trump's movement and
6:39
adversely affect her political prospects going
6:41
forward. But I guess she made
6:43
the calculation that that chip has
6:45
already sailed to some extent and
6:47
she might as well position herself as the
6:49
kind of person who maybe four years from
6:51
now, eight years from now could pick up
6:53
the pieces from Donald Trump's
6:56
movement, fashion a different kind of Republican coalition
6:58
and take the party on. It's
7:00
a risk, obviously, but it's one that she
7:02
seems to have made the decision to take.
7:05
Well, my decision is that it's time, guys,
7:07
that we say welcome
7:10
to America. America,
7:14
America from BBC News.
7:17
Let me start off with two words made
7:19
in America. I'm not running for santa here.
7:21
I'm running for president. I did everything right
7:23
and they indicted me. I can chew and
7:25
walk on at the same time. There is
7:28
no indication of aliens or
7:30
extraterrestrial activity. We will fight the
7:32
woke in education. We will fight the
7:34
woke in the businesses. We will never
7:36
ever surrender to the woke mob. Nobody
7:38
should have to go to jail for
7:40
smoking weed. It's
7:52
Justin in the worldwide headquarters of America's
7:54
in London, England And Sarah Smith.
7:56
They're back in the Washington bureau here
7:58
at the heart of American. Politics
8:00
in Washington, Dc. Beating. Heart
8:02
and it is Anthony sitting next to
8:04
say are also here in Washington Dc
8:07
And in a second we have a
8:09
big into the a Christian Amanpour who
8:11
in case people don't know of her
8:13
is a British Iranian journalist, was the
8:16
Cnn's work for Cnn for decades but
8:18
she is more than that as well.
8:20
She is someone who has worked around
8:23
the world, covered was been bombed and
8:25
source hot but also done a number
8:27
of interviews with people were she has
8:29
herself brought them to account so she.
8:32
Is the kind of person exactly the
8:34
right person to talk to us today
8:36
about America and Iran embassy grub partly
8:38
in Iran. Her father was Iranian, the
8:40
she was born in Britain. She knows
8:42
around wealth and they know how well
8:45
two sets of they will be interesting.
8:47
Sarah non not only because of what
8:49
he says about the United States and
8:51
to Bidens options, etc etc, but also
8:53
because she says all of those things
8:55
with a real knowledge of the area
8:57
and indeed of the country of Iran.
9:00
And. That's what so crucial right now
9:02
is into his should try to anticipate
9:04
what Iran's response will be to whatever
9:06
America does. The we are talking now
9:09
at ten Am in Washington, three Pm
9:11
in London on Wednesday and we anticipate
9:13
that at some point in the near
9:15
future America will take military action. In
9:18
response to the fact that three soldiers
9:20
were killed at the weekend and a
9:22
drone attack that set came from a
9:24
Iranian backed militias, it is inevitable that
9:26
America's gonna have to take action. in
9:29
fact, you Biden said himself. That. We.
9:31
Will respond. We're not entirely sure
9:33
what form that's going to take,
9:35
and the most important thing for
9:37
the White House is to try
9:39
to avoid whatever they do creating
9:42
more conflict in the region. And to
9:44
do that they have to try. To anticipate what around
9:46
response will be and that's why talking to somebody
9:48
who knows the Iranian leadership like to see I
9:50
will be so valuable. Yeah it's a fraught moment
9:53
out of what of eggs i heard her when
9:55
I was traveling with like an earlier this year
9:57
in in the Middle East. Was that preventing the.
10:00
The conflict from spreading throughout the
10:02
region was a central focus of
10:04
American foreign policy. Everywhere I went
10:06
I found leaders who are determined
10:09
to prevent these have with that
10:11
we're facing now from spreading. Doing
10:14
everything possible to deter
10:16
escalation. Prevent a
10:19
wise and. He
10:21
was-in all around from country to country,
10:23
not only talking to leaders, that country
10:25
be talking to leaders who could talk
10:27
to people like the Iranians and these
10:29
militants saw. In Yemen, I Hezbollah
10:31
in Southern Lebanon, In Iraq In
10:34
Syria All these people who are
10:36
stirring the pot and starting to
10:38
attack Us forces to try to
10:40
tamp down on the possibility that
10:42
this could expand and will be
10:45
seen. Since then, I continued strikes
10:47
by the Who, the militants in
10:49
Yemen targeting Western shipping and the
10:51
states respond militarily and now or
10:54
a striker in Northern Jordan that
10:56
has resulted in American deaths and
10:58
as you mentioned, Sarah is going
11:00
to lead to American reprisals. The
11:02
question is how big and how
11:05
much as pulls the United States
11:07
further into once is looking more
11:09
and more like a regional complex.
11:11
Isn't the same time? is trying. To make sure
11:13
this doesn't spread in terms of the
11:16
conflict, the American acts doesn't make that
11:18
worse. There has to be a response
11:20
asmir response and of for American public
11:22
opinions sake as well as to act
11:24
as. A deterrent against this happening
11:26
again and because. There's a lot of
11:28
political pressure on President Biden at the moment
11:31
coming from certain Republicans who are saying it
11:33
is. it is weakness it is in acts
11:35
in that caused this to happen in the
11:38
first place. that they're America hasn't been aggressive
11:40
enough to act as a deterrent against these
11:42
and militant groups daring to try and strike
11:44
American forces. Yeah, it's interesting you say there
11:47
has to be response to the eminent as
11:49
a understand why Santa Mums as he sure
11:51
you're right but. Because I'm in
11:53
in the doesn't actually have to Their response:
11:55
doing nothing was an option. As an option
11:57
they've now ruled out of the kind of
11:59
brew. in doing something. But I think
12:01
a lot of foreign policy experts might
12:03
say that the big risk for
12:06
the president now is that American
12:08
domestic politics turn this into something
12:11
that is more serious
12:13
than it would otherwise be. That's the
12:15
danger of an election year. We're
12:17
joined by Christiane Amanpour. I should say in the
12:20
interests of full disclosure, as they say, that I've
12:22
known Christiane often on, actually for
12:24
decades, first meeting her in the Bosnian
12:26
Civil War, where she was
12:29
not only staggeringly brave, but she
12:31
also was the first example
12:33
I ever saw of someone speaking truth to power
12:35
and doing it in a manner that I
12:38
just couldn't be bothered to do. So
12:40
we'd gone, Christiane, at the end of
12:42
a very long day, which had involved
12:44
a helicopter ride at zero altitude almost
12:46
to avoid anti-aircraft fire. And we'd gone
12:49
to the Bosnian Serb headquarters. And you
12:51
then decided to beard
12:54
Radovan Karajic, the leader of the Bosnian Serbs, and
12:56
tell him what an awful man he was. And
12:58
I was just thinking, number one, this is quite
13:00
a brave thing to do because we're at their
13:02
home. But number two, I just wish you wouldn't
13:04
because I wanted to go to bed. Anyway, you've
13:06
been doing that all your life and it's a
13:08
real pleasure to have you on the podcast. Justin,
13:11
thank you very much. That's a really sweet memory,
13:13
a sweet, I don't know, for me anyway.
13:15
And I tell you what, that whole war
13:17
there, which wasn't really a civil war,
13:19
it was a war of ethnic nationalism
13:22
by the Bosnian Serbs led by that
13:24
guy with his patron, you know, Milosevic
13:26
in Yugoslavia, to clear
13:28
out one ethnic group. And
13:30
for me, I had to speak truth to
13:33
power, but also I learned how to be
13:35
truthful, not just neutral. And
13:37
I also brought all that I learned
13:39
in Bosnia, all the way to
13:41
all the war zones and other things I've
13:43
been covering, including now in Ukraine
13:45
and elsewhere. Yeah. Okay.
13:48
So be truthful, but not necessarily
13:50
neutral about Iran and the US
13:52
now. How do you see this?
13:55
What is going on behind the scenes
13:57
and what is the best resolution to. Well
14:01
in the hopes that when odds
14:03
are outdated by events Ah is
14:05
very difficult to see a resolution
14:07
because this entire prices at the
14:10
moment of both the be plenty
14:12
of crises in the past between
14:14
United States are and Iran but
14:16
this particular one is around. What's
14:18
happening in Gaza? Iran is
14:20
using his proxies in that
14:22
region. And they are dotted all over
14:24
or to speak power or whether they're
14:26
truth to the power of the United
14:28
States and Israel. In other words, stop
14:31
the carnage. In Gaza or this is.
14:33
How would they into response now? do?
14:35
I think that they deliberately set out
14:37
to kill American. Forces? I'm not
14:39
sure it's a very big escalations.
14:41
The edo their lives, There has
14:44
been missiles and groans and all
14:46
sorts of things flying around that
14:48
regents between all sorts of different
14:50
senses of gravity. Whether it's the
14:52
Iran backed militias in Syria, any
14:54
robbed of booties school more than
14:56
a militia as you can see
14:58
right now firing actual miss isles
15:00
as shipping in the or in
15:03
the Red Sea, etc. Ah, weather
15:05
is Hezbollah and Israel facing off
15:07
on the Northern Israeli. Border and
15:09
the continued or Israel from Us
15:11
warfare there's going to launch including
15:13
have must still fiery some rockets
15:15
into Israel which means that Israel
15:17
has not met it's more time
15:20
goal of destroying her mosques Saw:
15:22
how is this gonna end? It's
15:24
hard to tell, certainly they are
15:26
baying for more war in some
15:28
quarters in the United States. but
15:30
interestingly it's interesting. The not the my
15:32
the groups and not Donald Trump. They
15:34
don't want war on there was
15:36
they are more isolationists, but it's
15:38
clearly Biden thinks he has to
15:41
do something to a real stabbed
15:43
his deterrence and to ensure that
15:45
no, you know we'll get Old
15:47
Tree a happy Militia actually kills
15:49
American troops without it becoming a
15:51
major houses bell. I am for
15:53
another war in the Middle East
15:55
I would say, and I think
15:57
it's important with this in context.
16:00
The United States hand is
16:02
Iraq. To Iran when it invaded
16:04
and occupied in two thousand and
16:06
three the big winners out of
16:09
the Us war against Iraq in
16:11
two thousand and Three was Iran
16:13
period. End of story. Yeah.
16:15
And and you know that well,
16:17
and it's become obvious to everyone
16:19
since then. But I suppose in
16:22
that context. In. The Post.
16:24
Iraq War Context Incomes:
16:26
Donald Trump. Saying.
16:29
Of that was a mistake. I wouldn't have fought
16:31
it. I had to cope with the
16:33
world as it was then. And love
16:35
of his supporters now say and I had
16:37
this when I was in in i work
16:40
at a few weeks ago saying you know
16:42
what, the world was safer and our relationship
16:44
with Iran was better actually because each side
16:46
knew what the other. Was. Capable of
16:48
doing when Trump was President and and that
16:50
for Biden is a problem isn't even if
16:52
even in a less put to one side
16:54
I see whether or not that's true. It's
16:57
not true and I think we can't put
16:59
that to one side. We absolutely have to
17:02
expect a tell people that that is
17:04
not true the first thing. That. Donald
17:06
Trump did against the advice of
17:08
all his allies. You member macro
17:10
the President went to the White
17:12
House. Embrace Trump, try to persuade
17:14
him don't pull out of the
17:17
Iran Nuclear Deal. This is the
17:19
only. Constraint. We
17:21
have on Iran this of as he
17:23
was an Obama Administration negotiations with at
17:25
least put and Arms control agreement in.
17:28
Place even if you didn't get everything you wanted. From
17:30
Iran Trump pulled out of it t.
17:32
Claim to his people into the. World that
17:34
he was such a genius that he
17:37
would exert maximum pressure. That became the
17:39
slogan of Americans Iran policies are only
17:41
Ron in order that. He would get
17:43
a better deal. It went nowhere. He
17:46
did not get a better deal now
17:48
Iran, which it hadn't been. for all
17:50
these years could according to the americans
17:52
are experts on on this and the
17:54
people who who watch this could be
17:57
very very close to his they wanted
17:59
to developing a nuclear weapon, pulling
18:01
that trigger, rather than just enrichment and
18:04
the like, which they've upped to an
18:06
enormous degree. In addition, Donald
18:08
Trump failed to come to the
18:10
aid of his allies Saudi Arabia
18:12
when Iran with drones attacked their
18:14
main oil
18:17
facility inside Saudi Arabia. He said, no, I'm
18:19
not going to do that. And
18:21
he, I'm not going to support my allies.
18:23
So this is all a bit weird. But
18:25
he did, if you remember, launch
18:27
the attack on Rassam Soleimani, the
18:29
head of the Huz Force of
18:31
the Revolutionary Guard.
18:33
But that wasn't in Iran. It
18:36
was in Iraq. And yes, Trump
18:38
did not attack Iran, even though many
18:40
of his allies had suggested that he
18:42
should because there were even attacks on
18:45
American servicemen and women back then. Christian,
18:47
you know very well that because this
18:49
is a presidential election year, domestic politics
18:52
are interfering with the decisions that the
18:54
president has to make. And this idea
18:56
that Donald Trump puts forward that his
18:59
strong man presence in the White House
19:01
would deter the kind of attack that
19:03
killed American forces at the weekend, whether
19:06
or not that's true, of course. So
19:08
Joe Biden is now faced with trying
19:11
to make a decision that responds to that as
19:13
well as responding to the facts on the ground,
19:15
trying to thread the needle of saying this
19:17
action will look like a deterrent to stop
19:19
other people trying to attack our troops in
19:22
the region. And it will also look like
19:24
vengeance to a certain degree, but not so
19:26
much that it escalates the conflict in the
19:28
region. Is it possible to achieve all of
19:30
those aims? Look,
19:32
I think it's very important for
19:35
your listeners and viewers to understand
19:37
that whatever Donald Trump says is
19:39
not what is the facts. It
19:42
is really important to tell people that
19:44
he has essentially lied to the world
19:46
and to the American people about foreign
19:49
policy and domestic policy for, you know,
19:51
ever since 2015 when he began his
19:53
first campaign for president. And now he's
19:56
coming back saying that I'm the strong
19:58
man, the only People. Who
20:00
that will appease a be polite Pucci
20:02
and people like Kim Jong own people
20:05
like you know all those people who
20:07
easy I was using paying for it
20:09
is all those people who is expressed
20:12
you know respect for and so I
20:14
think that yes President Biden if it
20:16
was me and is not me thank
20:19
goodness so as to make this very
20:21
very difficult decision I would be very
20:23
troubled by. The as I said
20:25
it earlier. the baying for. A War
20:28
on Iran by certain quarters of
20:30
the extreme right wing. In Congress
20:32
at the same time having to do
20:34
something to as I said, Detour itself.
20:36
I don't want to say what it will.
20:38
Be because I don't know and at but
20:41
I do think yes, he has a digital
20:43
needle to thread on. I think the fact
20:45
that it's happening in an election year is
20:47
difficult, but more to the point I think
20:50
it's not even the election. Yes, For
20:52
me anyway as a as a
20:54
foreign policy of and unsuitable
20:56
award journalists. It's that there's so
20:58
much more in the region now
21:00
they don't know which way to
21:03
zoc their know what to do
21:05
right now. And a not only
21:07
that, you have Donald Trump and
21:09
his allies nixing a board a
21:11
deal that was about to pass
21:13
between the Democrats and and the
21:15
Republicans Which means the Ukraine will
21:17
not get that the weapons it
21:19
needs to actually defend not just
21:21
it's own self and it's own
21:23
democracies, but our democracy and and
21:25
Us national. Security. So this is
21:27
a very very complex and very
21:30
dangerous moment and it is a
21:32
real problem that is being. Models.
21:35
And fake news by by
21:38
the mega when. Now we
21:40
definitely need stoked. By the southern border in the
21:42
way it's being tied into American foreign policy. But just
21:44
before we did, let me ask you this. Sticking with
21:46
Iran and this is a genuine query. I don't know
21:48
the answer to this. When the
21:50
Pentagon is planning some kind.
21:53
Of retaliatory military strike? Is it
21:55
possible at the same time for
21:57
diplomats to be talking to the
21:59
leadership in. Iran and saying, we're
22:01
going to have to take action, you've forced our
22:04
hand, this will
22:06
happen, but please do not
22:08
retaliate. Understand that this is
22:10
us responding to the fact that our troops
22:12
have been killed, this is not us trying
22:14
to escalate the conflict. And can you be
22:16
talking to them trying to calm things down
22:18
at the same time as you're escalating your
22:21
military action? Look, I don't
22:23
know because I'm not in the room, but I do know
22:25
that the Iranians have said, if you attack us,
22:27
whatever you tell us about not wanting a war,
22:29
and remember, well, we'll get to
22:31
this in a minute, the US keeps saying we
22:33
don't want another war with Iran, but if you
22:35
attack us, we're going to retaliate. I mean, that's
22:37
what they've said publicly. What happens,
22:40
what the reaction is from the United States and
22:42
then from Iran, we just don't know yet. But
22:45
it is a very, very difficult situation. And
22:47
there are many experts who are
22:49
calling for proportionality.
22:52
And again, remember that Donald Trump did
22:55
not want to attack Iran when many
22:57
on his right flank said that he
22:59
should over various things. And all the
23:01
way back to the George W. Bush
23:03
administration, when again, Israel and others and
23:08
his own right wing were urging him to
23:10
attack Iran, remember, it was going to be
23:12
Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, you know, and and
23:15
he didn't, because they didn't
23:17
think that that was going to raise
23:20
the security of the American people, national
23:22
security. And let's just not forget, it's
23:25
one thing to be hitting non
23:27
state actors, the Houthis, for instance,
23:29
in Yemen and their bases, the
23:31
Iran backed militias, wherever they may
23:33
be in Iraq, in Syria
23:35
and elsewhere. It's
23:37
another thing to attack a sovereign
23:40
nation with a big military and
23:42
a huge country. And I'm sure
23:45
President Biden is looking at, you
23:47
know, weeks of attacking bases in
23:50
in in Yemen, and seeing no
23:52
response and no no, you
23:54
know, no end to the to the Houthis action.
23:57
So if they having trouble with the Houthis,
23:59
you can imagine that. how it's going to be
24:01
trying to direct firepower to Iran. Look, if
24:03
you want me to bet, I would
24:05
say they're going to choose some kind of other route.
24:08
I may be wrong. But
24:10
since 1979, when the Islamic
24:12
Republic came and basically
24:14
cited America as its enemy, member
24:16
of the Great Satan, America
24:19
has never struck Iran and vice versa. Iran
24:21
has never struck America. So it
24:23
would be a massive new war in the Middle
24:25
East. You know Iran well,
24:27
obviously, and your background,
24:29
your heritage. How
24:32
rational are the
24:34
Iranian leadership? How open
24:36
do you think to
24:39
the world of diplomacy
24:41
and pressure? Very
24:43
rational. I think they're very rational. And you've
24:45
seen that in 46 years. Not
24:48
the politics most of the West likes, but
24:51
they are about survival of their regime
24:53
and the projection
24:55
of whatever power and influence they
24:57
can. So in that regard,
25:01
they would rather survive
25:03
than have any kind of existential
25:05
threat posed on them. Christian,
25:08
you brought up Donald Trump, or we did or
25:11
someone did, and he always comes in to every
25:13
conversation we ever have on an America. I'm conscious
25:15
you've only got two or three more minutes with
25:17
us. I just want to ask you, you've been
25:19
quite outspoken in the past about how Donald Trump
25:22
should be regarded. It looks as if he is
25:24
going to be the nominee from the Republicans. It
25:26
looks as if there is going to be a
25:29
long campaign now, and all of
25:31
us, the BBC, CNN, everyone
25:33
has got to work out how
25:35
to treat him. But
25:38
where do we start, do you think? What are the kind
25:40
of first principles? Well, the
25:42
first thing I think we need to
25:44
do is be truthful, not neutral. This
25:46
is not an equal fight between the
25:48
candidate on the Republican side and the
25:50
candidate on the Democratic side. It is
25:52
not an equal political base. One
25:55
is all about lies and
25:58
conspiracy theories. That's just what he does. You
26:00
know, he's been indicted for
26:02
an insurrection that was aimed
26:04
at violently overthrowing the peaceful
26:07
and legitimate election in the United States in
26:09
2020. That in
26:11
itself, some people believe, should be disqualifying.
26:14
That's the 14th Amendment that a lot
26:16
of people are struggling with.
26:19
But on the other side, I think what we
26:21
have to do as journalists, and we're journalists, we
26:23
cannot do all sides are equal. We
26:26
cannot do neutrality. We cannot do on
26:28
the one hand, on the other hand,
26:30
we have to be absolutely fact and
26:33
evidence based and point out what
26:35
he doesn't says and what the
26:37
effects are and point out the
26:39
Biden record and what the effects are. And right
26:41
now, in terms of domestic
26:43
policy, look, it's really
26:45
tricky overseas right now. I obviously
26:47
understand that Biden is in a
26:49
big bind for the moment over
26:51
Gaza, over certainly over Ukraine, if
26:53
the Republicans don't give the
26:56
weapons, but he's in a big bind. But
26:58
on most of the other policies that he has set
27:01
his mind to, he's had successful legislation,
27:03
he's worked in a bipartisan way
27:05
when it's possible. He tried to
27:07
do, you know, even irritating his
27:10
own left flank to do a
27:12
bipartisan border deal if the Republicans
27:15
Trump pressured even the Senate, the
27:17
so-called sensible Republicans to
27:19
drop it because he wants to run
27:21
on immigration chaos. So I think
27:23
we have to point those things out. And I do not
27:26
think that we can just give this
27:28
person a platform. Don't forget, this is a
27:30
person who wants to shut us all down too.
27:32
He does not want to hear the truth. He
27:35
wants to demonize us as well. So I
27:37
think we have to be incredibly knowledgeable,
27:40
cognizant, aware, and have the
27:42
courage of our journalistic convictions
27:44
to tell it as it
27:47
is. And you
27:49
know, everybody was so excited. Remember during 2019 and
27:52
before that Trump had met Kim
27:54
Jong Un and maybe there was going to be
27:56
a ratcheting down of tensions. I mean, she
27:58
told me it was a... complete debacle, the
28:01
Hanoi summit, which we all covered,
28:03
because there was zero follow-through. Trump
28:05
is about performance, and
28:08
his MAGA people are about
28:10
performance. That is the analysis
28:12
of Republicans on the old
28:14
Republican guard and moderate Republicans.
28:16
That is what they do. They're not interested
28:18
in policy. They're interested in politics. And as
28:20
long as we report that, that's
28:22
what we do, but we can't pretend
28:25
that the current house, for instance, is
28:27
interested in policy, even immigration policy. They're
28:29
interested in politics and in power and
28:31
in performance. Christian, you told me before
28:33
we started, you had a hard out,
28:36
as they say in broadcasting terms, and we've
28:38
reached that hard out. So I'm going to,
28:40
I'm so frightened of you and there are
28:43
consequences of messing you around that
28:45
I'm going to say. I'll do one more
28:47
question from Sarah. Sarah, have you got another?
28:50
Christian, we said we would return to
28:53
immigration and the way it's being tied
28:55
into domestic politics with Republicans in the
28:57
house insisting that they won't fund Ukraine
28:59
and possibly even dragging what's happening into
29:01
the Middle East around a deal on
29:03
the border. But this is one of the
29:05
most intractable issues that there are in American
29:07
politics trying to sort out immigration.
29:11
How much worse is it when it is
29:13
now being drawn into these other international crises?
29:16
So much worse. And the truth
29:18
is, you're right, you know, there has been, there
29:20
have been bipartisan plans to solve
29:22
this each and every time they've
29:25
been torpedoed by politics. And
29:28
it is a big problem, obviously. It's
29:30
a huge problem, not just for the
29:32
United States, which is very visible, but
29:34
all over Europe is a huge problem.
29:36
And it's going to get worse because
29:38
of climate, because of economic fact, all
29:40
the push factors in all the countries
29:42
that we deal with. It is immigration,
29:44
migration. Even here in Britain, you've got the
29:47
debacle of the attempt to deport people
29:49
to Rwanda, which, you know, I mean,
29:51
come on. You can see that the
29:53
politicians are desperate because they deal with
29:56
this politics rather than policy. And
29:58
I'm a person who follows covers
30:00
policy. I'm really not a political reporter.
30:02
So I'm really interested in seeing solutions,
30:05
seeing real world solutions
30:08
and bipartisan attempts to
30:11
solve these things. And
30:14
so now that it's gone
30:16
into the war zones and linked
30:18
to, I mean, it's madness. I
30:20
mean, this is an existential
30:23
crisis for all of us. If Putin
30:25
wins in Ukraine, which
30:28
is not off the cards right now, two
30:30
years into this war, nearly at the two
30:32
year anniversary, this is going
30:34
to open a can of geopolitical
30:37
worms that we can't
30:39
even begin to start imagining. It's
30:42
really an affront and a
30:44
defeat of democracy. It's huge.
30:47
And these guys, do they even know where to
30:50
find Ukraine on a map? I'm
30:52
sorry. It's just not as somebody
30:54
Adam Kinzinger, former Republican, former military
30:56
vet said to me yesterday, the
30:58
Republican Party, particularly the MAGA wing,
31:01
it is not a serious party
31:03
right now. And I'm not being
31:05
political. I'm just being analytical. Well,
31:07
Christian, the sheer breadth of what we've talked to
31:10
you about, I think illustrates everybody just quite
31:12
how busy you are covering all
31:14
of this all around the world. So we really
31:16
do have to let you go. But we are
31:18
genuinely grateful that you were able to join us
31:20
on America. It was a pleasure. Thank you, Sarah.
31:22
Thank you, Justin. Yeah, you're as feisty as you were
31:24
all those years ago in Bosnia, Christian. Never
31:27
slow down. Never slow down.
31:29
See you. Bye. Bye. Well,
31:40
Sarah, a lot to go on there.
31:42
Number one, I mean, my concern, Look,
31:46
I mean, we didn't have time to go
31:48
into this. And Anyway, Christian would have bitten
31:50
my head off if I'd mentioned it. But
31:52
It's not just Trump. It's all Trump's supporters.
31:54
And I Know you've picked this up as
31:56
well. You Talk to perfectly reasonable people who
31:58
don't. Maybe concentrate on foreign. Affairs. But
32:00
but who genuinely think that America
32:02
was safer when Trump was president?
32:05
and they're not going to be
32:07
convinced frankly, by kind of lessons?
32:09
Quite complex lessons about recent diplomacy
32:11
and and recent history. And it
32:13
just seems to me that for
32:15
all of us as broadcasters in
32:18
a way, that's that's the problem.
32:20
Here and I see it. They're not america list
32:22
as either so they want them he actress and
32:25
breaking down vault the fact that the situation are
32:27
but yeah I picked up. Exactly the same
32:29
thing over the last couple of years
32:31
and is born of the historical. Accident.
32:34
That. There were no conflicts in
32:36
which share America.brawl during the time that
32:38
Donald Trump was President and so he.
32:40
Is able to say it's I. Kept
32:42
to out of any of these
32:44
wars I had no wars on.
32:46
The only president is seventy two
32:48
years I didn't have any was
32:50
while simultaneously simplifying foreign policy to
32:52
the point where he can say
32:54
I project a strong image around
32:56
the world. And that acts as a
32:58
deterrent. Jill Biden doesn't So he's He's
33:01
playing into the image of both of
33:03
the man and and oversimplifying it in
33:05
foreign policy terms. But it's something that
33:07
people can understand. And you know, foreign
33:09
policy rarely play as much of a
33:11
part in domestic electoral politics, but but
33:14
horned down to the at. It's.
33:16
Something that people can digest as they
33:18
think about what America projects in the
33:20
world. And that is something that. American
33:22
voters care about. so I mean I
33:24
think it's it. It may not be
33:26
accurate, but it is a clever strategy
33:28
from Donald Trump which is to a
33:30
large extent working. Yeah, the other issues
33:32
of Biden of Courses is electorally from
33:34
the list. His problems: Who's already got
33:36
this problem with with Gaza With people
33:38
who think that is taken the wrong
33:40
cause essential in backing Israel or on
33:42
Gaza but more widely as well that
33:44
what we call the progressive Left, on
33:46
the left in the Democratic Party and
33:48
a lot of students and others who
33:51
they're desperately I will. Vote for them
33:53
and some key states. this actually
33:55
if is he's seen to attack
33:57
Iran. Or. To do things on
33:59
the. Things of which they disapprove. A
34:01
kind of adds to that that difficulty friend
34:03
as an as. Yet. Is being
34:06
interrupted all the time when he makes
34:08
them a campaign. Speeches and events by
34:10
and. Pro Palestinian protesters who are air
34:12
want him to start calling for a
34:14
ceasefire and pay more attention to the
34:16
humanitarian consequences of what's happening in Gaza.
34:18
They feel that that's being ignored by
34:21
the White House snap of course, and
34:23
they would say this, wouldn't they? But
34:25
if you listen to the National Security
34:27
Council spokesperson or people talking for the
34:29
Pentagon, they're very. Insistent that electoral politics,
34:31
opinion polls, any of that kind of
34:33
thing do not come to plays. When
34:36
they're making decisions about military actions that
34:38
they're looking at what's happening on the
34:40
ground, what's the right thing for American
34:42
forces as weighing up obviously the diplomatic
34:44
consequences of it, but not thinking about
34:46
politics. but it's impossible in the year
34:48
like this to look at what's happening
34:50
and for us and. Okay
35:00
folks Moran as in the house and
35:02
I say that with enormous joy because
35:04
the last time I say of our
35:06
anywhere in a hotel in Atlanta Atlanta
35:08
classes yes. As I've I was I learned
35:10
of the last ice be saying Atlanta. Atlanta
35:12
here anyway. says be the best You gave
35:14
his voice night last week. Thank you very
35:16
much for that but is so good to
35:18
have you back live. You are so busy
35:20
on a whole range of things, not as
35:22
Americans seem. Things it is fair to say
35:24
isn't it. Is fair to say. And
35:27
yeah so I can attest back from America and
35:29
well off I saw you. I was in Coffee
35:31
County and I guess back from across the county
35:33
which we need to talk about that was really
35:35
interesting and people have more about that and the
35:37
panorama with day and then I guess that's the
35:39
case in his knee poker series I've been doing
35:41
which is called why do you Hate Me where
35:44
each episode I investigate a different extraordinary case of
35:46
online hey. And the season is the one
35:48
you doing with particular relevance to the
35:50
United States tells is not only about
35:52
this enormously interesting and and frankly most
35:54
terrifying individual case, but also I think
35:57
something about the United States writ large.
35:59
The let's start with what it is
36:01
to to just the facts of what
36:03
you've looked. Admire him investigate. So
36:05
I was schooling on my i get lots
36:07
and lots semesters often lovely ones from America
36:10
is often not Said official concern shows and
36:12
I scrolling through and I had a message
36:14
from a mangled Stewart's and Sue It said
36:16
to me something along the lines of hi
36:18
my on earth I became interested in speaking
36:20
he i'm a survivor of the Las Vegas
36:22
shooting that happened and twenty seventeen and people
36:25
might remember that seating and happened at at
36:27
a music festival am it with a man
36:29
Could Stephen paddock seating people out of a
36:31
hotel window and it was actually the deadliest
36:33
mass shooting by single com and. In Us
36:36
history today am it with a second
36:38
is terrifying events and this man stewart
36:40
his from Northern Ireland with their on
36:42
his honeymoon and when he was that
36:45
he was caught up in this attack
36:47
and luckily him and his wife would
36:49
both. Okay they survived and he
36:51
came out time and he told me soon
36:53
as message he said to me i won't
36:56
tell you about the abuse I experience but
36:58
also about how I fell down the rabbit
37:00
hole with regards to the shooting I lived
37:02
three and so I went out to South
37:05
Us to talk to him and he explained
37:07
to me how ten social media he stopped
37:09
posting because he's worried about gun control in
37:11
America which something we talk about law and
37:14
he as a as some of Northern Ireland
37:16
found it really hard to understand why does
37:18
not stricter gun control in America. Owes.
37:20
The way I could vamp cousins and I
37:22
hope so far away from home. There wasn't
37:25
much supporter and the incident at home so
37:27
my connection to America was fire feel for
37:29
social media platforms that if is years and
37:31
so for me it was just spit know
37:34
your feelings on raw opinions towards things. Cities
37:36
outpacing saying oh I'm this is all about
37:38
where did in a while you guys allow
37:40
that and obviously he's and in I met
37:42
by quite fierce opposition by some people in
37:45
America who really care about them in their
37:47
right right to bear arms, eccentric that dress
37:49
an unsafe. He ended up getting have quite
37:51
bad trolling and and then he was really
37:53
struggling to process of thought that at that
37:55
point and still to be honest now we
37:58
don't really know why this man Stephen. Dick
38:00
good what he did it. It was
38:02
really a really motiveless sheeting. Say to speak, it
38:04
was it. Though there was no clear and obvious
38:07
reason that he had done this and and stood
38:09
on that really hard to cope with, basically because
38:11
he was miles from the Us where this had
38:13
happened, so there was no one could really talk
38:15
states, he tends to social media and he starts.
38:18
Hundred at for answers. What really happened because
38:20
there was no move on? The answer is
38:22
just pull that every thread the see which
38:24
one made the most sense be which one
38:27
probably related to your thera the best And
38:29
that's how you fall into conspiracy theorist. And
38:31
that is denied the mistake you made
38:33
since I searched. For a framework
38:36
that said that explains which
38:38
at a psychological level an
38:40
internal head level. Will.
38:42
Do I sleep for our laws? Such I I
38:44
release could understand six point of the and
38:46
I at think of I'd lived through that
38:48
sitting particularly that one last you don't understand
38:50
why this person has some what they've done
38:52
the you would tend to social media and
38:54
that way to look for answers. I think
38:56
that there's some times and we talked about
38:58
this quite lot but this kind of stigma
39:00
around conspiracy theories that in or you know
39:02
to believe them you have to be silly
39:04
or steal it or not really get this
39:06
title. Run the Pleasantville sat on have a nice. This
39:09
is a very intelligent, very articulate, very
39:11
kind man. He was trying to make
39:13
sense of this traumatic thing that happened
39:16
to him and he turns the social
39:18
media francis and it's not clear what
39:20
happened and say he starts aching This
39:23
one accounts in particular which goes by
39:25
the name of Weg Oag which is
39:27
a pseudonym and it's picture is Nostradamus
39:30
the sixteenth century philosopher and he thought
39:32
following it and this account with putting
39:34
out those documents, police footage or other
39:36
drops. Evidence drops that the police were releasing.
39:39
It also starting to spin these into conspiracy
39:41
theories. Was this actually a government plus of
39:43
some kind? Actually, this was feet. This was
39:46
used to cover up the assassination of the
39:48
Saudi prince or an attempted assassination of Saudi
39:50
prince or was actually helicopters above that was
39:52
shooting people. It wasn't the man in the
39:54
written or was it that that was a
39:57
plans to allow the seating to happen or
39:59
utterly absurd. The had it was never really
40:01
there, someone else did the seating and F
40:03
B I agent and it was all part
40:05
of an attempt to change in a gun
40:08
Rights Know this kinds of stuff and unite
40:10
the most extreme conspiracy theories. The crisis actor
40:12
stuff like believing that you are paid to
40:14
be there or that it was stays in
40:16
some way. It didn't go as far as
40:18
I said. it very much commits to it
40:20
that this was a government plot and he
40:22
was obsessed with this accounts. He told me
40:25
about hours and hours on end sitting in
40:27
his living room in Northern Ireland's obsessing over
40:29
this American account. He has no idea who
40:31
he is and he says scrolling through and
40:33
he's a he's printing off because he's worried
40:36
it's gonna get taken down and he some
40:38
he thinks he's above the conspiracy so soon
40:40
after a year or so realizes this become
40:42
unhealthy, has become paranoid, very isolated and he
40:45
decides to get help and it and has
40:47
therapy in counseling and that really helps in
40:49
process is torment and kind of except that
40:51
maybe he can ever know why this man
40:54
did it and conspiracy theories already a sort
40:56
have sex they're not going to ultimately resolve
40:58
this and that for hims. The conspiracy
41:00
theories while they caused harm upon away as
41:02
a distress they also were a strange ways
41:05
to him of making sense that he now
41:07
sees where he is now as that he
41:09
might not be so so of a piece
41:11
of they all had he not. Kind.
41:14
Of gone through that process of questioning it but.
41:16
What triggered the questioning? Of where he
41:18
was good. Timing Crossing the conspiracy or as
41:20
questioning the conspiracy was when he started to
41:22
think hang on A lot of these narratives
41:25
are kind of conflicting with each other, they
41:27
don't actually make sense and maybe I need
41:29
to look at how I'm feeling right now
41:31
because I think maybe I'm using these of
41:33
my crotch to get saying that it will
41:36
at my crush they would think I'd hold
41:38
on to but actually. Maybe.
41:41
This. Isn't actually helping me in a way that
41:43
I thought it was. Help Me. And it's not
41:45
helping me find the truth out because I'm never
41:47
going to know if any of these plots happened.
41:49
And actually all of the evidence available does point
41:52
to the fact that this man, for whatever reason,
41:54
decided to commit suicide shots of violence. The I
41:56
mention that because facts. Helps
41:59
him and. I'm not sure that facts
42:01
always do help with conspiracy theories. I think
42:03
sometimes people are just not interested or also
42:06
they're involved in the conspiracy theory for
42:08
reasons that are not going to be
42:11
sorted out by them just being bombarded
42:13
by the likes of you with actual
42:15
information. It doesn't work like that. I
42:17
completely agree. So I actually think that the
42:20
what is often besides the point is actually
42:22
the why. And in Stuart's case, the evidence
42:24
only worked when his frame of mind was
42:26
different. And I think that's what's crucial here
42:29
is that it took his family and friends
42:31
and people saying, hang on a second, you're
42:33
becoming really isolated, you're becoming very anxious, you're
42:35
becoming very paranoid. Let's step away from this.
42:37
And it was only on stepping away from
42:40
it and actually sharing. And this is what
42:42
happens so often I find is that people
42:44
have very legitimate questions and concerns or very
42:46
legitimate things that they are terrified about. And
42:48
if you can't make sense of a shooting,
42:51
and I really understand this, I think if
42:53
I was caught up in something like that,
42:55
I'd want to know what happened because I'd
42:57
feel like I could stop it
42:59
happening to me again. Because how can you prevent
43:01
it happening again, if you don't know what happened
43:03
in the first place? So I think, oh, okay,
43:05
right, that does make sense. Because we can't make
43:07
sense of random acts of violence. But the same
43:09
thing happened with 9-11. And still does. I mean, there's
43:11
always you know, better than I do. There's a whole
43:14
conspiracy theory set of conspiracy theories about 9-11 and
43:16
people who are absolutely still convinced by them.
43:18
But again, a lot of it because of
43:21
the psychological need to
43:24
have some sort of explanation
43:27
that is explicable to them. And
43:29
that's it though, the psychological need and
43:31
for Stuart, that psychological need shifted because
43:33
he managed to quell it in
43:35
a different way, which was actually talking
43:38
about the traumatic experience he'd had and
43:40
processing and making sense of that, rather
43:42
than kind of using the conspiracy theories
43:45
to quell his distress, I think. The
43:47
whole of this podcast series is about
43:49
how when we take this stuff offline,
43:52
understanding is possible and forgiveness is possible
43:54
and resolution is possible and we're going
43:56
to do it left, you know, in touch
43:58
friends like It
44:01
was brilliant and now they're sort of
44:03
messaging each other and messaging me and
44:08
it's sort of one of the most, everything I
44:10
investigated was so horrible. It's exposing
44:12
the horrible stuff but then saying, oh look it can have
44:14
a happy ending sometimes, not for the time. In all of
44:16
the episodes I think it does have a happy ending. Okay,
44:18
how do people hear the whole
44:21
podcast? You can go to BBC Sounds where
44:23
of course you can listen to America's and you can
44:25
listen to Why Do You Hate Me. The first two
44:27
episodes are available now and then it will be available
44:29
weekly on a Wednesday so when you're missing America's you
44:31
can listen to it first and then you can listen
44:33
to America's. Thanks Mariela. Thank
44:35
you so much. Now
44:45
one last thing before we go. We've got
44:47
just over nine months until Americans go to
44:49
the polls. The race for the White House
44:51
is already well underway. It's going to get
44:54
really, really busy. So if you want to try
44:56
and keep track of what actually matters in the
44:58
race and why, the BBC is launching a newsletter
45:00
to keep you informed and who else would
45:02
be the author of such a newsletter
45:04
other than our very own Anthony Zertner?
45:06
Exactly. If you're sitting here listening to
45:08
me on America's to say, I really
45:11
want to have Anthony's words sent directly
45:13
to my email inbox, this is your
45:15
chance. Each week I'm going to be
45:17
offering relatively briefly my takeaways
45:19
on what is important in the US presidential
45:21
campaign for that week. But to filter out
45:23
and what to focus on, not just what's
45:25
going on here in the United States, but
45:28
what happens here in the United States, how
45:30
it impacts the entire world because the US
45:32
presidential election really is a global
45:34
news story as well. I'm also
45:36
going to be plucking articles that
45:38
are written by my colleagues, including
45:40
you Sarah at our first issue
45:43
this week to focus on so
45:45
that they have further reading to
45:47
learn more about this campaign and
45:49
the issues behind it. Now, politics
45:51
can be serious business. It
45:53
can also be somewhat fun. And I'm going to
45:55
try to make this a fun email as well,
45:58
not necessarily always talking about Taylor Swift, but. She
46:01
is mentioned actually in this initial newsletter that
46:03
goes out this week. So can I get
46:05
a little Taylor Swift bit where I get
46:07
to contribute some Swissy news each week? Our
46:10
special Taylor Swift correspondent, absolutely. I think that we
46:12
could make that happen. But I'm
46:14
also going to be answering reader questions
46:17
just like Mark from Dublin, but in
46:19
text form. And you
46:21
can write to me and
46:23
I'll be reviewing this inbox
46:26
and hopefully get into your
46:28
questions. The email address is
46:30
uselectionunspun at bbc.co.uk. And
46:35
you can find the link to sign
46:37
up to the newsletter in the description
46:39
of this program on BBC Sound. If
46:41
you prefer the spoken word, you can
46:43
always send your questions to America by
46:46
WhatsApping us on plus four four three
46:48
three zero one two three nine four
46:50
eight oh or americast at bbc.co.uk or
46:52
hashtag America on social media platforms. And
46:54
of course you can hear America first
46:56
and in full as a podcast on
46:59
BBC Sounds. See you all later. Bye.
47:02
America from BBC News.
47:06
Thanks for listening to America from
47:08
BBC News. You can subscribe to
47:10
this podcast on the free BBC
47:12
Sounds app, which is now available
47:14
worldwide.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More