Podchaser Logo
Home
Why are there less writings on Roman imperial wars?

Why are there less writings on Roman imperial wars?

Released Friday, 26th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Why are there less writings on Roman imperial wars?

Why are there less writings on Roman imperial wars?

Why are there less writings on Roman imperial wars?

Why are there less writings on Roman imperial wars?

Friday, 26th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Some people just know there's a better way

0:03

to do things, like bundling your home and

0:05

auto insurance with Allstate. Or

0:07

hiring someone to move your piano instead of

0:10

doing it yourself. So,

0:14

do things the better way. Bundle home and

0:17

auto and save up to 25% with Allstate.

0:21

Bundled savings vary by state and are not available in every state. Saving

0:23

up to 25% is the countrywide average of the maximum

0:25

available savings off the home policy. Allstate Vehicle and

0:27

Property Insurance Company and affiliates Northbrook, Illinois. ones

0:31

get it done. The most important part is the

0:33

one you need now and the best partner is

0:35

the one who can deliver. That's

0:37

why millions of maintenance and repair

0:39

pros trust Grainger because we have

0:41

professional-grade supplies for every industry, even

0:44

hard-to-find products, and we have same-day

0:46

pickup and next-day delivery on most

0:48

orders. But most importantly, we have

0:50

an unwavering commitment to help keep

0:52

you up and running. Call, click

0:54

grainger.com or just stop by. Grainger,

0:56

for the ones who get it done. who get it done. Hi

1:06

everyone and welcome to another Ancient Warfare Answers with

1:08

me Murray. Your 10

1:10

minute escape from daily life to

1:12

think about ancient warfare. And

1:15

I answer questions sent in by

1:17

viewers and listeners in

1:19

various forms. Emails and

1:22

postcards. You can comment on a video.

1:25

You can of course back us on Patreon.

1:28

Lots of our questions come in from patrons. You

1:30

just need to go to Patreon/ancient warfare

1:32

podcast and you can back us there

1:34

at one of three levels. There's Legionary,

1:37

Optio and Centurion. One

1:39

dollar five dollars ten dollars. For five dollars you

1:41

get the digital copy of the magazine and for

1:44

ten dollars you get a print

1:46

copy of the magazine. Each well

1:49

every two months by bi-monthly. Not

1:52

meaning twice a month but meaning every

1:54

two months. Anyway, now this question has

1:57

been sent in by Aaron Friedman and

1:59

it's called... a comment about one of

2:01

the earlier podcasts I made. On

2:03

your comment about written battle

2:05

accounts, were Empire error writings

2:10

less common, lost to time, or

2:13

were the generals less educated than

2:15

Republican error generals? Oh

2:17

interesting, this was in the

2:20

context of talking about the

2:22

Battle of Mons Grauthiers I think in

2:25

an earlier podcast where we've only got

2:27

Tacitus' account and very few others. And

2:29

it's true that for the Roman Empire

2:31

you know we have Tacitus for events

2:34

of the first century, not as many

2:36

as we'd like. He's fragmentary in both

2:38

his histories and the Annales.

2:41

We also have the histories

2:44

of Josephus who's very

2:46

good and then Diocassius

2:49

again survives large

2:51

passages fragmentarily

2:54

and then later in the Roman Empire

2:57

we do have Amiens, Marcellinus and Procopius.

3:00

But that of course is 700 years

3:02

of history and we know

3:04

of lots of other sources that have

3:06

been lost and so the first answer

3:09

to your question Aaron is indeed lots

3:12

have been lost to time. We

3:15

know of accounts written

3:17

by Marcus Aurelius, accounts written by

3:19

Trajan and other generals, Demetius

3:22

Corbulo and others about their campaigns

3:24

that just did not survive unless

3:26

they survive in the fragmentary

3:30

accounts of the other historians. But often

3:32

those historians don't include a lot of

3:34

detail on the military campaigns of those

3:37

generals and so maybe

3:40

they didn't use them and that's problematic.

3:43

Now we also of course have Arian

3:46

who's most famous as a historian of Alexander the

3:48

Great but who was a general

3:50

and a commander himself and we do

3:52

have his Tactica and his

3:54

Ecotaxis which is his array

3:57

against the Allens as it's translated. So

3:59

in about one 136,

4:01

137 AD. He leads an army against a marauding

4:04

band of Alans and draws

4:07

up his army and tells us what he does, which

4:09

is interesting. Now, we've got to piece all

4:11

of that together though. The problem is of course, you've

4:14

got Josephus, you've got Arian and you've got these

4:16

sort of other battle accounts, which is all we've

4:19

got to go on to tell

4:21

us about what the

4:23

Roman Imperial Army did in the field, which

4:25

is not a lot. Of course, you've got

4:28

visual mediums as well. You've got the Trajan's

4:31

column famously and Mark's realtors column

4:34

slightly less famously, the Adam

4:37

Clissy monuments as well under Trajan, and

4:40

several other architectural and archaeological

4:42

finds which tell us stuff. And

4:44

of course, so much armor and

4:46

weapons and helmets to tell us

4:48

the story or confuse

4:50

the story as the case may be. Now,

4:52

in addition to the lost

4:55

to time, frustrating as

4:57

that is, we've also got

4:59

the idea of under

5:01

the Roman Empire, of course, the

5:04

commander in chief of all the Roman armies is

5:06

the Emperor himself and therefore

5:08

the generals who are writing

5:10

about their own campaigns face

5:13

the problem of highlighting

5:15

their own achievements and therefore

5:17

being sidelined,

5:20

asked to fall on their sword, put to death, blacklisted

5:24

by the Emperor. And

5:27

of course in the historians, especially in

5:29

Tacitus and Cassius Dio, you've got

5:31

the idea of good emperors and bad emperors and

5:34

bad emperors, of course, are jealous and petty

5:38

and will stop the careers

5:40

of good generals like Agricola, according to

5:42

Tacitus and you know,

5:44

Demetrius Corbulo falls on the

5:46

sword like a good general when Nero demands it.

5:49

The interesting thing there, of course, is

5:51

those accounts don't survive except

5:54

in little tiny fragments and there

5:57

are other ideas that

6:00

There are careers, and I've spoken about front times many

6:02

times, his career doesn't suffer.

6:04

And there are other generals whose careers don't

6:06

suffer under bad emperors. We

6:08

don't have any battle accounts by

6:10

them either, unfortunately. But

6:13

it's the idea that, you know, these

6:15

bad emperors block what the

6:18

generals did, or, you know, take credit

6:20

for them. That is,

6:23

I think, problematic. We've got

6:25

a couple of fragments of Lucius Verus' commentary

6:27

when he goes on the Parthian

6:30

War in the 160s, but

6:32

it's not particularly useful for

6:36

what the battles were looking like, unfortunately.

6:38

And so I think

6:40

the interesting thing there is they

6:42

probably were less common. So

6:45

even with these generals' accounts, you've

6:48

actually probably got people don't want to read about

6:51

battle in the detail that Julius Caesar

6:53

gave us, for instance. It's

6:56

not the done thing, because

6:58

of course the commander in chief is the emperor.

7:01

And so the credit

7:03

isn't being taken by these generals. And

7:06

so when we look at Arian, very

7:09

much the exception, and Josephus, who's not Roman,

7:12

again, the exception, and those battle accounts

7:14

and Tacitus which do survive, that's

7:17

not the emphasis. We

7:19

do rely on Vegetaus writing

7:21

in the late 4th or

7:23

early 5th century AD to tell

7:25

us about how Roman armies deployed.

7:28

It's Josephus and Vegetaus. And

7:30

another problem, so many problems, is

7:33

that we use them to extrapolate what

7:35

happens in 400 years of imperial Roman

7:37

history, which is problematic in itself.

7:40

So what have we got? Lost to

7:42

time, less common, I think, yes, both

7:45

of those things. Were the generals less educated than

7:47

Roman republican generals? No, I don't think so. I

7:49

think that there is a long

7:52

tradition of generalship in the Roman

7:54

army, and there are some phenomenal

7:57

generals in the

7:59

imperial period. Most interestingly, of

8:01

course, many of them

8:03

are fighting for their

8:05

Emperor. Now again, and I think I've spoken

8:07

about it before, always, broken

8:09

record me, the idea of course is

8:11

that the good generals are

8:14

there in person and they are active,

8:17

and their subordinate commanders are,

8:19

you know, deferring to them.

8:22

Bad generals, bad emperors, sorry,

8:24

are there. They might have

8:27

bad generals because they're sycophants, not good generals,

8:31

which I think is not true. I think that's the case in both

8:33

good and bad emperors have good and bad generals. But

8:35

of course when you have a bad emperor like Domitian

8:37

for instance, we don't believe he was there in person

8:40

in the front, even though the

8:42

Praetorian Guards, and we're told he's there, we

8:45

poo-poo that. Then we're told,

8:47

oh, he took credit for it but it

8:49

wasn't his to take. But when it's a good general, they take

8:51

credit for it, and it was theirs

8:54

to take. And it's like, well, hang on, exactly

8:56

the same scenario. A good general, sorry, a good

8:58

emperor taking credit for what their subordinates do, is

9:00

no different from a bad emperor taking credit for

9:02

what their generals do. But our

9:05

idea is, well, he's a good emperor, he's a bad

9:07

emperor. I think it's actually, no, no,

9:10

emperors are present, they either are responsible

9:12

or they're not. It doesn't change whether you're a good

9:14

or a bad emperor. You're there

9:16

and probably you're not

9:18

responsible. Trajan was not

9:20

responsible. Marcus Aurelius was not responsible. It

9:22

was Domitian, but they were there in

9:24

person. And their subordinate generals,

9:28

they commanded. Again,

9:30

coming back to their first issue, they're

9:32

fighting under the Roman Empire. They

9:35

give credit to their emperor,

9:37

not themselves, because they don't want to

9:39

be sidelined. That's true

9:41

under good and bad emperors. And we

9:43

weirdly give credit to good emperors that

9:46

they were responsible. And

9:48

we don't give it to bad emperors. And I

9:50

think it's like, no, no, they don't get any

9:52

credit. Whether they be a good emperor in our

9:54

estimation or a bad emperor, their subordinates did all

9:57

the commanding. And so there are very good generals

9:59

in the Roman Empire. We

10:01

hear less about them because they're not

10:03

as publicised for those reasons above. So

10:06

thank you for joining me. I hope that answered your

10:08

question, Aaron. I hope I raised more questions than I've

10:10

answered. Join me again for another

10:12

Ancient Warfare Answers and I will attempt to answer your

10:14

questions. Thanks. Bye. Some

10:28

people just know there's a better way to

10:30

do things, like bundling your home and auto

10:32

insurance with Allstate. Or hiring

10:34

someone to move your piano instead of doing

10:37

it yourself. So,

10:41

do things the better way. Bundle home and

10:43

auto and save up to 25% with Allstate.

10:47

Bundled savings vary by state and are not available in every state. Saving

10:50

up to 25% is the countrywide average of the maximum

10:52

available savings off the home policy. Allstate Vehicle and

10:54

Property Insurance Company and affiliates Northbrook, Illinois. Some

10:59

people just know the best rate for you

11:01

is a rate based on you with Allstate. Not

11:04

a rate based on Terry who keeps... It

11:07

makes the car behind them. Oh

11:10

no, they're about to... Save

11:13

with DriveWise on the Allstate app and only

11:16

pay a rate based on you. Not

11:19

available in every state. Such are the terms and conditions. Rating factors

11:21

and savings vary and in some states your rate could increase

11:23

with high risk driving. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company

11:25

and affiliates Northbrook, Illinois.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features