Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Like I really care, I'm really in
0:02
it, I'm really invested and it did make me
0:04
think how often we
0:06
risk
0:08
giving up episode one or two of our own
0:10
work.
0:15
Hi and welcome to episode 227
0:18
of Art Juice. This is honest, generous and humorous
0:21
conversations to feed your creative soul
0:23
and get you thinking with me Louise Fletcher.
0:26
And me Alice Sheridan. And
0:28
this week we're answering a question that
0:31
came in to me, oh good
0:33
grief, quite a long time ago and actually
0:36
I can't see in my, oh July 27th 2022. So yes,
0:38
so we're really quick at answering
0:44
these
0:46
questions so don't give up if you send
0:48
us something you want us to discuss and we haven't
0:50
discussed it. We will get to it eventually
0:54
and it's all about design and
0:57
we'll get to that and it's from
0:59
a listener called Lita and we'll get
1:01
to Lita's question once we
1:03
talk about that. But first of all, what
1:06
has your week been like Alice?
1:08
My week's been fun.
1:11
Good. I've had a lot of
1:13
fun interactions. I had a lovely day with
1:15
a friend which I think I dropped into the
1:18
end of the podcast last week. Yeah,
1:21
just reminded me what it was like
1:23
to giggle. My
1:25
parents have arrived back.
1:28
They
1:32
were away on a boat trip, which
1:35
I think, put it this way,
1:37
they've come back saying that's it, they're never traveling
1:39
ever again. And certainly
1:42
when they arrived back they were exhausted and some
1:45
sad things like my mum had lost her engagement ring
1:47
on the journey home and they had a 24-hour flight
1:50
delay and it really felt
1:53
like it would be very easy to fall back into
1:55
that, oh everything's down and like
1:58
I'm just not up for that.
1:59
at the moment, just not up for it.
2:02
So my focus has been on
2:04
testing with them, going
2:07
around, doing my mum's nails, which is why
2:09
my nails are painted, pointless,
2:12
but it feels good, teaching them a new
2:14
card game. Just
2:16
kind of having a bit of fun really. Just
2:19
funny things like we've got to have
2:21
some trees pruned. We have trees
2:23
at the front of our house that have to be pollarded every year
2:25
so their roots don't grow too big. And
2:28
got a new guy to come and quote for that and
2:30
he was just hysterical. He
2:32
was just really, really funny and
2:34
just reminded
2:37
me how much of those interactions are nice.
2:39
And then I have been on Chief Procrastination,
2:42
which we could have talked about this week actually,
2:44
Chief Procrastination
2:47
about getting back into the studio, which
2:50
I busted through yesterday. So. Oh
2:53
good. Yeah, good.
2:55
It's been a very long time.
2:57
Yeah. Did it feel good?
3:00
It felt really good and it
3:03
partly only felt good because I'd spent
3:05
two days making myself feel really
3:07
crappy. You
3:09
know, really
3:11
like, this is what I'm going to do. Like I'd go to bed
3:13
with full intentions and then somehow
3:16
there would be lots of other things that needed doing
3:18
and there were lots of other things that needed doing
3:20
to be fair. Yeah, so it was very
3:22
easy to find excuses not to go. So
3:24
the way I went through it at the end of the day
3:26
was really risk messing up
3:28
another day so badly. Knew I
3:31
would feel so rubbish at the end of the day.
3:33
I had something that I had
3:35
to get back home for as a deadline.
3:38
So I just thought, right, just
3:40
go and you've only got an hour and
3:42
what can go wrong in an hour? And I
3:45
went and I tidied and cleaned
3:47
and swept and moved things
3:49
that felt old that I was no longer interested
3:52
in and reacquainted myself and got
3:55
quite like, oh, there's quite a lot
3:57
of good things here I quite enjoy really. So
3:59
good.
4:00
Yeah, it's good. It's done. It's shifted
4:03
and I'm back to it. So
4:05
that's how I do it. But it's a body
4:07
thing. It's a movement thing. It's like when
4:10
you get stuck in your head about it and
4:12
I was totally there and I'd have conversations
4:15
with people. Oh, I want to make bigger
4:17
work, but what do I do? Then I'm going to have to hire
4:19
a van. And it's just
4:21
all like future problem thinking,
4:23
which is never the answer. It's
4:25
never the answer. And
4:27
the more you think about it, the
4:30
harder it all seems. It's like anything in
4:32
life. The more you think through all the possible,
4:34
oh, and I don't know what these are
4:36
going to look like at the end. And how am I
4:38
going to get stuck? I don't know where to start because
4:41
I don't know where I'm going. Well, you never do.
4:43
So you just have to start. But I
4:45
was the same as you, as we've talked about this recently,
4:48
how most, both of us weren't painting for
4:50
quite a long time. And I've
4:52
just got back into it recently and it was the
4:54
same thing. There were a couple
4:56
of days where I've been painting where I've
4:58
really had to push myself to
5:01
go over there. I'll be sitting doing things
5:03
on my computer, all things
5:06
which do need doing at some point, but don't need
5:08
doing, we're getting darker evenings
5:10
now. It gets darker earlier on. It's
5:12
a good time to do those things in the evenings,
5:15
not when I could be painting in good
5:17
light. And there's something about
5:20
just pushing yourself to actually get
5:22
there, that once you're there and you're looking at stuff
5:25
and you see the paint and you think, oh, well, just for
5:27
me anyway, I think, oh, I'll just put a
5:30
bit of white on there. That looks like it.
5:32
That would look good there. And then, oh,
5:34
I'll need to wash all the brushes and get everything sorted
5:36
out now because now I'm in the mood to get going.
5:39
And then hours can pass quite
5:41
happily. And then I think, why did I not?
5:44
I know. Why was it so hard? Yeah.
5:47
It's because we, you've said before that procrastination
5:50
is when we don't know. What
5:53
to do, or we really hate
5:55
it, but it isn't. I don't really hate it. So
5:57
it is for me. I
5:59
don't really.
5:59
know what I'm going to do
6:02
and like you said the thinking about
6:04
it doesn't it doesn't do anything you've got
6:06
to go see what you're going to do by doing it.
6:09
And I think it's also when something starts
6:12
to feel important like the longer
6:14
you delay it the more important
6:16
it feels the more stories you tell yourself
6:18
about why why you're delaying
6:21
it but I could very easily which I wasn't
6:23
actually this time get in a twist
6:25
about oh I haven't done any painting all summer
6:28
but put it put it this way by the time
6:30
I went I went to do the code to get into the studio
6:32
and I couldn't get in through the door and
6:35
I had to go round the front and
6:37
talk to the caretaker and he was like we changed
6:39
that months ago you can't use that door
6:41
anymore
6:42
you've got to come in this way it's like
6:44
you've really not been for a long time have you I don't
6:46
know
6:48
but it's when things start to feel too
6:51
important because when we put too much
6:53
importance on them and of course it's
6:56
going to be a bit daunting
6:57
yeah
6:58
you know
6:59
just breaking that isn't it anyway
7:02
yeah we'll see
7:05
so we're both painting again everybody so that's
7:07
good news yep
7:09
with no pressure yeah
7:12
absolutely no
7:13
pressure I mean I have no events or
7:15
plans or
7:16
anything for what I'm doing so it's just
7:19
free exploration which is really good
7:22
okay
7:28
so if
7:29
I am free exploring how
7:30
am I taking design
7:33
into consideration this is a question that
7:35
we got as I say a year
7:37
ago now from Lita and
7:40
I've saved all the questions that you send me and
7:43
then we go through them once in a while and this one
7:45
caught our eye today and Lita says
7:48
I would like to know how you use the
7:50
design principles in your work and your
7:52
assessment of how they elevate the end
7:54
result for example
7:56
you both use lines differently contrast
7:59
and value patterns are also evident.
8:02
My guess is that much of this you both
8:04
do instinctively now or
8:07
intuitively, but it
8:09
would be interesting to know how you see these design
8:11
elements in the finished pieces, why they
8:14
are important, how you've used them over
8:16
time, and it might help us
8:18
to give us more attention and understand
8:20
their significance. So I looked
8:22
back and we haven't discussed
8:25
design. Also
8:28
maybe thought of as composition or however
8:30
you think of it as a listener, you
8:32
might have a different word for it, but the
8:35
overall layout of our painting,
8:37
the overall elements that comprise
8:40
the painting. So
8:42
we thought, yeah, let's tackle Leta's question.
8:45
So go on Alice and then I'll just wrap
8:47
up at the end.
8:49
Because Alice is a graphic designer so
8:51
you have some design training which I
8:53
always envy because I always think that must
8:55
give you a foundation. I
8:58
think in a way it does help and
9:01
it was interesting when I first came across
9:04
this idea of
9:06
design in
9:08
paintings
9:10
was when I did the course
9:14
many years now with Nicholas Wilton.
9:17
And before then in art terms,
9:19
I'd always heard it referred to as
9:21
composition. And composition
9:25
in the sense of paintings was things like, you
9:27
know, have you got like
9:29
a, is there a winding rope that's leading
9:32
to a vanishing point?
9:35
Is there a focal area?
9:38
Is it on a cruciform basis?
9:41
And various almost like set
9:43
constructs or rules like rules
9:45
of thirds or golden
9:48
sections and those kind of things, but
9:51
they were all almost like linear
9:55
ways to break up the surface
9:57
of a painting. And So
10:00
what Nick really put in place was
10:02
he brought in the value idea,
10:05
which is how your brain interprets it.
10:08
And I think what that did for me was
10:10
it completely linked up with,
10:13
as you say, my experience of a graphic designer,
10:16
where we would have called it layout. Right.
10:18
You've got a number of different elements that
10:21
you need to include, have a
10:23
different hierarchy. And
10:26
you need to create something that is balanced,
10:29
but also of interest on a page.
10:31
If it's too balanced, it's too harmonised,
10:34
you need a little bit of tension.
10:36
Mm hmm.
10:37
So I'd always done that with
10:39
a layout. And in graphic design
10:41
terms, you know, before we had computers,
10:44
it literally was cutting things out
10:46
and moving them around a page. And
10:49
then you would do paste up and then you would get your microfilms.
10:54
Whereas when you paint, you're putting it on directly and
10:56
once it's painted, you can't move it. So
10:59
I think there were two things that really
11:02
shifted to me and I think is interesting
11:05
when we come to the idea of painting.
11:08
And one is the ability
11:10
to move things and change them and not
11:12
get stuck with what you
11:15
have done first off. And
11:19
as soon as I started thinking about paintings
11:21
in this form of layout and constructing
11:24
it in the ability to move things around
11:26
by painting over, but I'll come on to another
11:29
tip in a minute. That
11:31
really helped in terms of, oh,
11:33
I get what you mean now about
11:36
design. Whereas
11:38
composition for me had always
11:40
felt really restrictive, like
11:42
my painting had to fit one of these
11:45
rules, like rules of thirds of blah blah
11:47
blah blah blah. And that
11:50
always felt like you were sort of painting
11:52
to order. I
11:55
remember thinking about it like design just
11:57
made it feel much freer for me. Yeah.
11:59
Do you know Bob
12:02
Burridge? Have you ever seen him on
12:04
YouTube? He's an American painter,
12:07
really great teacher, very inspiring.
12:09
I'm sure lots of people listening will have seen
12:11
his videos. He's an older gentleman
12:14
now, but when he first started he was maybe
12:16
middle aged anyway. He
12:19
teaches a lot and he does a lot of demos on
12:21
YouTube and he offers a composition
12:24
chart. He paints both abstractly
12:26
and semi-representationally and he's
12:29
very, very good. But he
12:31
offered this composition chart you could download
12:34
and it was like 12, the 12 compositions
12:36
of a painting and it was just, what,
12:39
no, it was just what he said. So
12:41
this was when I was beginning, so I downloaded
12:44
it and also a colour
12:46
wheel where you could turn the colours and
12:48
know you would get a palette that worked
12:50
if you matched the colours in this way. I can't
12:53
remember quite how that worked, but both
12:55
things felt exactly what you just did,
12:57
which for those who obviously
12:59
can't see what Alice did, she vomited.
13:01
Well, she pretended to vomit. As
13:04
I'm literally typing in the links,
13:06
I was like, you started talking and I thought, oh, this might be useful.
13:09
Type in links, Bob Burridge composition
13:12
chart. Yeah. Okay, maybe not. No,
13:15
but look for Bob Burridge's videos
13:17
though because he is very
13:18
inspiring in his looseness and
13:20
freedom with paint and the way he encourages you
13:22
to explore. But yes,
13:25
there were things like here's the cruciform
13:27
composition, here's the this one. And
13:30
I would look at them and I was looking at what I
13:32
was doing and thinking, okay, I can't really see
13:34
how I make that work and I don't
13:36
really understand that one. That one doesn't
13:39
make any sense to me. And I'm
13:41
sure they're totally valid
13:43
and everything. But for me, yeah, I
13:46
was really lost. And the thing
13:48
I took from Nick's
13:51
course, because I was the same as you, that's where
13:53
I first heard about it. And
13:56
I didn't have any design background to pin it
13:58
to. So the
13:59
thing I took from him is this idea
14:02
of
14:03
bringing in contrast as
14:06
being
14:08
a way to make designs or compositions
14:11
interesting and I realised
14:13
instantly that was where some of my
14:15
landscapes were going wrong, that I was
14:17
missing that element of contrast. And
14:20
over the years I've
14:23
developed that so that the
14:25
way I use it in my artwork and the
14:27
way I teach it is I talk
14:30
about contrast and harmony and
14:33
these are things I have not invented,
14:35
I don't even claim to have invented them but what
14:37
I realised is contrast
14:40
is a great principle for me to make my
14:42
compositions more interesting but
14:45
you can push it so far that it's too much
14:47
and then there's nothing to tie
14:49
it all together. And the way I
14:52
describe it is if
14:54
you go into, you create
14:57
another world in a film say, everything
15:00
has to harmonise and fit
15:02
together to make that world,
15:05
you can have something strange
15:07
happen in it if it all fits together
15:09
and seems like that is a world that
15:11
works. So when we're making a painting,
15:14
we're
15:14
kind of making a world that works
15:17
together and
15:18
then putting some things in that surprise
15:20
you and just what
15:22
you said about in design, it can't be
15:24
too surprising because then it's clashy and it
15:27
can't be not surprising, it can't be all
15:29
harmonious because then we'll walk
15:31
straight past it without even looking. And
15:34
so that's how I now think about them
15:36
which I always feel, being totally
15:38
honest, is a bit amateurish and not
15:42
because I haven't got the knowledge
15:45
that I feel like people who went to graphic
15:47
design school or interior
15:49
design, any design
15:51
discipline, I feel like
15:53
when you speak about
15:54
it, you have this grounding to it.
15:57
Mine is have
16:00
these two things and that's what I constantly
16:02
look at in my paintings. Oh it's gone
16:04
too much this way,
16:06
it's gone too much that way, keep bringing
16:08
it back. Lots of contrasting elements
16:11
now it's too contrasty, let me
16:13
bring some harmony
16:14
back in. So for example,
16:17
harmony usually for me will
16:19
be in the colour. I'll usually make
16:21
sure that the colour palette is
16:23
consistent throughout and
16:25
then there'll just be a couple of little surprises.
16:28
But if I keep that consistency
16:31
out then whatever I do with shapes
16:33
and sizes and lines
16:35
and
16:36
it will hang together within the
16:38
consistent story
16:40
that I'm telling with colour. If
16:42
I have contrasty colour,
16:44
contrasty shapes, contrasty marks then
16:47
it's just too much for me anyway
16:49
for what I want.
16:51
I think a lot of this comes back to clarity
16:54
doesn't it? And when you're talking about
16:56
having too many things in there and
16:59
it being in a muddle it's
17:01
because there is no clarity and this
17:03
is always the conversation between you as
17:06
the painter and the viewer
17:10
and what it is that you want to say.
17:12
And you could look at some paintings
17:15
like, top of my head, Thinking of Basquiat,
17:18
you know they're not composed
17:22
with particular weighting
17:24
in different areas. Like the whole surface
17:27
of the painting is covered in many
17:29
ways with quite similar work. So
17:33
it's a very different approach to the design
17:35
of the painting but what that actually does
17:37
then is it's almost like you're
17:39
not distracted by a really strong
17:42
design. You're really looking at the elements
17:44
and you're looking at the colours and
17:47
you're looking at actually the story that he's trying
17:49
to tell within the shapes that he's chosen. It's
17:52
not about, let's
17:55
say you know with a Rothko piece where he's
17:57
really refined it down and the
18:01
shapes are kept so simple that
18:03
really all you're looking at is
18:06
the proportion of shapes and the
18:08
way that those colours vibrate against
18:10
each other. And by keeping it that
18:12
pure, that has a really
18:15
strong kind of emotional resonance, so
18:17
that's what he's aiming for with you. So
18:19
it comes down to your intention, doesn't it?
18:22
Well, in that sense, I think a lot of it does come
18:24
down to your personality, and I think that's
18:26
why I have a problem with those
18:29
kind of set
18:32
pieces of design or
18:34
composition. And I do think that there is
18:36
a place for learning about those, and
18:40
then there is a place for moving on from that
18:42
and deciding what you want to do with that information.
18:46
It's like learning
18:48
anything, is it? Like learning a piece of music or learning
18:50
piano or learning a language. You've got
18:53
to do the exercises, and
18:56
then you get to freewheel it. And
18:58
in terms of this question, I guess
19:01
that both of you know it's instinctive or intuitive,
19:05
you will have a different instinctive response
19:08
than I will to what you're doing
19:10
in your work, and what
19:12
I'm doing in my work. And
19:14
there might be, and even me within
19:16
my own work, there have been stages
19:19
where I have been playing with
19:21
very different design considerations
19:24
than I'm playing with now. What
19:26
I want to play with now is something where
19:30
it's much simpler,
19:31
it's not as bold, there's not
19:33
as much contrast, so that
19:36
you look at other things within the painting.
19:38
And
19:38
that's what you get to play with. And that's where I
19:40
think contrast is such a powerful
19:42
idea because
19:45
when you say contrast, people think
19:47
you're saying have lots of contrast. I'm
19:50
saying
19:51
have,
19:52
just like you said with Roscoe, he's
19:54
taken all the other things away
19:57
that he could have been contrasty with like
19:59
Marx and the other things.
19:59
textures
20:00
and made it really basic.
20:03
I have one shape that's bigger than another
20:05
so it's not
20:08
even and then I have I want
20:10
you to look at the colour and that
20:12
is because I've taken everything else away
20:14
you'll feel the colour so much more
20:16
than if all this other stuff was going on. Whereas
20:19
with Basquack who I'm a bit obsessed
20:22
with at the moment I just bought two books which
20:24
I cannot stop going through. He's
20:28
not obsessed with that as a consideration
20:30
at all I don't think and yet there's
20:34
so much contrast in his work as well
20:36
so he'll never have he'll have his say his
20:39
naive figures but he won't
20:41
have three the same size in a row
20:43
and he won't have the
20:46
same size writing in the background
20:48
all the time it will vary and move and
20:50
naturally it has a design that's
20:53
exciting to look at. I don't
20:55
always believe that every artist
20:57
is consciously doing that stuff
20:59
although I think lots are.
21:02
Or consciously doing it thinking about
21:05
composition I mean not going is
21:07
my composition perfect but it's the thing
21:09
which you recognise
21:10
when you've got some experience. Yeah
21:13
what I need to do Monet must
21:15
have thought I need to make that water lily
21:17
smaller than that one because of the moment they're
21:20
all the same size and that's making
21:22
it boring.
21:24
So I love this
21:26
when what I try and teach people
21:28
at the later stages of our courses
21:31
yes contrast is great for
21:33
interest
21:33
but
21:35
if you want say you're painting
21:37
to feel very calm and peaceful
21:39
and quiet
21:40
you're not going to do that with very strong
21:43
value contrast that's going to have the opposite
21:45
effect. So it's not
21:47
about making things contrast it's
21:50
about what you said understanding
21:52
what contrast does and
21:54
then manipulating it to get the
21:57
effect that you're looking for.
22:00
And that is where it's
22:02
not always instinctive for me.
22:05
I might have to think if I'm trying
22:07
to create a particular feeling, I
22:10
might have to step back and say, you know why
22:13
it's not feeling like that? Because it's gone too
22:15
far this way or too
22:17
far that way.
22:19
So it sometimes is instinctive
22:21
and intuitive, but it often I
22:24
do have to look and see what I've done
22:26
wrong, so to speak.
22:28
And I think those wrong routes as well,
22:31
they're an important part of the journey because
22:33
sometimes this
22:36
has happened to me in paintings before, like I've
22:38
made the beginning marks, maybe with something,
22:41
and I often go, well I used to, I'm
22:43
not sure I'm doing it so much anymore interestingly, go
22:46
quite high contrast at the beginning. And
22:49
I think because of that inherent
22:51
sense of design training, I can
22:54
kind of put them in the right place and it feels balanced.
22:57
And then I can look back and think, well that's
22:59
kind of done now. Yeah. Like
23:02
where do I go from there? But the painting
23:04
is thin still. Like it's,
23:07
it's like everything's in the right
23:09
place. It's strong because I might
23:11
have been doing like navy blue or
23:13
dark on a white gesso background.
23:17
But there's no depth of
23:19
substance to it. So quite
23:22
often I deliberately
23:24
put things in the wrong place so that I have to
23:26
work my way back from them. Yeah.
23:30
Because it's that kind of adjustment
23:33
and change that gives a
23:35
painting its history that for me is
23:37
interesting. And that's why
23:39
I
23:40
struggle with, I mean
23:42
I'm obsessed when people say, oh yeah, you know, I
23:45
can do a painting and get it done in an hour
23:48
or a morning or a day. I'm like, I
23:50
want to do that. Like
23:53
that sounds to me like
23:55
it would be very satisfying.
23:59
But would it be?
23:59
I don't know. So we just approach things
24:02
in different ways, you see. There is a reason why I
24:04
don't do that. I like
24:06
finding my route to the design
24:08
of the painting through the process of doing
24:10
it. And for me, that means sometimes deliberately
24:12
doing it wrong. But I think you do have
24:15
to know, you know, when it feels
24:18
right, and also know what
24:21
you're aiming for in design terms. So I'm just
24:23
looking up ahead of me a page
24:26
that I've torn out of the magazine,
24:29
which has got,
24:31
I don't know if they're charcoal drawings,
24:33
but they're big. They're like
24:35
one and a half meters tall, charcoal
24:37
drawings in a frame, and it's from an
24:40
interior magazine. And
24:42
there are two of them, and they're
24:44
almost like reverse images of
24:46
each other in terms of the black and white. And
24:49
each one is a figure deliberately
24:52
standing very centrally in
24:54
this
24:54
space,
24:55
with very high contrast, just black and white,
24:58
figure central.
25:01
That's a design or compositional decision
25:04
that makes sense for that piece. I
25:07
don't feel that's ever a design
25:09
or compositional decision that makes
25:12
sense in my work, because I don't want you just looking at one thing. I
25:15
want you looking at everything. So you've got
25:17
to know
25:17
what it is you want the viewer to do and why
25:20
you're doing that painting.
25:22
And then you choose the design. You
25:24
go with the design,
25:25
what suits.
25:27
Yeah,
25:27
because people will sometimes say, well,
25:30
should I have a focal point?
25:32
And if, should you have one focal
25:34
point? Who
25:37
knows? Should you? The question is,
25:39
what's it about? And maybe
25:42
you should, as you said, with the person in the middle, and maybe it won't
25:44
be in the middle. Maybe
25:46
you're painting a floral
25:48
in
25:49
a vase, and you
25:52
put the flowers, if you put the flowers
25:55
in the vase right in the middle of the painting, that says one thing. If
25:57
you move the vase, you can do it.
25:59
of flowers off right to the
26:02
side and have an empty table with a vase
26:04
of flowers and maybe you have it
26:06
from further away, that's got a
26:08
totally different feeling already even
26:10
before you start with colour and tone.
26:13
You could make that feel quite ominous if
26:15
you used very darks and lights and
26:18
blues and greens and made it
26:20
feel cold. That vase
26:22
of flowers could turn into something quite
26:25
eerie the way you compose
26:26
it.
26:28
Same if you want
26:30
us to just look at one red rose
26:32
amongst all these flowers then that might, yes
26:35
you might want a focal point and you might want to
26:37
draw us to that but you might
26:39
want us to look at all the flowers and you might want to
26:41
fill the frame with the flowers
26:43
in which case you won't want
26:45
to make them all really vibrant
26:48
and strong because it will be too much but
26:50
we might though. I wouldn't
26:53
want to, you might want to but you
26:55
could have little, five
26:57
focal points around the flowers where
26:59
we are drawn to look so you move
27:02
us around everything. So
27:04
it really is about, it all
27:06
comes back to intention doesn't it? Well
27:08
it's understanding
27:10
how it works
27:11
and then knowing what you want to do with
27:14
it to
27:15
make the decision and that takes time.
27:18
So
27:18
coming back to this question because I think it
27:20
is an interesting one. If we're talking about
27:22
design basically meaning
27:25
the visual areas
27:27
or shapes that you have in
27:29
your painting which doesn't necessarily
27:32
mean a triangle or a square or you
27:34
know but the visual
27:36
areas or shapes that you have that make up
27:39
your painting and the
27:41
contrast that allows you to see them either
27:44
boldly or more subtly
27:46
if that's design. Where does line
27:48
fit in? Because line
27:51
is a
27:52
shape, it's a very thin shape
27:56
but it does play a slightly
27:58
different role for me.
27:59
anyway. It's
28:01
interesting that this person's thought
28:03
that our views of lines how do
28:05
you use line?
28:08
Often for me that
28:10
it's a slight hint at
28:13
realism
28:15
so in my abstract landscapes
28:17
the line might hint at a stone
28:19
wall there
28:23
might just be faint marks
28:25
that look like stone walls there might be
28:28
faint marks that look like fence posts
28:31
or grasses and
28:33
then everything else might be very abstract.
28:37
In the current self-portrait
28:40
work that I'm doing
28:41
the lines I love
28:44
drawing I love drawing
28:46
I
28:46
still love it I love the look
28:49
of drawing so I like to
28:51
contrast paint application
28:53
loose paint application with quite
28:55
precise drawn lines I really
28:58
like that contrast.
29:00
I don't do it very successfully always but
29:02
that's what I really would love to get to so
29:04
at the moment in these self-portraits
29:07
I have some drawn hands and some drawn
29:09
feet that are part of the composition
29:12
and then there'll be a lot of loose paint and ink
29:14
and other things on there.
29:18
So I think that's what they're
29:20
referring to when they talk
29:22
about line. The other way I think
29:25
I use it is it's another contrasting
29:27
thing so if I've got lots of
29:30
loose paint just having a
29:32
line a thin line a thick line
29:35
different types of line is a nice different
29:38
thing that our eye can latch onto and go oh
29:40
that's interesting that's I've not seen
29:42
that but I do like
29:45
my lines to kind of come in
29:47
and out of things I don't like
29:49
when there's if I'm going to draw a hand I don't
29:52
like the whole hand being drawn there I want
29:54
it to be mostly
29:56
disguised and just be a hint so
29:59
I think that's how I use
30:02
it.
30:03
Yeah
30:04
and I think when you're talking about
30:06
painting like that and then having the
30:09
linear elements of something that's a more
30:11
recognisable and precise form,
30:14
it's important to know that that's where
30:16
we're going to look like because it's
30:19
more immediately accessible
30:21
for our
30:22
brain to understand so that's where we'll look first.
30:25
That's maybe why I don't like it being fully
30:27
defined actually
30:29
because if it's right there's a clearly
30:31
drawn hand and a mushy
30:34
face you're going to look at the clearly drawn
30:37
hand so it's finding the balance where
30:39
it starts to just be something
30:41
you notice later.
30:43
And also where that happens, where
30:45
that point of distinction is within your
30:47
work,
30:49
where you lay it out or where you place
30:51
it or where you design it on your painting
30:54
is important.
30:57
That is a conscious consideration.
31:00
That part is, it could be
31:02
intuitive but it is also a conscious, like
31:04
if you have a painting and you have as
31:06
you say three hands in different formations
31:09
along the middle of the painting, that's
31:12
going to be a very different feel to
31:14
it than a painting that's got them existing
31:17
in other places where it feels like there might be a
31:19
whole figure coming out of these abstract marks.
31:23
It is a conscious decision.
31:25
And I really get that in one of the
31:27
pictures I put on Instagram I had
31:29
put for my liking too much
31:32
of my face in, too many features,
31:34
it was too much of a drawing and
31:38
I just put work in progress on Instagram
31:41
anyway it's not to be finished but lots of people were
31:43
like oh I love that one it looks just like you. I'm
31:45
like no that's going to get obliterated again
31:47
because to me it felt
31:50
just what you said because it was clearly drawn,
31:53
I didn't have the words for it but now you've said
31:55
it, because it was clearly drawn
31:57
that's all you looked at and the rest of it was
31:59
disappearing. and I don't want that. So
32:01
I'm battling at the moment with drawing
32:04
and painting and trying to
32:06
find my way to where I'm happy with
32:09
enough of a hint that it's interesting
32:11
but not too much that you only stare at the
32:13
real bits.
32:15
So what about for you?
32:17
Because obviously in a way
32:19
I feel like line has
32:21
changed a
32:22
bit for you because when I first found
32:24
your work it was quite different than now.
32:27
I was just thinking that, bearing
32:29
in mind the time that's passed between this
32:32
question coming in and what I'm
32:34
doing now but I think almost in the last
32:37
set of work I have deliberately tried
32:39
not to use line but initially
32:42
for me it was a part of crossing over
32:45
from drawings that I would
32:47
have done out in the landscape for
32:49
one thing and a
32:52
kind of physical question of like
32:54
with a material shift and with a scale shift
32:56
how do I get that same feeling in a painting
33:00
that I've got in a drawing?
33:01
Because it's on a very
33:03
different scale
33:04
and you've got a lot of other things
33:06
going on. When you draw a line that's just a drawing,
33:08
it's just a mark or pencil mark or that's
33:11
all you've got to look at so you can see it. As
33:14
soon as you're painting you've got texture,
33:16
you've got colour, you've got brush
33:18
marks, you've got usually a lot more space
33:21
so anything linear is much smaller
33:23
within that space so it's a
33:25
very different set of
33:27
situations to think how
33:30
is this line going to have the
33:32
impact that I want it to have
33:34
or not to have and the answer
33:37
is usually not just to put more on because
33:39
that makes things more of a muddle
33:42
but scale, line
33:45
and scale is a tricky thing when you
33:47
start painting larger and
33:49
so I think my more
33:51
recent paintings I've deliberately tried
33:54
to avoid using line because
33:57
there were certain stage
34:00
where I felt it was becoming a
34:02
little bit too reliable. And
34:05
I wanted to explore something
34:08
different and because it has that definition, as
34:10
soon as you put lines in, that's
34:13
what you look at. I use
34:15
them to cross spaces so they're directional.
34:17
I use
34:19
them to reference movement, often
34:22
air, wind. I
34:26
use a line,
34:28
I had a phase definitely where I used
34:31
the line created by paints dripping
34:35
very consciously. The
34:37
line that was created not by
34:40
me but often quite controlled.
34:42
But of course that's a straight
34:45
rigid line, that's not a drawn curved line.
34:47
I don't like curves, I'm not very good
34:49
with curves. I like
34:51
lines to be direction and movement
34:54
and have corners.
34:56
It's funny that's where I struggle.
34:58
So I always admire that in
35:01
your paintings or when you used to
35:03
do a lot of directional line in the abstract
35:06
landscape.
35:07
I loved it but if I tried it I'd
35:09
have to get rid of it again. Be like no
35:11
it don't feel right because I can't
35:13
make that feel right. I
35:16
can make
35:17
down lines feel okay.
35:20
If they're coming from the sky down
35:22
I can manage that but for some reason
35:24
that didn't
35:24
work for me. And
35:27
this is where I
35:28
think when we see
35:30
what someone else is doing in design it's
35:32
good to try it if you want to.
35:35
Just to find out that either
35:37
oh yeah that fits me or no that really
35:39
doesn't fit me. Because you're not copying. If
35:41
it fits you you'll find your own way
35:44
with it anyway. But often
35:47
what you like in someone else's paintings
35:49
doesn't actually work for you when you
35:52
try it. No
35:53
and the other thing is lines
35:56
are
35:58
created in a very
35:59
So we've been talking about lines
36:02
that are created consciously and deliberately
36:04
as a form of drawing. But of course,
36:06
lines also exist wherever you have an edge.
36:09
So
36:10
that is a line.
36:14
And I think that that's something
36:17
that often catches people out. They're
36:19
thinking perhaps about the patches
36:22
of their painting and where
36:25
that join is between two areas,
36:27
particularly if it's a sharp edge or
36:30
if it's a messy edge. Like what are your edges
36:33
like between the spaces? Where are they
36:35
soft? Where are they sharp?
36:37
Because again, that will be a point of contrast that
36:40
people will see, notice
36:43
and can get you stuck in a certain place
36:45
rather than it's just
36:48
that you just need to be aware of it. You just need to be
36:50
aware of it.
36:52
Yeah. So the thing that really draws
36:54
attention
36:55
is anything text, anything
36:59
with readable words. Back to the definition thing
37:01
you see. Yeah. Anything to do with a face, we'll
37:04
see it. And that's why often in
37:06
abstract paintings people go, oh, it looks like a person.
37:08
It looks like a face because we're
37:10
designed to find eyes,
37:13
other people, things
37:16
that are hunting us. Anything that
37:18
we need to pay attention to, which is
37:20
text these days. It
37:22
would have been the detail of something moving,
37:26
but now it's text. So yeah, where you put
37:28
your text, watch it. I
37:30
can remember when I first had a
37:32
painting in a group exhibition, the curator,
37:35
it was just a local group exhibition
37:38
and she came over and I was using
37:41
collage text and then I
37:43
was sanding it so you could hardly read it. And it was
37:45
as part of a stone wall. It was like
37:48
making up the texture
37:48
of the stone wall.
37:50
And this lady said, oh, what
37:52
would be really great if you
37:54
made that text to be something meaningful
37:56
about the role of farmers in
37:58
the local landscape? and the whatever,
38:01
I don't know. And I said, oh, actually,
38:04
no, because for me, it's important,
38:07
you can't read it. I really want it to be mysterious.
38:09
So you try and get closer and then you can't read it.
38:11
And she went, oh, okay
38:13
then. And she got really offended and
38:16
walked
38:16
off because I wasn't taking her
38:18
advice. But
38:20
if you want to make a point like
38:22
that, yes, make the text readable, because
38:24
we will read any text. We will
38:26
go for it and look for it. But
38:29
actually, I really have always liked
38:31
that idea of just distressing
38:33
it or confusing it enough that it
38:37
makes you look at it and then
38:39
you can't quite make sense of it. So
38:41
often I'll hand dry on my paintings
38:44
and then cover
38:44
some of it over. So what I've written doesn't
38:47
quite make sense. You can't quite piece
38:49
together what it
38:50
once said. I don't know why I like that, but
38:53
I like that. And I've always done that. But
38:55
yes, if you collage on a
38:57
lovely text from a newspaper or a magazine
39:00
and you don't do
39:01
something with it, we're gonna stare at that and we're not
39:03
gonna see anything else.
39:05
And that's the important thing here, isn't it? Is
39:07
that it's another area where
39:09
you get to push it. Like
39:12
the piece that I bought last week from somebody,
39:14
he had a little block of very deliberately
39:16
legible, readable text. And it's
39:19
right up, sort of on the top
39:21
on a kind of awkward corner. And
39:24
I like the awkwardness of it.
39:27
So, you
39:29
know, if it was in a composition book,
39:31
this is how to do composition, probably wouldn't
39:33
be in there. But I like that
39:36
deliberate
39:37
awkwardness of it. Yeah.
39:40
And that's, again,
39:42
it's one of those things that it's important
39:44
to recognize in yourself
39:46
what you like, pay attention
39:48
to why you're liking things that
39:51
you see in other people. And it's
39:53
hard to do in your own work.
39:55
But I think if this is something
39:57
that you want to explore, area
40:00
where collage is so helpful
40:03
because you do get to do the thing that I was talking
40:05
about at the beginning of move things
40:07
round and actually you don't even have
40:10
to stick them down if you don't want to.
40:12
You know you can move them,
40:14
take a photograph, move them and
40:16
use two pieces
40:19
of card cut in L's to make crops. Move
40:22
the shapes around and give yourself shapes
40:25
that are contrasting
40:27
in scale, shape, size,
40:30
a bunch of lines and you
40:33
can create an exercise yourself where you cut things
40:35
out of black paper, grey paper and white paper
40:38
or
40:38
all
40:40
low contrast paper
40:43
and do some exercises for yourself
40:45
and notice what do you like. Do you like it where
40:47
it gets busy? Do you like it where there's tension
40:50
at the edge? Do you like it where things are settled
40:52
in the middle? Yeah
40:55
and it's even if you get a
40:57
photograph from a magazine for example you
40:59
know cut out all the objects from it and try
41:01
and position them in a different place to something
41:03
that feels more satisfying to you and
41:06
I think that collage is a really
41:09
helpful way to learn what
41:11
you like compositionally before you get
41:13
into the muddle of trying to do it with
41:15
paint.
41:17
Yes one of my favorite
41:19
things to do in my sketchbook if I'm just playing
41:21
around is to take a
41:23
piece of a random piece of collage
41:25
paper something really ugly
41:28
or something that isn't special
41:30
in any way, stick it down on a sketchbook
41:32
page and then make a composition
41:35
out of it so it looks good like
41:37
to find
41:40
a way to compose it so that I feel good
41:42
about it. Can't always do it because sometimes
41:44
it's
41:44
just so horrible that I can't
41:45
fix it sometimes I have to paint over it but
41:48
that is a nice exercise and
41:50
when I told that to Jane Davis some
41:53
people might know Jane in up in Vermont
41:55
and she said oh I do the same thing but I
41:58
try and deliberately make it as horrible as possible.
41:59
as possible
42:00
as an exercise, which is another
42:02
fun one. So take something and
42:05
try and put something as clashy and wrong
42:07
as possible with it, because sometimes
42:09
by trying
42:10
to make it as horrible as
42:13
possible,
42:14
you actually make something exciting that
42:17
you can take forward, because
42:19
you surprise yourself with not trying to make
42:21
it balanced and nice. So
42:24
yeah, I think it's just about experimenting,
42:26
isn't it? Having fun and trying things
42:28
out and seeing, I do always
42:31
emphasize to people what we've been saying that
42:33
it is about what you like in the end, just
42:36
what you said about the
42:37
one you bought that doesn't actually fit
42:40
any of the principles you would think it should
42:42
fit, but you love it.
42:44
In the end, someone else will if you do.
42:46
So it's finding what you love.
42:50
You just have to understand these things we're
42:53
talking about, because if you do put drawn
42:55
face and a big piece of text,
42:57
people will stare at those things and
43:00
you need to
43:00
understand that. But if that's what you want, that's fine. Yeah.
43:03
Yeah.
43:04
It's tricky because it's quite a hard
43:06
thing to talk about without showing
43:09
it. Showing any visual examples
43:12
like we were saying, I put
43:14
something down and then try and make it work. I
43:16
can imagine that there might be, wait, but what do you mean
43:18
make it work? Maybe I'll do a YouTube
43:21
video. So
43:24
for me, it's often a question of
43:27
looking at maybe extremes of balance.
43:29
Have I got spaces that are calm?
43:32
Where am I looking? It can be very small
43:34
bits that are
43:37
either very high contrast or much more
43:39
intense with color. I've been doing a lot of collages
43:41
in my sketchbook recently that are very muted,
43:44
very gentle backgrounds. And then there's a tiny,
43:47
tiny, tiny bit of something very bright in there.
43:50
And
43:51
for me, collage is very
43:53
often a way where I explore an
43:56
idea a long way before it hits
43:58
my painting. a plan
44:00
for a painting, not as a deliberate thing, but
44:03
it's where it's easier for me
44:05
just to instinctively pick
44:07
something up from a pile of magazine
44:09
colours or pages and
44:12
play with how it suits me and
44:15
what I'm noticing and what I like. And
44:18
then often it comes out in paintings, you know, maybe even
44:20
a year later. But
44:23
it's a really
44:23
great way to explain. Do
44:25
you remember that exercise that we
44:27
did? This is a fun thing to do if you've got friends.
44:29
Do you remember that exercise we did on that drawing
44:32
course up in Yorkshire? Yes,
44:34
you got that. So we
44:36
had two, people were
44:38
in a group, eight people in a group,
44:41
and we had a large sheet of
44:43
white paper and then we had a sheet of black
44:46
paper and they had to tear the
44:48
paper up into the black paper
44:50
into different, as many
44:52
different shapes as they could. So
44:55
long thin shapes, round shapes,
44:57
square shapes, different sizes. So they got their
44:59
own different things to start
45:02
with. And then you had to take it in turns.
45:05
Each person had to put down a
45:07
black shape on the white and
45:09
then the next person had to put down another
45:12
black shape which helped
45:14
or disrupted the composition. So
45:16
it was a kind of collaborative
45:19
thing to create a composition
45:22
out of these super high contrast shapes. And
45:25
what was so interesting was the discussion, how
45:27
people had different intentions for where
45:29
they wanted the composition to go. So
45:31
there was a little bit of battling going on. Yeah, it
45:34
was a fun thing to do.
45:36
Yeah, you're doing it and you're thinking, oh, she's
45:38
just ruining my composition.
45:42
It's
45:42
interesting to notice where actually you do have a
45:44
plan when someone else comes in and you're like, oh,
45:46
yeah, so that way. So
45:48
we do all have a sense of it.
45:50
Okay,
45:56
so what's inspired this week? I
45:58
have something to recommend.
45:59
which is I've been watching on iPlayer
46:02
just finished four episodes of
46:04
Boiling Point
46:07
which is a drama set in a restaurant.
46:09
When I mentioned it to Alice she said, who
46:11
did you see the film? And I didn't because I
46:13
think it's the follow-on to
46:16
a film.
46:17
Was the film on TV too?
46:19
No the film was only in cinemas
46:22
and what was interesting in the film was
46:24
it is set
46:25
in real time
46:28
in a working restaurant and the
46:31
entire film was done in one take. Yeah.
46:34
One moving camera take,
46:37
no cuts, no clips, a moving
46:39
camera working through
46:41
an active restaurant
46:44
with everybody having to get everything right,
46:47
cameras moved, lines said.
46:49
I think so much work in a film.
46:51
Absolutely
46:52
extraordinary.
46:54
Yeah. And now it's a series
46:57
yeah. The drama doesn't do that
47:00
but I can see how it gets that feeling
47:03
actually because what I thought when it ended
47:05
was I feel like I was dropped
47:07
into another world
47:09
that actually exists. I feel
47:11
like those people are out there now still
47:14
doing all that stuff every day and I
47:17
just
47:17
got to be part of it for a little while. It's
47:19
very real life
47:21
but of course it's more interesting than real life
47:24
because real life would be quite boring to watch
47:26
but it's very structured
47:28
as a drama but not in a way that you notice
47:30
it's happening. You kind of don't see the men
47:34
behind the curtain, you're just in it and
47:36
you really and if anyone does
47:38
try it I would say the first episode
47:41
you've got to give yourself time to really get
47:42
into it. You've got to go to episode two because by
47:44
episode two I
47:46
was just so like oh my god
47:49
I want to live with these people forever I want to
47:51
keep watching this all the time. It's fantastic
47:53
I loved it and such a
47:56
so beautifully written every
47:58
that I always admire.
47:59
the artistry, like every character
48:02
is beautifully delineated
48:05
and every actor is doing their
48:07
absolute best work and yeah
48:09
it's just brilliant.
48:11
And I felt the same about the woman in
48:13
the wall which was
48:16
again it's on BBC and I think in the States
48:18
it's going to be on Paramount because I checked for somebody
48:20
yesterday and it's about
48:23
an extraordinary period in Ireland's
48:26
history and
48:29
I got to episode five and
48:31
when it finished, like the first
48:33
episodes were about, this is a bit weird, I'm not
48:35
quite sure what's going on here, and
48:38
I got to episode five and I thought
48:40
the writing, the
48:43
acting, the way they have chosen
48:46
to tell this whole story
48:49
is the most extraordinary thing. Just
48:52
as you say, just complete appreciation
48:55
for it, it's just mind-blowing
48:57
and on a very
48:59
different level but the same, like
49:03
from high level to in the gutter,
49:05
right? Okay, can't
49:08
believe I'm admitting this that loud. In
49:10
my procrastination effort I
49:12
started watching Married at First Sight
49:15
UK. Oh,
49:16
oh I could, I
49:19
can trust you because I watched My
49:22
Mum Your Dad on ITV.
49:25
The reason that I'm bringing it up now
49:28
is and how it relates to art is, and
49:30
you, like we know these things are going
49:32
to be addictive and we also
49:35
know, like you start, like literally started watching
49:37
the first episodes of Women in the Wall thinking, what's
49:39
going on here? Okay, her accent's
49:41
good but like where is this going to go? Started
49:44
watching Married at First Sight thinking, why am I watching
49:47
this? You know, these are people, okay interesting
49:49
idea for a series
49:52
but you know, they're people I don't know, I don't
49:54
really care about. By
49:56
episode five I really care.
49:58
Like I really care.
50:01
I'm really in it. I'm really invested. And
50:03
it did make me think how often
50:06
we
50:08
risk giving up episode one or two
50:10
of our own work.
50:12
Rather than getting to episode
50:14
four or five where you're invested and
50:17
you're really keen to know what happens next. That's
50:19
a really good way of turning
50:22
trash TV into a moral lesson.
50:27
You're welcome. My mom, your dad. I
50:30
totally got so invested that by
50:32
the, it's like some kids bring their moms
50:34
and dads to meet each other in a house and then
50:36
they have to fall in love. And
50:39
I got so invested that when it finished, I
50:41
watched my mom, your dad Australia.
50:44
Because I was like, okay, I
50:46
want to keep seeing this happen.
50:49
Welcome to Art Juice, your highbrow
50:51
art discussion.
50:52
So
50:56
on that note, I think I'll finish for this
50:58
week and
50:59
wish you all a very creative week
51:02
and we will see you next time. And
51:05
I do actually have something a little bit highbrow
51:07
next time. So
51:09
if you're listening, Christie. We feel
51:12
like we dragged you into the gutter. Really
51:14
sorry. You will be
51:16
raising the game.
51:17
So yeah,
51:19
that's coming next week. All right. Well,
51:22
we'll see you next time. Okay. Bye bye.
51:24
Bye.
51:57
Bye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More