Podchaser Logo
Home
18 – A Popperian Evaluation Of Neuralink’s Presentation

18 – A Popperian Evaluation Of Neuralink’s Presentation

Released Sunday, 6th September 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
18 – A Popperian Evaluation Of Neuralink’s Presentation

18 – A Popperian Evaluation Of Neuralink’s Presentation

18 – A Popperian Evaluation Of Neuralink’s Presentation

18 – A Popperian Evaluation Of Neuralink’s Presentation

Sunday, 6th September 2020
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Applying some of Karl Popper's and David Deutsch's ideas to analyze and evaluate Elon Musk's recent Neuralink presentation and the Q&A afterward. Throwing some of my own ideas into the mix as well. Errors mine.

If you enjoyed this episode, follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/dchackethal

References- The original presentation and Q&A: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVvmgjBL74w- The neo-Darwinian theory of the mind (written article): https://medium.com/conjecture-magazine/the-neo-darwinian-theory-of-the-mind-d84c0bcc6485- The neo-Darwinian theory of the mind (read out loud): https://soundcloud.com/dchacke/16-the-neo-darwinian-theory-of-the-mind- David Deutsch’s interview on CBC radio: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/tapestry/the-new-human-1.4696724/oxford-physicist-predicts-ai-will-be-human-in-all-but-name-1.4696754- David Deutsch’s second interview with Sam Harris: https://samharris.org/podcasts/finding-our-way-in-the-cosmos/- Article about fluid buildup replacing much of man’s brain: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12301-man-with-tiny-brain-shocks-doctors/- David Deutsch, “The Beginning of Infinity,” chapters 5 (levels of emergence and abstractions), 12 (bad philosophy), 13 (Balinksi’s and Young’s no-go theorem regarding “deriving” the will of the group from the will of each individual)- Karl Popper, “Objective Knowledge,” appendix “The Bucket and the Searchlight”- Karl Popper, “Alle Menschen sind Philosophen,” Kapitel “Zweites Präludium: Die Zukunft ist offen” (the conversation with Konrad Lorenz)- Redwood Center for Theoretical Neuroscience ("Our Goal" section): https://redwood.berkeley.edu/- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy

Additional source- Twitter thread by Dennis containing tweets made live during the event: https://twitter.com/dchackethal/status/1299500744287031296

Correction: at 15:00, I say that memories arealways based on self-replicating ideas *that have high longevity*.That's not true. A memory could be a self-replicating idea with lowlongevity but high fecundity and high copying fidelity.

Correction: I attributed the fact that there can be no consistent "will of the people" to Balinski & Young. That was a mistake. That's Arrow's theorem, discovered by Kenneth Arrow. Balinski & Young's theorem states that there can be no apportionment rules that meets quota without also causing a population paradox (cf. Deutsch, "The Beginning of Infinity," ch. 13).

Show More

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features