Podchaser Logo
Home
The Rest is History with Dr. Paula Hinton

The Rest is History with Dr. Paula Hinton

Released Monday, 11th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Rest is History with Dr. Paula Hinton

The Rest is History with Dr. Paula Hinton

The Rest is History with Dr. Paula Hinton

The Rest is History with Dr. Paula Hinton

Monday, 11th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

There’s one thing that always brings us together. Something that can

0:03

make even the hardest days a

0:07

little easier, and the heaviest

0:07

hearts a bit lighter - a

0:10

delicious home cooked meal. When

0:10

Jessica and I don’t feel like

0:14

cooking or we just want an easy,

0:14

fresh option for dinner, Miss

0:18

Sallie’s Market is always our

0:18

first choice. Bringing the best

0:22

locally sourced meals, baked

0:22

goods, meats and produce

0:26

straight to your table, Miss

0:26

Sallie’s Market has something

0:29

for everyone (including my 4

0:29

kids). Open 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM

0:34

Tuesday through Saturday, in the

0:34

bustling heart of Downtown

0:37

Gainsboro, Miss Sallie’s Market

0:37

is serving the highest quality

0:41

in locally sourced food daily.

0:51

Because otherwise, history then is just a laundry list. And that's why

0:53

people hate history I'd find

0:56

because they're thinking of the

0:56

laundry list. They have to

0:59

memorize these dates, these

0:59

things happen. And that's not

1:02

history. I mean, it's part of

1:02

it. But that's like the skeleton

1:06

that you hang everything else

1:06

on.

1:08

Welcome to Better Together with Kosta Yepifantsev, a podcast on

1:10

parenting business and living

1:14

life intentionally. We're here

1:14

every week to bring you

1:17

thoughtful conversation, making

1:17

your own path to success,

1:20

challenging the status quo, and

1:20

finding all the ways we're

1:23

better together. Here's your

1:23

host, Kosta Yepifantsev.

1:27

Hey, y'all,

1:27

it's Kosta. Today I'm here with

1:29

my guest, Dr. Paula Hinton,

1:29

historian and professor of

1:34

history at Tennessee

1:34

Technological University. Dr.

1:37

Hinton, as today's episode is a

1:37

bit different from our normal

1:41

episodes, would you start us off

1:41

with a bit of information about

1:44

how you became a historian? And

1:44

what a historian really is?

1:49

So I'll start

1:49

with the second part of your

1:51

question. First, a historian

1:51

gathers primary sources. So this

1:56

is diaries, letters, you know,

1:56

any kind of resource from the

2:00

time period, it can even be a

2:00

vase, it can be architecture,

2:04

whatever it is, that tells you

2:04

about that time period, and then

2:08

they, you know, research them,

2:08

interpret them, analyze them,

2:11

and then they put that together

2:11

into a narrative. And that's the

2:15

history then. So they might go

2:15

through 20 boxes of documents

2:19

from the federal government that

2:19

have to do with the attack on

2:22

Pearl Harbor, let's say, and

2:22

then they'll analyze them and

2:26

give you their interpretation

2:26

then of what happened. You know,

2:30

what the government knew when

2:30

they knew it? If they knew

2:32

anything, that kind of thing?

2:32

How'd you get into this, I

2:35

started out as a business major,

2:35

actually, Oh, wow. And dropped

2:41

accounting three different

2:41

times, I'm still angry about

2:44

that double entry thing. Makes

2:44

no sense to me. I just don't get

2:50

it. So I did that. And then I

2:50

switched to literature. But

2:55

always love to read. So I

2:55

thought that would be

2:57

interesting. And I was

2:57

surprisingly bored with that.

3:02

And so this is back in the days

3:02

when they would actually print

3:06

out a list of the classes being

3:06

offered the next semester. So I

3:11

got my highlighter out. And I

3:11

went through the entire booklet,

3:15

and highlighted anything and

3:15

everything that sounded remotely

3:18

interesting. And when I got

3:18

done, it was all grouped in

3:22

history, right. So I thought,

3:22

Okay, then I'll be a history

3:25

major. And so that's what I

3:25

started to do them. And then I

3:29

took a trip with one of my

3:29

classes. I was taking a history

3:33

of the Soviet Union class, and

3:33

we went to the Soviet Union.

3:36

This is in 1991. Wow.

3:38

Oh, my gosh, you were in the Soviet Union in 91. That was like the last year.

3:40

Oh, yeah. Oh, yes. That was an

3:44

absolute disarray. Yeah. What

3:44

was that? Like?

3:48

It was very

3:48

chaotic. Yes, we were there in

3:52

January. And we were there for

3:52

just a couple of weeks. But we

3:56

ended up in Lithuania. And while

3:56

we were there, they declared

3:59

their independence. And so they

3:59

were invaded. And so we were

4:03

trapped there. And what struck

4:03

me was I didn't know what was

4:07

going on. I didn't know who to

4:07

root for, you know, I mean, I

4:11

had a feeling I should root for

4:11

the Lithuanians. But I didn't

4:14

know why, you know, and it

4:14

really bothered me that I was in

4:18

the middle of this huge

4:18

historical event. And I didn't

4:21

know the significance of it. I

4:21

didn't know what came before.

4:25

You know, I just didn't know

4:25

anything really about it. And

4:28

that was really, really

4:28

frustrating to me, and just made

4:33

me feel real powerless and what

4:33

was going on. And so it's when I

4:38

really got interested then in

4:38

really delving into history kind

4:42

of comes out of that you cannot

4:42

understand the world around you

4:45

and your place in it unless you

4:45

know the facts of the past, you

4:50

know, and

4:50

if you aren't

4:50

willing to find out and learn

4:54

those facts, I think that's when

4:54

people default to anger and

4:58

frustration. confusion. So as

4:58

you're talking, I completely

5:03

resonate with what you're

5:03

saying, if you don't understand

5:06

your past, you're never going to

5:06

be able to reconcile what's

5:09

happening right now in the

5:09

present. Right. So I totally get

5:11

that the fact that you were

5:11

there at 91. That was, my

5:15

goodness,

5:15

it was we, we

5:15

went down to the square, we our

5:19

hotel was right on Red Square.

5:19

And we went down there, and

5:23

there was a big TV screen. And

5:23

Ronald Reagan came on to wish

5:27

the Soviets a merry Christmas or

5:27

a happy, happy new years. Yeah.

5:30

Because their calendars

5:30

different from ours. I mean, it

5:32

was just there was just all

5:32

kinds of historical things

5:35

happening, you know, and some of

5:35

it I recognized because I was

5:38

taking a history of the Soviet

5:38

Union class, but we hadn't

5:41

gotten to the more modern stuff.

5:41

So you know, it was again, but I

5:45

completely agree. And that's why

5:45

in my classes, you know, I talk

5:49

about, you know, presidents, not

5:49

all of them, but most of them,

5:53

and I talk about wars, I don't

5:53

get into a lot of battles and

5:57

things. But I spend most of my

5:57

time talking about why things

6:00

happened. And the significance

6:00

of them, you know, are they the

6:04

product of something else? Did

6:04

they help to cause something

6:07

else does it exemplify something

6:07

else? Because otherwise, history

6:11

then is just a laundry list. And

6:11

that's why people hate history,

6:14

I find, because they're thinking

6:14

of the laundry list, they have

6:17

to memorize these dates, these

6:17

things happen. And that's not

6:20

history, right? I mean, it's

6:20

part of it. But that's like the

6:23

skeleton that you hang

6:23

everything else on?

6:26

Well, I think

6:26

you also have to be able to open

6:28

your mind, if you're not open

6:28

minded to see that, you know,

6:32

there's a much bigger picture to

6:32

be painted, than you will only

6:36

focus on the laundry list, you

6:36

also have to be curious, you

6:39

know, and you also have to have

6:39

time to be curious. So, you

6:43

know, all those history majors,

6:43

I applaud you, I really do. Now,

6:48

you teach a variety of courses

6:48

at TTU. From the history of

6:53

horror films, to ghosts, myths

6:53

and legends, to the history of

6:58

crime in America. As someone who

6:58

knows what scares us and has

7:03

extensive knowledge of history

7:03

in the United States, how much

7:06

of what scares us is actually

7:06

real? So

7:10

that's kind of

7:10

a difficult question to answer,

7:12

but I'll give you my take on it.

7:12

If we're looking at the history

7:16

of crime, and answering that

7:16

question, research shows that

7:20

the majority of people believe

7:20

that there's much more crime

7:22

than there actually is. And a

7:22

lot of it has to do with all the

7:25

media that's available now, and

7:25

how aware we are of everything

7:29

that's going on. And in some

7:29

cases, you know, that play out,

7:34

you know, week by week in the

7:34

media. But there are still some

7:38

dangers there. There are real

7:38

dangers that you need to be

7:42

aware of. So that stuff is real,

7:42

there are really seriously bad

7:47

people. I mean, there's some

7:47

people that are misunderstood,

7:50

but I'm talking to really bad people. They're not misunderstood. They're not

7:51

confused. They don't wish. Yes,

7:55

yeah, yes, they're just evil.

7:55

I've just come to that

7:57

conclusion. You're just people

7:57

who are evil, so you have to

8:00

look out for them. If you look

8:00

at the ghosts, myths and legends

8:04

history of horror films side of

8:04

that, and you know, what scares

8:07

us what is what is real about

8:07

that, that goes to some of the

8:11

topics that I teach. One of my

8:11

favorites in the ghost myths and

8:14

legends class I talked about.

8:14

And most people have never heard

8:17

of this, there was a vampire

8:17

scare in the New England area in

8:21

the 1890s. And I mean, they were

8:21

decentering bodies, and taking

8:26

the hearts out and burning them

8:26

on a rock and then feeding them

8:30

to people they thought were

8:30

victims of vampires. I'm talking

8:33

serious here, now, not Dracula

8:33

vampire, but they believed that

8:38

the dead were somehow coming

8:38

back to feast off of family

8:42

members. And what was going on

8:42

was tuberculosis. That's what

8:46

they were seeing in it, you

8:46

know, the you look at the names

8:49

for tuberculosis, one of them is

8:49

consumption is consuming you.

8:53

And there is a galloping version

8:53

of tuberculosis that goes very

8:57

quickly. But most the time you

8:57

have tuberculosis for a very

9:00

long time. I always sort of

9:00

refer to it as the Edgar Allan

9:03

Poe, tuberculosis, where you

9:03

cough very delicately into your

9:06

little white hanky and that kind

9:06

of thing. And so it's this slow

9:10

wasting away. So when people

9:10

were just searching, you know,

9:13

for some kind of an answer to

9:13

what's going on, and how can I

9:16

save my family? Most of them

9:16

weren't sure it would really

9:20

work, but they're up for

9:20

anything at that point. So these

9:23

were God fearing really solid

9:23

citizens that were doing this,

9:26

you know, this wasn't, you know,

9:26

some crazy cult or something.

9:29

And it didn't happen all over

9:29

the place. But that was

9:33

fascinating to me. And that

9:33

tells us again, we can talk

9:36

about vampires, but underneath

9:36

that vampire scare is a real

9:40

disease or real sickness. If you

9:40

look at the Salem Witch Trials

9:44

again, there is so much going on

9:44

underneath the surface of that I

9:48

mean, just complete disorder in

9:48

the Puritan world and they're

9:52

just reacting to that and then

9:52

you mix in a few very bad girls

9:57

and a really bad Reverend and

9:57

you know, Things can get out of

10:00

control very easily.

10:02

I am curious,

10:02

though. So these are things that

10:06

happened in the 19th century.

10:06

But the same themes continued to

10:11

recur. I mean, obviously, we

10:11

live in a community that has a

10:16

majority perspective on how

10:16

things are, and what the

10:20

outcomes and consequences of

10:20

those things are. Is there any

10:24

way to look at how people feel

10:24

right now, in the end, the

10:29

decisions that they make, or the

10:29

excuses that they say, or the

10:33

things that they pick to

10:33

justify, I hear a lot of like,

10:39

you know, it's the end of the

10:39

world, the Second Coming all

10:42

that stuff. And this may be too

10:42

large of a question to answer

10:46

all at once, we may need to cut

10:46

it up and digest it one at a

10:50

time. But quick summary

10:50

question, what do you think is

10:53

causing everybody to think it's

10:53

n times, it's

10:58

fear of the

10:58

unknown, and change that feels

11:02

like it's happening too fast,

11:02

okay. And if we do see that

11:06

pattern through history, you

11:06

know, with the turn of the

11:10

century that you know, the

11:10

1900s, you have tremendous

11:12

change happening. And you have,

11:12

you know, people living in urban

11:17

areas, you know, in record

11:17

numbers, and they're living, you

11:20

know, in places they've never

11:20

lived before, a lot of them are

11:24

from rural areas, and there's

11:24

just this sense of things are

11:28

happening too quickly, I don't

11:28

feel comfortable in the world

11:31

that I'm in. And so this can't

11:31

be the way life is supposed to

11:35

be, there must be something

11:35

bigger going on, and it's

11:38

potentially

11:38

tarnishing the world as we know

11:41

it. So it must end all in a big

11:41

crash.

11:44

Correct. And

11:44

again, we've seen that too,

11:48

throughout history where

11:48

literally people think it's the

11:51

end of the world. Um, the best

11:51

example, if your listeners get a

11:54

chance, if they're not already

11:54

familiar with this, if you go on

11:58

YouTube, and you search for the

11:58

Dust Bowl, and the dust storms,

12:03

it'll blow your mind that looks

12:03

like the end of the world. I

12:06

mean, this is not a little

12:06

tornado of dust. It's the

12:10

complete horizon, and it's

12:10

coming slowly towards you like

12:13

some big blob of a monster. You

12:13

know, there were many people who

12:17

thought it was the end of the

12:17

world and a couple of incidents

12:19

where they actually killed their

12:19

children and spouse because they

12:23

didn't want them to suffer. You

12:23

know, I think in today's world

12:26

is just the sense that

12:26

technology is moving really

12:30

quickly.

12:31

I mean, AI,

12:31

oh, it's disrupting so many

12:35

professions. And

12:36

that has been,

12:36

you know, the focus of a lot of

12:39

sci fi films and short films for

12:39

a long time. Yeah. And now we're

12:42

living it. So it's pretty

12:42

spooky, scary stuff, you know?

12:46

So Elon Musk

12:46

said, in three years, we will

12:49

have AI that is more intelligent

12:49

than the most intelligent human.

12:54

And I'll be honest with you, I

12:54

pull out chat GPT. I did it. We

12:57

had some we had dinner with some

12:57

friends last night, and they've

13:00

never used Chad GPT. Or he'd

13:00

never he had never used GPT. And

13:04

I said, bro, like, what do you

13:04

want to say, you know, and we

13:07

and I asked him to write a

13:07

letter about taxes and hotels

13:11

and all this other stuff. And

13:11

literally, within seconds, wrote

13:15

an entire letter that was

13:15

coherent that somebody would

13:18

take, and they'd be like, yes,

13:18

makes sense. We can we can base

13:21

an argument and create a

13:21

conversation around it. So

13:24

people should be in terms of

13:24

being scared. They may have not

13:26

they may not have been scared or

13:26

not had a necessity to be

13:30

scared, but just computers, but

13:30

AI is something that will

13:33

transform our world. Oh, yeah.

13:35

It's already

13:35

starting to transform education.

13:37

Really? I'm beginning to catch

13:37

students who are using that for

13:42

their papers. How can you tell

13:42

though we have a program, okay,

13:46

that Tech has purchased, but

13:46

it's not ironclad, right? Even

13:52

the program says now you have to

13:52

kind of take this with a grain

13:55

of salt, you know, and so it's a

13:55

little wishy washy, but yeah,

13:59

it's it's frustrating, and I

13:59

think too, and maybe this is the

14:03

old lady in me, but I feel like

14:03

it's dumbing us down. I just

14:07

feel like we're getting dumber

14:07

and dumber. It started with you

14:11

know, we had spellcheck so

14:11

people stopped learning how to

14:13

spell correctly. What's the

14:13

point then they took cursive out

14:17

of the schools which blows my

14:17

mind. And now this one

14:21

before that,

14:21

Grammarly? Yeah, I use it all

14:23

the time. And I'm terrible at

14:23

grammar. Like when I say I'm

14:26

terrible at grammar. I could

14:26

write you a novel. The grammar

14:31

on that novel would be awful.

14:31

And that's what I always got

14:35

dinged on because I just I

14:35

guess, you know, I'm from out of

14:37

town, so I never really learned

14:39

but you know,

14:39

Grammarly today I was looking at

14:41

it because one of my students

14:41

was using it. And I went on

14:44

there and you can actually

14:44

change the tone Yes, of what

14:48

you're writing, right. So if you

14:48

wanted it to be snarky, or if

14:52

you wanted it to be cute if you

14:52

want it to be angry. That is

14:55

just that just blows my mind,

14:57

business,

14:57

business style or Prag. Matic

15:01

and it gives you a little smiley face too if you're if you're sounding cheerful. Oh my

15:02

goodness. Let's talk about your

15:06

course ghosts, myths and

15:06

legends. What's your favorite

15:10

lesson from this course? And

15:10

currently as a collective? Are

15:14

there ghosts myths and legends

15:14

we still believe in? Yes, there

15:19

are. So I'll

15:19

start with my favorite lesson is

15:22

really, when I talk about

15:22

spiritualism with my class. And

15:26

I'm really looking at modern

15:26

spiritualism that came out in

15:30

New York, actually, in the

15:30

1840s, with these two young

15:33

girls who told their parents

15:33

that they were communicating

15:37

with a ghost, the neighbors

15:37

heard and they came over to see

15:41

and it just kind of grew and

15:41

they they worked out this sort

15:43

of Morse code kind of system

15:43

with the ghost. And so people

15:47

came to listen and watch and of

15:47

course, PT Barnum popped up his

15:51

head and said, Hey, is there

15:51

money to be made here? You know,

15:55

and when you mean oh, that

15:55

wouldn't be bad. So yeah, and

16:00

and it very quickly turned into

16:00

then mediums started popping up

16:05

everywhere, seances and then

16:05

they start to use, you know,

16:10

more and more technologies

16:10

starts with spirit cabinets, and

16:13

then it's going to spirit

16:13

photography and all this kinds

16:16

of stuff. And it's just a lot of

16:16

fun to talk about. But it also

16:20

reveals so much about what's

16:20

going on in the country at the

16:24

time and in people's lives. And

16:24

I should say Spiritualism is is

16:28

the belief that there is an

16:28

afterlife, it's it's

16:31

Christianity. It's not devil

16:31

worship or anything like that.

16:34

It's the belief that there's an

16:34

afterlife, but that there is

16:37

maybe proof of it. And that's

16:37

what they're focused on how to

16:40

be real world. Yes, yeah. How

16:40

can we prove that there's an

16:43

afterlife? So that's what the

16:43

seances are for, or spirit

16:47

photography of all those things.

16:47

And so we see a spike in spirit

16:50

and spiritualism then, during

16:50

and after the Civil War during

16:54

and after World War One. This is

16:54

when people are desperate to get

16:59

in touch with loved ones who

16:59

have passed, they want to know

17:01

that they're okay. That's

17:01

usually the first question

17:03

they'll ask, Is he okay? You

17:03

know, and they liked the idea

17:08

that someday they'll see him

17:08

again. And so there's a lot of

17:12

that, you know, going on. It's

17:12

so

17:14

is it real,

17:14

though? Um,

17:17

I would say

17:17

that I am a real skeptic,

17:19

meaning I'm not convinced of

17:19

anything yet. But I'm open to

17:23

it.

17:24

And here's the thing My house is haunted. And so I mean, you know, I don't

17:26

know, I don't it seems like a

17:29

pretty friendly ghost. I've

17:29

talked about him before on the

17:31

show. We call him Casper. You

17:31

know, he's just things happen.

17:36

You know, weird things happen.

17:36

Probably short circuits and

17:40

electricity, but we think it's a

17:40

ghost. Like I said, very

17:43

friendly. Very nice. And, you

17:43

know, what? Not? Well, jive.

17:48

Yeah, exactly. So I am curious,

17:48

with regards to the spiritualism

17:53

in with it having such a close

17:53

component to Christianity. Does

17:56

the whole the the notion of the

17:56

Holy Spirit, does that, like

18:01

become developed through this

18:01

spiritualism? Or is that a

18:04

totally different aspect of

18:04

Christianity?

18:07

That's something that at least with my understanding of spiritualism,

18:09

that I've not seen, Spiritualism

18:12

is sort of broken off into into

18:12

other streams. And I'm not

18:16

familiar with every one of them,

18:16

but it's really looking at this

18:20

is a modern world. And surely,

18:20

with all the things that we're

18:23

inventing, we can come up with a

18:23

way to prove that there's a

18:26

heaven and a hell. I mean,

18:26

Edison was working on a

18:29

telephone to the other world. He

18:29

worked on that for years and

18:33

years, he thought we can

18:33

communicate with them just like

18:36

we do with the telephone. And so

18:36

when you have, you know, people

18:40

like that, that are taking it

18:40

seriously, it's fascinating. And

18:43

of course, then you've got the

18:43

whole Harry Houdini, part of it,

18:47

versus Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

18:49

was the significance in those two,

18:51

Harry Houdini

18:51

again, desperate to believe in

18:54

it, especially after his mother

18:54

died. He just really wanted to

18:57

know that she was okay that

18:57

there was an afterlife, but he

19:00

spent most of his time revealing

19:00

the fakers out there and so he

19:05

would go to seances. And after a

19:05

while, he had to start to

19:08

disguise himself because as soon

19:08

as they saw him, they would shut

19:10

everything down, but he would

19:10

expose them. And then he became

19:15

friends with Sir Arthur Conan

19:15

Doyle and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

19:18

completely embraced spiritualism

19:18

to the point where he got caught

19:24

up in an incident that kind of

19:24

turned embarrassing, not for him

19:29

because he refused to

19:29

acknowledge that something had

19:32

happened. But there were these

19:32

little girls who claimed that

19:36

they had photographs of fairies

19:36

that were in their backyard, and

19:39

he saw them and said, these are

19:39

absolutely real. This is

19:43

amazing. And he was so excited.

19:43

And other people looked at him

19:47

and said, Dude, you know, is

19:47

this is not Yeah. And this is

19:51

the guy who writes Sherlock

19:51

Holmes, you know? Yeah. And so

19:56

it's just interesting then to

19:56

see the clashes between the As

20:00

to Worlds then between the

20:00

people who want to believe the

20:03

people who do believe the people

20:03

who don't I mean, it all kind of

20:07

comes together. So

20:09

not to take

20:09

it too deep. But I just want to

20:12

just one more rung down. Sure.

20:12

What is it about this fight

20:17

between reality and what people

20:17

make up into perceived reality

20:22

that feeds your love of history,

20:22

like, why choose Why choose that

20:26

dynamic to talk about?

20:28

Well, think of

20:28

an example, I just got done

20:31

teaching Civil War to my

20:31

students in the survey class.

20:34

And one of the themes that I

20:34

talked to them about weeks

20:39

before we even start the

20:39

material is this idea of reality

20:42

versus perception. And if you

20:42

look at a lot of the bigger

20:46

incidents that sort of drive us

20:46

toward the Civil War, it has to

20:51

do with misinterpretations of

20:51

things, people believing that

20:55

something bigger and more

20:55

horrible is going on. So you

20:58

have something like the Nat

20:58

Turner slave revolt. And so this

21:02

is a slave revolt. And there

21:02

were, I think, don't quote me on

21:05

this, but something like 70 or

21:05

80 Whites who were killed. It

21:09

wasn't ultimately successful,

21:09

but it was the most successful

21:12

slave revolt in the United

21:12

States. And so then you look at,

21:16

you know, the the state, you

21:16

know, legislature gets together

21:19

just weeks later, and you can

21:19

read it, and they're trying to

21:22

figure out what's to blame,

21:22

who's to blame. And they don't

21:25

say Nat Turner, they don't say

21:25

slavery, they say, northern

21:29

white abolitionist, and that's

21:29

just ridiculous. Northern White

21:34

abolitionist had zero to do with

21:34

it. Some of them were cheering

21:37

it on. But but they didn't plot

21:37

this, but they believed they

21:41

did. And so you see that in

21:41

just, you know, time after time,

21:44

and the same is happening with

21:44

northerners who are perceiving

21:47

things like Uncle Tom's Cabin as

21:47

being nonfiction. Like there

21:51

really is, you know, the these

21:51

characters really do exist. Now,

21:55

of course, they're based on real

21:55

people, of course, but their

21:59

belief is that there is a Simon

21:59

lagree Somewhere living in

22:02

Kentucky, you know, and that

22:02

every southern white male is

22:06

just like him. And so that's

22:06

where I think there is this

22:10

collision between the two. And

22:10

oftentimes we see people acting

22:14

upon misperceptions, what they

22:14

think is going on instead of

22:18

what really is going on. So a

22:18

lot of history is that

22:23

having access

22:23

to fresh food and locally

22:26

sourced ingredients is something

22:26

John and Natasha Dean hold close

22:30

to their heart since their first

22:30

visit. 25 years ago, the Dean

22:34

family has worked within the

22:34

Jackson County community to help

22:37

build a destination where

22:37

tourists want to visit and

22:40

locals wants to stay opened in

22:40

fall of 2023. Miss Sally's

22:44

market is the newest addition to

22:44

the continued growth of gains

22:48

burrows historic this, offering

22:48

a wide array of farmers market

22:52

produce, meat and grains, in

22:52

addition to homemade locally

22:56

sourced meals, breads, baked

22:56

goods, and a fully stocked salad

23:00

bar. open Tuesday through

23:00

Saturday 10am to 8pm. Miss

23:05

Sally's market is honored to

23:05

provide guests with exceptional

23:08

quality foods from the

23:08

exceptional farms that For more

23:13

information, visit Miss Sally's

23:13

dot com. Right. And you think

23:21

that maybe some people are

23:21

acting on misperceptions now?

23:24

And do you think it's because

23:24

they're not willing to? Maybe do

23:28

you think it's because they just

23:28

don't have the time to digest

23:33

the information, the accurate

23:33

information because they're not

23:35

going to be able to find that

23:35

information on a YouTube, right

23:38

or on a tic tock or on an

23:38

Instagram, like they're going to

23:41

actually have to go and pick up

23:41

a history book and read it that

23:44

has primary sources in it.

23:45

I think there

23:45

are a handful of people who are

23:47

looking for information, but I

23:47

think most people are looking to

23:52

justify their own beliefs. Okay.

23:52

And so they're turning to people

23:55

who already agree with them. I'm

23:55

trying to think we've really

23:58

broken down into this us versus

23:58

them. There's no gray area,

24:02

everything's black and white. If

24:02

you disagree with me, then you

24:06

are a bad person. You are a

24:06

dangerous person. You are a

24:09

stupid person. And so why would

24:09

you listen to a bad dangerous,

24:13

stupid person, so you don't. And

24:13

so everybody stays stuck in

24:17

their own beliefs and doesn't

24:17

even listen to the other side of

24:21

of an issue. It's sad, but and

24:21

we're all doing it, though. I

24:24

mean, yes. Oh, yeah, I'm not I'm

24:24

not talking. I've grown to hate

24:29

both parties. The beach party.

24:29

So yeah, I'm not I'm not going

24:34

on one side or the other here. I

24:34

just feel like it's really sad

24:38

that we just kind of spend most

24:38

of our time reacting and

24:41

reacting to what somebody else

24:41

has said about what we believe

24:44

instead of looking into things

24:44

and listening to other people.

24:48

I'm happy to listen to somebody

24:48

who disagrees with me. And I've

24:51

changed my views on things

24:51

before. Yeah. And I think you

24:54

have to do that. If you want to

24:54

keep growing, you know, the

24:58

other guy may

24:58

be right, right? Right. No, ever

25:00

No. You're writing a book about

25:00

serial killer Belle gunness who

25:06

lived in Indiana and was

25:06

reported to have murdered more

25:09

than 40 people between 1884 and

25:09

1908. Of all the women serial

25:15

killers, you've studied what

25:15

stood out about Belle story?

25:18

First of all, I think that numbers probably exaggerated. It could be as many

25:20

as 40. But we know for certain

25:24

there were 12 Okay, which is a

25:24

lot. Yeah. Okay. What stands out

25:28

about her, there's a lot of

25:28

things. First of all, most

25:32

female serial killers aren't

25:32

even recognized as such, because

25:36

we think of serial killers as

25:36

hunting for victims. And so you

25:40

know, I would include a female

25:40

serial killer who kills every

25:44

one of her children, you know,

25:44

one year at a time or something

25:47

or marries and kills her husband

25:47

and remarries kills him. That's

25:51

a serial killer, but they're not

25:51

hunting like a Ted Bundy or

25:55

something and so people don't

25:55

recognize them as being the same

25:58

thing. Aileen Wuornos, and

25:58

Florida popped up, she was said

26:03

to be and I think the FBI even

26:03

said at the time that she was

26:06

the first female serial killer

26:06

because she was out hunting for

26:10

victims. And that just threw

26:10

people off. But Belle gunness

26:15

isn't hunting for them. But

26:15

she's luring them, which to me

26:19

is virtually the same thing.

26:19

Yeah. So she's just not, you

26:22

know, going to go out and get in

26:22

a vehicle and go find them

26:25

herself. She just advertised and

26:25

had them come to her, and

26:29

literally would tell them in

26:29

letters to liquidate their

26:31

assets and bring all the cash

26:31

with them. Wow. So that's what's

26:35

interesting about her. The story

26:35

itself is just incredible. It

26:40

begins with a fire at her farm,

26:40

and the neighbors and the town

26:44

all come and they find an adult

26:44

female body with three

26:48

children's bodies. By this time

26:48

they fallen down through the

26:51

basement, the whole house is is

26:51

destroyed. And these four bodies

26:55

are found. And she's this

26:55

harrowing, because it looked

26:58

like she had tried to protect

26:58

them. They were all grouped

27:00

together. And then a couple of

27:00

days later, this man shows up

27:04

and he's looking for his

27:04

brother, his brother had gone to

27:07

visit with her and maybe marry

27:07

her. And he hadn't heard from

27:10

him for a couple of months. And

27:10

he had been, you know,

27:14

corresponding with Bill and she

27:14

was being very evasive. So he

27:17

says, you know, I'm just

27:17

wondering, you know, if have you

27:19

seen him around, he goes out to

27:19

the farm where they're still

27:23

cleaning up. And he says, Do you

27:23

mind if I just start digging

27:26

around? And one of the guys

27:26

said, well, there were some soft

27:29

spots over there. And he digs

27:29

and he literally uncovers his

27:33

brother in like 20 minutes. So

27:33

they call for the sheriff. And

27:37

they come and then they start

27:37

digging, and it's one body after

27:40

another. And it just keeps

27:40

unwinding from there until, you

27:44

know, I could go on and on and

27:44

on. There's all these twists and

27:46

turns. And then it becomes about

27:46

partway through the story. They

27:50

start to wonder if she was even

27:50

the female body in the basement.

27:55

Did she get away? And so even 10

27:55

or 20 years later, there was a

27:59

woman in California who was

27:59

arrested. And some people who

28:03

lived there saw her mugshot and

28:03

said that spelt gunness and they

28:07

actually sent a couple of people

28:07

from Laporte, Indiana where this

28:10

happened to go out and look at

28:10

her. So you know, this is a huge

28:14

story, and there's no little

28:14

tidy ending to it. It's just

28:19

kind of incredible.

28:20

And you teach

28:20

a course called why women kill

28:24

it's women who kill women who

28:24

kill Okay. Okay. So typically,

28:29

it would never, I mean, because you don't really talk about a lot of female serial killers,

28:31

right? Mostly, they're white

28:34

men, correct in their 20s and

28:34

30s. So why do women end up

28:41

becoming serial killers,

28:42

um, just for

28:42

some of the same reasons,

28:45

others, you know, it's

28:45

oftentimes about money, it's

28:49

oftentimes about wanting

28:49

freedom. So you get rid of your

28:53

kids, you get rid of your

28:53

husband, you know, a lot of the

28:56

same reasons, you just don't see

28:56

the sexual predators, like you

28:59

would see with a lot of male

28:59

serial killers. So that's

29:03

probably the biggest difference

29:03

there. And the course itself, if

29:07

I'm being honest, is really a

29:07

woman's history course. But it's

29:11

like spoonful of sugar, you

29:11

know? Yeah. So we'll talk about

29:15

the crimes. But as we're talking

29:15

about the deviant women, we have

29:18

to talk about, well, what's the

29:18

accepted norm? Right. So it's a

29:21

woman's history course.

29:24

I love it.

29:24

Maybe I'll take it. Yeah. It's

29:26

no secret. We love true crime.

29:26

It's one of the fastest growing

29:30

genres of film, television and

29:30

podcasts. What is it about

29:35

listening to the gruesome

29:35

details of how people were

29:38

killed that we want to hear?

29:40

There's a lot

29:40

of theories on that. One of the

29:42

ones that I find the most

29:42

fascinating is that it's an

29:46

actual biological kind of urge

29:46

that it comes from that sort of,

29:52

you know, hunt, be hunted kind

29:52

of instinct. And so there's this

29:56

sense that we want to inform

29:56

ourselves on who we should be Be

30:00

afraid of and why and what

30:00

situations to avoid, or even how

30:04

to protect our family, you know,

30:04

if we're looking at it from from

30:07

that point of view, and how

30:07

victims have escaped, and we may

30:11

not even recognize that's what

30:11

we're doing. But they think that

30:14

that's kind of, you know,

30:14

underlying all of it. It's also

30:18

a great detective story. We're

30:18

seeing now a rise in these, you

30:22

know, Facebook, you know, sites

30:22

and things where they're trying

30:25

to solve cold cases, right? Even

30:25

contemporary cases, and they're

30:28

doing it seriously. They're not

30:28

just goofing around, and they're

30:31

taking it very seriously. And so

30:31

for a lot of people, it's it's

30:34

playing detective. And I don't

30:34

mean that to diminish it. I

30:37

didn't mean that in the sense that they're just, I

30:39

mean, some of them have been successful in overturning and catching like,

30:41

killers from cases that have

30:44

been close since like the 80s. Yes.

30:46

And even if

30:46

they just reopen a case, that's

30:48

a success, sometimes if you just

30:48

get people to reinvestigate or

30:52

to look at things again, you

30:52

know, so that's been great. I

30:55

think there's also more access,

30:55

like you said, there's more of

30:58

it out there. But I think too,

30:58

it's just, there are some just

31:03

fascinating cases out there. If

31:03

I just think of the last few

31:07

months, we're talking Alex

31:07

Murtaugh, I mean, talk about

31:11

your twists and turns.

31:11

Literally, if I saw that in the

31:14

film, I would just shake my head

31:14

and go, Oh, please, you know,

31:17

this would not happen in real

31:17

life. But it did. There's a case

31:20

out of Florida, the eighth

31:20

Wilson family that is starting

31:24

to open up now. They've already

31:24

convicted 1234 People for the

31:28

murder of one man, and now

31:28

they're bringing in his mother

31:32

in law and some other people.

31:32

It's really complicated, but the

31:36

one of the guys is a dentist,

31:36

and it's just this crazy case.

31:40

And then you have the Chad

31:40

daybell and Lori vallow daybell,

31:44

the doomsday cult folks. So

31:44

she's had her trial recently.

31:48

Chad de belles trial is probably

31:48

going to start in, I don't know,

31:52

six months or so. The Idaho

31:54

murders. Yes,

31:54

that is that is something that I

31:56

am so intrigued about. And I

31:59

watched her

31:59

trial. And it's fascinating. And

32:02

they're not even trying the

32:02

cases in Las Vegas. There's

32:04

other stuff that happened in Las

32:04

Vegas to I mean, that's not even

32:07

the complete story. Wow, it just

32:07

again, it's like the Alex

32:11

Murdock case. He just keeps

32:11

opening up, you know, and they

32:15

just keep adding more and more

32:15

victims to the list. You

32:18

think that he

32:18

killed his wife and son? Yes.

32:21

Okay. I do. I

32:21

didn't at first, but I watched

32:24

the whole trial. And yeah,

32:28

I mean, he

32:28

was like, he admitted that he

32:30

was an opioid addict. Yeah. And

32:30

I don't know, do you believe

32:34

that that's true, or he might

32:36

have dabbled in it. And it looks like he probably did, but I don't think

32:37

he's anywhere near the addict

32:40

that he pretends to be. I don't

32:40

know how you spend millions of

32:44

dollars anyway, he would have he

32:44

would have dropped dead by that

32:48

point, you know, so,

32:49

I mean, I'm assuming you watch and listen to true crime. Yes. Okay. All

32:51

right. So since you've been

32:55

researching what is probably

32:55

your most fascinating, fine,

32:59

like what has been something

32:59

that stuck in your craw and just

33:03

kept you up at night like, Man,

33:03

I wish somebody would solve

33:06

this.

33:06

I think the

33:06

old standby and I hate to be a

33:09

cliche, but Jack the Ripper, you

33:09

know, it's never gonna get

33:13

solved. They've already tried

33:13

the DNA and all that and there's

33:15

just a lot of the evidence that

33:15

they had is walked away when

33:19

people retire. They took little

33:19

bits and bobs them, you know,

33:23

but I would love to see that.

33:23

One of my favorite cases that I

33:26

teach my women who killed class

33:26

is the Lizzie Borden case. And

33:29

she totally did it or at least

33:29

knows who did it. But she walked

33:33

away. They found her not guilty.

33:33

But I would love for there to be

33:37

sort of a some kind of, you

33:37

know, find her diary or

33:41

something. You know, that would

33:41

be awesome. And what was Lizzie

33:43

Borden? She's the one who took

33:43

an axe gave her father 40 wax,

33:47

you know that O'Brien? Yeah,

33:47

yeah. And it wasn't really 40.

33:50

But, and it's actually I always

33:50

thought it was a really old

33:55

case. And it is from the late

33:55

1800s. But there are crime scene

33:58

photographs and stuff that'll

33:58

blow your mind. It was it was a

34:01

messy crime. Yes.

34:03

And here's

34:03

the thing, I gotta say, I don't

34:05

know a whole lot about Jack the Ripper. Other than that he killed women in London. And

34:07

people were trying to solve who

34:10

he was correct. Okay, so nobody

34:10

knows who this serial killer

34:14

was. And he was essentially the

34:14

first serial killer in recorded

34:17

history.

34:18

He's not the first that ever existed. But he's the first in modern history

34:20

with modern newspapers that were

34:25

priced, where the average person

34:25

was, could afford them and buy

34:29

them. And because it remained a

34:29

mystery, it just spread. And you

34:33

know, I could bring in 30

34:33

experts on Jack the Ripper, and

34:36

they will tell you that it's 30

34:36

different people. And if you

34:40

listen to their arguments, you

34:40

would believe just about every

34:43

one of them too. They all make

34:43

sense to a certain degree.

34:46

I mean, I

34:46

just feel like it could be it is

34:50

extremely difficult to be a

34:50

serial killer in 2023. Like

34:55

yeah, because I mean, you are

34:55

literally you've got your tract,

34:58

everywhere you go. There's a

34:58

camera on every single corner

35:01

license plate readers, I mean

35:01

everything. There's no possible

35:04

way that you could bounce

35:04

around, you know, city to city

35:07

across the United States killing people.

35:09

Oh, yeah. Alex

35:09

Murdock, what did him in?

35:11

Really, I think what was pivotal

35:11

where people started to think

35:15

maybe, is his son literally

35:15

minutes before he shot and they

35:20

kind of know when he shot

35:20

literally minutes before that is

35:23

recording a dog in their kennel

35:23

who belongs to a friend of

35:26

theirs, because he thinks

35:26

there's something wrong with a

35:28

tail. And so he's filming it so

35:28

his friend can see. And they're

35:32

trying to think, is there something wrong? Do we need to do something and you can hear

35:33

him in the background talking?

35:36

And he said he wasn't there? And

35:38

there you go,

35:38

technology saving the day? Yeah.

35:42

So yeah, if I

35:42

was going to kill somebody, I

35:44

would get a time machine. And I

35:44

would also maybe go to Canada or

35:50

England where they don't punish

35:50

you as much as we do here. So

35:55

before we

35:55

wrap up, I want to ask you a

35:58

serious question. They say those

35:58

who don't know history are

36:02

doomed to repeat it. In your

36:02

opinion, as a historian, and

36:07

Professor, do you believe we

36:07

have enough of an understanding

36:10

of history to not repeat it? No.

36:13

And I don't

36:13

mean to be negative Nancy, and I

36:16

think I really am becoming so

36:16

negative. So I really try to

36:20

watch myself. But no, we're just

36:20

doing the same stupid stuff

36:24

again, and again, and again. And

36:24

I've come to believe, and this

36:27

will never happen. But it would

36:27

be wonderful if we required

36:32

every politician at every level,

36:32

to master American history,

36:37

constitutional history,

36:37

political science, foreign

36:41

policy, those kinds of things,

36:41

and to understand what has

36:46

happened in the past and why,

36:46

you know, and it can be done.

36:50

And it's been done. World War

36:50

Two, as soon as you know, it

36:54

looked like that was starting to

36:54

percolate. Congress got together

36:58

and said, Okay, we got pulled

36:58

into World War One. Let's look

37:01

at how that happened. And let's

37:01

try to avoid it. And so you get

37:04

all the neutrality acts, again,

37:04

didn't work in the end, because

37:07

you've got a Hitler and some

37:07

big, you know, horrible people.

37:11

But again, they they did learn

37:11

from the past, but overall, we

37:15

just don't do it. And it's kind

37:15

of sad. You

37:19

know, what's

37:19

interesting about history is it

37:22

allows us to have a conversation

37:22

in the gray. It allows us to

37:29

look at where we are now from

37:29

different angles. And I talk

37:33

about my experience with African

37:33

American Studies, often because

37:37

it was so impactful was life

37:37

changing for me. But it applies

37:41

to so many different aspects,

37:41

not just to the history of

37:45

African Americans, meaning like

37:45

the stuff actually studying the

37:49

history of how events occurred.

37:49

I have been trying to reconcile

37:54

this. And I've been spending a

37:54

lot of time in urban areas,

37:58

trying to understand it from

37:58

from people that lived their

38:00

perspective. Was the civil

38:00

rights, actually a good thing

38:06

for the African American

38:06

community? Oh, and was

38:10

desegregation actually a good

38:10

thing for the African American

38:13

because if you if you take the

38:13

perspective of Booker T,

38:17

Washington, there would have

38:17

been more benefit in the fact

38:22

that African Americans were

38:22

segregated and one segregation

38:25

was lifted, there was a lot of

38:25

African American teachers that

38:30

lost positions, African American

38:30

schools, that, you know, popular

38:36

belief is that they're terrible,

38:36

but they were actually

38:38

excellent, they created what's

38:38

known as the talented 10th. In

38:42

those environment. So if we look

38:42

back to the history of civil

38:49

rights, maybe it was just

38:49

unfinished is why we feel like

38:53

we have the opportunity to look

38:53

at is maybe a negative or maybe

38:56

just like an unfinished work. Am

38:56

I on the right track?

39:00

I would, I would say definitely was unfinished, didn't accomplish

39:02

everything that it could have,

39:05

and that people wanted it to, as

39:05

far as whether it, you know,

39:12

went in the wrong direction or

39:12

not was actually a negative.

39:15

People been talking about that

39:15

since you know, like around

39:18

1900, where you've got a Booker

39:18

T Washington versus a W. EB

39:23

Dubois, and they have very

39:23

opposite views. And they are

39:26

both logical. They both make

39:26

sense. I think that's just

39:30

something that people have to

39:30

decide for themselves. I don't

39:33

know that there's an answer to

39:33

that. And I don't feel like I

39:37

have the background to to even

39:37

theorize more than I already

39:42

have. But that is a huge, huge

39:42

question. Yeah.

39:45

It's been on

39:45

my mind a lot lately and really,

39:48

for the last year, it has been.

39:48

Second question is, was the

39:52

election of Donald Trump the

39:52

popular media has said that it

39:56

was because of the fact that two

39:56

thirds So Americans do not have

40:01

a college degree. And again,

40:01

these are statistics so that I

40:05

hear. So if I'm wrong, you need

40:05

to correct me. Two thirds of

40:08

Americans do not have a college degree. So they have a high school diploma or lower. And

40:10

specifically, the white male,

40:16

non college educated vote is

40:16

what sort of put Trump in the

40:21

position that he was. My

40:21

question is, is, why have we as

40:25

a country in the 70s, and 80s,

40:25

done everything in our power to

40:29

lower the labor participation

40:29

rate by taking away jobs through

40:32

globalization and continuing to

40:32

propagate that by essentially

40:36

eliminating what was the golden

40:36

age of the 50s and 60s for white

40:42

men essentially, being able to

40:42

earn and have a single income

40:47

family, all of the things that

40:47

we see in popular culture? Why

40:51

did we choose policy positions

40:51

that destroyed it, and

40:55

essentially has led us into this

40:55

chaotic environment where we're

40:58

choosing the person that doesn't

40:58

have any political background?

41:01

And we're just going, yes, that

41:01

guy is the loudest. And he's the

41:05

most controversial, and I

41:05

believe he'll have my back. So

41:07

we're going there.

41:09

That's a huge

41:09

question. Um, I think that in a

41:13

lot of ways, you had politicians

41:13

who were talking to a larger

41:17

audience, and who were serving

41:17

them.

41:21

By larger

41:21

audience, you mean the globe?

41:23

Like the world? Yeah. Okay.

41:24

But also just

41:24

even the voters in America. I

41:28

think that, you know, by the

41:28

time we get to the 70s, and 80s,

41:33

unions were losing a lot of

41:33

their power and influence. And I

41:37

don't think they were listened

41:37

to as much the thing with with

41:40

Trump, I think, again, I'm not a

41:40

political scientist, and I'm a

41:43

historian. So to me, this is

41:43

history. But my gut has always

41:48

been that people are completely

41:48

missing the boat on this. And

41:52

it's kind of insulting to say,

41:52

and I don't know about the

41:55

statistics, if they're correct

41:55

or not. But it seems dismissive

41:58

to me. What they're missing is,

41:58

I think that was happening in

42:02

both parties. With Bernie. Yeah,

42:02

yeah. Bernie Sanders and Donald

42:07

Trump, they were both so

42:07

similar. Both out of the party.

42:11

Really? Yeah. They're both loud.

42:11

They're both opinionated. They

42:16

both are driven. I thought they

42:16

were very similar in a lot of

42:19

ways, not their politics,

42:19

certainly. But these were ground

42:22

up movements on both sides. And

42:22

the Democrats, I think were able

42:27

to maneuver older politicians in

42:27

and move him out of the way. And

42:32

the Republicans couldn't do it.

42:32

But I think there was a bigger

42:34

movement going on, where I think

42:34

Americans in general, were

42:38

saying, We're sick of all these

42:38

politicians, and we want

42:41

something different. And I think

42:41

that's what was, you know, maybe

42:46

really, something that drew

42:46

people to him is that he's not

42:51

the same old thing, right?

42:51

Because we've had the same old

42:53

thing again, and again and

42:53

again. And it doesn't seem to be

42:57

working. You know,

42:58

when did it

42:58

stop working? Go golly, I know,

43:02

I'm asking you a lot of questions that may be outside of your scope, but just just bear

43:04

with me. I talk about inflection

43:07

points all the time. So when do

43:07

you think was America's

43:11

inflection point?

43:13

I keep thinking of different points and then thinking No. I have this

43:15

feeling that it's early 20th

43:20

century,

43:21

the recoil

43:21

from the progressive movement? I

43:25

think that's

43:25

part of it. Okay. I think that's

43:27

a big part of it. I think the

43:27

Great Depression played a big

43:31

role. I think we also keep

43:31

forgetting. And here we are,

43:35

again, forgetting the past, the

43:35

the 1918 flu pandemic, on top of

43:41

the war, that was the last year

43:41

of the war, you know, you're

43:44

talking about millions and

43:44

millions of people who disappear

43:47

from the planet within a four

43:47

year period of time. And I think

43:50

people don't recognize what an

43:50

impact that had. I just feel

43:56

like there's something happening

43:56

around there. And again, this is

43:59

beyond my scope of knowledge

43:59

here.

44:01

No, I believe me, I love it. Yeah, I could sit here and talk to you for three

44:03

hours. Oh,

44:06

thank you. But

44:06

I will say to that, that's when

44:09

I see just my own opinion, where

44:09

I find fewer and fewer

44:14

politicians that I find

44:14

readable, where they're writing

44:19

things, or giving speeches that

44:19

I think are profound, the

44:22

numbers start to dwindle. At the

44:22

end. That's just my own personal

44:26

opinion. I was talking earlier

44:26

about Thomas Paine, I was

44:29

reading something from the

44:29

American crisis to my students.

44:32

And I thought nobody writes like

44:32

this anymore. You know, nobody's

44:35

got this passion. Nobody

44:35

believes these kinds of things.

44:39

You know, nobody's able to use

44:39

rhetoric in the same way for the

44:44

same purpose. But again, that's

44:44

just my personal opinion. So

44:47

we always

44:47

like to end the show on a high

44:50

note, who is someone that makes

44:50

you better when you're together?

44:56

Well,

44:56

that would

44:56

definitely be my mother. She has

44:59

been an example too. me my whole

44:59

life, even today still, you

45:02

know, here I am Negative Nancy

45:02

and I'll go and see her. She

45:07

brought me chilly this morning

45:07

by the way, she made it at home

45:10

and brought it over this

45:10

morning. So, but if I were to,

45:13

you know, spend some time with

45:13

her this afternoon My mood would

45:16

shift, I would start to see the

45:16

world as a much kinder world, a

45:22

world where there's more

45:22

morality than I think there is

45:26

where things are a little better

45:26

than they are. She always puts

45:29

other people before herself and

45:29

she does things for other people

45:33

silently and happily. They never

45:33

know she's done it. She doesn't

45:37

need to pat on the back, which I

45:37

find really admirable. And I

45:41

wish I could do I always sort of

45:41

need that little thank you from

45:44

people. That's terrible, but

45:44

it's true. So I would say my mom

45:47

Thank you to

45:47

our partners Miss Sallie’s

45:52

Market for presenting this

45:52

episode. I hope it’s no secret

45:55

by now, I don’t know my way

45:55

around the kitchen. However, I

45:59

do know my way to the kitchen.

45:59

That’s where Miss Sallie’s

46:03

Market comes in. With fresh,

46:03

locally sourced to-go meals made

46:06

daily, I don’t have to worry

46:06

about my cooking skills getting

46:10

in the way of our eating skills.

46:10

Open 10:00 AM to 8:00 PM Tuesday

46:14

through Saturday, Miss Sallie’s

46:14

Market is located in the heart

46:18

of Downtown Gainesboro with free

46:18

community tastings every

46:21

Thursday from 4-6. Find out

46:21

more about vendors, offerings

46:27

www.misssallies.com

46:33

Thank you for joining us on this episode of Better Together with Kosta

46:35

Yepifantsev. If you've enjoyed

46:38

listening and you want to hear

46:38

more, make sure you subscribe on

46:40

Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or

46:40

wherever you find your podcasts.

46:44

Leave us a review or better yet,

46:44

share this episode with a

46:47

friend. Today's episode was

46:47

written and produced by Morgan

46:50

Franklin post production mixing

46:50

and editing by Mike Franklin.

46:53

Want to know more about Kosta

46:53

visit us at

46:55

kostayepifantsev.com. We're

46:55

better together. We'd like to

46:59

remind our listeners that the

46:59

views and opinions expressed

47:02

during this episode are those of

47:02

the individual speakers and do

47:06

not necessarily represent or

47:06

reflect the official policy or

47:10

position of this show its

47:10

producers or any related

47:13

entities or advertisers. While

47:13

our discussions may touch on

47:17

various topics of interest,

47:17

please note that the content is

47:20

intended to inspire thought

47:20

provoking dialogue and should

47:23

not be used for a substitute for

47:23

professional

47:28

advice.Specifically, nothing heard on this podcast should be construed as financial, legal,

47:30

medical or any other kind of

47:34

professional advice. We

47:34

encourage our listeners to

47:36

consult with a professional in

47:36

these areas for guidance

47:39

tailored to their specific

47:39

circumstances.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features