Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Welcome back to another episode of Big
0:03
Money Energy, where we talked
0:05
to super successful and self made people
0:07
to find out exactly how they
0:09
did it, how they went from nothing to
0:12
something. Today, I'm joined by astrophysicist,
0:16
author, director of the Hayden Planetarium,
0:19
and all around science megastar
0:22
Neil Degrass Tyson. This episode
0:24
is a little different than what we usually do
0:26
because there's no one like Neil in
0:28
the entire Milky Way. We discuss
0:31
a lot of things, but we talk about
0:33
the responsibility of using your platform
0:35
to champion causes you care about. We
0:38
go through how to keep your head above water
0:40
when pursuing a passion until it pays
0:42
the bills, and why the hell it's taken
0:44
so long for space tourism to
0:47
become an industry. Hint takes
0:49
a couple of billionaires. Now let's get into
0:51
it. Welcome to another episode.
1:07
I genuinely cannot
1:09
believe who I convinced
1:11
to come on the show today. He is
1:14
easily one of the most recognizable
1:16
personalities in the world
1:18
and by far one of the smartest
1:20
people out there, and will definitely
1:22
be the smartest person whoever comes on
1:24
this podcast. From now through history, you can mark
1:27
those words. He's an astrophysicist,
1:29
a host of bestselling author, and the director
1:31
of the Hayden Planetarium. And he's also, as
1:34
we just found out, a New Yorker. And
1:36
if that wasn't enough, in two thousand he was
1:38
voted the sexiest Astrophysicist
1:40
Alive by People Magazine. And
1:43
I think that is a ranking we should never
1:45
ever forget. So here to discuss how he
1:47
makes it happen and all the insane
1:49
things he's working on. Please welcome Neil
1:52
the grass Tyson. Thank you for the introduction,
1:54
But I need to clarify something in
1:56
in two thousand when I received that designation
1:58
by People magazine. You just have to
2:01
consider the category that I was saying.
2:04
There are categories way more competitive
2:07
than sexiest Astrophysicist. In
2:09
the People magazine issue Sexiest
2:12
Man Alive, first, there's a sexiest Man Alive
2:14
who transcends category that's
2:16
on the cover, and that year it was Brad
2:19
pitt okay got that one. And
2:21
then other categories where there's just no
2:23
contest if you're outside of that category,
2:26
like sexiest action star, sexiest
2:28
news anchor, sexiest professional
2:31
athlete, sex and you don't you don't have to
2:33
apologize for being sexies. See
2:35
what you're doing here. You're trying to clarify.
2:38
I'm a real estate broker. You know. My whole
2:40
life is ranking. I don't clarify
2:44
my sales volume is only x because
2:46
of this. You know, you know, it's just disclosure. I
2:48
just want to make sure people plus that that
2:50
was forty pounds ago. So you're
2:53
New York born and Brad Yeah, yeah, born
2:55
in the Bronx. Did the Bronx? Gotta say
2:57
it right? If you always lived in New York? Did you ever
2:59
leave? You go elsewhere? No? No, I look for college
3:02
and part of graduate school. So
3:05
if you added up those years, I've probably gone
3:07
for ten years. And then I came back to
3:09
finish graduate school at Columbia,
3:12
and and then I left. I
3:15
did post pH d work post
3:17
doc at Princeton, so we moved
3:19
to Princeton for a bit, but then came back.
3:22
It is hard to define exactly what
3:24
you do. Can you tell us all if you were
3:27
to say, hey, this this is what my day looks
3:29
like, this is my career, this is what I do. What
3:31
you would say? What's your answer to that? The challenge?
3:33
There is no day looks like any other day.
3:36
So it's hard to characterize what
3:38
I do. So if I step back and I can say
3:40
what kind of things happened to me in a month
3:43
over a month, so over a month, I will
3:45
write more for whatever it might be my next
3:47
book. I will have conducted
3:50
probably uh ten
3:54
interviews for national media, another
3:58
ten teen interviews
4:01
for just people who are interested in
4:03
what I do. I have a very soft spot
4:05
for fledgling podcasts, people
4:07
who are trying to bring science through their own
4:11
lens. Uh. In fact, I
4:13
recently agreed to do There
4:15
are two kids who are new in high
4:17
school. So one is like a
4:19
ninth grader, I other one was an eighth grader, and
4:22
they have a podcast in high school
4:24
because they love science. So it's their science podcast.
4:27
And so they wrote to me to see if I'd be a guest
4:29
on their podcast, and I said sure, and then
4:31
they just freaked out so that we did the
4:33
podcast. And
4:35
and this was in Canada. Small town in Canada
4:38
was only one high school, and that made like
4:40
local headlines, right, and and
4:42
I'm I was delighted to do that. And
4:45
and I chuckle any time I get invited to be
4:47
on a podcast, and they feel
4:49
compelled to list famous
4:53
guests they've already had, as
4:55
though I would say, oh, you had this famous
4:57
guest, therefore I want to be on your podcast.
5:00
I don't give a rats ass who was on your cup
5:02
podcast before? I really don't care.
5:04
Just is your mission, um, noble?
5:07
Do you want to do the right thing? Is
5:09
it something? And and so? I
5:11
have a soft spot for that. So so anyway,
5:13
so it's another ten or fifteen podcast,
5:16
um. And also
5:19
I oversee programs at the American
5:21
Museum of Natural History that relate to the
5:24
universe. I also read from
5:27
books. I have a collection of very old books
5:29
on science. I
5:32
read them because they tell me how we
5:34
used to think about the universe and
5:36
how what we learned later may
5:39
have pivoted off of some correct
5:42
assessment of the nature of the universe or
5:44
incorrect assessment, and
5:46
I tracked that. I also spend time reading
5:49
books that are completely opposite
5:52
anything I think or believe in, just
5:54
so I can understand how
5:57
people think who are very
5:59
different from myself. You've successfully
6:01
been able to take this passion for
6:04
for knowing more and
6:07
turn it into a very robust,
6:11
diverse career that I
6:13
think it's very hard for a lot of people to do.
6:15
Do you have any advice for anybody who
6:18
is struggling with the idea of
6:21
I. You know, I've got this passion, but it doesn't pay
6:23
my bills, so I've got to go and get a job
6:25
and maybe i can come back to it later. Yeah,
6:27
that's a really important question and an insightful
6:30
question. And I've gone in and out of different
6:32
understandings and explanations for this to
6:35
myself. Let me just share one of them
6:37
with you, and let me buy
6:39
analogy. Mentioned a library,
6:42
all right, a physical library like the old days.
6:45
So you walk into a library, and
6:48
so what is a library? A library
6:51
is at place where
6:54
they don't know in advance what
6:56
book you're going to look for, and
6:59
so one else who comes in five minutes after you
7:01
was gonna look for. So they
7:04
attempt to stalk everything that
7:08
you could possibly look for on
7:11
the expectation that you will
7:14
find what you are looking for.
7:17
All right, Well,
7:20
for library to be successful,
7:23
they need enough books in enough
7:25
fields with enough depth, so
7:29
that I'm picking number nine out of ten people
7:31
find what they're looking for, picking
7:35
a number, but it's got to be the majority.
7:37
Otherwise the library is
7:39
not really serving the
7:41
needs of a reading community.
7:44
Okay, so what are we as human
7:46
beings? As pliable, flexible
7:49
human beings, We often
7:52
don't know what our first
7:55
love will be. So what you can do is turn
7:57
yourself into a kind of a library.
8:00
Anything that interests you, pursue
8:02
it, at least on the side that's
8:04
not that hard. You do that for hobbies. If
8:07
you have a hobby, you do an other side. You have no expectation
8:09
you're gonna be paid for the attention
8:11
you give to your hobby. All right, So
8:16
think of your life as a library, and
8:19
as was my life. Okay, so watch this
8:21
happen. As a child,
8:23
I'm criticized by my teachers for my
8:26
social energy. I still
8:28
have my report cards. One
8:30
of them said, it's succinctly less
8:34
social involvement
8:37
and more academic diligence
8:39
is in order three exclamation
8:42
points. That was in fifth grade. Okay,
8:46
My grades were not high, they would kind of average.
8:49
And in school, the metrics for
8:51
your evaluation as a student art pivot
8:53
strongly on your grades and
8:56
whether you shut up when you're told to shut
8:58
up and pay attention in class. All
9:00
right, So the perfect student is one who does
9:03
not disrupt class, does all their
9:05
homework, assignments on time, and gets high grades,
9:07
and the entire system we have built
9:10
educational system says that's the
9:12
successful student. Meanwhile,
9:15
look at practically every entrepreneur
9:17
there ever was every
9:20
successful person by most measures
9:22
of a free society's metrics of success,
9:26
and ask were they that perfect student? The
9:28
answer is no, no, most
9:31
of them if not a D, and then
9:33
we're not that okay,
9:36
So there's something else going on in successful
9:39
people that are not cued,
9:42
that are not indexed off of your exams
9:45
and your behavior as a school child. So
9:47
what I'm saying is, yeah, there are things that I got good
9:49
at that no one cares about and no one is paying
9:51
any attention at all. But that's the library
9:54
problem. The library will have books that no one
9:56
will ever check out again, but you don't
9:58
know that in advance. So
10:01
so there's no harm in building
10:04
the portfolio of all the things you
10:06
like and are good at. Then
10:11
have that rise up. And I can tell
10:13
you this, Everything I'm doing that is valued
10:16
never appeared in anybody's job
10:18
description that I replied to when
10:22
I became director of the planting We need you to do
10:24
this and run the program. And fine, okay,
10:26
did it say host a series for for
10:29
Cosmos. No to say,
10:31
oh, by the way, the person who has
10:33
this, we want you to host PBS series.
10:36
Until that's not in the job description. No,
10:39
most of what I'm doing is not in the job description. But
10:41
when people see it, they
10:44
they come to value it, and
10:47
then everything I cared about and loved
10:50
becomes the very job description itself.
10:52
It's harder, and it's challenging. And by the
10:54
way, I did not have
10:56
a job where I made more
10:58
than six thousand dollars
11:00
a year until I
11:03
was thirty
11:07
three. Wow. Okay,
11:10
So if you're distracted by money,
11:14
then you can't rely on
11:17
all of your inner passions to be compensated
11:20
earlier in life. So yeah,
11:22
go find a pre existing job with a
11:24
pre existing job description that is a pre existing
11:27
salary listed to it, and tune
11:30
your training to fit that. Then they'll
11:32
hire you. Then you'll have a nice salary coming
11:34
right out of college. I did not were you worried
11:36
about job prospects because
11:39
after my PhD almost
11:41
didn't matter what happened to me in my life. That was my life's
11:43
goal as a child. Everything else would
11:46
just be gravy. Plus it helped that I married
11:48
someone who worked for the financial industry.
11:50
That's
11:53
not what I'm like, I'm looking for the secret. No, no, yeah,
11:56
that helped. It just meant we lived,
11:58
you know, we a nice place I
12:01
could have lived. I mean I was living the way
12:03
a student lived most of those years, right, so
12:06
I could have kept living that way. The trappings
12:09
of having more money, eating a nicer restaurant,
12:11
drink a nicer bottle of wine, this sort of
12:13
thing, um
12:15
and so. But but anyhow, all of this
12:17
sort of a cruise is what I'm
12:19
saying. And I also
12:22
started liking wine early
12:24
on. We had wine regularly at home, mostly
12:27
Gallo and Paul Masson when I was growing up. But
12:30
the fact that wine was something associated with
12:32
meals was a very early thing
12:34
for me. And I
12:36
then took an academic interest in wine and
12:40
uh at at some point
12:42
one of the wine magazines noticed me.
12:45
Okay, Wine Spectator magazine, big magazine
12:47
for the wine industry, and they
12:49
did a profile on me and it says, um,
12:52
uh astrophysicist
12:56
with stars in his eyes sees wine,
12:58
and that they tried there was I'm you know,
13:01
clever title. And
13:03
so you realize that these pockets
13:05
of society that will
13:08
find you if your
13:10
interests have a sufficient depth
13:12
of passion, and then
13:14
it builds the entire profile of
13:16
who you are and what you represent. Now, the
13:19
fact that I'm visible in public, none
13:21
of that was a goal, and I don't care if anybody
13:23
knew anything about me. I
13:25
just kept giving good sound bites to
13:29
the news and then they kept coming back,
13:32
and then people said, oh,
13:35
you're a natural at that. No, they have no idea
13:37
what I did to train for
13:39
those sound bites. I stood in front of a mirror because
13:42
the first time you didn't ask this, but I'm telling you, um,
13:45
it's important. The the first
13:47
time I was on national news
13:50
for a cosmic event was a
13:52
new planet around another star. Was
13:55
the first exo planet was discovered,
13:57
and so um NBC
14:00
was NBC News sent a camera up
14:02
to the Hayden Planetarium. By the way, they didn't
14:04
know about me from Adam. They just knew I
14:06
had title direct director
14:09
of the Hayden Planetarium. So
14:11
so they're interviewing the director of the Hayden
14:13
Planetarium. I give them my best profitsial
14:16
reply alright, because I'm an
14:18
academic, and I say, here's how we found
14:20
it. We my colleagues here's how
14:22
it works. Here's the Doppler shift.
14:24
There's a and and I said, you're
14:26
looking at the response of the host
14:28
star to the gravity of the
14:31
of the planet in orbit around
14:33
it. And that
14:36
evening when they finally cut the piece.
14:38
Basically the only part of that interview that made
14:40
it in was me shifting
14:42
my hips like this. And I thought,
14:44
I said, oh, even
14:46
though they came to me, they don't want my
14:48
profits soil reply. They
14:51
want to reply that will work in their
14:53
format. The
14:55
whole story last three minutes. They want
14:57
sound bites. That was a revelation
15:00
and for me and the and they
15:02
will always tell you, oh no, don't sound by, just give
15:04
us your thing. We'll fix it up later. Then I realized,
15:06
no, if you're gonna use one sentence for
15:08
me or three sentences and they're gonna be cut together,
15:11
I'm gonna hand you those sentences so
15:13
that you don't have to cut it, and then
15:15
arm in control of that content. So I
15:17
went home, looked in the mirror, had my wife
15:19
just say random things
15:22
from the universe to me, black holes, quasars,
15:24
big bang, and with each word I came out
15:27
with a three sentence sound bite, which has
15:29
got to be interesting, tasty,
15:31
informative, and and enticings
15:34
enough to want to tell someone else, and
15:36
you get it all. So test me on that, say
15:38
anything in the universe. Test me black
15:41
hole black Avoid them.
15:46
If one comes near, you go the other direction.
15:49
It's a region of space where the gravity is
15:52
so intense that the speed
15:54
of light is not even sufficient to escape.
15:57
It is a whole in the fabric of ace
16:00
and time, and we're still learning about
16:03
what's going on inside of them. Boom
16:05
about. You're taking that whole
16:08
thing and putting that in just as
16:10
I handed it to you, whereas there was a
16:12
day when that same information would have been
16:14
scattered across
16:18
and they'd have to plug it together.
16:20
So when people say, are you such a natural at
16:23
that? No, I fucking worked at it.
16:25
Please can we understand this?
16:28
Please? All right? Sorry
16:31
dropping f bomb on you. You're too welcome. I
16:33
think it's it's so important to be listening
16:37
to this. The man here is in a in a
16:39
highly pressed shirt and a
16:41
Wall Street tie, and
16:44
I'm I'm in my morning pajamas.
16:46
Just so weird over here. Okay, very
16:48
nice pajamas though I
16:58
didn't even ask you a lot of that. It's
17:00
Uh, it's so important because I think people don't
17:02
don't realize the work. But what I think it's so
17:04
curious about you is you
17:07
knew to do that work
17:10
to build a career as
17:12
a well known astrophysicist
17:15
without anyone having to tell you to do that. No,
17:17
because I didn't build it
17:19
on purpose. It just oh, so I
17:22
didn't finish the thought. So once I started giving
17:24
them sound bites they like, they kept coming
17:26
back for more. Then documentarians noticed
17:28
it, and so then they came to me for an interview, and
17:30
then people who wanted to do TV
17:33
series Nova came to me to host a spinoff
17:36
Nova Science Now. And so I'm
17:38
not seeking any of this out.
17:41
No it and so I
17:43
so why am I doing it. I'm doing it because
17:45
I judged that
17:47
I would be irresponsible if
17:50
I didn't. So there's responsibility,
17:53
Yes, if if if I have a way I
17:55
can communicate science to the public
17:57
that is unique or has
18:00
had flavors to it that people appreciate.
18:04
And if I didn't do it in a
18:06
society and in a culture that
18:08
that depends on science
18:10
literacy just for even its own governance,
18:13
if I didn't do it, I don't
18:16
know that I could feel like I was responsible
18:18
participant in our society.
18:21
What I long for. I fantasize about this, that we get
18:23
enough others doing this, and there's more.
18:25
It's a growing number of science sort
18:27
of educator, sort of pop educator,
18:30
science folk. You get enough of them on the landscape.
18:32
I will just slowly step
18:35
backwards and then
18:37
exit the rear door, just
18:39
slowly, and then when I exit, no one will
18:41
notice because it's so full of
18:44
others fully engaged
18:46
in fun, interesting ways. And then I'll go right
18:48
to the Bahamas and the
18:52
Bahamas totally the Bahamas. And
18:55
because I don't need to do this, I'm
18:57
happy to do it, but I don't seek
18:59
it out. Do you believe in fate? Well,
19:03
so you can look at the statistics of
19:05
it, all right, So there's
19:07
very good reason for the saying fate uh
19:10
favors the well prepared. Okay,
19:13
so uh, if you unpack
19:15
that statistically, it means put
19:17
as many books in your personal library as you
19:19
can so that when an opportunity
19:22
arises, you say I can do that, and
19:24
someone will other else will say, oh, you're the lucky person.
19:26
Was it really luck or did you
19:29
just recognize
19:31
the opportunity because you had the receptors
19:34
to do so. So no, I don't. I don't think
19:36
fate as in it would happen to you no matter what I
19:38
think. It's you've got to be ready for it and
19:41
recognize it when it arrives. If
19:43
you just look at how the numbers work
19:45
out, um. If
19:47
you say that there's no such thing as as
19:50
coincidence, is all meant to be? Um,
19:53
that is the product of a failure
19:56
of the human cognitive system.
19:59
It's it's why statistics as a branch of math,
20:02
it was very late in the coming.
20:05
I mean, calculus was practically fully
20:08
fleshed out and developed long before statistics
20:11
was formulated. And so that's
20:13
evidence that statistics is just not a natural
20:15
way for us to think about our life experience.
20:18
We want to think that we're special, that
20:20
the whole world is aligning for
20:23
us. This is the source of so many
20:25
religions, right if you're if you're in a heartless
20:27
world, but someone in your religion cares about
20:29
you, then you retain your
20:31
sense of personal value, uh,
20:34
in the face of that. And so
20:37
yeah, I don't know if knowing statistics
20:40
helps you or hurt you in that state
20:42
of mind, but I prefer
20:44
to be plugged into an objective reality
20:47
as often as I can. What
20:49
are your thoughts on Elon
20:52
Musk and what he's doing with with SpaceX. It
20:54
should have happened decades ago. We should have had
20:57
space entrepreneurs decades ago. Why do
20:59
you think it's only happening now between
21:01
Blue Origin. Well, it's expensive just because it
21:03
costs. You need rich people to
21:05
think to do it, because there's
21:07
no initial return
21:10
on investment. Really, um
21:12
it's and Elon Musk famously
21:15
said, how to make a small fortune in space
21:17
industry, start with a big
21:19
fortune. I
21:22
think that's Elon Musk, and so
21:25
it's really you need the passion of a rich person
21:27
to try to make it happen. And that way they can
21:30
plow through the years
21:32
of no r O I that
21:35
would have bankrupted anybody else, and they just
21:37
keep pumping in their money until you get
21:39
over that hump where oh, now I
21:41
can send you up in space for just
21:44
a million dollars, And there plenty of
21:46
billionaires out there now that will spend a million dollars
21:48
on a joy ride, and that becomes a
21:51
business model for space tourism.
21:53
But you have to get there first. You have to build the rockets
21:55
that failed first. You have to
21:58
can't just send anyone into thank
22:00
you, thank you. Do you want to go up into
22:02
space as a space tourist. Most
22:04
people's definition of space does not coincide
22:07
with my definition of space. I'm sure.
22:09
So Earth orbit
22:12
is typically what people think of when they think
22:14
of space. But that's
22:17
the distance from New York to Washington,
22:20
d C. But straight up,
22:24
all right, And in fact, in
22:26
lower th orbit, you are closer to Earth's surface
22:28
than San Francisco is from Los Angeles,
22:31
right, So that's that's
22:33
to me, that's not space. That's just a really
22:36
really really high airplane. Yes, thank you
22:40
for a lot. It's the most expensive airplane ticket
22:42
ever, perfectly worded. The differences.
22:45
You'll be waitless and you'll see stars in the daytime,
22:47
that sort of thing, because you're above most
22:49
of the scattering of light and Earth's atmosphere.
22:51
So that's that has an attraction to it.
22:54
But yeah, if you're gonna go to the
22:56
Moon or Mars or beyond, yeah I'll sign up for it.
22:58
But I joke, and I say, Elan, if you're gonna put me
23:00
in your rocket, um let
23:03
it be a rocket. You've already sent your mother on
23:05
and brought her back safely, then I'll go on
23:07
the rocket. So like interstellar like
23:09
that, that would be your idea space exploration
23:11
go that far? What
23:14
what about interstelling? I mean going to other planets?
23:17
Yeah, like if that's not a routine
23:19
thing. These were pioneers um
23:22
trying to find a new place to move. But
23:25
if you have that much technology to fly
23:27
to another planet through black holes and things, it
23:30
seems to me you have enough technology to fix the
23:32
blight on the crops on Earth. That'd
23:35
mean that'd be way cheaper exercise in
23:37
your science and engineering portfolio.
23:39
You think so, But Michael Caine couldn't figure
23:42
it out, so everyone had to
23:44
leave. Everyone
23:46
had to leave. What do you think about everybody
23:48
moving to and setting up life
23:51
on Mars? Do you think it's
23:53
an exciting experiment
23:56
or a kind of a fruitless waste
23:58
of time and money? Yeah? I know, judge how
24:01
people spend money and decide whether it's
24:03
a waste or not. Just not. People
24:06
should spend money however the hell they want if
24:08
they earn it. So that's my first comments. Second
24:10
I can give you, since some factual observation,
24:13
Antarctica is ball
24:15
mirror and whether that
24:18
any place on the surface of Mars. But
24:21
you don't see people lined up to build
24:23
condominiums there and move.
24:27
So the idea that you're
24:29
gonna set up habitats
24:32
on Mars on the
24:34
expectation that people will live there permanently.
24:38
If you needed evidence that that would happen,
24:41
you would need to look to Antarctica to see
24:43
if they're housing um
24:45
tracks that have been set up, and there haven't been. So
24:48
it's a little unrealistic for
24:50
me to think that
24:53
Mars would be a destination for people to
24:56
live. Now, if you
24:58
can create a hab module, they're
25:00
like a domed city where
25:03
you can control the environment and the temperature
25:06
and all the rest of this, so you're not always having to wear a spacesuit.
25:09
That could work, But then
25:11
you're just living on
25:13
Earth on Mars, right,
25:16
I mean, so it's
25:18
not really Mars. You're
25:21
not having to navigate the
25:24
hostile conditions of a different planet. So
25:27
I can imagine that such a place would be like
25:30
Disney World. You would go and visit
25:32
it. It would be a vacation and
25:34
you have rides in g
25:38
You know, if your hundred um,
25:40
you know, two hundred pounds on Earth, you are
25:42
what is it a hundred and that
25:46
so um eighty pounds, you'd
25:48
weigh eighty pounds on Mars. That's kind
25:50
of fun. You have all manner of
25:52
fun sports and amusement
25:55
park rides and things that exploit that fact.
25:57
But then you'd come back to Earth and you'd be glad
25:59
you came back to Earth when that happened.
26:02
So the only meaningful way
26:05
we become a multiplanet species is if we
26:07
figured out how to terraform another
26:10
planet. My favorite word of recent decades. When
26:12
you take a planet that is not like
26:14
Earth, steed them soils
26:16
or the clouds with bacteria
26:19
that create oxygen, this sort of thing, microbes,
26:22
and then create an Earth and then you move there.
26:25
Okay, so I
26:27
don't have a problem with that, but
26:30
I would ask what's your motivation? And
26:33
this is where I part ways with Stephen Hawking.
26:36
And there's even Carl Sagan who
26:38
said we need to become a multiplanet species
26:40
so that if if
26:42
a disaster happens on one planet, the
26:45
species survives. So
26:47
then I asked, for what disaster are you imagining?
26:50
Could be an asteroid strike? Okay, that's one,
26:54
A killer virus, right,
26:56
that's basically the plot of planet
26:58
or the apes um and
27:01
all right, or something we haven't thought of. All
27:03
right, well, how about this. I'm betting
27:06
that the effort, that's
27:09
the cost and time involved
27:12
in terraforming Mars
27:15
and then shipping a billion people there,
27:18
I'm betting that effort is more than
27:20
deflecting an asteroid than
27:23
funding viral research such
27:26
that there will never be a virus that will harm
27:28
us again. I'm kind of betting.
27:31
I would bet that it would take
27:33
less money and less time to accomplish
27:35
that. That's the iron man cutting
27:37
the cable. That's me on the on the
27:39
on the trolley car um
27:42
fixing the brakes, figuring
27:44
out what's wrong in that instant with the brakes
27:46
overcoming it and having the cable car stop.
27:49
It's I don't
27:51
I don't mind living on multiple planets if you think that's just a
27:54
fun thing to do. But and
27:56
then there people say, oh, we're gonna be trashing Earth.
27:58
We have to move to another planet because we're
28:00
polluting Earth or global warming.
28:02
If you terraformed Mars, if
28:04
you turn Mars into Earth, then
28:07
you have the geo engineering ability to
28:09
turn Earth back into Earth. Let's
28:11
get real here, My last question for
28:14
you, and I really really appreciate you taking
28:16
the time to to speak with me today. How
28:18
optimistic about the future are
28:21
you right now? My source of optimism
28:23
comes from the fact that the next
28:25
generation is way
28:28
more woke, almost
28:31
to a fault, but regardless, the
28:33
way more woke and progressive
28:35
minded and
28:38
environmentally concerned than any
28:41
previous generation. So
28:44
for example, okay,
28:47
let's go back to the beat nick piece,
28:49
nick hippie era. What's
28:52
not widely written about is that
28:55
that was a fringe movement among
28:58
highly privileged, young white
29:00
students. Okay,
29:03
highly that's what that was.
29:06
These were kids who didn't really have to work,
29:09
they could take time out and protest
29:12
and and uh
29:14
so, by the way it worked, largely
29:18
we did exit the Vietnam War um,
29:20
and peace as part of a cultural
29:25
urge has remained ever since. And
29:27
I don't think peace as a cultural
29:29
urge predates the sixties.
29:31
Really, Okay, make love not war,
29:33
these kinds of slogan. No
29:36
one really said that. In the Second World War,
29:38
the people might have wanted peace, but not
29:41
they didn't package it that way, all right,
29:43
So whereas now the next generation,
29:46
it's practically a dent
29:48
of them. You just look at the voting trends
29:50
by age in the demographics.
29:53
So and they they understand environment,
29:55
they understand science. They were not the
29:57
ones duped by intern
30:00
aunt rabbit holes that
30:02
older folks. You know, that
30:05
young generation is not the one who believed
30:07
that pizza gate, that they were selling and
30:09
eating babies in the basement. It's
30:11
not that generation. So perhaps
30:13
for the first time in the history of the world, I,
30:16
as an adult, say,
30:19
I can't wait till the next generation takes
30:21
over so they can fix the world. Big
30:24
Money Energy is hosted by me Ryan
30:27
Sirhant. It's produced by Mike Coscarelli
30:30
and Joe Lorresca and executive produced
30:32
by Lindsay Haw. Find more
30:34
podcasts like Big Money Energy
30:36
on the I Heart Radio app or wherever
30:39
you get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More