Podchaser Logo
Home
Outward: The Outing of Bubba Copeland

Outward: The Outing of Bubba Copeland

Released Wednesday, 17th January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Outward: The Outing of Bubba Copeland

Outward: The Outing of Bubba Copeland

Outward: The Outing of Bubba Copeland

Outward: The Outing of Bubba Copeland

Wednesday, 17th January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:15

Hello, and welcome to Outwards Slate's podcast

0:17

where we support all the new years

0:19

you create in this new year as

0:21

long as they are extremely deeply

0:23

queer. I'm Brian Lowder, an editor at Slate,

0:25

and we've got a somber, but I think

0:27

really important feature for you today. But before

0:29

we get into it, I wanted to offer

0:31

just a quick content warning. This episode will

0:33

discuss suicide, not in any graphic detail, but

0:35

just as a thing that happens in the

0:37

world. And so if that's not something that's

0:40

for you, we hope to see you on

0:42

the show next week. So

0:44

last November, news surfaced of a tragic

0:46

situation down in Smith Station, Alabama. The

0:48

town's mayor and local pastor, F.L. Bubba

0:51

Copeland, committed suicide after a week-long campaign

0:53

by a conservative news site to out

0:55

Copeland as a trans woman. In the

0:57

aftermath, my Slate colleague, Evan Urquhart, was

1:00

troubled not only by Copeland's death, but

1:02

by what this vicious right-wing assault indicated

1:04

about where anti-queer and trans conservatives, who

1:06

are of course a growing force in

1:09

this country right now, would

1:11

like to take us. He decided to

1:13

write about it and look into the history

1:15

of forced outings in America, and the result

1:17

is a sobering and essential new piece titled

1:19

The Outing of Bubba Copeland. I had the

1:21

pleasure of editing the piece, and I have

1:23

the pleasure of welcoming Evan back to Outward

1:25

today. If you need a refresher,

1:27

in addition to being an Outward contributor, Evan is

1:29

Slate's comments moderator and he's also the founder and

1:32

editor of Assigned Media. We'll be back with Evan

1:34

right after the break. Welcome

1:53

back. As a starting place,

1:55

why don't you just tell us what

1:57

we know about who Bubba Copeland was?

2:00

You know, I mentioned that he was the mayor of

2:02

this town. And also maybe we can have a quick

2:04

note about pronouns here, because you and I both were

2:06

struggling a little bit with that in the writing process.

2:09

I'm kind of using he when we're talking about Bubba,

2:11

but as we'll see, it gets more complicated than that.

2:13

Maybe they is more appropriate, so you can speak on

2:15

that too. But tell us a

2:17

little bit about who we know Bubba was,

2:19

about their life, and all of that before

2:22

this tragedy happened. So I don't

2:24

think you can understand who Bubba

2:26

Copeland was without understanding the

2:28

town of Smith Station, Alabama,

2:32

where he was the mayor,

2:34

he was also the pastor, and

2:37

I believe he also owned and ran a

2:39

grocery store. So this

2:42

was someone who was sort of central

2:44

to this very small, you know,

2:47

conservative Southern community. And

2:50

you know, accounts from people

2:52

who knew him have said, you know, this

2:54

was someone who cared very deeply about the

2:57

community, you know, and sort

2:59

of had a public life that was

3:01

very much, you know, central to the

3:03

small town life. What we also found

3:05

out in early November after a right

3:08

wing news outlet called 1819 publicized

3:12

it was that Bubba Copeland had a sort

3:14

of double life. And this is where we

3:16

kind of get into the pronouns. I have

3:19

tended to use he, him pronouns for Bubba

3:21

Copeland, a sort of very

3:23

public figure in a very small town. But

3:26

there was also Brittany Summerlin, Brittany

3:29

Blair Summerlin, I believe,

3:32

who described herself

3:34

on Instagram,

3:37

on Reddit, I believe on

3:39

maybe a few other places

3:41

online, as a transgender

3:43

woman, as a transgender girl, and

3:45

would sort of engage with people as

3:48

if she was an out transgender woman. And

3:53

so, you know, I think it's very

3:55

difficult to kind of talk about what someone's,

3:57

you know, identity was when they're not here.

3:59

Yeah. I

4:01

have tended to use sort of she

4:04

her for Britney Summerlin who

4:06

used those pronouns online and he

4:08

him for Bubba Copeland because He

4:11

never asked for anything else. Yeah, I think that's

4:13

reasonable So you just mentioned 1819 to

4:16

tell us about the campaign that they waged

4:18

against Copeland and how that went down Right.

4:21

So to give a little bit of sort

4:23

of background. I kind of scroll Transphobic

4:27

headlines all day all day. Right,

4:29

right as part of assigned media

4:32

Which is a website dedicated to

4:34

fact-checking and providing context for anti-trans

4:37

story in the right-wing press it's

4:39

been you know

4:41

intense focus of the

4:43

right-wing press for more than a year now

4:45

and You know,

4:48

so I kind of read whatever the

4:50

latest is and kind of try and

4:52

look for you know What's the context

4:54

what's going on? Yeah, so I became

4:56

aware of this story really early on

4:58

I believe is the day after they published.

5:01

Mm-hmm, which I think was November 1st for

5:03

our listeners Yeah, right. So on November 2nd,

5:05

I became aware of it and I didn't

5:07

want to touch it Because

5:10

they were ruining a person's life. I

5:12

mean in the story, you know They

5:14

talk about this person begging them not

5:17

to publish the story and deleting all

5:19

of their accounts Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm when they're

5:21

sort of confronted with the evidence of

5:24

this double life. They went ahead

5:26

anyway They published four

5:28

stories in like less than a

5:30

week all on this

5:32

one person's kind of you know

5:34

Secret online life and they ruined

5:36

this person's life. So the first story was

5:39

sort of revealing Copeland's, you

5:41

know double life or secret life and then

5:43

they went on to publish I think what

5:45

three more pieces over the course of the

5:47

week They published four stories in in

5:50

one week. And yeah that first one

5:53

Was sort of presented as

5:56

a bombshell right and so, you know as

5:58

I said in the intro Copeland is pushed

6:00

to suicide. I mean, it becomes a really

6:02

dark situation. There's a slow speed police chase

6:04

and then he ends his life, which is

6:07

horrible. You just mentioned that you spend a

6:09

lot of time looking at stories like this,

6:11

that this is part of your job. You're

6:13

used to horror. But you write in the

6:15

piece that this one sort of hit you

6:17

a little differently, that you felt like something

6:19

else was going on here that merited a

6:21

little more analysis and thinking. Can you talk

6:23

about what that was and sort of what

6:25

drew you to wanting to write something longer

6:27

about it? Yeah, I mean,

6:29

my first interaction with this story,

6:31

I decided not to write

6:34

about it because I'm

6:36

not going to say I predicted what would happen,

6:38

but I just had an awful feeling about this

6:41

is a person's life being ruined and

6:43

the less attention I bring to it,

6:46

kind of better. And

6:48

then by the end of the week, I

6:51

saw on social media that this

6:54

person had committed suicide and I instantly

6:56

knew who it was and what

6:58

the story was. And I'm

7:00

not a historian, but

7:03

it just really felt to me

7:05

kind of instinctively like something out

7:07

of a different time that a

7:09

newspaper would make

7:11

the outing of a

7:14

queer person this kind

7:16

of story on its own

7:18

with kind of nothing else. I mean, there

7:20

were some other things that they kind of

7:23

added later in the detail,

7:26

but that was the core of it.

7:28

And for that to be a story and for

7:30

that to be just used to ruin an individual

7:32

person's life isn't something that

7:35

we've seen. I feel it

7:37

isn't something we've seen for many years.

7:39

Yeah, recently,

7:42

yeah. Yeah, and this piece really is

7:45

as much about the past, right, that past

7:47

as it is about the present. You

7:51

write about how you felt this sort

7:53

of call to look toward queer history,

7:55

particularly pre-Stonewall queer history, to understand what

7:57

that world was like and where we

7:59

are now. What were you hoping to

8:01

find there? What was your

8:03

sort of initial question about pre-Sternwall life

8:05

and outing, as it pertains to outing?

8:07

Well, you know, I've sort

8:09

of had this kind

8:11

of dark obsession for a couple of years.

8:14

It kind of hit me, and this is a

8:16

very obvious thing to realize, but it kind of

8:18

hit me that people who were in

8:21

jazz clubs in the 1920s were

8:23

still alive in the 1940s and 50s. And

8:27

that these kind of young, vibrant,

8:29

gender-bending people would have just

8:32

been my age, would have been middle-aged at

8:34

the time when our country had kind

8:36

of the most repression. And

8:39

so this story felt

8:41

like a chance to ask about what

8:43

that was like, because I am worried

8:46

that at least for some people in

8:49

this country, that's the environment that we may

8:51

have to experience. Again, yeah. And so I

8:53

wanted to kind of go into the history

8:55

and kind of try to understand

8:58

what it would be like to live under

9:00

a situation where you

9:03

have to keep your identity secret, but

9:09

also that the press feels empowered to dig

9:12

into your account and find

9:14

out, and they can just kind of ruin you, and

9:17

that that was kind of an active concern. Well, I think

9:20

one of the things that your piece does really well

9:22

and evocatively is actually sort of paints

9:24

a picture of what that world was

9:26

like through, you know, you interview a

9:29

couple of historians in the piece. So I

9:31

wonder if you could just do that for our listeners here. What

9:34

was life kind of like in the 50s

9:36

and 60s, which is the period you're talking

9:38

about, with regard to this threat of outing?

9:40

You mentioned the press. Who were the antagonists?

9:42

Like, what were the consequences? What does that

9:44

world look like? Yeah, so, you

9:47

know, I kind of found out that my intuition

9:49

was kind of even a little bit more dead-on

9:51

than I had thought, because,

9:55

you know, newspapers in, you know, the

9:58

1940s and 50s would almost... have

10:00

like a beat reporter often whose

10:03

job was to, you know,

10:05

the police would call them up and they would

10:07

go to the local gay

10:09

club when it was being raided and

10:12

take pictures of the

10:15

gender nonconforming of the men in

10:17

dresses kind of all lined up against the

10:19

wall and the police would take down their

10:21

names and would pass it to the reporters

10:23

and ruining people's lives almost as

10:25

like a funny story or as a regular

10:28

feature. Yeah, their name, right? I mean, you write

10:30

their names and places of work and all of

10:32

this would be published like in the newspaper the

10:35

next the next day as a news story. Yeah.

10:37

And for the most part, people would be fired

10:39

from their jobs. And it's really not clear how

10:41

many committed suicide I always

10:43

really tried to stress, like most people

10:46

don't commit suicide. You

10:48

know, you know, gay people or others like most

10:50

people find a way to survive, but it certainly

10:52

was one of the

10:54

outcomes that could happen when people were publicly

10:57

shamed and humiliated and, you

10:59

know, often lost their families. These were often,

11:01

you know, people who were married men who

11:03

were married to women or

11:06

gender nonconforming people who were

11:08

married to women and who had

11:10

jobs and would just, you know, kind

11:12

of all of it would be gone. Yeah.

11:15

And that was just the way that was just sort of

11:17

the shape of life. You could expect that. Tell us one

11:19

of the things that you mentioned in your survey

11:22

in your reporting is the Mattachine Society, which

11:24

we've talked about on the show off

11:26

and on before, you know, leading part of

11:28

the homophile movement in the fifties.

11:30

Can you tell us a little bit about

11:33

who the Mattachine Society was, but also what

11:35

was their goal really with regard to the

11:37

press? Because you speak about that in particular.

11:39

Yeah. I talked to Jules Gil-Peterson, who listeners

11:42

may know, who

11:45

had kind of studied the papers of

11:47

one of the leaders who was part

11:49

of the Mattachine Society. You know, what

11:51

she found was that changing the press

11:53

coverage and changing this dynamic was one

11:55

of the major goals

11:57

of that kind of pre-Stonewall.

12:00

So, it varied in some ways, you know,

12:03

tepid, activism. And

12:06

I believe that, you know, members wouldn't

12:08

even like use their real

12:10

names with other members. This is kind of

12:12

how- Yeah, it was really underground, that's true.

12:14

How paranoid and difficult

12:17

it was to kind of have anything

12:19

like this sort of organizing. But one

12:22

of the things that the San Francisco

12:24

group really focused on was having better

12:26

relationships with the police, but also trying

12:29

to have stories in

12:31

the press that weren't uniquely, you

12:33

know, uniformly negative and trying to

12:35

shift this kind of

12:38

constant tone. And I believe

12:40

they also, you know, kind of defended

12:42

people in court who, you

12:44

know, were the victims of these kinds of raids.

12:46

Yeah. One other thing that you go into

12:48

a little bit, and it's actually, it's funny, we just

12:50

talked about it with regard to the show,

12:52

Fellow Travelers, the Showtime series, Fellow Travelers

12:54

on the podcast a couple of episodes

12:57

ago, is the Lavender Scare, which is

12:59

happening in this general period.

13:01

Can you just remind listeners sort of

13:03

what that was and how that fed

13:05

into this climate really of, you know,

13:07

just great terror around being outed? Yeah,

13:09

so the period that I was talking

13:11

about first where there's kind of a

13:13

beat reporter and they go down to the, you know,

13:15

gay club, is a little bit more in the

13:18

40s. And then I

13:20

believe it was in the 1950s when

13:23

McCarthyism kind of like decided that, you

13:27

know, that

13:29

gays were communists and that gays were

13:32

a blackmail risk. Now, again, this is

13:34

a very kind of self-facilic process because

13:36

the reason there's such a blackmail risk

13:38

is because anyone finds out, yeah, their

13:41

lives are gonna be ruined. So

13:44

they set out to find everyone out and

13:46

ruin their lives preemptively to

13:49

make sure they couldn't be blackmailed. So

13:53

that's very much the logic of homophobia

13:55

at the period. But, you know, so

13:57

in that case, it was national and there

13:59

were many. many people fired,

14:01

there were congressional hearings, and there

14:03

was a very public,

14:06

well-publicized suicide that was actually

14:08

the person who was outed

14:10

was the son of, I believe

14:13

it was a US senator. And

14:15

the US senator committed suicide because

14:18

his son was going to be outed. And

14:23

it is perhaps maybe

14:26

not the moment that suicide

14:28

became so associated with people's

14:31

impression of the LGBTQ community,

14:33

then gay or homosexual is

14:36

really the word they would

14:38

have used for everyone. But

14:41

it certainly kind of cemented that

14:43

and kind of put that nationwide as

14:46

sort of part of how

14:49

people could understand and

14:52

picture and stereotype gay

14:54

people or who we never were. Yeah,

14:57

I think that's actually a great place to take a break. We

15:00

will be right back with more and connecting

15:02

all of this history to sort of

15:04

our president right after a very short break. Just

15:18

before the break, you were telling us about

15:20

this association that forms between sort of queer

15:22

people or gay people and suicide. Can

15:24

you say a little bit more about that? Because

15:27

I find that that was one of the interesting

15:29

beats in your piece where you're sort of saying

15:31

that like, even if, as you said earlier, not,

15:33

we don't know how many people would have committed

15:35

suicide from this kind of thing, but certainly it

15:37

happened. But nonetheless, this idea

15:39

that like, queer people are suicidal, or

15:41

like, you know, more apt to do

15:43

that becomes very ingrained, I

15:45

guess, sort of in this period. What

15:48

did you learn about that? Because that's

15:50

an interesting idea. Yeah, so how

15:53

the history seems to have kind of gone was

15:55

that there were some of these sort

15:57

of suicides, some of them

15:59

were hoisted. high profile of

16:01

people who had been outed, people who had like

16:04

really just lost everything, lost

16:07

their entire social standing. And

16:09

then, you know, sort of a little later, you know,

16:11

psychologists started to sort of talk

16:14

about suicide more in the way that

16:16

we sort of think about it today

16:18

as being sort of more likely because

16:21

of ambient prejudice and, you

16:23

know, and bullying and sort of, and being

16:26

kind of also going along with like,

16:28

well, more drug use or more depression

16:30

or more, you know,

16:32

poverty and that kind of stuff. And

16:35

you know, I think that it's

16:37

a difficult line because it seems,

16:41

you know, pretty clear to me that,

16:43

that people, you know, gay activists, but

16:45

people who care about the welfare of,

16:47

you know, queer people

16:49

have sought to use

16:52

this kind of dramatic suicide story

16:54

as a way to try and explain

16:56

to the mainstream,

16:59

like, why is this bad? And

17:01

so this kind of Bubba Copeland story

17:03

has a lot of kind of echoes of like,

17:06

well, it would be bad for 1819

17:08

to ruin this person's life,

17:11

even if he didn't kill himself, he did

17:13

kill himself. And so it's kind of an

17:15

opportunity, but also a little bit

17:17

of a danger to kind

17:20

of reinforce the stereotype and

17:22

this, you know, kind of

17:24

persistent association between, you know,

17:26

queer people and suicide. And

17:28

again, most, most of us, you

17:31

know, actually, you know, live, most of

17:33

us make it. But

17:35

these kind of dramatic... Well, there's

17:37

something like pathologizing about it, right? Where it's

17:39

like, right, it's like assigning this, this thing,

17:42

it almost becomes a

17:44

kind of homophobia or something. Well, and

17:46

very, very explicitly in

17:48

the right wing kind of propaganda

17:50

stuff that I read, you

17:53

know, and I saw this, you know, when I was much

17:55

younger, used against lesbian

17:58

and gay people, but they will, you know... point

18:00

to the increased risk of suicide for

18:02

trans people and say this is why

18:04

you can't allow people to transition because

18:07

they're at a higher risk of suicide. And

18:11

it was absolutely the same for suicide

18:14

statistics that were more about lesbians and gays

18:16

20 years ago. That's interesting

18:18

because one of the quotes you have in

18:20

the piece from the historian Charles Kaiser, he

18:23

suggests that the trans folks today are basically

18:26

in a similar place to gay men and then the period

18:28

that we were talking about, the pre Stonewall period that we

18:30

were talking about. Can you like,

18:32

do you agree with that? Can you unpack that a little

18:34

bit? I thought that was an interesting idea.

18:38

There are definitely resonances. I mean,

18:40

I think I'm in Charlottesville,

18:43

which you might imagine as like an analog to a San

18:45

Francisco, but I think there are a lot more of them.

18:49

You know what I mean? My life

18:51

is not lived under

18:54

this shadow and this constant thrall.

18:58

But for trans people who are in

19:01

smaller towns or in

19:03

red states or especially both, there

19:06

is I think people

19:08

who live their whole lives in the closet

19:10

knowing that they're trans but never transitioning. And

19:13

then the other side of that

19:15

is people who are stealth, people who no

19:17

one knows that they're transgender and

19:21

transitioned and kind of moved away

19:23

and kind of reinvented their life, but who live

19:25

with the fear that someone

19:27

might find that out. And

19:29

I think the current kind of, I think that

19:32

was kind of felt like it was kind of

19:34

easing. It felt like it was kind of going

19:36

away. I think I had a lot of hope

19:38

that the stealth trans people that I kind of

19:40

knew of would either not need to

19:42

do that or be able to come out or that

19:44

we wouldn't need to have younger generations

19:47

wouldn't feel quite as much of a need to

19:49

do that. And what

19:51

this kind of, you know,

19:54

this current moral panic is doing is really

19:56

I think putting people back into that fear

19:58

of, you know, there's There's no

20:00

way that if anyone knew this about me, that

20:02

I could continue to have a normal life or

20:04

be accepted in my community. That's a

20:06

great segue actually to the sort of last

20:09

big chunk of your piece, which goes into

20:11

sort of where we are

20:13

now. So you talk about the

20:15

various ways that the right is

20:17

trying to reinvent this

20:19

climate of terror for

20:22

2024. What are

20:24

some of those ways and how do you sort

20:26

of see that climate and how it connects again

20:28

to this history that you looked at? Yeah,

20:30

I mean, I think that the right explicitly

20:32

wants to take us back to a time

20:35

when gay people stayed

20:37

in the closet or when they didn't exist,

20:39

depending on... At the very least

20:41

out of public, but yeah. Right.

20:43

I mean, we always existed. We

20:45

always will exist. You can't sort

20:48

of extinguish natural human variation, but

20:51

you can make it so difficult

20:53

that anyone who is publicly out,

20:56

but also anyone who is outed, their life is ruined

21:04

or they're facing

21:06

criminal... I mean, I think this is

21:08

this interesting thing where it doesn't have to be...

21:10

You don't have to be putting people in jail.

21:13

The possibility that you could lose your job or that

21:15

you could go to jail or that at any point

21:17

down the line, that kind of thing could happen,

21:19

is enough to create

21:21

a kind of climate of

21:23

fear. In

21:27

Florida, you can

21:29

see me. The listeners

21:31

can't see me, but I would need to use

21:33

female pronouns and use women's bathrooms

21:35

and I wouldn't be able to

21:37

explain to the schoolchildren

21:41

why this was. It would be illegal for me to explain

21:43

that I was transgender. And

21:45

as you can see, I just look like a man. So

21:48

how is the school going to hire me under those

21:51

circumstances? How am I going to... I

21:53

just can't have that job. You've been legislated

21:55

out of that arena of existence. Yeah. Right.

22:00

I think school teachers, maybe

22:02

daycare workers, people who are working with children are

22:05

the kind of most vulnerable

22:07

right now, but it's also a sign

22:09

of where the climate

22:11

that they want to bring back, where

22:13

it's just not possible to live as

22:15

a trans person in any kind

22:17

of safety or comfort. And again, as

22:20

you said, if you do try, whether that's

22:22

through maybe being stealth or not transition,

22:24

like not socially transitioning or whatever it may be,

22:26

there's still that outing fear

22:28

hanging over your head. I think this is

22:31

honestly the part about the Bubba Copeland story

22:33

that I find the most chilling is

22:35

that Bubba Copeland followed the rule. Right, right.

22:38

Bubba Copeland did not come out.

22:40

Bubba Copeland was not gender nonconforming.

22:43

Bubba Copeland had a private life

22:45

that I think he

22:48

had every reason to believe would be

22:50

respected by other white men of his

22:52

community. And what 81919 said was no, like

22:54

you're not allowed to have a private

22:56

secret trans

23:02

existence. We will

23:04

come into that private life and we

23:06

will make sure you're not able to

23:09

continue. And so that kind of changing of

23:11

the rules, I

23:13

didn't grow up in the South, but I believe you- I did, I did,

23:15

yeah. Yeah, yeah. You

23:17

know, it's no longer, well, you can,

23:19

you know, you can do whatever you want,

23:21

just don't be public about it. It's we're going

23:24

to come into your bedroom. And that's

23:26

a changing of the

23:28

code, I believe, that represents how

23:30

far they're willing to take this. That's such

23:32

an interesting point, because I think we've seen

23:34

a similar changing of the rules around, which

23:36

we knew would happen, but, you know, all

23:39

of this, the anti-trans legislation started with like,

23:41

it's just about the kids, right? We're just

23:43

protecting the children, you know, everybody else will

23:45

be- the adults will be fine, adults can

23:47

do what they want. And of course, within

23:49

like six months, they were going after adult

23:51

medical care and like all of the things

23:53

that we knew they would, but it's the

23:55

goalposts, you know, shifted immediately. And I think

23:58

that's exactly what you're describing here. where

24:00

you're right, in the South, I would

24:03

say that for a very long time, there was

24:05

a kind of a,

24:07

I don't know, like a detente

24:09

or kind of like a live and let live

24:11

idea that like, as long as you kept it

24:13

quiet and out of people's faces, quote unquote, like,

24:16

you could probably get away with

24:18

living the way you want to, certainly as like a

24:20

cis gay or cis lesbian. And

24:22

maybe even as a trans person, depending on where

24:25

you were, and you'd

24:27

be left alone, right, people might know about

24:29

it, but they kind of leave it be.

24:31

And I think you're entirely right that this

24:33

represents a kind of a shift, like a

24:35

violation of that agreement, you know,

24:37

that tacit kind of agreement, which is

24:39

really, really terrifying. I think, you

24:42

know, your piece, maybe this is the place we

24:44

can sort of end your piece is not prescriptive.

24:46

But I do wonder if you have any thoughts

24:48

about what we can do to combat this? Like,

24:50

is there a way to resist a return to

24:53

this world? Where shame and fear are running everything?

24:55

Or are you pessimistic about it?

24:57

Because that might be that's fine, too. You know, I

24:59

don't know if there's an answer. But I'm just curious

25:01

if you have thoughts about that. I think it is.

25:07

I think that coming out of the closet was a,

25:11

like a political act. When I was

25:13

a college student, I was still

25:16

I was kind of on the tail end

25:18

of that. But it was still seen as like, this

25:20

is how we resist. And I

25:22

think that it's really come to be seen

25:24

as kind of the stakes have lowered. It's

25:26

really come to be seen as a personal

25:28

choice. And, you know,

25:30

outing someone against their will has been, you

25:32

know, seen as like just

25:34

really completely beyond the pale, because

25:36

it's a personal, because it's

25:38

a personal choice. And while I continue to

25:40

think, you know, 1819 shouldn't

25:43

be outing people against their will.

25:45

And neither should we, I think it is

25:47

important to kind of understand

25:49

that no one can ruin you.

25:52

If you are out in public about who you

25:54

are. So my first suggestion

25:56

would be to have a renewed emphasis

25:58

on encouraging people to come out, not

26:01

in a shaming way, not in a,

26:03

everyone has to live in the exact same way way, but

26:05

in just a like, this is how you protect yourself is

26:08

you, you can't have

26:10

those secrets and expect that you'll

26:12

be left alone in this kind of

26:16

climate. I think

26:18

that doing a lot of work to try to welcome

26:20

people who are fleeing

26:22

states where the

26:24

situation is worse, you know,

26:27

trying to, you know, have, have

26:29

a day a month or something where people

26:31

are really encouraged to come and meet new people

26:33

or, you know, in bigger cities or whatever. Like

26:35

I think there's more we can do to kind

26:37

of make sure that people can leave and

26:40

can not just leave, but like

26:42

find somewhere somewhere in terms of, you

26:46

know, I am very optimistic over the longterm.

26:48

I think that for trans

26:51

people specifically the fact that

26:53

this medical treatment works

26:55

and that it's so life transforming and

26:58

positive, that knowledge can't go

27:00

back. Like we have an internet, we have, you

27:02

know, there's just too much of it out there. I

27:04

think over the short term, I am concerned. I mean,

27:07

this is why I've been obsessed with people

27:09

in the 1920s and imagining what they were

27:11

doing in the 1950s is because I do imagine, is

27:13

this going to be me? And I would probably move

27:16

to some place where I wouldn't have to live that

27:19

way. But it's, I do think we're going

27:21

to have a rough, I mean, let's be optimistic a rough

27:23

decade or something, maybe a couple decades. It's

27:26

going to be very tough in rough red States and

27:28

encouraging people and making room for people

27:30

to leave and encouraging people to be

27:32

out and to see being out as

27:35

protective and necessary

27:37

and not just this kind of personal choice that

27:41

no one can kind of say anything on either

27:43

way. Cause I worry about, you know, I did

27:46

a piece for you several years back on stealth

27:48

trans men in the South.

27:51

I don't think that they,

27:53

the safety that they had when

27:55

I wrote that just a couple of years ago obtains any

27:58

more. Yeah. Yeah. I

28:00

think those are great, really great suggestions. Okay,

28:02

I think there's more we could talk about

28:04

with this piece, but I think people should

28:06

probably just go read it because it's so

28:08

wonderful. The piece is titled The Outing of

28:10

Bubba Copeland and you can read it now

28:12

in Slate. Evan, before you go, I thought

28:15

I would ask if you have a Gay Agenda

28:17

item for us. That is, if listeners don't know

28:19

it, we tend to do that on the show

28:21

at the end, little recommendation section, updates

28:24

to the Gay Agenda. Evan, did you bring anything for

28:26

us? Well, luckily you

28:28

warned me because I

28:31

mostly consume other people playing video

28:33

games on Twitch, but there's

28:36

this short documentary called Victoria

28:40

by, I believe it's Eloisa Diaz,

28:45

and it

28:47

is the story of a out

28:49

transgender man in

28:51

a conservative small town in Mexico

28:54

who gets pregnant

28:56

and has a baby. This

28:58

is a guy who's on testosterone, who's very

29:00

kind of male passing, and he decides to

29:03

have a child. It's

29:05

a beautiful documentary. I

29:08

don't think many people know about it. Little

29:11

bit of transmasculine representation

29:13

there, so I'd encourage people to check it out.

29:15

Oh, that sounds wonderful, yeah. I hadn't heard of

29:17

it until you mentioned it, so that's great to

29:19

know. All right, well, our guest

29:21

today has been Evan Urquhart. He's the founder and

29:23

editor of Assigned Media, which we've talked about on

29:25

the show before. You can go check that out

29:28

at assignedmedia.org. Also an Outward

29:30

contributor and our fantastic community moderator

29:32

here at Slate. Evan, thanks

29:34

so much for writing this piece and for joining us

29:36

today on the show. I'm always

29:38

so glad to come. All

29:45

right, that is the show for today, but

29:47

just a reminder before we go, we're trying

29:49

to do more advice on the show with

29:52

Danny, Labrie, and friends, and so we need

29:54

you to send us advice questions for that

29:56

to happen. So send them to us at

29:58

outwardpodcasts.com. I really prefer voice memos

30:01

for this so that we can hear your beautiful

30:03

voices. The email works too. You'll just have to

30:05

let me read it. We're looking for stuff about

30:07

queer relationship dynamics, friendships, and

30:48

voices withbrajutz.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features