Podchaser Logo
Home
March 14, 2024. BIN  Weekly Recap - Nichole Deal + Mike Eiland

March 14, 2024. BIN Weekly Recap - Nichole Deal + Mike Eiland

Released Thursday, 14th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
March 14, 2024. BIN  Weekly Recap - Nichole Deal + Mike Eiland

March 14, 2024. BIN Weekly Recap - Nichole Deal + Mike Eiland

March 14, 2024. BIN  Weekly Recap - Nichole Deal + Mike Eiland

March 14, 2024. BIN Weekly Recap - Nichole Deal + Mike Eiland

Thursday, 14th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

It's been another busy news week and we like

0:02

to review the major stories of the week here on the Black

0:04

Information Network. Today, we are joined by

0:06

Black Information Network news anchors Mike

0:08

Island and Nicole Deal to discuss this week's

0:11

major stories. This is

0:13

the Black Information Network Daily Podcast.

0:16

Now I'm your host, ramses Jah.

0:18

All right, mister Mike Island, how

0:21

have you been, sir? Welcome back to the show.

0:23

Talk Not bad, not bad at

0:25

all. Good to be with you as always.

0:28

It's only been a couple of weeks.

0:29

This time.

0:29

I came back fast because I wanted to be back with

0:31

you.

0:32

Yeah, and I know there's another

0:34

couple of reasons, but we won't get into that right now.

0:36

Before we get there, let's talk to Nicole. How have you

0:38

been, Nicole Deal?

0:39

I am doing excellent.

0:41

Happy to be here as always

0:43

to join you people with

0:46

your exceptional talents.

0:47

So you're very kind. Well, Nicole,

0:49

let's let's have a conversation. So earlier

0:52

this week, President Biden and former President

0:54

Donald Trump secured the necessary delegates

0:56

to become the nominees for their respective parties

0:59

and punch their tickets to a history

1:01

making and rematch in the upcoming twenty twenty

1:03

four presidential election. So let's

1:05

get things started with you tell us more about this story

1:08

and your reaction to Biden's State of

1:10

the Union address, and then of course Mike will come to

1:12

you for your thoughts afterwards.

1:14

Sure, this is a moment

1:17

in US history that most of us

1:19

saw coming.

1:20

Right.

1:21

We live in a democracy, which means

1:23

we get to vote on just about everything,

1:25

or at least we're supposed to. So

1:28

on the Democratic side, President Biden

1:30

did not have much opposition.

1:32

He needed a minimum of one nine

1:35

hundred and sixty eight delegates to win, so

1:37

he ended up with two thy one hundred and seven.

1:40

On the Republican side, Donald Trump needed a minimum

1:42

of one thousand, two hundred and fifteen delegates to

1:44

win and ended up with one thousand, two hundred

1:47

and forty nine. So I

1:49

think it's important to note that former

1:51

South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley gave Trump

1:54

a little bit of heartburn along

1:56

the way, not a lot,

1:58

but just a little bit. But she

2:00

dropped out about a week after her

2:02

presidential primary wins in Vermont

2:05

and Washington, d C. After

2:07

their respective leans, Trump

2:09

and Biden each made a statement,

2:12

and here's I want to share with you a little piece

2:14

of what each of them had to say. Biden

2:17

says, despite the challenges we faced

2:19

when I took office, we're excuse

2:22

me, despite the challenges we faced when I took

2:24

office.

2:24

We're in the middle of a comeback.

2:26

Wages are rising faster than inflation,

2:28

jobs are coming back, consumer confidence

2:31

has soared. Amid this progress,

2:33

we face a sobering reality. Freedom

2:36

and democracy are at risk here at home,

2:38

running a campaign of resentment, revenge,

2:41

and retribution that threatens the

2:43

very idea of America.

2:46

So pretty yeah,

2:49

they're just kind of gunning for each other. Here's

2:51

a little bit of what Trump had to say. It

2:53

is my great honor to be representing

2:55

the Republican Party as its presidential

2:58

nominee. Our party is you and

3:00

strong, and fully understands that we

3:02

are running against the worst, most

3:05

incompetent, corrupt, and destructive

3:07

president in the history of.

3:09

The United States.

3:11

So again, you know, they're both just kind of gloves

3:13

off there, you know, while they're

3:16

taking their victory lap. And

3:18

of course our listeners can form their own

3:20

opinions about those comments.

3:24

As for Biden's State

3:26

of the Union speech, I think

3:28

he did a solid job. He

3:31

hit all the high points. He

3:33

talked about inflation and the economy.

3:36

He talked about jobs, student loans,

3:38

making it easier for people to buy homes,

3:40

healthcare, lowering

3:43

the cost of prescription drugs, which

3:45

he has done. He also

3:47

talked about lowering taxes for working families,

3:49

et cetera, et cetera.

3:52

Excuse me.

3:53

The one issue that I would have liked to

3:55

see him hit a lot harder

3:58

is illegal immigration. He

4:01

did go there a little

4:03

bit, but I think both he and

4:05

his predecessor have misgoverned in

4:07

this area, and I think it's a very

4:10

important issue.

4:10

We have to secure our

4:13

borders.

4:14

We simply just cannot have

4:16

thousands of people flooding

4:18

into our country every day un vetted.

4:20

We just can't

4:23

at solutions, and we need to pass legislation

4:26

that aligns with the interest

4:28

of putting Americans first.

4:31

Not that there were not

4:33

not that we're insensitive, not that we're not considering

4:36

others, not that we're not humanitarians.

4:38

But we still have to put Americans first.

4:40

This is America. So as

4:42

we lead up to the twenty twenty four presidential

4:45

election, President Biden absolutely

4:47

must must just find

4:50

a new gear and a

4:52

new resolve to combat illegal immigration.

4:54

And then also throwing

4:57

the hot potato UH to VP

5:00

Kamala Harris on the issue is just is

5:02

not the proper solution either.

5:05

Okay, Mike, let's get your thoughts.

5:06

Then well we're into the fight that nobody

5:09

wanted, even on both sides.

5:11

You know, Biden versus Trump. Nicole's

5:14

on point where she said that he's

5:17

he's in gear. He was on he

5:19

was on high on the State

5:21

of the Union address. He was running on

5:23

all cylinders and that's been

5:25

noted. But he handled

5:27

the disrespect pretty

5:29

good. The heckling that was going on.

5:32

You know, it sounded like to me, it sounded like

5:34

it was comedy night at the Laughs of Mint

5:36

Club with hecklers out there. It was,

5:39

but instead it was a high level talk

5:41

about our lives in this country.

5:44

His opposition is but the

5:46

State of the Union address and other high level

5:48

discussions basically

5:50

made him a w WF wrestling

5:53

match. You know, I'm more concerned about

5:55

the decorum of

5:57

this election more

6:00

or so than anything else. I believe

6:02

that Biden will find his uh find

6:05

his groove in getting the immigration

6:09

situation resolved. I have

6:11

full trust in that. It's just been slow, a slow

6:14

process, A lot of rhetoric, but

6:16

it's a very slow process. Uh,

6:18

you know, as far as actual instituting

6:22

something that the American people

6:24

can understand that this thing is

6:26

going to be stopped. This flow,

6:28

this influx can be controlled, doesn't

6:30

have to never necessarily be stopped, but

6:33

at least under control. But right now it's way

6:35

out of whack, and we

6:38

just have to respect the process. Sure,

6:41

you know, if an American president trying

6:43

to do his best, I think I think he'll get there.

6:46

But this but that's not what

6:48

we're going to hear these next few months. We're

6:50

just going to hear a little bit

6:52

of back and forth. Maybe Biden can cut through it, but

6:55

Trump is uh, you know, he's going to be

6:58

hurling insults and entertaining his base,

7:01

uh all the way to the White

7:03

House. So I think that's

7:05

all we're going to hear. And we're going to hear little

7:07

policy talk, a little

7:10

discussion, uh meaningful

7:12

discussion about immigration. What is actually

7:14

going to happen. We all we only hear that

7:17

we need to get this immigration policy.

7:19

We got to get together on both sides and get

7:21

this immigration situation resolved,

7:23

and it kind of stops there. Yeah, So

7:27

that that's where we need to go. We need to actually

7:29

meaningful implementation of

7:31

an immigration process.

7:34

Sure, sure, you know it's this

7:37

comes to mind. Okay, Republicans

7:42

Democrats, Okay, we

7:45

have to work together to get

7:49

anything done. Really, we

7:52

need to be on the same side

7:55

of an

7:57

agenda. And

8:00

and I liken it to

8:03

Okay, the Republicans are coming to paint a house,

8:06

and they are bringing the paint.

8:09

The Democrats are coming to paint a house, and they

8:11

are bringing the brushes. Okay. And

8:14

if the Democrats say, Okay,

8:17

I got the brushes, go ahead and give me the paint.

8:19

We'll get started painting the house. And

8:21

then Donald Trump says to the Republicans,

8:24

don't give them the paint, so

8:26

that I can say, the Democrats

8:28

are not painting the house, elect me, because

8:30

I'll get the house painted. It just

8:33

effectively kicks the can down the road,

8:35

and in the meantime, the

8:37

American population suffers. And

8:39

I think that that illuminates the

8:41

degree of control that Donald Trump

8:43

has over the Republican Party, because this

8:46

was true prior to him securing their

8:48

nomination for president. This time around,

8:51

they did have a border bill on the table,

8:54

a bipartisan effort as well, that

8:56

did not get passed because Trump at the last

8:58

second tanked it so that he could run

9:01

on a weak border platform and

9:04

stick that on Joe Biden. Because

9:07

fear sells. We've seen

9:09

that in Donald Trump's playbooks since the beginning.

9:12

If he can make the American population become

9:14

afraid that there is a humanity

9:17

or that there's a crisis, a replacement crisis

9:19

indeed at the border, and

9:21

that these people are coming in consuming all the resources,

9:24

which I won't say is entirely untrue, but certainly

9:26

not to the degree that they are making it seem

9:29

that these migrants are going to

9:31

come through and murder everyone in

9:33

the United States and vote

9:36

and replace all white people.

9:38

You know, because this is really the platform that

9:41

Donald Trump wants to run on, because this is what his

9:43

base causes his base

9:45

to move fear so

9:47

without that, by allowing Biden

9:51

and the Democrats to secure

9:53

our borders, it weakens Donald

9:55

Trump's personal chances at reclaiming

9:57

the White House given his

10:00

strategy, and that

10:02

feels a little bit unfair to America,

10:05

the United States of America, because

10:07

again, this one man wants

10:10

to reclaim the White House and he's willing to tank

10:12

a border deal that, as Nicole mentioned, we

10:14

do need in order to get back

10:16

there. As far as Biden's

10:20

State of the Union address, you

10:22

know, credit where it's due. He came out swinging.

10:25

He needed to show people that he was

10:27

not cognitively on

10:29

the decline. He needed to show people that

10:31

he was still strong,

10:33

he was still a capable leader and capable

10:36

of motivating the

10:38

American population. And

10:41

so I respect, you know, him

10:44

coming out doing that. Obviously, he spoke to

10:46

pretty much every major issue that you

10:49

know, people are picking him apart about.

10:52

I admittedly have been a lot more

10:54

critical of his administration since

10:56

the handling of the war, the

10:58

Israel Hamas war. I don't

11:00

like that one bit. I still don't like it. I think

11:02

that he can do more to stand

11:05

with the human beings on the ground in

11:07

Palestine. But

11:10

for his purposes, what he needed to do,

11:12

he came out and said what he needed

11:14

to say. You know, might have been speaking

11:17

out of both sides of his mouth, but

11:19

the fact that he spoke at all shows that

11:21

he's willing to engage. And that's not nothing.

11:25

And I think, Mike, you mentioned this that

11:27

there really is

11:29

a rematch here that nobody wanted to see

11:32

yes, we're just not excited

11:35

about this, but this is what we got and

11:38

we got to keep going. There are people who will vote

11:40

because they don't like Biden

11:43

or like Trump, you know, and

11:46

or there were people that vote because they don't

11:48

like Biden, and there will be people who vote because

11:50

they don't like Trump, and

11:52

that is a very The nature of this election

11:55

feels certainly different

11:57

from the last election. I was really excited

12:00

I did to vote in, which was when Obama

12:02

was elected in two thousand and eight, and

12:04

then of course the rematch in twenty twelve.

12:06

And so I know that there

12:08

are some people on Trump's side of the equation who

12:10

are excited to vote for him again, but

12:13

I suspect that a lot of the

12:15

enthusiasm has eroded.

12:17

Certainly a lot of

12:18

the numbers would indicate

12:21

that the enthusiasm has eroded. I

12:23

mean, there's still people who are going to vote for him, and he

12:25

still definitely has that base. But

12:28

again, I think you said it best. This is a rematch

12:30

that nobody really wanted. So no

12:33

surprises here that they secured the delegates

12:35

needed to get the nominations for their

12:37

parties. But it's

12:40

onward from here. And as you mentioned. As you both

12:42

mentioned, it's probably going to be a lot of mud

12:44

slinging until until we figure out who's

12:47

going to sit in the White House next. So moving

12:49

on. In Pittsburgh, a hospital

12:52

worker found himself suddenly unemployed after

12:54

reporting an incident of possible racist

12:56

behavior. Mike, I know that you and I talked

12:58

a bit about this. I asked you to pump the break

13:01

so we could talk about it when we're recording. So let's

13:03

telly you and then, of course Nicole,

13:05

we'll get your thoughts afterward.

13:06

I'm cool down a little bit of now, okay, but let's

13:09

give them. The story comes from the Kansas

13:11

City Star, and the

13:13

thing that's not surprised is that someone spoke up about

13:15

racism and got fired. That part

13:18

of the story is no surprise. What

13:21

got me was that this is at UNPC

13:23

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, a children's

13:25

hospital where a

13:27

series of events started actually a year

13:29

ago spring first day of

13:31

Spring in twenty twenty three. Caleb

13:34

Ferguson, he works in the transport

13:37

unit at the hospital. He was

13:39

working there and he came across one

13:41

of his co workers, white woman in

13:44

her late fifties to early sixties, and

13:46

she knitted a lot at work. She did knitting

13:49

things, which is a nice thing. But one

13:51

of the co workers asked

13:54

her what she was making, and she says,

13:56

I'm making a monkey, and then she

13:58

holds it up and said, look, it's Caleb,

14:01

referring to Caleb Ferguson. And

14:04

of course he was stunned by that. And

14:06

uh, but the other co workers,

14:09

no one spoke up for him. So

14:11

this was a thing he had to He was on

14:13

his own to make this claim

14:16

to his employer that something

14:19

just happened here that is really

14:21

wrong.

14:22

Uh.

14:22

You know, discussed discussing racial

14:24

slur. I think it was described as a

14:27

well known racial slur, that slur

14:29

that was uttered in that particular

14:32

moment. But the problem

14:35

here is that it's a

14:37

children's hospital, and you wonder, these

14:39

are all workers there, they're all coming

14:41

in that building. It just makes

14:43

me go to a broader level

14:47

talking about healthcare of

14:49

people. Now, if these people have

14:51

that attitude and their working, they do a lot of

14:53

the pre medical

14:56

ops before someone goes into surgery

14:59

or child goes into another procedure.

15:02

These people have those attitudes.

15:04

I'm just worried about the black children that come

15:06

into that hospital for treatment, and

15:09

whether this kind of attitude contributes

15:12

to the racial disparities in healthcare.

15:15

So it's bigger than someone

15:18

making a monkey. The real

15:20

issue here is the mental

15:23

state of the people who are in a hospital

15:25

charged with giving medical care

15:28

equally to all patients. If

15:30

they harbor these attitudes, I'm

15:32

wondering what happens to the quality of the healthcare

15:35

of the children and people that come into the

15:37

hospital. That's bigger than

15:39

this particular story. What happened here happens

15:42

all over in different ways. This was,

15:45

you know, a knitting you know, not everyone

15:47

knits, you know, at every job. There

15:49

are other racial you

15:51

know things that happen at many jobs.

15:54

But this is bigger than that because

15:56

it took place in a children's hospital,

15:58

in a medical facility, and that's

16:01

the bigger story to me.

16:02

Yeah, yeah, I think you're absolutely

16:04

right, Nicole's get your thoughts here.

16:07

Absolutely a great perspective,

16:09

Michaels. I love that my

16:12

response to this story is a lot more petty

16:15

than Michael's let's

16:17

get it, let's

16:19

go Their story

16:21

right here takes me off of

16:23

my a game a little bit.

16:25

All right, Why are you messing

16:28

with me at work?

16:29

Karen. It makes me kind

16:31

of want to throw hands with you, Karen, And

16:34

now I've lost my job behind

16:36

this foolishness.

16:38

Karen.

16:39

This is completely unacceptable

16:41

on every level. And y'all know

16:43

when I get to clap and I'm excited.

16:46

Listen.

16:47

If I brought a doll to work

16:50

and dressed it up in KKK GARB,

16:54

that in and of itself would be offensive

16:56

to a lot of people, black and white. Okay,

16:59

Strike one. But then

17:02

if I got the bright idea

17:05

and the audacity to name my improperly

17:07

dressed KKK doll after

17:10

one of my white cohorts in the

17:12

office, that would make my

17:15

actions disrespectful and vicious

17:17

and triggering.

17:19

Strike two. But after

17:21

all of that, if I

17:24

then decided.

17:25

To name my KKK

17:27

doll Karen and refer

17:29

to the doll in front of Karen

17:32

and other employees, oh

17:35

my goodness.

17:36

Strike three.

17:38

Employers need to take kinds

17:41

of racist acts and deal

17:43

with them harshly and

17:46

swiftly and make these people

17:48

accountable. You have to discipline

17:51

people for these types of actions.

17:53

They cannot go unchecked. And

17:56

that's strike three. Karen, You're out of

17:58

there. She should have been reprimanded with

18:00

a paper trail and possibly

18:03

fired.

18:04

I don't know for.

18:06

Certain that his firing

18:09

was retaliatory, but I

18:12

mean, let's just call it what it

18:14

is and say the timing of it is suspect.

18:17

Okay.

18:17

I think his lawsuit absolutely

18:20

has merit. I believe he is entitled

18:22

to just compensation. And I also

18:24

have a public service announcement

18:27

to people who are not black

18:29

and brown, and that message

18:31

is, please stop, please

18:34

stop doing this type of foolishness

18:36

at work on social media. Stop

18:39

painting your face black, all that, all

18:41

that, just stop. And to Caleb Ferguson,

18:44

I wish him the best with

18:46

his lawsuit.

18:49

Black Information Network News anchors Mike Island

18:51

and Nicole Dealer here with us discussing this week's

18:53

major stories. All

18:56

right, our next story comes to us from North Carolina,

18:59

where one black woman apparently received some interesting

19:02

feedback on why she didn't get a job promotion.

19:04

Nicole, why don't you go ahead and tackle this one

19:06

for us? And then Mike, we're gonna hear from you next.

19:09

Alrighty, Then, so this happened to a woman

19:11

by the name of Shantel Adams.

19:14

She is a senior marketing executive

19:17

and this

19:19

one really hit home for me, you know,

19:21

as a black woman. So if

19:24

I tell you that there's a job opening

19:26

at your company where you've put in years

19:28

of service, you're well respected, you

19:31

have consistently taking

19:33

taken on extra responsibilities,

19:36

You've proven yourself, et cetera,

19:39

you might see yourself as a good

19:41

candidate, right and

19:43

if you have a master's degree in business

19:46

administration, like Shantel Adams,

19:48

you might see yourself as an even

19:50

better candidate. But

19:53

unfortunately, what happened to Shantell

19:56

reportedly allegedly is happening

19:58

to other men and women across the country.

20:00

They are being overlooked.

20:02

For jobs and promotions

20:05

and what she believes is based

20:07

on their race. Chantell

20:10

says that she was turned down for

20:12

a promotion, with her boss telling

20:14

her she was too articulate

20:17

and sharp and that it was

20:19

intimidating to some people. Just

20:23

just let that let that sink sink

20:25

in for a moment, right,

20:29

It's like, all right, So I would

20:31

think that those would be the same

20:34

reasons and rationale that you

20:36

would use to bring me on board and hire

20:38

me. And maybe that's why you did hire me. But

20:41

now that I'm here and I've proven

20:43

myself and I've worked for you, and now

20:45

someone else sees me as a threat

20:48

because I am smart and I am articulate

20:50

and whatever. Now I can't get

20:52

promoted. What a slap

20:55

in the face. Her

20:57

remedy for that has just been to move

21:00

onward and upward and seek employment

21:02

somewhere else. But even by

21:05

doing so, you know, when

21:07

you change employers, you have to transfer

21:09

your four oh one K, you might have to change

21:11

locations, you might have to move change

21:14

residences. You know, you might have

21:16

to change banks and all those types

21:18

of things, and it interrupts your direct deposit

21:20

and so all of those things kind of go along

21:23

with this as the windfall of that.

21:25

But this is what you're up against, unfortunately,

21:28

or what she was up against as a black woman.

21:31

I mean, you have a decision to make because

21:33

if you hit that glass ceiling in your office,

21:36

where do.

21:37

You go from there?

21:38

When your own boss, the person that you need

21:40

to look to to give

21:42

you those promotions or to give you

21:45

a promotion that you've earned, let me say it

21:47

that way, is really

21:49

betraying you in that circumstance. And

21:52

also, I want to share a personal story. I went

21:54

on an interview once years many

21:56

years ago, and a person

21:58

that does not look like me raved

22:02

over my resume. She told me how

22:04

qualified I was. She even

22:06

told me that I was over quiet overqualified.

22:10

And she says to me, she looks me right in the face, and

22:12

she goes, you know what. She puts her pen down,

22:14

and she goes, can I just be honest with you? And I

22:16

said, sure, of course, And she goes,

22:19

you're overqualified for this position

22:21

that you're applying for, and if

22:23

I hired you, I'd be afraid

22:26

that in a year or so that you would

22:28

take my job. She literally

22:31

said that to me in the interview, and

22:33

I couldn't believe it.

22:34

I was like, whoa.

22:37

And then I found myself in

22:39

that seat saying, oh,

22:41

no, you know, no, I wouldn't do that.

22:44

I'm not trying to you know, I'm just here for

22:46

the job that I'm applying for, you know. And I

22:48

walked out the door.

22:50

Of course I didn't get the job, right, but

22:52

I walked out the door, and I thought, oh

22:54

my gosh, what a travesty.

22:57

And in that instance, it didn't matter what

22:59

color I want was, but it was the threat

23:02

of someone who she saw as

23:04

articulate or professional or whatever. And

23:07

she's already, you know, moved us

23:09

a year down the road and said no,

23:11

I can't hire you because you're a

23:13

threat to me. And I'm like, this is

23:15

really silly. But anyway, in the case of Chantell

23:19

Sean tell Adams, I

23:21

felt sorry for her when I when I read

23:23

this article, but I also felt

23:26

empowered by her strength to

23:28

just say, you know what, You're not gonna

23:30

hold me down. You know, I know why

23:33

the cage bird sings and I'm out.

23:37

All right, Mike, let's let's get you to weigh in here.

23:40

Oh wow, I gotta follow that.

23:41

Yeah right, Nicole, you know,

23:45

yeah.

23:45

It shows the tenor of things

23:48

today because when I was growing up, I

23:51

was told that the more articulate

23:53

you are, the better chances

23:56

of you getting a job, and

23:58

so

24:01

now that's a threat. But

24:03

the thing is, I think there's a comfort

24:05

zone among people

24:08

not of color in management positions

24:10

of I wish I was on camera here

24:13

where I'm holding my hand up high. They're

24:15

here, and you're here. My

24:17

hand is now lower.

24:19

Uh.

24:20

That's where the comfort zone is. If you get

24:22

too close to where they are, you are

24:24

a threat. You're okay as long as

24:26

you're just okay. As an employee.

24:28

But if you uh, you know

24:30

that that articulation and that

24:33

smartness and all that, that is a that

24:35

is a threat. A person of color is a threat

24:38

if you're too good and that, like you said, Nicole,

24:41

a slap in the face, because you

24:43

know, the way I grew up, you

24:45

had to be those things to make it. And

24:48

for a while that was acceptable.

24:50

But now with the tenor of

24:53

the country having changed, with Anti

24:55

Dei going on right now,

24:58

I think there's a push the other

25:00

a way. You can't be too smart.

25:02

Uh.

25:03

You have to be on a level where it's

25:06

your your scene as comfortable,

25:09

you know, like in your place, I guess,

25:12

you know, in your lane, I guess, so to

25:14

speak. But that's uh that that's

25:17

the nature of that story, Nicole. It's

25:19

it's it's crazy. You're very

25:21

articulate, you know, you sound

25:23

great on the air and on the

25:25

air, yeah, you sound great on the air,

25:28

you know.

25:29

But.

25:30

I love your conversational tone. But

25:33

the the thing is, with

25:36

a voice like yours, you probably fool

25:38

a lot of people when they see you in person if they only

25:40

hear your voice at first. And that's the same

25:42

with me, and so I've run into similar things

25:45

because you listen to my voice, you can't really

25:47

tell that I may be a person of color

25:49

because that dialect, that ethnicity

25:51

is just not there. And and in

25:53

most cases, especially when I'm doing

25:55

a newscast or doing a radio presentation,

25:59

so when you're in seen

26:01

in person for the first time, it's like, oh,

26:03

like, why didn't you tell me on the phone? You

26:06

know that type of thing. So it's

26:08

it's it's crazy right

26:10

now. It's I

26:13

I'm at a loss for words up to a certain point,

26:15

and I've reached that point, so I'll leave

26:17

it there.

26:18

Yeah, yeah, last thing before I let you to go. It

26:21

appears that former CNN host Don Lemon's

26:23

latest project has been canceled by

26:25

someone who has a history of pushing

26:27

back against black culture. Mike, why don't

26:29

you tell us more about the cancelation of

26:32

Don Lemon's project and then Nicole

26:34

will come to you to close us out.

26:37

Just makes me wonder that X hire a

26:39

Lemon. But they

26:42

did, But it was Don

26:44

Lemon, a very cool

26:47

gentleman and a very smart one

26:49

too. But he has put

26:51

the really pushed to

26:53

taken the metal, the pedal to the metal

26:56

with you know, his views

26:59

on things and I think that may may

27:01

have been a little strong, too strong for Elon

27:04

Musk. Although at the outset after

27:07

he was released, after Lemon was released

27:09

from CNN, Musk

27:12

welcomed the freedom of speech, but

27:14

apparently it was a little bit too much

27:16

freedom and he pulled the plug

27:18

kind of at the last minute. It sounded like there was full

27:21

support for Lemon, and then this thing

27:24

was going to happen on March eighteenth, not long

27:26

from now, and it's not going to

27:28

happen. I think we will see the interview, I think

27:30

on other platforms, I believe YouTube or

27:33

something eventually. But right

27:35

now, that unique and

27:37

honest voice that you

27:40

know Elon Musk must Musk

27:42

talked about about Lemon. He just really

27:45

praised this guy, sung the guy's praises

27:47

and apparently either someone

27:50

must have elbowed Elon Musk or

27:52

maybe he just had a change of

27:55

heart as a result of this interview.

27:57

Now, this would be better discussed if we actually

27:59

heard the interview. We could probably get a better

28:02

perspective on why that

28:05

Musk may have changed his mind. Until we

28:07

hear that, we won't really know, but we

28:09

can only speculate that maybe his tense

28:13

interview that was described as tense at times,

28:15

but Elon Musk said, I thought it was good

28:17

for people to see and hear our exchange and

28:20

that they we'll learn from our conversation. But

28:23

you know, it's not happening. So I

28:26

think it was Lemon that said apparently free speech

28:29

doesn't apply when it comes to questions about him

28:31

from people like me. So I think

28:33

that it hit a little too close to home

28:36

some of the questions, and if you know Don

28:38

Lemon's style, that could have been

28:40

very intense. So

28:44

we have to wait to hear it, and I think our

28:47

views on that will probably explain

28:50

more about why he

28:52

is not why he's canceled before he got started.

28:55

All right, Nicole, let's get your thoughts.

28:57

Sure, it's like the previous

29:00

story. You know, I have praise,

29:02

praise, praise for you. You're a great You're

29:05

fantastic, you're a great journalist

29:07

until.

29:07

You come for me.

29:08

In any way, I

29:11

don't really have a lot to say about about this

29:13

one because we don't have the perspective

29:15

of Leomen's interview with Elon Musk,

29:18

and we won't have that until, like, like

29:20

Mike already said, I believe it's scheduled

29:23

to air on Monday, March eighteenth.

29:25

But apparently the phrase,

29:28

you know, free speech

29:31

absolutism is on both of their minds.

29:33

Uh, but to what degree and what topics?

29:38

To me, it almost seems like, uh,

29:40

there's there's a bit of sarcasm

29:43

in Leomen's online I mean, you know, maybe I'm just

29:45

this is subjective, maybe I'm reading into this, but

29:47

it almost seems like a little bit of sarcasm in Women's

29:50

online post, and

29:52

in my interpretation, moves

29:55

me toward the word hypocrite.

29:58

But again, I think I think Musk

30:01

ending the partnership after his interview

30:03

but before the podcast is

30:06

oddly coincidental. Makes

30:09

me wonder what the

30:11

financial implications are, if

30:14

any, for Leomen by him doing that. So,

30:17

you know, we just won't know. It's kind of a wait

30:19

and see. Maybe there were

30:21

some hard questions being asked

30:24

and some squirmy moments, but

30:26

again, we just won't know until the interview

30:29

goes to air.

30:30

Well, there was a couple of things that happened

30:33

that kind of give a

30:35

little bit of insight. I think you're both right, We're gonna

30:37

have to wait and see the full interview. But funnily

30:41

enough, Don Lemon went back to CNN

30:45

to report on the

30:47

interview that he did right. So

30:50

on CNN he aired a couple of clips

30:52

from the interview. One clip where he was

30:54

kind of pressing Elon Musk about

30:57

the increase in hate speech on the X

30:59

platforms since Musk's takeover and

31:03

how he felt about that and how

31:07

Musk himself had been pushing the

31:10

great replacement theory and

31:13

how problematic that was. And

31:16

you could see Elon Musk kind of

31:18

pushing back, being a little bit more agitated

31:20

in his response. You could hear it in his voice and seen in his face

31:23

that he was uncomfortable being asked about that.

31:25

And Musk was like, you know, I just don't care. You

31:27

know, we invited you here because you

31:29

know, we thought that this would be good and

31:31

that's why you're here, and you know what,

31:33

you know, and just kind of kind of trying to little

31:36

brow him a little bit. But don

31:38

Lemon wasn't really you know, he's

31:40

not really on that because he's a Titan in his

31:42

own right. And then he asked him about it

31:45

was a drug, like a prescribed drug. But

31:47

I'm not a drug guy, so I don't know the name of it. But

31:49

he was like talking about his this

31:52

this use of this prescribed drug, and just

31:55

some other things that made Musk uncomfortable.

31:57

But again these are things that Musk himself hosted

31:59

on the platform. I think to your

32:01

point that, you know,

32:04

Don Lemon seems like he

32:07

has kind of a jovial attitude

32:09

about you know, the partnership coming undone,

32:13

and you can hear that in his voice. In fact, you know, we

32:15

have a clip here, so I'll share it with you before

32:17

we close out. Hi.

32:18

Everyone, Evon Musk is

32:21

mad at me, and I just put out a statement

32:23

about what happened between him me

32:25

and the interview that he is apparently so

32:28

upset about. But make no mistake about

32:30

this. This is going to be my first episode of

32:32

The Don Lemon Show this coming Monday, March

32:34

eighteenth, so make sure you tune in. This has

32:37

not changed anything about the show except

32:39

for my relationship with Elon and X

32:41

and there there's a whole lot that went

32:43

down and I'm going to tell you about in the coming days.

32:45

I know though, that many of you were not happy

32:47

that I was doing this in the first place, and you told

32:50

me so. I just want you to know that I did

32:52

this deal because not only do I believe in free speech,

32:54

but I believed that this was the

32:56

best possible chance for the work that

32:58

I'm doing to reach the lone just amount of

33:00

people. So, speaking of free speech,

33:02

right, I thought the first person interview no brainer.

33:05

Elon Musk, the man who calls himself a

33:07

free speech absolutist, I asked

33:09

him to do it.

33:10

He willingly agreed to the interview.

33:12

Throughout our conversation, I kept reiterating

33:14

to him that although it was tense at times,

33:16

I thought it was good for people to see

33:19

and hear our exchange and that they would

33:21

learn from our conversation, learn

33:23

more about him, learn more about me. But

33:25

apparently free speech absolutism doesn't

33:27

apply when it comes to questions about him

33:30

from people like me. What did we

33:32

talk about? Why is he so upset? Does

33:35

he even have a reason to be upset? Make

33:37

sure you watch it on Monday on YouTube and everywhere

33:39

you listen to podcasts, and you can decide for yourself.

33:42

You can even watch it on next because I'm still

33:44

going to post it there and I'm sure others

33:47

will as well.

33:48

So again from

33:50

the horse's mouth right there Monday,

33:52

we'll know more. But until then, We're

33:54

just going to have to hold on, so we'll

33:57

leave it right there. Thank you both very much, as always

33:59

for your insight into these stories

34:01

and your perspective once again. Today's Gut

34:04

are Black Information Network news anchors Mike Island

34:06

and Nicole Dial. This

34:09

has been a production of the Black Information Network.

34:12

Today's show was produced by Chris Thompson. Have

34:14

some thoughts you'd like to share, use the red microphone

34:17

talkback feature on the iHeartRadio app. While

34:19

you're there, be sure to hit subscribe and download all

34:21

of our episodes. I'm your host

34:23

Ramsey's Jaw on all social media, and

34:26

I'll be hosting another episode of Civicccer

34:28

this weekend on a station near you. For

34:30

stations, show times, and podcast

34:32

info, check civiccipher dot com

34:35

and join us Monday as we share our news

34:37

with our voice from our perspective right

34:39

here on the Black Information Network Daily

34:42

podcast

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features