Podchaser Logo
Home
Jarvis Sam, The Rainbow Disruption

Jarvis Sam, The Rainbow Disruption

Released Tuesday, 19th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Jarvis Sam, The Rainbow Disruption

Jarvis Sam, The Rainbow Disruption

Jarvis Sam, The Rainbow Disruption

Jarvis Sam, The Rainbow Disruption

Tuesday, 19th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Check me out at the annual Black Effect Podcast

0:02

Festival, happening Saturday, April twenty seventh

0:04

in Atlanta. Live podcasts are on deck

0:07

from some of your favorite shows, including this

0:09

one, Black Tech, Green Money, and also some

0:11

of the best podcasts in the game like Deeply

0:13

Well with Debbie Brown and Carefully Reckless.

0:15

Atlanta is one of my favorite cities in the world.

0:18

I've lived there for two years. Actually, in my worldview,

0:20

seeing us successful in every industry

0:22

and not having any limits on our potential largely

0:25

was shaped by Atlanta. So to be there with you

0:27

doing this podcast talking about how we build

0:30

or leverage technology to bill wealth. Come

0:32

on, man, doesn't get better. I want to see

0:34

you there. Get your tickets today at Black Effect

0:36

dot comback's last podcast festival.

0:38

I'm Will Lucas and this is Black Tech, Green Money.

0:42

Jarvis SAMs, founder and CEO at The Rainbow

0:44

Disruption with the mission is to partner with organizations

0:47

to develop practical solutions that champion

0:49

DEI in the workplace and enables

0:51

systemic progress where authenticity, empathy,

0:54

growth, mindset and transparency are celebrated.

0:58

Previously, he was Chief Diversity, Equity

1:00

and Inclusion Officer at Nike. A

1:03

large effort in DEI is to create equitable

1:05

opportunities in spaces where people from

1:07

various backgrounds can have a voice.

1:10

These are achievable goals.

1:12

So if we're successful in do DEI,

1:14

executives ultimately work themselves out

1:16

of jobs.

1:17

I think that the work equity and inclusion

1:20

is actually never done, as we

1:22

see as time goes on in different

1:24

horizons change, different groups

1:26

ultimately end up being at the center of

1:28

experiences of marginalization.

1:30

Unfortunately, the raw reality of our

1:32

work.

1:33

Is that because so many different factors

1:35

social, political, environmental,

1:37

economic tie into the way that

1:39

we do our work, there's always going

1:42

to be a need for organizations to understand

1:45

how do we create equitable approaches

1:47

and equitable outcomes that serve people

1:49

and teams. I think the product inclusion

1:51

space is critical here will if you take

1:54

a look at what new product development looks

1:56

like within organizations. Every

1:58

time a company drives in to

2:00

stand up a new product, we have to consider

2:03

it through the lens of ensuring that it's accessible

2:05

to all people. I'llbe at disability

2:08

status, language barriers, or otherwise.

2:10

And so with some of those different constraints in

2:12

mind, the work of equity practitioners

2:15

to ensure great outcomes

2:17

for all will forever be something that we have to

2:19

continue doing.

2:20

And to that point, you know, I've heard you talk about

2:22

before, specifically the around the time of George

2:24

Floyd and coming out of the pandemic, there

2:27

was so much focus on making sure.

2:28

Black people got equity in the workplace.

2:31

And then there was this big uprising

2:33

in you know, Pacific Islander and Asians

2:35

talking about they needed, you.

2:37

Know, equity.

2:38

So how do corporations manage

2:41

effectively so many people

2:43

you know, chomping at their heels saying, hey, you got to

2:45

pay attention to us too when it when it changes

2:47

so frequently.

2:49

Yeah, you know, for starters, organizations

2:52

have got to not look at this as

2:54

a zero of some game. Unfortunately,

2:56

so many organizations have positioned

2:58

the nature of this work through in us versus

3:01

them mentality. The challenge is the

3:03

USh and them are often too marginalized

3:06

and minoritized communities ourselves.

3:08

I recall the exact experience you're describing

3:10

will when we saw the rise and

3:13

recognition through a period of racial and

3:15

social reckoning following the murder of George

3:17

Floyd May twenty twenty, and

3:19

then by March of twenty twenty one, we started

3:21

to see increasing narratives and stories

3:23

highlighting this notion of hashtag stop.

3:25

Asian hate in numerous organizations.

3:28

You saw this conflict begin to be developed

3:31

between how communities are interacting

3:33

with one another, where support systems

3:35

are built versus none, and you literally

3:38

saw organizations positioning

3:40

a perspective that what, we

3:42

gave this much money to black communities,

3:44

and so we need to think about how do we support

3:46

API communities. The harsh reality,

3:49

though, is that the experiences of

3:51

the communities are so different, and

3:53

when you position it as a zero sum game, it

3:56

assumes that there's only this amount of

3:58

pie that's available for us to fight

4:00

over. Meanwhile, those that exist

4:02

in the space of the dominant discourse are enjoying

4:05

all of their nourishment and fruits and delight

4:07

on this side. For organizations

4:10

to be successful here, the lens

4:12

of equity requires us to consider the specific

4:15

needs of key organizations and

4:17

recognizing where our companies may

4:20

have been complicit in the marginalization

4:22

of those communities. Take, for example,

4:25

the sports industry and certainly in the footwear

4:27

industry. Arguably every

4:29

streetwear, lifestylear performance space

4:31

footwear brand has benefited off

4:34

of the contributions of black bodies, whether

4:36

it's the athletes that represent these organizations

4:39

through a sports marketing lens or the

4:41

consumers that patronize their businesses

4:43

and organizations every single

4:45

day in physical platforms and

4:47

digital These organizations then

4:50

have an obligation to think about

4:52

how they support these communities that

4:54

are a part of the building and development

4:56

of their bottom line. To do this

4:58

effectively, though, we can cannot see

5:01

the work of support of marginalized communities

5:03

at awe to one another, but rather

5:05

recognize that to truly move towards

5:07

systemic solutions means gaining

5:09

a stronger understanding of where

5:11

we've been and how we got here, how

5:14

does this show up in the present and its impact

5:17

and implication on people, and then what

5:19

investments are we going to make as an organization,

5:22

since you're a betterment of future.

5:25

I want to go a level deeper there because I've heard

5:27

black women talk about this. You know, black women's

5:30

diversity and equity inside the workplace lags

5:32

behind Black people in the workplace.

5:35

And I've heard black women talk about when organizations

5:38

and companies talk about well you talk about

5:40

women's issues, is black women get

5:42

left out and white women ultimately benefit

5:44

from the efforts that black women

5:46

have raised their arms about.

5:48

What's your take on this?

5:50

You know, well, in addition to my work

5:53

as the founder and CEO of the Rainbow Disruption,

5:55

I also teach in academic spaces.

5:57

So I am a professor of practice at Brown University.

6:00

When that I work as part of the fully Employed MBA

6:02

program as well with the University

6:04

of California, Berkeley. And so a lot of my

6:06

academic research and pursuits center

6:09

around the topics of intersectionality

6:11

and identity covering, and so the experience

6:14

that you're describing is squarely in

6:16

that space of intersectionality. Originally

6:18

a theory coined in nineteen eighty nine by

6:20

Kimberly Crenshaw from UCLA. It

6:23

argues that these interconnected identities

6:26

that we have impact either

6:28

certain privileges that we have in some cases

6:31

or increasing marginalization in

6:33

others. This is the exact experience

6:35

that we see with black women in the workplace. When

6:38

organizations talk about women's issues,

6:40

when organizations talk about making investments

6:43

in supportive women, they're typically talking

6:45

about experiences for white women. Rarely

6:48

do they consider the intersectional identity

6:50

of the approach. You can see this

6:52

in the way affirmative action policies have been built

6:55

up. The biggest beneficiary of approaches

6:57

to affirmative action have indep been white

6:59

women. On the flip side, when

7:01

many of these organizations, especially

7:03

those in the technology industry, describe

7:06

experiences of people of color or

7:08

underrepresented communities, they're typically

7:10

talking about black men or Asian

7:13

men, and so black women end

7:15

up getting lost in where and how

7:17

does this work is positioned. And yet

7:19

that means that we're not able to effectively solve

7:22

for some of the challenges that become impediments

7:24

to her ability to be successful in the workplace.

7:27

Take pay equity will We often

7:29

talk about the gender dynamic and the gender pay

7:32

gap, and yet it was not until recently

7:34

that we actually started to dig into

7:36

conversations that found that globally

7:39

around the world, if we look at where white

7:41

women are positioned relative to non

7:43

Hispanic identified white men and

7:45

then applied another layer to look at black

7:47

women, black women sit at levels

7:50

even below her white female counterparts.

7:53

Furthermore, in terms of development,

7:55

namely mentorship and sponsorship, she's

7:58

often met with resistance in so

8:00

many ways around the ability to grow,

8:02

advance and develop her career. And what's

8:05

more, when you add on

8:07

macro political and macro social layers

8:10

like those surrounding the rhetoric and sentiment connected

8:12

to the Crown Act, that's where we

8:14

begin to see the biggest implication on

8:16

her experience, where she has to make

8:19

a concerted decision every

8:21

single day how to wear her hair to

8:24

avoid being the recipient of microaggressive

8:26

behavior at best, an

8:28

abject discontent and disrespect

8:31

on what the evolution of her career could

8:33

actually look like because

8:35

of how she wears her hair, which,

8:37

as we know in the context of hair of politics,

8:40

has so many deep connections

8:42

to our experiences and identity as black

8:44

culture.

8:45

When we think about the intersection of

8:47

what it means to be both black and a

8:49

woman, she finds herself at

8:51

this intersection of certain

8:53

aspects of marginalization where

8:56

she's fighting to keep up in so many ways

8:58

to not only the status of identity

9:00

and experience, but she finds herself

9:03

competing with her white female counterparts

9:05

because we have been so preconditioned to

9:07

believe that there is only one seat

9:09

for.

9:10

Us that are available. I'll

9:12

just add to this world. This is why even more

9:14

when I talk in my lectures and the work that

9:16

I do. I often say that to truly

9:19

democratize diversity, equity, and inclusion,

9:22

we have got to create equitable

9:24

solutions for the most marginalized

9:26

amongst us, and my work and studies

9:28

we've discovered that is black transgender

9:31

women. To find yourself at the intersection

9:34

of not only trans or queer identities,

9:36

but female identities as well

9:38

as being part of the black community

9:41

or black identities means access

9:43

to things like environmental protections

9:45

from an environmental justice standpoint, health

9:48

equity, and the ability to not only seek

9:50

care and treatment from folks that understand

9:52

your experiences, but also the ability

9:55

to find a job and not be subjected

9:57

to under or underemployment, because

10:00

what was the experiences of those The further

10:02

you get away from the center, as Bill Hooks

10:04

describes it, and the further you get closer

10:06

to the margin.

10:08

You've talked about growing up, you know, giving

10:11

speeches in debate as being critical

10:13

to your success. I want to hear more about it.

10:16

You know, well, my family has

10:18

a very long history of the speech debate

10:21

space.

10:21

My mom was a debater, my older

10:23

brother was a debater.

10:25

And so in high school I didn't really feel

10:27

like I had a choice. It was just kind of what we do

10:29

in this houshold, and it

10:32

had the biggest impact on my life and

10:34

career. So I went on to debate throughout

10:36

my years in high school and went on to be a

10:39

national champion debater for Rice

10:41

University, and then went on to coach a

10:43

number of schools at both the high school

10:45

and collegiate level, including coaching a number

10:47

of national changions. What speech and debate

10:50

provides for people is the ability

10:52

to understand the mode

10:54

and means of effective communication,

10:57

both verbal and written. It allows

10:59

you to under stand what self expression

11:01

of identity is, and it allows you to

11:04

not only find your voice, not only

11:06

use your voice, but leverage your voice

11:09

as a means of having power and impact.

11:11

The beauty of it is well in the DEI

11:13

space, we often talk about this concept of

11:15

giving us a seat at the table, and I've often

11:17

challenged that because this table

11:20

could be broken, this table could be

11:22

being held up under the bottom by communities

11:24

that we don't even see down there, which

11:26

is the case with many fortune one thousand organizations,

11:29

this table could be ratch. I

11:31

don't necessarily need the seat at

11:34

the table. I want the voice

11:36

in the conversation. I want you to understand

11:38

my sentiments, I want you to respect

11:40

it, and I want to have the ability for

11:43

my sentiments and perspective to

11:45

be built into the way that this organization

11:47

runs and thrives strategically

11:50

and operationally. Speech and debate

11:53

gave me those skills to understand

11:55

how to build an effective argument,

11:58

how to build sound logic and

12:00

rationale, and how to combine

12:02

those great theories that are so deeply

12:04

rooted in the idea of public speaking, to

12:07

eat those logos and paint those that make the

12:09

ethical, emotional, and logical appeals.

12:11

To be able to forge connections for

12:13

people, whether I'm informing you about a topic,

12:16

attempting to persuade you about something, or

12:19

just trying to make you laugh. This is why

12:21

I highly encourage especially

12:23

underrepresented communities. One of the

12:25

biggest issues that we face in both governmental

12:28

spaces and nonprofit spaces, academic

12:30

institutions, as well as in our companies

12:33

is feeling voiceless, feeling that we

12:35

don't have a way or means to be.

12:37

A part of this conversation.

12:39

It's why I encourage underrepresented high school,

12:41

middle school, and college students in role

12:44

in public speaking courses, join

12:46

speech and debate teams, because the confidence

12:48

that you build and the ability to find your voice

12:51

becomes something will that no one can take

12:53

away from you, and it becomes so

12:55

highly impactful in how we lead and

12:58

thrive over time.

13:00

I've had this conversation with several

13:02

people recently who built companies

13:05

or you know, whether they be small businesses or tech

13:07

companies, but in traditionally non

13:10

melanated spaces, right and so, and

13:12

I ask, I'm always interested in how

13:14

they manage themselves in environments

13:17

where they are not represented. Particularly,

13:19

I was talking to Derek from Cloudy

13:22

Donut about the Nonisota tooe y'all.

13:24

I was talking to him and all of his donut

13:26

shops are in white neighborhoods, and he

13:29

was talking about how he doesn't assimilate. He

13:31

is who he is and completely who he is. He

13:33

doesn't change his the vocal tone of his voice,

13:36

you know. And I'm so interested in your take on this because

13:38

I was reading something where you said where

13:40

I finally began to understand the culture to which

13:42

I wanted to be a part of. I no longer had to

13:44

think about this construct of assimilation.

13:47

I could be myself and I think

13:49

about this from a perspective of there's

13:52

got to be some wisdom behind that too, because

13:55

and I want you to correct me if I'm thinking

13:57

about this wrongly, because I think

13:59

about, yes, you

14:01

can be you, but you can't just give

14:04

sometimes you got to give doses until you've proven

14:06

yourself in the room.

14:08

And so can you talk about that?

14:11

You know, well, if the

14:14

question is that I always look like this, no,

14:16

I don't know.

14:18

Fortunate one dousand spaces.

14:20

With rainbow locks and living my

14:22

truth, you know, it was a journey

14:24

of authenticity, you know when I think about assimilation.

14:27

And I'm actually really thrilled to share with the viewers

14:29

of this podcast. It's actually the first time that

14:31

I talk about this publicly. I have just finished

14:34

the manuscript from my book Dei Credential,

14:36

which will be coming out this summer, and

14:38

in DEI Credential, one of the pieces

14:40

that I described is a definition

14:43

for me around assimilation, and I

14:45

posit that assimilation is a tool

14:47

of the oppressor, which is utilized as

14:49

a means to destroy culture and

14:51

character, to degradate

14:54

history and heritage, and to overcome

14:57

the personal to the personality.

15:00

With assimilation, it forces us to

15:02

think through gaslighting techniques

15:05

that who we are, that our experiences,

15:07

that the loves that we have in

15:09

life are bad, are

15:12

harmful or negative, and that

15:14

to truly be successful and thrive

15:16

in a deeply capitalistic environment, we

15:19

have to harness perspectives

15:21

that shies away from what our actual

15:24

cultural heritage is and moves

15:26

toward or in service of, everything

15:28

that the.

15:29

Dominant discourse tells us it should

15:31

be. Well.

15:32

I have rejected this almost every

15:34

single day in my professional career.

15:37

It's hard, the dissonance that

15:39

exists between trying to show up

15:41

as somebody else, to serve a group of folks,

15:44

just to get to that next promotion, just

15:46

to get that next raise. You end

15:48

up working yourself so much that

15:50

the burnout both physically,

15:53

mentally and emotionally becomes

15:55

so deeply pressured. In the book, I write about

15:57

this conversation of the emotional tax, also

16:00

known as the black tax. It's this construct

16:02

of working twice as hard to only get half

16:04

the progress, or have to work. Here's

16:08

the challenge with that. When I was

16:10

going into workplaces very early in my

16:12

career, I found myself giving

16:14

smaller doses than I should have, and

16:17

so I found myself in conversations that

16:19

felt microaggressive, that felt incredibly

16:21

disrespectful, that felt racists,

16:24

that felt homophobic in so many

16:26

ways. And I was working in big oil

16:28

and gas and telecommunications companies,

16:30

and so when you're doing professional services

16:32

or client services work, you don't always

16:34

feel comfortable speaking out about the behaviors

16:37

of those clients because those individuals

16:39

are ultimately helping the firm grow and

16:41

helping the firm drive. By the time

16:43

I jumped into the technology industry, though, will

16:46

I changed my whole perspective on

16:48

this. Now, let me be clear, a lot of

16:50

folks will will walk around and tell you to

16:53

be your authentic self and bring your full

16:55

self to work. My full

16:57

self did not belong in anybody's corporate

17:00

space or anybody's corpus. Seting me

17:02

after five PM is real fun and probably

17:04

does not belong in the four wall on the corporate

17:07

But what I did find is

17:09

that authenticity is defining

17:12

those values that are important to you

17:15

and being unwilling to sacrifice,

17:17

shift or move away from those values

17:19

at.

17:20

Eighty and all costs.

17:22

And so that is what was important to me.

17:24

And so throughout my time at Nike, for

17:26

example, you know, I came into Nike in April

17:28

twenty eighteen, Ball fade

17:31

part on the side, still trying to relive my early

17:34

nineties truth and by the time I

17:36

departed the company in November twenty twenty two

17:38

to launch my firm, The Rainbow Disruption, you

17:40

know, I was walking around navigating the world with rainbow

17:42

locks and dressing exactly how

17:44

I wanted to because those experiences

17:47

of growing up as a black man in Houston, those

17:49

experiences in surrounding myself in

17:51

queer spaces and LGBTQ plus serving

17:54

spaces, those are all a part of

17:56

who I am, and so they have to

17:58

be brought in spaces because they're a part

18:00

of that value set that I hold

18:02

and that I support. My message

18:05

to the listeners on this will and

18:07

I get that what I'm saying is not easy.

18:10

I'm not saying that you go to your job tomorrow

18:13

and you're like, I'm good here, Thomas show

18:15

up. That's not the

18:17

case. It is a journey. I

18:19

recognize and understand that. But what I

18:21

don't think enough of us do is

18:24

write down what those values are

18:27

and then be unwilling and

18:29

unwavering in the lack of sacrificing

18:32

those as you navigate workspaces,

18:35

even if it may come at the impact.

18:37

Of your career.

18:38

We are brilliant, we are great,

18:41

and so understand and leverage

18:43

that and recognize that even if

18:45

that's not a great fit here, there's

18:48

a lot of organizations that desire your talent.

18:51

There is

19:01

DEI, the role of death.

19:03

I mean, let's be honest, who people decide

19:05

to work with can be very personal. People

19:07

like to do business with people they like. But

19:09

part of the work of diversity is to show that people

19:12

outside their bubbles and norms add

19:14

value.

19:15

But there's still that human struggle.

19:17

Does the work of pushing require you

19:20

to put yourself on the line at every time?

19:23

Jarvis speaks on.

19:24

It, It is a really great question, Will and

19:26

I think it depends on one,

19:29

the maturation of the organization

19:31

in terms of their readiness for great DEI

19:33

programming and work. And then two, it

19:36

depends on both the resilience

19:38

and impact of the leader. I'll

19:41

say this hand or heart,

19:44

working for myself now owning my

19:46

own firm and in the work that my team does

19:48

with the Rainbow Disruption, I am

19:50

no longer bridled or stifled by

19:52

this duality of having to

19:55

force the uncomfortable conversation while

19:57

also having to worry about the political

19:59

nature of my own career management, having

20:02

to think about if I give this leader

20:04

this type of feedback which is necessary

20:06

for them to grow and develop and provide impact

20:09

in the organization, is that going

20:11

to impact my performance review or

20:13

my ability to take on my next role in the company.

20:16

It's just not something I have to worry about anymore.

20:18

And so I can show up and authentically engage

20:21

with the various different clients, partners, and organizations

20:24

that I work with, because that constraints

20:26

not fair, like I'm not on y'all's benefits play, and

20:29

so I can talk to you about

20:31

what is actually necessary in your organization.

20:34

You know, well, over the last three years,

20:36

the term diversity, equity and inclusion, and when

20:38

it's positioned to people, it's met

20:41

with resistance by a lot of communities.

20:43

And the reason that happens is diversity,

20:46

equity and inclusion, when done right, is

20:48

literally a challenge to the status quo.

20:51

It is a perspective that says, the way that we have

20:53

done things historically have not fostered

20:55

the outcomes to which we desire going forward,

20:58

and so how do we create points of intervention

21:01

to challenge that systemically. As

21:03

you can imagine, this causes a lot

21:05

of fear to a lot of people because if

21:07

you have built your career and your last three

21:10

promotions have come via some connection

21:13

to systems of nepotism that have

21:15

allowed you to grow and develop, and now I'm

21:17

saying we're actually going.

21:18

To change that.

21:19

We're going to focus on inclusive hiring

21:21

measures where we have a diverse slate of talent.

21:24

We're going to position diversity in our interview

21:26

panels, and by the way, we're going to think about

21:28

inclusive succession planning and how we

21:30

develop, advance and promote talent.

21:33

This causes fear with folks where

21:35

they end up resisting the

21:37

future state approach. It's not that they actually

21:40

have a problem with understanding the car

21:42

tours of diversity and what elements of identity

21:44

is. There is a fear that

21:47

if you change the system so much

21:49

that I have been a beneficiary of, I

21:52

now have no clue what

21:54

approaches to advancement and development

21:57

might actually look like. And so well,

21:59

I don't believe that it has to be

22:01

the role of death.

22:02

Do I think it's difficult?

22:04

Absolutely? Do I think DEI leaders

22:06

really have to focus on the protection of our

22:08

own mental health and well being, and

22:10

organizations need to prioritize resourcing

22:13

to support us absolutely, because

22:15

the reality is George Floyd's

22:18

murder was such a big moment that

22:21

organizations basically starting to position

22:23

the chief Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer and

22:26

essentially a public affairs type role. You

22:28

got cdios right now having

22:31

to be the voice of response when

22:33

there's an earthquake in Turkey, when

22:36

there's violence in the form of war between

22:38

Russia and the Ukraine, when there's continued

22:40

conflict between Israel and power sign with

22:42

literally every shooting

22:45

and experience of gun violence in

22:47

this country, the CDIO is now

22:49

looked at as the voice of reason

22:51

and rationality.

22:52

There. That is such a shift.

22:55

In dynamic to where now this leader

22:57

is playing a role of government and public

22:59

affairs without the accountability, responsibility,

23:02

or the authority to actually make.

23:04

GPA based decisions.

23:06

They are having to opine on global sustainability

23:08

based topics without being an expert

23:10

in spaces of climate change. They are having

23:13

to navigate conversations about

23:15

social and community impact without

23:17

overseeing the multi million dollar budgets

23:19

that are used to be spent in these spaces

23:23

for organizations to be successful,

23:25

you have to understand the significant

23:28

amount of work that's being put on. These leaders

23:31

exhibit the grace with understanding, No,

23:33

they will not create solutions in three

23:35

years that resolves something that you have built

23:38

over the last fifty seventy

23:40

five and one hundred years in many of these

23:42

companies. And so we have to understand

23:45

how do we give the same rigor and intentionality

23:48

to social innovation with diversity, equity

23:50

and inclusion that we do with product innovation

23:53

When we're developing that new app, piece

23:55

of footwear or a pail based

23:58

product.

24:00

You tie THEI efforts because

24:02

they can't just be tied to you know, this the right

24:04

thing to do? How do you tie it to actual value

24:07

and business goals?

24:09

Yeah, you know there's a few things I think on

24:11

the ethical argument for diversity, though, this right

24:14

thing to do, this so called moral imperative.

24:16

I don't think we can overlook that too much

24:18

because a lot of organizations try to

24:20

move so clearly to the business case, and

24:23

when you do that, you lose sight of the fact

24:25

that, like, there's a whole bunch of

24:27

sociological, anthropological and

24:29

psychological impact and implication

24:32

that got us to where we are today. I

24:34

need you to understand how periods

24:36

and and development enslavement impact

24:38

it. Jim Crow laws and policies which

24:41

now impact how black communities show

24:43

up each and every day, and particularly

24:46

in the workplace. I need you to understand

24:48

how the media is representation and raffine

24:51

of certain stereotypes that impact underrepresented

24:54

communities all come from the history

24:56

of our experience. So we can't overlook

24:58

that moral imperative because I

25:01

argue, will it is the right thing to

25:03

do, because we are better

25:06

not saying we are better as

25:08

people than another group. I'm

25:10

saying, as humanity, we

25:13

are better than the systems,

25:15

tools, resources, and processes

25:17

that we have chosen to accept that

25:20

continue to put some communities out

25:22

of the ability to equitably engage in

25:24

society. We as humanity are

25:26

better than the tactics and

25:28

strategies being deployed by the current state of

25:30

the criminal justice system. This

25:33

is a topic that we've known for years that

25:35

continues to have such far reaching impacts

25:37

and implications not just on black and

25:39

brown bodies, but black families,

25:42

black men, black women, so

25:44

on and so forth. We are better

25:46

than that, and so we have to resolve that and

25:48

so a lot of companies then turn to the business case

25:50

for diversity.

25:51

I will tell you well, I was very proud

25:54

women get see.

25:55

A company release the studies around this work

25:57

in twenty fifteen and corroborated

25:59

it into twenty seventeen and twenty eighteen, and

26:01

then Deloitte and BCG added some additional

26:04

imminence connected to it. However, the

26:06

one critique that I've always positioned around

26:08

the business case so called for diversity,

26:11

equity and inclusion is that it considers

26:13

this work in such a deeply aggregated

26:16

nature that it doesn't force organizations

26:18

to understand how their own history

26:21

continues to contribute to the negative impacts

26:24

and implications of the work. The

26:26

business case in many ways would lead

26:28

organizations to believe that if you certainly

26:31

hire or position black and brown

26:33

bodies in certain roles, you're immediately

26:35

going to see this thirty five percent greater likelihood

26:37

of financial outperformance.

26:39

And that's not the.

26:40

Reality of the case. If your organization

26:42

has not done the work to shift your culture

26:45

or the climate within your organization, this

26:48

talent that you've put in role will not be set

26:50

up for success. They will continue to

26:52

be pushing up against a cement ceiling

26:54

that has always been positioned against them.

26:57

And then when you don't achieve those great

26:59

business results that have been highlighted by the

27:01

study, you can now not

27:03

hold yourself accountable but rather blame

27:06

shift to put it on that individual.

27:09

And so will to answer your question directly, how

27:11

then do we tie this to business goals?

27:14

Goal setting is absolutely critical. Employees

27:17

care about four main things in the workplace transparency,

27:21

visibility, accountability,

27:24

and belonging. I am a huge

27:26

fan of the idea of consequential accountability.

27:29

This is the idea that we as an organization

27:31

have set a goal or a target that we want

27:33

to achieve and there are consequences

27:35

connected to it, not through

27:37

the lens of blame, but through the lens

27:39

of accountability. So, when we choose to tie

27:41

executive compensation, for example, to

27:44

growth and representation goals, or commitment

27:46

to DEE education or

27:49

advancement to community and social impact

27:51

policies. In addition to that,

27:54

when we set these goals, it needs

27:56

to be specific enough in such a

27:58

way that even if we put position and growth

28:00

opportunities for representation, in particular

28:03

for growth of women, in the growth of communities

28:05

of color, how are we digging into

28:07

that concept of intersectionality to make

28:10

sure that our women numbers are not just growing

28:12

because of elevation and promotion of white women,

28:15

and that our people of color are underrepresented

28:17

numbers aren't just growing because of the hiring

28:19

and development of new black or Asian engineers.

28:22

Rather, how do we understand both

28:24

through pay equity, through core experience,

28:27

through education, development and community

28:30

that we're solving for those intersections of

28:32

identity along the way that we're providing

28:34

experience and pull surveys to understand

28:37

that impact and that DEI

28:39

has a place not just on the team and talent

28:42

strategy for an HR or people in culture

28:44

organization, but that it is positioned

28:47

right on that corporate strategy for the organization.

28:50

That's how you drive results. Will if

28:52

every strategy coming out of DEI

28:55

can tie back in some way to

28:57

the core goals that the business is looking

28:59

to drive from a strategy and operations

29:01

perspective, That's where impact

29:03

is created. And that is why I often

29:06

highlight and lecture and serience that I

29:08

do. I'm a business leader. It

29:11

just happens to be that my field of practice is

29:13

helping organizations realize their fullest

29:16

social and economic potential through

29:18

the lens and advocacy of DEI.

29:22

You know one thing we haven't discussed here that I've

29:24

got you for a few more minutes, and I want to talk about

29:26

this concept of supplier diversity, right.

29:29

Yeah, So one thing many companies

29:31

lean on as an excuse is, you know,

29:33

black owned companies don't have the capacity, particularly

29:36

corporations. You know, larger

29:38

small businesses lean on that, yep. And

29:41

how can they instead help

29:43

smaller companies black owned companies

29:46

build capacity versus count them out?

29:49

It is so necessary, you know, the supplier

29:51

diversity space. It has been

29:53

around a really long time. In fact,

29:55

work around supplier diversity has

29:57

been around longer than a lot of the core team and talent

30:00

strategies that we know, like the Rooney Ruler, the diverse

30:02

later proch on the team and talent side. And so

30:04

there's a number of learnings, especially from folks

30:07

who I would consider absolute maven's in the space,

30:09

like McDonald's, like University

30:11

of Chicago, who continue to do such

30:14

amazing industry leading work in

30:16

this space. But you're right, will so

30:18

many companies argue, well, in a

30:20

competitive process of an R ANDP, we're

30:22

just not finding enough black owned businesses

30:24

that can support this work, and so you end

30:26

up giving us the small contracts for things

30:29

like minimal food service, occasionally

30:31

bringing us in to do some content creation and

30:33

marketing or videography work, where

30:36

the big contracts are going to

30:38

major technology suppliers, major

30:40

marketing suppliers. For organizations

30:43

to be successful, they have to

30:45

move beyond the programmatic and truly

30:47

go to the systemic. The programmatic

30:50

is to say we're going to go out and create

30:52

this list of underrepresented suppliers

30:54

and hopefully they lay in we're going to try

30:56

to position these black small businesses

30:58

into these smaller areas within our company or

31:00

organization. Rather, we

31:03

should be finding ways to help them grow

31:05

to scale and through the lens of sustainability,

31:08

help them understand what results

31:10

in a successful RP.

31:11

Within your organization.

31:13

Help them by positioning some of the smaller

31:15

entities within your company or organization

31:17

to be successful. For example, if we think about

31:20

the footwear industry, while a vendor may

31:22

not yet be perfect for Nike eight,

31:24

could they do work to support the converse brand

31:27

to understand the infrastructure around the organization

31:30

but build from there. While an organization

31:32

may not be fully equipped for example, to

31:35

support a large retailer,

31:38

could they work on one aspect

31:40

of the merchandising space. That way they're knee

31:43

deep in the ecosystem and growing and developing.

31:45

And then what's more, how are companies actually

31:48

investing money into ensuring

31:50

that these businesses can grow by providing

31:52

them core skills on how to effectively

31:54

run a business. When you think about some of the

31:57

major I'll even say Fortune one hundred

31:59

companies, will they have some of the

32:01

best communications teams, operations

32:04

teams, supply chain teams, merchandising

32:06

teams.

32:07

What would it look like to.

32:08

Have those leaders and their teams extend

32:11

pro bono support and engagement with

32:14

these organizations to ensure that their

32:16

business model is air tight so that

32:18

when they come to you a year from then with

32:20

an RFP, they're not only competitive

32:22

in the process, but we know how they grow at a

32:24

scale. If your organization is

32:26

focused on the impact that you're having

32:28

in terms of carbon reduction, for example,

32:30

to drive towards applimate change goals,

32:33

make sure that you're equipping these folks

32:35

with the knowledge upfront so that they're aligning

32:38

their own approach to global sustainability

32:40

with that that you have as an organization, and

32:43

finally, we'll align to the same previous question

32:45

that you asked around goal setting. We have

32:47

got to set targets around supplier

32:50

diversity, but I want to see disaggregated

32:52

targets because a lot of companies will

32:54

set one billion dollar targets five

32:57

billion dollar targets over the course of a couple of years.

33:00

If you dig into it, the majority of those

33:02

funds are going to term women owned businesses,

33:04

which is absolutely incredible. We

33:06

do need to be investing even more significantly

33:09

in women owned businesses, and in veteran owned

33:11

businesses, and in underrepresented owned

33:13

businesses. However, if we're

33:16

not considering if ninety

33:18

percent of those women owned businesses are

33:20

owned by white women, and that none of the

33:22

funding is being distributed or allocated to

33:24

support Black women, Latino women, Native

33:26

women, are First Nations women, or API

33:29

women, we have not done our job effectively.

33:31

We're giving ourselves a pattern the ba for

33:34

what is arguably a participation trophy to

33:36

make us feel good or better about

33:39

what we're doing. It's often argued

33:41

that disaggregation of data helps

33:43

us to make more intentional and deliberate

33:46

and accurate decision making, and

33:48

so I implore organizations disaggregate

33:51

it, hold yourselves accountable, and enable

33:53

your consumers, vendors, and stakeholders

33:56

to be a part of that journey.

33:57

With you in the matter

33:59

of respecting DEI

34:01

expertise. Right, So, if I'm a business

34:04

and I'm looking for a DEI person, how do

34:06

I know that this person can actually do the job effectively

34:09

one? And how can I be

34:11

a respected DEI leader?

34:15

I think on the first front, well, this is show

34:18

topic ho you know. Following

34:20

George Fwitz Murder, I saw a lot of organizations

34:22

either go out to the marketplace to find

34:25

DEI leaders, and I found others elevate

34:27

leaders within their organization. Some

34:30

elevated leaders that had a great experience

34:32

in the space or at least knew some

34:35

effort around how to drive great progress in the

34:37

war. Others elevated

34:39

leaders who simply had a passion for it. It

34:42

is unfair to those leaders, you

34:45

know, when I think about other functions

34:47

within an organization, As I said, to drive

34:49

DEI effectively, we must think about

34:51

it and connects to our business strategy

34:54

and business operations. In no other

34:57

function would we ever take a

34:59

leader and just position them in a role

35:02

based off an element of identity and

35:04

passion. Will I actually

35:07

really like product development? I

35:10

almost failed out of art class in

35:12

eighth grade. I can't draw, And

35:14

so my passion for design

35:17

and product development.

35:18

Does not mean that I could go and become a

35:20

chief.

35:20

Design officer at a Fortune five hundred

35:23

company. And so the fact that we have

35:25

taken in some cases it's very lackadaisical

35:27

approach around just placing a talent

35:30

in role. It's unfair to the organization.

35:33

It's unfair to all equity serving communities

35:35

that are part of that engagement.

35:37

With the organization.

35:38

And it's unfair to that person because

35:40

when they step into the role and they

35:42

are unable to be successful because

35:44

they've never driven approaches that actually

35:47

foster systemic change in this arena,

35:49

we still point the finger at them because

35:52

the accountability exists within them. All

35:54

the other leaders will have absolved themselves

35:56

of their own accountability and how they drive

35:59

progress in the space, and so.

36:00

That leader is ultimately unsuccessful.

36:03

And so for businesses, I highly encourage

36:05

them think about what engagement

36:07

and partnerships, for example, what firms like mine might

36:09

look like with the rainbow disruption, we can

36:11

help that great DEI leaders for

36:14

and with you, as well as help to establish

36:16

the infrastructure that's necessary as

36:18

you build your own strategy and operating

36:20

model around engagement in this

36:23

space.

36:23

The whole goal is we need to be doing.

36:25

This work to drive longer term

36:27

sustainability and to ensure that we're

36:30

creating measurable and monitorable

36:32

frameworks to do the work even

36:34

more effectively. And so organizations

36:37

have to make sure that they are prioritizing

36:39

both experience and knowledge

36:42

in the space even more than passion

36:45

and lived experience is critical though I

36:47

see a lot of organizations promoting and

36:49

elevating folks who do not speak

36:52

from the community or do not speak from the eye

36:54

of experience, and that's tough.

36:57

It does not mean that these folks cannot as

36:59

allies, advocate or access activists

37:02

for.

37:03

The communities that are there.

37:05

But unfortunately, the black experience

37:07

is one that is so unique in the

37:09

United States and in various spaces. There's various

37:12

parts of Western Europe, certainly South Africa,

37:14

and so we need folks in these roles

37:17

that can actually speak to those experiences,

37:19

that understand what it means to be at

37:21

the margin of experiences of racial

37:24

minoritized status, to be able

37:26

to actually impact change

37:29

on the flip side for DEI

37:31

leaders. Will I get the question a

37:33

lot in my LinkedIn inbox, And when I

37:35

do lectures at universities of

37:38

a number of college students who are like I want

37:40

to go into the DEI space. And I think part

37:42

of it is rooted in gen Z and jen ALPA's

37:44

strong knowledge connection and commitment

37:47

to overcoming systems of oppression

37:49

and resolving things like institutional

37:51

and structural racism. And yet

37:54

in most cases I tell them, don't

37:56

do it immediately out of college. I

37:58

think there is something so critical about

38:01

getting experiences outside of

38:03

this space, whether it's in HR

38:05

directly, in marketing and product

38:08

roles, in finance and sales.

38:10

There is something so critical about

38:12

learning foundations and fundamentals

38:14

of how businesses run and operate so

38:17

that when you do step into the DEI

38:19

role, you can be effective and

38:22

you can drive great work in progress.

38:23

Now I get it.

38:24

Well, that may sound a bit counter productive

38:26

or counterintuitive to exactly what I just

38:29

argue, this idea that you need to be hiring

38:31

experienced professionals. My recommendation

38:34

is entered organization and do a

38:37

role in a different function for two to three

38:39

years, and then step in

38:41

as a coordinator, as a specialist,

38:43

as a junior manager to learn the

38:46

framework and understanding of the space.

38:48

Read the text from.

38:49

Leaders that are driving thought leadership and engagement

38:52

here, follow the right folks on Instagram,

38:55

Twitter and LinkedIn that are positioning

38:57

thought leadership on this topic, and

38:59

then parlay that into a growth and development

39:02

opportunity in the space. Furthermore,

39:04

though, I highly encourage

39:06

my peers and colleagues in the space that are

39:08

chief diversity officers or DEI

39:10

leaders, continue to grow

39:13

in your own practice like keep yourself sharp.

39:15

I talk to a lot of DEI leaders that at

39:18

times I feel like they may rest

39:20

on their lawrels of their experience from doing

39:22

this work so well and for so many

39:24

years. The reality though will is

39:27

times were changing so significantly, and

39:29

as gen Z and Janalpa are very

39:32

actively and rapidly entering the workforce,

39:34

expectations are different. There

39:36

are many DEI practitions who have not had

39:39

to navigate this construct of identity,

39:41

for example around pronoun utilization and

39:44

understanding how to create inclusive spaces

39:46

for transgendering non binary communities.

39:49

They have not had to navigate conversations

39:51

around neurodiversity and neurodivergence.

39:53

They have not had to navigate effective accommodations

39:56

for individuals with disabilities.

39:58

We all have to continue to row in.

40:00

Our own countenances, to be sharp,

40:03

to be effective, and to grow

40:05

this work even more while also

40:07

ensuring to protect our own well being.

40:21

Black Tech Green Money is a production of Blavity,

40:23

afro Tech on the Black Effect Podcast

40:25

Network and I Hire Media, and it's produced

40:27

by Morgan Debond and me Well Lucas,

40:30

with additional production support by Sarah Ergin

40:32

and Rose McLucas. Special

40:35

thank you to Michael Davis sivin That's a Serrano. Learn

40:37

more about my guests and other tech this refors and innovators

40:40

at afrotech dot com joining

40:42

Black Tech Green Money.

40:44

Share this with somebody, go

40:46

get your money, peace and

40:48

love.

40:52

Check me out at the annual Black Effect Podcast

40:55

Festival happening Saturday, April twenty seventh

40:57

in Atlanta. Live podcasts are on deck

40:59

from some favorite shows, including this

41:01

one, Black Tech Green Money, and also some

41:03

of the best podcasts in the game, like Deeply

41:05

Well with Debbie Brown and Carefully Reckless.

41:08

Atlanta is one of my favorite cities in the world.

41:10

I lived there for two years.

41:11

Actually, in my worldview, seeing us

41:13

successful in every industry and not

41:15

having any limits on our potential largely

41:17

was shaved by Atlanta. So to be there with you

41:20

doing this podcast talking about how we build

41:22

or leverage technology to build wealth. Come

41:24

on, man, doesn't get better. I want to see

41:26

you there. Get your tickets today at black effect

41:29

dot comback Slash Podcast Festival

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features