Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Check me out at the annual Black Effect Podcast
0:02
Festival, happening Saturday, April twenty seventh
0:04
in Atlanta. Live podcasts are on deck
0:07
from some of your favorite shows, including this
0:09
one, Black Tech, Green Money, and also some
0:11
of the best podcasts in the game like Deeply
0:13
Well with Debbie Brown and Carefully Reckless.
0:15
Atlanta is one of my favorite cities in the world.
0:18
I lived there for two years. Actually, in my worldview,
0:20
seeing us successful in every industry
0:22
and not having any limits on our potential largely
0:25
was shaped by Atlanta. So to be there with you
0:27
doing this podcast talking about how we build
0:30
or leverage technology to bill wealth. Come
0:32
on, man, doesn't get better. I want to see
0:34
you there. Get your tickets today at Black Effect
0:36
dot comback Slash Podcast Festival.
0:41
I'm Will Lucas and this is Black Tech, Green
0:43
Money. Ann
0:45
Samuels is founder and managing partner
0:47
at Collid Capitol, the sixty six
0:50
million dollar fund so Far, which
0:52
is the first VC fund simultaneously
0:54
backed by Amazon, Alphabet and
0:56
Twitter. He's also co
0:58
founder and served as O at Blavity,
1:01
the largest global black media company for millennials
1:04
in gen z and afro Tech, the
1:06
largest black tech conference in the world. He
1:09
began his career as a spoken word artist before
1:11
working at Bane and Co as a strategy
1:13
consultant and tell A Sign as a product manager.
1:17
Iaran has had a successful professional career,
1:19
and I wonder how he tells the story to limited
1:21
partners, the people who put money into
1:23
VC funds, how his career as
1:25
an operator signals that he might win
1:28
at investing their money.
1:29
I think that there's.
1:31
Many paths that people
1:33
take in order to break into
1:35
venture capital. I
1:37
think there's there's three primary paths
1:40
that people take. Which is one
1:42
being a former operator, which is which is my
1:44
path and having to dig into that a little bit. So
1:47
this is either you've you founded a company
1:50
or you rose through the ranks to become
1:52
a senior operator at a company. You learned
1:54
how to how to do the company building
1:56
fundamentals, and then ultimately that
1:58
teaches you how to identify that type
2:00
of talent, that type of support for other
2:03
companies. Right, So I think that's path number one,
2:06
and how do people break into venture Path
2:08
number two is you go through the investor
2:10
funnel. So oftentimes people
2:12
will work in investment banking, work in private equity,
2:15
maybe work at you know some smaller
2:17
venture capital shops and then worked their way up to the
2:20
larger the larger firms and then and then maybe
2:22
one day start their own, right, but you
2:24
kind of have the.
2:25
Career as an investor.
2:26
And I think number three is I
2:29
think actually the most common version
2:31
of becoming a venture capital venture
2:34
capital practitioner, which is that you are
2:37
just born rich.
2:38
And you just have So that's the
2:40
most that's the most common.
2:43
That's actually how the industry, that's how
2:45
the industry got started. The industry
2:47
got started as a cottage industry where
2:49
wealthy people effectively just made
2:52
angel investments as long
2:54
shot bets that had very
2:56
low probability of success.
2:59
But if they hit, they hit super
3:01
big.
3:01
And it's it's only over
3:04
the last you know, twenty to
3:06
thirty years that
3:08
that venture capital as an industry
3:10
has really started to
3:13
solidify. And so I
3:16
say that because I think it's important to remember
3:19
that for the for the majority
3:21
of the history of venture capital, this
3:23
was a game that that rich people played
3:26
by taking taking huge bets that
3:29
were of less consequence because
3:31
they could they could afford to lose the money that they
3:33
were playing with.
3:35
And it's only it's only recently that that.
3:37
The that the asset class has become
3:39
formalized, and so uh
3:41
so, if you want to become a venture capitalist, the easiest
3:43
way to do that is to just be rich,
3:46
uh for for those of us, for
3:49
those of us that don't have that option, I
3:51
recommend one of the former two paths, which
3:54
is to be to be an operator or
3:56
to be or to be an investor. And and
3:58
my my way was was to be an operation. So now
4:00
that now that we're grounded, I
4:02
had a I had
4:05
I had a I had a great career path that that led
4:07
me to this moment.
4:09
And you know, and I and.
4:10
I clipped from all of my experiences from from
4:12
being a spoken word artist to being a
4:14
consultant, to being a product manager to
4:16
being a CEO. But
4:19
but I think that I think it's important to say
4:21
for for all your listeners, because there might be people that
4:23
that walk different paths, that that want to find a
4:25
way to get into venture and you
4:27
don't have to just do it my way.
4:29
Yeah, that I want to talk about that first
4:31
way for a second. The people who are on a
4:34
career trajectory and they say, you know what,
4:36
I want to find my way here. They're an operator
4:38
today what are the things along
4:40
the operational journey that
4:43
are necessary to be
4:45
good at this till
4:47
I have learned?
4:48
Yeah? Yeah, yeah, I mean
4:50
it's a good question. In many ways, I'm
4:52
still figuring it out myself. The
4:55
hard thing about about venture
4:57
and a way that it's very distinct from being
4:59
an operator, is the feedback loops
5:01
are way way longer. So you
5:04
know, when I was COO at Blavity,
5:07
you know, I put in a solid week's worth Monday,
5:10
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. On Friday
5:12
afternoon, you could walk into my office
5:14
and ask me straight up, Hey, Aaron,
5:16
did you do a good job this week?
5:19
Yes?
5:19
Or no? And I could look you dead in the
5:21
eye and give you an honest answer,
5:24
Yeah, I crushed it this week. This
5:26
week not so well. It didn't go as
5:28
well. In the world of venture
5:31
capital. You don't have that,
5:33
yeah, you know at the end of the year, at the end of the week on
5:35
Friday, Yes me, yeah, yes me?
5:37
How well I did? I have no, I have no idea, and
5:39
I won't I won't know for as you pointed
5:42
pointed out, I won't know for seven to ten
5:44
years.
5:45
If I'm If I'm good at this, you're
5:48
making very very very
5:50
long.
5:50
Term, high risk bets.
5:52
And you know, the successful
5:55
firms are going to be the firms that
5:57
invest in twenty to fifty company
6:00
and have one or two huge
6:03
winners. Even if the rest completely
6:06
go to zero, it's hard to call
6:08
it. And so the things
6:10
that you do on your journey as an
6:12
operator in theory should
6:14
help you do one of two things, which is, either
6:17
help you become a better picker right,
6:20
help you help you pick winners, help you identify
6:23
the characteristics the attributes of founders,
6:25
of markets, of operating teams,
6:28
of business model ideas that will help
6:30
increase the likelihood that.
6:31
You that you pick a winner. And
6:33
two learning how to support
6:36
your portfolio.
6:37
The things that you do post investment, which
6:40
is where I think operators really shine, is
6:43
you know, after you've made the financial
6:45
commitment to a company, what else can you
6:48
do?
6:48
Can you help them build their CRM?
6:50
Can you connect them to operational
6:53
leaders, can you connect them to customers,
6:55
can you connect them to hires?
6:57
And that not only.
6:58
Will help support the poor folio company
7:00
after you've invested, but if companies
7:03
believe that you're going to be able to provide
7:05
that type of support, it might make
7:07
you more attractive as a firm to
7:10
begin with, which might then help you select
7:13
or help you have access to better top of funnel
7:16
for the investments that you make.
7:18
Now you've raised some really interesting questions
7:20
for me. And I've heard plenty of black
7:23
founders on this podcast, and many
7:25
who are wildly successful talk
7:27
about how there are so many vcs
7:29
who want to be in on their deals, and we
7:31
always we tend to because there are so few
7:34
of us. There's a growing number,
7:37
but so few still that you know,
7:39
just want anybody to give them a check. But
7:41
there's a certain segment of black
7:43
founders who have checks thrown at them
7:46
and they can get they get to be selective, and
7:48
so then the VC is then ultimately
7:50
trying to pitch themselves. So can you talk about what
7:53
it's like to be on both sides of that,
7:55
to where you're on the blavity side where people want to give
7:57
you money, then you're on the VC tie where you might
8:00
have to pitch yourself to some really
8:02
really interesting startups.
8:05
Yeah, I mean, look, this this
8:07
game, if anything, will, will help
8:09
keep you humble.
8:12
And look, I
8:14
think I think that's a good thing.
8:15
Like it for in some way you're
8:18
kind of always you're always pitching
8:20
yourself. You're always you're always selling
8:22
something. And I think, you know, the
8:24
older that I've gotten, the more that I've realized that
8:26
when you make it to the top of any field,
8:30
ultimately you're a seller.
8:32
You know.
8:33
I have a good friend of mine, he's
8:35
a climate scientist with a PhD
8:37
from Harvard.
8:38
I ask him how he spends most of his days.
8:41
He spends his days right in grants, which
8:44
you know, it means fundraising, which means
8:46
he's raising money for, you know,
8:48
to support the projects. I think that's the same
8:50
thing if you become a great founder, become a great
8:53
investor. At the end of the day, once you get to the top,
8:56
you're raising money, which means that you're selling yourself.
8:58
You're pitching yourself, and you're pitching yourself to as
9:00
a VC, you're pitching yourself to you know, your
9:02
LPs to invest in your fund, just
9:04
as much as you're pitching yourself to the
9:06
founders that you potentially
9:08
want to invest in. And so what it means is
9:11
that you can't take anything. You can't take
9:13
anything as a given, you can't take anything for granted. Understand
9:16
what your strengths are and you need to You
9:19
need to let the founders know why it's
9:21
going to be differentiated to receive
9:24
a check from you as opposed
9:26
to you know, any other lookalike,
9:28
you know, small emerging manager or you
9:30
know, they might be comparing you to a big box shop.
9:32
And then I need to convince them why taking
9:35
my money is better than taking money from
9:37
a twenty two billion dollar Silicon Valley,
9:40
you know based firm.
9:41
Yeah. I know you're very passionate
9:43
about your spoken word poetry,
9:45
and I wonder the connections
9:48
you might see if you can describe those for us
9:51
from that sort of creativity and
9:53
the business creativity that
9:55
you have to endure.
9:58
Yeah, I think I think of time my
10:01
time traveling as a as a performance poet.
10:04
For for about a decade I was, I was heavily
10:06
traveling around the country, and
10:10
I learned a lot about a lot about passion,
10:12
and a lot about kind of this this notion
10:15
in the in the poetry world that we
10:17
we we call speculative fiction,
10:20
uh, this idea of dreaming,
10:22
uh, dreaming a better world and writing
10:24
it into existence. And
10:27
I think that in many ways there are strong
10:29
commonalities between my favorite
10:31
artists and my favorite founders
10:34
in that both of them
10:37
are are dreaming a better
10:39
world, identifying a way that the world
10:41
can be happier, healthier,
10:43
more efficient, you know, but improved in
10:46
some way, and
10:48
and then building that and speaking it into
10:50
existence. If you can't, if you can't
10:52
dream it first, then then you can't
10:55
then build it. And for me, that
10:58
attribute of passion is
11:00
something that is probably the number
11:03
one characteristic that I look for in
11:05
founders. I'm looking for a founder
11:07
that is identified a hole
11:09
in the universe that they
11:12
uniquely are qualified to fill.
11:15
And I think that that's so important. You know,
11:17
as we mentioned earlier in the conversation, you
11:20
know, the feedback loop is long. You
11:22
know, it takes seven to
11:24
twelve years for a
11:26
venture backed startup to get to
11:29
exit. I
11:31
need to know that the
11:33
founder is going to be just as passionate on
11:36
year seven as they are on
11:39
year one. And that doesn't
11:41
happen if you're just in it for the money. It
11:43
doesn't happen if it's just a pet project
11:45
that you're doing in a classroom. It only
11:48
happens if you're obsessed with
11:50
the idea, if you're obsessed with the problem that you're trying to
11:52
solve and you really believe that you will make
11:54
the world a better place or at least a more interesting
11:57
place if you're able to execute.
12:00
You just spoke to something about you know, founders
12:02
who have you know, recognized the void
12:04
and they can something that they can uniquely feel
12:07
how dialed into the details
12:09
of what that future looks like are the
12:11
most successful founders, Like, can they talk
12:13
about the intricacies or just the concept?
12:17
No, No, they should be they should be really
12:20
dialed in.
12:21
You know, I think that that the best founders
12:23
that I've seen, they can they can paint you.
12:25
They can paint you a.
12:26
Very very detailed picture of what
12:28
the world will look like if their product,
12:31
service, business model, you
12:33
know, serves as a as a disruption
12:36
to the status quo.
12:38
To a VC. What do you need
12:40
to hear in those details that give you the confidence
12:43
say this, this lady, this guy
12:45
is going to go do it.
12:48
Yeah, I mean, I think there's a few things that I'm looking
12:50
for, so, you know, and this is true for a lot
12:52
of vcs, but you know, one
12:54
of the things that we first listen for is
12:57
is this problem a big enough problem
13:00
that if the founder succeeds, it
13:03
will create a billion dollar company. You
13:05
know, they might be they might be right about the problem,
13:07
and they could be super passionate, you know, about
13:09
it. But if it's a small problem, then
13:12
it doesn't necessarily return enough capital
13:14
for me or from my LP base for it to
13:17
move the needle. And that's that's kind of where we get into
13:19
the concept of is this a venture backable
13:21
company versus is it a small business
13:24
or a large business. That's a good idea,
13:26
but maybe not a great idea for a
13:28
venture because we need to have those
13:30
scaled returns. So, you know, firstus, is
13:32
this problem a big enough problem?
13:34
You know?
13:35
The second thing that I'm usually asking is
13:37
what about this founder's background
13:40
leads me to believe that they
13:42
are going to be able to execute on
13:44
this solution.
13:46
So they might be right that it's a great problem, and
13:48
it.
13:48
Would be awesome if somebody solved it, But
13:51
why do I believe that you're going to be able to do it? Have you have
13:53
you been thinking about this problem for the last fifteen
13:55
years? Have you have you worked on versions
13:57
or iterations of this problem over the course of your
13:59
career? Have you built prototypes, test
14:01
models? Do you have a PhD in the subject matter,
14:04
et cetera. It doesn't have to be all of those things.
14:06
But we're looking for some version of what
14:08
we call founder market fit, which
14:11
is, you know, do we believe that that this founder has,
14:13
you know, done the things in their career
14:15
to you know, to give you strong
14:18
indication that they'll be able to solve this problem.
14:20
Yeah?
14:21
I would, And you know, go
14:23
go ahead, no, no, go go ahead. No.
14:24
I was gonna say, like, because I know you invest at different
14:26
levels, you know, ced pre seed, like you know, one
14:28
hundred K to the three million.
14:31
I've read in my research and
14:33
I want you to speak to along the lines that you're
14:35
already on. But at how
14:37
deep are do you expecting them to be in at each
14:40
stage? So if I got to if I'm asking for
14:42
one hundred k, I'm assuming
14:44
that you're not expecting as much as you would
14:46
if I was asking for three million.
14:49
It's a good question, and
14:51
I would say, no, that that's that's not true.
14:55
You know, for me, the the
14:57
the dollar value doesn't correlate
15:00
the level of dialed.
15:02
In that I should see with the founder.
15:04
You know, if we're giving you money,
15:06
it's more correlated to what the stages
15:09
of the business and
15:11
making sure that you know that we own a
15:13
significant enough percentage of the company
15:16
to match with our portfolio construction.
15:19
But if you know, if we're
15:21
investing, we usually.
15:22
Don't go as low as one hundred k these days.
15:24
But say we're investing a five hundred k check
15:26
into a founder, you know, that oftentimes
15:29
means that the stage of the business is such
15:32
that if we invested more than
15:34
that, it would dilute the founders
15:36
too much. And so you know, we
15:38
typically don't want to take you know, more than
15:40
twelve percent ownership with the first
15:42
check. That being said, we'll
15:45
happily invest more at
15:48
the next round, you know, at a higher
15:50
evaluation if the company continues
15:52
to perform well. And
15:54
so you know, I would not
15:57
say that the amount of capital is correlated
15:59
to you know, to our conviction level
16:01
of the founder. Rather, it's just correlated
16:03
to the stage of the business and how how early
16:07
or later, how far along the kind of
16:09
business trajectory the companies the
16:12
company is.
16:13
Yeah, you spoke to something that I'd like to bring
16:15
back up, and you talked about the other
16:18
value you bring to a startup,
16:20
whether that's a network, whether that's you know, CRM
16:22
experience, et cetera. And can you speak
16:24
to holding that in one part
16:26
of your mind then this other idea which I'm
16:29
a believer of, And I remember recently
16:32
hearing a big finance guide who say it
16:34
it's as hard to build a
16:37
small successful business as it is
16:39
a big successful business. And
16:41
so if you think about that concept, most of us
16:43
don't think that way. They think, if I'm going to build,
16:45
you know, a one million dollar business, you
16:47
know that's going to be hard, but it's not going to be as hard
16:49
as I was trying to do one hundred million. But it's hard
16:52
as hard, you know. So it's
16:54
how big do you want to scale your heart? How much do
16:56
you want to take on? But can you speak to those concepts
16:59
of you know, what you believe you can bring
17:01
to a business and the level
17:03
of which effort you have to put in first, not
17:06
as much reward on the back much
17:08
on the outside, or I
17:10
might as well put my effort towards something that could be a bigger
17:13
windfall.
17:15
Yeah, no, I mean, I think it's it's a great point,
17:18
and I completely wholeheartedly agree with you.
17:20
Sometimes it's way harder to build a small business
17:22
and to build a big business, and I think the
17:24
reason that that is is, you know, the success
17:26
of the business isn't just about the outputs. It's
17:28
also about the inputs, right, So you
17:31
know, if I raise forty
17:33
million dollars and I create
17:35
a business that is a ten million
17:38
dollars a year business, you
17:40
know, some could say that that's successful,
17:42
but other people say, well, no, you raised forty to get
17:44
to ten.
17:45
You know that you've lost a bunch of money doing
17:47
that.
17:48
Versus, if I raise five million
17:50
dollars and I get to a ten
17:52
million dollar annual business, I
17:55
would consider that significantly
17:57
more successful. And so I
17:59
think not every everybody always factors in
18:01
both the inputs and the outputs
18:03
when they're looking at things. I think that that's especially
18:06
important when when you kind of observe
18:08
the world through a racial equity lens, because
18:12
you know, for the most part, black
18:14
founders, Latin founders, founders
18:18
who are women or have women on the founding team
18:21
oftentimes are significantly undercapitalized
18:25
relative to their straight white male peers.
18:28
And oftentimes they're judged based
18:30
on the same output metrics. So oftentimes
18:32
they'll say, oh, look at these two types of business models.
18:35
They seem similar, but this company is you
18:37
know, generating five x the revenue.
18:40
And you know, the first thing that I often ask
18:42
is, okay, but they did they raise ten
18:44
x the amount of capital?
18:47
Because if so, it's.
18:48
Actually it's actually less impressive to
18:50
get where they got and in the long run, ultimately
18:53
it won't return actual money for investors
18:55
because investors have invested in so much
18:58
that business needs to not just
19:00
you know, outperform their peer set, it
19:03
needs to outperform their peer set
19:05
at a multiple of the amount
19:07
of dollars.
19:08
That were invested into the business.
19:09
And so I think oftentimes it's important
19:11
to look at what has this founder
19:14
done with the resources that they
19:17
therefore do I believe that if I put more
19:19
resources into the business that
19:22
it will continue scaling.
19:24
That's really good. And so you brought
19:26
up, you know, racial equity and these things, and it
19:28
makes me think about the
19:30
landscape, the legal landscape of
19:32
trying to support black founders, women founders,
19:35
LATINX founders. And even when
19:37
you're talking about venture capital, where you're talking about
19:39
college admissions, colleges can't ask
19:41
what your background is anymore, you
19:43
know what, talk
19:45
about your thoughts on the efforts to support
19:48
black founders intentionally with venture
19:50
capital faced with the
19:52
issues that we now are presented with.
19:56
Yeah, I mean, these are these
19:58
are trying times, and you
20:01
know, it's it's hard as as
20:03
someone that's worked you know, in many ways
20:05
in the black empowerment space for the
20:07
majority of my career, whether as an
20:10
artist or you know, with you know,
20:12
with my time you know, founding Blavity,
20:15
we've seen the We've seen the pendulum
20:18
swing back and forth a
20:20
few times. You know, I remember when we when
20:22
we started Glavity back
20:24
in twenty fourteen.
20:26
In many ways, it was a you
20:28
know.
20:28
It was a direct response to
20:31
you know, what was happening in Ferguson,
20:34
you know, in response to the murder of Mike Brown.
20:37
And you know, then you know, there was
20:39
interest in supporting these types
20:41
of initiatives. That interest winds down
20:43
and then it ramps up again with
20:45
the murder of George Floyd, and then
20:48
again we see a lot of racial
20:50
equity initiatives permeate
20:53
throughout corporate America and the investing
20:55
world in twenty twenty, twenty
20:57
twenty one, twenty twenty two, and then
20:59
it and now we're seeing the pendulum
21:02
swing back with a pushback against
21:04
critical race theory, A pushback against
21:06
affirmative action. But
21:08
for those of us that are practitioners in the space,
21:12
this is not new. Sometimes
21:14
it's in vogue to support
21:16
racial equity, and sometimes it's
21:18
very much not in vogue. I think that the important
21:21
thing for founders to look at is
21:23
the people that have staying power,
21:26
the folks that have said that they care
21:28
about this work and have continued.
21:30
To do this work whether or not it's popular.
21:32
And I think that you know, there are companies like
21:35
Blavity that you know, will
21:37
support black people whether or not it's cool
21:39
to support black people. And I
21:41
think that there's a lot of firms that have demonstrated
21:44
track records in venture, you know,
21:46
of investing in people of color, corporations
21:49
that have done this.
21:50
And I think the most important.
21:51
Thing to look for is look at people's
21:54
track records over a longer time horizon.
21:56
Don't just say, you know, do you have a
21:58
new initiative or have you do you have
22:00
a good press release, you know where you've made
22:02
some type of dollar commitment, which,
22:05
by the way, many firms made dollar commitments
22:07
that didn't actually execute on those dollar commitments,
22:10
right, So don't look at that, look at the actual track record.
22:12
Of work and say, okay, over the last ten years,
22:14
over the last twenty years, you know, have
22:16
you you know, how many black founders have you actually
22:18
invested in, how many programs have you actually
22:21
created? What were the actual dollars that were
22:23
deployed versus the dollars committed? And
22:26
I think that you know folks rise to
22:28
the top in terms of who actually has a track
22:30
record of supporting women and people of color in this space.
22:33
There's this line of an article I read
22:35
about you, where the line is Samuels
22:38
is a believer that the best endings to a
22:40
story are both surprising yet inevitable.
22:44
And I'm going to allow you to pick
22:46
which you want to talk about with just that statement
22:49
alone. But I think about how that can be directly
22:51
related to so many things. Number One, you
22:53
know you talk about black people. I believe black
22:55
people ultimately find true
22:58
generational wealth and success as in our
23:00
country and around the world, we
23:03
will find our way to not be the
23:05
minority. We will be the I mean that's just numbers,
23:08
will be the majority or not a
23:10
minority. In less than ten years or about
23:12
eighteen years. We will find
23:14
success where we have not historically found
23:17
it. People who are gonna win. In
23:19
startups and business and et cetera, you
23:21
can probably find indicators that say that person's
23:23
gonna win regardless whether or not I invest
23:25
in them, because that's a winner. So that
23:28
person's gonna win. Aaron Samuels is going to
23:30
win, Jeff Nelson is going to win, Morgan
23:32
is gonna win, whether or not pick
23:34
a thing. And so talk
23:36
about what you want to talk about with just that statement,
23:38
like, what do you get? What do you derive from that
23:41
statement?
23:43
Yeah?
23:43
I mean, I think the clip
23:45
that you're pulling that from is actually
23:47
where I was talking about evaluating
23:50
founders and helping
23:53
founders tell their story to other investors.
23:56
And I think that when
23:58
you know when you're pitching a day, when you're pitching a company,
24:02
I think that subtly that's what
24:05
moves That's what moves the needle on
24:07
getting somebody else to be convicted
24:10
in you is be surprising
24:12
yet inevitable. I think
24:14
if if somebody walks away from your
24:16
pitch as a founder and they
24:19
say, oh, that called me off guard, but
24:23
also yeah, that's definitely
24:25
gonna happen, I think that
24:27
that makes me more likely to
24:29
invest in you, because I believe the world is naturally
24:32
going there anyways, but you surprised
24:34
me because you're going to get there first, or you're gonna
24:36
get there differently, or you're going to get there better. Of
24:39
course, I think that that's true more broadly,
24:43
you know, than just founder stories. I originally kind
24:45
of pay per clipped that expression from something
24:47
that we used to say a lot in the poetry world
24:50
in terms of an ending to a poem or an ending
24:52
to a story is surprising, get inevitable.
24:55
But I think that that's what leaves you at the end
24:57
of a presentation, at the end of a story, like
24:59
the end is sucked out of you a little bit. And I
25:01
think it's that that emotional feeling
25:04
oftentimes that drives a lot of
25:06
investing decisions.
25:08
Is you talked about something in that statement
25:10
there that you know you can invest, that you know Series
25:12
ABC potentially, and you're talking
25:14
about investing your seed and pre seed. Is
25:17
that ability to do because a lot of people
25:19
in the venture capital space pick one of those or
25:21
maybe two of those. But is that
25:24
particularly because you raise I mean you
25:26
raised a big round. I mean your first one
25:29
of the largest black owned first time funds
25:31
of sixty six million, is that
25:33
ability to invest as such
25:35
a wide category purely reflective
25:37
of the amount that you raised.
25:42
Not purely I mean I think I think,
25:45
you know, the amount that you raise has something to do
25:47
with your strategy, but it's not the it's not
25:49
the entire thing.
25:50
I would actually, you know, flip the order.
25:52
We knew that we wanted to invest at the seed stage
25:55
first, and so then we raised a fund
25:57
that we thought would be appropriate for the
26:00
stage that.
26:00
We wanted to invest in. You know, we we had
26:02
a proof of content fund.
26:03
We did thirty five companies. You know,
26:05
now we're running Fund one. We're going to do thirty five
26:07
companies in that fund. Then we're going to raise
26:09
another fund, probably going to do around thirty
26:11
five companies again, you know. And so we think that kind
26:14
of playing in the you know, sixty to one hundred
26:16
million dollar fund size window
26:18
is appropriate given the amount of companies
26:20
that we want to back over the you know, three to
26:22
four year time horiz, then we want to invest in them.
26:26
So when you're talking about the
26:28
LPs that you deal with, and you know, there's
26:31
you know, if you picked the category that you're in
26:33
of the
26:36
level of VC firm that you have, you know, let's
26:38
say around one hundred million dollars, there's
26:40
a lot of them. There's what
26:43
is the LP thinking about I'm
26:46
going to invest in Collide versus ACME
26:49
firm? What is the differentiating
26:52
factors that they're looking for?
26:55
I mean, I think they're looking for a lot of things, you know.
26:56
I think most LPs are looking for person
26:59
and foremost a history of strong performance.
27:01
So they're going to want to know, how did your previous
27:03
funds perform? Have you consistently
27:07
returned money to your other LPs? Outside
27:10
of that, oftentimes they're looking for some type of competitive
27:13
edge or competitive advantage.
27:16
Usually that means you either have access to
27:18
the unique communities that they don't have access
27:20
to, or you have some type of expertise
27:23
that makes you a better selector. You know, have
27:25
you spent time in an industry, do you have you
27:27
know, specific level of training or education
27:30
in a particular way of thinking. You
27:32
know, but do you know, do you have access? Are
27:35
you going to be a great picker? And do you have a history
27:37
of performance?
27:40
In that same article, they had this phrase
27:42
nails call it. You like to invest in people
27:45
building generational companies and
27:47
so is there a balance between
27:49
hey, this is a just a great
27:51
financial play, but it's probably not going
27:53
to be here in twenty years or we want
27:56
to be along for the long haul.
28:00
Absolutely, And look, there's a lot of different business
28:02
models in kind of venture in the broader
28:04
kind of private equity space.
28:07
If I invested later stage, if I invested
28:09
in.
28:09
Series D, Series E, Series F companies,
28:12
you know, I wanted to be along for the ride for three years
28:14
and then they go public and then I cash out.
28:17
That is a very different type of business model.
28:19
And of course, you know, there might be opportunities
28:22
to participate in projects like that
28:24
in a one off basis, but the reality
28:26
is when you invest at the seed stage or
28:28
when you invest at the pre seed stage, you're
28:31
signing up to be with these companies
28:33
for a you know, seven to twelve year journey
28:35
on average, sometimes longer.
28:37
You know, I know seed stage managers that.
28:39
Have held positions in companies for twenty
28:42
years before you know, before cashing
28:44
out. And if you're thinking about the world
28:46
that way, I mean twenty years, twenty
28:48
years is a generation. You know, like
28:51
that, you know, you could see full turnover
28:53
of team, of culture, of product
28:55
even just you know, think about what you were doing
28:58
twenty years ago, the world
29:00
was completely was completely different.
29:02
You know, we were we were listening, we
29:04
were listening to you know, to Nelly,
29:07
you know, performed videos on
29:09
one oh six in park. You know, we
29:11
were you know, people were slapping POGs.
29:14
You know, Instagram didn't exist, Buying
29:17
didn't exist. People were playing with Tomagotchi's,
29:20
you know, like like the world
29:22
was a different place. And so when
29:24
I say that though, just as a reminder, the
29:27
founders that I'm backing today are
29:29
potentially going to be building companies that'll play
29:31
in a world.
29:32
Twenty years from now.
29:34
So if we imagine how how different we
29:36
are now than twenty years ago, you really
29:39
taking a.
29:39
Big bet on the future.
29:42
And I believe that the
29:44
only way to successfully
29:46
invest at the seed stage is
29:48
to have that long view.
30:05
Black Tech Green Money is a production the Blavity
30:07
Afro Tech on the Black Effect Podcast
30:09
Network and I Hire Media, and it's produced
30:11
by Morgan Debonne and me Well Lucas,
30:14
with additional production support by Sarah Ergan
30:16
and Love Beach. Special
30:18
thank you to Michael Davis and Kate McDonald.
30:21
Learn more about my guests of other tech dis rubs an innovators
30:23
at afrotech dot Com enjoying
30:26
Black Tech, Green Money, shot U to
30:28
somebody, go get your
30:30
money. He's in love. Check
30:37
me out. At the annual Black Effect Podcast
30:39
Festival, happening Saturday, April twenty seventh
30:41
in Atlanta. Live podcasts are on deck
30:44
from some of your favorite shows, including this
30:46
one, Black Tech, Green Money, and also some
30:48
of the best podcasts in the game like Deeply
30:50
Well with Debbie Brown and Carefully Reckless.
30:52
Atlanta is one of my favorite cities in the world.
30:54
I lived there for two years. Actually, in my worldview,
30:57
seeing us successful in every industry and
31:00
I'm having any limits on our potential largely
31:02
was shaved by Atlanta. So to be there with you
31:04
doing this podcast talking about how we build
31:07
or leverage technology to build wealth. Come
31:09
on, man, doesn't get better. I want to see
31:11
you there. Get your tickets today at Black Effect
31:13
dot comback Slash Podcast Festival
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More