Podchaser Logo
Home
Premium: The Case Of The Salted Garden

Premium: The Case Of The Salted Garden

Released Wednesday, 8th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Premium: The Case Of The Salted Garden

Premium: The Case Of The Salted Garden

Premium: The Case Of The Salted Garden

Premium: The Case Of The Salted Garden

Wednesday, 8th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hello, you're listening to a preview of

0:02

a premium episode of Blocked and Reported. If

0:04

you want to hear the whole thing, which

0:06

involves Katie telling me a crazy story of

0:08

this sort of charitable gardener and there is

0:10

an assault, as in putting salt on her

0:12

garden, it gets really crazy. You're going to

0:15

want to hear it. If you want to

0:17

hear it, go to blockedandreporter.org where for just

0:19

$5 a month and up, you can become

0:21

a premium subscriber. Thank you and hope

0:23

you enjoy the preview. Katie

0:30

Herzog, how is it going? Well,

0:32

you sound crackly again, Jesse. Well,

0:34

you know, what

0:37

am I supposed to do? Okay, I'm new to this. I

0:41

am not boring people with any more of my

0:43

microphones. My travel laptop,

0:45

not working with this mic and multiple,

0:48

not only were there multiple attempts to buy

0:50

new mics from Best Buy that failed, I

0:52

borrowed a mic from a hardened fascist, an

0:55

Asian fascist, which is the worst kind of

0:57

fascism. This will be resolved by

0:59

our next episode because I'm just getting another mic, finally. You

1:01

said that last time, but yeah, if people

1:04

can hear the little crackling behind Jesse's mic,

1:06

we apologize. He

1:08

apologizes. It apparently could

1:10

not have been helped. There should be, I think

1:12

maybe a children's book about Jesse and the travel

1:15

laptop, all your various troubles. I thought you were

1:17

going to say like a children's mic, like a Fisher Price

1:19

microphone I could use. You could use that.

1:22

Just on off. People might have noticed that

1:24

we are starting this show a little differently today

1:26

because that is our new theme song. Our new

1:28

theme music is playing. We're going to start playing

1:30

it under all our episodes because the response to

1:32

the theme song was so popular. People love it.

1:35

Okay. A couple things. This is

1:37

the last, the

1:39

original theme song. You just found it.

1:41

Yeah. And it was by something called

1:43

like, what was the, do we know the name of the group? It's

1:46

not a group. It's the group didn't make that

1:48

Jesse. It's like one dude like plinking on a piano. It's

1:51

like barely a human. In this case, we get like,

1:53

I like the new music, but it's by an actual

1:55

name band. So we can't, I don't want to talk

1:57

shit about it. I think people. Our

2:00

listeners are a simple

2:02

folk with simple needs and they're used to

2:04

the, I have a Pavlovian response to the

2:06

old bar party because it makes me think

2:08

of having to talk to you

2:10

and I get all panicky. I think a lot

2:12

of our- It makes me nauseous. It makes me

2:15

nauseous. It's horrible. I think you

2:17

guys will get used to the new one, but

2:19

we'll see how the, is

2:21

it fair to say we'll see how the feedback goes? Do we

2:23

care about the feedback? Do you not care about the feedback? We

2:26

can wait the, I don't know how this works

2:28

in statistics, but we can wait the feedback from

2:30

the people versus the feedback from us. Not

2:34

equally, I would say 10 to one. The

2:36

people count as one. I think each of us is worth 2,000 bar pot lists.

2:41

Yeah. I'd

2:43

say I'm worth 3,000, you're worth 2,000 because I picked

2:45

the new theme song. I think

2:47

we should be clear for negotiating

2:49

purposes. We are open to the other critique

2:52

we got the last episode about the

2:54

sign-offs. The sign-offs mostly are because Katie has

2:57

a weird disorder where she freaks out that she can't

2:59

come up with a sign-off and then she worries too

3:01

much about it when no one cares. That's

3:04

not true. I think it's cheesy. That's why. I

3:06

think it's cheesy. There was way more feedback. There was

3:08

way more feedback about the lack of the sign-offs in the media. God,

3:11

no accounting for taste. Well, the more important thing is

3:13

that nobody's mad that we're opening our relationship. I don't

3:15

think that's true either. There were a few people mad, but they're

3:17

going to deal with it because we're going to have an amazing

3:19

host. Did you, I can't believe we got- Nick

3:21

Fuentes. Who did we get? Richard

3:24

Spencer and Nick Fuentes doing a panel. Oh,

3:27

speaking of panels, Jesse, before we get started

3:29

with the actual episode, I want to talk

3:31

briefly about something that happened this weekend. I

3:33

left my house this weekend. Whoa, that's weird. I

3:36

know. I went to a,

3:39

there was this like, the local

3:41

PBS station in Seattle had a little

3:43

festival. It was called the Cascade Ideas

3:45

Festival. I decided, I

3:47

do this every year where I'm like, look,

3:49

I live like a fucking hour boat ride

3:52

from Seattle. I'd hardly ever

3:54

go into the city. I have to start

3:56

actually going into the city and doing cultural

3:58

events instead of just about how

4:00

nothing ever happens. So we

4:02

decided to go to this PBS festival and

4:04

they had a bunch of different panels. Like

4:06

actually the real reason I wanted to go

4:08

is because Meghan McCardall was supposed to be

4:10

there. She ended up not being

4:12

there, but they had some good speakers. So she found out you were

4:15

going and then she didn't go. Yeah, exactly.

4:17

Shadi Hamid was there from the Washington Post. So there

4:19

were a few panels that I wanted to see. They

4:21

had some big names like Malcolm Gladwell was there, Tom

4:23

Hasecoats was headlining. So we got

4:25

there and I had plans to go to a couple

4:28

panels and I was looking at the program and I

4:30

sent you a photo of it because on the very

4:32

front page there was a land acknowledgement. A

4:34

land acknowledgement that was also broadcast on

4:37

the walls behind the speakers. And this

4:39

land acknowledgement wasn't just like

4:41

a regular land acknowledgement and also

4:43

had a line about how land

4:45

acknowledgments have like been done from

4:47

time immemorial and this is not

4:49

corporate pandering. I'm butchering the exact

4:51

quote, but it was something about

4:53

that. Like natives really do

4:55

this. We're not just doing

4:57

it because it's cool. Natives really do this. Wait,

4:59

natives do this? That's what it said. Well, I

5:01

mean, it didn't do that. So like after

5:04

the Iroquois scalp and torture their enemies

5:06

and occupy their land, they would be

5:08

like, we are standing on their land.

5:10

I'll just quote you directly. It is

5:12

important to note that this kind of

5:14

acknowledgement is not a new practice developed

5:17

by colonial institutions. Land acknowledgement is a

5:19

traditional custom dating back centuries for many

5:21

native communities and nations. So

5:24

it's not a white people thing, it's a native thing.

5:26

You might think that would be cultural appropriation, but I

5:28

guess we're not doing cultural appropriation anymore considering all of

5:30

the white people running around with Kaffias on it. Anyway,

5:32

that's not what I wanted to talk about. What I

5:34

wanted to talk about was, so I

5:36

went to two panels. One of which

5:38

was the New Yorker. Do you ever listen to the

5:40

New Yorker Critics podcast? No. It's

5:43

fine. Nomi Fry is on it.

5:46

I like her, she's funny. So it

5:48

was her and her two co-hosts. They were

5:50

all three interviewing another staff writer for the

5:52

New York Times. His name is Patrick Raiden

5:54

Keefe. He's a great writer. He does a

5:56

lot of true crime stuff. So

5:58

we'll be talking about the role of empathy. in his reporting

6:00

process and how after doing this

6:03

for decades, he has come to

6:05

the mind-bending realization that

6:07

life isn't black and white and even

6:09

people we might consider evil have some

6:12

good qualities, things like that. Oh, so he's

6:14

a fascist. Right. So this

6:16

guy who has spent time with murderers and has

6:18

himself actually solved, he solved the cold case. Great

6:23

writer. He's writing about empathy and nuance and

6:25

things like this. And I also

6:27

go to a panel that was so Lindy West,

6:29

you know who Lindy West is, I take it.

6:32

Yep. So she's very well known, very

6:34

well loved in Seattle. She was a writer for The

6:36

Stranger. She was writer for Jezebel, The Guardian. She

6:39

wrote the book and then the TV

6:41

show, Shrill. And

6:44

Lindy, she has a new podcast that she

6:46

hosts with her best friend. It airs on

6:48

KOW, one of the

6:50

local PBS stations. By the way, is

6:53

her best friend Megan something? Yeah. Megan.

6:56

Yeah. I've had I've had. I'm not surprised. I don't

6:59

remember a lot. Oh, just like a very,

7:01

very Thatcher Hayes, I think. Yeah. I heard

7:04

they have something in the pipeline. That's pretty amazing. Anyway,

7:07

not the podcast. They have an

7:09

ep. I heard through the grapevine that

7:12

there's an episode they're doing about someone

7:14

who chronically faked

7:16

having a cancer diagnosis and

7:19

was like in progressive spaces and they're doing like a mystery

7:21

episode on it. Or maybe they already have, but I'm not

7:23

going to listen to the podcast. Anyway, That does sound pretty

7:26

interesting. Yeah. Can we do that first? Fake

7:28

having a cancer diagnosis. Do the episode. By

7:34

the way, that's what people with cancer sound like.

7:36

I know for a period. I have

7:38

cancer. Yeah, we'll do it. Okay. I'll do

7:40

it. We'll scoop them. Was this about

7:42

the, there was a writer for a TV show.

7:44

Was it about her? Was she the one who...

7:47

If memory serves, I

7:50

Don't want to get into details, but I'm

7:53

connected to one of these people via social

7:55

networks. And I Just heard about this crazy

7:57

case of someone who apparently just like worked

7:59

in progressive. The juices and just completely

8:01

faked having a cancer died. Why?

8:03

Haven't we done this show yet? I hadn't heard

8:05

about it until I heard that Lindy was presided.

8:07

Know what? Lindy West and make it that? her?

8:09

he's if that's her name I don't remember, I

8:11

just from her on twitter shovels are I didn't

8:13

know they were friends. I do know the had

8:15

apologize as sense. Oh gods. Also, Lindy

8:18

West did an amazing what I thought was

8:20

an amazing thing of contacting her cruelest troll

8:22

and my turning him into a human being.

8:24

Yeah, I thought that was so valuable like

8:26

that. Yeah, what we should be doing is

8:28

we should be lights. Find the worst people

8:30

explain what made them so bad. Yeah, so

8:32

many was that was a that must turn

8:34

into an episode of this Maximise but this.

8:37

This. Is why I wanted to talk you. So.

8:39

At this at this panel the slide

8:41

podcast recording which are like I went

8:43

to mostly because I wanted to see

8:45

how other podcasts would do a live

8:47

show and I'm pleased. To report as we

8:50

have no idea how since. Please or

8:52

for it was sucking terrible I learned

8:54

it was so that alert a couple

8:56

things about this for what you need

8:59

to know your audience so you might.

9:01

I don't know this, my pillow controversial,

9:03

but one might think that the sorts

9:06

of people who would it turns and

9:08

ideas as sponsored by the local Pbs

9:10

station might be of a certain age.

9:13

Or the old. Old old people.

9:16

And so their gimmick for

9:18

the slideshow involved. The.

9:21

Real Housewives like they were talking about Real house

9:23

was nobody fucking knew who they were talking about.

9:25

sorry but like I was the youngest person on

9:27

the on it down by far nobody knows about

9:30

said I was one thing I learned. Played.

9:32

Your Audience! So when we do

9:34

we're doing of the keynote for

9:36

Fire at the Fire Student Conference.

9:39

It's proposal relatives.

9:42

Yes I we will be wearing can see

9:44

is at that conference although it's fire it's

9:46

Florida maybe on I guess that was a

9:48

good learning experience. but the thing I see

9:50

one is talking about was that their panel

9:52

was about whether they're live show is about

9:54

the supreme court. So. they're talking

9:56

about these supreme court justices and there

9:59

And the way that they talk about

10:01

them, people like Amy Coney Barrett, evil,

10:05

they keep talking about how they're bad

10:07

people, specifically because of their

10:09

feelings about abortion.

10:12

And it just to me, it was like, I

10:15

am pro-choice. I think

10:17

that you should actually be able to murder your

10:19

kids after they're born. I really, I'm like very,

10:21

very pro-choice. You're into like

10:23

seventh trimester abortions. I'm into, yeah, for

10:26

sure. How many trimesters

10:28

are there? Three?

10:31

Three? Try a little harder to understand

10:33

language, Katie. Come on. I think

10:35

you should be able to poison your children when

10:37

they're, especially when they're in high school. That's fine.

10:39

But their entire explanation for why these justices would

10:41

rule the way that they did when it came

10:44

to abortion was that they were bad people. And

10:46

to me, it takes very

10:49

little leap of the imagination

10:51

to think, oh, maybe

10:53

they just really think that abortion is

10:55

murder. No. Like it's...

10:57

Well, okay. Okay. They

11:00

know the reason, they don't really think

11:02

abortion is murder, maybe, because they

11:04

don't... No, they do think abortion is murder.

11:06

Then why aren't they calling for people to be arrested

11:08

or imprisoned? Some of them are. Okay.

11:11

The crazier ones. No. I

11:13

mean, go talk to any, like I know that you don't

11:15

know any Christians, but you could probably find some if you

11:17

like go to New Jersey or something. It's crazy. I

11:19

could go to the outer boroughs. Yeah, go to

11:22

the outer boroughs. Go ask

11:24

a Christian, why are you opposed to abortion?

11:27

It's not hard to find these people. Like

11:29

read what they say. They genuinely think that abortion

11:31

is murder. I'm doing the thing

11:33

where I'm like, I'm drowning in nuance. I

11:35

hate this thing where the... Okay. The

11:38

two things are they're evil or men trick

11:40

them into being pro-abortion. That's yet like the

11:43

patriarchy. Neither of those is true. I'm not

11:45

sure they actually act as though they think it's murder. Maybe they

11:47

say that. But yeah, the point is I don't even disagree with

11:49

you. I'm just trying to start a fight because I missed you.

11:51

To me, it was just a very interesting moment

11:53

to hear the guy who has actually spent

11:55

time with murderers be like, everybody has shades

11:58

of gray. Nobody is all good. Nobody

12:00

is all bad and then to hear Lindy West

12:02

and her friend be like no if you are

12:04

pro-life you are a bad person You are evil

12:06

that that is it. That is it. It's just

12:08

it's They

12:10

really do they tell you this believe them when

12:12

they say this they literally think it's murder Yeah,

12:15

I am I first of all I didn't

12:17

mean to butcher her name I think I

12:19

called her Megan Thatcher trays Megan. It's making

12:21

a hatcher maze. I'm now looking at her

12:23

messages to me Oh, she's that you've DMed.

12:25

No, we've tweeted. I think

12:27

I did the old in 2020 I

12:32

She was mad at my work and I asked

12:34

her what she was mad at I'm not going

12:36

to go back and revisit every trash thing You've

12:38

written about trans people though I have read that

12:41

and I've seen your pathetic attempts to claim that

12:43

your work is not transphobic So I'm not interested

12:45

in debating you on the topic either. She's a

12:47

real fan of nuance. You can tell that one Mm-hmm.

12:50

She seems like a good person. Anyway, the

12:53

PBS festival is pretty fucking bad. I

12:56

Like it's just so much more

12:58

comforting to be like well, is it

13:00

more comforting? So what how many Americans are

13:03

vaguely generally half of the entire portion about

13:05

a hundred fifty million? 160

13:09

I guess you could say they're they're all

13:11

diluted they're all confused but our political beliefs

13:13

are not driven by emotion right or Stupidity

13:17

or conformity our random

13:20

Completely unique 2024 views

13:23

on sex and gender and everything else that they just

13:25

happen to be the right one tomorrow That's it. Right?

13:27

I mean and even people who say that they

13:29

are pro-choice Ask

13:31

a my dad used to do this ask a

13:33

classroom full of people Ask them

13:35

if they're pro-choice or pro-life ask them if

13:37

they're pro-choice under all circumstances And

13:40

then you can ask them questions that will make them

13:42

rethink that like for instance What if the

13:44

baby will be really ugly like for instance? Are you

13:46

pro-choice when it comes to? Aborting

13:49

babies on the basis of sex or

13:51

if the baby will be Hitler for example, all

13:53

right You're making it stupid, but

13:55

there's just no everyone is everyone is

13:57

it like everyone but Most

14:01

of the vast majority of Americans do not have

14:03

radical views on this. Right. Even

14:05

just like exceptions for rape and incest

14:07

or ugliness, stuff like that. Yeah, exactly.

14:09

Alright, what are we talking about today? You're

14:13

doing most of the talking. I wanted to talk

14:15

a little bit about the Zadie Smith piece from

14:17

The New Yorker, but then you have a story

14:19

about, I don't even want to

14:22

risk a spoiler. It's

14:26

going to be so good. No idea what it's about. It's

14:28

going to be so good, Katie. I don't want to even

14:30

describe it at risk of spoilers. Alright, why don't we

14:32

do Zadie Smith? Alright, I don't want to go

14:34

too deep into this. I just found it interesting. She

14:38

wrote an essay in The New Yorker called, Shibboleth

14:40

in the campus protests over the war on Gaza.

14:42

Language and rhetoric are, as they have always been

14:44

when it comes to Israel and Palestine, weapons of

14:47

mass destruction. It's been getting a lot of attention

14:49

online. There was one part of it that really

14:51

annoyed me. I'm curious if you're annoyed by it

14:53

too. She does

14:56

this self-flagellating thing where she highlights the

14:58

bravery it requires for protesters to put

15:00

themselves on the line to prevent injustice.

15:03

She argues that even though certain forms of

15:06

protest like throwing soup on paintings or whatever,

15:09

these forms might seem pointless or performative

15:11

to skeptics, but they, quote, represent a

15:13

level of personal sacrifice unimaginable to many

15:15

of us. She continues, I experienced this

15:17

not long ago while participating in an

15:19

XR climate rally in London. Do

15:21

you know what that is? Oh, Extinction Rebellion. When

15:24

it came to the point of the proceedings where

15:26

I was asked by my fellow protesters whether I'd

15:28

be willing to commit an arrestable offense, one that

15:30

would likely lead to a conviction and thus make

15:32

traveling to the United States difficult or even impossible,

15:34

I'm ashamed to say that I declined that offer.

15:37

Turns out I could not give up my relationship with New

15:39

York City for the future of the planet.

15:41

I just about managed to stop buying plastic

15:43

bottles, except one very thirsty and was trying

15:45

to fly less, but never to see New

15:47

York again. What pitiful, ethical creatures we are.

15:49

I am. Looking at

15:51

the first hurdle, anyone who finds themselves rolling their eyes

15:53

at any young person willing to put their own future

15:56

into jeopardy for an ethical principle should ask themselves where

15:58

are the limits of their own commitment. Also,

16:00

whether they've bought a plastic bottle or

16:02

booked a flight recently, a humbling inquiry.

16:05

I found this like just annoyingly,

16:07

performatively self-flagellating because like, I don't

16:09

know what dumb, extinction rebellion

16:11

shit she was doing, but it could just be

16:13

the case that it would have

16:15

made no real difference and it isn't worth

16:17

giving up potentially a lifetime of travel, right?

16:20

Whatever they were doing, I'm pretty sure

16:22

it didn't change anything. It used to

16:24

be their modus operandi. I

16:26

mean, like you see

16:28

these dissidents in like, I don't know,

16:31

Myanmar type places who get exiled and

16:34

they get exiled because they're trying to fight

16:36

against the military dictatorship, for example. In

16:39

that situation, they've sacrificed a lot, but they've

16:41

sacrificed a lot to do something good. I

16:43

think like this essay

16:45

of Zadie Smith ended up being really nuanced, but she just sort

16:47

of, I think she conflates

16:49

all these different forms of protest and we just,

16:52

we need to look at these in a context dependent way. Yeah, I

16:54

mean the other thing is that a lot of the people

16:56

who participate in these sort of direct actions are very young

16:59

and I hope this doesn't sound too condescending, a

17:01

little condescending is fine, but not too condescending. Young

17:05

people don't often have

17:07

a good grasp of their own futures

17:10

and you can see that not just in the context

17:12

of protesting, but like smoking.

17:15

These typically young people who start

17:18

smoking because they literally don't think

17:20

that they can, they feel invincible,

17:22

right? That was my experience when I was

17:24

18 to 35, 39 actually. And

17:30

so this idea that young people have some like

17:33

foresight and they're taking these brave stands, I

17:36

think it's also possible that they're just kind of stupid and they

17:38

don't think bad things are going to happen to them. And I

17:40

saw this, like I saw a video of this, this

17:42

protester at one of the schools this

17:45

week who has now been suspended from campus

17:47

for three years. She can't graduate. Her whole

17:49

family was supposed to come for graduation. Now

17:52

she's not graduating and she seemed

17:54

absolutely bereft because

17:56

it seemed like it hadn't actually occurred to her that there

17:58

was going to be consequences for her actually. There's

18:01

been a really interesting subplot with the

18:03

college graduation things and people arguing online

18:05

over whether we should care. I mean,

18:08

there's this one idiotic person who basically

18:10

told kids, it doesn't matter if you

18:12

don't graduate from your school, all employers

18:14

look at is the name

18:16

on the resume, which I think is just not

18:19

true for prestigious jobs. I think they absolutely care

18:21

if you graduate. But also, now that some great-

18:23

Do you think they check? Because my advice to students is to

18:25

not go to college and just say that you did. Do

18:28

not listen to Katie. Yes, I think if

18:30

you start a job and it's found out

18:33

you didn't graduate and you said you graduated

18:35

or it will also stand out on a

18:37

resume if you say attended without BA or

18:39

whatever. But I think there's-

18:41

You gotta lie. I think there's a

18:43

really interesting class element here. Were you when,

18:46

or I should say if, you graduated

18:49

college, what do you remember about your

18:51

graduation? Were you excited for the

18:53

ceremony? I didn't go. Yeah, exactly.

18:56

Yes. I literally moved across the

18:58

country on the day that I graduated. I didn't go. Exactly.

19:02

I remember my college graduation. I remember joking around

19:04

with my friend. We actually had a cool speaker,

19:06

Christiane Amanpour. It was hot. It

19:09

was not fun. It took forever. That's

19:11

because I'm from a family of people

19:13

who went to college. You're from a

19:15

family whose parents literally were professors. I

19:18

think for first-generation college students, a

19:21

college graduation ceremony is a massive

19:23

deal. That diploma is a big

19:25

deal. I don't know where my diploma is. I'm

19:27

going to go online. Brianna Joy Gray said, I

19:29

think she said she lost her diploma or didn't

19:31

know where it was. I'm in the same boat

19:33

because it becomes a normal thing going to college.

19:35

She went to Harvard. She went to a real

19:37

school. Right. It becomes this normal thing. I

19:41

do think it's sort of unfair

19:43

to first-generation college students and to people like

19:46

us who aren't assholes who value this to

19:48

rob them of these ceremonies. I think they

19:50

matter a lot, especially like immigrant families. Yeah.

19:53

Obviously, there's a huge class element here. I

19:57

also think that probably there aren't that many

19:59

first-generation students graduating from Columbia,

20:01

places like Columbia. Places like Columbia, public

20:03

universities more so, yeah. OK, anyway,

20:05

the part I like the most, I'm

20:07

just going to read this one passage from the Zay Smith thing. She

20:10

writes that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is, quote,

20:13

in fact, perhaps the most acute example

20:15

in the world of the use of

20:17

words to justify bloody murder, to flatten

20:19

and erase unbelievably labyrinthine histories, and to

20:21

deliver the atavistic pleasure of violent simplicity

20:23

to the many people who seem to

20:26

believe that merely by saying something, they

20:28

make it so. So she goes

20:30

on to say that if you just treat Hamas as

20:32

nothing but a terrorist entity, nothing to talk

20:35

about here, that provides you that pleasure of

20:37

oversimplifying. Or if you talk about the Zionist

20:39

colonialist state, that gives you that pleasure of

20:42

oversimplifying. If you say, we must eliminate Hamas,

20:44

as though that's all there is to it.

20:46

And I really like the way she pointed

20:48

out that both sides are just retreating to

20:51

these shibboleths and these catchphrases. I

20:54

mean, she wrote this, for example. The person who

20:57

uses the word Zionist as if that word were

20:59

an unchanging and unchangeable monolith, meaning exactly the same

21:01

thing in 2024 and 1948 as it meant in

21:03

1890 or 1901 or 1920, that

21:08

person does not so much bring definitive clarity

21:10

to the entangled history of Jews and Palestinians

21:13

as they successfully and soothingly draw a line

21:15

to mark their own zone of interest and

21:17

where it ends. So what she's

21:19

basically saying is this is a form

21:21

of virtue signaling and sort

21:24

of thought-terminating cliches.

21:26

And I thought this was

21:29

a really useful point and it annoyed

21:31

me how many, of

21:33

course I'm not surprised at this point, but

21:36

like online among other academics. I

21:38

mean, did you see any other response to

21:40

this or were you too busy watching Meghan

21:42

Margaret Thatcher Hayes or whatever? Yeah, I

21:44

saw a bunch of people mad about this, which was not,

21:46

I didn't expect to like wake up on a Monday

21:48

and see people screaming about Zadie Smith on the internet. Also

21:50

everyone, she's not gonna hear you. She's not on Twitter. You're

21:53

screaming into the void. But her

21:56

piece is very nuanced and she ends the

21:58

piece sort of saying. like now is the

22:00

time when you expect me to like put my stake

22:03

in the ground and say which side I'm on and

22:05

she refuses to do that and I think that's like

22:08

maybe it's a little bit of a pussy

22:10

move but I totally appreciate that because you

22:12

can be you can

22:14

be conflicted about this whole thing yeah you of course

22:16

you know you can be like I personally I'm on

22:18

the side of less murder well that's kind of harder

22:20

on both sides release the hostages and stop killing children

22:22

like that seems like

22:25

the side that everybody should be on yeah just a

22:27

couple of responses I don't want to get too deep

22:29

in this but Zadie Smith's essay

22:31

has confirmed a feeling I've had every single

22:33

day of my life so many people feel

22:35

compelled to write about or debate what Palestine

22:37

is and what Palestinians are the irony being

22:40

they have no idea what they're talking about

22:42

we are real people human beings so that's

22:44

how the essay was described here

22:46

by somebody asshole on Twitter professor

22:48

here's what Zadie Smith one of the lines from

22:51

Zadie Smith's essay she says it's a great relief

22:53

to say quote there is no such thing as

22:55

a Palestinian people as they stand in

22:57

front of you so she's literally like people like

23:00

they don't reach it now this next quote

23:02

is more important because I want some reader feedback

23:04

on this have you heard the name Priam

23:07

Vada Gopal no

23:09

she's a professor of post-colonial studies at

23:11

Cambridge I tweeted about what I'm about to

23:14

read you and I got so many

23:16

responses people seem to really think we

23:18

should devote a segment to her she seems

23:20

amazing here's what she said to understand

23:22

Zadie Smith you have to understand Cambridge and

23:24

its special brand of self-regarding gaslighting I

23:26

am NOT quite sure why people are

23:28

shocked or surprised this is the price of

23:31

admission into elite white literary and institutional

23:33

circles so wait did you say that she's at

23:35

Cambridge yeah this is a professor

23:37

of post-colonial studies there saying that this

23:39

is the price okay so does it not apply to

23:41

her the price of admission it sounds like she's

23:43

in the club it's almost like she hasn't

23:45

thought this through she's also basically calling

23:48

Zadie Smith like sort of an auntie Tom this

23:51

is the price of admission into elite

23:53

white literary institutional circles this professor is

23:55

a trip someone pointed me the past

23:57

tweets like I resist urges to

23:59

nique cap white men every day, so

24:01

no, I am the hero." And then

24:04

I'll say it again, white lives don't

24:06

matter as white lives. And she has

24:08

this history of complaining

24:10

about her treatment. She complained

24:12

about University of Porter's like

24:15

calling her madam instead of

24:17

doctor, and she like made a

24:20

whole thing about it, and apparently she's just constantly accusing

24:22

everyone of everything. So if there's

24:24

interest in a segment on her, I immediately got

24:26

that bar pod tingle that we should do a

24:28

segment on this woman. So if listeners think we

24:31

should send me an email with your favorite highlights,

24:33

and maybe I'll start to look into that. But

24:36

yeah, that was the Zadie Smith thing. Good

24:38

essay, although I didn't agree with all of

24:40

it, and a characteristically deranged response. My

24:42

favorite part was people on Twitter. That's

24:44

it. That's all you get. If you want to

24:46

hear the rest, go to bloctorimport.org and become a

24:48

premium subscriber. Thank you for listening.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features