Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hello, you're listening to a preview of blocked
0:02
and reported. We talk about the WPath files.
0:05
You're only going to hear part of that conversation.
0:07
So if you want to hear the rest of
0:10
it and a discussion of the alleged problems in
0:12
the New York times reporting on Hamas and rape,
0:15
if you want to hear this conversation in
0:17
full, go to blocks are reported.org where for
0:19
just $5 a month and up,
0:21
you get a bevy of benefits, including early
0:24
ad free access to the weekly free episodes,
0:26
as well as three extra episodes like this one
0:29
each and every month. That's blocked or reported.org
0:31
best deal in media. Should we
0:33
move on to something less controversial? Yes, let's
0:35
do it. All right. So you've heard you have
0:37
not read the WPath files, correct? I have not
0:39
read them. No. I'm guessing you saw people tweet
0:41
about them. What did you discern from the tweets?
0:44
That there was a massive scandal
0:47
unfolding based on this communications that
0:49
were leaked from within
0:51
WPath. I did see a
0:53
response put out. It stopped me if we're
0:55
going to get to this by Marcy Bowers.
0:58
We are going to get to it. Okay.
1:00
Strange line. Strange line. You know what
1:02
I'm talking about. Yes. We've
1:05
never discussed trans issues on the show
1:07
before. So WPath, World Professional Association for
1:09
Transgender Healthcare, they're this complicated
1:14
tangled organization that writes- They're
1:17
Facebook group. Very influential Facebook group. They
1:19
write the standards of care for transgender
1:21
healthcare or what is called the standards
1:23
of care or SOC. So
1:25
yeah, the idea of
1:28
the WPath files is there's this major
1:30
scandal. They were published by a group
1:32
called Environmental Progress founded by Michael
1:34
Schellenberger. I originally knew him as
1:36
basically a heterodox environmental activist, very
1:38
pro nuclear and stuff. He co-founded
1:40
the Breakthrough incident. He's also a
1:42
big critic of the Bay Area
1:45
just as a place. He wrote Sanford Siko.
1:47
He ran for governor, right? He ran for
1:50
governor. He also- He did not
1:52
win. It's fine. Wait, he didn't? No. Why
1:55
have I been calling him governor? I'm so embarrassed.
1:57
It's embarrassing. He also has this group of people.
2:00
called Environmental Progress and he has a very
2:02
successful sub-stack based publication called Public which has
2:04
more than 123,000 followers and readers, the bastard
2:06
subscribers, whatever
2:10
calling them. It was Environmental Progress
2:12
that published the WPATH files which I
2:14
found a little weird. They included this
2:16
explanation that... What is Environmental Progress? I
2:19
don't know. Here's
2:21
how they explained why an environmental group
2:23
did this. The short answer is that
2:26
we are pro-human environmentalists and our mission
2:28
is to incubate ideas, leaders, and movements
2:30
for nature, peace, and freedom for all.
2:33
We thus work on a wide range of issues
2:35
from climate change to homelessness to freedom of speech,
2:37
all of which constitute important aspects of
2:40
our quote-unquote environment. Oh, come
2:42
on. That is like stretching
2:44
the definition of environment a
2:46
little too far. I guess anything
2:49
is the environment. Yeah, the HDTV shows
2:51
I watch about remodeling kitchens are
2:54
actually environmental TV shows. Yeah. Okay,
2:56
so who was the author of this? He
2:58
didn't write it. He wrote the intro. So
3:02
who was the actual author of the WPATH
3:04
files? A journalist named Mia Hughes.
3:07
So Hughes used to go by Mia
3:09
Ashton. She has a pretty established online
3:11
footprint as both a journalist and a
3:13
gender-critical activist. They
3:15
wrote for Human Events which is a
3:18
pretty conservative website. Wait, is she a they?
3:20
You said they wrote. She wrote for Human...
3:23
She's definitely not a they. She
3:25
wrote for Human Events a conservative
3:27
website. Pretty conservative where
3:29
she's listed as the lead on Cozbar,
3:33
Cozbar's child safeguarding campaign.
3:36
And that is... I
3:38
can't... So it's lowercase a, capital
3:40
W. I thought it was only
3:42
lefties who did the queer capitalization
3:44
thing. So it's a weirdly named
3:46
group that is short for the
3:48
Canadian women's sex base, right? Oh,
3:50
I get it. Canada is lowercase.
3:53
Women is uppercase. The
3:55
sex base writes is lowercase. Okay.
4:00
Well be very nice. So me I issues
4:02
may as soon as someone who is pretty
4:04
pre established views on the subjects I'm just
4:06
describing. I'm not criticizing but but she's been
4:09
pretty open about be an activist in his
4:11
run. A lot of stuff outlets like are
4:13
the posts millennial on the subject. Of
4:16
a so what's actually in the debate? hassles. Okay,
4:19
so. I should say this
4:21
is a packet of documents that a source
4:23
has been shopping around for. While I was
4:25
provided with printed out copies of basically all
4:27
the stuff that appears in the Duffy has
4:29
files About a year ago. Did. Some
4:31
and mail them to your house anonymously. They. Were
4:33
not mail to me I'd I'd but I
4:35
obtain them and so we're gonna leave that
4:37
that I have seen. them. Terrorists. You. Obtain
4:40
and because someone gave them see If it isn't
4:42
that sad hill who is this anonymous source to
4:44
going to give it up as. I didn't say
4:46
the name and social security number or this
4:48
is behind the pay wall. Know this is
4:50
it. was an activist who is a very
4:52
art and skeptic. Have used gender medicine. Okay,
4:55
so the source doesn't necessarily tell us
4:57
anything about the packet, and in activists
4:59
can. On rare occasions provide
5:01
useful information. And.
5:04
You did nothing with us. Why? I
5:06
did not the recovers and some. Gonna tell me
5:08
about the files. Could have been hosted
5:10
on Blessing Reported.whatever. A
5:13
blotter Party Environmental Progress
5:15
Som vi These. Files
5:18
were mostly light. Their.
5:20
Posts from the W Task message
5:22
boards. The point is anyone to
5:24
join these forums to the toss.
5:26
I told her twenty five dollars
5:28
or less to.w Fasts and ah.
5:31
So. I was given and
5:33
just these posts. By.
5:35
Mostly random people hadn't heard of, some of
5:37
which for like pretty wacky but it it
5:40
is wasn't clear to me that this really
5:42
told us anything about W Path or anything
5:44
we didn't know arm and it struck me
5:46
frankly as like more trouble than or be
5:48
worse to actually like verify and report and
5:50
choose what redact and all that. Okay, so
5:53
you're lazy. That's the answer. Isn't
5:55
said Debbie Pass World Professional
5:57
Association for Transgender Health Care.
6:00
I cancelled. Maybe that. He.
6:02
Is a as professional. Should
6:05
be excluded because anybody can join.
6:07
I mean it's a prot lot.
6:09
Through a lot of professional divisions,
6:11
anyone can join Bullets. This is.
6:13
This A pretty wide net, so
6:15
quote for professional membership is available
6:17
to professionals working in disciplines such
6:19
as Madison: Psychology, Loss Social Work,
6:22
Counseling, Psychotherapy, Nursing, Family Study, Sociology,
6:24
Anthropology, Speech and Voice Therapy, and
6:26
Sexologist. So Lights Past the World
6:28
is. Okay, so the files
6:30
are from random numbers person. Is ones
6:32
that were sense yeah it's there's a bigger
6:34
names will deaths you but it's mostly random
6:36
stuff from random people. Forget what kind
6:38
of stuff isn't there so. I. Have.
6:41
Not heard of hundred here, but like right
6:43
off the bat, there's a problem. This is
6:45
a packet of documents leaked from an online
6:48
discussion forum by someone who is quite hostile
6:50
to the organization that hosted that forums. You're
6:52
getting a very cherry picked subset of documents
6:54
from these forms of presumably are tens of
6:56
thousands of posts. and I'm not saying the
6:59
source doesn't have every right to their own
7:01
political views. it and to weekend documents said
7:03
they think are damage. But
7:05
you just have to be really careful in how you report on
7:08
something like this. Said eating selim burger
7:10
and this me as use ne aston do
7:12
think they were careful. I just I
7:14
don't really think they were careful now. Ah,
7:16
like Okay, so they're just they're not really
7:19
transparent about the selected by a problem. They
7:21
don't provide any information about who lives in
7:23
the files other than that it was someone
7:25
who might show and burgers work on the
7:27
Twitter files. They also don't provide any information
7:30
about their attempts to like verify the contents
7:32
of these posts. And they do this really
7:34
annoying thing where they'll say something like nowhere
7:36
in the files does anyone talk about x
7:38
or y as though this is damning. But
7:41
but you can understand why. That not necessarily
7:43
democrats. Were. Yeah, I mean this. The files themselves
7:45
are just a snapshot of what's being discussed on
7:47
his farm. So even if they're on the files
7:49
x or y could have been discussed elsewhere to
7:51
different time as is not included. right? Yeah,
7:53
it's like it's it's I'm not saying
7:56
there's like you're not allowed to Reporters
7:58
really clear. They probably didn't. Sir
8:00
why is w bad? Well, maybe
8:02
maybe not. I did I It's
8:04
just like at you don't know
8:06
it's a it's a small me,
8:08
not tidy, but it's a pretty
8:10
small packet of documents, printed outs,
8:13
screenshots, Of. Internal this or posers
8:15
without much broader context. Okay, so
8:17
let's get into specifics. Your
8:19
arms so. There's.
8:22
A range of both random people,
8:24
social workers, nurse practitioners. bob. Of
8:26
last, I've got the unredacted files
8:29
armored. Basically what they did add:
8:31
Environmental Progress is a. Redacted.
8:34
Most of the names I'm weirdly the
8:36
redacted some big names like Floors Ashley
8:38
who's an activist and ah scholar in
8:40
Canada and To and also intended use
8:42
a physician one of the biggest names
8:44
as feel but they also provides just
8:46
like more than enough clues to know
8:48
that's who they're talking about. There's deathly
8:50
some weird stuff in there. For example,
8:52
there are clinicians openly talk about doing
8:54
gender nullification surgeries. I actually just got
8:56
my they do some cards see you
8:58
know what that is, right? Ideal.
9:00
That's the it's the Barbie surgery
9:03
or that the Kindle. Surgery. So I
9:05
guess it depends what has Barbie have to
9:07
other exactly. You don't have
9:09
any. You don't have an alley, You
9:11
have nothing. it is null and void
9:13
of. You have a P. Whole or
9:15
in. This. This is a physicist
9:18
as.of you're flying. Help? Well I
9:20
mean hopefully hopefully they don't suffer see
9:22
the P thing the P to But
9:24
let me get yeah, it's not like
9:26
a a unique situation because an edict
9:28
still have their taxes on their balls
9:30
is a very strange idea of the
9:32
fact that any. Clinician.
9:34
Would perform this. Strikes
9:36
me as much closer to like cutting
9:38
off someone's. Slim. Anyone
9:40
got. There are just I'll read
9:42
a little bit from their twitter
9:44
files: One doctor Thomas Sadder White,
9:46
a renowned California surgeon ask for
9:48
the group's input for quote unquote
9:50
non standard procedures such as talk quote
9:53
top Surgery without Nipples nullification, all
9:55
the Marilyn Manson. So.
9:57
i said last top surgery big
10:00
that's it. That's all you get for the preview. If you
10:02
want to hear the rest, go to blockedandreported.org and
10:04
become a premium subscriber. Hope you enjoyed.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More