Podchaser Logo
Home
Premium: ”Top-Surgery Without Nipples”: The WPATH Files

Premium: ”Top-Surgery Without Nipples”: The WPATH Files

Released Thursday, 14th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Premium: ”Top-Surgery Without Nipples”: The WPATH Files

Premium: ”Top-Surgery Without Nipples”: The WPATH Files

Premium: ”Top-Surgery Without Nipples”: The WPATH Files

Premium: ”Top-Surgery Without Nipples”: The WPATH Files

Thursday, 14th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hello, you're listening to a preview of blocked

0:02

and reported. We talk about the WPath files.

0:05

You're only going to hear part of that conversation.

0:07

So if you want to hear the rest of

0:10

it and a discussion of the alleged problems in

0:12

the New York times reporting on Hamas and rape,

0:15

if you want to hear this conversation in

0:17

full, go to blocks are reported.org where for

0:19

just $5 a month and up,

0:21

you get a bevy of benefits, including early

0:24

ad free access to the weekly free episodes,

0:26

as well as three extra episodes like this one

0:29

each and every month. That's blocked or reported.org

0:31

best deal in media. Should we

0:33

move on to something less controversial? Yes, let's

0:35

do it. All right. So you've heard you have

0:37

not read the WPath files, correct? I have not

0:39

read them. No. I'm guessing you saw people tweet

0:41

about them. What did you discern from the tweets?

0:44

That there was a massive scandal

0:47

unfolding based on this communications that

0:49

were leaked from within

0:51

WPath. I did see a

0:53

response put out. It stopped me if we're

0:55

going to get to this by Marcy Bowers.

0:58

We are going to get to it. Okay.

1:00

Strange line. Strange line. You know what

1:02

I'm talking about. Yes. We've

1:05

never discussed trans issues on the show

1:07

before. So WPath, World Professional Association for

1:09

Transgender Healthcare, they're this complicated

1:14

tangled organization that writes- They're

1:17

Facebook group. Very influential Facebook group. They

1:19

write the standards of care for transgender

1:21

healthcare or what is called the standards

1:23

of care or SOC. So

1:25

yeah, the idea of

1:28

the WPath files is there's this major

1:30

scandal. They were published by a group

1:32

called Environmental Progress founded by Michael

1:34

Schellenberger. I originally knew him as

1:36

basically a heterodox environmental activist, very

1:38

pro nuclear and stuff. He co-founded

1:40

the Breakthrough incident. He's also a

1:42

big critic of the Bay Area

1:45

just as a place. He wrote Sanford Siko.

1:47

He ran for governor, right? He ran for

1:50

governor. He also- He did not

1:52

win. It's fine. Wait, he didn't? No. Why

1:55

have I been calling him governor? I'm so embarrassed.

1:57

It's embarrassing. He also has this group of people.

2:00

called Environmental Progress and he has a very

2:02

successful sub-stack based publication called Public which has

2:04

more than 123,000 followers and readers, the bastard

2:06

subscribers, whatever

2:10

calling them. It was Environmental Progress

2:12

that published the WPATH files which I

2:14

found a little weird. They included this

2:16

explanation that... What is Environmental Progress? I

2:19

don't know. Here's

2:21

how they explained why an environmental group

2:23

did this. The short answer is that

2:26

we are pro-human environmentalists and our mission

2:28

is to incubate ideas, leaders, and movements

2:30

for nature, peace, and freedom for all.

2:33

We thus work on a wide range of issues

2:35

from climate change to homelessness to freedom of speech,

2:37

all of which constitute important aspects of

2:40

our quote-unquote environment. Oh, come

2:42

on. That is like stretching

2:44

the definition of environment a

2:46

little too far. I guess anything

2:49

is the environment. Yeah, the HDTV shows

2:51

I watch about remodeling kitchens are

2:54

actually environmental TV shows. Yeah. Okay,

2:56

so who was the author of this? He

2:58

didn't write it. He wrote the intro. So

3:02

who was the actual author of the WPATH

3:04

files? A journalist named Mia Hughes.

3:07

So Hughes used to go by Mia

3:09

Ashton. She has a pretty established online

3:11

footprint as both a journalist and a

3:13

gender-critical activist. They

3:15

wrote for Human Events which is a

3:18

pretty conservative website. Wait, is she a they?

3:20

You said they wrote. She wrote for Human...

3:23

She's definitely not a they. She

3:25

wrote for Human Events a conservative

3:27

website. Pretty conservative where

3:29

she's listed as the lead on Cozbar,

3:33

Cozbar's child safeguarding campaign.

3:36

And that is... I

3:38

can't... So it's lowercase a, capital

3:40

W. I thought it was only

3:42

lefties who did the queer capitalization

3:44

thing. So it's a weirdly named

3:46

group that is short for the

3:48

Canadian women's sex base, right? Oh,

3:50

I get it. Canada is lowercase.

3:53

Women is uppercase. The

3:55

sex base writes is lowercase. Okay.

4:00

Well be very nice. So me I issues

4:02

may as soon as someone who is pretty

4:04

pre established views on the subjects I'm just

4:06

describing. I'm not criticizing but but she's been

4:09

pretty open about be an activist in his

4:11

run. A lot of stuff outlets like are

4:13

the posts millennial on the subject. Of

4:16

a so what's actually in the debate? hassles. Okay,

4:19

so. I should say this

4:21

is a packet of documents that a source

4:23

has been shopping around for. While I was

4:25

provided with printed out copies of basically all

4:27

the stuff that appears in the Duffy has

4:29

files About a year ago. Did. Some

4:31

and mail them to your house anonymously. They. Were

4:33

not mail to me I'd I'd but I

4:35

obtain them and so we're gonna leave that

4:37

that I have seen. them. Terrorists. You. Obtain

4:40

and because someone gave them see If it isn't

4:42

that sad hill who is this anonymous source to

4:44

going to give it up as. I didn't say

4:46

the name and social security number or this

4:48

is behind the pay wall. Know this is

4:50

it. was an activist who is a very

4:52

art and skeptic. Have used gender medicine. Okay,

4:55

so the source doesn't necessarily tell us

4:57

anything about the packet, and in activists

4:59

can. On rare occasions provide

5:01

useful information. And.

5:04

You did nothing with us. Why? I

5:06

did not the recovers and some. Gonna tell me

5:08

about the files. Could have been hosted

5:10

on Blessing Reported.whatever. A

5:13

blotter Party Environmental Progress

5:15

Som vi These. Files

5:18

were mostly light. Their.

5:20

Posts from the W Task message

5:22

boards. The point is anyone to

5:24

join these forums to the toss.

5:26

I told her twenty five dollars

5:28

or less to.w Fasts and ah.

5:31

So. I was given and

5:33

just these posts. By.

5:35

Mostly random people hadn't heard of, some of

5:37

which for like pretty wacky but it it

5:40

is wasn't clear to me that this really

5:42

told us anything about W Path or anything

5:44

we didn't know arm and it struck me

5:46

frankly as like more trouble than or be

5:48

worse to actually like verify and report and

5:50

choose what redact and all that. Okay, so

5:53

you're lazy. That's the answer. Isn't

5:55

said Debbie Pass World Professional

5:57

Association for Transgender Health Care.

6:00

I cancelled. Maybe that. He.

6:02

Is a as professional. Should

6:05

be excluded because anybody can join.

6:07

I mean it's a prot lot.

6:09

Through a lot of professional divisions,

6:11

anyone can join Bullets. This is.

6:13

This A pretty wide net, so

6:15

quote for professional membership is available

6:17

to professionals working in disciplines such

6:19

as Madison: Psychology, Loss Social Work,

6:22

Counseling, Psychotherapy, Nursing, Family Study, Sociology,

6:24

Anthropology, Speech and Voice Therapy, and

6:26

Sexologist. So Lights Past the World

6:28

is. Okay, so the files

6:30

are from random numbers person. Is ones

6:32

that were sense yeah it's there's a bigger

6:34

names will deaths you but it's mostly random

6:36

stuff from random people. Forget what kind

6:38

of stuff isn't there so. I. Have.

6:41

Not heard of hundred here, but like right

6:43

off the bat, there's a problem. This is

6:45

a packet of documents leaked from an online

6:48

discussion forum by someone who is quite hostile

6:50

to the organization that hosted that forums. You're

6:52

getting a very cherry picked subset of documents

6:54

from these forms of presumably are tens of

6:56

thousands of posts. and I'm not saying the

6:59

source doesn't have every right to their own

7:01

political views. it and to weekend documents said

7:03

they think are damage. But

7:05

you just have to be really careful in how you report on

7:08

something like this. Said eating selim burger

7:10

and this me as use ne aston do

7:12

think they were careful. I just I

7:14

don't really think they were careful now. Ah,

7:16

like Okay, so they're just they're not really

7:19

transparent about the selected by a problem. They

7:21

don't provide any information about who lives in

7:23

the files other than that it was someone

7:25

who might show and burgers work on the

7:27

Twitter files. They also don't provide any information

7:30

about their attempts to like verify the contents

7:32

of these posts. And they do this really

7:34

annoying thing where they'll say something like nowhere

7:36

in the files does anyone talk about x

7:38

or y as though this is damning. But

7:41

but you can understand why. That not necessarily

7:43

democrats. Were. Yeah, I mean this. The files themselves

7:45

are just a snapshot of what's being discussed on

7:47

his farm. So even if they're on the files

7:49

x or y could have been discussed elsewhere to

7:51

different time as is not included. right? Yeah,

7:53

it's like it's it's I'm not saying

7:56

there's like you're not allowed to Reporters

7:58

really clear. They probably didn't. Sir

8:00

why is w bad? Well, maybe

8:02

maybe not. I did I It's

8:04

just like at you don't know

8:06

it's a it's a small me,

8:08

not tidy, but it's a pretty

8:10

small packet of documents, printed outs,

8:13

screenshots, Of. Internal this or posers

8:15

without much broader context. Okay, so

8:17

let's get into specifics. Your

8:19

arms so. There's.

8:22

A range of both random people,

8:24

social workers, nurse practitioners. bob. Of

8:26

last, I've got the unredacted files

8:29

armored. Basically what they did add:

8:31

Environmental Progress is a. Redacted.

8:34

Most of the names I'm weirdly the

8:36

redacted some big names like Floors Ashley

8:38

who's an activist and ah scholar in

8:40

Canada and To and also intended use

8:42

a physician one of the biggest names

8:44

as feel but they also provides just

8:46

like more than enough clues to know

8:48

that's who they're talking about. There's deathly

8:50

some weird stuff in there. For example,

8:52

there are clinicians openly talk about doing

8:54

gender nullification surgeries. I actually just got

8:56

my they do some cards see you

8:58

know what that is, right? Ideal.

9:00

That's the it's the Barbie surgery

9:03

or that the Kindle. Surgery. So I

9:05

guess it depends what has Barbie have to

9:07

other exactly. You don't have

9:09

any. You don't have an alley, You

9:11

have nothing. it is null and void

9:13

of. You have a P. Whole or

9:15

in. This. This is a physicist

9:18

as.of you're flying. Help? Well I

9:20

mean hopefully hopefully they don't suffer see

9:22

the P thing the P to But

9:24

let me get yeah, it's not like

9:26

a a unique situation because an edict

9:28

still have their taxes on their balls

9:30

is a very strange idea of the

9:32

fact that any. Clinician.

9:34

Would perform this. Strikes

9:36

me as much closer to like cutting

9:38

off someone's. Slim. Anyone

9:40

got. There are just I'll read

9:42

a little bit from their twitter

9:44

files: One doctor Thomas Sadder White,

9:46

a renowned California surgeon ask for

9:48

the group's input for quote unquote

9:50

non standard procedures such as talk quote

9:53

top Surgery without Nipples nullification, all

9:55

the Marilyn Manson. So.

9:57

i said last top surgery big

10:00

that's it. That's all you get for the preview. If you

10:02

want to hear the rest, go to blockedandreported.org and

10:04

become a premium subscriber. Hope you enjoyed.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features