Podchaser Logo
Home
Trinity's Tai: Large Companies Risk Becoming Dinosaurs (Audio)

Trinity's Tai: Large Companies Risk Becoming Dinosaurs (Audio)

Released Thursday, 18th August 2016
Good episode? Give it some love!
Trinity's Tai: Large Companies Risk Becoming Dinosaurs (Audio)

Trinity's Tai: Large Companies Risk Becoming Dinosaurs (Audio)

Trinity's Tai: Large Companies Risk Becoming Dinosaurs (Audio)

Trinity's Tai: Large Companies Risk Becoming Dinosaurs (Audio)

Thursday, 18th August 2016
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:03

Global business news twenty four hours

0:05

a day at Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:08

Radio plus Mobile Act and on your radio.

0:10

This is a Bloomberg Business Flash

0:12

from Bloomberg World Headquarters. I'm

0:15

Charlie Pelota. The down Jones industrial averages

0:17

trading lower, the SMP and nez DAC both

0:19

higher, and this update is brought

0:21

to you by Bentley University.

0:24

What to tying up the finances at Converse

0:26

and managing asset allocations at

0:28

JP Morgan have in common a business

0:30

degree from Bentley University. Because

0:33

business is everywhere, prepare

0:35

here. Stocks are fluctuating. We've

0:38

got the SMP up two points to four.

0:40

That is a gain of one tenth of one percent,

0:43

as stack up nine a gain of two tenths

0:45

of one percent. Down Industrials

0:47

lower by a point now to eighteen thousand,

0:49

five hundred seventy three. The ten

0:52

year of five thirty seconds yield one

0:54

point five three percent. Gold up

0:56

eight thirty ounce the thirteen fifty three

0:58

in advance of six tenths of crude

1:01

oil West Texas Intermediate traded in

1:03

New York up three point three four.

1:06

Brent is above fifty dollars a barrel,

1:08

first time since July of two percent now

1:10

fifty nine. I'm Charlie Pallotte.

1:12

That's a Bloomberg Business flash.

1:16

You're listening to taking Stock with

1:18

pim Box and Kathleen Hayes on

1:20

Bloomberg Radio. Eat

1:22

or Be Eaten, Acquire or Be

1:25

Acquired? M and A madness in the startup

1:28

universe, and our next guest says, if

1:30

you want to survive and thrive, you better pay

1:32

attention to a very major trend,

1:34

the move from the information age into

1:37

the intelligence age. Joining us the

1:39

studio day is gust Tie. He's general

1:41

partner at Trinity Ventures in Menlo

1:43

Park, California, the heart of

1:46

the valley, and he's here today to join us

1:48

to talk about this. Gus, welcome, Thank you. So,

1:51

uh, there is certainly a lot of M

1:53

and A activity what is driving

1:55

in and we're talking about trends, but is there anything

1:57

about people uh

2:00

getting more confident, financing being

2:02

cheap? What's behind it? Yes, Kathleen,

2:05

I think we're in a super fascinating time

2:08

right now where you have Microsoft buying

2:10

LinkedIn for six billion, you have Walmart

2:12

buying Jet for three point three billion, and

2:15

even GM bought Crews for billion

2:17

dollars. I think that the trend is driving.

2:19

All of these are large corporations seeking

2:22

to bring in DNA and capability to

2:24

move from the information age to the intelligence

2:26

age. Hey, Gus, you

2:28

know, just to give some context here, at

2:31

Trinity Ventures, Zu

2:33

Lily initial public offering, that

2:35

would be you, Blue Nile

2:37

initial public offering, that would be

2:40

you. If I always keep asking

2:42

myself, if these are all such great companies,

2:45

whether it's publical private, why

2:47

sell them? Sure? Well,

2:50

from a venture capital standpoint, when we

2:52

make investments in companies, we do make

2:54

agreement with the management team and the other shareholders

2:57

to have some form of liquidity. And so if

2:59

the liquidity comes in other forms

3:01

such as dividends, that would be possible. But in

3:03

general, when a company is acquired

3:05

or goes public, it makes their capital

3:08

liquid and then we could we buy in

3:10

and we liquid eight and we distribute those

3:12

profits back to our LPs. That makes sense

3:14

to me. You want to put some money in your pocket when you put all that work

3:17

into starting up a company. What

3:19

about this? What are you talking about? Information

3:21

age to intelligence age? What does

3:23

that mean? It's it's very it's very compelling.

3:26

What does it mean? Yeah, we

3:28

view this as as transformative from

3:30

moving from the industrial revolution

3:32

to the information revolution. And so now

3:35

over the last twenty years, we've been aggregating

3:37

all of this information about things. So if you look

3:40

at Amazon when they pulled together

3:42

all the things you could buy, that's pulling

3:44

together information on one particular

3:46

place. However, the information

3:48

overwhelms all of us, whether we're individuals

3:51

or businesses, and so you need to add

3:53

intelligence to be able to sort through that information.

3:56

So you've seen this intelligence

3:58

revolution where you makes sense of

4:00

the data in in information technology

4:03

companies, but you haven't seen that shift

4:05

yet in all the other industries. And

4:07

that's what we're arguing is taking place

4:09

right now that if these large companies don't

4:12

add intelligence to all the information they have already,

4:14

they may become dinosaurs. Does

4:17

that same strategy apply to the

4:19

venture capital world? Well,

4:21

because I understand that what is it you know? You do ten

4:23

investments, seven dive, three maybe

4:26

live on, and one is the thing that

4:29

you know puts the roof over everybody's head,

4:31

it sure does apply to venture

4:34

capital in all other industries. And

4:36

you are seeing innovation at various

4:38

different types of venture firms, particularly the newer

4:41

ones that have this fresh look A

4:43

dear friend of mine who who inspires me in

4:45

the valley is Dave McClure. He

4:47

has five startups, and he would argue that

4:50

firms that are traditional, perhaps even a

4:52

firm like ours, as a dinosaur, and and

4:54

we have to pay attention to that because

4:56

you need to sort data better. I mean, seriously, what does

4:59

that mean for you? If you're a dinosaur? How could

5:01

you be a dinosaur? Well? You know, I would

5:03

argue that venture firms are more resilient

5:05

to this trend because we actually

5:07

are competing to understand

5:09

and makes sense of data we already have and

5:12

put it in the forms of or

5:15

what it's it's the model of

5:17

so so a thesis for a

5:20

disruption for venture capital what pim

5:22

the way, what I inferred from what Pim was saying is

5:24

that the traditional model is you make

5:27

two investments per partner per year. And if

5:29

you have a firm of ten ten partners at investments

5:32

per year, from a portfolio theory

5:34

basis, it may make sense to make a hundred

5:36

investments per year. If you have a strategy

5:39

for feeding the winners and calling the

5:41

losers, that's a legitimate strategy. And

5:43

if you have information that that you

5:45

can transform it intelligence to understand that trend

5:47

better. You could have a leg up. I just

5:49

want to go through some recent deals to get your thoughts

5:52

on this. Gillette, Dollar Shave

5:54

Club. Yeah, I mean Dollar Shave

5:56

Club, as I understand, doesn't make money necessarily,

5:59

at least not yet. Is

6:01

there a strategy or a theme that we need to understand

6:03

here? Yes? And and so? Uh

6:06

the theme and Uni Leaver purchased

6:08

Dollar Shave Club for a billion in Gillette, which

6:10

is owned by PNG, had a lawsuit against Dollar

6:13

Shave Club. If I understand the public information

6:15

properly, the theme would be

6:18

that Uni Lever, being a hundred and thirty

6:20

billion dollar, hundred forty billion dollar company,

6:23

would be interested in developing a deeper relationship

6:25

with end consumers and collecting information from

6:28

them and serving them. Dollar Shave Club

6:30

innovated in moving from a product

6:33

to a service and using analytics

6:35

of understanding the customers and how to tune

6:38

products for those customers. So it's very savvy.

6:41

So what what do you make of

6:44

I just have to ask you. Just Walmart just seems like

6:46

a match made in heaven potentially, sure,

6:48

yes, Uh, it's I think it's

6:50

a very savvy strategic move

6:53

and strategic moves have to play out operationally.

6:55

You have to execute. But why so savvy

6:57

strategically is that Walmart is

7:00

a four billion is revenue

7:02

company. Last year it actually shrank from the previous

7:04

year. It's online business

7:07

last year was fourteen billion dollars.

7:10

And if you think online revenue retail

7:12

is important, that fourteen billion dollars

7:15

barely matched the growth of

7:17

of Amazon, so they have to do something to catch up. You

7:21

remember a dollar Shape Club? I am not no

7:23

would you invest in that? Would you have invested in Dollar

7:26

Shape Club? I made the mistake in passing,

7:28

and I regretted, but you were offered

7:30

Yes both, Thanks

7:32

very much, Gus, general partner at

7:35

Trinity Ventures. They're based in Menlo Park,

7:37

California. You're listening to

7:39

taking Stock. This is Bloomberg

7:45

coming up. Designers on

7:48

a dime, a global consignment

7:50

business selling merchandise via e

7:53

commerce platform. I'm gonna take

7:55

a look at how it works and why small business and

7:57

focus something of the radio

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features