0:00

Alright, guys, it's Thursday. And the question of the

0:02

day today is are women ruining

0:04

the workplace? Or are we enriching

0:06

it? It wonderful now that women can

0:08

work alongside men and have things gotten

0:10

better? I'm asking you that question seriously and want

0:13

you to think about it and I want you to be honest

0:15

with yourself. Plus that are on

0:17

the show, I'm going to be addressing that Stephen

0:19

Crowder video because it would be kind

0:21

of ridiculous if didn't address it it's all anybody's

0:23

talking about. All that and more today coming

0:26

up on Canvas Owens. Alright.

0:39

So this isn't even meant to be a controversial

0:41

topic. It's just one of those discussions that

0:43

I've had with my husband that I am bringing to the forefront

0:46

because I'd like to see your feedback. So

0:48

how did the discussion come up? Well, we were talking

0:50

about what schools to send

0:52

our son to. We obviously eventually

0:54

have to have that talk. What kind of a education

0:57

do we want our children to have? There's so many

0:59

things to consider. Especially now that

1:01

we live in Waukesopia, you have to be

1:03

so aware of what your children might

1:05

learn at school. And my husband who grew up

1:07

in England and attended and all boys school

1:09

for most of his life wants to

1:11

send him overseas because boarding school,

1:14

I guess, is much more natural for people in Europe

1:16

as in America. I'm like, no.

1:18

My child needs to come home every

1:20

single day after school. As

1:23

we're flushing out this discussion, He

1:25

mentioned to me the school, you may,

1:27

for you, but obviously, eton College, which is

1:29

where Prince Harry and

1:31

most of the royals attended. As

1:34

well as Saint Paul's School in the UK. They

1:36

are very high ranked schools for education,

1:39

and they are also

1:41

all boy schools. And

1:43

when we have discussion, I said, I don't want my child

1:46

to go to in all boys school, my hush, and I said,

1:48

my my reasons were a little ridiculous, and maybe they

1:50

weren't ridiculous. But I just said, I feel like that's all good and

1:52

fine. Until they kinda get into middle school.

1:54

And then it's sort of weird. I feel like once they go through

1:56

puberty, they should be around the opposite sex

1:58

because what do they what do they do? They're not around the opposite

2:01

sex. They all just start liking each other, maybe that's ignorant,

2:03

maybe it's not, I'm just telling you what I said in the privacy

2:05

of my own home, and now it's in the public domain.

2:07

Who cares? Right? And then my husband

2:10

offered back that the reason why

2:12

these schools are so good and

2:14

why the children come out so academically accomplished

2:16

is because there are no distractions. When

2:19

you have men with men

2:21

and you have women with women, they are able

2:23

to focus on their

2:25

work, to focus on their academics. And

2:27

it allows those children to

2:30

blossom. I thought that was a very

2:32

interesting argument, but what I offered back

2:34

to him was okay, but

2:36

they're gonna have be able to contend

2:38

with those distractions, obviously, because

2:40

once they graduate and get onto the real world,

2:43

there you go. There's women in the workplace.

2:45

Better to learn it early than to be shocked

2:47

by the presence of women when you're done with your

2:49

schooling. And then, of

2:52

course, I thought to myself, women in

2:54

the workplace. Not

2:56

that one. Our rear distraction.

2:59

Do you guys think we're a distraction? And

3:02

the more I thought about it, I thought, yeah,

3:05

we kind of are a distraction. If

3:07

you think about work in general,

3:09

If you think about what men have to do

3:11

when they go to work now, it's essentially just

3:13

a bunch of landmines. Right? Once upon time,

3:15

it was a man's world. Yes, I agree. And

3:17

by the way, I want to make it clear I am not making

3:20

an argument that women should not have the

3:22

right to work and should be relegated

3:24

to the household. I'm not saying that whatsoever,

3:26

but I am acknowledging that

3:29

things have gotten worse at work since

3:31

women joined. Since women joined the

3:33

workforce, I think that

3:35

men are having to deal

3:38

with all of these land mines everywhere. Do

3:40

I say something? Do I not say something not to be careful

3:42

on how I teach this person? Because she's a woman, she might

3:44

see this. As some sort of an assault. Oh,

3:46

do I tell her she looks nice today or she gonna think

3:48

that's inappropriate? Is it appropriate especially

3:50

in the post Me Too era forget it? Do

3:52

I say anything to her. Well, if I don't say anything to

3:54

her, well, she's gonna say that I'm ignoring her

3:56

because I'm a man. If I say something to her, she knows,

3:58

I'm only speaking to her because I meant, I mean, I

4:00

couldn't even imagine the internal

4:02

dialogue that men must be having at work at

4:04

all times. And I laugh because

4:07

this year, the daily wire had a Christmas

4:09

party, and I didn't go for separate reasons.

4:11

But I found out that the Christmas party

4:14

was dry. And immediately in my head, I didn't

4:16

say this out loud. What I'm saying out loud now, I

4:18

thought to myself, Why

4:20

is it a dry party? Who

4:22

ruined it? Right? Who ruined it?

4:24

Why is there a dry Christmas party? Everybody goes

4:26

to this parties are not supposed to be dry. Once

4:29

again, have a great time with all of

4:31

your colleagues. Everyone gets ridiculously

4:33

drunk and it's the one time a year, but you can do

4:35

that. All of your work all year and you look forward

4:37

to the holiday season so that you and

4:39

all of the office employees and office

4:42

colleagues can get drunk. But

4:44

no, now, similar to DailyWire, a bunch

4:46

of corporations are saying, Let's

4:48

not do that. Mm-mm. Let's not do that. Why are they saying,

4:50

let's not do that? I don't know for sure,

4:52

but probably because they were avoiding

4:54

traps. Right? You supply

4:56

alcohol. There's women and there's

4:58

men and things could happen. Natural things

5:00

in the wild. Men and women start flirting.

5:02

Girls get a little loose and they

5:04

start being a little appropriate and suddenly

5:06

people men look around and go, oh, it's an opportunity. I always thought

5:08

she was cute. I was like, she was kind of cute. Let me go

5:10

talk to her, but then what if it goes wrong,

5:12

And then next day, you just have an HR

5:14

nightmare. So it's easier to say, you know what,

5:16

guys, do we do on your spirit time, but

5:18

at work, you have to keep it professional.

5:20

You guys don't talk me about. And the

5:23

truth is is that whereas I think

5:25

that women enrich

5:27

the lives of men when they come together

5:29

in marriage, enrich the lives men in the

5:31

households. I believe that households are

5:33

when there was just a man he's by himself when he gets

5:35

married. Suddenly, the households are more

5:37

alive. There's like light and laughter and

5:39

color. And there's like a darkness when men just

5:41

live by themselves, a bachelor pads, just seem

5:43

so bland. So women rich

5:45

lives when they are in households.

5:48

But at the workplace, a bit of tip

5:50

toe and egg shells going on. And what's funny about this

5:52

discussion is that I then created an

5:54

imaginary world in my head like I often do. And

5:56

I said, okay, well, what if

5:58

you had a scenario where we disagreed

6:00

that just like those schools and how we're talking

6:02

about? You just said, okay, all men work in

6:04

the office together. That's where they existed, so

6:06

we know that that works. And then now women

6:08

can only work with women. That

6:10

would be a disaster. That's the weird

6:12

part. If the solve for this was okay, now

6:14

let's have all female firms, women

6:17

would kill each other. We know this. Mean

6:19

girls is real life. We know that that movie

6:21

is taking a hysterical stab at

6:24

female culture. We attack each other all

6:26

the time. So we we don't flourish

6:28

on our own in workspaces, and

6:30

we certainly don't lend

6:32

to workplaces in terms of the social environment

6:34

flower I'm about the work, I'm talking about the social

6:36

environment, which someone's women are there. So

6:38

it's this weird thing to

6:40

consider. It's just this weird idea that I

6:42

had And then I saw this post on

6:44

Reddit and I wanna read it to you because

6:47

it really just backs up what

6:49

I'm saying. This is, by the way,

6:51

in the category on Reddit, which is referred to

6:53

as MIVA whole. And people

6:55

post anonymously about various

6:57

circumstances that they're in, and they just ask

6:59

the audience says, hey, am I the a hole for

7:01

this? Or am I crazy man? I don't

7:03

think I'm the a hole, but could I be the a hole? I'm a little

7:05

confused and then read it and a bunch of

7:07

anonymous people give them and answer. So this

7:09

is what this person posted, and this was

7:11

this week, guys. Ready? And I, the

7:13

A. Hole, for listening to my

7:15

coworker, used the bathroom. Seems

7:17

weird, what Seabody has to say.

7:20

He says, so a bit of a backstory

7:22

first. I have IBS

7:24

that's irritable bowel syndrome.

7:27

As such, I have been in my fair share of

7:29

uncomfortable situations at work where I've

7:31

needed to use the bathroom. I do find

7:33

it to be quite embarrassing when it does happen, but I

7:35

have a method I follow that seems to work well.

7:38

First, I will fill an empty bathroom if

7:40

possible. Oh, part and

7:42

first, I will find an empty bathroom if

7:44

possible. Then I flush the toilet simultaneously

7:47

as I'm going to mask any sounds

7:49

and or smells. I apologize if

7:51

this is TMI. Anyways,

7:53

I have noticed that some people at work

7:55

have pretty much zero shade while using

7:57

the bathroom. They will release gas,

7:59

have explosive diarrhea, etcetera, without

8:01

trying to cover it up in the slightest. Whereas

8:03

I am the type of person who will

8:05

sit there and try to wait for the bathroom to

8:07

clear out before I even think about going

8:09

number two. I work in a very

8:11

professional environment and I would just be absolutely

8:13

mortified if a coworker knew it was me blowing

8:15

up the bathroom. Although at times I

8:17

do wish that I just didn't care. This

8:20

brings me to early last week. I was

8:22

using the restroom just peeing when

8:24

someone came in and started to have a loud

8:26

episode on the toilet. I guess

8:28

you could say I was overcome with curiosity

8:30

because as I was washing my hands, I decided to

8:32

stick around in the bathroom to wait for this person

8:34

to come out of the stall. I

8:37

was genuinely curious who

8:39

this could be with just no embarrassment

8:41

regarding their audible bathroom using.

8:43

I stood in front of the mirror, pretended

8:45

to fix my hair and whatnot

8:47

until they came out. Turns

8:49

out, it was a girl on a team

8:51

adjacent to mine. We have been friendly

8:53

in the past, but I don't know her very well.

8:55

She came out of the stall, I started to make small

8:57

talk with her. I ended up saying something

8:59

along the lines of U2 to

9:02

which she seemed confused. I

9:04

then elaborated on the whole IBS ordeal.

9:07

To be honest with you, I was just kind of looking to connect

9:09

with someone that shares similar issues to

9:11

me. She was nice about it, but a bit

9:13

reserved which I get. Well, a few

9:15

days later, I found myself essentially being

9:17

scolded by my manager in HR.

9:19

Apparently, this girl felt that I was being

9:21

rude and intrusive. Not only

9:23

is that not the case, but some of my other

9:25

coworkers have gotten wind of the situation and

9:27

are now calling me out and think that I'm an a hole

9:29

for harassing someone in the bathroom.

9:31

feel like this whole thing has been blown out of proportion, and

9:33

now I'm myself am feeling embarrassed and

9:35

awkward, and my coworkers have been acting weird around

9:37

me. Also, I'm not sure if this matters or not,

9:39

but this all to place in a gender

9:41

neutral restroom. Am I really

9:43

get a hold for this? Like I legit don't feel like

9:45

I've done anything wrong here? That

9:47

is the end of that. Now you can tell by the context because

9:50

you're reading this, she's like, to my surprise, it was a girl in

9:52

the restroom. I I wanted not this is a

9:54

general neutral restroom. Very clearly,

9:56

he is a guy and he was startled to see that a

9:58

girl was making this much noise in the bathroom.

10:00

And while I laugh at this scenario, first

10:02

and foremost, it is a commentary on the

10:04

ridiculous nature of gender neutral bathrooms. I said it

10:06

over and over again, I don't want to be in a male

10:08

space. Men do not want to be in a woman's space

10:10

in the bathroom. I think men bathrooms

10:12

spell horrific. I think I don't

10:14

want to be anywhere where there is a urinal,

10:16

right, that in in of itself to

10:18

me is so wrong and backwards. But whatever,

10:20

well, topia, we're pretending that we want to merge

10:22

this. And so you have certain times

10:24

like this, of course, that can arise when you

10:26

decide to be woke

10:28

and create terraces where people

10:30

are not allowed to have privacy based on their own

10:32

genders. And it's

10:34

especially necessary for pregnant women, but

10:36

again, forget that part. Let's get back to

10:38

his story. It's very obvious he's talking about

10:40

when that came up and you can just and he

10:42

just see the differences. There's just these

10:44

underlying differences between men and

10:46

women. Men are

10:48

comfortable with bathroom talking. As a rule,

10:50

as a rule, had she been a

10:52

man that walked out and he made a

10:54

joke about how loud how loud he

10:56

was, it would have been fine and this

10:58

situation would have never made it to

11:00

HR. Because it was a

11:02

woman who did this and walked out and saw a

11:04

man who heard her do this who made

11:06

a comment she was positively

11:08

mortified and she was embarrassed. And so

11:10

what did she do because she was mortified embarrassed

11:12

rather than dealing with maybe just saying, man, like,

11:14

hey, listen, like, that's weird. Don't that

11:16

to me. She brought it all the way

11:18

to HR. In fact, she's so embarrassed and

11:20

so mortified. She's potentially risking wants

11:22

this person to be fired because she

11:24

finds to be inappropriate. By the way, I think

11:26

it's inappropriate that you brought this up with her. I think it's

11:28

like you know who waits to see

11:31

someone out of the restroom, probably a male. I

11:33

think it's inappropriate. But it

11:35

is not worthy of raising

11:37

this situation to AR. This is not a

11:39

level of harassment. It's just men

11:41

being men. You've seen the situations over and

11:43

over again. The woman does not understand the man. The man does not

11:45

understand the woman. And we have these

11:47

underlying differences. Right? And

11:49

women can see harm where men see no

11:51

harm. Right? Which again,

11:53

which is back to the question, are

11:55

women ruining workplaces? How

11:57

many men have lost their job

11:59

over something as ridiculous as

12:02

bathroom talk. You can see. And he

12:04

doesn't see if he's anything wrong. He he he

12:06

sounds still so innocent and confused.

12:08

I now feel embarrassed and awkward. People have

12:10

been acting weird don't feel like I've done

12:12

anything wrong here. Of course, you don't because

12:14

to men bathroom talk is like discussing

12:16

the weather. They don't care. It's like it's the bathroom. They

12:18

love it in there. Broke

12:20

time. It's awesome. Yeah. Right?

12:23

And for women, it's like, no. No. No. No. No.

12:25

This is not. We are not sitting around in a

12:27

circle, having any bathroom top. You

12:29

know, we I upholds the lie

12:31

that I say women don't even

12:33

poop. Right? Totally different

12:35

ideas about bathroom talk. And when

12:37

it collides, it ends up in a situation

12:39

that lands this man with a visit

12:41

to HR. It's wrong. And it

12:44

happens over and over again, I

12:46

get a Christian's party, a guy tells a girl

12:48

that she looks beautiful and she

12:50

misreads who knows, but these circumstances are

12:52

only happening because we are bringing together men and women in the

12:54

workplace. So My opinion

12:56

is yes, women

12:58

are ruining the workplace. There is less

13:00

laughter. There is less, less

13:02

joking. We are not enriching it. By any

13:04

means because if we were enriching it and we were

13:06

able to take a joke, which some women are. I've always been

13:08

that woman and would take a joke. I understand,

13:10

I the differences from the sexes

13:12

and talk and all that stuff. And I also have the

13:14

confidence that's what makes you uncomfortable. I'm just gonna tell you

13:16

your face. I need to run to HR. I'll give

13:18

you a really stern warning and say, that was

13:20

weird. Don't do it again. Loser.

13:22

You know? It'll lose her. Maybe it'll get a

13:24

little swirly in that bathroom. You know? I don't

13:26

know. But the circumstances as

13:28

they are or that now we are forced

13:30

to work together because it's,

13:33

you know, I guess, the dream women want

13:35

to sleep at work. And

13:37

abandon the household. This is what happens

13:39

due to fourth wave, third wave,

13:41

fourth second wave feminism, and

13:44

I think we're worse for it.

13:46

I think women would be

13:48

much happier. We are. I am

13:50

much happier at home. But instead,

13:52

let's keep striving for

13:54

awkward bathroom talk. And that's all I

13:56

have to say about that. Do you

13:58

know what big tech and big government have in

14:00

common? They both want a silence to

14:02

scenting voices. Let's say you're a proud gun

14:04

owner and you wanna talk on social media about the right

14:06

to bear arms. Changes are that your post will

14:08

be flagged by a content moderator and you might

14:10

even end up on some kind of government

14:12

watch list To fight back against having your

14:14

voice censored by both Big Tech and Big

14:16

Government, I recommend ExpressVPN. Big

14:19

Tech tracks everything you do online. you're

14:21

searching for, the videos you watch and everything that

14:23

you click, they can match your

14:25

activity to your device's unique IP address.

14:27

When I use express VPN, they

14:29

can't see my IP address. My

14:31

identity becomes completely anonymized.

14:33

What I love most about Express Japan is how

14:35

easy it is to use. The app

14:37

has just one button. You tap it and then

14:39

you're protected. It's that simple.

14:41

Stop letting Big Tech and big government sensor

14:43

and track you. Protect yourself from prying

14:45

eyes at expressvpn dot

14:47

com slash canvas. That's EXPRESSVPN

14:51

dot com slash candace to get three

14:53

months free. Visit expressvpn

14:55

dot com slash candace to

14:57

learn more. Okay. Now it's time for some

14:59

topics to shore. Alright.

15:07

So we've covering the Amy Rowback

15:09

and TJ Holmes story of Good

15:11

Morning America just to sort of jog your

15:13

memory. These were the co anchors that

15:15

were suspended from the show after it was discovered

15:17

that they were having an affair at the

15:19

time that this affair was discovered. I think

15:21

the story was broken by a Daily Mail.

15:24

They were both married and in

15:26

relationships, and this was supposed to

15:28

be egregious immoral behavior,

15:30

which flected poorly on good

15:32

morning America, at least that's what the public

15:34

debate that was being had was.

15:36

And so even though they appeared once

15:38

more together as co anchors in on

15:40

December first, they were

15:43

eventually just suspended, and we

15:45

were told that they were the network was trying to

15:47

determine what to do with them. While there seems to have been

15:49

update to that story, and a

15:51

well placed industry source

15:53

recently told the Daily Mail that it

15:55

looks less likely that they will return

15:57

to network and that their

15:59

positions are now very much in

16:01

limbo. Now what

16:03

is strange about this story and I've been pretty

16:05

vocal about this and some people perhaps not

16:07

understand my stance on this,

16:09

is that they never violated

16:11

their company policy. So and

16:13

and the believe it was the president admitted that. There

16:15

was no company policy, but they just thought that this was

16:17

an immoral thing, which reflected poorly on the

16:19

network. And these are two consenting adults. And

16:22

so if we were talking about my opinion

16:24

about it on a on the basis that they're both

16:26

married, of course, I have a very hard

16:28

opinion. Both of them are doing this. Horrible for them to

16:30

do this to their families. It's horrible to do this to

16:32

their children. We don't know the

16:34

details. Perhaps they were separated and a wish it was

16:36

already over. So I'm being an

16:38

assumption that their significant others were

16:40

also equally as rocked by the

16:42

discovering of this affair.

16:44

But in a professional setting,

16:46

I don't see how it

16:48

matters. I don't see why both these people,

16:50

individuals, consenting adults, are

16:52

going to lose their jobs unless they did

16:54

something that was unprofessional at

16:56

work. And I disagree with this. And I think that this gets

16:58

back to what we were talking about

17:00

in the monologue, which is that these

17:03

things sort of happen and bud naturally when men and

17:05

women come together. We are

17:07

biological creatures. Men are going

17:09

to have a response to women. Women are going to

17:11

have a response to men. They're spending this much time

17:13

together, perhaps hope for them are their

17:15

marriages are suffering in some capacity, and they're not

17:17

in love. Who knows what the issue is? We don't know it.

17:19

We're not privy to it. Because all

17:21

they have to do is show up to work and do their job

17:23

and talk about topics of the day.

17:25

And because somebody decided to

17:27

follow them, their after work

17:29

hours and found out something personal about both

17:31

of them. They are now both going to lose

17:33

their jobs. I I am just against

17:35

this. I wanna speak out against it. I

17:37

I think that the direction that companies are

17:39

headed toward, which is to say that not only

17:41

matters what you do at work, it matters what you do

17:43

outside of work, is

17:45

a little unfair. I don't think many people survive based

17:47

off of those rules. And as I've mentioned in

17:49

earlier articles, forget an affair. We as

17:51

a Christian, I'm very against this. I think it's horrible

17:54

and horrific. What if there are two work

17:56

employees and if discovered, after we'll follow

17:58

them, that they did elicit drugs

18:00

together. You know what I mean? And it was completely off of

18:02

work time and they went and smoked

18:04

some pot. And if the daily mail

18:06

finds this and brings it over to the

18:08

company, are they going to be fired? They

18:10

have to be able to answer for that. Is it is it something that brings in

18:12

bears into the company? Are you gonna be fired? Because in your

18:14

off time, you smoke a joint? And

18:18

I find that slope to be

18:20

very slippery. So I am taking

18:22

a professional opinion

18:24

that it really is not something

18:26

unless they trip something at work, unless they can point to

18:28

a specific code that they violated at

18:30

Good Morning America, then what has

18:32

happened to them is unfair.

18:35

And it's not something that is of concern

18:37

to Good Morning America even though

18:39

the Daily Mail made it of concern to Good Morning America

18:41

just because a story is being us

18:43

in the public sphere. It doesn't mean that the com the kind of

18:46

the employees, it's something that violated

18:48

their company's ethical standards. And also, just

18:50

as a reminder, we're talking about

18:53

Good Morning America. We are talking about on

18:55

the left. What ethical standards

18:57

do we have on the left?

18:59

My opinion is that had it not

19:02

have been a heterosexual relationship and it was

19:04

instead a homosexual relationship. If it

19:06

was discovered that T. J. Holmes

19:08

was cheating on his wife with

19:10

another man better yet a

19:12

transgendered woman, they would be

19:14

celebrating. It would be popping

19:16

champagne bottles at

19:18

the office It said, we're so proud and

19:20

so brave. TJ Holmes was like,

19:22

I'm cheating on my wife with this

19:24

wonderful trans woman. He would

19:26

probably be promoted. And

19:28

so that is also another element of this that

19:30

I think is wrong. Moving

19:32

on guys, it was a debate that we were having in

19:34

the control room regarding

19:37

What is the age gap between men and

19:39

women? If the woman is

19:41

older, that you would guess that the

19:43

relationship is not going to survive? Is there an

19:45

age gap that you believe that which ships

19:47

do not survive. As a rule, not an exception. I

19:49

know I always get the comments. It's gonna be at

19:51

least five people that go, Candice, I

19:53

don't agree with you saying, that men can't

19:55

date older women. My husband and I

19:57

have fifteen years apart and we've been together for

20:00

thirty seven years and we're very, very

20:02

happy. I know there's exceptions, but as

20:04

a rule, It is my opinion

20:07

that there is too

20:09

much older when it comes to an amen. So they tend

20:11

to be together for a few years. Give you an example,

20:13

cultural example, ash Cucher. He was obsessed with Debbie Moore.

20:16

Right? When he was young, I don't remember how

20:18

young he was. I think she was in her fifties, and I just

20:20

kept going. It's obviously not going to work out because eventually

20:22

he's gonna get to where he wants to have then

20:24

suddenly he's gonna look at that me and go, I can't have kids

20:26

with you because it's a natural biological thing.

20:28

You wanna have kids. Men maybe get

20:30

that urge a lot later than women

20:33

do. Or perhaps a little bit later than women do.

20:35

And so what happened? He

20:37

eventually she hit on her with someone that was younger than her,

20:39

and then he went and he hooked up with my

20:41

LaCunice. So in

20:43

that same vein. Today, it's been reported that Sean

20:46

Mendez, you know him. He's a singer. He's twenty

20:48

four years old. He is dating a woman that is

20:50

fifty one. Dr.

20:53

Jocelyn Miranda, and

20:56

they seem to be happy and affectionate, and

20:58

I'd have no issues between

21:00

them dating. I think she's a little weird. I I

21:02

personally find it completely bizarre that

21:04

a fifty one year old woman is attracted to

21:06

a twenty four year old young man. I guess I do

21:08

have some problems with it. That just came out,

21:10

just some naturally came out. I do have some issues with

21:12

it. I think that's a weird age gap. I don't

21:14

know what you're talking about with a twenty

21:16

four year old. Young man, but she

21:19

him and her dating and there's nothing

21:21

illegal or listened about it.

21:24

Fine. Very clear not gonna work out.

21:26

Why? Because he is a boy? And at

21:28

some point, he will transition to a man. I know he's

21:30

not legally a boy. You're like, oh, hey. He's twenty four

21:32

years old. But men do a lot of growing up from twenty

21:34

four to thirty. A whole lot of growing up from

21:36

twenty four to thirty. And he's doing

21:38

the Ashton Cook This is literally the Ashton

21:40

Kutcher situation. It's not going to work

21:42

out. Obviously, it's just too steep of an aged up

21:44

for it to work out. He's going to want to

21:46

have kids He's not going to be able to have

21:48

children with heart fifty one years old or at

21:50

least, naturally

21:52

have children with heart, of course, they could adopt

21:54

and there's other options. So I

21:56

wanted to open up that question to

21:58

you. How much of an age gap is

22:00

too much when it comes to an

22:03

older woman? And a younger man. And by the way, I'll

22:05

tell you I am a cougar. My

22:07

husband is one year older than me. He

22:09

is younger than me, pardon. So I

22:11

technically am a cougar. I like them young. But

22:13

when I dated somebody, prior to

22:15

him and he was four

22:17

years younger, it felt like and

22:19

I think he was twenty four up time we started

22:21

dating. It felt like

22:24

he was fifteen years

22:26

younger. Men just mature a

22:28

little younger than women do. And as in

22:30

their early twenties are just

22:32

not the men that they will

22:34

be when they are thirty years old. So just

22:36

wanted to throw that little

22:38

tidbit out there. Alright. So this

22:40

was a very big story, and I got tons of

22:42

tweets from people asking me about

22:44

Crowder. People were saying, you need speak out for Stephen

22:47

Crowder Canvas blink twice if you're under

22:49

duress, all sorts of comments like that. And I had

22:51

no idea what they were talking about. I obviously then went

22:53

to Stephen Crowder's YouTube page and I

22:55

saw a video. That he had put up and he was

22:58

discussing a company who

23:00

were essentially offering him what he thought amounted to

23:02

a slave contract. It was very heavily

23:05

implied throughout that the

23:07

company was the daily wire. He said it wasn't the

23:09

blaze. He said that there were ad

23:11

reads, that the company offered him a lot

23:13

of money. And that he wouldn't sell

23:15

out. You know, it was this super I'm

23:17

a martyr, and I'm not selling out to you. And the

23:19

comments reflected that, yes, even you're a hero,

23:21

before I even give you my feedback, let me just let's just

23:24

hear Steven in his own words. Big

23:26

tech is in bed with

23:28

big con. The people

23:30

you thought, the people

23:32

I thought were fighting for

23:35

you, a lot of it has been.

23:37

A big con. Now, I'm specifically

23:40

avoiding naming names or

23:42

going after individuals in

23:44

this video. Because I genuinely hope

23:46

that those I'm addressing and you know who you

23:48

are have a change of heart. Don't

23:50

sign don't sign these contracts. I

23:53

know I now know what you are signing out there. I have the

23:55

luxury of not having to. You know, let me go through this.

23:57

If any of the major platforms issues a

24:00

content strike, such

24:02

that Crowder cannot be monetized on

24:04

such platform, the fee

24:06

will be reduced by twenty

24:08

five percent And then another twenty percent of it

24:10

happens on Apple. And then another ten percent of it happens

24:12

on Facebook. And then another ten percent of it happens on

24:14

Spotify. And then if you get a then if you

24:16

get a strike, meaning a

24:18

suspension, another twenty percent.

24:20

Just to drive it home. You eat it by a car, you have a sick

24:22

day. You can lose a hundred thousand dollars a day. This is

24:24

what's sent out to everybody. Alright.

24:26

So we got the gist of this. It is

24:28

a super predatory contract. And

24:30

like I said, he never explicitly said

24:32

a daily wire, but clear. They was talking about daily wire because

24:34

how many organizations do you know are big enough to offer

24:36

him. Steven Crodaher, you know, what he

24:38

should or around the range of what he should

24:41

be paid. does AdRe's.

24:43

Obviously, it's not gonna be Fox News. It's

24:45

not gonna be Preggier you. They're 501C3

24:47

or Training Point USA. And he mentioned

24:49

explicitly that it wasn't the

24:51

boys. So to me, it was sort of like he

24:53

said, the Schneely Schmaier, but I'm not naming

24:55

any names. And I'm gonna tell

24:57

you two things that I thought. First and

24:59

foremost, to give something a name like the Big Con, obviously,

25:01

it was mudslinging. And

25:04

if this was the daily wire, which I

25:06

wasn't entirely sure that it was, I

25:08

said it was heavily implied, then he also threw mud on

25:10

me. He threw mud on Matt Wall. She threw mud mud

25:12

on Michael Knowles. He threw mud on every single

25:14

person, Brett Cooper, that works with the DailyWire by implying

25:17

that we are signing these contracts and he heroic

25:19

for not signing it. And

25:21

it pulling out excerpts from the contract

25:23

to say basically we're beholden to Big

25:26

Ten. Right? And I don't like that. I don't If

25:28

you want to rev up your

25:30

engine and fire up

25:32

your big truck, don't

25:34

get mud on my car. Right? That's my thing. I don't if you

25:36

wanna go to war, keep me out of it. At

25:38

least say this was a contract that was offered to me.

25:40

He kinda makes this plea. And again,

25:42

people were just on board with it, but I will also

25:44

be honest. But I was

25:46

a bit disturbed. Like I said, heavy accusations that

25:48

this is how the contracts are being handled.

25:50

This would mean and imply that I was making for

25:52

an organization that is not

25:55

acting in the capacity of

25:57

what I would like how I would like them to

25:59

act. Right? Or acting in good faith toward

26:01

the talent, it felt predatory. So

26:03

the first thing that I did was I reached out to

26:05

executives here and was like, what what is this? Are you

26:07

guys gonna respond to this? I wanna know whether or

26:09

not you're treating people poorly behind the

26:11

scenes because it matters to me. It's always mattered to

26:13

me. Okay? You can speak to any

26:15

organization that's ever worked with me. I have very

26:17

good reputation and I maintain friendship with everybody.

26:19

I do. I don't personally know Steven

26:21

Crowder. To be honest, the first time I ever had

26:23

any correspondence with him, He was a bit of a dick

26:25

to me. I probably you can bleep that out, whatever. But

26:28

he offered me online to come into show. I

26:30

said, yes. An hour later, he lied and

26:32

said that I canceled and I never did.

26:34

Then he corrected it and said, oh, we got

26:37

confused. And I just thought that's pretty

26:39

crappy that you publicly tweeted at the

26:41

time I think, get more followers than me. But I

26:43

I canceled on your show when I never did. But

26:45

anyways, I never met him in person, and I think

26:47

he's tremendously talented. And

26:49

I laughed all the way through his Lexin Night

26:51

coverage. So I didn't really have a horse

26:53

nutrition. I wanted the daily wire to respond to it.

26:55

I said, you have to respond to this. This makes us all

26:58

look guilty. People are now thinking, I

27:00

signed a talking this. Like, I sold my soul

27:02

to the devil. This is the implication here.

27:04

So Jeremy Booring, the co CEO of

27:06

DailyWire, did in fact give

27:09

a response. Actually a

27:11

thorough response, a one

27:13

hour response last night, which I

27:15

watched late later than my bedtime, I

27:17

could say. And he went through

27:19

the contract that they offered

27:21

Stephen line by line. Again,

27:23

it was an hour long, so I

27:25

absolutely cannot play it

27:27

right now or recover the entire show. But you should

27:29

take the time and you should watch it because he

27:31

adds clarity and he

27:33

expands. He goes through the entire contract there could

27:35

not have been more transparency. It goes through the

27:37

entire contract that was offered

27:39

and it allows people to actually discern

27:41

what really went down and what really

27:43

went down According to Jeremy, and I'm very interested to see what

27:45

Stephen's response is, is that Stephen

27:47

became a free agent. He left the

27:49

blaze. The Daily Wire offered

27:51

him a contract, a huge contracts,

27:53

by the way, fifty million dollars.

27:55

They offered him. First, they said

27:57

we won't even talk unless you offer a big amount.

27:59

The DailyWire came back and offered fifty

28:02

million dollars. And then

28:04

Steven's agent wrote back

28:06

that they wanted a hundred and twenty million

28:08

dollars. So basically, you wanted a

28:10

hundred and twenty million dollars over

28:12

the span of four years, which by the way,

28:14

pretty unrelatable. Okay. This was

28:16

last year. Yeah. I think I think Jeremy

28:18

said this all went down in September of

28:20

last year. Then Jeremy went back and said that

28:22

there was no way they could afford that.

28:24

Months past, and I don't know, Stephen Croder,

28:26

New Year, New Me, popped up in January

28:28

and was like, actually to know your Taneumi and a few

28:30

daily wire. I'm not okay with the

28:32

fact that you even offered me this contract in the

28:34

first place. By the way, it was a term sheet, not a

28:37

contract. Okay? So

28:39

Steven is relying on the ignorance of people who

28:41

don't know how business work. Okay?

28:43

Don't understand that. This is how it works. Say, put

28:45

an initial offer on the table. And

28:47

then go get your lawyers and

28:49

they go over every single

28:52

line. Okay? So my contract with

28:54

the DailyWire took us five

28:56

months to negotiate. Lawyers going

28:58

over every single line. They got me. A term

29:00

sheet, I said, no

29:02

way to this. what

29:04

I'm saying. They say, no

29:06

way to this. And then I say, no.

29:08

And you go back and forth. And this is

29:10

just business negotiations or nothing personal.

29:13

Okay? And of course, if I did not believe something that I was

29:15

signing or I thought it was disadvantageous, we

29:17

talk it out. And they give explain their logic

29:19

and I explain my logic of what my fears

29:21

are. This is totally normal. In

29:23

the capacity of contracts everywhere signed.

29:25

And yet, by removing

29:28

some crucial information in his initial video,

29:30

and like I said, I felt the same way as

29:32

people that wash it at first. It made it seem

29:34

as of a daily wire, which is trying

29:36

to enslave Crowder. It's

29:39

just not fair, what Stephen Broward did. I think that honestly, he was acting

29:41

a bit like a child actor, and I think it's

29:43

incredibly immature to not give

29:45

people all of the information upfront

29:48

Right? To refuse to name

29:50

specific names and to therefore sling

29:52

mud onto every single person, and

29:54

it's ego centric. Right? It's going This was my

29:56

experience, and therefore, it must be everybody

29:58

else's experience. And so I'm gonna be

30:00

the hero by saying,

30:02

that everyone's under duress and you can come to me so I can start my

30:04

own company. At the end of the day, I

30:06

think what happened, this is my completely

30:08

my opinion, by the way. So I'm not blinking twice

30:10

and not under duress. Is

30:12

that Steven Croda became a free agent and he's feeling a

30:14

little vulnerable right now. Right? He's used to working

30:16

for other organizations. He has some

30:19

guaranteed pay. And he thought that daily

30:21

wire were actually going to meet him at a hundred and

30:23

twenty million dollars. They didn't. They declined. And

30:25

he's still feeling a little shaky on that.

30:27

It's it's scary to go out on

30:29

your own. I thought about it. I thought I'm going going out on my own. It's a lot of

30:31

work. Maybe down the line I will, but it's a scary

30:33

thing to go out, to step out on your own

30:35

and say I'm going to do this thing completely

30:37

by myself. As Jeremy pointed

30:39

out, Steve has not done that before.

30:41

Right? And so to do this, he

30:43

pulled a move in which he was going to

30:45

try to take a bunch of people

30:47

that were swipe the DailyWire and start his

30:49

own company. So essentially saying, I'm

30:51

the hero, I'm the martyr.

30:53

Follow me because I'm not like those guys and

30:55

then he was going to start his own

30:57

shop. And that's what he's trying to do. And some people fell

30:59

forward and said, I'm with you with the UN. I'm a

31:01

mug club till I die and

31:03

didn't understand that really nothing happened

31:05

here other than nobody wanted to pay

31:07

Stephen Crowder one hundred and twenty million

31:09

dollars. So we turned to his viewers who

31:11

he thinks are stupid Super

31:13

definitely times on our top business negotiations work. Right? Like, this is

31:15

like normal. You kick it back and forth.

31:17

And they were gonna make up

31:20

for results. So people that are upset by his video, the

31:22

million people who watched it, are now going to

31:24

give him a dollar, whatever it costs to be

31:26

in the mug club. And they're gonna become the

31:28

hundred and twenty million dollars that he feels that he

31:30

deserves. First of all, we're gonna say this, unrelatable. Unrelatable.

31:34

People are trying to pay for bacon and eggs right now

31:36

at the grocery store or trying to buy stake

31:38

once a week and you're over here crying because

31:40

somebody couldn't meet you at a hundred and twenty nine dollars and

31:42

it is crying, I don't like it. It was a total

31:44

bitch move. There are plenty of things that

31:46

happen across all organizations in the

31:48

concerted moment where I will say

31:50

that I empathize and

31:52

with Steven Croda. I'm saying that sometimes you feel

31:54

like a cynic where she's like, is everybody telling

31:56

out, are people doing those people doing that?

31:58

There are a lot things that DailyWire has

32:00

done that I disagree with. There's a lot of things that turning

32:02

point in some of this that I disagree with. There

32:04

are things perhaps that Prageru has done.

32:06

I disagree with. I have worked with all of these companies.

32:09

Right? But to do a total

32:11

bitch move and go out to the

32:13

public rather than trying to resolve these things in these

32:15

in these slight differences behind the scenes.

32:17

And to make it seem like you're the hero and you're the true

32:19

one and you keep it authentic when

32:21

something really nothing happened

32:23

other than you didn't like an initial

32:25

term sheet, And all you gotta do is tell them that

32:27

and tell them what you didn't like and go back and forth with

32:29

lures like everybody else. I think it's

32:31

crappy. I think it's I I think Steven

32:33

is a a little ego centric probably

32:35

will do better on his own. I don't think he knows how to

32:37

plan a team. And by the way, the last name I'm gonna say, because

32:39

I'm going on Tim Pool tonight, so I'm gonna say anyways

32:41

later, is that I'm

32:43

pretty sure Wasn't it Steven Crodader who

32:45

also screwed over somebody he used to

32:47

work with? Was it not gay Jared? Because he had him

32:49

tied up in a contract? Wasn't

32:51

that Steven Crocker who did that? So is he supposed to

32:53

be the moral high bar? We're not supposed to call him out for

32:55

that here here's the thing. Steven, why don't you release

32:57

not gay Jared from his NDA?

33:00

And allow him to talk about how he felt he was treated by you

33:02

because I know that at the blaze,

33:04

everyone says that you're actually not that

33:07

nice. You treat people poorly, but you bring in so much revenue that

33:09

everybody just has to take it. So I don't like it.

33:11

It stinks to high heaven, and I'm calling you out

33:13

on that because I think it was crappy that you threw

33:15

mud on me Did it the first time via tweet long

33:17

time ago? You're not doing it a second time. Total

33:19

bitch move. Next. Alright, guys.

33:21

Switching gears here. You know that we have

33:23

been on the hunt. To

33:25

give my gang a name in response to

33:27

Matt Walsh having his sweet baby gang.

33:29

We decided that I needed to also have

33:31

my own little gang and we've been getting a lot of submissions. So

33:33

I'm gonna go through some of

33:36

your submissions live. We have one that says

33:38

bad candy band. The

33:40

Hot Chocolate gang. Chocolate

33:43

cake is very funny. The can do

33:46

crew, lit Owens legion.

33:49

Candy crushers. I like candy crushers. I

33:51

think we would crush a sweet baby

33:53

gang. I like it. It's hard

33:55

candy crew. That sounds weird.

34:00

Candy centers. The

34:02

candy shop. Tasty

34:04

toddler day one. Everyone

34:06

only thinks of candy when they have kids. It's incredible. Right?

34:08

Everything is just about food. The salty

34:10

senior solos or the

34:13

s 3G for short. I have a lot

34:15

of questions about that. Why are we a salty? Why

34:17

are we senior? And why are

34:19

we so low? And you have an answer for you. You're

34:21

saying the opposite of Sride is salty, the

34:24

opposite of baby is senior,

34:26

and the opposite of gang is

34:28

so low. The

34:32

salty senior solos. I

34:34

like it. The salty sweet or

34:36

the salty

34:38

senior gang. SSG. I like it. We're warming up, guys.

34:40

The candy clan, I like that

34:42

too. Candy clan.

34:44

Candice car Oh,

34:46

I love a cartel. I love a cartel.

34:48

I love it. Dead bunny's

34:50

gang, the sour candy

34:52

gang. Candice own them. mad

34:58

gang. Stay mad gang. I love

35:00

that. And last, but not least, this

35:02

submission that we received is the

35:04

salty adult gang.

35:06

I'm really liking the salty

35:08

something gang. That's all I'm saying. Well, you later

35:10

on, I'm gonna I'm gonna think about that. I'm

35:13

gonna think about these submissions. We

35:15

will circle back with you, discover which one

35:17

of these gangs, cartels, or

35:20

clans will take down Nat

35:22

Walsh, a sweet little

35:24

baby gang, because they're making me real angry. Alright. So if you

35:26

follow me on Instagram, we know that I have been waking up

35:28

at four thirty AM recently to work

35:30

out because

35:32

I just feel like that is the military hour and it gives me more time in morning

35:34

to myself. However, living a

35:36

healthy lifestyle is not always easy especially when

35:38

you're on the road as much as I am.

35:41

I need simple manageable routines to make sure I'm

35:43

getting the proper nutrition every single day, which

35:45

is why I'm a huge fan of

35:47

balance of nature. Balance of Nature

35:49

fruits and veggies are the best way to make sure that you're

35:51

getting essential nutritional ingredients every

35:54

single day. Their products are one

35:56

hundred percent Whole Foods, Balance of HR

35:58

uses a cold vacuum process that preserves

36:00

the natural phytonutrients in whole

36:02

fruits and vegetables and encapsulates

36:04

them for easy consumption. Balance of nature sent

36:06

a bunch of their products down to the studio for

36:08

my team to try, and we all love

36:10

them. When you're disciplined enough to take care of

36:12

your health, you reap all kinds of benefits,

36:14

more energy, less tea better focus,

36:16

consuming the right balance of fruits and vegetables

36:18

every day is an important first

36:20

step. Balance for nature is offering a twenty

36:22

five dollar off plus a

36:24

free fiber and spice with your first

36:26

preferred order of fruits and veggies.

36:28

This offer can end at any

36:30

time. Call or go to balance of nature dot com and use promo code

36:32

Candice for twenty five dollars off plus

36:34

a free vibrant spice. That's

36:36

balance of nature dot com promo

36:38

code Candice. Alright, guys.

36:40

Next portion of the show is going to be available

36:42

exclusively on DailyWire Plus. I'm going to be reading

36:44

your comments and answering your questions. You're not going to

36:46

miss that. If not a

36:48

member, go ahead and click the link in the description and

36:50

subscribe right

36:52

now.