Podchaser Logo
Home
Raphael Arndt – The Death of Traditional Portfolio Construction? (EP.365)

Raphael Arndt – The Death of Traditional Portfolio Construction? (EP.365)

Released Monday, 29th January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Raphael Arndt – The Death of Traditional Portfolio Construction? (EP.365)

Raphael Arndt – The Death of Traditional Portfolio Construction? (EP.365)

Raphael Arndt – The Death of Traditional Portfolio Construction? (EP.365)

Raphael Arndt – The Death of Traditional Portfolio Construction? (EP.365)

Monday, 29th January 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Capital Allocators is brought to

0:03

you by Ten East, an

0:05

investment platform for sophisticated investors

0:07

to access private markets. Ten

0:10

East brings benefits of having your own

0:13

family office without the cost and headaches

0:15

of doing so. It's

0:17

founded and led by Michael Lefel, former

0:20

deputy executive managing member of

0:22

Davidson Kempner. Michael

0:24

and his investment team offer members

0:26

the opportunity to co-invest by offering

0:28

at their discretion. Michael

0:30

and his team source, diligence, and

0:32

commit material personal capital to

0:35

each investment. The

0:37

opportunities shared on the Ten East

0:39

platform offer exposure to private credit,

0:41

real estate, niche venture and private

0:44

equity, and other idiosyncratic investments that

0:46

typically aren't available through traditional channels.

0:49

The principles have over a decade track record

0:51

of investing in these types of exposures across

0:54

more than 350 transactions. With

0:58

his investment, the Ten East team conducts

1:00

ongoing monitoring and reporting, just as

1:02

you'd expect from an institutional investment organization.

1:06

I've known Michael for about a decade,

1:08

and after becoming impressed by the quality

1:10

of Ten East offerings, its research process,

1:12

and high quality investment team, I became

1:15

an advisor to the organization, an investor

1:17

in multiple offerings. You

1:19

can learn more and join me as

1:21

a member at TenEast.co. That's

1:24

the number TenEast.co. Capital

1:29

Allocators is brought to you by

1:32

Inflection Point Partners, an executive and

1:34

performance coaching firm dedicated to the

1:36

investment community. Recognized as

1:38

one of the top coaches in asset management

1:40

by institutional investor, CEO Matt

1:43

Spieleman is coached to several members

1:45

of the Capital Allocators community, including

1:47

yours truly, and leads a carefully

1:49

curated team of certified coaches. Matt

1:52

and his dream team partner with

1:54

chief investment officers, managers, and their

1:56

teams to achieve meaningful and consequential

1:59

goals. For more

2:01

information or to schedule

2:03

an introductory call, visit

2:05

inflectionpoint.info or email winn

2:07

at inflectionpoint.info. Hello,

2:17

I'm Ted Sides and this

2:19

is Capital Allocaters. This

2:21

show is an open exploration of

2:23

the people and process behind capital

2:26

allocation. Through conversations with leaders

2:28

in the money game, we learn how

2:30

these holders of the keys to the

2:32

kingdom allocate their time and their capital.

2:36

You can join our mailing list

2:38

and access premium content at capitalallocaters.com.

2:43

All opinions expressed by Ted and podcast guests

2:45

are solely their own opinions and do not

2:47

reflect the opinion of capital allocators or their

2:49

firms. This podcast is for informational purposes

2:51

only and should not be relied upon

2:53

as a basis for investment decisions. Clients

2:56

of Capital Allocaters or podcast guests may

2:58

maintain positions and securities discussed on this

3:00

podcast. My

3:02

guest on today's show is Raph

3:05

Art, the CEO of The Future

3:07

Fund, Australia's $200 billion Aussie

3:10

dollar sovereign wealth fund that his team

3:12

manages alongside $55 billion Aussie dollars

3:15

of other sovereign pools in capital. Raph

3:18

assumed the CEO ceased in 2020

3:20

after serving as chief investment officer

3:22

for six years. Our

3:24

conversation from five years ago as the

3:27

fund's total portfolio approach is replayed

3:29

in the 60s. Our

3:31

conversation focuses on the significant changes in

3:33

the Future Fund over the last few

3:36

years. Raph and his

3:38

team spent the year analyzing changes

3:40

in the global economy, demographics, and

3:42

markets and concluded the Future Fund

3:44

needed substantial turnover to prepare for

3:46

the coming period. We

3:49

discussed these changes in the external environment

3:51

and the governance and culture internally in

3:53

order to do something about it. What

4:10

you just heard is my son Ryan's

4:12

response to my asking him to create

4:14

a guitar riff for a new intro

4:16

for Capital Allocators. We

4:18

do bring some heavies on the show and

4:21

he's definitely got that heavy metal vibe. So

4:23

I'll leave this one up to you. Next time

4:26

you're chatting with a friend about Capital Allocators,

4:28

why not ask what they think about the

4:30

potential new show intro? We'll

4:32

take you out with it one more time and thanks

4:34

so much for spreading the word. Please

4:39

enjoy

4:42

my

4:45

conversation

4:49

with Raph. Raph, good to see you. Well,

4:56

it's actually been five years since you last came

4:58

on the show. Since then,

5:00

there have been a couple things that have changed. So

5:02

you are now the CEO, not the

5:04

CIO. And there

5:07

are two pieces that I've seen you put together

5:09

that sort of would be a bit of this

5:11

for the 15-year letter of the history of the

5:13

fund and then last year's piece on the death

5:15

of portfolio construction. Maybe we should

5:17

start with how do you feel about being CEO?

5:21

Yeah. What an interesting question and what an interesting

5:23

time. And what has changed in the world. I

5:25

think COVID was a real catalyst for a lot

5:27

of things and it just so happened that right

5:29

in the middle of 2020, I

5:31

changed jobs and became the CEO.

5:34

It wasn't something I was really looking to do. I

5:37

was happy being the chief investment officer and

5:39

I was quite passionate about that. But

5:41

what happened was that the role was

5:43

vacant and there was a market crisis.

5:46

From a future fund perspective, we were turning 15. I

5:50

had a lot of ideas about things I

5:52

thought we needed to do to pivot, to

5:54

double down on. I

5:56

started talking to the board about

5:58

that and eventually. someone on the board said,

6:01

why don't you go fit the job? And I thought, oh,

6:03

that's an interesting idea. I hadn't thought about that. So

6:05

I thought, what could go wrong? So I

6:07

did. And here I am. What

6:10

were some of those views of what you wanted to do in the

6:12

role? They sort of fell into two

6:14

broad buckets. One was internal related issues and

6:16

the other one was external. So on the

6:19

external, we'd really been fortunate

6:21

in that we don't have members

6:24

or clients, we don't have to do marketing,

6:26

we're not regulated. And so we

6:28

thought really deeply long and hard about the

6:30

investment world and what was changing. And we've

6:33

done some research already around the return

6:35

of inflation, the end of monetary policy,

6:37

at least in a traditional sense

6:39

when interest rates are all zero, and

6:42

what might come next. So when COVID

6:44

happened and government started to stimulate, we

6:46

sort of got really interested in whether the

6:49

world was changing. And I felt like we

6:51

had to reposition not just the portfolio,

6:54

but the mindset of the organisation around

6:56

the world being different now. And

6:59

that's a big task because when you've got

7:01

investment professionals that have been doing things for

7:03

20 years sometimes or longer, and

7:05

an organisation that had existed long enough in 15

7:08

years at the time that had

7:10

developed a process and approach and

7:12

a way of thinking to change it is

7:15

a big task. And then secondly,

7:18

the external world was changing and we had

7:20

to adapt to that. So whether

7:22

it was the things our staff expected

7:24

from us, ways of working, societal

7:27

expectations, things around

7:29

reputation when you're a sovereign well-fund, I

7:31

felt like we needed to do an

7:33

even better job at that than what

7:35

we had been doing. So

7:37

lots of interesting things to tackle. Why

7:40

don't we start with this idea that

7:42

the external market environment is changing

7:44

and you need to do adapt.

7:47

How did you lay out what

7:49

that meant and how you should change your approach? It

7:52

was really founded in research with Bangdong for quite

7:54

a few years and we'd started to talk to

7:56

the board about Just long-term

7:59

trends. Kilocycles and things like

8:01

that and then when covered happened. I

8:03

am in Melbourne in Australia and unfortunately

8:05

that was one of the city's that

8:07

was locked in the most in the

8:09

world and must have s now so

8:11

they totally and was a big disruption

8:14

and all such as a soft to

8:16

think you have time dealing with issues

8:18

because we lost. Our

8:20

was really soulful. That is this world was

8:23

changing. Driven. By generational trying

8:25

so people who was high and

8:27

of forty five said i millennium

8:29

when James A really have a

8:31

very different lived experience partly. Because

8:34

of how old's I would win, the

8:36

financial crisis happened and what sort of

8:38

jobs? I god what? That. Felt

8:40

lot of them with as I can

8:43

afford to buy assets, houses and things

8:45

like that or north North. And

8:47

says I expect different things from their

8:49

governments and because the research was done

8:51

on notice that amount had been through

8:53

they saw calls before and or challenge

8:56

the time to start thinking about a

8:58

six when what happened is I ran

9:00

up soon, was thin and of of

9:02

holiest G and said i think the

9:04

world's changed A way to tear it

9:06

down to first principles, figure out how

9:08

it's changed, figure out what we know

9:10

today to succeed in that new Weldon.

9:13

build a backup you've got a year.

9:15

And. Say, say it off. That's an interesting question.

9:17

I bluffed story that but I'm too busy with

9:20

they are you. And. Or said

9:22

okay I use cancelled say are literally went

9:24

to the bone said we're gonna stop reporting

9:26

on a whole lot of stuff because we

9:28

like to focus on this project in the

9:30

board to support even lower in a market

9:32

crisis. We. Recognize that we didn't

9:34

know what was gonna happen in the

9:37

world so the next thing we did

9:39

was a wiki says i across the

9:41

whole organization as in from the receptionist

9:43

up and we said with these exchanging

9:45

in the world what's important We came

9:47

up with the been over seventy ideas

9:49

and we tried to group them and

9:51

ultimately came up with obtained growing things

9:53

that are settings as paper the new

9:56

investment order. It always feels like

9:58

something is changing in the world. The.

10:00

Especially in markets, drinks or tops

10:02

and bottoms. How

10:04

do you develop the conviction? Looking

10:07

at cycles, Looking at these ideas

10:09

that your team developed that you

10:11

should make a significant change

10:13

in a substantial portfolio. Are

10:16

just boils down to expressing a form of

10:18

leadership because you can over analyze something today

10:21

and come up with a million reasons why

10:23

he will refer to the main law and

10:25

models will tell us something will be. I

10:28

guess it was a career of

10:30

writing and seen teaching and being

10:32

influenced by different things I've read

10:34

that really went so you the

10:37

fact that finances are calls for

10:39

high ville and whether it's quantities

10:41

old Norse. Paypal. Program the

10:43

algorithm. Some sides: Eco

10:45

Challenge. Or. Was pretty influenced

10:47

by a book or right back in the nineties

10:50

called the Fourth Turning. That. Really

10:52

went to have generations think differently

10:54

and how the world actually does

10:56

change Caught pro family have done

10:58

a little bit of writing and

11:01

sinking around the Great Depression and

11:03

Nine Twenty Nine Market Proof of

11:05

men, the financial crisis. Or

11:08

could say on of parallels to the

11:10

wealth and exist then and are just

11:12

as such a conviction in Illinois. Engage

11:15

the time and got them to write

11:17

up a it and talk about it.

11:19

A point where Life Thoughts was a

11:21

pretty interesting project but it was really

11:24

the process of coming through the project

11:26

to year which also engaged and higher

11:28

interest tax. And

11:30

at the time when. I'm. Seventy or

11:33

eighty pipeline project. With.

11:37

Us internal and on the whole

11:39

thing to build views and conviction

11:41

upon my we attach the portfolio

11:44

and people would be on that

11:46

journey rather than impose it on

11:48

the top. Damn financing for deflect.

11:51

Tests including paper you titled the

11:53

test asked. Us

11:56

to discuss. So.

11:59

Sorry. Finance or really

12:01

based on observations on have

12:04

financial markets and economies have

12:06

worked and ascribes. Quite.

12:08

Laws or behavior is to

12:11

these activists in the economy.

12:14

assuming. That people in the future will

12:16

like lotta having the past. But when you

12:18

start to think about it, most of the

12:20

daughter we have comes from that era, postwar,

12:23

daughter, and in many cases really only the

12:25

last thirty or forty years. And.

12:27

So we've been in a particular part

12:29

of the cycle during that period was

12:31

head. Democratic. An economic

12:33

title wins with had the emergence

12:36

of middle classes in Europe in

12:38

the Us postal votes who was

12:40

had increasing dead in the world

12:42

and that was a positive thing

12:44

mostly because of brought forward consumption

12:46

and wealth from the future but

12:48

we had a fast growing world.

12:51

Pretty good season see productivity

12:53

top affects Globalization global trade

12:55

mostly economic rationalist government policy

12:58

makers through a lot of

13:00

that era. not solely the

13:02

always like bumps on the

13:05

why, but mostly. But.

13:07

Actually, when you look back at hundreds of

13:09

years of history, the world hasn't normally bang

13:11

lotta and suddenly gone through by cycles for

13:13

far. As said, the question was, why will

13:16

it continue? Was. Ultimately

13:19

a bull's dance harrys capitalism performing a

13:21

useful says as a society at large

13:23

and the city's it will continue and

13:25

if it isn't than someone some tom

13:27

will try to intervene in those markets

13:30

and challenge of. Such hiking

13:32

that backdrop. Then you can start

13:34

to say well why should bonus

13:36

be. Negatively. Correlated with

13:38

equities always. Why should equities

13:41

own a higher return than

13:43

some point? Loma Risk Acid

13:45

always. Why should prose of

13:47

markets and have none? Illiquidity

13:49

always. And. The answer is

13:52

well on every guy's a time by

13:54

promo we should because Paypal otherwise wouldn't

13:56

mind them. Parts. At different

13:58

points in the cycle by Chloe, Don't. For

14:00

example was just a couple of years

14:03

of inflation rising interest rightfully bones falling

14:05

equities of the site on. And.

14:08

So really inciting the deaths of traditional portfolio

14:10

construction and much I made me put a

14:12

question mark on the end of natal at

14:14

all because we really calling from a debate

14:16

and I guess I personally think it is.

14:19

What? We really saying is the might be

14:21

periods in the future way bones are

14:23

still defensive relative to equities and were

14:25

profit markets win in a premier and

14:27

so forth by the econ assume it

14:30

will always be the case and said

14:32

the reason I say forget portfolio anymore

14:34

that eaten just put on and when

14:36

and sleep. Or philip an

14:38

asset allocation with dollars every year

14:40

have to actually buy a lot

14:42

more dynamic and along. So.

14:45

Would you do with Sat Ccs

14:47

when it comes to the actions

14:49

to takes you. Are

14:52

very first principles invest. We.

14:54

Call a joined up hopefully. Oh investing

14:56

A tend not to use the term

14:58

title portfolio approach because when other people

15:01

do that I do different things to

15:03

what we do. Say.

15:05

Right now we think. The.

15:08

Assets Array Pricing Still as the

15:10

world works at. What's that? The

15:12

price of money base in Us

15:14

Higher Inflation Weldon A. Boat.

15:16

With is more competition for capital. Printed.

15:19

Actually looks pretty attractive because it has

15:21

free prost. Say. More

15:24

would need to put all your portfolio

15:26

and critter and this good reasons why

15:28

you wouldn't but that's the starting supposition

15:30

rather than a will have an overweight

15:32

have some small amount Within some tracking

15:34

era budgets are some strategic asset allocation.

15:38

When. We look at the will

15:40

going forward. We say more inflation

15:42

will volatility probably was at least

15:45

in why cause prices more frequently

15:47

take mobilization A more populist governments

15:49

that will to recapitalise things detract

15:52

from economic growth. All those things

15:54

are inflationary and in that world

15:57

in the big picture you would

15:59

have. Probably. Less reliance

16:01

on equities and you would have

16:03

less conviction in offs answer. The

16:05

question becomes we did as he

16:08

returns from And what color offensive.

16:11

As as he got about thinking through that. We.

16:13

Concluded that we need better

16:16

slice. It

16:18

many many reasons were missing and functional.

16:20

By Sustain that doesn't mean will study.

16:23

of the digital ha single digits or

16:25

come back down in all gop again

16:27

and will come back to and will

16:29

go up again. This is the past

16:31

history. Since. Hopes of Real

16:33

less. It's particularly infrastructure assets that

16:35

can pass through inflation quite attractive,

16:37

but not for example, regulated utilities

16:39

which you moment in series. I

16:41

should be because the nice to

16:44

be social contract if you're buying

16:46

an essential service conscious couch anything

16:48

you want it up with the

16:50

process or the racers I reported

16:52

by says it's quite risky in

16:54

this world. But. There are

16:56

other things mobile phone

16:58

towers, fi bar, data

17:00

centers, renewable energy infrastructure

17:02

that are caught attractive.

17:05

We. See commodities are one of the see

17:07

things that have worked through stagflationary periods

17:10

and inflationary periods and we say no

17:12

reason to think the future will be

17:14

different, but you've got an added tile

17:16

We now that in the. Day

17:18

Carbonized Economy A Lotus. Commodities.

17:21

Become very valuable. Not the petroleum

17:23

months, but the reverse said the

17:25

tops of minerals and metals and

17:27

so was. Put. That exposure

17:29

on in the portfolio. In

17:32

Twenty Twenty, we put Golding to the

17:34

portfolios for the first time. Because.

17:36

we saw that more populous governments

17:38

would be more likely to print

17:40

money or otherwise sea bass the

17:42

currency's because that's what governments always

17:45

do when they're in the sort

17:47

of situations or at least he

17:49

contacted for granted that that life

17:51

and then we still have very

17:53

high conviction in school bus strategies

17:55

particular private equity vince capital a

17:58

sort of infrastructure and property we

18:00

don't and CreditWidow tends to be

18:03

private and equity

18:07

markets where some years ago we

18:11

were able to keep the equity

18:13

small cap strategy. We

18:16

started a great fanfare

18:18

and interest in Australian

18:21

equity small cap strategy

18:23

earlier this year because

18:26

it was a space where there was

18:28

capacity available and there is the potential

18:30

to deliver sustainable health. I'm

18:32

trying to think about how your portfolio

18:35

would change with this

18:37

different lens of a paradigm after this

18:39

year of work. You

18:41

started with an approach that's a little bit

18:43

different from traditional asset allocation as it was

18:45

anyway. How much

18:47

can you change such a large pool

18:49

even over two or three years to

18:53

move into the areas that you think are

18:55

more likely to benefit from a different environment?

18:58

So we manage about $265 billion Aussie

19:00

across seven funds. The future fund, which

19:02

is the higher risk fund, is a

19:04

bit over $200 billion and we've changed

19:07

half of it in the last three years. So

19:09

it is something we have conviction

19:11

in. Some of it isn't

19:14

obvious if you just look at the asset allocation

19:16

because it says equities, we've still got equities but

19:18

we've got different types of equities now than we

19:20

used to. Some of it is

19:23

things that don't really show up in the

19:25

asset allocation. We think we need to be

19:27

more careful about our liquidity. We

19:29

think there's going to be more volatility in currency.

19:31

We think there's options in

19:34

unlisted assets that can get us higher

19:36

returns in lower growth world but other

19:38

issues come with that. So

19:40

we've built an internal treasury management function

19:43

for example to work the liquidity harder.

19:45

We're taking some of the risk using derivatives

19:48

over the cash that we have. So we're

19:50

being more disciplined about how we think about

19:52

that. But other things are quite

19:54

different. So the nature of the type of infrastructure

19:57

we're buying is different. The way we're doing real

19:59

estate is different. different we don't think

20:01

certain forget-free assets are that exciting

20:04

because there's no reason to think that

20:06

you'll just get rewarded for having capital

20:08

and so you need to have strategies

20:11

that actually create something worth that people

20:13

want to pay for and

20:15

the issues in terms of office

20:18

building utilization or shopping centers versus

20:20

internet retail for example will

20:23

know in an ignored at

20:25

the same things are happening right

20:27

across the ecosystem. So

20:29

it's more inside a chess and

20:31

allocation how we execute on the

20:33

portfolios that is changing. This

20:35

idea that credit looks

20:38

interesting couldn't you just put all your money in credit

20:40

well you can't do that well this

20:42

infrastructure is interesting but it's a liquid. How

20:44

do you get to the sizing of all

20:47

these different buckets of opportunities? Well

20:49

firstly I'd say we can put all that money

20:51

in credit that's a decision not to and the

20:53

reason we don't is because we

20:55

might not be right or maybe

20:58

the market capacity in the size of the

21:00

fund over the time period would restrict it

21:02

but we wouldn't start from the

21:04

attitude that we can't. And so

21:07

most of the conversations around the investment committee are we

21:09

like this idea why can't we do more? Usually

21:11

the investment committee is pushing the sector team

21:13

to do more of a good idea rather

21:15

than less. And that's what

21:18

the whole portfolio investing really comes

21:20

to sizing issues of the whole

21:22

portfolio level appropriately. But of

21:24

course we do have an existing portfolio and

21:26

we can only have one portfolio and so

21:29

there are multiple future scenarios in

21:32

the world. No portfolio will

21:34

be great in all the scenarios, we

21:36

could have a low-growth stackflation, we could

21:38

have a productivity shock where everything's fine,

21:40

we could have anything in

21:42

between, we could have geopolitical conflict that

21:44

means that certain geographies get impacted more

21:47

than others and so we do think

21:49

about true diversity in the portfolio. I

21:52

don't use the word diversification because we

21:55

don't assume asset classes behave differently

21:58

in a particular way we try to to look

22:00

through that in a more granular

22:05

real estate in these geographies will

22:24

or through using option strategies or other things

22:26

like that. In a

22:28

world where you're expecting there to be

22:30

more volatility across whatever these

22:33

factors are, inflation, equities, bonds, how

22:36

do you dial up or down the investments

22:39

you make in the dynamic asset allocation

22:41

portion of what you do? There's

22:44

a few different lenses on it. Probably the more

22:46

important one is that we talk to

22:48

each other a lot. So we talk about

22:50

joined up whole portfolio investing. The joined up

22:52

piece is that teams are

22:54

talking to each other all the time about

22:56

what they like, what they don't like, what

22:58

they're seeing in the portfolio, what

23:01

they think is attractive. We try to learn off each

23:03

other and our fund managers of course.

23:06

If we say something that's attractive, we'd work

23:08

together on it. So right now real estate

23:11

credit for example looks pretty interesting. There's a

23:13

shortage of capital and so our real estate

23:15

teams and our credit teams are working together

23:17

on that. So there's that piece

23:20

and then we have a

23:22

more formulaic, more traditional dynamic

23:25

asset allocation piece as well.

23:27

This is something that has changed since

23:29

the work we did because we think the

23:31

world is more volatile and we think it's

23:33

worth investing more in capturing

23:35

the benefits of the volatility

23:37

because we have a longer term mindset.

23:39

We don't mind if we

23:41

lose money over the short term or if we

23:44

are running tracking errors to some

23:46

sort of benchmark and so we

23:48

can take a longer term view

23:51

about whether there's fundamental value in something and

23:54

take a position. And so we

23:56

have built a dynamic asset allocation team that's

23:59

doing that now. The across

24:01

a kiddies. Tops

24:03

of currency, an interest rates

24:05

and I can. Movies in

24:07

front are if necessary. Actually

24:09

was. It's

24:11

really just based on fundamental longer

24:14

term value plus a few other

24:16

matrix a bit shorter term macro

24:18

cycle and that's proving to add

24:20

quota value was always done that.

24:23

But. With ramped up and say we

24:25

try to analyze it runs performs. We.

24:28

Pretty much start with if we

24:30

just had equities in cash, nothing

24:32

else and we ran a typical

24:34

responsible for a time of thing.

24:37

And. Then we think we didn't have the

24:39

support the portfolio. my can actually get

24:41

some alpha and we can be dynamic.

24:43

wouldn't be bright. Damn the returns over

24:45

the loss of the sun I time

24:47

he is now we've added minutes on

24:49

off percent per annum. Think

24:51

is pretty good and of

24:53

sexually split interestingly only about

24:55

half a percent to. Those.

24:58

Of suffocation in the traditional sense.

25:00

And. About one person Hm, dynamic asset

25:02

allocation an alpha and if you look

25:05

at last three is actually of discussion

25:07

has been significantly negative because obviously bottles

25:09

inequities have been correlated in a bad

25:11

way. but Elsa has been really, really.

25:15

You. Mentioned that. To. Make a

25:17

significant change in the portfolio like

25:19

that. He had to get the

25:21

organizations. Prepared. To. Be.

25:23

Able to make change because people are

25:26

used to just doing what they've done

25:28

and incrementally moving forward. How

25:31

did you get. The. Organization

25:33

to change. Site.

25:35

Says I'm lucky because we didn't have to

25:37

change from the opposite we didn't have fundamentally

25:39

times. we just set the was needs the

25:41

culture with already bills and do more of

25:43

it with an item on the We also

25:45

had to do it with more. Because.

25:48

We decided english weeknight.

25:51

More strategies to have all manages to

25:53

my. Last six

25:55

months. And

25:59

not a part of the price. This was born.

26:02

With more want some reference

26:05

portfolios? You're tracking era budget.

26:07

Hooked on work. All. His

26:09

conversations we were having as we went through

26:11

this year of research we will also having

26:13

with the board. And. When we

26:16

ultimately got the recommendation on hand attached

26:18

the portfolio the board was rather with

26:20

us so you build confidence and model

26:22

was the why but thankfully this those

26:24

decisions have added value to the portfolio

26:26

since then and so that helps you

26:28

have higher conviction in doing a even

26:31

more and actually lost a window into

26:33

the board. We put up a recommendation

26:35

and then we put up another proposal

26:37

which way called be Bold of. Which

26:40

really means. Doubled. Down

26:42

into a conviction about the challenges in

26:44

the world. The board actually said something

26:47

so you don't have that iii conviction

26:49

that were ice and less important to.

26:52

And. Say it's caught solitary she's we

26:54

know before Adding value will not

26:56

perfect pass. We just have to

26:58

back each other to have even

27:00

saw it tasted to be open

27:02

about it takes a back into

27:04

pieces as a goat. So.

27:07

Bold did be bolder look

27:09

like. It. Really when

27:11

hard into commodities? It

27:13

when Harding to hedge funds which we

27:15

sing can be defenses and tops of

27:17

hedge fund strategies in this world as

27:19

you would knighted conviction in his friends

27:21

doesn't always pay off, so you want

27:23

to be careful about that. But.

27:25

Really interested more of what we're already doing in

27:27

terms of saw as it. Does. Seem

27:30

to remember was something like about

27:32

how a single digits of the

27:34

portfolios moving out of traditional less

27:36

it seems to I saw day

27:38

is with for very done quite

27:40

a lot of been another. A

27:42

scene of The Portfolio doing. I

27:46

want to take a break in the

27:48

action. To tell you about Net Sweet

27:51

by Oracle helping businesses accelerate growth and

27:53

run better with the suite at the

27:55

Rp Financial Crm an ecommerce products. Here.

27:58

Are three numbers for you. Remember. Thirty.

28:01

Six thousand, Twenty five,

28:03

And one. Thirty. Six

28:05

thousand is the number of businesses that have

28:07

been upgraded to net sweet by Oracle. That.

28:10

Sweet twenty five years old this

28:12

year. That's twenty five years helping

28:14

businesses do more with less closer

28:16

books and days and drive down

28:19

costs. And one. Because.

28:21

Your business is one of the kind. Get.

28:23

A customized solutions for all your Kp

28:25

eyes in one efficient system with one

28:28

source of truth. Manage. Risk

28:30

that reliable forecasts and improve

28:32

margins. Everything you need all

28:34

in one place. right?

28:36

Now download next week

28:38

Popular Tp I checklist

28:40

designed to give you

28:42

consistently excellent performance. Absolutely

28:45

free. It's and Net

28:47

sweet.com/allocators That's Nets we.com/allocators

28:49

to get your own

28:51

Tp I checklist as

28:53

we dot com/allocators. And.

28:55

Now back to the show. In

28:59

your seat as Ceo. A

29:01

curious how you thought about

29:03

culture. Touches. Very fundamental arcing

29:06

and a lot of would have been described

29:08

as you can do without a counselor. Support

29:10

the innovation and the recycling in the being

29:12

different. I think to begin

29:14

with each fans had that since it

29:16

was established at We Will really small

29:19

and young and we sort of grow

29:21

it as we weigh ins and. We.

29:23

Got bigger and as we went

29:25

into the cousin period part of

29:27

the strategy was when I grow

29:29

the investment time by about sixty

29:31

percent because we need more strategies

29:33

for next be more granular when

29:35

I to be more active for

29:37

their fund managers to bring the

29:39

information scalar. i was convinced

29:42

by launching an old was really concerned

29:44

about the culture of the organization if

29:46

we did that about the fact that

29:49

you need more people to manage more

29:51

paypal whether it's in hr people and

29:53

culture top teams all legal and finance

29:55

and other execution for hims at the

29:58

same time we were up our

30:00

data and technology capability to understand

30:04

what was in the portfolio and

30:06

we just couldn't buy it off the shelf what

30:09

we wanted. So our technology

30:11

team I think quintupled over

30:13

the period of four or five years. There

30:16

were lots of challenges in managing

30:18

that growth in terms of having

30:21

an aligned investment focused culture and

30:24

also in ensuring that our

30:27

people who were becoming leaders especially

30:29

in the middle of the organisation understood

30:32

what their role would be and what

30:34

their obligation is. And so I

30:37

was very focused on ensuring

30:39

that we continued to offer

30:41

quality support for ultimately

30:43

the investment mission which is why we're here

30:46

and that meant listening to the organisation

30:48

about what wasn't working and

30:51

fixing it. Technology being

30:53

a good example that we couldn't afford to

30:55

have a technology team that could do lots

30:57

of things and have lots of ideas but

30:59

wasn't being driven by the investment need explicitly.

31:02

As a CEO I

31:04

felt like my job was to ensure

31:06

the whole organisation was wrapping itself around

31:08

this really significant change

31:10

in the investment world and the change we

31:13

had to do in the portfolio and our

31:15

mindset and supporting it. That goes to the

31:17

risk team and how they think that goes,

31:20

I already mentioned to Treasury management, it goes

31:22

to how all our enablement functions are working

31:24

and it ultimately goes to how we innovate.

31:27

I decided that in order

31:30

to grow successfully we had to cater

31:32

for the culture and I'm a little

31:34

allergic to that and my

31:36

predecessor, Dov Niel, I think was highly allergic to

31:38

that because he felt it had to be more

31:41

dynamic but if we were growing from something

31:43

like 150 people in five years to 350 then I just felt like I

31:46

was too

31:49

risky not to do that. So I took

31:51

a summer and thought very hard about it

31:54

and wrote down what I thought

31:56

the culture was in two

31:58

phrases and four actions. Oh

32:00

like corrected by my colleagues too far

32:02

as actions. Does. A

32:04

speech on it to the organization.

32:07

It was really not about you

32:09

must join at Tulsa Neck. The

32:11

why when you hear better was

32:13

more about this is what guides

32:15

us. This is why were different

32:17

to somewhere else is largely about

32:19

working together and collaborating with each

32:22

other without joints focus. Now.

32:24

When people join the organization like get

32:26

a copy of that and we talk

32:28

about what unites of a successful. What?

32:32

Were those two faces? So.

32:35

The first one was one time on purpose

32:37

which would head for a long time. And.

32:39

That really time and of an investment context

32:41

for east side ones. I am one portfolio

32:43

but now that we manage seven thousand of

32:46

the governments of didn't really work anymore and

32:48

it was really a bad aligned objectives the

32:50

second one else has. On

32:52

to see newly repeated even to this

32:55

day Investment Performances if I guess we

32:57

have to know why we exist and

32:59

every decision that anyone in the organization

33:01

max nice to come back to that

33:03

have will you help Investment Performance and

33:05

was influenced by Sam Signs point about

33:07

warm out when he said well if

33:09

you don't see the customary and or

33:11

helping someone who says the customer we

33:13

don't have a few and I'll sing

33:16

when have to sign. When it comes

33:18

to Investment Perform and some analysts you

33:20

to build a big technology turning let's

33:22

show. Money in those wonderful things and

33:24

Mister Trump's investment performance. And

33:26

are simply to commit the

33:28

risk someone's transaction functions. Going

33:32

out of pace three the side

33:34

Mullins wants to promote. how are

33:36

you helping us and or any

33:38

investing So there was a tree.

33:40

Phrases in the nerves for a

33:43

regional elections which are try to

33:45

make or i'm just so people

33:47

would remember them were collaborate, facilitate,

33:49

innovate, and deliberate which goes to

33:51

working together telling to souls the

33:53

investment problem with a whole portfolio

33:55

liberal facilitate. Really my style whites fiasco

33:58

in Alpha. and if you've

34:00

got some knowledge, some connections, some

34:05

awesome capital in the portfolio because some

34:07

other idea is better than yours, then

34:09

go and offer. Innovate, I think a

34:11

lot of people have but I talked a lot

34:14

about looking at the quality of the

34:16

decision we made at the point of the decision,

34:18

something you've explored on your podcast and

34:21

not judging people by the outcome because there's

34:23

too much uncertainty in the world when you're

34:25

in the investor to know if we're good

34:27

at decision making just by a

34:29

few decisions a year and what the outcome

34:32

was and that's really encouraging people to be

34:34

bold and you can hear the outcome of

34:36

that through the new investment order

34:38

work we did. Deliberate is

34:41

about reputation risk management, whether government's

34:43

fund but also in our

34:45

view of the future more populous governments

34:47

are likely to be sustained around the

34:49

world and society is

34:51

expecting more and more from its institutions

34:54

and we're no different so we need to be

34:56

very thoughtful about things that are appropriate for

34:58

us to do and talk openly about that.

35:01

And then it seemed implicit to me

35:03

that in that world we were collaborating

35:05

and working together that we would get

35:07

a whole diverse range of people into

35:10

the organisation and value their views and

35:12

so I wasn't explicit about that but

35:14

my colleagues corrected me and said well

35:17

if you want to achieve that you better be explicit

35:19

about it so we've added inclusion which

35:21

I think is really important, it doesn't rhyme

35:24

but that's okay and we talk a lot

35:26

about that internally. We've set up

35:28

the Future Fund Academy which is only small

35:30

but we're only a few hundred people. They're

35:33

helping teach a whole lot of things

35:35

from leadership through to how to pick

35:37

a good fund manager but most importantly

35:39

on your first day in the organisation

35:41

you come to an induction

35:43

program for that day and the whole first half of

35:46

the day is on our culture, they've had a copy

35:48

of my speech and we talk

35:50

about why are we different, what do you

35:52

think that will do in terms of your

35:54

decision making no matter what role you're in

35:56

and People

35:59

are able to... Hi Busquets good idea

36:01

or that much I will not sure

36:03

about the sweet question if we think

36:05

it's gonna be valuable in when I'm

36:07

on than a that are going to

36:09

made as many people as I can

36:11

if I'm around and it just stops.

36:13

Michael feel connected organizations that also understand

36:15

that winning a fly studies class emissions

36:17

the beginning the book we did on

36:19

the fifteen years history of the sand

36:21

or felt that was really important not

36:23

just to mock an important occasion and

36:25

a crash in of a new institution

36:27

first riley of but also because really,

36:30

The audience who may was Pizza

36:32

sauce or want people to neither

36:34

joining an organization that existed and

36:36

as some runs on the board

36:38

which can be a bit scary

36:40

some paypal as well At the

36:42

insight I kind of the tines

36:44

to have a new ideas but

36:46

one day when you leave and

36:48

everyone likes eventually. The organization

36:50

will continue as well as opponents

36:52

I've on gets. To

36:55

probe a little more and some

36:57

of these principles and it sounds

36:59

intuitive to say. Investment. For

37:02

fairness is what you're driving towards.

37:04

That are some of the ways

37:06

that having that. as one

37:08

of the core emissions. So.

37:10

Kisses activities in a way

37:13

that. Hadn't been taking place

37:15

before. Some obvious ones

37:17

would be a red and risk

37:19

and lay goal functions and have

37:21

I apply the lens. Some it's

37:23

not just us doing risky things

37:25

but to know that that I

37:27

consider risky things is also draws

37:29

that A returns in the summers

37:31

were open minded and clear eyed

37:33

about that. That a more subtle

37:35

one would be how and Paypal

37:37

with culture and Inclusion function is

37:39

working with their senior investors to

37:42

build trust between Moon. T.

37:44

support they soft skills of challenging

37:47

each other without becoming defensive and

37:49

we think that to continue to

37:51

fries and succeeding this more complex

37:53

world we have to get even

37:56

better it hopefully i joined up

37:58

investing and And the key plank

38:00

is how senior investors, in fact,

38:03

all our investors engage

38:05

with each other and challenge. And

38:08

to do that, you need to have trust. You

38:10

need to have a framework so that you

38:12

understand the rules and not be personal. We're

38:15

not bad at that, but we're not great at

38:17

that because we're people. So we need to keep

38:19

working at that. And so our team is building

38:22

all sorts of supports from how

38:24

we hire, how we sponsor people,

38:26

who we promote the sort

38:29

of conversations we have about the behaviours

38:31

we reward or we penalise when

38:34

we fill senior roles. We'll often try

38:36

to do that internally, but what attributes

38:38

are we looking for? So it really

38:40

gets embedded all the way through the

38:43

organisation. And then we can apply those

38:45

same things to the other parts of

38:47

the organisation, not just the investment team.

38:49

That's probably what's coming next on our

38:51

agenda. We're really trying to

38:54

create the structure and the straps for the

38:56

organisation as a whole to support the culture

38:58

and the culture's focused on delivering investment performance.

39:01

What have been some of your biggest challenges in

39:03

your time in the CESE? Well, there's

39:06

the basic CEO problem

39:08

of every day, which is that everyone you

39:10

speak to has a view on something,

39:12

but usually they're completely different to each

39:14

other and everyone wants to give you

39:16

advice. And one thing you learn is to

39:19

not jump to conclusions or make quick

39:21

decisions on those type of things, but

39:23

to take the time to talk to a range of people

39:25

and get a range of views and understand why it is.

39:29

As I said, I became the CEO in the middle of 2020 in

39:31

a lockdown, so that was quite challenging. And

39:34

just to engage the organisation,

39:37

the purpose helped. Obviously, we work for

39:39

the Australian taxpayer. We don't just invest

39:42

the Future Fund, which helps strengthen the

39:44

Commonwealth Development Balance Agency and helps support

39:46

the economy through COVID. But we also

39:48

manage the Medical Research Future Fund that

39:50

funds a better set of medical research

39:52

in Australia and then a

39:54

whole bunch of other funds that data support,

39:56

drought and emergency relief, social

39:59

affordable housing. in the indigenous community.

40:01

So the person.

40:20

I suppose you just do what you have to do. I think

40:23

as a CEO the other big challenge

40:25

for me has been to engage the

40:29

senior leaders around the

40:31

strategy where we want to go, how we want

40:33

to get better. Getting better together

40:35

is hard because you're changing things that

40:37

you've done for a period of time

40:40

and so I have found that quite

40:42

challenging to keep the focus,

40:44

keep the alignment, keep everyone engaged

40:46

in a positive way with momentum

40:50

but it's going quite well. What

40:53

have you learned post-COVID as you're able

40:55

to travel around and meet other people

40:57

in similar senior leadership roles? Everyone

41:00

has the same sort of issues. I think

41:02

they change a little bit depending on your

41:05

stakeholders most importantly and your

41:07

governance models but mostly everyone has the same

41:09

issues and so I find that speaking

41:11

to my peers is the best way

41:13

to learn because some of their organisations

41:16

have been around a lot longer than

41:18

ours and they've confronted most of those

41:20

issues before. Fortunately or otherwise

41:22

when you're an asset owner most

41:24

people you speak to either work for you and

41:27

so it's always hard to know if they're really

41:29

telling you what they think or

41:31

want to mandate off you and so

41:33

usually they agree with you wholeheartedly. I'm

41:35

always very skeptical about that so peers are

41:38

the best way to learn. No

41:40

organisation is exactly the same but there's great

41:42

things that you can learn from others and

41:44

adopt for yourself. What are some of those

41:46

lessons that you've learned from others? So

41:49

for example as we've got bigger as

41:51

I said before we've set up the Future Fund

41:53

Academy to help train people and I was fortunate

41:55

to be able to do some research and talk

41:57

to you some of our peers. Goldman's,

42:00

GIC, has GIC school,

42:03

a lot of organisations

42:06

have well-developed learning academies that do a great job

42:08

and they've all been very generous with access and

42:10

insight about what works and what doesn't

42:12

work. What have you found does

42:15

work and doesn't from this? So

42:17

actually someone said to me when we first

42:19

started you have to decide will it sit

42:21

reporting directly to you as CEO or will

42:23

it report through the people and

42:26

culture function or through some other part

42:28

of the organisation because that's important. If

42:30

it doesn't come from the top people

42:33

won't do it or they'll see it as

42:35

a distraction or a waste of their time.

42:37

It also needs to be

42:39

demand driven from the organisation so there's

42:41

no point in imposing things

42:43

on the organisation if it doesn't value those

42:45

things. So we're trying to get that model

42:47

right. I don't have it reporting to me

42:49

because I thought it was important to integrate

42:52

with our other processes

42:54

around engaging, sponsoring, developing

42:57

people. That seems to

42:59

be going fine but I take a pretty

43:01

close interest in it including sitting on the

43:04

steering committee and having input into the syllabus.

43:06

It needs to be bottom up and we need the investment

43:09

people and the people in the other parts of

43:11

the organisation to be saying I need

43:13

help with this particular set of skills in

43:16

my team and if there's enough demand we

43:18

can try to develop some content around it.

43:20

So it's kind of astounding

43:23

that this significant pool

43:25

of capital has only been around for 15 years.

43:28

As you wrote this 15-year

43:30

letter I'd love to

43:32

hear your impressions of the perspective you

43:34

have from this period of time. So

43:37

I joined probably a bit over a year

43:39

after the Future Fund was established and I

43:41

was one of the first people into the

43:44

investment team but it had been going. It

43:47

had established its culture at

43:49

least in principle and

43:51

it had started investing even if

43:53

just in index equities. I'd

43:56

never really thought of myself as one of the

43:58

founders therefore I thought of myself as someone. who

44:00

came along pretty quickly thereafter and

44:02

was part of the team that

44:04

built out the original ideas.

44:07

I'm grateful for that because if it was

44:09

there at the time, then it

44:11

just seems like another day at the office. You have

44:13

to make 30 decisions today. One of them was what

44:16

sort of approach would we have and it just gets

44:18

lost in the midst of the decision making but I

44:20

was able to come in and say actually that's a

44:22

bit different, it's a bit special and

44:24

it's helped us be who we are and

44:27

then reinforce it as a

44:29

builder. And so I really

44:31

wanted to capture the things that

44:33

are different. I think the two

44:35

things really that have allowed us to

44:37

be successful if we have been and I'll let

44:39

others judge that. One

44:41

the governance model. So we have a

44:44

board appointed by government but the board

44:46

are all industry experts, they're not a

44:48

lay board. And I can engage in

44:50

quite a sophisticated way and they've always

44:52

been aligned and supportive but

44:54

they've always been close. And

44:57

by that I mean we have monthly

44:59

board meetings and we don't have some

45:01

quantitative reference portfolio approach

45:03

to measuring our success. We have

45:06

much more qualitative debates and discussions and

45:09

that allows us to do things that

45:11

would be considered quite risky in

45:13

other frameworks. So governance and the other one

45:15

is culture and I've already spoken quite a

45:17

lot about that but I think that culture

45:20

allows us to understand

45:22

the world and act on it. And I

45:24

think most trends understand the world at some

45:26

level. Most of the things we think about

45:28

the world are not secrets. Plenty

45:31

of people are debating the same issues.

45:34

It really boils down to are you willing to act

45:36

on that and how far are

45:38

you willing to move off the back of

45:40

that? And mostly that's not the capability of

45:42

the people, it's the governance model.

45:45

How do you feel about being

45:48

effectively responsible for pivoting the

45:50

organization to make those important

45:52

decisions when you're not as close to

45:54

the investment markets as you were? I

45:57

feel pretty good about it and that's because I'm not

45:59

trying to make investment. decisions anymore.

46:01

I think it's important to

46:07

make the decisions. My job is to

46:11

make sure that we've got a culture that's

46:13

agreed and clear, make sure that

46:15

the team's putting in place clear

46:17

investment processes and strategies and they

46:19

make sense. There's enough checks and

46:21

balances but not too many to

46:24

seize the pipes up so that we can't actually

46:26

act quickly and then make sure that the whole

46:28

rest of the organisation is supporting. And

46:31

I quite like that job actually. I've probably done

46:33

the investment job for long enough that I've got

46:35

the perspective and I don't need to make the

46:37

day-to-day decisions. I just want to make sure that

46:39

the infrastructure is there and the culture is right

46:41

and the people are right. So

46:43

as you're looking at over the next couple of years, what

46:45

are the most important initiatives you're working on? The

46:48

first one is just maintaining that flexible way

46:50

of thinking and culture because the world will

46:53

keep changing and we can't predict what will

46:55

happen. In the next five years, we might

46:57

have a hot war, we might have a

46:59

cold war, we might have a cyber war

47:01

but even if we park that, we'll certainly have

47:04

major political change in a lot of important

47:06

places in the world next year, the US election.

47:08

I think it's very hard for anyone to predict

47:10

which way that will go but it

47:13

seems quite clear that whoever wins

47:15

might make some changes to how policy is

47:17

made and where the US sits

47:20

in the world economically. We've

47:22

got new technologies emerging, AI potentially

47:25

new energy forms,

47:27

not just renewables but nuclear

47:29

fusions coming along, quantum computers

47:31

coming along. So it's very,

47:34

very hard to predict what's going to happen and

47:36

that's quite exciting for an investor because

47:38

what we need to do is make

47:40

sure we stay elastic, flexible and nimble

47:43

in our thinking and also that we

47:45

have the portfolio approach and the governance

47:47

model to allow us to act on

47:49

it. That's really the biggest challenge. To

47:52

do that in a joined-up whole

47:54

portfolio way, we need much

47:57

better tech data about what's in

47:59

the portfolio. And so we've spent more

48:02

than a half a dozen years now building a

48:04

system that can look into the

48:06

portfolio, look through the private funds

48:09

to understand the underlying assets

48:12

that we can ascribe our own

48:14

information onto any assets that we own

48:17

in terms of what currency it is,

48:19

what duration it is, how risky it

48:21

is and that we can aggregate that

48:23

and poll the portfolio in real time

48:26

so we know exactly what we own

48:28

and then we can do all

48:31

sorts of interesting things with that

48:33

in terms of analytics, scenario, testing,

48:35

looking forward and also analyzing the

48:37

performance of individual positions or managers.

48:39

So we've got all that now

48:41

which is amazing. Now we can

48:43

test what to do with it. We have all

48:45

our data, we're sure that it's clean. So

48:48

something like AI coming along, we've got

48:50

a little team working on what

48:52

could we use this for, how could it help

48:54

us and there's lots of

48:57

exciting other things that are emerging and so

48:59

we need to keep enough bandwidth to make

49:01

sure we continue to get better on what we know

49:03

every day as well. I'd love

49:05

to ask throughout your career as you encounter

49:07

money managers, peers, you always learn lots of

49:09

lessons along the way. I don't know if

49:11

you could pick out a few people that

49:14

you've learned some key lessons from. I

49:16

think the best investors are

49:19

open-minded. There's a lot of people and I

49:21

find this right across the

49:23

universe, public and private markets that have done

49:25

something in a particular way. It's worked in

49:27

the past. They assume they just have to

49:30

keep making that sausage and

49:32

the future will look like the

49:34

past. I think that's fraud. I

49:37

think the people you can learn or the people

49:39

who are open-minded who try to understand the changes

49:41

in the world. If you're a money manager, try

49:43

to understand what your clients want

49:45

or need or what problem are they trying

49:47

to try to

49:49

invent new ways of solving that that fit

49:51

the world. I won't name them because

49:53

I think that's not appropriate but there's quite a few

49:55

people like that I enjoy talking to. I have

49:58

A couple of closing questions for you. The that

50:00

are different from the ones from five

50:02

years ago. What is one sacked the

50:04

most? People don't know about you. On.

50:07

Clock fanatical about Disney same park

50:09

sexual offences and I enjoy going

50:11

sometimes on mine. At. Times you

50:13

pick things up that to influence house in Tibet

50:15

work as well. What? Are some of those

50:18

the effect of. I. Think they go right

50:20

at. In. Viewing culture through the organization

50:22

and so started to investigate be some actually

50:24

have the Finkel the Season University in my

50:27

day this culture induction on the surface die

50:29

and off and fortunate enough to meet with

50:31

them and shamelessly cops quite a bit of

50:33

what I don't. Which. To

50:35

people have had the biggest impact on your

50:38

professional less. Everyone has sponsors

50:40

and sometimes you don't know. That.

50:42

You do that in my Korea have

50:44

been fortunate enough a few times when

50:47

I was an engineer originally and then

50:49

I went back to dame year and

50:51

a person called much it's Petrie ten

50:53

renner unlisted infrastructure be take in Australia

50:55

begged me to come in and moon

50:58

had to invest really taught me how

51:00

to invest It worked out okay but

51:02

it was unclear it was going to

51:04

they he really had facing me and

51:06

then when attempt to the feet financing

51:09

david know was the site and money

51:11

because say I have. Me, the opportunity

51:13

to become the Chase investment Officer not wasn't

51:15

something out done before and he really backed

51:17

me to step into that role. Or sixty

51:19

nine people like that in your career. Her.

51:22

A or more What was the best

51:24

advice you've ever received? A

51:26

my very first study of works as

51:28

an engineer in Australia in the early

51:30

nineties. they was appointed big recession and

51:32

old Walked into my job and thirty

51:34

people got migrant on and on. Muscle

51:36

that die and someone said to me

51:38

don't take a job for granted, just

51:40

put your head down and work hard

51:42

and have never forgotten that. Arrest!

51:45

Thanks so much for sharing your perspective on

51:47

this important inflection point in the markets in

51:49

the world. Sextus. thanks

51:53

for listening to the south to learn

51:55

more up on our website at capital

51:57

outfitters.com for you can join our mailing

51:59

list Access past shows, learn

52:01

about our gatherings, and sign up

52:04

for premium content, including

52:06

podcast transcripts, my investment portfolio,

52:08

and a lot more. Have

52:11

a good one, and see you next time.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features