Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
This is Charleston's Morning News with Kelley and plays Now the top three things you
0:06
should know. The Supreme Court is considering whether Donald Trump is immune from criminal
0:11
prosecution for acts he took in office. The case before them yesterday center around
0:15
Trump's federal election interference charges. Trump's attorney argued prosecuting a president for official acts
0:21
is incompatible with the Constitution. The Special Council attorney argued that the Constitution does
0:27
not grant a president absolute immunity. The High Court is expected to rule in
0:32
June, and a favorable ruling for Trump would end the election interference case and
0:37
unravel other criminal cases against him. Buying a new home is now more expensive
0:43
than ever. A new report from Redfinn found that the median home price in
0:47
the United States is now over three hundred and eighty three thousand dollars. That's
0:50
a record high. The economic research lead with Redfinn says prices may drop slightly
0:57
in the coming months, but buyers should accept that housing costs are likely to
1:00
remain elevated for the foreseeable future. The median down payment is also up twenty
1:04
four percent compared to just last year. It's now around fifty six thousand dollars.
1:11
A New Jersey company that produces burger making vending machines has landed a one
1:15
and a half million dollar deal thanks to Shark Tank. The three co founders
1:21
of Roboburger went on the reality show recently and demonstrated a vending machine that creates
1:26
customized burgers within minutes. The panel members were skeptical of its business model,
1:30
but in the end, two investor judges put up one point five million dollars
1:36
for a nine percent stake in the company. Why do you think that they
1:41
chose to invest that money? Why do you think because of the rising minimum
1:47
wage like in California forcing this down business's throats. It's killing jobs and making
1:55
the move to automation go exponentially faster. Hmm. I would agree with all
1:59
of that talk about killing jobs. We have a new Joe the Plumber.
2:01
We'll play him for you here coming up. Trump ahead of his trial yesterday
2:06
that you let off there with had to squeeze in politickings somewhere and he did
2:09
it with some hard hats a plumbers union that has nine thousand strong and the
2:16
head of it I think made international news and I think he's going to make
2:20
a name for himself. I'm dubbing a Bob the Builder. We'll see where
2:22
it goes. But Joe the Plumber back in two thousand and eight with Obama
2:25
and McCain, you know, rose to all kinds of fame on the campaign
2:30
trail that that year. You know, when it came to saying Obama's taxes
2:36
are going to cut you know, they're going to hurt small businesses and cut
2:38
jobs. Well it goes back to Clinton and it's the economy stupid. Yeah,
2:43
And I still think you got a name them Bob the Steamfitter. It
2:46
doesn't fit like Bob the Builder. That's what he's a build a steamfitter.
2:51
Well, steamfitters build, So I think it works. But here's the thing
2:54
about this trial blaze we were talking about with Rory O'Neil in the six o'clock
2:59
hour. I mean, oh, it was fascinating by the way to lean
3:01
in. I don't know a lot of people you can't lean in, and
3:05
that's why we're here. But I mean the Supreme Court when it comes to
3:08
upholding this whole presidential immunity thing, I mean, we can't not touch on
3:13
the fact that Jack Smith seems deranged all of this seems like a witch hunt
3:17
and unconstitutional. It's why it's been pushed all the way to the Supreme Court
3:21
of the United States against you know, former President Trump. Here, will
3:25
they you know, put an uphold presidential immunity and put it into it.
3:29
We're not going to know till win June. I'm going to be waiting on pins and needles. Well, you know, Jack Smith was exposed when the
3:36
judge in that case, you know, unredacted the documents and you could see
3:42
where they were trying to hide evidence and then stop the defense from defending right.
3:46
I mean it was over the top and many would call it, you
3:51
know, prosect prosecutorial misconduct. Yeah, political lawfair. We're seeing in multiple
3:57
cases here against the former president trying to run again for you know election come
4:01
November. So it really boiled down to official act versus personal act. Right,
4:06
And that was really our conversation with Rory. If you missed it a
4:10
post show podcast. Wherever you get podcasts, check out our app I Heard
4:13
Radio apps free to download and you can binge some of this this weekend and just catch up. But defining the scope also of immunity. What struck me
4:23
was the line of questioning with Amy Coney Barrett that I caught yesterday. I
4:27
didn't catch all of it. Was three hours of it, I didn't,
4:30
you know, but this one what you know, the idea we don't realize
4:32
how many positions within our government, like the Supreme Court justices are actually afforded
4:38
immunity and absolute immunity. And why this was put into our Constitution of the
4:44
United States. I mean, I think that it's important we all understand.
4:46
Two hundred and thirty four years ago, this is what our founding fathers were.
4:51
The framers of our constitution wisely understood and created this for a reason.
4:57
It was to prevent endless, destructive cycles of recrimination for the president, potentially
5:02
even Supreme Court justices. So this recrimination, I recognize that's a big word,
5:10
but if the president, let's just leave it with the president and take
5:14
the supremes out of it. For example, it didn't have immunity. Think
5:17
of all of the political opponents that could prosecute the president once he leaves office.
5:23
Oh wait, it's happening. I mean, this kind of power,
5:28
this is what our family fathers tried to prevent. It could distort the president's
5:31
most important decisions. It just is wrought to invite corruption. If this case
5:38
is ruled and he isn't isn't a I don't know, this is all.
5:42
They brought up some interesting points like murder okay, so you know, and
5:46
they were walking through these scenarios. So you know what, what if a
5:51
president murdered his political opponent. A lot of people would say, well,
5:56
that's what and I think the defense even said, well, that's what impeachment
5:59
is for. You know, the president can be impeached. But they're like,
6:01
yes, but once he's out of office. What if it comes to
6:05
light towards the end of his term in office and all of a sudden,
6:09
he's out of office and you found out he murdered his political opponent to gain
6:13
that office in the first place. Can you prosecute him or is he immune
6:16
from that? So there's some interesting, deep questions that go along with this.
6:23
That's what I'm saying. I mean, it was so fascinating yesterday and
6:25
also scary because I think about the idea if they took away immunity, and
6:31
I mean the layers we could get into here. It looks like they're leaning
6:35
towards like a limited type immunity. Hmmm, that concerns me. I mean
6:41
the details on that I want more of. And they might even kick it
6:43
back down to a lower court. Well, the lower courts weren't willing to
6:46
have the gumption to stand up to this. This is why it went all
6:49
the way to the Supreme So I don't even know if they can kick it
6:53
back down. Yeah they can, and it can be the first time they've
6:56
done something like that. But I just think of all the correct that this
7:00
could blackmail, extortion, lawlessness, I don't know, traffic and weather every
7:09
ten minutes. This is Charleston's Morning News with Kelly and Blaze on ninety four
7:14
to three WSC Like it, love it, loathe it. Pot is legal
7:20
in many states, not here in South Carolina yet or maybe ever. Frankly,
7:25
I mean, this is something that's been debated and we'll continue to be
7:29
debated here in the Palmetto State. But in the meantime, you have places
7:32
and choices you can go to get your gonge on and air. In reality,
7:35
I got to say, you don't strike me as someone who leaned into
7:39
a wake and bake this morning. No, what, Kelly, You're right,
7:43
I actually I have morally, I have no issue with it, but
7:46
I get wildly paranoid. I have no interest in smoking weed myself, and
7:50
the industry and the economics around it very fascinating and we now know. According
7:56
to lawn Starter, they ranked the twenty twenty four best cities to get stoned,
8:01
and what they found is that Los Angeles, not surprisingly number one,
8:03
followed by San fran Vegas, Denver, and New York. They came in
8:07
top five. But they were really comprehensive. They looked at three hundred of
8:11
the biggest cities where recreational marijuana is legal. They looked at access, consumer
8:16
satisfaction, muntie relief, They looked at a lot of different metrics. So
8:20
this wasn't like just some willy nilly what do you like the most? And
8:24
the reason this is actually truly an economic story is because the impact from regulated
8:30
marijuana sales on the US economy. It's going to top one hundred twelve billion
8:33
this year. It's a twelve percent increase from last year if things stay exactly
8:37
as they are, so this is a conservative estimate. This is like if
8:41
it doesn't become legal on a federal level and if no more states allow it,
8:46
they're likely to see the industry grow by two hundred billion by twenty thirty.
8:50
That's a lot of money, and it's a lot of money that questions
8:52
have to ask that states have to ask themselves, do we want to leave
8:56
that money on the table or do we just regulate it and tax it.
9:00
Well, the federal government has to ask themselves that too, right, because
9:03
it's a boon to the state's economies that have illegalized it, but it's still
9:09
illegal on a federal level, so there's no federal tax collected on it.
9:13
And it's so true. I know what, I would love to know your guys opinion on this, because I feel like this week I've been on the
9:16
Vice speed, I've talked about legal gambling. Now I'm talking about marijuana.
9:20
And it seems like on some level, depending on how you look at it,
9:24
but the federal government has kind of taken this libertarian stance where they're like,
9:28
we'll leave it up to the states, give it to the states,
9:31
like we're not going to touch this one. And I don't know is that
9:33
a good thing, smaller government, less less intrusion, or if it's an
9:37
indicative of like the decay of society. I think you could argue either one,
9:43
and it's unclear what the answer is today. I think you could you
9:46
bargain, are you either one? Absolutely because she's right, You're right.
9:50
I mean, you know, do we want, you know, more government
9:54
overreach so that they can cram down you know, a bunch of bloated,
9:56
bureaucratic you know, nightmare nonsense or well, I mean not only that it
10:01
should be left up to the states. And then if you think it depends
10:05
on which side of the you know, that coin you fall on, whether
10:09
you think it is the degradation of society or whether you think it's a libertarian
10:13
issue, and you should be able to do whatever you want. You should
10:16
be able to vote on that locally, I think, and you know in
10:20
each state might think differently. And then go ahead, Well, I was
10:24
just going to ask in the statistics in what you're referencing here, we have
10:28
to look at the flip side of this, because yeah, it brings in
10:31
money, but it also costs money. I mean, every time we talk about this on the air, there's law enforcement issues sadly that are created and
10:39
other issues when it comes to legalizing marijuana. For sure, you're absolutely right,
10:43
and then also there are a certain there's a certain percentage of the population
10:46
that will become addicted that we know for sure, whether it's gambling or alcohol
10:52
or marijuana. So the question becomes, do you work on prevention, mitigation,
10:56
and then assistance for those who will absolutely become addicted? And we know
11:01
from gambling the statistics there that the more legal it is, the more people
11:05
become addicted. It's not like seventy five percent, it's actually less than half,
11:11
but it's still people who otherwise wouldn't have had exposure to it that are
11:13
becoming addicted. So the question becomes, do we outlaw it for everyone and
11:18
just take that off the table. Well, it still exists, It just exists now in a more dangerous way, and the government gets none of the
11:24
tax but the financial benefit via tax or do you just let, like you
11:28
said, the states make their own decision. It seems like we're leaning in
11:33
that general direction. And then if you just like look at humanity, we
11:35
know that a human since the advent of like any sort of recorded history,
11:41
have been altering their consciousness, whether it be through it's alcohol or something like.
11:45
It's just something that we tend to do. Doing it too much is
11:48
categorically bad and it doesn't help society. So it is a moral question,
11:54
it's a legal question, and it's a question that regulators and policymakers have to
11:58
ask themselves when deciding whether or not they want to forward with it. Yeah,
12:01
and I kind of think of it, and it might be cold hearted
12:03
or immoral, but I look at it like, do we want to live
12:07
in a society based on the weakest links. So, in other words,
12:13
I can't get a drink because some people have a problem controlling themselves, and
12:16
that goes for gambling and pot and everything else too. This is Charleston's Morning
12:20
News with Kelly and Blaze. Kelly and Blaze. When it comes to the
12:24
legalization of marijuana, I kind of had two opinions. One, I'm not
12:28
all for everybody smoking it, but if little Timmy's going to smoke it,
12:33
I'd rather him go somewhere where a safe to get it, then to go
12:37
with some under the table, who knows what might happen. Also, why
12:41
don't they make it up to the States, but then make them tax it?
12:43
Use that for the international debt? Ooh, the international debt? So
12:48
talk back feature on the iHeart app there free to download today. The iHeart
12:52
app is awesome, especially with the weekend coming up. I mentioned our Posho
12:56
podcast. You can binge all kinds of stuff, including music and playlist if
13:00
you don't want to, you know, listen to any more politics. I
13:03
certainly you know, understand it. But the conversation was at seven fifty with
13:07
Aaron Real, you know, and I'd said, like it, love it,
13:11
loath it. Pot's legal in many states, and she ran down,
13:13
you know, all the you know, cash benefits of it in certain states
13:18
and where. It was an interesting conversation, but it always found Los Angeles
13:22
who was the best place, yeah it to get hug Yeah, it always
13:26
leads into you know, a very I mentioned it a very divisive debate debate
13:31
here of especially in conservative talk radio. And I know that there are people
13:35
who are listening who are not conservative, who are not Republican, you know,
13:39
maybe they're independent or extremely left leaning. I don't know, but the
13:43
debate usually is fifty to fifty or sixty forty on legalizing it because it's not
13:46
here in South Carolina, and that's among the conservatives. Yeah. Well,
13:50
and I like Paul the uber driver go ahead, see ate way. So
13:56
it shouldn't be It shouldn't be on the streets. You shouldn't be allowed.
13:58
That's it. It should I don't know, you know, I mean I
14:03
think of it this way. If it's something that can grow in you, you can grow in your backyard and they can throw you in jail forever for
14:09
it. I don't. That doesn't sit right with me. Well, also,
14:13
Aaron mentioned being addicted to marijuana. I didn't realize marijuana was as addictive
14:18
as you know that pot's been proven to be as addictive as legalized opioids,
14:22
for example, legalized opioids. I don't know. I have to do more
14:26
research on that. But always always an interesting conversation. Well, you know,
14:31
as I said at that time, I don't. I'm not comfortable either
14:35
with lowering to the lowest common denominator the behavior of society. So if I
14:43
want to have a drink, I don't want to be prevented from having a
14:46
drink because there's some people that turn into alcoholics. Right one apple spoiling the
14:52
barrel. And you know, if I want to bet on a football game
14:56
or a hockey game, or a car race or whatever, then I don't
15:01
want to be stopped because people have a gambling problem, so I don't you
15:05
know, you know that's not legalized in South Carolina. Came up, that conversation came up yesterday, even though we have the lottery, which feels hypocritical,
15:11
but in South Carolina online that apparently not really not a big gambler,
15:18
but any But the point is is, you know, if you lean libertarian
15:24
and you believe in individual freedoms, and I get it, you have to
15:30
balance it with society. We do that every day. But where is that
15:33
balance? So I guess that's the question. Well, I want to get
15:37
into Bob Bartell's before we hit you mentioned football. The NFL Draft is a
15:41
biggie. It's in full swing and we'll hit your Carolina sports report here in
15:46
sixty seconds. But there's a new Joe the Plumber. Do y'all remember Joe
15:50
the Plumber. Joe the Plumber was the guy back in I think two thousand
15:52
and eight when Obama was running against the McCain Palin ticket, and he became
15:58
the metaphor for middle class America. Well there's a new one and he emerged
16:02
yesterday. I'm calling him Bob the Builder. You're trying to reign on my
16:04
parade because because he's not a builder, he's Steve Fitter. It's fine,
16:10
they're still buildings. So steam Fitter Local six thirty eight in New York City
16:14
busts out alive on Fox yesterday. But this guy is the COEO chief operating
16:19
officer there. They have nine thousand people in their union and he's live on
16:25
Fox and he's like, I'm a lifelong Democrat. At three to one, our union is voting for Trump. And the guy's like, wait, wait,
16:30
wait, don't you feel like there's gonna be some pressure there? Well,
16:34
yeah, I'm probably going to get a lot of phone calls after this
16:37
interview. But like I've told other people, I don't work for my international
16:42
union. I work for my members. I represent my members, and I
16:47
wish every politician that was elected to any office would remember they work for their
16:52
constituents that vote for them. They don't work for themselves. So I can't
16:57
wait to see if, like more people will be motivated by Bob the Builder
17:00
or Steamfitter whichever. I think he's just going to become, you know,
17:06
something that people are going to talk about more than just you, And I
17:08
think, yeah, I mean, I don't know if it's actually if they
17:11
motivate people. But I hope this might be going to the grocery store motivates
17:15
people, going to the gas pump motivates people. I mean specifically other unions
17:21
like scrant and Joe up here trying to, you know, claim that he's the you know, boss hog of all the unions are all pro Democrat in
17:26
him, and that's not the case. That's not true, and this guy
17:30
laid it out. I'll share the whole interview, you know, on our
17:33
website ninety four to three WUS dot com on the blog. But JT made
17:37
a good point. My cousin works in western Pennsylvania, him and his wives,
17:41
and they do cranes and building. I don't know what their unions call,
17:45
but we were actually having a very similar conversation a few weeks ago,
17:48
and he said that their entire union is pretty much the exact said that everybody
17:52
in their union was really hush hush about it, but they'd all kind of
17:56
decided to vote for Trump. But that's a whole other union in Pittsburgh,
18:00
crane workers, heavy machine operators. He says, they're like all in for
18:04
Trump. We could see New York go for Trump. Can you imagine,
18:08
Blaze, that would be amaze, that would go back. So, I
18:14
mean, i'd like to see it, but yeah, that's a swing state.
18:18
So to JT's point, well, you just said new York, Well
18:21
it's western Pennsylvania. He said, yeah, what you were saying both things.
18:26
But the point is is that you just said that you know, New York could go to Trump And I said, that's a pretty tall order.
18:30
I would like to think so. And I'm somewhat skeptical that happening. I'm
18:34
going to be hopeful over here. I'm going to sit in the hopeful lane.
18:38
Check out our website ninety three WSC dot com. Now back to Charleston's
18:45
Morning News with Kelly and Blaze. Today's Confederate Heroes Day, also called Confederate
18:52
Memorial Day or Confederate Decoration Day. It's a state holiday celebrated in several southern
18:57
US states to commit Marit approximately two hundred and sixty thousand Confederate soldiers who lost
19:03
their lives in the American Civil War. It was first celebrated one hundred and
19:07
fifty six years ago in eighteen sixty six. The date was chosen to honor
19:12
the day General Johnston of the Confederacy sur under to Major General Sherman of the
19:18
Union back in eighteen sixty five, marking the end of the Civil War.
19:22
Here in South Carolina, we celebrate Confederate Heroes Day or Confederate Memorial Day on
19:30
May tenth. Interesting, I don't understand why, because they commemorate it for
19:34
different events, so the different states chose different dates. Interesting. Well,
19:41
we have museum at Market Hall down at at the Market in downtown Charleston,
19:48
and I would suggest you go visit that today or this weekend. It's going
19:51
to be a beautiful weekend. Learn more about history, our history. We
19:56
all need to be learning more about our history. I mean, look how it's repeating itself on the ca purposes of Columbia University, for example, the
20:02
insanity. Well, I hope it doesn't repeat itself too much. Thanks for
20:07
listening to the Charleston Morning News podcast. Catch Kelly and Blaze weekday mornings from
20:12
six to nine.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More