Podchaser Logo
Home
News Brief: Media Adopts Israel's Simplistic 'Hunt for Hamas' Narrative, Providing Cover For Ethnic Cleansing

News Brief: Media Adopts Israel's Simplistic 'Hunt for Hamas' Narrative, Providing Cover For Ethnic Cleansing

Released Tuesday, 21st November 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
News Brief: Media Adopts Israel's Simplistic 'Hunt for Hamas' Narrative, Providing Cover For Ethnic Cleansing

News Brief: Media Adopts Israel's Simplistic 'Hunt for Hamas' Narrative, Providing Cover For Ethnic Cleansing

News Brief: Media Adopts Israel's Simplistic 'Hunt for Hamas' Narrative, Providing Cover For Ethnic Cleansing

News Brief: Media Adopts Israel's Simplistic 'Hunt for Hamas' Narrative, Providing Cover For Ethnic Cleansing

Tuesday, 21st November 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:04

Welcome to a Citations Needed News

0:06

Brief. I am Nima Shirazi. I'm Adam

0:08

Johnson. You can follow Citations Needed

0:10

on Twitter at CitationsPod, Facebook Citations

0:13

Needed, and if you are so inclined, you can become

0:15

a supporter of the show through Patreon.com

0:17

slash Citations Needed Podcast.

0:20

We are 100% Lister funded,

0:22

so your support is incredibly appreciated.

0:25

We do these news briefs in between

0:27

our regularly scheduled full-length

0:29

episodes. And on this news brief, Adam,

0:31

we wanted to do an update

0:34

on Gaza. I know we've been talking about Gaza

0:36

a bunch, but, you know, when there's ongoing

0:38

ethnic cleansing, maybe that makes sense. And

0:40

especially when we are seeing in the media,

0:43

and this is a media criticism show, there's

0:45

a lot of focus still,

0:48

even after the invasion of the Al-Shifa

0:50

Hospital in Gaza. Adam,

0:52

we've seen now this moving of the

0:55

goalposts in terms of Israel's

0:57

ongoing hunt for Hamas.

1:00

Yeah, so there's something very strange going on here, which

1:02

is, this is kind of maybe more of a macro

1:05

lens here. But on October 13th, the

1:07

Israeli military issued an evacuation

1:10

order for all of northern Gaza, specifically Gaza

1:12

City, and 23 major

1:14

hospitals were told to evacuate. They've been called every

1:16

day since this evacuation order to evacuate.

1:19

And the reason why they're trying to evacuate northern Gaza,

1:21

they say it's because of humanitarian reasons, but the reason is

1:23

that, very clearly, as their president implied

1:26

on October 9th, they're going

1:28

to probably annex northern Gaza

1:31

and turn it into a quote unquote buffer zone. They may

1:33

settle it at some later date, but as The Economist notes,

1:35

northern Gaza is not inhabitable. It won't be inhabitable

1:38

for at least six months, probably several years,

1:41

because of all the dust and rubble. And there's

1:43

no infrastructure, there's no homes there. They've destroyed 260,000 homes. And

1:47

the 1.5, 1.7 million residents,

1:50

the vast, vast majority of whom have now gone south, because that's what they're

1:52

told. Now we'll get to how the,

1:54

apparently the main bad guys are in the

1:56

south now conveniently, but we'll set that aside for now.

2:00

This is sort of clearly their plan. It's their plan because

2:02

everything they're doing has been pursuant to the goal

2:04

of basically ethnically cleansing

2:06

North Gaza. And since they've been carrying

2:08

out the plan that they said

2:11

they were going to do, still we

2:14

see this kind of very credulous

2:16

taking at face value idea

2:19

in the media, which is like, oh, Israel

2:22

is still looking for like Hamas

2:24

headquarters. Yeah. And it's

2:26

strange because the major example

2:28

of course is Al-Shifa hospital. So

2:31

they rated the hospital on November 14th, 15th,

2:33

depending what hemisphere you're in. And this

2:35

was framed in the lead up to the rate of the hospital

2:37

as effectively a US intelligence

2:39

Tony Blinken. They all said it was a command and control

2:42

center. Now as of the time we're recording this on

2:44

Sunday, November 19th, the New York times

2:46

wrote quote, but proof of an extensive

2:49

Hamas command center under the hospital is yet to be

2:51

revealed unquote. So they found, I think a tunnel.

2:54

They found some guns supposedly, although

2:56

CNN claims they rearranged the guns. Yeah. Then

2:59

they like planted more guns because it's the

3:01

Israeli military and that's what they do. Yeah.

3:04

Or they, maybe they didn't. I don't, but they probably may have because

3:06

CNN says they clearly moved guns when they were doing

3:08

different videos. But let's say for the sake of argument,

3:11

they had some guns at the hospital. I don't know.

3:13

And they also released videotape

3:16

of armed gunmen, presumably

3:18

Hamas bringing in hostages to

3:20

the hospital on October 7th. Most

3:23

of whom are clearly injured to

3:25

receive medical treatment. And this

3:27

is seen as evidence that this is a Hamas command and control

3:29

center. This evidence is not satisfactory to the New

3:31

York times. It is not satisfactory to

3:34

us as of yet to justify calling

3:36

it a command and control center. Now most people on

3:38

the left and most people in human rights world would say it doesn't matter if

3:40

it was a command and control center. You still don't get the bomb and shell and

3:43

use sniper drones on a hospital. But I do think

3:45

it sort of matters, right? It sort of matters if they're lying about

3:47

that. It matters if this kind of hunt for

3:49

Hamas narrative is being propped up by

3:51

our media because in the days leading up to the raids, we had

3:53

headlines like this in the Washington Post, quote,

3:56

Israel's hunt for Hamas puts Gaza's

3:58

Al-Shifa hospital under siege. Israel's

4:01

military has sounded a steady drumbeat of accusations

4:03

that Gaza's largest hospital sits atop a

4:05

headquarters for Hamas. And

4:08

then the New York Times had

4:10

one that was even sort of more zero-dark-30-ish

4:12

when it said, quote, Gaza city hospitals are

4:15

caught in deadly crossfire. Battling

4:18

Hamas fighters, Israel forces are closing in

4:20

on hospitals where thousands of people are stranded.

4:23

And so there's this idea that there was a battle

4:25

like in the hospital, but there wasn't. Israel just

4:27

walked into the hospital. There

4:29

were some, I think, light skirmishes outside the

4:31

hospital because fighters attacked Israeli

4:34

soldiers wherever they are. But there was

4:36

no evidence of any shooting coming from the hospital. There

4:38

was no evidence of any gunfire when

4:41

they went into the hospital. And so there's sort of

4:43

this general impression. And of course, again,

4:45

as of this recording, there's no IDF casualties.

4:48

Clearly, if there was some kind of, you know, if this

4:50

was a military base, one would think that that would have

4:52

happened. So then they kind of waltzed into the hospital.

4:55

There's no evidence of any Hamas fighters or

4:57

any militants at all. They claimed that they actually had escaped

5:00

weeks prior. But there's still no, like,

5:02

evil lair that's been discovered. No,

5:04

there's no evil there's no evil lair at all. And

5:06

the threshold for what they show, they showed multilayer,

5:09

three-level. I mean, it really looked like a Bond villain

5:11

lair. We have conference rooms, you

5:13

know, all this lighting. These are like

5:15

the 3D computer models that were passed

5:18

around by Israeli intelligence and propaganda

5:20

outfits being like, this is what we expect

5:22

to find. And their big smoking gun

5:25

is like, oh, there was some hostages were brought into the

5:27

hospital. But of course, it's not clear to me

5:29

what they want them to do. Do they want them not to treat

5:31

the I mean, it's not really clear. I

5:34

mean, had they refused, that would have, I suppose, been worse.

5:37

They treated the hostages because that's what doctors do.

5:40

And it's not clear who they would even report that to since Hamas

5:42

is the governing body. Guess they're

5:44

supposed to report Hamas to Hamas. It's not clear. But

5:46

this was sort of seen as evidence of a command and control center.

5:49

Now, this is not evidence again, according

5:51

to the New York Times, this is not sufficient evidence for a command and

5:53

control center. And again, they're excavating

5:56

around the hospital. Who knows what they'll find

5:58

again, if it was, it doesn't appear to be at the. very least,

6:01

an active command and control center. And according

6:03

to the Economist magazine, who wrote

6:05

on November 18, quote, even

6:08

Israeli intelligence officials do not believe that Hamas

6:10

currently has its main headquarters to the extent that

6:12

such a thing exists below the hospital that being

6:14

al-Shiva. These they say have probably

6:17

moved to Khan, you know, and

6:19

so Israeli intelligence says it's not a headquarters,

6:21

according to the economists or at least to the extent to which it

6:23

has, quote unquote, Hamas presence. It's not what they claimed

6:26

it was. It's not a command and control center. It's not a headquarters.

6:29

The State Department, Tony Blinken has now kind

6:31

of walked it back. They went from saying it was

6:33

a command and control center. Now their new phrasing is it's

6:35

a command and controlled node, I

6:37

guess. So if it's like, and there are strict definitions,

6:40

according to international law, about what constitutes a

6:42

militarized hospital, having some

6:44

weapons there or treating

6:47

wounded prisoners or hostages is not nearly

6:49

sufficient enough to justify it being a military

6:52

target. And so groups will look into this in the

6:54

coming weeks. Amnesty International, I know, is

6:56

currently investigating it. The New York Times, Washington

6:59

Post, both of whom seem quite skeptical that this is a command

7:01

and control center, are investigating

7:03

it, again, to the extent to which Israel

7:05

believes it, they've now sort of shift the goalpost and

7:08

now say that the main bad guy

7:10

center is actually in South Gaza, which brings

7:12

us to the bigger issue of

7:14

what are they going to do next? Well,

7:16

right. So as soon as it was clear that

7:18

the Israeli line about

7:21

al-Shifa hospital was bullshit and

7:24

intended just to further terrorize

7:26

Palestinians and further clear

7:29

out as much of northern Gaza as possible,

7:31

you got former Israeli Prime Minister

7:34

Ehud Olmert saying in an interview

7:36

with Euronews on Friday, November

7:39

17th, all of a sudden he kind of comes

7:41

out and he's like, oh yeah, you know, quote, Khan

7:43

Yunus, which is in the southern part

7:45

of Gaza Strip, is the real headquarters

7:48

of Hamas. There they have the leadership,

7:51

they are hiding, they have bunkers, they have the command

7:53

positions, they have the launching pads,

7:56

end quote. So

7:57

instantly you

7:59

get the this shifting of the goalposts

8:01

that we've been talking about, Adam, which gets

8:04

us to, as you said, the purpose

8:06

for actually labeling

8:08

hospitals as centers of

8:12

command and control or centers of Hamas

8:14

threat because in

8:17

Israel's attempt to actually ethnically

8:20

cleanse

8:21

Gaza,

8:22

certainly northern Gaza at this point,

8:24

moving on to southern Gaza soon, some

8:27

of the last holdouts for people

8:29

who can't actually evacuate

8:32

are going to be hospitals. So there needs to

8:34

be a pretense and a pretext

8:36

for going into hospitals and

8:39

forcibly removing people

8:42

from them, sending them south and then

8:44

saying, oh no, we actually need to keep attacking

8:47

Gaza and we need to keep attacking

8:49

more and more southerly positions.

8:52

And then you get to Khan Yunus

8:54

and then eventually it's going to be, oh no, they're in Rafa.

8:57

Oh no, they're in Suez. I know they're in fucking

8:59

Cairo and then you eventually get to Johannesburg.

9:02

Well, now they're the BBC, the Red Cross

9:04

and the ICC. They're all Hamas now, but there

9:07

is a logic to it.

9:09

When one accepts the sort of human shields,

9:11

the perpetual human shields logic that justifies

9:13

killing 12,000 people,

9:16

upwards of 6,000 children if you include those who

9:18

are in rubble and almost certainly dead, there's

9:21

a logic to that morally that

9:23

begins to emerge. I think it's heavily animated by

9:25

racism. It's also heavily animated

9:27

by political necessity, which

9:30

is that if you take the human shields logic to

9:32

its end point,

9:33

then by definition,

9:36

all the Hamas guys' headquarters would be in hospitals

9:39

because if the vulnerability

9:41

and innocence and the preservation of life is

9:44

necessarily like sort of insects

9:46

going to some piece of rotten

9:49

meat, that's how they view

9:51

it, that they would go to the most vulnerable places. So

9:54

I think to some extent they begin to believe they're on bullshit.

9:56

Now, I think a lot of them are just kind of cynical and lying. They're kind

9:58

of improvising as they go.

9:59

But I think a lot of people genuinely internalize

10:02

the human shield's rationale because in a way when

10:04

you kill thousands of children in less than 40

10:06

days,

10:08

you kind of have to believe that, right? Because

10:11

then they say this in their statements. Whenever

10:13

Israeli officials are on CNN or on NPR or

10:15

PBS and they say, well, what about all the children you're killing? They

10:17

say, well, that's Hamas human shield. Hamas human shield. You have

10:19

to, that's how you rationalize it because how

10:21

else would you sleep at night? And so the

10:24

human shield's moral ecology

10:27

becomes its own

10:29

logic. And so therefore hospitals

10:32

and vulnerable places,

10:33

schools, et cetera, have to be the place where Hamas

10:36

keeps their headquarters. Now

10:39

Hamas has a lot of tunnels under Gaza. Clearly

10:41

that's how they operate as an insurgency force.

10:44

So they probably incidentally have tunnels

10:46

near schools and hospitals. But Amnesty International

10:48

looked into the issue of human shields both

10:50

in 2009 to 2014 and found no

10:53

evidence that they meet the legal definition

10:55

of human shield because the legal definition of human shield is

10:57

compelling a civilian to stay in

10:59

some place under threat so they can deter

11:01

an attack from someone who has air

11:04

superiority, which obviously Israel does. And

11:06

so they found that they did not meet that criteria because simply being

11:09

a guerrilla or urban insurgency

11:11

force, whatever you want to call it, does

11:14

not make you a human shield machine.

11:16

That's not sort of not how it works. Otherwise you

11:18

could just bomb whenever you want to bomb

11:20

because at any point you're going to be within 500 yards

11:22

of some tunnel or some machine gun,

11:24

which is exactly what Israel does

11:27

because that's their logic. And it's a logic that human rights

11:29

groups categorically since, again, since

11:31

Castled, since Protective Edge 24, they've

11:34

categorically denied that as a legal or moral framework because

11:37

it effectively militarizes an entire population.

11:40

And so that I think informs why

11:42

they, on some level, they may believe that all these hospitals

11:45

have these James Bond bunkers underneath

11:47

them because that sort

11:49

of follows from the logic of human shields, moral

11:51

ecology. So then they raid the place. There's

11:53

nobody there and they say, oh, they're here, but they filled it with

11:55

cement. It's like, well, okay, maybe, I don't know. But

11:58

typically, you know, historically.

11:59

military head,

12:00

because again, they're not saying some tunnels or some guns, right?

12:03

Had they said we're going to raid shell and use

12:05

drone snipers on this hospital because

12:07

they have some guns or they

12:09

have

12:10

or they treated patients on October 7th who

12:12

were hostages, nobody

12:14

would have said that justifies this, right? I

12:16

think that would have not passed the sniff test. But they say this is

12:18

their words, the quote unquote beating heart of Hamas.

12:21

That was the exact words that Israeli leadership

12:23

used until clearly it's not and

12:25

then they just shift where the beating heart is. Yeah,

12:27

they say, oh, there were some Hamas guys here a few weeks

12:29

ago and there was a gun. So yeah, there's

12:31

a militia, they're the ruling party of Gaza,

12:34

like, but that's not what you set. If

12:36

Israel treats a Palestinian prisoner in a hospital, the hospital

12:38

does not become a target for bombing

12:40

and shelling and drone snipers. But

12:43

this is all still taking Israel

12:46

almost at face value when actually

12:49

the point is that the

12:51

Israeli military, the Israeli government,

12:53

Israeli officials do not consider

12:56

Palestinians, whether they are one

12:58

minute old or 97 years old, to

13:02

actually be human

13:04

beings whose lives mean anything.

13:06

And so we see this because they say this out

13:09

loud. For instance, this past Friday on

13:11

November 17th, a former Israeli

13:13

intelligence chief was on Anderson

13:16

Cooper on CNN and said this.

13:18

Now,

13:19

again, one little

13:21

note, the non-combatant population

13:24

in the Gaza Strip is really a non-existent

13:27

term because all of the

13:29

Gazans have voted for the Hamas.

13:32

And as we have seen on the 7th of October,

13:35

most of the population in the

13:37

Gaza Strip are Hamas. Nonetheless,

13:40

we are treating them as non-combatant,

13:43

we are treating them as regular

13:45

civilians, and they are spared from

13:47

the fighting.

13:49

Okay, so that is Rami Igrat, the former

13:52

division chief for the Mossad,

13:54

the Israeli Intelligence Agency, who

13:56

said that this past Friday on CNN.

18:00

Gaza Naka 2023." So the

18:02

fact that this is so clearly an ethnic cleansing

18:10

campaign is not just

18:12

as you kind of analyze what's happening

18:15

and oh they say this and then they do this

18:17

and then they kind of say the next thing

18:19

and they try and move the population south

18:21

and south and south they are literally

18:24

saying what they are doing and

18:27

yet they're still hand-wringing

18:29

and sort of like ooh this is incendiary

18:32

rhetoric like the media says it's incendiary

18:35

or then you hear you know the US administration

18:37

whether it's Biden or Blinken or whoever the fuck

18:40

saying like oh well you know yes

18:42

of course we're gonna stand by

18:44

our ally Israel and keep rearming

18:46

them to the teeth so that they

18:49

can murder as many people as they want but we're

18:51

really you know thinking about really

18:54

making it clear to them that

18:57

we think they should probably

18:59

maybe try sorta kinda

19:01

to avoid civilian

19:03

deaths like it's such

19:06

fucking bullshit that's what makes

19:08

the liberal appeals for like a more humanitarian

19:10

work against Hamas popularized by people like Elizabeth

19:12

Warren and Bernie Sanders so cravingly

19:15

obtuse is that everybody knows that

19:17

this really leadership is not and does not

19:20

make a distinction and to the

19:22

extent to which they aren't bombing you know nuking

19:24

Gaza City or they show some kind of relative

19:27

restraint to what they could do which is what they argue that

19:29

oh we could destroy overnight if we wanted to it's

19:32

simply taking it up to the threshold that would not

19:34

create mass riots in the US

19:36

to be unable to defend them right they sort of take it up

19:38

just to the edge of what they can get

19:40

away with without totally creating

19:42

disgust in the US Congress and in the

19:45

kind of quote unquote Arab streets as they used

19:47

to say back in the mid-2000s which is to say

19:49

are a bunch of Arabs gonna go fucking start

19:51

riots and I mean I kind of feel at this point

19:53

Adam that there's nothing like even if they

19:55

were to go so far Pat like whatever

19:58

we're calling going up to the edge

19:59

still genocide. And so

20:02

going beyond that, honestly, I'm like,

20:04

what would it take? I mean, this

20:07

is what Ilhan Omar had said weeks

20:09

and weeks ago, right? And what so many

20:12

people have said before her comments,

20:14

but also since the idea of how

20:16

many Palestinian children does it take

20:19

before this vengeance is quelled on

20:21

the Israeli side? And it's like, well, here's

20:23

a question that takes at face

20:25

value that there is like

20:28

some sort of endgame

20:30

that doesn't have to do with ethnic cleansing,

20:33

right? That like, Oh, aren't you seeing the harm

20:36

you're causing? How can you cause so

20:38

much harm? And it's like, Israel

20:41

wants to cause that harm. Like, there

20:44

isn't actually a threshold because

20:46

they're not being stopped. And they won't be

20:49

stopped. Because the Biden administration

20:51

has said, flat out,

20:53

it will not put any limits

20:56

on whatever combat operations combat

20:58

I put in gigantic fucking

21:00

air quotes, but combat operations

21:03

that Israel is undertaking and decides to enact.

21:06

So the idea that there's a line

21:08

that they're going up to like, well, yes, of

21:10

course, they are not literally firing

21:13

every single missile that they have at once

21:15

at every single Palestinian

21:17

baby. But like, what they're

21:19

already doing isn't that far

21:22

off. Well, it's killing as many people as

21:24

possible to create a terror regime to ethnically

21:26

cleanse them to Egypt. Which is

21:28

to say, if I was to say, because people, again,

21:31

I think people, and I think a lot

21:33

of its racism, I think it's a lot of its cultural proximity.

21:35

I've been to Israel, I know Israelis, I

21:38

personally, I know that a lot of people in the West know,

21:40

you know, know Israelis anything, well, they wouldn't be sort

21:42

of axiomatically evil. Nevermind the fact that

21:45

we vehemently criticized Saudi Arabia and the US government

21:47

all the time on this, on this podcast

21:49

and described to them the most cynical motive as possible. We're

21:51

typically right. And no one sort of has

21:54

an issue with that. I think when it comes to Israel, it's

21:56

like, there's an assumption that they're being singled

21:58

out or something. And it's like, No, it's a very

22:01

specific form of early 20th, late 19th

22:03

century colonialism that has bizarrely

22:06

lasted until 2023, which

22:09

requires some very pre

22:11

Geneva, ugly tactics

22:13

to maintain itself. Like ethno states to maintain

22:15

themselves require genocide

22:19

or genocide adjacent activity, by

22:21

definition, this has always been the case. And

22:25

Israel's main problem is that they were about 75 years

22:28

late to the genocide party, where

22:30

Australia, the United States, other

22:33

settler colonies,

22:34

they just killed everybody. Right? I

22:36

mean, obviously the genocide against Native Americans in North

22:38

America is still ongoing. But in terms

22:41

of just numbers, like they're not a quote unquote demographic

22:43

threat like Palestinians are, which are roughly half the

22:45

population of the borders from the river

22:47

to the sea.

22:48

And so like, that's why it's

22:50

so crude and unprecedented. I mean, the number of children

22:53

killed in this war

22:55

far outweighs any other conflict.

22:57

The Washington Post is a very striking graphic, which

22:59

we can share with you. I mean, the bar graph is just,

23:02

and this is why there's so much urgency, so much anger, so

23:04

much frustration among activists, among young voters, that

23:06

this is pretty much a textbook ethnic cleansing

23:08

campaign, textbook genocide in

23:10

very key ways. But it's ours

23:13

and it's Uncle Joe's. And there's a sort of cognitive

23:15

dissonance there that people are struggling with. And I get

23:17

it. What I would say to you is that's probably

23:20

just due to kind of mindless racism and

23:22

mindless chauvinism and doesn't really

23:24

measure up to the objective facts. To give you one

23:26

example, in March of 2011, when

23:29

Moammar

23:29

Gaddafi said, he said

23:31

his opponents in Western Libya were cockroaches.

23:35

This was seen by everybody as evidence

23:37

of genocidal intent, right? One line

23:39

in Arabic about cockroaches.

23:41

This was seen as in and of itself, per se, evidence

23:44

of genocidal intent. And meanwhile, the

23:46

Agriculture Minister says, we're doing knockbox 2.0.

23:49

The president says, there's no innocent civilians

23:51

here. The Defense Minister, two days after

23:54

October 7, said, quote, we are fighting human

23:56

animals and we are acting accordingly. Right.

23:58

And then we say, I don't know.

23:59

I don't know, you know, in the New York Times, there's a roundup of it

24:02

and kind of treats it like it's ethno-nationalist

24:04

locker room talk. Like, ah, no big deal, boys will

24:06

be boys. And it's like, what the fuck are you talking

24:09

about? This is textbook genocidal intent.

24:11

Now, are they publishing a PDF on

24:13

their website, you know, israel.gov

24:15

saying, here's our plans for genocide? No,

24:17

although there was one minor think tank

24:20

that did basically spell out what they're doing, which is expelling

24:23

the Palestinians to Southern Gaza. This has been floating around right

24:25

wing circles in Israel for decades now, which is kind of the final

24:27

solution for Gaza to push them in Egypt. And

24:30

then annex the West Bank, so they have a two to one demographic advantage.

24:33

But this is the worst, this is the, we're

24:35

kind of saving the worst for last here in

24:37

terms of evidence of genocidal intent.

24:40

This was written by Israel intelligence minister, Gila

24:42

Demiel, in the Jerusalem post on November

24:44

19th, 2023. And

24:47

this is a clear in English, this is an English

24:49

Israeli newspaper. This is a clear

24:51

as day, and this is the intelligence minister.

24:54

This is the person who's most responsible for the

24:56

quote unquote post Hamas war plans for Gaza.

24:59

And this is a clear as day

25:01

blueprint for ethnic cleansing.

25:03

The headline reads, victory is an opportunity

25:06

for Israel in the midst of crisis.

25:08

It would begin by saying quote, Albert Einstein

25:10

was quoted as saying, in the midst of every crisis lies

25:13

an opportunity. This usually means you're about to get something

25:15

quite sinister. It would go on to say,

25:18

one of the issues on which my office has been working diligently

25:20

is how to proceed the day after Hamas has been defeated

25:23

and annihilated.

25:24

We will still have around 2 million people in Gaza,

25:26

many of whom voted for Hamas and celebrated the massacre

25:28

of innocent men, women and children unquote.

25:31

So right there you have the militarization of the

25:33

civilian population effectively saying, many of

25:35

them effectively saying they're all kind

25:37

of collectively responsible, which has been again, the logic

25:39

of the Israeli government since the beginning of this

25:41

war. And it would list that the current options

25:44

don't work. The Israel controlling Gaza,

25:47

the PA controlling Gaza, these are sort of aren't good.

25:49

So she presents what she calls quote, other

25:51

options for Gaza, but there aren't other options she presents.

25:54

She actually only presents in this op-ed one option.

25:56

And that's to remove Palestinians

25:59

from Gaza. to remove Palestinians from Palestine.

26:02

She would write, quote, another option is

26:04

to promote the voluntary resettlement of Palestinians

26:06

in Gaza for humanitarian reasons

26:09

outside of the strip. It is important that

26:11

those who seek a life elsewhere be provided with

26:13

that opportunity. Some world leaders are already

26:15

discussing a worldwide refugee resettlement scheme

26:18

and saying they would welcome Gazans to their countries. This

26:20

could be supported by many nations around

26:23

the world, especially those that claim to be friends

26:25

of Palestinians.

26:26

It is an opportunity for those who say they support the

26:28

Palestinian people to show that these are

26:30

not just empty words. Unquote, so here

26:32

we have, as long as you front-load it with voluntary, but

26:35

they're making Gaza uninhabitable, which

26:38

again, one half of Gaza already is uninhabitable.

26:40

Okay, human life cannot live there. And

26:43

now they're pivoting the war to Southern Gaza, so

26:45

presumably that'll go just like Northern Gaza, and

26:47

that'll be uninhabitable. So the entirety

26:49

of Gaza is being rendered uninhabitable,

26:52

and then you turn around and say, well, for humanitarian reasons,

26:54

we should voluntarily resettle them. That's not

26:56

voluntary, because they can't stay there, because there's

26:58

nowhere to stay, other than an internment

27:00

tent.

27:01

And the op-ed would go on to say, quote,

27:04

instead of funneling more money to rebuild Gaza,

27:06

or the failed UNRWA, which

27:08

is United Nations Relief and Work Station, which

27:11

operates a great deal of the things

27:13

that keep people alive in Gaza, the

27:15

international community can assist in the cost of

27:17

resettlement, helping the people of Gaza build new

27:19

lives in their new host countries,

27:22

unquote.

27:23

If I make the entirety of Gaza

27:26

unlivable, and then say, well, we should voluntarily

27:28

resettle them, there's a name

27:30

for that, and it's not a war, and

27:33

it's not a, quote, unquote, hunt for Hamas. It

27:35

is forcible removal of population, which

27:38

is a textbook definition of ethnic cleansing,

27:41

and a subset of genocide. And again, to

27:43

be clear, this is the person currently,

27:45

right now, this isn't some fringe minister, or some crazy

27:48

settler, or whatever, this is the person currently

27:50

in charge with the, quote, unquote, post-Hamasq

27:53

Gaza strategy, unquote. This

27:55

is the single most influential person

27:58

who is involved in strategizing this. who writes

28:00

an op-ed where she offers only

28:03

one option, and that is to expel Palestinians

28:05

from Palestine. There is no other

28:07

option proffered in this piece. In fact, all the other ones

28:09

are just dismissed at hand. I don't know how

28:12

much clearer they can make it. Right.

28:14

I mean speaking of the West Bank, just quickly, over

28:17

a hundred and fifty Palestinians have been

28:19

killed by Israeli military

28:22

and Israeli settlers since October 7.

28:24

So the idea, and there's no fucking Hamas in the

28:27

West Bank, right? Like, so the idea

28:29

that again, this like hunt for

28:31

Hamas can go wherever the propaganda

28:33

wants it to go to enable

28:36

the ongoing apartheid

28:39

regime terrorizing Palestinians,

28:42

whether it's in the West Bank or Gaza. But

28:45

you could frame anything as a hunt for Hamas. I mean,

28:47

again, the destruction of UN schools, the destruction

28:49

of refugee camps, the destruction, basically

28:52

anyone who's held out and refused to go to

28:54

their little tent cities in southern Gaza can

28:57

be reverse engineered into a hunt for Hamas

28:59

story. And this is what makes the media

29:01

adopting this narrative so problematic because they're

29:03

not connecting dots where they would absolutely connect

29:06

dots. If this was a baddy country,

29:08

these dots would have been connected a long time ago.

29:10

Yeah, there would be no hand wringing about complexity

29:14

or oh, this is there's a lot

29:16

of nuances here. There's a lot of history to unpack.

29:19

Only experts can really know what's going

29:21

on here. That would not be the

29:23

case where this happening almost

29:26

literally anywhere else. And there was

29:28

a front page of the New York Times on Sunday has a picture

29:30

of a Palestinian child looking down at his dead

29:33

sibling. And the headline reads smoldering

29:35

Gaza becomes a graveyard for children. And

29:38

then it's like, wow, that's like

29:40

really sobering and dramatic. And then the sub

29:42

headline, thousands are killed in bombardments

29:44

as Israel responds to Hamas attack. And

29:47

it plays into this human shields idea.

29:49

And this is all a very elaborate

29:52

that's developed over decades. It's kind of elaborate

29:54

or sensed moral ecology where

29:56

Israel can just kill thousands of children

29:59

and.

29:59

somehow it's always hamas his faults

30:03

and also the have no choice and

30:05

also ever was a human shields but also you

30:07

know they were human shields we're going to be a us anyway and

30:10

one feels like they're taking crazy pills

30:12

which is why you see this massive disconnect between

30:15

now younger people view the war versus cnn

30:18

and people are older who watch cnn msnbc

30:20

all day because are getting a totally different narrative

30:23

were

30:23

again all the sort of death and destruction

30:26

and i were your piece myself stuck with the anonymous

30:28

palestinian american contributor who

30:31

works as a quantitative researcher and

30:33

he showed the overwhelming preference

30:36

for focusing on israel israel deaths

30:38

vs palestinians even as the numbers

30:40

begin to skyrocket up to the several thousands

30:43

of the five digits and this is

30:45

is not what you see on twitter ends to

30:47

talk and you tube you to see

30:50

a different story there are tons of front

30:52

pages across the country adam i just want to note

30:54

like if you look at the new york post you look

30:56

at like a local paper

30:58

i mean i know that are prose the tabloid and murdoch

31:00

guy yeah i got it but

31:03

it's still a fourth most popular newspaper the country exactly

31:05

and you look at any kind of local papers

31:07

well and we are still seeing

31:09

personal stories on the front

31:11

pages about whether they're israeli

31:13

hostages or israelis who were killed in october

31:16

seventh and when that's all

31:18

you tell it is clear

31:21

whose lives

31:22

matter

31:23

yeah because our government funds and arms

31:26

one side of that and not the other side and so

31:29

this

31:29

kind of genocidal intent or ethnic cleansing

31:31

intentionality which

31:32

you can we have tons of evidence

31:35

for

31:35

and less israel publishes it on

31:37

their website sing this is our genocidal

31:40

plan even know everything

31:42

fits within that framework very clearly

31:44

again as several aid

31:46

organizations and human rights or decisions have been

31:49

sounding the alarm about of things like potentials

31:51

inside to become a diplomatic and you know i get it

31:54

but like the problem is that you don't have

31:56

a smoking gun until it's done you

31:57

have a smoking gun for ethnic cleansing

31:59

until it's pretty much over. And right

32:02

now, Northern Gaza, according to The Economist,

32:04

not inhabitable for six months to several years. So

32:07

yeah, when you destroy 25 hospitals and 52

32:10

health centers, you attack 55 ambulances,

32:14

you destroy completely 83

32:16

mosques, you partially

32:20

destroy 166 mosques, you

32:23

target multiple churches,

32:26

you destroy 262 schools,

32:29

and you completely obliterate any

32:31

kind of residential building in

32:34

entire neighborhoods in Northern

32:36

Gaza. You are not hunting for

32:38

fucking anything. You are just committing

32:41

genocide. Like, that's what that is.

32:43

I mean, they keep saying they don't make a distinction. And

32:46

the line between not making a distinction

32:48

between combatant and non-combatant or civilian

32:51

and soldier, once you erase

32:53

that distinction, then

32:56

all that's left is ethnic cleansing, right? Like,

32:58

there's no other option, unless you're,

33:00

you know, if you say we're gonna

33:02

eliminate Hamas, and then you say, pretty much

33:04

everybody's Hamas, if so ergo,

33:07

whatever sort of Latin syllogism you wish to

33:10

use, you're eliminating everybody. Right.

33:13

And so when you see headlines, like

33:15

from the New York Times, just the other day, that

33:18

say, quote, the Israeli military signals

33:20

its intent to battle Hamas in Southern

33:22

Gaza, and you see the Daily Beast

33:25

say, quote, Israeli military says

33:28

it is preparing to fight Hamas in

33:30

Southern Gaza. Think

33:32

about what that hunt for Hamas

33:35

line does to absolve

33:38

Israel from clear ethnic cleansing.

33:41

So Adam, I'm glad we were able to talk that through because

33:43

we're seeing these headlines over and over and over

33:45

again. And the dots just

33:47

need to be connected because they're so obvious.

33:49

And it seems like our media

33:52

is very hesitant to do so. Or

33:54

at least like proposed as an option.

33:57

Instead of saying like, Israel says they're gonna go after Hamas,

33:59

be like. Israel says they're going to go after Hamas,

34:01

but historically they've gone after whatever percentage

34:05

of people who have died, I mean, are not

34:07

quote unquote Hamas because they don't really think there's a difference.

34:10

I mean, has anyone even asked Israel what percentage

34:13

of people they've killed are quote unquote Hamas?

34:16

I don't think they've even said that. So

34:18

I mean, it doesn't matter to them. So why

34:20

should it keep mattering to American media? Well,

34:22

right, because the intent is clear.

34:25

And so that will do it for this Citation

34:27

Seated News Brief. We will be back

34:30

very soon with more full length

34:32

episodes of Citation Seated. Until then,

34:34

of course, you can follow the show on Twitter at

34:36

CitationSpot, Facebook Citation Seated. And

34:38

if you are so inclined, become a supporter

34:41

of the show through patreon.com slash

34:43

Citation Seated podcast. All your

34:45

support through Patreon is so incredibly

34:47

appreciated as we are 100% listener funded. So

34:51

thanks again for listening. I am Nima Shirazi. I'm

34:53

Adam Johnson. Our senior producer is

34:55

Florence Burrough Adams. Producer is Julianne Tweeton.

34:58

Assistant is Trendon Lightburn. Newsletter

35:00

by Marco Cartolano. Transcriptions are by Mahnoor

35:02

Imran. The music is by Grandaddy. Thanks again.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features