Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:04
Welcome to a Citations Needed News
0:06
Brief. I am Nima Shirazi. I'm Adam
0:08
Johnson. You can follow Citations Needed
0:10
on Twitter at CitationsPod, Facebook Citations
0:13
Needed, and if you are so inclined, you can become
0:15
a supporter of the show through Patreon.com
0:17
slash Citations Needed Podcast.
0:20
We are 100% Lister funded,
0:22
so your support is incredibly appreciated.
0:25
We do these news briefs in between
0:27
our regularly scheduled full-length
0:29
episodes. And on this news brief, Adam,
0:31
we wanted to do an update
0:34
on Gaza. I know we've been talking about Gaza
0:36
a bunch, but, you know, when there's ongoing
0:38
ethnic cleansing, maybe that makes sense. And
0:40
especially when we are seeing in the media,
0:43
and this is a media criticism show, there's
0:45
a lot of focus still,
0:48
even after the invasion of the Al-Shifa
0:50
Hospital in Gaza. Adam,
0:52
we've seen now this moving of the
0:55
goalposts in terms of Israel's
0:57
ongoing hunt for Hamas.
1:00
Yeah, so there's something very strange going on here, which
1:02
is, this is kind of maybe more of a macro
1:05
lens here. But on October 13th, the
1:07
Israeli military issued an evacuation
1:10
order for all of northern Gaza, specifically Gaza
1:12
City, and 23 major
1:14
hospitals were told to evacuate. They've been called every
1:16
day since this evacuation order to evacuate.
1:19
And the reason why they're trying to evacuate northern Gaza,
1:21
they say it's because of humanitarian reasons, but the reason is
1:23
that, very clearly, as their president implied
1:26
on October 9th, they're going
1:28
to probably annex northern Gaza
1:31
and turn it into a quote unquote buffer zone. They may
1:33
settle it at some later date, but as The Economist notes,
1:35
northern Gaza is not inhabitable. It won't be inhabitable
1:38
for at least six months, probably several years,
1:41
because of all the dust and rubble. And there's
1:43
no infrastructure, there's no homes there. They've destroyed 260,000 homes. And
1:47
the 1.5, 1.7 million residents,
1:50
the vast, vast majority of whom have now gone south, because that's what they're
1:52
told. Now we'll get to how the,
1:54
apparently the main bad guys are in the
1:56
south now conveniently, but we'll set that aside for now.
2:00
This is sort of clearly their plan. It's their plan because
2:02
everything they're doing has been pursuant to the goal
2:04
of basically ethnically cleansing
2:06
North Gaza. And since they've been carrying
2:08
out the plan that they said
2:11
they were going to do, still we
2:14
see this kind of very credulous
2:16
taking at face value idea
2:19
in the media, which is like, oh, Israel
2:22
is still looking for like Hamas
2:24
headquarters. Yeah. And it's
2:26
strange because the major example
2:28
of course is Al-Shifa hospital. So
2:31
they rated the hospital on November 14th, 15th,
2:33
depending what hemisphere you're in. And this
2:35
was framed in the lead up to the rate of the hospital
2:37
as effectively a US intelligence
2:39
Tony Blinken. They all said it was a command and control
2:42
center. Now as of the time we're recording this on
2:44
Sunday, November 19th, the New York times
2:46
wrote quote, but proof of an extensive
2:49
Hamas command center under the hospital is yet to be
2:51
revealed unquote. So they found, I think a tunnel.
2:54
They found some guns supposedly, although
2:56
CNN claims they rearranged the guns. Yeah. Then
2:59
they like planted more guns because it's the
3:01
Israeli military and that's what they do. Yeah.
3:04
Or they, maybe they didn't. I don't, but they probably may have because
3:06
CNN says they clearly moved guns when they were doing
3:08
different videos. But let's say for the sake of argument,
3:11
they had some guns at the hospital. I don't know.
3:13
And they also released videotape
3:16
of armed gunmen, presumably
3:18
Hamas bringing in hostages to
3:20
the hospital on October 7th. Most
3:23
of whom are clearly injured to
3:25
receive medical treatment. And this
3:27
is seen as evidence that this is a Hamas command and control
3:29
center. This evidence is not satisfactory to the New
3:31
York times. It is not satisfactory to
3:34
us as of yet to justify calling
3:36
it a command and control center. Now most people on
3:38
the left and most people in human rights world would say it doesn't matter if
3:40
it was a command and control center. You still don't get the bomb and shell and
3:43
use sniper drones on a hospital. But I do think
3:45
it sort of matters, right? It sort of matters if they're lying about
3:47
that. It matters if this kind of hunt for
3:49
Hamas narrative is being propped up by
3:51
our media because in the days leading up to the raids, we had
3:53
headlines like this in the Washington Post, quote,
3:56
Israel's hunt for Hamas puts Gaza's
3:58
Al-Shifa hospital under siege. Israel's
4:01
military has sounded a steady drumbeat of accusations
4:03
that Gaza's largest hospital sits atop a
4:05
headquarters for Hamas. And
4:08
then the New York Times had
4:10
one that was even sort of more zero-dark-30-ish
4:12
when it said, quote, Gaza city hospitals are
4:15
caught in deadly crossfire. Battling
4:18
Hamas fighters, Israel forces are closing in
4:20
on hospitals where thousands of people are stranded.
4:23
And so there's this idea that there was a battle
4:25
like in the hospital, but there wasn't. Israel just
4:27
walked into the hospital. There
4:29
were some, I think, light skirmishes outside the
4:31
hospital because fighters attacked Israeli
4:34
soldiers wherever they are. But there was
4:36
no evidence of any shooting coming from the hospital. There
4:38
was no evidence of any gunfire when
4:41
they went into the hospital. And so there's sort of
4:43
this general impression. And of course, again,
4:45
as of this recording, there's no IDF casualties.
4:48
Clearly, if there was some kind of, you know, if this
4:50
was a military base, one would think that that would have
4:52
happened. So then they kind of waltzed into the hospital.
4:55
There's no evidence of any Hamas fighters or
4:57
any militants at all. They claimed that they actually had escaped
5:00
weeks prior. But there's still no, like,
5:02
evil lair that's been discovered. No,
5:04
there's no evil there's no evil lair at all. And
5:06
the threshold for what they show, they showed multilayer,
5:09
three-level. I mean, it really looked like a Bond villain
5:11
lair. We have conference rooms, you
5:13
know, all this lighting. These are like
5:15
the 3D computer models that were passed
5:18
around by Israeli intelligence and propaganda
5:20
outfits being like, this is what we expect
5:22
to find. And their big smoking gun
5:25
is like, oh, there was some hostages were brought into the
5:27
hospital. But of course, it's not clear to me
5:29
what they want them to do. Do they want them not to treat
5:31
the I mean, it's not really clear. I
5:34
mean, had they refused, that would have, I suppose, been worse.
5:37
They treated the hostages because that's what doctors do.
5:40
And it's not clear who they would even report that to since Hamas
5:42
is the governing body. Guess they're
5:44
supposed to report Hamas to Hamas. It's not clear. But
5:46
this was sort of seen as evidence of a command and control center.
5:49
Now, this is not evidence again, according
5:51
to the New York Times, this is not sufficient evidence for a command and
5:53
control center. And again, they're excavating
5:56
around the hospital. Who knows what they'll find
5:58
again, if it was, it doesn't appear to be at the. very least,
6:01
an active command and control center. And according
6:03
to the Economist magazine, who wrote
6:05
on November 18, quote, even
6:08
Israeli intelligence officials do not believe that Hamas
6:10
currently has its main headquarters to the extent that
6:12
such a thing exists below the hospital that being
6:14
al-Shiva. These they say have probably
6:17
moved to Khan, you know, and
6:19
so Israeli intelligence says it's not a headquarters,
6:21
according to the economists or at least to the extent to which it
6:23
has, quote unquote, Hamas presence. It's not what they claimed
6:26
it was. It's not a command and control center. It's not a headquarters.
6:29
The State Department, Tony Blinken has now kind
6:31
of walked it back. They went from saying it was
6:33
a command and control center. Now their new phrasing is it's
6:35
a command and controlled node, I
6:37
guess. So if it's like, and there are strict definitions,
6:40
according to international law, about what constitutes a
6:42
militarized hospital, having some
6:44
weapons there or treating
6:47
wounded prisoners or hostages is not nearly
6:49
sufficient enough to justify it being a military
6:52
target. And so groups will look into this in the
6:54
coming weeks. Amnesty International, I know, is
6:56
currently investigating it. The New York Times, Washington
6:59
Post, both of whom seem quite skeptical that this is a command
7:01
and control center, are investigating
7:03
it, again, to the extent to which Israel
7:05
believes it, they've now sort of shift the goalpost and
7:08
now say that the main bad guy
7:10
center is actually in South Gaza, which brings
7:12
us to the bigger issue of
7:14
what are they going to do next? Well,
7:16
right. So as soon as it was clear that
7:18
the Israeli line about
7:21
al-Shifa hospital was bullshit and
7:24
intended just to further terrorize
7:26
Palestinians and further clear
7:29
out as much of northern Gaza as possible,
7:31
you got former Israeli Prime Minister
7:34
Ehud Olmert saying in an interview
7:36
with Euronews on Friday, November
7:39
17th, all of a sudden he kind of comes
7:41
out and he's like, oh yeah, you know, quote, Khan
7:43
Yunus, which is in the southern part
7:45
of Gaza Strip, is the real headquarters
7:48
of Hamas. There they have the leadership,
7:51
they are hiding, they have bunkers, they have the command
7:53
positions, they have the launching pads,
7:56
end quote. So
7:57
instantly you
7:59
get the this shifting of the goalposts
8:01
that we've been talking about, Adam, which gets
8:04
us to, as you said, the purpose
8:06
for actually labeling
8:08
hospitals as centers of
8:12
command and control or centers of Hamas
8:14
threat because in
8:17
Israel's attempt to actually ethnically
8:20
cleanse
8:21
Gaza,
8:22
certainly northern Gaza at this point,
8:24
moving on to southern Gaza soon, some
8:27
of the last holdouts for people
8:29
who can't actually evacuate
8:32
are going to be hospitals. So there needs to
8:34
be a pretense and a pretext
8:36
for going into hospitals and
8:39
forcibly removing people
8:42
from them, sending them south and then
8:44
saying, oh no, we actually need to keep attacking
8:47
Gaza and we need to keep attacking
8:49
more and more southerly positions.
8:52
And then you get to Khan Yunus
8:54
and then eventually it's going to be, oh no, they're in Rafa.
8:57
Oh no, they're in Suez. I know they're in fucking
8:59
Cairo and then you eventually get to Johannesburg.
9:02
Well, now they're the BBC, the Red Cross
9:04
and the ICC. They're all Hamas now, but there
9:07
is a logic to it.
9:09
When one accepts the sort of human shields,
9:11
the perpetual human shields logic that justifies
9:13
killing 12,000 people,
9:16
upwards of 6,000 children if you include those who
9:18
are in rubble and almost certainly dead, there's
9:21
a logic to that morally that
9:23
begins to emerge. I think it's heavily animated by
9:25
racism. It's also heavily animated
9:27
by political necessity, which
9:30
is that if you take the human shields logic to
9:32
its end point,
9:33
then by definition,
9:36
all the Hamas guys' headquarters would be in hospitals
9:39
because if the vulnerability
9:41
and innocence and the preservation of life is
9:44
necessarily like sort of insects
9:46
going to some piece of rotten
9:49
meat, that's how they view
9:51
it, that they would go to the most vulnerable places. So
9:54
I think to some extent they begin to believe they're on bullshit.
9:56
Now, I think a lot of them are just kind of cynical and lying. They're kind
9:58
of improvising as they go.
9:59
But I think a lot of people genuinely internalize
10:02
the human shield's rationale because in a way when
10:04
you kill thousands of children in less than 40
10:06
days,
10:08
you kind of have to believe that, right? Because
10:11
then they say this in their statements. Whenever
10:13
Israeli officials are on CNN or on NPR or
10:15
PBS and they say, well, what about all the children you're killing? They
10:17
say, well, that's Hamas human shield. Hamas human shield. You have
10:19
to, that's how you rationalize it because how
10:21
else would you sleep at night? And so the
10:24
human shield's moral ecology
10:27
becomes its own
10:29
logic. And so therefore hospitals
10:32
and vulnerable places,
10:33
schools, et cetera, have to be the place where Hamas
10:36
keeps their headquarters. Now
10:39
Hamas has a lot of tunnels under Gaza. Clearly
10:41
that's how they operate as an insurgency force.
10:44
So they probably incidentally have tunnels
10:46
near schools and hospitals. But Amnesty International
10:48
looked into the issue of human shields both
10:50
in 2009 to 2014 and found no
10:53
evidence that they meet the legal definition
10:55
of human shield because the legal definition of human shield is
10:57
compelling a civilian to stay in
10:59
some place under threat so they can deter
11:01
an attack from someone who has air
11:04
superiority, which obviously Israel does. And
11:06
so they found that they did not meet that criteria because simply being
11:09
a guerrilla or urban insurgency
11:11
force, whatever you want to call it, does
11:14
not make you a human shield machine.
11:16
That's not sort of not how it works. Otherwise you
11:18
could just bomb whenever you want to bomb
11:20
because at any point you're going to be within 500 yards
11:22
of some tunnel or some machine gun,
11:24
which is exactly what Israel does
11:27
because that's their logic. And it's a logic that human rights
11:29
groups categorically since, again, since
11:31
Castled, since Protective Edge 24, they've
11:34
categorically denied that as a legal or moral framework because
11:37
it effectively militarizes an entire population.
11:40
And so that I think informs why
11:42
they, on some level, they may believe that all these hospitals
11:45
have these James Bond bunkers underneath
11:47
them because that sort
11:49
of follows from the logic of human shields, moral
11:51
ecology. So then they raid the place. There's
11:53
nobody there and they say, oh, they're here, but they filled it with
11:55
cement. It's like, well, okay, maybe, I don't know. But
11:58
typically, you know, historically.
11:59
military head,
12:00
because again, they're not saying some tunnels or some guns, right?
12:03
Had they said we're going to raid shell and use
12:05
drone snipers on this hospital because
12:07
they have some guns or they
12:09
have
12:10
or they treated patients on October 7th who
12:12
were hostages, nobody
12:14
would have said that justifies this, right? I
12:16
think that would have not passed the sniff test. But they say this is
12:18
their words, the quote unquote beating heart of Hamas.
12:21
That was the exact words that Israeli leadership
12:23
used until clearly it's not and
12:25
then they just shift where the beating heart is. Yeah,
12:27
they say, oh, there were some Hamas guys here a few weeks
12:29
ago and there was a gun. So yeah, there's
12:31
a militia, they're the ruling party of Gaza,
12:34
like, but that's not what you set. If
12:36
Israel treats a Palestinian prisoner in a hospital, the hospital
12:38
does not become a target for bombing
12:40
and shelling and drone snipers. But
12:43
this is all still taking Israel
12:46
almost at face value when actually
12:49
the point is that the
12:51
Israeli military, the Israeli government,
12:53
Israeli officials do not consider
12:56
Palestinians, whether they are one
12:58
minute old or 97 years old, to
13:02
actually be human
13:04
beings whose lives mean anything.
13:06
And so we see this because they say this out
13:09
loud. For instance, this past Friday on
13:11
November 17th, a former Israeli
13:13
intelligence chief was on Anderson
13:16
Cooper on CNN and said this.
13:18
Now,
13:19
again, one little
13:21
note, the non-combatant population
13:24
in the Gaza Strip is really a non-existent
13:27
term because all of the
13:29
Gazans have voted for the Hamas.
13:32
And as we have seen on the 7th of October,
13:35
most of the population in the
13:37
Gaza Strip are Hamas. Nonetheless,
13:40
we are treating them as non-combatant,
13:43
we are treating them as regular
13:45
civilians, and they are spared from
13:47
the fighting.
13:49
Okay, so that is Rami Igrat, the former
13:52
division chief for the Mossad,
13:54
the Israeli Intelligence Agency, who
13:56
said that this past Friday on CNN.
18:00
Gaza Naka 2023." So the
18:02
fact that this is so clearly an ethnic cleansing
18:10
campaign is not just
18:12
as you kind of analyze what's happening
18:15
and oh they say this and then they do this
18:17
and then they kind of say the next thing
18:19
and they try and move the population south
18:21
and south and south they are literally
18:24
saying what they are doing and
18:27
yet they're still hand-wringing
18:29
and sort of like ooh this is incendiary
18:32
rhetoric like the media says it's incendiary
18:35
or then you hear you know the US administration
18:37
whether it's Biden or Blinken or whoever the fuck
18:40
saying like oh well you know yes
18:42
of course we're gonna stand by
18:44
our ally Israel and keep rearming
18:46
them to the teeth so that they
18:49
can murder as many people as they want but we're
18:51
really you know thinking about really
18:54
making it clear to them that
18:57
we think they should probably
18:59
maybe try sorta kinda
19:01
to avoid civilian
19:03
deaths like it's such
19:06
fucking bullshit that's what makes
19:08
the liberal appeals for like a more humanitarian
19:10
work against Hamas popularized by people like Elizabeth
19:12
Warren and Bernie Sanders so cravingly
19:15
obtuse is that everybody knows that
19:17
this really leadership is not and does not
19:20
make a distinction and to the
19:22
extent to which they aren't bombing you know nuking
19:24
Gaza City or they show some kind of relative
19:27
restraint to what they could do which is what they argue that
19:29
oh we could destroy overnight if we wanted to it's
19:32
simply taking it up to the threshold that would not
19:34
create mass riots in the US
19:36
to be unable to defend them right they sort of take it up
19:38
just to the edge of what they can get
19:40
away with without totally creating
19:42
disgust in the US Congress and in the
19:45
kind of quote unquote Arab streets as they used
19:47
to say back in the mid-2000s which is to say
19:49
are a bunch of Arabs gonna go fucking start
19:51
riots and I mean I kind of feel at this point
19:53
Adam that there's nothing like even if they
19:55
were to go so far Pat like whatever
19:58
we're calling going up to the edge
19:59
still genocide. And so
20:02
going beyond that, honestly, I'm like,
20:04
what would it take? I mean, this
20:07
is what Ilhan Omar had said weeks
20:09
and weeks ago, right? And what so many
20:12
people have said before her comments,
20:14
but also since the idea of how
20:16
many Palestinian children does it take
20:19
before this vengeance is quelled on
20:21
the Israeli side? And it's like, well, here's
20:23
a question that takes at face
20:25
value that there is like
20:28
some sort of endgame
20:30
that doesn't have to do with ethnic cleansing,
20:33
right? That like, Oh, aren't you seeing the harm
20:36
you're causing? How can you cause so
20:38
much harm? And it's like, Israel
20:41
wants to cause that harm. Like, there
20:44
isn't actually a threshold because
20:46
they're not being stopped. And they won't be
20:49
stopped. Because the Biden administration
20:51
has said, flat out,
20:53
it will not put any limits
20:56
on whatever combat operations combat
20:58
I put in gigantic fucking
21:00
air quotes, but combat operations
21:03
that Israel is undertaking and decides to enact.
21:06
So the idea that there's a line
21:08
that they're going up to like, well, yes, of
21:10
course, they are not literally firing
21:13
every single missile that they have at once
21:15
at every single Palestinian
21:17
baby. But like, what they're
21:19
already doing isn't that far
21:22
off. Well, it's killing as many people as
21:24
possible to create a terror regime to ethnically
21:26
cleanse them to Egypt. Which is
21:28
to say, if I was to say, because people, again,
21:31
I think people, and I think a lot
21:33
of its racism, I think it's a lot of its cultural proximity.
21:35
I've been to Israel, I know Israelis, I
21:38
personally, I know that a lot of people in the West know,
21:40
you know, know Israelis anything, well, they wouldn't be sort
21:42
of axiomatically evil. Nevermind the fact that
21:45
we vehemently criticized Saudi Arabia and the US government
21:47
all the time on this, on this podcast
21:49
and described to them the most cynical motive as possible. We're
21:51
typically right. And no one sort of has
21:54
an issue with that. I think when it comes to Israel, it's
21:56
like, there's an assumption that they're being singled
21:58
out or something. And it's like, No, it's a very
22:01
specific form of early 20th, late 19th
22:03
century colonialism that has bizarrely
22:06
lasted until 2023, which
22:09
requires some very pre
22:11
Geneva, ugly tactics
22:13
to maintain itself. Like ethno states to maintain
22:15
themselves require genocide
22:19
or genocide adjacent activity, by
22:21
definition, this has always been the case. And
22:25
Israel's main problem is that they were about 75 years
22:28
late to the genocide party, where
22:30
Australia, the United States, other
22:33
settler colonies,
22:34
they just killed everybody. Right? I
22:36
mean, obviously the genocide against Native Americans in North
22:38
America is still ongoing. But in terms
22:41
of just numbers, like they're not a quote unquote demographic
22:43
threat like Palestinians are, which are roughly half the
22:45
population of the borders from the river
22:47
to the sea.
22:48
And so like, that's why it's
22:50
so crude and unprecedented. I mean, the number of children
22:53
killed in this war
22:55
far outweighs any other conflict.
22:57
The Washington Post is a very striking graphic, which
22:59
we can share with you. I mean, the bar graph is just,
23:02
and this is why there's so much urgency, so much anger, so
23:04
much frustration among activists, among young voters, that
23:06
this is pretty much a textbook ethnic cleansing
23:08
campaign, textbook genocide in
23:10
very key ways. But it's ours
23:13
and it's Uncle Joe's. And there's a sort of cognitive
23:15
dissonance there that people are struggling with. And I get
23:17
it. What I would say to you is that's probably
23:20
just due to kind of mindless racism and
23:22
mindless chauvinism and doesn't really
23:24
measure up to the objective facts. To give you one
23:26
example, in March of 2011, when
23:29
Moammar
23:29
Gaddafi said, he said
23:31
his opponents in Western Libya were cockroaches.
23:35
This was seen by everybody as evidence
23:37
of genocidal intent, right? One line
23:39
in Arabic about cockroaches.
23:41
This was seen as in and of itself, per se, evidence
23:44
of genocidal intent. And meanwhile, the
23:46
Agriculture Minister says, we're doing knockbox 2.0.
23:49
The president says, there's no innocent civilians
23:51
here. The Defense Minister, two days after
23:54
October 7, said, quote, we are fighting human
23:56
animals and we are acting accordingly. Right.
23:58
And then we say, I don't know.
23:59
I don't know, you know, in the New York Times, there's a roundup of it
24:02
and kind of treats it like it's ethno-nationalist
24:04
locker room talk. Like, ah, no big deal, boys will
24:06
be boys. And it's like, what the fuck are you talking
24:09
about? This is textbook genocidal intent.
24:11
Now, are they publishing a PDF on
24:13
their website, you know, israel.gov
24:15
saying, here's our plans for genocide? No,
24:17
although there was one minor think tank
24:20
that did basically spell out what they're doing, which is expelling
24:23
the Palestinians to Southern Gaza. This has been floating around right
24:25
wing circles in Israel for decades now, which is kind of the final
24:27
solution for Gaza to push them in Egypt. And
24:30
then annex the West Bank, so they have a two to one demographic advantage.
24:33
But this is the worst, this is the, we're
24:35
kind of saving the worst for last here in
24:37
terms of evidence of genocidal intent.
24:40
This was written by Israel intelligence minister, Gila
24:42
Demiel, in the Jerusalem post on November
24:44
19th, 2023. And
24:47
this is a clear in English, this is an English
24:49
Israeli newspaper. This is a clear
24:51
as day, and this is the intelligence minister.
24:54
This is the person who's most responsible for the
24:56
quote unquote post Hamas war plans for Gaza.
24:59
And this is a clear as day
25:01
blueprint for ethnic cleansing.
25:03
The headline reads, victory is an opportunity
25:06
for Israel in the midst of crisis.
25:08
It would begin by saying quote, Albert Einstein
25:10
was quoted as saying, in the midst of every crisis lies
25:13
an opportunity. This usually means you're about to get something
25:15
quite sinister. It would go on to say,
25:18
one of the issues on which my office has been working diligently
25:20
is how to proceed the day after Hamas has been defeated
25:23
and annihilated.
25:24
We will still have around 2 million people in Gaza,
25:26
many of whom voted for Hamas and celebrated the massacre
25:28
of innocent men, women and children unquote.
25:31
So right there you have the militarization of the
25:33
civilian population effectively saying, many of
25:35
them effectively saying they're all kind
25:37
of collectively responsible, which has been again, the logic
25:39
of the Israeli government since the beginning of this
25:41
war. And it would list that the current options
25:44
don't work. The Israel controlling Gaza,
25:47
the PA controlling Gaza, these are sort of aren't good.
25:49
So she presents what she calls quote, other
25:51
options for Gaza, but there aren't other options she presents.
25:54
She actually only presents in this op-ed one option.
25:56
And that's to remove Palestinians
25:59
from Gaza. to remove Palestinians from Palestine.
26:02
She would write, quote, another option is
26:04
to promote the voluntary resettlement of Palestinians
26:06
in Gaza for humanitarian reasons
26:09
outside of the strip. It is important that
26:11
those who seek a life elsewhere be provided with
26:13
that opportunity. Some world leaders are already
26:15
discussing a worldwide refugee resettlement scheme
26:18
and saying they would welcome Gazans to their countries. This
26:20
could be supported by many nations around
26:23
the world, especially those that claim to be friends
26:25
of Palestinians.
26:26
It is an opportunity for those who say they support the
26:28
Palestinian people to show that these are
26:30
not just empty words. Unquote, so here
26:32
we have, as long as you front-load it with voluntary, but
26:35
they're making Gaza uninhabitable, which
26:38
again, one half of Gaza already is uninhabitable.
26:40
Okay, human life cannot live there. And
26:43
now they're pivoting the war to Southern Gaza, so
26:45
presumably that'll go just like Northern Gaza, and
26:47
that'll be uninhabitable. So the entirety
26:49
of Gaza is being rendered uninhabitable,
26:52
and then you turn around and say, well, for humanitarian reasons,
26:54
we should voluntarily resettle them. That's not
26:56
voluntary, because they can't stay there, because there's
26:58
nowhere to stay, other than an internment
27:00
tent.
27:01
And the op-ed would go on to say, quote,
27:04
instead of funneling more money to rebuild Gaza,
27:06
or the failed UNRWA, which
27:08
is United Nations Relief and Work Station, which
27:11
operates a great deal of the things
27:13
that keep people alive in Gaza, the
27:15
international community can assist in the cost of
27:17
resettlement, helping the people of Gaza build new
27:19
lives in their new host countries,
27:22
unquote.
27:23
If I make the entirety of Gaza
27:26
unlivable, and then say, well, we should voluntarily
27:28
resettle them, there's a name
27:30
for that, and it's not a war, and
27:33
it's not a, quote, unquote, hunt for Hamas. It
27:35
is forcible removal of population, which
27:38
is a textbook definition of ethnic cleansing,
27:41
and a subset of genocide. And again, to
27:43
be clear, this is the person currently,
27:45
right now, this isn't some fringe minister, or some crazy
27:48
settler, or whatever, this is the person currently
27:50
in charge with the, quote, unquote, post-Hamasq
27:53
Gaza strategy, unquote. This
27:55
is the single most influential person
27:58
who is involved in strategizing this. who writes
28:00
an op-ed where she offers only
28:03
one option, and that is to expel Palestinians
28:05
from Palestine. There is no other
28:07
option proffered in this piece. In fact, all the other ones
28:09
are just dismissed at hand. I don't know how
28:12
much clearer they can make it. Right.
28:14
I mean speaking of the West Bank, just quickly, over
28:17
a hundred and fifty Palestinians have been
28:19
killed by Israeli military
28:22
and Israeli settlers since October 7.
28:24
So the idea, and there's no fucking Hamas in the
28:27
West Bank, right? Like, so the idea
28:29
that again, this like hunt for
28:31
Hamas can go wherever the propaganda
28:33
wants it to go to enable
28:36
the ongoing apartheid
28:39
regime terrorizing Palestinians,
28:42
whether it's in the West Bank or Gaza. But
28:45
you could frame anything as a hunt for Hamas. I mean,
28:47
again, the destruction of UN schools, the destruction
28:49
of refugee camps, the destruction, basically
28:52
anyone who's held out and refused to go to
28:54
their little tent cities in southern Gaza can
28:57
be reverse engineered into a hunt for Hamas
28:59
story. And this is what makes the media
29:01
adopting this narrative so problematic because they're
29:03
not connecting dots where they would absolutely connect
29:06
dots. If this was a baddy country,
29:08
these dots would have been connected a long time ago.
29:10
Yeah, there would be no hand wringing about complexity
29:14
or oh, this is there's a lot
29:16
of nuances here. There's a lot of history to unpack.
29:19
Only experts can really know what's going
29:21
on here. That would not be the
29:23
case where this happening almost
29:26
literally anywhere else. And there was
29:28
a front page of the New York Times on Sunday has a picture
29:30
of a Palestinian child looking down at his dead
29:33
sibling. And the headline reads smoldering
29:35
Gaza becomes a graveyard for children. And
29:38
then it's like, wow, that's like
29:40
really sobering and dramatic. And then the sub
29:42
headline, thousands are killed in bombardments
29:44
as Israel responds to Hamas attack. And
29:47
it plays into this human shields idea.
29:49
And this is all a very elaborate
29:52
that's developed over decades. It's kind of elaborate
29:54
or sensed moral ecology where
29:56
Israel can just kill thousands of children
29:59
and.
29:59
somehow it's always hamas his faults
30:03
and also the have no choice and
30:05
also ever was a human shields but also you
30:07
know they were human shields we're going to be a us anyway and
30:10
one feels like they're taking crazy pills
30:12
which is why you see this massive disconnect between
30:15
now younger people view the war versus cnn
30:18
and people are older who watch cnn msnbc
30:20
all day because are getting a totally different narrative
30:23
were
30:23
again all the sort of death and destruction
30:26
and i were your piece myself stuck with the anonymous
30:28
palestinian american contributor who
30:31
works as a quantitative researcher and
30:33
he showed the overwhelming preference
30:36
for focusing on israel israel deaths
30:38
vs palestinians even as the numbers
30:40
begin to skyrocket up to the several thousands
30:43
of the five digits and this is
30:45
is not what you see on twitter ends to
30:47
talk and you tube you to see
30:50
a different story there are tons of front
30:52
pages across the country adam i just want to note
30:54
like if you look at the new york post you look
30:56
at like a local paper
30:58
i mean i know that are prose the tabloid and murdoch
31:00
guy yeah i got it but
31:03
it's still a fourth most popular newspaper the country exactly
31:05
and you look at any kind of local papers
31:07
well and we are still seeing
31:09
personal stories on the front
31:11
pages about whether they're israeli
31:13
hostages or israelis who were killed in october
31:16
seventh and when that's all
31:18
you tell it is clear
31:21
whose lives
31:22
matter
31:23
yeah because our government funds and arms
31:26
one side of that and not the other side and so
31:29
this
31:29
kind of genocidal intent or ethnic cleansing
31:31
intentionality which
31:32
you can we have tons of evidence
31:35
for
31:35
and less israel publishes it on
31:37
their website sing this is our genocidal
31:40
plan even know everything
31:42
fits within that framework very clearly
31:44
again as several aid
31:46
organizations and human rights or decisions have been
31:49
sounding the alarm about of things like potentials
31:51
inside to become a diplomatic and you know i get it
31:54
but like the problem is that you don't have
31:56
a smoking gun until it's done you
31:57
have a smoking gun for ethnic cleansing
31:59
until it's pretty much over. And right
32:02
now, Northern Gaza, according to The Economist,
32:04
not inhabitable for six months to several years. So
32:07
yeah, when you destroy 25 hospitals and 52
32:10
health centers, you attack 55 ambulances,
32:14
you destroy completely 83
32:16
mosques, you partially
32:20
destroy 166 mosques, you
32:23
target multiple churches,
32:26
you destroy 262 schools,
32:29
and you completely obliterate any
32:31
kind of residential building in
32:34
entire neighborhoods in Northern
32:36
Gaza. You are not hunting for
32:38
fucking anything. You are just committing
32:41
genocide. Like, that's what that is.
32:43
I mean, they keep saying they don't make a distinction. And
32:46
the line between not making a distinction
32:48
between combatant and non-combatant or civilian
32:51
and soldier, once you erase
32:53
that distinction, then
32:56
all that's left is ethnic cleansing, right? Like,
32:58
there's no other option, unless you're,
33:00
you know, if you say we're gonna
33:02
eliminate Hamas, and then you say, pretty much
33:04
everybody's Hamas, if so ergo,
33:07
whatever sort of Latin syllogism you wish to
33:10
use, you're eliminating everybody. Right.
33:13
And so when you see headlines, like
33:15
from the New York Times, just the other day, that
33:18
say, quote, the Israeli military signals
33:20
its intent to battle Hamas in Southern
33:22
Gaza, and you see the Daily Beast
33:25
say, quote, Israeli military says
33:28
it is preparing to fight Hamas in
33:30
Southern Gaza. Think
33:32
about what that hunt for Hamas
33:35
line does to absolve
33:38
Israel from clear ethnic cleansing.
33:41
So Adam, I'm glad we were able to talk that through because
33:43
we're seeing these headlines over and over and over
33:45
again. And the dots just
33:47
need to be connected because they're so obvious.
33:49
And it seems like our media
33:52
is very hesitant to do so. Or
33:54
at least like proposed as an option.
33:57
Instead of saying like, Israel says they're gonna go after Hamas,
33:59
be like. Israel says they're going to go after Hamas,
34:01
but historically they've gone after whatever percentage
34:05
of people who have died, I mean, are not
34:07
quote unquote Hamas because they don't really think there's a difference.
34:10
I mean, has anyone even asked Israel what percentage
34:13
of people they've killed are quote unquote Hamas?
34:16
I don't think they've even said that. So
34:18
I mean, it doesn't matter to them. So why
34:20
should it keep mattering to American media? Well,
34:22
right, because the intent is clear.
34:25
And so that will do it for this Citation
34:27
Seated News Brief. We will be back
34:30
very soon with more full length
34:32
episodes of Citation Seated. Until then,
34:34
of course, you can follow the show on Twitter at
34:36
CitationSpot, Facebook Citation Seated. And
34:38
if you are so inclined, become a supporter
34:41
of the show through patreon.com slash
34:43
Citation Seated podcast. All your
34:45
support through Patreon is so incredibly
34:47
appreciated as we are 100% listener funded. So
34:51
thanks again for listening. I am Nima Shirazi. I'm
34:53
Adam Johnson. Our senior producer is
34:55
Florence Burrough Adams. Producer is Julianne Tweeton.
34:58
Assistant is Trendon Lightburn. Newsletter
35:00
by Marco Cartolano. Transcriptions are by Mahnoor
35:02
Imran. The music is by Grandaddy. Thanks again.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More