Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:05
I'm Alan Olga, and this is
0:08
Clear and Vivid, conversations about
0:10
connecting and communicating. There's
0:16
so many textbooks in psychology and other fields
0:18
that start with, only we humans do this.
0:21
And my first reaction is, are you
0:23
sure that that's the case? And
0:25
I have my doubts about it. So I see
0:27
this enormous amount, like an iceberg. You see, there's
0:29
an enormous amount of continuity, and then the little
0:31
tip of the iceberg, which is where our differences
0:34
are. I felt it made it my
0:36
task in life to show that there are lots
0:38
of similarities. This
0:40
year on March 14th, Franz de Waal died at the
0:42
age of 75. Franz
0:46
was a leading primatologist who found in
0:48
the lives of chimps and bonobos a
0:51
level of empathy and a capacity
0:53
for reconciliation, and an
0:55
ability to form political alliances and other
0:57
traits once reserved for humans.
1:01
This is a special episode of Clear and
1:03
Vivid in which our executive producer Graham Ched
1:05
and I look back on some of the
1:08
times we shared with Franz, learning
1:10
from him that things like morality and
1:13
even just a simple sense of fairness have
1:16
their roots in the brains of our primate
1:18
cousins. I first
1:20
met Franz de Waal almost 30 years
1:22
ago shooting an episode of Scientific American
1:24
Frontiers. He was a good teacher
1:26
with a dry sense of humor. Over
1:29
the decades, I interviewed him a total of
1:31
four times, including twice on
1:33
Clear and Vivid. And
1:35
each conversation brought me closer to
1:38
these animals who are
1:40
much more like us than we usually realize.
1:43
Graham, why don't you take it from here? Happy
1:45
to. That little clip of Franz
1:47
we just played is from an interview you did
1:49
with him from an episode in our PBS miniseries,
1:52
The Human Spark. In 2010,
1:54
while we were filming a group of
1:57
chimpanzees engaged in complex negotiations over a
1:59
couple of water on them at
2:01
the Yerkes Primates Centre in Atlanta. That's
2:04
where Franz spent many years watching and
2:06
filming both chimps and monkeys. When
2:09
we started Clearing Vivid back in 2019, Franz was one of
2:11
our early guests.
2:14
A great communicator, he wrote well over
2:16
a dozen books on primates, primates that
2:18
include us. He'd just
2:20
published a book called Mama's Last Hug, a
2:23
moving tribute to a female chimpanzee he'd
2:25
known for almost all her 40 years.
2:28
In your conversation with him, you talked about an
2:30
experiment he and a student, one
2:32
of many students, Franz mentored over his career,
2:35
an experiment that was perhaps his most
2:37
famous. It revealed a trait
2:40
in monkeys that's all too familiar to us
2:42
humans. So we do
2:44
experiments on the sense of fairness
2:46
in both chimps and monkeys. It
2:49
started with a very simple study that
2:51
we did on capuchin monkeys together with
2:53
Sarah Brosnan, a student of mine. We
2:56
discovered that these monkeys pay attention to
2:59
what others get. We think
3:01
that's maybe fairly normal, but if
3:03
you have these monkeys trained on a very simple task
3:05
and you give them food, they're
3:08
not just keeping track of what they did and
3:10
how much food they got, but they also look
3:12
what the neighbor is getting for the same task.
3:16
And so they
3:18
should be doing that. I think they should just pay attention
3:20
to what they do, but they do that. And you must
3:23
do that, of course, also. If I have the same job
3:25
as you and I
3:27
make twice as much money, you will notice and
3:29
you will be a bit upset about it. So
3:32
in the capuchin monkeys anyway, we started doing
3:34
experiments to see how they
3:36
would respond if they get the same rewards. Like
3:39
let's say both monkeys should give them
3:41
cucumber slices for the task, or
3:44
how they respond if you give them different rewards.
3:46
One monkey gets cucumber slices, the other one gets
3:49
grapes, and grapes are 10 times
3:51
better than the cucumber slices. So
3:53
then we did these experiments and we found that the
3:55
monkeys get very upset if they get less than the
3:57
other. They Don't want to perform.
4:00
Normally the willing to perform twenty five times
4:02
in a row for cucumber slices. If the
4:04
partners getting grapes they do it and maybe
4:07
three times and then they become angry and
4:09
under stop and so we we did. That
4:11
was the caput sense and then later we
4:13
did to twist Simpson that simply go further
4:15
than the could put sins in the sense
4:18
that the one who gets to grapes may
4:20
also refused to perform. if the other one
4:22
doesn't get grapes a sudden it's employees. so
4:24
now me that again say that again. That's
4:26
that's and resilience of unknowns that's the better
4:29
of are you are. It's may also refuse
4:31
if the other one doesn't get the
4:33
better. Be worth because there seems to
4:35
be a sense of fairness as lady
4:37
want to impose this fairness on the
4:39
person who's giving our grapes and cucumbers
4:41
know I sing to. My
4:44
theory is that it's all about
4:46
cooperation. Both Capuchin monkeys and Sims
4:48
live in cooperative societies, but some
4:50
sun belt about a thinking ahead
4:52
to chimps are better at. Products.
4:55
In a future behavior and I think
4:57
they realize that if the part that
4:59
is not happy if the part that
5:01
is pissed off because they only get
5:03
cucumber am that have a bad relationship
5:05
is that partner they will they will.
5:07
It will harm their relationship and so
5:09
they prefer that. The partner also gets
5:11
cooked foods. That. In order to
5:14
preserve that relationship and seems probably also
5:16
do that in the Hudson conduct in
5:18
the wilds because they hunt together. If
5:20
if if one of them would always
5:22
take all the good food and and
5:24
leave nothing for the rest that would
5:26
undermine their cooperation because than the others,
5:28
Why would have worked with that individual
5:31
As I think it's all cooperation based
5:33
and in human society. That. if
5:35
you get lots inequalities in human
5:37
societies as we have nowadays in
5:39
american society as he gets his
5:42
wife's inequalities you're basically undermining the
5:44
cooperative nature of the society a
5:46
basic be harming them the fabric
5:48
of society and and me know
5:50
that actually from the health data
5:52
is that societies that are more
5:54
an equal they have also more
5:57
trouble of his health and longevity
5:59
and some that there is a connection
6:01
also in human society. Have
6:03
you learned anything from chimps that
6:06
we humans could benefit from if
6:08
only we were a little more like that? Yeah,
6:13
I find it hard to compare because, not
6:16
because we humans are not comparable with
6:19
chimps, I think we are very similar
6:21
in our psychological makeup to chimps, but
6:23
we live in these very large anonymous
6:25
societies now, so that's a big difference
6:27
with chimps. Humans live in small scale
6:30
societies where everybody knows everybody,
6:32
very much face-to-face kind
6:34
of societies, the way we humans used
6:36
to live. Our ancestors lived in that
6:38
kind of societies, but now we
6:41
live in these huge places where
6:44
people actually can get away with inequality,
6:46
so you have the 1%, as
6:49
we call them, the grape-eaters of this
6:51
society, and so people can get away
6:53
with these things that you couldn't get
6:55
away within a smaller scale society. So
6:57
it's a bit hard to
6:59
compare a chimpanzee
7:02
community of maybe 100 individuals with
7:05
our societies of maybe 300 million
7:08
individuals, so it's very hard to draw
7:10
the connections. But in terms
7:12
of basic psychology and emotional makeup,
7:14
we are still very similar, I think.
7:18
By the way, you can search for Franz
7:20
de Waal, capuchin monkeys, and you'll see why
7:22
that clip went viral. Each
7:25
year we invited Franz back to talk
7:27
about his latest book, Different, Gender Through
7:29
the Eyes of a Primatologist. He
7:32
was rueful about a term he'd used in an
7:34
earlier book that became a meme, the
7:36
alpha male. I
7:38
have a lot of trouble with that view. First
7:42
of all, because male dominance
7:44
is not universal in the animal kingdom,
7:46
and our two closest relatives are a
7:48
good example in the sense that
7:51
male chimpanzees are dominant over females with
7:53
male bonobos, which are equally closer as
7:55
the bonobos, the
7:57
females are dominant. This
8:00
is relative to percent not so
8:02
nasa clear that In addition, Physical
8:05
dominoes is just a small part of
8:07
the picture. Or yes, yes, mail chimp
8:09
on Caesar Physically dominant. But in my
8:11
previous books I described Mama, the alpha
8:14
female of it's infancy colony Hoover's alpha
8:16
female for forty years see as an
8:18
enormous amount of power. So yes, physically,
8:20
C C did not dominate the males.
8:22
But that doesn't mean that he did
8:25
not decide to lot of things including
8:27
the status of males and in the
8:29
sense that you could not become alpha
8:31
male and that colonies without the support
8:33
of my mother. The females him
8:35
if he doesn't have her supports
8:38
and us have a problematic position
8:40
to be in for him because
8:42
the females are usually a large
8:44
group who are very cohesive and
8:46
so the but office of course
8:48
our special in that to have
8:50
collects of female dominance I would
8:52
say is basically a me too
8:54
movement in the sense that the
8:56
females have decided to put a
8:58
stop to two male aggression that
9:00
day they object to mail harassment,
9:02
the certainly no rapes possible in.
9:04
A bit over society because the females
9:07
would never tolerate something like that since
9:09
have a different society. some the temples
9:11
and it make the comparison so interesting
9:13
as a debt that is of course
9:16
a tendency in the among the as
9:18
the policies they don't like. The bonobo
9:20
said the soda bonobo. They try to
9:22
push his size and do the right
9:25
in their books. Things like the bonobo
9:27
was a very strange primates and then
9:29
they dismiss them, but they are genetically
9:31
exactly equally closer. As a symptom cease
9:33
they have a very different society. They
9:36
are much more peaceful. They're much more
9:38
a rock toss. A
9:41
very sexy primates and so
9:43
yeah, people try to push them
9:45
out of the picture because
9:47
they have. To. Sort
9:50
of picture of the human evolution that
9:52
is based on violence and male dominance
9:54
but I think him down exactly equal
9:56
irrelevant sympathies and been open and we
9:58
should try to. That's an
10:00
evolutionary process that includes both of
10:02
them, and you paint a picture
10:05
of the alpha male. even in
10:07
the same population, Being alpha doesn't
10:09
necessarily make you a bully. Know
10:12
that there are. There are bully
10:14
alphas and. There. Are. Socialized.
10:18
Health is her. Alphas that share more
10:20
in the her a break up fights
10:22
and don't causes much violence the right?
10:24
Yes. Oh and it did. The business
10:26
literature has settled on a picture of
10:28
the alpha male that is a bully.
10:30
Such a retired literature it is. So
10:32
make sure that you are the boss.
10:34
Make sure that everyone knows you're the
10:37
boss. To her he has the biggest
10:39
office. A bit of him on over
10:41
the head you get. You get the
10:43
women. you know that's the story in
10:45
the business books. And. Even
10:47
though. The popularity of
10:49
term alpha Male comes partly from my
10:51
work because it started after I wrote
10:54
some fancy politics and thought the lot
10:56
about alpha males a day have reduced
10:58
it to some sort of from a
11:00
dictator. Most alpha males
11:02
that I know. That
11:04
the I substance who are bullies
11:06
efforts to do exists. but most
11:08
alpha males that I know. Has
11:12
been very protective of the
11:14
underdog from somebody Defense juveniles
11:16
against adults, day defense emails
11:18
against males they break up
11:20
fights they are very emphatic
11:22
to arts are victims of
11:24
fights and and so they
11:26
can become extremely popular the
11:28
this by the end of
11:30
their life they may be
11:32
the most popular male and.
11:34
A group of because they were such
11:36
great leaders and so I'm the most
11:38
alpha males that I know. They are
11:41
very different from bullies. They are really
11:43
individuals who keep a group together. His
11:46
book on gender made a powerful
11:48
case of gender fluidity. isn't some
11:50
bizarre aberration, only sand and humans.
11:53
He told the story of a chimpanzee name's
11:55
Donna. Sudden.
11:57
i was a baby when i met her and
12:00
And already at that time, we didn't really know
12:02
that she was different, but you could see that
12:04
she played with
12:07
adult males. She thought out
12:09
adult males to wrestle with,
12:11
which young males very often do, but
12:14
not young females. And so in that sense, already she
12:16
was different from the rest. Then
12:19
when she grew into adolescence,
12:21
years later, she became a
12:23
very robust female. She developed
12:25
the big shoulders and the
12:27
big hair and the big head of
12:30
a male. And she started to act
12:32
like a male. She would display with them if
12:34
the males were displaying around, which
12:36
we usually call bluff behavior with all
12:39
the hairs on end and intimidating everybody.
12:41
She would run along with
12:43
them and she was part of that.
12:45
And she associated more with males than
12:47
with females, actually. So
12:49
she became, from a distance,
12:51
if you didn't know it, you would swear she
12:54
was a male. She
12:56
became a male-like character. And of course,
12:58
I cannot ask her about her
13:00
identity, her sexual
13:02
identity, but clearly
13:05
she acted more like a male than like a
13:07
female. And what I think
13:09
is so interesting about her, compared to our
13:12
current discussion about trans people
13:14
and so on, is that
13:17
she was extremely well accepted. I've never
13:19
noticed any problem with her. She was
13:21
extremely well accepted by both males and
13:23
females in the group. I
13:26
wonder, did she ever get
13:28
pregnant and have a baby? She
13:31
had no offspring at all.
13:33
And she was not interested in
13:35
sex. Initially, we thought she
13:37
might be a lesbian female, but she was
13:40
not interested in sex, neither with males nor
13:42
with females. So
13:44
overall, it seems to
13:46
be that we're not condemned to
13:49
inherited behaviors, but
13:51
we can look for clues in
13:54
our cousin's behavior for how we
13:56
can change through our own socialization.
14:00
of self-socialization. Yeah. Yeah,
14:04
there's a lot more flexibility than
14:08
people assume. So people assume that
14:11
like some conservative politicians nowadays, they say
14:13
such things as like those men and
14:16
women and the trolleys. And
14:19
I think things are not so simple for us
14:21
and things are not so simple for our closest
14:24
relatives. There are indeed
14:26
males and females, but
14:28
whether they are mutually attracted is
14:30
not always the case. So for
14:33
example, I consider Bonobos perfectly
14:35
bisexual in the sense that I don't think
14:37
it matters much for them, whether they have
14:39
sex with a male or a female. So
14:42
sexual orientation is not as clear
14:44
cut as people think. And
14:47
maybe also sexual development. Look at the
14:49
case of Donna and I've also known
14:51
males who are not
14:54
exactly into the macho game. So
14:56
they may be big males who
14:58
are not interested in getting
15:01
a high ranking position among the other males
15:03
and stay out of confrontations. So
15:06
you have all that variability going on,
15:08
what we call nowadays in society, we
15:10
call it gender diversity. So
15:12
you find all that gender diversity also in
15:14
the other primates. And
15:16
it's unfortunate that our current
15:19
societies are intolerant of diversity.
15:21
So we like to put people in pigeonholes
15:23
like you are male, you are female, you
15:26
are homosexual, you are heterosexual.
15:29
We like these pigeonholes, but not
15:31
everything fits and
15:33
not everybody fits. And
15:35
we are intolerant of the ones who don't fit
15:37
in these pigeonholes. Franz
15:40
de Waal died on March 16th of
15:42
stomach cancer. His bequest
15:44
to us all is a richer understanding of
15:46
who we are and how we got this
15:48
way. Alan
15:51
will be back with our next regular episode of
15:53
Clear and Vivid next Tuesday. Meanwhile
15:56
our Patreon subscribers can check out the video
15:58
of Alan and Franz watching Chimpanzee. tons of
16:00
these wrangle over water cannons. Chip
16:03
politics in action. Law
16:16
4, take your base. The only thing worse
16:18
than a pitcher running out of gas on
16:20
the mound is your old phone running out
16:22
of storage for your photos in a stand.
16:24
Goodbye, home run! Switch to Verizon and get
16:26
a great deal on a new iPhone 15
16:28
Pro with tons of storage for all the
16:30
ballpark picks you want. Just trade in your
16:32
iPhone, any model in any condition so you'll
16:34
feel like you're winning. Even when your team's
16:36
not. Trade in any iPhone in
16:38
any condition for a great deal on iPhone
16:41
15 Pro with Unlimited Ultimate and get iPad
16:43
and Apple Watch SE with eligible service plans,
16:45
only on Verizon.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More