0:00

politics without the soap

0:02

opera with unfiltered constitutional

0:04

conservative truth the

0:07

conservative review And

0:09

welcome back fellow American patriots and

0:11

Minutemen standing at the ready to fight

0:13

a new with whatever little tools we

0:16

have To fight for our lives

0:18

liberty and property here at CR

0:20

podcast. This is your host Daniel Hurwitz

0:22

back here today for

0:24

a brand new week When

0:28

there is actually a lot new in the sense

0:30

that we no longer have any Backstop

0:34

at a federal level to protect

0:37

us from every last thing That

0:39

this federal morass is foisting

0:42

upon us invasion inflation indoctrination

0:46

islamic ization The

0:49

war on our products food The

0:53

weaponization And The

0:56

war on our bodies with biomedical tyranny

0:58

that we have broken the last tackle

1:01

or I should say the bad guys

1:03

have broken The last tackle

1:05

now that Republicans have voted to fund

1:08

every last thing on steroids

1:10

There's nothing left Stopping

1:13

them at a federal level So what we're gonna

1:16

explore today and in the coming

1:18

days is you know what we could do within our

1:20

own dominion family community

1:23

church Society

1:26

locally State

1:29

government at best To

1:31

try to protect ourselves But

1:33

make no mistake about it. We are living

1:35

in a political nuclear winter now Never

1:38

forget there is nothing they cannot do to

1:40

us And

1:42

there's no deterrent. So we're gonna go through some

1:44

of the Immediate

1:49

ramifications of what occurred on Friday

1:51

and Then I

1:54

have a lot of new information on

1:56

the vaccines that's

1:58

that's really we're studying Again, that's something

2:00

that we're going to have to

2:03

fight in society, medically, to convince

2:05

people not to kill themselves if you're

2:07

truly pro-life, but also try to see

2:09

how we could sort of

2:11

get around this prep act

2:14

business and

2:16

exact liability on

2:19

those who mandate, if not on the

2:21

manufacturers themselves, but those who push them,

2:23

who are

2:25

not the manufacturers, whether they're doctors,

2:27

hospitals, employers, you name it. So

2:29

a lot to get to today.

2:32

Our first sponsor is our friends at

2:35

Birch Gold as you finish

2:37

your taxes this season and

2:40

you're looking for a place to park your IRA or

2:42

401k. And by

2:44

the way, it doesn't have to be this season. You

2:47

could roll over existing IRAs into gold

2:50

with Birch Gold. Folks,

2:52

now that they've signed this bill, there

2:56

is literally no backstop on

2:58

inflation. So I don't know

3:00

if you saw global government debt is now at 82 billion in the

3:02

world, up 20

3:05

trillion since COVID. So

3:08

that means that the global

3:10

debt grew by nearly a quarter

3:14

since just COVID,

3:17

four years ago. In

3:19

the US, the debt has actually grown by

3:21

almost a third since COVID, but

3:24

the treasury market to service that debt

3:26

has grown by 60% in just four

3:28

years. So

3:31

again, the US now holds 42%, 42%

3:33

of all global debt. So

3:39

folks, there is never ever

3:42

a better time to invest in gold than

3:45

today with Birch by texting Daniel to 989898.

3:48

You'll get your free info kit on gold

3:51

and then you'll talk to a precious metals

3:53

specialist on how to protect your savings from

3:56

this intractable, irrevocable

3:58

inflation. I'm again texting

4:01

Daniel to 989898 today.

4:04

So let's go through some of

4:06

the ramifications. Again, inflation off to

4:08

the races. So

4:10

we had a majority in the end in the

4:13

House voted against the bill, so it's

4:15

a complete joke where you have leadership

4:17

take a minority of the Republicans and

4:19

join with almost every Democrat to pass

4:21

the bill. And again,

4:24

that just shows you that

4:27

if they were really that upset, you would get rid of

4:31

Speaker Johnson, right? I'd

4:33

love to brag about 112 voting no, but

4:35

they're just scared with their voting records, and

4:38

this is the game they're playing. This

4:40

is the game they're playing with Move the Ball.

4:42

Oh, you're vulnerable. You haven't been elected

4:44

yet. You know, what's interesting is if

4:46

you look at the roster of those

4:49

who voted for it in the House,

4:51

a lot of them are the ones that

4:53

already won their primaries. So they pocket the

4:55

win, and then they screw us, the ones

4:57

that are in cycle, then

4:59

are given a hall pass. So

5:02

the point is they might have a decent

5:04

voting record at the time, but they're part

5:06

of the game. They're part of the problem.

5:09

And that's why we're never going to solve this until

5:11

we completely change things to

5:13

being either Freedom Caucus or Uniparty.

5:15

And if you're not part of

5:17

the Freedom Caucus, immediately you

5:20

deserve a no vote, whether you're an incumbent, whether

5:22

you're an open seat candidate

5:24

that's not pledging to join it.

5:28

So that's one thing. Obviously in the

5:30

Senate, it was about

5:32

50-50, roughly split down the

5:34

middle of the GOP conference with 24

5:37

no votes. What's

5:42

interesting is one of the votes

5:44

that's yes is Kevin Cramer, deep

5:46

red state Republican who is in cycle, but

5:48

why is he not scared? He's

5:51

not scared because he has

5:53

Trump's support. Trump

5:55

already endorsed him. Well, you might

5:57

think, well, Daniel, there's no real opposition. Well, I'm not going to

5:59

do that. Well, the primary is in June,

6:03

we could still recruit. For

6:07

a while I've asked you

6:09

guys to imagine if rather than endorsing

6:12

the bad guys, Trump would

6:14

have announced ahead

6:16

of time that if you challenge any

6:18

rhino, and a rhino is defined not

6:20

by how much you kiss Trump through

6:22

your end, but where

6:25

you are on the issues, but

6:28

that if you go and challenge them, you

6:30

will have my support, I'll comment and

6:32

campaign for you. And

6:34

I said, imagine what the GOP would look like

6:37

today if that would have been the case. Well,

6:39

I think you don't need to imagine that anymore,

6:41

because you could find it for the bad. So

6:46

you have all these people that

6:49

just voted for the

6:51

sellout with Trump's support.

6:56

And yet, the one person he

6:58

picks on randomly, Trump

7:01

just puts out a post yesterday soliciting

7:04

opposition, meaning asking people

7:07

to go and run against

7:09

Laurel Lee, a congresswoman from

7:11

Florida. Now you might think that's a

7:13

random name, never heard of her. What's with

7:15

her? Well, she's one of only

7:18

four house members who voted

7:20

to, who not voted, who

7:22

endorsed DeSantis for prison. That's

7:25

why. Hey, if you screw with on every

7:27

issue, you'll get his support. The

7:31

only ones who'll exercise his power are

7:34

someone like that, someone like that

7:36

who attacked him from the right.

7:38

Now, Laurel Lee is not like the other three,

7:40

Bob Good, Thomas Massey and Chip Roy. She's not

7:42

so good. I mean, I'd appreciate a better person,

7:44

but that's not where this is coming from or

7:47

headed here. You know,

7:49

she supported him because she was Secretary of

7:51

State in Florida at the time, so obviously

7:53

had what to do with him and had

7:55

gratitude to him. But

7:57

anyway, this is how completely

8:00

backwards this man has become. So

8:04

when he actually wants to influence

8:06

things, he opens his mouth. So

8:09

just know when you don't hear him

8:11

supporting good guys, when you don't hear

8:13

him opposing bad legislation, just know it's

8:15

because he's on the wrong side of

8:17

it. Now

8:19

that leads us to a couple other things here.

8:23

Immediate outcomes. So Marjorie Taylor

8:26

Greene announced a

8:28

motion to vacate. She already filed it, didn't

8:30

act upon it, but filed it. People

8:35

are asking, hey, what do you think? What do you think? At

8:37

this point, we have nothing to lose. See,

8:40

we didn't want the chaos in the middle of the budget

8:42

fight because we wanted to fight on the budget. Now that

8:44

it's over with, this entire

8:47

session of Congress is done. There

8:50

is zero purpose, zero

8:53

purpose to Republicans

8:57

remaining in power. In fact,

8:59

it's worse. In fact, the best

9:01

thing you could do is throw

9:03

the house into chaos in a

9:05

way. See, this is

9:07

the first time I actually believe chaos is

9:09

something constructive. Depends

9:11

on the time. The time we're in, it

9:14

would actually be better to ensure that we

9:16

have no speaker. So, you

9:18

know, the deadlock that existed for a month or a little bit

9:20

more than a month last year, make

9:22

that until the end of the year. You

9:24

know why? Because at

9:26

this point, there is nothing good that they

9:28

can or will do and they're

9:32

only gonna do bad stuff. Let me give you

9:34

an example. See, if we

9:36

have no speaker, they can't pass new bad things.

9:40

Now you might think, well, Daniel, they're not gonna pass new

9:42

bad things. They might not have the votes or desire to

9:44

hold up, you know, the budget bill, but you're not gonna

9:46

pass the new bad... No! On

9:49

CBS's Face the Nation, House Foreign

9:51

Affairs Committee chair Michael McCall said

9:54

that Johnson had committed to putting a

9:57

Ukraine bill on the floor after

9:59

Easter. So

10:01

– and by the way, just

10:03

know he wouldn't be saying that

10:06

without Trump's support. I

10:08

want you to understand that very clearly.

10:10

There will never be a scenario where

10:12

Johnson's going to emphatically push something on

10:14

the floor knowing that Trump will come

10:16

out and oppose it. Just know that.

10:19

That's the invisible hand behind

10:21

this. So not only are

10:24

they not going to use their leverage

10:26

to block bad

10:28

things, they're actually going to

10:31

initially pass new bad things

10:33

with GOP control. And

10:37

you're going to like it. It's all going to be good.

10:41

It's all going to be good. By

10:45

the way, another immediate outcome – so that's

10:47

an outcome that now he's going to move

10:49

on to Ukraine. Another

10:51

one is, what happens

10:54

when you have zero backstop on

10:56

invasion, inflation, weaponization? Well,

10:58

the Justice Department just launched

11:01

the National Extreme Risk Protection

11:03

Order Resource Center, and

11:06

they're saying it's designed to

11:09

keep guns out of the hands of

11:11

people who will harm themselves or others.

11:15

Now, that doesn't mean

11:17

career violent criminals, right? Because as

11:19

we well know, violent

11:21

criminals in Chicago who violate

11:23

their parole with

11:25

felony possession of firearms, the

11:29

Democrats are forever passing legislation to let

11:31

them out. It's

11:33

not those people. You know who that means. It

11:37

means if you own a gun and

11:39

you say the vaccines

11:41

are killing people, there's

11:44

election fraud, you're a

11:46

threat to other people. And

11:48

why not? In

11:50

fact, it turns out that buried

11:52

in the omnibus bill was a provision called

11:55

Ethan's law, which lets the attorney

11:58

general confiscate your guns. if

12:00

they've not been stored safely. So you

12:03

know what they can do now? They can find

12:05

like a guy like Steve Baker, you

12:07

know, where we arrest you for having been

12:09

at the Capitol doing nothing but reporting, but

12:11

we don't like what you're saying about the

12:13

government. And then once we're there, we

12:15

check out your firearms. Oh, and if we don't

12:18

like you're safe, ooh, well,

12:20

that's now another program. See

12:25

what I mean? There is no backstop. There

12:27

is – pick the

12:29

top ten issues. The

12:32

indoctrination, inflation, invasion, weaponization,

12:34

the war on energy, the entire

12:39

biomedical security state. That

12:42

is off to the races,

12:45

off to the races. There's

12:48

nothing we can do. And

12:52

that leads me to one final point I want to

12:54

make about the

12:57

fallout from the omnibus bill. Mike

13:00

Gallagher, the chair of the Intel Committee

13:02

at yet another Rhino, announces

13:04

that he is retiring early, not just at the

13:06

end of the year, but he's going to leave

13:08

in middle of the year. Under

13:12

Wisconsin law, he's from Wisconsin, congressional

13:14

vacancies occurring prior to the second

13:16

Tuesday in April in the election

13:18

year get filled. But

13:21

instead, he's going to retire

13:24

immediately, but after April 19th,

13:27

in order to ensure that there's no special election. So

13:30

basically, that seat will remain vacant, and

13:32

Republicans will lose another seat. So we

13:34

now have McCarthy leaving, Bill Johnson left,

13:36

Ken Buck. See,

13:39

this is what they do. They

13:42

take their ball and go home. We're

13:44

always accused of, oh, we have to

13:46

support whatever piece of garbage Republican, because

13:48

otherwise, it will empower the D's. We

13:50

can't let the Democrats win. Notice how

13:52

they don't have a problem doing that,

13:55

literally handing the majority to Democrats. Now,

13:57

again, like I said before, I don't

13:59

care, because... They already do control it,

14:02

so it doesn't matter. It's actually

14:04

better this way they'll let them own it. Or

14:07

at least have a Deadlock Chaos at this point.

14:09

I don't mind it, just so you

14:11

know, based on where we are now. But

14:15

the point being is that

14:17

these guys never care. They

14:19

just don't care. So

14:22

the only way to restore Deterrent is

14:26

to do it the other way around. See,

14:28

they sabotage our people even in general

14:30

elections, and this is the ultimate general

14:32

election, when you already have a narrow

14:34

GOP majority, and one after another, they

14:36

just quit. I mean, here's

14:38

another thing. How is Kevin McCarthy in

14:40

good standing with Trump to get

14:43

him to follow his every whim

14:45

on endorsements down the ballot, including

14:47

in his own congressional district, and also

14:49

be bantied about as

14:52

a possible Chief of Staff for Trump, when

14:54

he left in middle of the session?

14:56

I mean, why is

14:59

that not handing control to Democrats? I'm

15:02

sick of this one-way street. I'm

15:04

telling you this, headed forward.

15:08

The only way we will

15:10

ever have Deterrent against

15:12

these people is if

15:14

we're willing to shoot hostages. And

15:17

that means that the

15:19

same way we don't vote for these people in

15:21

primaries, which most people do, we're

15:24

not going to vote for them even in a

15:26

general election. That is

15:28

the only way you are ever going to

15:30

change the game, that

15:33

we are different parties. You're either

15:35

Freedom Caucus or you're Uniparty. If you're not

15:37

one of us, screw

15:39

you, because that's how they feel about us. There

15:42

is no unity. They take

15:44

their ball and go home. But

15:46

they know that we'll always be on

15:48

their plantation because we're so terrified of

15:51

but the Democrats. But you know what?

15:54

As I walk in the valley

15:56

of the shadow of death, I

15:58

don't fear any – evil

16:00

because God is with me. At some point, I

16:03

just don't fear it anymore because we get it

16:05

anyway. That's

16:08

where we need to head. That

16:12

is where we need to head. And I do

16:14

have one more point, actually. Now that I brought that

16:16

up, that I do want to make, but

16:19

I first want to get to a very

16:21

relevant new sponsor that's also relevant

16:23

for the second part of today's show on

16:27

more death and destruction and

16:29

disease from COVID. We're

16:32

now seeing blood disorders. We're seeing

16:34

heart disorders everywhere. We

16:37

all know that we're full of toxins, what we eat,

16:40

what we're exposed to, whether you had the COVID shots

16:42

or not, maybe you're even exposed to them even if

16:44

you didn't get them. But even

16:47

without that, there's just so many things that

16:49

our bodies are now so deficient. So then

16:52

we're working on supplements, but there's a lot of

16:54

pill fatigue. A great

16:56

new product I want to introduce you

16:58

guys to is

17:01

from our friends at Superbeats. They

17:04

have heart chews. Literally,

17:06

they're chewable. So you don't have to

17:08

sit and swallow more pills. You don't

17:11

have to make this big concoction with

17:13

some sort of liquid. You just boom.

17:15

That's what I'm really intrigued

17:17

about. Now, what does it do? Their heart chews,

17:20

they support healthy blood pressure.

17:22

It's an easy way to

17:25

support healthy blood pressure, helps

17:28

keep your blood

17:30

flow and circulation at a time when

17:32

we have so many circulatory disorders paired

17:36

with a healthy lifestyle. The antioxidants

17:38

in Superbeats are clinically shown to

17:40

be nearly two times more effective

17:43

at promoting normal blood pressure than

17:45

even a healthy lifestyle alone,

17:47

which certainly you want to exercise and

17:50

eat right as well. Again,

17:53

these things are amazing that

17:57

they don't cause a crash like you have with a lot of

17:59

this. stuff where it stimulates your

18:01

body, you know,

18:36

you're swallowing so many pills, it's

18:38

great to have chewables, that's get

18:40

super be e

18:43

t s.com offer

18:45

code Daniel. So

18:48

just one more point I wanted to

18:50

make on general elections, you know, I'm

18:52

from Maryland and

18:54

nobody will understand when I tell them

18:57

I will not vote for Larry Hogan.

18:59

He's running for Senate, lockdown Larry, I will not

19:02

vote for him in the general election. And

19:06

to underscore the point

19:08

of negative efficacy, how Republicans

19:11

are often like COVID shots, in

19:14

that they help the Democrats more than

19:16

if you would have a Democrat from

19:18

that seat. First of all, I'm very

19:20

skeptical that he's up 20 million points,

19:22

that he could carry Maryland, no

19:24

matter how liberal he is, carry Maryland in

19:27

a presidential year. But

19:30

this is from a couple weeks ago in

19:32

the New York Post, Larry Hogan says Trump

19:34

ordering GOP to block bipartisan border bill made

19:36

him angry enough to run. So

19:39

the reason why Larry Hogan

19:41

is running is

19:43

because he wanted the Langford bill.

19:46

Do you see what I mean? There's one

19:48

thing to have a guy or a Republican

19:51

from a blue state that is

19:54

with you on some issues and then

19:56

other issues he quietly just votes with the Democrats

19:58

because he wants to hold deceit and he thinks

20:00

that's what he needs to do. You know, so

20:03

then there's a reason to believe that, look, something

20:05

is better than nothing. You would just have a

20:07

full Democrat, so now you have a half Democrat

20:09

from the state. What

20:11

Larry Hogan is announcing publicly is

20:14

that his purpose of being in the Senate

20:16

is to be Mitt Romney times the 100,

20:19

is to work with the

20:21

Dems actively to

20:23

subvert us and

20:25

create things that empower them that if

20:27

they just had another Democrat seat, they wouldn't

20:29

have the leverage to do because Democrats are never going to

20:31

get 60 seats. But

20:34

remember, as much

20:36

as, you know, even if we can't

20:38

win a national election, there's more small

20:40

red states than blue states and

20:43

every state gets to Senate seats. This was

20:45

the, you know, genius of our

20:47

founders that they wanted the smaller rural states

20:49

to get as much representation in the Senate

20:51

as, let's say, you know, modern

20:54

day California. So

20:56

Dems really are going to have a hard time ever

20:59

getting near 60 seats just

21:01

based on the red state dynamic and

21:04

the realignment of politics. So, you know, our guys are kicked out

21:06

of blue states, but they're going to be kicked out of red

21:08

states and they might lose their

21:10

final few. So

21:12

you know, they're not going to have 60 seats. The

21:16

problem that we have is when you

21:18

have subversive Republicans who work with them.

21:23

So again, I am done

21:26

with this way of thinking that a

21:28

Republican of any living organism is always

21:30

better than having a Democrat in that

21:33

seat. So

21:36

this is where we need to go. We

21:39

need to pledge that we will

21:42

not support them. You nominate them in

21:45

a primary, we will not support them even

21:47

in a general election. Again,

21:50

I want to talk about that more headed

21:53

forward as

21:56

we talk about how to create a

21:58

new party within a party. Freedom

22:01

Caucus versus Uniparty, but

22:03

this is certainly one of them. So

22:06

moving on to another

22:09

big story over the weekend, Kate

22:12

Middleton, Princess of Wales announcing that she's

22:14

undergoing cancer treatment and that's why she's

22:16

been, you know, out of the public

22:18

eye for so long. Now typically, anything

22:20

that has the name, you know, Royal

22:22

Family attached to it is something you're

22:24

never gonna hear on this show because

22:26

I couldn't give a darn. But

22:29

this is something that is

22:31

very important because this

22:33

is coinciding with a time when there is

22:35

so much data in the UK on an

22:38

explosion of cancers perfectly coinciding

22:41

with 2021 that this is something

22:43

that we should use this new story to

22:48

push ahead on the

22:50

imperative to get rid of this shot, to

22:53

get rid of the technology around it, and

22:55

to start investigating the other shots and

22:57

other things in our environment

23:01

that are causing this. Now,

23:04

whenever you're talking about an individual,

23:06

unless you see one of these real

23:08

clear turbo cancers, you

23:11

can't pin that particular case on the shots.

23:13

You just don't know. Clearly she

23:15

got them. We don't

23:18

know, so I don't want to speculate. There's no way of knowing. But

23:21

in the macro data, it for sure is causing

23:23

that. And I wanted to go through some of

23:25

what we're seeing. Again,

23:28

I'm not gonna have time to go through all the things we've

23:30

missed, but every once in a while, I want to arm you

23:32

with the information as it

23:34

comes out, but especially coinciding

23:36

with this story. I mean,

23:38

it's kind of a big deal that everyone's getting

23:40

cancer. Are we at

23:43

the least bit curious

23:46

as to the cause? And again,

23:48

this is not, okay, you know, this famous

23:50

person, that famous person, this is a matter

23:52

of places like Johns Hopkins in

23:55

Maryland, are booked

23:57

up indefinitely. their

24:00

oncology and radiology departments. You

24:03

can't get an appointment. There's something

24:05

really wrong there. I mean,

24:08

anyone who works in that will

24:10

tell you it's out of control,

24:12

it's more aggressive, it's younger, there's

24:14

nobody who will deny that. Aren't

24:18

we kind of interested in understanding what is going

24:20

on? And again, there

24:22

is a long-term macro trend of

24:25

toxins that's disturbing, but then there's just

24:27

off the charts since

24:29

2021. And

24:34

it's a little bit bizarre that

24:37

there is zero

24:39

concern about where

24:42

this is coming from. And remember,

24:44

this is another thing that

24:47

is off to the races now

24:50

that Republicans have

24:52

fully, fully funded

24:54

the Fourth Reich. And

24:57

in fact, the

25:00

NIH, CDC, and FDA,

25:04

and BARDA for that matter, and forget

25:09

the one that starts with ARPA-A, all

25:13

the pandemic programs have

25:15

record baseline funding. A lot

25:19

of them got increases off the

25:21

existing record baseline, like the NIH

25:23

especially, in the

25:25

omnibus bill from what I can see. HHS

25:29

funding is now like double what it

25:31

was just a few years ago. So

25:35

we're funding all of this. So again,

25:37

we're gonna have to fight back in medicine, society,

25:42

and state and local

25:44

governments to deal with this.

25:48

But again, I can't speculate

25:51

about Kate's diagnosis

25:53

itself when we don't know the

25:56

circumstances, but it's

25:58

shocking that someone

26:00

of her fame doesn't

26:03

draw more attention to what we know is going

26:05

on. This is from the UK

26:07

Daily Mail from

26:10

last week. Studies project diagnosis

26:12

will continue to rise by 30,

26:14

this cancer diagnosis, by 31% and

26:16

deaths will rise by 21% in 2030. Nearly

26:19

every continent is experiencing an

26:24

increase of various types of cancer in

26:27

people under 50, which

26:30

is particularly problematic as the disease tends

26:32

to be caught in later stages

26:34

in this population because most doctors aren't trained

26:37

to look for it in younger people. I

26:39

would also add that the machinery of

26:41

the body, the cellular reproduction

26:43

is much quicker so cancer works off

26:45

of that so it's going to be

26:48

more aggressive. Globally,

26:50

Australia has seen the highest number of

26:53

early onset cancer

26:57

diagnoses in the world with a rate

26:59

of 135 per 100,000 people. The

27:04

US falls in sixth place with 87. Again,

27:06

this is per 100,000 people under 50. New

27:15

diagnoses. Okay,

27:19

so you don't need to

27:21

speculate about an individual, you know, people are going to

27:23

debate this, there's no way we could ever prove that.

27:26

But what we can prove is

27:28

that anecdotally, when

27:30

you're seeing all these famous people, some of

27:32

them have to be included in

27:34

the macro data that

27:37

absolutely is not anecdotal, that

27:41

the media is openly reporting on this that,

27:43

yeah, oh yeah, it's going to, it's skyrocketing

27:46

under 50 in every continent, especially

27:48

in these high vaccinated countries like the

27:50

UK, US, and especially Australia. As studies

27:55

project, it's going to go off the charts for the next

27:57

five, six years, you know, another 30 percenting.

28:02

And there's no curiosity,

28:05

especially now that we have

28:07

endless academic studies tying

28:11

the correlation of this rise to the rise

28:14

of the COVID shots, as

28:17

well as the numerous mechanisms of action

28:19

of how

28:21

the shots are both carcinogenic

28:24

actively but also indirectly tamp

28:26

down your anti-cancer

28:29

or anti-tumor surveillance

28:31

system in your body. I

28:35

mean, again, anyone who is not

28:37

fighting this issue, you're not pro-life. There's

28:43

more. Our

28:46

friend, Sonia Elijah, could be

28:48

the best writer on COVID data out

28:51

there now. She writes that her

28:53

sub-stack, The Princess of Wales, is truly not

28:56

alone in her cancer treatment. Because

28:58

she said in her speech, you're not alone. And

29:01

indeed, cancer suffers without being alone. And

29:05

she points to a pre-print paper

29:08

entitled, U.S. Death Trends for

29:11

Neoplasms ICD Codes, C00

29:14

to D48, ages 15

29:16

to 48. So very young,

29:19

co-authored by Carlos Allegria

29:22

Ury-Nunez and Dr. David Weissman,

29:26

delved into the concerning trajectory of

29:29

cancer-related mortality rates. And

29:33

they drew from raw data

29:36

sourced from CDC. And they

29:38

found troubling patterns. We

29:41

show a rise in excess mortality from neoplasms

29:43

reported as underlying cause of death, which started

29:45

in 2020 as a 1.7% increase. And

29:53

then in 2021, increased 5.6%. And in 2022, increased 7.9%.

30:02

That's a z-score of 11.8 in 2021, 16.5 in 2022, highly

30:04

statistically significant. When

30:13

looking at neoplasm deaths reported as

30:15

one of multiple cause of deaths,

30:18

we observe a similar trend. So

30:21

this is not when it's the sole cause. It's

30:25

excess going up 3.3 in 2020, 7.9 in 2021, and 9.8% in 2022. So

30:36

yeah, I mean, again,

30:38

this is incontrovertibly clear that

30:41

this is going on. Another

30:45

paper from Allegria was

30:48

referenced which investigated trends in cancer

30:50

rates in individuals 15,

30:53

44 from the UK which

30:55

showed much larger deviations from

30:57

trend in 2021, We

31:00

show a large increase in morbidity

31:03

and mortality due to the malignant neoplasms

31:06

that started in 2021, accelerated substantially in

31:08

2022. So

31:14

there doesn't seem to be a concern as

31:17

to what is going on. Younger

31:22

people right

31:24

around that time in the

31:26

US, UK, Australia.

31:32

Now you might be wondering, you know, there was a little increase in

31:34

2020. Look, that doesn't bother

31:36

me. Okay?

31:41

Not everything but a lot of things that are

31:43

associated with the vaccines were associated with the virus.

31:46

But again, the vaccine makes it more likely you'll get

31:48

the virus too. There's

31:50

no way you could avoid that. The same

31:52

genocidal maniacs that created one created the other.

31:56

The virus was toxic as hell. Again,

31:58

a lot of people got over it fine. But

32:01

a lot of people didn't, and

32:04

a lot of people had long-term damage, and

32:06

a lot of people who maybe didn't

32:08

really notice much, they had long-term damage and

32:10

they don't notice it. Again,

32:13

four years into this, we have enough

32:15

data that's very clear that the vaccines

32:17

clearly turbocharge it in terms of

32:20

correlation. But

32:22

that for some of these ailments, you

32:24

get a little bit of heart from

32:26

the spike protein in the vaccine, no

32:28

question about it, and

32:30

maybe even cancers. Yeah,

32:33

I mean as toxic as anything. So

32:39

everyone's talking about – anything about the

32:41

royal family is just obsessed

32:44

about, but in

32:46

reality, in

32:48

reality, we don't

32:50

need to talk about one person. We

32:53

have the data that this is out of

32:55

control, particularly in that country. So

33:01

those are cancers. Then

33:03

there's neurological. I mean neurological,

33:05

we talked about from day one, and there's a bunch

33:07

of new studies out on that. So this is –

33:09

where is

33:12

this? Neurological,

33:18

conditions affecting the nervous system such

33:21

as strokes, migraines, and dementia.

33:24

Strokes, migraines, and

33:26

dementia have surged past heart

33:28

disease to become the leading

33:30

cause of ill health

33:33

worldwide. A major neural analysis said

33:35

on Friday, more than 3.4 billion.

33:39

That's 43% of

33:41

the global population experiencing neurological

33:43

condition in 2021, far

33:46

more than they had previously thought. More

33:49

than 11 million people died from

33:51

37 neurological conditions in 2021 according

33:53

to the study published in The

33:55

Lancet Neurology Journal. Again, these are

33:57

top journals, the top. cardiovascular

34:00

disease remain the leading cause of

34:02

death, killing 90.8 million

34:04

people worldwide in 2022. So,

34:10

heart, neurological,

34:13

cancers. Okay, the big three.

34:17

You know, it's only all of humanity on the line. All

34:23

of humanity. There's

34:26

also another preprint titled,

34:30

Evaluation of Fibril Seizure

34:32

Risk Following Ancestral Monovalent

34:34

COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination. That's

34:36

Moderna among US children

34:38

aged 2 to 5.

34:42

It's a preprint with

34:44

the lead author being a current

34:46

FDA scientist. So again, I'm showing

34:48

you all from their research. I

34:52

mean, they haven't, they're not even covering it

34:54

up. Because again, they know

34:56

there's no backstop. Republicans will never

34:58

fight on anything, so

35:00

they could just openly publish their studies now.

35:03

They are, they actually are. They're

35:05

not even hiding them anymore. They're not even censoring. We're

35:08

beyond the censorship. Yes,

35:10

this is basically going to take every leading

35:13

man killer, neurological,

35:16

heart and cancer, and it's off the

35:18

charts just, you know, coinciding with 2021.

35:22

And we have all the mechanisms of action understanding

35:24

why these shots would do that. And

35:26

yeah, it's not a problem. So anyway, this is from the

35:28

study with the

35:31

FDA scientist. Toddlers

35:33

and other young children face a higher

35:35

risk of seizures. Shortly

35:37

after COVID-19 vaccination, according

35:39

to a new study from

35:41

the US Food and Drug

35:44

Administration researchers. Okay,

35:47

I mean, straight up, demonic as

35:49

hell. Toddlers getting seizures

35:51

from a shot that even if it

35:54

was safe and effective, they never needed.

35:58

The incidence of fever. seizures was

36:01

2.5 times higher among children 0

36:03

to 1. After

36:10

taking the Moderna shock compared to the same children 8

36:13

to 63 days after vaccination, the

36:18

risk was significantly elevated they

36:20

wrote in a pre-print paper

36:23

describing the results. It's a pre-print but

36:25

again this is from the FDA researchers.

36:29

Should I go on? Speaking

36:32

of neurological,

36:34

we have another one. This

36:37

is from the Epic Times and

36:40

they're taking this from a JAMA

36:42

study, Journal of

36:44

American Medical Association. So JAMA and Lancet

36:47

are the top journals. We

36:49

have a Lancet study on

36:53

you know neurological going off the charts

36:55

in 2021. Record

36:57

number of people affected 43% worldwide

36:59

experiencing something. You know

37:02

a lot of that's migraines but again

37:04

you know substantial

37:06

amount with strokes. We

37:10

have an FDA study on seizures and now we have

37:12

a JAMA study that

37:14

some people who received the COVID-19 vaccine

37:17

were at higher risk of stroke but

37:19

an analysis found that the risk was

37:21

connected to influenza vaccination. Researchers

37:24

analyzing data from Medicare detected

37:27

an elevated stroke risk among the elderly

37:29

following receipt of a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine

37:31

made by Pfizer and Moderna and available

37:34

from the fall 2022 to the fall

37:36

2023. Again demonic as hell after it

37:38

was known that those things

37:43

had negative efficacy and killed people.

37:46

There was an elevated risk of non

37:48

hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack in

37:51

people 85 or older following Pfizer

37:53

vaccination and people aged 65 to 74 following

37:56

Moderna but the researchers

37:58

then looked at which people received an influenza

38:00

shot and they found that

38:02

it was basically concentrated among those people. So

38:05

remember, these are the people that are

38:07

going to the pharmacy every fall and

38:09

they're getting bombed now with three, RSV

38:12

and COVID and

38:15

influenza. We always said, like, hey, did

38:18

you ever understand the consequences of

38:20

that? And remember, as they note here,

38:23

that seniors get a high dose

38:25

flu vaccine. So we're used to

38:27

thinking the flu vaccine is one of the more

38:29

innocuous ones, meaning it probably

38:31

causes immune suppression, it certainly doesn't

38:33

work, it's a scam, but it's

38:36

probably not, like, you know, really bad. But

38:39

remember, seniors get a high dose of it.

38:43

So we now have a JAMA

38:46

study, okay? Top

38:49

journal study,

38:52

peer reviewed, saying

38:55

that they found COVID influenza, they believe it

38:57

seems to be the influenza shot, mixing

39:00

in with it, that we're

39:02

just getting seniors in droves. Remember,

39:05

we can't left this off because,

39:07

you know, I'm

39:10

sure a lot of you are nodding your heads. Heck,

39:13

maybe some of you yourselves, but certainly your family

39:15

members that are seniors,

39:18

they get the flu shot every year. They

39:22

get a high dose flu shot. It's

39:25

not a conspiracy theory, anti-vax, this, that,

39:27

whatever epithet you want to throw, I'm

39:30

reading to you from top journals

39:33

that just came out. The

39:38

clinical significance from

39:41

the study, clinical significance of

39:43

the risk of stroke as a vaccination

39:45

must be carefully considered together with the

39:47

significant benefits of receiving an influenza vaccine.

39:51

More studies are needed to better understand the association

39:53

between high dose or a jubinated

39:55

influenza vaccination and stroke. The jubinated is

39:57

the ones for younger people. So

40:01

they openly

40:05

admit that it's a problem. They're like, well, you

40:07

gotta weigh the benefits. So

40:12

it looked at stroke cases between August 31st, 2022 and January

40:14

or February, 2023, so that a half a year window, after

40:22

exclusions, they

40:24

included 11,000 stroke cases. Yeah,

40:31

real nice. Real,

40:33

real nice. So

40:36

that's what we have here. This

40:39

is what we have. This

40:42

is an utter nightmare. I

40:45

can't believe we're living through this. And

40:49

then I have one more study

40:51

I want to share with you. This

40:54

is another preprint, a German

40:56

preprint. This

41:02

is the lead author is, if you want to

41:04

look it up, Kubansner,

41:06

K-U-H-B-A-N-D-N-E-R. So

41:13

German researchers, what they did is they

41:16

looked at excess mortality and end excess

41:18

stillbirth, so two separate points. In

41:22

each of the 20 or so

41:24

German independent states,

41:27

they're kind of local government jurisdictions,

41:31

and what they did was they made

41:34

correlation between vaccination

41:36

rates and

41:38

then excess mortality and stillbirths.

41:41

And they found excess

41:44

mortality varied substantially across federal states in each

41:46

of the pandemic years, and

41:48

nearly all states, excess mortality was

41:50

small in the first pandemic

41:52

year, increased in

41:54

the second and even more in the

41:57

third. What

42:00

does that tell you? As

42:02

vaccines went on, they had more deaths, meaning

42:04

you should have the most in the

42:06

first year, which is the pandemic, without

42:09

this great protection, right? But

42:11

no, they found the opposite. The

42:13

increase varied substantially across the federal states as well.

42:15

Regarding the covariations with

42:17

the explored state-specific quantities,

42:20

two correlation patterns are

42:22

noticeable. In the first two

42:24

years of the pandemic, but not in the

42:26

third, there was a strong correlation between excess

42:28

mortality and the number of reported COVID deaths,

42:31

suggesting that the differences in excess mortality observed

42:33

earlier in the pandemic are due to differences

42:35

in the levels of exposure to COVID. In

42:38

other words, the excess deaths were COVID. But

42:41

remember, Germany didn't have that

42:43

much COVID. It was one of

42:45

those countries didn't have that much COVID in 2020. And

42:51

by the way, even in

42:53

2021, just remember, another important thing

42:55

we talked about at the time three years ago. In

42:58

America, we have a perfect starting point with

43:00

the calendar year when you do data analysis.

43:04

2021 is the vaccine year, January 2021. Some

43:06

healthcare workers got it December 2020. But

43:08

the public, for seniors, it was eligible in

43:11

January. For Germany, it

43:15

was available in Israel, the UK,

43:17

and America. Continental

43:20

Europe like Germany, they actually

43:23

held off until much later in the year because

43:26

the companies were shaking them down. And unlike America,

43:28

a lot of these countries, they don't have the

43:30

wealth to buy all this stuff. So

43:32

they were they were balking at it. And finally, they

43:34

gave in. But they

43:37

didn't start the vaccination till later. So this

43:39

correlation actually makes perfect sense for a country

43:41

like Germany. But

43:48

however, this cannot explain the increase of

43:50

excess mortality in the second and third

43:52

pandemic years because the number of COVID-19

43:54

deaths decreased instead of increased in

43:57

almost all the federal states. So the

43:59

COVID deaths. went down. So

44:01

that can't be the excess mortality like

44:04

it was at the beginning of the pandemic. Regarding

44:07

the increase in excess mortality, an

44:10

increasingly strong positive correlation with vaccination

44:12

rate of a federal state is

44:14

observed, which reaches a value of

44:16

r equals 0.85

44:18

in the third pandemic year, indicating that

44:21

excess mortality increase the stronger, the

44:23

higher the vaccination rate in a

44:25

federal state was. So that's

44:28

one thing. And then another thing is, an

44:32

analysis of stillbirths showed

44:35

the exact same pattern.

44:39

No other systemic correlation

44:42

pattern was observed, meaning

44:44

two things. Excess

44:47

mortality went up with

44:51

both the timing

44:53

and location of vaccination

44:58

rates, even though

45:00

COVID deaths were going down. And

45:05

likewise, stillbirths went

45:08

up as the vaccines came online and

45:11

more acutely in the German

45:13

states that had the higher vaccination

45:15

rates. As shown in figure 6b, obviously

45:18

you can't see that, but

45:20

you can look it up. This is further supported by

45:22

an analysis of the increase in the number of

45:24

stillbirths from the first to the second and the third

45:26

year of the pandemic, meaning the first is 2020,

45:28

second is 2021, third is 2022.

45:33

Already for the increase in the second year, a

45:36

moderately strong positive correlation is

45:38

observed. That's

45:40

0.178. Okay,

45:43

that's moderate correlation, which makes sense because it didn't

45:45

even start the vaccination until later in 2021 in

45:47

Germany, and then it takes time to

45:51

get the stillbirths, right, through the get pregnant

45:53

pregnancies. So it makes sense that the main thing

45:55

is going to be in the third pandemic year, 2022, there's a strong

45:59

positive correlation. observed,

46:01

that's 0.002.

46:05

P-value of 0.002. That's

46:08

well over the academic threshold

46:10

for statistical significance. It's usually

46:12

0.01. This is 0.002. That

46:14

is a very, very, very

46:16

strong correlation. So

46:26

folks, this is where we

46:28

are. And

46:31

nothing matters. We're

46:33

not fixing this. We're not doing anything. Chip

46:37

Roy has his bill, but obviously

46:39

we're never going to do anything federally.

46:43

The key now

46:48

is to

46:50

work at a state level where

46:53

we need to take these things off the market.

46:56

We need to use

46:58

anti-fraud, consumer protection statutes that

47:00

states have, because remember, that's a

47:03

different point than liability

47:05

for the health issues. And

47:09

we also need legislation that

47:12

places the onus of liability on anyone

47:14

who mandates any shot, frankly.

47:17

We need it on the flu shot, too. There's

47:21

a lot of dirty things going on there. So

47:26

I just presented to you an

47:29

FDA study, and then

47:31

from the two top journals, a Lancet and

47:33

JAMA study, showing

47:36

increases in strokes

47:40

in children and

47:42

neurological problems generally coinciding with

47:45

the vaccines.

47:48

And

47:52

Stilberst as well. Okay, that's the German study.

47:57

And then, of course, You

48:00

know, we have This

48:06

shocking study from from JAMA

48:08

on The

48:11

senior flu shot This

48:13

is not okay. I Mean

48:16

a lot of you might be wall

48:18

painting. I'm scared my 80 year old's grandparent. They might

48:20

get the flu Folks,

48:23

this is open source. Look it up Google

48:26

it in I'm

48:29

losing the years by now. Is it 2023 season 2022 2023 winter

48:31

season? The

48:37

FDA says or CDC says the

48:40

flu shot had an efficacy rate of 14% and

48:45

Remember, that's their number when you see

48:47

14% that likely means

48:49

a leaky negative effective vaccine

48:55

And we just go on like nothing happened There's

48:58

no reckoning on anything and

49:01

again like the weaponization is gonna be crazy

49:03

Let's go back to that. There's no

49:05

backstop on Ukraine now. There's no backstop

49:07

on the border There's

49:09

no backstop on the the biomedical

49:11

security state. There's no backstop on

49:14

the weaponization so they're gonna come

49:16

after people on guns and By

49:19

the way, you know an interesting thing is I Spoke

49:22

to a friend of mine who was an attorney for

49:24

January 6th defendants He's

49:27

starting to see signs that they're largely backing

49:29

off where you know judges are starting to

49:31

give normal rulings and whatever It

49:33

wouldn't surprise me if they're mainly

49:36

done with genuine January 6th Now

49:39

you might think wow, that's that's big news

49:41

No, that's actually bad news because you know

49:43

what that means they milked it for what

49:45

they can get as the impetus for kind

49:48

of Acculturating us to

49:50

a new normal that this is okay.

49:52

You could just subvert due process and

49:56

all enlightened views

49:58

on criminal justice this

50:01

against political opponents and now they're just going to

50:03

move on to just ubiquitously targeting

50:06

political opponents not sort of you

50:09

know concentrated around

50:11

one particular event

50:15

but just in

50:17

general they're gonna go after

50:19

us on everything they can get their hands

50:21

on and

50:24

what is our solution no

50:28

one's talking about this what

50:30

is our solution oh

50:34

well maybe we'll win big in

50:36

November first of all it's interesting if you look

50:38

at all the polling trends they're actually going back the other

50:40

way so even look at

50:42

the polls is losing its muster but

50:45

let's say you do win like I said they

50:48

will never ever fight for us

50:52

you can never have a government shutdown everything

50:55

the courts say is supreme so any executive

50:57

order gets thrown out what are you gonna

50:59

do what

51:02

are you going to do and

51:06

yet the only people probably go down and primaries

51:09

are conservatives

51:11

at this point it's

51:15

truly shocking and

51:18

then family yeah there's

51:21

the border there's no backstop there

51:23

is no backstop this

51:25

from zero hedge if

51:27

you've ever traveled internationally and return legally to

51:30

the US there's a rigorous vetting process through

51:32

customs but for the millions of migrants that illegally

51:35

crossed into the

51:37

US anyone

51:39

is welcome terrorists and drug

51:41

lords DHS claims that migrants

51:43

flooding into the US undergo robust

51:45

security vetting but law-abiding citizens especially

51:48

folks in Manhattan know the statement

51:50

is malarkey in

51:52

neighborhoods that are now transformed into

51:54

third world countries earlier

51:58

this month spokesperson Angelo

52:00

Fernandez Hernandez doubled down on the

52:02

big lie claiming migrants pass through

52:04

you know this this vigorous

52:07

vetting but

52:13

it turns out one of the most shocking

52:15

revelations of the vitamin admins failure to

52:17

properly vet migrants was in San Antonio

52:20

Texas where authorities recently arrested 29 year

52:22

old a

52:24

derbis perilla one of

52:26

Interpol top 10 most

52:28

wanted for operating a

52:31

drug ring with any

52:33

migrant shelter Perilla

52:36

the second in command of the violent Colombian gang

52:39

was wanted for four murders drug trafficking

52:41

or instead of Bogota the

52:44

fact that the gangster made

52:47

it into the US is

52:49

evident in the lack of

52:51

robosecurity and this is the

52:53

type of stuff we're finding remember to

52:55

destroy your society as we learn from

52:58

Europe you don't even need a top

53:00

10 Interpol guy terrorist drug gang leader

53:02

I mean just these

53:04

third world animals that just attack white

53:06

people that you

53:09

know just bring this back to the stone ages

53:11

even if they're not a particularly organized

53:13

professional criminal syndicate terrorist

53:16

syndicate is a deal-breaker

53:18

on society this

53:20

is just nuts absolutely

53:23

nuts so

53:25

folks this is how we

53:27

start off the week I'm

53:30

gonna try to give solutions or to go into again what

53:32

we can do in the States what we can do as

53:35

they close one avenue which was

53:38

the budget we try to find something else but

53:40

just remember unless we

53:43

reinvent something at a local

53:45

level there is now

53:47

no backstop for invasion inflation

53:50

indoctrination weaponization all of that

53:52

stuff and of

53:54

course the biomedical security state don't

53:56

let any of your parents get those shots any

54:01

And yet they want them to get three in one. Truly,

54:05

truly demonic. So

54:07

let me know what you want to cover this week as

54:10

they go on a long two-week

54:12

vacation, which is better, by the way. And

54:14

no, it's not because of Holy Week, because they do

54:17

it all year round. They barely

54:19

do anything. But in this

54:21

case, I guess I'd rather they be out. There's

54:23

no good they can do anymore. So once they're

54:26

not going to do any good, maybe they'll keep them

54:28

out. So that's that. Daniel Horowitz

54:30

at Start Mail is the email at armconservative

54:32

is the Twitter. It could give us a

54:34

five-star rating if you have not done so

54:36

on iTunes yet. Until tomorrow, 8 to 6

54:38

8.