Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
politics without the soap
0:02
opera with unfiltered constitutional
0:04
conservative truth the
0:07
conservative review And
0:09
welcome back fellow American patriots and Minutemen standing
0:12
at the ready to fight anew for all
0:14
the issues that matter in the way they
0:16
matter at The time they
0:18
matter and that is quite a tall order
0:20
here at Sierra podcast But we try to
0:22
do our best one hour every
0:25
day here. It is Thursday the
0:27
28th of March and
0:30
folks, you know Every
0:33
day we try to enumerate the amount
0:36
of existential threats to
0:38
our country and Every
0:41
day you could pair that against the
0:43
amount of things that are done
0:45
to counteract that on the right
0:48
You know like in half the states
0:51
where the right claims to control
0:53
government And yet there's
0:55
only one state where we
0:57
keep running up the score Everywhere
1:00
else it seems hopeless But
1:03
remember it's never hopeless Joshua 10 25.
1:05
Do not be afraid do not be
1:07
discouraged be strong and Courageous.
1:09
This is what the Lord will do
1:12
To all the enemies you are going to fight, but
1:15
you know, you got to recognize what is the enemy
1:17
and formulate a plan. I Want
1:21
to focus in particular on health care
1:23
today the WHO One
1:26
health that's not just far off
1:28
but is permeating the You
1:32
know CDC here domestically, but also
1:34
the state health departments in 49
1:36
out of the 50 states Shockingly,
1:40
we have not redress that and
1:43
when you look at four years into the
1:45
rise of the fourth Reich and all
1:47
of the lies and devastation and
1:49
destruction of the creation of the
1:51
virus the blocking of treatment the
1:53
vaccines the Shutdown the
1:55
threats to our life liberty and property
1:58
and you look at how little there has
2:00
been done to even
2:02
rectify what has already happened,
2:05
much less in inoculate
2:07
ourselves, immunize ourselves from this happening in
2:09
the future and the next iterations, which
2:12
we're gonna talk about with a special
2:14
guest, it
2:17
makes you wonder what needs
2:19
to happen in
2:21
order to spawn, to
2:24
impel, some
2:26
sort of unified righteous reaction.
2:30
And when I say a righteous reaction, I don't
2:32
mean meaning about something.
2:36
The conservative industry has no
2:39
objectives, no plans, no
2:41
strategies, no blueprints or
2:44
roadmaps, heck, they
2:46
don't have a destination altogether. Just
2:49
constant mindless, aimless whining
2:51
for clicks about
2:53
why something impossible wasn't
2:56
done, you know, outside the Overton
2:58
window, while absolving
3:01
their favorite politicians of any
3:03
responsibility for their own failures
3:06
on what is eminently achievable and
3:08
within the Overton window. And
3:11
that's essentially a summary of where we exist
3:15
today. When we
3:18
talk about red-state governors
3:20
and their executive actions, the legislatures,
3:24
what we're doing and not doing with the courts, what
3:26
we talked about yesterday, the primaries we talked about earlier
3:28
this week, I
3:31
mean, I still get stupid responses
3:34
on Twitter from people, Daniel,
3:36
the primaries over, you know, whenever I
3:38
talk about Senate and governor's
3:41
racism, like, no, you idiot, there's more
3:43
to life than the presidential election and
3:45
most of those primaries have not begun
3:47
yet, not the voting
3:49
at least. So
3:51
I want to give you a sense
3:54
of where we are four
3:56
years later. Everything
4:00
we know, the amount of information
4:02
we have on the death and
4:04
destruction and lies
4:07
and deception and censorship around
4:09
the public health edifice and
4:12
yet it is still as powerful
4:14
as ever in 49
4:17
out of 50 states. West
4:23
Virginia. Okay.
4:26
The state motto is, mountain years are
4:29
always free. I forgot the
4:31
Latin for that, but those of you know Latin know
4:33
what it is. Except
4:36
there's no freedom whatsoever. We
4:38
talked about this bill that finally passed
4:41
the legislature.
4:43
There's almost no Democrats left. Democrats
4:45
have not carried a single county
4:48
since 2000, yeah 2000 I think, the
4:52
presidential race. Yet
4:55
it is may as well be California. HB
4:59
5105 originally
5:04
we tried to get an amendment passed to
5:07
allow for a religious exemption from vaccine mandates,
5:10
a mandate that should never exist by the
5:12
way. But
5:15
to this day it remains the only red
5:17
state that does not
5:20
have a religious exemption. And
5:23
I think only five or six blue states don't have it
5:26
because they recently repealed them. Like
5:29
Connecticut, New York and Washington
5:31
State, California. But
5:33
anyway, all
5:36
it did, very modestly,
5:38
was to say that private
5:41
schools don't have to have a
5:43
vaccine mandate and public schools, you're
5:46
exempt from it if you only
5:48
take courses online, you
5:50
know, like you don't show up in person
5:52
or from certain extracurricular activities. So
5:56
meaning for a regular school day
5:58
in public school, You still
6:00
have a mandate with no religious exemption,
6:02
even after passage of 5105. Still
6:07
worse than, you know, at least 42 or so
6:09
states. This
6:11
is West Virginia. Yet,
6:15
this dirtbag Jim Justice, a
6:19
vaccine animal who once said that
6:21
Biden wasn't doing enough to promote
6:23
the vaccines and
6:26
opposed Biden getting rid of the
6:28
emergency declaration, allowing it to expire.
6:31
He vetoes the bill. And
6:36
just remember, this piece of
6:39
crap was just elevated
6:41
by Trump and the NRSC
6:44
to be the anointed one for the Senate
6:46
over a Freedom Caucus candidate, Alex Mooney.
6:49
I mean, I have issues with him, but it's
6:51
certainly a lot better than Jim Justice. That
6:55
is the embodiment of
6:58
a mindless, populist, stupid
7:00
movement that you come
7:02
full circle and
7:05
you elevate rather than—I mean, could you
7:07
imagine if you had a Democrat that abolished
7:10
the vaccines, abolished gay marriage, and
7:12
then not only don't they get rid of him, they
7:15
re-elect him, but then afterwards they elevate him to another
7:17
higher office as a
7:19
presumptive nominee and have Biden and
7:21
Obama, you know,
7:23
and whoever their grand poobas are, endorse
7:26
the guy. As
7:29
if this is some sort of new
7:31
majority. This guy will enter the Senate
7:35
immediately to the left of Mitch McConnell. By
7:38
the way, he's big into Ukraine. Huge, huge
7:40
leftist. He's literally a Republican
7:43
in name only. He was actually a Democrat.
7:45
He just switched recently because
7:48
you can't get elected as a Democrat there. So
7:50
he just swaps hats and
7:52
kissed up to Trump personally and
7:54
done. Tell me
7:56
where I'm wrong. What
7:59
are we even doing? This
8:02
is all within our own
8:04
sphere of influence, both
8:07
the legislative happenings in West Virginia and
8:10
his run for federal office with
8:12
the support of, you know,
8:15
MAGA, Trump himself. When
8:20
he was vetoing it, he said, I hear
8:22
how strongly people believe on one side or
8:24
the other on this subject, and I respect
8:27
all opinions, but I must follow the guidance
8:29
of our medical experts on this subject. They
8:32
are our most important resource – children
8:36
are our most important resource, and I will
8:38
protect them with everything I have. This
8:42
is the sort of fascism –
8:44
fascism, sorry – we have an
8:46
every read state. I
8:49
told you, South Carolina, you
8:53
got the state health department – they want to
8:56
create a health czar, but even the current version
8:58
– they said, oh, we looked
9:00
into adverse events and we don't see anything wrong. We
9:03
recommend new boosters – this is in the year
9:05
2024, by the way – three
9:09
years later for babies and
9:11
toddlers. So
9:15
nothing is changing. I want
9:19
you guys to think – we talked about this a little bit with the,
9:21
you know, destruction of the Key
9:24
Bridge in Baltimore, whether
9:27
it's Hawaii or the Vegas shooting. We
9:30
have these catalyzing events, and
9:32
we never wind up pausing time
9:34
and doing a deep dive into
9:36
where did this come from, what's
9:38
the cause. Again, I'm not insinuating
9:41
that we have any information definitively
9:43
what – that, you know, that
9:45
it was terrorism or this or that. We just don't – you
9:47
know, we're not getting a lot of information at all. And
9:50
then to properly prescribe
9:52
a policy solution. Point
9:57
and shoot. Here's the problem. Here's what all –
10:02
Chronicles, you know, Sons of
10:04
Issachar, men, wise
10:06
men who know the times
10:09
and what ought to be done. That's
10:11
all we need. But
10:14
there seems to be one man that keeps doing
10:16
that. You know, there's this meme going around, the
10:18
Babylon B put out a
10:21
– you know, they have their satire articles and
10:23
they put out a headline. DeSantis
10:25
kicked out of the Republican Party for
10:28
accomplishing too many things. You
10:31
know, he – everyone talks
10:34
about squatters' rights. It's become a new thing. Like,
10:36
rather than talking about this for five years, he
10:39
just totally banned it. Anyone
10:41
could call their sheriff, get them out immediately, and
10:43
increase felonies for every stage of
10:45
that process of anyone who engages
10:47
in it or sells or
10:52
rents land as a squatter. And
10:56
done. There's no beating around the bush.
10:59
He defeated Disney in the final thing.
11:01
Disney dropped all lawsuits. It's over. A
11:05
whole other thing I might get into tomorrow with – he's
11:09
about to sign a bill extirpating
11:12
the mention and
11:14
acknowledgment of climate change from any
11:16
state documents, something we talk
11:18
about a lot as an action item we
11:20
should be doing in other states. He
11:23
just does. No one's perfect. We don't have
11:25
a cult around him like some other people
11:27
do around Trump. But
11:30
why is this not the baseline
11:32
expectation? I
11:35
don't get it if we really
11:37
believe our talking points. You
11:40
know, I didn't just write a book
11:42
to make money. I didn't get on
11:44
a single cable show, by the
11:46
way. I was
11:48
like, oh my gosh. This
11:51
was already early
11:53
2023. I mean, we embarked on it in 2022. I said,
11:55
you know, we're
11:58
not changing anything, despite – all
12:00
the evidence that
12:03
we had, let's say circa
12:05
2022, about the
12:08
people who caused the virus and caused
12:10
the vaccines and the lockdowns and
12:12
the devastation, we were, to
12:14
this day, we're nowhere closer to
12:17
solving it. And
12:20
copy and paste that for any
12:22
other grievance that we have a
12:24
pretty robust movement behind so-called
12:27
exposing it, but
12:30
then nothing gets done with it. And
12:33
we just go on and on. This
12:35
is the circus. And
12:38
I, for one, actually believe in it. So
12:41
we don't have any time for this. Again,
12:45
I will tell you, if we had,
12:48
you know, let's just play it safe. 20, I was gonna say 25,
12:50
20 states, just
12:54
flooring the gas pedal on all of our
12:56
daily action items. You would
12:58
have a different country. A, you would
13:00
have a, you know, a significant portion
13:02
to escape to, but moreover, that in
13:05
itself would be a huge check and
13:07
balance on the behavior of the left
13:10
at a federal level. But
13:14
here we go. We just keep it going.
13:16
By the way, similar thing to West Virginia in South Carolina. Adam
13:19
Morgan, you know, we had him on a couple days ago,
13:21
the chairman of the Freedom Caucus running for Congress
13:26
against a rhino in Federal
13:29
District 4, he tweeted out a
13:31
couple hours ago that he found, it says on the
13:36
Medical University of
13:38
South Carolina's website, that you need to ask for a
13:40
medical exemption from the
13:42
vaccine mandate. They have vaccine mandates there,
13:46
including COVID. So you can get a medical exemption, but you know
13:48
where you have to go
13:51
for the medical exemption? To the DEI
13:53
office of this state university. So
14:02
you have to go to an office
14:04
that should never exist in a
14:06
red state to ask for an exemption
14:09
from a vaccine mandate that should never exist in a
14:11
red state. I mean, first of
14:13
all, this is the sort of oversight that we need
14:15
of the
14:18
agencies and institutions under
14:20
public control in red states. And
14:23
this could be done even when they're at a session.
14:25
This is why we need to create freedom caucuses
14:27
with staff and
14:30
a force multiplier as an
14:32
institution to expose this stuff and
14:34
then demand action. But
14:38
I mean, in Florida, it's like we're like, you
14:41
know, the governor either does
14:43
it himself or he gets
14:46
calls from people, hey, do you know this is going
14:48
on? Okay, let's do something about it.
14:52
Yet we've created a market, an environment
14:57
where people like Henry McMaster and Kristi
14:59
Noem and Jim Justice, deep
15:02
red states could thrive and
15:05
be elevated as the not
15:08
just a Republican in good standing but MAGA
15:10
in good standing by
15:13
continuing to perpetuate the
15:15
worst elements of all public policy,
15:18
including biomedical tyranny. And
15:25
there's one other point I wanted to make before
15:28
going on to the
15:31
next phases, the next battle in
15:34
global public health tyranny, but
15:36
I think it's a good preface. I got
15:39
to mention this. Again,
15:41
I don't want to talk about Trump every day, but what
15:44
am I supposed to do when
15:47
the number one voice in our movement, our
15:49
party – I mean, it's not mine, but
15:51
you know what I mean. By
15:54
a mile, I mean, there's no close second. Okay,
15:56
I think – do we all agree, right? There's
15:58
no close second to the – influence
16:00
and image of Trump over
16:03
the Republican Party,
16:05
over the hard right. Okay,
16:09
I mean, this is everything. So
16:11
when he makes comments that
16:15
are off the rails regarding
16:17
major policy issues,
16:21
I mean, don't we have to speak up and say like,
16:23
hey, well, if the number one guy
16:25
on the right is agreeing to the left, we got
16:27
a big problem because we have no avenue to ever
16:29
fight that. Now, you
16:32
can't get a greater issue than healthcare. Healthcare
16:34
is our life, our liberty,
16:37
our prosperity, our economy, our ability
16:39
to afford things. It's
16:42
the largest share of the economy. I
16:46
mean, we're seeing this now with a decrepit healthcare
16:48
system. We
16:51
bankrupt ourselves to
16:53
afford subpar care where life
16:55
expectancy is continuously going downhill,
16:59
circling the drain. Then
17:01
we spend 4.5 trillion as
17:03
a nation on healthcare
17:08
every year to
17:10
get increasingly worse outcomes. And
17:13
where you can't, where healthcare
17:16
is now health insurance and
17:18
medical insurance is unaffordable on your
17:20
own and from work, unless
17:22
you work for government, it's
17:25
increasingly coming out of your
17:27
paycheck. To
17:31
get access to
17:33
a system where increasingly it's becoming like Europe
17:35
where you can't even get appointments and then
17:38
when you do, the guy's looking at an
17:40
iPad, has seized you for three seconds and
17:43
is working off of an algorithm from
17:45
the one health WHO. So
17:49
anyway, Trump out of nowhere,
17:51
like he randomly comments on things. He
17:53
put out a post on Tuesday
17:57
riddled with grammar and spelling this. I'm
18:01
not running to terminate the ACA, so now
18:03
he doesn't even call it Obamacare. And
18:06
he calls it their term. As
18:10
Crooked Joe Budden, this information
18:12
misinformates all the time. I mean,
18:14
he made up verbs
18:17
there that don't exist. I'm running
18:19
to close the border, stop inflation,
18:21
make our economy great, strengthen our
18:23
military, and make the ACA much
18:26
better, stronger, and far less expensive. So
18:29
I mean, this was a
18:32
big forgotten healthcare—or failure
18:34
of the Trump administration.
18:36
Let's not forget, COVID
18:39
fascism is the bester child of
18:41
Obamacare. There is
18:43
no prosperity or economy or cure
18:47
of inflation without solving healthcare, and
18:49
there is no solving healthcare
18:51
without repealing the core of Obamacare.
18:55
There's no way around it, because we've talked about this
18:57
a lot before, that it
18:59
is extremely—we all know what healthcare ought
19:01
to look like and why it doesn't
19:03
look like that. The question is the
19:05
complexity of the way it is now.
19:08
How do you evacuate
19:10
from that? And this is where we needed
19:12
a mindful,
19:14
not mindless, movement that
19:18
I worked very hard on in 2016, 2017. When
19:24
we had that opportunity, what does
19:26
healthcare look like? Those of you who
19:28
were with me back then remember the
19:30
degree of specificity. I covered COVID. I
19:32
covered the courts. I covered crime. I
19:34
covered, obviously, immigration. I covered
19:38
healthcare, not just Obamacare, but
19:40
holistically, what it should look
19:42
like and what is achievable. Remember,
19:46
if I give things that are beyond the
19:48
Overton window of our ability to achieve, it's
19:50
worthless. As much as we would
19:52
like that to happen, you might have that as your
19:55
kind of lighthouse at the end of the ocean
19:57
that you're steering towards, but you have to have
19:59
gradations. you know, pit stops
20:01
and tranches that you could achieve that
20:03
are short of that, but will, you
20:05
know, start building momentum towards that goal. And
20:09
everything ultimately revolves around price
20:11
transparency and the ability to, you
20:15
know, decoupling health care from
20:17
insurance and decoupling insurance from
20:19
employment. And
20:21
ultimately, what needs to happen is you
20:23
need to have people shopping around for
20:26
both health care and health insurance, all
20:29
330 million people in the same
20:31
market with multiple choices
20:35
and paying for maintenance,
20:38
the main thing is really out of pocket
20:41
that's ultimately what needs to happen. And
20:43
insurance needs to become more like what
20:45
it is with car insurance and homeowners
20:47
insurance, where it's more
20:50
for catastrophic. And
20:53
that's ultimately how you're going to free up innovation
20:56
where you're not owned by the government owned
20:58
by the insurance cartel. And
21:01
you get back to a doctor patient
21:03
relationship, right? At its basic core, that's
21:05
the goal. But
21:07
you cannot achieve that with
21:09
Obamacare. That's the problem. You
21:13
can't really do it. Now I think within
21:16
the margins, there are some waivers
21:18
written into the ACA that states
21:21
need to look into and utilize
21:23
more. But
21:26
the problem is you
21:29
can't see right
21:32
now, you can't
21:34
afford to pay out of pocket because
21:38
you have to spend your wad, whether
21:41
through your salary or personally, or
21:44
for most people getting it subsidized for
21:47
insurance. There
21:49
is no way to be like, look, you
21:51
know, I want
21:54
to make sure that, you know,
21:56
I'm capped above any
21:58
like, you know, five to I'm capped, I
22:00
want to have problems. I want
22:02
to pay for a cheap plan
22:04
that's just going to cap
22:06
it that anything above that, I get some big hospital
22:09
stay, it will be paid for, but otherwise, I'll pay.
22:11
I'm willing to pay out of pocket. What Obamacare strategically
22:13
did was ensure that such an option doesn't
22:16
exist. Again,
22:26
there is no getting our economy
22:28
back on track. There's no getting life
22:30
and freedom and prosperity
22:34
without dealing with that, repealing
22:36
Obamacare and understanding innovatively how to deal with this. This
22:43
man is clueless. I'm
22:45
telling you, I
22:47
remember in 2017, I spoke with
22:51
individuals who wound up becoming very close
22:53
with Trump and very high up in
22:55
the admin – I mean very, very high up in the admin, and they would tell me the
22:58
guy had no clue what Obamacare was. He
23:04
thought it was just the individual mandate to
23:06
purchase and maybe the tax
23:08
increases to fund it. He
23:10
didn't understand what it was. He
23:13
had no clue. And
23:16
that's somewhat okay if you have people around
23:18
him who do have a clue, but
23:21
we've created this movement around him
23:23
that decided to
23:26
mimic his low IQ mannerisms
23:29
rather than elevate him. So
23:32
we get what we get. So
23:34
now we have what's
23:36
called literally one health,
23:41
globally, from the
23:43
international NGOs and organizations,
23:45
WHO, into CDC,
23:48
HHS, and flowing
23:50
into nearly every state and
23:52
county health department. And
23:57
you are completely cut
23:59
out. from the most
24:01
important issue pertaining
24:03
to life, liberty, and prosperity.
24:08
Never forget. It's appalling.
24:10
I see these polls consistently
24:12
showing – most issues,
24:15
Republicans are ahead. They lose elections,
24:17
but no one's happy with the
24:19
crime, inflation, economy, obviously immigrated
24:21
to the border. But healthcare,
24:23
Biden is consistently up 20-25
24:25
points. That's
24:27
appalling and disgusting, but it's
24:30
a fact that Republicans ceded this issue
24:32
long ago, and they never built their
24:34
own narrative when it's so easy after
24:36
everything that's happened to us. So
24:40
I want to get to what we can do,
24:42
what we ought to be doing, but again, even
24:45
then, we can't continue electing people like
24:47
Henry McMaster and Jim Justice in red
24:50
states, so the primaries are going to
24:52
matter. But let's get
24:54
to our special guest. So,
24:56
folks, we spent time over the
24:58
last year or two talking about on and off
25:01
this threat of the pandemic treaty. And
25:04
it's not just a pandemic treaty. What
25:06
I believe is a greater threat is
25:08
this IHR, the International Health Regulations, that
25:11
the United States is already a party to, and
25:14
it's not a treaty, so it doesn't need
25:17
Senate ratification. And
25:20
come May, this WHO
25:22
assembly is going to
25:25
vote on amendments to it
25:28
because the wheels are turning in their mind.
25:30
They took a look at the pandemic, and
25:32
we take a look at it, and we're
25:34
like, oh my gosh, we need kind of
25:36
13th, 14th Amendment style, Civil War style, Reformation
25:40
to reaffirm the Nuremberg Code. No,
25:43
their takeaway is the
25:46
opposite, that there was too much
25:48
freedom, too much individuality among
25:50
states like Florida, maybe Sweden when it came to the
25:52
lockdowns, and we have to make sure that we consolidate
25:54
this power. And we might think with the WHO as
25:56
a joke, and it kind of makes it a little
25:58
bit more of a joke. of is. But
26:01
you'd be shocked at how much
26:03
seeps in, not just, you know, to
26:06
CDC, which is obvious, but even
26:08
red state health departments, with
26:11
the exception of Dr. Latipo in Florida,
26:13
you go to their websites, you go to their list
26:16
of their programs, and the
26:18
personnel and actions that are taken.
26:20
It's really
26:23
along the lines of this one
26:25
health, this one health, which
26:27
is antithetical, of course, to the Nuremberg
26:29
Code to Freedom. And remember, as we
26:31
said, healthcare is,
26:35
I would argue, you know, Justice Joseph
26:37
Story said that the Second
26:39
Amendment is the palladium of all liberty.
26:41
I would argue healthcare nowadays is really
26:44
the palladium of all liberty. So
26:46
what do we have to look out for?
26:48
What would be focused on? What action items
26:52
do we have? As always, we want to
26:54
get into action items. So with us today
26:56
is Dr. Kat Lindley. She's been here before.
26:59
She's a primary care doctor in Texas, president
27:02
of the Global Health Project that
27:04
really oversees and studies these
27:07
WHO edicts that we need
27:09
to look out for. She's also director of the
27:11
Global COVID Summit. You could follow her at KL
27:14
Veritas on Twitter.
27:17
And she's been going all
27:19
over testifying in state legislatures
27:22
to try to create
27:24
legislation that will serve as a bulwark against
27:26
this. So I wanted to give you guys
27:28
an update with the best as always. Hey,
27:30
Dr. Kat, thanks so much for joining us
27:32
once again here at Blaze Media. Thanks
27:35
for having me, Daniel. Alrighty. So
27:38
yeah, we talk a lot in private. We
27:40
work together. And I want to bring some
27:42
of this out to the public. Could you
27:44
first describe what this
27:47
one health is? I've noticed
27:49
that it's everywhere. It's in red state
27:51
health departments. Where does it come
27:53
from? And what is the agenda behind
27:55
it? So
27:57
One health, you know, and you've. Then
28:00
toggle I say candidate quick research
28:02
just. To see like who has
28:05
it were very good than it
28:07
took over every department really even
28:09
within our our own health department
28:11
at once wrote actually was initiative
28:13
broad that of the so kind
28:16
of role.in September twenty seven team
28:18
and they call it an integrated
28:20
unifying approach the Bell Balance and
28:22
of the my the health of
28:25
people on in most and environment
28:27
as they have included it in
28:29
their pandemic treated the agreement I
28:31
believe it's under. Article Five and
28:34
essentially says that the health of
28:36
human is not more important than
28:38
the health of the animal and
28:40
plant, and it's all interconnected. The
28:43
climate change. So. When you
28:45
kinda look at this from this perspective,
28:47
dead dogs are trying to pass the
28:49
amendments Ndtv arm and you look at
28:52
the documents and different articles is sit
28:54
and they're trying to keep us in
28:56
this perpetual state of condemning. So just
28:58
around the corner new one is under
29:00
you know, on the corner a corner
29:03
and can be anything he can be
29:05
climate change. You know it can even
29:07
be done right right? They can call
29:09
Doc the on. We have
29:11
a pandemic of gun on
29:13
into Smile and so it
29:15
really can be anything according
29:18
to the way they're. Trying
29:20
to post this and. What's concerning
29:22
is that. Behind.
29:24
The scenes. For. A while now.
29:27
Our. Own Hhs and C D C and
29:29
if you go directly to cities to website.
29:32
They. Talk about that one. Help Basics.
29:35
Are. They're talking about
29:37
this approach that we need
29:39
to introduced into our On
29:41
Managing of Human illnesses and
29:43
each Department h States already
29:45
has this one Health Initiatives.
29:48
And with that specifically, plus taxes.
29:51
And. Dom It's in our our
29:53
Texas Health and Human Services. And
29:55
then I Texas the An Ambitious considered a
29:57
very good. Universities here. As
30:00
a global. Ah One
30:03
Health Department. So.
30:05
It's very annoying thing to look one
30:07
house and and and it's something that
30:09
I'd never preceded growing up. You know
30:12
I kind of took vaccines for granted.
30:14
You know you're born into a new
30:16
think this is normal but the entire
30:19
mass vaccination approach was this know of
30:21
one health right the beginning. something that
30:23
depending on the type of vaccine and
30:25
for what illness for what person, what
30:28
health status might be appropriate. like any
30:30
other medical intervention like any other drugs
30:32
or. Treatments or
30:35
surgeries. And. Then you make it. One
30:37
health, One health? on? what do
30:39
you mean when you say. As
30:42
part of this agenda. So. I
30:44
get the. You. Oneness parts,
30:46
but that you're no
30:48
better than animals. Yes,
30:52
So like, you know if. I'm
30:54
kind of bomb, So that the
30:56
way they talk about it, they
30:58
call this approach that it's a
31:00
kicker. Well, and robin. For food
31:03
and water safety nutrition, The
31:05
console zoonoses. Those. Are nice
31:07
if they can spend in animals
31:09
and humans the pollution management and
31:11
him a cool will of resistance
31:13
so. Innocence is like something that
31:15
we as humans do effect on
31:17
animals or the environment By said
31:20
go back to the climate change
31:22
that can be some type of
31:24
initiative. Didn't say okay you guys
31:26
are not the lol and and
31:28
actually just look about that the
31:31
cards right. They keep on saying
31:33
that we have this carbon. Credits
31:36
need to when we're travelling gonna
31:38
stop the stepping on carbohydrates when
31:40
you go on a plane and
31:43
then the emission. All of that
31:45
is affecting the climate, right? So.
31:47
If is the If is causing climate change
31:49
in. Climate change according to
31:51
a doubling Hiv. really talk
31:53
them this time next ah
31:56
pandemic i next big health
31:58
emergency control every
32:00
aspect of our lives. They can say
32:02
you can't drive more than 50 miles
32:05
outside your
32:09
radius or whatever because it affects
32:11
the nature around you.
32:14
There are lots of ways of them for them
32:16
to control us. No,
32:18
no, there is. I do want to get to
32:21
what they have in terms of viruses cooking
32:24
up, but it's important to
32:26
remember like you're saying, it's not necessarily going to
32:28
manifest the next time in the exact same way
32:30
that it will be a virus. We already know
32:32
that they view the
32:35
climate as a virus. Talk
32:38
about this. The IHR, again,
32:40
the amendments, it's going
32:42
to come up in May. This is something around the
32:44
corner we have to mobilize for. One of
32:48
the aspects of it is that it
32:51
expands the definition of pandemics
32:53
and health emergencies to
32:55
include basically anything
32:57
that they say what harms quality of life.
33:00
Yes, exactly. The
33:03
concerning thing is Tedros
33:06
keeps on saying that we need
33:08
to pass this because the future
33:10
of our children depends on it.
33:12
We need to protect the planet
33:15
in all this. Truly, when you
33:17
look at the substance of both documents,
33:20
but in particular, the IHRs,
33:24
you see that we will give power to
33:26
WHO, in particular, their
33:29
director general, to go
33:31
and at any time declare a
33:33
public health emergency of international concerns.
33:36
Once he does that, then you
33:38
have WHO, the Global Health Authority,
33:41
that can tell us what type
33:43
of medications we can use, what
33:45
diagnostic treatments we can use, the
33:47
diagnostic test treatments we can use.
33:49
They can do the same thing
33:51
that they did to our American Hydrocyclic
33:53
drug when they say you cannot use those
33:56
type of drugs. You can only use this.
34:00
In particular, the vaccine, you
34:02
know, they keep on talking about this new vaccine
34:08
development we're going to have. Everything's going
34:11
to be mRNA platform, because on mRNA
34:13
platform, they can get the vaccines out
34:15
within 100 days. And
34:18
I actually read a very interesting article
34:20
how they said, oh, we're going to
34:22
be able to do, you know, the
34:24
vaccines are going to come out fast, and
34:26
we're going to have good safety data. And
34:29
I'm thinking to myself, how can you have
34:31
any safety data when you haven't looked at
34:33
the long-term consequences of this new product? But
34:36
that's what I want to do is not equity and,
34:40
you know, production, and
34:43
again, you have to look big, deep, and what
34:45
do you do? Look at what's happening with the
34:47
funding of WHO, who is funding
34:49
them? Private-public partnerships.
34:53
80% of their voluntary contributions
34:55
are coming from organizations
34:58
like Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,
35:01
Gavi Alliance, the
35:05
Wellcome Trust, and things
35:07
like that. So there are
35:09
a lot of these financial
35:12
transactions happening, and
35:14
having pandemics over and over again, it's
35:16
going to be really financially beneficial to
35:18
someone. And
35:21
also, isn't it true that the
35:23
IHR or the proposed amendments would
35:25
change their recommendations from non-binding to
35:29
mandatory inspections? Particularly
35:31
Article 1. If you read Article
35:33
1 of amendments to IHR, that's
35:35
exactly where they cross out, the
35:38
non-binding recommendations, and
35:40
they become binding obligations, which means
35:44
that if you sign this, actually, like you
35:46
said, IHR don't need to be signed. Once
35:49
WHA, which is the War Health
35:51
Assembly, adopts them, they actually
35:53
are already, we have
35:55
adopted them unless we say we don't want them.
35:58
But I just want to interject for a moment. moment, to be clear,
36:01
that will be subject to the determination
36:03
of the Biden administration, HHS,
36:05
and State Department, meaning because
36:07
we're already signed onto it, they could agree, not
36:10
just agree to adopt, they're the ones proposing a
36:12
lot of this. So like
36:14
with the pandemic treaty, for example, you need
36:16
67 votes in the Senate. And as
36:18
bad as the GOP and the Senate is, and they're pretty
36:20
bad, I don't see them
36:22
doing that. But the IHR, it
36:25
would automatically be binding. So
36:28
now we would argue it's not, and I want
36:30
to get to that. And that's what we're going
36:32
to fight back locally. But at a federal level,
36:34
they're going to treat it that way. Isn't
36:37
there also an avenue for
36:39
them to, again, they're taking
36:41
everything they did illegally, and
36:44
they want to codify it and do more of
36:46
it. So one of the things was a censorship
36:48
regime over, you
36:51
know, different approaches and different
36:54
speeches. Talk about the
36:56
censorship aspect of this. So
36:58
there is Article 44 in the
37:03
IHR amendments that actually
37:05
does ask for the
37:07
member countries to censor anyone
37:10
who is talking
37:12
differently than the WHO
37:14
recommendations are. Like
37:16
I said, they're really nice recommendations anymore.
37:18
They're going to become obligations because of
37:21
that crossing out of non-binding part of
37:23
the agreement. It's
37:27
going to be kind of what we
37:29
experienced at the height of the COVID
37:32
pandemic, where, you know,
37:34
the doctors who were promoting early
37:36
treatment or were speaking against
37:39
vaccines were censored by our medical
37:41
boards. Some of them are
37:43
still under, you
37:46
know, have lawsuits that they have to defend, like Dr.
37:48
Mary Callie Bowden. Some
37:50
of them have lost their medical
37:53
board specialty certifications.
37:57
And, you know, it's always a
37:59
little bit of a struggle. like dig deeper, dig
38:01
deeper, and you do see these
38:04
lobbying happening
38:06
at the AMA level at
38:09
the Federal Medical
38:12
Board organization.
38:15
A lot of money is going back
38:17
and forth, and in the meantime,
38:19
the physicians who have tried to
38:22
kind of say this doesn't make sense, this
38:24
is what we shouldn't be doing, are
38:27
the ones that are paying the price and
38:29
will continue to pay the price if WHO
38:32
gets lower. Now,
38:34
I mean this is scary. Again, this is coming
38:36
around the corner in less than two months, and
38:39
so therefore in preparation, you've been leading
38:41
an effort to get
38:44
states to push back
38:46
against this. So obviously, it feels hopeless.
38:49
We don't control WHO. We don't control
38:51
the Biden administration. Republicans just gave
38:53
up their last leverage and agreed to fully
38:55
fund the WHO, so
38:57
that's going to be done for the remainder of the year. So
39:01
the way to fight globalism is
39:03
with localism, and every
39:05
state has a health department in most
39:07
or many counties, many
39:09
states, it's really all the counties have their
39:12
own health departments. And beginning with
39:14
the red areas of the country,
39:16
there's no reason we shouldn't say
39:18
from the get-go. They might do what they
39:20
do. The Biden administration might adopt this, push
39:22
for this. We are banning
39:25
implementation of these ideas here. Florida
39:28
passed this as part of their big medical freedom bill,
39:30
SB 252, last session. Update
39:35
us a little bit on what you've been doing
39:37
in some of the states and what our listeners
39:39
could do to find such
39:41
a bill or advocate
39:43
for one in their states. So,
39:47
again, if you look at the Article 18 of the
39:50
International Health Regulations, I'm
39:54
sorry, one of the things, like I
39:56
Said, they can tell us what type of treatment they need. You
40:00
know that we will have used but one
40:02
of the truth is rare for general can
40:04
do is close the borders. And.
40:06
Actually limit the trade because the
40:08
are you know he deems. That
40:11
to Syria is the one where you
40:13
cannot enter or leave. And
40:15
you. And by telling.
40:18
Er doctors have to to the
40:20
patience of things like off I'm
40:22
just is kinda where you can.
40:25
Say. This is an attack on the
40:27
Tenth Amendment because it comes to the arm.
40:30
Health. On. The
40:32
states are the ones that have the power
40:35
to where she to help curb their citizens.
40:37
And haven't Whr. A super
40:39
national agency tell us how
40:41
to do it is actually
40:43
against. I'm accustomed to sing
40:45
and dance. So.
40:48
One is always the states can. Kind.
40:51
Of try to put some measures
40:53
in this try to pass or
40:55
different bills to say that debate show
40:58
would not have jurisdiction within the
41:00
state. Farm. New
41:02
Hampshire has tried to do that, but
41:04
they kind of lot on put the
41:06
Cdc part in there as well. Ah
41:09
and which was the problem because while
41:11
democrats. Fielded like we should still trust
41:14
the city's t and maybe they're both
41:16
the funding or whatever. So they did
41:18
have heart and be dead bill and that bill
41:20
has been tabled and I do know that they
41:22
will try. To. Mended and
41:24
bring it back, but we
41:26
have. Louisiana is this kind
41:28
of the big news. On
41:30
behalf Senator Presley in Louisiana
41:32
who introduced the bill that
41:34
the W H show United
41:36
Nations is W E S
41:39
wouldn't have any jurisdiction in
41:41
Louisiana. Surprisingly. Democrats
41:43
were on board. And discuss
41:45
thirty seven to zero. In
41:47
Louisiana senate and I was going to the
41:49
house and I do feel. that they
41:51
have support i was also speaking with
41:54
representative edmondson from louisiana who try to
41:56
do the same thing last year but
41:58
her bill had city So
42:01
they took that out, and now
42:03
there is the support that, you
42:05
know, WHO will not
42:08
have jurisdiction. I personally
42:10
feel that we have
42:12
to send a strong message from the
42:14
states to the
42:17
Biden administration to tell
42:20
them that we do not want WHO to
42:23
have any jurisdiction when
42:25
it comes to health. And people also
42:27
realize, you know, you
42:30
can collaborate globally. You
42:32
can exchange information and
42:35
work with other countries
42:38
if you feel that there is a need for it. We
42:40
just don't need someone like WHO
42:43
to tell us how to do it and
42:45
when to do it. No, absolutely.
42:47
And look, you know, it's basic legislative
42:49
negotiation advice. You have to know how
42:51
far you can go. We
42:53
should throw the CDC in there, ideally,
42:56
and we need to work towards that.
42:58
But obviously, if all we can get
43:00
out of them is WHO, it's still
43:02
worth passing that much as well so
43:04
that when the Biden admin adopts that,
43:06
you know, this is something that we have with
43:08
us. But also, it's
43:10
part of a broader effort. What
43:15
are some things that our listeners could do
43:18
to research their county and
43:20
state health department websites?
43:22
What are some things that they should
43:25
be looking for to flag and
43:27
speak to their elected state legislator
43:29
to start getting on board? And
43:32
we have, you know, various freedom
43:34
caucuses in some of these states
43:36
to mobilize, to embarrass the
43:38
state governor and the state, you know,
43:40
cabinet members, what they're doing to get
43:42
this change. For example, what we just
43:44
talked about with South Carolina and the
43:46
DEI office and the medical schools, what
43:49
are some sort of like a checklist of some policies
43:51
we need to watch out for? Well,
43:54
you know, I think one of the good
43:57
things is really maybe take the bill
43:59
that Louisiana. and Senate your representative
44:01
and senators in the state and say, can
44:03
we do something like this? That's kind of
44:05
a start. You
44:08
mentioned there are many states that are trying
44:10
to do similar. Idaho has a bill in
44:12
the Senate, 1287. It's
44:15
also trying to accomplish the same thing. We
44:17
really truly need to start calling our
44:20
local reps and say, this is what
44:22
we need to do. And I support
44:24
you. How can I help? And we
44:26
kind of need all hands on deck.
44:29
We all talk about elections and
44:31
how we're gonna go do this and do
44:33
that. And then when the time comes in
44:36
the 6.30 at night, then I haven't
44:38
voted. Oh, it doesn't matter. My candidate
44:40
is gonna win. We
44:43
tend to not follow through and we need to
44:45
follow through. And then on a
44:47
personal level, you really kind of have to
44:49
take responsibility for your own health and
44:53
make sure that you do everything at home
44:56
first and don't have to
44:58
necessarily take pharmaceuticals
45:03
that you don't need and things like that. I
45:08
find it very frustrating
45:11
to see what's happening, obviously on the federal
45:13
level, but even on the state level, they
45:16
all are kind of acting ignorant.
45:19
And we don't have to
45:21
worry about it. It's just not a big deal. It's not
45:23
gonna happen to us. And if it happens to us, what
45:25
are they gonna do? Well, we
45:27
all know that sure, on local
45:29
level, they're not gonna send United
45:32
Nations troops to make sure that
45:34
we comply. Those type of talks
45:36
are really,
45:39
they don't make any sense. But
45:42
they can not complying with WHO
45:44
and stuff like that. It's
45:49
not gonna happen because like I said, this
45:51
administration is very much in favor and they're
45:53
gonna do exactly what WHO and
45:56
United Nations want them to do. And
45:58
it is concerning because... because with
46:01
these initiatives that they're trying to do,
46:03
they are trying to use the vaccine
46:05
passports as well. And our
46:07
states are doing it. Our states are doing
46:09
these ID digital programs. You know,
46:11
they say it's voluntary. You don't have to worry.
46:14
So we all need to
46:17
really empower ourselves and go on
46:19
the state website, go look at the
46:21
health department, see what type of initiatives
46:23
they're doing, and then call, whoever
46:26
you have to call and say, I don't agree. What can we
46:28
do to stop this? No, and
46:31
I would argue on a county level as well. We
46:33
should pass resolutions banning
46:36
WHO mandates. Remember, I mean we
46:38
all remember this time of year
46:41
very vividly four years ago, you
46:44
know, the states were involved, but
46:46
counties also, the stuff ranged from county to
46:48
county. And you
46:51
really need both to push back, but
46:53
we need to take whatever we can.
46:55
And you know, North Carolina has done
46:58
it, you know. North Carolina has, there
47:00
are three things that have started passing
47:02
resolutions specifically. You
47:05
know, they did some with the mRNA vaccine, but they put WHO
47:07
in it as well. And
47:10
you're right, because in Texas, you know, if
47:12
the governor says you have to
47:16
wear masks or whatever, you know, comes the county,
47:18
the county judge actually can say, no, our county
47:20
is not going to do it. We're
47:24
going to start at a county level and
47:26
go up. No, for
47:28
sure, and we need that because as I
47:31
mentioned, we have really failed
47:33
to rectify and immunize ourselves
47:35
against future iterations of
47:37
this in many, many
47:39
red states. And certainly the blue states are
47:41
terrible. And we still have these
47:44
mandates. So, Texas, there's a lot of work
47:46
to be done. And hopefully next legislative session
47:48
will be key to
47:50
get the rest of Bob Hall's bills
47:52
enacted. And the
47:54
remaining time, I just, there's one other issue I
47:57
wanted to really broach with you. We
48:00
haven't really covered this, but we see
48:02
grumblings in the media from these international
48:05
NGOs we're talking about, about
48:07
Disease X and the coming of
48:09
a Disease X that's 20 times
48:11
more fatal than COVID. What
48:13
exactly is it? Where is it
48:16
coming from and how do they know about it? So
48:19
we don't know what it is,
48:21
but it's 20 times deadlier than
48:24
anything we've ever seen. And
48:27
then they list a couple of different scenarios
48:29
that could happen. So I
48:31
see Disease X as a propaganda.
48:33
I see that this propaganda
48:36
of fear, because they
48:38
want to pass this pandemic agreement.
48:42
They are flying the amendments to IHR
48:44
under the radar and people are not
48:46
talking about them enough. And,
48:49
you know, Tedros Gabrasion goes
48:51
on on these different platforms that
48:54
keeps on talking about how this
48:56
Disease X is going to wipe
48:58
us all out and we need
49:00
to make sure that we protect
49:02
ourselves. And the only way to do this is sign
49:04
this agreement. You
49:09
cannot live life worrying about
49:11
next disease and what's going to happen.
49:14
You know, sure, we're going
49:16
to have different
49:18
outbreaks and things like
49:20
that. But if the physicians
49:22
are allowed to do their jobs, I
49:27
would say that we can weather whatever comes
49:29
our way. It
49:31
is important to realize that by
49:35
giving the bureaucrats and government more
49:37
power, all we are doing
49:39
is allowing them to control our way of life. And
49:42
that's exactly what they want to do. You
49:44
know, one day you and I also need
49:47
to talk about United Nations. Really,
49:49
everything that's coming down is initiatives
49:52
of United Nations. There's
49:56
something that's going to happen in September.
49:58
It's called It
50:01
has to do with pact for freedom,
50:04
but it's a symposium on freedom where
50:06
they're all going to sign this pact
50:08
that has like 40 some points, but
50:11
essentially is a way of United
50:13
Nations having control over the world
50:15
and global governance. And
50:17
I know this sounds very, you
50:20
know, conspirational and, you know, overall
50:23
conspiracy, whatever. But
50:28
my point is you just have to
50:30
go on their website and read these documents. What
50:33
they want to accomplish is
50:37
you kind of have to get a look at European
50:39
Union. You know, I know you
50:41
mentioned I'm from Europe and, you know,
50:43
I'm from Yugoslavia. And when
50:45
Croatia separated and we became our own country, at one
50:48
point I was like, yeah, we really need to be
50:50
part of EU because EU is going to
50:52
do these great things. But
50:54
what EU has done,
50:56
they've done their small version of
50:59
this global governance where you have bureaucracy
51:01
that's trying to tell the countries how to lead
51:03
their life. And
51:05
now the countries are starting to realize
51:07
that they have lost their identity and
51:09
they're becoming this one big Europe
51:12
that no one wants except for
51:14
the bureaucrats who are controlling our life. So
51:17
I know you asked me about Disease X,
51:19
but that's kind of how they're trying to
51:21
get us. They're trying to make a square
51:24
life so that we give them more power
51:26
to control it. That's really
51:28
the bottom line. And always a pretext, the next
51:30
virus, the next thing. And remember,
51:33
like the censorship that could
51:35
be triggered under the IHR
51:37
if they declare some sort
51:39
of public health emergency would
51:42
be, you know, you can't say their sort of
51:44
reaction or
51:46
pharmaceuticals don't work, you can't say
51:49
that climate change is a myth, you can't
51:51
say that, you know,
51:53
gun control doesn't work and things like that.
51:55
It could apply to anything. And,
51:58
you know, again, it's not just ban. the WHO in
52:01
the county and state, we definitely need
52:03
to do that. But also going on
52:05
offense. I mean, the more that we
52:07
lay down the markers statutorily in these
52:09
states that this cannot be done, mandates
52:11
cannot be done, public health guidance cannot
52:13
be done like this. And
52:16
obviously calling out these people by name. I
52:18
mean, you should get to know who the
52:20
top guns are in your county and state
52:22
health departments. And if you're in a red
52:24
area, especially, and you start reading stuff like
52:26
this, I mean, you need to start alerting
52:28
everyone you know, your elected reps. Dr.
52:32
Kat, where could people go to find
52:35
out kind of a
52:37
synopsis article by article of what these
52:39
amendments are, so they could pass them
52:41
around to their elected representatives? So
52:45
I'm part of
52:47
Sovereignty Coalition. There's
52:49
sovereigntycoalition.org that has a lot of
52:52
different, you know, there are links
52:55
to the actual documents. So you can read
52:57
the document for yourself and decide what you
52:59
think about it. But there's also different initiatives
53:01
that you can do a line up where
53:03
you can find them, it will be sent
53:06
to your representatives. Another good
53:08
website is doortopredom.org by Dr.
53:10
Meryl Nass. She has
53:12
a lot of different articles and
53:15
ways people can get involved.
53:18
It's really important to make this an
53:21
election issue. Not only a
53:23
federal election issue, we need our candidates,
53:25
both of them to be asked about
53:27
it. Well, three of them really, at
53:29
this point, each one of them has
53:31
to have a clear answer
53:34
on this. You know, Trump
53:37
has tried to exit and maybe he
53:39
will still feel the same way. Kennedy
53:42
has indicated that he would not be
53:44
in favor of WHO either. We all know what the administration
53:47
is doing. But we need to make
53:50
it an election issue and ask them,
53:52
are you ready to give up your
53:54
sovereignty to the supranational agency? And
53:56
up and down the ballot as well. Well,
54:01
I think this really speaks to dr. Bowdoin's
54:03
pledge that we need to get and this
54:06
another thing I'd be remiss if we didn't get it I
54:08
mean are they gonna sign the pledge
54:10
to again a lot of them aren't in
54:12
the power to do this But that they
54:14
would advocate to take the COVID shots off
54:16
the market because that's an IQ
54:18
test That really see
54:21
if you're one of the
54:23
cartel Republicans and certainly Democrat You're
54:27
not going to want to answer that there
54:29
that is something that they're not going to want to answer and that will tell
54:31
you a lot about them if they
54:34
are willing to embrace that message then
54:37
that that demonstrates that We
54:40
know where they are frankly on a lot of other
54:42
issues as well. It really is a very Determining
54:46
issue and we can't just sleep through
54:48
them. We have a bunch of primaries in June July and August
54:51
You know and much less the general election
54:54
So we're still early on and it's not
54:56
too late to delay the marker down. So
54:58
again, it's sovereignty coalition.org And was it door
55:00
to freedom org? Yes,
55:02
what the freedom org and it's
55:05
exactly what you said, you know, it's
55:07
interesting that our physician caucus In
55:10
Congress, you know hasn't really
55:13
Looked at this either and it's very silent.
55:16
It's very telling to me and there are
55:18
some good people there but at the same
55:20
time they keep on ignoring this big elephant
55:22
in the room because They
55:24
don't want to upset the lobbies and
55:28
the far right industry But well the
55:30
current iron sub committee, you know in
55:32
the GOP controlled house I literally cannot
55:34
think of what they've done. Obviously the
55:36
chairman's not running for re-election. So who
55:38
knows? But I mean
55:40
they pretty much gave away the farm.
55:42
They funded in fact all the HHS
55:44
agencies got record record
55:47
funding in this omnibus bill
55:50
So this is going to have to be a
55:52
battle we fight in the states to match
55:54
every state matches Florida and then take even
55:56
that to the next level. That's where we
55:58
need to go with this This
56:00
is something that can and must be
56:02
fought. Remember, folks, I know this sounds
56:05
a little bit out of
56:07
our control, but it's really not because if you
56:09
had in March 2020, 20
56:13
red states calling BS on this,
56:16
not only would you have, again, had a
56:18
place to run to as refuge, but also,
56:21
that would have been such a check and
56:23
balance because Dr.
56:26
Catt, just to end off here, isn't it true that – the
56:28
reason why they want one health is because
56:31
to create a dystopia, you need shared
56:33
misery. If there's a whole bunch of
56:35
people not living in the misery, it's
56:37
very hard to convince some people that
56:39
they need to be doing that, and
56:42
that's why it has to be won. Yeah.
56:46
You know, we need to show them once and
56:48
for all that they are
56:50
supposed to be representing us. And
56:53
that's why I love this initiative of
56:55
the state doing it.
56:58
State saying, we say no, and
57:01
now you should say no as well. I
57:04
love history and I love – I'm a
57:07
naturalized American, so I had to learn
57:10
a lot before I took
57:12
my oath to become an American.
57:14
But I love reading about forefathers
57:16
and stuff like that. And
57:20
I posted yesterday on my Twitter because we
57:22
did a Twitter space on who, and
57:25
it's one of my favorite little
57:27
stories when Benjamin Franklin was
57:29
walking out of the Independence Hall and he
57:31
was asked, you know, what
57:34
do we have, republic or monarchy? And
57:36
he said, republic, if you
57:38
can keep it. And I
57:40
love those words. I really truly do. And
57:42
I – because
57:45
states now have to say,
57:47
we have a republic and
57:49
we say no. And
57:52
then, you know, I am tired
57:54
of the federal government telling the
57:57
rest of us what to do, but they're so – separated
58:01
from us. They don't live in the same
58:04
world that we live in. They live in
58:06
the world of Washington DC where they go
58:08
to dinners with the lobbyists
58:10
and party away. You
58:13
know, I know there are some good men
58:15
and women out there, but not
58:17
enough. So we need to remind
58:19
them who they are, who they represent, and
58:21
they represent us. They represent the state and
58:23
states have had enough. And if we only
58:26
incited the majority will, and it is
58:28
the majority in a lot of parts
58:30
of the country, upon those
58:32
areas, a place like Texas, I mean that
58:34
department of health should be firing on all
58:36
cylinders. So we have our work cut out
58:38
for us. We do have a Texas team.
58:40
I'm looking forward to working with you and
58:42
some of your other doctors on this. Thank
58:44
you, Dr. Hutt, and thank you all of
58:46
you for joining us today. We'll be back
58:48
sometime someplace tomorrow. God bless you all.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More