0:00

politics without the soap

0:02

opera with unfiltered constitutional

0:04

conservative truth

0:06

the conservative review with Danny

0:09

and welcome back fellow American Patriots

0:11

and Minimans standing at the ready to

0:14

fight anew for everything that matters

0:16

in our life

0:18

life itself liberty property standard

0:20

of living

0:22

our minds bodies souls you name it

0:24

everything in between it is all on the line

0:26

we have a plan for all of it here at

0:28

CR podcast Daniel Hurwitz

0:30

your host back in the house today

0:32

at Blaze Media June

0:35

14th

0:36

and happy flag day where

0:38

is it a happy flag day what

0:40

does the flag mean to you what do

0:42

the stars and stripes mean to you in 2023 in

0:47

the America we live in today it's

0:49

I'm dead serious about that certainly

0:52

this the nostalgia will

0:55

always fill a sacred

0:57

place in our heart in terms

0:59

of what it did stand for in the country it did reflect

1:03

and still reflects in the past but

1:06

does it mean anything today because

1:08

it meant that well that's our country those are

1:10

our values

1:12

but no I mean

1:13

whether we like it or not the rainbow flag

1:16

is today's American flag

1:19

it's not just a couple of usurpers that does

1:21

reflect the power

1:23

structure of America what

1:26

does it mean to you see

1:29

to me it used to mean almost

1:32

like you find in the Bible judges

1:35

each man is able to live peacefully under his

1:38

grapevine fig tree

1:41

because of that flag and really what it represents

1:45

we could live quietly in

1:47

a relative peace and prosperity with

1:49

two oceans surrounding us while

1:52

there's a bunch of chaos decadence and

1:55

craziness throughout the world where

1:59

are we glad we got away

3:59

12 month supply of your

4:02

existing prescriptions. So

4:04

if you have a prescription for mental health, for blood

4:06

pressure, heart health, diabetes,

4:09

whatever it is, it is in shortage.

4:11

I mean, we've had this with our family

4:14

now. It's a big, big problem. Also,

4:17

increasingly, by the way, aside from the shortages,

4:20

they give you so many freaking problems.

4:22

One day we'll talk about this with the pharmacies, the

4:25

runaround you get nowadays. It's

4:27

like if it's heroin and marijuana, it's

4:29

like, boy, it's free everywhere. Open

4:33

air drug markets in Baltimore. But

4:36

anything else, oh, it's a regulated this, or we

4:38

can't get it. So it's not

4:40

just the supply shortages. There's

4:42

also our messed up healthcare

4:45

system as we saw during COVID. So

4:47

again, go to jacemedical.com, fill

4:50

out a 10 minute survey so

4:52

the doctors associated with them know to give you the

4:55

prescription, offer code review

4:57

at checkout, and you will be prepared

5:00

responsibly for the Fourth Reich.

5:02

So I wanna read to you.

5:05

You know, there's a lot of news of the day, and we could

5:07

catch up on that,

5:09

but I wanna read to you an email

5:12

that brings this out on

5:14

Flag Day. Now, the flag

5:16

obviously most evidently represented the

5:19

military more than any other part of the

5:21

country. And just understand

5:23

what has happened to our military.

5:25

And I want you as I'm

5:28

reading this to think about and

5:30

reminisce about the failure of

5:32

anyone in the Republican Party and on the right

5:35

to properly address this.

5:37

Finally, Kevin McCarthy said, I'm gonna hold up the NDAA

5:41

to end the mandate in the

5:44

military, but

5:46

that just showed that could have been done a year and a half

5:48

earlier.

5:51

But as we've noted,

5:52

it's not over.

5:54

What they're doing now is they're

5:56

not rectifying all the damage they

5:59

gave these people. So for example, I noted

6:01

in some ways they're asking people to come back with the

6:04

National Guard people that left. They're

6:06

saying you're derelict your AWOL

6:08

if you don't come back. Well, what do you mean? They moved

6:10

on with their lives. You can invite them

6:12

back and offer them to come back, but you can't force

6:14

them back. That's one way. One thing that needs

6:16

to be rectified, but also there the

6:19

widespread discrimination is still

6:22

taking place.

6:24

And how the Armed Services Committee

6:27

and all the subcommittees this week are marking up

6:29

the NDAA, and I'm not hearing any news

6:32

about this,

6:33

to hold these people accountable and

6:35

make sure that

6:36

every last person

6:39

who was discriminated against and opportunity was

6:41

taken away from him or he was demoted

6:44

or denied a promotion, that that is immediately

6:46

rectified. My

6:51

husband and I, this is from Caitlin, won't

6:54

say your last name, have been Blaze

6:56

members for a few years, and it's about

6:58

time our story was told. And to be frank, we need

7:01

help. My husband is, I

7:03

won't say his name, he's a captain, has

7:05

been fighting the COVID vaccine mandate

7:07

since day one. He was a member of the Spence

7:09

v. Austin case before

7:11

he was picked up by the class action lawsuit. Later,

7:14

many Americans think that the fight was won over

7:16

the issue in the Armed Services once Congress forced

7:18

the services to undo the mandate. However,

7:21

this has not happened in our case and

7:23

in many others. My combat

7:26

action medal recipient husband is

7:28

still facing adverse action. He's

7:32

a C-17 mobility pilot currently

7:35

serving as a triple qualified evaluator pilot

7:37

at the Air Force Academy.

7:40

My husband was supposed to pin on the rank of major

7:43

last December. The promotion was

7:45

delayed last year as a result of the adverse action

7:48

after refusing to take the vaccine. The

7:50

rank was supposed to be delayed until May 1st, which

7:53

was recently. And

7:55

it was supposed to be backdated retroactively to December.

8:00

but his command had a promotion ceremony on May 1st,

8:03

and as of today, he's found out that the promotion

8:06

is being revoked, or technically

8:08

not being completed by the Secretary of the Air Force. So

8:11

he's still a captain. This

8:15

is just, and you know, I'm just skipping here, this is just the current

8:17

damage. Our story is much longer

8:19

than this. My husband last spring

8:22

held the position of Commander's

8:24

Action Group CAG at the Air

8:26

Force Academy. The position is usually held by LTCs,

8:29

and my husband was rewarded based

8:31

on merit and recommendation for the position.

8:34

Upon finding out that my husband was pursuing a religious

8:36

exemption, meaning even before anything

8:39

happened with that, the personnel manager at the office fired

8:41

him from CAG

8:45

when he confronted her, that he felt that was

8:47

a form of religious discrimination. So he responded, I don't

8:50

care. He has experienced everything

8:52

from letters of reprimand, delayed promotion,

8:54

and almost two years of no flight time.

8:57

Um,

8:58

he was only recently allowed to start flying again,

9:00

and even that took months to get accomplished. My husband

9:02

is an excellent pilot, that the Air

9:04

Force chose not to utilize for over a year

9:07

because of, simply because literally

9:09

he didn't take a poison for which

9:11

the people pushing it belong in prison.

9:15

And I should mention that despite constant force testing

9:17

and ample time instructing Air Force Academy

9:19

cadets, he has never contracted COVID.

9:23

My husband was even awarded the

9:26

flight instructor of the quarter for the 12th

9:28

flying training wing in the fall of 2020. When

9:32

his peers were afraid of COVID, he was mentoring

9:34

and instructing our next generation of Air Force

9:36

officers without fear. And

9:39

again, it's these type of men that

9:41

they're purposely trying to drum out of the military

9:44

for obvious reasons. This

9:47

fight has not been without personal sacrifice. She knows that

9:51

she's had major medical problems with

9:55

her youngest son, Spina

9:57

Bifida, that I had to have all these

9:59

surgeries. So all the while they're on the hook to

10:01

lose their health insurance My

10:04

husband is a man of honor who has served

10:06

honorably since 2013 who

10:08

is well on his way to command We

10:10

wanted to serve 20 30 years Meaning

10:13

a lot longer than you need to because

10:15

we believe in our nation. We believe in his oath Alan

10:17

has over 50 of his peers of all ranks and positions

10:20

write for him personal letters of character

10:22

recommendation Response to his adverse actions in no

10:24

way Did we think that this is the

10:26

way that he would serve out the oath defending

10:29

the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic?

10:32

Yet we stand here with resolve. We are wary

10:34

as a family and the fight never seems to end

10:36

every American Even Americans

10:38

in our own circle think we already won

10:41

this fight, but we haven't we

10:43

need the damage undone We need

10:45

the damage to stop coming We

10:47

need new AFI's written allowing

10:50

future generations to get immunization accommodations

10:52

approved right now Congress Has

10:55

put a simple and small band-aid on a festering

10:58

wound and

10:59

There's a lot to digest there just in terms of

11:02

what has happened to our nation. What has happened

11:04

to our military

11:08

But

11:08

there is a broader lesson

11:10

as well as a specific action item obviously

11:12

a specific action item is How

11:14

in the world is something this destructive?

11:17

indefensible immoral and Illegal

11:21

and also extremely unpopular I mean if you

11:23

poll people should should service members

11:25

be demoted based on not getting the vaccination

11:27

status now in June 2023 I mean it

11:30

would it's a it's a 90-10 issue and Yet

11:34

where is the fight?

11:36

But it's emblematic of a broader thing

11:39

We satiate ourselves on metatwamp

11:42

our talking points, but we don't do anything including

11:44

about that by the way

11:46

It's like the whole barisma scandal with

11:48

bite in the bite and bribe are they can actually

11:50

do anything about it

11:54

This is the thing

11:55

we go on to the next thing we don't do

11:57

anything

11:59

and I love how she's

13:24

retreated

14:00

a little bit, but not really, they're reloading. Same

14:03

thing with inflation, I don't have time to get into it, but I wanted to

14:05

get to some of the inflation numbers. It's like, they

14:08

go up to the line, it goes crazy, and

14:10

then it hasn't gone down, it's just plateauing,

14:13

it's not increasing, although some

14:15

categories are. So it's

14:17

like, and the people absorb it, people are very

14:19

resilient. And that's

14:21

what I always say, it hasn't gotten bad enough.

14:25

But what the Republican Party brilliantly does,

14:28

is, again, it's like, either you

14:32

spit up an item you're ch- when you're choking, you

14:34

either spit it up,

14:35

or you could swallow it.

14:36

But we come to some sort of resolution. They

14:40

perfectly keep it right in that middle.

14:44

See, I either want to resolve it through the front door,

14:47

or then

14:48

make it that everyone understands how bad

14:50

it is, so you have some sort of existential

14:53

resolution. But

14:55

instead, it's just enough that we just keep

14:57

it going, keep it going. With

15:00

that, I want to get to our next guest. Our interview today

15:02

is sponsored by our friends at

15:04

Barrel Buddy. You know, guns

15:06

are very expensive. Speaking of inflation, it's insane

15:09

how much, you know, even

15:11

just a polymer, a striker fire,

15:13

costs

15:15

these days a good handgun. Gone are

15:17

the days when you can get a quality handgun

15:20

for $300. So, you

15:22

want to take care of it. And

15:24

often it's not very enjoyable cleaning a

15:26

gun, but it's something you gotta do for

15:29

the functionality of it to make sure it's safe. After

15:32

you run a couple hundred rounds, certainly a thousand rounds

15:34

through it, you want to always clean it.

15:37

And, you

15:39

know, the boar snakes don't really work.

15:41

All of the, um, the

15:44

worst thing is, you know, you have a lot of sharp pieces, so

15:46

when you go with these little cloths,

15:48

they could leave lint in them, and that's not good either. Barrel

15:53

Buddy is a cartridge that compresses,

15:56

goes perfectly through the barrel, but recently

15:58

I was using it, it's not just the barrel.

17:59

you have a massive company

18:02

that's

18:03

connected to China, connected to

18:05

foreign interests, connected to Republican

18:08

lobbyists,

18:09

that wants to build a

18:11

pipeline not to deliver energy,

18:14

but

18:15

to capture carbon.

18:17

I mean, the most absurd thing you could imagine in the

18:19

world,

18:20

the notion that you're going to lay

18:22

out the premise and agree to the premise that

18:24

carbon is unsafe and the only way

18:26

you could have functioning energy

18:29

is if you offset it with capture

18:31

and somehow you're going to build enough pipelines

18:33

and then storage caverns underground

18:37

in perpetuity until,

18:39

you know, God plants his feet on the

18:41

Mount of Olives

18:43

to store all of the carbon we use.

18:46

I mean, it's not even ideological, it's

18:49

just insane. But

18:50

if you're trying to grift in the short

18:52

term

18:53

and government's going to pony up the money, well,

18:56

why not? Let's get in on it. So

18:59

we've talked about this a couple times before.

19:01

There are landowners on

19:03

the route to this Summit

19:06

Carbon Solutions pipeline they're building

19:08

from Iowa through

19:10

Nebraska and South Dakota

19:13

and somehow going to dump into central North

19:15

Dakota.

19:16

And there's real lives on

19:18

the line here that they're stealing people's

19:21

land

19:22

for something that is so onerous,

19:25

something that will facilitate this net

19:28

zero agenda 2030 nonsense that

19:30

should be a non-starter everywhere,

19:33

much less in a state where there aren't

19:35

enough Democrats to even populate all

19:37

the legislative committees. Yet the

19:39

legislation that was done to end the eminent

19:42

domain, or

19:43

that was crafted to end the eminent domain,

19:46

or at least to treat it like a public carrier, in

19:48

other words, right now, they could just take you to court

19:50

without the utilities commission ruling

19:53

that's in a public interest. So they could

19:55

just say, hey, we're a public carrier,

19:57

we're a pipeline, we're coming in.

19:59

Here's the summons, that's it.

20:02

Go take it or leave it, we'll

20:04

reimburse you, but

20:07

we're getting that pipeline through your land.

20:10

And I am shocked that there is no outrage,

20:13

and I truly believe if the top 30

20:15

voices in conservative media

20:18

would go and train their fire and

20:20

say, wait

20:21

a minute, Kristi Noem, this is your state.

20:24

You shouldn't have carbon capture going on at all,

20:26

much less stealing people's land for

20:28

it. You need to convene a special session

20:31

and pass that bill to certainly

20:33

at least take away this extra degree

20:36

of eminent domain that they don't even have to go through the state

20:38

government to do it. But yet

20:40

it's cricket. So I wanted you guys to hear

20:43

from a real life story. One of these people who got a

20:45

court summons was Jared Bosley,

20:47

he's a Brown County landowner and

20:50

farmer for four generations. Brown

20:52

County is kind of in the Northeastern part of the state.

20:54

He's facing the Summit Carbon Solutions summons

20:58

in court. He was actually accused of threatening

21:00

people from Carbon

21:03

Solutions who was doing a survey on his

21:05

property for simply

21:07

just telling him to get off his land. He

21:09

was obviously cleared of all charges, but

21:11

was ordered to stay 100 yards away from

21:14

their surveyors. So he's

21:16

the, it's literally the inmates

21:19

running the asylum there,

21:21

they run your land. It's truly unbelievable.

21:24

We need to do something about it. Jared,

21:26

thanks so much for joining us today to

21:29

tell your story.

21:31

Well, thanks for having me on. I appreciate

21:34

it and all my pipeline

21:36

family. We appreciate the chance

21:39

to get this story out there because it is

21:41

a very concerning

21:43

deal, which it should be for anybody

21:45

who owns any type of property. So

21:49

kind of a general background, this pipeline

21:51

thing's trying to come through my, or

21:54

my homestead is. And

21:56

that would be, and where they

21:59

want to come through, want to run north of the

22:01

farm north of my old

22:03

shelter belt and we have planted a bunch

22:06

of new trees

22:07

to kind of

22:09

reduce shelter belts and set up more

22:11

stuff for the cattle and where they want to run through they're

22:13

going to go through these new trees and

22:16

for the ranch to give the next generation

22:19

the fifth generation a chance to come back

22:21

here and expand the cattle herd we have

22:23

to go north that's just how old the way of the land

22:26

is here we've got kind of a flu creek

22:28

to the east and a property line to the west so

22:30

only option is north and that's

22:32

right where they want to put this pipeline and they kind

22:35

of get to come in and just take

22:38

it we've done everything right and

22:40

we're living off the land but

22:42

they just get to come you know and

22:44

take it and and then they're made

22:46

up

22:47

false accusations against me that

22:50

I threatened these surveyors I never did

22:52

any of that I was 10 miles away in a field

22:55

plant and they just

22:57

made up they signed affidavits they

22:59

were complete lies and state's

23:01

attorney the judge's nobody's going after

23:04

him I want to start from the beginning before the

23:06

accusation that you know you attacked

23:08

the surveyors but before that

23:11

did you first get a court summons

23:14

or or some sort of offer

23:17

a financial payout before

23:19

the surveyors came or the surveyors just came to

23:21

your property one day without notice

23:23

well they've been yeah we got some in there

23:26

they they gave like a final offer

23:28

deal we weren't gonna take it and then they said the next

23:31

step will start the condemnation process

23:33

to start

23:34

this eminent domain thing they

23:37

offered you a deal they offered you a deal now

23:39

could you just describe for our audience so some

23:41

people might think all right well you know it's not

23:43

like they totally I mean they grab it but they

23:45

offer to pay is it not worth the

23:47

money it's

23:49

not well this land is not

23:53

for sale in my opinion no here

23:55

it's just it's just not for all future

23:57

things here but what they offered

23:59

not even what like the

24:01

local land sales and auctions are

24:03

bringing. And this stuff like it was almost

24:06

been just slaps in the face, slaps in

24:08

the face and they they have always

24:11

increased their offers but they're still

24:13

not close. It sounds like a big

24:16

deal but they're paying you for rut crops

24:18

for multiple years and this

24:21

ground through here we just don't have a lot of black

24:23

dirt that's just how it is. You'd never like

24:26

you just don't

24:27

once you do a project like this it just never

24:29

really comes back. And I know there's

24:32

places around that have a pipelines

24:35

in the ground for 40 years and

24:37

they can still see the yield loss on their

24:39

yield maps and stuff from their combine.

24:41

So it's just something that... So can you describe

24:44

that a little bit more in case some people are

24:46

wondering. So you're saying you know that compensation

24:48

is underwhelming for what it is even and

24:51

obviously like you're saying you know if you have a family homestead

24:53

you want to keep it sometimes it could

24:55

be priceless but you know they're not

24:57

even that the payment is not enough

25:00

but could you describe so it's not a case where they're taking

25:03

literally just taking away all the land that sometimes

25:06

could happen with you know certain eminent domain

25:08

projects they're just running a pipeline

25:10

through it. So how does that to someone who's not a farmer

25:13

how does that affect you in the long term?

25:15

Well

25:16

they're running they want to run these pipes

25:19

like kind of diagonal

25:21

across quarters and across fields

25:23

like they don't follow like a property line

25:26

or a right-of-way they just come

25:28

right through the absolute middle of this stuff

25:31

and once they get the pipe in yes

25:33

we can farm over it but now you

25:36

got to worry about wrecking this pipe they

25:38

only want to put it in four

25:40

feet deep

25:41

and like farm insurances liability

25:44

stuff we can't get liability

25:46

stuff on that the company says oh don't

25:48

worry about that that'll all be fine

25:50

but in Mississippi

25:53

when that pipe broke people

25:55

tried to you know come after

25:57

the pipeline company and they

25:59

just filed

27:52

So

28:00

to start the process, they sent surveyors

28:02

in. So describe what happened that day. What

28:05

was that, May?

28:07

Yeah, it was May, I don't know,

28:09

May 7th or 3rd, somewhere

28:11

up in there. So

28:14

I had left to go plant. I

28:16

was 10 miles north of the farm. There's

28:19

nowhere around here. My wife was home.

28:21

She had gallbladder surgery, so she's recovering

28:24

from that at home. She said

28:26

it takes about 10. She goes, well, it's in

28:28

the shower. Heard someone yelling in the house. Was

28:31

you expecting parts or anything like that, or expecting

28:33

someone to stop? I said, no, there's nobody stopping.

28:35

I know nothing. Didn't think

28:38

much of it, you know, whatever. When she got

28:40

down out of the shower and went

28:42

to our computer and turned the cow cameras

28:44

on, we got a bunch of cameras around to watch speed

28:47

lots and more cabin to help monitor

28:50

them. So she turned them over

28:53

to the shop where they went, and then they

28:55

got out of their pickup, went in the shop. Well,

28:58

a shop is in a totally different parcel

29:00

of land. It's not in any of the legal

29:02

for the condemnation process. They

29:05

already have the order from the judge. They

29:07

can just go survey. There's

29:09

no reason for them to come into my house,

29:11

go into my shop, no reason to even check

29:13

with me. They already got their order

29:16

they wanted. They can just go. Well,

29:20

we didn't know who it was, because it's just an

29:23

unmarked pickup. There's nothing that's just a, I

29:25

said a random pickup, Louisiana plates.

29:28

Well, I had to see that here in South Dakota.

29:30

So

29:32

she went up there to talk to them, called

29:34

me as she walked across the road to them. I

29:37

clicked the phone on, and I could hear

29:39

them say summit surveyors. And

29:42

all I said was, if it's summit surveying,

29:44

then the sheriff should be involved. I'll deal with this

29:46

later. And I hung up. I was coming

29:48

to a waterhole with the planner, and

29:51

I had to go around that and get out and check stuff.

29:55

And that, as far as I knew, the whole conversation

29:57

was over. And she'd text later,

29:59

just to. out there just leaving I guess. Well

30:02

I guess good enough whatever. Well

30:04

then a few hours later, four or five

30:06

hours later the detective came out trying

30:09

to find me which we didn't cross paths

30:11

that day. A few days later we met

30:14

up. He came out we talked and I said

30:16

well what he goes what do you want to

30:18

talk about? I said you came out to see me the other

30:20

day what did you want to talk about?

30:22

Like I don't know what's I don't know what's going

30:24

on yet you know

30:26

and they then he goes well

30:28

you did

30:29

you threaten those surveyors? I said I didn't

30:31

even talk to them. Like I was on the

30:33

phone with Tara and just said if it's

30:36

the surveyors the sheriff should be involved. I

30:38

didn't say anything about anything else

30:40

like they made up. So then

30:43

he goes well they said you threatened to kill them.

30:46

Well that did not do that. Like

30:49

I just kind of laughed I thought it was so

30:51

crazy. Well then you know

30:54

a week goes by and

30:56

I then had to go to court for contempt

30:59

to court because I prevented them from

31:01

doing the surveying. I was 10 miles

31:04

away I had I was on a phone for six seconds

31:06

and this is all happening. Like they're just totally

31:09

targeting me making this whole

31:12

thing up and then so

31:14

when we get to court we get to that

31:16

deal and get up

31:19

the judges in the room and we got all

31:21

this evidence. We got phone records we got

31:23

videos here we got pictures like I

31:25

got witnesses that I was planting by up

31:28

there they were gonna I mean can say I was up

31:30

there I don't have a pickup I'm not

31:32

running home pass you know it just me and the tractor.

31:35

I'm up there with so then the

31:38

judge he just got

31:40

up we got up and he goes well I'm gonna find mr.

31:42

Bosley not in contempt but

31:44

there's no reason to go through all this evidence.

31:47

Well isn't that part of the judges deal is find

31:50

out who's telling the truth or not telling the truth

31:52

just it just that was them nobody

31:54

said. In other words you

31:57

wanted to go through with the disposition

31:59

of the case

31:59

And if I get what you're

32:02

saying is

32:03

that you're concerned that

32:05

well on the one hand you're exonerated You know

32:07

that which is good, but on the other

32:09

hand you want to get to the bottom

32:12

of this because this is an intimidation tactic

32:15

It's not so much to find you guilty now, but

32:17

to dissuade anyone from from

32:19

just speaking out against it Obviously,

32:22

I think people in this audience will have some very

32:24

strong feelings about what your rights

32:27

are and aren't when the government

32:29

comes deputizing a private

32:32

Agency to to do something like this, but

32:34

you weren't doing that you spoke

32:36

out against it You didn't take their offer, but

32:38

you literally didn't stop them and you

32:40

didn't even say anything to them and

32:43

If I just just to sum up and and

32:46

again, we're speaking with Jared Bosley Brown

32:48

County, South Dakota landowner farmer fourth

32:51

generation is getting his land Just

32:54

condemned for a pipeline Not

32:57

for oil and gas but to grab

32:59

carbon it just the most bizarre thing around

33:01

and Is your major

33:04

concern this? Like everything

33:06

else to say look we just want the pipeline.

33:09

We won't intrude it won't bother

33:11

you will pay you But what you're

33:14

I think what your case demonstrates Is that this

33:16

is just the tip of the iceberg if

33:18

they have this much power to? initiate

33:21

it like you're saying if you ever have a

33:23

dispute if you ever have a problem with the

33:25

Pipeline if you ever have a problem with insurance Are

33:29

you really gonna have the upper hand?

33:33

Yeah, absolutely not if this goes

33:35

through your you're not just giving

33:37

that little easement away I feel you're giving

33:39

up pretty much your rights for that entire

33:42

quarter because you can't Like

33:44

our future plans we got I think

33:46

I sent you some pictures the trees are set up

33:49

Kind of making a lot there for pairs

33:52

and we talked about putting a couple hoop arms back

33:54

there Well, this is right where this goes.

33:56

You can't do any of those things and once

33:59

a

33:59

it's there. I

34:01

mean, they're never going to just say, Oh, well, it's

34:03

all yours. We're not going to use that pipe. You

34:06

just don't know what the future is going to hold and who's

34:08

going to run it. And what else is coming next

34:10

beside it. And if this eminent

34:12

domain gets used

34:15

lightly for a private company that is not a public

34:19

utility, it is a hundred percent

34:21

the tip of the iceberg because it's just going

34:23

to be, I mean,

34:25

it's stuff's going to go wild that way for

34:28

private things. I mean, there's a place

34:30

for eminent domain, maybe a, you

34:33

know, power line, highways, things

34:35

like that. Just for public

34:38

things, you know, stuff that'll help the public.

34:40

This is a complete money grab, you

34:43

know, using a 45 tax queue of money that we

34:45

don't really have. If

34:49

you pay attention to how in

34:52

debt or nation is, I don't know

34:54

why they want to put billions of dollars into

34:56

something like this where the result is zero.

34:59

I mean, no one in the right mind would invest

35:01

a thousand dollars for the result being

35:04

zero. A billion dollars

35:06

for zero return. Nobody. It's

35:08

just, it's, it's crazy. The

35:11

Scandinavians have, have looked down

35:14

on this carbon capture thing, even from the

35:16

left green, whatever perspective,

35:18

I mean, there's literally, it is the most absurd.

35:21

The economies of scale are so inefficient.

35:25

It just, the idea of it is just

35:27

so

35:27

utterly insane. It blows

35:30

the mind that it could be serious, but

35:32

it's is serious in your own property.

35:35

Um, so I, I noticed

35:37

recently you made a comment about the governor

35:39

and, and I've been covering this story

35:41

for maybe a half a year and I've

35:44

been surprised at how, you know,

35:46

we had legislation, I know some guys in

35:48

the south go to house that were pushing

35:50

it. We've had one on the show and you

35:52

know,

35:54

they could not get the bill

35:56

passed in the Senate

35:58

to again, take away this private

36:01

use eminent domain that you could be designated

36:04

as a carrier, that it would have to be in the public

36:06

interest designated by the Utilities Commission,

36:09

that is 100% governed by statute, 100%. So

36:13

that is 100% within the purview of

36:16

the legislature. Now the legislature only

36:19

has, really only meets for two

36:21

months and then they're

36:23

gone. And I was shocked at how you have

36:25

such an existential crisis in,

36:28

you know, to landowners like this, and they'll

36:31

just blow through the session without dealing with it. And

36:33

I was always wondering like, wait

36:35

a minute, where's the governor? Now I'm

36:38

being a little bit facetious because we know her former

36:40

chief of staff was the lead

36:42

lawyer assigning some of these condemnations for

36:44

Summit Carbon Solutions. All the

36:47

big wigs related to her in the South

36:49

Dakota GOP are involved in Summit, I

36:51

get that. But how could she not

36:53

be forced to publicly take a stand? So

36:55

you evidently, was it a few months

36:58

ago or last year, you ran into

37:00

her and asked her about this. Could you tell us about that?

37:04

Yeah, about a year ago was last

37:06

August on at Dakota Fest, that's

37:08

a farm show by Mitchell, South Dakota.

37:12

We went down there because they were having a

37:14

forum on this pipeline thing, more or

37:16

less. They were trying to sell it to everybody.

37:19

How it's such a, if we don't

37:21

do this, ethanol is gonna go away, which

37:24

that's all just lies too. But

37:27

after that forum was over, walking

37:30

out of there, well, Christie was walking

37:32

in because she had some deals she was gonna

37:34

talk about after this. And

37:36

I stopped her and I just asked

37:39

her, I said, can I ask you a couple of questions

37:41

quick? And I said, you

37:43

ran on property rights, landowner's

37:46

rights. That was the number one bullet point on your

37:48

webpage for a long time, property rights,

37:50

right on the top. And I said,

37:53

this is property rights. I

37:55

said, how come you're not saying anything

37:58

about this? Why are you not standing up with this?

38:00

us and she said it's in the PUC

38:02

hands there's nothing she can do about it and I

38:04

said Kristy you're the you are

38:07

the most powerful person in the state elected

38:09

official in the state I feel I feel you can do

38:12

more about it than you think you can she goes

38:15

looked right at me and says what am I supposed to

38:17

fight all your battles for you

38:20

and I just was shocked

38:22

that she said it yeah I'm like well

38:25

really it

38:28

was just and there was a kind of a group of us

38:30

there was another gal standing beside me she was

38:32

trying to ask her a question but I got there

38:35

was 10 15 of us standing around there

38:37

and that's what she said to me and I'm not

38:40

making this up I have the picture of the conversation

38:43

and I can get witnesses that heard

38:45

me say this it wasn't I wasn't trying to be

38:47

mean or anything like that I was just asking

38:49

a complete

38:50

question

38:51

and I mean when you kind of run

38:54

for governor that's kind of part of the job

38:56

is that stand up for the people I thought

38:58

but so far we've got

39:01

no comments from I mean there's

39:03

two problems with that there's two problems

39:05

with that statement number one

39:07

the Public Utilities Commission it's

39:10

actually not in their hands that's part of

39:12

the problem that

39:14

unlike in other states you guys have bad

39:16

laws that need to be fixed in

39:19

the sense that I

39:21

mean correct me if I'm wrong they're they're

39:23

going straight to court without the

39:25

Commission deeming it a public interest because

39:28

statute doesn't require that yep

39:31

so it's not in their hands she needs to make

39:34

it at a minimum in their hands that's

39:36

a statutory change a

39:38

we had a session just a couple

39:41

months ago with a piece of legislation

39:43

she refused to back it now she didn't

39:45

publicly oppose it at least publicly I'm

39:48

sure her gurus you know

39:50

opposed it but why didn't

39:52

she support the legislation she has

39:55

a very high approval rating she absolutely

39:58

could have done something about that that That is the

40:00

quintessential job of a governor when you

40:02

have a statutory flaw that comes

40:04

to the forefront affecting

40:07

the property of people, and then you have

40:09

conservatives in the legislature trying to change

40:12

that,

40:13

and you decline

40:15

to endorse it. That's

40:18

a huge thing. And then number two, you

40:21

need to, now that they're at a session,

40:23

Kristi Noem needs to be

40:25

pressured to call a special session

40:27

to deal with this problem, which

40:30

leads me to kind of the, you know, I just

40:32

want to wrap it up here, the punchline, what people could do.

40:35

How many people are ultimately affected?

40:37

Do you have a rough number?

40:39

I think there's

40:41

like 80 or 90, 100, 100-ish kind

40:44

of getting that

40:46

have got served papers and condemned

40:48

so far along this route, and

40:50

that's just in South Dakota. And that

40:52

goes down to other states too. There's

40:55

I mean, more in Iowa, and there's no

40:57

state that is standing up for this. Now,

40:59

this was so good for everything.

41:03

The farmers understand they have,

41:05

there's, I mean, pipeline, we're not anti-pipeline.

41:09

It's just we're hand-tied this one because of the

41:11

Green New Deal thing. It's just like you said

41:13

earlier, it is so crazy. And

41:16

when we talk about it with common sense, like

41:19

you can hardly believe it. It's even

41:21

something people are thinking about, little longcoming

41:24

and taking the land and,

41:25

you know, pushing this on

41:27

us. It's just unbelievable. Yeah,

41:30

I mean, you're right. It's Nebraska, Iowa,

41:33

South Dakota, North Dakota.

41:35

I mean, there is no, I

41:37

don't want to hear, but the Democrats, I don't

41:39

want to hear, but the media, the Democrats

41:41

and the media have nothing to do with it. This

41:44

is within the own purview of the Republican

41:46

Party, all those states. This is exclusively

41:49

a problem in those states.

41:51

It will expand elsewhere over time, but

41:53

this project and another, this

41:55

navigator pipeline, I think there's two of

41:57

them that affect those states.

41:59

States.

42:01

To me, it is shocking. And I

42:03

guess you answered my question, I thought there were more people

42:06

affected. But if it's only about 100, I mean,

42:08

this is the problem that they

42:10

they spread out the misery among a lot

42:12

of people, usually that it's not bad enough. And

42:14

among the people that it's really bad,

42:17

you know, it's

42:19

just not enough. And they're like, Yeah, screw

42:21

them. Kind of like what we talked about before

42:23

I brought you on the people affected by the

42:25

vaccine mandate in the military. I get

42:27

heartbreaking emails every day about, you

42:30

being discriminated against even now. But

42:33

there's not enough of them. So you know, no one cares.

42:35

Um, do you guys have some sort of legal

42:37

defense fund a GoFundMe that people

42:39

could donate to?

42:41

We got a website,

42:44

SD property rights.com.

42:47

And I think there's a donation deal on that.

42:49

And there's a bunch of information about, you

42:52

know, CO2 pipelines and kind of what we've

42:54

done on there. That's the best place

42:57

for someone to go look, or maybe

42:59

working on setting some other things up yet.

43:01

And once I get those information, like,

43:04

you know, I can, I can get that to a hit too.

43:06

But for the time being South Dakota

43:08

property rights.com.

43:10

And is it an accurate statement?

43:13

So so SD property rights.com

43:15

is it an accurate statement that

43:18

aside from a couple of members of

43:20

the South Dakota, lower

43:22

house, there is not a single

43:25

statewide elected officials speaking out

43:27

on your behalf.

43:29

That's correct. Correct. Just

43:31

some of the local representatives are,

43:33

or everybody with upper with

43:36

power seems to be

43:37

just doing maybe what Christie's telling

43:39

them or so the congressmen, you know, what is

43:41

it dusty Johnson, the senators

43:44

Thune and

43:47

Mike rounds,

43:49

Mike rounds, forgot a former governor there.

43:52

Nothing. We've, we've sent letters

43:55

and emails and it's, it's

43:57

I mean, they've gotten endless amounts that you

44:00

emails and letters and phone calls

44:02

and, and the only group

44:05

that really even, you know,

44:07

has a little concern or gives you

44:09

a time of day would be some of the people from

44:12

my ground. Other than that, nothing

44:14

from anybody else. Just complete silence.

44:16

And we do have some good representatives

44:20

that are trying to get Christie back in the session.

44:22

Therefore, special session to get this stuff,

44:25

you know, some of these laws straighten out here,

44:28

it's just opening up a can of worms.

44:30

I mean, Christie had the commercial

44:32

and she's running for governor. That's

44:35

her dad that don't sell the land Christie

44:37

don't sell the land because they're not making any more

44:40

of it. So I guess don't sell her

44:42

land, but come take all of our land. I guess

44:44

was maybe what she meant to say in the model. I

44:46

guess it's just crazy. She'd

44:48

say one thing and then absolutely

44:51

do nothing on the other hand or the totally

44:54

opposite of what she said. And it's

44:56

frustrating that we're not getting any support

44:58

from so many of them. This is so

45:01

emblematic of these people.

45:03

They'll talk to level 100, but

45:05

won't even do a level one to the

45:08

most bare minimum life liberty

45:10

property against the onslaught

45:12

of something that anyone with a brain,

45:14

much less conservative should

45:17

oppose. And I love the way how you

45:19

said land use, you know, because we talk, you know, land

45:21

is something that you don't make any more of. Part

45:24

of the whole green agenda is saying that everything is

45:26

finite. But then what they're doing is,

45:28

you know, the amount of land use you

45:31

need for the creation, dissemination, transmission

45:33

and use of wind and solar

45:36

and batteries and carbon capture

45:39

all this stuff is just, it

45:41

is so counterproductive to their

45:43

own

45:44

supposed stated goals. I mean, we

45:46

know kind of what they're

45:47

real guys. I know there's a solar

45:49

panel project proposed out West of

45:51

here just a little bit. And they say,

45:54

you know, we have to do this green new deal stuff.

45:56

So they're going to just clear 3000 acres. I

45:59

mean, there's going to be no. trees and be nothing on

46:01

there. And they're gonna put solar panels

46:03

cement below a solar panel sticks them

46:06

with the embeddries out there and

46:08

think they're gonna gain anything by that. Well it

46:10

snows up here once in a while and when it snows

46:13

on a solar panel it doesn't do anything

46:15

so they got heaters

46:16

mounted in them.

46:17

The solar panel barely

46:19

has enough power to run the heater so they're

46:21

just gonna melt. So you need fossil

46:23

fuels to prop

46:25

the thing up so I mean it

46:27

is so absurd it's not even again

46:30

there's nothing logical but it's not right or left

46:32

it it literally makes no sense.

46:35

There's one thing if you're like you know I don't like coal

46:37

and gas let's do nuclear but they're against

46:40

nuclear you know

46:41

and for obvious reasons because

46:43

the goal is not green the goal is no

46:46

energy and you know again

46:48

folks I want to encourage you that this

46:51

is all taking place in red states

46:53

because that's where most of the land is.

46:55

We view this as like oh that that green

46:58

absurdity places where I live Baltimore San

47:00

Francisco New York they have these crazy

47:02

edicts yeah but but the facilitation

47:06

of the agenda the infrastructure

47:09

is built off the red states and

47:11

that's where we need to block this there's real

47:13

property and lives on the line here and

47:16

they talk a big game but then won't even stop

47:19

the most odious radical forms

47:21

of I mean stuff that we could have never

47:23

imagined would happen in America today on

47:26

this flag day. Well thank you Jared

47:28

for telling your story again SD

47:30

property rights calm may

47:33

God be with you in this fight. I hope everything

47:35

works out we're certainly gonna do everything we can from

47:37

our end and definitely keep us updated.

47:40

Will do. Thank thank you for me and

47:42

the pipeline family we appreciate it

47:44

because that's the one good thing I got about

47:47

this I met so many good people it's

47:49

unbelievable that are fighting the same fight

47:52

and that's we we appreciate

47:54

the help we really do.

47:56

Absolutely glad to deliver we're gonna

47:58

get this done God bless. I'll see you later.

48:01

So again folks, that was Jared Bosley,

48:04

a Brown County, South Dakota land

48:06

owner who has his

48:08

property about to be condemned and

48:10

destroyed by a foreign

48:13

green energy retarded

48:15

company propped up

48:17

by government subsidies.

48:19

And Republicans are, it's

48:21

not just that they're apathetic to it, they're actually

48:24

all in on it. That's the thing, because

48:26

Republicans are the power structure in that part of the country, so

48:28

they control, they are controlled

48:30

by and are in with the special interest.

48:32

They literally, they're fundraisers, they're lobbyists,

48:35

they're staffers, all of them circle in

48:37

and out of it to the point that Kristina was former

48:39

chief of staff is the lead attorney. If

48:41

you look at some of these court documents, it

48:43

will have his name

48:45

on it signing the petition

48:47

to the

48:48

district court there in the state to

48:52

issue the condemnation. And again, that does in South Dakota,

48:55

they have bad laws, they need to be fixed. It doesn't

48:57

have to run through the utilities commission, or

48:59

some states have a public service commission. It

49:01

runs, it's, they

49:04

don't have to do that. It's private

49:06

use eminent domain for

49:08

something as insane

49:11

as carbon capture, which will

49:13

grease the skids for net

49:15

zero

49:17

happening in the most conservative part of the country. This

49:19

is the greatest story not told. And

49:22

it's emblematic of everything we're

49:24

going through. You

49:26

know, because we started out talking about how everyone thinks, oh, we won,

49:28

ha ha, we're owning the left, we're owning the left. And

49:30

Jared on his own, he didn't hear the first part of the show. He

49:33

echoed that with the fact that Kristi Noem's

49:35

like, yeah, you know, I'm

49:37

gonna stand up for landowners and,

49:40

you know, my daddy told me don't sell the land because that's,

49:42

they don't make more of that.

49:44

And they'll literally do the opposite.

49:46

And there's no pressure brought to bear on

49:48

them.

49:50

I just, I just don't understand this.

49:54

I don't understand how that's okay. Don't

49:57

let me fight. Don't ask me to fight

49:59

your

49:59

battles This

50:02

this is that I mean there are certain things let's

50:04

say let's say theoretically, you

50:07

know

50:08

someone comes in with green energy and

50:11

They just do it on their own. They don't take anyone's land

50:13

and there's no subsidies There's no anything and

50:15

then look it's a free market whatever usually there

50:18

is there's something that they're utilizing that you could stop

50:20

but in this case, it's literally a

50:23

statute with public

50:25

carriers

50:27

That there is a piece of legislation to

50:29

change and she Refused

50:31

to voice support for and allowed to die which as

50:34

you well know what that means is when you

50:36

have a super majority And the governor is of the same party

50:38

and the bill dies because the governor wanted it to die

50:41

There's

50:41

no middle ground if she supported it. She would have

50:43

voice support for it

50:45

She obviously doesn't you know

50:47

the same now? There's the same reason she's on the wrong

50:49

side of the you know Men and female sports

50:52

and the and ending the employer-based Vaccine

50:55

mandates because of Sanford

50:57

health and everything so summit

51:00

carbon solutions is just as powerful

51:02

as Sanford health in the Dakotas

51:05

and This is the problem

51:08

But notice he said it's a hundred people.

51:10

So if you want to know why there's not more outrage,

51:13

that's why

51:14

they're very smart

51:16

It's very appropriate for this week. Everyone's like and

51:19

Trump himself said this last night. It's not about me

51:21

They're gonna come for you dude. They already did

51:24

but the problem is they come in a very smart

51:26

way They

51:28

they bring generalized misery

51:31

on people But it's not bad enough that gets them

51:33

to react you have to have your life

51:36

personally on the line so look

51:38

those people they limit it to the to

51:40

a certain amount and people

51:43

like

51:44

Caitlin's husband the captain

51:46

really a major at

51:48

the Air Force Academy

51:50

Colorado Springs and Jared Bosley

51:53

They represent the forgotten men the

51:57

forgotten men that every

52:00

Republican not just Trump. I'm

52:02

saying every Republican now is like I'm for the blue-collar

52:04

guy the farmer that this

52:07

the military No, you're not Because

52:10

on the issue that actually matters

52:13

In the way the issue

52:15

actually matters and in the time the

52:18

issue actually matters in The

52:21

best-case scenario their mia

52:24

But all too often they're downright on the other

52:26

side This

52:28

Is something again, you know, this is

52:30

not Biden. This is not Congress. It's not Washington.

52:33

This is not the media This is

52:35

a state where there are four

52:38

or maybe three Democrats left in the

52:40

state Senate But the Republicans are really Democrats

52:43

and you have this amazing popular

52:46

rising star Kristi Nome

52:48

touted widely as a VP candidate

52:51

future presidential candidate and And

52:55

She's allowing this there's no middle

52:57

ground Okay,

52:59

this is like having a vaccine mandate going on

53:01

your state. Of course you could stop it Okay

53:07

She supports summit carbon

53:09

solutions and and and I'll tell you why

53:12

Because what they do is they tell the state will

53:14

steal the land of a hundred people But

53:17

you're gonna get a ton of revenue Pwnied

53:20

up by the federal government and that's what they

53:22

do now it will lead us into the stone

53:24

ages But in the short term

53:26

these projects

53:27

the feds set up a system where the red states

53:30

are incentivized to get them We're

53:33

gonna do a new amp. Yeah, except when you

53:35

get the money for it This

53:39

is the fraud of the Republican

53:41

Party and the lack of focus from the conservative

53:44

movement lay bare

53:46

This is not just about Trump is about everyone else. Yeah, but

53:48

whenever anyone else is on the hook you don't

53:51

do anything for them

53:54

They stood silently for a year and a half

53:56

with the military vaccine mandate met

53:59

the tromp tromp tromp

54:01

Never about the working man, never

54:03

about the farmer and the landowner, never

54:06

about the people that were boxed out of their careers

54:08

by the vaccine mandate, never about people

54:10

like Daniel Penny and Daniel

54:12

Perry being persecuted

54:15

by BLM and you know, that thing. It's

54:18

always, and Trump himself to this day,

54:22

won't talk about Daniel Penny. But

54:26

DeSantis evidently didn't talk enough about

54:28

Trump,

54:29

even though he totally defended him.

54:32

We don't have time for this nonsense.

54:35

But this is the problem and it hasn't gotten bad enough.

54:40

What does the flag mean to you?

54:43

On a day like today, on a year like this

54:46

year, in the era in which we live? Let

54:49

me know. Daniel Horowitz at Startmail.com is the email,

54:52

at RM Conservative is the Twitter. If you could please

54:54

give us a five star rating on iTunes so we can get

54:57

ahead of the other noisy, aimless,

55:00

vapid shows on the so-called right. I'd

55:03

really appreciate it. Till tomorrow. God bless you

55:04

all and thank you for listening.