Podchaser Logo
Home
Why the Fibrous, White Clots Suddenly Being Pulled Out of Bodies Matter | Guest: Thomas Haviland | 1/24/23

Why the Fibrous, White Clots Suddenly Being Pulled Out of Bodies Matter | Guest: Thomas Haviland | 1/24/23

Released Tuesday, 24th January 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Why the Fibrous, White Clots Suddenly Being Pulled Out of Bodies Matter | Guest: Thomas Haviland | 1/24/23

Why the Fibrous, White Clots Suddenly Being Pulled Out of Bodies Matter | Guest: Thomas Haviland | 1/24/23

Why the Fibrous, White Clots Suddenly Being Pulled Out of Bodies Matter | Guest: Thomas Haviland | 1/24/23

Why the Fibrous, White Clots Suddenly Being Pulled Out of Bodies Matter | Guest: Thomas Haviland | 1/24/23

Tuesday, 24th January 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Whole Foods market has you covered all

0:02

winter long with next level fines

0:04

for any occasion. Score big for

0:06

game day with your favorite select of

0:08

hard to find beer, party platters,

0:10

and winning appetizers from their prepared

0:13

foods to wild happy goodies from

0:15

three sixty five by whole foods market,

0:17

it's all good. And for those nights

0:19

when you just wanna cozy up and have a romantic

0:22

dinner at home, there's no place better to

0:24

shop. From roses, two animal welfare

0:26

certified meat. Level up all your winter

0:28

plans at Whole Foods Market. Politics

0:33

without the soap opera, with unfiltered

0:36

constitutional conservative truth.

0:39

The conservative review, Danny

0:41

Brewer. Silverback, Bill American

0:43

patriots and ministers standing at the

0:45

ready to fight for what actually

0:47

matters in our life, our liberty,

0:49

our property, our future If

0:52

that is what you're hoping to do, well, this is

0:54

pretty much your only place to tune

0:56

into. See our podcast, your

0:58

host, Horowitz, back here today

1:00

for Tuesday, January twenty

1:03

fourth. And the

1:05

question is, do we even know what

1:07

it is that we're fighting

1:09

for? And from

1:12

talking to most people, I've spent pretty

1:14

much last fifteen hours

1:16

just on the phone, which is why I don't

1:18

have much of a voice today. With

1:20

various legislators and friends of mine

1:23

in different states trying to get them

1:25

to wake up and smell the freaking fourth

1:27

reich. It's just bizarre.

1:30

We're living through people dying

1:32

suddenly and they're doubling down

1:34

on it. And it's like not even an issue. It's not

1:37

even issue number ten. And

1:39

what it is is most people

1:41

just like politics as an end to itself.

1:43

I hate politics. Now that

1:45

might sound funny given what I do for

1:47

a living, but I'm

1:50

not here for the politics. I'm

1:53

here for the outcomes to

1:56

civilization. And

1:58

even conservatives, whether they're influencers,

2:01

whether they're activists, whether they're think tank people,

2:03

whether they're legislators, state federal,

2:06

even the best ones, often a lot

2:08

of them, They're colored by what's

2:10

in the news. It's a self fulfilling prophecy. You

2:13

know, they'll focus on what's in the news from

2:15

a right leaning perspective as opposed to

2:17

a left leaning perspective. But

2:19

nonetheless, it's the issue that the media

2:22

wants you to talk about. But it's

2:24

the news cycle itself that is the

2:26

problem. Because the

2:28

biggest problems to society are the

2:30

things that aren't being discussed. But

2:32

without a discussion, without media

2:34

focus, And without a grassroots

2:36

firestorm, good

2:38

things will not happen on their

2:40

own, which means that the bad

2:42

things will continue. And

2:45

that's what I noticed. You know,

2:47

even the worst Republican legislators

2:50

or legislature chores, chambers,

2:54

They're horrible on everything, but we

2:56

we finally turned the corner on the trainee issue.

3:00

There are actually are most red states

3:02

are gonna be passing not just the

3:04

sports bill, but a lot of this

3:06

stuff. And we struggled for years

3:09

on this issue. We couldn't even

3:11

get the sports stuff passed, which is a

3:13

kind of the low hanging fruit. But

3:16

that's because we broke through with with

3:18

stories, with videos, got lips of

3:20

TikTok, things like that, and it finally

3:23

broke through. But it shows

3:25

you it's not gonna happen on its own.

3:27

So with other issues, such

3:29

as medical freedom. It's it's everything.

3:31

It's life liberty property, surveillance. Human

3:35

life at its core. Philip,

3:40

Jeremiah walking through the ruins, but no one

3:42

knows it's happening. It's weird. And

3:45

you know, they said, when I explained it, like,

3:47

yeah, it's a problem. But it's like,

3:49

what are you gonna do about

3:50

it? The FDA is

3:52

meeting. On Thursday.

3:56

And

3:57

among other things which we'll see what happens,

4:01

they're planning an interesting Remember

4:03

how I said with this limited hangout,

4:05

they're gonna take this

4:08

building pressure against the

4:10

Haviland they're gonna try to

4:12

create a release valve and channel it

4:14

through something limited. Like,

4:17

hey, yeah, you're right. It's a problem.

4:19

Here's what we're gonna do. I

4:21

love how these guys work. So the announced, here's what

4:23

they're gonna do. You're right.

4:25

It is time we treat the COVID

4:27

shots, like the flu shots. So

4:30

you get it every year. Like, what?

4:32

I guess it means as opposed to getting it two or

4:34

three times a year and then changing up

4:36

with the fake variants, we're just gonna have a

4:38

standard COVID shot every year.

4:41

So, dude, this means

4:43

that for the rest of time,

4:45

every pharmacy is gonna give a death

4:47

shot along with the flu shot

4:49

to every senior anyone who walks

4:51

in. How

4:54

are we okay with that? That needs to

4:56

be stopped, and that's before we get to the

4:58

RSV. And other mRNA shots

5:00

and other pathogens they're creating.

5:04

But it doesn't register Now

5:07

I'm trying, I'm clawing away one

5:09

after another. If I have a conversation, let's

5:11

say with ten legislators one

5:14

day, By the end of the day, I can get,

5:16

you know, four or so to introduce

5:18

one of my ideas. So that's kind of what

5:20

I'm doing. It's very time consuming.

5:22

But this is what you guys could do if you wanna

5:24

join a team. By the way,

5:27

anyone who wants to be a team

5:29

leader. That they understand

5:31

the legislative process. They're they

5:33

work good together. They have good leadership skills.

5:35

You might be retired or whatever. You

5:37

know, stay at home mom. You have you

5:39

have time. I need a

5:41

team in in South Dakota. We

5:44

have people signed up, but I need a team leader.

5:47

To actually formulate it.

5:49

So again, you could sign up at conaction dot

5:51

network or email me at danielherwoodstartmail

5:55

dot com. But

5:59

folks, what we've learned is you've

6:02

got to create a firestorm

6:05

They want this to continue without

6:08

inquiry. It's

6:10

like, yeah. Yeah. This is killing everyone. Okay.

6:13

Let's go on and not even just go on, but

6:15

let's double down on this. The

6:18

WHO is Jeremy Ferrar. Recently

6:21

said. It's critical that responsible,

6:24

respected scientists, and agencies get

6:26

ahead, get ahead of the

6:28

science, and the narrative of

6:30

this and are not reacting

6:32

to reports which could be very damaging.

6:35

They wanna get ahead of

6:38

the undeniable genocide.

6:42

But we need to be in place We

6:45

need to have the ideas in place

6:47

that when we reach critical mass

6:50

like we did on the trainee

6:51

stuff, we could act

6:53

swiftly. And

6:55

this is why I hated the fact that

6:58

legislators, a lot of states, the the

7:00

chambers are barely in session. Because,

7:02

you know, you reach critical mass in

7:04

a May or June. You have to wait until next

7:06

January, February to do

7:08

anything about

7:09

it. It's just simply ridiculous.

7:11

And I'm finding that too. A lot of legislators

7:14

are they're very part time.

7:16

A lot of them work even during

7:18

the session, much less out of the session.

7:21

They don't have staff or very little staff.

7:24

And, you know, they'll fight two or

7:26

three righteous battles and it's usually on what's

7:28

in the news and a lot of them is good. A lot of

7:30

these guys are the sponsors of the trainee bills,

7:32

things like that. That's great.

7:34

But there's no bandwidth left to promote

7:36

anything

7:36

else. And this is a

7:39

big problem. It

7:41

is shocking how Republicans

7:44

and fake conservative movement people

7:46

have grifted for decades.

7:48

And we have, you know, thirty

7:50

one to four eighty eight twelve

7:52

majorities in West Virginia, and

7:54

we can't do anything with it because nobody

7:57

is working with a few good guys to build

7:59

the case, build legislation, and

8:02

and build a movement behind it.

8:05

So I'm doing my best as a one man show

8:07

to kinda do this, but anyone who

8:09

thinks that they have the time and acumen

8:11

dedication to help you

8:14

know, at least lead or co lead one of

8:16

these teams, let me know because

8:19

this is a big deal. So

8:22

we're gonna have a very special guest coming

8:24

up. Talking

8:26

about again, what is the most

8:29

important story if I have to say? What

8:31

is the most important impact

8:33

impactful, dire

8:35

consequential issue looming

8:37

over us right now? There's a lot of

8:39

that. But I

8:41

don't understand how the

8:44

therapeutic genocide. What

8:46

has already been done? What is currently

8:49

being done? What is pipeline imminently

8:52

is not in the top three, much less the

8:54

top ten. And

8:57

we're gonna talk about one of the biggest

8:59

stories of the genocide.

9:01

But first,

9:02

I wanna just go through some some

9:04

information. There's a new Danish

9:06

preprint study

9:07

out on

9:08

this bivalent shot,

9:11

which has proven to make like thirty

9:13

percent of all kids either

9:15

vomit or get fever from

9:16

it. One point

9:19

seven million individuals over the

9:22

age of fifty analyzed found

9:26

a two point five times

9:29

increased rate of

9:31

encephalitis. In

9:33

females twenty eight days

9:35

post booster. Relative

9:37

to another third fourth dose cohort,

9:40

starting twenty eight days post vaccination.

9:44

Now, notice how they study these things

9:46

and they study it in a way that there's no

9:48

control group of pure blooded

9:50

people. Now,

9:52

that picks up a safety signal. Right?

9:54

Because everyone agrees that you

9:56

know, typically, even if something is

9:58

gonna cause long term, you

10:00

know, like like a late hit on your

10:02

body, which they definitely do,

10:04

it's you're gonna have, you know, a greater

10:07

proportion of the injuries, the closer you

10:09

get to the actual injection.

10:11

So they found a

10:14

two and a half times increased

10:16

rate of encephalitis twenty

10:18

eight days after the

10:20

shot. Relative to those

10:23

beyond twenty eight days. Now

10:25

a lot of you are probably wondering, okay,

10:27

well, what's the increased rate above

10:30

those who didn't get any other

10:31

shots. Any duration

10:34

passed the shot because he didn't get

10:35

it. Well, yeah, we'd like to

10:37

know, but that tells you that that's

10:39

gonna be exponentially higher, encephalitis.

10:42

It's

10:43

titled safety of bivalent Omicron

10:46

containing mRNA booster

10:48

vaccines, a nationwide cohort study

10:50

out of Denmark if you want to check

10:52

it

10:52

up. Now first today

10:54

is as we're talking about medical

10:56

freedom, human life,

11:00

Medical freedom and access is the new pro

11:02

life issue.

11:04

Part of the supply chain issues

11:07

making food and fuel in,

11:10

you know, really severe

11:12

shortages in many parts of the country.

11:15

Expensive We now have a

11:17

problem with emergency medical

11:19

supplies, including medications, even

11:22

common common antibiotics.

11:26

Like amoxacillin, osmatin,

11:28

doxycycline. We now

11:31

have a new partner, Chase

11:33

Medical, go to jace medical dot com,

11:35

JASE medical dot com,

11:37

use offer code review ten. You

11:39

get ten dollars off in order of five

11:41

different courses of antibiotics in

11:43

what's called a JACE case. They could

11:45

take it with you in case you can't

11:48

get it when you need it, either

11:50

you're traveling, pandemic, knows

11:52

what they're gonna do? You have

11:54

the most basic antibiotics to

11:56

treat bacterial

11:57

illnesses, UTIs, respiratory infections,

12:00

sinusitis. You name it.

12:02

You have it there. It's gotta be part

12:04

of your emergency kit. I'll

12:06

say I made fun of the preppers years ago. They

12:08

were ahead of their time, but I think you

12:10

should add your Chase case from Chase

12:12

Medical to that

12:15

kid. Obviously, it

12:17

has to be prescription, so you fill out

12:19

a questionnaire online. As

12:21

long as they don't see any red flags,

12:23

they'll prescribe it. And then they'll mail it

12:25

to you at jace medical dot com

12:27

offer code review ten.

12:30

Oh, by the way, speaking of Denmark,

12:32

there's another paper

12:34

out there, not a paper. This

12:37

is from d r dot

12:39

d

12:39

k. So it's a news website in Denmark.

12:44

This

12:44

is a translation from English.

12:47

Undertakers lack

12:49

space for coffins. With

12:51

the deceased. Quote, we

12:53

can't put a coffin on the street. Lack

12:56

of space and lack of refrigeration, acrimatory

12:58

on chapel must

13:00

be resolved before the summer

13:02

heat sets in according to

13:04

undertakers. Now,

13:06

you go through this article and

13:11

nowhere does it ever explain

13:13

exactly what

13:17

is causing this. It's it's so weird. Yay.

13:20

Like, people are just dying in this cardiac

13:22

stuff, and we're putting defibrillators in

13:24

schools now in in England.

13:26

You know, thirty five percent

13:28

x is death here in Australia. I

13:30

mean, this is out in the mainstream. And no

13:32

one's asking, Why is it happening?

13:35

This is the most bizarre See,

13:38

first, we had the mass psychosis of

13:41

fear. And

13:43

mass psychosis of people uniformly

13:46

going along with insanity. Now

13:48

it's the opposite. We have mass

13:50

psychosis to just live your life. They

13:52

want you to live your life now. They don't

13:54

want you to think about COVID or

13:56

anything related to it. And

13:59

there's there's a rubber band, the pendulum

14:01

effect. Because we

14:03

were so crushed for a year

14:05

and a half or so, depending on where

14:07

you were, how long, the

14:09

fact that you're now, you know, most people

14:11

could go anywhere without a mandate,

14:13

without a shot, without masks, at

14:15

least at this point, hey, it's

14:17

it's great. It actually feels better

14:19

than it ever felt to just be normal because,

14:21

you know, we we took it

14:23

for granted and then we went without it for

14:25

a year and a half. That's

14:27

the new mass psychosis. Like, there's nothing

14:29

going on. Like, we forget, wait

14:31

a

14:31

minute. Where the heck did this come from?

14:34

Who did this? Who planned all

14:36

this? Why? What are they

14:38

currently planning? How come people are still

14:40

dying? How come they're still pushing more

14:42

shots? You

14:45

cannot move away from this.

14:50

Switzerland had the largest birth rate drop in a

14:53

hundred fifty years.

14:58

Australian

14:58

birth rates fell twenty one percent

15:01

from October to November twenty twenty one,

15:03

followed by a sixty three percent

15:05

decrease in the next month headed

15:08

into December. And

15:13

again, I don't see

15:15

this. Anything related

15:17

to the last three years on

15:21

Scalise's majority leader, Flora, scheduling

15:23

for House votes, a bunch

15:25

of flaccid weird bills. Weird,

15:29

weird bills. Before

15:32

we bring on our guests, I just wanna leave you with

15:34

this question. There's this story

15:37

out there.

15:38

About this Utah doctor, a

15:40

plastic surgeon.

15:41

It was reported by the UK

15:43

Daily Mail, doctor Michael Kirk

15:45

Moore, and his nurse practitioner,

15:47

Carrie De Berghoon, and

15:51

then two more people were roped into this

15:53

they were charged for allegedly dumping

15:56

COVID vaccines, administering

15:58

fake ones with Haviland issuing

16:00

fake COVID cars for fifty

16:02

dollars each. It's not a bad cost to save your

16:04

life, fifty dollars. Now,

16:07

this guy will probably give him the death penalty

16:09

or

16:09

something. But

16:11

can I ask you a question? Do you

16:14

disagree with me that this

16:16

guy should be pardoned and in fact be

16:18

a

16:18

hero? Now you don't want people committing

16:20

fraud, but what if you

16:22

commit fraud on the

16:24

greatest fraud ever perpetrated

16:27

That wasn't just financial

16:30

fraud, but the greatest genocide

16:32

probably when this is all said and

16:34

done of all time. I

16:36

mean,

16:37

is there something wrong with

16:39

that? If

16:41

people came to him because they wanted to get out of it

16:43

and he serviced

16:44

them, See, this this

16:46

is where there's this disconnect. Like,

16:49

everyone's tasked listening. Yeah. This kind of doesn't

16:51

work, negative

16:51

effective, causes more spread.

16:54

Yeah, causes this, causes that

16:56

injury. Well,

16:57

when you get to a story like

16:59

this, so then, shouldn't

17:01

this guy be treated accordingly? We we

17:03

don't let it penetrate our hearts. We

17:06

see things, but we don't change our

17:08

laws and policies based

17:10

on the morality of

17:12

reality. I just

17:14

don't get

17:14

it. And I think

17:16

that's a good

17:17

segue into

17:19

our special guest today.

17:20

So folks, when

17:23

we talk about each one

17:25

of these studies, data points,

17:28

observations about humanity,

17:30

sudden deaths, excess deaths,

17:32

decrease birth rates, increase stillbirths. All

17:34

this of each one alone is

17:37

enough to just I mean, you

17:39

look at the past when we would pull something

17:41

off the market, a fear of an

17:43

airbag going wrong, a fear of a car seat,

17:45

Something like that. I mean, it it would be

17:47

a firestorm. And yet, this

17:50

is a thousand firestorms and

17:52

it just it just doesn't penetrate.

17:54

It's bizarre. And each of these are the type of things

17:56

that there's no middle ground you can't

17:58

turn away from because if

18:00

it's true, and

18:02

you didn't follow-up on it. I mean, that's that's

18:04

humanity. This is something that was

18:06

put in everyone's body.

18:08

It codes their body to produce something

18:11

we know sticks to your

18:13

endothelium. We know it damages your blood

18:15

vessels and we know it does fifty million

18:17

other things that's been proven time again, theirs,

18:19

fee safe, case studies, academic

18:22

studies, all these observations. And

18:24

we just we just move on. Perhaps

18:27

the biggest example of

18:29

this is the issue

18:31

of these Frankenstein

18:34

white fibrin like plots.

18:36

When we started coming out,

18:38

heard people like and bombers like

18:40

Richard Hirschman in Alabama. We had him

18:42

on the show last year a

18:45

couple others saying, you know, in

18:47

a in a given day or a

18:50

week, sometimes from

18:53

anywhere from a quarter to a third and sometimes

18:55

a half of the

18:57

bodies that I'm working with, you

18:59

know, typically in preparation for a

19:01

funeral, they I'm

19:03

pulling out these just just

19:06

hard substance you

19:08

know, not not like a typical jelly clot with a

19:11

little bit of clotting in in blood, but it's not

19:13

even blood. It's just this stuff that you

19:15

wonder how someone could even live for a minute

19:17

with with it. And they're pulling it out

19:19

of their bodies and it

19:21

started around, you know, beginning of twenty

19:23

twenty one and they never really saw

19:25

it before. Well, that's the type of

19:27

thing that I thought. Forget

19:29

how long it's been a year or so since this

19:31

has come out. I mean, we would have followed up

19:33

on that by now. How How is

19:35

there no intellectual curiosity? How is there

19:37

no emergency? I mean, this is the type of

19:39

thing that Congress you would think would call these

19:41

people in immediately. And investigate this, get

19:43

to the bottom of this. Because what

19:46

that poor tends in

19:48

many respects, is

19:50

something the sick feeling that keeps growing in

19:52

us every day that

19:54

as crazy as

19:56

the death toll and the injury

19:59

toll is you

19:59

know, let's say several hundred thousand in the United States

20:01

and several million injured, you

20:04

know, substantially.

20:06

That that's just the tip of

20:08

the iceberg and perhaps this is

20:11

looming in someone. It's

20:13

creating some sort of, you know, circulatory

20:15

issues that are

20:18

much greater in terms of

20:20

the proportion of those who got the shot than any of

20:22

us could

20:22

imagine. And we need to get get

20:25

ahead

20:25

of this. What's causing it? How

20:28

pervasive is this? And and perhaps

20:30

what could we do to reverse the

20:32

effects beyond certainly

20:34

banning these shots

20:34

completely? So Today, we're gonna have a very

20:37

interesting guest on.

20:38

You know, regular citizen

20:41

who actually was interested in this and said, wait

20:43

a minute. We can't just, like, turn away

20:45

from that. Either of these guys are

20:47

completely lying or this

20:49

is the death of humanity and we gotta

20:51

follow through that. So

20:53

Thomas Haviland He's with us today.

20:55

He's an electrical engineer and data

20:57

analyst. He spent twenty years in the air

20:59

force. Retired as a major then

21:01

worked as a defense contractor, and he's taken

21:03

this on as a project to

21:06

call various funeral

21:09

directors and bombers, undertakers,

21:11

including those involved in

21:14

official associations, he

21:16

created a survey that he sent around

21:19

to, you know, a number

21:21

of of people that deal with

21:23

the advise and say, hey, are you

21:25

seeing this? And he now

21:27

has documented documented.

21:30

At least eighty eight

21:32

on the record that he knows who they are.

21:34

He of email correspondence with these people

21:36

that affirm to have

21:39

seen to varying degrees and

21:41

frequencies this crazy phenomenon

21:44

that you cannot turn away from,

21:46

and it needs immediate investigation. So

21:48

I figured rather than writing an article, I'll get

21:50

the man himself on with us so

21:52

you could hear him and what he's

21:54

uncovered. Hey, Tom. Thanks so much for

21:57

joining us today at CR podcast.

21:59

Hey, Daniel. Thank you so much for

22:01

having me on the show to talk about this very

22:03

important topic. And I want to make one

22:05

slight correction to what you said in the

22:07

intro there. The eighty eight embalmers, I do

22:10

not have their email addresses or know

22:12

who they are, because we promised that in the

22:14

survey that we would allow them to remain

22:16

a non in their

22:17

responses. So

22:18

we know

22:18

what state they're from, but we don't

22:21

know exactly who these embalmers

22:23

are. Got

22:24

it. So so I I wanna get to

22:26

the details, but start from the beginning.

22:28

How in the world did you embark

22:30

on this of creating maybe

22:32

know, a ten question or so survey ten bombers

22:35

sending it around and getting

22:37

responses. How in the world did he get that off the

22:39

ground?

22:39

Well, you know, I watched that film

22:42

died suddenly the week of

22:44

Thanksgiving of this last year, it premiered like on the

22:46

Monday of the week of

22:46

Thanksgiving. And it started kinda

22:49

cookie. I wasn't sure I was gonna watch the whole thing. I mean, you

22:51

know,

22:51

there's there's

22:51

pictures of bigfoot in the moon landing. And I said,

22:54

what's going on

22:54

here? But

22:55

I stuck with it, and I'm glad that I

22:57

did, Daniel, because a thirteen minute and fifteen second

23:00

mark, there's an embolmer from the State

23:02

of Indiana, his name's Mr.

23:04

Wallace

23:04

Hooker. And he said that he recently gave a lecture

23:07

at our Ohio Embomers

23:09

Association Conference that took place on twenty

23:11

six October in Columbus,

23:13

Ohio. Ago. And during that lecture, he

23:15

showed photos of these white fibrous clots that

23:17

he's been pulling out of his corpses for the

23:19

last year and a half or so. And

23:22

he asked the audience of almost one hundred

23:24

embalmers at the conference,

23:26

are you seeing these white fibers class

23:28

two? And he said almost all of the

23:30

one hundred embalmers raised their hands,

23:32

yes, they

23:32

are seeing these clots.

23:34

So then the next question he

23:36

asked him is, well, when did you start seeing

23:39

Clots. And they all agreed it was about

23:41

sixteen to eighteen months

23:41

ago, which would be in the middle of twenty twenty

23:44

one,

23:44

you know,

23:45

about six months after the vaccine

23:47

is rolled out. Coincidence,

23:49

who knows, you know. But

23:52

so that got -- I said that

23:54

was an extraordinary statement, right? So I

23:56

went to bed that I got up the next morning and I

23:58

said to myself, I don't know if any journalists is

24:01

going to investigate and follow-up on that because that's

24:03

an extraordinary statement. Either those one

24:05

hundred embalmers raised their hands or they

24:08

didn't. So I called I

24:10

called the Ohio embalmers Association

24:12

myself. I live in subgroup

24:14

of Dayton, Ohio. So now he's about an

24:17

hour south of me and that's where their

24:19

headquarters is. I

24:21

talked to the Secretary of the

24:23

Iowa Woolworths Association of

24:24

Mr. David Hicks. I talked

24:25

to their President and Mr. Dan Becker,

24:28

and I also talk to their second vice president,

24:30

mister Woody Wilson, and

24:32

asked the three

24:32

gentlemen, did you happen to be in the room at

24:35

the time that mister Hooker said

24:37

that the one hundred bombers raised their

24:39

hand saying

24:39

yes. And all three of them said

24:42

they just happened not to be in the room at

24:44

the time that the that that

24:46

question was asked. Last. But the last

24:48

gentleman, Mr. Woody Wilson, who owns

24:50

a a hotel in a home and does his own

24:51

embalming, and little

24:54

town called Marysville, Ohio, about an hour north of

24:56

me. Said, Tom, I have been seeing the

24:58

white fibers

24:59

clots. So

25:00

I said, wow. This is this is big news. So the

25:02

next thing I thought is, you know, we

25:05

need to do a survey, a nationwide

25:07

survey. Right? See how many of the

25:09

embalmers are seeing these white fibers clots.

25:11

When did they see them? Where on the

25:13

body? And how much are they seeing of them?

25:16

So I decided to do a survey.

25:18

So I worked with a young woman

25:20

that lives in Northeastern Ohio who

25:22

just happens to be an expert in

25:24

survey

25:24

monkey. Her name's Laura. She's a terrific

25:27

gal and we worked nicely to the

25:29

team. And

25:29

so I decided to do the survey.

25:32

And like I said, I started

25:34

you know, trying to be like a good reporter, you ask

25:36

the basic questions. Right? Who, what, where,

25:39

when, why, and how? Well,

25:41

you we really can't ask the question who

25:43

because there's a private that goes with the embalming

25:44

room. don't want to talk about the corpse, you know,

25:47

respect for the dead. And a lot

25:48

of these embalmers really don't want to reveal who

25:50

they are. They want So I

25:52

want to give the freedom to take the survey anonymously without

25:56

any fear

25:56

repercussions. Also,

25:58

you don't

25:59

want to ask the question why, because embalmers

26:02

qualified to tell you why the clots are forming.

26:04

Exactly. You know, they're not trained on that. But

26:06

the other questions, the what, you know, are you

26:08

seeing the clots? The when?

26:11

When did you start seeing them? Where

26:15

are the body you're finding them? And

26:17

then of course, how much

26:19

what percentage of your courses actually have these clots. So

26:21

I devised the survey to be like

26:23

seven questions long, three minutes long, very

26:25

easy for them to

26:27

take, I gave them to my

26:29

assistant Laura. She loaded them into SurveyMonkey.

26:31

So then the next thing for me

26:33

to do was to send out emails

26:36

to

26:36

distribute the survey

26:36

to try to get as many active embalmers to take

26:39

it as possible. Now who in the

26:40

world would answer a random anonymous survey

26:43

like that? Yeah.

26:46

So I used a top down and a bottom up

26:48

approach. My top down approach was I

26:50

contacted the thirty most

26:52

populated

26:52

states. I contacted their state

26:55

funeral direct for associations. Wow. You

26:57

know, they have

26:57

hundreds of embalmers in, you know, funeral homes

26:59

that are members of their association. And

27:02

I actually called the president's

27:04

first and talked to Haviland then I

27:06

sent emails with the survey link to survey monkey

27:08

to the to the survey at

27:09

it. And now I

27:10

also use the bottom up approach.

27:13

Laura and I found

27:15

found out the email addresses for over

27:17

eight hundred funeral homes across the

27:19

United States. So we set the

27:22

survey to them directly as well.

27:24

So, you know, like for California, I would send

27:26

to funeral homes in

27:28

the Los Angeles, San Jose, San

27:31

Diego, San Francisco, Oakland Sacramento

27:33

areas, for example. So using these

27:36

two

27:36

approaches, I was trying to maximize participation.

27:38

So you

27:39

spent a lot of time on

27:40

this. I did. Yeah. It's

27:43

it's it's I'm retired. So this is a full

27:45

time job for me. This I'm doing this

27:47

for free because I love humanity. You know what?

27:49

I'm curious. I wanna know the answer. I

27:51

don't wanna Are these seven bombers like the only ones

27:53

seeing these white fibers clots?

27:55

I don't think

27:55

so because the one hundred bombers are

27:58

at the that they raised their hands. And I want to

28:00

find out what other embalmers around the country are

28:02

seeing this.

28:03

So despite the fact that I we

28:05

sent this to all those, you know, using a top down and

28:07

bottom up approach, we didn't get as many responses I

28:10

would have liked

28:10

to. You know, I I would have liked to gotten in

28:12

the area of zero. I mean, because I wouldn't

28:14

want to talk to anyone who wanna just go,

28:16

you know, go and fill out

28:18

a random guy, not knowing who you are. Hey. Whoa.

28:21

What is they obviously know the

28:23

implications. So the fact that you did get what how

28:25

many out of the eight hundred did you get

28:26

responding? I got one

28:28

hundred and twenty eight responses.

28:30

One hundred twenty response. That's actually in

28:32

my mind pretty good. I understand why

28:34

you're disappointed, but that's but the point is

28:36

like this. For our listeners, let's just take this

28:39

down to basic level. Hirschman

28:41

comes out. I have him on the show. You're seeing

28:43

favorite spots. Alright. Maybe he's lying.

28:45

Now obviously, you know, I saw I spoke

28:47

to him enough. I saw the pictures enough.

28:49

There were a few others ready at the time. You

28:52

know, Ryan Cole got a hold of the samples. It's

28:54

just too much to me

28:56

clearly he was at least giving over

28:58

what he was

28:58

seeing. But eighty

29:02

eight is a lot more than one.

29:04

So you --

29:04

Yep. It is. -- eighty

29:05

eight out of the one twenty eight affirmed

29:08

to some degree seeing it. That

29:10

is sixty nine percent Daniel. That's

29:12

almost seven out of every ten embolvers that

29:14

responded to the survey say, yes, indeed, I

29:16

am seeing these white fibers clots. That

29:19

was the second question to our

29:21

survey? The first question was what state are you from? We wanted

29:23

to know what state they were from because we wanted to

29:25

check for regionality and maybe see if there was any

29:27

kind of red versus blue bias

29:30

we did not see that. There wasn't enough responses to

29:32

really double check that. But we

29:34

got responses from blue states that's

29:37

at saw the clots and some didn't see the clots. And

29:39

from Red States, we got responses and said

29:41

that some we saw the clots and some

29:43

we didn't see the So we didn't

29:45

see any particular blue

29:48

versus red bias. And we did -- and the same

29:50

thing for regionality, we got responses from

29:52

all different areas a country that said they were seeing

29:54

the clots and those that said they were not seeing the

29:57

clots. So Question

30:01

two, like I said, seven out

30:03

of ten Embauler said they are

30:05

seeing the clause. The next critical question was,

30:08

what year's have you seen these

30:10

clots? And I actually had a five year range

30:12

from twenty eighteen through twenty

30:14

twenty two. So I want to have twenty

30:16

eighteen and twenty nineteen as control

30:18

years that there was no COVID,

30:20

right? And

30:21

then year twenty twenty as a year that we

30:23

had COVID, but no vaccines yet.

30:25

And then the years twenty twenty one

30:27

and twenty twenty

30:28

two,

30:28

when we had both COVID and the

30:31

vaccines. And

30:33

the vast majority, the main consensus

30:35

of the embalmers for that question said that

30:38

the clots started these white fibers clots started in the

30:40

year twenty twenty one and have

30:42

continued into twenty twenty two and

30:44

today. So

30:46

again, very interesting, right, that they started after,

30:49

appears the rollout of the vaccines. And

30:51

and what's interesting is

30:52

you did have some that

30:55

a minority that did say twenty twenty.

30:58

And and I think, you know, like a lot

31:00

of safety signals we're seeing,

31:02

it does make sense that if you

31:04

just understand, you know, the basic mechanism

31:07

here, you know, the spike

31:09

protein is a spike protein. It's it was it's a

31:11

gain of function beauty

31:15

from their perspective is what they were working

31:17

on for many years to screw people over

31:19

over a six your the the lining of your

31:21

blood vessels. Whereas with

31:25

COVID, it has to fight through your defenses

31:27

with the shots it

31:29

could potentially go anywhere behind

31:31

your defenses. So it makes sense you're gonna

31:33

have some of this. We're seeing that a little

31:35

bit with some of the hard stuff. Some signals in

31:37

twenty twenty and then explodes twenty twenty

31:40

one because you're taking, you

31:42

know, the spike protein and then

31:44

you're just getting it behind the

31:46

body's defenses, so you're gonna have

31:48

a much greater prevalence of it causing

31:50

that damage. But my question to you

31:52

is so so this is a big deal. This is

31:54

a big deal. I think, you know, so you don't bury

31:56

a lead that that you

31:59

now have eighty

32:01

eight individuals that are embalmers you

32:03

know they're embalmers you got their emails.

32:05

You know what you you know you know what

32:07

they do. It's you don't have

32:10

it documented each one,

32:12

but they weren't fake people,

32:14

and you did get a response that

32:17

eighty eight Affirmative

32:19

seeing this. My question is, isn't

32:22

this black and white? Isn't this the type of

32:24

thing that there's no middle ground? If you're

32:26

gonna have pea

32:28

that are testing. To seeing this

32:30

on average twenty to forty percent

32:32

of the bodies they're seeing,

32:34

not one percent. Not, you know,

32:36

one you know, okay, I saw it once or twice

32:38

where I never saw it before. How

32:41

could you then have people even

32:43

a minority that say they're not

32:45

seeing it?

32:46

Yes. It is strange,

32:49

Daniel. And I think you're

32:51

absolutely right. Even though I only got one hundred and

32:53

twenty eight responses, this count

32:55

of eighty eight is significant. Right? To me,

32:57

it's a Houston, we have a

33:00

problem type signal that warrants

33:02

further

33:02

investigation. And

33:03

I'm I'm not saying that my survey is the end all,

33:05

the be all. Yeah. I think that it

33:07

should lead to deeper investigation

33:10

by the powers of being to,

33:12

you know -- FDA and CDC

33:14

to go out and do their own survey and see

33:16

if they can

33:16

corroborate, verify what my survey is

33:19

showing that eighty eight --

33:21

that seven now every ten and boomers are

33:22

seeing these clots and that the majority of them are saying that

33:24

they started in twenty twenty one after

33:26

the rollout of the vaccines.

33:29

You alluded to the last question I had, which

33:31

is what percentage of corpses are

33:33

you seeing these

33:33

in? And that's a

33:36

shocking number right there. Because

33:38

fifty seven out of the one hundred and twenty

33:41

eight

33:41

embollers that respond to the survey

33:43

are seeing the clock and at

33:45

least twenty percent or more of their corpses.

33:47

There were twenty three embolvers out of the

33:49

one hundred and twenty eight that responded that said

33:51

they're seeing the white fibers klots in twenty

33:53

one percent to forty percent of their corpses. There was

33:56

another twenty three embolmers that said they were

33:58

seeing the white fibers white clots in

34:00

forty one percent to sixty percent of

34:02

their

34:02

corpses. And there

34:02

was even ten embolmers that

34:05

said they were seeing these clots in sixty

34:07

one to eighty percent of their corpses, Daniel.

34:09

I mean, that shot and and

34:11

if that's true, I mean, we've got a disaster on our hands.

34:13

We really

34:13

do. We really do. I mean, that's not the type

34:16

of thing you ignore. I

34:18

mean, I think it's abundantly

34:20

clear that this is happening.

34:22

Now, obviously, you're not a

34:24

pathologist and No. But

34:26

but the issue is

34:28

why isn't the government

34:30

doing autopsies or they probably are,

34:32

but they're, you know, they're not

34:34

releasing details about it. And and that's the thing how

34:36

do you not get to the bottom of

34:38

this? What is forming in people's

34:40

bodies? When let let's face

34:44

it. We already have I mean, one of the first safeties.

34:46

The first safety signal that even the

34:48

media and the government admitted was blood clotting,

34:50

I guess, maybe more in a traditional sense.

34:54

But but all along, I mean,

34:56

long before these embalmers became

34:58

a thing. And I knew Richard Hershman

35:00

went public, one

35:02

of the thing things that

35:04

the doctors who treat vaccine

35:06

injury kept saying, and to

35:09

an with COVID as well. These are

35:12

bizarre clots that don't seem

35:14

to respond to heparin or

35:16

other things we

35:18

typically use to break up the closet. I'll never

35:20

forget a doctor in

35:22

Africa who

35:24

is very cutting edge

35:27

on treating COVID did. He treated blood

35:30

clots from vaccine injury with,

35:32

like, one mgkg IV

35:34

Mectin, really high dose IV Mectin. He said

35:37

that work. Wow. It it that's one of its mechanisms

35:39

of actions anticoagulant. But

35:42

that but that's the point that

35:44

this is not coming from left

35:46

field. The bombers didn't start

35:48

it. That was the icing on the cake. I mean,

35:50

the wares, the studies, the

35:52

this. I

35:54

mean, that's it ain't called a clot shot for nothing. That might be its

35:56

number one mechanism of action.

35:58

It's number one, modality sticks

36:00

to the ceiling, and this this is proven a

36:02

hundred times over. The question

36:04

is, how is this distinct from the

36:06

typical clots? What exactly is

36:08

this composed of? How does it form?

36:10

What does it mean? This is what we need

36:12

to find out, but the fact that we can

36:14

go a single day without

36:16

investigating this is is just

36:17

crazy. What about in terms of the

36:20

locations and whether that tell

36:22

you?

36:22

Locations were nothing surprising there

36:25

because the main two injections high points

36:27

from embalmers are the carotid artery

36:29

in the neck

36:30

and also the iliac artery in the pelvis area that leads down

36:32

to the to the from oral arteries and

36:35

the legs. That's where most revolvers do

36:37

their injections to try to get

36:39

the fluid in. And that's where most of

36:41

the clots were seen. That doesn't mean that's where most of the clots were. They could have traveled

36:44

to those areas. Right? But those that's

36:46

where the embolmers saw those. So that wasn't

36:48

really

36:49

surprising.

36:50

What was interesting in the survey, Daniel, is at the very end, we we

36:52

gave the embalvers a chance to comment

36:55

if they wanted

36:56

to, you

36:56

know, talk a little bit more about what they were

37:00

And I made sure that in this nowhere in my survey, do I mention

37:02

the words COVID or COVID

37:04

vaccine? All I asked remember

37:06

was What

37:08

are you seeing? When did you start seeing

37:10

it? Where in the body? And what percentage

37:12

of your corpses are having this? There was

37:14

no mention of COVID or the COVID back

37:16

vaccine. But despite that, quite a few of the responses of the

37:18

comments talk about the vaccine. I'd like to

37:20

read a few of them to

37:23

Here's one

37:25

from Alabama.

37:26

I've seen claudine coming from most any of

37:28

the points of incision. I mainly

37:30

embalm in the common carotids

37:32

and I've seen many white fibers clots about time the vaccine

37:35

came out. I've also seen an

37:37

increase in the COVID for

37:39

the jelly clots. Here's

37:42

a naysayer one from California.

37:44

I've never seen any white clots

37:46

or any increase in grape jelly clots,

37:49

not sure what you're getting at. Do you believe

37:51

the vaccine is related or something?

37:53

I've involved over five hundred

37:55

people for twenty twenty to now,

37:57

and I've never seen this.

37:58

See, that sounds very

37:59

defensive. The guys from California,

38:02

you know, it sounds like he's

38:06

yes, something is weird.

38:09

You know, I I know

38:11

your thing was mainly just a limited

38:13

point of survey just to see

38:15

how ago, and this was but in your talks, you have called

38:17

a lot of embalmers associations,

38:20

funeral directors. There's other

38:22

aspects to this than just the physical find

38:25

things. There and and because we've had a lot of

38:27

even mainstream news articles throughout the world. I

38:29

just read one from a

38:31

Danish publication about undertakers

38:34

complaining about a lack

38:36

of space for coffins

38:38

and crematories and refrigeration. We've

38:41

seen stuff about children's, coffins,

38:44

you know, in high demand, a

38:46

lot of different signals that with

38:48

death. Anything that has to do with that

38:50

supply chain of death. Kinda like,

38:53

you know, like, everyone

38:55

knows this that that

38:57

with the cancer world, oncology and

38:59

radiology. They're just booked up for months. So that's

39:01

just something going on there. Did you get

39:03

a sense of

39:05

just you're not just informally not

39:07

with your survey talking to that there's a broader

39:10

just a death

39:11

bomb and

39:11

b particularly

39:14

weighted unusually towards younger people? No.

39:17

I think that from talking

39:19

to some of the

39:22

embalmers, I think they're still seeing a lot in elderly

39:24

people, but they're seeing in younger people

39:28

as well.

39:29

It doesn't discriminate by age. The clots can appear at any

39:32

age. So they're seeing

39:34

it in just as many elderly people as

39:36

they are in younger people. have any

39:37

them either in the comments on your survey

39:40

or in your phone

39:42

conversations that, you know, you've talked to some of

39:44

these people Have

39:46

they gotten a sense

39:48

of vaccination status? Obviously, it's

39:50

not a standard

39:51

thing. Let

39:52

me read Let me read a few more of them

39:54

to you, Daniel. And that'll pop up in as

39:56

I read a

39:57

few. Okay? Here's here's one from

40:00

Ohio. People that were COVID

40:02

confirmed had bad grape jelly clots. It was early twenty

40:04

twenty one when we started seeing the white

40:06

fiber and structures being pulled out of both

40:08

veins and arteries.

40:10

And that's interesting in and of itself. Because usually, embalmers have always found

40:12

clots in the veins, but never the arteries.

40:14

It's very rare. Arteries

40:15

arteries. It's very rare. It's just

40:17

so for the like, on a basic level. I mean -- Yeah. --

40:19

I I don't know anatomy that well, but I know enough that, you know,

40:21

an artery is

40:24

coming directly out of the heart, you know,

40:26

if something's gonna get gummed up, it's

40:28

gonna be, you know, over time on the

40:30

return. But right after the heart,

40:32

it's it's it's I think everyone would

40:34

agree in the form of blood clotting in an

40:36

artery is pretty

40:37

rare. Yeah. Because you're right. The the

40:39

pressure on that side night on the

40:41

arterial side is higher than the pressure on the Venus

40:43

side. So you said

40:45

we never

40:45

pulled a claw

40:48

from an artery. I just pulled

40:50

a white structure from the right

40:52

common carotid

40:52

yesterday. Are we a few more

40:54

to you here? Here's

40:55

one from

40:56

Missouri. The clots almost look like

40:59

large night crawler worms. They are

41:01

usually very long. They kind of branch off

41:03

from the main clot. I started

41:05

noticing them after the COVID vaccine came

41:07

out.

41:08

I've been

41:08

evolving for the last thirteen years and

41:10

I've only started seeing these clocks for

41:13

the last year or

41:14

two. Here's a naysayer one from Arizona. I have

41:16

seen zero changes to the presentation of

41:18

human remains in the last few years. It

41:20

is clear that this is a

41:23

poor attempt a farming anecdote to malign the COVID

41:26

vaccine. Please don't do

41:28

this or claim that

41:30

any anonymous survey data,

41:32

because any sort of substitute for rigorous

41:34

scientific research. Howard

41:35

Bauchner: Got it. See, that's that's very

41:38

interesting, and it's self that

41:40

the ones that said no

41:43

were extremely defensive

41:45

and presumptuous about out what this

41:46

is. Like, they're the ones, you know, you said you didn't bring

41:48

up the vaccine. They're bringing it up. I didn't mention

41:50

it. Yeah. They're bringing it up. Not me. I didn't

41:53

talk about it at all. And

41:55

the questions. Here's another one from Idaho.

41:58

My clients have had the COVID vaccine

42:00

and have passed of COVID have

42:02

had remarked probably more clots. So much so that I began to

42:04

ask families if they're loved ones if they have the

42:06

vaccine. So that answers your question from

42:08

earlier. If there are revolvers that just start

42:10

to

42:10

ask, the families,

42:12

hey, I

42:12

found a lot of clots in your loved

42:15

one. Did that person

42:17

have the vaccine? Listen

42:19

to this one from an involvement

42:21

from Alabama. This is the scariest thing that

42:23

I've ever seen in the last twenty years.

42:25

I worry every day at me or my

42:28

family have them growing inside

42:29

us. That's from an embolmer

42:31

himself. So he's

42:32

he's he's scared about what he's seeing, what he's

42:34

doing the

42:35

embolming. And here's last one from Ohio. Some

42:38

of the fibrous clots were six to eight

42:40

inches long and almost impossible to

42:42

break

42:43

with four steps.

42:43

And that's one of the things that we when we send out

42:45

the instructions for the survey, we made sure that the

42:48

embalmers understood the difference between these new

42:50

white fibers clots that are

42:52

very

42:52

tough. And what they call traditional chicken fat clots, which

42:54

are much smaller, yellowish and pear

42:56

easily. So so there were some revolvers that

42:58

I

42:59

think we're starting to get that confused.

43:02

So we made sure in our instructions

43:04

to the survey that they

43:06

were not confused and that we just distinguish

43:09

between the YFibers' clock

43:11

that are very tough. Yeah. And and the

43:13

chicken fat loss that they've been seeing forever.

43:15

That's very important because, again, like I said,

43:17

the doctors were pretty unanimous about this. I

43:19

don't think I'm saying something

43:22

outlandish here that they there there seemed

43:24

to be a consensus in the hospitals

43:26

that it wasn't responding

43:29

to what was typically used as an anticoagulant. That was

43:31

that was a problem. And and again, there's no

43:34

question that anything that the

43:36

vaccine does potentially

43:38

on some level could show up in the virus itself.

43:40

So you do have that kind of

43:42

muddled thing as well. But like most things,

43:44

you know, you you just uncontrollably get your body to

43:46

produce that in infinite quantities,

43:50

infinite locations. Whatever you have

43:52

with the virus you're gonna have this times a

43:54

hundred. So we gotta

43:56

run here, but I just wanna close

43:58

with, where are you

44:00

headed with this project. What would you like to

44:02

do to take it to the next

44:04

level? And how could perhaps are listeners

44:07

help your endeavor? I

44:10

am actually requested to speak at the FDA, they're having a meeting

44:12

here on the 26th, and they're giving

44:14

an hour for oral presentations. I'm

44:17

denied that opportunity, unfortunately. There was a

44:19

lottery and I wasn't selected. But I

44:22

did submit a written package.

44:24

You know, I think this goes above the FDA

44:26

and the CDC, though, I'm not sure we can can

44:28

trust them to to do the the

44:30

legwork to, you know, see whether

44:32

this is really a problem or not, because they

44:34

they failed us in the past. So I think we

44:36

need to go to Congress

44:37

and

44:37

have them I've heard you talk about maybe

44:40

putting a ban, a

44:42

moratorium on the mRNA shots until we determine

44:44

the prevalence of these white fibers clots

44:46

and whether or not they are linked

44:48

to the COVID-nineteen

44:49

vaccines. We need to make that

44:52

determination before farmer continues to

44:54

go down the path of

44:55

retooling vaccines

44:56

in the future using the same mRNA

45:00

technology. Exactly. And

45:02

and I just wanna say, just, you know,

45:04

people are gonna hit at things.

45:06

Oh, how dare you? We

45:08

have, like, I don't know, five

45:11

thousand different points on the

45:13

shots. They'll take each point

45:15

and isolate it and reset the baseline

45:17

as if the other of thousand

45:19

don't exist, so they view everything in

45:21

a vacuum. No one's saying that this in

45:23

a vacuum wouldn't necessarily prove

45:26

anything. It's when you

45:28

have all the other

45:30

known thrombotic issues that the

45:32

government themselves have admitted

45:34

and the way this thing works and

45:36

all the sudden deaths. And, you know, you put it all together, that

45:39

makes this very significant

45:41

what you're doing that

45:44

you are able to get eighty eight people a

45:46

firm in this country that, yes, I'm seeing

45:48

this suddenly in the bodies,

45:50

primarily beginning

45:52

around that period of time, we would have expected it if it were by

45:54

this. Do you need

45:55

help? Do you need help

45:57

in this endeavor? Right

46:00

now, I'm just trying to

46:02

get the information out there and you're

46:04

already helping Daniel with the

46:06

shows like yours I would love

46:07

to, you know, eventually get to maybe Steve

46:09

Day's and Glen Beck, the big man

46:11

himself, and

46:12

talk about this. Just to get because I think

46:14

that

46:14

getting it out there to the pub if our government

46:17

fails, if a big pharma fails us and continues to

46:19

try to push out the mRNA

46:20

jobs, the last line of defense is us

46:23

the people. And

46:24

the good news is, as you know, that even though

46:26

eighty percent of Americans got the first two jobs,

46:28

less than twenty percent of Americans

46:30

over the age of eighteen, have

46:32

gotten the overcomp by Baylor, even though it's been out there for five months

46:34

and it's being pushed heavily by Dr.

46:37

Fauci or Shell Luinski,

46:40

etcetera. So I think the Americans public is

46:42

starting to get it. They they know the shots don't work.

46:44

They don't stop you from catching COVID or

46:46

transmitting it. And I also think that they're

46:48

starting to get the idea that these shots could be

46:50

dangerous. They're hearing about myocarditis,

46:52

and I would love them to start thinking about white

46:54

fibers cloth in the same vein they

46:56

think about my

46:56

carditis. This is a big deal. This is a very big deal. And

46:58

and folks, I don't have it posted anywhere.

47:01

But if you wanna find it,

47:03

there's a terrific, terrific sub

47:06

stack called the forgotten side of medicine with a mid western

47:08

doctor. The guy is just, like, produces

47:10

like five thousand word essays every

47:12

day, just brilliant doctor there. So

47:16

the top posters of now is do the mysterious

47:18

Fibers class really exist where he

47:20

has shared Tom's work and

47:23

you could click on the files, the power

47:26

points there. So you could see the

47:28

data, you could see the word for

47:30

word comments that people,

47:32

you know, emailed back and a

47:34

few of them said, no. It's not they're not seeing

47:36

it. So it's nothing that Tom could have

47:38

fabric hated. This is pretty well done. Tom really

47:42

appreciate all of your work. It's gonna

47:44

take citizen journalism

47:46

like this to make a difference. It's not gonna come on its

47:48

own from the usual usual

47:49

sources. So God bless you and

47:52

your endeavor definitely keep us

47:54

updated. Thank

47:54

you, Dan

47:55

and I, and I

47:57

sure will. Alright, folks. Was

47:59

that creepy or what? I mean,

48:01

it's like a science fiction movie. This

48:04

is the times we live in,

48:06

but this is what it's

48:08

gonna take. It's ordinary people. There's no amazing

48:10

background to this guy. Kudos

48:12

for spending time on this. This has become

48:14

his obsession. He's email me

48:16

a lot. And I feel like

48:18

he's put in enough work that this

48:20

merits something. This is not the type of

48:22

thing. See, if you're doing vaccine injury, you

48:24

can't randomly

48:26

survey you know, people and then only hear back from ten percent and

48:28

they say, well, this percent whatever. These

48:30

are a finite number of people. It's embalmers.

48:33

So if you have eighty eight of them willing to

48:36

say, like, yes, this is what I'm

48:38

seeing, that's a big

48:40

big problem. I

48:43

just wanna comment on one other thing on this

48:45

topic before we move on.

48:48

It's just

48:51

you know, there's been a lot of discussion about this died

48:54

suddenly movie.

48:56

And it's kind of divided some

48:59

people anti COVID fashions on medical freedom,

49:02

anti COVID shot movement.

49:04

Some people don't like the fact they feel

49:07

there's inaccuracies in the

49:10

movie, there's things that shouldn't have been put in there.

49:12

And all I could say

49:14

is, you know, obviously,

49:17

we wanna get everything as accurate as possible. I had nothing to

49:19

do with that movie. I wasn't involved in

49:22

it. But when you have

49:24

people

49:25

lying that a hundred percent of what they're saying is

49:28

wrong. And based

49:29

on those things, they're

49:31

killing millions of

49:34

people. And then you have people clamoring

49:36

to put out information to combat

49:37

it. And ninety percent of

49:39

what they put in there

49:42

is right. And the other ten percent.

49:44

It's not that it's wrong in the sense that it's not

49:45

happening. It's just the data points they use or

49:47

the things they use

49:51

don't necessarily show that, but other

49:54

things do show it. It's not that it's not sure

49:56

where, like, I think there's a claim that they

49:58

put a picture in there, so I'm dropping

50:00

suddenly when it actually

50:02

was before the vaccines were ever out, so

50:04

it clearly wasn't from that. But clearly,

50:06

it is happening too. So you know what

50:08

I'm saying? That's the point. Doesn't mean make not

50:10

sloppy, but the broad point is true, and

50:12

those inaccuracies

50:15

aren't killing anyone. The broad tenor of

50:17

it is true. So I think, you know, that that

50:20

scene from the documentary that he's referring

50:22

to or a hundred

50:24

of them raise their hands

50:26

reveal if they're having problems, that is significant. And this

50:28

is our job is to create

50:32

that firestorm. To

50:34

create that firestorm around this so

50:37

that they cannot ignore

50:39

this

50:39

issue. I

50:42

just saw that

50:44

I I knew this, by

50:46

the way, privately, but it is official

50:48

now that Thomas Massey,

50:52

Chip Roy, and Ralph Norman. Ralph was also

50:54

involved. He was one of the original

50:56

five publicly against McCarthy.

50:58

They are appointed to Rules Committee.

51:01

And that basically means that

51:04

those three practically will wind up

51:06

having veto power over

51:08

what comes to the United States House floor.

51:11

So this is where this needs to be done. We need

51:13

to work with those members. And by the way,

51:16

two of them, Massey and Roy

51:18

will be on

51:20

the subcommittee under judiciary

51:22

investigating the federal government's mouth

51:24

seasons violation of human rights. So

51:27

this is where we have to

51:29

make our stand as well as the

51:31

state

51:31

legislators. But without it, this

51:33

is not gonna be their

51:35

focus. Michael McCall,

51:38

He's the chairman of the House Foreign

51:40

Affairs Committee. He says the US needs to be sending

51:42

m one Abrams tanks

51:45

to Ukraine. This is the chairman

51:48

of the foreign affairs committee. This is what they're

51:50

focused on.

51:52

They

51:53

are not focused. On what

51:55

you and I are focused on. And they won't be focused on it on

51:57

their own. So we cannot

52:01

allow this issue to

52:05

go by the wayside. A

52:06

couple other interesting things

52:08

on this front, just

52:11

to point out here,

52:13

Did you know

52:17

that in children

52:19

injured by Myocarditis,

52:21

Harvard researchers found It's American

52:24

heart association journal circulation.

52:26

If you do the math, it's not

52:28

directly in there. You can't do a

52:30

word but if you do the math of the formula

52:33

they

52:33

have, it works out to being that they found

52:35

four hundred thirty six billion copies of

52:37

spike protein

52:39

circulating freely. In

52:40

their plasma a month after they got the shot, in

52:42

all the people that were

52:45

injured. I just

52:46

want you guys to think about that.

52:50

What are the consequences

52:53

of creating a

52:56

technology that goes into

52:58

your at

53:00

any given time in

53:02

any location your body could produce

53:04

an infinite amount of pathogenic

53:07

spike proteins. That your lining

53:09

of your

53:11

blood vessels. I mean, I just

53:13

want you to

53:15

think about that. Well, it's not a surprise that we're

53:17

gonna start seeing really crazy phenomenon in

53:20

your body and this being one

53:22

of them. With the

53:24

fibrous clots.

53:27

Another story I wanted to share with

53:30

you just kinda going

53:32

in no particular order. We're gonna

53:34

cover January six tomorrow

53:37

and some of the ramifications

53:38

of that degree of fascism. So

53:42

I wanna get some of these

53:44

things off the docket. Justin

53:44

Hart, a friend of mine. He started rational ground. That's

53:48

his substack. Just

53:50

horrific. He he posted

53:53

foyered emails from the FDA

53:55

laughing at people who

53:57

died, denied Ivermectin. Could

53:59

you just imagine that?

54:02

They're obtained originally by Epiq Times

54:06

and they were thrilled at

54:08

how they put out the famous

54:10

tweet from the FDA

54:12

that got, you know,

54:14

a hundred and eleven thousand likes

54:16

and forty eight

54:18

thousand retweets You're not a horse.

54:20

You're not a cow. Seriously, I'll stop it.

54:22

And there so there was this email

54:25

from this Jennifer Erica

54:28

Jefferson to this doctor

54:30

Woodstock bragging about the metrics

54:32

on it. All said it looks like we

54:34

gained a total of eleven thousand followers.

54:37

Across the accounts we posted these

54:39

on. That's up six hundred thirty

54:41

six

54:41

percent. I want you to think about it. And I and

54:44

I've it rips my heart about

54:46

the people. That you had those critical forty eight hours

54:48

there where their blood oxygen level would

54:50

drop and you had time to save

54:52

them and they couldn't get it because of what the

54:54

FDA did

54:56

the scene told them they were blocking hydroxychloroquine, but,

54:58

like, right before that tweet, a couple

55:00

weeks before, I actually went to a Walgreens.

55:02

No problem. I got Ivermect in.

55:06

It was because of that and they're laughing about the metrics

55:08

they got. One of

55:10

them said this guy, Timo, Haviland

55:14

the w o, Tycho, whoever that jerk

55:17

is, well done. I couldn't help but

55:19

laugh at the tweet. Reacting

55:21

to infamous use of the word y'all in

55:24

Brad's voice. I'm so here for

55:26

the comments.

55:32

Acting chief of staff,

55:34

Jessica tierney, gave it a

55:36

kudos to the whole FDA team,

55:38

their social

55:40

team, This is outstanding work so creative and most importantly gets

55:42

FDA public health message out to the

55:44

universe. I can't wait to see what else you have in

55:46

the works. All

55:49

while people

55:49

suffered. And again,

55:50

now we have a randomized double blinded

55:52

controlled trial out from Belgium

55:58

showing, I forget what it was, like, seventy

56:00

two percent reduction

56:03

from point six mgs

56:06

per

56:06

kg. And by the way, there's also an interesting

56:08

study out from the University of Mircea.

56:10

Same researcher. I forget

56:13

the name in I'm speaking

56:15

just from memory, Peter McCullough had a substack recently on

56:17

it. But talking about

56:20

mechanistically how I've remectin works.

56:25

And Peter, actually,

56:28

interestingly enough,

56:32

Peter identified that it was the same

56:34

researcher from University of Mircea

56:36

that if you remember discovered

56:38

antibody dependent disease enhancement

56:42

in Delta in the delta variant

56:44

how the shots created

56:46

a d in delta, which is what we

56:50

saw Delta just took the virus to a new

56:52

level, and it happened after the

56:54

proliferation of the vaccines,

56:56

which is why more people died.

56:59

In twenty twenty one of COVID than

57:01

twenty twenty, and the vaccine

57:04

caused that. And that much

57:06

to be clear affected

57:08

all of us including the unjammed. And

57:10

that's when they were able to they would point

57:12

out every unjared person, not the jed person, plenty of

57:14

jed people dot they didn't point to that. Oh,

57:16

he died because he didn't get the vaccine. See, there's two types of things.

57:18

It could it could mess up your immune

57:20

system, create immune tolerance, IgG

57:24

four, original antigenic sentiment in printing, that's only gonna

57:26

be in a micro sense that the individual

57:28

who got the shot. But

57:35

ADE, what

57:38

this

57:38

did is it enhanced the

57:42

actual pathogen. And

57:44

that affected everyone. It

57:48

affected everyone.

57:51

And it just

57:52

so so sad. So

57:56

unbelievably

57:57

sad. This

57:59

needs to be investigated. I'm gonna give

58:00

you guys a

58:01

homework assignment. If you had to

58:04

put in

58:06

specific

58:07

but not too specific, pointed

58:10

questions that can't last for more

58:12

than two two or three sentences.

58:14

Top ten questions that

58:17

if

58:17

you are on the

58:20

sub committee and

58:22

judiciary investigating both DOD and HHS. Every

58:26

aspect of this, what are your

58:28

top ten oversight

58:30

research questions? You would

58:32

pose. Here's the deal. You guys

58:34

give me your best wands. I'll take the best

58:36

wands and pass it on to members in

58:38

the committee. Let's do this a

58:40

collaborative work just like we're doing with

58:42

conaction dot network. Sign

58:44

up for

58:46

your team. I need team

58:48

leaders in Montana, in

58:50

Idaho, in South

58:51

Dakota. We could use in Kansas,

58:54

in Oklahoma, as

58:56

well Texas,

58:56

lot of states

58:57

we need to do Arkansas. Let me know if

58:59

you

58:59

are willing to lead or at least co lead if

59:02

we get a few

59:04

other people email is

59:06

daniel hermits at start mail dot

59:08

com. Again, this is our

59:10

our our our our work at

59:13

this point. What is it we would

59:15

actually do? To create

59:17

a firestorm with oversight,

59:19

with revelations of

59:21

hearings, with legislation, that's the best

59:23

we can

59:23

do. But we

59:25

got to

59:28

be unrelenting. And the

59:29

main focus has to

59:32

be on things like this.

59:34

There's nothing political about today's show

59:36

in the sense that sound at

59:38

fighting Republican's Democrat Trump,

59:40

this, that you did that

59:42

scandal. The

59:44

outcome of our inquiries, of our questions, and

59:46

our coverage is nothing

59:48

short of literally all of

59:50

humanity. This is literally a science fiction

59:53

movie. That's what we need to focus

59:56

on. I'm not as concerned

59:56

about the rope politics, but I'm just gonna

59:59

tell you that consumes

1:00:02

the purview and the focus

1:00:04

of of most of even the better

1:00:06

state legislators, certainly, congressman, we

1:00:09

need to change the game. And that's what we're here to do.

1:00:12

That's why I need you guys to give me five

1:00:14

star rating on iTunes with a

1:00:16

comment. It really helps with

1:00:18

the algorithm. Pass this

1:00:20

show around to everyone you

1:00:22

know who wants to learn more about

1:00:24

the shots. And again, we're gonna cover a

1:00:26

lot of other issues. We're gonna get into the global

1:00:28

warming more energy policy. We're gonna get

1:00:30

into, obviously, what we can do about

1:00:32

the FBI. And January

1:00:34

sixth, Chuck's

1:00:36

supposed to crime, which is crazy. We have crazy crazy

1:00:38

crime stories. Hopefully, we'll get you

1:00:40

tomorrow with Julie Kelly. She'll

1:00:42

be back. So we got a lot more. I

1:00:44

will be

1:00:46

out Friday, so it'll be a little of shorter it up

1:00:48

and pack it in these four days till tomorrow.

1:00:50

God bless you all. Whole

1:00:55

Foods market has you covered all winter long with next level fines

1:00:57

for any occasion. Score big for

1:00:59

game day with your

1:01:02

favorite select of hard to

1:01:04

find beer, party platters, and

1:01:06

winning appetizers from their prepared

1:01:08

foods to wild happy goodies

1:01:10

from three sixty five by Whole Foods Market, it's all

1:01:12

good. And for those nights when you just wanna

1:01:14

cozy up and have a romantic dinner at

1:01:16

home, there's no place better to shop.

1:01:18

From roses, two

1:01:20

animal welfare certified meat. Level up all your winter plans

1:01:23

at Whole Foods Market.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features