Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hello and welcome to this podcast
0:02
from the BBC World Service. Please
0:04
let us know what you think and tell other
0:06
people about us on social media. Podcasts
0:10
from the BBC World Service are supported
0:12
by advertising.
0:16
So this is the road between Forested
0:18
Area and another Forested Area
0:21
where there was a concrete barrier
0:23
for about a mile down the middle of the road.
0:25
So
0:25
as
0:28
I was driving down the road I
0:30
saw in front of me a possum that had
0:32
tried to cross the street but had come
0:34
right to this concrete barrier. So
0:37
he couldn't escape, he was obviously
0:40
hit by a car and it just passed away right there.
0:45
Poor possum. You're
0:47
listening to Crowdscience from the BBC World
0:49
Service. I'm Caroline Steele
0:52
and I'm with listener Terry next to a very
0:54
busy road on the edge of the housing development
0:56
where she lives
0:57
in Lincoln, California. I mean
0:59
it seemed like indignity heaped upon
1:01
indignity when he's this fully
1:03
knowledgeable animal. It's just a
1:06
consequence of the
1:08
process of developing and not taking
1:10
wildlife into concern. Frustrated
1:15
by how little humans seem to care
1:17
about other animals' lives, a question
1:19
started nagging at Terry,
1:22
which back in her much more peaceful garden
1:24
she put to us. So
1:26
my question is where
1:28
do humans fit into the
1:31
ecology of the earth?
1:34
The earth is filled with ecosystems and
1:38
many thousands of years ago it seems
1:41
like things were more in balance but
1:44
it seemed like we began to affect
1:46
all the ecosystems which
1:48
made me think do we have
1:51
a place in a balanced ecosystem
1:53
anymore or are we just an
1:55
invading species?
1:58
I've always been concerned. with
2:00
human effect on the planet? I
2:03
was in Los Angeles and we were fighting
2:06
to save the remaining wetlands. And
2:08
then when I moved up to Lincoln, they have
2:11
started doing a lot of developing. So
2:14
what is Lincoln like as a place? This
2:17
is their slogan. A
2:19
fast-growing community with a small
2:21
town feel. And since
2:24
I moved here, there's
2:26
been thousands of houses
2:28
built.
2:30
This development here is about 20
2:33
years old. It's wetlands.
2:36
And it's beautiful, but
2:38
I didn't realize it was wetlands when I first
2:41
moved here. They do build nice
2:43
neighborhoods with green space in mind,
2:46
but it's human green. So taking
2:49
away a lot of the territories
2:52
of the wild critters. So
2:54
where do they go or do they just die?
2:58
And how then does that affect
3:00
the ecosystem as a whole? So
3:03
what is humans place in ecosystems
3:06
and what could or should
3:08
it be? Terri's
3:11
question is huge, but I'm hoping
3:13
we can find some answers here in her
3:15
home state of California. Humans
3:18
have lived in this part of the world for over 10,000 years.
3:22
And for most of that time, it's safe to
3:24
say they've had a much closer relationship
3:27
with the rest of nature than most people
3:29
do today. My
3:32
producer and I drove seven hours north into
3:35
the Klamath Mountains of Northwestern California.
3:38
Off the main road and oh gosh,
3:41
including a rather bumpy bit at the end.
3:44
Yeah, we're
3:47
literally driving through a small
3:49
clearing. Really wild
3:51
and rugged.
3:58
We made it to a peaceful river valley.
4:07
and
6:00
the potatoes, it's got a purple flower
6:02
on top and we native
6:05
people like to eat the bulbs. If
6:07
you're coming out of a hard winter, these
6:09
are little packages of nutrition
6:13
and they have a lot of starch, a lot of vitamins
6:15
and minerals. I'd be starting to eat the greens
6:18
that they had that came here naturally. And
6:21
I'm gonna go dig a bulb out to show you. Oh,
6:23
that would be great. Go over here. I
6:27
don't wanna dig that one because you see there's a burl
6:29
right there. Oh, so you might accidentally disturb.
6:32
I don't, yes, I don't wanna disturb
6:34
him. So let's try this.
6:38
Cultivating Indian potatoes, a type
6:41
of wild lily, isn't just helping
6:43
humans. It's important for other animals
6:45
too.
6:46
They call it deer potatoes too because
6:49
deer like to come in and eat the tops.
6:53
So when you manage for
6:55
those types of plants, you're also managing
6:58
for the deer and the elk. We
7:00
wanna provide areas to welcome
7:03
the elk back.
7:07
Can't keep hitting these big rocks.
7:10
Kathy is an expert at this, but
7:12
she's having some trouble.
7:14
Should I help? How'd you get him out of here? Yeah, how
7:16
about it? Oh
7:19
gosh. There's a big rock there, which
7:21
is annoying. Yeah. And a big rock there.
7:23
Yep, so we're working. Trying
7:26
to dig in an old mining
7:28
area. In order to mine
7:30
a big area like this, they had
7:32
to shoot water at
7:35
the mountain slopes, tearing these
7:37
mountain slopes down and then they could
7:39
further mine it for gold.
7:42
The landscape here isn't the same as it was
7:44
when Kathy's ancestors lived here hundreds
7:47
of years ago. In the 19th century,
7:49
the outsiders who came to the area looking
7:51
for gold used destructive mining
7:53
practices that disturbed the environment.
7:56
They even rerouted the river. Before
7:59
contacting...
7:59
before they moved this river, this
8:02
soil wouldn't have been like this. So it's
8:04
kind of... You're almost there!
8:06
You
8:09
keep
8:09
going! This is like formula.
8:13
How much energy you
8:15
expend for the calories
8:17
you take in. What do you think, gang?
8:22
On average, we humans need to get
8:24
more calories from our food than we
8:27
spend harvesting it. Otherwise,
8:29
we can't exist as a functioning
8:31
part of an ecosystem. As
8:34
I discovered, after expending a lot of
8:36
energy trying to dig up one single potato,
8:39
the mining fallout skewed that equation.
8:42
But for thousands of years it did work
8:44
for the Karuk tribe, and that kind of
8:47
ecosystem balance would be a
8:49
dream for our listener, Telly.
8:51
But it's not the norm on the planet today,
8:54
with mined, farmed, built up and
8:56
polluted every corner of the Earth
8:59
to an extraordinary degree.
9:01
One study estimated only 3% of
9:04
land in the entire world remains
9:07
untouched by humans.
9:09
Humans have become, over
9:12
their long history, a
9:15
major, major component in
9:17
pretty much all the ecosystems
9:20
of the world. Obviously,
9:22
cities, which is where I work,
9:24
but you can, for example, find
9:27
microplastic residues in
9:30
soils and waters and ice, very
9:33
distant from dense human habitation.
9:36
So in fact, we are all over the
9:38
place. I'm
9:40
Stuart Pickett, and I work
9:43
at Cary Institute of Ecosystem
9:45
Studies in Millbrook, New York,
9:48
where I am an urban and
9:51
landscape ecologist.
9:52
Would you say that humans are part
9:55
of their ecosystems, or
9:57
do you think by now we've kind of become sector-like?
9:59
from them? That's a really
10:02
interesting question because in
10:04
many ways we still
10:07
so deeply depend on the
10:09
products of ecosystems. We
10:11
depend on ecosystems
10:13
around the world or maybe even
10:15
you could say the whole world ecosystem.
10:18
We depend on that. For oxygen
10:20
we depend on that for processing
10:23
our wastes, for our food,
10:25
for our cultural
10:27
amenities and the things that symbolize
10:31
spiritual well-being for us.
10:34
We're still very much embedded
10:36
in the ecosystem but
10:38
we kind of pretend that we're not because
10:41
we get our food from the grocery store
10:43
and we don't notice how connected
10:46
we are with ecosystem
10:48
processes.
10:50
It may not look like it but ecosystems
10:52
are at work in even the densest of cities.
10:55
So urban dwellers like me, listener Terry
10:58
and over 50% of the rest of the world
11:00
are also inescapably embedded in them.
11:02
I think it's really important
11:05
for people in cities to
11:08
see themselves as
11:10
part of ecosystems.
11:13
You can have functional ecosystems
11:16
in urban areas. They're going to be different
11:19
from the ecosystems out in wild
11:21
areas but still they
11:24
have the same kinds of components, the
11:26
same kinds of relationships, the
11:28
same kinds of biological
11:31
processes that any ecosystem
11:33
would have. We just have to kind of wake
11:35
up to it.
11:37
Were there any key developments
11:39
in our history that sort of changed the way
11:41
we think about our place in
11:43
Well, if you look at
11:46
sort of the Western philosophical
11:48
tradition, when you think
11:50
about the Enlightenment, the
11:53
birth, say, of contemporary
11:55
modern Western science or the
11:57
growth of the industrial era,
12:00
people, I think, began to
12:03
see themselves as separate from nature.
12:06
And that's a big deal because that means
12:08
now it's okay to
12:10
use nature in pretty much any
12:12
way you want to accomplish
12:15
those industrial goals or those
12:17
goals of empire, for example.
12:20
Colonialism is really all
12:23
about moving around the
12:25
world to exploit resources,
12:28
to grow more intense
12:31
kinds of agricultural products.
12:34
So colonialism, I think, still
12:36
shows up as the
12:38
root of so much of our environmental
12:41
malaise today.
12:44
It's that legacy of resource exploitation
12:47
that Kathy and I banged right up against
12:49
while trying to dig for Indian potatoes among
12:52
the rocks left by miners in North West
12:54
and California. And mining's
12:56
not the only colonial practice to impact
12:58
the landscape there. There's also
13:01
been commercial logging, giant river
13:03
dams and legislation against native
13:05
traditions, all interfering
13:07
with the relationship the Karuk people have developed
13:10
with nature over thousands of years.
13:12
There's an incredible bird
13:14
circling over
13:15
us. Yeah, it's a turkey vulture.
13:17
You've got a bald eagle nest right
13:19
up here on the other side of the ridge. Really?
13:22
My
13:24
name is Bill Tripp and I'm the
13:27
director of natural resources and environmental
13:29
policy for the Karuk tribes Department
13:31
of Natural Resources.
13:33
Like Kathy, Bill is a Karuk tribal
13:35
member and a driving force in
13:37
landscape restoration efforts here.
13:40
He took us to a breathtaking viewpoint on
13:42
the side of a mountain where we looked
13:44
down on the valley we'd visited early with Kathy,
13:47
an important place in their culture. This
13:49
is what we call the red cap overlook
13:52
but the overall area is
13:54
a place where coyote is
13:56
from. You know there's stories about
13:59
how you roll
15:59
colonial settlers for its timber.
16:03
In the 19th and 20th centuries, fire
16:05
suppression laws were passed with the aim of protecting
16:08
these forests, but that effectively
16:10
made traditional burning illegal.
16:13
Now, fire is a key
16:15
part of California's ecology, as
16:18
lightning strikes naturally ignite its
16:20
parched vegetation, and ecosystems
16:23
here have evolved alongside these
16:25
regular blazes, as have
16:27
native traditions.
16:29
This time in memorial, tribal people have learned
16:31
to adapt and evolve to really diversify
16:34
the potential ecology here. So
16:37
living in a fire-prone ecosystem and then
16:39
developing a culture that becomes a fire-dependent
16:41
culture.
16:42
Dr. Frank Canala Lake is an ecologist
16:45
with the US Forest Service. He
16:47
is both indigenous and European heritage
16:49
and was raised in this area of northwest
16:51
California.
16:52
There was very sophisticated, ritualized
16:55
forms of management. So for tribal
16:57
people here, fire, using fire, was one
16:59
of those main processes. Lightning
17:01
has a certain chance of where it's going to strike, start
17:03
a fire. But as native people adapted
17:06
here as part of the living of that system, you
17:08
could see where burning more frequently
17:10
would favor certain plants over the others.
17:12
My kind of knee-jerk reaction to hearing
17:15
about burning something is, that
17:17
must be bad for the tree, but it
17:19
clearly has some benefits.
17:20
The benefits is fire will
17:23
kill other plants around it that could grow and be a competitor
17:25
for your favorite trees or shrubs, the ones that
17:27
produce your foods, nuts and berries and medicines. It
17:30
also cycles nutrients when it's a cooler burn.
17:33
And then in many cases, a lot of the trees may
17:36
actually benefit from a frequency
17:38
of fire. Fire would get rid of bugs
17:40
and diseases and other pests. Then
17:43
it would have a better crop. You would have the
17:45
rejuvenated growth.
17:47
Traditional burning can also limit
17:49
damage from wildfires. If
17:51
a blaze reaches recently burnt land,
17:54
it's less likely to keep burning. Because
17:56
some of the fuel, smaller plants and bushes,
17:59
have all
17:59
already been used it. The
18:02
laws banning tribal fires prevented
18:04
those benefits to the
18:05
ecosystem.
18:07
Maybe the thinking behind the bans
18:09
comes from that false separation of
18:11
humans and nature that's so embedded
18:14
in Western European thinking.
18:16
The newcomers just didn't understand
18:18
that Indigenous practices, like control
18:20
burning, were an important part
18:23
of this environment.
18:24
In Western science you have a null hypothesis
18:26
which is there is no effect. The control
18:29
or the nothing, right? And so for
18:31
me it's kind of what I call the colonial
18:33
null hypothesis that Native people didn't have
18:35
influence on ecosystems, on species,
18:38
biodiversity, not recognising
18:40
the Indigenous histories, processes
18:42
and protocols about how you live with your environment.
18:46
Despite what it might have looked like to settlers
18:48
arriving here, this landscape
18:50
was not untouched wilderness. Frank
18:53
is a scientist, so he wanted to know
18:56
more about this area's
18:57
history of human fire
18:59
use.
19:00
He and his team drilled lake cores to
19:02
reconstruct past climates, analysed
19:05
ancient tree stumps for evidence of burning
19:08
and studied land surveys and traditional
19:10
knowledge.
19:11
Now,
19:12
you'd expect there to be more burning
19:15
during hotter climate
19:16
periods. There was a big dry period
19:18
and then we saw a shift getting
19:21
cooler and more moisture of what you would expect less
19:23
fire, but you still thought there was
19:25
actually more fire that
19:28
was counterintuitive. Well, that's the intentional
19:30
burning that's counter than what you would
19:32
expect the climate to be doing under a cool
19:34
moist period. So there was
19:37
a high degree of cultural stewardship. Again,
19:39
the null hypothesis is there was
19:41
no effect and that you would expect climate to
19:43
be the main factor on the ecology
19:46
and the fire, but we were able to show using
19:49
all those different lines of evidence, there was more biomass
19:51
now than there was in like the last 1100,
19:55
1200 years. That means there's more trees
19:57
now. And so if we're wanting to look for
19:59
a reference.
19:59
So a
20:00
lot of times for ecological restoration
20:02
we want a reference condition. There was this mythological
20:05
time of how it was so great. And we
20:08
want to recreate that. We recreate
20:10
that, right? But if that reference condition
20:12
in part was the result of indigenous cultures,
20:15
you better plan that same type of stewardship and
20:17
fire use into the future of the decision that
20:19
you're trying to manage towards. Otherwise you're never going to
20:21
get there. Yeah. Right? You're
20:25
listening to CrowdScience from the BBC World
20:27
Service and we're exploring a question
20:30
from listener Terry who wants to know what
20:32
is humans' role in ecosystems?
20:36
I've often thought of humans as sort
20:39
of meddlers in ecosystems,
20:41
that we look after nature best by leaving
20:44
it alone. But, as was
20:46
heard from Frank, human activity,
20:48
even with something like fire, can sometimes
20:51
benefit the
20:52
environment.
20:54
Luckily, despite the fire suppression
20:56
laws, the cultural knowledge of fire
20:58
was not completely lost. As
21:01
Bill told me, back on Redcap
21:02
Overlook. You know, my great-grandmother
21:05
was a full-blooded karuk
21:08
from about four years old to eight years
21:10
old. I burned with her. You know, I was
21:12
starting a fire in the stove one day and
21:14
she told me if I was going to plant a fire, I'm going to do
21:17
something good with it. And so she
21:19
showed me how to use fire and started
21:22
telling me the stories associated with
21:24
all the places and the animals that are
21:26
built into
21:27
our traditional teachings
21:28
in karuk culture. But,
21:31
you know, fire largely was
21:33
kind of lost as that tool
21:35
that kept this place and our culture sustained
21:38
and healthy. So, you
21:40
know, we do a lot of work to try to bring
21:42
that back.
21:43
And it kind of looks like this
21:46
patch down here has burned
21:48
recently. Yeah.
21:49
A lot of that flat up there was burned
21:52
off in March this year with the cultural
21:54
fire practitioner. We
21:56
have some pretty strict
21:58
protocols on windmills.
21:59
we don't use fire. Kind
22:02
of a flexible protocol
22:05
around the birds coming back to
22:07
nest. You know, traditional
22:09
ecological knowledge by definition
22:12
is oral in nature. It's a community
22:14
knowledge system. The
22:16
knowledge holders in the Cuttock community
22:19
aren't necessarily the kind of people that are
22:21
gonna sit in a meeting all
22:24
day and write down a document that
22:26
says that this is how we're gonna do it. They're
22:29
more in tune to the smell of the air or
22:32
you know the way the
22:34
breeze is hitting the hair on the wrist you
22:36
know just little things like that. Those
22:38
are the things that these folks are tuned into
22:41
is when it's right here in this spot.
22:45
Although it is hard to put onto paper
22:47
the community here are trying to come to an agreement
22:50
on how best to use fire. There
22:52
has been greater acceptance of cultural
22:55
burning in recent years but there
22:57
are still restrictions. Fire
23:00
after all can be dangerous. As
23:03
the planet heats up Californian
23:05
wildfires are getting more frequent, hotter
23:08
and deadlier. Cultural
23:11
and controlled burning could help mitigate
23:13
them so this conversation is urgent.
23:17
During our visit a big meeting was held
23:19
to discuss fire planning in the area.
23:21
We're creating the human
23:23
emergency. We're taking fire out of
23:26
fire-dependent ecosystem.
23:27
Will Harling is the co-lead with
23:29
Bill Trip and others of the Western
23:32
Klamath Restoration Partnership or
23:34
WKRP who are running this meeting.
23:37
Their aim is to restore the landscape
23:39
here
23:40
but that's not easy. While
23:42
there's not a lot of people in these mountain
23:44
communities they have very diverse
23:47
ideas you know from loggers
23:50
to miners to environmentalists to
23:52
tribal members to for service
23:55
employees to some of the early
23:57
settlers that came here five or six generations
23:59
ago. And they all have a different
24:02
vision about what the land should be
24:04
and how it should be managed. And
24:06
so the Western Climate Restoration Partnership
24:09
allowed us to come together, building
24:11
these projects together. You know, we've
24:13
made a lot of incredible progress.
24:16
I mean, it's evidenced by the fact that Bill
24:19
is currently on President Biden's
24:21
Wildfire Commission redefining the
24:24
rules of engagement with fire
24:26
nationally. So part
24:28
of these workshops is trying
24:31
to crowdsource the ideas that
24:33
are going to help us bring in fire back
24:35
to this landscape in a good way.
24:38
And there's evidence that it's working. Frank
24:41
Lake, the US Forest Service ecologist
24:44
we heard from earlier, carried out research
24:46
with the Karuk tribe and the University of
24:48
California, Berkeley.
24:50
They looked at the condition of traditional
24:52
gathering sites, assessing several
24:55
culturally important species for the
24:57
Karuk people.
24:58
They found many areas were degraded
25:01
because of a lack of tribal stewardship. But
25:03
in the areas the WKRP was managing,
25:06
with tribal guidance on which trees to cut
25:08
and which to leave and when and where to use
25:11
fire, there was a reduced threat
25:13
of wildfire and drought and increased
25:16
biodiversity.
25:17
This is something Kathy has witnessed firsthand.
25:21
There's more potatoes and they're bigger.
25:24
You see that one right there, that's almost two
25:26
feet. Yes. The bulbs have
25:28
been underground and they've been waiting to
25:30
come up. And so by removing
25:33
all of the dead vegetation
25:36
and having rotational burns, we're
25:38
waking up this area and that's
25:40
what world renewal is all about. Piki
25:43
Alish, we fix the world. So
25:46
that's what we're doing just by interacting
25:48
with the environment, with the light hand
25:50
at the right time of year, we're
25:53
improving the area for both
25:55
people and animals.
27:59
I've got you guys out here. Anybody
28:02
that'll listen, I'll tell them. I'll talk
28:05
to them because people can live
28:07
sustainably.
28:09
I left Kathy, Bill, Will and
28:12
Frank with an overriding sense of how
28:14
deeply connected the Karuk tribe are to
28:16
their environment, seeing plants
28:18
and animals as their relations. In
28:21
cities, like our listener Terry's home of Lincoln, our
28:24
place in nature can feel quite different.
28:28
But there are plenty of ways to aim for a healthier
28:30
balance in these places too. And with rampant climate change and
28:32
biodiversity loss, taking
28:36
those measures is pretty urgent. If
28:39
you want to hear more about living sustainably, you
28:42
can dip into the Crowdscience Back catalogue and
28:44
find the episode called, What Does a Sustainable
28:47
Life Look Like? But
28:49
a good start is to recognise we're not
28:51
separate from our ecosystems. We
28:53
depend on them and they also
28:56
depend on us. To
28:58
end the show, here's listener Terry again, reflecting
29:01
on living in a city surrounded by
29:03
wetlands.
29:05
People will come here thinking
29:07
this is human space now. But
29:10
if you're going to live this close to nature,
29:13
then you have to be sure to accommodate
29:16
yourself to nature.
29:19
That's all for this episode of Crowdscience
29:22
from the BBC World Service. Today's
29:25
question was for me, Terry
29:27
English in Lincoln, California. The
29:30
episode was presented by Caroline
29:33
Steele and produced by Kathy Edwards. If
29:36
you have a question, big or small, why
29:39
not send it to the team at crowdscience
29:42
at bbc.co.uk.
29:46
Thanks for listening. Bye.
29:59
See how the podcast is sitting
30:02
on stage. Expect the unexpected.
30:05
We were having a big, careful discussion. How
30:07
could someone ever do this? How could that ever happen?
30:10
And that's the first time I ever came out with
30:12
my story about how I was almost a school shooter.
30:14
Live less ordinary from the BBC
30:17
World Service. Find it wherever
30:19
you get your BBC podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More