Podchaser Logo
Home
Can humans be part of healthy ecosystems?

Can humans be part of healthy ecosystems?

Released Friday, 6th October 2023
 2 people rated this episode
Can humans be part of healthy ecosystems?

Can humans be part of healthy ecosystems?

Can humans be part of healthy ecosystems?

Can humans be part of healthy ecosystems?

Friday, 6th October 2023
 2 people rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Hello and welcome to this podcast

0:02

from the BBC World Service. Please

0:04

let us know what you think and tell other

0:06

people about us on social media. Podcasts

0:10

from the BBC World Service are supported

0:12

by advertising.

0:16

So this is the road between Forested

0:18

Area and another Forested Area

0:21

where there was a concrete barrier

0:23

for about a mile down the middle of the road.

0:25

So

0:25

as

0:28

I was driving down the road I

0:30

saw in front of me a possum that had

0:32

tried to cross the street but had come

0:34

right to this concrete barrier. So

0:37

he couldn't escape, he was obviously

0:40

hit by a car and it just passed away right there.

0:45

Poor possum. You're

0:47

listening to Crowdscience from the BBC World

0:49

Service. I'm Caroline Steele

0:52

and I'm with listener Terry next to a very

0:54

busy road on the edge of the housing development

0:56

where she lives

0:57

in Lincoln, California. I mean

0:59

it seemed like indignity heaped upon

1:01

indignity when he's this fully

1:03

knowledgeable animal. It's just a

1:06

consequence of the

1:08

process of developing and not taking

1:10

wildlife into concern. Frustrated

1:15

by how little humans seem to care

1:17

about other animals' lives, a question

1:19

started nagging at Terry,

1:22

which back in her much more peaceful garden

1:24

she put to us. So

1:26

my question is where

1:28

do humans fit into the

1:31

ecology of the earth?

1:34

The earth is filled with ecosystems and

1:38

many thousands of years ago it seems

1:41

like things were more in balance but

1:44

it seemed like we began to affect

1:46

all the ecosystems which

1:48

made me think do we have

1:51

a place in a balanced ecosystem

1:53

anymore or are we just an

1:55

invading species?

1:58

I've always been concerned. with

2:00

human effect on the planet? I

2:03

was in Los Angeles and we were fighting

2:06

to save the remaining wetlands. And

2:08

then when I moved up to Lincoln, they have

2:11

started doing a lot of developing. So

2:14

what is Lincoln like as a place? This

2:17

is their slogan. A

2:19

fast-growing community with a small

2:21

town feel. And since

2:24

I moved here, there's

2:26

been thousands of houses

2:28

built.

2:30

This development here is about 20

2:33

years old. It's wetlands.

2:36

And it's beautiful, but

2:38

I didn't realize it was wetlands when I first

2:41

moved here. They do build nice

2:43

neighborhoods with green space in mind,

2:46

but it's human green. So taking

2:49

away a lot of the territories

2:52

of the wild critters. So

2:54

where do they go or do they just die?

2:58

And how then does that affect

3:00

the ecosystem as a whole? So

3:03

what is humans place in ecosystems

3:06

and what could or should

3:08

it be? Terri's

3:11

question is huge, but I'm hoping

3:13

we can find some answers here in her

3:15

home state of California. Humans

3:18

have lived in this part of the world for over 10,000 years.

3:22

And for most of that time, it's safe to

3:24

say they've had a much closer relationship

3:27

with the rest of nature than most people

3:29

do today. My

3:32

producer and I drove seven hours north into

3:35

the Klamath Mountains of Northwestern California.

3:38

Off the main road and oh gosh,

3:41

including a rather bumpy bit at the end.

3:44

Yeah, we're

3:47

literally driving through a small

3:49

clearing. Really wild

3:51

and rugged.

3:58

We made it to a peaceful river valley.

4:07

and

6:00

the potatoes, it's got a purple flower

6:02

on top and we native

6:05

people like to eat the bulbs. If

6:07

you're coming out of a hard winter, these

6:09

are little packages of nutrition

6:13

and they have a lot of starch, a lot of vitamins

6:15

and minerals. I'd be starting to eat the greens

6:18

that they had that came here naturally. And

6:21

I'm gonna go dig a bulb out to show you. Oh,

6:23

that would be great. Go over here. I

6:27

don't wanna dig that one because you see there's a burl

6:29

right there. Oh, so you might accidentally disturb.

6:32

I don't, yes, I don't wanna disturb

6:34

him. So let's try this.

6:38

Cultivating Indian potatoes, a type

6:41

of wild lily, isn't just helping

6:43

humans. It's important for other animals

6:45

too.

6:46

They call it deer potatoes too because

6:49

deer like to come in and eat the tops.

6:53

So when you manage for

6:55

those types of plants, you're also managing

6:58

for the deer and the elk. We

7:00

wanna provide areas to welcome

7:03

the elk back.

7:07

Can't keep hitting these big rocks.

7:10

Kathy is an expert at this, but

7:12

she's having some trouble.

7:14

Should I help? How'd you get him out of here? Yeah, how

7:16

about it? Oh

7:19

gosh. There's a big rock there, which

7:21

is annoying. Yeah. And a big rock there.

7:23

Yep, so we're working. Trying

7:26

to dig in an old mining

7:28

area. In order to mine

7:30

a big area like this, they had

7:32

to shoot water at

7:35

the mountain slopes, tearing these

7:37

mountain slopes down and then they could

7:39

further mine it for gold.

7:42

The landscape here isn't the same as it was

7:44

when Kathy's ancestors lived here hundreds

7:47

of years ago. In the 19th century,

7:49

the outsiders who came to the area looking

7:51

for gold used destructive mining

7:53

practices that disturbed the environment.

7:56

They even rerouted the river. Before

7:59

contacting...

7:59

before they moved this river, this

8:02

soil wouldn't have been like this. So it's

8:04

kind of... You're almost there!

8:06

You

8:09

keep

8:09

going! This is like formula.

8:13

How much energy you

8:15

expend for the calories

8:17

you take in. What do you think, gang?

8:22

On average, we humans need to get

8:24

more calories from our food than we

8:27

spend harvesting it. Otherwise,

8:29

we can't exist as a functioning

8:31

part of an ecosystem. As

8:34

I discovered, after expending a lot of

8:36

energy trying to dig up one single potato,

8:39

the mining fallout skewed that equation.

8:42

But for thousands of years it did work

8:44

for the Karuk tribe, and that kind of

8:47

ecosystem balance would be a

8:49

dream for our listener, Telly.

8:51

But it's not the norm on the planet today,

8:54

with mined, farmed, built up and

8:56

polluted every corner of the Earth

8:59

to an extraordinary degree.

9:01

One study estimated only 3% of

9:04

land in the entire world remains

9:07

untouched by humans.

9:09

Humans have become, over

9:12

their long history, a

9:15

major, major component in

9:17

pretty much all the ecosystems

9:20

of the world. Obviously,

9:22

cities, which is where I work,

9:24

but you can, for example, find

9:27

microplastic residues in

9:30

soils and waters and ice, very

9:33

distant from dense human habitation.

9:36

So in fact, we are all over the

9:38

place. I'm

9:40

Stuart Pickett, and I work

9:43

at Cary Institute of Ecosystem

9:45

Studies in Millbrook, New York,

9:48

where I am an urban and

9:51

landscape ecologist.

9:52

Would you say that humans are part

9:55

of their ecosystems, or

9:57

do you think by now we've kind of become sector-like?

9:59

from them? That's a really

10:02

interesting question because in

10:04

many ways we still

10:07

so deeply depend on the

10:09

products of ecosystems. We

10:11

depend on ecosystems

10:13

around the world or maybe even

10:15

you could say the whole world ecosystem.

10:18

We depend on that. For oxygen

10:20

we depend on that for processing

10:23

our wastes, for our food,

10:25

for our cultural

10:27

amenities and the things that symbolize

10:31

spiritual well-being for us.

10:34

We're still very much embedded

10:36

in the ecosystem but

10:38

we kind of pretend that we're not because

10:41

we get our food from the grocery store

10:43

and we don't notice how connected

10:46

we are with ecosystem

10:48

processes.

10:50

It may not look like it but ecosystems

10:52

are at work in even the densest of cities.

10:55

So urban dwellers like me, listener Terry

10:58

and over 50% of the rest of the world

11:00

are also inescapably embedded in them.

11:02

I think it's really important

11:05

for people in cities to

11:08

see themselves as

11:10

part of ecosystems.

11:13

You can have functional ecosystems

11:16

in urban areas. They're going to be different

11:19

from the ecosystems out in wild

11:21

areas but still they

11:24

have the same kinds of components, the

11:26

same kinds of relationships, the

11:28

same kinds of biological

11:31

processes that any ecosystem

11:33

would have. We just have to kind of wake

11:35

up to it.

11:37

Were there any key developments

11:39

in our history that sort of changed the way

11:41

we think about our place in

11:43

Well, if you look at

11:46

sort of the Western philosophical

11:48

tradition, when you think

11:50

about the Enlightenment, the

11:53

birth, say, of contemporary

11:55

modern Western science or the

11:57

growth of the industrial era,

12:00

people, I think, began to

12:03

see themselves as separate from nature.

12:06

And that's a big deal because that means

12:08

now it's okay to

12:10

use nature in pretty much any

12:12

way you want to accomplish

12:15

those industrial goals or those

12:17

goals of empire, for example.

12:20

Colonialism is really all

12:23

about moving around the

12:25

world to exploit resources,

12:28

to grow more intense

12:31

kinds of agricultural products.

12:34

So colonialism, I think, still

12:36

shows up as the

12:38

root of so much of our environmental

12:41

malaise today.

12:44

It's that legacy of resource exploitation

12:47

that Kathy and I banged right up against

12:49

while trying to dig for Indian potatoes among

12:52

the rocks left by miners in North West

12:54

and California. And mining's

12:56

not the only colonial practice to impact

12:58

the landscape there. There's also

13:01

been commercial logging, giant river

13:03

dams and legislation against native

13:05

traditions, all interfering

13:07

with the relationship the Karuk people have developed

13:10

with nature over thousands of years.

13:12

There's an incredible bird

13:14

circling over

13:15

us. Yeah, it's a turkey vulture.

13:17

You've got a bald eagle nest right

13:19

up here on the other side of the ridge. Really?

13:22

My

13:24

name is Bill Tripp and I'm the

13:27

director of natural resources and environmental

13:29

policy for the Karuk tribes Department

13:31

of Natural Resources.

13:33

Like Kathy, Bill is a Karuk tribal

13:35

member and a driving force in

13:37

landscape restoration efforts here.

13:40

He took us to a breathtaking viewpoint on

13:42

the side of a mountain where we looked

13:44

down on the valley we'd visited early with Kathy,

13:47

an important place in their culture. This

13:49

is what we call the red cap overlook

13:52

but the overall area is

13:54

a place where coyote is

13:56

from. You know there's stories about

13:59

how you roll

15:59

colonial settlers for its timber.

16:03

In the 19th and 20th centuries, fire

16:05

suppression laws were passed with the aim of protecting

16:08

these forests, but that effectively

16:10

made traditional burning illegal.

16:13

Now, fire is a key

16:15

part of California's ecology, as

16:18

lightning strikes naturally ignite its

16:20

parched vegetation, and ecosystems

16:23

here have evolved alongside these

16:25

regular blazes, as have

16:27

native traditions.

16:29

This time in memorial, tribal people have learned

16:31

to adapt and evolve to really diversify

16:34

the potential ecology here. So

16:37

living in a fire-prone ecosystem and then

16:39

developing a culture that becomes a fire-dependent

16:41

culture.

16:42

Dr. Frank Canala Lake is an ecologist

16:45

with the US Forest Service. He

16:47

is both indigenous and European heritage

16:49

and was raised in this area of northwest

16:51

California.

16:52

There was very sophisticated, ritualized

16:55

forms of management. So for tribal

16:57

people here, fire, using fire, was one

16:59

of those main processes. Lightning

17:01

has a certain chance of where it's going to strike, start

17:03

a fire. But as native people adapted

17:06

here as part of the living of that system, you

17:08

could see where burning more frequently

17:10

would favor certain plants over the others.

17:12

My kind of knee-jerk reaction to hearing

17:15

about burning something is, that

17:17

must be bad for the tree, but it

17:19

clearly has some benefits.

17:20

The benefits is fire will

17:23

kill other plants around it that could grow and be a competitor

17:25

for your favorite trees or shrubs, the ones that

17:27

produce your foods, nuts and berries and medicines. It

17:30

also cycles nutrients when it's a cooler burn.

17:33

And then in many cases, a lot of the trees may

17:36

actually benefit from a frequency

17:38

of fire. Fire would get rid of bugs

17:40

and diseases and other pests. Then

17:43

it would have a better crop. You would have the

17:45

rejuvenated growth.

17:47

Traditional burning can also limit

17:49

damage from wildfires. If

17:51

a blaze reaches recently burnt land,

17:54

it's less likely to keep burning. Because

17:56

some of the fuel, smaller plants and bushes,

17:59

have all

17:59

already been used it. The

18:02

laws banning tribal fires prevented

18:04

those benefits to the

18:05

ecosystem.

18:07

Maybe the thinking behind the bans

18:09

comes from that false separation of

18:11

humans and nature that's so embedded

18:14

in Western European thinking.

18:16

The newcomers just didn't understand

18:18

that Indigenous practices, like control

18:20

burning, were an important part

18:23

of this environment.

18:24

In Western science you have a null hypothesis

18:26

which is there is no effect. The control

18:29

or the nothing, right? And so for

18:31

me it's kind of what I call the colonial

18:33

null hypothesis that Native people didn't have

18:35

influence on ecosystems, on species,

18:38

biodiversity, not recognising

18:40

the Indigenous histories, processes

18:42

and protocols about how you live with your environment.

18:46

Despite what it might have looked like to settlers

18:48

arriving here, this landscape

18:50

was not untouched wilderness. Frank

18:53

is a scientist, so he wanted to know

18:56

more about this area's

18:57

history of human fire

18:59

use.

19:00

He and his team drilled lake cores to

19:02

reconstruct past climates, analysed

19:05

ancient tree stumps for evidence of burning

19:08

and studied land surveys and traditional

19:10

knowledge.

19:11

Now,

19:12

you'd expect there to be more burning

19:15

during hotter climate

19:16

periods. There was a big dry period

19:18

and then we saw a shift getting

19:21

cooler and more moisture of what you would expect less

19:23

fire, but you still thought there was

19:25

actually more fire that

19:28

was counterintuitive. Well, that's the intentional

19:30

burning that's counter than what you would

19:32

expect the climate to be doing under a cool

19:34

moist period. So there was

19:37

a high degree of cultural stewardship. Again,

19:39

the null hypothesis is there was

19:41

no effect and that you would expect climate to

19:43

be the main factor on the ecology

19:46

and the fire, but we were able to show using

19:49

all those different lines of evidence, there was more biomass

19:51

now than there was in like the last 1100,

19:55

1200 years. That means there's more trees

19:57

now. And so if we're wanting to look for

19:59

a reference.

19:59

So a

20:00

lot of times for ecological restoration

20:02

we want a reference condition. There was this mythological

20:05

time of how it was so great. And we

20:08

want to recreate that. We recreate

20:10

that, right? But if that reference condition

20:12

in part was the result of indigenous cultures,

20:15

you better plan that same type of stewardship and

20:17

fire use into the future of the decision that

20:19

you're trying to manage towards. Otherwise you're never going to

20:21

get there. Yeah. Right? You're

20:25

listening to CrowdScience from the BBC World

20:27

Service and we're exploring a question

20:30

from listener Terry who wants to know what

20:32

is humans' role in ecosystems?

20:36

I've often thought of humans as sort

20:39

of meddlers in ecosystems,

20:41

that we look after nature best by leaving

20:44

it alone. But, as was

20:46

heard from Frank, human activity,

20:48

even with something like fire, can sometimes

20:51

benefit the

20:52

environment.

20:54

Luckily, despite the fire suppression

20:56

laws, the cultural knowledge of fire

20:58

was not completely lost. As

21:01

Bill told me, back on Redcap

21:02

Overlook. You know, my great-grandmother

21:05

was a full-blooded karuk

21:08

from about four years old to eight years

21:10

old. I burned with her. You know, I was

21:12

starting a fire in the stove one day and

21:14

she told me if I was going to plant a fire, I'm going to do

21:17

something good with it. And so she

21:19

showed me how to use fire and started

21:22

telling me the stories associated with

21:24

all the places and the animals that are

21:26

built into

21:27

our traditional teachings

21:28

in karuk culture. But,

21:31

you know, fire largely was

21:33

kind of lost as that tool

21:35

that kept this place and our culture sustained

21:38

and healthy. So, you

21:40

know, we do a lot of work to try to bring

21:42

that back.

21:43

And it kind of looks like this

21:46

patch down here has burned

21:48

recently. Yeah.

21:49

A lot of that flat up there was burned

21:52

off in March this year with the cultural

21:54

fire practitioner. We

21:56

have some pretty strict

21:58

protocols on windmills.

21:59

we don't use fire. Kind

22:02

of a flexible protocol

22:05

around the birds coming back to

22:07

nest. You know, traditional

22:09

ecological knowledge by definition

22:12

is oral in nature. It's a community

22:14

knowledge system. The

22:16

knowledge holders in the Cuttock community

22:19

aren't necessarily the kind of people that are

22:21

gonna sit in a meeting all

22:24

day and write down a document that

22:26

says that this is how we're gonna do it. They're

22:29

more in tune to the smell of the air or

22:32

you know the way the

22:34

breeze is hitting the hair on the wrist you

22:36

know just little things like that. Those

22:38

are the things that these folks are tuned into

22:41

is when it's right here in this spot.

22:45

Although it is hard to put onto paper

22:47

the community here are trying to come to an agreement

22:50

on how best to use fire. There

22:52

has been greater acceptance of cultural

22:55

burning in recent years but there

22:57

are still restrictions. Fire

23:00

after all can be dangerous. As

23:03

the planet heats up Californian

23:05

wildfires are getting more frequent, hotter

23:08

and deadlier. Cultural

23:11

and controlled burning could help mitigate

23:13

them so this conversation is urgent.

23:17

During our visit a big meeting was held

23:19

to discuss fire planning in the area.

23:21

We're creating the human

23:23

emergency. We're taking fire out of

23:26

fire-dependent ecosystem.

23:27

Will Harling is the co-lead with

23:29

Bill Trip and others of the Western

23:32

Klamath Restoration Partnership or

23:34

WKRP who are running this meeting.

23:37

Their aim is to restore the landscape

23:39

here

23:40

but that's not easy. While

23:42

there's not a lot of people in these mountain

23:44

communities they have very diverse

23:47

ideas you know from loggers

23:50

to miners to environmentalists to

23:52

tribal members to for service

23:55

employees to some of the early

23:57

settlers that came here five or six generations

23:59

ago. And they all have a different

24:02

vision about what the land should be

24:04

and how it should be managed. And

24:06

so the Western Climate Restoration Partnership

24:09

allowed us to come together, building

24:11

these projects together. You know, we've

24:13

made a lot of incredible progress.

24:16

I mean, it's evidenced by the fact that Bill

24:19

is currently on President Biden's

24:21

Wildfire Commission redefining the

24:24

rules of engagement with fire

24:26

nationally. So part

24:28

of these workshops is trying

24:31

to crowdsource the ideas that

24:33

are going to help us bring in fire back

24:35

to this landscape in a good way.

24:38

And there's evidence that it's working. Frank

24:41

Lake, the US Forest Service ecologist

24:44

we heard from earlier, carried out research

24:46

with the Karuk tribe and the University of

24:48

California, Berkeley.

24:50

They looked at the condition of traditional

24:52

gathering sites, assessing several

24:55

culturally important species for the

24:57

Karuk people.

24:58

They found many areas were degraded

25:01

because of a lack of tribal stewardship. But

25:03

in the areas the WKRP was managing,

25:06

with tribal guidance on which trees to cut

25:08

and which to leave and when and where to use

25:11

fire, there was a reduced threat

25:13

of wildfire and drought and increased

25:16

biodiversity.

25:17

This is something Kathy has witnessed firsthand.

25:21

There's more potatoes and they're bigger.

25:24

You see that one right there, that's almost two

25:26

feet. Yes. The bulbs have

25:28

been underground and they've been waiting to

25:30

come up. And so by removing

25:33

all of the dead vegetation

25:36

and having rotational burns, we're

25:38

waking up this area and that's

25:40

what world renewal is all about. Piki

25:43

Alish, we fix the world. So

25:46

that's what we're doing just by interacting

25:48

with the environment, with the light hand

25:50

at the right time of year, we're

25:53

improving the area for both

25:55

people and animals.

27:59

I've got you guys out here. Anybody

28:02

that'll listen, I'll tell them. I'll talk

28:05

to them because people can live

28:07

sustainably.

28:09

I left Kathy, Bill, Will and

28:12

Frank with an overriding sense of how

28:14

deeply connected the Karuk tribe are to

28:16

their environment, seeing plants

28:18

and animals as their relations. In

28:21

cities, like our listener Terry's home of Lincoln, our

28:24

place in nature can feel quite different.

28:28

But there are plenty of ways to aim for a healthier

28:30

balance in these places too. And with rampant climate change and

28:32

biodiversity loss, taking

28:36

those measures is pretty urgent. If

28:39

you want to hear more about living sustainably, you

28:42

can dip into the Crowdscience Back catalogue and

28:44

find the episode called, What Does a Sustainable

28:47

Life Look Like? But

28:49

a good start is to recognise we're not

28:51

separate from our ecosystems. We

28:53

depend on them and they also

28:56

depend on us. To

28:58

end the show, here's listener Terry again, reflecting

29:01

on living in a city surrounded by

29:03

wetlands.

29:05

People will come here thinking

29:07

this is human space now. But

29:10

if you're going to live this close to nature,

29:13

then you have to be sure to accommodate

29:16

yourself to nature.

29:19

That's all for this episode of Crowdscience

29:22

from the BBC World Service. Today's

29:25

question was for me, Terry

29:27

English in Lincoln, California. The

29:30

episode was presented by Caroline

29:33

Steele and produced by Kathy Edwards. If

29:36

you have a question, big or small, why

29:39

not send it to the team at crowdscience

29:42

at bbc.co.uk.

29:46

Thanks for listening. Bye.

29:59

See how the podcast is sitting

30:02

on stage. Expect the unexpected.

30:05

We were having a big, careful discussion. How

30:07

could someone ever do this? How could that ever happen?

30:10

And that's the first time I ever came out with

30:12

my story about how I was almost a school shooter.

30:14

Live less ordinary from the BBC

30:17

World Service. Find it wherever

30:19

you get your BBC podcasts.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features