Podchaser Logo
Home
COJ #80 - The Red Flags in Mica Miller’s Death + Sandy Smith Meets with Investigators, Colucci Trial is Almost Here

COJ #80 - The Red Flags in Mica Miller’s Death + Sandy Smith Meets with Investigators, Colucci Trial is Almost Here

Released Tuesday, 7th May 2024
 1 person rated this episode
COJ #80 - The Red Flags in Mica Miller’s Death + Sandy Smith Meets with Investigators, Colucci Trial is Almost Here

COJ #80 - The Red Flags in Mica Miller’s Death + Sandy Smith Meets with Investigators, Colucci Trial is Almost Here

COJ #80 - The Red Flags in Mica Miller’s Death + Sandy Smith Meets with Investigators, Colucci Trial is Almost Here

COJ #80 - The Red Flags in Mica Miller’s Death + Sandy Smith Meets with Investigators, Colucci Trial is Almost Here

Tuesday, 7th May 2024
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Introducing Bluehost Cloud. Ultra-fast WordPress

0:02

hosting with 100% uptime. Want

0:06

a website with unmatched power, speed,

0:08

and control? Of course you do.

0:11

And now you can have all

0:13

three with Bluehost Cloud. The new

0:15

web hosting plan from Bluehost. With

0:17

100% uptime and incredibly speedy load

0:19

times, your WordPress websites will be

0:22

dependable and lightning fast on a

0:24

global scale. Plus, your sites can

0:26

handle even the biggest traffic spikes

0:28

without going down or lagging. And

0:30

with Bluehost Cloud, you get

0:33

24-7 WordPress priority support. Meaning

0:35

you're connected to WordPress experts

0:37

any time you need them.

0:40

Not to mention, you automatically

0:42

get daily backups and world-class

0:44

security. So what are you

0:46

waiting for? Get Bluehost Cloud

0:48

today by visiting bluehost.com. That's

0:52

bluehost.com. You

0:56

know that's the sound of another sale on your online

0:58

Shopify store. But did

1:00

you know Shopify Power is selling in person

1:02

too? That's right. Shopify

1:04

is the sound of selling everywhere.

1:08

Online, in store, on social media, and

1:10

beyond. Shopify

1:14

POS is your command center for

1:16

your retail store. From accepting payments

1:18

to managing inventory, Shopify has everything

1:20

you need to sell in person.

1:23

With Shopify, you get a powerhouse selling partner

1:26

that effortlessly unites your in-person and online

1:28

sales into one source of truth. Track

1:30

every sale across your business in one

1:32

place and know exactly

1:34

what's in stock. Connect

1:38

with customers in line and online. Shopify

1:41

helps you drive store traffic with plug-and-play

1:43

tools built for marketing campaigns from

1:45

TikTok to Instagram and beyond. Get

1:48

hardware that fits your business. Take

1:51

payments by smartphone, transform your tablet

1:53

into a point-of-sale system, or use

1:56

Shopify's POS Go mobile device for

1:58

a battle-tested solution. Plus, Plus,

2:00

Shopify's award-winning help is there to

2:02

support your success every step of

2:05

the way. Do retail right with

2:07

Shopify. Sign up for a $1 per

2:10

month trial period at

2:12

shopify.com/crimes all lowercase. Go

2:15

to shopify.com/crimes to take your

2:17

retail business to the next

2:19

level today shopify.com/crimes

2:24

Hey, y'all. You know some people enjoy

2:26

composing their own music chord by

2:29

chord So

2:35

be sure to follow COJPOD for

2:37

all the latest updates on exciting

2:39

new guests, the Kaluchi case, and

2:41

more. On today's episode,

2:44

we will talk more about the Kaluchi case.

2:46

We have less than a week before the

2:48

trial begins on May 13th. If

2:51

you're interested in this case and

2:53

haven't already listened to last week's

2:55

True Sunlight podcast, I highly recommend

2:58

that you do. We have uncovered

3:00

a lot. Now it's

3:02

just a question of whether the

3:04

prosecution can do the case justice

3:06

this time around. We

3:08

also talk about the very disturbing and

3:10

heartbreaking case of Micah Miller, a 30-year-old

3:13

woman from Myrtle Beach who was found

3:15

dead a week and a half ago

3:17

in a state park in North Carolina

3:19

near the South Carolina border. Micah

3:22

had just filed for divorce from her

3:24

past her husband. John Paul, JP Miller,

3:26

who has a history of violence. There

3:30

are so many strange things with this case,

3:32

but mostly there are red flags. Micah

3:34

lived in fear of John Paul and even

3:36

told her family members that if she'd ever

3:39

been found with a bullet in her head,

3:41

that JP did this to her. We

3:43

have put out a bunch of voyas in this

3:46

case and we will be talking about it more

3:48

on this week's True Sunlight. But

3:50

today, you're basically getting our raw reactions

3:52

to the case and what we think

3:54

needs to happen to protect women after

3:57

their untimely deaths. Premium members

3:59

will get a little something extra.

4:01

Today, Eric talks about those

4:03

pesky liability waivers we all have to

4:05

sign from time to time. Do we

4:08

have to sign them? What happens if

4:10

we don't? What happens if we were

4:12

to scratch out part of the agreement

4:14

before signing it? All that and more.

4:16

Let's get into it. Cups

4:20

up. Cups up. Cups up.

4:22

Hey partners, how you doing? Doing

4:24

well. So Eric, tell us what

4:26

happened at this meeting that you

4:28

had with the Attorney General and

4:31

Sandy. That's been a long time coming. Yeah,

4:33

it has. I guess the genesis of it

4:36

was at the victim's rally that

4:38

we were at, I guess, in early April.

4:42

And the Attorney General saw Sandy and David

4:44

and Mandy and Sandy, you know, mentioned something

4:46

the Attorney General said, I'll be glad to

4:48

meet with you. And I guess it was

4:51

one of those offhand comments, you

4:53

know, the people say like, hey, let's go do lunch next

4:55

week. And you call the guy and you say, hey, let's

4:57

have lunch. He's like, I don't want

4:59

to have lunch with you. But you know,

5:01

the Attorney General said he'll be glad to

5:03

meet and we certainly held him to it

5:05

because we immediately notified him and said, hey,

5:08

we would like to meet. And so this

5:10

morning we met at the Attorney General's office

5:12

and there was a significant

5:15

number of important people there. I don't want

5:17

to name who was there in addition to

5:19

the Attorney General. But we

5:22

were told that it

5:24

is an absolute active

5:26

investigation and that

5:28

they are actively pursuing answers

5:32

for Sandy. They both, they all

5:34

to a person said they want

5:36

to give her peace. And Sandy

5:39

said it the same way. I want to

5:41

just find out what happened. I want to

5:43

have peace for what happened

5:45

to my son. The Attorney General

5:47

was very serious about finding an

5:49

answer for her. He does not

5:51

like the fact that Stephen

5:55

was killed in that manner and that they

5:57

don't have an answer. They

6:00

were clear to tell us that when

6:02

they took over, meaning sled in the

6:04

AG, it was essentially a cold case

6:07

because the highway department had it for six

6:09

years and they released the file.

6:13

They reiterated the same concerns we had

6:15

when they released the file to the

6:17

public that that was a chilling effect,

6:19

in essence, for

6:21

the potential investigation. They

6:25

didn't share much of the

6:27

granular details of their investigation other

6:30

than that they believe that they

6:32

will come to a point that they will

6:35

have an answer as to what happened. It

6:37

may not be enough for

6:39

criminal prosecution, but they

6:41

believe that they will get

6:43

an answer. I saw a list of 11 things

6:46

that they're going

6:48

to do. I take them

6:51

at their word and they

6:53

were receptive to what Sandy was

6:55

asking them. I

6:58

did ask them some poignant

7:01

questions about the tablet

7:03

and different things like

7:05

that. I'm

7:08

not sure what they found off the tablet, but

7:10

it wasn't enough that it would have

7:12

yielded anything and you gave me some

7:14

suggestions about

7:17

Craig's List and different things like that that

7:19

I passed on. They were

7:22

very welcoming to any information

7:24

that we can give or any

7:26

information that the public

7:28

can give, either through you, through

7:31

True Sunlight, or

7:34

directly to the AG. They're

7:36

committed to getting

7:38

answers. When they said that it was

7:40

a homicide in March

7:43

of 2023, that

7:45

word connotes a number of things. It could

7:47

mean a murder. It could

7:49

mean somebody who was

7:51

grossly negligent under the

7:53

influence of alcohol and caused

7:56

the death, or it could have

7:58

been somebody who was inattentive and didn't… mean

8:00

it at all, that they were just looking

8:02

the other way and didn't see Steven and

8:04

something happened. So it's a broad

8:07

spectrum of definition of death. When

8:10

we hear the word homicide, we

8:12

already think homicide occurred. That's a

8:14

murder. And they wanted me

8:16

to understand and

8:18

Sandy to understand that they're

8:20

not reaching any conclusions regarding the

8:23

word homicide. Well, I don't think we

8:25

ever did. I think we were pretty clear

8:27

that homicide can also mean a vehicular

8:29

situation. But did they mention, so

8:33

there's been a lot of confusion because it's been

8:35

reported that there were two people of interest that

8:38

had been developed in the case. And of course, those

8:40

are the two people who

8:42

appear in the final

8:44

pages of the case file, where the case

8:46

file ends. Did they

8:48

mention that there's any person, like did they say that they

8:50

have people of interest or what did they say about that?

8:53

They did not say that. They did not say

8:55

that they have any persons of interest. Yeah.

8:57

And I did, I believe, over a year ago. I took

8:59

it as murder with the way that it was being said

9:08

and the way that it was being reported. Yeah,

9:10

I'll be the first to admit because it wouldn't

9:13

have been in development if it

9:15

was still a homicide in that context. You know

9:17

what I mean? So

9:19

this has just all been very disappointing

9:21

and confusing because a year ago, it

9:24

seemed like they were on

9:26

a track. It

9:29

seemed like there was more developments

9:31

a year ago than there is

9:33

today. And that is highly, highly

9:35

concerning. I mean, I guess

9:38

we have to take the positive here. And

9:41

it's a great thing that, Eric,

9:43

you got that meeting to begin with for

9:46

Sandy. I think Sandy definitely

9:48

deserves that kind of face time with

9:50

important people. And I have not talked

9:53

to her following it, but I'm sure

9:55

she's greatly, greatly appreciative of just that

9:57

because that's all that she's wanted just based.

10:00

updates of what

10:02

they know, what they don't and what they're doing.

10:04

It was definitely not a blow off meeting,

10:07

Mandy, because there was one,

10:09

two, three, four, five, there was

10:12

six very important people in that

10:14

meeting. Some that came from across

10:16

town. And if it

10:18

was a blow off meeting, it would have been

10:20

five minutes with just an assistant, I just didn't,

10:23

I'd been in blow off meetings and you've been

10:25

in blow off meetings too. I didn't take it

10:27

as such, but I did take it as a

10:29

meeting that they don't have a lot to

10:33

say or show at this time. Right.

10:35

And I think that it, I

10:37

still believe that this case can

10:40

be absolutely cracked with one to

10:42

two people talking. And I believe

10:44

that one to two people

10:46

out there, maybe three who

10:48

knew what happened could absolutely change the

10:51

game. And so we are still begging

10:53

people to contact Sled,

10:55

contact us. Contact,

10:57

if you don't trust Sled, contact

10:59

us, but please, please, please contact

11:02

Sled in the attorney general's office.

11:05

This case is still ongoing. I

11:07

also want to be clear that the

11:09

people out there who knew what happened

11:12

and who are bearing

11:14

these secrets, they are not in the

11:16

clear by any means. And

11:18

the fact that all of these important people showed up to

11:20

this, that shows that. I

11:23

mean, this is still ongoing and that

11:25

is the good news. The bad news

11:27

is that it just seems

11:29

like we just have the,

11:32

it's not bad news, but we just

11:34

got to keep pushing. So I'm a

11:36

little, I have to say this,

11:38

and I think that this is something that I hope

11:41

makes it back to the AG's office and to Sled,

11:44

but you mentioned that there

11:46

was a chilling effect when the

11:48

state highway patrol released the case

11:50

file, right? So we

11:52

talked about that before on the show and

11:55

how that could be seen as a

11:57

strategy that was done, you know,

11:59

could. was that done on purpose to create

12:02

that chilling effect, right? Because it was a

12:04

very unusual move at the time and

12:06

it has actually had that effect. I do

12:08

think that the AG's office and Sled need

12:10

to change their tactic a little when it

12:12

comes to the investigation. So, we say, oh

12:14

yeah, there's people who know and those people,

12:16

you know, you might think that like the

12:18

rest of your life is going to be

12:20

lived and you're going to get away with

12:22

this. But, you know, I'll say

12:25

this, like cases get solved every day that are

12:27

50 years old. So, it's not going anywhere. Everybody's

12:29

going to talk at some point. But

12:32

that said, why aren't

12:34

the AG and Sled looking at

12:37

the, like do an investigation of

12:39

the investigation? Okay, so

12:41

let's look at it this way. When

12:43

the boat crash happened, there was, there

12:45

were accusations of this obstruction of justice,

12:47

right? And just how

12:49

things were diverted, how decisions were made, what

12:51

have you. That same thing

12:53

seems to have happened with the state

12:56

highway patrol, right? And we're

12:58

just, I'm just going off of that decision

13:00

to release that case file unredacted with

13:02

witnesses' names out there, with their

13:04

interviews out there, recordings of their

13:07

interviews. Why doesn't the

13:09

AG, like AG's office and Sled, why

13:11

aren't they looking into the potential of

13:14

obstruction of justice and go that route

13:16

and find out? Because if you start

13:18

at the top of, if something, and

13:21

I'm saying if there was obstruction of

13:23

justice here, won't that lead a breadcrumb

13:25

trail if it did exist to potentially

13:27

what happened that night? It

13:29

could, absolutely. You know, obstruction of justice

13:32

is really a great

13:35

charge when you're trying to figure

13:37

out the main crime. Because

13:41

it says that people are

13:43

actively trying to suppress information,

13:45

whether they're threatening others, whether

13:47

they're bribing others, whether it's

13:49

a quid pro quo not

13:51

to talk or say this.

13:55

That could happen. And it very well

13:57

may be, you know, look, Creighton's running

13:59

this investigation. Smart dude. And.

14:02

You know, We. Have to trust

14:04

him that he's going to see

14:06

this through the end. because you

14:08

know he said one thing You

14:11

know. They. Work methodically and it

14:13

may not be in the sequence that

14:15

you and I and Mandy want them

14:17

to work. For instance, they brought the

14:19

financial crimes against Alex for this out

14:21

of your case and they waited a

14:23

long time. Before. They brought

14:26

the murder charge and it's incremental

14:28

and we were very critical in

14:30

the fall of Twenty Twenty One

14:32

through Twenty Twenty Two of the

14:34

pace of what they were doing

14:36

and does he said basically trust

14:39

in the process on. They.

14:41

Have a process that they fall that's different

14:43

than the timelines that we want and the

14:45

sequence that we think they should do. I

14:47

did say and I name some names

14:50

of people that I. Believe.

14:52

Should be asked to. Do you

14:54

know anything? What? May have

14:56

happened to Steve and not of where you have

14:58

in a relationship with. I'm not. Did you kill

15:00

loan or were you in a car? Where? and.

15:03

But. You. Know. This.

15:05

Is a small area where so

15:08

that was a big time. Death.

15:11

Okay, that wasn't just and eighty eight

15:13

year old man fell off a tractor

15:15

and die. That. Was a nineteen

15:17

year old kid that was a seminal

15:20

death. If there's such a word, a

15:22

seminal Death. Paul and

15:24

Maggie were seminal. Desk Mallory

15:26

Beach was a seminal death.

15:29

Gory. Satterfield turned out to be a seminal

15:31

death, but not when it happened. But.

15:33

A ninety year old kid. Is.

15:36

A seminal death. And I

15:38

think in that community in that

15:40

school remember he was just that

15:42

a high school just about use

15:44

technical college. There. There's

15:46

a close knit group of people. He

15:49

may not have been in the group

15:51

of people that knows, but enough of

15:53

people didn't talk and I I honestly

15:55

believe that. The. there are

15:57

people carrying around the knowledge of what happens

16:00

And they're just not sharing it. And I

16:02

think there are law enforcement officers who are

16:04

carrying the knowledge of what might have gone

16:07

down in terms of decisions that were made

16:09

behind the scenes to further investigate, not

16:11

further investigate, to release the whole case

16:13

file to the public and expose the witnesses. So

16:17

I do think if they're not already looking

16:19

into that, I think that that's a tactic that

16:22

they should explore. Start from

16:24

the, you know, start from the other end.

16:26

It's not necessarily an expectation I have of a

16:28

timeline. It's just obviously the old way isn't working.

16:30

So let's come up with a new way. Let's

16:33

look at, let's try a different trail

16:35

where breadcrumbs can lead us. And I

16:37

think if we're going to trust anyone, it's

16:39

Creighton Waters. So I don't think it's really

16:42

a trust issue. It's just more

16:44

a question of whether they're going to approach

16:46

this from a different angle. There

16:49

are plenty of law enforcement officers who have

16:51

retired since Steven died nine years

16:54

ago. Plenty of law

16:56

enforcement officers who have retired. There are

16:58

also plenty who have gone on TV

17:00

shows saying that something was wrong with

17:03

the investigation, but not specifically saying like

17:05

who was pressuring them, what was going

17:07

on? Like

17:09

start there. Start with those officers who have

17:12

gone on all the documentaries and seen

17:14

what was the pressure,

17:16

what was going on in the investigation. Here's

17:20

the reality though. By defining

17:22

it as a cold case, it's not

17:24

at the front of the list

17:26

of cases that they're going to probably

17:29

devote all their resources

17:31

and time. We

17:33

have a drug problem in our

17:35

state. We have fentanyl

17:37

coming into this state. We

17:40

have environmental polluting going on.

17:42

Things that are touching people

17:45

today. Right now, Steven's death

17:47

touches us, touches our listeners,

17:50

and touches Sandy. But

17:52

it's a death that already occurred.

17:54

But when we have things like

17:57

fentanyl taking place and current investigation.

18:00

the Guatturi crimes, you know what I'm

18:02

saying? And even though

18:04

they didn't say Stephen is not number one

18:06

in the list, I think by

18:08

nature of being a cold case, it's never

18:10

going to be number one on the list

18:13

like Alex and Maggie and Paul. I would

18:15

ordinarily agree with you on that, but here's the

18:17

thing. This case is one they

18:19

chose to take. They chose it.

18:22

They said that this was important to

18:24

them. They have taken a bow

18:26

before they had something to take a bow about

18:28

in some ways. I'm not talking about necessarily the

18:30

AG's office alone. I

18:32

think that this is a case that

18:35

yes, it's just one boy, one, one case, one situation.

18:41

This case is here now because of

18:43

a failure of the system. So

18:47

I think that this is different. I don't think it's

18:49

just a cold case. I don't think it's just your

18:51

ordinary, they ran into a brick

18:53

wall. The brick wall was built in front of them

18:55

and that's, that's always going to

18:57

be in my position on it. The brick wall is built in

18:59

front of them. They didn't hit a wall. The wall hit them.

19:01

So I think they have an obligation.

19:04

They have an obligation just to follow this through.

19:06

I hear you. Liz, what is the definition of a

19:08

cold case? So a cold case is generally

19:10

seen as an old case, right? Because when you

19:13

hear about it in the news, it's usually these

19:15

cases from the, you know, 1980, 1950s, whatever. But

19:19

a cold case is just simply means when

19:21

a law enforcement officer or sorry, an investigator

19:23

has run out of the leads. So a

19:25

case can go cold almost right away. If

19:27

you, if you don't have, you know, once

19:30

you get your forensics back, once you have

19:32

interviewed all the witnesses and what have you.

19:34

It loses its pulse is what you're saying.

19:36

Yeah, essentially. You seem upset, Mandy.

19:39

Why are you not upset? You're frustrated.

19:41

What's your frustration about? The

19:45

whole thing is just frustrating. I

19:47

think everybody in journalism and as

19:49

in police work and lawyers, they

19:52

all have the one case that haunts them. And this is

19:54

it for me. This is the one that like I, I

20:00

feel stuck in,

20:02

and I feel like I can't

20:04

move on from, into anything else

20:06

without getting answers in this case.

20:09

And we have tried and tried and

20:11

tried, and it's just

20:13

extremely frustrating. And it's extremely

20:16

frustrating with how

20:18

much we know this hurts Sandy and how

20:20

much we know that this hurts

20:22

the family. And

20:25

I don't want to go too hard on

20:27

the Attorney General's office, but I will say

20:29

that it is frustrating when I'm seeing his

20:31

Twitter account and he's clearly prioritizing

20:33

a lot of political aspirations

20:35

and a lot of political

20:38

endeavors over just straight up

20:40

murder cases and over public

20:43

safety. And we'll talk about that

20:45

in a minute with the Kaluchi

20:47

case and his office's handling of

20:49

that. But yeah, I'm just really

20:52

frustrated. And we'll talk

20:54

about Kaluchi after the break. How

21:04

would you like to look five

21:06

years younger? In clinical study, people

21:08

who had volume added with Juvederm

21:11

Voluma XC in the cheeks perceived

21:13

themselves as looking five years younger

21:15

at six months after treatment. Look

21:17

younger, feel like you. Add

21:20

volume for lift and contour in the cheeks

21:22

with Juvederm Voluma XC. Reverse signs

21:24

of aging by adding volume to smooth

21:27

laugh lines with Juvederm Volular XC. For

21:30

important safety information and to

21:32

find a licensed specialist, visit

21:34

juvederm.com. That's j-u-v-e-d-e-r-m.com. Not

21:40

for people with severe allergic reactions, allergy,

21:42

steliticane or the proteins used in Juvederm.

21:45

Common side effects include injection site

21:47

redness, swelling, pain, tenderness, firmness, lumps,

21:49

bumps, bruising, discoloration or itching. There's

21:52

a risk of unintentional injection into

21:54

a blood vessel which can cause

21:56

vision, abnormalities, blindness, stroke, temporary scabs

21:58

or scarring. to a licensed

22:00

specialist to find out if it's right for you. Want

22:04

to temporarily restore definition in your

22:07

jawline where it's been lost over

22:09

time? With Juvederm Velux XC, you

22:11

can get a non-surgical jawline treatment

22:14

that adds volume for smooth contour

22:16

and to reduce the appearance of

22:18

jowls in one in-office treatment with

22:21

little downtime. Juvederm Velux XC injectable

22:23

gel is the first and only

22:25

hyaluronic acid filler that improves moderate

22:28

to severe loss of jawline definition.

22:30

For important safety information and to

22:32

find a licensed specialist, visit juvederm.com.

22:36

That's j-u-v-e-d-e-r-m.com. Not

22:40

for people with severe allergic reactions, allergies

22:43

to lidocaine or the proteins used in Juvederm.

22:45

Common side effects include injections

22:47

like redness, swelling, pain, tenderness,

22:49

firmness, lumps bumps, bruising, discoloration

22:51

or itching. There's a risk

22:54

of unintentional injection into a

22:56

blood vessel which can cause

22:58

vision abnormalities, blindness, stroke, temporary

23:00

scabs or scarring. Talk to

23:02

a licensed specialist to find

23:04

out if it's right for

23:06

you. Visit juvederm.com. That's j-u-v-e-d-e-r-m.com.

23:17

So, Eric, yeah, we're frustrated. I mean,

23:19

I don't want to hurt people's feelings

23:21

and obviously we trust Creighton. We

23:24

know if anyone's going to follow through, it's going

23:27

to be him. But like Mandy said, the attorney

23:29

general, I get it, like the attorney general position

23:31

is a political one. And, you know, that's their

23:33

kind of all for one and one for all

23:35

when it comes to the party lines. But

23:38

it's sort of hard for us to understand

23:41

how that's justified when it comes to

23:43

you're trying to solve cases

23:45

outside of the state almost. Or like you're

23:48

like jumping in these fights that are

23:50

national instead of at the state level.

23:52

So, I don't know. Right, and I

23:54

don't think it should be a political

23:56

position. I think that it's really hard

23:58

for us to understand that. It's really

24:00

weird that an attorney general has to decide.

24:02

I absolutely agree with you. Right. I

24:05

think that, and while I think it's very weird

24:07

that our attorney general has to be either Republican

24:09

or Democrat because the law should be the law

24:11

and they should be focused

24:13

on things happening in our state, not things

24:16

that are aligning with national political parties that

24:18

have no interest of what is going on

24:20

in the state of South Carolina. And

24:23

it's just extremely frustrating and I think that

24:25

that's an example of it

24:27

right now. We

24:30

just keep coming across

24:32

cases where, and the other thing

24:34

I'm frustrated with, I'll continue

24:36

this thought, the other thing that I'm really

24:38

frustrated with is just the system as a

24:40

whole. I'm very frustrated.

24:42

I know that they're trying. I know

24:44

Creighton is trying really hard and I'm

24:47

very, very thankful for his work, but

24:49

I also understand that there

24:51

are not a lot of resources in

24:53

the attorney general's office. I think there

24:56

are enough and I don't know

24:58

how they're being dedicated. I don't know how

25:00

many are being dedicated for all of these

25:02

national lawsuits because every other day we see

25:04

that Alan Wilson is suing Joe

25:07

Biden for something, et cetera, et cetera.

25:09

And it really doesn't have to do

25:11

with the local core issues and the

25:13

crime in our state. The attorney general

25:16

should be managing the crime

25:18

in our state and I don't think that

25:20

the position is doing that. It's just way

25:22

more political. However, how

25:24

about managed prosecutors? Because you look at

25:26

the Kooluche case was, BAG's office will

25:28

tell you over and over again, they

25:30

don't do murder cases, right? They don't

25:32

do homicides. They do more

25:35

child exploitation, human trafficking, like

25:38

larger scale issues that involve multiple

25:40

ponies. So why are

25:42

they taking a case? I mean, fine,

25:44

you have to take a case because

25:47

the prosecution in the circuit is recusing

25:49

itself, but it would seem to me

25:51

that maybe that's a problem. The AG

25:53

has authority over these individual prosecutor's offices.

25:56

If they can't handle these murder cases,

25:58

for instance, like the... The

26:00

14th Circuit can't handle Seidens' case, so obviously

26:02

it has to go to the AG's office.

26:05

But maybe it's time for a special

26:07

prosecutor, too. I mean, maybe they give

26:09

it to David Pascoe or something, you

26:11

know? Somebody who can have

26:14

a little bit more focus on it or to

26:16

follow through with it. I don't like the idea

26:18

of Sandy being told that there's more important cases

26:20

because they chose to take it. –

26:23

Cases that are more urgent. –

26:25

Okay, so urgent. I just don't like her being

26:27

told. I mean, if that was the sense that

26:29

she walked away from that meeting, is that

26:32

there's more urgent cases than Stevens, then that's

26:34

not the message I like coming from

26:36

that. – Urgent to come up out of

26:38

the woodwork that you

26:40

don't anticipate. – Oh, gotcha. – That's

26:42

what they were saying. They're not pushing

26:44

Stevens' case off. I don't want that

26:47

to be what you

26:49

walk away with it from. But there

26:51

was a realization that this is an

26:53

older case and that, you

26:55

know, there are emergency things that pop

26:58

up that require a lot of different

27:00

things. This was a cold case. That's

27:02

how they're defining it. And

27:04

you know, there's a lot of people don't want it

27:06

to be solved. I'm sure there's a lot of people

27:08

that don't want this case to be solved, right? I

27:10

mean, in the low country. But

27:13

I didn't find in that room that there were people that

27:15

didn't want that to be solved. I found

27:17

in that room that there was a genuine intent

27:19

to see a resolution of this case.

27:21

– Yeah. This is hard, Eric,

27:23

because there's so much going on, I think, with the

27:25

AG's office in our realm right now. So

27:28

you know, last week we had sort

27:30

of maybe the most disappointing – disappointed

27:33

I've ever been in Alan Wilson's

27:35

office. We have been

27:38

reporting for quite some time that

27:40

the AG's office didn't seem

27:42

to know where Michael Kaluchi

27:44

was, meaning that his bond

27:46

conditions, as they stated them

27:48

to us, could not possibly have existed that

27:50

way, because he didn't live where

27:53

they told us he was under house

27:55

arrest. And right as we

27:57

were finishing up the episode of True Sunlight last week

27:59

–. We found out from

28:01

a source that Michael is not on

28:03

house or us and in a isn't

28:05

soft on an ankle monitor which is

28:08

something that we came to the cheese

28:10

office with an ass in several different

28:12

ways because we believed him to be

28:14

on an ankle monitor. So. For.

28:16

Them to give us misinformation and then let

28:18

us run with it. For. Weeks on end.

28:20

Was his bond modified? Did they didn't

28:22

know ago? His bond with modified in

28:24

two thousand and eighteen during the trial

28:26

date the Pilot: Instead of having him

28:28

in the holding cell overnight, they gave

28:30

him an ankle monitor and allowed him

28:33

to stay at a nearby hotel with

28:35

Andy Savage such doubtless had been assigned

28:37

know ah night at the. Bar. Fun

28:39

Fun Fun Room service!

28:43

Or don't. Let about less about my

28:45

gray. Of them

28:47

fell out again and imagine there are worse

28:50

scenario is getting stuck with your client and

28:52

and vice versa. But would you do that?

28:54

Eric. Know. Would you say let's

28:56

go on? Yes! I. Am know, I

28:58

know, I just yes, I've had clients

29:00

that are my friends and civil cases

29:02

yes But in criminal cases now I

29:05

I think you gotta. Have a

29:07

line of demarcation that you don't break. You

29:09

eat, you don't want to let your shirt

29:11

down in front of them. and they shouldn't

29:13

let their shared down in front of you.

29:15

There has to be some clear wall between

29:18

the two two of you. So, and he's

29:20

a pro. He? Yeah, yeah, maybe they were

29:22

saying the same hotel, but I'm not sure

29:24

they were staying in the same room and

29:26

Grand Do. and that's why I'm I'm picturing

29:28

Andy with a big long sleeping cap on

29:31

and submitting Michael and and nice. But

29:34

as. i

29:36

guess the question i have for you

29:39

though is is it normal for an

29:41

attorney to be seen as sort of

29:43

the i don't want to see baby

29:45

sitter but sort of like in charge

29:48

of where their client is staying know

29:50

and i'll stop because now right because

29:52

evoke hulu t from what i understand

29:55

what sources tell me if he called

29:57

it the andes office according to my

29:59

sources and said that he

30:01

wanted Michael Colucci out of his house.

30:04

And this is in 2016, and I

30:06

just don't know what Andy, why is

30:08

that Andy's responsibility? I get that he's

30:11

being paid, but that just doesn't

30:13

seem like a lawyer's responsibility. So

30:16

you're not held personally accountable if

30:18

your client doesn't

30:20

adhere to bond conditions

30:23

or doesn't wear the ankle monitor

30:25

regularly or things like that. No, no,

30:28

unless, you know, and a client does have the

30:30

right to always meet with an attorney, even

30:33

if he's under, or she's under house arrest and

30:35

can come to the attorney's office. And then there's

30:38

exceptions for counseling

30:40

and medical appointments. I

30:44

will say this, that Andy

30:47

is an unusual lawyer in

30:50

that he invests a ton

30:52

of himself in his cases. He's not a

30:54

guy that takes on a lot

30:56

of cases. And when he takes it on like

30:58

the Michael Slager case, that was a case that

31:01

certainly wasn't popular. And

31:03

he fought so hard for Michael

31:06

and he genuinely liked

31:08

Michael and genuinely liked his

31:10

wife and was so scared

31:12

for the family because

31:14

they were getting death threats. There

31:17

was death threats coming everywhere, from every

31:19

angle on lawyers, on investigators, on the

31:21

family. And I

31:24

know that Andy cared enough that

31:27

he made sure that Michael and his family

31:29

were safe. So Andy's that

31:31

unusual lawyer. He really, because he

31:33

takes on these difficult cases, he

31:39

has strong feelings for his clients in a good way.

31:42

That makes sense. Yeah, that does make

31:44

sense. I know that that case affected

31:46

him deeply when he didn't

31:48

get the sentencing that he had hoped

31:50

for his client federally. No, not

31:52

from Judge Norton. No, not at all.

31:54

Yeah, yeah. So with Colucci,

31:56

though, The disappointing thing

31:59

is that we were given... Listen for me said

32:01

after we came to them with craft information

32:03

because our what we were told was that

32:05

the bond conditions that were sad during the

32:08

trial which is that he would be on

32:10

an ankle monitor. That

32:12

those still stood, that he had an

32:14

ankle monitor currently and we were told

32:16

by the age is Us Up that

32:19

wasn't the case and that he was

32:21

on house arrest and that he was

32:23

at his parents' house and so this

32:25

whole time we've been you know those

32:27

are sack that were easily disproved. But

32:30

sister find out like a week

32:32

before the trial that this person

32:34

was on ankle monitor. I guess

32:36

people might wonder why that is

32:38

significant, Why that's important. If you're

32:41

a victim or member of assembly

32:43

who had somebody or die violently

32:45

and the defendant in that case

32:47

is out on bond he has

32:49

and in jail awaiting trial, you

32:51

are always waiting for the other

32:53

shoe to drop. Because.

32:55

There is violence involved. granted me on

32:57

Michael for she says he didn't do

33:00

that. Said he's innocent where have you

33:02

but does it and Siri well may

33:04

believe that he dead as to list

33:06

outlay for so long. We're talking about

33:09

nine years now and six years since

33:11

the first child without. Knowing

33:13

what the conditions that as bond or

33:15

for without understanding that he was being

33:17

kept track of ostensibly because we know

33:19

that system sucks. That's just not. That's

33:22

not the way it should. Be for

33:24

victims Scholars A big difference between house arrest

33:26

an ankle monitoring house arrest you're sure did

33:28

somebody is in their house age but some

33:30

of these on like a minor. you're gone,

33:33

the shop. it. On. Whole

33:35

Foods or you're shopping at Publix and

33:37

you'd walk down the aisles and there

33:39

he is. So that's scary year. Charleston's

33:42

not that big. It's Yes, it's a

33:44

a big city in in the terms

33:46

of South Carolina, but you can run

33:48

into people twice in one day. Both.

33:51

In West Ashley in a male pleasant

33:53

or downtown. And. You know, So.

33:56

That scary for victim's family.

33:59

Or. I think the scary thing

34:02

that we have found is over and

34:04

over again with a Bow and Turner

34:06

End it. Case in the with this

34:08

case is that there really isn't a

34:10

system monitoring these people and monitoring his

34:12

ankle monitor is like there's no it

34:15

it. Just because there's a piece of

34:17

plastic on somebody his ankle doesn't mean

34:19

that there is somebody twenty four seven

34:21

making sure that they're not at the

34:23

victims house or making sure that the

34:26

the victim as being alerted when they're

34:28

near. There's really nothing like that. Going

34:30

on, it's justice. It seems

34:32

like a protocol. That's a

34:34

company. right? It's a company

34:36

re private. It's not

34:38

raining to poor breed. Which is

34:41

insane. A ride on profit from it,

34:43

right? They contract with local

34:45

law enforcement Solicitor's office to

34:47

provide a service and it's

34:50

one person. Probably.

34:52

In that shift would say it's

34:54

a ten o'clock This o'clock in

34:56

the morning monitoring he'll three hundred

34:58

people. Play. It. But there's

35:00

also no incentives. I have no incentive

35:02

to call it out when somebody is

35:04

violating bearer. Bonds

35:06

and. Then they

35:09

lose. That guy goes to jail and

35:11

they lose a customer. Hundred.

35:13

And thirty five dollars a week or one eight was

35:15

at one seventy five a week or something about is

35:17

a hero up from some people to lot of money.

35:20

For their customers, the sake, of

35:22

course there's I don't wanna lose

35:24

a cancer rate like when Bolland

35:27

Turner violated his sixty different times

35:29

and it was only after Sarah

35:31

Forward and Chloe Best parents and

35:33

several people made several complaints that

35:35

they realize how many times that

35:38

he live in just because people

35:40

kept seeing him and public and

35:42

people kept seeing and then these

35:44

different spots is that they notice

35:46

like no one's really looking at

35:48

their and he was. by he

35:50

violated it over sixty times and even

35:53

after that they didn't they gave him

35:55

a plea deal and did nothing with

35:57

that like there was no repercussions for

35:59

that whatsoever I just think,

36:01

I mean, we keep screaming about these

36:03

things over and over because we just

36:06

keep seeing like these big flashing lights

36:08

with the justice system. And this is

36:10

a huge one of there is a

36:13

giant disconnect between the ankle monitoring system

36:15

and the justice system and actual public

36:17

safety and people, keeping people safe. I

36:20

feel like it's almost a huge, it

36:22

is, it's a huge disservice to victims

36:24

to tell people, oh, they're out on

36:26

bond, but they're on an ankle monitor

36:30

when that's just a piece of plastic.

36:32

That doesn't really mean anything at all

36:34

except for the only, the

36:37

only thing that it could do is

36:39

that if that person committed a crime,

36:41

they might be able to walk back

36:43

the GPS and see where, where

36:45

that person was during the crime maybe. But

36:49

it's, it's worth it. I've definitely seen it,

36:52

Mandy, where a guy on an ankle monitor

36:54

was in the area of where a murder

36:56

happened on Hilton Head. And

36:59

I mean, that seems like a slam dunk,

37:01

right? You're like, oh, we got the

37:03

guy who's out on bond for murder

37:05

and now there's another murder and they

37:07

had beef and it was not enough

37:09

to get prosecutors interested in that. I

37:11

mean, I see him all the time. You

37:13

go in the summer, you know,

37:16

to a convenience store, pump a gas or

37:18

you go to a fast food restaurant and

37:20

you're waiting in line and people are wearing

37:23

shorts. You know, somebody's got an

37:25

ankle bracelet monitor on. What does that mean?

37:27

You know, some people like

37:30

when Greg Leone had an ankle bracelet, it

37:32

was to house and to work. And,

37:36

you know, he wasn't allowed to go

37:38

to Chick-fil-A and stand in the line. You're not

37:40

allowed to do that. When,

37:42

when you are under house arrest

37:44

or with exceptions for work and

37:47

your attorneys, you can't make a break for

37:49

Dunkin Donuts. You could call up and say,

37:51

look, I got a flat tire. I got

37:53

to go to Nuddles and get my tire

37:56

plugged or whatever. But you just can't stop

37:58

and get ice cream at Pelicans. you

38:00

know, but you see people do that and you wonder how

38:02

are they doing that? But if

38:05

you do, I think like

38:07

Greg Leon, he obviously had attorneys who

38:10

were like, you cannot do listen, you

38:12

cannot do this, it could compromise your

38:14

entire case, blah blah blah and I'm

38:16

sure he was smart enough to understand

38:18

that. The problem is, is

38:21

there's lots of people that

38:23

just like Bowen Turner who just they

38:25

hear one thing, a set of directions

38:28

and they do what they want to

38:30

do and I have never known anybody

38:32

who was on an ankle monitor, I will

38:35

admit and I didn't know a

38:37

whole lot about the system until the Bowen Turner

38:39

case and silly me, I

38:41

thought that it would be something like,

38:44

oh, if you go to McDonald's, then it's going to

38:46

be like beep beep beep beep beep

38:48

and then it beeps in the

38:50

police station, right? Beeps in the police

38:52

station, beep beep beep and then the police

38:55

dispatch somebody and then they come and get

38:57

you and put you in jail. That's what

38:59

I've done and it's nothing

39:01

like that at all, unfortunately

39:04

and again, the technology

39:06

exists for that to

39:08

be possible. The technology

39:10

is all there. We have AI, Mandy,

39:12

like let's get a robot on this,

39:15

like let's get somebody to analyze this.

39:17

I can tell where somebody just from

39:19

their phone had lunch yesterday, we should

39:22

be able to have an

39:24

AI tell us that this is the

39:26

printout of this person's GPS

39:29

coordinates and these are not within the

39:31

scope of where he was supposed to

39:33

be. I had a case in Greenville

39:35

where a guy who was

39:37

an ankle bracelet on Columbia couldn't leave Columbia

39:39

proper, went to Greenville and murdered somebody. How

39:42

did that happen? And he was there

39:44

in Greenville for two weeks. He was

39:47

in Greenville for two whole weeks and

39:49

he was not supposed to leave Columbia proper. But

39:52

we ask how that happened. I mean, it's because

39:54

there's no system in place to stop it. How

39:57

does it happen? All these guys talk. to

40:00

each other and they're like, oh yeah, I was able to

40:02

go to McDonald's and I was able to go to Greenville

40:04

and I went to North Carolina

40:06

last week and blah, blah, blah and they

40:08

haven't done anything. And that stuff gets around

40:10

and it's very obvious why this is happening.

40:12

The problem is, do we have legislators to

40:15

fix it and do they care enough? No,

40:17

because they're the ones who created it. They're

40:20

the ones who prioritize private profit. Right,

40:22

and they're making money off of it. Mm-hmm.

40:24

Gross. It's just so gross. But I guess

40:26

with Koji, I mean, I think he's getting

40:29

off easy because he has just the one

40:31

ankle monitor. You know,

40:33

Porell Russell, he had the two. He

40:36

had double. And he had double.

40:38

But do you remember Russell talking

40:41

about like what a headache it

40:43

was to charge both his legs?

40:46

I was thinking about that because, you know,

40:48

from what I understand about some people who

40:50

are on ankle monitors is they

40:53

might use that charging time to go to

40:55

someplace where they shouldn't be, like a bar

40:57

or some sort of transaction that might be

40:59

illegal, that kind of thing. Don't you have

41:01

to charge it by plugging it in the wall and then

41:03

plugging it into the monitor? Oh,

41:06

sorry. Yeah, they, sorry. They let it die. Yes.

41:09

Sorry. Yes, they let it die. Correct. Am

41:11

I bad? Yes. Yes. There's some people

41:13

who let their monitors routinely

41:16

die. And they wait to see

41:18

if that phone call comes in from

41:20

the monitoring company. And if they give

41:22

you an hour or two hours before

41:25

they call, I've seen this, then

41:27

they know they have that window and

41:30

they go do things during

41:32

that downtime. It's

41:34

not an instantaneous phone call that you

41:36

get like, Hey, Mandy, your monitor just

41:38

went off, you know, and I'm calling

41:41

you 30 seconds later.

41:43

Right. And it's also not like we

41:46

were talking about. It's not like there's

41:48

an alarm and the police are called

41:50

and immediately dispatched to your house. It's

41:52

a phone call that you can probably

41:55

not answer for a while and

41:57

still get away with it being

41:59

off. for a while and that's again

42:02

it's just it's worthless and until we we

42:05

fix it and until we have actual repercussions

42:08

to if you violate

42:10

your your ankle monitor and

42:14

if you are if you're caught it

42:16

should just say you go back to jail straight

42:21

to jail if you're caught if you're

42:23

caught doing anything that we told

42:26

you not to do you go back straight

42:28

to jail because you're on bond here and

42:30

it is a privilege that you are on

42:33

bond and we can revoke that at any

42:35

time and I feel like our government just

42:37

does not use that enough. You know

42:39

they sure don't there's just such a dichotomy

42:41

between what legislators say they want they want

42:44

to be tough on crime they want to

42:46

protect the public but really what they

42:49

want is to help their friends profit

42:51

and to pretend that the system is

42:53

working just fine the way it is. And

42:56

with that we'll take a break and be

42:58

right back. Y'all

43:08

I am so excited to

43:10

tell you about our new

43:12

Aqua true water purifier. Aqua

43:14

true purifiers use a four-stage

43:16

reverse osmosis purification process and

43:18

their countertop purifiers work with

43:20

no installation or plumbing. It

43:23

removes 15 times

43:25

more contaminants than ordinary pitcher filters

43:27

and we are enjoying the benefits

43:29

every day and you don't have

43:31

to worry about PFAs or other

43:33

harmful contaminants. Best of all our

43:36

water tastes fantastic it is

43:38

even portable making it perfect for

43:40

renters or college dorms or even

43:42

when embedded in a trial. Aqua

43:44

true comes with a 30-day money-back

43:46

guarantee and even makes a great

43:49

gift. Today my listeners received 20%

43:52

off any Aqua true purifier just go

43:54

to aquatru.com that's a

43:56

q u a t r u.com and

44:00

inner code COJ at checkout. That's

44:02

20% off any AquaTrue water purifier

44:04

when you go to aquatru.com and

44:07

use promo code COJ. Shout

44:11

out to Claritin for supporting this

44:13

episode and providing us with samples.

44:15

It has been wonders for our

44:17

seasonal allergies. We recently started feeling

44:19

the effects of spring. Luckily for

44:22

those of us who live with

44:24

the symptoms of allergies, we can

44:26

live Claritin Clear with Claritin D.

44:28

Designed for serious allergy sufferers, Claritin

44:30

D has two powerful ingredients in

44:33

just one pill that relieve your

44:35

allergy symptoms and decongest your nose

44:37

so that you can breathe better.

44:39

This double action combination of prescription

44:41

strength allergy medicine and the best

44:43

decongestant available relieve sneezing, itchy and

44:45

watery eyes and itchy nose and

44:48

throat, sinus congestion and pressure with

44:50

ease. Ready to live life as

44:52

if you don't have any allergies?

44:54

It is time to live Claritin

44:56

Clear. Fast and powerful relief is

44:58

just a quick trip away. Ask

45:00

for Claritin D at your pharmacy

45:02

counter. You don't even need a

45:04

prescription. Go to claritin.com right now

45:06

for a discount so you can

45:08

live Claritin Clear. Use as directed.

45:15

So are we gonna talk about the wacky preacher? I think

45:17

we have to. Yes, also known

45:19

as the Micah Miller case. We

45:22

have to talk about it. It's really,

45:25

really sad. I mean, I've

45:27

been diving into this case for

45:29

all of seven hours so bear

45:32

with me on details here but

45:34

I've already gotten a couple sources

45:36

and already have

45:38

my bearings about it and

45:41

it's just a really horrifically

45:43

sad situation. Her name was

45:45

Micah Miller. She is like

45:48

me from Kansas and eventually moved to

45:50

South Carolina. She was 30 years old

45:53

and she was married to a preacher

45:55

named JP Miller who

45:58

was the preacher. at

46:00

Solid Rock Church in Myrtle Beach

46:03

and on April 27th a couple weeks ago, Micah

46:10

was found dead of at least one

46:12

gunshot wound that we know of in

46:15

a park in Lumberton, North

46:17

Carolina which is a little

46:19

bit north of Myrtle Beach. And

46:22

I think the biggest red flag

46:24

is that authorities... there's

46:26

also breaking news in this case,

46:28

the medical examiner has said that

46:30

her wound was self-inflicted and that's

46:33

why we're involved here because

46:35

it seems like there needs to

46:37

be a lot more than a wound

46:40

to tell if somebody else

46:42

was involved. By all indications

46:45

if somebody was leaving breadcrumbs saying

46:47

this is the person who is

46:49

going to murder me, that is

46:52

what Micah did. She

46:54

left a trail of breadcrumbs

46:56

including she was filing for

46:58

divorce already and that was

47:00

official. Both of her

47:02

siblings have filed affidavit saying that there

47:05

was abuse in the marriage, that he

47:07

was an abusive husband and

47:09

that she was worried for her safety, she was

47:11

worried for her life and she even went to

47:13

the extent to saying that if I'm

47:16

found with a bullet in my head it is not

47:18

me, it is him.

47:20

And it's just heartbreaking that

47:22

this woman left so many crumbs

47:25

and did so many things and

47:28

still it seems like authorities

47:30

are pushing back a bit.

47:33

The narrative is it doesn't

47:35

look like a suicide and all

47:38

surrounding evidence points to

47:40

a murder and points

47:42

to him being the

47:44

number one suspect. Well let's break

47:46

this down. I mean to suicide they

47:49

would have to say that she had

47:51

gunpowder residue on her hand

47:54

and that's how they must have determined

47:57

it was self-inflicted because I can put a

47:59

gun god forbid. up to your head and

48:01

shoot you and drop the gun

48:03

and I have a rubber glove on and then

48:05

I put your fingerprints on it, but

48:08

you won't have gunpowder residue on it. Or I

48:10

could hold your hand up and do it, then

48:12

you could have gunpowder residue on it. The

48:15

thing that really stuck out

48:17

to me was he proceeded

48:20

from the pulpit to talk

48:22

about her alleged mental problems.

48:24

That no one

48:28

in the parish knew that

48:31

she was – God forbid he

48:33

said she committed, tried to commit suicide

48:36

a number of times that she was

48:38

committed. What husband would publicly talk about

48:40

that, about their wife? I mean,

48:42

that to me was fitting into

48:45

the narrative that it was a self-inflicted

48:47

killing because she had all these mental

48:49

problems. Right. And I mean,

48:51

I think the biggest thing that I –

48:53

the biggest red flag that I've seen so

48:55

far is that he announced to the entire

48:57

church the next day that

49:00

his wife was dead because

49:02

of suicide and that she had

49:04

all these mental health problems. And

49:07

that was very not only strange to

49:09

do – to announce it in that

49:11

way, but at that time, it seems

49:13

like authorities had not ruled it as

49:16

a suicide. Right. So what husband, if

49:19

you truly care about your wife in any

49:21

way, shape, or form, would be

49:23

so quick to announce that it's suicide

49:25

and not be worried and say,

49:28

I don't know

49:30

why she was up there. I don't know what – I

49:33

hope that they investigate this, and I hope they

49:35

find out what happened to her. I'm not sure

49:37

if it was a suicide or if she was

49:39

murdered, but I want people – I want answers.

49:42

I want answers. Right. That's the normal

49:44

thing. That investigation takes place.

49:47

Right, but he did the opposite of that, which

49:50

is – and then, Liz, what did he say

49:52

when he stood up before

49:54

everybody? He told everyone to stand.

49:56

So he said that he had an announcement to make

49:58

and that he wanted everyone to stand. be quiet and

50:00

that they should stand up and

50:02

he said that he wanted to say

50:04

this and then have them leave and

50:06

not talk about it. So

50:09

essentially it's he didn't want any reaction

50:11

from them he instructed them that as

50:13

well and then he went on to

50:16

announce her death and

50:19

there's a couple of things here. Yeah if my

50:22

wife God forbid took her

50:24

life yesterday I'm not on the

50:27

pulpit tomorrow guys I'm sorry I'm gonna

50:29

have to ask a junior preacher to

50:31

take over I'm gonna be with

50:33

my kids and I'm gonna be mourning I

50:35

mean it's the strangest reaction to lose your

50:38

wife like that to say

50:40

I'm gonna pitch baseball the next day you know

50:42

what I'm saying? Right so I think it's

50:44

hard because you know I think obviously our

50:46

first like our entry into any case is

50:48

just like how the person reacted

50:51

after something like this happened and comparing

50:53

it to how we would or how

50:55

the normal person would and right

50:58

all that Alex and we're and I think a

51:00

lot of people are right in their assumptions about

51:02

people sometimes like that's an odd thing to do

51:04

after you found out that your wife died what

51:06

have you but I

51:08

think there's some bigger issues that we need

51:11

to talk about in terms because obviously like

51:13

the medical examiner has now ruled it a

51:15

suicide or you know that she took her

51:17

own life like you said Eric gun shot

51:20

residue like on your hands could

51:22

be telling but like you said it's not

51:24

also telling like if somebody's holding

51:27

a gun to your chest or to

51:29

your head or something and and you

51:32

know making you do that it makes you

51:34

wonder if they they jumped I don't

51:36

know like I hate to say it's because I don't

51:38

know enough about the case to say that I believe

51:40

the husband did this but what

51:42

worries me is that generally speaking in

51:45

cases where there is a pattern or

51:47

at least an inkling that there was

51:50

some domestic violence occurring that

51:52

there's a divorce in the works Anything

51:54

like that I Feel like there

51:56

needs to be some measure for

51:58

investigators? No matter. After what state

52:01

it is that they need to stop

52:03

what they're doing and look at this

52:05

case as any sort of other investigation

52:07

not just immediately say suicide because with

52:10

the Clergy case I think what we

52:12

lost in the investigation comes from Michael

52:14

Fluid. She be able to just say

52:17

that my wife killed or south and

52:19

then that law enforcement comes onto the

52:21

scene With that in mind and varied

52:24

see things don't get done because in

52:26

their mind this is Dave been told

52:28

it was a suicide so. When

52:30

you know that there's a history of

52:32

violence or that there's a divorce in

52:35

the works or in Michael Pooches case,

52:37

at least some evidence that there was

52:39

some source struggle or perhaps a site

52:41

before no matter what he says happened

52:43

at least you look at that. The

52:45

evidence as their and can say something

52:47

might have gone down here. You have

52:49

to stop as investigators and say we

52:51

need to treat this case it differently

52:54

and the husband. And God

52:56

help him if he is in a

52:58

sense god help the any husband who

53:00

citizen who gets blamed for his wife's

53:02

death, they need to Just under C

53:05

N.unasked this case you I'm sorry, but

53:07

this is what it looks like. From

53:09

this angle something more needs to be

53:11

done to protect women after death after

53:13

they've been killed or they die at

53:16

their own hand. Whatever it is, the

53:18

case needs to be classified as something

53:20

different and investigators need to treated differently

53:22

and and not go because it that

53:25

that. Would have they say like the

53:27

the first forty eight hours as like the

53:29

most critical on that me investigation like right

53:31

on the scene at the most part of

53:33

call and and I don't now but we

53:36

got the probate file an the the facts.

53:38

And mean, she. Filed.

53:40

For divorce a. April.

53:43

sixteenth i wanna say ah and

53:45

then he was served in the

53:47

papers two days before she was

53:50

killed and that in that's a

53:52

big it that have any there's

53:54

just a lot of red flags

53:56

but i i agree with you

53:59

liz something else has to

54:01

be done because we just see

54:03

this over and over and over again and I'm

54:07

not fully convinced just because the

54:10

medical examiner said based on the

54:12

wounds that it is a self-inflicted

54:14

wound. We've

54:20

all seen movies, people can set up a

54:24

murder to look like a suicide and in

54:27

this case I

54:29

just really hope and the other thing

54:31

is that this is the Robeson

54:34

County Sheriff's Office who it

54:36

seems like is pretty busy.

54:40

I think quite a few murders

54:42

happen there and it's

54:44

just really unfortunate that some

54:47

cases and not saying that

54:49

it's going to happen with this one but

54:51

it's just much easier for everybody to

54:54

say it was a suicide and then

54:56

to write it off as a suicide

54:58

and move on and check that box

55:00

and it's one less

55:02

open case and I'm

55:05

sure they're like everywhere. I'm

55:07

sure they're overworked and lacking

55:09

resources but couple things, this

55:11

could be within the FBI's

55:13

jurisdiction if there was any

55:15

sort of crossing borders if

55:18

he murdered her and if and

55:21

I'm saying if and again I'm

55:23

not positive one million percent that he

55:25

murdered her. I'm

55:27

just saying that there's a lot of signs that

55:30

she was very very scared of him and that there's

55:34

enough there for motive in

55:37

itself. Very strange the way he gave

55:39

a full description to

55:42

his flock. You

55:45

could say you may have heard that

55:47

my wife passed away last

55:49

night. It's very traumatic for my family and

55:51

me. I don't want to

55:53

talk about it but please say your prayers for

55:55

me. But why go into

55:57

the granular detail on that when

55:59

you... just found out 12 hours earlier and you

56:02

don't know what it was. Like

56:04

Mandy said, it could be

56:06

that she was abducted or somebody did this.

56:10

Why go into that granular detail like that

56:12

and get into her background and give a

56:14

cause of death? It's hard

56:16

to say because the evangelical churches

56:18

have very distinct relationships with

56:20

their pastors and their pastors

56:22

have very distinct relationships with

56:25

their flock. There's more of a,

56:27

not in every church, but I think in more

56:29

charismatic ones, there's a

56:32

sort of an open book kind

56:34

of mentality. I think like I'm transparent

56:37

and here, so it's hard to say

56:39

whether that's a sign of anything. When

56:42

you look into his history, he

56:44

does have violence. He's gotten in

56:46

trouble for being violent before. He

56:48

was charged with assault and battery

56:50

of a high and aggravated nature.

56:52

That's a serious felony. That's just a serious

56:55

felony. It means somebody got hurt and

56:57

you're very seriously hurt. So listen

57:00

to this though. In October

57:03

2021, he applied. This

57:07

assault and battery occurred in the late

57:09

90s and he pleaded guilty to it

57:11

in 1999. He

57:16

was sentenced to, I believe it was like four

57:18

years suspended, that kind of thing. Okay, so Eric,

57:20

when you commit a felony, admit to a felony,

57:22

what are the things that you lose as

57:24

a citizen? Right to vote, right

57:27

to hold a license. Can't be

57:29

a plumber, can't be a barber, can't be an

57:31

accountant. What kinds of things can't you maybe purchase?

57:33

Can't hold a gun. Can't hold a gun,

57:35

right? So in October

57:38

2021, this is now 22 years

57:41

after he pleaded guilty for

57:43

assault and battery of a high and aggravated

57:45

nature. He submitted

57:48

an application to be pardoned for that

57:50

crime and he was granted it five

57:53

months later, six months later, something like that. I think it was

57:55

in May 2022. He

57:57

was granted and we have the application. that

58:00

he put in for his pardon along with the

58:02

recommendation letters. We got it while we were... Was

58:04

that a federal partner or a... No, it was

58:07

state. It's state. Governor McMaster gave him

58:09

the pardon? Apparently. I mean, the

58:11

board agreed and yeah,

58:13

Governor McMaster must have agreed. And

58:15

he wrote in his reason for

58:17

requesting a pardon. And again, this

58:20

is in just two years ago.

58:23

I am seeking a pardon to restore my

58:25

civil liberties in the community that I serve

58:27

daily. As a husband,

58:29

father and pastor, the right and ability

58:32

to protect my wife and

58:34

children as well as

58:36

my congregation is imperative. So

58:39

he hasn't said firearm here,

58:42

but it sure does seem like

58:44

the reason he was seeking a pardon was

58:46

so that he could purchase a

58:49

firearm, right? Am I crazy? So

58:51

two years ago, he put in an application to

58:54

get rid of his very serious felony,

58:57

which was a violent crime for this.

59:01

So that's disconcerting. And

59:05

that's something that I'm hoping that

59:07

the sheriff's office is looking into.

59:10

What's the lead... Who's the lead investigative chair of

59:12

agency, Mandy? Is it the local or is it

59:14

the North Carolina one? Is that what we have

59:16

to find out? It's North

59:18

Carolina because she was found in North

59:20

Carolina at a state park. But Robeson

59:22

County Sheriff's Office is in charge of

59:24

the investigation as far as I know,

59:27

as state police could take over, the

59:30

FBI could take over if we find out

59:32

that it crossed state lines. I

59:36

think the problem that

59:38

we're seeing right now is that breaking

59:40

news on this as we

59:42

were talking about this, the

59:45

case is already derailed. When an

59:47

ME says it was

59:49

suicide, it just makes it incredibly

59:51

hard for a proper investigation

59:54

to occur. And just again, I want

59:56

to... When an ME says suicide based

59:58

on wounds, I really... want to ask

1:00:00

a million more questions. Just

1:00:04

like when a pathologist says it was an auto

1:00:06

accident that took Stephen Smith's life and you go

1:00:08

down that rabbit hole. You're

1:00:11

down that rabbit hole and it could

1:00:13

just be a completely incorrect rabbit hole

1:00:15

and instead I mean they need to

1:00:17

be getting GPS data of not only

1:00:20

her phone, of his phone, they

1:00:23

need to be again make it

1:00:25

whose gun is it, when was

1:00:27

it purchased and what happened with

1:00:29

that and whose fingerprints are on

1:00:32

it. I mean there's

1:00:34

a lot of things but the scary thing

1:00:36

is if this was a murder

1:00:38

and if he did it, it sounds

1:00:40

like he had been planning this for a very

1:00:42

long time and he knew where to place

1:00:46

evidence and knew how to point

1:00:49

the investigation in the wrong

1:00:51

direction and that makes it

1:00:54

a whole lot more difficult

1:00:56

but I don't think that this

1:00:58

man like Alex Marduk anticipated

1:01:00

the entire internet coming down on

1:01:03

him and looking up every move

1:01:05

that he's made and carefully watching

1:01:07

him and carefully combing through his

1:01:09

life and looking through all of

1:01:12

his very

1:01:15

alarming past. Why

1:01:17

do you have to reach a conclusion so

1:01:19

quickly? That's what I'm thinking like what is that all

1:01:21

about? What about a toxicology report

1:01:24

on her? Let's take that,

1:01:26

let's find out. So

1:01:29

execute a search warrant, go look in their

1:01:31

house, see what is in there. Is

1:01:34

that a prescription that's in the

1:01:36

house? Find out little

1:01:39

things. I mean just what's the

1:01:41

rush to reach a conclusion that

1:01:43

somebody committed suicide? Well I think

1:01:45

it's easy. It's easy for the medical examiner, he's

1:01:47

just going on the information he's gotten, what he

1:01:50

sees in front of him. It's easy for the

1:01:52

police department because they can close the case. It's

1:01:55

certainly easy for a potential if this

1:01:57

was a murderer, for the potential murderer.

1:02:00

But let's just say this, if there is

1:02:02

a woman legislator in North

1:02:04

Carolina and one in South

1:02:07

Carolina and you're listening, I

1:02:09

think it would be a very good thing to

1:02:11

do to write some

1:02:13

legislation that puts a

1:02:16

hold on any suicide case, any scene,

1:02:18

any case where it seems like a

1:02:20

woman has taken her life, where

1:02:22

like I said earlier, there's question

1:02:25

about her relationship, where there's

1:02:27

some sort of indication that

1:02:29

her not all was

1:02:31

well in her home life. It's not to

1:02:33

say that women don't take their own lives,

1:02:36

but when you complicate, when you have this

1:02:38

complicating factor of this was a fraught relationship

1:02:40

when she was actively worried about this happening

1:02:42

to her. I don't think you could, because

1:02:44

how many cases now are we going to

1:02:46

talk about this where a medical

1:02:48

examiner or a coroner

1:02:50

or what have you has put down a

1:02:52

cause of death or manner of death that

1:02:55

then screws everything up for

1:02:57

the case itself. We're dealing with this, this is

1:02:59

Sarah Lynn Kaluchi's case. It

1:03:02

was a situation with Steven's case. It

1:03:05

just seems like we're constantly talking about

1:03:07

this. We had three different death

1:03:09

certificates in Steven's case. Right. Three.

1:03:12

Right. I think first of all,

1:03:14

we're supposed to find out more about this on

1:03:17

Tuesday. The Robeson County Sheriff's Office is supposed to

1:03:19

come out with some sort of a report or

1:03:21

some sort of statement

1:03:24

saying what they have found

1:03:26

and I hope that they're

1:03:28

either investigating it thoroughly or

1:03:30

they have some really, really,

1:03:32

really convincing information that points

1:03:35

to suicide. I'm not

1:03:38

even sure if I can imagine what

1:03:40

that could be because every piece of

1:03:42

information that I'm imagining could

1:03:44

also be placed, if you know what I mean. Are

1:03:48

they being coy? Is it

1:03:50

possible that they're going

1:03:52

along with the suicide thing to watch the

1:03:55

preacher to see what he's doing and to see

1:03:57

if he lets his guard down? I

1:04:01

mean, they'd have to be pretty cunning to come up

1:04:03

with that idea in Robeson County. Because

1:04:05

it is tarnishing her name. Well, kind

1:04:08

of. I mean, there's no shame. I know that it's

1:04:10

shameful in certain religions and what have you, but I

1:04:12

don't think we want to shame people who make the decision

1:04:14

to take their lives. No,

1:04:16

but I'm just saying, you know, for him to

1:04:18

get on the pulpit and say, oh, she tried

1:04:20

a number of times to

1:04:23

commit suicide, and she had mental problems,

1:04:25

and we've committed her. I mean, they

1:04:27

stigmatized her. He's weaponizing it,

1:04:29

and that's really frustrating from, like,

1:04:32

it's so hard to articulate how

1:04:34

upsetting it is when you see

1:04:36

a man weaponize a woman's mental

1:04:38

illness. Because it is a

1:04:40

stigma. It's still, no matter how many

1:04:43

Instagram posts, no matter how many times we put

1:04:45

it out in the public, it's still a badge

1:04:48

that somebody wears where they sort of feel

1:04:50

like they have to, I don't

1:04:52

know, maybe like compensate for it. Or

1:04:55

in certain lights, it looks different, right? Like,

1:04:57

you can have depression and anxiety, and that's

1:04:59

a normal thing, and most people I know

1:05:01

have some form of it. But when you

1:05:04

start to talk about, like, somebody

1:05:06

took their own lives… Right. And

1:05:09

a couple other things I want to say.

1:05:11

It seems like they start – they at

1:05:13

least met when she was underage, and he

1:05:15

was some sort of a youth

1:05:17

pastor. I believe she was 14, 15. So,

1:05:22

he could have – that's

1:05:25

another giant red flag. But the other thing I

1:05:27

want to say before we wrap this up is

1:05:30

that with this

1:05:32

case, what

1:05:34

is different is that the family

1:05:37

seems to be very – they

1:05:39

already out of the gate seem

1:05:42

to be 100 percent

1:05:44

against the idea that it's a

1:05:47

suicide, and

1:05:49

very, very, very skeptical of him

1:05:51

and the relationship, which sometimes in

1:05:54

abusive relationships like this, the abuser

1:05:56

controls her family as well. And

1:05:58

so sometimes the – person

1:06:00

who's being abused family just kind of

1:06:02

stays quiet and stays down. But it's

1:06:04

been good to see that they are

1:06:07

taking their power back. They have a

1:06:09

lawyer. They're filing probate

1:06:11

documents. His sister is

1:06:13

in charge of got a

1:06:15

special appointment. Well, under our state

1:06:17

law, she would be appointed as

1:06:20

personal representative to pursue an investigation

1:06:22

or any wrongful death claims regarding

1:06:24

the death of her sister. Special

1:06:27

administrator. Really? Okay. All right. It's

1:06:30

just, I guess she has investigatory

1:06:32

powers and they're not pursuing any

1:06:34

legal claim yet. I mean, usually

1:06:36

it's a PR, special administrators a

1:06:38

little different, but then obviously

1:06:41

you're right. They have questions and they're going to

1:06:43

demand answers and they're going to hire their own

1:06:45

investigators and they're going to have a lawyer that's

1:06:47

going to have his ideas and possibly

1:06:50

hopefully there could be a coroner's in

1:06:52

question. Right. It's extremely important.

1:06:54

And they did the smart thing with

1:06:56

putting the family, putting in writing, what

1:06:59

they knew about the abuse of the

1:07:01

relationships and what they were questioning with

1:07:05

her death. So it doesn't get

1:07:07

all skewed within media and it

1:07:09

does the message doesn't get conflated

1:07:12

by it or it's, it's a

1:07:14

solid document showing what they knew

1:07:16

and what they believe. And that's

1:07:19

super helpful and important when it comes

1:07:21

to covering cases like this. For sure.

1:07:23

Well, that was a big episode. Cuts

1:07:25

down, everybody. Cuts down. Cuts

1:07:28

down. Kaba

1:07:36

Justice is a Luna shark production created

1:07:38

by me, Nitti Matney and co-hosted by

1:07:41

journalist Liz Farrell and attorney Eric

1:07:43

Bland. Learn more about our mission

1:07:45

and membership at lunasharkmedia.com. Interruptions

1:07:48

provided by Luna and Joe Pesky. A

1:07:53

bold approach to engineering. At

1:07:56

Bowling Green State University, our engineering

1:07:58

degrees fuse the. The Eye

1:08:00

have some traditional engineering with technology

1:08:02

and hands on skills. This.

1:08:04

Combination is what employers are looking

1:08:07

for and the up and coming

1:08:09

fields of robotics, advanced manufacturing, and

1:08:11

Systems engineering. It's. Why are

1:08:13

graduates find jobs? And why Bgs

1:08:15

you stands out. Don't.

1:08:17

Just get a degree. Secure.

1:08:19

Your future at Bgs. You.

Rate

From The Podcast

Cup Of Justice

We all want to drink from the same Cup of Justice... and it starts with learning about our legal system.With tales from the newsroom and the courtroom, co-hosts Mandy Matney, Liz Farrell and Eric Bland invite you to gain knowledge, insight, and tools to hold public agencies and officials accountable. Beginning as bonus episodes to the Murdaugh Murders Podcast with analysis of the trials of Alex Murdaugh and co-conspirators, Cup of Justice launched as its own show in January of 2023.Mandy Matney and Liz Farrell from the Murdaugh Murders Podcast and everyone’s favorite attorney Eric Bland take a hard look at everything from the state of news to important cases around the world. INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM Mandy and Liz are two of the most driven and talented investigative journalists who are revolutionizing how news is derived and delivered. Join them as they pull at threads and chase down leads to get the story straight. THE LAW With the expertise of Eric Bland, we empower listeners to understand their legal system in an entertaining format while providing tools to hold agencies and public figures accountable in order to give voice to victims and change those systems for the better. JUSTICE SYSTEMS We know that our justice systems are intimidating, but we will all encounter it at one point. Together, our hosts create the perfect trifecta of legal expertise, journalistic integrity and a fire lit to expose the truth wherever it leads. Learn more about our hosts and mission at http://CupofJusticePod.com Support Our Podcast at: https://lunasharkmedia.com/support/SUNscribe to our free email list to get alerts on bonus episodes, calls to action, new shows and updates. CLICK HERE to learn more: https://bit.ly/3KBMJcP*** Alert: If you ever notice audio errors in the pod, email [email protected] and we'll send fun merch to the first listener that finds something that needs to be adjusted! ***Find us on social media:Twitter.com/mandymatney - Twitter.com/elizfarrell - Twitter.com/theericblandhttps://www.facebook.com/cupofjustice/ |  https://www.instagram.com/cojpod/YouTube*The views expressed on the Cup of Justice bonus episodes do not constitute legal advice. Listeners desiring legal advice for any particular legal matter are urged to consult an attorney of their choosing who can provide legal advice based upon a full understanding of the facts and circumstances of their claim. The views expressed on the Cup of Justice episodes also do not express the views or opinions of Bland Richter, LLP, or its attorneys.

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features