Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Introducing Bluehost Cloud. Ultra-fast WordPress
0:02
hosting with 100% uptime. Want
0:06
a website with unmatched power, speed,
0:08
and control? Of course you do.
0:11
And now you can have all
0:13
three with Bluehost Cloud. The new
0:15
web hosting plan from Bluehost. With
0:17
100% uptime and incredibly speedy load
0:19
times, your WordPress websites will be
0:22
dependable and lightning fast on a
0:24
global scale. Plus, your sites can
0:26
handle even the biggest traffic spikes
0:28
without going down or lagging. And
0:30
with Bluehost Cloud, you get
0:33
24-7 WordPress priority support. Meaning
0:35
you're connected to WordPress experts
0:37
any time you need them.
0:40
Not to mention, you automatically
0:42
get daily backups and world-class
0:44
security. So what are you
0:46
waiting for? Get Bluehost Cloud
0:48
today by visiting bluehost.com. That's
0:52
bluehost.com. You
0:56
know that's the sound of another sale on your online
0:58
Shopify store. But did
1:00
you know Shopify Power is selling in person
1:02
too? That's right. Shopify
1:04
is the sound of selling everywhere.
1:08
Online, in store, on social media, and
1:10
beyond. Shopify
1:14
POS is your command center for
1:16
your retail store. From accepting payments
1:18
to managing inventory, Shopify has everything
1:20
you need to sell in person.
1:23
With Shopify, you get a powerhouse selling partner
1:26
that effortlessly unites your in-person and online
1:28
sales into one source of truth. Track
1:30
every sale across your business in one
1:32
place and know exactly
1:34
what's in stock. Connect
1:38
with customers in line and online. Shopify
1:41
helps you drive store traffic with plug-and-play
1:43
tools built for marketing campaigns from
1:45
TikTok to Instagram and beyond. Get
1:48
hardware that fits your business. Take
1:51
payments by smartphone, transform your tablet
1:53
into a point-of-sale system, or use
1:56
Shopify's POS Go mobile device for
1:58
a battle-tested solution. Plus, Plus,
2:00
Shopify's award-winning help is there to
2:02
support your success every step of
2:05
the way. Do retail right with
2:07
Shopify. Sign up for a $1 per
2:10
month trial period at
2:12
shopify.com/crimes all lowercase. Go
2:15
to shopify.com/crimes to take your
2:17
retail business to the next
2:19
level today shopify.com/crimes
2:24
Hey, y'all. You know some people enjoy
2:26
composing their own music chord by
2:29
chord So
2:35
be sure to follow COJPOD for
2:37
all the latest updates on exciting
2:39
new guests, the Kaluchi case, and
2:41
more. On today's episode,
2:44
we will talk more about the Kaluchi case.
2:46
We have less than a week before the
2:48
trial begins on May 13th. If
2:51
you're interested in this case and
2:53
haven't already listened to last week's
2:55
True Sunlight podcast, I highly recommend
2:58
that you do. We have uncovered
3:00
a lot. Now it's
3:02
just a question of whether the
3:04
prosecution can do the case justice
3:06
this time around. We
3:08
also talk about the very disturbing and
3:10
heartbreaking case of Micah Miller, a 30-year-old
3:13
woman from Myrtle Beach who was found
3:15
dead a week and a half ago
3:17
in a state park in North Carolina
3:19
near the South Carolina border. Micah
3:22
had just filed for divorce from her
3:24
past her husband. John Paul, JP Miller,
3:26
who has a history of violence. There
3:30
are so many strange things with this case,
3:32
but mostly there are red flags. Micah
3:34
lived in fear of John Paul and even
3:36
told her family members that if she'd ever
3:39
been found with a bullet in her head,
3:41
that JP did this to her. We
3:43
have put out a bunch of voyas in this
3:46
case and we will be talking about it more
3:48
on this week's True Sunlight. But
3:50
today, you're basically getting our raw reactions
3:52
to the case and what we think
3:54
needs to happen to protect women after
3:57
their untimely deaths. Premium members
3:59
will get a little something extra.
4:01
Today, Eric talks about those
4:03
pesky liability waivers we all have to
4:05
sign from time to time. Do we
4:08
have to sign them? What happens if
4:10
we don't? What happens if we were
4:12
to scratch out part of the agreement
4:14
before signing it? All that and more.
4:16
Let's get into it. Cups
4:20
up. Cups up. Cups up.
4:22
Hey partners, how you doing? Doing
4:24
well. So Eric, tell us what
4:26
happened at this meeting that you
4:28
had with the Attorney General and
4:31
Sandy. That's been a long time coming. Yeah,
4:33
it has. I guess the genesis of it
4:36
was at the victim's rally that
4:38
we were at, I guess, in early April.
4:42
And the Attorney General saw Sandy and David
4:44
and Mandy and Sandy, you know, mentioned something
4:46
the Attorney General said, I'll be glad to
4:48
meet with you. And I guess it was
4:51
one of those offhand comments, you
4:53
know, the people say like, hey, let's go do lunch next
4:55
week. And you call the guy and you say, hey, let's
4:57
have lunch. He's like, I don't want
4:59
to have lunch with you. But you know,
5:01
the Attorney General said he'll be glad to
5:03
meet and we certainly held him to it
5:05
because we immediately notified him and said, hey,
5:08
we would like to meet. And so this
5:10
morning we met at the Attorney General's office
5:12
and there was a significant
5:15
number of important people there. I don't want
5:17
to name who was there in addition to
5:19
the Attorney General. But we
5:22
were told that it
5:24
is an absolute active
5:26
investigation and that
5:28
they are actively pursuing answers
5:32
for Sandy. They both, they all
5:34
to a person said they want
5:36
to give her peace. And Sandy
5:39
said it the same way. I want to
5:41
just find out what happened. I want to
5:43
have peace for what happened
5:45
to my son. The Attorney General
5:47
was very serious about finding an
5:49
answer for her. He does not
5:51
like the fact that Stephen
5:55
was killed in that manner and that they
5:57
don't have an answer. They
6:00
were clear to tell us that when
6:02
they took over, meaning sled in the
6:04
AG, it was essentially a cold case
6:07
because the highway department had it for six
6:09
years and they released the file.
6:13
They reiterated the same concerns we had
6:15
when they released the file to the
6:17
public that that was a chilling effect,
6:19
in essence, for
6:21
the potential investigation. They
6:25
didn't share much of the
6:27
granular details of their investigation other
6:30
than that they believe that they
6:32
will come to a point that they will
6:35
have an answer as to what happened. It
6:37
may not be enough for
6:39
criminal prosecution, but they
6:41
believe that they will get
6:43
an answer. I saw a list of 11 things
6:46
that they're going
6:48
to do. I take them
6:51
at their word and they
6:53
were receptive to what Sandy was
6:55
asking them. I
6:58
did ask them some poignant
7:01
questions about the tablet
7:03
and different things like
7:05
that. I'm
7:08
not sure what they found off the tablet, but
7:10
it wasn't enough that it would have
7:12
yielded anything and you gave me some
7:14
suggestions about
7:17
Craig's List and different things like that that
7:19
I passed on. They were
7:22
very welcoming to any information
7:24
that we can give or any
7:26
information that the public
7:28
can give, either through you, through
7:31
True Sunlight, or
7:34
directly to the AG. They're
7:36
committed to getting
7:38
answers. When they said that it was
7:40
a homicide in March
7:43
of 2023, that
7:45
word connotes a number of things. It could
7:47
mean a murder. It could
7:49
mean somebody who was
7:51
grossly negligent under the
7:53
influence of alcohol and caused
7:56
the death, or it could have
7:58
been somebody who was inattentive and didn't… mean
8:00
it at all, that they were just looking
8:02
the other way and didn't see Steven and
8:04
something happened. So it's a broad
8:07
spectrum of definition of death. When
8:10
we hear the word homicide, we
8:12
already think homicide occurred. That's a
8:14
murder. And they wanted me
8:16
to understand and
8:18
Sandy to understand that they're
8:20
not reaching any conclusions regarding the
8:23
word homicide. Well, I don't think we
8:25
ever did. I think we were pretty clear
8:27
that homicide can also mean a vehicular
8:29
situation. But did they mention, so
8:33
there's been a lot of confusion because it's been
8:35
reported that there were two people of interest that
8:38
had been developed in the case. And of course, those
8:40
are the two people who
8:42
appear in the final
8:44
pages of the case file, where the case
8:46
file ends. Did they
8:48
mention that there's any person, like did they say that they
8:50
have people of interest or what did they say about that?
8:53
They did not say that. They did not say
8:55
that they have any persons of interest. Yeah.
8:57
And I did, I believe, over a year ago. I took
8:59
it as murder with the way that it was being said
9:08
and the way that it was being reported. Yeah,
9:10
I'll be the first to admit because it wouldn't
9:13
have been in development if it
9:15
was still a homicide in that context. You know
9:17
what I mean? So
9:19
this has just all been very disappointing
9:21
and confusing because a year ago, it
9:24
seemed like they were on
9:26
a track. It
9:29
seemed like there was more developments
9:31
a year ago than there is
9:33
today. And that is highly, highly
9:35
concerning. I mean, I guess
9:38
we have to take the positive here. And
9:41
it's a great thing that, Eric,
9:43
you got that meeting to begin with for
9:46
Sandy. I think Sandy definitely
9:48
deserves that kind of face time with
9:50
important people. And I have not talked
9:53
to her following it, but I'm sure
9:55
she's greatly, greatly appreciative of just that
9:57
because that's all that she's wanted just based.
10:00
updates of what
10:02
they know, what they don't and what they're doing.
10:04
It was definitely not a blow off meeting,
10:07
Mandy, because there was one,
10:09
two, three, four, five, there was
10:12
six very important people in that
10:14
meeting. Some that came from across
10:16
town. And if it
10:18
was a blow off meeting, it would have been
10:20
five minutes with just an assistant, I just didn't,
10:23
I'd been in blow off meetings and you've been
10:25
in blow off meetings too. I didn't take it
10:27
as such, but I did take it as a
10:29
meeting that they don't have a lot to
10:33
say or show at this time. Right.
10:35
And I think that it, I
10:37
still believe that this case can
10:40
be absolutely cracked with one to
10:42
two people talking. And I believe
10:44
that one to two people
10:46
out there, maybe three who
10:48
knew what happened could absolutely change the
10:51
game. And so we are still begging
10:53
people to contact Sled,
10:55
contact us. Contact,
10:57
if you don't trust Sled, contact
10:59
us, but please, please, please contact
11:02
Sled in the attorney general's office.
11:05
This case is still ongoing. I
11:07
also want to be clear that the
11:09
people out there who knew what happened
11:12
and who are bearing
11:14
these secrets, they are not in the
11:16
clear by any means. And
11:18
the fact that all of these important people showed up to
11:20
this, that shows that. I
11:23
mean, this is still ongoing and that
11:25
is the good news. The bad news
11:27
is that it just seems
11:29
like we just have the,
11:32
it's not bad news, but we just
11:34
got to keep pushing. So I'm a
11:36
little, I have to say this,
11:38
and I think that this is something that I hope
11:41
makes it back to the AG's office and to Sled,
11:44
but you mentioned that there
11:46
was a chilling effect when the
11:48
state highway patrol released the case
11:50
file, right? So we
11:52
talked about that before on the show and
11:55
how that could be seen as a
11:57
strategy that was done, you know,
11:59
could. was that done on purpose to create
12:02
that chilling effect, right? Because it was a
12:04
very unusual move at the time and
12:06
it has actually had that effect. I do
12:08
think that the AG's office and Sled need
12:10
to change their tactic a little when it
12:12
comes to the investigation. So, we say, oh
12:14
yeah, there's people who know and those people,
12:16
you know, you might think that like the
12:18
rest of your life is going to be
12:20
lived and you're going to get away with
12:22
this. But, you know, I'll say
12:25
this, like cases get solved every day that are
12:27
50 years old. So, it's not going anywhere. Everybody's
12:29
going to talk at some point. But
12:32
that said, why aren't
12:34
the AG and Sled looking at
12:37
the, like do an investigation of
12:39
the investigation? Okay, so
12:41
let's look at it this way. When
12:43
the boat crash happened, there was, there
12:45
were accusations of this obstruction of justice,
12:47
right? And just how
12:49
things were diverted, how decisions were made, what
12:51
have you. That same thing
12:53
seems to have happened with the state
12:56
highway patrol, right? And we're
12:58
just, I'm just going off of that decision
13:00
to release that case file unredacted with
13:02
witnesses' names out there, with their
13:04
interviews out there, recordings of their
13:07
interviews. Why doesn't the
13:09
AG, like AG's office and Sled, why
13:11
aren't they looking into the potential of
13:14
obstruction of justice and go that route
13:16
and find out? Because if you start
13:18
at the top of, if something, and
13:21
I'm saying if there was obstruction of
13:23
justice here, won't that lead a breadcrumb
13:25
trail if it did exist to potentially
13:27
what happened that night? It
13:29
could, absolutely. You know, obstruction of justice
13:32
is really a great
13:35
charge when you're trying to figure
13:37
out the main crime. Because
13:41
it says that people are
13:43
actively trying to suppress information,
13:45
whether they're threatening others, whether
13:47
they're bribing others, whether it's
13:49
a quid pro quo not
13:51
to talk or say this.
13:55
That could happen. And it very well
13:57
may be, you know, look, Creighton's running
13:59
this investigation. Smart dude. And.
14:02
You know, We. Have to trust
14:04
him that he's going to see
14:06
this through the end. because you
14:08
know he said one thing You
14:11
know. They. Work methodically and it
14:13
may not be in the sequence that
14:15
you and I and Mandy want them
14:17
to work. For instance, they brought the
14:19
financial crimes against Alex for this out
14:21
of your case and they waited a
14:23
long time. Before. They brought
14:26
the murder charge and it's incremental
14:28
and we were very critical in
14:30
the fall of Twenty Twenty One
14:32
through Twenty Twenty Two of the
14:34
pace of what they were doing
14:36
and does he said basically trust
14:39
in the process on. They.
14:41
Have a process that they fall that's different
14:43
than the timelines that we want and the
14:45
sequence that we think they should do. I
14:47
did say and I name some names
14:50
of people that I. Believe.
14:52
Should be asked to. Do you
14:54
know anything? What? May have
14:56
happened to Steve and not of where you have
14:58
in a relationship with. I'm not. Did you kill
15:00
loan or were you in a car? Where? and.
15:03
But. You. Know. This.
15:05
Is a small area where so
15:08
that was a big time. Death.
15:11
Okay, that wasn't just and eighty eight
15:13
year old man fell off a tractor
15:15
and die. That. Was a nineteen
15:17
year old kid that was a seminal
15:20
death. If there's such a word, a
15:22
seminal Death. Paul and
15:24
Maggie were seminal. Desk Mallory
15:26
Beach was a seminal death.
15:29
Gory. Satterfield turned out to be a seminal
15:31
death, but not when it happened. But.
15:33
A ninety year old kid. Is.
15:36
A seminal death. And I
15:38
think in that community in that
15:40
school remember he was just that
15:42
a high school just about use
15:44
technical college. There. There's
15:46
a close knit group of people. He
15:49
may not have been in the group
15:51
of people that knows, but enough of
15:53
people didn't talk and I I honestly
15:55
believe that. The. there are
15:57
people carrying around the knowledge of what happens
16:00
And they're just not sharing it. And I
16:02
think there are law enforcement officers who are
16:04
carrying the knowledge of what might have gone
16:07
down in terms of decisions that were made
16:09
behind the scenes to further investigate, not
16:11
further investigate, to release the whole case
16:13
file to the public and expose the witnesses. So
16:17
I do think if they're not already looking
16:19
into that, I think that that's a tactic that
16:22
they should explore. Start from
16:24
the, you know, start from the other end.
16:26
It's not necessarily an expectation I have of a
16:28
timeline. It's just obviously the old way isn't working.
16:30
So let's come up with a new way. Let's
16:33
look at, let's try a different trail
16:35
where breadcrumbs can lead us. And I
16:37
think if we're going to trust anyone, it's
16:39
Creighton Waters. So I don't think it's really
16:42
a trust issue. It's just more
16:44
a question of whether they're going to approach
16:46
this from a different angle. There
16:49
are plenty of law enforcement officers who have
16:51
retired since Steven died nine years
16:54
ago. Plenty of law
16:56
enforcement officers who have retired. There are
16:58
also plenty who have gone on TV
17:00
shows saying that something was wrong with
17:03
the investigation, but not specifically saying like
17:05
who was pressuring them, what was going
17:07
on? Like
17:09
start there. Start with those officers who have
17:12
gone on all the documentaries and seen
17:14
what was the pressure,
17:16
what was going on in the investigation. Here's
17:20
the reality though. By defining
17:22
it as a cold case, it's not
17:24
at the front of the list
17:26
of cases that they're going to probably
17:29
devote all their resources
17:31
and time. We
17:33
have a drug problem in our
17:35
state. We have fentanyl
17:37
coming into this state. We
17:40
have environmental polluting going on.
17:42
Things that are touching people
17:45
today. Right now, Steven's death
17:47
touches us, touches our listeners,
17:50
and touches Sandy. But
17:52
it's a death that already occurred.
17:54
But when we have things like
17:57
fentanyl taking place and current investigation.
18:00
the Guatturi crimes, you know what I'm
18:02
saying? And even though
18:04
they didn't say Stephen is not number one
18:06
in the list, I think by
18:08
nature of being a cold case, it's never
18:10
going to be number one on the list
18:13
like Alex and Maggie and Paul. I would
18:15
ordinarily agree with you on that, but here's the
18:17
thing. This case is one they
18:19
chose to take. They chose it.
18:22
They said that this was important to
18:24
them. They have taken a bow
18:26
before they had something to take a bow about
18:28
in some ways. I'm not talking about necessarily the
18:30
AG's office alone. I
18:32
think that this is a case that
18:35
yes, it's just one boy, one, one case, one situation.
18:41
This case is here now because of
18:43
a failure of the system. So
18:47
I think that this is different. I don't think it's
18:49
just a cold case. I don't think it's just your
18:51
ordinary, they ran into a brick
18:53
wall. The brick wall was built in front of them
18:55
and that's, that's always going to
18:57
be in my position on it. The brick wall is built in
18:59
front of them. They didn't hit a wall. The wall hit them.
19:01
So I think they have an obligation.
19:04
They have an obligation just to follow this through.
19:06
I hear you. Liz, what is the definition of a
19:08
cold case? So a cold case is generally
19:10
seen as an old case, right? Because when you
19:13
hear about it in the news, it's usually these
19:15
cases from the, you know, 1980, 1950s, whatever. But
19:19
a cold case is just simply means when
19:21
a law enforcement officer or sorry, an investigator
19:23
has run out of the leads. So a
19:25
case can go cold almost right away. If
19:27
you, if you don't have, you know, once
19:30
you get your forensics back, once you have
19:32
interviewed all the witnesses and what have you.
19:34
It loses its pulse is what you're saying.
19:36
Yeah, essentially. You seem upset, Mandy.
19:39
Why are you not upset? You're frustrated.
19:41
What's your frustration about? The
19:45
whole thing is just frustrating. I
19:47
think everybody in journalism and as
19:49
in police work and lawyers, they
19:52
all have the one case that haunts them. And this is
19:54
it for me. This is the one that like I, I
20:00
feel stuck in,
20:02
and I feel like I can't
20:04
move on from, into anything else
20:06
without getting answers in this case.
20:09
And we have tried and tried and
20:11
tried, and it's just
20:13
extremely frustrating. And it's extremely
20:16
frustrating with how
20:18
much we know this hurts Sandy and how
20:20
much we know that this hurts
20:22
the family. And
20:25
I don't want to go too hard on
20:27
the Attorney General's office, but I will say
20:29
that it is frustrating when I'm seeing his
20:31
Twitter account and he's clearly prioritizing
20:33
a lot of political aspirations
20:35
and a lot of political
20:38
endeavors over just straight up
20:40
murder cases and over public
20:43
safety. And we'll talk about that
20:45
in a minute with the Kaluchi
20:47
case and his office's handling of
20:49
that. But yeah, I'm just really
20:52
frustrated. And we'll talk
20:54
about Kaluchi after the break. How
21:04
would you like to look five
21:06
years younger? In clinical study, people
21:08
who had volume added with Juvederm
21:11
Voluma XC in the cheeks perceived
21:13
themselves as looking five years younger
21:15
at six months after treatment. Look
21:17
younger, feel like you. Add
21:20
volume for lift and contour in the cheeks
21:22
with Juvederm Voluma XC. Reverse signs
21:24
of aging by adding volume to smooth
21:27
laugh lines with Juvederm Volular XC. For
21:30
important safety information and to
21:32
find a licensed specialist, visit
21:34
juvederm.com. That's j-u-v-e-d-e-r-m.com. Not
21:40
for people with severe allergic reactions, allergy,
21:42
steliticane or the proteins used in Juvederm.
21:45
Common side effects include injection site
21:47
redness, swelling, pain, tenderness, firmness, lumps,
21:49
bumps, bruising, discoloration or itching. There's
21:52
a risk of unintentional injection into
21:54
a blood vessel which can cause
21:56
vision, abnormalities, blindness, stroke, temporary scabs
21:58
or scarring. to a licensed
22:00
specialist to find out if it's right for you. Want
22:04
to temporarily restore definition in your
22:07
jawline where it's been lost over
22:09
time? With Juvederm Velux XC, you
22:11
can get a non-surgical jawline treatment
22:14
that adds volume for smooth contour
22:16
and to reduce the appearance of
22:18
jowls in one in-office treatment with
22:21
little downtime. Juvederm Velux XC injectable
22:23
gel is the first and only
22:25
hyaluronic acid filler that improves moderate
22:28
to severe loss of jawline definition.
22:30
For important safety information and to
22:32
find a licensed specialist, visit juvederm.com.
22:36
That's j-u-v-e-d-e-r-m.com. Not
22:40
for people with severe allergic reactions, allergies
22:43
to lidocaine or the proteins used in Juvederm.
22:45
Common side effects include injections
22:47
like redness, swelling, pain, tenderness,
22:49
firmness, lumps bumps, bruising, discoloration
22:51
or itching. There's a risk
22:54
of unintentional injection into a
22:56
blood vessel which can cause
22:58
vision abnormalities, blindness, stroke, temporary
23:00
scabs or scarring. Talk to
23:02
a licensed specialist to find
23:04
out if it's right for
23:06
you. Visit juvederm.com. That's j-u-v-e-d-e-r-m.com.
23:17
So, Eric, yeah, we're frustrated. I mean,
23:19
I don't want to hurt people's feelings
23:21
and obviously we trust Creighton. We
23:24
know if anyone's going to follow through, it's going
23:27
to be him. But like Mandy said, the attorney
23:29
general, I get it, like the attorney general position
23:31
is a political one. And, you know, that's their
23:33
kind of all for one and one for all
23:35
when it comes to the party lines. But
23:38
it's sort of hard for us to understand
23:41
how that's justified when it comes to
23:43
you're trying to solve cases
23:45
outside of the state almost. Or like you're
23:48
like jumping in these fights that are
23:50
national instead of at the state level.
23:52
So, I don't know. Right, and I
23:54
don't think it should be a political
23:56
position. I think that it's really hard
23:58
for us to understand that. It's really
24:00
weird that an attorney general has to decide.
24:02
I absolutely agree with you. Right. I
24:05
think that, and while I think it's very weird
24:07
that our attorney general has to be either Republican
24:09
or Democrat because the law should be the law
24:11
and they should be focused
24:13
on things happening in our state, not things
24:16
that are aligning with national political parties that
24:18
have no interest of what is going on
24:20
in the state of South Carolina. And
24:23
it's just extremely frustrating and I think that
24:25
that's an example of it
24:27
right now. We
24:30
just keep coming across
24:32
cases where, and the other thing
24:34
I'm frustrated with, I'll continue
24:36
this thought, the other thing that I'm really
24:38
frustrated with is just the system as a
24:40
whole. I'm very frustrated.
24:42
I know that they're trying. I know
24:44
Creighton is trying really hard and I'm
24:47
very, very thankful for his work, but
24:49
I also understand that there
24:51
are not a lot of resources in
24:53
the attorney general's office. I think there
24:56
are enough and I don't know
24:58
how they're being dedicated. I don't know how
25:00
many are being dedicated for all of these
25:02
national lawsuits because every other day we see
25:04
that Alan Wilson is suing Joe
25:07
Biden for something, et cetera, et cetera.
25:09
And it really doesn't have to do
25:11
with the local core issues and the
25:13
crime in our state. The attorney general
25:16
should be managing the crime
25:18
in our state and I don't think that
25:20
the position is doing that. It's just way
25:22
more political. However, how
25:24
about managed prosecutors? Because you look at
25:26
the Kooluche case was, BAG's office will
25:28
tell you over and over again, they
25:30
don't do murder cases, right? They don't
25:32
do homicides. They do more
25:35
child exploitation, human trafficking, like
25:38
larger scale issues that involve multiple
25:40
ponies. So why are
25:42
they taking a case? I mean, fine,
25:44
you have to take a case because
25:47
the prosecution in the circuit is recusing
25:49
itself, but it would seem to me
25:51
that maybe that's a problem. The AG
25:53
has authority over these individual prosecutor's offices.
25:56
If they can't handle these murder cases,
25:58
for instance, like the... The
26:00
14th Circuit can't handle Seidens' case, so obviously
26:02
it has to go to the AG's office.
26:05
But maybe it's time for a special
26:07
prosecutor, too. I mean, maybe they give
26:09
it to David Pascoe or something, you
26:11
know? Somebody who can have
26:14
a little bit more focus on it or to
26:16
follow through with it. I don't like the idea
26:18
of Sandy being told that there's more important cases
26:20
because they chose to take it. –
26:23
Cases that are more urgent. –
26:25
Okay, so urgent. I just don't like her being
26:27
told. I mean, if that was the sense that
26:29
she walked away from that meeting, is that
26:32
there's more urgent cases than Stevens, then that's
26:34
not the message I like coming from
26:36
that. – Urgent to come up out of
26:38
the woodwork that you
26:40
don't anticipate. – Oh, gotcha. – That's
26:42
what they were saying. They're not pushing
26:44
Stevens' case off. I don't want that
26:47
to be what you
26:49
walk away with it from. But there
26:51
was a realization that this is an
26:53
older case and that, you
26:55
know, there are emergency things that pop
26:58
up that require a lot of different
27:00
things. This was a cold case. That's
27:02
how they're defining it. And
27:04
you know, there's a lot of people don't want it
27:06
to be solved. I'm sure there's a lot of people
27:08
that don't want this case to be solved, right? I
27:10
mean, in the low country. But
27:13
I didn't find in that room that there were people that
27:15
didn't want that to be solved. I found
27:17
in that room that there was a genuine intent
27:19
to see a resolution of this case.
27:21
– Yeah. This is hard, Eric,
27:23
because there's so much going on, I think, with the
27:25
AG's office in our realm right now. So
27:28
you know, last week we had sort
27:30
of maybe the most disappointing – disappointed
27:33
I've ever been in Alan Wilson's
27:35
office. We have been
27:38
reporting for quite some time that
27:40
the AG's office didn't seem
27:42
to know where Michael Kaluchi
27:44
was, meaning that his bond
27:46
conditions, as they stated them
27:48
to us, could not possibly have existed that
27:50
way, because he didn't live where
27:53
they told us he was under house
27:55
arrest. And right as we
27:57
were finishing up the episode of True Sunlight last week
27:59
–. We found out from
28:01
a source that Michael is not on
28:03
house or us and in a isn't
28:05
soft on an ankle monitor which is
28:08
something that we came to the cheese
28:10
office with an ass in several different
28:12
ways because we believed him to be
28:14
on an ankle monitor. So. For.
28:16
Them to give us misinformation and then let
28:18
us run with it. For. Weeks on end.
28:20
Was his bond modified? Did they didn't
28:22
know ago? His bond with modified in
28:24
two thousand and eighteen during the trial
28:26
date the Pilot: Instead of having him
28:28
in the holding cell overnight, they gave
28:30
him an ankle monitor and allowed him
28:33
to stay at a nearby hotel with
28:35
Andy Savage such doubtless had been assigned
28:37
know ah night at the. Bar. Fun
28:39
Fun Fun Room service!
28:43
Or don't. Let about less about my
28:45
gray. Of them
28:47
fell out again and imagine there are worse
28:50
scenario is getting stuck with your client and
28:52
and vice versa. But would you do that?
28:54
Eric. Know. Would you say let's
28:56
go on? Yes! I. Am know, I
28:58
know, I just yes, I've had clients
29:00
that are my friends and civil cases
29:02
yes But in criminal cases now I
29:05
I think you gotta. Have a
29:07
line of demarcation that you don't break. You
29:09
eat, you don't want to let your shirt
29:11
down in front of them. and they shouldn't
29:13
let their shared down in front of you.
29:15
There has to be some clear wall between
29:18
the two two of you. So, and he's
29:20
a pro. He? Yeah, yeah, maybe they were
29:22
saying the same hotel, but I'm not sure
29:24
they were staying in the same room and
29:26
Grand Do. and that's why I'm I'm picturing
29:28
Andy with a big long sleeping cap on
29:31
and submitting Michael and and nice. But
29:34
as. i
29:36
guess the question i have for you
29:39
though is is it normal for an
29:41
attorney to be seen as sort of
29:43
the i don't want to see baby
29:45
sitter but sort of like in charge
29:48
of where their client is staying know
29:50
and i'll stop because now right because
29:52
evoke hulu t from what i understand
29:55
what sources tell me if he called
29:57
it the andes office according to my
29:59
sources and said that he
30:01
wanted Michael Colucci out of his house.
30:04
And this is in 2016, and I
30:06
just don't know what Andy, why is
30:08
that Andy's responsibility? I get that he's
30:11
being paid, but that just doesn't
30:13
seem like a lawyer's responsibility. So
30:16
you're not held personally accountable if
30:18
your client doesn't
30:20
adhere to bond conditions
30:23
or doesn't wear the ankle monitor
30:25
regularly or things like that. No, no,
30:28
unless, you know, and a client does have the
30:30
right to always meet with an attorney, even
30:33
if he's under, or she's under house arrest and
30:35
can come to the attorney's office. And then there's
30:38
exceptions for counseling
30:40
and medical appointments. I
30:44
will say this, that Andy
30:47
is an unusual lawyer in
30:50
that he invests a ton
30:52
of himself in his cases. He's not a
30:54
guy that takes on a lot
30:56
of cases. And when he takes it on like
30:58
the Michael Slager case, that was a case that
31:01
certainly wasn't popular. And
31:03
he fought so hard for Michael
31:06
and he genuinely liked
31:08
Michael and genuinely liked his
31:10
wife and was so scared
31:12
for the family because
31:14
they were getting death threats. There
31:17
was death threats coming everywhere, from every
31:19
angle on lawyers, on investigators, on the
31:21
family. And I
31:24
know that Andy cared enough that
31:27
he made sure that Michael and his family
31:29
were safe. So Andy's that
31:31
unusual lawyer. He really, because he
31:33
takes on these difficult cases, he
31:39
has strong feelings for his clients in a good way.
31:42
That makes sense. Yeah, that does make
31:44
sense. I know that that case affected
31:46
him deeply when he didn't
31:48
get the sentencing that he had hoped
31:50
for his client federally. No, not
31:52
from Judge Norton. No, not at all.
31:54
Yeah, yeah. So with Colucci,
31:56
though, The disappointing thing
31:59
is that we were given... Listen for me said
32:01
after we came to them with craft information
32:03
because our what we were told was that
32:05
the bond conditions that were sad during the
32:08
trial which is that he would be on
32:10
an ankle monitor. That
32:12
those still stood, that he had an
32:14
ankle monitor currently and we were told
32:16
by the age is Us Up that
32:19
wasn't the case and that he was
32:21
on house arrest and that he was
32:23
at his parents' house and so this
32:25
whole time we've been you know those
32:27
are sack that were easily disproved. But
32:30
sister find out like a week
32:32
before the trial that this person
32:34
was on ankle monitor. I guess
32:36
people might wonder why that is
32:38
significant, Why that's important. If you're
32:41
a victim or member of assembly
32:43
who had somebody or die violently
32:45
and the defendant in that case
32:47
is out on bond he has
32:49
and in jail awaiting trial, you
32:51
are always waiting for the other
32:53
shoe to drop. Because.
32:55
There is violence involved. granted me on
32:57
Michael for she says he didn't do
33:00
that. Said he's innocent where have you
33:02
but does it and Siri well may
33:04
believe that he dead as to list
33:06
outlay for so long. We're talking about
33:09
nine years now and six years since
33:11
the first child without. Knowing
33:13
what the conditions that as bond or
33:15
for without understanding that he was being
33:17
kept track of ostensibly because we know
33:19
that system sucks. That's just not. That's
33:22
not the way it should. Be for
33:24
victims Scholars A big difference between house arrest
33:26
an ankle monitoring house arrest you're sure did
33:28
somebody is in their house age but some
33:30
of these on like a minor. you're gone,
33:33
the shop. it. On. Whole
33:35
Foods or you're shopping at Publix and
33:37
you'd walk down the aisles and there
33:39
he is. So that's scary year. Charleston's
33:42
not that big. It's Yes, it's a
33:44
a big city in in the terms
33:46
of South Carolina, but you can run
33:48
into people twice in one day. Both.
33:51
In West Ashley in a male pleasant
33:53
or downtown. And. You know, So.
33:56
That scary for victim's family.
33:59
Or. I think the scary thing
34:02
that we have found is over and
34:04
over again with a Bow and Turner
34:06
End it. Case in the with this
34:08
case is that there really isn't a
34:10
system monitoring these people and monitoring his
34:12
ankle monitor is like there's no it
34:15
it. Just because there's a piece of
34:17
plastic on somebody his ankle doesn't mean
34:19
that there is somebody twenty four seven
34:21
making sure that they're not at the
34:23
victims house or making sure that the
34:26
the victim as being alerted when they're
34:28
near. There's really nothing like that. Going
34:30
on, it's justice. It seems
34:32
like a protocol. That's a
34:34
company. right? It's a company
34:36
re private. It's not
34:38
raining to poor breed. Which is
34:41
insane. A ride on profit from it,
34:43
right? They contract with local
34:45
law enforcement Solicitor's office to
34:47
provide a service and it's
34:50
one person. Probably.
34:52
In that shift would say it's
34:54
a ten o'clock This o'clock in
34:56
the morning monitoring he'll three hundred
34:58
people. Play. It. But there's
35:00
also no incentives. I have no incentive
35:02
to call it out when somebody is
35:04
violating bearer. Bonds
35:06
and. Then they
35:09
lose. That guy goes to jail and
35:11
they lose a customer. Hundred.
35:13
And thirty five dollars a week or one eight was
35:15
at one seventy five a week or something about is
35:17
a hero up from some people to lot of money.
35:20
For their customers, the sake, of
35:22
course there's I don't wanna lose
35:24
a cancer rate like when Bolland
35:27
Turner violated his sixty different times
35:29
and it was only after Sarah
35:31
Forward and Chloe Best parents and
35:33
several people made several complaints that
35:35
they realize how many times that
35:38
he live in just because people
35:40
kept seeing him and public and
35:42
people kept seeing and then these
35:44
different spots is that they notice
35:46
like no one's really looking at
35:48
their and he was. by he
35:50
violated it over sixty times and even
35:53
after that they didn't they gave him
35:55
a plea deal and did nothing with
35:57
that like there was no repercussions for
35:59
that whatsoever I just think,
36:01
I mean, we keep screaming about these
36:03
things over and over because we just
36:06
keep seeing like these big flashing lights
36:08
with the justice system. And this is
36:10
a huge one of there is a
36:13
giant disconnect between the ankle monitoring system
36:15
and the justice system and actual public
36:17
safety and people, keeping people safe. I
36:20
feel like it's almost a huge, it
36:22
is, it's a huge disservice to victims
36:24
to tell people, oh, they're out on
36:26
bond, but they're on an ankle monitor
36:30
when that's just a piece of plastic.
36:32
That doesn't really mean anything at all
36:34
except for the only, the
36:37
only thing that it could do is
36:39
that if that person committed a crime,
36:41
they might be able to walk back
36:43
the GPS and see where, where
36:45
that person was during the crime maybe. But
36:49
it's, it's worth it. I've definitely seen it,
36:52
Mandy, where a guy on an ankle monitor
36:54
was in the area of where a murder
36:56
happened on Hilton Head. And
36:59
I mean, that seems like a slam dunk,
37:01
right? You're like, oh, we got the
37:03
guy who's out on bond for murder
37:05
and now there's another murder and they
37:07
had beef and it was not enough
37:09
to get prosecutors interested in that. I
37:11
mean, I see him all the time. You
37:13
go in the summer, you know,
37:16
to a convenience store, pump a gas or
37:18
you go to a fast food restaurant and
37:20
you're waiting in line and people are wearing
37:23
shorts. You know, somebody's got an
37:25
ankle bracelet monitor on. What does that mean?
37:27
You know, some people like
37:30
when Greg Leone had an ankle bracelet, it
37:32
was to house and to work. And,
37:36
you know, he wasn't allowed to go
37:38
to Chick-fil-A and stand in the line. You're not
37:40
allowed to do that. When,
37:42
when you are under house arrest
37:44
or with exceptions for work and
37:47
your attorneys, you can't make a break for
37:49
Dunkin Donuts. You could call up and say,
37:51
look, I got a flat tire. I got
37:53
to go to Nuddles and get my tire
37:56
plugged or whatever. But you just can't stop
37:58
and get ice cream at Pelicans. you
38:00
know, but you see people do that and you wonder how
38:02
are they doing that? But if
38:05
you do, I think like
38:07
Greg Leon, he obviously had attorneys who
38:10
were like, you cannot do listen, you
38:12
cannot do this, it could compromise your
38:14
entire case, blah blah blah and I'm
38:16
sure he was smart enough to understand
38:18
that. The problem is, is
38:21
there's lots of people that
38:23
just like Bowen Turner who just they
38:25
hear one thing, a set of directions
38:28
and they do what they want to
38:30
do and I have never known anybody
38:32
who was on an ankle monitor, I will
38:35
admit and I didn't know a
38:37
whole lot about the system until the Bowen Turner
38:39
case and silly me, I
38:41
thought that it would be something like,
38:44
oh, if you go to McDonald's, then it's going to
38:46
be like beep beep beep beep beep
38:48
and then it beeps in the
38:50
police station, right? Beeps in the police
38:52
station, beep beep beep and then the police
38:55
dispatch somebody and then they come and get
38:57
you and put you in jail. That's what
38:59
I've done and it's nothing
39:01
like that at all, unfortunately
39:04
and again, the technology
39:06
exists for that to
39:08
be possible. The technology
39:10
is all there. We have AI, Mandy,
39:12
like let's get a robot on this,
39:15
like let's get somebody to analyze this.
39:17
I can tell where somebody just from
39:19
their phone had lunch yesterday, we should
39:22
be able to have an
39:24
AI tell us that this is the
39:26
printout of this person's GPS
39:29
coordinates and these are not within the
39:31
scope of where he was supposed to
39:33
be. I had a case in Greenville
39:35
where a guy who was
39:37
an ankle bracelet on Columbia couldn't leave Columbia
39:39
proper, went to Greenville and murdered somebody. How
39:42
did that happen? And he was there
39:44
in Greenville for two weeks. He was
39:47
in Greenville for two whole weeks and
39:49
he was not supposed to leave Columbia proper. But
39:52
we ask how that happened. I mean, it's because
39:54
there's no system in place to stop it. How
39:57
does it happen? All these guys talk. to
40:00
each other and they're like, oh yeah, I was able to
40:02
go to McDonald's and I was able to go to Greenville
40:04
and I went to North Carolina
40:06
last week and blah, blah, blah and they
40:08
haven't done anything. And that stuff gets around
40:10
and it's very obvious why this is happening.
40:12
The problem is, do we have legislators to
40:15
fix it and do they care enough? No,
40:17
because they're the ones who created it. They're
40:20
the ones who prioritize private profit. Right,
40:22
and they're making money off of it. Mm-hmm.
40:24
Gross. It's just so gross. But I guess
40:26
with Koji, I mean, I think he's getting
40:29
off easy because he has just the one
40:31
ankle monitor. You know,
40:33
Porell Russell, he had the two. He
40:36
had double. And he had double.
40:38
But do you remember Russell talking
40:41
about like what a headache it
40:43
was to charge both his legs?
40:46
I was thinking about that because, you know,
40:48
from what I understand about some people who
40:50
are on ankle monitors is they
40:53
might use that charging time to go to
40:55
someplace where they shouldn't be, like a bar
40:57
or some sort of transaction that might be
40:59
illegal, that kind of thing. Don't you have
41:01
to charge it by plugging it in the wall and then
41:03
plugging it into the monitor? Oh,
41:06
sorry. Yeah, they, sorry. They let it die. Yes.
41:09
Sorry. Yes, they let it die. Correct. Am
41:11
I bad? Yes. Yes. There's some people
41:13
who let their monitors routinely
41:16
die. And they wait to see
41:18
if that phone call comes in from
41:20
the monitoring company. And if they give
41:22
you an hour or two hours before
41:25
they call, I've seen this, then
41:27
they know they have that window and
41:30
they go do things during
41:32
that downtime. It's
41:34
not an instantaneous phone call that you
41:36
get like, Hey, Mandy, your monitor just
41:38
went off, you know, and I'm calling
41:41
you 30 seconds later.
41:43
Right. And it's also not like we
41:46
were talking about. It's not like there's
41:48
an alarm and the police are called
41:50
and immediately dispatched to your house. It's
41:52
a phone call that you can probably
41:55
not answer for a while and
41:57
still get away with it being
41:59
off. for a while and that's again
42:02
it's just it's worthless and until we we
42:05
fix it and until we have actual repercussions
42:08
to if you violate
42:10
your your ankle monitor and
42:14
if you are if you're caught it
42:16
should just say you go back to jail straight
42:21
to jail if you're caught if you're
42:23
caught doing anything that we told
42:26
you not to do you go back straight
42:28
to jail because you're on bond here and
42:30
it is a privilege that you are on
42:33
bond and we can revoke that at any
42:35
time and I feel like our government just
42:37
does not use that enough. You know
42:39
they sure don't there's just such a dichotomy
42:41
between what legislators say they want they want
42:44
to be tough on crime they want to
42:46
protect the public but really what they
42:49
want is to help their friends profit
42:51
and to pretend that the system is
42:53
working just fine the way it is. And
42:56
with that we'll take a break and be
42:58
right back. Y'all
43:08
I am so excited to
43:10
tell you about our new
43:12
Aqua true water purifier. Aqua
43:14
true purifiers use a four-stage
43:16
reverse osmosis purification process and
43:18
their countertop purifiers work with
43:20
no installation or plumbing. It
43:23
removes 15 times
43:25
more contaminants than ordinary pitcher filters
43:27
and we are enjoying the benefits
43:29
every day and you don't have
43:31
to worry about PFAs or other
43:33
harmful contaminants. Best of all our
43:36
water tastes fantastic it is
43:38
even portable making it perfect for
43:40
renters or college dorms or even
43:42
when embedded in a trial. Aqua
43:44
true comes with a 30-day money-back
43:46
guarantee and even makes a great
43:49
gift. Today my listeners received 20%
43:52
off any Aqua true purifier just go
43:54
to aquatru.com that's a
43:56
q u a t r u.com and
44:00
inner code COJ at checkout. That's
44:02
20% off any AquaTrue water purifier
44:04
when you go to aquatru.com and
44:07
use promo code COJ. Shout
44:11
out to Claritin for supporting this
44:13
episode and providing us with samples.
44:15
It has been wonders for our
44:17
seasonal allergies. We recently started feeling
44:19
the effects of spring. Luckily for
44:22
those of us who live with
44:24
the symptoms of allergies, we can
44:26
live Claritin Clear with Claritin D.
44:28
Designed for serious allergy sufferers, Claritin
44:30
D has two powerful ingredients in
44:33
just one pill that relieve your
44:35
allergy symptoms and decongest your nose
44:37
so that you can breathe better.
44:39
This double action combination of prescription
44:41
strength allergy medicine and the best
44:43
decongestant available relieve sneezing, itchy and
44:45
watery eyes and itchy nose and
44:48
throat, sinus congestion and pressure with
44:50
ease. Ready to live life as
44:52
if you don't have any allergies?
44:54
It is time to live Claritin
44:56
Clear. Fast and powerful relief is
44:58
just a quick trip away. Ask
45:00
for Claritin D at your pharmacy
45:02
counter. You don't even need a
45:04
prescription. Go to claritin.com right now
45:06
for a discount so you can
45:08
live Claritin Clear. Use as directed.
45:15
So are we gonna talk about the wacky preacher? I think
45:17
we have to. Yes, also known
45:19
as the Micah Miller case. We
45:22
have to talk about it. It's really,
45:25
really sad. I mean, I've
45:27
been diving into this case for
45:29
all of seven hours so bear
45:32
with me on details here but
45:34
I've already gotten a couple sources
45:36
and already have
45:38
my bearings about it and
45:41
it's just a really horrifically
45:43
sad situation. Her name was
45:45
Micah Miller. She is like
45:48
me from Kansas and eventually moved to
45:50
South Carolina. She was 30 years old
45:53
and she was married to a preacher
45:55
named JP Miller who
45:58
was the preacher. at
46:00
Solid Rock Church in Myrtle Beach
46:03
and on April 27th a couple weeks ago, Micah
46:10
was found dead of at least one
46:12
gunshot wound that we know of in
46:15
a park in Lumberton, North
46:17
Carolina which is a little
46:19
bit north of Myrtle Beach. And
46:22
I think the biggest red flag
46:24
is that authorities... there's
46:26
also breaking news in this case,
46:28
the medical examiner has said that
46:30
her wound was self-inflicted and that's
46:33
why we're involved here because
46:35
it seems like there needs to
46:37
be a lot more than a wound
46:40
to tell if somebody else
46:42
was involved. By all indications
46:45
if somebody was leaving breadcrumbs saying
46:47
this is the person who is
46:49
going to murder me, that is
46:52
what Micah did. She
46:54
left a trail of breadcrumbs
46:56
including she was filing for
46:58
divorce already and that was
47:00
official. Both of her
47:02
siblings have filed affidavit saying that there
47:05
was abuse in the marriage, that he
47:07
was an abusive husband and
47:09
that she was worried for her safety, she was
47:11
worried for her life and she even went to
47:13
the extent to saying that if I'm
47:16
found with a bullet in my head it is not
47:18
me, it is him.
47:20
And it's just heartbreaking that
47:22
this woman left so many crumbs
47:25
and did so many things and
47:28
still it seems like authorities
47:30
are pushing back a bit.
47:33
The narrative is it doesn't
47:35
look like a suicide and all
47:38
surrounding evidence points to
47:40
a murder and points
47:42
to him being the
47:44
number one suspect. Well let's break
47:46
this down. I mean to suicide they
47:49
would have to say that she had
47:51
gunpowder residue on her hand
47:54
and that's how they must have determined
47:57
it was self-inflicted because I can put a
47:59
gun god forbid. up to your head and
48:01
shoot you and drop the gun
48:03
and I have a rubber glove on and then
48:05
I put your fingerprints on it, but
48:08
you won't have gunpowder residue on it. Or I
48:10
could hold your hand up and do it, then
48:12
you could have gunpowder residue on it. The
48:15
thing that really stuck out
48:17
to me was he proceeded
48:20
from the pulpit to talk
48:22
about her alleged mental problems.
48:24
That no one
48:28
in the parish knew that
48:31
she was – God forbid he
48:33
said she committed, tried to commit suicide
48:36
a number of times that she was
48:38
committed. What husband would publicly talk about
48:40
that, about their wife? I mean,
48:42
that to me was fitting into
48:45
the narrative that it was a self-inflicted
48:47
killing because she had all these mental
48:49
problems. Right. And I mean,
48:51
I think the biggest thing that I –
48:53
the biggest red flag that I've seen so
48:55
far is that he announced to the entire
48:57
church the next day that
49:00
his wife was dead because
49:02
of suicide and that she had
49:04
all these mental health problems. And
49:07
that was very not only strange to
49:09
do – to announce it in that
49:11
way, but at that time, it seems
49:13
like authorities had not ruled it as
49:16
a suicide. Right. So what husband, if
49:19
you truly care about your wife in any
49:21
way, shape, or form, would be
49:23
so quick to announce that it's suicide
49:25
and not be worried and say,
49:28
I don't know
49:30
why she was up there. I don't know what – I
49:33
hope that they investigate this, and I hope they
49:35
find out what happened to her. I'm not sure
49:37
if it was a suicide or if she was
49:39
murdered, but I want people – I want answers.
49:42
I want answers. Right. That's the normal
49:44
thing. That investigation takes place.
49:47
Right, but he did the opposite of that, which
49:50
is – and then, Liz, what did he say
49:52
when he stood up before
49:54
everybody? He told everyone to stand.
49:56
So he said that he had an announcement to make
49:58
and that he wanted everyone to stand. be quiet and
50:00
that they should stand up and
50:02
he said that he wanted to say
50:04
this and then have them leave and
50:06
not talk about it. So
50:09
essentially it's he didn't want any reaction
50:11
from them he instructed them that as
50:13
well and then he went on to
50:16
announce her death and
50:19
there's a couple of things here. Yeah if my
50:22
wife God forbid took her
50:24
life yesterday I'm not on the
50:27
pulpit tomorrow guys I'm sorry I'm gonna
50:29
have to ask a junior preacher to
50:31
take over I'm gonna be with
50:33
my kids and I'm gonna be mourning I
50:35
mean it's the strangest reaction to lose your
50:38
wife like that to say
50:40
I'm gonna pitch baseball the next day you know
50:42
what I'm saying? Right so I think it's
50:44
hard because you know I think obviously our
50:46
first like our entry into any case is
50:48
just like how the person reacted
50:51
after something like this happened and comparing
50:53
it to how we would or how
50:55
the normal person would and right
50:58
all that Alex and we're and I think a
51:00
lot of people are right in their assumptions about
51:02
people sometimes like that's an odd thing to do
51:04
after you found out that your wife died what
51:06
have you but I
51:08
think there's some bigger issues that we need
51:11
to talk about in terms because obviously like
51:13
the medical examiner has now ruled it a
51:15
suicide or you know that she took her
51:17
own life like you said Eric gun shot
51:20
residue like on your hands could
51:22
be telling but like you said it's not
51:24
also telling like if somebody's holding
51:27
a gun to your chest or to
51:29
your head or something and and you
51:32
know making you do that it makes you
51:34
wonder if they they jumped I don't
51:36
know like I hate to say it's because I don't
51:38
know enough about the case to say that I believe
51:40
the husband did this but what
51:42
worries me is that generally speaking in
51:45
cases where there is a pattern or
51:47
at least an inkling that there was
51:50
some domestic violence occurring that
51:52
there's a divorce in the works Anything
51:54
like that I Feel like there
51:56
needs to be some measure for
51:58
investigators? No matter. After what state
52:01
it is that they need to stop
52:03
what they're doing and look at this
52:05
case as any sort of other investigation
52:07
not just immediately say suicide because with
52:10
the Clergy case I think what we
52:12
lost in the investigation comes from Michael
52:14
Fluid. She be able to just say
52:17
that my wife killed or south and
52:19
then that law enforcement comes onto the
52:21
scene With that in mind and varied
52:24
see things don't get done because in
52:26
their mind this is Dave been told
52:28
it was a suicide so. When
52:30
you know that there's a history of
52:32
violence or that there's a divorce in
52:35
the works or in Michael Pooches case,
52:37
at least some evidence that there was
52:39
some source struggle or perhaps a site
52:41
before no matter what he says happened
52:43
at least you look at that. The
52:45
evidence as their and can say something
52:47
might have gone down here. You have
52:49
to stop as investigators and say we
52:51
need to treat this case it differently
52:54
and the husband. And God
52:56
help him if he is in a
52:58
sense god help the any husband who
53:00
citizen who gets blamed for his wife's
53:02
death, they need to Just under C
53:05
N.unasked this case you I'm sorry, but
53:07
this is what it looks like. From
53:09
this angle something more needs to be
53:11
done to protect women after death after
53:13
they've been killed or they die at
53:16
their own hand. Whatever it is, the
53:18
case needs to be classified as something
53:20
different and investigators need to treated differently
53:22
and and not go because it that
53:25
that. Would have they say like the
53:27
the first forty eight hours as like the
53:29
most critical on that me investigation like right
53:31
on the scene at the most part of
53:33
call and and I don't now but we
53:36
got the probate file an the the facts.
53:38
And mean, she. Filed.
53:40
For divorce a. April.
53:43
sixteenth i wanna say ah and
53:45
then he was served in the
53:47
papers two days before she was
53:50
killed and that in that's a
53:52
big it that have any there's
53:54
just a lot of red flags
53:56
but i i agree with you
53:59
liz something else has to
54:01
be done because we just see
54:03
this over and over and over again and I'm
54:07
not fully convinced just because the
54:10
medical examiner said based on the
54:12
wounds that it is a self-inflicted
54:14
wound. We've
54:20
all seen movies, people can set up a
54:24
murder to look like a suicide and in
54:27
this case I
54:29
just really hope and the other thing
54:31
is that this is the Robeson
54:34
County Sheriff's Office who it
54:36
seems like is pretty busy.
54:40
I think quite a few murders
54:42
happen there and it's
54:44
just really unfortunate that some
54:47
cases and not saying that
54:49
it's going to happen with this one but
54:51
it's just much easier for everybody to
54:54
say it was a suicide and then
54:56
to write it off as a suicide
54:58
and move on and check that box
55:00
and it's one less
55:02
open case and I'm
55:05
sure they're like everywhere. I'm
55:07
sure they're overworked and lacking
55:09
resources but couple things, this
55:11
could be within the FBI's
55:13
jurisdiction if there was any
55:15
sort of crossing borders if
55:18
he murdered her and if and
55:21
I'm saying if and again I'm
55:23
not positive one million percent that he
55:25
murdered her. I'm
55:27
just saying that there's a lot of signs that
55:30
she was very very scared of him and that there's
55:34
enough there for motive in
55:37
itself. Very strange the way he gave
55:39
a full description to
55:42
his flock. You
55:45
could say you may have heard that
55:47
my wife passed away last
55:49
night. It's very traumatic for my family and
55:51
me. I don't want to
55:53
talk about it but please say your prayers for
55:55
me. But why go into
55:57
the granular detail on that when
55:59
you... just found out 12 hours earlier and you
56:02
don't know what it was. Like
56:04
Mandy said, it could be
56:06
that she was abducted or somebody did this.
56:10
Why go into that granular detail like that
56:12
and get into her background and give a
56:14
cause of death? It's hard
56:16
to say because the evangelical churches
56:18
have very distinct relationships with
56:20
their pastors and their pastors
56:22
have very distinct relationships with
56:25
their flock. There's more of a,
56:27
not in every church, but I think in more
56:29
charismatic ones, there's a
56:32
sort of an open book kind
56:34
of mentality. I think like I'm transparent
56:37
and here, so it's hard to say
56:39
whether that's a sign of anything. When
56:42
you look into his history, he
56:44
does have violence. He's gotten in
56:46
trouble for being violent before. He
56:48
was charged with assault and battery
56:50
of a high and aggravated nature.
56:52
That's a serious felony. That's just a serious
56:55
felony. It means somebody got hurt and
56:57
you're very seriously hurt. So listen
57:00
to this though. In October
57:03
2021, he applied. This
57:07
assault and battery occurred in the late
57:09
90s and he pleaded guilty to it
57:11
in 1999. He
57:16
was sentenced to, I believe it was like four
57:18
years suspended, that kind of thing. Okay, so Eric,
57:20
when you commit a felony, admit to a felony,
57:22
what are the things that you lose as
57:24
a citizen? Right to vote, right
57:27
to hold a license. Can't be
57:29
a plumber, can't be a barber, can't be an
57:31
accountant. What kinds of things can't you maybe purchase?
57:33
Can't hold a gun. Can't hold a gun,
57:35
right? So in October
57:38
2021, this is now 22 years
57:41
after he pleaded guilty for
57:43
assault and battery of a high and aggravated
57:45
nature. He submitted
57:48
an application to be pardoned for that
57:50
crime and he was granted it five
57:53
months later, six months later, something like that. I think it was
57:55
in May 2022. He
57:57
was granted and we have the application. that
58:00
he put in for his pardon along with the
58:02
recommendation letters. We got it while we were... Was
58:04
that a federal partner or a... No, it was
58:07
state. It's state. Governor McMaster gave him
58:09
the pardon? Apparently. I mean, the
58:11
board agreed and yeah,
58:13
Governor McMaster must have agreed. And
58:15
he wrote in his reason for
58:17
requesting a pardon. And again, this
58:20
is in just two years ago.
58:23
I am seeking a pardon to restore my
58:25
civil liberties in the community that I serve
58:27
daily. As a husband,
58:29
father and pastor, the right and ability
58:32
to protect my wife and
58:34
children as well as
58:36
my congregation is imperative. So
58:39
he hasn't said firearm here,
58:42
but it sure does seem like
58:44
the reason he was seeking a pardon was
58:46
so that he could purchase a
58:49
firearm, right? Am I crazy? So
58:51
two years ago, he put in an application to
58:54
get rid of his very serious felony,
58:57
which was a violent crime for this.
59:01
So that's disconcerting. And
59:05
that's something that I'm hoping that
59:07
the sheriff's office is looking into.
59:10
What's the lead... Who's the lead investigative chair of
59:12
agency, Mandy? Is it the local or is it
59:14
the North Carolina one? Is that what we have
59:16
to find out? It's North
59:18
Carolina because she was found in North
59:20
Carolina at a state park. But Robeson
59:22
County Sheriff's Office is in charge of
59:24
the investigation as far as I know,
59:27
as state police could take over, the
59:30
FBI could take over if we find out
59:32
that it crossed state lines. I
59:36
think the problem that
59:38
we're seeing right now is that breaking
59:40
news on this as we
59:42
were talking about this, the
59:45
case is already derailed. When an
59:47
ME says it was
59:49
suicide, it just makes it incredibly
59:51
hard for a proper investigation
59:54
to occur. And just again, I want
59:56
to... When an ME says suicide based
59:58
on wounds, I really... want to ask
1:00:00
a million more questions. Just
1:00:04
like when a pathologist says it was an auto
1:00:06
accident that took Stephen Smith's life and you go
1:00:08
down that rabbit hole. You're
1:00:11
down that rabbit hole and it could
1:00:13
just be a completely incorrect rabbit hole
1:00:15
and instead I mean they need to
1:00:17
be getting GPS data of not only
1:00:20
her phone, of his phone, they
1:00:23
need to be again make it
1:00:25
whose gun is it, when was
1:00:27
it purchased and what happened with
1:00:29
that and whose fingerprints are on
1:00:32
it. I mean there's
1:00:34
a lot of things but the scary thing
1:00:36
is if this was a murder
1:00:38
and if he did it, it sounds
1:00:40
like he had been planning this for a very
1:00:42
long time and he knew where to place
1:00:46
evidence and knew how to point
1:00:49
the investigation in the wrong
1:00:51
direction and that makes it
1:00:54
a whole lot more difficult
1:00:56
but I don't think that this
1:00:58
man like Alex Marduk anticipated
1:01:00
the entire internet coming down on
1:01:03
him and looking up every move
1:01:05
that he's made and carefully watching
1:01:07
him and carefully combing through his
1:01:09
life and looking through all of
1:01:12
his very
1:01:15
alarming past. Why
1:01:17
do you have to reach a conclusion so
1:01:19
quickly? That's what I'm thinking like what is that all
1:01:21
about? What about a toxicology report
1:01:24
on her? Let's take that,
1:01:26
let's find out. So
1:01:29
execute a search warrant, go look in their
1:01:31
house, see what is in there. Is
1:01:34
that a prescription that's in the
1:01:36
house? Find out little
1:01:39
things. I mean just what's the
1:01:41
rush to reach a conclusion that
1:01:43
somebody committed suicide? Well I think
1:01:45
it's easy. It's easy for the medical examiner, he's
1:01:47
just going on the information he's gotten, what he
1:01:50
sees in front of him. It's easy for the
1:01:52
police department because they can close the case. It's
1:01:55
certainly easy for a potential if this
1:01:57
was a murderer, for the potential murderer.
1:02:00
But let's just say this, if there is
1:02:02
a woman legislator in North
1:02:04
Carolina and one in South
1:02:07
Carolina and you're listening, I
1:02:09
think it would be a very good thing to
1:02:11
do to write some
1:02:13
legislation that puts a
1:02:16
hold on any suicide case, any scene,
1:02:18
any case where it seems like a
1:02:20
woman has taken her life, where
1:02:22
like I said earlier, there's question
1:02:25
about her relationship, where there's
1:02:27
some sort of indication that
1:02:29
her not all was
1:02:31
well in her home life. It's not to
1:02:33
say that women don't take their own lives,
1:02:36
but when you complicate, when you have this
1:02:38
complicating factor of this was a fraught relationship
1:02:40
when she was actively worried about this happening
1:02:42
to her. I don't think you could, because
1:02:44
how many cases now are we going to
1:02:46
talk about this where a medical
1:02:48
examiner or a coroner
1:02:50
or what have you has put down a
1:02:52
cause of death or manner of death that
1:02:55
then screws everything up for
1:02:57
the case itself. We're dealing with this, this is
1:02:59
Sarah Lynn Kaluchi's case. It
1:03:02
was a situation with Steven's case. It
1:03:05
just seems like we're constantly talking about
1:03:07
this. We had three different death
1:03:09
certificates in Steven's case. Right. Three.
1:03:12
Right. I think first of all,
1:03:14
we're supposed to find out more about this on
1:03:17
Tuesday. The Robeson County Sheriff's Office is supposed to
1:03:19
come out with some sort of a report or
1:03:21
some sort of statement
1:03:24
saying what they have found
1:03:26
and I hope that they're
1:03:28
either investigating it thoroughly or
1:03:30
they have some really, really,
1:03:32
really convincing information that points
1:03:35
to suicide. I'm not
1:03:38
even sure if I can imagine what
1:03:40
that could be because every piece of
1:03:42
information that I'm imagining could
1:03:44
also be placed, if you know what I mean. Are
1:03:48
they being coy? Is it
1:03:50
possible that they're going
1:03:52
along with the suicide thing to watch the
1:03:55
preacher to see what he's doing and to see
1:03:57
if he lets his guard down? I
1:04:01
mean, they'd have to be pretty cunning to come up
1:04:03
with that idea in Robeson County. Because
1:04:05
it is tarnishing her name. Well, kind
1:04:08
of. I mean, there's no shame. I know that it's
1:04:10
shameful in certain religions and what have you, but I
1:04:12
don't think we want to shame people who make the decision
1:04:14
to take their lives. No,
1:04:16
but I'm just saying, you know, for him to
1:04:18
get on the pulpit and say, oh, she tried
1:04:20
a number of times to
1:04:23
commit suicide, and she had mental problems,
1:04:25
and we've committed her. I mean, they
1:04:27
stigmatized her. He's weaponizing it,
1:04:29
and that's really frustrating from, like,
1:04:32
it's so hard to articulate how
1:04:34
upsetting it is when you see
1:04:36
a man weaponize a woman's mental
1:04:38
illness. Because it is a
1:04:40
stigma. It's still, no matter how many
1:04:43
Instagram posts, no matter how many times we put
1:04:45
it out in the public, it's still a badge
1:04:48
that somebody wears where they sort of feel
1:04:50
like they have to, I don't
1:04:52
know, maybe like compensate for it. Or
1:04:55
in certain lights, it looks different, right? Like,
1:04:57
you can have depression and anxiety, and that's
1:04:59
a normal thing, and most people I know
1:05:01
have some form of it. But when you
1:05:04
start to talk about, like, somebody
1:05:06
took their own lives… Right. And
1:05:09
a couple other things I want to say.
1:05:11
It seems like they start – they at
1:05:13
least met when she was underage, and he
1:05:15
was some sort of a youth
1:05:17
pastor. I believe she was 14, 15. So,
1:05:22
he could have – that's
1:05:25
another giant red flag. But the other thing I
1:05:27
want to say before we wrap this up is
1:05:30
that with this
1:05:32
case, what
1:05:34
is different is that the family
1:05:37
seems to be very – they
1:05:39
already out of the gate seem
1:05:42
to be 100 percent
1:05:44
against the idea that it's a
1:05:47
suicide, and
1:05:49
very, very, very skeptical of him
1:05:51
and the relationship, which sometimes in
1:05:54
abusive relationships like this, the abuser
1:05:56
controls her family as well. And
1:05:58
so sometimes the – person
1:06:00
who's being abused family just kind of
1:06:02
stays quiet and stays down. But it's
1:06:04
been good to see that they are
1:06:07
taking their power back. They have a
1:06:09
lawyer. They're filing probate
1:06:11
documents. His sister is
1:06:13
in charge of got a
1:06:15
special appointment. Well, under our state
1:06:17
law, she would be appointed as
1:06:20
personal representative to pursue an investigation
1:06:22
or any wrongful death claims regarding
1:06:24
the death of her sister. Special
1:06:27
administrator. Really? Okay. All right. It's
1:06:30
just, I guess she has investigatory
1:06:32
powers and they're not pursuing any
1:06:34
legal claim yet. I mean, usually
1:06:36
it's a PR, special administrators a
1:06:38
little different, but then obviously
1:06:41
you're right. They have questions and they're going to
1:06:43
demand answers and they're going to hire their own
1:06:45
investigators and they're going to have a lawyer that's
1:06:47
going to have his ideas and possibly
1:06:50
hopefully there could be a coroner's in
1:06:52
question. Right. It's extremely important.
1:06:54
And they did the smart thing with
1:06:56
putting the family, putting in writing, what
1:06:59
they knew about the abuse of the
1:07:01
relationships and what they were questioning with
1:07:05
her death. So it doesn't get
1:07:07
all skewed within media and it
1:07:09
does the message doesn't get conflated
1:07:12
by it or it's, it's a
1:07:14
solid document showing what they knew
1:07:16
and what they believe. And that's
1:07:19
super helpful and important when it comes
1:07:21
to covering cases like this. For sure.
1:07:23
Well, that was a big episode. Cuts
1:07:25
down, everybody. Cuts down. Cuts
1:07:28
down. Kaba
1:07:36
Justice is a Luna shark production created
1:07:38
by me, Nitti Matney and co-hosted by
1:07:41
journalist Liz Farrell and attorney Eric
1:07:43
Bland. Learn more about our mission
1:07:45
and membership at lunasharkmedia.com. Interruptions
1:07:48
provided by Luna and Joe Pesky. A
1:07:53
bold approach to engineering. At
1:07:56
Bowling Green State University, our engineering
1:07:58
degrees fuse the. The Eye
1:08:00
have some traditional engineering with technology
1:08:02
and hands on skills. This.
1:08:04
Combination is what employers are looking
1:08:07
for and the up and coming
1:08:09
fields of robotics, advanced manufacturing, and
1:08:11
Systems engineering. It's. Why are
1:08:13
graduates find jobs? And why Bgs
1:08:15
you stands out. Don't.
1:08:17
Just get a degree. Secure.
1:08:19
Your future at Bgs. You.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More