Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:34
Hello and welcome to the Digital Works podcast
0:37
, the podcast about digital stuff in
0:39
the cultural sector . My
0:46
name's Ash and in today's episode episode
0:48
41 , I chat with Hayden Coridus
0:50
. Hayden is a digital marketing
0:52
consultant and was previously part of Arts
0:54
Council England's Digital Culture Network
0:57
. He was their tech champion , focused
0:59
on social media . Before that
1:01
, he worked in both agencies and client side
1:03
with brands like Unilever , super Drug , coca-cola
1:05
and more . Hayden and I discussed
1:08
the fragmentation of social platforms , understanding
1:10
your audience , being thoughtful about the value
1:13
that you can offer to that audience , the
1:15
value of storytelling and loads more . Let's
1:17
enjoy it . Hi
1:26
, hayden , thanks for joining us , thanks for having me . So
1:28
I want to start a bit with
1:31
your background , your career . I
1:33
know you through your work with the Digital
1:36
Culture Network , but I know
1:38
you've worked in agencies and freelance and
1:40
your freelance again . Now , where
1:43
does your story start .
1:44
So ultimately , I used to be a musician
1:46
. So I worked in a nine
1:48
to five , a normal job , worked in retail etc , etc . I
1:50
wanted to do music . I was lucky enough
1:53
to tour the UK and perform
1:55
a glass , to bring all those kind of cool things . But
1:58
when I hit 30 , I was like , okay , I'm 30 years
2:00
old now I haven't quite broke that
2:02
ceiling . What am I doing in my life ? So
2:05
I decided that I couldn't be an intern at 30 . I used
2:07
to watch Friends a lot I don't know if people know
2:09
Friends , but I used to watch Friends and Chandler decided
2:11
to be an intern at 13 . I was like that's
2:14
not going to work for me . So I
2:16
very randomly just started working with all my old
2:18
music colleagues and people I knew , even in the music industry
2:20
, doing social and digital for them . I used to manage
2:23
all the social accounts for my band
2:25
and stuff that I was in . That
2:27
then led to me working an agency . I
2:29
had a friend at an agency that said I can come and do your socials
2:31
Again . Ironically she said , oh , we've just
2:33
hired somebody . A few of them came to me Like
2:35
a week earlier you'd have been like , okay , literally
2:38
three months later she came back to me and said oh , this person
2:40
wasn't the greatest , can you come in ? And
2:42
literally that was my agency journey . I started working in agencies
2:44
, working commercially . So I worked with Coca-Cola , we
2:46
did a project with Dior there . I
2:48
then moved from there to another
2:50
agency where I was working with Superdrag
2:53
Enterprise , unilever . And then I went
2:55
into the Arts Council working with the Digital Culture
2:57
Network , which I was one of the founding members . So we started
2:59
to kind of set up the Digital Culture Network and went
3:01
from there .
3:02
What sort of time are we talking about here ? It sounds
3:05
like probably early 2010s , late
3:07
2000s .
3:08
For me , my whole career , yeah , so yeah , yeah
3:12
, probably about something in and around that
3:14
time .
3:14
Yeah , so you've sort of ridden the wave of social
3:16
as it's become a really central part
3:19
of how brands reach
3:21
and engage with audiences .
3:23
Exactly that . I've got a degree in marketing , advertising
3:25
, but when I went to school , I went to university Social
3:27
wasn't even a flat , it wasn't even on the people's imagination
3:30
, let alone a thing that was really happening . So it's
3:32
been a really interesting to see how it's evolved
3:34
, where it's taking it , how much
3:36
the mobile phone has evolved social
3:38
media , because even before smartphones , there's
3:40
an argument that it might not even take enough to the
3:42
way it did if there wasn't a smartphone . So even the
3:44
way things have perfectly aligned has made
3:47
it interesting .
3:48
And I think we're at quite an interesting moment as
3:51
we sit here in autumn 2023
3:54
. Twitter is on
3:56
fire and falling apart . X , sorry
4:01
, x . New things are being launched
4:03
to wildly varying degrees of success
4:05
all the time . It feels like the social landscape
4:09
, which for years was moving
4:11
towards sort of consolidation and actually there
4:13
were probably only two or three platforms
4:16
that you really needed to be on and you could service
4:18
most of your audience . It feels like that's completely
4:20
gone into reverse and things have fragmented
4:22
quite significantly . What's
4:25
your perspective on where we are right
4:28
now ? Where do you think the direction of travel
4:30
is ? It feels like a lot of people are grappling
4:32
with how they use
4:35
social now , because you can't just be on
4:37
one platform and know that that will
4:39
mean you reach 75 , 80% of your
4:41
audience .
4:42
I think the term social and
4:44
, as platforms , it's evolving . So
4:47
now people , for example , for many years I've
4:49
heard people say Spotify is a social media platform as an example
4:51
. Now people are starting Slack channels
4:53
and seeing that as a platform for social
4:56
interaction . So now it's more about you
4:58
thinking about where do I want to build a community
5:00
, when do I want to build an audience and what's
5:02
the best way for me to engage with them on whatever
5:04
platform that may be for you . So if that's a WhatsApp
5:07
channel , if that's what you want to do . If that's a Slack
5:09
channel , that's what you want to do . If that's Instagram , people
5:11
now are getting wiser and smarter to understand
5:13
it's more about how you connect with
5:15
an audience or build an audience , and then you can
5:18
decide what platform works best for you . I
5:20
always say when people say you need to build every
5:22
single platform there's 4.7
5:24
billion people on social media or something like that every
5:27
single platform , I guarantee you will have
5:29
your audience . It's just dependent on how you want to use
5:31
it . Even with the idea of Facebook
5:33
, there's no kids on there . I guarantee you there
5:35
are . But it's just about how
5:37
you , what platforms work best for you , what stories
5:39
you're trying to tell ultimately and where
5:42
your primary audience are , so that it reaches
5:44
an objective , because a lot of cultural
5:46
organizations are on social just to be on social
5:49
, without they're having an objective behind it
5:51
. So that's what ? Yeah .
5:52
And I think that that shift that you're describing
5:54
is really exciting for
5:57
the sector that we both work in , for cultural
5:59
organizations , because it sounds
6:01
like if organizations can be thoughtful
6:03
about where they are active , actually
6:05
the opportunity is probably bigger
6:08
than when everyone was on Facebook
6:11
, twitter , instagram , but that it's maybe
6:13
going to take more thought
6:15
, more analysis , more work to identify
6:18
where you need to be and how you need to engage with your
6:20
audience .
6:21
So now it comes to a point where now , hopefully
6:23
, in the culture and it's in the , the irony of
6:25
it . So I went back into the commercial sector
6:28
for about eight months to a year and
6:30
brands are not that much further ahead
6:32
. There's some incredible digital
6:34
creatives in the art sector who are doing some incredible
6:36
work . It's just that it's not profiled . In the same way . I've
6:39
worked with a brand and I won't say the brand name , but
6:41
I worked with a brand this year and their
6:43
team had very little understanding
6:45
of digital , had very little understanding
6:48
of social , but they're a global brand and
6:50
you'll think how does this even work ? How does it happen ? How
6:52
do you get into this position ? And the conversations
6:54
we're having were similar to the conversations I've
6:56
been having with art and culture organizations . So
6:58
I say all that to say that art and culture organizations
7:01
, when they see themselves and they feel like , oh , we're
7:03
so far behind , you're actually in similar
7:05
positions . So the playing field
7:07
is level . It's about you now raising your skill
7:09
set .
7:10
You've touched a bit there on the work
7:12
that you've done in the cultural sector and
7:14
I know you're a freelancer now working with cultural
7:16
clients . But you worked , as
7:18
you said earlier , as one of the founding members
7:21
of the digital culture network and
7:23
I'm interested to talk a bit about that
7:25
part of your career because the
7:27
DCN , for someone like me
7:29
, was a really good move by the Arts
7:31
Council putting money into creating
7:34
a team of experts that could serve the whole
7:36
sector , and I'm
7:38
interested in your reflections on that
7:41
time . What did you take away
7:43
from that experience ? What were some of the insights
7:45
, the learnings , the observations you had Through
7:47
your perspective ? We're working with tens , if not hundreds
7:49
, of cultural organizations and how they're
7:52
using digital and social in
7:54
particular .
7:55
The main issue and again , I'm talking to the crowd so they
7:57
understand that the issues that you've ultimately came across
7:59
when I was working at the Digital Culture Network were
8:01
capacity and the understanding
8:03
of leadership . So I understand that how leadership
8:06
would put restraints on what
8:08
could be done digitally , would be done socially
8:10
, and that just came down to understanding and that
8:12
learning piece being able to talk
8:14
to a team and showcase . So this is why you need
8:17
to maybe consider doing things like this . Another
8:19
thing that I found very surprising in one of
8:21
my colleagues , emma . She's now a smart fire
8:23
. There was a real big pushback to e-commerce
8:26
, which that took us by surprise
8:28
. It was almost you could feel it . It
8:31
was that forceful and Emma worked with some really
8:33
good and she did some great work . But just really trying to
8:36
educate the sector and educate organizations about the
8:38
power of e-commerce and although , yes , we
8:40
live in the UK , which has a funding system
8:42
, there's so many great opportunities to build
8:45
finances or build revenue from
8:47
digital which they seem to frown upon
8:49
, but I think some organizations will get . Obviously , you know
8:51
the Tank Museum are cleaning up on that sector
8:53
, but some organizations are really starting to get it . You
8:56
touched on something .
8:56
I think important there this idea
8:59
of leadership of sort of executive
9:01
teams in the sector , understanding
9:03
the value of digital
9:06
activity , you know , and digital activity manifests in
9:08
many different ways and it was interesting
9:10
that you said it felt like there was a pushback to revenue
9:12
generating activities , because my
9:14
assumption would have been that those would be the ones that would
9:16
be easiest to make the case for . But
9:19
I think social definitely
9:22
falls into the category of maybe
9:24
hard to explain sometimes If
9:26
your leadership team is maybe not super
9:29
digitally literate and they're not
9:31
maybe active on social platforms anecdotally
9:33
. I've heard that it can be a real challenge
9:35
to explain why it's
9:38
important to spend time and effort , as you
9:40
said , building your communities , engaging with those
9:42
communities 100% , and
9:44
again this is big and small again , so
9:46
it goes across the spectrum of the organizations
9:48
.
9:49
Where they struggle is , I think people have
9:52
an association with what social media as
9:54
a platform is , so they see the negative
9:57
sides of it . They see dancing videos
9:59
going viral , they see stuff like that and they assume
10:01
the virality of hits and the things will go viral
10:03
. They don't associate with themselves . So
10:06
they then think , well , what's the purpose of what we're doing
10:08
this ? I always try to tell people . Again , going back to
10:10
the 4.7 billion having people on social
10:12
media , there's what a billion or post
10:14
a day . If you see a hundred things
10:16
in your feed that have gone viral that day , that's
10:19
not even 1% of the post that's gone . So
10:22
people need to kind of really think
10:24
about social media as a . I call it like
10:26
the shop window , the shop window for your organization
10:28
. How are you enticing people to want to know more ? How
10:30
are you enticing people to find out more about your
10:32
story ? How are you educating people ? How
10:35
are you providing entertainment ? One thing that
10:37
used to drive me bar me when people used to talk about doing hybrid events
10:39
and doing a collaboration
10:41
and they would see the digital side of it mean , okay
10:44
, we're going to stream it live , but that's not what hybrid means . There's
10:46
so many different avenues and ways you can bring that campaign
10:49
to life . You can showcase okay
10:51
, maybe we're going to do a Q&A with the cast at this moment , or
10:54
maybe a museum curator is going to speak , or maybe
10:56
there's going to be an element where there can be a call
10:58
to action and people can share posts with the organization
11:00
back and forth from being at the event . Just
11:03
thinking about different ways you can engage with your audience
11:05
digitally is what seems
11:07
to be the missing part , where there's a complete blindness to
11:09
how do we use
11:11
these platforms , use these tools To
11:13
engage with people , to tell stories , and
11:15
it's more case of we've got this tool and it's a
11:17
platform to just sell , and we
11:20
don't even going to sell in a clever way . We're just going to sell and
11:23
to say come to this event , that's it .
11:26
Yeah , and that broadcast mindset does seem like
11:28
it's still quite prevalent , despite
11:31
people like you and others explaining
11:33
how that is maybe not the most effective way to be active on these
11:35
platforms .
11:37
I always compare it to . You know , when you've got that friend or family member who
11:40
only comes to you when they want something , that's what's literally what's literally what
11:42
it's like . So we're only going to our audiences when we want
11:44
to buy something . When they want them to buy nothing , we don't talk to
11:46
them . Normally , we don't generate engagement
11:48
. I did a talk for Museum Next
11:50
about fundraising and talked about the
11:52
fact that communities are expecting
11:55
you to be online . They expect organizations
11:57
to tell their stories . They're expecting to be able to go and
12:00
get that social proof and see that , yeah
12:02
, you're active online and there's active conversations and
12:05
they're seeing that you're providing value
12:07
in some way , shape or form . Social
12:09
media now competes . Tiktok is
12:11
said to be a competitor to Netflix . So
12:14
when you're seeing social media platforms in that kind
12:16
of guys , ultimately just your own TV
12:18
channel and then you can dictate
12:20
the content what's happening , what shows are happening
12:22
and it's just up to you to use it in that
12:24
way and then really build out your stories .
12:26
And we've talked there about some of the challenges
12:28
that the sector has around social activity
12:30
. But let's put
12:32
our positive hats on for a moment . You know , I
12:34
think there is a lot of really great
12:36
, entertaining , engaging , impactful
12:40
social activity from
12:42
organizations large and small
12:44
. What do you think , or where do
12:46
you think , the sector is getting it right when
12:48
it comes to being active on social platforms there ?
12:50
are some great examples . I
12:52
think the Sacra Mentor History Museum
12:54
are killing on TikTok and they focus
12:57
on one specific element of
12:59
their museum , which is their printer press and
13:01
they tell stories and they've got a clear strategy
13:03
about how they go about doing that . So they
13:06
make every single day a post about something , so
13:08
they add in value . They tell stories
13:10
around the print and around the history of what things are
13:12
happening that are trending as well . So something's happening
13:14
in the world that's relevant to them . They will tell a story
13:16
about that that relates to their print . So
13:18
I think they're doing really great things . The
13:21
Vagina Museum would bring it on X . They're
13:23
really good at using threads to tell
13:25
stories about the history of female
13:27
anatomy and things like that . Those are
13:29
the two that come to mind straight away on different platforms
13:32
. To give you an example of what that looks like Smartify
13:34
, brilliant on Instagram . Google Arts and Culture
13:36
Brilliant online . They're really good at showcasing stories . You've
13:39
got organizations like American
13:41
Ballet Society they're brilliant or American
13:43
Ballet Fair I think they're called Sydney Opera
13:46
House again , they're brilliant . They really understand
13:48
how to showcase their programming
13:50
while also talking about the events and
13:52
making people want to come to their organization
13:54
. The Barbican are doing some really cool
13:56
stuff . So there's so many organizations
13:59
now from across the world who are really championing it
14:01
, but what I find is they're few and far between
14:03
. So if there's a million
14:05
social media accounts from , also culture organizations
14:07
, maybe there's a hundred of them that are really
14:10
thinking about what they do on the platforms , which is the
14:12
biggest issue for me .
14:13
And it sounds like the thread that runs through all of those
14:15
is the organization having a really
14:17
clear understanding of their
14:20
perspective and their sort of tone
14:22
of voice , but also linking
14:24
it to something that is of value to
14:27
their audience .
14:28
Exactly , and not just that understanding the platform
14:30
features . Those
14:32
are for three different platforms , but they understand what works
14:34
really well on those platforms and the features of
14:36
the platform .
14:37
So yeah , yeah , because you can't just post
14:39
the same thing on every platform regardless
14:41
.
14:41
Exactly yeah .
14:42
And do you think there are commonalities
14:45
between the organizations
14:47
that are doing a good job ? You know
14:49
that other people can look to
14:51
and learn from and take influence from .
14:53
A hundred percent the people who are doing
14:55
. I've just been consistent . If I'm being honest with you , they've been
14:58
consistent and they've looked to your insight . Social
15:00
media doesn't have to be rocket science . It's literally look
15:02
at your insights and be consistent , and then how
15:04
you add in value to your audience . So if you
15:07
were trying to build a strategy , those would just be the three , even
15:09
if it's the top layer strategy . How can
15:11
we be consistent ? What do our insights tell us
15:13
and how do we add value to our audience ? That's
15:15
it , and then do that . And if you're consistent
15:17
across those three metrics , those three spaces
15:20
, then you will eventually come
15:22
across some success . Again , another issue
15:24
you'll find with it is that there's
15:26
an idea that it's an overnight thing and
15:29
again , you're telling a story . It will take
15:31
time , you're going to have to dabble with things . Another
15:34
kind of bad thing that we do is
15:36
that we put young people in
15:38
a place and say , oh , you're young , you can do social media go
15:40
. And yes , they probably understand social
15:43
media from a personal standpoint , but from an organizational
15:45
standpoint , from a okay , we've got objectives
15:47
to reach , I've yet to come across
15:50
one who understands that concept . So you're
15:52
setting yourself up to fail .
15:53
And I think also that dynamic
15:55
that you just described there of social
15:58
roles often being held by younger
16:00
or more junior members of staff . And
16:03
actually Social role
16:05
is an emotionally demanding
16:08
, intellectually demanding
16:10
role . You know you're carrying the
16:13
way the organization exactly
16:15
, and it through the pandemic you saw . Institutions
16:18
were suddenly reduced as maybe the wrong word , but
16:20
the only way that their institution
16:22
existed in the minds and eyes of their audience was
16:24
their social presence , and those are often
16:27
being mad by quite junior
16:29
members of the team and probably
16:31
didn't get the support that they needed
16:33
no strategies in place how
16:35
to do escalation issues like
16:37
exactly that .
16:38
The vagina museum is a really good example because it is
16:41
just one person and she's
16:43
brilliant at being up to this . Ok
16:45
, I understand what my audience wants where
16:48
the woods gonna be . She's really good
16:50
at telling stories via
16:52
their guys and via the tone of voice and
16:54
it's work to cross multiple platforms . Because of that
16:56
and that just come down to again that's
16:58
not a big team . So you suppose on time there's this illusion
17:01
that there's a has to be a big team . It's more
17:03
just about saying , okay , what story are we
17:05
trying to tell ? How does it resonate with what
17:07
we're trying to achieve ? And then , how do you tell the
17:09
story and add value ? And from them adding value
17:11
, that when they did the fundraiser , they raise so much
17:13
money in two weeks like and I
17:16
know there was a few issues trying to raise the money
17:18
and they still every time it got to one level
17:20
that up again and up to again and they did
17:22
really well and because the audience were engaged
17:24
with the doing , the audience bought into the story telling
17:26
and that's just one example of how you
17:29
can start to build these communities that will really support
17:31
what you're trying to do . We spoke about the museum
17:33
of English for a life before we started
17:35
the podcast and Again , although
17:38
they're pretty well known now , where
17:40
ultimately came down to is the fact that , because they
17:42
had built this community , people
17:44
were interested in going to find out more . The
17:46
tank museum is another example and although I've
17:48
heard nick talk about the time you many says they've got totally
17:51
different audience from what they have that
17:53
come to the tank museum On the
17:55
online , which is totally from the people who come to the organization
17:58
, they've been able to say , okay , what do I
18:00
want ? Audience one , and then how do you get to
18:02
the benefit of the organization ? So again , they think
18:04
it from is from a strategic point of view . How do we
18:06
Understand what audience wants and
18:08
how does that then play into what we're trying to achieve as organization
18:10
? And then they've married that beautifully . I think
18:12
they said they made a million dollars from ads
18:15
or something over the last couple years . That
18:17
that's insane . You're making a million
18:19
from ads like that's insane . And then partnerships
18:22
, and it's just another great example of when
18:24
you use it correctly , what you can do with it .
18:26
It's interesting you've touched on a number of times
18:28
the idea that your
18:31
focus with your social activity shouldn't
18:33
Primarily be rich . You
18:35
know , it's not about how many people
18:37
you reach , it's about how you
18:39
engage those those individuals , yes and no
18:42
with that .
18:42
So Another organization work with , again massive
18:44
organization that had a million
18:46
followers there's . Really , just think about okay
18:49
, well , we got a million followers , but we
18:51
don't get much engagement on the platform . Is
18:53
there much point in doing it ? They were going back
18:55
and forth , going back and forth , and then we worked out what they
18:57
engage with . The engagement was like 0.001 . It
18:59
was something ridiculous . That was the year
19:02
and yeah , so it worked out . You're engaging with about
19:04
900 people On average , like what's
19:06
the point ? Like , but you got a
19:08
million followers , so we have to be well
19:10
. If you're engaging with less than a thousand people
19:12
, like there's better times of resources
19:15
of your time , just so I mean . So it's again
19:17
going back to the inside , something to understand what your day
19:19
is telling you . We say it's a vanity
19:22
metric that the following number is a vanity
19:24
metric to the extent that if you got a million
19:26
followers but they're not engaging , if you , it means it literally
19:28
means nothing . If you got 10 thousand followers and you got
19:30
a thousand , two thousand , three thousand , then You're
19:32
killing the game something given that you
19:34
know and talking about understanding
19:37
your audience and delivering value to your
19:39
audience .
19:40
Maybe this is not the choice of people being asked
19:42
to make , but would you say it's about
19:44
people being active on
19:46
fewer platforms ? Be
19:49
more intentional and specific about the activity
19:51
, rather than trying to have
19:54
a profile on every platform and just basically
19:56
posting the same stuff for having a bot that's replicating
19:59
at your post I say it's better to
20:01
be great on one , then we go to important
20:03
cross five or six .
20:05
If there is a demand for you to be on
20:07
every platform , then be
20:09
clear what your strategy is for that specific
20:12
platform . So let's say , for example
20:14
, you want to be on the normal big
20:16
one , so facebook , instagram
20:18
, x , tiktok , as an example
20:20
, you may say x is going to be
20:22
literally a strategy , for x is only
20:25
gonna post Our events , so we're
20:27
not trying to engage the time about audience , but it's gonna post
20:29
our events . Instagram and tiktok as well
20:31
. We're gonna try and create communities , as
20:33
an example . So that's gonna be focused with those platforms
20:35
. And in facebook might be we might have a facebook
20:37
group where we can delve into building
20:40
more close . Brand . Ambassador is all
20:42
driving people to the website . So having a clear
20:44
purpose for each platform makes it easier for
20:46
you to then say these are why we're here , be
20:49
on every platform , just been every platform and stress about
20:51
your post . Social media manager saying we have to have content
20:53
across all these things and they don't mean nothing , can
20:55
nobody think agent of them is Recipe
20:57
for disaster and probably why organization
21:00
leadership looks at and says nothing's happening
21:02
and suppose the other side of
21:04
the question I asked earlier .
21:06
Where do you think the big Mist
21:08
opportunities are for the cultural
21:10
sector around ? Social , you know what's the things that
21:12
you wish you saw people doing more of ?
21:15
I think it is just the story telling a side
21:17
of things like . So one
21:19
of the beautiful things about working in digital culture network is
21:21
we worked with all types of organizations
21:23
so libraries of museums
21:25
, theaters , music , etc . And
21:28
libraries used to come to us and be like we
21:30
don't know how to tell the story . I'm like you're a library
21:32
, how can you not know have stories to tell
21:34
? That used to blow my mind like
21:37
that . That makes no sense . How
21:39
can you have no stories to tell as a library
21:41
, like You've got a story to tell for every
21:43
single day of the week you can tell a different
21:45
story , you can theme up , you can
21:47
die up and down . There's so many things
21:49
that you can do as a library and
21:51
that's the thing . I think it's really sad that we don't
21:54
buy into the fact that there's an audience out there for
21:56
everybody . I used to say jokingly when
21:58
I should do talks . I still do
22:00
, but one of the my like quips were that
22:03
there's an audience , everybody , even
22:05
people who like to tissue and the nice search
22:07
start . There was a instagram page that had like sixty
22:09
thousand followers just toilet paper , and if
22:11
the pictures of the toilet paper Like
22:14
literally doesn't all , just every single
22:16
thing out , that it might be a hundred , thousand
22:18
hundred , but there was , like said with so
22:20
many people on social media , I guarantee you
22:22
doesn't all just few . It's just about you dialing
22:24
up what you want to tell the story
22:26
about .
22:27
And I think it's interesting that almost
22:29
every example that you have been enthusiastic
22:31
about got excited about that we've talked
22:33
about over the last half an hour . So have
22:36
been where organizations
22:38
have been using social
22:41
platform , social activity , to engage
22:44
with audiences , to build community
22:46
, to tell stories . It hasn't
22:49
been about directly driving revenue
22:51
or , you know , promoting a
22:53
one-off thing . It's about that
22:55
sort of long-term relationship
22:58
building and , from your perspective
23:00
, do you think that should be the primary focus
23:02
of social activity ?
23:03
I think yes , because I think ultimately it does
23:06
tell us to every cause . So if
23:08
you're first of mine , when someone comes to
23:10
London and says , okay , I want to go to the South Bank Centre because
23:12
I've seen all this great content and these great stories that
23:15
come from , that's where you're going to go . If , when
23:17
you think , okay , I want to go to a theatre show and you
23:19
know there's one Pacific theatre , there's always got
23:21
this great content , that's the first place you're going to look up
23:23
to see have they got anything on that I want to see
23:25
. There's also a conversation that there's
23:28
a different way to tell stories now , and so
23:30
there's a really good TED talk
23:32
by an Australian doctor about social
23:34
media , and she talks about the
23:37
role of museums or also cultural
23:39
organisations to socially capture
23:41
history as it happens and how
23:44
things have evolved . An example she gives is
23:46
of Anne Frank , so she's an event in Anne Frank's
23:48
time , her the way she documented what's happening
23:50
in history was through an old book . There's
23:52
a Ukrainian teenager who use
23:55
TikTok and she said , ultimately
23:57
it was the same thing and we're
23:59
just totally missing that . We're not amplifying those
24:02
stories . We're not seeing social media as a way to capture
24:04
social and cultural moments and historical
24:06
moments and then to add value to that because
24:08
of the fact that we work in arts and we know the history
24:10
behind these things , we know the stories , but the stories
24:13
that have maybe led to that , to add value to that
24:15
, and to me , that's where the opportunities
24:17
are being missed . And if you're an organisation
24:20
that says , oh , we can't be funny or we can't be nice , then
24:22
find that educational moment where you can add
24:24
value to something . Find that historical
24:26
moment that relates to something . There's
24:28
a great instagram page called art , but make
24:31
it sports and literally they get
24:33
famous paintings and they'll compare to a
24:35
sport event . And again , hundred thousand followers
24:37
. Nothing to do with culture , sexual , but this
24:39
is what this counts doing things that we could
24:41
be doing so easily . Did you send me ?
24:43
and I think that last point is the opportunity
24:46
. Right , you know Cultural organisations , whether
24:48
that's performing arts , galleries , museums
24:50
, wherever they
24:53
are experts in , whatever it
24:55
is they are expert in , and ultimately
24:57
there is a degree of storytelling
24:59
in their core . That's the yeah
25:01
and it feels like the missed opportunity
25:03
is that that expertise and
25:05
that storytelling muscle isn't exercised
25:07
outside of .
25:09
Often , bringing people into a building feels
25:12
like what you're describing is the opportunity
25:14
for social to be another
25:16
way to extend that mission and just extend
25:19
that storytelling activity
25:21
and the thing we have to remember it's scary
25:23
as it is I've got an F you who's eight years old , but
25:25
from the three or four
25:27
he's had a mobile phone or tablet in his hand . That
25:30
next generation of audience go is online
25:32
. Roblox , I believe
25:34
I don't want to call it because I might get the numbers from
25:36
Roblox made more money in 2020
25:38
, then every fashion house in the world
25:40
and stuff like that is insane . When you think it's
25:42
a digital platform because people would just buying
25:44
digital clothes in Roblox like that's
25:47
crazy . Some of those kind of stats
25:49
that you look at and you see how I
25:51
think between 70% of the kids
25:53
4 to 10 year olds in America are
25:56
using Roblox . So you think
25:58
of those kind of age groups who are coming through
26:00
digitally savvy . They're going to expect
26:02
to be connecting and find the
26:04
stories and find the communities online
26:07
. That's how their world works and faster
26:09
than say we're just gonna ignore it and we're gonna
26:11
deal with an age group which is aging out
26:13
and then even Age group of millennials
26:16
. We live on communities as well online
26:18
. So the idea that we're just gonna literally ignore
26:20
it Is almost ludicrous . Almost
26:23
. It's almost a death call to ourselves , like we're saying
26:25
we don't care what's gonna , you know , it's just
26:28
be ordering some time .
26:29
I agree because , alongside
26:31
that behavior shift
26:33
to everything being or
26:36
having some sort of digital touch point , you
26:38
know there's been a reduction in formal arts
26:40
education as part of the curriculum and actually
26:42
, as you say , if cultural sector doesn't
26:44
respond to how people Are
26:47
engaging with the world , and also
26:49
there's a reduction in how people
26:52
are exposed to sort of traditional forms of cultures
26:54
. You know that there is a pie
26:56
is getting smaller for everyone . Exactly
26:58
and as well as you said . You
27:00
know , you and I are not that
27:03
young and we are millennials
27:05
. You know , and I think that assumption that
27:07
digital or social automatically
27:10
equals teenagers Was
27:12
true 25 years ago but
27:14
is no longer the case . And again
27:16
, I think , through the pandemic , because
27:18
everyone was having to access
27:20
products and services digitally
27:23
, that behavior shift
27:25
now runs right through , demographically
27:27
, the traditional cultural audiences as
27:29
well . So to ignore the opportunity
27:31
to engage with these audience through these tools and platforms
27:34
?
27:34
because everybody else is . So it's not like
27:36
the world is saying , okay , you're not doing it , on why everybody
27:38
else is doing it . And going back to what we said about
27:40
tick to be in a competitor to Netflix , arts
27:43
and culture , realistically , you're competing with movies
27:45
, you're competing with concert , competing with TV
27:48
, and so it's the same thing you got
27:50
to think about . How do we tell stories ? How do we get people
27:52
into the spaces ? In the UK
27:54
were lucky to have funding . A lot of other countries
27:56
don't have funding , so if they don't have funding , it's even
27:59
more like that . You need to compete to get eyeballs
28:01
and so that you can actually have revenue
28:03
, have people coming through the door . So it really is a
28:05
critical touch point . And it's not just
28:07
social cause . When I talk about storytelling , it's
28:09
about the whole digital experience . So
28:11
how you drive people to your website , what stories
28:13
on your website , how are you telling
28:15
people things about your information via newsletters ? Have
28:17
a connection there . If you got a payment
28:19
system , how simplified is that ? If
28:22
you're telling stories about your donations and
28:24
how people can support you , how simplified
28:26
is that connection ? It's the whole digital ecosystem
28:29
that you need to be really thinking about and
28:31
having a synergy across so that people can
28:33
really buy into what you're doing .
28:35
And it sounds like , and I'm definitely putting
28:37
words in your mouth to tell me if this
28:40
is wrong but it sounds like you're saying
28:42
that the most effective use
28:45
of social activity is
28:47
as a brand awareness play . You
28:49
know , as you say , explaining who
28:51
you are and what you do , be keeping
28:54
yourself top of mind . Yeah , see
28:56
, not doing a hard sell , but allowing people
28:58
to come to you , and it's
29:01
a storytelling piece , it's a brand piece brand
29:03
awareness thing .
29:04
But again , cold color has been around
29:06
for so long because of the fact power of the brand
29:08
. So brand awareness almost don't
29:10
say trivialize it , but it makes it feel like that . That's
29:13
not gonna amplify everything else that you
29:15
do . It's gonna play into the revenue
29:17
that you create because people know who you are . Because of
29:19
the power of your brand , you're gonna have more
29:21
people who are saying have
29:23
you heard about the show ? You should really check out
29:25
because people are aware of you and they're telling their
29:28
friends . That word of mouth moment happens , real
29:30
social . They do quite freaking close and
29:32
there's one for June and it said again
29:34
word of mouth . I said comments people
29:36
were finding brand to find organizations through
29:39
common and that was across age groups , like
29:41
24 , 25% across age
29:43
groups . These are all factors that people
29:45
happy to find out , find out who you are . So
29:47
, yes , it's a brand awareness piece , education
29:50
and a story telling piece so that you've got your
29:53
, your turning people into fans
29:55
and advocates for what you're doing and
29:58
people advocating different ways . So that might be if
30:00
they don't come to the show , but they love you , do so much . They
30:02
said I think you love this event . You
30:04
should go check out . Did you know this new
30:06
event happening at this such and such museum ? You
30:08
should check out the love that you start
30:11
to see them , to their life and to their into their mindset . So
30:13
, yes , it's a brand awareness piece , but it's so much bigger
30:16
than that because it ties into everything .
30:18
And for people that are
30:20
in the process of making that shift , or they're
30:22
listening to this and think , okay , we need to shift from a
30:24
selling mindset , more cost mindset , more of
30:26
an engagement . Where
30:28
would you recommend people start
30:31
? What's step one to working
30:33
in a more effective way ? And sort of where you've described
30:35
.
30:35
I think step one is being honest about your
30:37
resource level . So being honest about
30:39
what your resources are from a
30:41
financial standpoint , from a skill set , internally
30:44
standpoint , what the team makeup looks like
30:46
, because what you'll find is , if
30:48
you just add social as an add-on to someone else's
30:50
job and it's not their main role , they will
30:52
do it for a month , two months , and then it'll be my
30:55
main role , takes over and it will fall off . So
30:57
, really being honest about what that looks like
30:59
. Once you've done that , you can then say okay , how do
31:01
we start to build out benchmarks of success for ourself
31:04
? And I think everybody does it across
31:06
art sector brand . I think
31:08
it's a human thing where we judge our success
31:10
based on others without really saying
31:12
, okay , but what's got into that success ? So what
31:15
are our benchmarks ? What do our insights look like ? So
31:17
for me , it would be look at your internal resources first
31:20
, see what that looks like , then look at your
31:22
results to start saying , okay , how can we start framing some
31:24
benchmarks for ourselves ? And then , three
31:26
, you're gonna wanna say this might have come first , but
31:28
it's fine . Three , you're gonna say , okay
31:30
, what do we want to do ? Why are we here in the first place
31:32
? What are we trying to achieve ? Like I said , even if you're just
31:34
doing those three things , add the consistency
31:37
to that , you will build something and
31:39
you'll start to enjoy it . You'll start to see successes
31:41
and then you'll be able to go from there .
31:43
Yeah , and I think that third step
31:46
, or maybe first step , about
31:49
really being , I guess , having
31:51
a really frank conversation about why
31:53
do we exist , what is the
31:55
thing that we can say or the value that we
31:57
can add that no one else can . It feels
31:59
like that's the conversation that lots
32:02
of organizations aren't having , or
32:04
maybe had 10 years ago and haven't revisited
32:06
. And
32:08
if you're working in a digital team or leading a digital team
32:10
and maybe you feel like your organization needs
32:13
to have that sort of conversation , do you
32:15
have any tips of sort of how you catalyze
32:17
that conversation , because that's a conversation that feels like it needs
32:19
to happen on an organization-wide level ?
32:21
Yeah , I always say you wanna try and get the people in
32:23
the room who are gonna make the decisions to have those
32:25
conversations . So I'm working . I
32:28
think that'd be fine for me . I'm working with a lot of guys called Piper
32:30
at the moment and we had a really good
32:32
meeting where we got their board members in , we
32:34
got the senior team members and we got in there
32:36
, like the junior members and the overall
32:38
digital team . We had a whole day session where
32:40
we went through what do we expect , what do you
32:42
wanna see from our digital communications , what do
32:44
you wanna see from our social media output
32:47
? And just for having everybody in the room , we
32:49
could see there were different opinions and different viewpoints
32:51
, but we could come to an agreement of what made sense
32:53
for us as an organization . So
32:55
even if that means you get somebody to facilitate that
32:57
session for you where you've got an outsider who can say
32:59
, well , this is what we're trying to achieve and this
33:01
is how you can go about doing that and just staring
33:03
it , rather than having kind of people at loggerheads
33:06
against what they wanna get from the different channels
33:08
. But for me that is a really great step because once
33:10
everybody's aligned of what the reason they're doing
33:12
it . It makes it easier and it also helps the social
33:14
media person or digital person , because you won't get
33:16
this , you gotta do this , you gotta do this . Well , no , we've
33:19
agreed , this is our strategy . So we've got kind of , you've got
33:21
a kind of a leg to stand on to say , well , this is our
33:23
strategy , based on what we've all agreed and I think
33:25
everything we've described today
33:27
demonstrates that
33:29
this is a specific
33:32
strand of activity .
33:33
It requires specific skills
33:35
, it requires a thoughtful approach
33:38
, it requires a plan . It
33:40
cannot , as you said earlier , just be a
33:42
bolt on digital marketing
33:45
and also we'll post some stuff on Twitter
33:47
. Actually , it needs to be a longitudinal
33:49
strategic approach because otherwise
33:51
, as you say , either it's gonna fall down
33:54
the list of priorities or you're just
33:56
gonna be screaming into the void and getting
33:58
nothing back .
33:59
Exactly , and then it really is a waste of your time at
34:01
that point when you slide that I
34:03
couldn't have summarized it better , and that's
34:06
why you're got the podcast
34:08
.
34:10
And you know before again we press
34:13
record . You were talking about some work
34:15
you're doing in the States , working with museums
34:17
over there . Listenership to this is
34:19
international . I'm intrigued
34:21
if you see a difference in approach because
34:24
you've worked with lots of UK-based organizations and now some North
34:26
American organizations . Is there a difference to help
34:28
people approach social ?
34:30
I think the bigger American organizations
34:33
get it a bit more , but I also think that comes
34:35
down to the idea that they understand that
34:37
they need to have a story out there to get funding
34:39
, to get donations , et cetera , et cetera . I
34:41
think the larger UK organizations
34:44
a lot of them get by
34:46
on the fact that they're a big organization , so
34:48
there's recognition on their name , more so than them
34:50
actually being good at digital or social , and
34:53
I think that's something I know . There's some organizations who are
34:55
trying to change that philosophy and change the way they approach
34:57
it . I think ultimately
34:59
, though as much as I always harp on about it
35:01
, it does come down to you owning your story
35:03
. I'm giving an example . So the South Bank Center , for
35:05
example . The South Bank Center is
35:08
a center , but what story do they
35:10
want to tell ? It doesn't have to be about all
35:12
the million different events that happen . Is what's
35:14
the core story we want to tell ? And we've
35:16
said here that we don't talk about sales . It's not about that . You don't
35:18
talk about sales . You just find other ways to tell
35:20
stories through sales . So
35:22
if you're doing an event say you're doing , they're
35:25
doing a book launch you can talk
35:27
about the layers , about what that book launches , and you
35:29
can talk about that on your social fees , and then
35:31
the ads that you run could be pushing
35:34
for it , so you can do dark ads that are pushing towards oh
35:36
, by the way , comes this event . So it's not that we're
35:38
saying that you don't use social for sales . You
35:41
definitely do , but it's not the beat on end
35:43
of why you're using the platform and you connect
35:45
it to other elements of the story . So
35:48
yeah , ultimately , I think around the world , there's similarities
35:50
between all of them , because I think arts and culture
35:52
organizations are very focused on the arts and
35:54
the culture and
35:56
the business side of it can be frowned upon
35:58
. I think that seems to be a universal mandate
36:01
.
36:01
So yeah , At the beginning we talked about the
36:03
fragmentation of sort of the social media
36:05
landscape and my colleague Katie
36:07
and I talked about newsletter we sent out
36:09
recently where one of the things we shared
36:11
was that the Australian Broadcasting Corporation
36:13
has come off X , come off
36:16
Twitter because it was
36:18
more hassle than it was worth . Basically , you
36:20
know , I also had conversations with colleagues
36:22
in cultural organizations where they're Looking
36:25
at the relative toxicity
36:27
of a platform and asking questions about actually
36:30
, should we even be active here ? I suppose
36:32
this relates to the conversation we're
36:34
having earlier about Be more thoughtful
36:36
about where you are active . But do you think , as part
36:38
of that conversation , what should
36:41
organizations should also be thinking about where they
36:43
should not be active ?
36:44
so again I got to say earlier about it
36:47
being a strategic point of view . I think there's
36:49
a couple things to consider . What do you
36:51
stand for as an organization , so
36:53
does that platform go against that ? Now
36:56
, for me , when you start to take those kind of
36:58
start is , though , there has to be consistency
37:00
across it , so it can become
37:02
quite tricky to say , okay , we're gonna leave this
37:04
because of this and go to here , because
37:07
then someone else will definitely especially if you're a larger organization
37:09
will find that the same issue when you go to the
37:11
other platform . I tend
37:13
to tell people to really look at it from an audience standpoint
37:15
. So the ex scenario as
37:18
an example although , yes , there is a
37:20
lot of noise around the only
37:22
and how the platform is , there's also
37:24
a lot of people on it who don't care either
37:26
way , who are still on the platform , so
37:29
it's more about you thinking , okay , what do
37:31
we stand for organization ? We're gonna take that
37:33
start . Are we doing it just because it seems to be the
37:35
cool thing to do all the thing that's done ? Are
37:37
we doing it because this is what we don't believe in ? And
37:39
if that is what you don't believe in , are we gonna have that
37:41
same kind of energy across the board to
37:43
everything that we do going forward . If
37:46
you are gonna have that , then be prepared to
37:48
face criticism for that and be okay with
37:50
it . Second of all , like I said , then think about your
37:52
audience . If your audience is ultimately
37:54
on this platform and that's what you generally believe , then
37:57
you have to contemplate how do we reach these people otherwise
37:59
. So the vagina music , for example , they've got
38:01
a really active on twitter . I
38:03
know they've moved out of a platform , but they've got a really
38:05
active orders and so For me would
38:07
it would make sense to me to say something don't be on twitter
38:09
anymore , or excellent
38:12
, that would make sense for that because they've got an active audience
38:14
which helps them get out their messaging . So
38:17
I think this is a bit more complicated than the same . When
38:19
you're gonna leave , because we don't agree with the management style
38:21
of the owners of the platform . Jim
38:23
from museum next put a really great post out
38:26
about . These are some tips on linked
38:28
in the page about . This is why I left the page and he made
38:30
it and it works for him because he's given clear
38:32
reason . This is why we're gonna leave it . This
38:34
is what I'm gonna try find out . Market engagement . I used
38:36
to get off it All of that . So it goes back
38:38
to saying always have a plan .
38:39
There's a reason for you doing it , not just doing it as
38:41
a knee-jerk reaction and once again , it
38:44
seems like the core of what you were saying there is
38:46
Understanding your audience . Yes , because
38:49
that should be the reason why you're on these platforms
38:51
in the first place , and it feels
38:53
like still there are lots of organizations
38:55
that maybe aren't fully
38:58
understanding or Analyzing
39:01
where their audience is . Again
39:04
, if you're in an organization where that's maybe Partly
39:07
or fully the case , what sort of tool
39:09
should people be using ? Is it about using the
39:11
, the in-built analytics tools on these platforms
39:14
? Is it about doing research
39:16
activities outside of that , focus group surveys
39:18
, etc . How do you build the understanding
39:20
of where your audience ?
39:21
I think , yeah , this is when you're approaching
39:23
it . From what you do , it comes down to
39:25
now , what your objectives is
39:27
. Literally , done that . Who are you trying to reach ? Why are you trying
39:30
to reach them ? What impact they can have on
39:32
your what you're trying to do ? How did
39:34
you go into ? That is then up to you . So , yeah , then do you do
39:36
workshops , do you do Surveys
39:38
? Do you do focus groups of people to find out
39:40
what that perfect audience looks like for you to start
39:42
looking at this and I love all that stuff
39:44
. So , yes , that's what I ideally want to do . Most
39:47
are , if we're gonna be honest , most awesome culture organizations
39:49
are gonna do all that . So it's then comes out to say , okay
39:51
, we want to achieve xyz , we
39:53
believe our audience looks like this . Ultimately
39:56
, those people can be found here , and
39:58
then you started play with it and build just right
40:00
from that . If you can go in a lot more depth than a
40:02
hundred percent , that's the way to go . But
40:04
why do you believe is and again , this is probably
40:06
for my time working digital culture network is , the
40:09
more they start to see the things that work in , the more
40:11
they start to understand . Okay , we need to add a layer
40:13
of detail to this and then they start to get better
40:15
, bigger and better and better , and that's when you get the winners , more
40:17
so than people try to go in Super
40:20
heavy with . Okay , understand the data , and then
40:22
it's not their world . So you're doing
40:24
things that the alien to them . So therefore
40:26
it becomes a bit much of a woman and then end
40:29
up just leaving it . So just start small
40:31
. I would say , start small , but be really clear
40:33
this objective . We think audience looks
40:35
like this , or who we see coming to our shows
40:37
or events , what have you ?
40:39
Where those people that ultimately , yet the
40:41
last question is everything
40:44
you've described and you said this
40:46
specifically is that actually you
40:48
should look at this . Your
40:50
timeline horizon over which you're measuring success
40:52
needs to be realistic . Realistic
40:55
longer term . Actually , a slow
40:57
burn is probably going to be more impactful for your
40:59
organization than one thing going viral once . Hundred
41:01
percent and actually virality
41:03
is almost impossible to predict
41:06
. You can't legislate for it . If
41:08
it happens , great . But the
41:10
focus should be on the slow burn over
41:13
months or years with a really
41:15
specific focus on a
41:17
really specific audience .
41:19
Even when we think about the organizations who discussed
41:21
, who have done really well . All of them are
41:23
the ones fit for years , even
41:26
the mail , although it had a quote
41:28
, unquote , overnight success . They've really
41:30
thought about how they build that and how they build on that
41:32
and they've really Delve into the data and
41:34
look to the inside to say , okay , this is what works for
41:36
us , this type of copy works for us , this tone
41:38
of voice works for us . They've had to really
41:41
get strategic with it . So that's
41:43
what is that ? That's what you're thinking about . Think about what
41:45
is the long picture ? How do we make
41:48
sure we're telling stories that are relevant to watch , relevant
41:50
to audience , at value , and we're not just putting
41:52
cap means up that have no , have
41:54
no relevance to anything we're doing , but it's getting lots of views
41:57
.
41:57
That is pointless and Social
42:00
media can be a dark place at times , but
42:02
overall , are you
42:04
still optimistic and enthusiastic
42:06
about it being part of the mix for cultural organizations
42:08
to as much as the
42:10
cliche people .
42:11
So it's a tool . Everything's a tool . If
42:13
you understand social media what it is , you
42:15
can legislate for that and you can build
42:17
off it from there . Yes , it can be dark
42:20
and it can be cruel , but it can also be
42:22
a place of joy , place of education , place
42:24
of light the math things I've learned from
42:26
social media , from how you create your feed
42:28
, the kind of energy you put out yourself as an organization
42:30
. So what do you stand for ? Your value should
42:33
be seen through the content you put out . Your
42:35
value should be seen for the copy and the positive
42:37
things you talk about , and people
42:39
will gravitate to that . Again , that there's
42:41
an idea that everything that social media slides
42:43
very negative and it is very negative , but then you'll
42:46
see Every single positive post
42:48
. Allow all this does instagram pages
42:50
about positivity with 50 million
42:52
followers and like . So people still
42:54
, they want to find this good information about
42:56
you . Show on in and find a way to tell
42:58
your story in a positive way that reflects you .
43:11
You can find all episodes of the podcast . Sign
43:13
up for the newsletter and find out about our events
43:16
on our website , the digital
43:18
dot works . You can
43:20
also find us on linkedin . Now that Twitter is a total
43:22
garbage fire , our theme
43:24
tune is Vienna beat by blue dot sessions
43:27
. And , last but not least , thanks to Mark
43:29
cotton for his editing support on this episode
43:31
. See
43:33
you again soon .
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More