Podchaser Logo
Home
Unemployment and Imputed Income for Colorado Alimony and Child Support | Episode 198

Unemployment and Imputed Income for Colorado Alimony and Child Support | Episode 198

BonusReleased Monday, 1st April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Unemployment and Imputed Income for Colorado Alimony and Child Support | Episode 198

Unemployment and Imputed Income for Colorado Alimony and Child Support | Episode 198

Unemployment and Imputed Income for Colorado Alimony and Child Support | Episode 198

Unemployment and Imputed Income for Colorado Alimony and Child Support | Episode 198

BonusMonday, 1st April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Welcome to Divorce At Altittude,

0:03

a podcast on Colorado family law.

0:05

I'm Ryan Kalamaya. Each week,

0:07

along with my business partner and co-host,

0:09

Amy Goscha, or an expert, we

0:12

discuss a particular topic related

0:14

to Divorce or co-parenting in Colorado.

0:16

In addition, we have created

0:19

a short series of lessons that

0:21

will take you through the legal process

0:23

of Divorce and answer your questions

0:25

from simple to complex. Divorce

0:28

isn't easy. The end of a marriage,

0:30

especially when children are involved, brings

0:32

a great deal of loss and change.

0:34

We hope these practical tips and insights

0:37

will help you on your journey to a new.

0:39

And better life.

0:42

This is a how to episode on

0:44

voluntary unemployment, underemployment,

0:48

and imputed income.

0:50

Now, these issues come up when

0:53

we are discussing either spousal

0:55

support and or child

0:57

support. So let me give you an example

0:59

of what we are really

1:02

discussing and then we'll dig into the various

1:04

concepts and break it down in

1:06

terms of how the law applies these

1:09

concepts in alimony as

1:12

well as child support. So let's

1:14

say that we have Eric and Melanie Wolfe, our

1:16

hypothetical divorce clients and

1:18

we're discussing alimony. And as

1:20

listeners and or viewers would recall,

1:23

we really are going to look at some of the

1:25

income of the parties.

1:28

Let's say that Melanie. has been

1:30

a stay at home mom and

1:32

they have a five year old. What

1:34

happens when Eric says Melanie

1:37

is capable of earning income.

1:39

She earned a substantial

1:41

income before our child was

1:44

born and the child is now at kindergarten,

1:46

so she can work while the child

1:48

is at school. Or in another circumstance,

1:51

let's say that Melanie

1:54

is, working part time and she

1:57

is earning substantially less

1:59

than what her degree or her

2:01

previous employment would suggest.

2:04

Or another example is Eric just

2:06

quits his job. He gets a bad case of

2:08

what I call divorce flu. And

2:10

he says, listen, I'm not gonna Earn

2:13

substantial income and have Melanie

2:15

sharing that. So I'm just going to quit my job

2:17

or I'm going to go become a raft guide.

2:20

When I was a lawyer and no

2:22

offense to raft guides, they don't make as much money

2:24

generally speaking as lawyers.

2:26

What happens in those circumstances?

2:29

The court is going to impute

2:31

or apply potential income

2:34

for Eric or Melanie in either of those

2:36

circumstances. And the concept

2:38

is called voluntary unemployment.

2:41

So if someone is deciding not

2:43

to work or they are underemployed,

2:46

they're working and they're making less

2:48

than what what they could. In the circumstance

2:51

of alimony, we do have these

2:53

general guidelines and provisions for

2:56

what happens in that circumstance. And the law

2:58

says if a party is voluntary unemployed

3:01

or underemployed, maintenance

3:03

should be calculated based on a determination

3:06

of the potential income of that

3:08

party. And as listeners will recall,

3:10

There is this formula. So the concept

3:13

and if you get into the net

3:15

spendable income or rather the

3:17

reasonable needs of Melanie, if she's

3:19

claiming maintenance, then, and she

3:21

says my spend is I need 10,

3:24

000 a month. Her potential income.

3:27

Would reduce that gap. Now

3:29

there are circumstances in which let's

3:31

say Melanie is the party that we're looking

3:34

at as the voluntarily

3:37

unemployed or underemployed party.

3:40

In what circumstances is there, an

3:42

exception to imputing the

3:45

law does provide that that Melanie

3:47

will not be deemed underemployed

3:50

if the employment is temporary

3:53

and is reasonably intended to result in

3:55

higher income within the foreseeable future.

3:57

If she's in a training program if

4:00

she's doing some sort of apprenticeship or.

4:02

There's some sort of program that she

4:04

is doing and we'll talk more about that

4:06

in another circumstance, but really,

4:09

if she's learning and the idea

4:11

is that she's going to result or it's going

4:13

to result in higher income, then, for the

4:15

time being whatever she's making at

4:17

that particular time is what it is.

4:20

Okay. The other circumstance is

4:22

if someone is taking care,

4:24

if Melanie is taking care of a child

4:27

less than 30 months, so

4:29

a newborn the law does provide

4:31

that newborns. Or children,

4:33

toddlers up to the age of 30 months.

4:35

Now, remember that because I will, as we get

4:38

into the child support threshold

4:40

or age is actually different. It's 24

4:42

months. And it's an unusual kind of

4:44

a little wrinkle in the differences between

4:46

maintenance and child support. And it could

4:48

be an oversight by the legislature. In

4:50

any event the law for maintenance

4:53

says 30 months. for your time. And

4:55

then also if a party or

4:57

parent is incarcerated for

5:00

a year or more in that circumstance, we're not going

5:02

to impute income to Melanie

5:04

if she is in jail or is in

5:06

prison, the other circumstance

5:09

or exception is if the employment

5:11

is a good faith career. choice. So

5:13

this gets into kind of the history. If Melanie

5:16

has been a high flying executive

5:18

in, has switched into the

5:20

non profit world and has been

5:23

in that world for a decade

5:25

or the last two years or three years

5:27

before the marriage or I'm sorry, before

5:29

the divorce rather then that would be

5:32

a good faith choice. Career choice. If Melanie

5:34

had some health issues or

5:36

the parties had decided between, between themselves

5:39

or Melanie just said, listen, this is what I

5:41

want to do and there had been

5:43

some sort of history of her working

5:45

in the nonprofit, that's going to be

5:47

different than all of a sudden during

5:49

the divorce Melanie just quits her job.

5:52

And pursues a career in

5:54

the nonprofit world. And that just came out of nowhere.

5:57

The final exception to this concept

6:00

of, imputed pay is

6:02

if a party is enrolled in an

6:05

educational program that is reasonably

6:07

intended to result in a degree

6:09

or certificate within a reasonable period

6:11

of time, there is, will result

6:13

in a higher income so long as

6:16

the educational program is a good faith

6:18

career choice. So If

6:20

Melanie goes back to culinary school and

6:23

her her idea is that she wants to become

6:25

a private chef and, or cater

6:27

and that's going to result in, more income

6:30

than she was before that might be acceptable.

6:32

If she, is a lawyer

6:34

but then decides that she wants to quit being a lawyer

6:37

and wants to go back and study

6:39

Buddhism or philosophy or

6:41

some other career. Her suit that might

6:43

be valuable or that might

6:45

be something of interest to her that she's

6:47

always been interested in Buddhism

6:50

the court is going to really look at and

6:52

say, is this intended to

6:55

result in more income

6:57

or is it just that you're just avoiding and trying

6:59

to fit within this exception

7:01

and not work? These are the concepts

7:04

that are a play for maintenance. Let's

7:06

turn and talk about child support.

7:08

We haven't really talked about child support in

7:11

other episodes, but this concept

7:13

does come up in child

7:15

support as well. And there's a little bit

7:18

more meat to it. To the law when

7:20

it comes to guidance on how do

7:22

we figure out because I haven't

7:24

gotten into what is the potential

7:26

income that is going to be

7:28

imputed or used for Melanie

7:31

or any sort of party that is underemployed.

7:35

As I intimated before the exceptions

7:38

are generally similar between alimony

7:41

and child support in terms of the

7:43

the employment is temporary or reasonably intended

7:46

to result in higher income there's a good

7:48

faith career change or

7:50

someone is involved in or enrolled

7:52

in a part time or rather a full

7:54

time educational vocational

7:56

training. Program. Those are still

7:58

the same. We do have the

8:00

difference, as I said before, in taking

8:03

care of a young child. In

8:05

child support, there is no voluntary

8:07

underemployment up to 24

8:10

months. And so two years old

8:12

you Melanie can stay at home and

8:14

there's not going to be any income that is

8:16

going to affect her. be imputed to

8:19

her. She gets a little bit longer under the

8:21

alimony, and I will say that the court

8:23

can use its discretion in

8:25

applying these and, could find

8:28

in certain circumstances in which a

8:30

parent may not be voluntary

8:33

underemployed if, for example,

8:35

a child is 26 months and,

8:37

it really is going to depend, but that is what

8:39

the law says and it, listeners

8:42

should do. Understand that difference.

8:44

As I said before, there is going to be a little bit

8:46

more definition in

8:49

the child support law, and

8:51

it's also I will, let listeners

8:53

know this is a circumstance in which

8:55

lawyers or parties could argue

8:58

or present to the court

9:00

or use, in response to the

9:03

what should the potential income be.

9:05

The factors for child support that

9:08

may or that don't apply or

9:10

rather aren't listed in the statute on

9:13

maintenance, but it still is providing guidance

9:15

and it makes sense when you hear 'em. So

9:17

the court or the law says that in

9:20

determining potential income that

9:22

the court shall consider to the extent

9:24

known specific circumstances

9:27

of the party, including consideration of

9:29

the following factors. Now,

9:31

this is again, for determining potential

9:33

income. So you're gonna get into the

9:35

parents' assets. Residence,

9:38

Employment and Earnings History, Job

9:41

Skills, Educational Attainment,

9:44

Literacy, Age, Health,

9:47

Criminal Record, Other Employment

9:49

Barriers, Record of Seeking

9:51

Work, the Local Job Work, The local

9:54

job market and the availability

9:56

of employers hiring the community.

9:58

So these factors,

10:00

they make sense. So if you're up in Aspen

10:03

and you work in a particular industry

10:06

that doesn't exist in Aspen and

10:08

you can't work remotely, that might be

10:11

relevant or that is going to be relevant

10:13

for the court in determining The potential

10:16

income, but likewise, we have

10:18

in Aspen where, I currently am recording

10:20

this, we have, a high cost

10:22

of living. And so the entry level positions

10:25

are generally higher than minimum wage.

10:27

And so we're going to really look at, the

10:29

local wages as well

10:31

as the. Market. And

10:34

so you're going to get into the history

10:36

and so one might look at the social security

10:38

earnings of a party. So if Melanie

10:41

worked before taking time off

10:43

or not, working during the marriage, that's

10:45

going to be relevant as opposed to where she

10:48

never worked. And, if Melanie

10:50

is 55 and has

10:52

a 20 year gap in

10:54

working, that's going to be good. Substantially

10:56

different than Melanie at the age of

10:58

30 who had a,

11:01

has a college degree and the

11:03

part, took some time off for young children

11:05

and now they have a 3 year

11:08

old. Those circumstances are going to really

11:10

change. And so you get into

11:13

potential expert witnesses, we

11:15

sometimes will hire vocational rehabilitation

11:17

experts or vocational

11:20

evaluators, and their job is to

11:22

look at what the prevailing

11:24

wages are in a particular industry. The

11:26

options, they're available for a party

11:29

like Melanie, and we'll say that

11:31

based on the U. S. Department

11:33

of Labor Bureau of Statistics,

11:35

and the court can, under the law,

11:38

take into consideration, and you can

11:40

go to the website of the U. S.

11:42

Department of Bureau of Labor And

11:44

you can look at, how much does a real

11:47

estate broker make or how much does a software

11:49

executive and so on and so forth, they have,

11:52

reams of data and these experts

11:54

will interview Melanie, look at

11:56

what her earnings history is and,

11:58

opine about how much she could potentially

12:01

earn. Those are the circumstances. The last

12:03

thing I will say is that there can be. Special

12:07

unique circumstances such as, a

12:09

child that has special needs

12:11

that a parent needs to take care of,

12:13

there is, law suggesting that

12:15

Melanie may not be imputed

12:17

or required to work full time and likewise

12:19

for Eric if he's staying at home

12:22

and there could be other circumstances taking

12:24

care of elderly parents or

12:26

there might be, some sort of mental or physical

12:28

handicap. Good for one

12:31

of the parties. All of those things are going

12:33

to come into play. The

12:35

concept in wrapping this up is

12:38

voluntary unemployment and underemployment

12:40

is one of the most disputed

12:43

and frequently challenging

12:46

issues that come up in

12:48

a circumstance of a divorce between

12:51

Eric and Melanie Wolfe in

12:53

Colorado. Hopefully that gives you a high

12:55

level indication

12:58

or overview of the issue.

13:00

And these are the sorts of things

13:02

that lawyers will deal

13:04

with often in a call or a divorce.

13:06

Until next time, thank you for joining us on

13:09

Divorce at Altitude.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features