Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Welcome to Divorce At Altittude,
0:03
a podcast on Colorado family law.
0:05
I'm Ryan Kalamaya. Each week,
0:07
along with my business partner and co-host,
0:09
Amy Goscha, or an expert, we
0:12
discuss a particular topic related
0:14
to Divorce or co-parenting in Colorado.
0:16
In addition, we have created
0:19
a short series of lessons that
0:21
will take you through the legal process
0:23
of Divorce and answer your questions
0:25
from simple to complex. Divorce
0:28
isn't easy. The end of a marriage,
0:30
especially when children are involved, brings
0:32
a great deal of loss and change.
0:34
We hope these practical tips and insights
0:37
will help you on your journey to a new.
0:39
And better life.
0:42
This is a how to episode on
0:44
voluntary unemployment, underemployment,
0:48
and imputed income.
0:50
Now, these issues come up when
0:53
we are discussing either spousal
0:55
support and or child
0:57
support. So let me give you an example
0:59
of what we are really
1:02
discussing and then we'll dig into the various
1:04
concepts and break it down in
1:06
terms of how the law applies these
1:09
concepts in alimony as
1:12
well as child support. So let's
1:14
say that we have Eric and Melanie Wolfe, our
1:16
hypothetical divorce clients and
1:18
we're discussing alimony. And as
1:20
listeners and or viewers would recall,
1:23
we really are going to look at some of the
1:25
income of the parties.
1:28
Let's say that Melanie. has been
1:30
a stay at home mom and
1:32
they have a five year old. What
1:34
happens when Eric says Melanie
1:37
is capable of earning income.
1:39
She earned a substantial
1:41
income before our child was
1:44
born and the child is now at kindergarten,
1:46
so she can work while the child
1:48
is at school. Or in another circumstance,
1:51
let's say that Melanie
1:54
is, working part time and she
1:57
is earning substantially less
1:59
than what her degree or her
2:01
previous employment would suggest.
2:04
Or another example is Eric just
2:06
quits his job. He gets a bad case of
2:08
what I call divorce flu. And
2:10
he says, listen, I'm not gonna Earn
2:13
substantial income and have Melanie
2:15
sharing that. So I'm just going to quit my job
2:17
or I'm going to go become a raft guide.
2:20
When I was a lawyer and no
2:22
offense to raft guides, they don't make as much money
2:24
generally speaking as lawyers.
2:26
What happens in those circumstances?
2:29
The court is going to impute
2:31
or apply potential income
2:34
for Eric or Melanie in either of those
2:36
circumstances. And the concept
2:38
is called voluntary unemployment.
2:41
So if someone is deciding not
2:43
to work or they are underemployed,
2:46
they're working and they're making less
2:48
than what what they could. In the circumstance
2:51
of alimony, we do have these
2:53
general guidelines and provisions for
2:56
what happens in that circumstance. And the law
2:58
says if a party is voluntary unemployed
3:01
or underemployed, maintenance
3:03
should be calculated based on a determination
3:06
of the potential income of that
3:08
party. And as listeners will recall,
3:10
There is this formula. So the concept
3:13
and if you get into the net
3:15
spendable income or rather the
3:17
reasonable needs of Melanie, if she's
3:19
claiming maintenance, then, and she
3:21
says my spend is I need 10,
3:24
000 a month. Her potential income.
3:27
Would reduce that gap. Now
3:29
there are circumstances in which let's
3:31
say Melanie is the party that we're looking
3:34
at as the voluntarily
3:37
unemployed or underemployed party.
3:40
In what circumstances is there, an
3:42
exception to imputing the
3:45
law does provide that that Melanie
3:47
will not be deemed underemployed
3:50
if the employment is temporary
3:53
and is reasonably intended to result in
3:55
higher income within the foreseeable future.
3:57
If she's in a training program if
4:00
she's doing some sort of apprenticeship or.
4:02
There's some sort of program that she
4:04
is doing and we'll talk more about that
4:06
in another circumstance, but really,
4:09
if she's learning and the idea
4:11
is that she's going to result or it's going
4:13
to result in higher income, then, for the
4:15
time being whatever she's making at
4:17
that particular time is what it is.
4:20
Okay. The other circumstance is
4:22
if someone is taking care,
4:24
if Melanie is taking care of a child
4:27
less than 30 months, so
4:29
a newborn the law does provide
4:31
that newborns. Or children,
4:33
toddlers up to the age of 30 months.
4:35
Now, remember that because I will, as we get
4:38
into the child support threshold
4:40
or age is actually different. It's 24
4:42
months. And it's an unusual kind of
4:44
a little wrinkle in the differences between
4:46
maintenance and child support. And it could
4:48
be an oversight by the legislature. In
4:50
any event the law for maintenance
4:53
says 30 months. for your time. And
4:55
then also if a party or
4:57
parent is incarcerated for
5:00
a year or more in that circumstance, we're not going
5:02
to impute income to Melanie
5:04
if she is in jail or is in
5:06
prison, the other circumstance
5:09
or exception is if the employment
5:11
is a good faith career. choice. So
5:13
this gets into kind of the history. If Melanie
5:16
has been a high flying executive
5:18
in, has switched into the
5:20
non profit world and has been
5:23
in that world for a decade
5:25
or the last two years or three years
5:27
before the marriage or I'm sorry, before
5:29
the divorce rather then that would be
5:32
a good faith choice. Career choice. If Melanie
5:34
had some health issues or
5:36
the parties had decided between, between themselves
5:39
or Melanie just said, listen, this is what I
5:41
want to do and there had been
5:43
some sort of history of her working
5:45
in the nonprofit, that's going to be
5:47
different than all of a sudden during
5:49
the divorce Melanie just quits her job.
5:52
And pursues a career in
5:54
the nonprofit world. And that just came out of nowhere.
5:57
The final exception to this concept
6:00
of, imputed pay is
6:02
if a party is enrolled in an
6:05
educational program that is reasonably
6:07
intended to result in a degree
6:09
or certificate within a reasonable period
6:11
of time, there is, will result
6:13
in a higher income so long as
6:16
the educational program is a good faith
6:18
career choice. So If
6:20
Melanie goes back to culinary school and
6:23
her her idea is that she wants to become
6:25
a private chef and, or cater
6:27
and that's going to result in, more income
6:30
than she was before that might be acceptable.
6:32
If she, is a lawyer
6:34
but then decides that she wants to quit being a lawyer
6:37
and wants to go back and study
6:39
Buddhism or philosophy or
6:41
some other career. Her suit that might
6:43
be valuable or that might
6:45
be something of interest to her that she's
6:47
always been interested in Buddhism
6:50
the court is going to really look at and
6:52
say, is this intended to
6:55
result in more income
6:57
or is it just that you're just avoiding and trying
6:59
to fit within this exception
7:01
and not work? These are the concepts
7:04
that are a play for maintenance. Let's
7:06
turn and talk about child support.
7:08
We haven't really talked about child support in
7:11
other episodes, but this concept
7:13
does come up in child
7:15
support as well. And there's a little bit
7:18
more meat to it. To the law when
7:20
it comes to guidance on how do
7:22
we figure out because I haven't
7:24
gotten into what is the potential
7:26
income that is going to be
7:28
imputed or used for Melanie
7:31
or any sort of party that is underemployed.
7:35
As I intimated before the exceptions
7:38
are generally similar between alimony
7:41
and child support in terms of the
7:43
the employment is temporary or reasonably intended
7:46
to result in higher income there's a good
7:48
faith career change or
7:50
someone is involved in or enrolled
7:52
in a part time or rather a full
7:54
time educational vocational
7:56
training. Program. Those are still
7:58
the same. We do have the
8:00
difference, as I said before, in taking
8:03
care of a young child. In
8:05
child support, there is no voluntary
8:07
underemployment up to 24
8:10
months. And so two years old
8:12
you Melanie can stay at home and
8:14
there's not going to be any income that is
8:16
going to affect her. be imputed to
8:19
her. She gets a little bit longer under the
8:21
alimony, and I will say that the court
8:23
can use its discretion in
8:25
applying these and, could find
8:28
in certain circumstances in which a
8:30
parent may not be voluntary
8:33
underemployed if, for example,
8:35
a child is 26 months and,
8:37
it really is going to depend, but that is what
8:39
the law says and it, listeners
8:42
should do. Understand that difference.
8:44
As I said before, there is going to be a little bit
8:46
more definition in
8:49
the child support law, and
8:51
it's also I will, let listeners
8:53
know this is a circumstance in which
8:55
lawyers or parties could argue
8:58
or present to the court
9:00
or use, in response to the
9:03
what should the potential income be.
9:05
The factors for child support that
9:08
may or that don't apply or
9:10
rather aren't listed in the statute on
9:13
maintenance, but it still is providing guidance
9:15
and it makes sense when you hear 'em. So
9:17
the court or the law says that in
9:20
determining potential income that
9:22
the court shall consider to the extent
9:24
known specific circumstances
9:27
of the party, including consideration of
9:29
the following factors. Now,
9:31
this is again, for determining potential
9:33
income. So you're gonna get into the
9:35
parents' assets. Residence,
9:38
Employment and Earnings History, Job
9:41
Skills, Educational Attainment,
9:44
Literacy, Age, Health,
9:47
Criminal Record, Other Employment
9:49
Barriers, Record of Seeking
9:51
Work, the Local Job Work, The local
9:54
job market and the availability
9:56
of employers hiring the community.
9:58
So these factors,
10:00
they make sense. So if you're up in Aspen
10:03
and you work in a particular industry
10:06
that doesn't exist in Aspen and
10:08
you can't work remotely, that might be
10:11
relevant or that is going to be relevant
10:13
for the court in determining The potential
10:16
income, but likewise, we have
10:18
in Aspen where, I currently am recording
10:20
this, we have, a high cost
10:22
of living. And so the entry level positions
10:25
are generally higher than minimum wage.
10:27
And so we're going to really look at, the
10:29
local wages as well
10:31
as the. Market. And
10:34
so you're going to get into the history
10:36
and so one might look at the social security
10:38
earnings of a party. So if Melanie
10:41
worked before taking time off
10:43
or not, working during the marriage, that's
10:45
going to be relevant as opposed to where she
10:48
never worked. And, if Melanie
10:50
is 55 and has
10:52
a 20 year gap in
10:54
working, that's going to be good. Substantially
10:56
different than Melanie at the age of
10:58
30 who had a,
11:01
has a college degree and the
11:03
part, took some time off for young children
11:05
and now they have a 3 year
11:08
old. Those circumstances are going to really
11:10
change. And so you get into
11:13
potential expert witnesses, we
11:15
sometimes will hire vocational rehabilitation
11:17
experts or vocational
11:20
evaluators, and their job is to
11:22
look at what the prevailing
11:24
wages are in a particular industry. The
11:26
options, they're available for a party
11:29
like Melanie, and we'll say that
11:31
based on the U. S. Department
11:33
of Labor Bureau of Statistics,
11:35
and the court can, under the law,
11:38
take into consideration, and you can
11:40
go to the website of the U. S.
11:42
Department of Bureau of Labor And
11:44
you can look at, how much does a real
11:47
estate broker make or how much does a software
11:49
executive and so on and so forth, they have,
11:52
reams of data and these experts
11:54
will interview Melanie, look at
11:56
what her earnings history is and,
11:58
opine about how much she could potentially
12:01
earn. Those are the circumstances. The last
12:03
thing I will say is that there can be. Special
12:07
unique circumstances such as, a
12:09
child that has special needs
12:11
that a parent needs to take care of,
12:13
there is, law suggesting that
12:15
Melanie may not be imputed
12:17
or required to work full time and likewise
12:19
for Eric if he's staying at home
12:22
and there could be other circumstances taking
12:24
care of elderly parents or
12:26
there might be, some sort of mental or physical
12:28
handicap. Good for one
12:31
of the parties. All of those things are going
12:33
to come into play. The
12:35
concept in wrapping this up is
12:38
voluntary unemployment and underemployment
12:40
is one of the most disputed
12:43
and frequently challenging
12:46
issues that come up in
12:48
a circumstance of a divorce between
12:51
Eric and Melanie Wolfe in
12:53
Colorado. Hopefully that gives you a high
12:55
level indication
12:58
or overview of the issue.
13:00
And these are the sorts of things
13:02
that lawyers will deal
13:04
with often in a call or a divorce.
13:06
Until next time, thank you for joining us on
13:09
Divorce at Altitude.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More