Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hello Welcome to dust jackets
0:14
conversations with authors. My
0:18
guest today is Alma Alexander.
0:18
ALMA is not someone I know
0:23
personally and I haven't yet had
0:23
a chance to read any of her
0:26
books. However, her background
0:26
and the topics of her books do
0:30
intrigue me. ALMA is a fantasy
0:30
writer whose novels include the
0:35
World Weavers young adult
0:35
series. Voya magazine suggested
0:39
her world Weaver series of four
0:39
books might be just the thing
0:42
for readers suffering Harry
0:42
Potter withdrawal. That is a
0:47
great review.
0:49
Well, actually,
0:49
I got two different kinds of
0:51
reviews for those books. One was
0:51
that it was a great withdrawal
0:57
antidote for Harry Potter.
0:57
Implying that it's the same sort
1:01
of thing if you like Harry Potter that you love these books. It's the same sort of
1:03
story and all this. The other
1:05
one is diametrically opposite.
1:05
It says, these books are nothing
1:08
like Harry Potter, they're
1:08
completely unique. They're
1:10
completely different. There's
1:10
something else entirely.
1:15
Well, both of those are good.
1:16
As long as that
1:16
person can say why don't I read
1:19
them and decide for yourself,
1:19
right.
1:23
So let me just
1:23
tell you a little bit about Alma
1:25
and where she comes from. She's
1:25
a native of Yugoslavia, and she
1:30
grew up in various African
1:30
countries, including Zambia,
1:33
Eswatini, and South Africa. And
1:33
she's also spent time in England
1:38
and New Zealand before moving to
1:38
the United States.
1:41
In addition to her fantasy
1:41
novels, she's published a memoir
1:45
about growing up in Africa, and
1:45
an epistolary novel written with
1:49
her husband about the NATO war
1:49
in Yugoslavia. She's also
1:53
written and published numerous
1:53
book reviews, travelogues,
1:56
essays, poetry, and other
1:56
articles in various magazines
2:00
around the world. In fact, in
2:00
2000, her short story, The
2:04
Painting, won the 2000 BBC short
2:04
story contest. In 2009, she
2:11
donated her archive to the
2:11
Department of Rare Books and
2:14
Special Collections at Northern
2:14
Illinois University. And since
2:18
then, she has published at least
2:18
nine additional titles. So
2:23
welcome, Alma, I'm so happy to
2:23
have you here. And I hope that
2:28
you feel free to answer these
2:28
questions in any way you like.
2:31
And if I forget anything along
2:31
the way that you just want to
2:34
talk about, feel free to just
2:34
start in and mention that.
2:40
So my first question for you is
2:40
that your books seem to be
2:47
primarily based in mythology,
2:47
and explore the mind from both a
2:52
cultural and intellectual
2:52
perspective. Can you talk about
2:56
why you've chosen to focus on
2:56
the fantasy or magical side of
3:00
speculative fiction?
3:03
Well, I keep on
3:03
telling everybody who cares to
3:05
listen that all fiction is
3:05
fantasy period, because it's
3:08
basically alive to begin with.
3:08
And essentially, what we
3:12
consider to be fantasy is just a
3:12
subset of that greater circle of
3:19
literary work. The thing about
3:19
fantasy, with a small F, as in
3:25
the fantasy subset that deals
3:25
with a sort of metamorphic and
3:29
magical kind of stuff, is that,
3:29
for me, it's freeing. You are
3:38
not tied into a set of
3:38
preconceived and pre understood
3:46
notions and prejudices that the
3:46
real world brings with it.
3:50
Inevitably, if you set a book in
3:50
our world, in the world that we
3:55
live in right now, in the world
3:55
outside this window, we all know
3:58
that world really, really well.
3:58
We know what's going on in that
4:03
world. If we're halfway
4:03
connected or plugged into the
4:05
current situation, we know
4:05
what's going on outside of our
4:09
backyard. We know that the world
4:09
is going to hell in a
4:12
handbasket. In a lot of ways.
4:12
There's a lot of things that are
4:18
human centered in the
4:18
Anthropocene as they call it,
4:21
which is how people treat each
4:21
other. And that is a building
4:24
block of fiction of fantasy, if
4:24
you like. But in this kind of
4:30
context, writing a story that is
4:30
fictional, but set in our world
4:37
and dealing with these horrid
4:37
hard truths can step on a lot of
4:43
metaphorical toes. There are a
4:43
lot of readers who are going to
4:46
react viscerally to something
4:46
that is being presented to them,
4:50
which is not their own
4:50
worldview, not their own point
4:54
of view, which is directly
4:54
opposing to what they think and
4:58
they feel. Because the world, the world in
5:00
which the book is set in the
5:03
world in which they live out the
5:03
same world, they're going to
5:06
feel almost targeted by
5:06
something like this. Whereas in
5:11
fantasy world, you can set up a
5:11
situation which is remarkably
5:15
similar to reality, but it is
5:15
not. And what you're getting
5:20
people to do is understand and
5:20
internalize certain hard truths.
5:25
And a sort of hard pill that is
5:25
coated with this sugarcoating of
5:29
fantasy. You can teach people a lot of
5:30
things that they may not
5:34
necessarily be inclined to
5:34
learn, if you like, if you're
5:39
writing a fantasy story like
5:39
that. This is not to say that
5:41
I'm considering fantasy to be a
5:41
sort of allegorical, preachy,
5:46
here's my podium, this is what I
5:46
think about the world. And I'm
5:48
just gonna wrap it up with sugar
5:48
plums and then try it and just
5:51
drop it down your throat. That's
5:51
not what I'm saying. But what I
5:54
am saying is that if there is a
5:54
harder truth that you want to
5:57
explore, wrapping it up in the
5:57
silver tissue of Why that is
6:01
fantasy. It is a remarkable tool
6:01
for reaching people who might
6:07
not otherwise have been reached at all.
6:09
So I really love
6:09
that analogy. And, I find for
6:13
myself, the same thing is true
6:13
in science fiction, which is
6:18
more what I write although I
6:18
have written some fantasy. So
6:22
um, I did see an anthology or
6:22
two on your website that does
6:27
have science fiction. Do you
6:27
write in that as well?
6:32
Well, my first
6:32
real science fiction novel came
6:34
out last year, which is this.
6:34
The Second Star. In fact, like a
6:43
lot of my stories have really
6:43
weird genesis points. And this
6:51
one turned up in a single
6:51
sentence that I woke up with
6:54
from a deep sleep. And then I
6:54
spent the rest of the next three
7:00
weeks asking what-if questions
7:00
around that particular sentence,
7:04
and then that just kind of
7:04
gotten broader, more dominant.
7:08
Before I knew what I was doing,
7:08
I had 160,000 words.
7:13
Oh, my goodness.
7:17
So I do that a
7:17
lot. When I, when I did my weird
7:25
Chronicles books, they
7:25
started...there was an email
7:32
that floated about that somebody
7:32
was doing an anthology about
7:35
weird creatures. But they didn't
7:35
way what they wanted. Other
7:40
stuff they wanted. Weird, exotic
7:40
Were creatures, they wanted
7:43
something different. So I
7:43
decided to start writing a short
7:46
story for this anthology. I
7:46
ended up with not one novel, but
7:52
three novels. And the possibility of a second
7:54
Were Chronicles trilogy coming
7:58
up eventually, because I left a
7:58
lot a world open for me to
8:02
explore. So I mean, when I start
8:02
writing something, I never know
8:06
when it's going to stop. It's
8:06
like riding a bareback horse
8:09
without any kind of tack and
8:09
just trying very hard to hang
8:12
on, until it stops somewhere
8:12
where it wants to.
8:15
Oh, my goodness.
8:15
In terms of those Were novels, I
8:20
know when we've briefly talked
8:20
about this before, what sets
8:23
them apart, and in my mind,
8:23
makes them science fiction as
8:27
opposed to fantasy, is that you
8:27
actually did some research about
8:32
how these creatures could
8:32
evolve.
8:35
Well, I actually
8:35
have a master's degree in
8:37
molecular biology. Ah, which was
8:37
remarkably useless in the career
8:43
that I was doing until now. When
8:43
I was starting to write these
8:50
books, I actually posited a
8:50
way--I am a hard technical
8:54
science person--I don't know how
8:54
much is gonna go over
8:56
everybody's head. But there is a
8:56
lot of stuff in it.
9:00
In your DNA, every cell of your
9:00
body, there is a hell of a lot
9:05
of DNA probably longer than you
9:05
are in every cell of your body.
9:10
A bunch of that DNA is what they
9:10
call junk DNA, which is
9:14
essentially not directly
9:14
applicable to anything that they
9:19
can figure out. And a lot of
9:19
your DNA, which is applicable to
9:25
this kind of stuff doesn't come
9:25
in a chunk, like your gene
9:28
starts here. And here. No, it's
9:28
more like a gene starts here and
9:31
ends here. And then there's
9:31
another junk DNA and there's
9:33
more DNA was there and then
9:33
there's another kind of junk DNA
9:36
and there's something else over
9:36
there, there's more of a genome.
9:39
So basically it gets reread and
9:39
the RNA kind of figures out
9:43
which parts of your DNA connect
9:43
to this particular thing that
9:46
you're trying to figure out is part of a human. But there's a whole lot of stuff in there that
9:48
doesn't really attach to
9:53
anything specific. And the way
9:53
that a lot of this works is by
9:57
operons. An operon is a certain
9:57
sequence of DNA which the mRNA
10:02
that reads the genome, is going
10:02
to attach to this particular bit
10:06
and say, Okay, I'm doing this
10:06
particular job, the gene for
10:10
this particular job starts over
10:10
here. This is my operon signal.
10:13
I'm going to start reading from here, and I'm going to pick up whatever is attached to this
10:15
kind of thing. Well, what I posited was, what
10:17
happens if all this junk DNA
10:22
that we don't know what it does,
10:22
if your RNA starts reading it
10:25
from a different set of operons,
10:25
it reads a different creature.
10:30
Ah, so
10:30
essentially, there's a space for
10:34
an entirely different double
10:34
self inside your DNA that can
10:39
create a creature, like a Were creature and ignore the human DNA.
10:41
It was actually
10:41
fun to figure this out. It was
10:43
just fun to sit there and figure
10:43
out that this is actually
10:45
possible. And my professor, the
10:45
guy who supervised my master's
10:49
degree, wrote back to me an
10:49
email saying the science is as
10:52
good as it gets.
10:53
Oh, that's
10:53
wonderful. You know, I have
10:56
often wondered, because of
10:56
evolution, you know, how much of
11:05
DNA is from animals, before we
11:05
evolved to be what we are today.
11:08
How much came forward? And if
11:08
perhaps some of that is the junk
11:12
DNA that we don't really know
11:12
what it does? Because it's, if
11:15
we're not using it, we think, in
11:15
terms of what we look at so
11:21
much, we don't really know.
11:23
Yeah, the other
11:23
part of this equation is that
11:27
it's a question of translating
11:27
maths and metabolism, if you
11:33
like. And if you as a human are
11:33
being turned into a Weird Mouse,
11:40
the size differential is kind of
11:40
radical, and all that difference
11:45
has to go somewhere. If you by
11:45
the other extreme, if you as a
11:50
human being turned into a
11:50
grizzly bear, same thing
11:53
applies, but in a different
11:53
direction. The bear is so much
11:56
more massive than you are. So
11:56
from somewhere you have to find
11:59
the energy to to be the bear
11:59
kind of thing, right? So what I
12:02
posited is that, what happens is
12:02
that the energy of changing into
12:08
a creature that's much bigger
12:08
than you are, goes into that
12:11
metabolism. So if you turn into
12:11
the mouse, you become a
12:14
supercharged mouse, your
12:14
metabolism level just skyrockets
12:21
and goes through the roof. And
12:21
vice versa, if you turn to the
12:25
big bear, you'll be sleepy and
12:25
slow as they can possibly be,
12:27
because all of that energy is
12:27
going into maintaining the bear,
12:31
which is not right. So the creatures who change into
12:33
the creatures who people change
12:38
into are constrained by this.
12:38
And a lot of the shifters who do
12:45
change into to something like a
12:45
mouse pay for this because their
12:50
bodies are, you know, really
12:50
racked by this. I mean, think
12:54
about what goes on in terms of
12:54
changing your entire insides
12:58
into something else. Your heart
12:58
suddenly beats how many times
13:02
faster. Think what happens if
13:02
you suddenly became a
13:05
hummingbird? You'd explode?
13:08
Yeah, exactly.
13:08
Exactly. Wow. That's really a
13:14
lot to think about. I perhaps
13:14
that's one of the reasons for
13:17
the most part, I've never liked
13:17
shifter worlds. But I do like
13:22
the idea of there being other
13:22
seemingly human like creatures.
13:27
The one thing
13:27
that I strongly believe in, and
13:31
it's really important in fantasy
13:31
creation, is that there is no
13:35
such thing as a free lunch.
13:35
Everything has a price. All
13:37
magic has a price. And sometimes
13:37
that price is more than you may
13:41
be willing to pay. But you have
13:41
to know that there is a price
13:45
that if you do something that is
13:45
magical and big, you're going to
13:51
have to count on the fact that
13:51
somewhere along the line there's
13:54
a reckoning coming of some sort
13:54
and you have to be willing to
13:58
pay it.
13:59
Yeah, I absolutely
13:59
agree with you. And that
14:02
actually leads directly into my
14:02
next question, which is that any
14:07
kind of speculative fiction
14:07
requires really good world
14:10
building to be believable. And
14:10
part of that is just as you
14:13
said, you know that magic has a
14:13
price or shifters have a price,
14:18
you know? So can you just talk a
14:18
bit about how you approach this
14:22
process? Do you like plan out
14:22
your world and the rules of that
14:27
world before you start? Or does
14:27
it come while you're writing the
14:32
book? Does it happen a bit more
14:32
organically and then you go back
14:35
and and tweak it to make sure it
14:35
actually makes sense.
14:37
I'm your
14:37
ultimate pantser. I tend to tell
14:40
people that what I do is I take
14:40
a story seed and I stick it into
14:43
a story pot, and I never know
14:43
what's going to come out. A
14:45
cabbage or a redwood until I
14:45
start writing the thing. I find
14:51
out what happens a lot of the
14:51
time while I'm typing the scene.
14:55
As in I'm looking at my
14:55
character doing something
14:58
What?
14:58
Yyou expect me to get you out of
15:02
this? He could walk? Why didn't
15:02
you warn me? You're on your own
15:07
boy. But the flip side of that is
15:08
that my characters just kind of
15:13
wander out of the woodwork fully
15:13
formed and they take over and I
15:15
just sit there and take
15:15
dictation as it were. And if I
15:18
do it wrong in the shifter work,
15:18
for instance, a character called
15:23
Chalky, basically, sat on my bed
15:23
at three o'clock in the morning,
15:26
kicking his heel against the
15:26
side of the bed very annoyingly,
15:29
and telling me I did not say
15:29
what you said. I said, and if I
15:32
did say it, I didn't say it in
15:32
those words. Now go and fix it.
15:39
The worst part of that is that
15:39
he was right, damn his hide.
15:46
Well, I'm so glad
15:46
actually to meet another pantser
15:50
because I am one, although
15:50
probably not quite as committed
15:55
as you are. Because I will pants
15:55
along till maybe the halfway
16:01
point. And then I usually feel
16:01
kind of lost. Because I am not
16:07
quite sure where we're going.
16:07
And that starts to bother me. So
16:12
I start making up things about
16:12
where we're going and then go
16:15
back and try writing that. It
16:15
doesn't always go that way. But
16:17
it makes me feel a little more
16:17
secure.
16:23
One thing I'm
16:23
absolutely lousy at doing what
16:26
they call the Sales Synopses
16:26
which which came up with the
16:29
worldview of books. My situation
16:29
was that the first book was at
16:35
the publisher, but they wanted a
16:35
sale synopsis for the second
16:37
I can't do
16:37
that. I haven't written it yet.
16:41
They said just write a synopsis.
16:41
So I wrote the synopsis. And I
16:45
still have that synopsis. I
16:45
might say that the finished book
16:47
and that synopsis have got
16:47
absolutely nothing to do with
16:50
each other. They are, they are
16:50
there. They were very kind to
16:54
accept the book that I didn't
16:54
give them. But they asked me to
16:57
do something I can't do. I don't
16:57
know what the book is about. I
17:00
haven't written it yet. I
17:00
haven't thought it yet.
17:04
I completely
17:04
understand that. In school, when
17:08
they were teaching us how to
17:08
write papers, they wanted me to
17:10
do an outline first. And I
17:10
always wrote the paper first and
17:14
did the outline second.
17:15
I had one of
17:15
those teachers, I had one of
17:17
those teachers who insisted that
17:17
every time we handed in an
17:21
essay, it had to be preceded by
17:21
a synopsis of the essay. And I
17:25
handed in my essay. I don't do
17:25
that. So I handed in my essays
17:28
and I kept getting marks taken
17:28
off by not having the synopsis.
17:32
So eventually I just wrote the
17:32
essay, then wrote the synopsis,
17:35
copy down the synopsis, and the
17:35
essay. I handed it into him got
17:39
Yyou
17:39
see how much better it is now?
17:42
Yes, that is a
17:42
person who doesn't understand
17:48
the pantser mentality at all for
17:48
sure. So I see that you've also
17:55
written a lot of short works,
17:55
you know, short stories and
17:58
novelettes, and participated in anthologies.
18:00
Yes and I'm putting them together in collections. Yeah, this is the
18:01
latest one of those.
18:08
I can't see the
18:08
title. Can you tell us what it
18:11
says?
18:12
It's Fractured Fairy Tales.
18:14
Very good. Really
18:14
lovely cover.
18:18
So I got I got
18:18
really lucky because I am good
18:22
friends with an artist who is
18:22
amazing. And this was a
18:27
Kickstarter anthology. And when
18:27
my Kickstarter got a little bit
18:31
more money than I anticipated. I
18:31
went to my friend and I said: I
18:34
don't want to lowball you. But
18:34
I've got this extra money and I
18:37
want to use it for original art.
18:37
Would you be willing to do a
18:40
sketch for this book for this
18:40
money? And he said, Absolutely.
18:44
And I sent him a sketch. This is
18:44
my idea. This is his art. The
18:47
artwork is my idea, but I can't
18:47
draw to save my life. So I sent
18:50
him a sketch and I said, Don't laugh. He came up with this magic.
18:54
People have bought this book
18:59
because of the fact that this
18:59
book cover was on it, because
19:02
it's just so amazing.
19:05
Yeah, well and
19:05
that definitely proves the
19:07
point. How important book covers
19:07
can be in terms of sales.
19:11
I don't know. I
19:11
mean, you can probably get this
19:13
if it doesn't work, but can you
19:13
actually see the details?
19:16
Oh, yes. Now that
19:16
it's much closer that wow, that
19:19
is absolutely gorgeous. Oh my
19:19
goodness.
19:27
Wow. So um, can you just give us
19:27
an idea of why it's fractured
19:35
fairy tales?
19:36
Because these
19:36
are the stories of the fairy
19:39
tales that are told, retold,
19:39
reimagined, recast and forms
19:43
that you might not have been
19:43
anticipated them. For example,
19:46
there is a story in there or
19:46
what are the pointers for
19:49
stories that create a sort of
19:49
mini subsection in there, which
19:56
arose from an anthology I was
19:56
editing at that point. It had
20:00
stories for the UN about
20:00
refugees.
20:06
The Anthology was a charity in
20:06
Georgia and the proceeds were
20:08
going to the refugee charity.
20:08
That was the whole idea of that.
20:13
But while I was doing that the
20:13
rest of my brain, as usual, was
20:17
percolating somewhere else
20:17
entirely. And five o'clock in
20:20
the morning, I woke up and
20:20
thought, well, what if your
20:22
classic Disney princesses, and
20:22
everybody will recognize ithem
20:25
mmediately, were refugees? So I
20:25
got up at five o 'clock in the
20:30
morning and I was tapping
20:30
furious. And I'm not a morning
20:33
person. All right. I don't
20:33
usually do this. In early
20:36
mornings. I'm, a um huh? Who?
20:36
What day is it?
20:41
Oh, my goodness,
20:41
wow.
20:41
I was sitting there at my
20:41
husband's computer as it
20:43
It's absolutely
20:43
like this is what I'm talking
20:43
happened, because it was the
20:43
closest one. He came out and he
20:47
said, What are you doing? And I
20:47
said, I'm trying to write a
20:50
story. Go away. Five o'clock in
20:50
the morning, I wrote the first
20:52
about. When I say fantasy can
20:52
give you a platform which you
20:54
one. The rest of them I wrote
20:54
that day. Four stories and the
20:57
princesses in question, which
20:57
you will recognize immediately
21:01
as Cinderella, Snow White,
21:01
Sleeping Beauty and Little Mermaid.
21:12
might not otherwise have. There
21:12
are backstories here, there are
21:18
situations here that you can
21:18
translate into what is going on
21:22
in our own world. In fact, the
21:22
Cinderella story was almost
21:28
directly inspired by images that
21:28
kept on coming through while the
21:32
Syrian refugees, at the time,
21:32
that people were running from
21:34
this hot war and basically
21:34
leaving everything just to get
21:38
out with their skins. That was
21:38
what more or less triggered that
21:43
story and the rest of it just
21:43
just came and followed. And some
21:47
of these stories are harrowing
21:47
stuff. I mean, these are not
21:50
your children's fairy tale. This
21:50
is not something you read
21:52
someone to sleep with.
21:55
But then neither was Grim, really.
21:56
Yes Grim. And
21:56
most importantly, neither was
21:57
Oh, I love that
21:57
story so much.
22:00
Hans Christian Andersen, which
22:00
is what I cut my teeth on. I
22:04
mean, Anderson's original
22:04
stories were not happy. I mean,
22:07
And, again, this
22:07
was one of those things that I'm
22:08
think about the original Little
22:08
Mermaid had no singing lobsters
22:12
in it, it was a tragedy. Right?
22:12
And there's another story in
22:16
there that is a retelling or
22:16
re-inspired by a Hans Christian
22:17
that are mapped directly on to
22:17
our situation under a story rich
22:21
Andersen story. And that's The
22:21
Little Match Girl.
22:23
from our own headlines, in my
22:23
Little Match Girl, she is a
22:38
little Latina girl in the pens
22:38
of refugee children ripped from
22:43
their parents on our borders.
22:46
Oh my goodness.
22:46
Wow, that is quite an
22:50
imagination, I have to admit to
22:50
be able to, to take something
22:54
that's going on in our own lives
22:54
and make a connection to fable
23:00
is amazing. I have a really hard
23:00
time separating that. I get like
23:03
get lost and despondent about
23:03
what's going on in our own
23:07
lives. And then I see my writing
23:07
and fantasy is something that's
23:10
completely separate, I just
23:10
really admire that, that you can
23:14
do that.
23:17
I've got a very
23:17
strange story telling brain.
23:23
All to our benefit.
23:24
It's basically a
23:24
set of jumble, jigsaw puzzle.
23:29
And every now and again, I just
23:29
take a piece from one puzzle and
23:31
put it into another puzzle. And
23:31
it fits perfectly. So the whole
23:34
thing changes, the whole picture
23:34
changes immediately.
23:36
Wow. So can you
23:36
talk a little bit about for you,
23:42
is there a difference in the
23:42
forms for you? Do you have
23:45
difficulty in writing short
23:45
versus longer? Because there's
23:49
not very many people I know who
23:49
can do them both well. And you
23:53
certainly seem to do that. You
23:53
know, most people tend to choose
23:56
one format, you know, either the
23:56
novel or maybe a novella, or the
24:01
short story. Not that many, you
24:01
know are more equal, which you
24:04
seem to be very split from what
24:04
I can tell from from your
24:07
website.
24:07
They are two
24:07
very different beasts and short
24:11
stories are that much tougher,
24:11
simply because it's that much
24:15
more constrained. I mean, if you
24:15
have a novel, which is anything
24:20
above 40,000 words, depending on
24:20
how long you go, you have a lot
24:25
of elbow room. Yes you can start
24:25
with a story. And then you can
24:30
figure out some stories and
24:30
subplots, and world building and
24:34
description and character
24:34
development. And it all comes
24:39
along and you've got room for
24:39
this. If you can actually build
24:43
this book brick by brick and
24:43
into some kind of pyramid that
24:48
has some kind of sense. A short
24:48
story you have. What? What's the
24:52
short story 7000 words on the
24:52
outside, right? Usually two to
24:57
four, right? Usually two to four.
24:59
You have to match space. And
24:59
every word has to count every
25:03
word has to be that word, the
25:03
perfect word, the word that
25:07
means that thing that you want
25:07
to say, because you don't have
25:10
the room to go off into the
25:10
brambles for a word. There's
25:14
just no space for that. A short
25:14
story is this absolutely
25:18
brilliant little gem that has to
25:18
spit precisely in good setting,
25:22
because otherwise, the whole
25:22
thing is just wreck. There's a
25:25
lot of people who start out
25:25
writing short stories who don't
25:28
know where to begin one and
25:28
don't know where to end one,
25:30
these two are very, very
25:30
important things because some
25:33
people will begin a short story
25:33
a long way before the story
25:36
begins. And then they find
25:36
themselves getting, I don't
25:40
know, trapped by the fact that
25:40
then they're halfway through the
25:43
story, shape, and they still
25:43
haven't started their story yet.
25:48
And then there's people who
25:48
finish the story somewhere
25:50
brilliant, and then overwrite
25:50
their ending because they feel
25:54
that something else is required.
25:54
So they write another 1000 words
25:57
over and above that, and just
25:57
carry on and you kind of go
26:00
here, yeah, this is, this is
26:00
stuffing, this is padding take
26:04
This is why I'm a very good
26:04
editor of other people's work, I
26:04
this away. can see these things happening
26:08
when they're thrown at me. I can
26:13
see like your story ended, like
26:13
three paragraphs ago, all of
26:17
this is not necessary. The power
26:17
of your story ends here. This is
26:22
where you leave, and endings are
26:22
so important. Because that is
26:27
the thing that you leave your
26:27
reader with. That is the last
26:30
thing that they take away with
26:30
them. That is the thing that
26:32
they will remember, sometimes
26:32
the last word of the story is
26:37
going to linger in your head. I
26:37
mean, take, for example, for a
26:42
short story, the 9 billion Names
26:42
of God. Have you read that?
26:47
I have not.
26:48
Arthur C. Clarke?
26:50
No, I've read
26:50
Arthur C. Clarke novels, but I
26:52
have not read this short story.
26:53
This is
26:53
basically about a computer that
26:56
that is working to print out the
26:56
9 billion Names of God. And what
27:03
happens when that work is done.
27:03
The whole story is working
27:06
towards this ending. And it's
27:06
working. And it's working. And
27:10
it's working. And now it's
27:10
finished. And then the
27:13
characters look up. And the last
27:13
word, the last sentence of that
27:16
story is overhead without any
27:16
sound. The stars were going out
27:20
one by one.
27:22
Oh my gosh. Wow.
27:22
You just stop there.
27:25
Yeah. And your hair stands up on your arm.
27:27
It gives me shivers.
27:28
A lot of people
27:28
who don't know when to stop, I'm
27:33
going to go on and explain this
27:33
now. Right, we started going up,
27:37
you know? Yeah, right. You don't
27:37
need to know, you know that once
27:41
God is fully named, everything
27:41
else becomes irrelevant. The
27:45
World Ends. Andyou don't need to
27:45
say anything else. This is the
27:50
end of that story. This is the
27:50
end of everything.
27:52
Yeah. Yeah. Wow.
27:52
So do you have a favorite
27:59
between those two forms for
27:59
yourself?
28:04
No, because it
28:04
depends on what I'm trying to
28:06
do. And depends on what I'm trying to write. I mean, the princess stories were definitely
28:08
short stories. They were not
28:11
novel length. There wasn't
28:11
enough there for novel length
28:15
material. On the other hand, the
28:15
shifter short story was
28:18
definitely not the short story
28:18
that I set out to write. So
28:21
depends on the material, it
28:21
depends on what I'm trying to do
28:25
with it, where it's supposed to
28:25
go. And if it grips hard enough
28:28
to actually show me that there
28:28
is a lot more iceberg under that
28:32
surface than I thought that
28:32
there would there was just by
28:34
looking at the what I could see.
28:37
Okay, well, I
28:37
admire you, I have to say. I
28:42
have written some short stories,
28:42
maybe 30, over 40 years. But
28:47
they're always difficult for me.
28:47
I almost always start them
28:52
because of an anthology or
28:52
something I've been invited
28:55
into. And, at least 50% of the
28:55
time, I get past whatever the
29:03
requirement is, whether it's
29:03
4000 words or 7500 words top
29:07
and, and then it's too long and
29:07
there's nothing for me to give.
29:10
So I admire that you can see
29:10
firstly, opportunities and
29:15
second that you can actually
29:15
execute them.
29:19
So you've had a long career as a
29:19
writer and I wonder if you can
29:25
talk about you know, what keeps
29:25
you going and move through
29:30
challenges. I mean, so many
29:30
different times, not only in
29:33
your own life, but in the life
29:33
of our country or the world as a
29:37
whole. So many writers get kind
29:37
of bogged down in events that
29:42
are happening outside of them.
29:42
So can you just give us a little
29:46
bit about what keeps you going
29:50
it's just who I
29:50
am. It's what I do. It's how I
29:58
think. I think that in certain
29:58
contexts, there are times in my
30:07
life when things happen, and I
30:07
just shut down, which includes
30:12
writing. When I went through a
30:15
particularly bad breakup, many
30:17
years ago, I spent many months,
30:17
wordless, until I heard a tiny
30:24
little voice in the back of my
30:24
brain saying, if you don't start
30:26
writing, we're all going to die.
30:28
Oh, wow.
30:30
So I just kind
30:30
of started picking it up again,
30:32
and then kept on writing. The
30:32
last six months have been
30:36
difficult. I haven't really
30:36
written anything original,
30:38
except for one story, which I
30:38
think is madly self indulgent.
30:42
And it's probably never gonna
30:42
get seen by anybody. But it's
30:49
sometimes it's hard to find the
30:49
heart to go somewhere where you
30:58
can't see if you're adrift in a
30:58
sea, which is just horizon. It's
31:03
very hard to, you know, to find
31:03
that shore which to just get out
31:07
of the water on. But more often than not, that
31:10
shore is always there, for me,
31:16
at least as a shape on clouds
31:16
somewhere as a reflection in the
31:22
water. I know it's there. I know
31:22
it's in here. And it's somewhere
31:27
where I just can't get at it
31:27
right now. But it's probably
31:29
going to come back. Eventually,
31:29
I hope.
31:34
No, I think it
31:34
will for sure.
31:36
Because if I
31:36
don't do it, all of us, we're
31:38
Well. And I think
31:38
that often, at least for me,
31:38
going to die. this is true. And I've gone much
31:46
longer periods of time, perhaps
31:49
than you are. Like right now I'm
31:49
sitting on two years of not
31:53
having anything original. So and
31:53
I think some of it is me being
31:58
willing to, to not only see that
31:58
the shore is there. But to want
32:04
the shore to be there. So because when I'm really
32:07
bogged down, like, right, the
32:13
thing I've been going through
32:13
lately is that there's nothing
32:17
that I can write that is as as
32:17
important as whatever the events
32:22
are of the world. And so I keep
32:22
looking for, and failing to
32:25
find, something that is as
32:25
important as that.
32:27
And this is where you write fantasy, and you use the events events in the
32:29
world to write.
32:34
Exactly, so. So
32:34
I'm slowly inching my way there,
32:39
I've actually decided, I'm going
32:39
to do a middle grade series. So
32:44
because children accept what you
32:44
say, and I don't have to write
32:49
to adults. So that's actually
32:49
what I'm going to do to get
32:52
myself out of it.
32:52
The way that I
32:52
grew up the way I was brought up
32:55
in the house that had books
32:55
everywhere is essentially no
32:58
book was forbidden. If you can
32:58
reach it, you can read it. If
33:02
you can figure it out. It's
33:02
okay. If not, you're going to
33:05
find your own level, you can put
33:05
it down because you don't
33:09
understand it, you're going to
33:09
come back to it later. That's
33:12
The librarian is going she's
33:12
seven and my parents are going
33:12
fine. By the age of four, I
33:12
taught myself to read. By the
33:15
age of seven, I'd gone through
33:15
the entire children's library in
33:19
my town and my parents got me an
33:19
adult card because I finished
33:23
everything that I wanted to read
33:23
in the kids section.
33:32
that's okay.
33:34
Wow, what a
33:34
wonderful childhood. That's just
33:40
really amazing. Well, no wonder
33:40
you're a writer. You were
33:43
connected to stories. So very
33:43
young then.
33:47
Yeah. I
33:47
basically learned to read I
33:50
taught myself to read was
33:50
because my mother read Heidi to
33:54
me when I was four. She just
33:54
read me the story as sort of
33:58
reading the story to me, and I
33:58
loved it. I probably didn't
34:02
understand three quarters of it.
34:02
But I loved the whole thing, the
34:05
whole idea of Heidi and the
34:05
goats and Grandpa in the pines,
34:07
in the cottage in the mountains,
34:07
and I just loved the whole
34:10
thing. And when she was finished
34:10
with it, she shut the book and I
34:13
said start again. She said, Oh no. So I went away and I started to
34:14
read it myself because I knew
34:19
the story. And I just figured it
34:19
out. And this is my first
34:23
memory. The first true memory
34:23
that I know is real is me
34:26
wobbling into the kitchen when
34:26
my mother was washing dishes and
34:29
asking whether she wanted me to
34:29
read to her. And what she heard
34:34
was, Do you want me to read to
34:34
you. She said I'm busy. I can't
34:38
do it right now. And I just
34:38
opened the book and started
34:40
reading and she dropped whatever
34:40
she was washing into the
34:43
dishwater and then came into the
34:43
same room.
34:49
Wow. Do you
34:49
remember how you were able to to
34:52
teach yourself?
34:53
Well, I had the
34:53
advantage there because my own
34:56
mother tongue is completely
34:56
phonetic. So there's no such
34:59
thing as spelling or weirdnesses
34:59
like the word that looks like
35:05
something but it said something
35:05
else and I couldn't recognize it
35:08
by sight. Now, in my language,
35:08
the word which the way you say
35:11
things is the way you write it.
35:11
So it's, it's directly
35:15
connected. And once I've figured
35:15
out the sounds, the words on the
35:19
page were no mystery.
35:23
Now, I think
35:23
that's something those of us who
35:25
speak English have difficulty
35:25
with. Because even using
35:29
phonetics sometimes doesn't
35:29
quite work out the way you
35:32
think. Nor the meaning that
35:32
you're looking for. So, wow.
35:36
I also learned
35:36
English, a lot of it from the
35:40
printed page. So a lot of the
35:40
words that I knew I didn't know
35:43
how to pronounce because I
35:43
learned them by reading them
35:46
phonetically but not by saying.
35:48
Ah, okay,
35:48
interesting. Wow. So, um, what
35:53
do you think is next for you? Do
35:53
you have some ideas floating in
35:57
your head right now?
35:59
Well, I'm
35:59
currently engaged in reissuing a
36:02
book that was originally written
36:02
as a single novel, but which
36:06
because it clocked in at a
36:06
quarter million words, was
36:10
published as a duology. Ah,
36:10
basically, the publisher said
36:16
split that puppy up. And I'm
36:16
putting together a 20th
36:19
anniversary edition. So instead
36:19
of these two books, you're gonna
36:22
get this book.
36:23
Oh, how wonderful.
36:23
And what are the names?
36:27
Changer of Days.
36:27
Okay, it's high fantasy. And
36:33
it's actually quite funny
36:33
because my mom is very, very non
36:38
fantastical. I often describe it
36:38
to people as someone with two
36:42
feet in the ground so firmly,
36:42
she's standing in it up to her
36:45
ankles. We're finding it very
36:45
hard to, to come to terms with
36:51
the fact that she produced
36:51
somebody who lives up in the air
36:53
fairy clouds like me. She's read
36:53
a lot of my stuff. And she
36:59
doesn't quite connect with it.
36:59
But for some reason, the most
37:02
fantastical of the fantastical,
37:02
this secondary World Fantasy.
37:06
She loves this. She says that
37:06
this book is about real people.
37:13
Oh, okay. Well, I
37:13
think that's a great compliment
37:18
for certain.
37:20
From her Yes.
37:21
Well, and if she
37:21
can, and if she does love it,
37:24
given, you know who she is, then
37:24
there may be other people like
37:28
her that that will find that
37:28
same thing. So that's, that's
37:31
really great for you. And what
37:31
is your timeline on that right
37:34
now?
37:35
I'm hoping to get it out just in time for Christmas shopping.
37:39
Ah, wow. So very
37:39
soon, then.
37:41
Yeah, at
37:41
present, I just handed it off to
37:44
someone to proofread it because
37:44
I did a very messy thing. And
37:49
there's a lot of names in here
37:49
with apostrophes in them. And I
37:52
changed something that changed
37:52
the apostrophes with double
37:55
quotes. And I had to go through
37:55
the whole thing like name by
38:00
name by apostrophe by logo to
38:00
figure out which was which and
38:04
what I was doing. So I handed it
38:04
off to someone else to proofread
38:07
it, because I'm not trusting my
38:07
own eyes at this point.
38:12
So that's where it is right now,
38:12
when that person hands it back
38:15
to me, I'll just fix all the
38:15
fixes that need to be fixed. And
38:19
then we're ready to go. I mean,
38:19
I've got everything else. I've
38:21
got original artwork for the new
38:21
cover. I'm going to miss the map
38:25
in there, which of course is
38:25
copyrighted to this publication.
38:29
So I had to redo the map,
38:29
because I had to redraw it. So
38:33
the new book has a copyrighted
38:33
map for it. So I've got that.
38:37
Everything else is in place. All
38:37
I'm waiting for is the final
38:40
shape of the manuscript and then
38:40
format that and we're off to the
38:43
races.
38:45
Excellent. Oh, I'm
38:45
so glad to hear that. I think
38:49
that a great way to stay
38:49
connected is by looking at
38:52
backlist. And seeing, you know,
38:52
how you can put those out in
38:55
different forms is really
38:55
helpful. I think.
39:01
So really, the
39:01
really weird thing is that we
39:04
were talking earlier about not
39:04
plotting and pantsing away and
39:08
there was a character in this
39:08
book, which started out as a
39:11
throwaway name in somebody
39:11
else's conversation. That
39:17
character is probably going to
39:17
get the novel of his own out of
39:20
this. It's just he just grew
39:20
like Topsy, and he just created
39:26
himself out of nothing. And he's
39:26
a very interesting guy. And at
39:31
some point, there's probably
39:31
going to be a companion novel to
39:34
this.
39:35
Oh, that will be
39:35
great. Absolutely. Wow. So we're
39:40
kind of getting towards the end
39:40
of our time. But is there any
39:43
questions I didn't ask you or
39:43
something you wanted to share
39:46
with the audience? Before we
39:46
close here?
39:51
No, I'm just a
39:51
writer who writes and I'll keep
39:55
writing as soon as I can get my
39:55
mojo back which is gonna take a
40:00
little while to get there. But
40:00
I'll I'll keep doing this
40:03
because that's the only thing I
40:03
wanted to do. And the only thing
40:06
I know how to do. Without this,
40:06
there was there was a wonderful
40:13
quote that I tend to kind of
40:13
carry around with me. Somebody
40:16
asked Ursula Le Guin once in an
40:16
interview, what would you be if
40:20
you weren't a writer? And she
40:20
said very succinctly, dead.
40:24
I believe that of
40:24
her. I absolutely do. That will
40:30
probably be my answer to and in
40:30
that kind of context.
40:34
Yeah. Well, I
40:34
think true writers have to write
40:39
you know, that is their life.
40:39
And so the way I put it before
40:45
was, if you want to be a writer,
40:45
no one can stop you. If you
40:47
don't want to be a writer, no
40:47
one can help you.
40:51
Very good. I love
40:51
that quote. I love that quote, I
40:54
think you should copyright it,
40:54
make a t-shirt.
40:59
Well, thank you very much for
40:59
your time, Alma. And thank you
41:03
listeners for listening to this
41:03
episode of Dust Jackets
41:07
conversations with authors with
41:07
my special guest, Alma
41:11
Alexander. As always, I will
41:11
have additional information on
41:15
how to contact Alma in the show
41:15
notes.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More