Podchaser Logo
Home
The Intelligence: The fallen crypto king learns his fate

The Intelligence: The fallen crypto king learns his fate

Released Thursday, 28th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Intelligence: The fallen crypto king learns his fate

The Intelligence: The fallen crypto king learns his fate

The Intelligence: The fallen crypto king learns his fate

The Intelligence: The fallen crypto king learns his fate

Thursday, 28th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

You've seen the headlines. Bonds are

0:02

making a comeback. But if you've

0:04

ever tried to invest in bonds,

0:06

you know what a clunky, complicated,

0:08

broken experience it can be. That's

0:10

why at Public, we took fixed

0:12

income and fixed it. Now you

0:15

can find, evaluate, and buy thousands

0:17

of bonds with an investing experience

0:19

designed in this century. Add fixed

0:21

income to your portfolio with corporate,

0:23

treasury, and municipal bonds. Go to

0:25

public.com/the economist to get started. Full

0:28

disclosures can be found at public.com/

0:30

bonds. Hello

0:44

and welcome to the intelligence from the economist.

0:46

I'm your host, Ora Ogunbiyi. Every

0:49

weekday we provide a fresh perspective

0:51

on the events shaping your world.

0:58

States everywhere from Bhutan to

1:00

Honduras are trying to build

1:02

shiny new cities. But

1:05

how many adjust the experiments of

1:07

vain, glorious billionaires? Can

1:09

any of these planned developments actually rise

1:11

above existing ones? And

1:15

our correspondent takes us to the

1:17

archive of retail star, Marx and

1:20

Spencer. It turns out that

1:22

knickers and cardigans can reveal quite a lot about

1:25

Britain's social history and even

1:27

help solve crimes. First

1:35

up though... It

1:42

has been called one of the biggest

1:44

financial frauds in American history. In

1:48

November last year, a jury took

1:50

just four hours to convict Sam

1:52

Bankman-Friede, the former

1:54

boss of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX,

1:57

on seven complicated charges. Sam

2:00

Bankman Freed had been found guilty

2:03

of the charges. There were seven counts,

2:05

including wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire

2:08

fraud, as well as conspiracy to commit

2:10

money laundering, and a number of others.

2:12

Following FTX's collapse, $8

2:16

billion of its customers' money was

2:18

unaccounted for. And today, in

2:20

a New York federal court, Mr.

2:22

Bankman Freed, also known as S.B.F.,

2:25

is due to be sentenced. He

2:27

maintains that he did nothing wrong, blaming

2:30

accounting mistakes for the missing money. But

2:33

the jail time facing the 32-year-old former

2:36

king of crypto could be harsh.

2:39

The sentencing that is due today

2:42

essentially marks the completion of

2:44

the downfall of Sam Bankman

2:46

Freed, excluding any appeals that

2:48

he might file. Alice

2:51

Forward is our Wall Street correspondent

2:53

and the co-host of Money Talks,

2:55

our podcast on business and finance.

2:58

This is essentially the last step

3:00

in his conviction. Before

3:03

the collapse of his empire, he

3:05

was fabulously wealthy. He was the

3:07

leading whiz kid of the crypto

3:09

industry. He was hobnobbing with politicians

3:12

in the White House and celebrities, and

3:14

he lived this extremely glamorous life. Today,

3:16

he could face as much as 110

3:18

years in prison. Now,

3:21

his own lawyer has described this

3:23

possibility as grotesque, and

3:26

it's not the sentence that prosecutors

3:28

are seeking. They've asked for between 40 and

3:30

50 years. Meanwhile,

3:32

in their defense filings, Sam Bankman

3:34

Freed's lawyers have argued for just

3:37

six. Okay,

3:39

before we get onto the sentencing, what

3:41

exactly was the fraud and conspiracy that

3:43

Sam Bankman Freed was found guilty of?

3:46

So Sam Bankman Freed ran a

3:48

cryptocurrency exchange called FCX. Customers would

3:50

deposit money, either dollars or cryptocurrency

3:52

in that exchange, and they could

3:55

then buy and sell crypto as

3:57

they pleased. The fraudulent

3:59

past... The is that Stx loans

4:01

at various points in his life

4:04

basically all of the customer money

4:06

that had been deposited with it

4:08

to a sister company which was

4:10

this it is trading firm or

4:13

had sudden that sound like were

4:15

treated Also founded cold elevator resets

4:17

and through Alameda resets Amendment Freedom

4:19

has made a losses investments seeds

4:22

to spend money on on property

4:24

he blood and money to employees

4:26

Stx but the precipitating of said

4:28

the downfall of Stx. Was the

4:31

revelation I coined desk of a

4:33

balance sheet of from Alamo. Their

4:35

ad eight revealed that essentially all

4:37

of our limited is valued was

4:39

message a tokens that had been

4:41

issued all created by Sub Bagman

4:43

Fried. It's as have had very

4:45

very few hard assets and that

4:47

had long been question marks about

4:50

the relationship between Stx in Alameda

4:52

and seeing this balance sheet seeing

4:54

that he he really didn't seem

4:56

to have much safer itself artist

4:58

misbegotten to lose confidence in Stx.

5:00

This article joy their sons and

5:02

eventually Sx suspended withdrawals a could

5:04

no longer pay out that people

5:06

who was coming set of money

5:08

back and Asia a few days

5:10

later filed bankruptcy with roughly eight

5:12

billion dollars of costs money missing.

5:15

When it went to trial, three

5:17

of his former colleagues to the

5:19

sound against him admitted fraud, sounded

5:21

very remorseful and at times distraught

5:23

by the actions that they had

5:25

played a role. Ads and see

5:27

a said that he had directed

5:29

them to. Do everything ahead

5:31

a tad. Oh. They really

5:33

threw him under the bus. So does

5:35

that mean that Spf is likely to

5:37

see the sentence? Can a said for

5:40

the maximum a hundred years than six.

5:43

They're. All sudden the things that might make

5:45

you think that he would get a long

5:47

sentence One is that he really didn't a

5:49

d himself a tool to the jugs. He

5:51

repeatedly violated the rules of his release from

5:53

prison in the run up to the trials.

5:55

say with seized Vpn while he was on

5:58

house arrest is a contact with this. We

6:00

always do in bankruptcy proceedings. He said

6:02

lot of things in public that with

6:05

and revealed in the trial not be

6:07

truthful. He showed the private diaries of

6:09

his ex girlfriend Caroline Ellison. he was

6:11

a witness, testified against him and he

6:14

read Alameda to the New York Times

6:16

and they published excerpts from them. So

6:18

the worst case scenario this is a

6:20

judge of looks it all this behavior

6:23

and wants to give him pointed long

6:25

sentence. The. Counter arguments: that which

6:27

is lose weight is that of

6:29

the money that was lost when

6:31

Stx it had bankruptcy in November.

6:33

Message to recoup that actually altering

6:35

pretty well stays in be arguing

6:37

that they will be a full

6:39

repayment of the money that was

6:41

lost when Stx went bankrupt. pets

6:43

the plus interest and so the

6:45

total home that has been done

6:47

to people from his crimes is

6:49

actually much smaller than you might

6:51

have thought and smaller than in

6:54

others fraud cases of similar method.

6:56

She's. They will simply to

6:58

other factors like that he's already

7:00

says some time and he suffers

7:02

from autism and attention deficit disorder

7:04

and other conditions at a time

7:06

of. People seem

7:08

to think that he will end up being given

7:10

a sentence of between twenty and and twenty five

7:13

they be says he is. that the range that

7:15

Lloyds I think into a people have commented publicly

7:17

on the case seems. think that he will gets.

7:20

That. You mention that some of customs money has

7:22

been repeats. How much are we talking here?

7:24

As. Of last August which was last time

7:27

he got an update from the bankruptcy team.

7:29

Stx have recovered about seven point eight billion

7:31

dollars in class and liquid crypto assets and

7:33

that does seem to be roughly the size

7:35

of the whole that was left the Dallas

7:38

he fled the country. Sales know this is

7:40

partly been made possible by just finding more

7:42

assets and there were lots of Crypto Council

7:44

bank accounts that company had lost track of.

7:46

The have turned out to have assets in

7:49

dense but I see what's it to the

7:51

that this is a C B B Hi

7:53

recovery rate is at a loss. of the

7:55

assets that they held have actually done very

7:57

well since they that between sweaty t So

8:00

if you think about crypto, that $8 billion

8:02

in November of 2022, that was when Bitcoin

8:06

was worth maybe a sixth of its

8:08

current value. And creditors and

8:10

FDX, those who had bought crypto, bought Bitcoin

8:13

on the platform, will be paid back a

8:15

dollar amount. So because

8:17

crypto has gone up so much,

8:19

that is inflating the dollar value

8:21

of the crypto that was left. So

8:24

it does look as though most of the

8:27

money is going to be recouped. The problem

8:29

is that a lot of customers think about

8:31

their loss in terms of crypto, not in

8:33

terms of the dollar amount in November of

8:36

2022. And so

8:38

some customers even though, in theory, they're getting all

8:40

of their money back as of the dollar value

8:42

in November 22, they feel like they are being

8:44

shortchanged here. Because

8:46

now crypto is performing well. I

8:49

mean, it sounds like none of this has impacted

8:51

confidence in crypto markets. It

8:54

certainly did in the short term. So when

8:56

FDX collapsed, the price crypto fell

8:58

very sharply. And then about a

9:00

year after FDX failed, you also

9:02

saw a huge blow to FDX

9:04

rival Binance, which was fined by

9:07

the US government for its involvement

9:09

in money laundering and terrorist financing.

9:11

The CEO of Binance, Cheng Peng Zhao,

9:13

was forced to step down. The firm

9:16

is now being modest very closely. So

9:18

you said you had the two biggest

9:20

exchanges, either failing or facing huge challenges

9:22

in relatively quick succession. That

9:24

said, there are a lot of reasons why crypto might be

9:26

climbing again now. One is just interest rates

9:28

tend to move inversely with those and people

9:31

think that interest rates have peaked. The

9:33

other is that actually a lot of this close

9:35

scrutiny of crypto and regulators

9:37

and legal authorities getting involved.

9:40

There is an argument that's washed out

9:43

many of the problems in crypto and

9:45

the firms that are left are better

9:47

regulated and more compliant in general. There

9:49

have actually been some sort of positive

9:51

regulatory developments in crypto as well, which

9:53

might make it sort of easier for

9:55

more people to buy into it. So

9:58

the SEC recently approved the creation of. exchange-traded

10:00

funds that could hold Bitcoin. And there

10:02

have been huge infos into these funds

10:04

since January when they were created and

10:06

that seemed to have coincided with its

10:08

sort of most recent rise. So although

10:11

the failure of FTX was a huge

10:13

blow for crypto, it might ultimately be

10:15

good news for the industry that's left

10:17

behind. Alice, thank you

10:19

so much for coming on the show. Thank you, Ori. Always

10:21

a pleasure to be here. You've

10:34

seen the headlines. Bonds are making a

10:37

comeback. But if you've ever tried to

10:39

invest in bonds, you know what a

10:41

clunky, complicated, broken experience it can be.

10:43

That's why at Public, we took fixed

10:46

income and fixed it. Now you can

10:48

find, evaluate and buy thousands of bonds

10:50

with an investing experience designed in this

10:52

century. Add fixed income

10:54

to your portfolio with corporate,

10:57

treasury and municipal bonds. Go

10:59

to public.com/The Economist to get

11:01

started. Full disclosures can be

11:03

found at public.com/ bonds. All

11:12

around the world, cities are

11:14

rising up. Egypt is preparing to

11:16

spend billions doubling the size of its lavish

11:18

new capital, the new desert. Get ready

11:21

for Touloza, a $400 billion

11:23

proposed smart city in the

11:25

United States. Saudi Arabia's $500

11:27

billion mega project, NEARM, which is being

11:30

built from the ground up, is tapping

11:32

Asian expertise. We're building in more cities

11:34

than at any time in the

11:36

post-war period. Ninety-one of them

11:39

have been announced in the past decade,

11:41

with 15 in the past year alone.

11:44

Bhutan just announced one new city,

11:46

Iraq has started building five, and

11:49

Donald Trump says he wants to

11:51

build ten so-called freedom

11:53

cities. In the

11:55

early stages, projects have attracted their fair

11:57

share of criticism, But

11:59

the sheer... the number and diversity of

12:01

these projects suggests that at least some

12:04

will take off. On

12:06

the face with building new city should be

12:08

a great thing. Called

12:10

in, Duncan writes about business and

12:12

finance for The Economist. Some economists

12:14

think the cities of mankind's greatest

12:16

inventions. When they work well, they

12:18

make us happier, healthier, richer, brainer.

12:21

And there are some really pressing

12:23

issues with our existing urban areas

12:25

that mean that building new cities

12:27

really make sense. But despite all

12:29

this today, city builders face a

12:31

pretty cold reception. Coven.

12:33

What does a critic same? Or

12:36

a as we know, governments around

12:38

the world today love industrial policy.

12:40

Answer some credit, Think this is

12:42

just another wasteful attempt at reshaping

12:45

economy using different phones. Others.

12:47

See these as quixotic projects by

12:50

Bangor is billionaires who are looking

12:52

for a legacy project. But.

12:54

These critics often overlooked the diversity of

12:56

the city's under construction. Today they tend

12:59

to focus on flashy project slide Saudi

13:01

Arabia's neon where the government is trying

13:03

to create this one hundred and seventy

13:06

climate along building that they sang who

13:08

wean themselves off with whale dollars that

13:10

trying to attract new industries and tourism,

13:13

manufacturing and financial services. Another example might

13:15

be El Salvador's plans to sell bonds

13:17

the pay out in bitcoin in order

13:19

to fund but they call a crypto

13:22

currency city but they're also lots of

13:24

less. Flashy protests and to this and

13:26

I spoke to Stephen Jennings to say

13:28

former private equity boss time developer. Bought

13:33

a lot. More.

13:36

Interested in our disposal? The city's

13:38

worth. Of

13:41

high quality lifestyle. Entire

13:44

to city outside Nairobi in Kenya,

13:46

he's trying to create infrastructure and

13:48

institutions that would make a place

13:51

say said both capital and people

13:53

say things like that. And

13:55

traffic controllers. he's

13:58

focusing on the more boring Okay,

14:01

you've talked so far about building new cities,

14:03

but how about improving our existing ones? Wouldn't

14:05

it be better to do that? Yeah,

14:08

Orey, I've spoken to lots

14:10

of architects and developers, and all of

14:12

them are very keen to insist that

14:14

they are not giving up on our

14:16

existing cities. But from Nairobi

14:19

to San Francisco, they

14:21

face a lot of the same

14:23

challenges. Those are planning regimes, infrastructure,

14:25

and existing shortages, which aren't keeping

14:28

pace with growing urban populations. Retrofitting

14:30

existing urban infrastructure can be really

14:33

slow, expensive, and it's a very

14:35

risk averse process. And

14:37

by building new cities, there's more

14:39

opportunity for experimentation. In some cases,

14:42

people are completely rethinking how society

14:44

operates within those cities. Interesting.

14:47

Who's doing that? One

14:49

of the more experimental projects is Telosa

14:52

City, which should be built somewhere in

14:54

the deserts of western North America. The

14:56

billionaire behind that project, Mark Law, claims

14:58

to want to do away with private

15:01

ownership of land. Instead, he wants to

15:03

hold land in a communal trust and

15:05

then use the funds from leasing that

15:07

land out to pay for public services

15:09

within the city. Some

15:11

of these cities really double as

15:14

social experiments, and the ideas range

15:16

from really sensible to

15:18

quite outlandish. And as you

15:21

say, some of these really are experiments.

15:23

How many of these new cities do

15:25

you think will actually prosper? City

15:28

building is really hard, and we are

15:30

very much out of practice. There

15:32

are lots of challenges. The upfront

15:34

costs can be staggering, and that involves

15:37

years of negative cash flow. And over

15:39

that time, money and enthusiasm for the

15:41

project can run out. For

15:43

example, work on Egypt's $60 billion

15:45

capital city has really slowed as

15:47

that country's economy falters. In

15:50

Malaysia, for a city which is being

15:52

built by a Chinese property developer is

15:55

complete, but the developer has now gone

15:57

into default, and the city remains mostly

15:59

closed. But history points

16:02

to some examples that have succeeded.

16:04

So we're thinking about Milton Keynes

16:06

outside of London, Reston outside of

16:08

Washington, DC, Chandigarh in India and

16:10

Brasilia in Brazil. They all

16:12

have pretty modest growth, but it's consistent

16:14

and people are voting with their feet.

16:17

More people want to live there. It's true that

16:19

these new cities are unlikely to become

16:21

the world leading cities that we know

16:23

like London and Singapore, but

16:25

it's worth remembering that some greenfield cities

16:28

have succeeded and they can

16:30

go on to become growing sustainable mid-tier

16:32

cities. As Stephen Jennings said,

16:35

the crucial thing is getting the boring

16:37

stuff right, roads, sewerage and the like.

16:40

Getting that infrastructure in place so that people actually want

16:42

to move there. One of the people

16:44

I interviewed for this story said that in order

16:46

for a city to be mixed use, mixed income,

16:48

it needs to be all use, all income.

16:51

And that means that you need to have the infrastructure

16:53

in place for people to want to move to that

16:55

new city. So even though some

16:57

of these cities might fail, and

17:00

even if we view all of these

17:02

new cities as experiments, all of them

17:04

are learning something new about mankind's greatest

17:06

invention and we should applaud them for

17:08

that. Morgan, thank you

17:10

so much for joining us. Thanks, everyone. Is

17:27

it a corpse? Or, to be

17:29

more precise, consider it pants. Catherine

17:32

Nixsey is a Britsom correspondent for The

17:35

Economist. When

17:38

the body was pulled from the North Sea in 1994,

17:41

almost all pleased with its identity had gone. One

17:44

or two things were still obvious. It was clear that the

17:46

man had been tall. He was six foot five inches.

17:49

That he had been well dressed. He had fancy

17:51

loafers on. And that whatever had led

17:53

to him bobbing around in the North Sea hadn't been

17:56

very nice. He had a head injury. But

17:58

dating his death was clearly going to be a problem. be hard. Except

18:01

for one thing, his underwear. Because

18:05

in his pants was a small white label.

18:08

It stated that they were medium, that

18:10

they were 100% cotton, and

18:12

best of all, that they were made by St Michael.

18:16

Suddenly there was hope. This was

18:18

not just a corpse. This

18:20

was an M&S court. This

18:26

matters because M&S, or

18:28

Marks and Spencers, is a British

18:30

retailer with a rich history, and that history

18:32

is contained in its own archive. The

18:35

first Cyber City centre in Leeds are

18:38

72,000 items. 3,300 of them are clothes. On rails and

18:40

on shelves, in ghostly white

18:46

suit covers, and in boxes filled with

18:48

tissue paper, lie a nation's

18:50

castor. There

18:53

are jumpers and cardigans, suits and

18:55

romper suits, leggings and jeggings, bed

18:57

jackets and bras. And above all,

19:00

because this is not just an archive, this

19:02

is an M&S archive, there are pants. There

19:05

are tiny pants and startlingly enormous pants. There

19:07

are silky pants and bustlingly woolly pants.

19:10

There are lacy pants, racy pants

19:12

and supremely sensible pants. I,

19:15

went to look at some of these pants and

19:17

some of the other clothes that they held there

19:19

with the archivist Katie Cameron. These

19:22

are 1950s. They're amazing. They're sort

19:24

of enormous actually. They're incredibly brilliant.

19:27

I think it would

19:29

be nice. In

19:31

the 1920s, that whole

19:34

thing, we were talking

19:36

about flea cinecas, so they would have

19:38

been really, you know, really gorgeous. Oh

19:41

God, that's a more marathons than pants.

19:43

Yeah, with the added synthetic element

19:46

as well. So totally is

19:48

the word that you're looking for in Genesis early on,

19:50

isn't it? Pants

19:54

might seem trivial. They are not. Occasionally,

19:57

just occasionally, they're important to police here.

20:00

looking to solve crimes. So the

20:02

archive's detailed records and M&S's

20:04

date stamp labels can

20:06

help to date corpses. Here is

20:08

a top tip for murderers, cut the labels off your

20:10

corpse. Pants

20:12

are also extremely important to M&S.

20:15

The shop sells food and home accessories as well, but

20:17

it really is known for its underwear. Around

20:20

one in every four pairs of pants sold in

20:22

Britain today is bought there. So

20:25

for listeners in Britain there is a good chance that

20:27

you're sitting on a bottom that has been wrapped in

20:29

M&S clothing. And

20:31

though they might not see it, pants are

20:33

also important to British history because clothes and

20:35

how well they wear, and above all how

20:37

well they wash matter fundamentally to

20:40

women and M&S helps

20:42

to improve both. I

20:45

think it might be. One

20:48

of the things you notice when you go around

20:50

the archive is how much of it is synthetic

20:52

materials. There is rail after rail

20:54

of fabric such as nylon and rayon

20:56

and terra-line and crimp-line. These

20:59

sound comic to modern ears. In

21:01

fact they were of serious importance in easing

21:03

the daily burden of the British household. People

21:08

write a lot about labour-saving devices but

21:10

what people often forget is that you

21:13

need labour-saving materials which are often sturdy

21:15

synthetic ones to go in them. And

21:18

these fabrics, these rayons and terra-lines and so on,

21:21

freed women up as one expert told me. Because

21:23

long before women were liberated by burning

21:26

their bras they were liberated by being

21:28

able to pop them in the twin tub and

21:30

let them drip dry without earning. I

21:40

actually found going to the archives in Leeds

21:42

an oddly moving experience. One

21:46

of those things that captures women's history and the

21:48

loss of women's history is in fact

21:51

just washing. At

21:55

first sight it feels like any other archive but

21:57

if you open its boxes another world immediately

21:59

appears. In one box

22:01

there's a beautiful 1940s pink, silk

22:03

and bra and it comes like a stuffed tissue

22:06

paper as if almost by a ghostly bosom. On

22:09

a nearby rail there are dressing gowns, one

22:11

of them is post-war and woolly, one is

22:13

diaphanous and 1970s. One

22:16

has the kind of paisley-ish Britain that

22:18

the stern 1950s father might have worn.

22:21

Each of them is almost unbearably evocative of

22:23

its era. The

22:27

priest might have had his madamins but some

22:29

Britons have an minister and clean coat again.

22:32

That's all for this episode

22:35

of The Intelligence. Let

22:45

us know what you think of the show. You

22:50

can always email us at

22:52

podcastateconomists.com and we'll see you back

22:54

here tomorrow.

23:09

You've seen the headlines. Bonds are making a

23:11

comeback. But if you've ever tried to invest

23:14

in bonds, you know what a clunky, complicated,

23:16

broken experience it can be. That's

23:18

why at Public we took fixed

23:20

income and fixed it. Now you

23:23

can find, evaluate and buy thousands

23:25

of bonds with an investing experience

23:27

designed in this century. Add fixed

23:29

income to your portfolio with corporate,

23:32

treasury and municipal bonds. Go to

23:34

public.com/The Economist to get started. Full

23:36

disclosures can be found at public.com

23:38

forward slash bonds.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features