Podchaser Logo
Home
How the Bible Came to Be

How the Bible Came to Be

Released Saturday, 3rd February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
How the Bible Came to Be

How the Bible Came to Be

How the Bible Came to Be

How the Bible Came to Be

Saturday, 3rd February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:08

Well. Good day. It's. It's alive.

0:10

And I'm at Stetson and I'm broadcasting to you

0:12

live from my studio here at Mariner's Church

0:14

in Southern California. And, uh,

0:17

for many of you who are listening, who are on the

0:19

Moody Network, we're on different networks sometimes,

0:21

but most of you overlap. You heard our,

0:23

uh, Mike Ferrera's just beforehand hosting

0:25

an open line with, uh, as

0:28

he does when he fills in sometimes. And he actually is recording

0:30

from Southern California, broadcast from Southern California. So

0:32

it's a it's a moody radio partner,

0:34

an affiliate of Southern California. Morning. And

0:36

so glad to have you with us as as

0:38

well. It did rain this week. So we

0:41

really, really were very sad because we never get

0:43

rain here. So I know, I know it's still 75

0:45

degrees and but it did rain this week. So

0:47

just keep in mind that we're kind of in a

0:49

sad season here. Like not being able to go

0:51

out and go for walks every day anyway.

0:54

Just have a little fun. As a former guy, I used to live in Chicago

0:56

for seven years there at Wheaton College, but now I am

0:58

the the dean and a professor

1:00

at the Talbot School of Theology at Biola

1:02

University. And for today I am.

1:04

And every Saturday I'm your host here.

1:06

And that's her live. And our guest today is going to help

1:08

us to understand the Bible, not

1:10

just about its content, but more

1:12

about its maybe our origin and why

1:15

it matters in its journey and more. Our

1:17

guest today is Rob Suggs. He's

1:19

written and collaborated on more than 60 books.

1:22

Among them are Christmas eight, My Family,

1:24

The Comic Book Bible, and The

1:26

Book That Conquered Time. The Book That Conquered time is going to be what

1:28

we talk about today. We actually have five

1:30

copies. We're going to give away not just random

1:32

folks calling up saying I want a book, but to brilliant

1:34

and insightful callers, as you always

1:37

are. He's an experienced teacher and preacher,

1:39

and has led a four part seminar on how the Bible

1:41

came to be. Also wrote the Life

1:43

Guide, Bible Studies, Ten Commandments,

1:45

and Christian Community. So

1:47

super glad to have you Rob here to talk about

1:49

the well, the book that conquered time.

1:52

And fascinatingly, you actually trace

1:54

the history of the creation

1:56

of the Bible. I think a lot of people,

1:59

um, maybe, I mean, maybe me, maybe

2:01

me, when I was a new believer, kind of perceived

2:03

that the Bible maybe came

2:05

down on, well, maybe Golden

2:07

plates, but that's a different religion, but

2:09

came down somehow, all connected and

2:12

completed. Then later I found out it wasn't

2:14

one book, but it was 66 books. And later I found out

2:16

that it spans centuries of time. So

2:18

let's jump in. And just why

2:21

do you think it's important for us to understand

2:23

the history of how the Bible

2:25

came to be?

2:27

Well, thanks for having me. First of all, Ed.

2:29

Um, I wrote this book because

2:31

I wanted to write a kind of biography

2:34

of the Bible. Like you'd write a biography

2:36

of any famous person. I

2:38

felt like I wanted to introduce it to people who

2:41

don't know it. And it's interesting that

2:43

you said your perception

2:45

of it as a new Christian was that it came down on

2:47

a golden plate, all formed

2:49

and ready and connected in 66

2:52

books. Um, I think most

2:54

people today it's more the opposite.

2:56

They are highly suspicious

2:58

of it, and they

3:00

kind of keep themselves at a distance

3:03

because they're afraid that it's going to

3:05

pop like a bubble. They're just

3:07

they hear what the world says. They think

3:09

it's maybe a collection of myths.

3:12

They believe that it's been

3:14

copied over so many times that we have no

3:16

idea what it originally said. And

3:19

so they kind of keep their distance from it.

3:21

And what I found, um, as someone

3:24

who's been around the Bible all my life, was

3:26

the closer you draw to it,

3:28

the more powerful it becomes. The more the

3:31

more personal it becomes, the

3:33

more integrity it has. And

3:35

boy, just don't be afraid of it because it's

3:38

it's it defends itself.

3:41

Yeah, fascinating. I actually, because I grew up

3:43

nominally Catholic, so Irish Catholic,

3:45

New York City. So we sort of had this high

3:48

respect for the Bible. Matter of fact, I would

3:50

put it, I would say God wrote a book. God wrote a

3:52

book. I just didn't think I could understand it. And then

3:54

when someone opened the Bible, it was very, you know, transformative

3:57

for me. But we're at a different stage, you know, that was decades

3:59

ago or a different stage in our culture.

4:01

And I think you're you're right. A lot of people just sort

4:03

of unsure, um, of its

4:06

origin. I remember the first time I was a new Christian,

4:08

and the first time someone finding

4:10

out I was relatively new Christian questioned

4:12

the authority of the Bible. And this is I started

4:15

my journey asking some of the questions. You are. It's

4:17

my high school. Uh, maybe my

4:19

not maybe my middle school, late middle school, early

4:21

high school teacher, when talking about

4:23

the Bible said, well, you know, the Bible is a

4:26

good book written by shepherds thousands of years

4:28

ago that doesn't have application to our life

4:30

today. And and I was it my shepherds.

4:33

And so I started doing some work. So so

4:35

how would if like so my first understanding

4:38

history of the Bible thousands of years ago, some shepherds

4:40

wrote this stuff down, doesn't have application today,

4:42

but could understanding the history of Bible help

4:44

us understand more clearly how God is

4:47

working through His Word, his work through His Word?

4:48

Oh, absolutely. Absolutely. And

4:51

and in this journey that's in the book,

4:53

which takes us through the history

4:55

of how the Bible came to be. Uh,

4:58

we do talk about the various parts

5:00

of the Bible and what kinds of people

5:02

wrote those parts of the Bible. And,

5:04

you know, we we go into the assumption that God inspired

5:07

at all that the voice of God

5:09

speaks through it, but he speaks very definitely

5:11

through the personalities of the people.

5:13

And, uh, yeah, some of them were

5:16

were shepherds. One of them wrote

5:18

a lot of psalms, for example, but

5:20

a lot of other different kinds of people

5:22

wrote the Bible is written by kings

5:25

and prophets and priests

5:27

and ordinary people like

5:29

Abraham. Uh, and it just

5:31

that they were just called out and, um,

5:34

for the with their stories. Not that Abraham

5:36

wrote any of it, but people like him.

5:39

Yeah, certainly people of

5:41

of centuries, millennia ago.

5:44

And so then for some people, the question becomes, you know, how

5:46

is this pertinent to me and how

5:48

so let's let's even talk about that. So if it's going to part

5:51

of what you write about is you actually think

5:53

that understanding the history of the Bible could help people,

5:55

well, engage the Bible more effectively, could

5:58

could bring more people to faith and more.

6:00

So that's a pretty lofty goal. I don't

6:02

generally think of. One

6:04

way to reach more people is for understanding the history of

6:06

the Bible. But you you kind of make that case. And

6:08

I found it interesting. So tell us a little bit about why that's

6:11

the case.

6:12

Yeah, I think you're right in that it's not the

6:14

major, um, evangelistic

6:17

weapon that we're going to use a book like this,

6:19

but I wrote more for the Christian

6:21

who's been around the Bible has

6:24

been maybe to Sunday school classes and

6:26

Bible studies, but really

6:28

doesn't know what's in that book. Uh,

6:31

the type of people I teach on Sunday mornings

6:33

in my class that, uh,

6:35

are again, I feel

6:38

like there's a kind of almost a

6:40

functional agnosticism in our churches

6:42

and that people say, yeah,

6:45

I believe in God. I

6:47

believe in these things, but I don't really

6:49

want to. I don't really want

6:51

to get too close to it, because I'm afraid I'll find

6:54

that it's all mythology and that it's not

6:56

real. Um, and then I'd lose my

6:58

church and I'd lose my friends. So

7:00

I wanted them to say, look, let's get

7:02

to know this book. Let's take this on.

7:04

How do we know that these

7:06

that what we're reading is what they wrote

7:09

2003 thousand years ago

7:11

and so we go into

7:14

the different parts of the Bible, how they

7:16

came together, what kinds of people

7:18

made the decisions to,

7:20

uh, use this? Don't use

7:23

that. And then how do we

7:25

know it stayed the same? You know, how do we know

7:27

we're reading something that is in

7:30

line with what was originally written?

7:33

Because so much is based on that. You know, we we even

7:35

in, you know, schools and the doctrinal

7:37

statements. I served with the Talbot School of Theology and

7:39

Biola University. I was at Wheaton, I think.

7:41

I think all of those doctrinal statements

7:43

say that the Bible was

7:46

I think it used the word inerrant at both schools and

7:48

and in the original autographs,

7:50

which sounds like a strange phrase. It's not autographs

7:53

doesn't mean that that, you know, John wrote

7:55

his John Hancock is a big flowery signature

7:57

at the end of the gospel, but it means that you know what

7:59

was actually written there. So this leads to a lot of questions,

8:02

and I know our audience is going to have questions

8:04

as well. For example, we don't have

8:06

any of the original autographs, not one.

8:08

So what does that mean

8:10

for the idea of the Bible being reliable,

8:13

being true, its history. But I'm going to

8:15

open up the phones as well and invite people

8:17

to call it 87754836758775483675.

8:25

Maybe you have a question about how the Bible came to be. What's

8:27

in the Bible? What's not in the Bible? Why?

8:30

Um, you know what? What ultimately

8:32

how that how that matters for our faith

8:34

and more. Um, and so

8:36

again, we're talking to, uh, Rob Suggs. The

8:38

book is the book that conquered time. We're going to give

8:40

away a few copies to our brilliant callers. Um,

8:42

so, you know, the Bible is the best selling book

8:44

of of all time. It always

8:47

is. You always go every year. It's there. Um,

8:49

why do you think that is after so

8:52

many thousands of years?

8:55

I think because it is just so absolutely

8:58

unique, because it has,

9:01

um, one thing we talk about is

9:03

how deeply it is affected our culture.

9:06

It affects our language, the expressions

9:08

we use. The way we look at each

9:10

other, the way our justice system

9:12

works. Western culture is

9:14

based on the Bible. And people

9:17

think that, well, we

9:19

could just kind of push the Bible aside.

9:22

Not so easily. I mean, it's

9:24

been it's had thousands of years

9:26

of shaping the way we think

9:28

and the way we speak and the way we see

9:30

each other, the the meaning

9:32

of things. So people who think that they

9:34

are completely divorced from Christian

9:37

or all religion and they say,

9:39

I have no religion, I have no faith,

9:41

and I have no spiritual beliefs. Those

9:44

people two are tremendously

9:46

molded more than they know by the

9:48

Bible.

9:49

For sure. For sure. Remember our number is (877) 548-3675.

9:55

That's (877) 548-3675.

10:00

Of course, you know, we can't trust the Bible because

10:02

it is been translated and

10:04

people have added things to it and taken

10:06

things they didn't want out of it. And so

10:08

so the Bible is maybe,

10:10

maybe long ago, it was more to

10:12

the true writing intent of the

10:14

author. But we can't trust it anymore, right?

10:17

Oh, that's an interesting

10:20

thing. You know, the internet has really,

10:22

really cut into a lot

10:25

of things. So. Yeah, but.

10:26

But Rob, you can't put it on the internet unless it's true.

10:28

So, you know, it's if it's on the internet it's true.

10:31

So we but I see a lot of

10:33

Jesus never existed. Jesus

10:35

is a fairy tale. Yeah. And you and I know

10:37

that even the most skeptical of the skeptics out

10:40

there, people who study the Bible

10:42

every day. But maybe you're not Christians

10:44

at all. They'll all tell

10:46

you Jesus definitely existed.

10:48

That's a historic fact. Now,

10:50

when we get into the miracles and the resurrection,

10:52

we can talk about those things. But

10:55

Jesus existed. But as

10:57

you said, you can't believe everything on the internet.

11:00

But it has. There's been this general

11:03

challenge that the Bible is just like

11:05

any other ancient piece of literature.

11:08

It's a bunch of stories. It's a bunch

11:10

of myths, and we can't trust

11:12

it. And one of the the, I

11:14

guess the central things I set

11:16

out to challenge was this idea

11:19

that we have no idea what was

11:21

in those original autographs,

11:23

and I have a member of my family that

11:25

believes that. And it's very we've

11:27

I've tried to dialogue with him about it

11:29

and he just it's hard

11:31

to get through. He believes that it's like

11:34

that game of telephone. And you've heard that

11:36

comparison to where us or something

11:38

in someone's ear and they whisper it and they

11:40

whispering, and it goes around the circle and the message

11:42

changes. And of course, you and

11:44

I know Bible transmission was

11:46

nothing like that at all. Um,

11:49

and, you know, we I don't know how deep into

11:51

the, into the weeds we would go on that. But

11:53

the point is, it's, it's more like

11:55

I write something down and I hand it to

11:57

someone else, and then he makes

12:00

a copy of it very carefully

12:02

and hands it to someone else. And then

12:04

over time, people are copying those copies.

12:07

So, um, it's very different

12:09

than a game of telephone.

12:11

In other words. Yeah, for sure, for sure. And the level

12:13

of precision, the intentionality and

12:15

more, we're going to talk more about that and much more

12:17

with Rob Suggs. His new book is the

12:20

Book that Conquered Time. We'll be taking your calls as

12:22

well. (877) 548-3675.

12:25

That's (877) 548-3675.

12:39

Hey! We're back.

12:40

Its jets are alive. And we're talking about

12:42

the Bible. Not just like the what

12:44

the Bible's content is, but really kind of the history

12:46

of the Bible itself. A biography

12:49

of the Bible is the way Rob Suggs or

12:51

the author here of the book That Conquered time,

12:53

explained it to us as well.

12:55

We're taking your calls, got lots of calls lined up, so

12:57

we're going to jump right in. (877) 548-3675.

13:02

Rob it's always fascinating to me like what people

13:04

are interested in calling in about.

13:06

And it appears based on our phone calls here today

13:09

that people are interested in talking about these

13:11

issues. So let's let's take a look

13:13

and start jumping in with

13:15

to our conversation. Let's see,

13:18

uh, we're going to go to Victoria and Rialto, California.

13:20

Victoria, you're live on the air. You go ahead with your question,

13:23

your comment.

13:24

Hello. I'm so grateful

13:26

to hear that this book is being offered

13:28

and the author has written it because

13:30

I'm a 67 year old grandma with a 22

13:33

year old grandson who was raised

13:35

in not in our home all the

13:37

time, but a lot of the time

13:39

that he was growing up. He lost his dad to

13:41

a car accident. So no father

13:43

in in the home.

13:46

But his grandpa is a Christian and he went

13:48

to church with us. But he's 22

13:50

now. He's gone through relationships,

13:53

car accidents, drugs, alcohol.

13:56

And he said, grandma, how can you believe

13:58

in that old antiquated book? It's

14:01

been passed down for all these years.

14:03

Nobody believes in that anymore.

14:06

How can you think that? It's the truth.

14:08

I think it's nothing more than Wikipedia.

14:10

It can be changed. It can be somebody's

14:13

opinion I need

14:15

help.

14:17

I think it's a great question, Victor. If you'll hold on just

14:19

a second. And after Rob Suggs answers,

14:21

we're going to give you a copy of his

14:23

book to help. It's called the book The Concord. Tommy, will that help

14:25

you in your conversation with him as well? But,

14:28

Rob, what do you think?

14:30

Boy, that is such a great question and I

14:32

know exactly where she's

14:34

coming from. Um. We

14:36

face a culture that is saying, you know,

14:39

why should I believe that?

14:41

And number one, be thankful the questions

14:43

being asked, even if it's being

14:45

asked skeptically because it shows

14:48

a desire to

14:50

listen to, to can

14:52

I trust this book? And maybe

14:55

maybe he doesn't believe he can.

14:57

But this is where the

15:00

Bible can stand up for itself. It

15:02

can. If he gets into

15:04

a good study, if you could get him to

15:06

into a good study in a church, for example,

15:09

where some of these questions could be answered

15:11

and where the Bible could be taught, he

15:14

would see that it does apply

15:16

everything in it in Old Testament and new

15:18

applies to the the struggles

15:21

we face today because people

15:23

don't change. So yes,

15:25

these are old stories, but they're stories

15:28

about people very similar to

15:30

the people we face today. And

15:32

what attracted me to the Bible

15:34

from the very beginning, I think, is that

15:37

it understands us so well.

15:39

It doesn't have. Faultless

15:43

characters. David is not a faultless character.

15:45

Abraham is not a faultless character.

15:48

Um, none of Moses. None

15:51

of these people. They're all just very

15:53

imperfect people. And yet it just

15:55

nails the problem of sin the Bible

15:57

does. And so when I talk

15:59

to people, I begin to talk to them on the basis

16:02

of don't you feel like

16:04

there are things in your life that you wish

16:06

weren't so? It isn't. What

16:08

is it that's wrong with all of us?

16:10

It's not just you, it's all of us.

16:12

We have these things in our lives, life

16:14

that just aren't right. These

16:17

temptations we have these tendency

16:19

to do things wrong. The Bible understands

16:22

that it nails it and understands

16:24

the problem of sin, and it

16:26

shows us what to do about it.

16:30

Well, could help. Maybe. Yeah,

16:33

right. Hold on the library too, because right

16:35

after, uh, right after I'm done talking,

16:37

our producers are going to come on the line. Karen. She's going to give you

16:39

a copy of the book. And

16:41

super, super helpful question. Okay. Let's go to David

16:43

listening on Wbai in Chicago.

16:46

David, you're live on the air. Go right ahead.

16:48

Hi. Um, really appreciate your program.

16:51

It's excellent. Thank you. Um,

16:53

my question is, um, uh,

16:56

I believe you had said that,

16:59

um, there's not one

17:01

original. Um.

17:05

Uh, autograph or manuscript?

17:08

The original. Uh,

17:10

that is, uh, that had

17:12

survived. And

17:14

so my question is,

17:17

uh, isn't it, isn't it true

17:19

that, um, a

17:22

manuscript was was

17:25

by archaeologist was found

17:27

that was around

17:30

the time of John, uh, the

17:32

apostle John around 100

17:34

A.D. or so. Isn't that correct?

17:39

We think. Rob.

17:40

Well, that's a that's a good question too.

17:42

We're finding new manuscripts all

17:44

the time, and some of them get

17:47

very close to,

17:49

uh, that period. That is the most interesting

17:52

period to me, which is the period

17:54

of the gospels. So we

17:56

found some things that could be very late

17:58

first century. Now, if you get very

18:00

late first century. Yes. That's around the time

18:02

John was written. We haven't found

18:04

what John wrote, though.

18:07

We found very,

18:09

very early copies. Possibly.

18:11

But keep in mind that the copies we find

18:14

are fragments there you can find

18:16

pictures of them online. They

18:18

look like someone ripped something out of a book.

18:20

And there's a little groups of words here

18:22

and there. But by the way,

18:24

this is this is why. We

18:28

have less of a need to see those originals

18:30

than you might think is because there are

18:32

so many copies, there's so many

18:34

thousands in there, in so many different

18:36

places. They're in Egypt, they're

18:39

in Asia minor, they're in Europe, and

18:41

they compare very well to each other.

18:43

So here's the thing. Let's

18:46

just say John writes this. He writes down

18:48

his gospel. In the beginning was the word,

18:50

and the word was with God, etc.. And

18:53

then people began to make copies, and

18:55

these copies go all off to different corners

18:57

of the world. And then you find

18:59

that 30 years later there's copies of copies

19:02

and they still match each other. And

19:04

the only thing that's different, or maybe

19:06

the the word D is,

19:08

is different here. Or,

19:11

um, there's a qualifying adverb

19:14

and not even an adverb preposition

19:16

that's stuck in there. Very minor

19:19

words that don't affect the sentence at all. And

19:21

those are the only changes. That's

19:23

the situation we have with manuscript

19:26

study. We know that,

19:28

uh, scholars will tell you what we have

19:31

is about 97%

19:33

accurate to the original, we believe,

19:36

because there's just such consistency

19:39

in the in the copies we have.

19:42

Yeah. And I think that I, I

19:45

think I want to hold on, get a copy of the book

19:47

as well, remember. If you'll just hold on for the line after

19:49

I'm done talking. Uh, we'll give you Robb Suggs

19:51

book, the book that conquered time. But

19:53

but I think, David, that

19:55

again, I'm not a New Testament scholar,

19:58

but I if I recall, the oldest

20:00

manuscript is in the Rylands Library

20:02

and it's kind of mid one hundreds,

20:04

I think maybe I mean, there are books

20:07

that might be older

20:09

than, than the, for

20:11

example, the book of revelation. Uh, you know,

20:13

there might be, you know, things like The decay and

20:15

the Shepherd of Hermes. So maybe that's what you're thinking

20:18

about. Whereas there are books

20:20

that are not in the Bible that are as

20:22

old as the Bible, that are Christian books

20:24

and so, so, but but I'm not sure.

20:27

But we don't I don't think anybody says

20:29

that I've ever heard. And I could could be

20:31

wrong, but I don't think I've heard anyone say that we have

20:33

an actual manuscript, in part because

20:35

it would be, I mean, paper. It would be very

20:38

difficult to withstand

20:40

2000 years of of

20:42

time. And here's the great thing. And now I'm jumping on

20:44

your stuff, Rob. So forgive me, but here's the great thing

20:46

the power is not in the object.

20:48

It is in the inspired, inerrant words.

20:51

So even if we had

20:53

the original manuscript, it wouldn't

20:56

be any more holy. It's not like

20:58

a relic that we would carry around and put in a

21:00

case and, you know, walk through town singing

21:02

about it. It's the Word of God,

21:04

not the paper upon which the word or

21:06

the papyrus in that case upon which the word

21:08

is written. So super question, David, and just hold on. We're going

21:10

to give you a copy of this as well.

21:13

Let's go. You started getting to this a little bit

21:15

and I think John John in Moline,

21:17

Illinois, he's listening on Wdvm. He's got a question

21:19

that I think will help us move forward. The conversation.

21:21

John, you're on the air. Go right ahead.

21:24

Yes.

21:25

Thank you very much again. Um, just

21:27

kind of curious, as I've studied

21:29

in reading more in the Bible and getting

21:31

deeper with it, uh, older persons

21:34

age. Um, and the

21:36

other day, uh, a little Bible

21:38

study group ago with um, they

21:40

said, well, why do we have so many conversions,

21:43

like the Living Bible, which I've read

21:45

and studied with? And of course, and as

21:48

you grow from the 25 to 45

21:50

age, and I agree with

21:52

what has been said here this morning.

21:55

And of course, and then I guess I'm going back for

21:57

confirmation. My own thoughts here from

21:59

the people here today on the show.

22:02

Um, if it was King James,

22:04

it was the Living Bible, whatever verse

22:06

you want to call out there. They're

22:08

all pretty much close because

22:10

like you say, we don't have an exact. Word

22:14

for word proven. And

22:16

if that makes you understand what

22:18

Christ does for us and God's

22:20

power was in the creation of all this,

22:23

then that's the true

22:25

test I was feeling. Is there what makes

22:27

you feel to grow, to dig deeper?

22:30

Not just the name of the conversion

22:32

of what the book is.

22:34

Right?

22:34

Right. Yeah, yeah.

22:36

Yeah. So I'm looking.

22:37

Let's, let's, let's let's have Rob. So let's jump in.

22:39

Let's have Rob jump in on that and

22:41

talk a little bit about that. Because I think just to make

22:43

sure we get one thing though, to be clear,

22:45

most, uh, the overwhelming

22:48

majority of English

22:50

translations of the Bible

22:52

rely on the same set of manuscripts.

22:54

Or there's two. So it's not that the translations are

22:56

not generally saying, with the exception

22:58

of there are exceptions. I'm saying generically,

23:01

most recent translations of the Bible rely

23:03

on the same or similar set of manuscripts.

23:05

King James Version has some variants. We'll talk about that.

23:07

But but I want to make sure we're talking. So let's

23:09

start with the question of why there are different translations

23:12

rather than and John, you hold

23:14

on the line. We're going to give you a copy of the book. Uh,

23:16

but why are there different translations

23:18

if we have some reliable manuscripts?

23:22

That's it really is a good question and a common

23:24

one. I hear that a lot. People

23:26

are saying I'm confused by all these translations,

23:29

and why are there so many? And

23:31

we have a whole chapter on that. And toward the

23:33

end of the book, um, and it introduces

23:35

some of the translations, it doesn't make

23:38

a lot of value judgments on which translation

23:40

is better than the other. But part

23:43

of this is that, as it

23:45

said a minute ago, um, it's

23:48

not the paper that it's written on. It's

23:50

not any of that. Those

23:52

are the wineskins. You know, Jesus talked

23:54

about new wine placed in old wineskins.

23:57

These translations are like wineskins

24:00

that cover that have

24:02

carried the word of God. But

24:05

while the Word of God never changes, human

24:07

language does so. For

24:09

example, for 500 years, I

24:11

guess the King James Bible

24:14

was just a fabulous, fabulous

24:16

translation. I wrote a lot

24:18

about the King James because I'm actually

24:20

a fan of it. Yes, it has inaccuracies

24:23

in it today, and a lot of the wording

24:25

is archaic, but

24:27

it was written during Shakespeare's era,

24:30

the most beautiful period of the English language.

24:32

God chose to to

24:35

bring the King James out of that. So

24:37

it's written for poetry, it's written for

24:39

sound. And it just it

24:41

carried through the years. But now

24:43

we need new translations because

24:46

the language has changed. We don't say

24:48

faith, hope and charity anymore. We

24:50

say faith, hope and love. So

24:52

we need to keep up with the changing

24:54

of the language. That's part of it.

24:56

Also, there are different purposes

24:59

for different translations. If

25:01

you have the new American Standard Version,

25:04

you've got a very, very, very

25:06

accurate, almost painfully accurate

25:09

word for word translation. So

25:11

you people don't like to know, I want to know exactly

25:13

what the Greek word was and

25:15

exactly what the English version of that

25:18

Greek word was. Well, that's the new American

25:20

standard. And translations like

25:22

it, the English Standard Version,

25:24

etc. but it might be

25:26

a little less readable as a result of that.

25:29

A version like the New International and

25:32

some of the others is going to come along

25:34

and say, let's take a concept

25:36

for concept and translate it

25:38

not based on every word, but

25:41

on every sentence, and get the sense

25:43

we're going.

25:43

To run out of time.

25:44

So they're a different time.

25:45

Rob. So we're going to jump right back in and

25:47

continue with Rob Suggs in just a minute

25:49

about his book, the book that conquered time and your calls.

25:51

(877) 548-3675.

26:07

Hey, we're back yet? Stats are live. Sorry about that.

26:09

Cut off there at the end. Rob. Appreciate you hanging

26:11

with us. We unfortunately got a hard break

26:13

at the bottom of the hour. We're giving away a few copies

26:15

of Rob Suggs book, the Book

26:18

That Conquered Time talking about it. Because I have

26:20

a biography of the Bible, there

26:22

are several questions, Rob, that are coming in that

26:24

I think I'll probably just put them together as

26:27

one question. And

26:29

so if that's okay for our for our listeners, our

26:31

callers. So Doug in Michigan

26:33

asks, do you think the NLT is

26:35

a good version? If so, why?

26:37

Why is some scripture taken out

26:40

compared to the NKJV, uh,

26:43

where it's in the NKJV? So

26:45

but I'm going to combine these together. Could

26:47

um, could Rob comment. This is

26:49

Michael in Dayton. Could Rob comment about

26:52

how his research would impact the thoughts about a King

26:54

James only group? Are also,

26:56

are there some translations to avoid

26:58

which are the best ones?

27:00

And then another one is why there's so many different versions of the Bible.

27:03

What's there? What's the opinion of the best

27:05

version? But I think they they all

27:07

kind of have to do with. And you and

27:09

you said there were some I think you use the word

27:11

mistakes in the KJV, which I

27:13

want to I want to give you the opportunity to explain

27:16

by that what you mean by that, because, uh,

27:18

because the language can mean different things

27:20

to different people. So if you don't mind, unpack

27:22

because, I mean, we're talking about manuscripts here with

27:24

the KJV and we're talking about translations

27:27

as well. So just walk us through that

27:29

so people understand that why we got these different translations,

27:31

why the KJV has some verses

27:33

that others don't. And

27:36

what do you think about modern translations today?

27:39

Okay. Boy, that's that's a lot there.

27:41

Okay. And if you could do that all in about seven

27:43

minutes.

27:45

Yeah, I first of all yes

27:47

I don't if I use the word mistakes

27:50

I don't I don't want to use that word at all. So

27:52

let's let's have that stricken from the record.

27:54

I totally know what you're saying. You were talking about some translation

27:56

differences, right?

27:57

It translation differences. And it has

27:59

to do with, um, discoveries that

28:01

have been made since 1611,

28:04

you know, since around the time

28:06

of Queen Elizabeth when

28:08

that translation was made. They

28:10

did a tremendous job. The scholars on

28:12

the King James Version and the King

28:14

James is still a good translation to read.

28:17

I read it mainly for the beauty

28:19

of the language. Um,

28:22

I would use more something like the

28:24

English Standard version or something

28:26

along those lines to read more for

28:28

precision. Um,

28:30

I'm, I'm very hesitant

28:32

to make value judgments on on

28:35

translations. I don't think

28:37

there are a lot of bad ones because

28:39

as editor has said, they're all the word of

28:41

God and they're all based on

28:43

the same manuscripts. And

28:46

I have to remind my people of that, you know, when

28:48

I teach and they compare their

28:50

Bibles to each other and, hey, they're

28:52

those are based on the same manuscripts,

28:54

but different scholars make different judgments

28:57

on how to translate this or that phrase.

28:59

Um, someone asked a question about

29:02

why would the NLT drop

29:05

some verses? Um.

29:07

Let me add, so it's not just right, it's not just

29:09

the NLT. It would be. Most modern

29:11

translations, for example, don't include the longer

29:13

ending of Mark. There's a passage

29:16

first, John, there's there's and it has

29:18

to do with the manuscripts

29:20

that the that yes, yes that the King

29:22

James Version you. So the King James Version uses

29:24

a different manuscript set and, uh,

29:27

ironically, it uses a younger manuscript

29:29

set and the newer translations

29:32

have found older manuscript sets. So

29:34

the King James is older, but uses a

29:37

manuscript set that was closer to

29:39

its time. Whereas now we go back a little further.

29:42

Yeah. So so so why why does

29:44

that matter? Why do we keep looking at manuscript

29:46

studies like that?

29:47

This. This is a this is a great thing.

29:50

Um, and this is why

29:52

I'm not going to tell you what translation

29:54

to buy, but I'm going to tell you to buy

29:57

a good study Bible. And there

29:59

are a lot of good study Bibles out there. There's

30:01

a, a website. I mean, I'm sorry,

30:03

there's a YouTube, um,

30:05

that that has a really good YouTube

30:08

video that talks about the various study Bibles

30:10

and compares them, and you need to seek

30:12

that out. But a study Bible

30:15

will give you some of this. We've mentioned

30:17

that the long and short endings of Mark.

30:20

Most Bibles will give you

30:22

a note when you get to the end of

30:24

Mark that says, you know, after

30:27

this verse, these endings

30:29

are not in any of the oldest manuscripts.

30:31

So I believe the last verse

30:34

of Mark that we know is

30:36

in the oldest manuscript says

30:38

that the women went to the tomb

30:40

and and they saw the angel,

30:42

and then they went back, you know, went

30:44

back to their homes frightened, which is a

30:46

strange way to end that

30:49

gospel. But it does end there.

30:51

And they in terms of the original, the oldest

30:53

manuscripts we have, there are manuscripts

30:56

from a little later that have endings

30:58

that seem to have been cobbled on and

31:01

a little bit similar to Matthew, etc.

31:03

and so the point is,

31:06

you should have a note in your Bible that tells

31:08

you about this, so nobody's trying to sneak

31:10

anything by you. Now,

31:12

the other big one is John.

31:14

Uh, is at John six, the woman

31:16

caught in adultery and the woman

31:19

caught in adultery. Story. This is where

31:21

he was without sin. Cast the first

31:23

stone. That story, it's a favorite

31:25

story, but it's not in the

31:27

oldest manuscripts. Now, it

31:29

is such a wonderful Jesus story,

31:31

and it's so much in keeping, um,

31:34

with the Gospels. Then

31:36

it has been left in, but usually

31:38

with a qualifying note that says

31:41

this is not part of the original manuscripts.

31:43

For that reason, some preachers will

31:45

not preach from that passage. Um,

31:48

because as they're saying, we we really don't

31:50

know if this is in the original autographs.

31:53

So those

31:55

are the two biggest passages

31:57

that have, uh, questions

32:00

about them. But there are other little places

32:02

here and there. The Lord's Prayer.

32:05

Um, here are some some of the verses

32:08

were in the original or the oldest. So

32:10

those are those are some the reasons

32:12

you need a good study Bible is they

32:14

give you some of the background of that.

32:17

Yeah. Super helpful. And again, it's

32:19

it's worth noting that a lot of this

32:22

is is in every study Bible because it's not

32:24

like a secret that people are trying

32:26

to sometimes you'll end up in a, maybe a King James only

32:28

conversation. And they'll also often

32:30

point to first John five seven and eight, which

32:32

in the King James Version says there are three that bear

32:34

record in heaven the father, the word, and the Holy Ghost.

32:37

And these three are one. And

32:39

that's omitted from almost all

32:41

modern versions.

32:43

It's but a King James only person would say, but

32:45

listen, that proves the Trinity. Well, the Trinity is in the

32:47

Bible. It's it doesn't need this verse

32:50

that is kind of found later

32:52

in later manuscripts as well. And we should

32:54

also add that there's no doctrine of Scripture

32:56

that is overturned or

32:58

undermined by any manuscript

33:00

difference as well. Okay. We're getting

33:02

we're getting down a rabbit hole here and I should and I should

33:04

stop that. So but again I'm interested in topic

33:07

as well. So um, but let's go to Gary

33:09

in Alabama. Gary, you're live on the air with

33:11

your question or comment. Go right ahead.

33:15

Thank you for taking my call.

33:17

Um, I'd like to know, is it? Can

33:20

you justify a position

33:22

that. Surely

33:24

the God who created the universe could preserve

33:27

His Word and through all

33:29

the translations. Maybe

33:31

I don't know exactly the word that was used

33:34

in the original, but

33:36

surely the meaning is still

33:39

applicable in the various

33:41

translations of the Bible that we have.

33:45

Yeah. So what do you. What do you think, Rob? Oh,

33:47

let me say to oh, we're going to give you a copy of

33:49

of, we're going to give you a copy of his

33:52

book and the book that conquered

33:54

time. So, you know, how

33:56

does God preserve his word as a matter? I mean,

33:59

how is that case important that God has preserved

34:01

his word?

34:02

Well, it's it's very important.

34:04

Very important, because we have

34:06

to know that we haven't

34:08

been mixing in, um, our

34:10

own doctrines and our own ideas and our

34:12

own guesses, but that, um, as

34:15

Gary says, God inspired

34:17

his word from the beginning. And

34:20

and it comes down to us.

34:22

And this is, I think,

34:24

the heart of the book that I wrote is

34:26

the fact that after these thousands

34:29

of years, this book is still

34:31

the bestseller. It's still blesses

34:33

lives every time

34:35

I teach. Doesn't matter

34:37

what the passage is. The prodigal son

34:40

I've taught the prodigal son, and I

34:42

know you have to add over and over and over

34:44

and it's never the same story.

34:46

Every time I come to it, there's

34:49

something new in it. And what

34:51

it is, is that's the Holy Spirit applying

34:53

it to my life and where I am in

34:55

life and where are the hearers of

34:58

the lesson are and what they need

35:00

to hear. And so it's a living

35:02

word. God is speaking through

35:04

it. The same God that spoke thousands

35:06

of years ago, as Gary pointed out,

35:09

is still speaking to us. But

35:11

through that word, through the word he inspired.

35:14

So that's why it's so important for

35:16

us to understand that it's a living

35:18

book.

35:20

Okay. So we're going to continue.

35:22

A conversation with Rob Suggs in just a moment. And

35:24

the book is the book that conquered

35:26

time. We've got one more segment with your calls.

35:28

I'll give you one number one more time. We're going to try to do

35:30

a rapid fire round, which I have not

35:32

been a good model or example of when I started

35:34

going into the manuscript stuff, so forgive me.

35:37

(877) 548-3675

35:41

is our number. That's (877) 548-3675.

35:45

The book that Conquered Time with author Rob

35:48

Suggs. We're gonna talk more about the Bible. Hey,

36:00

Rebecca. Headsets are live. We're going to do, I don't

36:02

know, a lightning round kind of thing. I'm going to go hopefully

36:04

to Clark and then to Elena and then

36:07

to Judy, and then we'll keep going through.

36:09

So Clark, Elaine and Judy, you'll be ready, but

36:11

with brief questions. And then we'll

36:13

have Rob give brief answers and they'll

36:15

all be around his book, the book that

36:17

conquered time. So, Clark, you're up first. How

36:19

do you defend the Old Testament scriptures? Talk to us about

36:21

your question. I almost gave you a question. But tell us what your question

36:23

is.

36:26

You beat me to it. Um, huge fan of Moody

36:28

Radio is thankful for you guys. For

36:31

your love for the Lord. Um, yeah. So

36:33

just in essence of how many

36:35

manuscripts there are for the New Testament,

36:38

I'm just wondering how to provide a

36:40

reason for the hope within me for

36:42

the, um, the Old Testament scriptures,

36:45

since there aren't as many manuscripts.

36:47

Super question, Clark Holden. I'm going to give you a copy

36:49

of the book. Rob, what do you think? Less manuscripts

36:52

in the Old Testament.

36:54

Less manuscripts, but they

36:56

were scrupulously copied

36:59

by scribes even more

37:01

carefully than the New Testament in many

37:03

cases. And, um, there's

37:05

just very little, there's

37:08

very little dispute. Um, of,

37:10

of complete version of Isaiah

37:12

was found in the Dead Sea Scrolls

37:15

in the 1940s, and it perfectly

37:17

matched. Almost perfectly matched what?

37:19

You know, what we've always used.

37:23

The Dead Sea Scrolls were such a huge find

37:25

and address some of these issues as well. Super Christian Clark,

37:27

remember going to give you a copy of that book. Elena in

37:29

Wheeling, Illinois, you're live on the air. Go ahead.

37:32

Oh, hi. Thanks. Well, how do you

37:35

answer someone who says, yes? The Bible

37:37

is a historic book, but only in the

37:39

fact that it's, um. It's helps

37:41

mankind with his agenda of, like, pro

37:44

communism, anti-communism, pro homosexual,

37:46

anti-homosexual. And it just helps

37:49

me push his agenda through time.

37:51

Just as you would use Shakespeare, which

37:53

is lasted, um, quite a long time. And

37:55

the ancient philosophers, they put the Bible

37:58

on that and that shelf,

38:00

because you can use it for your agenda.

38:03

Okay, good. Thank you. Let's let's

38:05

have Rob jump in. Okay. Let's have Rob jump in. So

38:07

it was hard to hear too. So what? Um, so how do

38:09

you start with people who believe the Bible is, is

38:12

used for an agenda rather

38:14

than maybe historic. And in our case,

38:16

we believe inerrant, inspired.

38:18

Well, it's number one. It's so broad

38:20

and it doesn't cover agendas

38:24

other than, well,

38:26

not really, other than the

38:28

problem of sin, what to do

38:30

about our sin? Who were who

38:32

was humanity and who was God. And

38:35

it covers those main things and

38:37

it touches on these other things, but

38:39

it's not about an agenda. As far as

38:41

ancient literature, I enjoyed

38:43

Homer's Odyssey and Homer's Iliad. I

38:46

enjoy Aesop's Fables, which were written

38:48

at the same time as the Book of Daniel,

38:50

but I don't they don't speak into

38:52

my life. The Bible does.

38:55

Okay, good. Judy, we're.

38:56

Going to go to Judy in Sycamore, Illinois. Listen,

38:58

Wbai, Judy, you're live on the air with your question. Please

39:00

jump right in.

39:02

I will. Hi. I've rephrased

39:04

my question since I left it with the caller, but

39:07

in conversation with someone

39:10

who seems to be really pushing their

39:12

point that the Bible's just not true and

39:14

can't be believed. What would

39:16

be the best beginning

39:18

response to them?

39:21

Um, how do

39:23

you start with the information

39:26

that's been given today? There's so

39:28

much of it. Yeah.

39:30

That's great. That's great. By the way, thanks for pushing through

39:32

that phone ringing in the background. I appreciate you staying

39:34

on the other question. So so what do you think?

39:36

I mean how do you start is is her question Judy

39:38

swaying when someone maybe questions that starting

39:40

point.

39:42

Start with a non argumentative

39:44

attitude. That's the best thing you can do.

39:47

Listen carefully, not

39:49

say I understand how you would ask that question,

39:52

and I would invite you to

39:54

read the Bible and would

39:56

invite you to listen to the

39:59

to its words and see what it

40:01

says, and that you

40:03

might have some preconceptions, like

40:05

the man said, tell me about the God you don't believe

40:07

in. I probably don't believe in that God either.

40:10

So. But the main thing is

40:13

not to get drawn into arguments

40:15

with people, because when people

40:17

become very defensive in arguments and

40:19

we can never make any progress that way.

40:22

Yeah for sure. And that's helpful. I think it's

40:25

helpful. You say you say in the book that if the Bible disappeared

40:27

tomorrow, its imprint would remain

40:29

really across our culture and every part of life. Explain what you

40:31

mean by that.

40:33

And we hit on this a little earlier in

40:35

the interview. Um, it is had

40:37

such an effect on

40:40

shaping Western civilization

40:42

that we can't carry on

40:44

a conversation without using

40:47

phrases that come out of the Bible whenever

40:49

we say something like a prophet in his own country

40:51

or or any of those things

40:53

where, um, we're using

40:56

words and ideas that come

40:58

out of the Bible. So,

41:02

um, and then our system

41:04

of government, our, our, um,

41:06

the idea that justice, um,

41:09

is what we owe to people, these are biblical

41:11

ideas. So it's just

41:13

it's just been a tremendous that just the

41:15

very idea of sin is another one. The

41:18

idea I think most people

41:20

have a conception of,

41:22

uh, the the lack of perfection

41:25

in humanity and the fact that there's something

41:27

wrong with us. That's the idea of sin.

41:29

You don't find as much about that in eastern religions,

41:32

but it's a biblical idea that,

41:34

um, so our culture has been

41:37

just shaped tremendously

41:39

by the Bible.

41:40

Super, super. Chris Chicago. You got

41:43

a question in your comment. You're live on the air. Go for it.

41:46

Yeah. Hi. Thank you for taking my call. I

41:48

was wondering how

41:50

early translations into

41:52

languages other than Greek, like

41:54

maybe Coptic and other languages.

41:57

Uh, help us to understand what the original

42:00

autographs, uh, would, would

42:02

indicate or help us to get back

42:04

to those.

42:05

That's a super question, Chris. And it's kind of like

42:07

like it's beyond my my I'm

42:10

not I know, just everyone knows Bibles written in three primary

42:12

languages, uh, the biggest of which is Hebrew

42:14

and Greek. And then we have a translated English,

42:16

but it was translated into other things as well.

42:19

So what do you think, Rob? You got any brilliant insights on that?

42:22

Not on not as much on the Coptic.

42:24

That's a really good question. Makes

42:26

me want to do some more.

42:27

Translated, some more.

42:28

Research.

42:29

What about just it being translated into other languages?

42:31

How does that speak to our confidence in the Bible?

42:33

Yeah.

42:34

I think that's something that I work

42:36

really hard when teaching it to help people understand

42:38

is that languages aren't

42:41

perfectly portable to other languages.

42:44

So we have to do a lot little extra

42:46

work when we're working from the Greek.

42:48

And we know that we see the word love. Most

42:50

people know the Greek has several

42:53

words for love, not even just three,

42:55

but more than that. And so we have

42:57

to understand which Greek word

42:59

was used. So yes, the

43:02

languages are very, very important

43:04

because we have to understand what they meant

43:07

to those, the words meant to those cultures.

43:09

And that's why, again, a good study Bible

43:11

can be helpful.

43:13

Yeah. Super question Chris. Good. I'm going to I'm

43:15

actually going to do a little googling about that afterwards

43:17

and maybe even move beyond Google. We're going to go to

43:19

Paul. He's listening on my Faith radio.

43:21

I love the Faith Radio Network. By the way, Paul, you're live

43:23

on the air with your question or your comment.

43:26

Hi. Thank you for.

43:27

Taking my call. So I have a quick question. Why

43:29

do we have to limit the Bible to say that

43:31

it must be completely an accurate

43:34

historical document? And did older

43:36

theologians like I'm talking about 500,000

43:38

years ago, see it only in that

43:40

way?

43:42

That's a good question, Paul. It's a good question. So

43:44

I think he's talking about an historical

43:47

document. In other words, does it

43:49

does it always accord and accurately record

43:51

history and did theologians thousands of

43:53

years ago see it that way or see it more?

43:56

Uh, I could see it sometimes using more as

43:58

metaphor things of that sort. Why does that matter?

44:00

We've got about two minutes left in the program.

44:04

I think what the Bible attempts

44:06

to do is to be a book of faith, and

44:08

that's the primary thing that is. However,

44:11

in terms of history, for example,

44:14

here's what I've learned. Always

44:16

give the Bible the benefit of the doubt, because

44:19

archaeologists keep finding things

44:21

all the time that reinforce

44:23

what the Bible says. The history

44:25

in it is extremely accurate. Um,

44:27

now, when you get into questions of science,

44:30

that's almost a philosophical thing.

44:32

There are poetic descriptions of

44:34

what the mountains clap their hands. Mountains

44:37

don't literally clap their hands, you know, things

44:39

like that. So when you get into those

44:41

kinds of you, we have to understand

44:44

when the Bible is speaking poetically,

44:46

when it is speaking historically,

44:48

when it is speaking on faith, because

44:51

it does use a lot of allegory,

44:53

metaphor, parable, and

44:55

all of those things. God expects

44:57

us to use our brains and our

44:59

common sense when we study

45:01

it, but it's best not

45:03

to get too hung up on it. As

45:06

strictly a book of history because

45:08

it's not primarily a book of history.

45:11

It's a book that contains this history.

45:15

Subprime. The Book of History is a book. It contains

45:17

history. And I would say when it speaks to history, it it

45:20

does so intentionally.

45:22

And and so I think ultimately at

45:24

the end of the program. So I want to and accurately I

45:26

want to I want to go I want to go and spend

45:28

like ten minutes on just that answer. But we have about

45:31

a minute left. So last word

45:33

from you is, again, the book is the book

45:35

that conquered time. Robb Suggs. I want to encourage

45:37

people to get the book. But what you know, in a paragraph

45:40

or less, what was it that drove

45:42

you to this topic, and why do you think it matters to Christians?

45:46

A deep, lifelong love of the Bible.

45:49

The book is almost a fan letter to the Bible

45:51

for me, and wanting

45:54

to get to know it and wanting to walk

45:56

with it through its own life, which

45:58

people don't normally do, and

46:00

to to to learn about

46:02

the path the Bible has been on.

46:06

Fascinating. You speak of the Bible as if, you know,

46:08

like almost like a person. You're writing a biography

46:10

and, and I think, I think reading the Bible and

46:12

understanding its origin really is it's

46:14

actually a discipline. It's actually I have professors

46:17

at the Talbot School of Theology who teach on that,

46:19

but this is a good, accessible resource. So I

46:21

want to thank my guest, Rob Suggs, for joining

46:23

me today. Thank him for writing the book that Conquered

46:25

Time. Also thanks to behind the scenes team

46:28

here at Moody Radio, my producer, the amazing

46:30

Karen Hendren, my engineer Bob Morrow,

46:32

and Laura manning. The phones today here,

46:34

today's program again. You'll find it at headsets

46:37

or Live.com or on the Moody Radio app,

46:39

where you can actually subscribe to every program as a podcast.

46:41

All the Moody Radio programs, this podcast connect

46:43

with us through social media headsets are live. And

46:45

remember, headsets are live as a production

46:47

of Moody Radio, which is a ministry of.

46:50

Moody Bible Institute. Thanks for listening.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features