Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:04
Hello and welcome to the Enter the Bible
0:06
podcast, where you can get answers, or at
0:08
least reflections on everything you wanted
0:10
to know about the Bible. But we're afraid to ask.
0:13
I'm Kathryn Schifferdecker .
0:14
I'm Katie Langston.
0:16
And our guest today again
0:19
for part two of this episode
0:21
is or the series is
0:24
Dr. Jeremy L Williams. He's the Assistant
0:26
Professor of New Testament at Brite
0:28
Divinity School at Texas Christian University,
0:31
and the author of
0:33
a forthcoming book in the fall here
0:35
called Criminalization in Acts of
0:37
the Apostles: Race, Rhetoric, and
0:39
the Prosecution of an Early Christian Movement.
0:42
So welcome back, Jeremy. Glad
0:44
to have you with us.
0:46
Glad to be back.
0:48
All right.
0:49
Thank you for having me.
0:49
So. Yeah. Thank
0:52
you. So
0:54
this is part two of a single
0:57
subject. So for those listeners
0:59
who happen to have
1:01
come across this
1:04
on its own, you might want to go back and listen
1:06
to part one first. But
1:08
we're still addressing a question
1:11
that came into our website
1:13
at Enter the Bible. Org. And
1:16
the question goes like this: My confirmation
1:18
students want to know where does the devil
1:20
come from? Did God create
1:22
the devil and why would God do
1:24
that if God did create
1:26
the devil? And so in part one,
1:29
in answer to this question, we
1:31
spent a fair amount of time,
1:33
as you might imagine, in the
1:35
Bible. I'm an Old Testament
1:37
scholar. Jeremy is a New Testament scholar,
1:39
and this is Enter the Bible. So
1:41
we talked about the figure of Satan,
1:44
both in the Hebrew Bible or Old Testament
1:46
and the New Testament, and
1:49
talked about the kind of development of the idea
1:52
of this figure in
1:56
various books of the Bible and including
1:58
in some works
2:00
that came between the Old Testament and the New Testament,
2:03
like some of the Dead Sea Scrolls
2:05
or a book called Jubilees,
2:07
which is a Jewish
2:09
book that recounts
2:11
some of the same stories in the
2:13
Old Testament. So we see this development
2:16
of from the Satan as a kind
2:18
of accusing figure or prosecuting
2:20
attorney in Job,
2:23
to the Satan or Satan
2:26
or Beezelbub or whatever
2:28
name you want to call him, as really a
2:30
demonic force or a oppositional
2:33
force to God in the New
2:35
Testament. So
2:38
we want to, I don't know
2:40
that we, and we talked about the
2:44
the story of Satan being a fallen
2:46
angel. So in that sense,
2:49
I suppose we answer the the listeners
2:51
question is, yes, God did create
2:54
Satan, but not as an evil being,
2:57
but as as a good being. And
2:59
that Satan rebels. But
3:02
what else? What else do we want to say? I know
3:04
we talked in part one, Jeremy, about the
3:06
usefulness of Satan. I think you , the
3:08
usefulness of thinking about Satan.
3:11
Do you want to start with that and
3:14
we'll get back into the topic?
3:16
Yes. I
3:20
believe it's important, especially when we think
3:22
about biblical
3:24
texts. And for those who
3:27
are believers and are faithful
3:29
Christians who believe that God
3:31
inspired these texts to recognize
3:34
that God speaks
3:37
but sound doesn't travel in a vacuum. Sound
3:40
has to vibrate
3:42
off of material. And
3:45
and for when it comes to biblical texts,
3:47
God's Word vibrated off of
3:50
the experience of the writer's lives.
3:53
And one feature of their lives that
3:55
I think is important when we think about the Satan,
3:57
is that these are people who were chronically
4:00
and frequently oppressed,
4:02
colonized, and subjugated. And
4:05
so part of
4:07
the way that they heard God speaking
4:09
to them was through experiences
4:13
of oppression and experiences
4:15
of a foreign rule and
4:17
domination and the
4:20
Satan or the devil,
4:22
or some type of spiritual force
4:24
that there
4:26
seemed to be outside of their own powers,
4:29
even as a collective group. Became
4:32
a useful trope for thinking about
4:35
how in the world could a God
4:38
who loves them has all power
4:40
and is able to defend them?
4:42
How? How can
4:45
they reconcile being
4:48
in relationship with a God like that,
4:50
when such terrible oppression
4:53
and tragedies and calamities
4:55
have befallen them? And a useful,
4:58
um, I would say, literary trope,
5:00
and then or we could talk about a spiritual idea,
5:02
however we want to parse it out, became
5:05
the idea of the Satan.
5:07
And and see this
5:09
idea in particularly
5:12
in like Daniel and then
5:15
particularly have the early
5:17
Jesus followers of the New Testament started
5:19
to think about the
5:22
way that in these
5:24
end times, these
5:28
imperial ruling forces
5:31
were really portrayed
5:33
as beasts,
5:36
creatures and demonic
5:39
imps, or ultimately
5:43
the minions of the devil.
5:45
Because these people who are
5:48
writing and penning and discussing
5:50
God's word are living in these scenarios
5:53
of oppression, domination. And so,
5:56
so Satan becomes a way
5:58
for them to rationalize
6:00
a world that otherwise
6:03
wouldn't make sense with
6:05
a God who was supposed to be with
6:07
them and who they're in covenant with. And
6:09
so from that perspective, thinking
6:12
about how the Satan is a tool
6:14
of oppressed people to
6:17
concile and to make sense of a
6:19
world that is otherwise
6:21
nonsensical, I think is
6:23
something worth interrogating.
6:27
Now that's really helpful. I really I
6:29
like that metaphor a lot, or
6:31
analogy of God speaking,
6:33
but not in a vacuum, right?
6:36
That God speaks in people's
6:38
experiences and history, and that's
6:41
a really beautiful way of putting it. Thanks for
6:43
that. So
6:45
yeah, so the so the Jews and
6:47
then the early Christians with
6:49
them who are first of all Jews
6:52
and then more Gentiles,
6:54
right. They're experiencing
6:57
this oppression. They're experiencing
6:59
kind of event after
7:01
event that seems to
7:04
at least call into question
7:06
the idea of an all powerful, loving
7:08
God. And so then,
7:11
so the re seems to be this dawning
7:15
realization or
7:17
idea of spiritual
7:20
forces that then are opposed to God
7:23
that, you now,
7:25
instead of assigning all the bad stuff
7:28
to God, it
7:30
really makes more sense to think, well, maybe
7:32
there's something besides
7:34
God that's working against God, right?
7:37
So let me ask the...
7:40
And...Oh, go ahead, Katie.
7:41
Well, I was going to say I'm
7:43
going to channel my inner skeptic, which
7:46
she's never far from the surface anyway.
7:48
But, you know, I
7:51
could imagine someone saying, well, that
7:53
is a likely story,
7:55
right? Like bad things happen.
7:58
And instead
8:01
of just concluding that therefore
8:03
there is no God, you're
8:05
going to just invent this
8:07
like bad guy and say,
8:09
well, it's his fault that all the that
8:12
all this has happened, right?
8:15
And so yeah,
8:17
I would, I would want to kind
8:19
of wrestle with that a little bit like I
8:21
would um, posit
8:25
that perhaps as
8:28
they are, as
8:30
they're asking those questions and
8:32
as they're, you
8:35
know, considering what's
8:38
going on, I don't know that they're inventing
8:42
this as much as they are finding
8:44
words and symbols
8:47
and ways to express
8:49
a reality that they're experiencing.
8:53
Well, I feel like I feel like you resolved your
8:55
skepticism by the end of your
8:57
statement. I think you resolved
9:00
it. It sounds like...
9:01
Throwing out one possible way. One possible
9:03
way to think through that. Yeah.
9:06
Because I think that part of what
9:08
you raise is, is
9:12
that certainly this is a
9:14
way to to give God
9:16
a way out. Yeah. To
9:19
say, well, well, God didn't really do it. It
9:21
was the devil
9:21
It was the devil.
9:23
But by the, but what you got to at the end
9:25
was that people
9:28
really had to make
9:30
sense of, of their world.
9:33
And, and it works.
9:36
Um, and one of the, one
9:38
of the things that's worth noting is
9:41
that, the
9:43
reason why I wanted to highlight the oppressed
9:46
status of the people, because
9:49
it makes a lot more sense
9:51
when people do not have their hands
9:53
on levers of power to
9:55
recognize that
9:57
there are intermediaries
9:59
in between them and real
10:02
power. That's
10:04
not an experience that would seem necessarily
10:07
untenable, that
10:10
when we think about marginalized
10:12
people, whether the enslaved or whether
10:14
immigrants or people with
10:17
disabilities, it's not
10:19
difficult for them to see that people
10:21
who have privilege and power can function
10:23
one way, and that there are
10:26
things in between that
10:28
that are that are keeping
10:30
them from from having access
10:32
to those, those other rights and privileges.
10:34
And so in that way, rather
10:36
than to castigate
10:39
the entire framework,
10:43
especially if one presumes that that
10:47
that wholeness is attainable in this world,
10:50
then there has to be some forceful, powerful
10:52
thing in between. And
10:54
I think that, so
10:57
now you have me theologizing. And I've warned, I've
11:00
warned before.
11:02
You did warn us. But this is good. This
11:04
is good.
11:05
But I think that. Um,
11:08
creating satanic opponents
11:14
is a way to
11:18
make sense of situations
11:20
that are difficult to comprehend. And
11:23
I say that in
11:25
antiquity I talked about the empires. But
11:27
I think in contemporary times we easily
11:29
can point out when this happens negatively.
11:32
Right. Or we can talk about certain groups
11:34
that point to other groups
11:37
and want to demonize them or exclude
11:39
them or, or to like, put them
11:41
in hell, et cetera. But what's interesting
11:44
too, is on, on, on
11:47
the other side, if the more conservative
11:49
side is who we would want to pinpoint that
11:51
on, the more conservative, the more progressive
11:53
side often similarly
11:56
has its own devils that it likes to name
11:59
and call out, like
12:01
neoliberalism and and
12:04
sexism and homophobia
12:06
are demons that need to be destroyed.
12:08
Right? But isn't this some utility?
12:11
Right.
12:11
Yeah.
12:12
Utility to calling out patriarchy
12:14
and kyriarchy as like if
12:16
we use the Ephesians idea,
12:18
you know, that spiritual wickedness
12:21
in high places, right?
12:23
Yeah.
12:23
And so so the language is it's
12:26
plastic enough to be
12:28
dangerous, but also
12:30
a useful way to think about systems
12:33
that are not working perfectly that,
12:36
that, that there's there's a way
12:38
to say, I still think this can work,
12:41
but this is not ideal the way it is now.
12:44
These forces, right, that
12:47
the systems, these sorts of things, they kind
12:49
of take on a life of their own,
12:51
right? Like what you think about
12:53
people that get caught up in,
12:55
you know, in mob mentality, or
12:58
you think about the ways in which
13:01
we participate in these systems
13:03
and perpetuate them, you know,
13:06
even without wanting to, there
13:08
is a sense in which, like, they really
13:11
do like have their own
13:14
energy and propelling,
13:16
you know, movement forward like a force
13:18
of power, right? So I yeah,
13:21
think, you know, in a, in a skeptical
13:23
kind of worldview, kind of
13:25
sciencey kind of,
13:27
you know, and post-enlightenment kind of world.
13:30
These are hard concepts
13:33
to, to wrap our minds around. But
13:35
I think you kind of see it
13:37
happening.
13:40
Yeah, I was going to go along the same
13:42
lines. Katie, I think there are certain things
13:44
that happen, at least for me.
13:46
I'll just speak personally that I
13:49
do believe there are evil forces, that there
13:51
are evil spiritual forces. I don't think it's just
13:54
an invention. You
13:56
know, to explain things, I think,
13:59
and maybe because
14:01
I can't figure out otherwise,
14:03
like how things like the Holocaust
14:05
happens or slavery or,
14:08
you know, genocide. Or maybe
14:11
we can just attribute all that to human sin.
14:14
But sometimes, as you
14:16
say, it does seem like things,
14:20
movements or mobs
14:22
kind of take on a life of their own.
14:26
And it's I
14:29
find it useful anyway. And again, I'm just
14:31
speaking personally. I find it useful to talk
14:34
about that in terms of spiritual forces.
14:38
I do want to say, and
14:41
I think it's important to say that time
14:43
after time, and you referenced this, I
14:45
think, in our first the first episode.
14:48
Jeremy. Uh, that
14:50
that time after time, the New Testament affirms
14:53
that these, these forces, whatever
14:55
they are, not equal to God,
14:57
right? That that God is, is
15:00
always more powerful. And
15:02
we see that especially in Revelation, ut
15:04
in other texts as well, right, that,
15:07
that there
15:09
may be there may be forces that
15:12
work oppositional to God and
15:14
to God's people, but
15:16
they're not as powerful as God.
15:20
So like in 1 Peter 5,
15:22
you know, the devil prowls around like a roaring
15:24
lion. Resist him firm in your faith.
15:26
Right. There's a there's
15:29
it's not an inevitable kind of
15:33
downfall, right? That that the devil
15:35
can be resisted or these forces,
15:37
however you want to characterize it, can be resisted.
15:39
Yeah. Like when
15:42
Jesus tells Peter in the garden
15:45
of Gethsemane that that Satan desires
15:47
to sift through you like wheat.
15:50
It seems that there's a point of decision,
15:52
right?
15:53
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
15:55
And that, you know, ultimately, I
15:57
think the hope of the Christian faith
15:59
and the and and and the hope
16:01
of the resurrection is that those
16:04
forces have been defeated,
16:06
you know, and will be defeated in
16:09
Jesus Christ.
16:10
And I think that there are there
16:13
are and one and going back to one of
16:15
my earlier points and where I want to kind
16:17
of reiterate it again, is that
16:20
when people are on
16:22
the underside of power, it
16:24
is very easy to see the entire world
16:26
as being controlled by Satan. And
16:29
that and that what's actually more difficult
16:31
to believe, and I think there was a little bit of conversation
16:34
about this before, is that God is
16:36
good. It may be much more
16:38
difficult to believe that then, that Satan
16:40
is real, but that evil forces
16:43
are in control of the day, right?
16:45
Yeah.
16:46
Um, like with those
16:48
atrocities that you mentioned,
16:50
Kathryn. Holocaust, enslavement,
16:54
we think about the climate crisis
16:56
as they we're experiencing, like when,
17:00
when a handful
17:02
of corporate plutocrats can
17:04
determine the fate of the world, it
17:07
would seem it would seem that
17:10
is harder to believe that God is in control,
17:14
to have this type of regime
17:16
and the faith and
17:18
the perseverance component
17:20
is, is in actually
17:23
observing the world as it is.
17:25
And to say that
17:28
that a lot of the way that the world
17:30
currently operates is under the influence
17:32
of the evil one. And
17:35
I offer that because an
17:37
article I wrote on on revelation
17:41
argued that often we think about that
17:43
text as just about the end of the world.
17:46
But there are three ways that I think it's
17:48
important to look at it. That
17:50
one is that it's about power
17:52
and mapping power in the Roman
17:54
Empire. The second,
17:58
outside of power, it's about perseverance.
18:02
The goal is to remind those
18:05
who are committed, those
18:07
who are faithful to continue
18:10
to persevere through,
18:13
through this system, even when it seems
18:15
that that your
18:18
opportunity for vindication
18:20
is far away. But
18:23
to know that ultimately you'll
18:27
have victory is very
18:29
meaningful. But the challenge
18:31
with that is that, just like
18:33
any message, this kind of message in
18:35
the wrong hands becomes
18:38
support for labeling
18:41
people who are oppressed as demonic and needing
18:43
to be eradicated. And so the
18:46
difficulty with the nimble language is
18:48
that it can be used against its
18:50
original purpose too.
18:53
Now, that's a really important point,
18:55
Jeremy. Like this language,
18:58
like the imagery of Revelation
19:00
s really helpful and has
19:02
been historically helpful to those who are
19:04
oppressed. But if
19:06
used by the oppressor, it can,
19:09
you know, that kind of war imagery can be really
19:11
dangerous. So yeah, very,
19:14
very important caveat about that
19:16
kind of imagery.
19:17
I do wonder if there is, you know, going
19:19
back to the usefulness
19:21
of these kinds of concepts, like one,
19:24
one useful aspect of it could
19:26
be that, um.
19:30
That in a sense, thinking of
19:32
it as a power or a force
19:34
or an entity or something like that
19:38
can depersonalize it. In other
19:40
words, the person. Right? You don't
19:43
say this, this person
19:45
or this group of people themselves
19:47
are evil and must be eradicated. It
19:49
would be instead understanding
19:51
that that the fight is not against flesh
19:54
and blood, but is against the
19:56
forces of evil, and that there's a
19:58
way in which that actually calls us
20:00
back to remembering
20:02
the humanity and
20:04
the, you know, of our fellow
20:07
image bearers, of other
20:09
human beings, that that it's not
20:11
okay to actually demonize
20:13
a person, because that's not
20:15
who our fight or argument is
20:18
with.
20:19
When I as
20:22
you, as you heard in my bio , I'm C. M. E . And so
20:24
but I didn't get baptized as an infant.
20:27
I still had to come
20:29
down and accept, joined
20:32
the church and got baptized, although
20:35
three modes, you know, pour and sprinkling were available, got
20:37
immersed. But on the day that I decided
20:39
to join the church, as we called
20:42
it, my grandmother called
20:44
Meemaw, she rang out with this song and
20:46
said, Satan, we're going to tear your kingdom down
20:49
because you've been building your kingdom
20:51
all over this land, Satan.
20:53
We're going to tear your kingdom down. And it has several verses. We're
20:55
going to pray your kingdom down,
20:57
Satan. We're going to moan. You can say the preachers
21:00
are going to preach your kingdom down right.
21:02
And then in that verse about the preachers are going to preach
21:04
you down. You've been building your kingdom all
21:06
in the house of God, right?
21:08
Oh, wow.
21:09
And so that song evoked some
21:11
really powerful images that, that
21:13
now kind of having done my training, I can go back to
21:15
kind of the, there's a folksiness to
21:18
it, but there's something I think that
21:21
has actually animated a lot of my work and my
21:23
activism and my, in my engagement
21:25
is that there is there's a real
21:27
job to do
21:30
going around tearing Satan's
21:32
kingdom down. Sometimes
21:34
we imagine that we're preventing it from growing.
21:37
But in a lot of places it's settled
21:39
and established. When we when we look at the
21:41
laws that are coming out of Florida and where I live
21:43
now in Texas, it looks like Satan's
21:45
kingdom is thoroughly established
21:47
and is expanding. And so
21:49
the work is to tear
21:51
it down. And
21:53
I think that for the early Jesus followers, like
21:56
those in Revelation, for those who had
21:58
just lost their temple in Jerusalem
22:00
when it seemed like God's presence was lost, that
22:03
Rome looked like it was getting stronger,
22:05
and their their
22:07
comrades and their experience and their traditions
22:10
were getting weaker. And so
22:13
part of the hope is that not
22:15
only will Satan's
22:17
kingdom ultimately fall, but
22:21
we have some power to to
22:23
take a brick or two out of it while we're here.
22:27
Amen.
22:28
Even I try to avoid, like, war like images,
22:30
but I do think that some sometimes
22:32
this idea of tearing down a kingdom, I
22:35
think tearing down a kingdom is peaceful, right? Like,
22:37
not not necessarily like waging war
22:39
with another kingdom, but maybe tearing down one
22:42
that can that can be active peace.
22:44
That works. Yeah.
22:46
That preaches. That's good. Yeah.
22:50
So in, in, in
22:52
our Lutheran tradition
22:54
that Katie and I are in, at
22:57
baptism, either
22:59
you know, whether it's a baby or adult,
23:03
the parents or sponsors or the
23:06
one being baptized are asked
23:08
the parents and sponsors answer for
23:10
if the if the baptized is an infant,
23:13
do you renounce Satan and all his
23:15
works and all his ways? It's the it's
23:17
similar kind of thing, right? I renounce
23:20
them and then you say, do you believe in God the Father?
23:22
Do you believe in? And you recite the
23:24
Apostles Creed. So Satan
23:26
and all his works and all his ways to renounce
23:29
that, I think that goes along the same
23:31
lines of what you're talking about tearing Satan's
23:33
kingdom down.
23:36
It presumes that they're standing right.
23:40
That's right
23:42
Yeah. Right. Right. Yeah. Yeah,
23:44
yeah, I think it's it's just realistic
23:47
about that. And yeah, that's
23:49
a really powerful call. Thanks for sharing that. I
23:51
don't know that song, but that's, that's
23:53
really a powerful way of thinking
23:55
about the Christian vocation.
23:59
Right. To tear Satan's kingdom down.
24:02
So just one more question though. Like we're
24:04
talking about, you know, all of this
24:06
in context of,
24:09
you know, forces and powers. And
24:11
we kind of tracked in part one, we track the
24:13
history of how,
24:15
you know, how these ideas
24:19
evolved and how people
24:21
began to describe what they had experienced
24:23
in these terms. But like,
24:25
where did we get the , like,
24:28
dude with the pitchfork or
24:30
like the you know what I mean? Like some
24:32
of these ideas that seem so
24:34
pervasive in our culture now, if they're not
24:37
rooted in Scripture,
24:39
like where, where
24:41
did they come from?
24:44
Thank you. Thank you for this question. And
24:47
in the first part, we got through Hebrew Bible,
24:49
got through most of the New Testament. And
24:53
what we didn't get to some of the,
24:55
the things the text like the apocalypse
24:57
of Paul that comes after the New
24:59
Testament, probably
25:02
third or fourth century,
25:04
where you start to see these, these different
25:06
gradations of the afterlife
25:09
and, and torment in,
25:11
in hell and layers of hell et cetera.
25:14
But, but even there, you don't
25:16
get the types of images that many of
25:18
us are familiar with, like the pitchfork
25:20
and the horns kind of thing. Those
25:22
really evolve out of texts like Dante's
25:25
Inferno and and Milton's
25:27
Paradise Lost, like, like
25:29
although hell
25:32
and the devil, they make appearances in biblical
25:35
texts, these texts,
25:37
these later texts make hell hotter,
25:40
make the devil more personal and fierce.
25:43
They take it to another
25:45
level.
25:49
Sorry, but
25:51
yeah.
25:53
And part of it is a
25:56
I think, not to go too far
25:58
down this road, is to just imagine
26:01
the experiences that people
26:04
engage to, to to need
26:06
this as, as either a way to warn
26:08
people to avoid. John Chrysostom
26:10
always talked about how hell
26:13
was a useful concept for teenagers
26:15
to get them to behave correctly.
26:19
I need to I need to maybe roll that out more
26:21
in my parenting. I got too much
26:23
of this gray stuff going on. Like, God
26:26
loves you, you're forgiven.
26:29
You know? You know, I
26:31
think the fear of eternal
26:33
torture is, is probably a little over
26:35
handed to get teenagers to behave. I
26:37
think it could be. It could work.
26:39
It can. It can be effective.
26:41
Yeah, indeed I do,
26:44
yeah, I do mention that sometimes
26:46
on staff with my colleagues
26:49
coming from, let's just say a more
26:51
punitive tradition than I am now in,
26:54
I'll say, you know, if we want them
26:56
to donate more, we could just
26:58
tell them that if they don't, they're
27:00
going to be punished for eternity and
27:03
my experience is that works pretty
27:05
well. Oh
27:13
my gosh.
27:13
And I think one thing, just to loop
27:15
it all the way back around to our conversation around
27:18
Satan and kind of what I mentioned at the beginning of
27:20
this segment is, is
27:22
and this might be a little, a
27:24
little too, too meta, but I think your
27:27
listeners can go here is is
27:30
what work is
27:33
Satan doing? For
27:35
whom and to what effect? One of my teachers, Karen
27:37
King, always ask this question: for whom
27:39
does the text work? For whom and with what effect?
27:42
And I think asking that question around Satan
27:44
is also important, because
27:46
it helps us to
27:48
see the ancient
27:50
author, the more contemporary author,
27:53
and our own work,
27:55
and it helps us to show the work
27:57
we are thinking of the concept of the devil.
28:01
For whom does it work and with what
28:03
effects? And
28:05
then we can see are there
28:07
moments, as we talked about in this time, where
28:10
using an image of Satan
28:12
can be useful to help a group
28:14
be resilient against insurmountable odds,
28:16
but it can also be very, very
28:19
problematic and harmful
28:21
when used to demonize entire
28:24
groups of people and use that as logic
28:26
for their extermination. And so
28:29
it's a dangerous concept
28:31
to use, and people have used
28:33
it in multiple ways. And
28:35
so in some ways, I know some communities
28:39
choose to not use it at all because of all
28:41
of its negative implications. But
28:44
what I think can be worthwhile
28:47
is to recognize when
28:49
it's important to see that Satan's
28:52
kingdom is erupting in some places and
28:54
really need some direct action
28:57
and confrontation. But the tricky part,
28:59
and this goes back to something we said in the first segment,
29:01
is we have to be careful
29:04
in identifying the
29:06
work of evil, the work of the enemy,
29:08
and make sure that we're not misidentifying
29:11
it with the work of God's Spirit.
29:14
And that's that's the real
29:16
work, and that's an internal work.
29:19
And it should make us very, very cautious
29:22
in making these assessments on
29:24
who is being moved by the devil and
29:26
who is not.
29:28
And I'd suggest that
29:30
kind of that kind of discernment
29:32
needs to happen best in community.
29:36
And with prayer, that
29:39
it's not so much an individual discernment
29:42
as it is a community discernment. But you're
29:44
right, that's hugely important work,
29:46
right? To discern what, what
29:49
kind of spirit is at work in
29:51
various events?
29:53
Wow. Well, we could probably do many,
29:55
many more parts of what has been
29:58
a two part, two parter
30:00
already, which which we don't
30:02
do that often. So this
30:05
has been really, really interesting and helpful.
30:08
And dear listener, I hope
30:10
that this isn't too much for your
30:12
confirmation students, but
30:14
at least maybe it could be food for thought for
30:16
you, and you can figure out how to present
30:18
it to 14 year olds. But
30:23
in any case, thank you
30:25
so much Jeremy. This has been a
30:28
wonderful conversation, super
30:30
fruitful, super interesting, and just glad
30:32
that you could be with us today. And
30:35
for those of you who have joined us, yes,
30:38
for those of you who have joined us either
30:41
on YouTube or in your
30:43
favorite pod catcher, thank you for
30:45
being with us as well. You can get
30:47
more resources, commentaries,
30:49
conversations, articles,
30:52
all kinds of stuff at Enter the Bible.
30:54
Org and of course, please
30:57
rate us. You know, five
30:59
star ratings and reviews, especially
31:02
on your favorite podcast app are super,
31:04
super welcome. It
31:07
helps other people find the show. And
31:09
although the best way to do that is to share it with a friend.
31:12
So if you do that, we would appreciate it.
31:14
Thanks for being with us today.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More