Podchaser Logo
Home
White Guilt and the Rwandan Genocide

White Guilt and the Rwandan Genocide

Released Friday, 25th June 2021
Good episode? Give it some love!
White Guilt and the Rwandan Genocide

White Guilt and the Rwandan Genocide

White Guilt and the Rwandan Genocide

White Guilt and the Rwandan Genocide

Friday, 25th June 2021
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

In this podcast, May and Tenley take a look at Rwanda pre- and post-genocide. Using the case of Paul Rusesabagina, known as a hero for saving hundreds of people throughout the genocide and now having been arrested on terrorist charges, they delve into how the country has progressed since the genocide in 1994 by looking at the transitional justice mechanism of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). Directed at a Western audience, the two podcasters hope to clear up the romantic image of Rwanda dominant in the West, which developed through the creation of the ICTR. Viewed often as a solution to all problems (and Western guilt), the ICTR should be looked at critically; the achievements for the international legal regime and domestically for Rwanda diverge dramatically. May and Tenley hope to tell the audience about major cases throughout the trial that set important precedents for international law, but will simultaneously highlight the shortcomings of the ICTR as a tool of transitional justice.

To download a full transcript, visit humanrightspodcast.sandbox.library.columbia.edu.

Show More
Rate

From The Podcast

Facing the Violent Past

How do societies emerging from violence rebuild, and what mechanisms do they employ to punish past perpetrators, to come to terms with difficult pasts, to acknowledge the suffering of victims, and to try to nurture democratic processes that will prevent future violence? This podcast series was developed in conjunction with a course offered at Columbia University that examines the ways in which societies have addressed the questions of accountability and the challenge of “dealing with the past” in the aftermath of political transition and violent conflict that have marked the last half century. In particular, the course examined the discourse around “historical wrongs,” and attempts—international, national, local—to address such wrongs. The question of how societies can address historical wrongs is a question that ultimately requires us to consider the relationship between history, memory, trauma and justice. Why does the past matter? Does the pursuit of justice limit, or compromise, the work that historians are expected to do? What new ways of thinking about history have emerged in the period we are examining (we can think about testimony, museums, sites, literature to name just a few)? In exploring these questions, this series allows students to consider what is necessary for societies to deal with violent pasts, and the success and limitations that the discourse and practice of historical justice suggests when it comes to questions of prevention and repair.

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features