Podchaser Logo
Home
Grooming for Hate: Online Radicalization and Neo-Nazism w/Jordan Green, Journalist

Grooming for Hate: Online Radicalization and Neo-Nazism w/Jordan Green, Journalist

Released Saturday, 2nd March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Grooming for Hate: Online Radicalization and Neo-Nazism w/Jordan Green, Journalist

Grooming for Hate: Online Radicalization and Neo-Nazism w/Jordan Green, Journalist

Grooming for Hate: Online Radicalization and Neo-Nazism w/Jordan Green, Journalist

Grooming for Hate: Online Radicalization and Neo-Nazism w/Jordan Green, Journalist

Saturday, 2nd March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:17

Hey, welcome back, Faithful Politics

0:17

listeners and viewers.

0:19

If you're watching us on our YouTube

0:19

channel, I'm your political host, Will

0:22

Wright, and I'm joined by your faithful

0:22

host, Pastor Josh Bertram.

0:26

How's it going, Josh? Doing well.

0:28

Thanks, Will. Hey, and this week we are delighted to

0:29

have with us Jordan Green.

0:33

He's an investigative correspondent based

0:33

in Greensboro, North Carolina Who covers

0:37

right-wing extremism for a raw story His

0:37

work's been featured in a host of

0:42

publications including the Washington

0:42

Post, Daily Beast, The Nation Um in these

0:47

times, Sorgenors and many more and he's

0:47

here today to talk with us about wait, is

0:53

this right? Nazis? Um, so welcome to the show, uh, Joshua, or

0:55

I'm sorry, Jordan, my apologies.

1:01

Thank you, Will. be here. Thank you for having me, Will and Josh.

1:05

Yeah, so, um, I, I guess, I guess I, I

1:05

would be remiss if I didn't ask, like,

1:14

we're here to talk about Nazis, but

1:14

weren't the Nazis defeated, like, in World

1:18

War II? Like, why are we talking about Nazis?

1:23

Yes, they were. And then there was an American Nazi party

1:25

that was founded not too long after that.

1:32

And yeah, I mean, this is a continuous

1:32

history.

1:36

Where I live in Greensboro, there was

1:36

notoriously a massacre carried out by a

1:44

coalition of Klansmen. Nazis against labor and anti-racist

1:46

activists who were members of the

1:52

Communist Worker Party. For those who don't know, the Nazis

1:55

attacked the beginning of this march in a

2:02

black public housing project in

2:02

Greensboro.

2:06

The shooting killings were carried out on

2:06

video cameras and the...

2:13

Nazis and Klansmen were acquitted in two

2:13

criminal trials on the self-defense

2:20

because although the Nazis fired the first

2:20

shot, they were warning shots into the

2:26

air. I may have this somewhat wrong, so I

2:30

apologize for that, but there was a

2:37

self-defense, successful self-defense

2:37

strategy.

2:43

I mean Kathleen Blue has written about the

2:43

Greensboro Massacre was kind of the

2:47

beginning of the revolutionary white power

2:47

movement when.

2:54

White supremacy, violent white supremacist

2:54

groups had previously been kind of an

3:00

extension, vigilante extensions of the

3:00

state, but after the Vietnam War, there

3:05

was a sense of betrayal after the civil

3:05

rights movement and civil rights laws.

3:12

white supremacists decided they had to

3:12

overthrow the United States government.

3:17

And so the groups that I have been writing

3:17

about are the heirs of that legacy.

3:22

And it continued through Timothy McVeigh

3:22

with the Oklahoma City bombing and the

3:30

various mass shootings, massacre carried

3:30

out by Dylann Roof.

3:36

So sorry, I tried to summarize this.

3:40

no, but no, you're doing just fine.

3:42

Yeah, because the majority of your

3:42

reporting and specifically kind of what we

3:48

are having you on today to talk about is

3:48

sort of this new faction of neo-Nazi

3:54

groups. So so maybe you can talk a little bit

3:54

about that, like the I don't know, 2119

3:59

blood and soil crew. Yeah, that's the specific group that I've

4:01

written about, but they're part of a

4:05

larger ecosystem and there are other rival

4:05

groups that are like them out there.

4:13

So what I would say is they come out of

4:13

the broader neo-Nazi movement that has

4:21

emerged since January 6, called the Active

4:21

Clubs.

4:26

The founder of the Active Clubs, Robert

4:26

Rundow, is actually charged with inciting

4:31

a riot. And a judge in California, a federal

4:32

judge, actually threw out his case.

4:40

But in any case, they are kind of the more

4:40

violent and extreme aspect of this active

4:49

club movement. They're a lot younger teenagers, people

4:51

who came of age or were adolescents during

5:00

Donald Trump's first campaign in 2016.

5:05

And there's been a lot of.

5:08

kind of push back against the MAGA

5:08

extremism from January 6th due to the

5:15

prosecutions and so these more violent and

5:15

more extreme groups are kind of moving

5:21

into that vacuum and um...

5:25

just to kind of wrap up, you know the

5:25

activity that I read about is um...

5:31

Hate crimes but vandalism attacks

5:31

targeting Jews, African Americans, LGBTQ

5:38

folks. It's important to say though that they

5:39

aspire to more extreme violence because

5:45

their online chatter is valorizing mass

5:45

shooters and industrial sabotage.

5:53

They're part of an accelerationist.

5:56

tendency in the white supremacist movement

5:56

that rejects elections and political

6:02

solutions to achieve their objectives they

6:02

feel like they need to bring about a

6:07

collapse of American society so that's how

6:07

I kind of...

6:13

So, well that's, I mean that's...

6:17

fascinating and horrifying at the same

6:17

time.

6:21

What take a step back again, because I

6:21

think the history is really important here

6:26

for people who are listening to our show

6:26

to understand kind of what's really going

6:33

on. You're talking just and I'll kind of

6:34

summarize it and then have you speak on a

6:39

little bit more of the history. What I'm hearing is that there's this.

6:44

new kind of surge of different hate groups

6:44

that have in particular come into

6:52

existence since the 2016 Donald Trump

6:52

election and then maybe even been

6:57

accelerated after the 2020 election and

6:57

these groups are violent or at least

7:05

aspiring to violence.

7:07

And there's this major goal, this kind of

7:07

endpoint that they're...

7:13

going where it's to essentially create a

7:13

collapse of society that then creates a

7:20

race war that then drives everyone who's

7:20

not Anglo and white out of the out of the

7:29

United States and then they rebuild the

7:29

country as a white supremacist country.

7:35

Is that the idea?

7:38

What's the history? What's the overall goal and how has this

7:39

come?

7:42

How have we come to this place here in

7:42

America?

7:47

Yeah, great question. And I think you summarized the goals

7:48

pretty well.

7:55

And it goes back to, I always cite

7:55

Kathleen Bellew.

7:59

She wrote a really excellent book called

7:59

Bring the War Home about the white power

8:04

movement and the aftermath of Vietnam.

8:10

She writes about in 1983, there was kind

8:10

of a convergence of.

8:15

revolutionary white power groups.

8:19

So their goal is to create a white

8:19

ethnostate.

8:24

They see it as incremental.

8:28

They don't believe it's really, and

8:28

they're right.

8:31

It's not realistic to think they could

8:31

just flip a switch and take control of the

8:36

United States government. So they want to kind of create just...

8:43

establish influence in rural predominantly

8:43

white areas like the Pacific Northwest,

8:49

Appalachia, the Ozarks, and then kind of

8:49

build a white ethnostate so they see the

8:55

necessity of breaking apart the United

8:55

States.

9:00

And then you were asking like how did we

9:00

get here?

9:05

So after Charlottesville in 2017, there

9:05

was a big backlash against what was then

9:13

called the alt-right movement because of

9:13

the murder of Heather Heyer.

9:18

So some of the groups in that coalition

9:18

became more mainstream and concerned about

9:24

optics. And others took a more kind of underground

9:25

terrorist approach.

9:31

And then we saw the rise of Adam Waffen.

9:35

and the base, those two groups were

9:35

largely dismantled in 2019, 2020 by the

9:43

FBI. And so you saw that kind of terrorist

9:46

activity, white supremacist terrorist

9:54

activity abate for a while.

9:57

And then as I was saying earlier, when the

9:57

prosecution of the January 6th defendants

10:04

kind of put the MAGA movement on its

10:04

heels.

10:08

Now this terrorist wing is kind of

10:08

resurgent.

10:13

That's kind of the sequence that I see.

10:18

Got it. And he said, so this group in particular,

10:19

the 219, yeah, like what's, yeah, what's,

10:30

I guess what's the significance of the

10:30

name, the number?

10:33

Is it, it's a link to something? I'm glad you asked because I'm just so

10:35

immersed in this stuff.

10:38

I forget to state the obvious, but blood

10:38

and soil is a Nazi slogan of the Third

10:44

Reich. So they are, you know, just to be clear,

10:46

they are unabashedly, unapologetically

10:52

pushing Nazism and they talk about a

10:52

Fourth Reich, you know, so they see

10:59

themselves as helping establish something

10:59

that would replicate or succeed with Adolf

11:05

Hitler. did in Nazi Germany.

11:09

Hmm. Yeah. So, so, so that's the blood and soil is

11:10

the 2119 is that is that like

11:16

it's a numeric code. You see a lot of neo-Nazi groups do this.

11:20

Well, actually, any kind of gang,

11:20

honestly.

11:25

Two equates to B for blood.

11:29

One equates to A for and.

11:33

Nineteen is... S is the 19th letter of the alphabet, so

11:34

19 stands for soil.

11:40

Interesting. That's so weird.

11:42

I remember when I was in college, one of

11:42

my favorite bands was this band called

11:49

311. And I remember some of my friends were

11:52

like, oh, you know, that's a racist band,

11:57

right? Because like 11 is like the 11th letter of

11:57

the alphabet, it's K and three, it's like

12:03

means it's KKK. And I'm like, I don't know about that, you

12:04

know, but.

12:07

Oh, I don't think that's the case, but

12:07

yeah, I hadn't heard that, but...

12:10

..the same logic.

12:13

Wow. Yeah, but it is weird how people sort of

12:13

like use kind of like, I don't know,

12:17

numerology to sort of, you know, make a

12:17

point.

12:20

But is this group primarily located in the

12:20

south or is it like a much broader

12:26

network? Oh, all over the country.

12:31

From, I mean, so my story mentions that

12:31

there are criminal cases being

12:37

investigated in North Carolina and New

12:37

Hampshire.

12:41

Members are facing charges in Florida.

12:45

There's documented activity in California.

12:48

And really, due to the fact that they're

12:48

organized through the internet.

12:55

They're talking with people all over the

12:55

world.

12:57

So I've even heard that there are members

12:57

who claim to be 2119 in the UK.

13:07

Dude, that's amazing. I mean, in a bad way.

13:12

It's like, I mean, like this thing is so

13:12

like spread all over the place.

13:19

What exactly, how are they doing this?

13:22

Can you kind of speak to, how are they

13:22

radicalizing kids?

13:30

like young, I'm reading some of the

13:30

articles that you posted, kids as young as

13:36

13, 12, whatever, they can't drive leaders

13:36

in the thing or 17 years old.

13:42

It's like, what, what is 17 year olds

13:42

leading anything?

13:45

What does that even mean? I mean, yeah, how, what, what's, how are

13:46

they doing this exactly?

13:54

Well, you know, the power of the internet

13:54

and just to get kind of briefly to talk

14:00

about the global aspect is, you know, it

14:00

is ironic that they call themselves

14:07

nationalists because they are really, I

14:07

mean, they're more transnational than

14:12

anything else. I mean, this really goes back.

14:15

a long time to the 1980s that these groups

14:15

have kind of reinforced each other across

14:22

global boundaries. But the internet is the engine of

14:23

radicalization and it's also the thing

14:30

that brings them across together across

14:30

state lines and national lines.

14:39

Yeah, you know, I've just been puzzling

14:39

through this myself, but as I think about

14:44

it... They are able to kind of create an online

14:46

persona to where a 13 year old can kind of

14:57

adopt the persona of this like 30 year old

14:57

paramilitary super soldier and they

15:05

project it to each other and they say and

15:05

share things that are shocking to build

15:12

clout with each other. And part of the way that 2199 was

15:15

organized, to my understanding, it was

15:24

founded by Waylon Fowler, this 17-year-old

15:24

who's currently facing charges for a brick

15:31

attack against the synagogue in Pensacola.

15:34

But it was started on a Discord channel,

15:34

which is a way that just mainstream

15:40

teenagers get together and chat about

15:40

gaming.

15:45

He would kind of stoke, develop

15:45

relationships, invite adolescents in and

15:54

push them towards discriminatory beliefs

15:54

and then they started this new thing

16:00

called 2119 and they pushed the kids to

16:00

show some in real life action.

16:10

To put up a flyer or...

16:13

spray-painted some graffiti and then

16:13

posted on the channel.

16:17

And so, I guess it's just kind of like a

16:17

feedback loop of online and in real life

16:28

that kind of carries it forward. Does that answer your question?

16:32

Because it is a really complex and

16:32

dynamic, and I mean, we have so, we really

16:40

understand so little of it because...

16:43

I feel like we've only been in this space

16:43

for about 10 years where children's

16:49

experiences online and I've talked to

16:49

experts who are saying the internet that

16:56

you knew a year ago is not the same

16:56

internet that exists.

17:03

And it's different for teenagers than it

17:03

is for us because all of us have

17:10

algorithms that

17:12

show us what they think we want to see to

17:12

keep us engaged.

17:19

And one of the experts pointed out to me

17:19

that when 13 year olds come online, they

17:25

don't have the history that we do going

17:25

back 15 years.

17:29

And so TikTok or Instagram shows them

17:29

what, they use an algorithm for, I don't

17:39

know, like a different subset of.

17:42

I don't know how it's, it's not their

17:42

algorithm.

17:45

to like build like and understand what

17:45

their interests are and so it's throwing a

17:50

massive amount of things at them just to

17:50

kind of see where they click what they

17:55

look at all that kind of stuff and then it

17:55

will begin to filter that down and make it

18:01

more precise i mean when you talked about

18:01

you know roblox waffen or yeah something

18:10

like that i mean my you know

18:13

I have my son plays Roblox and I know that

18:13

he's got a lot of friends.

18:20

So I am very controlling on who he's

18:20

friends with.

18:23

Probably for this very reason it

18:23

reinforces it.

18:27

But it's like what I mean, is it because

18:27

these platforms they don't allow access

18:33

because of You know, they won't take these things

18:35

down because of the ripple effect it would

18:40

have to other groups if they started

18:40

reinforcing the stuff for letting law

18:44

enforcement. I mean, it's a really it's a difficult

18:45

problem because if you let law enforcement

18:49

come in and just, you know, you give them

18:49

their telegram.

18:53

I saw a lot about telegram. You give them that account.

18:58

You let law enforcement come in, and then

18:58

what does that mean?

19:02

So then we just know that the government

19:02

has access to all of our stuff no matter

19:05

what, and does that violate our rights in

19:05

some way?

19:11

It's a difficult thing. And then, yeah, I mean, I can feel your

19:13

pain in that this is a hard nut to crack

19:23

in terms of figuring out how all this

19:23

stuff happens.

19:27

Yeah, I certainly don't have the expertise

19:27

on technology and regulation, but I hear

19:36

reporters talking about it.

19:39

And I think I do come down on the

19:39

regulation side.

19:44

I mean, one person put it like, we created

19:44

the internet, we dropped it on our, we

19:51

dropped this bomb on our children.

19:53

And we do have a... responsibility to control it and to kind

19:56

of protect our children from the toxic

20:04

elements of it. I mean the same way that we would regulate

20:05

who comes in and out of a school building

20:11

or school grounds. Yeah.

20:14

So I'm really interested in kind of like

20:14

how the organization or how they decide

20:28

what crimes they want to commit.

20:30

I mean, I'm just thinking like, is the

20:30

radicalization like sort of very organic

20:36

because you're kind of building this

20:36

community and then you want to sort of

20:39

like be one of the cool kids and...

20:43

And then once you are a cool kid, is it

20:43

like on telegram, you're like, hey, who

20:48

wants to meet me at this synagogue and do

20:48

some crimes?

20:52

Is it like that, or is it just basically

20:52

just a one upper organic type of things

21:01

that they do to try to impress everybody

21:01

else?

21:06

Yeah, I looked at a lot of the telegram

21:06

channels, but I'm not privy to the very

21:10

internal ones. But my understanding from what others have

21:11

told me is that there's just a strong

21:16

encouragement to do, you know, what they

21:16

would call in real life activities to show

21:25

their commitment. But yeah, so we're talking about

21:28

teenagers.

21:31

So most of them don't drive.

21:34

So. you can imagine that it would be a lot of

21:36

solo activity.

21:41

And then, you know, there is a effort to

21:41

kind of get like-minded people together

21:49

who are in the same geographic space.

21:53

So typically what I find with these types

21:53

of groups is that if they live an hour or

22:01

maybe two hours away from each other,

22:01

they'll make some effort to meet in

22:05

person. and 2119 leaders have talked about like

22:06

getting together in person, doing leaders

22:15

doing national tours to meet with the

22:15

members across the country.

22:23

So yeah, that is a logistical challenge

22:23

when you have a group that is, you know, a

22:29

couple dozen people that spread across the

22:29

United States then obviously.

22:34

most of them are not going to be in

22:34

person.

22:38

Yeah, and I'm like, how are they funded?

22:41

I mean, like, are they just using

22:41

allowance money to buy the brick, you

22:46

know, to throw? Or like, to meet up with friends and

22:47

whatnot?

22:53

That is a really good question and I would

22:53

just say, I mean, I've heard some things

23:01

about parents, some parents enabling it.

23:05

I haven't been able to verify that, but I

23:05

wanna pursue that further.

23:13

Yeah, I mean, it's fascinating to me

23:13

because you have this certain group of

23:20

people that are going to be, number one,

23:20

like I'm thinking about the amount of

23:26

steps I'm imagining my son, and I'm

23:26

imagining the amount of intermediate steps

23:32

that it's going to take, that it would

23:32

take to get him like radicalized in that

23:38

way, and what they would have to convince

23:38

him of, and what

24:23

with him would be like that I wouldn't

24:23

know or there wouldn't be regulation on

24:29

what he's doing or I wouldn't be checking

24:29

in right there's a number of things that

24:33

would start happening. I know you kind of covered this in your

24:34

follow-up article to of your first one on

24:43

raw story about the parents and how the

24:43

parents were reacting to all this and the

24:48

kind of you know

24:50

they were being they were like they were

24:50

they didn't know what to do they kind of

24:58

at a at a at a loss and even seeing like

24:58

most kids once they saw the once they saw

25:06

the legal potential legal consequences right

25:08

kids are getting like interviewed by the

25:12

FBI if I was in high school and I got the

25:12

FBI Taking me out of class to interview me

25:18

that would really scare me quite a bit And

25:18

I probably would want to change what I'm

25:23

doing and I'm just wondering yeah I mean,

25:23

I'm just wondering like so Excuse me this

25:31

2119 right sounds like it's

25:37

You know, it's a small group of people.

25:41

Obviously small groups of people can do

25:41

big damage.

25:45

They can do... terrible damage.

25:47

They have asymmetric information.

25:50

So law enforcement don't know to

25:50

potentially what they're planning and you

25:54

have protection from rights and you know,

25:54

things like that where you can't just go

25:58

in and, you know, get their phone without

25:58

a warrant or go and you know, there it

26:03

makes it more difficult for potentially

26:03

law enforcement to predict these things,

26:08

find these things. What is this?

26:10

Like, why is this so interesting to you?

26:13

This group and how does this?

26:16

How does this, what connection does it

26:16

have even to the larger issues that are

26:25

like, I mean, again, it's not as if I'm

26:25

saying that their potential violent acts

26:32

are not important.

26:35

to cover or to understand or anything like

26:35

that.

26:39

But how does this connect to the broader

26:39

movement that you're seeing and what's

26:44

really concerning you and driving you to

26:44

look at and investigate this group besides

26:52

the fact that it's just terrible stuff

26:52

they're saying and doing, but what's

26:57

driving this interest in reporting this

26:57

and making sure people know about it?

27:05

Well, yeah, I mean, what drove my interest

27:05

is just that when I started looking at the

27:10

string of vandalism incidents and hate

27:10

crimes back in this spring of the past

27:18

year and then seeing this group's name

27:18

attached to it, so I was interested in

27:22

what appears to be like a coordinated

27:22

criminal enterprise and

27:31

I'm concerned that it's attached to a

27:31

larger movement, the active club movement,

27:38

that is very aggressive and kind of

27:38

growing.

27:45

and their ambition to or their interest in

27:45

these more extreme forms of terroristic

27:52

violence. But as I was reporting it, I mean you were

27:54

before, the earlier part of your question

27:59

you were talking about the internet

27:59

radicalization and as I was reporting it

28:04

that, I mean that suddenly became more

28:04

important to me.

28:10

That's not why I started reporting it.

28:15

But yeah, I mean, in terms of the internet

28:15

radicalization of children, I do think

28:23

it's important to mention that neo-Nazi

28:23

activity is just one subset of internet

28:30

radicalization. There's a

28:34

Really good article that came out the same

28:34

day as mine by Mac Lammerow at Vice News.

28:42

And it's about online self-harm cults that

28:42

recruit children and they, you know, in

28:50

the same way as 219, they radicalize

28:50

children and then the children, when they

28:57

become 16 or 17, then they are

28:57

radicalizing and recruiting other

29:02

children. really vile stuff encouraging children to

29:04

cut themselves and the most vile and

29:13

dehumanizing kinds of activities that you

29:13

can imagine.

29:19

But gosh, my main point is that when I

29:19

talked to Dana Kester, a professor at West

29:25

Virginia University who studied online

29:25

radicalization, she was saying...

29:32

if your child is on the internet then they

29:32

are exposed to white supremacy and any

29:39

other toxic content you can imagine.

29:44

And I mean, this is just, I think, you

29:44

know, this is where it crosses the

29:51

ideological divide.

29:53

It doesn't matter whether we're right or

29:53

left.

29:56

We have to figure out how to...

29:59

deal with this as a society and to protect

29:59

children.

30:03

And there are no clear answers.

30:07

I kind of, you know, I hear you, Josh,

30:07

about limiting children's, you know, one's

30:15

child's access.

30:19

I kind of myself kind of tend to take a

30:19

harm reduction approach and realize that

30:26

children... are going to be online.

30:30

I would be kind of hypocritical myself if

30:30

I said just stay offline because all of my

30:36

research and engagement right here is

30:36

online.

30:43

I think we need to teach children to be

30:43

very wise and judicious in how they engage

30:50

with the content and be critical about

30:50

what they're seeing.

30:56

and not just passive consumers.

31:01

Yeah, so I can imagine writing stories

31:01

about neo-Nazis probably doesn't make you

31:09

really popular amongst that group.

31:12

Because having read some of your articles,

31:12

you're not necessarily advocating that

31:18

neo-Nazis are full of rainbows and

31:18

unicorns.

31:22

So maybe you can talk to us a little bit

31:22

about some of the challenges you've had

31:27

and even you know, some of the attacks that you

31:28

have experienced yourself just reporting

31:34

on this group. Yeah, well I wrote about it sidebar to my

31:36

piece at Raw Story.

31:41

But yeah, basically when I began reporting

31:41

this, investigating and reporting this

31:48

story, and the 219 members became aware

31:48

that I was reporting on them, it was

31:55

pretty intense backlash.

32:00

They kind of trash-talked me on Telegram,

32:00

which I would not be.

32:06

I'm kind of used to, but it escalated to

32:06

harassing phone calls, warning that they

32:12

were watching me and invoking the brick

32:12

there, obviously what was used to attack

32:20

the synagogue in Pensacola.

32:24

And surveillance, they, 2119 members

32:24

ordered a pizza to be delivered at my

32:32

house and then somehow someone knew about the delivery

32:35

and was outside and took my photograph

32:41

while I talked to the delivery person and

32:41

it culminated with six neo-Nazis holding a

32:50

four minute flash rally in front of my

32:50

house a couple, about ten days before the

32:56

publication of the story. And so these are, 2119 is part of a larger

33:04

ecosystem and they kind of called for

33:04

support from these older neo-Nazis who

33:12

have written about them as well.

33:14

So I guess there was motivation of trying

33:14

to prevent me from reporting and also

33:20

retaliating for past reporting that I've

33:20

done on others.

33:26

But I mean, I just, I mean, I'm not going

33:26

to be intimidated and stop.

33:34

reporting on it and if anything this kind

33:34

of validates the importance that they

33:40

would go to such great lengths to try to

33:40

suppress the truth.

33:49

Yeah, I mean, that's got to be unnerving

33:49

to experience that.

33:55

What was that like experiencing that for

33:55

the first time?

34:02

Well, I'm not going to say too much about

34:02

the impact of it.

34:11

Yeah, obviously it's not fun. But.

34:15

Yeah, that makes sense. going to keep. I mean, whatever they want to bring, I

34:20

mean, I was raised to ask the question,

34:29

like, you know, what would you do if the,

34:29

you know, the Nazis come to power and,

34:37

like, how will you respond?

34:39

And, like, the moral question of, like, do

34:39

you remove the train tracks of, you know,

34:46

when they are...

34:50

taking people to concentration camps or do

34:50

you drop flyers from a dorm hall and take

34:57

actions that would result in almost, you

34:57

know, certain severe consequences and this

35:10

just seems pretty straightforward.

35:14

We're reporters. We're reporting on the...

35:18

currents and political trends in our

35:18

society.

35:21

And reporting without fear or favor is a

35:21

fundamental aspect of democracy.

35:28

So I'm not gonna stop reporting on them.

35:32

I know many of my colleagues are also not

35:32

gonna be intimidated by this kind of

35:40

thing. Well, I appreciate your response and, you

35:42

know, definitely support you in that.

35:51

Do you feel like the...

35:54

Oh, go ahead. Were you saying something?

35:58

Oh, yeah. Absolutely.

36:01

I mean, you know... If you're going to make an impact at some

36:03

point, people are not going to be happy

36:08

with you, especially if you're talking

36:08

about something that is important to them

36:15

for whatever reason. And it's pretty amazing that you've been

36:17

able to

36:24

keep this going and so I really, I do

36:24

appreciate that because we need people

36:29

that are bold and are willing to speak

36:29

against the evils that they see in society

36:35

and take a stand.

36:38

Do you feel like the law enforcement,

36:38

maybe not do you feel like, what response

36:46

have they been able to have, not

36:46

necessarily in your particular case, but

36:49

I'm talking about more widely.

36:54

for them to try to regulate this and you

36:54

know to try to

37:05

to try to quell this kind of stuff and

37:05

react to this.

37:08

It's very reactionary, it seems like, but

37:08

maybe there's more proactive ways that law

37:14

enforcement is doing to try to get ahead

37:14

of this kind of stuff.

37:21

What has been your experience? How have you seen the law enforcement

37:23

respond and what challenges do they face

37:28

in this? Yeah, yeah.

37:32

Yeah, I mean, law enforcement is

37:32

definitely active in trying to build cases

37:38

against violent extremists.

37:41

And... Yeah, I mean, they prosecuted members of

37:45

the base, one of the groups that I

37:51

mentioned, that had talked about in

37:51

January 2020, there was a Second Amendment

37:59

rally in Richmond, Virginia, where people,

37:59

thousands of people brought assault rifles

38:06

into the state Capitol. And these neo-Nazi groups had talked about

38:13

bringing guns and shooting at people to

38:13

instigate this kind of accelerationist

38:19

collapse. They were arrested shortly afterwards.

38:24

Law enforcement uses informants to

38:24

infiltrate these groups and the neo-Nazis

38:35

know it and there is some degree of

38:35

paranoia.

38:40

And I... you know, I guess they have to, to get the

38:43

evidence to build the cases.

38:48

You do worry that the informants might

38:48

kind of push things further than it needs

38:55

to go to try to make the case.

39:00

They're incentivized to get people to do

39:00

something criminal so that they can make a

39:06

case. I don't know, it's tricky.

39:11

But certainly... aware.

39:15

I mean that sounds like so difficult and

39:15

stressful to try to figure out.

39:20

Yeah, totally. And it's like it reminds me of, I'm not

39:21

sure how many of our listeners are

39:28

familiar with like the old show 21 Jump

39:28

Street.

39:31

where a bunch of these high school kids

39:31

are secretly cops and trying to solve

39:38

crimes. In my mind, when you're like, yeah, they

39:40

try to get informants, I'm like, who are

39:43

they getting? Are they going to the class valedictorian

39:44

or whatever and be like, hey, we got a job

39:50

for you. We need you to infiltrate this neo-Nazi

39:51

group, which, I don't know, would probably

39:57

be pretty cool and fun maybe. I don't know.

39:59

But. You know, I'm curiously...

40:02

century generation myself.

40:06

But, I got in. least on the three people on this call.

40:12

So like, what are the schools doing?

40:15

I mean, since this is a population that's

40:15

primarily young, you know, kids, I'd

40:21

imagine the schools are being informed,

40:21

maybe?

40:25

Like, hey, there's this like, radicalized

40:25

group that's sort of spreading in our

40:29

area. Like, are the schools involved kind of

40:30

with any of this?

40:35

Yeah, three of the members, three or maybe

40:35

four, have said that they got kicked out

40:42

of school. Not when my story came out, long before my

40:44

story came out.

40:48

Their activities came to light locally,

40:48

and they were forced to leave school.

40:58

And I think that's understandable, because

40:58

they present a threat to.

41:03

other students, particularly black and

41:03

Jewish and LGBTQ students.

41:12

But, you know, I don't know, broadly

41:12

speaking, I don't know if your average

41:17

principal, middle school principal, or

41:17

high school principal is really thinking

41:22

about this that much. Yeah, I mean, to that end, what do you

41:27

hope that this reporting does?

41:34

I mean, how do you hope it impacts?

41:40

Who do you hope will read it? And what kind of actions do you feel like

41:42

you would hope that this would spark and

41:49

inspire? from your perspective what's most

41:52

important that people do with this

41:56

information besides just be freaked out.

42:00

Yeah, I hope it doesn't freak people out.

42:03

That always worries me that people will be

42:03

shocked and then just shut down.

42:09

But one audience I really, I'm very

42:09

critical as a journalist and as a person

42:15

of law enforcement, but I do appreciate

42:15

people who work in law enforcement.

42:23

And I guess that's one audience that I

42:23

hope to reach.

42:26

And I hope that they will kind of

42:29

understand the contours and I think mainly

42:29

for law enforcement I want them to

42:35

understand that this is not like one or

42:35

two bad actors.

42:40

It is part of a collective cohesive

42:40

movement and it has to be tackled as a

42:48

sometimes you have to you know apply look

42:48

at it as a conspiracy to violate civil

42:53

rights and I wish there was more

42:53

prosecutions along those lines.

43:00

Broadly speaking, I just want all of

43:00

society to be aware of what is unfolding

43:09

and to respond as in whatever role they

43:09

find to be appropriate.

43:19

Yeah, I mean, I'm thinking about the law

43:19

enforcement and so like this side of it,

43:26

you're hoping that they will take it and

43:26

assimilate the information, understand it,

43:33

become aware because why most law

43:33

enforcement's they're unaware of this.

43:38

They don't see it as a big issue.

43:41

Like what what's the motivation again,

43:41

besides like understanding that what

43:46

they're doing is wrong, right? And bad.

43:49

And it's not, I mean, it's this racism is

43:49

evil and it's hurting them as well, like

43:58

their own internal heart, I believe,

43:58

right?

44:01

It's damaging their soul as a pastor, as

44:01

greatly.

44:08

And my prayer and hope would be that they

44:08

would come to some kind of repentance and

44:13

to turn around from this.

44:15

But from the law enforcement standpoint,

44:15

that's more spiritual standpoint, from the

44:21

law enforcement standpoint, the idea is

44:21

like, what do you see as the issue that is

44:30

occurring that you hope this will spark in

44:30

the law enforcement ignorance, will for

44:39

ignorance, right? Just kind of like...

44:43

Well. brushing it under the table, what do you

44:44

think?

44:47

Yeah, I think there's a tendency with law

44:47

enforcement to see this as like a

44:52

localized .. this, I hate to call it vandalism, that

44:56

it's an attack on people.

45:03

But you might see it as like a localized

45:03

issue, law enforcement might see it as a

45:08

localized issue. some crazy teenagers or something like

45:09

that.

45:11

They're just being silly and we just

45:11

gotta, you know, whatever, just deal with

45:15

it and move on. And also to think, you know, these are

45:17

just teenagers who are just did something

45:23

stupid as teenagers do, but if you look at

45:23

the fact that they've been organizing,

45:29

this group has been organizing for two to

45:29

three years on the internet, I think it's

45:35

important to look at the people who are

45:35

organizing the activity and coordinating

45:43

it online. as opposed to just those who commit the

45:44

acts of vandalism or racial and ethnic

45:53

intimidation. So, Jordan, I guess my last question for

45:55

you is, what's next for your

46:01

investigation? I mean, like, what do you need, who do you

46:03

need to talk to, to really kind of gain a

46:08

more comprehensive picture of, you know,

46:08

where this group is going next, and, you

46:14

know, what would be important for the

46:14

public to really take away from your

46:20

reporting? Well, that's a good question.

46:28

I would say just looking forward, look at

46:28

how groups, neo-Nazi teenage groups that

46:40

are inclined towards terrorism, look at

46:40

the hot button issues that they're going

46:45

to exploit.

46:52

the presidential election, the ongoing war

46:52

in Israel and Gaza, is something that

47:01

neo-Nazi groups like this are going to

47:01

play both sides and try to pit people

47:06

against each other. Ongoing...

47:12

look for them to kind of opportunistically

47:12

latch on to various hot-button issues that

47:19

make people passionate and divide people

47:19

and to exploit those to erode trust.

47:26

And also, you know, white supremacist

47:26

groups going back decades and decades are

47:31

very good at rebranding.

47:33

Now that there's a light being shown on

47:33

twenty one nineteen they may change their

47:39

name or they may break into two groups or re-merge

47:40

with other groups and so it's very it's

47:46

very fluid but uh...

47:50

yeah look at the uh... kind of the occurrence of the movement and

47:52

not the particular groups or players

47:57

necessarily That's it.

48:01

That's good. So I guess last question is how can people

48:02

follow you, how stay up to date on your

48:07

reporting or if they've got like you know

48:07

a hot tip or something like that, how can

48:12

folks connect with you? Yeah, the best way to connect with me is

48:15

by email, jordan.com.

48:24

Got it. That's great. And yeah, well, appreciate you coming on.

48:30

We have lots of journalists on the show,

48:30

and I'm always just impressed by just the

48:35

work that you folks do. I mean, putting yourself kind of at harm's

48:37

way. And it's like, I don't know what it's like

48:39

to be a journalist, but based on what I

48:44

hear, see, and read, it looks like a very

48:44

thankless profession.

48:48

Um, so I want to at least, um, be one that

48:48

does thank you for, for the work that you

48:53

do, because it's not easy.

48:59

And yeah, thank you.

49:01

And, uh, and to our faithful politics

49:01

listeners and watchers, we'll see you next

49:06

time. Remember, keep your conversations not

49:06

right, not left, but up.

49:09

We'll, uh, see you next week. Take care.

Rate

From The Podcast

Faithful Politics

Dive into the profound world of Faithful Politics, a compelling podcast where the spheres of faith and politics converge in meaningful dialogues. Guided by Pastor Josh Burtram (Faithful Host) and Will Wright (Political Host), this unique platform invites listeners to delve into the complex impact of political choices on both the faithful and faithless.Join our hosts, Josh and Will, as they engage with world-renowned experts, scholars, theologians, politicians, journalists, and ordinary folks. Their objective? To deepen our collective understanding of the intersection between faith and politics.Faithful Politics sets itself apart by refusing to subscribe to any single political ideology or religious conviction. This approach is mirrored in the diverse backgrounds of our hosts. Will Wright, a disabled Veteran and African-Asian American, is a former atheist and a liberal progressive with a lifelong intrigue in politics. On the other hand, Josh Burtram, a Conservative Republican and devoted Pastor, brings a passion for theology that resonates throughout the discourse.Yet, in the face of their contrasting outlooks, Josh and Will display a remarkable ability to facilitate respectful and civil dialogue on challenging topics. This opens up a space where listeners of various political and religious leanings can find value and deepen their understanding.So, regardless if you're a Democrat or Republican, a believer or an atheist, we assure you that Faithful Politics has insightful conversations that will appeal to you and stimulate your intellectual curiosity. Come join us in this enthralling exploration of the intricate nexus of faith and politics. Add us to your regular podcast stream and don't forget to subscribe to our YouTube Channel. Let's navigate this fascinating realm together! Not Right. Not Left. UP.

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features