Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:05
Welcome to the Fear and Greed business interview. I'm
0:07
Sean Aylmer. Yesterday afternoon the Reserve
0:09
Bank board left interest rates on hold
0:12
as was widely expected, but the
0:14
Central Bank did revise its inflation
0:16
forecast to 3. 8% up
0:19
significantly from the 3. 3%
0:21
I think it was in its previous
0:23
forecast. My guest today is Westpac's Chief
0:26
Economist Luci Ellis. Luci is in
0:28
a very unique position to comment on what the Reserve
0:30
Bank board might be thinking. Until October
0:32
last year, Luci was Assistant Governor at
0:35
the Reserve Bank. Luci Ellis. Welcome to Fear and Greed.
0:37
Thanks, Sean. It's great to be here.
0:40
So what did you make firstly of
0:42
the outcome and the wording
0:45
of the statement from the Reserve Bank
0:47
board? They weren't overly
0:49
aggressive or overly hawkish in what
0:51
they thought on rates. Did that surprise you?
0:54
It didn't actually. We did expect
0:56
them to become more hawkish
0:58
in their language, and they did. And they talked about
1:00
how they were being vigilant around
1:02
the upside risks. But
1:05
I think they're also mindful that
1:07
in November they reacted
1:09
and took out some insurance to some upside
1:12
risks after the September
1:14
quarter CPI. And then of course the December
1:16
quarter CPI and all the real side
1:18
data in the December quarter turned
1:21
out to be below expectations
1:23
and their February forecasts went
1:25
straight back down and reversed out the forecast
1:28
upgrades. They are expecting
1:30
a bumpy ride, and I think it's important
1:32
that they don't treat every bump as a
1:34
change in trend. It was right that they
1:37
were more hawkish and more vigilant about the
1:39
upside risks, but I think
1:42
making sure that this isn't just yet another
1:44
bump is the appropriate thing to do.
1:46
Now, Michelle Bullock, who obviously
1:49
you worked with closely for many years is
1:51
making it very clear she doesn't want to give an indication
1:54
of whether the next move is up or down, and
1:56
that is her job as the governor of
1:58
the Reserve Bank. We respect that. Luci Ellis,
2:00
you used to be in that sort of role
2:02
now you're in a totally different role, what do you think
2:04
will happen to rates?
2:07
Our central case is that rates are
2:09
on hold. We do think there are upside
2:11
risks. We think there are states of the world in
2:13
which they do end up
2:15
raising rates, but we just don't think that's
2:17
the most likely outcome. We
2:19
look at the configuration of incredibly
2:22
weak consumer spending,
2:24
of a household sector that's been squeezed
2:27
of a labour market that is easing
2:30
although some of the lagging indicators
2:32
like unemployment haven't eased
2:35
as much as some of the leading edge indicators
2:38
such as job ads or vacancies.
2:42
So things are turning
2:44
out broadly as was expected. Inflation
2:47
is coming down, discretionary
2:49
inflation, things like dining out are
2:51
all actually very close to their pre-
2:54
pandemic rates. But there is
2:56
this lingering element of
2:59
indexation of
3:01
insurance and of course the
3:04
outworkings of strong population growth
3:06
and what that's done to housing inflation.
3:08
And all of that will unwind over time but
3:11
I can quite understand that the RBA is
3:13
very alert to the risk that this doesn't
3:15
come down fast enough.
3:17
So your central case is that rates are on hold,
3:19
do you think the next move will be down
3:22
rather than up?
3:23
If things turn out as we expect, so our
3:25
central case will then around
3:28
about November, we expect the RBA
3:30
would have enough comfort to have seen
3:32
enough of a decline in inflation to be
3:35
ready to withdraw some of the
3:37
tight stance of policy. The board
3:39
does assess policy as being tight
3:42
and they'll get to a point
3:44
as inflation starts to approach the target
3:46
range that they no longer
3:48
need to be as tight and they can start withdrawing
3:51
some of the tight stance of policy and come
3:53
back to something a little bit more average
3:56
in terms of the level of interest rates and
3:58
no longer be constraining the economy.
4:01
But we just don't think they have enough
4:03
comfort with the current trajectory,
4:05
particularly in light of the upside
4:08
surprise in March quarter. So
4:10
we just think they're going to wait for more
4:12
information. If inflation
4:14
does keep coming down as they would like, then
4:18
they'll be in a position that they can start cutting rates.
4:20
And we recently pushed out our assessment
4:22
of when that was likely to November
4:25
from September.
4:26
Stay with me Luci. We'll be back in a minute. I am
4:36
speaking to Luci Ellis Group Chief Economist
4:38
at Westpac. Luci,
4:40
you've been inside the bank and to most
4:42
people out there the bank is just this big
4:44
black box or gray box actually
4:48
at the top of Martin Place there. As
4:50
you talk, you sound like a true market economist,
4:52
but I mean all these discussions that the
4:55
market economists have here, presumably
4:57
they're all taking place inside the
5:00
bank. Is the debate much
5:02
different inside the bank to
5:04
outside the bank?
5:06
Well, I think we're all looking at mostly the same data.
5:09
There are some differences in the sense that, for
5:12
example, the Reserve Bank has its liaison
5:14
program so it's talking
5:16
to firms in a somewhat different way. I mean,
5:18
obviously we are a bank, we have a lot
5:20
of customers. We talk to those customers as
5:22
well and we do glean insights
5:25
in an increasingly systematic way from
5:27
our customers. But we don't have over 20
5:30
years of a liaison
5:32
program in the same way. But
5:34
by and large, we have the same data sets.
5:37
There are some things that the public sector has access
5:39
to, like single touch payroll
5:41
and some of the micro data that the private
5:43
sector doesn't have access to but all the macro
5:45
data, we are looking at it in
5:48
very similar ways. Where there
5:50
has been a bit of an evolution has been
5:52
in the outworkings from the RBA
5:54
review, some of the recommendations
5:56
there were things like that they
5:58
now needed to be more explicit about
6:00
their assessment of where the economy was relative
6:03
to full employment and where the economy
6:05
was relative to potential output.
6:07
And what that's doing is
6:10
making the RBA staff put
6:12
their models more front and center. I
6:15
think they have quite sensibly made
6:17
it clear that no one model is perfect,
6:20
that you need to use judgment. But
6:22
what I am seeing is a bit more of
6:24
a shift of the way the RBA is conveying
6:27
its analysis to being a little bit more
6:29
model driven and a little bit more like
6:31
some of the other advanced economy
6:33
central banks where you have much more of an academic
6:35
flavour.
6:37
And what about Michelle Bullock her job, not
6:39
so much as an economist I suppose, but
6:41
as a representative of the bank, particularly
6:43
because she's now to giving press
6:45
conferences with which none of her predecessors
6:48
ever had to do, how do you think she's
6:51
evolving into that role?
6:53
I would just point out that for
6:55
many, many years, the RBA had
6:58
been rolling out
7:00
its senior staff to give speeches
7:02
where you had live Q& A that was recorded
7:05
and transcribed afterwards. And so
7:07
in many respects, that was a substitute for
7:09
media conferences. And one
7:11
thing you might've noticed is there's actually been a lot fewer
7:13
speeches outside of the policy
7:16
decision. Now, part of that's because
7:18
obviously my successor is new,
7:20
the deputy governor's new, everyone's still
7:23
settling in, so you haven't seen
7:26
a lot of the other senior staff giving
7:28
that many speeches. I mean, the assistant
7:31
governor of financial markets gave a speech that
7:33
was very straight down the line
7:35
about their new operating model
7:37
in how they're going to manage
7:39
the level of reserves. You had the assistant
7:41
governor of financial system talk
7:44
about SME finance, but you've had
7:46
very little communication outside
7:48
of those media conferences and parliamentary
7:51
appearances and the
7:54
policy round about monetary
7:56
policy and their assessment of the economy. And so
7:58
there's been a trade- off between
8:01
the kind of discussions about the economic
8:03
outlook that used to happen and
8:07
what's now happening. So we're
8:09
getting the media conferences, but we are getting
8:11
fewer speeches and we're not getting
8:13
speeches with Q& A after them.
8:16
And so it does appear to have
8:18
been a bit of a trade- off, at least in the short term, while
8:20
the other senior staff settle in. I
8:22
think the people who were clamouring for a media
8:25
conference may need to have been a
8:27
bit more careful about what they wished for because
8:29
there already was a lot of that opportunity
8:32
to communicate and to communicate
8:34
off the cuff. So in that sense, Michelle
8:37
and all of the other senior staff have had plenty
8:40
of practice going up before Parliament,
8:42
going up in media Q&A, this is
8:45
just a much more scrutinised
8:47
event. I will say the way the
8:50
RBA is communicating now
8:52
has definitely improved.
8:55
Some of the things they did on the SMP
8:58
made it much more accessible. And they're all things that people
9:00
would've liked to have done before, but sometimes
9:03
you have to be told to do it by someone
9:06
external, that's just the way the public
9:08
sector works. And I
9:10
think it does really validate at
9:12
least one of the recommendations
9:14
out of the RBA review, which was to resource
9:17
their communications function differently and
9:19
communicate differently. And I think that
9:22
recommendation has been heard and
9:24
responded to.
9:25
Now, Luci, I think I'm
9:28
right in saying you started at the bank in 1991.
9:30
In fact, I think I'm right in saying I started as a graduate
9:32
on the same day you started as a graduate at the
9:34
Reserve Bank.
9:35
That is correct. And you had the desk
9:37
next to mine.
9:37
Indeed.
9:38
Yeah. Well, that
9:41
was something that I would not have forecast.
9:42
No. Nor
9:45
I. Do you miss it? I mean, I'm sure you're
9:47
loving working at Westpac no doubt, but do
9:49
you miss the bank given it was such a major
9:51
part of your life for such a long time?
9:53
Look, I think you get to a point in your life
9:55
that it's time for a change and the right
9:57
role came up at the right moment for
9:59
me. So look, I'll be honest,
10:02
six months in, I am really
10:04
enjoying it. I couldn't be happier having
10:06
moved. I think it was the right thing to
10:08
do, and I think
10:11
it's provided an opportunity
10:13
to join the dots in a different
10:15
way. I think I was always very
10:18
mindful having spent quite a bit of time in the financial
10:20
stability side about the
10:23
need to see the system as a whole
10:25
and connect everything together. And
10:27
it's nice to be able to talk about monetary and fiscal
10:29
policy together instead of just
10:31
about one of them and pretend that the other one is
10:33
something that you don't even comment
10:35
on much.
10:36
Yeah. Luci, thank you very much for talking
10:38
to Fear and Greed.
10:40
You're very welcome. Thanks, Sean.
10:42
That was Luci Ellis Group Chief Economist
10:44
at Westpac. This is the Fear and Greed
10:46
business interview. Join us every morning for the
10:48
full episode of Fear and Greed, Australia's best business
10:51
podcast. I'm Sean Aylmer. Enjoy
10:53
your day.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More