Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:17
We're back with another edition of the Federalist
0:19
Radio Hour. I'm Emily Deschinsky culture
0:21
editor here at the Federalist. As always,
0:23
you can email the show at radio at the federalist
0:25
dot com. Follow us on Twitter at FDRLST.
0:28
Make sure to subscribe wherever you download your
0:30
podcasts as well. Today, we're joined
0:33
by Leonidas Johnson. He is the author
0:35
of the new book called raising victims.
0:37
The pernicious rise of critical
0:39
race theory it is out on February
0:42
seventh is also the host of a podcast
0:44
called informed descent He runs
0:46
a substack by the same name. You can find that
0:48
at leonidas dot subsack dot com.
0:50
Leonidas, thank you so much for joining Federal
0:52
Stradewire. Absolutely. Thank
0:55
you so much for having me. Of course. Well, first of
0:57
all, congratulations on the book. And
0:59
if you could start since it's your first time on the
1:01
show just by giving us a little bit of your
1:03
background, You know, what led you to
1:05
writing the the book raising
1:07
victims? What's your career looked
1:10
like up until this
1:11
point? That would be great. Yeah.
1:13
So I'm actually a speech
1:15
language pathologist. That's
1:17
my day job. And the
1:19
whole political commentary, the
1:21
podcast, in in the book actually
1:24
all happened by accident, believe it or not.
1:26
I never I never intended on
1:29
setting out to dive into
1:31
the world of politics and political commentary.
1:34
That was that was never something I wanted to do or
1:36
something I pursued. But I
1:39
I ended up building a following on social
1:41
media because people were responding
1:44
to what I was saying and it was resonating
1:46
with people. Particularly around issues
1:48
of race. And, yeah,
1:51
I I ended up having over a hundred
1:53
thousand followers on Twitter. And
1:55
I had a agent approach me. Well, I
1:57
why started well, first, I started getting interviews
2:00
with Fox and and news
2:02
nation and and things like that. And
2:05
And and then an agent
2:07
approached me and asked me if I wanted to write a book.
2:09
And I would I was already writing all
2:11
kinds of stuff about about race and about
2:14
critical race theory and about
2:16
color blindness and post racial society
2:18
and things like that. So I'm
2:20
writing this stuff anyway. Might as well
2:23
put it into a book. So that
2:26
that's the basic genesis of it is
2:28
it it all kind of God kinda
2:30
just opened one door at or another.
2:32
And all of a sudden, I have a book coming
2:34
out on February February seventh.
2:37
Well, hey, that's a great that's a great
2:40
great story. And if
2:42
you what do you think it is? I mean, this is a
2:44
really difficult time for a lot
2:46
of people to just be honest about their
2:48
opinions, especially in critical race there. It's divided
2:50
a lot of communities divided families,
2:53
friendships, and all of that. What made
2:55
you wanna kinda stick your neck out and
2:57
start doing writing on this and and hosting
2:59
the
2:59
podcast? Well, it it was
3:01
it was general annoyance because
3:04
all the commentary, all the popular commentary
3:06
anyway that was coming from the progressive much. Surrounding
3:10
race was just black wrong.
3:12
And and and I would and I would hear
3:14
my friends and and even people in my
3:17
church would buy into
3:19
these narratives. And I would spend so
3:21
much so much time just trying
3:23
to debunk these narratives and try to show them the
3:25
statistics and try to show them how this
3:28
various toxic and how it's infiltrating
3:30
into the schools under DEI
3:32
and anti racism. And like all of
3:34
these things, And so
3:37
it it was something I was doing anyway because it
3:39
was just a frustration at at the narrative
3:41
that was surrounding race And
3:44
I but you're absolutely right. People are
3:47
they're they're they're they're mostly terrified to
3:49
speak out against it even if they do understand
3:51
what critical race there is. And they do
3:53
understand the toxicity around it. A
3:55
lot of times people are afraid to push back.
3:57
And that's not that that's
4:00
not always unwarranted because there is
4:02
there is some risk there or some, you know, people
4:05
still lose their jobs sometimes where for
4:07
not having the right the right opinions and
4:10
they get attacked by mob sometimes if they don't
4:12
have the right opinion. So it's not unwarranted, but
4:14
at the same time, time, there there does
4:16
need to be some courage, and people
4:19
need to stand up for what they believe in. So,
4:21
yeah, this book is just it it's it's become
4:24
something that I I really wanted
4:26
to really really break
4:29
into what critical race theory actually
4:31
is because so people would understand what
4:34
it is and how it rates, what its history
4:36
is, where it comes from, and then
4:38
how it's infiltrating our society and how
4:40
it's impacting, well,
4:42
our society at large, but especially our children.
4:45
And then on top of that, I
4:47
would say the undercurrent and the entire book is
4:49
the idea of color blindness and and pushing
4:51
us toward this post racial society. And
4:54
that's really my main passion in the leads
4:56
that I I want to initiate
4:58
this paradigm shift in our society where
5:01
we start moving toward basically
5:03
doctor King's dream. You know, like, treating
5:06
people by the content of their character and not the color
5:08
of their skin. Treating skin color is no
5:10
more consequential to who we are than
5:12
hair color and eye color. It's part of
5:14
us, but we we don't let it define us.
5:17
So that's what I'm hoping the book
5:19
is able to do. At
5:21
least start a conversation and
5:23
hopefully move into that paradigm
5:25
shift. But, yeah, it's it's
5:27
been a tough it's been a tough battle. So
5:30
I was gonna say, you know, personally, what's
5:32
it been like for you? Obviously, the book is a positive
5:34
consequence of your decision to test
5:36
that when I've gotten started. Saying things that
5:38
a lot of people probably agree with or they would
5:40
if they had more information other
5:43
outside the sort boundaries of what media
5:45
is in popular culture is saying. But
5:47
what has your experience been, like, personally, in
5:50
the last, you know, a couple of years,
5:53
especially things have been very tense. You
5:55
know, just your old community and your own personal
5:57
life. Have you gotten a lot
5:59
of pushback? Has it been sort of a painful
6:01
experience? Or has it also, you
6:03
know, had some good consequences like
6:05
the book come out of it as well. It's
6:08
it's it's been a mixed bag. There's
6:10
obviously been a lot of positive
6:12
things that have come from it.
6:16
But there's been a lot of negative too But
6:18
the fortunate thing is I've done a pretty good
6:21
job at separating the political
6:23
stuff from my personal stuff So
6:25
it hasn't really infiltrated my personal
6:27
life too much.
6:29
And we I I think it
6:31
helps because we live in a very conservative area
6:34
of Southern Ohio. And so
6:36
most people in my community where
6:38
we live, they're they're pretty
6:41
conservative and they're all against
6:44
the CRT stuff, and they they they agree
6:46
with the things that I'm saying. So
6:48
I haven't had a lot of pushback in
6:50
the real world. Much of it comes
6:52
from comes online on
6:55
Twitter and Facebook and, you know, you get your
6:57
your social media lynch
7:00
mobs that that come after you for
7:02
having the wrong opinion. So get a lot of Uncle
7:05
Tom and and things like that.
7:07
So it's but,
7:09
you know, they they it comes with the territory.
7:11
When when you say when you say things that
7:13
are true, particularly
7:16
when it's shining a light on
7:18
the darkness of the of
7:20
the progressive left. And
7:22
then you're going to get pushed back and you're going
7:24
to get a lot of hate coming your
7:26
way. And that's just the nature of the beast.
7:28
Probably from some white Federalist
7:30
too. I would imagine. Oh, oh,
7:32
so that's that's actually a
7:34
great point because one
7:37
of the things I say is that that, like,
7:39
racism, throughout my life. I've
7:41
experienced racism from from time to
7:43
time, but the vast
7:45
majority of racism has come
7:47
from other black people as I was growing
7:49
up. And now, it's the
7:51
vast majority of racism that I experience
7:53
comes from white Liberals, and it's
7:55
not even close. It's not even close
7:57
because they think that they know better and
8:00
they they like, my position is
8:02
not the right position for a black man.
8:04
I I like, I'm portraying my
8:06
community or something, portraying my race
8:09
And so they let me know
8:10
that, and they let me know how disappointed
8:12
they are in me. And
8:15
because they want they want to be my they wanna
8:17
be a savior or whatever, but I I get
8:19
a lot of very racial
8:21
racially charged attacks from white labels
8:23
and that's very frequent. So it's kinda
8:25
interesting. No. That is really interesting.
8:28
I and brings me to what I I wanted to
8:30
unpack a little bit of the title of your book because there's
8:32
there's two really interesting things in it.
8:34
Yeah. Raising victims,
8:36
the pernicious rise of critical race
8:39
theory. So there have been
8:41
a lot of kind of independent black
8:43
thinkers or talk about Daniel
8:45
Patrick Moynihan and and all of
8:47
the people in this space. Paul Ryan
8:49
did work in this area with various
8:54
leaders in the black community. For
8:56
a long time, victimhood has
8:59
always been a target
9:01
of sort of conservative THOUGHT
9:04
AS THE WEALTH CARE STATE GRU, THERE
9:06
HAS BEEN A LOT OF CONSERVATIVE SCHOLERSHIP IN
9:08
THE
9:08
SPACE. YOU HAVE WONDERFUL WRITERS, THOMAS
9:10
SOL, JASON RYLE, WALTER WILLIAMS,
9:13
have
9:13
have talked about victimhood for a really long
9:15
time. You connected here to
9:18
critical race theory. And I actually don't
9:20
see a lot of people connecting that
9:22
old tradition of scholarship with
9:24
CRT. CRT gets taken
9:26
as something that's sort of new for a
9:28
lot of people because they may be they hadn't been to college
9:31
for the last ten years and had it sort
9:32
of dirt on their throat like
9:34
I did. But it's it's existed
9:36
for a long time. It's influenced, you know,
9:38
Liberals' decisions about welfare for a really
9:41
long time. Can you talk to us
9:43
about why it's essential to connect?
9:45
The concept, the philosophy of critical
9:47
race theory to Victorhood?
9:51
Yeah. Sure. Why I think I think the first
9:53
thing you have to do is you have to
9:55
understand what critical race theory actually
9:57
is. And a
9:59
lot of times, the definition of critical
10:01
race there can be nebulous because it's
10:04
a moving target whenever you
10:06
try to define it, the people who adhere
10:08
to it will say, no. No. No. You don't understand you
10:11
you don't even know what critical race there is. And
10:13
they they do that in in order to try to undermine
10:16
you. So they they kinda hide the ball a little bit.
10:18
But if you read the founder's
10:21
documents, if you if you read the
10:23
actual writings of the people who support
10:25
critical race theory, the common
10:28
thread that runs through it is that racism is
10:30
endemic in our society, that it's
10:32
all around us at all times, and that
10:35
is the natural order of the way
10:37
that our country operates. And then
10:39
you can even expand that to western cultures.
10:41
The natural order of the way that western
10:43
culture operates. So that means
10:45
that racism is imbibed in
10:47
the very foundations of our country
10:50
and our institutions and interwoven into
10:52
the very fabric of our society. And
10:54
so all interactions, everything
10:56
your normal everyday life can be
10:58
viewed through the lens of white supremacy and
11:01
racism. And that's how we get things like
11:03
five police officers and and five black
11:05
police officers and Memphis beating up a
11:07
black man is somehow indicative of
11:09
white supremacy. That's why because
11:12
they think that the entire system is
11:15
founded in white supremacy and everything
11:17
that happens, well, everything negative that happens,
11:19
is indicative of that. So
11:22
do people need to understand that concept? Because it
11:24
doesn't always make sense unless you understand
11:26
that sort of Marxist tradition
11:28
that that it comes from. And
11:30
so as far as the data hook goes, that
11:32
critical race theory is very much a
11:35
external locus of control ideology.
11:39
And pro progressivism as a whole
11:41
is very much an external locus of control
11:43
ideology. And what I
11:45
mean by that is that when you have an
11:47
external locus of control, you think
11:49
that everything that happens
11:51
to you or at least the vast majority
11:54
of the things that happen to you are due to
11:56
external circumstances are due to some
11:58
outside force acting
12:00
on you. And in this case, it would be white
12:02
supremacy. Why is the premise acting
12:04
on you and controlling your destiny,
12:07
so to speak? Whereas an internal locus of
12:09
control, you you feel like you
12:11
have the keys to your to your own destiny.
12:13
You can shape your own destiny. And
12:15
if that doesn't mean that you that either
12:18
things can't happen that are out of your control.
12:20
Like, the the person with the internal locus of
12:23
control recognizes that sometimes
12:25
things happen that you can't control,
12:27
but you can't control how
12:29
you respond to it. And that gives you empowerment.
12:32
That's That's empowering. And before
12:34
the American psychological association went,
12:36
whoa, they any psychologist worth
12:38
their salt would have told you that
12:41
the healthiest thing for an individual
12:43
to have is an internal locus of control.
12:45
And that external locus of control leads
12:47
to all kinds of psychological problems and
12:49
mental illnesses and all kinds of
12:53
negative outcomes. And so critical
12:55
race theory is particularly
12:57
when you're in you're infusing that into
12:59
children, is teaching them that
13:01
these external factors, the outside
13:04
system, is controlling them and
13:07
acting on them and causing their negative comes.
13:10
So you get a kid in Baltimore that fells
13:12
his class. It's not because he didn't
13:14
study. It's not because he didn't take notes
13:16
in class. It's not because he didn't care. And
13:18
didn't think or didn't show up or he was absent.
13:20
It's because of white supremacy. It's because
13:23
he was victimized by the history of
13:25
racism and slavery in this country.
13:27
So he's numbers responsible. And
13:29
he doesn't need to be responsible. It's these
13:31
people over here who should be held responsible. So,
13:34
yeah, I mean, I know do
13:36
we do elaborate too much
13:38
for you to for people to
13:40
recognize how detrimental that can lead
13:42
to a person's psyche. I mean,
13:45
you have no you feel like you have no agency,
13:47
you feel like you have no personal responsibility that
13:50
everybody is responsible for the bad things
13:52
that happen to you. So so why even
13:54
try? And that's the kind of things that we
13:56
see. It's it's so it's
13:58
it's toxic.
13:59
A lot of really good points there. And
14:02
you mentioned there's this kind of Marxism
14:04
baked into Critical Race Theory.
14:06
I wanted to ask you to elaborate on
14:09
that point. Where do you see that kind of
14:11
venn diagram between Marxism
14:13
and Critical Race Theory overlapping
14:16
or that's that's a terrible analogy actually
14:18
because one is kind of downstream of the
14:19
other. But -- Sure. -- how important do you
14:21
think
14:22
Marxism is to critical race theory?
14:24
Okay. So so critical race theory comes
14:26
directly from from Marxism. Like, you
14:28
said it's a downstream ideology
14:31
and just building off of it. So
14:34
the Frankfurt school in Frankfurt, Germany
14:36
built something called the critical theories.
14:39
And that was Neil Marxist in
14:41
in its in its origins. And
14:43
they were decidedly openly
14:47
Marxist about. And, you know, they were all about
14:49
reforming Marxism and and making
14:51
it work for for philosophy. Critical
14:54
legal theory came came later on,
14:57
and that was basically critical theory
14:59
applied to law, which Yeah.
15:01
It's again, it's this idea that
15:04
the whole system is involved with
15:06
with oppression and the
15:10
elites use it to to further
15:12
the audit to self perpetuate the
15:14
the oppression. And So they
15:16
also applied to critical legal theory, and then
15:19
critical race theory came from critical
15:21
legal theory. And if
15:24
you read the writings again, if you read
15:26
writings of the founders, they will admit openly
15:29
that they were all Marxist. That
15:31
the where the meeting where
15:33
the the term was coined,
15:35
critical race day, where Kimberly Trenshaw came
15:38
up with the term critical race theory.
15:40
Richard Delgado says, yeah,
15:43
it was a room full of Marxist sitting
15:45
there, talking about racism
15:47
and and critical theory. And
15:49
yeah. So they tell you explicitly that
15:52
they're marxist. So there's that element. But
15:54
if you if you look at if you look at a crack
15:56
particularly. I mean, you're just separating
15:59
your people into a proletariat and bourgeoisie
16:01
into victims and oppressors, and then pinning
16:03
those groups against each other. It's
16:06
operating the
16:09
idea of cultural hegemony, which comes
16:11
from Antonio Gamshi, who
16:14
is an Italian Marxist. And
16:17
it's that idea that the elite in power
16:20
create this status quo in order
16:22
to perpetuate their perpetuate their
16:24
power and basically impress people without their
16:26
knowledge. So it creates this invisible
16:29
system of oppression where it becomes the status
16:31
quo and the normal way that things
16:33
operate. You don't even know that you're oppressed and
16:35
you're basically oppressing yourself. And
16:38
so as the as these ideas
16:40
that that propagate And
16:43
so they have these these antagonistic
16:47
sort of attitudes toward western
16:50
culture, toward the constitution. Toward
16:52
free speech, toward enlightenment,
16:55
rationalism, toward neutral trans neutral
16:58
principles of constitutional law, and
17:00
it it sounds when
17:02
when I say these things, it sounds like
17:04
conspiracy theory. It sounds like I'm
17:06
I'm just, you know, like, high
17:09
purpline high purplizing and just,
17:11
yeah, just augmenting this this this
17:14
argument. But this is straight
17:16
from the source and state, like, if you read
17:18
critical race theory and introduction, they
17:20
say these things explicitly and
17:22
that they're that it all comes down to cultural
17:25
revolution, and that's what they're aiming to do.
17:27
And so it is decidedly Marxist
17:29
and origin, and it's it's Marxism
17:32
in its
17:32
application. The only different the only real
17:34
difference is that race is replacing
17:37
class here. Okay.
17:39
Yeah. That's a such an important point. And
17:41
you mentioned Crenshaw, and Grampsy, and
17:45
I wanna ask you, your book is called The Rise.
17:47
Of critical race theory uses word
17:49
the riser critical race theory. And before
17:51
I think critical race theory had entered
17:53
the mainstream become kind of a household
17:57
household fray is something people
17:59
recognized outside the kind of fringes of academia.
18:02
How do you think CRT influenced
18:06
American culture and American politics
18:08
when the left was sort of more quietly organizing
18:11
around that concept. You know,
18:13
for for years until it became
18:16
more central or more mainstream.
18:18
You know, it's an interesting thing because III
18:21
think it's I I think it's multiple
18:23
things. I think the the race thing, think the
18:25
gender thing is attached to it, and I think the
18:27
sexuality thing is attached to it. I
18:29
think it all goes together. And I think it has
18:31
has to do with
18:34
with cultural capture. And
18:36
you know, they what they've done, it's that and
18:39
one one of the arguments you'll hear is that, well,
18:41
critical race theory is only taught in law school. It's
18:43
not taught in public schools. And that
18:45
kind of gives away their hand because
18:47
what they've done throughout the years
18:50
is they've kind of
18:52
they they've sneakily snap these
18:54
ideas into multiple different
18:56
institutions and
18:58
put people in place where they
19:00
could influence the culture from
19:02
these institutions. And education is the
19:05
biggest one. People think it's not in education,
19:08
but teachers are being trained in the edicts
19:10
of critical race theory. In
19:12
the schools of education all around the country.
19:15
And so it makes no real sense to
19:17
believe that, you know, they're being trained
19:19
in critical race theory in college, but for
19:21
when they graduate and they go into K-twelve
19:24
schools to go teach, they're somehow
19:26
not taking those ideas with them into
19:28
the classroom. So it's
19:30
it's been a very clandestine effort
19:32
over the years, I think, to kinda shift the culture
19:35
and influence the different ways that
19:39
that people are being trained. And and, you know,
19:41
now people look around and it's it's
19:43
almost like a snap thing that's happened overnight.
19:45
Like, oh my gosh. Like, now that mentioned
19:47
earlier, the American psychological association is
19:50
woke. Like, what is happening? The American pediatric
19:52
association is woke. Why
19:55
why are these why are all these hospitals talking
19:57
about critical race theory. Why aren't all these corporations
19:59
incorporating critical race theory now? And,
20:02
like, it it seemed to happen overnight. Like, all these
20:04
things started to shift. And it's because,
20:06
like, all of this training and all of this
20:09
influencing was happening over on
20:11
behind the scenes and on under
20:14
the underneath the public consciousness. And
20:16
by the time the public became aware of it, it
20:18
was almost too late. Tell
20:21
us about the concept of of ethnic
20:23
nosticism that you talk about?
20:26
Yeah. So ethnic nosticism is a term that
20:28
was coined by the
20:31
embodied caution, the
20:33
theologian. And basically,
20:36
what it means is that there's
20:38
this sort of idea that
20:41
black people have lived as esoteric
20:43
existence that only they
20:45
can recognize and
20:48
feel racism, then define
20:50
racism and or oppression
20:52
in general. So a
20:55
white person trying to define what
20:57
racism is or what oppression is
20:59
would be undermined
21:02
by a black person who disagrees with them.
21:05
The black person gets the hierarchy because
21:07
they are the oppressed and they are
21:09
in a special position to define
21:11
and recognize oppression because of
21:13
their quote unquote lived
21:16
experience or their their personal
21:18
truth. And so it's this
21:20
special special card that
21:22
you get in order to
21:26
live this existence. Like, it becomes
21:28
almost, like I said, esoteric
21:30
sort of religious kind of thing where you're
21:33
elevated to this this
21:35
this plane of understanding and
21:38
consciousness that nobody else can
21:40
really understand unless you've
21:42
gone through that experience. As
21:45
a as a black person in America. And
21:48
and it's it's really just this
21:50
idea that you
21:53
know, black people only
21:56
are able to recognize races
21:58
and it controls the narrative so that nobody
22:00
can falsify it.
22:02
Like, then the theory can't be falsified. Like,
22:04
if I if I provide evidence that
22:06
that goes, like, hey. Like, look at these
22:08
statistics that show that that
22:11
white suspects are actually more likely to be
22:13
killed than black suspects. Then all they have to
22:15
do is say that that's not my lived experience.
22:18
And then the game is
22:20
over. And you have nothing. It gives nothing
22:22
else. So Oh, yeah. That's
22:24
I like, that that is such
22:27
a huge problem in
22:29
American politics and culture that everything
22:31
is filtered through the corporate
22:33
media and the corporate media will create narratives
22:35
that are totally divorced from reality
22:37
because they're influenced heavily
22:40
in this incentive structure by people
22:42
who whether they are conscious
22:44
of it or not are influenced by the
22:47
the kind of critical race theory school
22:49
of of thought. The and
22:51
sort of schools of thought that are adjacent to it.
22:54
We saw some of this on display over the course of the
22:56
last week when it came to Tyria Nichols. Wanted
22:58
to ask you, you mentioned a little bit early early night, but
23:00
I wanted to ask you to talk to us a little
23:02
bit about what you've seen over the course of the
23:04
last week as the public has reacted
23:06
to The video released,
23:08
the initial reports of what happened, and
23:11
Tyria Nichols' death, Van Jones
23:13
published an op ed for CNN. You probably
23:15
saw I think it said something like it doesn't
23:18
matter that the officers who beat
23:20
Tyria Nichols to death were black.
23:22
They could still have been influenced by why supremacy
23:24
or acting under the influence of
23:26
of white supremacy. Yeah.
23:29
What's your sort of take on everything that's
23:31
transpired over the course of the last week?
23:33
Well, yeah. It it it gets in time. Well, first
23:35
of all, I'll say that that what happened to Tyria
23:37
Nichols is traffic and off. And and
23:40
and you hope that
23:43
the that the justice system works
23:45
the way that it should and that there is justice
23:47
in that in that situation. I'm
23:50
not gonna speculate further about, you know,
23:52
all the facts because we don't know everything to
23:54
happen. The video was awful,
23:56
clearly. But you
23:58
know, you you hope that the the facts
24:01
come out and and then the the right
24:03
decision is made in court. But Beyond
24:06
that, as far as the reaction, you
24:08
know, it was it was pretty it was pretty predictable what
24:10
was going to happen, particularly
24:13
from the people who who
24:15
push the racial narratives on a regular basis,
24:18
basically their job to push racial narratives.
24:22
And Yeah. They they they came out and
24:24
they said, like, listen, this is we
24:26
know it only involved black people, but it's
24:28
still indicative of white supremacy. And
24:30
it's not the first time that they've done this.
24:33
They did it when black people were
24:35
when there was black suspects who were attacking
24:37
Asian Americans in California. They
24:40
did it when there were black suspects attacking
24:42
Jewish Americans in New York. They
24:45
did it with Kyle Rittenhouse. Like, it's
24:47
Kyle Rittenhouse. He keeps on
24:49
trial for shooting three white people.
24:51
And nothing to do with black people other than
24:53
happen to be ever black lives matter, riot,
24:56
rally, or riot. But
24:58
somehow, that had to do with white supremacy. So
25:01
so this is they they do this constantly. But,
25:04
again, you have to understand how they
25:06
view the world and how they view society
25:09
and it's that the entire system
25:12
is involved with white supremacy.
25:14
And so white supremacy can explain everything
25:17
if if you wanted to. However, you wanted whatever
25:20
you want the explanation to be why supremacy can
25:22
can stand in. One
25:24
one analogy that I use in the book or
25:27
allegory, I should say, came comes from
25:29
Ken Mnuchin, who who was an Australian
25:31
philosopher. And what he talked about was
25:35
is this Saint George, the dragon slayer
25:38
when he goes into retirement. And
25:40
Saint George was this prolific dragon slayer
25:43
who the town loved. He was this big
25:45
hero and, you know, everybody everybody
25:47
loved him and venerated him and he would go
25:49
around slaying dragons. And he would eventually
25:52
slay all the dragons in the land. And
25:54
then finally, he could go retire and rest
25:56
and take it easy. So he goes
25:58
and he he's sitting in his chair, he doesn't have anything
26:00
to do, he starts to have an identity
26:03
crisis, and he doesn't feel like he has
26:05
any purpose or or any reason
26:07
for living, and he doesn't know what to do, he
26:09
doesn't know who he is. But suddenly
26:11
he looks out of the window and miraculously,
26:14
he sees a dragon. So he's all excited.
26:16
He grabs his sword, his shield, runs outside,
26:19
slays the dragon, And
26:21
suddenly, he looks around and there's dragons
26:23
everywhere. There's dragons that there's dragons
26:25
that bark. There's dragons that quack. There
26:28
there's dragons that that even proclaim
26:30
themselves to be villagers. Right?
26:33
And there's there's dragons. And then then he
26:35
eventually seen just swinging his sword
26:37
it thin air and proclaiming it
26:39
to be the spirit as dragon of them all
26:41
or whatever. But it's it's
26:43
such a powerful allegory, I think, because it
26:46
speaks to the motivations of
26:48
a lot of these people who have rooted
26:50
their identities in slaying the
26:52
dragons of racism. And
26:55
So if there aren't any dragons to
26:57
slay, the only thing that
26:59
they can do in order to maintain that identity
27:01
into
27:02
yeah, get the either the
27:04
psychic benefits or the financial benefits
27:07
or or just the the social benefits from
27:09
it. The only thing they can do
27:11
is to create dragons, to fabricate them,
27:13
and see them where they don't exist. And
27:15
that's what happened. That's what's happening. Currently
27:18
with the Thiry Nichols case. That's what happened with
27:20
those other cases. And that's what happens almost
27:22
every time there's a police shooting. George Floyd,
27:24
same thing. There's still Not not
27:27
to this day. To this day, there's not a
27:29
lick of evidence that race had
27:31
anything to do with what happened George Floyd.
27:33
No matter how you feel about it either way,
27:35
there's no evidence that race had anything to do with
27:37
it, but yet we're supposed to believe that
27:40
it was a dragon of racism that
27:42
needed to be slain. And so this
27:44
is the it's the common
27:47
pattern of of of
27:50
of those who adhere to critical race theory.
27:52
To to constantly see racism
27:54
and white supremacy and everything. Mhmm.
27:57
You you write and talk about religion
27:59
a lot. And -- Yes. -- I wanted to
28:01
ask how critical
28:03
race theory has maybe become
28:06
falsely intertwined. Maybe that's
28:09
a way to phrase it. With
28:11
maybe the black church, with liberal
28:14
white protestants, with American kind
28:17
of faith traditions in have
28:22
different institutions, faith institution, faith
28:24
based institutions, wrongfully
28:26
sort of taken up the banner of CRT
28:28
in a detrimental way over the last several
28:31
decades. Howard Bauchner: We have one hundred
28:33
percent. There's there's lot of churches and
28:35
I I don't wanna generalize the church as or
28:38
or
28:38
even, like, certain demographics. But
28:42
there are a lot of churches in this country who
28:44
have taken on
28:47
either either, like, Black Lives
28:49
Matter and Critical Race Theory, Edicks,
28:52
or they've gone all out progressiveness, and
28:55
then they're even hanging rainbow
28:57
flags in their in their church malls. You
29:00
know, it is an interesting interesting
29:03
move for a for a church. But
29:06
as far as the race stuff goes, there are many
29:08
churches that have anti racism sort
29:12
of data drive, they
29:14
they have listing on their websites.
29:18
Anti races and Black Lives Matter, justice
29:21
for George Floyd, you know,
29:23
or sometimes all out critical race theory
29:25
in in how to fight
29:28
back against systemic racism. So
29:30
there are churches around this country who have
29:32
bought into this idea
29:35
that racism is the most pressing
29:37
problem for black individuals
29:40
or or non I should say non white
29:42
individuals in this country. And
29:44
that the country itself is is built
29:46
on a system of oppression. And,
29:48
yeah, there there's even some
29:51
more prominent Christian
29:53
intellectuals, I would say, like
29:55
Jimartisbee, who pushed
29:58
the idea that Christianity itself or
30:00
the or the Christian church itself
30:03
is built on white supremacy and that
30:05
it needs to be grappled with. So
30:07
these ideas having infiltrated the church
30:09
and it's very unfortunate. I I mentioned George
30:11
Floyd earlier. And even
30:13
after that, like, I go to a great church
30:15
and I love my church and there's
30:18
there's wonderful people there. But
30:20
after George Floyd, there
30:23
were some people
30:25
in my church who were just
30:28
beside themselves with anguish
30:30
and you know,
30:33
like, just, like, crying out and
30:35
and asking people to step
30:38
asking with the white members of our church,
30:40
to stand up and help black people
30:42
because black people are being murdered in the streets.
30:45
It's a it was so the
30:47
emotional the
30:50
emotional appeal of of the
30:53
narrative was so powerful that
30:56
and and I had never seen anything like that. From
30:58
from the people in my church. So it was shocking.
31:00
It was very jarring for me. So but
31:02
it it gives insight to how how
31:04
powerful the narrative can be and how susceptible
31:07
people can be to it. There
31:10
doesn't need to be any evidence. There doesn't need to
31:12
be any facts that support it. The
31:14
emotional aspects of it
31:16
are enough. It it it's psychological and
31:19
spiritual warfare, and that's that's how I said
31:21
it at the time. It really gets into people's
31:23
minds and manipulates them and,
31:25
you know, makes them think things that just aren't
31:27
true. And it's it's an incredible thing and
31:29
it's it's very disheartening to
31:32
see that happen in the church. Why don't you know,
31:34
this this hardening to see it happen in
31:36
society, but let them own the
31:37
church. Howard Bauchner: Why
31:40
is critical race theory? I know
31:42
I I agree with you on this question. But if someone,
31:44
you know, maybe on the left or probably somebody in the
31:46
center would be more likely ask you this question,
31:48
why is critical race theory incompatible
31:52
with Christianity.
31:53
How would you respond to that? I
31:56
I would because it creates race as an idol.
31:58
And it lifts race up as being
32:00
the most important thing in a person's
32:03
identity. And it makes the
32:06
most important aspects of a person.
32:09
As far as, like, judging person, who a person
32:11
is and what they're it makes value judgments
32:13
about a person based on their race, based on
32:16
who they are based on their skin color. Right?
32:18
And that is the antithesis of the
32:20
gospel. You know, critical race
32:23
theory itself is and
32:25
I've said this many times critical race theory itself
32:27
is a religion. It's it's it's it
32:29
has it has its
32:32
priests and passed down the holy
32:33
dogma. It has it has its holy texts.
32:35
So the John
32:36
McQuorter yeah. The the John McQuorter
32:39
formulation. Yeah. Right.
32:42
The the, yeah, the the
32:45
the inquisitors who go down the
32:47
heretics and honestly, honestly,
32:49
I mean, it has everything. It it it
32:51
has every aspect of idea.
32:54
I I need to say religion. It has every aspect
32:56
of an extremist religion. It's it's
32:59
very much religious in in its
33:01
application and its ideology. So
33:04
if you're going to now
33:06
as a Christian, I I should say this because
33:08
as a Christian or as a religious individual,
33:12
injustice is something that
33:14
you want to fight against. I mean,
33:16
that so that part was what makes
33:18
people susceptible to it, I think, is
33:20
that they want be compassionate, and they want
33:22
to be empathetic, and they want
33:24
to they want to fight against
33:27
injustice, and they fight against real racism,
33:29
and those are admirable things. But
33:32
they don't recognize that
33:34
the religion of CRT goes much,
33:36
much deeper than simply fighting
33:39
against racism. But fighting against racism
33:41
is a smokescreen to
33:44
impose, you know, to basically institute
33:46
cultural revolution is the only
33:49
the logical endpoint of critical race there,
33:51
if you believe that the entire system
33:54
if the the entirety of our foundation
33:56
of our country is imbibed with white supremacy
33:59
and intertwined to the point where
34:02
it's everywhere at all times.
34:04
If you truly believe that, then
34:06
the logical solution is
34:08
to tear everything down and start over.
34:11
It's very malice in its application
34:13
on Again,
34:15
we we come back to communism, Marxism.
34:19
But now in in communist China,
34:23
during the Chinese culture revolution
34:26
said that in order to build a
34:28
new social system on the site of the own,
34:30
the old site must be swept
34:32
clean. And that's the kind of ideology that
34:34
critical race theory carries with it.
34:37
So if you're going
34:39
to embrace Christianity and
34:41
the gospel, you cannot support
34:44
the gods of critical race theory. You
34:46
have to choose which God you're going to serve.
34:49
There's been it it has seemed like
34:51
there there has been a a
34:53
flurry of interest in
34:56
thinkers like yourself. You
34:58
know, Kanye West had a brief moment
35:00
before everything went off the rails -- Yeah.
35:02
-- where he seemed to have,
35:04
like, really made inroads and
35:06
kinda interesting, traditionalistic interpretations
35:09
of of Christianity are with those
35:11
interpretations, and then kind
35:13
of extending them into politics as
35:15
well. We start trying to make a slight
35:18
dent in the black vote.
35:20
Just wanted to ask Leonidas, as you're you've
35:22
taken up this cause more publicly,
35:26
do you find that it is empowering
35:28
for people when you explain
35:31
sort of the roots of all of this? And
35:33
do you think, you know, there there's any
35:35
kind of sea change on the horizon? Are
35:37
things sort of opening up as the
35:40
the old guard and media loses its power
35:42
and and new independent with pendant point voices
35:44
like yourself are able to have podcasts
35:47
and
35:47
substacks. Is something changing? I
35:50
think so. Absolutely. I I think
35:53
you're anytime you you shine a light
35:55
on what's going on, the
35:58
the needle moves a little bit. As
36:00
the only way this ideology is success school
36:03
is if people don't recognize what's actually
36:05
happening because it rerelies
36:07
so much from manipulation. And
36:10
deception. Though, like, in
36:13
Black Lives Matter is a great example of that.
36:15
There's, you know, one thing I
36:17
talked about in the book is how they they
36:19
manipulate language in order to get people
36:21
people to support what they're
36:23
doing. And in order to slide in this more nefarious
36:26
ideology, And Black
36:28
Lives Matter is a good good example of that
36:30
because who is going to disagree with the phrase
36:32
Black Lives Matter. You know, nobody's
36:34
going to disagree with that. So
36:37
everybody's gonna feel like they need to support
36:39
it. And I hate
36:41
hate to keep talking about George Floyd, but you
36:43
know, right after that happened, I
36:46
so many people were bullied
36:48
essentially into posting black squares on
36:50
their
36:50
Instagram. I don't know if you remember that. Oh, yeah.
36:52
But like so but
36:55
people felt like they had to do that
36:58
or else they would be labeled
37:00
as a racist they will be labeled as someone
37:02
who thinks that black lives don't matter or
37:05
whatever. So their
37:07
their sense of compassion and their sense
37:09
of empathy is being manipulated. And the only
37:11
way the ideology is going to work is if
37:13
people are not wise to what's going
37:15
on behind the scenes, the more nefarious
37:18
aspects of Black Lives Matter, which is
37:20
essentially the critical race theory elements
37:22
and, you know, the anti nuclear family
37:25
and and of course, the Marxism. But,
37:29
you know, so when people become aware of that, and then,
37:31
of course, there's strength in numbers. So the more people that
37:33
are speaking out about it, the more people that are
37:35
being bold about standing up,
37:37
and we saw that at school board meetings all over
37:39
the country, the more people that stood up
37:41
and yelled at, the school board members, the
37:43
more people that came to the mic afterward. It
37:46
takes that one brain. And, you know, it
37:48
reminds me of a video There
37:50
was AII think it was a fair, and
37:53
there was a ride that was starting to collapse.
37:56
And it was, like, it wasn't a huge ride,
37:58
but it was a it would I mean, it would hurt the people
38:00
on it. And well and then,
38:02
you know, everybody was kinda just standing around and watching
38:04
this ride start to tip over. And
38:06
one guy ran up and
38:09
held it, you know, or tried to hold it.
38:11
And then after he did that, then
38:13
all of a sudden, there's, like, five six
38:15
and seven, and then there's a whole
38:17
crowd of people coming up and holding it. But
38:19
it took that one guy stepping out
38:21
before anybody did anything. Before
38:23
anybody had the courage to to do it.
38:25
And sometimes that's what it takes. It it just it
38:28
it takes more and more people to stand up and
38:30
say, no. We're not gonna go along with this.
38:32
And and then more and
38:34
more people step
38:35
up. And one of the ways I win
38:37
and I'm sorry. I don't wanna be too long winded
38:39
here, but
38:42
one of the ways that I end the book is that
38:45
I I talk about, you know, moving into a post
38:47
racial society and and and then
38:49
place where we are truly color blind.
38:52
And by the way, that doesn't mean that we don't see
38:54
color. It just means that, you know, is Dr.
38:57
King's dream that we treat color
38:59
as inconsequential to a person's
39:01
identity. But in order to
39:03
move to that society, it could take
39:05
generations to do that. It it may not
39:07
happen in this generation. It may be
39:10
AAA slow process. But
39:13
it's the age old problem that in
39:15
a society grows great when old men
39:18
plant trees under whose shade
39:20
they know they may never sit. So
39:23
I hope we plant the trees and we start
39:25
that paradigm shift and continue
39:27
to move
39:29
move forward toward the toward the right
39:31
way to eradicate racism for good?
39:33
The hook is called raising victims, the
39:35
pernicious rise of critical race theory.
39:38
It's out on February seventh Leonidas
39:40
Johnson is its author. He has podcast
39:43
called informed descent and a subset
39:45
called informed descent as well.
39:47
Thank
39:47
you, Leonidas so much for joining us today.
39:49
Thank you, Emily. Really appreciate you. Of
39:52
course, you have been listening to another edition
39:54
of the Federalist Radio Hour. I'm Emily
39:56
Jucinski, culture editor here at The Federalist.
39:58
We'll be back soon with more. Until then
40:00
be lovers of freedom and anxious
40:02
for the frame.
40:21
New customers download the DraftKings sportsbook
40:24
app and use code swing to get two
40:26
hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly
40:28
when you place a five dollar bet on anything.
40:31
That's code swing, only at DraftKings
40:33
sportsbook, gambling problem called one
40:35
eight hundred gambler, twenty one and over and physically
40:37
present in Ohio, valid one offer per first
40:40
depositors who have not already redeemed two hundred
40:42
dollars and free bets via prelaunch offer. Minimum
40:44
five dollar deposit in wager. Two hundred dollars
40:46
issued as bonus bets eligibility restrictions
40:48
apply. See DKNG dot co slash
40:50
oh for terms. New customers, download
40:53
the draft case sportsbook app and use code
40:55
swing to get two hundred dollars in bonus
40:57
bets instantly when you place a five dollar
40:59
bet on anything. That's code swing.
41:02
Only a draft king sports blog, gambling
41:04
problem called one eight hundred
41:06
gambler, twenty one and over, and physically present in
41:08
Ohio,
41:08
valid one offer per first time depositors who
41:10
have not already redeemed two hundred dollars in free
41:12
bets via prelaunch offer. Minimum five dollar
41:14
deposit in wage here. Two hundred dollars issued as
41:17
bonus bets, eligibility restrictions apply.
41:19
CDKNG dot co slash o h
41:21
per terms,
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More