Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Black voices are making an impact
0:03
this month and beyond. Keep listening
0:05
to discover one of our favorite
0:06
shows, courtesy of Acast recommends.
0:09
What's going on everybody? This is Tristan McWiles.
0:12
One third of guys next door. And
0:14
if you are hearing my voice, maybe
0:17
you should be listening to guys next door.
0:19
If you ever wanted to get into the mindset
0:21
of the young black millennial man,
0:24
all of the things that we go through love
0:26
sex, relationships, financials,
0:31
technology, mental
0:34
health and everything that lies in between
0:37
this show is for you.
0:39
Now, I don't know what you guys are doing. I know you
0:41
guys are probably listening to a really really nice
0:43
podcast, but make sure you guys go subscribe
0:46
right now to guys next door, and
0:48
we'll see you guys in the neighborhood.
0:50
Peace. Acast
0:52
helps creators launch grow
0:54
and monetize their podcast everywhere,
0:57
acast dot com.
1:02
Hi. I'm Will Summer, and welcome to The Daily
1:04
Beast Fever Dreams. I'm a politics reporter
1:06
at Daily Beast. My book on QAnon,
1:08
trust the plan, the rise of QAnon and the conspiracy
1:11
that unhinged America will be available in February
1:13
and is available for a preorder
1:14
now. And I'm Kelly Weil. I am also
1:17
a reporter at The Daily Beast, and I'm the author
1:19
of the book off the
1:20
edge. Flat Earthers, conspiracy culture,
1:22
and why people will believe anything. On
1:25
this podcast, we're gonna take you on plunges into
1:27
the sometimes hilarious, sometimes scary fanatics,
1:29
infecting the way that millions of Americans view the
1:31
world. And how they vote. Even in the
1:33
aftermath of the Trump administration, the
1:35
energy of these conspiracy theorists, gifters,
1:38
and influencers is still pushing our
1:40
mainstream political landscape closer
1:42
and closer to a breaking point.
1:44
Alright. Welcome back to Fever Dreams.
1:46
I'm Will Summer joined as always by Kelly.
1:49
Kelly, today we have a very special milestone
1:52
to mark.
1:53
Yeah. It is our hundredth birthday,
1:55
so to speak, our hundredth podcast birthday.
1:58
We made it. Woo. Yeah.
2:02
Honestly, this is really wild. I think it's
2:04
rare for podcast to hit this, shout
2:06
out to Heohui, sell the
2:08
names, when getting us this
2:10
far and it's been a wild
2:12
ride. Yeah. It's been quite a journey.
2:14
Willard Scott is gonna be putting our name up on the
2:16
Today Show, podcast fan. Obviously,
2:19
swim, producer Jesse, Long gone,
2:21
Phoebe's editor, no Attachman for
2:23
bullying me into doing this. And most importantly,
2:25
of all the listeners, it's very cool hear from
2:27
people who enjoy the podcast and who tweet
2:29
topics for us to discuss and drive pretty
2:31
good ideas. They are pretty. So just briefly
2:33
up top, we wanted to say thanks everyone because
2:35
Applebee suggests INFORMS US THAT ONLY one
2:37
percent OF PODCAST MAKE IT THIS
2:39
FAR, SO WE DID IT.
2:40
WE'RE NOT THE ninety nine percent ANYMORE. WE ARE
2:42
NOW YEAR NO LONGER POPULIST OVERLORDS.
2:44
We did it. We did a podcast rich
2:46
boys here. Okay.
2:49
Well, hundreds podcast, not the only thing we're
2:51
celebrating. We are one week out from
2:53
the launch of your
2:54
book. How are you feeling? Yes. I'm feeling
2:56
good. Trust the plan. Coming February
2:58
twenty first, it's available for preorder now.
3:00
What better to celebrate the hundredth episode of Fever
3:02
dreams, then by buying my book.
3:04
Buy a hundred copies. A hundredth episode,
3:06
hundred copies. Nice round
3:09
number. Look. If you're sitting here, you're like,
3:11
I like Fever Dreams, but am I gonna like Will's
3:13
book? Trust the plan. Q1 on the conspiracy
3:15
theory arranged America or unhinged America? Well,
3:17
look, book list gave it a starred review. I think we should
3:19
have some more positive reviews coming soon. Some
3:21
excerpts are gonna start coming out ideally and relatively
3:24
soon after you listen to this Pod. So check them out,
3:26
and I'll be posting about it on Twitter. I
3:28
would also like to plug. I'll be March third,
3:30
that weekend. I'll be at the Tucson literary
3:32
festival, paling around if you're in the
3:34
southwest, come through. Maybe we'll look at some Jack
3:36
Die together. I've never been out there, so I'm looking forward
3:39
to it. Phoenix plays a large role in the book, but
3:41
I've not been a Tucson before. Overall, I think
3:43
I'm very excited. And Kelly, of course, you have a
3:45
book dropping as well.
3:46
Yeah. The paper back of my book off the edge
3:48
coming out actually, same day as yours. I'm excited
3:50
it. If you haven't picked up hardcover above the
3:51
edge, now is your chance to get it little bit cheaper.
3:54
I love it. I love it. We gotta get a package deal going,
3:56
a BOGO. So overall, lots of book news. So
3:58
the news news,
4:00
Kelly, what's going on in Congress? Okay.
4:02
So George Santos media
4:04
darling has had all our attention with his very
4:06
colorful and arguably completely false
4:08
resume. But while we were paying attention
4:11
to him, another, maybe up and coming
4:13
fabulous seems to have slipped under the radar.
4:15
I'm talking about Anna Polly and Aluna. She's
4:17
a newly elected representative from Florida
4:19
and some elements of her
4:21
backstory aren't making sense. There was
4:23
a really good Washington Post story the other day.
4:26
It dove into her kind of evolving
4:28
claims about her backstory, including claims
4:31
where she's described herself as Jewish,
4:33
sort of like George Santos, but then had to clarify
4:35
that it's more Jewish She
4:38
says that she was raised by a
4:40
Christian father who was part of the
4:42
messianic Jewish movement. Now
4:44
for folks who don't know this this is not
4:47
a Jewish movement at all. These folks
4:49
are Christians who are really bent on converting
4:51
Jews. And some of her family say even
4:53
that's dubious, her dad's a Catholic. Is
4:56
it just a girl down here? I mean, you're messy attitude
4:58
to your thing. But it is a little
5:00
odd. Sort of like with Eliza Blue who we discussed
5:03
last week, I think. This is someone who is seems to
5:05
be sort of deliberately vague about their background
5:07
and enough that, like, it's kinda hard to catch them
5:09
particularly, like, saying, like, well, you said
5:11
this and this whatever, but there's a lot of, like, going
5:14
on here. And so, I think the implication is
5:16
that her father was Catholic but
5:19
then became a messy anecdote, which is, like,
5:21
truly the craziest stuff to me. Typically,
5:23
I think these are Jewish people who should probably
5:25
just convert to Christianity and they sort
5:27
of split the difference. But the idea of, like, specifically
5:30
becoming a messianic Jew, I think, recalls lot
5:32
of this, like, appropriation of, like, the so
5:34
far and all this stuff these various Christian
5:36
sects get into. Because I think you were leading up to
5:38
kind of the big bombshell about the old Jewish
5:41
backed
5:41
story. Yeah. The hammer drop here is
5:43
that her grandfather appears to have
5:45
fought in the army for Nazi
5:47
Germany. Now listen, I
5:49
think they had a draft but I
5:51
tweeted this out. You know it's a rough way. You're kind
5:53
of skimming a profile. You're kind of a critical profile,
5:55
and it's like,
5:56
alright. Time to drag out the picture of her grandpa
5:58
in the nights beautiful.
6:00
Yeah. When you see that CPA tone picture
6:02
of an ancestor, you know something bad is about
6:04
to come. Yeah. There's that. I mean, there's
6:06
also the thing with her is. Right? So she has
6:08
this background, and there are kinda these questions
6:11
about her. Her ethnic background, obviously, you mentioned
6:13
the Jewish thing. Her name for a while was
6:15
Meyer Hoffer, and then she adopted
6:17
Luna as her name. Obviously, she's in
6:19
Florida. And you know who's weirdly
6:21
like the what did they say? The eight or nine
6:23
most hated words of the English language. Roger
6:25
Stone was right. You know what I mean? Corporate.
6:28
But, like because Roger Stone has been on this
6:30
Annapolis backstory case
6:32
for years and years because he had another
6:34
favorite candidate in this congressional district.
6:37
And so people like Roger Stone and sort
6:39
of his minions have been trying to convince people
6:41
like me at the Daily Beast. To run these
6:43
these, like, oh, Anna Pulena. She claims to have been
6:45
a waitress at a strip club, but, like, they would darkly
6:47
imply What else was going on there? Or they
6:49
she had changed her name. So this has been
6:51
kind of a topic on the right for a while. I think posed does
6:54
a good job of nailing down a lot of this stuff and really,
6:56
really reaching back and going beyond this conjecture.
6:58
There's also this origin story that
7:00
I think a lot of conservatives
7:03
have sort of an origin
7:04
story. These politicians are like, I used
7:06
to be a liberal, but x happened to me. Tell me
7:08
about this, Kelly. Yeah. So there's a saying, like,
7:10
oh, liberal is just a conservative who hasn't been
7:12
mugged yet. Well, she claims that her
7:15
conservative turn came during
7:17
this really frightening nighttime home
7:19
invasion. Her life was at risk. And
7:21
the post talked to her roommates at the time said,
7:24
Nah, that never happened. Someone did break into
7:26
their house during the day, but no one was home, no
7:28
one was at risk. I'm glad you brought up
7:30
the Elijah Blue story from last week because
7:32
this is another case where there's
7:34
a nugget of something there, something bad
7:37
did happen. But there's just been all
7:39
this evolution of the story for what
7:41
sounds like years and
7:42
years. And it's at this point just not really
7:44
lining up with the police wreck card. Right.
7:46
So she claims this is sort of the moment that she got
7:48
into the second amendment, which is then sort
7:50
of how she became a a right wing pundit
7:52
because she was tweeting about second amendment that
7:55
she got picked up by Charlie Kirk, who kinda
7:57
made her a star. So basically, you kinda have to read the
7:59
poster. gets into the nitty gritty here, but essentially
8:01
this idea that there was this home invasion her
8:03
roommate at the time claims that in
8:05
fact that this was a burglary, no one
8:07
was home. There's these various accounts. I mean,
8:09
the police report backs up the roommate's claim
8:11
Anna Pulena has done, I
8:13
would say, a pretty effective job in
8:16
the aftermath of this story coming out, putting
8:18
up enough sort of dirt on
8:20
the post story that I think certainly people on the
8:22
right are not going to treat her like George Santos.
8:24
Post had to make a couple minor corrections. For
8:26
example, there was an issue with her voter registration
8:28
where they claimed she'd registered, I believe, is a Democrat.
8:31
But in fact, this state has nonpartisan voter
8:33
registration. It's a whole thing. I mean, at the core, I think
8:35
there's a lot of interesting stuff in the post story.
8:37
But think Aplina has done a really kind
8:39
of done a full court press here pushing back on it.
8:41
Yeah.
8:42
Absolutely. I mean, on the right, you just need to throw up
8:44
enough dirt to kind of skerer, Target,
8:46
and she's done enough of
8:47
that. George Santos just is not savvy enough.
8:50
So that's the difference between the two of them.
8:52
There's too much. I mean, it's he's like, oh, no.
8:54
Here's a tech from a dog that I
8:56
did get surgery
8:57
for. He can't do that. Alright.
9:00
Will speaking of other in prepping journalism,
9:03
you have done some digging on problems
9:06
at the Vaunted Project Vera to
9:08
us. Alright. This is the big enchilada of
9:10
this week's episode. Excited about this. Okay.
9:13
So last week, as we sat down to record
9:15
the podcast, I was getting hearing rumbles
9:17
that James O'Keefe pranks or prints of right
9:19
wing media was in trouble. Now folks may remember
9:21
him from his decade plus of antics,
9:24
and people would say, dirty tricks, as
9:26
critics would say. Dressing like a pimp,
9:28
taking down acorn, all these undercover stings.
9:30
So but I would say over the past,
9:33
I don't know, two years or so, there have been a lot of
9:35
signs of cracking at Project Veritas
9:37
is nonprofit. I see nonprofit. I mean, they're
9:39
not running a soup kitchen. Right? I mean, these are the people
9:42
who are this is how he runs his undercover
9:44
Yeah.
9:44
This
9:44
is A501C3 for parking outside. Someone's
9:47
house with a long distance camera. Exactly.
9:49
Exactly. Right. I mean, this is the group that a few
9:51
weeks ago, ambushed New York Times reporter, and
9:53
I think pretty solidly got got owned by
9:55
the reporter. I mean, this is not what we would think of typically
9:58
his charity work. There have been some issues. And so the
10:00
lead up to what was go what sort
10:02
of the this all culminated last week.
10:04
But they did layoffs in December, roughly,
10:07
I think, ten percent of the staff. There's this
10:09
FBI investigation. I mean, I'm I'm saying, like, issues.
10:11
It's kinda like maybe the biggest issues you can have. The
10:13
FBI rated James O'Kire's department as
10:15
well as the departments of some of his other associates
10:18
over this alleged theft of Ashley Biden's
10:20
diary, which was sold to Project
10:22
Veritas and then leaked to
10:24
another conservative outlet after they
10:26
apparently refused to do anything with it. And so
10:29
two people who were involved in the sale have
10:31
pleaded guilty, so there's this ongoing FBI investigation.
10:33
The I sort of think they haven't
10:35
been getting a lot of big scores.
10:38
I mean, I think in January, they
10:40
released this video, this Pfizer executive. Who's
10:43
construed in the video as saying that Pfizer was making
10:45
viruses more deadly. That was a huge
10:47
hit on the right. Before that, they were kind of thin on
10:49
stuff. And other thing that's gonna become a recurrent
10:51
theme here in this segment is James O'Keefe's
10:53
obsession with musical
10:54
theater. Now, this is he was a musical theater guy in
10:56
high school. And I think this is sort of the Rosetta Stone
10:58
to under
10:59
You can always tell. Well, once you learn that,
11:01
you go, OKeefe. Because think
11:03
of his passion for costumes and characters.
11:05
I
11:05
mean, someone was saying to me, oh, Will, you're punching
11:07
down a theater kid.
11:08
Listen. If if theater kid start to make six
11:10
figures or more, then I think I can punch up
11:12
at them. This idea that all these high
11:15
school theater kids are like Will said, what?
11:17
Well, it shows off guys. So
11:20
think about the characters, he loves flare. But I mean,
11:22
really over the past few years, he's gotten really specifically
11:24
into doing musical theater through Project
11:26
Veritas. So they did this show
11:28
called the Project Veritas experience where
11:30
you would go and James O'Keefe would do all
11:33
these musical numbers. So they did, like,
11:35
to Prince's song controversy, they did
11:37
Olegard Kiki. And so you'll be like, ah,
11:39
you, Dem or GOP. And
11:42
James O'Keefe is working like a bulletproof vest that
11:44
says press and he's doing kinda like spins and stuff
11:47
and he's got all these backup dancers. And I guess
11:49
I had just been so like a nerd to this that I had
11:51
just seen this so many times that I was like, oh yeah,
11:53
sure. It's the nonprofit that does musical numbers.
11:55
This came out this week. I remember goes, what? This looks
11:57
weird. And I guess it does. But wrapping up the musical
11:59
theater thing, he did the performance of Oklahoma that
12:01
was served with a canceled director
12:03
famous for his sort of outlandish sets,
12:06
but project Veritas spent twenty thousand
12:08
dollars basically relocating staff so
12:10
that he could do this they had to admit that it was
12:12
improper improper use their
12:13
money. So there's all this stuff going on project Veritas.
12:16
So Kelly, what happened last week? Okay. So this like
12:18
a dinner theater running out of a charity
12:21
news site basically. And those think
12:23
would be normally workplace issues enough.
12:25
I don't think I'd want to work someplace that can accepted
12:27
me into a performance of Oklahoma, but it sounds
12:29
like something hit a breaking
12:31
point. Last week, what happened there?
12:33
Yeah. So two weeks ago, something's going down
12:35
at Project Veritas. And I think as we relate
12:38
this story and what think the causes of this might
12:40
be, I think it's worth considering that I think there's still
12:42
something we aren't seeing. But basically, James O'Keefe
12:44
fired two executives. Who it
12:47
seems were sort of either somehow
12:49
got cross wise with him. And so he fired them. This
12:51
was seen as by the board
12:53
as like James was really running a
12:55
mock. And so last week, the board met
12:57
and as they met roughly a third of Project
12:59
Veritas's employees delivered a
13:01
memo to them complaining about James
13:03
O'Keefe's managerial style. Now,
13:06
we've seen some evidence of this in the past. There's
13:08
a lawsuit from a former employee claiming
13:10
that James O'Keefe pulled up porn on his computer
13:12
at work that this was like a really sexually charged
13:14
and racist workplace. Someone had drug overdose
13:17
that the apartment. It alleges, I gotta say here
13:19
Project Veradoc denies all this. But so this stuff kinda
13:21
leaked out in the past, but this memo, which we have
13:23
started out on the Daily Beast, I think really
13:25
gets into this. And these are people who I think
13:28
are true believers, I think it's fair to say. Who
13:30
are saying, like, look. James is really alienating
13:32
all our donors they claim that he's saying everyone
13:34
when you meet him, he's like, look, we need a five or six
13:36
figure check from you. He's really bad during
13:38
these donors, that he left one donor's wife
13:41
near tears because I guess he was rude to her. But I
13:43
guess more importantly, that he's probably treats
13:45
staff really poorly. I mean, I would say first
13:47
of all, the various stories I hear about right
13:49
wing media bosses do not suggest
13:51
that it is always a great place to work. But
13:53
I think the idea that these people who probably
13:56
often are like, oh, I hate snowflakes. That
13:58
they're resorting to some sort of collected
14:00
action, suggests to me that this is really
14:02
extreme situation. They say James subjects
14:04
people to, quote, public crucifixions. If
14:07
he doesn't like what they say. I
14:09
mean, he really is in this memo.
14:11
He's portrayed as this really horrible boss.
14:14
At one point, they had this civil trial
14:16
last year. And he allegedly was he was really angry
14:18
about something because he was hungry. And he was so hungry.
14:21
I will say, this anecdote doesn't really get into details.
14:24
They claim he took a sandwich from
14:26
an eight month pregnant woman. I
14:28
mean, you know, I will say
14:30
James bookkeeping's defenders have since dressed
14:32
this up as like, oh, yeah. So
14:34
what? So we took a sandwich.
14:36
Listen, we don't do handouts here if
14:38
that pregnant woman wants to say on what she needs
14:40
to fight for it. Exactly. Exactly.
14:43
OKeefe. So this memo is delivered.
14:45
The board reinstates these executives.
14:47
James is put on paid leave. I'm kind
14:49
of being specific here, but it's a little unclear.
14:52
This memo goes out where it says, okay, everyone.
14:54
This guy's back and this guy's back. And James
14:56
is on some well deserved vacation. So
14:59
it's a little unclear how how much arm twisting
15:02
was involved to get him to go on vacation. But then
15:04
New York Magazine first reports this, then we report
15:06
more on the memo on Tuesday, I believe.
15:09
And so this sets off a firestorm
15:11
on the right. Keep in mind James O'Keefe himself is
15:13
being, like, totally quiet during all this. But all of
15:15
the kind of people you would
15:17
expect, Benny Johnson and Jack
15:19
so big. I think Orca may be weighed in. I mean,
15:21
really basically every right wing punted
15:23
out there, gets out Lara Logan, and
15:26
they say, Project Veritas is James
15:28
O'Keefe. They can't try to get rid of this guy.
15:30
And I would tend to agree with
15:32
them that Project Veritas doesn't really exist
15:34
without James O'Keefe. But and that makes me think that there's
15:36
something else going on here because this board these
15:39
are not George Soros appointees. Right? I mean,
15:41
these are right wingers themselves. This
15:43
board includes a guy named Matt Teerman. Who
15:45
is a sort of longtime OKeefe
15:48
acolyte slash Bolsonaro fan. These
15:51
are pretty dyed in the world right wingers. And so that
15:53
they had to step in here suggest me that, something
15:55
pretty serious was going on, probably above
15:57
the sandwich issue. And so it's all
15:59
these people like, oh, we hate Project Veritas
16:01
now, whatever. Then on Friday, there was a board
16:03
meeting that sort of doesn't seem to have resolved anything.
16:06
As far as I can tell from my sources, it keeps so
16:08
kind of up in the air, preferred viruses and chaos,
16:11
it's a very confusing
16:12
situation. Kelly, what do you make of all this? I mean,
16:14
there's a lot of parallels here to Infowars.
16:16
Right? We know there's a ton of descent inside
16:18
Infowars. People are leaking videos of Alex
16:21
Jones walking around and drinking, but it's
16:23
really hard to separate that brand name
16:25
from its leader. It's hard to separate
16:27
in force from Alex Jones, the project barrettettes
16:30
from James O'Keefe. And I think
16:32
they are probably right to degree that remove
16:34
James O'Keefe from this media outlet,
16:37
kind of it takes away its figure head.
16:39
Right? But I think that also speaks to
16:41
the lack of substantive journalism
16:44
going on there. If it can't survive without
16:46
its mascot, well, I'm not really sure
16:48
what exactly they were doing right. So
16:51
I think for them to even mull, something
16:53
like putting this guy on paid leave. They know
16:55
it looks bad. That does speak
16:57
to some pretty significant issues
16:59
under the surface there. And I'm I'm really curious to
17:01
see comes out because these folks do
17:03
have a tendency to leak on each
17:05
other. Yeah. So this is what we're entering
17:07
what I call the cool zone. Right? Because
17:11
We should be approaching a point where the board,
17:13
if I'm them, because this board now is being painted
17:15
as all these liberal shells. If I'm the board,
17:18
I start leaking on O'Keefe to
17:21
say, hey, guys. No. Actually, here's
17:23
why we did this. It's not that we're all liberals.
17:25
It's that, like, we had no choice. So far that
17:27
hasn't really happened, at least in
17:29
terms of there hasn't been, like, any secretly
17:31
recorded audio. The other thing to keep in mind here,
17:33
right, is that all these people live with our
17:35
experts at secretly recording audio and video.
17:37
And so think that's kind of the wildcard here.
17:39
A couple more things on this. So a lot
17:42
of the pro O'Keefe side
17:44
is being laundered through the founder
17:47
of the website Old Row, which
17:49
people may be familiar with. It's sort of like a
17:51
college themed martial sports. It's like,
17:53
here's the hottest girls of Tuscaloosa. And
17:55
so for some reason, this guy's linked up with O'Keefe.
17:57
And he has been putting out this narrative
18:00
that the board all this kind of supposed inside stuff
18:02
on the board. But he's now been championing
18:04
some of Project Veritas's donors sent a cease
18:06
and desist to the board. And they said, If you
18:08
don't let James OKeefe do whatever you want, you
18:10
are in violation of nonprofit law. Now, I'm
18:12
not a lawyer, but I don't think the point of boards,
18:14
it's like you are required to let
18:16
him do musicals. And whatever he wants.
18:18
You don't interfere at all. This letter has become
18:21
like a big oh, we're so excited about this thing
18:23
on the right. The final thing I would say is that there's
18:25
an interesting run to Santa's angle, which
18:27
is we're starting to see separate
18:29
from this. We're starting to see some
18:31
more mega figures, particularly this was around
18:34
the RNC chairman. Right? Starting to see more of
18:36
them really sort of specifically say, like, I am with
18:38
DeSantis. I am done with Trump. And a lot of
18:40
these people are based in Florida, and a lot of them
18:42
are people who coincidentally or not
18:44
have been hosted at the governor's mansion.
18:47
Our colleague Jake Lahut at the Daily Beast had story
18:49
about Ron DeSantis recruiting some of these influencers. But
18:51
basically, there are people like John Cardillo who is
18:53
currently under phasing lawsuit over an arms
18:55
deal that went south in Ukraine, these various
18:58
guys. And so and and they're sort of varying degrees
19:00
of DeSantis devote. But what we're seeing
19:02
is the the other side, the real MAGA Trump
19:04
people, are trying to put DeSantis in the jackpot
19:07
here. And so they're seeing a cause that is very
19:09
unpopular on the right, which is to say getting
19:11
rid of James O'Keefe. And they're saying, well,
19:13
Rhonda Santis' people are behind this. And
19:15
it's kinda some tortured logic, but they have,
19:17
like, some pictures of someone like Matt Tirman,
19:19
this board member, or John Cardillo,
19:22
another board member or whatever, and they're saying, the DeSantis
19:24
people are just trying to get around to James O'Keefe
19:26
and loot the treasury. I mean, it these
19:28
stories don't make any sense, but they are
19:30
getting some traction And and I think they're,
19:32
like, weirdly I don't know if they could really matter
19:34
anyway, but, like, we're sort of seeing this as a first flash
19:36
point in an attempt to really slime DeSantis.
19:39
Absolutely. I think the only solution is they get
19:41
together and solve this for the power of dance.
19:44
I'd have to hand it over to Jay and thinking about
19:46
the advance. Foliage there. So this is certainly
19:48
something we'll be watching. Like I said, I think
19:50
there's a lot more to come and it's very
19:52
bizarre to see really one of the rights most important.
19:54
It's weird to call not really per se media outlet,
19:56
but it's sort of really one of the right one media's biggest,
19:58
like institutions, really just sort of tearing
20:00
itself apart over
20:01
those. Right. I mean, I think fundamentally, a lot of these
20:03
people are just bad bosses. Right? They rise to the top,
20:06
not because they're good managers or savvy
20:08
media operatives. But because they're
20:10
a little bit weird, a little bit willing to do
20:12
kind of mean things that most folks won't.
20:14
And after a certain point, there's diminishing returns.
20:17
And, yeah, you start alienating people when you
20:19
steal a pregnant pregnant woman sandwich allegedly.
20:21
And so it's not really a surprise that
20:23
this does seem to continually happen
20:26
to the James OKeefe and the Alex
20:28
Joneses of the world.
20:29
OKeefe. So Kelly, we have obviously,
20:31
we're talking about Donald Trump and DeSantis, but we
20:33
have a couple more people who might be competing for the Republican
20:36
nomination who's thrown their hat in the ring.
20:38
Alright. So we have the next slate of
20:40
also rands are starting to come out.
20:42
We have Nikki Haley. She's a former
20:45
UN ambassador under Trump. She announced
20:47
today, Tuesday, that she is officially running
20:50
for president. We're also seeing rumblings
20:52
from some other folks, Tim Scott, Republican
20:54
senator from South Carolina. We're
20:56
seeing talk from Vivek Ramaswamy.
20:59
He, if anyone knows him, is the author of a
21:01
book about taking down the Wolk
21:03
Inc. So we're getting a lot of
21:05
kinda see tier conservative
21:08
figures. And I don't think anyone
21:10
is really, really getting hyped for Nikki
21:12
Haley run. And I don't think Trump
21:15
is too worried about this either. You look at
21:17
some early reporting out of the Nicki Haley
21:19
campaign, and Trump is sort of like nagging
21:21
her by saying, yes, totally fine if she runs. He
21:23
even said, I talked to her for little while and
21:25
said, look, you go by your heart if you want her on.
21:27
I said, you should do it. So that's
21:29
not really the voice of a Trump who's
21:32
too concerned about a Nikki
21:34
Haley candidacy.
21:35
He was harsher towards Rihanna's halftime
21:37
show performance than he was to Nikki
21:39
Haley running for president.
21:41
Absolutely. You do have to wonder how many of these
21:43
candidates are actually just running for a spot
21:45
in the prospective Trump twenty twenty
21:47
four cabinet or something. Tim
21:49
Scott, I love him because he accidentally
21:52
appears to have, like, leaked his presidential ambitions
21:54
last August when he launched his book. There
21:56
was a blurb about it saying that it was
21:59
political memoir about his core messages
22:01
as he prepares to make presidential bid
22:03
in twenty twenty two. His publisher
22:05
had to go back and say, We didn't mean that. That
22:07
was an error. We didn't mean to have anything about
22:09
a presidential bid on there.
22:11
So listen, are they sending their best
22:14
not necessarily. Of
22:16
course, we know that a lot of the speculation
22:19
revolves around Rhonda Santos or
22:21
as Trump is calling him meatball
22:23
run. I like this.
22:25
This is good. I
22:26
like this meatball run. It's pretty like explicitly
22:29
anti Italian, but
22:31
Yeah. It kind of is, but I like
22:33
that we're witnessing the real time evolution
22:35
of a Trump insult. Right? So he was starting
22:37
with something like ronde sanctimonious, which
22:40
gotta say two out of ten, no
22:42
good, too long, doesn't stick. Meatball
22:44
run for all its anti Italian
22:46
implications, I think it's a really promising
22:49
contender. It's just got that sauce, so
22:51
to speak. And, well, meatball
22:53
slurs aside. Trump has really
22:55
been going in at Rhonda Santos. He
22:57
recently had a truth social tear
23:00
where he suggested that Ron DeSantis
23:02
is maybe a
23:03
groomer. Can you tell me what those posts
23:06
for? Yeah. So this pulled from a sort
23:08
of long forgotten article on
23:10
hill reporter dot com, which is website founded
23:12
by the Crafts scene brothers, the famously
23:14
liberal crime scene. We love the FBI.
23:17
This article is basically this idea that Rhonda
23:19
Santos as a high school teacher
23:21
partied with high school students.
23:24
Now, it's a little unclear what
23:26
what exactly party means. And
23:28
I don't think the allegations really go beyond
23:30
further than that. That said, there's
23:32
this picture of him and these young women who are
23:34
implied to be in high school. And so Trump
23:37
retweeted some of his fans who are talking about this.
23:39
And he does this thing that's very popular, sort
23:41
of among right wing influencers. When something is
23:43
so honestly untrue or at least
23:46
as far as we can tell. You don't say like, wow, Ron's
23:48
stance is a groomer, but Trump goes like,
23:50
wow, could this be true?
23:52
Or he says, Is this real? Or
23:54
I think he says, like, Ron, do
23:56
you think really? And so basically, yeah,
23:58
as you said, he's implying that DeSantis is a
24:00
Peeto. To cut straight to it. Yeah. And
24:03
he's really throwing it out there. I think,
24:05
fever dreams, I think, has been bearish
24:07
on DeSantis' primary chances. The fact
24:10
that DeSantis' he's avoiding this. I mean, the
24:12
great challenge here is anyone facing Trump is that
24:14
Trump gets a lot more latitude to be
24:16
really rude to people and and throw these smears
24:18
in a way that if DeSantis was like, Oh, yeah.
24:20
Well, I hear your repeat, oh, hear this evidence.
24:22
I think it wouldn't look so great for him. So we've
24:25
got that. And then we have this guy who
24:27
I find to be maybe the most interesting
24:29
guy. In terms of flavors of the
24:31
week, those guys that are asking Vivek
24:33
Ramaswamy, tell me about this guy, Kelly. So
24:35
this is someone he's not a politician. I'm
24:38
sure he'd be very happy to tell you that he's an
24:40
author. He comes out of the sort of think
24:42
tank world where he's railing
24:44
against wokeness in corporations, and
24:47
he's posed himself as this populous,
24:50
but within the corporate world. He says he
24:52
had this he worked in business and his
24:54
elite educated peers would
24:56
say something unwelcome in private, but would
24:59
be very equitable and public.
25:01
And he feels like that's hypocritical. This
25:03
is a very common right wing talking
25:05
point, but Ramaswami's positioning
25:07
himself as one of these these truth speakers.
25:09
Right? I think he has a lot of maybe
25:11
Andrew Yang vibes to this
25:13
effect. Right? Yeah. He's kinda like an alternate
25:16
universe Andrew Yang. Because, I mean, he's this
25:18
guy. He's kinda like, I'm an entrepreneur. And
25:20
I've just
25:20
got, oh, politicians. We gotta forget these guys.
25:22
I got big ideas. Yeah. Absolutely.
25:25
Right? He's sort of the industry
25:27
guy who's gonna import his
25:29
ideas into politics. He's been hitting
25:31
the ground in Iowa where he's
25:33
been using he likes to have all these
25:35
corporate matter four is he had a great tortured
25:38
metaphor that he told that he crowd recently said
25:40
we were taught that if you satisfy a moral
25:42
hunger by going to Ben and Jerry's and order
25:44
a cup of ice cream with some social justice sprinkles.
25:46
Now, of course, this is the right, not like, Ben and
25:49
Jerry's because they're like a nominally liberal
25:51
ice cream company. And he's saying, we
25:53
are not gonna satisfy our moral hunger
25:55
with fast food. So he's a thinking
25:57
man's candidate. Right? He's mad at
25:59
work company and he's going
26:01
to bring some truth telling
26:03
into the arena. I I don't think he's any
26:06
kind of real contender, but he's someone who's
26:08
getting his name out there will probably have
26:11
moderately successful podcast in four years
26:13
time and this is a good launching pad
26:15
for
26:15
him. I think that's right. I mean, he's the backstory
26:17
here is, I mean, this is a super rich guy and
26:19
he's emerge. He's kind of the voice against
26:22
Woke Capital. And so he has this book called
26:24
Woke Inc. And he's the big critic
26:26
of environmental and social in
26:28
corporate governance, which is ESG,
26:30
which is this idea that these investment funds
26:33
are not just caring about returns, but
26:35
but things things like global warming. And this has
26:37
become a a big issue on the right. You have
26:39
these red states divesting from pension
26:41
funds and stuff like this because they, for example,
26:43
are trying to invest in fossil fuels. So this is a
26:45
guy who who's had a lot of appearances on cable
26:47
news as sort of businessman who blowing the
26:49
whistle on ESG. But, you know, for
26:51
a guy who talks so much about ideas, So the
26:53
fascinating thing with Andrew Yang was that
26:56
he actually had a lot of ideas, a bit too many.
26:58
Perhaps he was a guy who
27:00
obviously, I think a lot of these outsiders well, I
27:02
have a lot ideas and then you say it's like, oh, my
27:04
idea is government work good. But Inner Yang
27:06
would say things like we're gonna have tax to support
27:08
newspapers and briefly his
27:10
anti circumcision policy, which which I had
27:12
pleasure of interviewing him about. But
27:14
this guy okay. So here's how this political story
27:16
from Daniel Litman, which which sort of broke the news
27:18
of Ramaswami's presidential ambitions. So here's
27:21
what it He's already fashioned a policy platform,
27:23
defeating China economically. Pretty vague there.
27:25
Firing the managerial class of
27:27
the federal government. Now, this is a very, like, thesis
27:30
slash new right idea, which is
27:33
read gut the bureaucracy
27:35
and install our guys. Yeah. They don't
27:37
like the professional managerial which
27:39
is it's a little on the nose because many of them
27:41
are actually
27:42
managers, but they're talking about the other
27:44
kind of manager. Jurassic
27:46
changing or shutting down large numbers of federal
27:48
agencies. I gotta say, I mean, this is all just
27:50
this is normal Republican stuff. Right. Reforming
27:52
Nationals Curiaparas, alright, whatever, and shutting
27:54
affirmative action. I mean, this guy is This guy
27:57
might as well be in the freedom caucus. Like, I mean,
27:59
this is the the usual stuff. So, nevertheless,
28:01
I do think this is an interesting character
28:03
to watch he will receive point five
28:05
percent of the vote in Iowa that go away.
28:07
But I think you're right. I mean, this is when you wanna this
28:09
guy also maybe sort of has like some Pete Buttigieg
28:12
vibes to me kind of like a tech the crap
28:14
and very
28:14
much, I think, like, Nikki Haley, scheming
28:16
for a position, I think, in a cabinet,
28:18
more than actually being president. Maybe he can form
28:21
the other side of the Andreeang forward party
28:23
after that but someone who's got his eye
28:25
in the
28:25
future, but not necessarily a future in
28:27
the White House. I think that's right. Overall,
28:29
I have to say As we close this segment. Getting a
28:31
little more than I thought we would. The drama Swamy
28:34
guy is an interesting character. I think Nicky Haley
28:36
certainly doomed to run should be interesting to watch.
28:38
So I'm glad shape enough to be a little more than
28:40
just versus Trump, just as an observer of
28:42
these things. I think we're already starting to griping
28:44
from the donors who recognize that
28:46
Donald Trump is probably not as competitive a candidate
28:49
as Rhonda Santos and the general. Saying like,
28:51
no. If everyone runs, you're gonna split the
28:53
vote. Trump's gonna wait again, but sometimes
28:55
that's out of cookie crumbles folks.
28:57
Absolutely. Look forward to the back stabbing in
28:59
the end fighting. And yeah, keep it coming for
29:01
the next year and half. Okay.
29:03
Kelly, who do we have on the podcast this week? Our guest this
29:05
week is Kim Kelly. She's the author of
29:08
like hell, the untold history of
29:10
American labor. She's been following the far
29:12
right for years while covering a really interesting
29:14
range of topics. Ranging from the heavy metal
29:16
scene to the labor
29:17
movement. So we're excited to talk to her and
29:19
see what she's up to.
29:23
Feverrid dreams like all daily beast journalism
29:25
exist because of the generous support of our
29:27
subscribers. The people who pay for access
29:29
to daily beast reporting and who are quite
29:31
frankly, our favorite people on the face of the
29:34
planet. Wanna get in on all the action?
29:36
Join now and get unlimited access to these
29:38
reporting, exclusive ad free
29:40
newsletters, and are undying appreciation.
29:43
Head to fever dreams dot the daily
29:45
beast dot com to sign up.
29:53
Alright. We are joined by Kim Kelly,
29:56
author of the book, Fight Like Hell. Kim,
29:58
how's it going? Well, before we started
30:00
reporting, we're talking about the Eagles on Island,
30:02
Philadelphia. So it could be
30:04
better, but it could probably be worse.
30:06
It could have been cowboy Well, I'm
30:08
very sorry for your loss, but I'm
30:10
really stoked to talk to you today about just
30:12
kind of a range of cool stuff you
30:15
cover from labor to heavy metal.
30:17
And I did wanna start off talking about your
30:19
background as a metal journalist.
30:22
And your writing on the metal
30:24
scene has kind of worked in parallel
30:26
to your coverage of the far right. And I was
30:28
wondering if These two topics
30:31
are linked in your mind. Did one
30:33
lead to the other as you were covering
30:35
out your path as a
30:36
journalist? Yeah, absolutely. The thing
30:38
that the world needs to understand about heavy
30:41
metals is that a, it is the best.
30:43
And b, we have lot of nopsies.
30:46
And those two things do not sound like they
30:48
should exist within the same subculture and
30:50
musical genre. And yet, here
30:52
we are because metal is complicated. Yeah.
30:55
I'm stoked to talk about this kind of thing. I suppose
30:57
I am better known now in,
30:59
like, the wider realm of media or what have
31:01
you as a labor reporter is. Somebody else
31:03
got used all the time. But I've been
31:05
a heavy metal journalist critic,
31:07
whatever, for, like, basically, my entire
31:10
life, since I was fifteen. So
31:12
that's what I feel like that's who I am. I just
31:14
happen to have taken a hard pivot in the past.
31:17
Five or six years. And it's
31:19
funny that people don't necessarily even know about that
31:21
part of my work or my life until they see me, you're
31:23
like, oh, you have like a lot of satanic goatetus.
31:28
Yeah. In terms of covering metal and kinda
31:30
covering the far right. It sort of
31:32
became I'm trying to think like,
31:34
a way to word it. Like, metal came first.
31:36
Like, just metal. Just had empty. No
31:39
thoughts. No politics. Just rips forever.
31:41
And then as I grew up,
31:43
got older, learned more about politics, met
31:46
more people left my super rural area
31:48
where I grew up. And I kind of became
31:50
pretty cognizant of, like, we have some
31:52
issues. Right? At first, I realized, OKeefe, there's
31:55
the issue with women and girls because
31:57
as a teenage girl at the Metal Show, this
31:59
has been going great. And
32:01
I realized, Obviously, there's
32:03
issues here with racism, anti Semitism, homophobia.
32:06
This thing that I love, this culture that
32:08
means so much to me that I've grown up in
32:10
has a lot of problems And by the
32:12
time I figured out their analysis running around,
32:14
I was like, someone should do something about this. Right?
32:16
As a writer, I found myself kind
32:19
of pivoting an earlier pivot,
32:21
pivoting towards writing specifically about
32:23
women and people of color and queer folks
32:25
in metal, and about why it sucks
32:27
but there are some bands and some labels
32:29
and some parts of this theme that allow that.
32:31
And I suppose I sort of became known
32:34
as this loud mouth, feminist, SJW
32:38
as like pre antifa panic in the metal
32:40
world. And that was just kind of the focus my
32:42
work started taking. And it's hard to write
32:44
about metal in any real debt especially
32:46
in some of the subgeners like Black Medal, which is
32:48
one of his most complex politically and otherwise,
32:51
without running into these hard questions
32:53
of, like, OKeefe. this band was on
32:55
label with this band and they're Nazis. But
32:57
this band isn't actively part
33:00
of the far right. But, like, maybe they are but
33:02
their label or like this one guy or the drummer
33:04
put out split. Like, there's a lot of research you
33:06
have to do in order to really understand
33:09
who and what you're supporting and listening to.
33:11
And having that, I suppose, comfort
33:14
level with digging into people's side
33:16
projects and posts and paths to figure out what
33:18
was going on. That translated really
33:21
well into figuring out what
33:23
Nazis and other fascists were up to,
33:25
especially because there is such a deep
33:27
unsettling connection between those two
33:29
worlds when you look at things like operation
33:31
werewolf or just some of
33:33
the leaders of various far right
33:35
movement instead of ended up at metal shows.
33:37
Like, it's our problem too. And
33:40
I suppose there once I figured that out,
33:42
once that lightning bolts struck me, there's really no
33:44
way to separate the art from the artist.
33:46
Right? Like, to separate the fact
33:48
that I love metal and I'm writing about
33:50
metal and I know a little bit about metal by
33:53
now. And the fact that we have this cancerous
33:55
aspect of our community. Yeah. It's
33:57
complicated, man. So a little
33:59
anecdote here. Who was back a
34:02
few years ago, and you were holding
34:04
a metal festival in Brooklyn. And
34:06
I'm like, I'll show up, I'll support, and
34:08
me not being a metal head at all. I show up in,
34:10
like, light washed jeans. One
34:12
of the most embarrassing situations
34:14
I've ever been in, being the person not wearing
34:17
all black at a metal festival won't ever do
34:19
that again. But I thought
34:21
that place was that festival was really interesting
34:23
because it was about pushing back on
34:25
the far right in the middle scene. And
34:27
I was hoping you could tell me just a little bit more
34:30
about how a community,
34:32
a fairly small community, can
34:34
resist against far right elements That
34:37
was twenty nineteen. It was black flags
34:39
over
34:40
Brooklyn, an antifascist metal festival,
34:42
a couple of bodies that I put together. And
34:44
then, yeah, was explicitly advertised
34:47
and organized and held
34:49
as an anti fascist, anti racist,
34:52
deeply inclusive event, like most of bands
34:55
playing were either people of color,
34:57
they're clear, they're trans, they're women, like, it it
34:59
did not look like a typical extreme
35:01
metal show, but it was awesome. And it just
35:03
kinda showed, like, you don't have to give it
35:05
in the platforming garbage bans just
35:07
because, like, there are plenty of other
35:09
good bans out there that deserve our support.
35:12
And I was really, really happy that
35:14
I got to do that. Really happy it went well.
35:16
And I think it just showed that we
35:18
can take these spaces back. We don't
35:20
have to see ground under the far right. We don't
35:22
have to let the Nazis into our shows. I
35:24
mean, hunks and skin heads in the eighties
35:26
really figured it out way before metal did,
35:29
like, oh, there's nazis coming to our shows.
35:31
Let's beat them up. And then they'll stop.
35:33
And I'm sure there's other
35:35
ways to approach that issue. You
35:37
can do that, and I think that's fine. Or
35:40
can just create very intentional
35:43
spaces and be very obvious about
35:45
who you wanna support, who you don't wanna support. I
35:47
mean, there's been, over the past few years,
35:49
really in the past five years, especially, I
35:52
would say there's been a big movement in
35:54
in the extreme end of world of more
35:56
like more explicitly anti fatless, lefty,
35:59
queer and trans bands who are getting
36:02
support, who are getting out of there, who getting
36:04
signed to labels. And on that flip
36:06
side, like, there have been a lot of fans
36:08
who have garbage politics, who
36:11
aren't getting the support they use. To get or getting
36:13
their shows or their tours canceled or getting dropped
36:15
from their labels. Like, there has been a real
36:17
groundswell of effort in
36:19
the medical community to clean
36:21
up our own backyard little bit. And it
36:23
just shows that it's possible. It's
36:26
worthwhile. It's doable. It's just
36:28
hard that it can be awkward. Sometimes you have
36:30
to throw out some of your records and sometimes you have
36:32
stop talking to some of your homies. But ultimately,
36:35
it's worth it because if metal is
36:37
gonna be something that is a
36:39
successful to everyone. Not unlike
36:41
anybody could pick up a record and be like, oh, great.
36:44
This is just as easy to listen to is Rihanna
36:46
or whatever. But just in terms of no one
36:48
accept a Nazi can show up at a medal show
36:50
and feel like I don't belong. That's the
36:52
goal. Like, it's the best thing in the world.
36:55
Everybody who doesn't suck should
36:57
be able to walk into a metal show and
36:59
oh cool. I belong here too.
37:01
So Kim, moving on to your labor reporting.
37:04
You're the author of fight like hell the untold
37:06
history of American labor. What is the
37:08
state of the labor movement in the United States? I realize
37:10
that's a pretty broad question, but just sort of for someone
37:12
who's on the ground covering
37:13
it, what sort of actions and developments are
37:15
you keeping an eye on? There's so much happening.
37:17
You can kind of pick your struggle at this point. Pick
37:19
your industry. If you're interested in
37:21
what academic workers grad students are up
37:23
to. Student there are grad student workers
37:25
at Temple in North Philly on strike right
37:27
now. She's interested in the tech world and
37:29
in fighting back against that whole realm.
37:32
Tesla workers, I can't remember exactly
37:34
where, but they just filed to unionize today.
37:37
There's a coal minor strike in Alabama. There
37:39
are Teamsters everywhere doing what Teamsters
37:41
do. The United Auto Workers
37:44
were the stored industrial union. They're
37:46
in the middle of this bitter reform
37:48
fight to try and elect someone who isn't
37:51
stuck into that decades old hierarchy
37:53
and trying to bring in some new life into their part
37:55
of the movement. There's really so much happening.
37:57
We see the numbers of public support, seventy
38:00
one percent highest since the sixties.
38:02
We see that we have at least on paper.
38:04
And in some ways, in actuality, this
38:07
very pro labor administration that
38:09
is at the very least making things lot
38:11
easier than they were back when we had that other
38:13
guy in here. There's a lot of room to
38:15
grow, lot of opportunity, still a lot
38:17
of red tape, a lot of bullshit, a lot of
38:19
rickety, jack, dev labor laws that
38:21
don't help the people they need to be helping. There's
38:24
still so many problems. We still
38:26
have so much to push through,
38:28
to get even a tiny bit closer
38:30
to the kind of working class collaboration we deserve.
38:33
But it's a really exciting moment and
38:36
I am just stoked that I get to be part of
38:38
helping to tell that story and amplifying worker's
38:41
voices and putting out the idea
38:43
that unions really are for
38:44
everyone. Except cops because fuck the cops.
38:47
So you kicked at that previous president
38:49
we had, and what's interesting is
38:51
the right likes to kind of position itself as
38:53
this friend of Blue or workers. Right?
38:56
But my read is that the relationship
38:58
with unions is a bit more complicated
39:00
than
39:00
that. So what's the rights deal
39:03
with labor unions? They
39:05
like to prop up certain
39:07
kinds of union workers and use
39:09
them as political pawns or as backdrop
39:12
to photo opportunities. Think about all
39:14
the times Trump put out a heart hat and stood around
39:16
extra some people who've actually worn car hard
39:18
and pretended to be a big man's man,
39:20
working man. But the proof is in
39:22
the pudding. As an example, I can point to
39:24
at a store I've been coming for almost two
39:26
years now, there are hundreds
39:29
of coal miners have unstripe right now in rural
39:31
Alabama. It's a multiracial,
39:33
multilagenda workplace, but it is
39:36
a predominantly Christian or
39:38
conservative, rural blue
39:40
collar, red state, whatever kind of vibe.
39:42
Like a lot of those folks voted for Trump allowed
39:44
those folks vote for Republicans, though that
39:46
might change after the strike. But there's been
39:49
no support whatsoever from Republican petitions
39:51
from Republican conservative media,
39:54
from their own state officials who
39:56
are all Republicans. So and these are
39:58
coal miners. Like, these are the kind of archetypal
40:00
blue collar worker that Republicans
40:03
and conservatives like to prop up as real
40:05
Americans, real work and they've completely
40:07
amended them because those workers are
40:09
on strike from their labor union.
40:11
They don't wanna give up their union. They know that
40:13
history means something to them. And that just
40:15
says so much about the way
40:18
that Republicans and Conservatives trying
40:20
cosplay as blue collar
40:23
understanders or working class knowers
40:26
but are really just a bunch of soft
40:28
handed suits that will never
40:30
actually show up when workers need
40:32
them. They just wanna use us as pawns.
40:35
And I hope that more people sort
40:37
of start to understand that
40:39
because the democrats aren't very
40:41
good at looking tough or cool.
40:44
And and they have
40:46
this sort of out of touch, elite, whatever,
40:49
stake on them. But someone has to
40:51
show for the workers. And if it's neither of those
40:53
guys, that and we're in well, we're still
40:55
in hot water. We've been in hot water for Mad Long,
40:57
but whatever. I could go on about that for a long
40:59
time. But all that to say is, Republicans
41:01
are full of shit when I pretend to care about
41:03
blue collar workers. I am always here
41:05
to call them out when I have the opportunity to do
41:07
so.
41:08
So you talk about this idea that coal
41:10
miners are the real working man's workers.
41:12
One thing that I've noticed in a parallel
41:15
labor issue going on right now, which
41:17
is the efforts by Starbucks workers
41:20
to unionize. The right loves
41:22
to denigrate those workers. And I see these tweets
41:24
all the time. They'll have a picture of a barista
41:27
that's almost always a woman, often woman
41:29
of color. They're being like, is this someone who
41:31
really need a union? And I was wondering
41:33
if you could speak to this effort to sort of
41:35
divide union work in between this
41:37
stereotypical
41:39
men and hard hats camp and stuff
41:41
that women do. This has been
41:43
a be it my bottle and many other bottles
41:45
for a really long time because it's such a transparent
41:48
and cynical ploy that
41:50
people and power users trying to buy the workers.
41:53
This is something that I get in this is my book
41:55
a lot, but this is in general going back throughout
41:57
the centuries. Before it was well,
41:59
black and white workers. Black workers don't
42:01
deserve a union because there's that the other
42:03
reason that we have decided upon that
42:06
it was different types of immigrants, that
42:08
it was ground workers, specifically
42:10
workers from Latin America and Mexico to
42:12
South America, and it's always
42:15
been women. There's always
42:17
been this effort to try to act as
42:19
though occupations that are
42:21
predominantly held by women and female
42:23
people are just not as hard.
42:25
They don't count. You don't need a union. You should
42:27
have a husband. Whatever NOx's
42:30
nineteen fifties era bullshit that they're still
42:32
trying to convince people is actually
42:35
viable. I mean, we when
42:37
you talk about the Starbucks workers, it's the same kind
42:39
of ire that I see directed at grad
42:41
students at striking academic workers
42:44
or nonprofit workers. Journalists,
42:46
media workers, anybody who
42:49
whose occupation doesn't fall into
42:51
that very narrow, okay, factory
42:53
worker, coal miner, person in
42:55
a hard hat who has bad political opinions.
42:57
If you don't fall into that very, very
43:00
small slice of existence, it's
43:02
as though your labor doesn't count. And
43:04
obviously, that's nonsense. Every
43:07
worker needs a union. If you have a boss,
43:09
you need a union because you're probably getting
43:11
screwed and the only way you can fix this by
43:13
organizing collect I think there's
43:15
a very real reason that
43:17
that kind of anti worker line
43:20
is being pushed because if more workers
43:22
realize that they do have access to
43:24
you news and do have the ability to organize, they'll
43:27
do it, and that will cause problems for
43:29
the powerful people that are interested
43:31
in keeping them down and profiting off their labor.
43:34
It's like, honestly, it's the scam. And
43:37
right wing idiots like, to claim the enemy
43:39
vague culture worth thing they can think of so being,
43:41
like, oh, pink haired, librarian
43:44
or Starbucks barista. They don't deserve rights.
43:47
Like, that's what they're saying. When they say these
43:49
workers don't deserve a union, you don't
43:51
deserve rights. They just found
43:53
a way, a slightly more clever way to say
43:55
it. They won't give them yellow that quite as much,
43:57
but that's what they're saying, and that's what the issue
43:59
is. So can we talk to earlier on the episode
44:01
about the East Palestine train derailment?
44:03
I'm seeing a lot of chatter sort of relating
44:06
this, maybe not this incident particular, but
44:08
to the threatened train worker strike and
44:10
their safety concerns. Can you I mean, I feel
44:12
like there were a lot of different things out there
44:14
about, like, what this threatened strike was about.
44:16
As a labor
44:17
reporter, can you sort of drill down on that and the
44:19
current status of that and whether this might have played
44:21
a role in this derailment? I mean, I've seen
44:23
real workers saying we warned you,
44:26
we told you somebody this could happen
44:28
because when they were trying
44:30
to market those contracts and they
44:32
were threatening to strike. It wasn't just
44:34
over money. It wasn't just
44:36
over sick pay, though that was a huge part.
44:39
And a very important part that kinda
44:41
got left by the wayside because the government was
44:43
too scared of workers actually enacting
44:45
any kind of economic impact
44:48
that they need captain. But one of the big
44:50
issues that the workers were concerned about that
44:52
they're screaming about is safety. Is
44:54
it under staffing? Is on the fact that
44:56
the folks who are working on these trains who
44:58
are pulling these long shifts, they
45:00
don't have what they need to do that safely.
45:03
Because these massive corporations
45:06
masquerading as modern day railbarons,
45:08
they cut the workforce down. They rely
45:11
on these sort of It's hard to explain
45:13
that I forgot the actual name. We use this kind
45:15
of algorithmic almost systems
45:17
to try and make things more efficient. More
45:19
efficient doesn't mean safer or
45:22
better or smarter. It just means someone
45:24
somewhere save in a buck. And
45:26
play the fact that we're seeing so many
45:28
railroad workers or railroad workers union speak
45:30
up after this horrific tragedy say.
45:32
We told you we told you something that
45:34
this could happen if safety isn't
45:37
a paramount aspect of what
45:39
you're doing. I think it just goes
45:41
to show that maybe folks would have
45:43
listened A little bit more if
45:45
the workers hadn't had the federal government
45:48
shove a contract down their throats and
45:50
forced them back to work. It's almost as
45:52
if the people who do the jobs and
45:54
spend time in that environment know
45:56
better than the people that sit in offices in
45:59
Washington and pick their
46:00
noses. But what do I know about all
46:02
that? So, Kim, you've been really
46:04
close to the activist community for
46:06
a while. And One thing I recall
46:08
is back in twenty seventeen, you're at the
46:10
right in Charlotte. So you were actually there in that
46:12
crowd that I knew not secret of a car
46:14
until And I'm
46:16
wondering, surviving an event like
46:18
that, does that shape your
46:20
coverage as a journalist looking at
46:22
the far right? Yeah, I mean, that kind of changed
46:25
everything. Definitely broken my brain.
46:27
Gotta laugh. Right? But, yeah, I was not only in
46:29
the crowd. I was just, like, three feet away
46:31
from the car, and I got a
46:33
front row view of Heather Hires death
46:35
when I had friends who were pulled under the cars,
46:37
friends who were previously injured during
46:40
that moment. I just happened to jump
46:42
at the right moment. And so going into
46:44
that and coming out of that and being lucky enough
46:47
to come out of that physically unscathed, it
46:49
just sort of it washed away any
46:51
remaining fear or trepidation had
46:54
about being loud and
46:56
public about saying guests, I'm an antifascist.
46:59
I'm an anarchist. This is who I am. This is what
47:01
I believe. This is what we're fighting
47:03
before. Because when you work within
47:05
the media ecosystem, especially in the time
47:07
I was working at vice, which is, like, not exactly
47:10
the Wall Street Journal. Right? But it was still
47:12
a moment where I thought I was thinking to myself, I'm
47:14
not sure how public, I wanna be about my involvement
47:16
in this world, about my actual political views.
47:19
But after that, it's like, well, Nazi
47:21
just tried to murder create a bunch of my friends.
47:23
There's not really what am I afraid
47:25
of now? Being part of the anti fascist
47:27
world has been such an important aspect
47:29
of my life for so long, like all my best
47:31
friends are anti fascists. I met my boyfriend.
47:34
And occupy ice. It's an it's
47:36
an important part of who I am and I bring that into
47:38
my reporting and in a way that especially given
47:41
the fact that I write predominantly about labor issues
47:43
now, There are ways that you can bring that
47:45
energy into that world. I would say
47:47
specifically about the way I'd talk about the presence
47:50
of police within the labor movement.
47:52
It's funny to be this like tattoo
47:54
heavy metal anarchist who somehow
47:57
is semirceptible now. And
47:59
I encountered people that don't necessarily know
48:01
my deal. don't know what
48:03
my gay teen tattoo means or know where
48:05
was in August twenty seventeen. Because
48:07
sometimes I tell them, sometimes I don't, but
48:09
I always have that in the back
48:11
of my mind when I'm deciding what to cover,
48:14
who to talk to, how to approach things because
48:16
it's not something you can forget and
48:19
you can't let yourself forget that and
48:21
you can't forget who the enemy
48:23
is and who we're fighting for. No
48:25
matter how you are using
48:27
your energy, whether you're writing about energous
48:30
black metal or writing about how
48:32
cops have no place in labor movement. Or
48:35
writing about whatever other nonsense you can
48:37
trick an editor and to let you write about that
48:39
freelance and you know how that hustle goes.
48:41
It's entwined in my DNA now.
48:44
And I think it's part of why I probably will
48:46
never really get a job at, like,
48:48
the Wall Street Journal, political, whatever. Because
48:50
that's not something I've ever going to
48:52
silence, and I'm never gonna pretend to
48:55
be objective because I know which
48:57
side I'm
48:57
on. Great. Well, Kim, before we let
48:59
you go, I've never really had banked my
49:01
So What's a good intro to the metal
49:03
scene? Oh, good lord. Well, it depends
49:06
on the kind of music you like. I am a firm
49:08
believer that there is a metal band for
49:10
everyone.
49:11
I like the hold steady, the mountain goats.
49:14
Okay. Well, you know what? I'm
49:16
just gonna throw it out there because
49:18
it seems like I appreciate Melody and
49:20
intricate lyrical themes. Maybe the heavier
49:23
stuff will come with it. There's a bank called Fall
49:25
of Afra. I'll send it to you. Follow
49:27
the frothy. They're like kind of a
49:29
neo crust band. And that doesn't
49:31
make sense when I just say it like that, but
49:33
it trust me, it's real. Or
49:36
since I've been talking a lot about Erica's stuff
49:38
about Black Mountain, one of my favorite bands
49:40
is Dawn Raid from the K. They're
49:43
an antifascist enterprise, black male band,
49:45
and their new record has a lot of really pretty
49:47
folk influenced parts. Like, there's a violin.
49:50
Like, it's If you wanted to get
49:52
into black metal or a fascist
49:54
metal in general, that would be a great gateway
49:57
because you can figure out what speaks to you
49:59
and kind of follow follow your
50:01
nose from there. And then there's always, like,
50:03
black sabbathies you just wanna turn your brain
50:05
off, which in this economy, why
50:07
wouldn't you?
50:09
Great. Well, thank you, listening to you talk here. I realize
50:11
that this is kind of a blind spot for me. Well,
50:14
again, we've been joined by Kim Kelly. She's
50:16
a labor reporter and she's the author of fight
50:18
like hell, the untold history of American
50:20
labor. Kim, thank you so much for joining us.
50:23
Thank you for having me. The paper bag
50:25
comes out on August twenty ninth
50:27
And I'm extremely online always
50:29
around. Just keep an eye on him. Alright. Graham
50:31
Kim on Twitter as well. Okay, Kim.
50:34
Thank you.
50:43
Alright. And now it is time for Fresh Hell,
50:45
will we tell you the thing that no one
50:47
is actually talking about? Will, can
50:49
you tell me how no one is talking about
50:51
the train derailment in East
50:53
Palestine, Ohio. Okay.
50:55
So February third, there was this train derailment
50:58
in East Palestine, Ohio. People may have seen the
51:00
news about this. It has resulted in
51:02
this toxic cloud that really
51:04
looks awful. And so this seems like a horrible
51:06
environmental situation. What I think is
51:08
interesting here got couple listener requests to
51:10
talk about this because people were wondering,
51:12
I mean, why so many right wingers
51:14
seem to really be focusing on this? And suggesting
51:17
that there's something tad more nefarious
51:19
at play because I think if you look at the
51:22
the sort of the conservative playbook of
51:24
twenty years, this idea of giant
51:26
corporation spills chemicals everywhere
51:29
would not become a Republican called
51:31
Salab. Right? But in fact,
51:33
this one has. And so I think there's a couple things
51:36
to play here. I think the most obvious is this
51:38
is being used as sort of a cudgel on
51:40
Pete Buttigieg, which, I mean, obviously, I
51:42
don't know how fair that is, but I mean, he is
51:44
the inventory of transportation. So kind of a pretty
51:46
typical political move there. I think there's some more
51:48
interesting aspects. One is this
51:50
idea that the balloons. Everyone loves the balloons.
51:52
We're hearing so much about them and the UFO's, that
51:55
you might think the UFO's would be
51:57
plenty of material for conspiracy
51:59
theorists if you were so inclined to think
52:01
about. But it sort of seems like they're not that end
52:03
of the balloon. Is this the sense you're getting as well, Kelly?
52:05
Yeah. This is so interesting. Right? Because you and
52:07
I both have books about conspiracy theories and when
52:09
people think about a typical conspiracy theory
52:11
to think about moon landing, UFO's, aliens
52:14
and everything. That doesn't really seem to
52:16
what the hell anymore. Now the
52:19
UFO's or unidentified balloons
52:21
are actually being posed as a front
52:23
for a real conspiracy. People are
52:25
saying that everyone is focused on these balloons,
52:27
which in many cases seem honestly to
52:29
be weather balloons that's still developing. There
52:32
are actually to cover up for something maybe
52:34
the derailment in Ohio. And
52:36
this isn't just like a couple wing nuts suggesting
52:39
this. Marjorie Taylor Green tweeted this
52:41
weekend, she's saying, She tweeted, East Palestine,
52:43
Ohio is undergoing an ecological disaster
52:45
because authorities blew up the train derailment
52:47
cars. She says, oh, but UFOs.
52:50
What is going on? Edward Snowden
52:52
advanced different theory that the balloons
52:54
were a distraction for another cause of
52:56
his. And it is interesting
52:59
that we have something that's kind of an event.
53:02
Interesting balloons, it could be enough
53:04
to get conspiracy theorists of old
53:06
talking about aliens. But in this case, it's actually
53:09
a front for something
53:10
else. Yeah. I mean, I think the reason
53:12
the balloons have failed to catch on, beyond,
53:14
shoot them down. Shoot the first one down, and then it
53:16
gets shot down. I think, oh, okay. Is there not really a
53:18
political violence at least one that can be exploited
53:21
really because Biden shooting down the balloons.
53:23
So they can't do much with that. But
53:25
what you can do is something that I think we're
53:28
seeing more and more of over the past few years, which is,
53:30
oh, you think that thing in the news is important?
53:32
That's just a distraction you simple tune.
53:34
And we see this summed up in a meme that's popular
53:36
with the en masse, which is what they call the current
53:38
thing. Right? And so what normal people
53:40
and people who haven't taken the red pill might
53:42
call news or the progression
53:45
of time or current events, this idea
53:47
that things change and certain things are in
53:49
the news, that instead is all an elaborate distraction.
53:52
And so that, for example, oh, you thought
53:54
COVID mattered? You thought a worldwide pandemic
53:56
that killed millions of people? No. No. No. That's
53:58
an MPC way of thinking. That was a distraction
54:00
for something else. Or then it became, of course, George
54:03
Wood's death, or it became a couple it's
54:05
January six would be another example. And so they're
54:07
saying, oh, this big thing of the news are Ukraine for
54:09
example. Oh, that's a ruse. And so now the
54:11
balloon is gonna be treated the same way. And
54:13
people are saying, as you said, Market Taylor Green
54:15
is implying it's a distraction. So
54:18
a distraction from one. Right? Why?
54:20
What is the implication? Why do they need to people
54:22
from the train derailment going back to that. Well,
54:24
this ties into the longstanding
54:27
conspiracy theory on the right for at least the past year. That
54:29
something's up with the food supply chain, not
54:31
just that it's COVID or what have you or the avian
54:34
flu, but that there's something nefarious
54:36
So for example, one popular tweet I saw
54:38
said, do you guys realize how much farmland is
54:40
in Ohio? There's seventy five thousand farms. Ninety percent
54:43
of them are family farms. This says untold direct
54:45
food supply chain impact. So the implication
54:47
here is that the derailment was somehow
54:49
meant to sabotage the food, which
54:52
is if you kind of pull back the lens a little
54:54
bit, the further implication is that, like, the
54:56
cabal is trying to cause chaos. The
54:59
other thing I I'd wanna hit on here is if
55:01
you search trained derailment Amish.
55:03
Interesting thing here because the other conspiracy
55:05
theory is that the derailment was an attempt
55:08
to somehow undermine the
55:10
Amish community. Now there
55:13
is sort of a a thing over the past few years
55:15
on the right. Amish really been treated like these
55:17
beloved mask and sort of the American
55:19
enclave that will save America. I wrote
55:21
a story about how this farmer is Amish guy
55:24
who had repeatedly flouted federal
55:26
food inspection laws and allegedly caused
55:28
a food illness outbreak that he became this kind
55:30
of caught the lab on the right and was featured on
55:33
Tucker Carlson because these food regulators
55:35
dared to ask him to not spread.
55:37
Castro rise his story.
55:38
Yeah. Exactly. And so this idea
55:40
that, like, oh, the infamous derailment was meant to
55:42
stop the Amish because they're anti woke and they
55:44
won't get vaccinated is also really really
55:46
prevalent out there.
55:47
Yeah. And I think it's interesting. Right? This is
55:49
part of a broader trend
55:51
of the right will occasionally pick
55:53
up some populist messaging. It's also
55:56
popular with the left. Right? The
55:58
left blikes environmental issues certainly
56:00
calling attention to some of
56:02
the labor issues that may have resulted in this train
56:05
derailment. The right wants
56:07
to hint in that direct and writes, say that
56:09
there's a really big issue that's being under covered. I
56:11
would actually argue that you can look up information
56:13
about the Storama on every single news site
56:15
that there's It's not entirely true
56:17
that nobody is talking about this. A lot of people are
56:19
talking about this. But they will take that sort
56:22
of populous, I think, very legitimate
56:24
anger and redirected away
56:26
from the labor issues, away from the environmental issues
56:29
into the idea that middle America
56:31
that these hard scrabble blue collar tones
56:34
are being put in the eye
56:36
of a globalist plot. And
56:39
III think that's probably pretty savvy
56:41
messaging. They understand that there is
56:43
pretty across the political spectrum,
56:45
a lot of legitimate anger at
56:47
this derailment. And instead, they're
56:49
saying that this is part of a larger plot
56:51
that we've been warning you about. And so I think when
56:54
they hinted the weather balloons being a distraction,
56:56
well, you forget that what two we've ago Marjorie
56:58
Taylor Green was all about the weather balloon. She
57:00
was bringing a weather balloon into the state of the
57:02
union where think she may have been dressed as a weather
57:04
balloon with that big white coat. I'm not really sure with
57:07
the underlying motive there was.
57:09
But they are looking for,
57:12
I hate to say, current thing, the
57:14
tie in to take what is
57:16
a very in the news actually issue
57:18
and make it relevant to their own
57:21
long running conspiracy theories.
57:31
On that note, let's wrap up this episode
57:34
of Fever Dreams from The Daily Beast. In
57:36
future installments, we'll also be speaking to some
57:38
amazing guests at The Daily Beast and
57:40
Beyond. From politics to popular
57:42
culture. We hope you'll subscribe to us on
57:44
your preferred podcast app and share the show
57:46
on social media and at your family dinner table.
57:48
If you'd like to follow us on Twitter, I'm at
57:50
Will Sommer, and Kelly is at
57:53
Kelly Weil. That's WEILL.
57:56
Come say hi. This podcast is produced
57:58
by Jesse Cannon with music by Brian Demaglia.
58:01
Thanks so much for listening, and we'll see you next time.
58:20
Black voices are making an impact this
58:23
month and beyond. Keep listening
58:25
to Discover one of our favorite
58:26
shows, courtesy of Acast recommends.
58:29
When going on everybody. This is Tristan McWile.
58:31
It's one third of guys next door. And
58:34
if you are hearing my voice, maybe
58:37
you should be listening to guys next door. If
58:39
you ever wanted to get into the mindset of
58:41
the young black millennial man, all
58:43
of the things that we go through love,
58:46
sex, relationships, financials,
58:51
technology, mental
58:54
health, and everything that lies in between
58:57
this show is for you.
58:59
Now, I don't know what you guys are doing. I know you
59:01
guys are probably listening to a really really nice
59:03
podcast, but make sure you guys go
59:05
subscribe right now to guys next
59:07
door, and we'll see you guys in the neighborhood.
59:10
Peace. Acast
59:12
helps creators launch grow
59:14
and monetize their podcast everywhere,
59:17
acast dot com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More