Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Ted Audio Collective Hello
0:07
Francis. Hey beautiful. Francis,
0:09
today we're going to talk about something every
0:11
organization needs to focus on at some point
0:13
in its life cycle, which is how to
0:16
tell the story of the work it's doing
0:18
to people outside the organization, which
0:20
is also known in certain circles as
0:23
communication strategy. Oh, indeed. So
0:26
just to kick this off, I
0:28
wanted to ask you, where do you see
0:30
people most often getting stuck on
0:32
this issue? Oh, it's when they
0:34
use overly complicated jargon. It's when they
0:36
use the jargon from inside the organization
0:38
and they translate it outside the organization.
0:40
Without a decoder ring? With
0:43
no decoder ring. And I'll tell you,
0:45
the one where I was
0:47
struck just so viscerally is I was
0:50
working with a cable company, and
0:53
they would refer to ARPUs. That's
0:56
an awkward acronym. Yeah, and it was, they
0:58
would do it in capital letters, capital R,
1:00
capital P, capital U, and
1:03
they just did it so conversationally, they would
1:05
do it internally, externally, and everyone knew. And
1:07
I finally had to say, what's
1:09
an ARPU? And I got two
1:11
responses. From one people said, oh, that's
1:13
what we mean by our customers. And I was
1:15
like, why do you call your customers ARPUs? Because
1:18
they're revenue paying units. Oh,
1:22
that really hurts. Yeah. Wow.
1:25
Do you remember how you solved that one?
1:27
Yes, I suggested that they were
1:29
animate. No,
1:32
actually, I get paid for, baby. It's that powerful
1:34
insight. Yeah, no, I actually do remember
1:37
my response at the time. I was like, do
1:39
your customers react like you're
1:41
making a two-dimensional caricature of them? And
1:44
their response was yes. And I said, I think I know why.
1:47
I love that. How about you? Where do you see
1:49
people getting stuck on the communication strategy? Yeah,
1:51
I would say one thing we
1:53
observe is this impulse to start
1:56
with Mount Everest in
1:58
terms of the Amazon. The shen
2:00
and complexity of the message when you
2:02
really need to start with a local
2:04
foothill Am and what I mean by
2:06
that is starting with the assumption that
2:08
you have to reach everybody everywhere all
2:10
at once with the great movie Chris
2:12
a great movie it's not a great
2:14
strategies ah and I think this is
2:16
one of the issues within to be
2:18
getting into Tibet. This
2:22
is six a lot. I'm And Morris. I'm
2:24
a company builder and leadership coach and I'm
2:26
Frances Fry. I'm a professor at the Harvard
2:28
Business School and I'm and twice. On
2:32
this show we believe that meaningful
2:34
change happens as anything is fixable
2:37
and solutions are often just a
2:39
single. Conversations Francis: Today we are
2:41
hosting Robin Steinberg. Robin is the
2:43
founder of the Bail Project, which
2:46
is a nonprofit organization that please
2:48
bell for people who care for
2:50
it and also advocates for policy
2:52
reform in the criminal justice system.
2:55
Well, So. Let's hear directly
2:57
from her. The
2:59
questions that we really have
3:02
is. One of message A.
3:05
The. Mission over Organizations to external partners
3:07
and his people who are interested
3:09
in this issue. Over the past
3:11
decade or a majority of Americans
3:13
have become increasingly aware that they
3:15
give a it's it's Criminal justice
3:17
system is in dire need of
3:20
reform. That. Date is clear
3:22
as A we know people see
3:24
the need for change. What we
3:27
are really finding though is that
3:29
when push comes to shove, people
3:31
are afraid of change. Have.
3:34
Been Sirens which is really what
3:36
crime is about which can be
3:38
easily exploited by misinformation and people
3:40
who are opposed. Change So Me:
3:43
Think about this problem. I think.
3:45
About how to we resolve the tension
3:47
between. Our desire to feel safe and
3:50
our desire for better justice in our
3:52
legal system. And. That's really
3:54
the question that I'm. I'm struggling. Where
3:56
is there something that we could be doing that
3:58
would be more and. All in
4:01
bringing people into this conversation
4:03
in a way that can
4:05
lead to leo long term
4:07
systemic change as. Wow!
4:09
This is a varsity sports The. City
4:13
Sports. Where did your head
4:15
down Francis you know on the
4:17
one hand I might oh my
4:19
goodness, Where I think a lot
4:21
of people's heads will go is
4:23
oh my goodness, there is rampant
4:25
crime and that would then cloud
4:28
my thinking about. Even reasonable
4:30
policies. Going after that. So
4:33
the I think this is like a
4:35
very big emotional hurdle to go over
4:37
before you can pour on any logic
4:39
of how to make the system better.
4:41
Totally, that's where my head was going
4:44
to as long as we're framing it
4:46
as a showdown between my need for
4:48
safety and my need for criminal justice
4:50
reform. Money for Safety is always gonna
4:52
win. So I think we really have.
4:54
To re same the problem here for the
4:57
to make some. Absolutely.
5:09
This episode is Bratty by Progressive Insurance.
5:12
Was. Comparing higher insurance rates was as easy
5:14
as putting on your favorite podcast. With Progressive
5:16
it is just visit the Progressive website to
5:18
quote with all the coverage as he want.
5:21
You'll see progress. Has direct rate than their
5:23
toll. Provide options from other companies so you
5:25
can compare. All you need to do is
5:27
use the rate and coverage you like. Quote
5:30
Today A progressive.com to join the over twenty
5:32
eight million drivers you trust. Progressive Progressive cancelled
5:34
he insurance company an affiliate comparison or it's
5:37
not available in officer situations. Prices vary based
5:39
on how you. I. Want
5:41
to tell you about a podcast
5:43
from our Colleagues at Work for
5:46
Business Review It's called Women at
5:48
Work. It's back for season Nine
5:50
to tackle some of women's hardest
5:52
career problems like Divorce a D
5:54
H D and True Masses Sillier
5:57
with expert guests, personal stories and
5:59
practical advice. rooted in real research.
6:01
Women at Work makes women's work lives
6:03
just a bit better. Listen for
6:05
free to HBR's Women at Work wherever
6:08
you get your podcasts. Robin,
6:13
welcome to Fixable. Well, thank you. I
6:15
am delighted to be here. So
6:17
this is a show about fixing things, which
6:20
is why you're one of our celebrity callers,
6:22
Robin. That
6:25
I've been throwing myself into cement walls trying to
6:27
fix them for a very long time. But
6:31
what problem did you set out to solve when you
6:33
started the bail project? So you
6:35
can intervene in lots of places
6:38
along the criminal justice system. They all need
6:40
changing and all need fixing, right? But
6:42
what I really wanted to focus on in this part
6:44
of my career was the front end.
6:47
How can we work on something that's
6:49
very concrete that might prevent
6:51
mass incarceration before it begins?
6:53
We have 3,000 local
6:55
jails across America. And in those 3,000
6:58
local jails, upwards of 60% of
7:02
people in those jails every single day
7:04
are there because they can't pay their
7:06
cash bail, not because they've been convicted
7:08
of a crime or they're serving sentence.
7:10
So it is the majority of people
7:12
in our local jails are there
7:14
because they don't have enough money to pay cash bail.
7:17
And so it really was an effort
7:20
to think about how do we eliminate
7:22
our reliance on cash bail in this
7:24
country. And so we set
7:26
out to address the humanitarian crisis by bailing
7:28
out as many people as we could over the past
7:30
five years. And we have to bail out about 30,000 people across
7:33
the country. But also collecting
7:35
the data to really be able to
7:37
make the case with evidence that you don't need
7:39
cash to ensure people will come back to court
7:41
because if we're paying the bail, nobody has any
7:44
skin in the game. It's not their money on
7:46
the line. So that was sort
7:48
of the idea was let's really think about
7:50
what a better pre-child justice system would
7:52
look like. That's more fair and take
7:54
money out of the system. But
7:57
the ultimate goal is to put ourselves out of business. The
7:59
ultimate goal is. to change cash bail
8:01
and eliminate it and work with
8:03
jurisdictions to stop relying on cash
8:06
to be the thing in the system that determines who's in and
8:08
who's out because that's just wrong. And when
8:11
you solve this problem, who
8:13
benefits? What's the
8:16
up-call for government rights? So
8:18
obviously the most immediate harm happens to
8:20
the person who's held in jail. Jail
8:22
is a horrifying place to be. It's
8:25
traumatic. It's violent. It causes
8:27
all sorts of physical and psychological harm to
8:29
the person being held in the jail cell. It
8:32
also causes harm to their life outside
8:34
and their family outside and their community.
8:37
Yeah. What has surprised you the most in
8:40
the journey of immersing yourself in these issues?
8:43
In particular, what surprised me is
8:45
how misunderstood the Preach
8:47
and Justice system is by most
8:50
Americans. Even thoughtful journalists
8:52
that I talk to will sometimes
8:54
fall into the trap of thinking that bail
8:56
got set because somebody was guilty of a crime.
8:58
And so you have to keep reminding people over
9:00
and over again, right? No, no, no. Bail
9:03
gets set by a judge before any evidence
9:05
has been brought to court. It's
9:07
just about a mechanism to ensure people
9:09
should come back to court. That's
9:11
what its purpose was. And people
9:13
really don't understand that because it's become
9:16
a proxy for let's hold people
9:18
in jail who might cause harm. The
9:20
good side is when you talk to people and
9:22
ask them, you know, should money be the thing
9:24
that determines who stays in jail and who goes
9:26
home free in the pre-child context? Almost
9:29
everybody agrees that money shouldn't be the thing
9:31
that determines that. So how does
9:33
your program work as an antidote
9:35
to some of these trends? So,
9:38
you know, we have a revolving bail fund that
9:40
we use to bail people out in the
9:42
different jurisdictions where we have teams. There are
9:44
local teams and local communities who do the
9:46
day in and day out work of introducing
9:48
people at the jail, determining who we can
9:50
pay bail for, paying the bail, supporting the
9:52
client when they come out, meaning giving them
9:55
court reminders and transportation if they need it.
9:57
And then the policy team and the rest
9:59
of our advocates really want to do that.
10:01
work hard to try and work towards change
10:03
either at the local city state level. Sometimes
10:06
that's legislative change, sometimes that's a
10:08
policy change. It is a substantial
10:10
number of people whose cases get
10:12
dismissed entirely once we intervene by paying bail.
10:15
So the voicemail you left us
10:17
was around messaging. We're
10:20
delighted to dig in there but I wanted
10:22
to pause and just ask how could this
10:24
conversation be most helpful to you today? Well
10:27
so my guess is that you all have
10:29
seen what happens when there is a
10:31
disconnect right between what the facts
10:34
are and what we know and what people
10:36
think and how they behave and
10:38
I'm curious whether there are things that you
10:40
have seen in other spaces and other industries
10:43
where you know the facts say this
10:45
right but somehow we can't get
10:47
people to be driven
10:49
by the facts and the evidence
10:52
and they continue to sort of be said
10:54
misinformation that fuels really bad
10:57
ideas. I don't know if you
10:59
can solve that problem you can probably fix our entire political
11:01
system. If you could have
11:07
anything you wanted as
11:10
an input to your work if
11:12
you think about it from the bench of you like leading an
11:16
army of change
11:18
right now what
11:20
would be most helpful to you? I
11:23
think there's a huge investment in
11:26
the communication strategy would
11:28
go a long way and like we
11:30
have a great communications team that obviously
11:32
is limited by funding so yes if
11:34
there we would love to see a
11:36
real investment in the communication strategy that
11:39
went national that would begin to change
11:41
hearts and minds. Awesome tell us
11:43
about that team. We have a fantastic communications
11:45
team who have been working since
11:48
day one on trying to think
11:51
about How do you
11:53
get the message out there and change
11:55
hearts and minds about our pretrial justice
11:57
system? So they do everything from how
11:59
human. The story is about the devastating
12:01
impacts of cash fail to also tell successful
12:03
so that people getting out in her they
12:05
succeed and thrive when they're out. We knew
12:08
the very beginning of the Barrel project by
12:10
know the bailing out people with going to.
12:12
Be crippling for permission but still was using communications
12:14
as a way to change hearts and. Minds
12:16
and eventually policy and how big is
12:18
at him. Ah we now I think
12:20
it is that is. One Two
12:22
three, four, People on the team nice
12:25
and how big is the team overall? Oh,
12:27
about one hundred and twenty five south across
12:29
the country. So. For
12:31
small in ah to swallow hard hit
12:33
a half the card is there. So
12:37
I think where we are is that. We
12:41
have a situation where there.
12:43
Were. The facts are on our side
12:46
as the this is it's a true
12:48
communication. Found that facts are on our
12:50
side. Yeah, And yet
12:52
we. Are. Struggling to
12:54
overcome the emotional hurdles
12:57
of other people receiving
12:59
them? Yes. To. It
13:01
at it's very simplest. it's a
13:03
communication problem and as it's deepest.
13:06
If we can change the way
13:09
people think, that will manifest in
13:11
new behavior. So I also I
13:13
think that you have a communication
13:15
problem and I also think communication
13:17
is the right solution because when
13:19
we can get this into the
13:22
minds of people. All. Of
13:24
the behaviors will start to be
13:26
different so I'm going to. It's
13:28
a very novel context, but it's
13:30
a very common problem. And
13:33
Simba. and if we the that
13:35
all that here and I'm optimistic
13:37
we can, we're going to solve
13:39
it for everyone else who doesn't
13:42
have quite such an extreme novel
13:44
context and the subset of it
13:46
is we have sex and we
13:48
have to penetrate emotions. Was.
13:52
That's a great sense I love that some yeah
13:54
yeah from what I also find my something
13:56
he a lot about Francis his. Favorite.
13:59
Rodgers were. Com the diffusion of
14:01
innovation which is all about. How.
14:04
Do good ideas get
14:06
adopted. By.
14:08
Sectors by People by communities and
14:11
the premise of the his work
14:13
with this really extraordinary is that
14:15
the facts and on and moss.
14:18
So having and as he starts
14:20
in. Law in actually
14:22
farming technology. Having a better
14:25
axe right is not enough
14:27
to get adoption and some
14:29
pretty good everywhere with at
14:31
including on my favorite. Is.
14:34
The devalued boiling water. As
14:37
a public health innovation and for know
14:39
that's one of the same as case
14:42
studies. So how does this idea disseminates
14:44
And what he found was there's a
14:46
pretty stable architecture for that diffusion of
14:49
innovation. Being defined as a better way to
14:51
do something. And. Wounded. The key
14:53
findings that has kind of seeped
14:55
into our vocabulary is that. It.
14:57
Doesn't make any sense to
15:00
waste your resources on. The
15:02
majority. Of the population,
15:05
you really want to go in order,
15:07
starting with the early adopters, So
15:10
in every community and Mrs what
15:12
he was able to show over
15:14
his his career is. The
15:16
way to get these ideas out
15:19
in the world is to start
15:21
with the people who are really
15:23
predisposed. To. Sink.
15:25
Their interesting And whether that's
15:27
early adopters inside the criminal
15:30
justice system? Whether it's early
15:32
adopters among policy. Can
15:35
we bring some real strategy?
15:38
And really focus our resources on the
15:40
people whose hearts and minds we are
15:42
most likely to win over at this
15:44
point. Mister what his research shows his
15:46
let's not try to win over everyone
15:48
because most the people were not can
15:51
be able to convince at this point
15:53
the sorry for those late adopters they
15:55
need to see all the other people.
15:57
Something on there are going to be
15:59
convened. Bar yeah, Robin's
16:02
Timers passionate. Storytelling
16:05
and presentation of the data. They're
16:07
going away. They're going to be
16:09
were on the sidelines until they
16:11
see other people getting on board.
16:13
Yeah, let me offer an alternative
16:16
to related but an alternative. Pit
16:18
ends Pro twitches I think the.
16:20
You need to partner with the
16:22
police because. The
16:25
police should. Be.
16:28
On your side with it. But.
16:30
They're emotionally know, like
16:32
even. If this
16:34
is viewed as soft on crime it's
16:37
it's the incorrect view on it. So
16:39
if you can tell a compelling story
16:41
that can get and we don't have
16:43
to go to the most extreme. Police
16:46
but see open. Minded
16:48
part of the police. If we can
16:50
say it to then you're going to
16:52
be able to affect everyone else. Another
16:54
way to describe those people, fences or
16:56
early adopters idea is that I think
16:58
it over by a set of try
17:00
to do and a slightly more accessible
17:02
language. But I want
17:04
to that wants to defend our audience.
17:07
Didn't get to see your eyes pop
17:09
out of your head when I said
17:11
it, the partner with the police you
17:13
are very politely he of us sit
17:15
nonverbal urban because I don't see any
17:17
reason why. Except for emotional
17:19
ones. Why Police wouldn't want
17:22
this to occur? I
17:24
think there are right testing audience to
17:27
do it and when we can tell
17:29
a story that they're like of course
17:31
how can we help. Then
17:35
we will get everyone else so
17:37
I first want to hear your
17:39
reaction to that and then I
17:42
have a bunch of ideas of
17:44
how to do it so they
17:46
get a one of the surprises
17:48
has been. We have developed some
17:50
substantial. And really positive partnerships with
17:52
a jail administrator. For.
17:54
It so that that the police but
17:56
as long as are split the. The
17:58
the been really. Have a
18:01
partner is in lots of
18:03
places am I think that's in
18:05
large measure because. There
18:07
are tasked with the job
18:09
of managing jails that are
18:12
overcrowded under resource terrible for
18:14
the people stuck in them
18:16
including the Sas. Their staff.
18:19
Arm and they look in and.
18:21
They can see. oh I don't
18:23
know. why is that seven months
18:26
pregnant woman who stole something is
18:28
in here on cast fail. Can't
18:30
somebody get her? And so they
18:32
have one and up in lots
18:35
of jurisdictions being really good partners
18:37
for us. Because the so let's see
18:39
of proximity of problem I see as a
18:41
lotta love i it so also lied for
18:44
spent more generally instead of police. It's fine
18:46
and so let's say that the earliest doctors
18:48
to and point or chair administrator is I
18:51
think we're going to get a move. Or
18:53
not up the tree, but across the forest
18:55
when we do this. But as his. So
18:57
let's say we're partnering with jail
19:00
administrator for her, you ask me?
19:02
Who will be magnificent storytellers? Think
19:04
he wanted to be law enforcement.
19:08
I want. I think you
19:10
want law enforcement to be
19:12
telling your story because then
19:14
it's not saw. It can't
19:16
be misunderstood as soft on
19:18
crime his own. I'm very
19:20
much praising. Having
19:22
you Don't Tell administrators
19:25
in uniform. Talking.
19:28
About why this is best
19:30
for the criminal justice system.
19:34
and it is best for
19:36
the criminal justice system or
19:38
less i would say let's
19:40
partner with jail administrators and
19:42
and here's then the components
19:44
of the story yeah i
19:46
think that i think it's
19:48
has great like you have
19:50
done something exceptional you now
19:52
have the data said now
19:54
it is simply a matter
19:56
of communicating and the messenger
19:58
matters which is why I
20:00
want someone in uniform. I don't
20:03
even know if jail administrators wear uniforms, but if they
20:05
do, I want it there. Because for
20:07
several reasons, one of which is that
20:09
their system is improved by this. You
20:12
have a solution that is quite
20:14
literally better for everyone except for
20:17
people that profit off of this.
20:21
And they're not one of our art constituents.
20:23
And so it's almost like I want the
20:25
extreme example of someone who we would never
20:27
expect to be on site, but even they
20:29
will be better off. Even they are not
20:32
holding these people and spending this money. And
20:34
what could they do? And then now
20:36
we're in a
20:38
position where we have a
20:41
proven solution that works.
20:44
And the only thing I will
20:46
put on our radar is
20:48
that when people have
20:50
an emotional obstacle, we sometimes try
20:53
to double down with facts. There's
20:56
no stack of facts that
20:59
can penetrate the emotions and
21:01
you need bilingual people. So
21:03
your world-class communications team, I
21:05
want them to be expert in the logical
21:08
part of the argument. And I want them
21:10
to be expert in the emotional part of
21:12
the argument. And the reason I want the
21:14
jail administrator is as much for the emotional
21:16
part of the argument, which
21:18
wouldn't necessarily fall out of the logical.
21:21
But because so many people have an
21:23
emotional obstacle, we need bilingual, logical
21:26
and emotional as part
21:28
of this. So I can
21:30
imagine as a next step, bringing
21:33
your awesome bilingual
21:35
communications team and sitting down
21:38
with jail administrators that you've
21:40
already know and saying,
21:43
how can we co-create a narrative
21:47
for why this is a
21:50
useful thing? And I know the jail administrator is
21:52
going to be able to reach people that you
21:54
probably won't be
21:58
able to reach. And
22:00
it's the same set of facts. We're just
22:02
honoring the fact that there's the emotional
22:04
side to it. I love this. So
22:07
great. I love it because it is this
22:10
issue should be bipartisan. This issue
22:12
really is one that should appeal
22:14
to everybody. And somehow
22:17
it gets caught up in the ideology
22:19
wars. And frankly, you know,
22:21
our partnerships with jail administrators was we
22:23
hadn't really thought about it in the
22:26
communications lane or the change lane as
22:28
much as we'd thought about it in
22:30
the operational need. I was going to
22:32
say, side note, I would be broadcasting
22:35
in every conversation that this your solution
22:37
was co-produced. We'd be in partnership with
22:39
a law enforcement. Yeah. Amazing.
22:41
So here's my one final tactical thought.
22:45
I have no doubt that you have
22:47
four extraordinary best in class
22:49
communications professionals on the project from the
22:51
detail that you shared. I
22:54
would love to somehow supplement that team
22:56
in a way that's going to be
22:58
cost efficient to you. Every
23:01
great advertising agency that I know
23:03
takes on a small number of
23:05
pro bono projects that
23:07
the team really believes in. And
23:11
so I think
23:13
as homework, I
23:15
would also charge you and
23:18
or your team with the past. And
23:20
the listeners of this right now. I know
23:22
I was exactly work
23:24
at said advertising agency of
23:26
finding a partner as a
23:29
pro bono client as a
23:31
pro bono client who really
23:33
thinks about bringing
23:35
messages, bringing messages
23:37
to the general public that will
23:39
really spur action. Can
23:42
we bring that team into the new
23:44
framing? Yeah. How do
23:46
we integrate all of the different
23:48
stakeholders into telling the story? Great
23:51
idea. So fun. So smart. We
23:54
really appreciate it. You're
23:58
right. That is just sort of we think. I
24:00
think sometimes in terms of influencers
24:02
and athletes and, you know, and
24:04
musicians who are all
24:06
amazing. And I think you need all of those voices, but
24:09
had not really thought about
24:12
bringing that team into really thinking
24:14
about how might we do some of
24:16
the communications with unlikely voices.
24:19
Police chiefs, jail administrators.
24:22
That are enormous stakeholders in
24:24
this. Yeah. Robin,
24:27
this has been such a pleasure. For me
24:29
as well. We are team
24:31
Robin. We are team Bail Project.
24:33
Really. Thank you. This
24:42
show is sponsored by BetterHelp. Around
24:45
New Year's, it's easy to get distracted
24:47
by changing ourselves. What
24:49
if instead we simply built on what we're
24:51
already doing right? Maybe you've
24:53
figured out that tricky client deal and
24:55
now you're ready to tackle another. Or
24:57
maybe you're making strides, building trust with
25:00
your team, and you want to take
25:02
on more responsibility as a leader. Therapy
25:04
helps you find your strength so you can
25:07
ditch the new year, new me resolutions and
25:09
make changes that really stick. I
25:11
can't remember a time in my adult
25:13
life when I haven't had
25:15
a therapist on the team. And it's
25:18
been a huge part in helping me
25:20
find my growth edge and build
25:23
the life that I want to
25:25
live. If you're thinking
25:27
of starting therapy, give BetterHelp a
25:29
try. It's entirely online and specifically
25:31
designed to be convenient, flexible, and
25:34
suited to your schedule. You can
25:36
fill out a brief questionnaire to
25:38
get matched with a licensed therapist
25:40
and switch therapists anytime for no
25:42
additional charge. Celebrate
25:45
the progress you've already made. Visit
25:47
betterhelp.com/fixable today to get 10%
25:50
off your first month. That's
25:54
betterhelp.com/fixable. Frances,
25:58
something that always surprises me is how... how
26:00
quickly projects can get derailed by the
26:02
lack of organization. Oh my gosh, yes.
26:04
I mean, not mine. No,
26:07
not yours. But yes, information
26:09
overload, multiple stakeholders, shifting timelines.
26:12
Anne and I love big ideas, and
26:15
big ideas take a lot of coordination.
26:17
Luckily, Miro is here to help. Miro
26:20
is an online visual workspace that
26:22
helps teams streamline workflows, organize information,
26:24
and keep everyone on the same
26:26
page, no matter how big the
26:29
dream. We use Miro
26:31
to coordinate across multiple teams in
26:33
the making of this podcast, from
26:35
conversations about timelines, to season
26:38
maps, to marketing brainstorms. We
26:40
love Miro's flexibility as a
26:42
project management tool. Find simplicity
26:44
in your most complex projects
26:47
with Miro. Your first three
26:49
Miro boards are free when
26:51
you sign up today at
26:53
miro.com/podcast. That's three free boards
26:56
at miro.com/podcast. Where
27:00
does it leave you, Frances? So many
27:02
good places, quite honestly. One
27:05
of which is we can come
27:07
up with such great solutions, and we can lose
27:09
it in the communication. It just means we gotta
27:12
do the thing, and then we have to be
27:14
able to communicate the thing, and
27:16
they both need to be done. And
27:18
I think I may even believe this even more
27:20
strongly than you do, in the sense that it
27:23
is just as important, if not more important than
27:25
the innovation itself. I'm
27:28
gonna go 50-50. Yeah, and it is
27:30
often a secondary thought
27:32
for innovators. And
27:36
all of it fits in our move fast and
27:38
fix things approach. And these things
27:40
do need to be done in sequence. I
27:42
also loved the part of the, how
27:45
many of the stakeholders, like the leader sometimes
27:47
can't be the same person, but
27:49
the jail administrators can participate in both
27:51
parts. And I do think that sometimes
27:55
on our communication, we get
27:57
afraid of our biggest critics.
28:00
When we can actually include our biggest
28:03
critics, it's so much more powerful sort
28:05
of minds the of the story of
28:07
Dominoes that we wrote about where when
28:09
dominoes wanted to do with turn around
28:11
fast customers, What's wrong with our peter
28:13
and then what did they do with
28:16
it? They put it on the ticker
28:18
in Times Square. We
28:21
saw yeah I mean it's it's it's an
28:23
interesting case production like as the Us and
28:25
talk about coal production on the operation sides
28:27
but whole production on this on that were
28:29
yelling ah and. The Camino Snide. I
28:31
think those examples a really powerful and
28:33
yeah that that The Dominoes story was
28:35
a moment in time when they hints
28:38
come around to the fact that the
28:40
pizza did know his. Very good
28:42
as yesterday. There was a
28:44
lettuce data supporting that and
28:46
the team really? Decided
28:49
to bring. Consumers.
28:52
Into the challenge of
28:55
making that. Pizza.
28:57
Better and they have been. They use
28:59
that story to galvanize the whole organization.
29:01
Six of them puts me puts consumer
29:04
comments on a billboard in Times Square
29:06
and it which is it just was
29:08
running of as if he's a pro.
29:10
That guy plays ascribed to act like
29:12
hard. Work on the Princess. And
29:15
was really powerful because then we're
29:17
also super invested it's authenticity I
29:20
also then authentic yeah I hope
29:22
our listeners get these it to
29:24
girl nature of communication out of
29:27
this and that we can cope
29:29
reduce in both the operations and
29:31
the communication and said they are
29:34
amazing public servants of hair and
29:36
the have any pro. Bono Moscow
29:38
and be of service to them
29:41
and love it! Thanks
29:43
for listening every one we wanna hear from
29:45
you to. If you want to figure out
29:48
a workplace prom together, send us a message.
29:50
Email us at that civil it's had that
29:52
com or collison two three. Four Fixable. That's
29:54
Two, three, four, three, four nine, Two
29:56
to five, Three. The
30:06
Moment Brought here by The Tide Audio
30:09
Collective. It's hosted by me and Morris
30:11
and me Francis Nice. Our team includes
30:13
Isabel Critters, Constanza Get Hundred. El
30:16
Video Gene Pot, Grace Rubinstein,
30:18
Sarah Next, Michelle, Clint, Corey
30:20
Hey Jim Alla Hundred Salazar,
30:22
Ban Ban Chang and Roxanne.
30:24
Side this episode with Next and Louis.
30:27
It's very hard if you're enjoying the
30:29
show. Make sure to subscribe wherever you
30:31
get your package. In
30:34
still send a check and were more
30:36
saying if you can please take a
30:38
second to leave. Us a movie and. Didn't
30:40
really help has made the great. Show and
30:42
it totally health the search algorithm.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More