Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:08
Hello there.
0:09
Rosey again, and this is our
0:11
fourth episode exploring the real stuff
0:13
that inspired the welcome to Vanguard
0:15
Estates series. Today,
0:17
we are talking about money.
0:20
And I will say off the bat here that this episode
0:22
is mostly going to talk about the economics
0:24
of care work in the United States.
0:27
which is not necessarily how
0:29
it works globally. So yes,
0:31
international listeners. I know we're doing
0:33
a US focused episode. I am sorry.
0:36
This is how it is. The story that you heard is set
0:38
in the US and there's just like no way for
0:40
us to cover how this works everywhere. So
0:42
With that apology slash disclaimer out
0:44
of the way, let's talk about
0:47
money. First, we're gonna talk about
0:49
how expensive it is to get care.
0:52
And then we're gonna talk about how hard it
0:54
is to work in the care industry and make
0:56
a reasonable living. So sort of two
0:58
sides to the same coin.
1:00
As part of my research
1:02
for welcome to Vanguard Estates, I spent a
1:04
lot of time on Reddit reading
1:06
posts from people struggling to help support
1:08
their loved ones. And a lot
1:10
of the scenarios and conundrums that you
1:12
heard in these various storylines, and welcome
1:15
to Estates, came from real
1:17
situations that I found in these threads.
1:19
And that includes, by the way, the incredibly
1:22
predatory loan that the father
1:24
signs up for in one of the storylines.
1:27
Last week, you heard all about
1:29
the various technologies that can be useful
1:31
for folks as they age. And
1:33
when I asked Lori Orlev, our industry
1:36
analyst, you heard her on last episode about
1:38
the barriers that keep people from using
1:40
technology. She immediately said
1:43
money. Well,
1:44
one of the challenges of course, is
1:46
always cost.
1:48
So the wealthiest part of a market
1:50
can probably afford all of the technologies
1:52
I've described quite easily
1:54
it's becoming harder and harder for
1:56
the middle tier of the financial
1:59
market
1:59
for people.
2:01
to afford
2:02
many of these technologies. And at the low
2:05
income end of the market, it's
2:07
difficult to move forward any of them.
2:09
And this answer was about technology, but
2:11
it could also be about pretty
2:13
much everything when it comes to
2:15
senior care. Wealthy people can afford
2:17
it and everybody else has to kind of
2:20
scrape around and hope for
2:22
the best. It costs a lot
2:24
just period.
2:26
This is Devon Bodey. She's a community
2:28
development specialist for the Federal Reserve
2:31
Bank of New York. And in order to be able to
2:33
talk with us today, she had to offer this
2:35
disclaimer. my opinions
2:37
are my own and they do not
2:39
represent the Federal Reserve Bank in New
2:41
York or the Federal Reserve Estates.
2:43
At
2:43
her last job at the Aspen Institute
2:46
Security Program, Devon wrote a report
2:48
called the True Cost of Caregiving.
2:51
every year or so
2:53
we do an expert survey
2:55
that basically ask, what
2:58
are the financial financial
3:00
issues that are most important to
3:02
families, to people, to human
3:04
beings, or another way that we usually
3:06
put it as what is the issue that keeps
3:08
you up at night? And in
3:11
two thousand nineteen, we did this survey.
3:13
And for the first time, one of the
3:15
top three answers was caregiving.
3:18
The report looks at three kinds of
3:20
care, child care, adult care, and
3:22
elder care. We are obviously going to focus
3:24
on that. Last one, elder care. but
3:27
it is not always easy to tease apart
3:29
the three for reasons that we're gonna talk about
3:31
in a minute. So before we get
3:33
into this, let's just set the stage with a
3:35
couple of numbers. According to the US
3:37
Census Bureau, by twenty thirty, there will
3:39
be one billion people on this
3:41
Earth who are over sixty five.
3:44
In the United States, there are currently about
3:46
fifty million people in that age
3:48
group, sixty five and older. And you've
3:50
probably heard about this, right, that there
3:52
is a silver tsunami That
3:55
is my favorite term for it that I have read.
3:58
Instead of our population looking like a pyramid
3:59
with more younger people, the bottom
4:02
and then kind of dwindling down to fewer
4:04
older people. Right now, it looks
4:06
like more of a diamond with like
4:08
kind of a bulge in the middle.
4:10
Eventually, that bulge will find its way
4:12
to the top and we will have essentially
4:14
an upside down pyramid with
4:16
more older people than younger ones.
4:19
I was
4:19
looking at some data
4:22
earlier and it basically stated
4:24
that the number it contracted
4:26
actually that the number of people
4:28
in the United States who are aged
4:30
sixty five
4:31
and older is
4:32
projected to more than double
4:34
between twenty fifteen and twenty
4:36
sixty. And
4:37
then again, for people
4:39
aged eighty five and older, the population
4:42
growth is expected to increase from
4:44
six million to twenty million
4:47
in two thousand and sixty. So this
4:49
is just gonna be a a very
4:51
large need in the future.
4:53
The implications
4:54
of this are really wide reaching,
4:57
culturally and politically. But
4:59
for our purposes, we are going to focus on the
5:01
question of caring for that big
5:03
group of aging folks. Because at
5:05
some point or another, pretty much
5:07
all of those people will need
5:10
care of some kind. And
5:12
there are two main types of care that we're
5:14
gonna
5:14
talk about. The
5:15
first being family caregivers. Family
5:18
caregivers are Generally,
5:20
family members who are providing care, whether
5:22
that is to a child, to a
5:24
loved one, to their parents who are
5:26
aging or someone who needs
5:28
help within their family.
5:30
This is unpaid work. These are family
5:32
members stepping in and taking this
5:35
on. There's more than
5:37
fifty million people providing
5:39
unpaid care to a child or an
5:41
adult. And this is
5:43
just to give a clear picture, this is
5:45
nearly one in five people in
5:47
the United And
5:49
there is one big commonality
5:52
among these family caregivers.
5:55
They are mostly women. And
5:58
as we stated in the report, an
5:59
estimated six and ten family
6:02
caregivers are women
6:04
or at least were women at the time
6:06
that this
6:06
report was written.
6:08
The
6:08
COVID-nineteen pandemic has really
6:10
exacerbated this statistic. When
6:13
schools shut down and child care facilities
6:15
shut down and many adult care facilities
6:17
shut down, it was disproportionately women
6:20
who wound up dropping their careers who
6:23
care for the family
6:24
and actually report
6:26
by the Nationalists Law Center,
6:28
which did a did
6:30
a quick analysis of the Bureau of Labor
6:32
Statistics at the time found that
6:34
over two
6:34
million women left the
6:36
labor force between February
6:38
and October twenty twenty.
6:40
And even more troubling
6:42
is that woman of color typically
6:44
play the largest role with
6:47
black and Latino women providing
6:49
caregiving at higher rates than
6:51
white women. We
6:53
saw this happen in our story. Right? Our
6:55
narrator winds up having to make a choice between
6:57
work, school, and caring for
6:59
their father. And this is what
7:01
Nikki had to do for her mom too.
7:03
I quit my job. I
7:05
was working in the fashion industry as
7:08
an account executive for
7:10
a swimwear company that was, like, standing
7:12
into a big clothing line. And
7:15
I had quit so that I
7:17
could be my mom's full time caregiver.
7:19
And So I was able
7:21
to lean off of my savings for
7:23
about four to six months,
7:25
and I did try to do
7:27
freelancing and part time jobs,
7:30
but in in the interim of the four to
7:32
six months. But going
7:34
outside and working was not sustainable,
7:38
having to make the decision between I'm
7:40
gonna go work my job and earn a
7:42
wage or I'm going to stay
7:44
home that's such a hard decision
7:46
because at the end of the day, we all have
7:49
rents to pay, bills to pay.
7:51
We all have these different financial
7:53
responsibilities. And
7:55
in many cases, these folks are actually
7:57
caring for both ends of the
7:59
family of
8:00
this entire population about
8:03
twenty eight percent of family caregivers are
8:05
providing
8:05
care to both
8:06
an adult
8:07
and a child. And this is known as
8:09
the sandwich generation
8:12
This happens because in the US,
8:14
care, both for children and for
8:16
adults and elders, is
8:18
really expensive. And
8:20
that brings us to the second type of care, which
8:23
Devon calls direct care.
8:25
And
8:25
direct care is
8:27
basically just a realm of care
8:29
where it provides
8:31
for older adults and people living with disabilities.
8:35
This can usually include personal care
8:37
aids, or home health case
8:39
or nursing assistance.
8:41
There are about five point
8:43
seven million direct care workers
8:45
in the United States today. We're
8:47
gonna come back to those folks who they
8:49
are, what that work is like, and what their
8:51
economic situation is in a little
8:53
bit. But if you want to hire someone
8:55
like this, or to live in a facility
8:58
with staff or anything like
9:00
that. It is really expensive.
9:03
In twenty twenty, the median annual cost
9:05
range for non medical in home
9:07
care. So that's things like helping with
9:09
cooking and laundry and kind of like the
9:11
day to day stuff. That costs about
9:13
sixty thousand dollars annually.
9:16
Community and assisted living, so things
9:18
like shared living quarters with some
9:21
supervision and medical management, that
9:23
costs anywhere between twenty thousand
9:25
and fifty five thousand dollars a
9:27
year. Then there are nursing
9:29
homes. which provides
9:30
room and board at
9:32
a in a higher level of supervision. This
9:35
is the most expensive nursing
9:37
homes are ninety thousand into
9:39
one hundred and two thousand.
9:41
And so just taking
9:43
in those costs altogether, it's
9:45
kind of staggering. And
9:47
this is on an
9:49
annual basis.
9:51
No.
9:51
I don't know about you, but I personally
9:54
don't have like twenty thousand
9:56
dollars every year just sort of
9:58
hanging around.
9:59
And
9:59
most people don't.
10:02
Even the lowest range of
10:04
annual cost is more than thirty of
10:07
median family income in
10:09
thirty states. And
10:11
in a lot of cases, insurance
10:13
doesn't cover this stuff. Some people
10:15
have success getting financial support through
10:17
Medicare or Medicaid or other programs,
10:20
but not everybody does.
10:22
It's also often hard to figure out what
10:24
even exists in your state or
10:26
region in terms of financial support.
10:29
So
10:29
what it says currently is really
10:32
a patchwork of
10:33
systems that help support
10:36
family needs.
10:37
and not to say that what
10:39
exists right now is bad, but it
10:41
is very complicated. It can
10:43
really relies on the state that you
10:45
live in and relies on
10:47
the employer that you work for.
10:49
And unfortunately, because of
10:51
this, millions of households fall
10:53
into gaps in our care system,
10:55
some people simply can't afford
10:58
to pay out of pocket, and some
11:00
people lack access to government
11:02
programs that can help them meet
11:04
rising costs. In the
11:06
interviews for the report, Devon
11:08
says that she heard stories of people going into
11:10
pretty deep credit card debt to pay
11:12
for care. they
11:13
delayed major life
11:15
purchases, and they
11:16
tapped into their emergency
11:18
savings, and even more troubling, they
11:20
tapped into their retirement funds.
11:23
Then there
11:23
are those who we talked about earlier, the
11:26
family caregivers. And that's
11:28
expensive too.
11:29
Family caregivers spent an average
11:32
of six thousand nine hundred
11:34
of their annual income or about
11:37
twenty percent on out of
11:39
11:39
costs related to caregiving.
11:41
Not to
11:41
mention the burnout that we talked about
11:44
on the first episode. And the fact that
11:46
these folks don't aren't able to pursue
11:48
the jobs and careers that
11:50
they've had before.
11:51
And like we talked about on the second
11:54
episode, these impacts are
11:56
not evenly distributed. People
11:58
of color were
11:59
were and are more likely
12:02
to receive lower quality
12:04
care and to have lower
12:06
financial resources to
12:08
actually form the care. And then additionally,
12:11
fewer culturally appropriate
12:14
care options there was
12:16
actually a study in two thousand
12:18
eleven by in the
12:20
International Journal of Health Services
12:22
that
12:22
show that the elimination
12:25
of health disparities
12:25
for people of color reduces
12:28
indirect costs associated with
12:30
illness and premature depth,
12:32
which is really important.
12:35
So what does a better way look
12:37
like? If we wanted to go big, rethinking our
12:39
entire medical industrial complex and health
12:41
system and insurance in the United States
12:43
would be great. But maybe
12:45
let's start a little smaller.
12:47
There is some low hanging fruit that could
12:49
make a difference really quickly.
12:52
So
12:52
in the report,
12:54
what we find that can
12:56
help build a more adjusted medical care
12:58
system includes having
13:01
more access to federal and state
13:03
subsidies This will mostly
13:05
help protect families from the
13:07
high unaffordability of direct
13:09
care. It prevents them from
13:11
spending down their own savings and going
13:13
into debt.
13:14
In New York State, for example, there's a
13:16
program called the Consumer Directed
13:18
Personal Estates Program or
13:20
CDPAP. This program
13:22
basically allows for people who are
13:24
eligible for Medicaid to select,
13:27
train, and direct their own
13:29
caregivers. And what that really means is that if
13:31
you have a family member or a
13:33
friend who actually wants
13:35
to provide care, you
13:37
can hire them and get them trained
13:39
through this program. So instead of having
13:41
to quit their job and not have an income,
13:43
they could actually get paid to
13:45
do this work. Another thing
13:47
Devon and her team identified in their
13:49
report is making it easier to
13:51
actually qualify for programs
13:53
like Medicare. So
13:56
there are federal and state insurance
13:58
programs, including Medicaid,
13:59
Medicare,
14:02
social security, disability insurance,
14:04
and more. They all should have very flexible
14:07
eligibility goals that allow more
14:09
families
14:09
to be able to access subsidized
14:12
care. This
14:13
is something that Washington State is trying
14:15
to do now. In twenty nineteen, they
14:17
passed the Long Term Care
14:19
Trust Act. And
14:21
the bill provided a lifetime
14:23
benefit of up to thirty six thousand five
14:25
hundred dollars for people who need
14:27
assistance with activities of daily
14:29
living. And the
14:30
eligibility for that benefit is
14:32
far more flexible than in a
14:34
lot of other places. The
14:36
true benefits of this long term
14:39
care trust act in Washington
14:41
is that it gives families
14:43
another option when
14:45
they are unable
14:48
to success, Medicaid, Medicare,
14:50
and the existing disability
14:53
supports that really help
14:55
people fund the long term
14:57
care needs that people will
14:59
have. This kind of
15:00
thing was actually part of the American
15:03
families plan put forth by president
15:05
Joe Biden. the
15:07
American families plan. It
15:10
really had some
15:11
important care infrastructure
15:13
essentials. One of them
15:15
being about
15:16
four hundred billion dedicated
15:18
to expand access to quality and
15:21
affordable home or community based
15:23
care for aging relatives and
15:25
people with disabilities. So a provision
15:27
like that would be
15:29
really, really life changing for a
15:31
lot of families just by
15:33
improving access in the first
15:35
place. As
15:36
you perhaps know, that
15:38
plan did not make the
15:40
cut in Congress. So for
15:42
now, Americans are going to continue to
15:44
struggle to figure out how to pay for
15:46
the care that we are all
15:48
going to need at some point.
15:50
And that was Davon's big
15:52
takeaway from working on this
15:54
project. that this isn't a
15:56
niche thing. This isn't something that we can
15:58
just kind of ignore. Everyone
16:00
will need care at some
16:02
point in their lives.
16:04
from infants to
16:06
adults to elders. Care
16:08
is
16:08
in a universal need. It's the
16:11
backbone of our economy.
16:12
The
16:12
sooner we realize that this is
16:15
universal need, I
16:16
think the more we'll be done
16:19
to build some more ethical care
16:21
infrastructure.
16:22
As it
16:23
stands, it's really,
16:25
really hard to find and pay for
16:27
quality senior care.
16:29
and it doesn't seem like
16:31
it's going to get any
16:32
easier. And I
16:34
think that the failure of Joe Biden's
16:36
American families plan actually
16:38
highlights one of the reasons why.
16:40
When you look at the arguments made online
16:42
against that bill, against
16:44
spending that money, It often
16:46
boils down to the idea that
16:48
care work isn't real
16:50
work. And that is
16:52
an insidious belief think
16:54
many people don't even realize
16:57
perhaps that they have. This idea
16:59
that, like, well, of course, you wouldn't
17:01
pay people to care for their family. That's
17:03
just like, what you do. That's not real
17:05
work. But that idea
17:07
is not only rooted in some pretty dark
17:09
history. It's also one
17:11
that creates seriously bad
17:13
working conditions for both family
17:15
caregivers and professional ones.
17:17
So when we come back, we are going to
17:19
talk about the employee side of this
17:21
coin and what it's like to actually try and
17:23
make a living providing care
17:26
in this country. First,
17:28
a
17:29
quick
17:29
break. This ad
17:31
talks about alcohol. If
17:33
you don't want to hear that, skip it.
17:36
Lots of people found themselves pandemic
17:38
plants knitting, roller skating. And some people
17:40
I know got really into beer.
17:42
And if you did or you were already
17:44
into beer or you're just like beer
17:47
curious, Tavor has a
17:49
beer for you, or honestly,
17:51
probably many beers. Tavor is an
17:53
incredible place to find craft beer from
17:55
all over the US. Tavor does all the searching
17:57
for you, giving you easy access to a wide
17:59
range of craft
17:59
brews from across state lines.
18:02
All you have to do
18:02
is download the Tavor app
18:05
to get access to hard to find one hundred percent
18:07
independent craft beer from all across
18:09
the country. Build your own custom box
18:11
of the craft beers you love
18:13
or enroll in a beer subscription and they
18:16
will automatically snag the highest
18:18
rated beers that suit your taste.
18:20
No minimums or commitments. Get
18:22
your hand picked beer delivered right to your doorstep
18:24
for a flat fee or ship
18:26
for free with a subscription. Tastes the
18:29
extra carabiners put into every
18:31
p a, stout, and sour ale. Explore
18:33
tried and true classic beer styles
18:35
and trend setting hybrids from some
18:37
of the country's best breweries.
18:40
Essentially, you get a VIP invite into the
18:42
craft beer community. Discover
18:44
outstanding beers, support indie breweries,
18:46
and flaunt your beer hall a little
18:48
bit too. Download the app from the App Store to try
18:50
TAVR now and that's TAV0UR
18:53
TAVR. And use FlashForward
18:56
all lowercase all one word for ten
18:58
dollars off your first order of
19:00
twenty five dollars or more.
19:02
Okay. So it
19:04
is hard to get care in the United
19:06
Estates. but it's also hard
19:08
to give care. The people
19:10
working in direct care, working as home
19:12
health aids or nursing home employees, are
19:15
often underpaid overworked and
19:17
just like straight up exploited.
19:19
I think the most shocking thing
19:21
is care workers are among
19:23
the lowest paid in our nation. They do not
19:25
earn a living wage. And
19:28
if you look into data,
19:30
you know home
19:31
care workers earn a median of fourteen
19:34
dollars per hour, just right
19:35
around twenty nine thousand per
19:38
year. So in addition
19:40
to being some of the lowest paid workers
19:42
in our nation, care workers
19:44
also experience very inconsistent
19:47
work hours marginal label
19:49
protections. And from what we
19:51
hear, limited opportunities for
19:53
career growth and just general
19:55
long term mobility. Not
19:58
only are these workers paid incredibly
20:00
low wages, they are also
20:02
often excluded from
20:04
workplace protections.
20:06
there's just such a vast history
20:08
of gender and race that
20:10
plays into the dynamics of
20:12
why domestic workers maybe are
20:15
left out of very simple rights
20:17
that are granted to a lot of
20:19
workers today, and it will perhaps
20:21
not surprise you that that history
20:24
has a whole lot to do with both
20:27
sexism and racism. So
20:28
women of color, in particular, they've
20:31
provided childcare and
20:33
worked since, you know,
20:34
the sixteen hundreds with many
20:36
black women being forced to care
20:38
for the children of their enslavers.
20:41
That lead the foundation for the idea
20:43
that this work was not worth
20:45
paying for. During the
20:47
civil war, nursing emerged
20:49
as a job that mostly women did.
20:52
And for the confederacy, that actually
20:54
included enslaved women.
20:56
When slavery was abolished, women
20:58
were affected to step into the roles that enslaved people
21:00
were doing, that included care work.
21:02
And often, these were actually the
21:04
very same women who had done
21:06
this work under slavery forced into
21:09
unethical employment contracts with
21:11
wealthy white landowners. Since
21:13
the civil war, women have
21:15
clawed their way into the paid
21:17
workforce despite endless efforts
21:19
both overt and more subtle to
21:21
keep them out. And the fields that
21:23
were a little easier to get into as
21:26
a woman tended to be
21:28
these caregiving professions? So
21:31
women were in the past
21:33
and continue to be very prominent in
21:35
caregiving roles. whether that was
21:37
family caregiving or professional caregiving,
21:39
a lot of these roles involved child
21:41
care, nursing, domestic
21:44
work. That insidious
21:46
history, the one that built care work
21:48
on a foundation of enslavement,
21:50
has meant that even now,
21:52
care workers don't get the same kinds of
21:55
protections and pay as other
21:57
industries that don't have the same
21:59
history. In nineteen
21:59
thirty five, the US passed something called
22:02
the National Labor Relations Act
22:04
and then three years later, similar law called the Fair
22:06
Labor Standards Act
22:08
that
22:08
protects workers from harassment,
22:11
from over time
22:13
withholding from unfair hiring
22:15
and firing practices.
22:17
That's Dr.
22:17
Alana Leaglaser, an assistant professor
22:19
of Anthropologie at St. John's University.
22:22
So these two laws were in theory
22:24
great for workers, except that
22:26
they said that the protections they
22:28
outlined do not apply
22:30
to domestic workers. because
22:32
it takes place in the home and because
22:35
there are all these impressions about who does
22:37
it and whether or not it
22:39
constitutes real work, that kind of thing.
22:41
One
22:41
of the key demands of the civil rights
22:43
movement in the nineteen sixties was for
22:45
labor protections to be extended to
22:47
these kinds of jobs that work largely
22:49
done by black workers. In the
22:51
nineteen seventies, activists had some success
22:53
at getting these laws amended.
22:56
But there are still places where labor protection
22:58
laws exclude care work. That's
23:00
actually how Alana got interested in
23:03
this topic. I'd
23:04
come out of some labor union
23:07
organizing and was interested in those
23:09
questions, but also had a strong kind of
23:11
feminist bent and really
23:13
wanted to ask questions about where working women were
23:15
fighting for improved
23:17
wages, better conditions on
23:19
the job, better, maybe, political
23:21
recognition. And I came to this organization in
23:23
New York called Domestic Workers
23:25
United. That is a
23:27
activist organization representing
23:29
home health care workers, child care
23:32
providers, and house cleaners throughout New
23:34
York. And for about ten
23:36
years, they lobbied the
23:38
New York state legislature to
23:40
pass a series of
23:42
laws that are codified as the New
23:44
York domestic worker bill of rights.
23:45
Over
23:46
half of the people who work as home
23:48
health aids in the United States are women
23:51
of color. And nearly forty
23:53
percent of them were born outside the
23:55
United Estates. And many of these
23:57
workers are employed by private
23:59
companies and classified as independent
24:01
contractors, which means they don't
24:03
get health insurance or other
24:05
benefits. These companies don't actually have very much overhead.
24:07
They basically just have a computer and
24:09
a rolodex of workers.
24:12
they
24:12
typically charge something
24:15
like two times the
24:17
rate of what they pay to the people who
24:19
work for them. So they might
24:21
charge your eye, twenty dollars
24:23
an hour to care for our
24:26
loved ones, and then the person
24:28
actually doing the work might see ten
24:30
dollars or eight dollars an hour of
24:32
that amount, even though again,
24:34
there's not -- there isn't
24:36
overhead enough to account for
24:38
that gap. And in
24:39
some cases, the workers actually have to pay
24:41
the company for their placement.
24:43
And the way
24:45
that it works In many cases, though not all, is
24:47
that the job seeker themselves pays
24:50
a small portion of
24:52
their first week's pay.
24:55
to the placement agency. So the
24:57
income generating component of the job
24:59
placements agency actually
25:01
is on the backs of the workers.
25:03
Often,
25:04
these firms don't seem
25:06
to really care if their workers are
25:08
treated well. And that
25:09
also extends to incidences
25:13
where the home healthcare workers
25:15
report, you know, being mistreated, not
25:17
being able to access food on the job,
25:19
not being able to find a safe and
25:21
comfortable place to sleep. being berated,
25:23
being locked in the homes where
25:25
they spend sometimes one, sometimes two,
25:27
sometimes three weeks working twenty four hours
25:29
a day.
25:30
The Ain't Iowoman
25:31
campaign, which is a group of workers
25:33
who organize for the rights of laborers,
25:35
including home health aids in New York
25:38
City has a series of testimonials on
25:40
their site about the ways that these companies
25:43
exploit their employees.
25:45
One caregiver, Rureet Lin Wang, says
25:47
that quote, long term twenty four
25:49
hour care work made me anxious, nervous,
25:52
sleep deprived with aching limbs
25:54
and waist, high blood pressure, and stomach
25:57
disease. You could say that I too become
25:59
a patient. Another worker, Wheeling
26:01
Chen, said that the company that she worked
26:03
for, quote, told home
26:05
attendants, do not give water to patients at
26:07
night, do not get up from bed to change
26:09
their diapers. ignore the patient when
26:11
they call for help. End
26:12
quote. Right now, eight
26:14
Iowomen is organizing to try and end
26:16
twenty four hour care shift
26:18
in New York City, which often wind up stretching
26:20
to as long as seventy two hours for
26:23
these workers without any
26:25
breaks. And Alana says that in her
26:27
research, she found that some of these employers
26:29
treat their workers essentially
26:32
as disposable. this agency
26:33
in particular and others like it,
26:35
particularly preyed upon people who
26:37
had relatively recently immigrated to
26:40
New York and had few other options because they were waiting
26:42
for paperwork to go through or were
26:44
waiting for official documentation
26:46
that might make working
26:48
elsewhere more feasible.
26:50
And since the firm
26:50
is getting a kickback with every new
26:53
placement, it makes sense that they don't
26:55
mind cycling through workers at
26:57
this rate. These firms
26:59
illustrate something that Alana has called the
27:01
uberization of senior care.
27:03
This idea has two parts.
27:05
The first is what we talked about. All these industries,
27:07
senior care, included, are trying
27:09
to save costs by misclassifying workers
27:12
as independent contractors.
27:15
the apps or companies control access to these
27:18
workers and take a cut, but they don't
27:20
offer their workers any kind of
27:22
protections or benefits. The
27:24
second piece of the uberization of an
27:26
industry is surveillance. We
27:28
talked last week about the ways that facilities
27:30
will install cameras without really talking
27:32
to their patients. But it's worth noting that
27:35
often facilities are installing cameras
27:37
without talking to their workers
27:39
either. And in many cases, these
27:41
cameras are there to
27:43
watch employees as much as they are to watch patients.
27:45
There are these real
27:46
time locating systems where
27:49
nurses' movements are literally tracked
27:51
throughout a like acute haired hospital
27:53
or a long term living facility. In the
27:55
past,
27:55
workers would be required to call
27:58
and clock in using a
28:00
patient's home phone. Now there are apps
28:02
that track them through their entire
28:04
visit and cameras that watch them
28:06
while they're in the room.
28:09
technologies that track direct care
28:11
employees are often justified in two
28:13
ways. The first is by arguing
28:15
for efficiency. saying that
28:17
we need to maximize every single
28:19
second of time that a worker has
28:21
and we can do that by tracking their
28:23
every move. if you have listened to
28:25
this show at all, you probably know.
28:27
I feel about that argument, which
28:29
is in part that there is often very
28:31
little evidence that tracking people act
28:33
actually leads to increased efficiency. And
28:36
in the case of care
28:38
in particular, perhaps
28:40
shooting for maximum efficiency
28:43
should not be the goal. There ends
28:45
up being a
28:45
kind of objectification of
28:48
the elderly people in their
28:50
care. bodies because they're sort of moving through these processes as
28:52
quickly as they possibly can.
28:54
And then that leaves the emotional,
28:57
relational, cognitive needs
28:59
of elderly patients
29:01
unattended to because it's simply
29:04
infeasible. The second
29:05
reason you see people arguing for tracking
29:07
workers is the idea that employees need to be
29:09
tracked because of course, they are going
29:12
to do a bad job if they
29:14
are not.
29:15
the surveillance and the tracking and the
29:18
reporting of work tasks,
29:20
of work hours tends
29:22
to have a strong
29:24
kind of surveillance
29:26
component that assumes the people
29:28
who do these jobs are
29:30
going to clock out early or
29:32
are going to fail to complete important
29:35
tasks that the patients and their care
29:37
rely on them for, or that they
29:39
will take advantage of the system.
29:42
A
29:42
lot of knows this firsthand because for a few years,
29:44
she actually worked for an elder care
29:46
company herself. And she
29:48
says that that experience helped
29:50
her know what to ask when
29:53
interviewing fellow workers. I
29:55
knew that, you know, for example, I haven't
29:57
gone a day without
29:59
being struck by the woman that I
29:59
take care of if she hits me every
30:02
time she sees me. So I was,
30:04
you know, all of a sudden asking people
30:06
who did care work in the home? Have you ever
30:08
been struck? Have you ever been pinched? Have you ever
30:10
been bitten? Now, for a
30:12
long time, I think that there has been kind
30:14
of an antagonistic relationship,
30:16
between disability activists who
30:18
might reside in some of these places, and
30:21
the worker activists representing
30:24
these workers. So for example, when I spoke with
30:26
Kate Swaffer about cameras, her
30:28
first reaction was that they could be useful
30:30
to catch cases of abuse in
30:32
nursing homes, perpetuated by
30:34
the staff. if
30:35
I was the
30:37
family member or legal guardian,
30:42
what
30:42
I have been. Obviously, I said that early,
30:44
I've been one for three people.
30:46
I wished I had surveillance cameras
30:49
in their rooms. you know, we've got footage in Australia
30:52
of a a care worker
30:53
smothering someone's
30:55
face with pillows.
30:57
This
30:58
does happen and it's
31:00
terrible and should absolutely not
31:03
happen and catching these people is
31:05
worth trying to do. We're gonna talk more
31:07
about the conditions in nursing homes
31:09
next week. But it's also worth noting
31:11
that cases of direct abuse
31:13
like this at the hands of
31:15
care workers are maybe not as common
31:17
as we might think.
31:19
Elder abuse is way underreported.
31:22
I think that people often
31:24
imagine they think about their abuse,
31:26
horrendous physical and sexual abuse in
31:28
nursing homes by staff. Right? And
31:30
that's a huge problem.
31:33
But especially when we're studying
31:35
surveillance technology, the reality of
31:37
abuse among older adults is that
31:39
it's far more common at the hands of family
31:41
of spouses and adult children
31:43
than it is by
31:44
personal aids or
31:46
workers. That's
31:46
doctor Clara Barahji the social work
31:48
professor who studies aging and technology.
31:51
And so there's
31:52
a kind of presumption that
31:54
the women who do this work
31:57
might cut corners or might not provide an
31:59
adequate level of care even though there's
32:01
almost no evidence of
32:03
widespread patterns of that kind of
32:05
neglect or time theft,
32:07
and there's very little evidence
32:09
of widespread incidences of abuse,
32:11
you know, for example.
32:13
I think the key thing
32:13
that I wanna say here is that this doesn't
32:16
have to be an eitheror
32:17
situation. These two
32:18
groups actually have way more in
32:21
common than they do that separates
32:23
them. Both groups are suffering while the
32:25
people who run these institutions and
32:27
companies are making money.
32:29
a baseline assumption that workers must
32:31
be surveilled in order to not be
32:34
abusive or neglectful. It doesn't
32:36
exactly make for a great work
32:38
environment. I mean, like imagine this. Imagine if you got to work and your
32:40
boss was like, okay. My assumption is
32:42
that you are a terrible person and a
32:44
terrible worker who will probably abuse and
32:46
neglect your post and so I
32:48
am going to watch every single thing you do so that I can
32:50
catch you. It doesn't really like
32:53
make you want to put your heart
32:55
and soul into a job. Does
32:57
it? We talked last week about the ways in
32:59
which constant surveillance can impact
33:01
a patient, but it also impacts
33:03
the care they receive and
33:05
the working conditions. when
33:07
a technology, like a camera, for
33:10
example, in a nursing home resident room,
33:12
is used pretty clearly to
33:14
surveil the worker. it can send a message that they're not trusted
33:16
to provide for the patient's best
33:19
interests. And then the ethical
33:20
concern is that could
33:22
erode ethical concerns is that could erode
33:24
their
33:24
sense of being the trusted responsible care
33:27
provider. Another thing that nursing
33:29
homes or care facilities will do to
33:31
save money is to employ only a
33:33
small number of people who aren't
33:35
adequately trained in the job, and
33:37
then it's sort of up to families and residents
33:39
to employ additional people who
33:41
have less training to fill the
33:43
gaps. Anna says that she
33:45
experienced this herself. She was hired
33:47
essentially to provide social care
33:49
for a conversations, hanging out with
33:51
her, keeping her cognitively stimulated,
33:54
and so
33:54
I wasn't, like, clued into
33:57
or trained in how to also address some of the physical
33:59
aspects of her condition that
34:01
were present and they were present throughout the
34:03
time I spent with her
34:05
and because of the very very narrow
34:08
scope that my role entailed because of
34:10
this kind of process of having like
34:12
essentially I was
34:14
paid to fill in one little hole in what would have
34:16
previously been a much more integrated care
34:18
work position.
34:22
it ended up meaning that the times that she was with me, she
34:24
was not getting adequate physical
34:26
care because I hadn't been
34:28
trained to do it or expected to
34:31
do it. And I was particularly struck by
34:33
the fact that no one except
34:35
for other workers on the floor
34:37
mentioned to me what her
34:39
physical needs were.
34:41
Technology comes into play here too.
34:44
In some places, there is one nurse
34:46
on call watching a wall of
34:48
screens with feeds into
34:50
people's rooms. responding only if there is an
34:52
emergency. Actually, the way that
34:53
Kaiser Permenente does it, they
34:55
have nurses observing
34:58
these, like, closed circuit television another Estates. And
35:01
then they call the floor
35:03
nurse and say, hey, did you know that
35:05
room 302 needs
35:08
help getting to the bathroom or whatever it is. And there's like, related problem
35:11
where there's constantly buzzers and
35:13
alarms going off
35:16
because that patients are so heavily surveilled in both
35:18
long term living and acute care facilities. And
35:20
so they like to start tuning out
35:22
these alarms because they're so
35:25
frequently going off an error. And so it's
35:28
like like that kind of like over stimulation
35:30
problem where you're just becoming
35:32
accustomed to having all of your
35:34
patient's alarms buzzing at once, and then you actually go
35:36
to check on it and nothing has
35:38
happened. So there's a real
35:40
desensitization to
35:42
these these bells and
35:44
whistles that all of the surveillance
35:46
technology give
35:47
off to, like, alert
35:49
someone to come help. All of
35:51
this reduces both the workers and older people in
35:53
these situations to sort of cogs
35:55
in a machine. to
35:57
things that be maximally efficient,
36:00
constantly surveilled, and constantly
36:02
scrutinized. And it
36:04
matters that these workers are treated
36:06
fairly. I mean, just because the baseline
36:08
everyone should be paid fairly and treated
36:10
well at work. But also
36:12
because if workers are
36:14
underpaid, miserable, and
36:16
being exploited, Their work isn't going to be very
36:18
good. The health of
36:20
patients
36:20
is so intricately connected to the working
36:24
conditions of caregivers,
36:26
whether it's nurses or doctors
36:28
increasingly doctors are subject to the
36:30
same kind of capitalist efficiency
36:33
policies that nurses and home
36:35
health care and elder care providers have long
36:37
been subject to
36:39
And what
36:39
that means is that every
36:42
interaction becomes a
36:44
business transact rather than an act of
36:46
care. A lot of told one story about the
36:48
woman she was caring for and a situation in
36:50
which she needed a
36:52
diaper change. she did not
36:53
want a diaper change. And that's
36:56
such a private and personal and an
36:58
invasive experience.
36:59
In this
37:00
moment, as a care provider,
37:02
you have to wait into some murky
37:04
ethical waters. Right? On the one hand,
37:06
you want to respect this person's autonomy.
37:08
On the other hand, there are risks to letting someone spend too
37:10
much time in a soiled diaper. At
37:12
the time, Alana was able
37:16
to ask for help from the certified nursing assistant on staff
37:18
and they worked it out. But
37:20
in a future where these places keep
37:22
shifting further and
37:24
further towards efficiency and
37:26
surveillance, that negotiation
37:28
looks really different. My
37:30
prediction is that
37:32
the cost saving imperatives
37:34
that the kind of emphasis on efficiency,
37:36
that the understaffing, the
37:39
pruning of workers repertore
37:42
of, like, duties
37:45
and tasks, worsens those kinds
37:47
of conflicts because it's
37:49
just there's so much more pressure to get things done quickly so
37:51
that you don't have time
37:54
for, like, more nuanced coaching and
37:56
discussion or
37:58
more kind of flexible negotiation. I'm
38:00
like, okay, now is not the time to change that
38:02
diaper. I can come back, you know, or I can
38:04
get someone else who you're more comfortable
38:06
with. Earlier in
38:06
this episode, we talked about the demographic trends
38:08
in aging and about how in
38:10
the next few decades there will be
38:13
a huge increase in people who
38:15
need care. Meanwhile, the actual number
38:18
of people who work in the direct care
38:20
industry is decreasing, and
38:22
it's not really hard to understand why.
38:24
Right? We just talked about how this industry pays really poorly and
38:27
often includes exploitative workplace
38:30
conditions. One solution
38:32
that people raise is outsourcing, which brings
38:34
us back actually to Missy from last
38:37
episode. Care dot coach
38:39
health advocates are not based in the
38:41
United States. And we hire them like in
38:42
the Philippines and Latin American countries for
38:45
Spanish. Victor likes
38:46
to
38:47
brag about the rigorous hiring
38:49
process these workers go through. Howard Bauchner: Yeah,
38:51
a lot of
38:52
these are secret sauce because as far as I know,
38:54
we're the only company in the world that actually,
38:56
like, does exactly this. But the the
38:59
overall of it is that it's a quite
39:01
a sophisticated process. We end up
39:03
hiring one percent of
39:06
our applicants. So it's,
39:07
like, easier to get into, like,
39:10
you see Berkeley or Stanford or
39:12
something something like that?
39:13
Potential workers
39:14
go through a bunch of steps and
39:16
screenings and trainings. And here is what he said when I
39:18
asked how much a care dot coach
39:21
employee gets paid?
39:24
I
39:24
will compare it to what a
39:26
registered
39:27
nurse who got a
39:29
bachelor's degree in nursing.
39:31
would make if they commute it
39:33
a couple hours a day to a
39:35
local hospital in the Philippines and work the
39:37
grueling twelve hours shift, that's
39:40
what
39:40
what they mean they make.
39:42
According
39:42
to Indeed dot com, the average
39:44
salary for a nurse in the Philippines
39:46
is twenty one thousand pesos a month,
39:48
which is about three hundred and seventy dollars.
39:51
comes out to an annual salary of about
39:53
five thousand dollars. Which ends
39:55
up being very cost effective
39:57
here in the US. If you
39:58
are part of the FlashForward Book Club, you might remember that we
40:00
read a book called ghost work all
40:02
about remote, largely international workers
40:06
at the power dynamics at play in those kinds of jobs,
40:08
which is complicated and
40:10
fraught. But there are lots of things that
40:11
these remote
40:14
workers can't do. Lots of people, millions
40:16
of people need in person
40:18
care. And across the United
40:20
States, people are finding that they're simply are
40:24
not workers taking those jobs. People who used to
40:26
be employed by these elder care firms
40:28
are deciding to move on.
40:31
often if they can transitioning to better paying
40:34
healthcare jobs, but sometimes
40:36
leaving care
40:38
work entirely. And again, this
40:40
is only going to get
40:41
worse, unless
40:43
we
40:44
do something. And
40:45
there are things to do. both
40:48
culturally changing how we think about
40:50
senior care and politically
40:52
demanding that these workers and programs
40:54
get the funding and pay
40:56
they deserve.
40:57
In general, I think we tend to shove the idea of aging
41:00
off into its own little
41:02
box. But this is really all
41:04
about care.
41:06
caring for one another in all kinds of
41:08
stages of life. And if we
41:10
reevaluate how we think about care,
41:14
who does it and what it's worth, we can start to imagine
41:16
a better future of aging.
41:19
My kind of
41:20
real big pie
41:22
in the sky kind of romantic vision of
41:24
these things is that you were it
41:27
possible to have a society organized
41:30
around caring for one another, caring for ourselves rather than sort
41:32
of spending every waking moment, selling
41:34
our labor power so that we can afford
41:36
to eat and have a home
41:39
that there would be, like, ample easy
41:41
resources for a kind
41:44
of seamless aging process
41:46
or seamless process of illness and wellness that didn't have to
41:48
be isolating or
41:50
alienated and that didn't result
41:52
in that kind of fracturing of
41:54
our sense of our physical needs from our
41:57
emotional or cognitive needs. Next
41:59
week, we're going to try
42:00
and sum all of this up. So
42:03
what does it look like to age in the future? Where
42:05
do you want to grow old? Why is
42:07
there still such a big gap between
42:09
what people want and what
42:12
people get? And what can be done
42:14
about it?
42:21
That's all for
42:24
this
42:26
episode. FlashForward is hosted by me,
42:28
Rose Eveleth, and produced by Aussie
42:30
lina Skidman. The intro music is by Asura, and the outro music
42:32
is by Hasulonia. The episode art is
42:34
by Maddie Luchansky. Come back next
42:36
week for our
42:38
final episode in this series
42:40
about the real stories and research that inspired welcome to Vanguard and Steaks.
42:44
Until then.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More