Podchaser Logo
Home
Vanguard Estates: Where Do You Want to Grow Old?

Vanguard Estates: Where Do You Want to Grow Old?

Released Monday, 5th December 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Vanguard Estates: Where Do You Want to Grow Old?

Vanguard Estates: Where Do You Want to Grow Old?

Vanguard Estates: Where Do You Want to Grow Old?

Vanguard Estates: Where Do You Want to Grow Old?

Monday, 5th December 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:08

Hello,

0:08

and welcome to flash forward.

0:10

This is the fifth and final

0:12

episode looking at all the stuff that inspired

0:14

the welcome to Vanguard Estates fictional

0:17

series. Today, we're gonna talk

0:19

a little bit about nursing homes and why

0:21

it is that while most people want

0:23

to spend their final years at home

0:25

or in a supportive community, that

0:27

doesn't tend to happen. And

0:29

then we're gonna do a little bit of wrap

0:32

up on this whole series and consider

0:34

what we have learned. Oh,

0:36

and by the way, I'm I'm your host. I say that

0:38

on every episode, so I should say it here now.

0:40

But before we go any further, I wanna share something

0:43

really which is that a listener has actually

0:45

created an interactive version of

0:47

welcome to Vanguard Estates with the audio

0:49

all in one place. So if you, like, wanted

0:51

to listen to the series but got frustrated

0:54

by trying to find the various episodes

0:56

or whatnot. I know it's like little confusing where you

0:58

have to scroll through your podcasting app, etcetera,

1:00

etcetera. Now, you

1:01

can play through the audio online.

1:04

I

1:04

am so thankful to Markos for setting that up will

1:06

put a link in the show notes and you can go

1:08

to flash forward pod dot com

1:10

slash vanguard interactive to

1:13

see and hear it. So again,

1:15

thank you, Marcos, for making that so cool.

1:18

I am like so stoked to have it now

1:20

on the site. Okay. Back to our

1:22

regular programming. So

1:24

let's start with the question that

1:27

is the name of this episode.

1:29

Where do you want

1:31

to grow old? Most

1:33

people share the same answer to that question.

1:36

Surveys show that seventy seven percent

1:38

of people over fifty say they want to remain

1:41

in their homes. And that number has

1:43

stayed consistent in polling for over

1:45

a decade. But not

1:47

all of those seventy seven percent of people

1:49

will get their wish. Three point four

1:51

million people over the age of sixty five

1:53

currently live in their children's homes,

1:55

and two point four million live in group

1:57

settings like nursing homes.

1:59

And

1:59

this happens for a bunch of different

2:02

reasons. For some people,

2:04

the homes they currently live in

2:06

would need to be changed. in some

2:08

way in order for it to be safe for them

2:10

to stay. In one survey, about a third

2:12

of all participants said that their homes

2:14

would need to be modified somehow if

2:16

they wanted to keep living in them. That

2:19

includes things like there's no bedroom

2:21

or bathroom on the first floor for them

2:23

to use. Most people

2:25

don't have the money to do that

2:27

kind of major renovation to

2:29

put a bedroom and bathroom on that

2:32

first floor. And that's

2:34

assuming that you own your house

2:36

and can do those kinds of renovations. One

2:39

think tank called the Urban Institute estimate

2:41

that by twenty forty, the number of

2:43

people renting their homes or apartments

2:45

will surge to twelve point nine

2:47

million. and in particular

2:50

those are likely to be black older

2:51

adults. What

2:53

that means is that a lot of people,

2:55

whether they like it or not,

2:57

will wind up in some kind of facility,

3:00

likely a nursing home.

3:02

And there is a reason that most of

3:04

us don't want to end

3:06

our lives in one of these places.

3:10

We know nursing homes are unpleasant

3:12

places to live. it's a punch

3:15

line in the Simpsons that Grandpa

3:17

Simpsons Nursing Home is like a sad, horrible

3:19

place to be. That's Sarah

3:21

Luederman, a reporter at the nineteenth

3:23

who's covered nursing home conditions. There's

3:26

just like this thing that we know about

3:28

them and yet we send our the percent of people

3:30

we love to them anyway.

3:32

The

3:32

quality of nursing homes varies

3:34

wildly, but they're marked by

3:37

some specific elements. And

3:39

one of them is that you can't

3:41

really leave just because

3:43

you want to. Here's Dr. Alana

3:45

Lee Glaser, the Anthropologie professor

3:47

at St. John's University. who you heard last

3:49

week. The

3:50

facilities where I worked, you know,

3:52

you couldn't get off the floor. So

3:54

you need to pass, put a passcode in

3:56

to access the elevator or the stairwells.

3:59

And that's just such

3:59

a high level of containment. It always made me

4:02

feel really uncomfortable and

4:04

envisioning a future where I live in a setting

4:06

like that, you know, and knowing that I am

4:08

unable to leave.

4:10

Many nursing homes have dedicated dementia

4:12

awards. also sometimes called memory

4:15

care units, where they have extra

4:17

security in place. And in sociology

4:19

jargon, these places are considered

4:22

total institutions. The

4:24

total institution is a

4:26

a concept that was proposed by the sociologist,

4:29

Irving Goffman, And

4:31

basically, it's the the

4:33

basic definition is this place where

4:34

a lot of people are

4:37

living in the same place and they work in the

4:39

same place and they live in the same place. And there

4:41

isn't really the separation between

4:43

sort of, like,

4:45

home

4:45

and work

4:47

and that we see

4:49

in most places, they're in the same sort of

4:51

separation spheres. And

4:53

then in the total

4:55

institution,

4:56

people don't have privacy.

4:59

They

4:59

don't have

5:00

freedom of choice. They

5:03

don't choose what

5:04

they're going to do, what they're going

5:06

to eat. Prisons

5:08

are also total institutions.

5:11

These

5:11

are places where when you live there, you

5:14

no longer have the ability to decide

5:16

for yourself what your day

5:18

looks like or what you want to

5:20

do. A disability activist,

5:22

Dave Hingsburger, came up with what he

5:24

calls the burrito test. That

5:26

test goes like this. You wake

5:28

up in the middle of the night and you are craving

5:30

a microwave burrito. Can

5:32

you get up and microwave one

5:34

yourself? If the answer is no,

5:36

you are not allowed to do that. It's

5:39

a total institution. There's

5:40

also like a concurrent concept called

5:43

the right to eat too many doughnuts. which

5:45

is like, you know, people

5:47

have a right to make bad decisions. Like,

5:49

if if I as

5:50

someone who's not living in an institution or

5:53

in a group home or you

5:55

know, with a certain level of

5:56

care, like, if I decide to eat a

5:58

bunch of if I decide to skip work, eat a bunch

6:00

of donuts and take an nap, like, nobody's

6:02

gonna stop me. I might, you know,

6:04

lose my job or or face, you

6:06

know, get have a stomachache,

6:07

like, you know, regular consequences. But

6:09

like, no one's

6:10

gonna stop me.

6:12

In

6:12

most nursing homes, that

6:14

wouldn't be allowed. A nurse would stop

6:17

you. And it doesn't have to just do

6:19

with food. This is about your choices

6:21

generally. You or

6:23

I might be feeling like a little

6:26

blip one day and decide to just spend

6:28

the day in bed. That

6:30

is not a choice that folks who live

6:32

in these places have. There's

6:34

a really excellent older study

6:37

and there's like this one

6:39

passage that he writes about where

6:42

someone wanted to stay in bed

6:44

all day. They didn't wanna have to get out of bed, but

6:46

long term living facilities protocols insisted

6:50

that every patient get out of bed and

6:52

move to a common room or whatever at certain

6:54

point in the day. And he kind of writes

6:57

like along the lines of, you know, this person's human

6:59

rights weren't being trampled

7:01

by, you know, not

7:03

by their wishes to stay in bed, not being respected.

7:06

And it always stuck with me that, you know, in

7:08

fact, like, aren't they? You know, if if what you

7:10

wanna do all day is play around.

7:14

It seems so unfair that

7:16

because of various bureaucratic

7:19

liabilities or bureaucratic values

7:22

that you're not permitted to just

7:24

make that decision for yourself in

7:26

these in certain settings, these

7:28

congregate care care settings.

7:30

Secure dementia units a

7:34

severe form of violation

7:38

of rights of institutionalization and

7:41

worse of segregation.

7:44

That's

7:44

Kate Swaffer again. Not only

7:46

are folks with dementia segregated away,

7:48

conditions in many nursing homes

7:51

are often very bad. We

7:54

talked last week about the shortage of caregivers

7:56

and people willing to do these jobs

7:58

for such low pay. And

8:00

that is having a huge impact on

8:02

the quality of care in these

8:04

facilities.

8:06

We're talking like like one person

8:09

being responsible

8:10

for toiloting,

8:11

feeding, changing, cleaning,

8:15

giving medication to like

8:17

seventy people.

8:18

That's like not something that

8:19

someone could do competently and also

8:21

provide emotional support for those

8:23

people. Like, it's not it's not

8:25

like a thing

8:26

a human being can do.

8:28

And

8:28

so, like, when we have these,

8:30

like, this understaffing, when we have

8:33

these underpaid, undertrained,

8:35

overworked staff

8:38

doing all of this stuff, like,

8:40

it gets really ugly, really quickly.

8:44

During the COVID pandemic, nursing

8:46

homes were hit really,

8:48

really hard. Here is a statistic that

8:50

I always find just shocking.

8:52

According

8:53

to the COVID Tracking Project,

8:56

deaths connected to long term care

8:58

facilities account for thirty

9:00

five percent of US

9:02

COVID nineteen fatalities, even though

9:04

less than one percent of

9:06

the US population lives in

9:08

these places. And this

9:11

continues to be an issue. In October of

9:13

this year, AARP data showed

9:15

that thirty two percent of nursing home

9:17

residents tested positive. for

9:19

COVID-nineteen that month. And

9:21

it's not that COVID has

9:23

suddenly made nursing homes unpleasant.

9:26

For decades, folks living in these

9:28

places have been routinely strapped

9:30

down or drugged. In

9:32

fact, in Australia, there is

9:34

data to say that probably six hundred people

9:36

a year are dying from

9:38

the overuse of antipsychotics in

9:41

Australia, and there's been a

9:43

number of research projects about reducing

9:46

antipsychotics in nursing

9:48

homes globally and yet

9:50

they persistently prescribed

9:52

to to paper with dementia.

9:54

Part of thinking about care is

9:57

our medication interventions in that

9:59

case in

9:59

particular have been disastrous.

10:02

That's

10:02

Dr. Tia Powell again, the psychiatrist

10:04

and bioethicist at Albert

10:06

Einstein College of Medicine.

10:08

We've been using antipsychotic

10:09

medications to

10:12

treat agitation in nursing

10:14

homes. And they're terrible. They cause

10:16

delirium. They have terrible side effects. They

10:18

cause sedation, so you fall, you break a hip,

10:20

and then you're bed bound and game

10:22

over. They cause delirium. They

10:24

do all kinds of

10:24

things. They make a lot of other illnesses worse.

10:26

There have been

10:28

some attempts to make it harder to prescribe

10:30

these things in nursing homes,

10:32

but there is a long way to go.

10:35

There's almost no regulation at all

10:37

for the use of antipsychotic medications,

10:40

insisted living programs, and

10:42

in other places. And even in the acute

10:45

care hospital and our big fancy

10:47

medical research institutions,

10:48

we still use this stuff in its bad

10:50

news. And

10:51

people are finding workarounds.

10:53

Like, oh, yes, schizophrenia. That's why

10:55

we're actually it

10:58

would be reportable in New

10:59

England Journal if you found a ninety year

11:01

old who was first diagnosed with schizophrenia.

11:04

That's kinda not like how

11:05

that works. It would be,

11:07

whoa. That just doesn't happen.

11:09

In

11:10

other places, they've stopped using

11:13

antipsychotics and started using

11:15

other drugs.

11:16

Professor Henry Brodarty, who's one

11:18

of the leaders in dementia in Australia,

11:20

in his witness

11:22

statement to the Royal Commission said that Now

11:25

some doctors are switching from

11:27

antipsychotics as ways

11:30

to sedaterestrained. and

11:33

are starting to use high dose

11:35

and histamines, which also have a

11:37

highly sedative effect.

11:40

Given

11:40

all of this, it won't

11:42

surprise you then that the outcomes

11:44

for living in these places

11:46

are

11:46

not good. People

11:48

who move into nursing homes tend to die

11:50

sooner than those who get to age in place.

11:52

Over thirty percent of residents

11:54

who enter a nursing home facility die

11:57

within the first year. Now,

11:59

when you think about it, this

12:01

is kind of weird.

12:03

Most people don't want to

12:05

live in these places. The conditions

12:07

are bad. They are cesspools for

12:09

disease, they are poorly regulated, and

12:11

as we talked about last week, They're really

12:13

expensive. So

12:15

why do they exist? Why

12:17

do we allow this to happen?

12:19

It

12:20

turns out actually there's a lot of suffering

12:22

that people

12:23

in our society are completely comfortable with

12:25

living with. I

12:26

am officially on the record as being

12:29

opposed to nursing homes

12:30

sort of on principle. I do

12:31

not think that they should exist.

12:33

Sarah agrees. We actually wrote very

12:35

similar stories right around the same time

12:37

in twenty twenty. both arguing for

12:39

the end of nursing homes. And

12:41

one of the things that you hear when

12:43

you talk about this or write about this.

12:45

is

12:46

that there is simply no other

12:48

way for us to handle

12:50

the aging population. There's just like no

12:52

other solution. What else are we

12:54

supposed to do? Nursing homes have been around

12:56

forever for a reason. The

12:58

thing

12:58

is, they have not been around

13:01

forever. It's

13:02

actually really new. That was the thing that

13:04

shocked me when I was doing research for this

13:06

piece. Before

13:07

nursing homes, there were things like rest

13:10

homes, which were small facilities that housed

13:12

thirty to fifty people at a time.

13:14

Those were generally run by philanthropists,

13:17

and they were for folks who had really nobody

13:19

else to turn to. Historically,

13:21

people have

13:23

done care at home. It's

13:25

mostly been family care.

13:28

Those who didn't have that would go to alms

13:30

houses or poor houses, which

13:32

were generally awful.

13:34

people were often forced to work

13:37

for scraps on

13:38

Blackwell's Island, which is now called Rosebel

13:41

Island in New York City, there were hundreds of beds

13:43

that were squeezed together so tightly that

13:45

residents had difficulty getting in and out

13:47

of them.

13:48

During the Great Depression,

13:49

the number of poor people famously skyrocketed,

13:52

and these places could no longer

13:54

keep up. And for a

13:56

long time, the US government

13:58

was not sure what to

13:59

do. It

14:00

wasn't until the nineteen fifties

14:03

that the large institutional spaces

14:05

we know of today became common,

14:07

thanks to a new law in the US called

14:09

the Hill Burton Act, which allowed

14:11

public money to be used to build

14:13

nursing homes. Between

14:15

nineteen sixty and nineteen sixty five, federal

14:17

spending on nursing homes, went up from

14:19

forty seven million to four hundred and

14:21

forty forty nine million a year. So

14:23

it's like

14:26

Sorry. If this is a podcast, you can't see my

14:28

arm going up with the the hand

14:30

motioned up. And

14:33

then

14:33

Medicaid, came to be, which is like the

14:36

biggest wonder of long

14:38

term

14:38

care in the ICs in nineteen sixty five.

14:40

and

14:41

that put even more money in the nursing home

14:43

system. So the nursing home capacity in

14:45

the US basically more

14:48

than doubled in the

14:50

decade between nineteen I get between nineteen sixty

14:52

three and nineteen seventy three. So

14:54

there

14:54

was all of this money going into

14:56

these new institutions, but

14:58

very little oversight. There

15:00

weren't a

15:01

ton of requirements about

15:03

things like building

15:05

codes, whether a

15:07

nurse was available, you

15:09

know, whether narcotics were unlocked cabinets,

15:13

whether

15:13

the food was

15:15

food.

15:19

Yeah. Like, just really there's

15:22

just one account that I read that, like, talked

15:24

about, like, green meat with maggots in the kitchen.

15:26

It was just, like, really gross stuff.

15:28

Eventually, the US passed some basic

15:31

rules about what constituted a

15:33

skilled nursing facility to

15:34

address these glaring errors.

15:37

But

15:37

there are still big problems with

15:39

oversight. and a lot of the current oversight

15:41

relies on nursing homes to

15:43

accurately self report their

15:45

conditions.

15:47

Today, the nursing home industry in the

15:49

US is huge.

15:51

According to the CDC, there were fifteen

15:53

thousand six hundred facilities in

15:55

twenty sixteen. and almost seventy

15:57

percent of them were for profit.

15:59

A report by Grand View Research

16:01

found that the long term care market is

16:03

set to be worth one point seven

16:06

trillion dollars by two thousand and

16:08

thirty. In the United States,

16:10

nursing home lobbyists are powerful and

16:12

have already gotten to work seeking

16:14

immunity from COVID-nineteen related

16:16

lawsuits and asking for billions

16:18

in federal relief funding and

16:20

resisting additional oversights

16:22

and regulations. that might be imposed upon

16:24

them. Now, the point that

16:26

Sarah and I are making here, the argument

16:28

that nursing homes are fairly

16:30

recent and should probably not exist.

16:33

It

16:33

is not an argument to go back to

16:35

free domestic labor.

16:37

I think a lot

16:38

of people misunderstood my argument and think that what

16:40

I'm arguing is that Like, it

16:42

was totally better when unpaid

16:45

family caregivers, mostly almost

16:47

entirely women basically didn't

16:49

have lives and spent all their time

16:51

caring for people. Like,

16:53

that's no. That's that's that's

16:55

bad, obviously. But

16:57

it's not like those are her only two

16:59

options. Right? Either women have to give up

17:01

their jobs and do all this care work for

17:03

or we have these terribly run and

17:05

poorly regulated nursing homes where people

17:07

suffer and die. We actually do

17:09

have other choices. when

17:12

we come back, we're gonna talk about what those

17:15

choices

17:16

are. This episode of FlashForward

17:18

is sponsored by Volante Design.

17:20

If you are looking for gear that makes you

17:22

feel just as badass in real life as you

17:24

do when you get a triple s

17:27

combo kill in a game, look no further than

17:29

Volante design. Okay. Listen, I'll be

17:31

honest that I don't know what that

17:33

means, but I suspect that some of

17:35

you do And if you are a

17:37

person that does know what a triple s

17:39

combo kill is,

17:41

voluntary designs makes really rad

17:43

jackets that can make you legit look

17:45

like your favorite characters from

17:47

Essence Creed, Devil May Cry and Star

17:49

Trek, as well as plenty of other original

17:51

collections like their cyberpunk and

17:53

modern ninja line. Volante

17:55

design jackets are ethically sourced and

17:57

manufactured. They are made for quality, and they

17:59

will last you for years to come. Just

18:01

go to volante design dot

18:03

u s, that's V0ANTE

18:07

design dot u s and use the

18:09

code flash forward for

18:11

ten percent off your entire

18:13

order. That's flash forward all one

18:15

word for ten percent off your

18:17

entire order. Voilante design,

18:19

stay

18:19

at us.

18:20

Okay. So I have said already, multiple

18:23

times now, that I think nursing homes as an

18:25

institution, as a place, are something that

18:27

we should consider a band name. But even

18:29

within the construct of nursing homes, there

18:32

are much better models than the

18:34

standard institution. And

18:36

one

18:36

of these examples can be found in

18:38

the Netherlands. So you must

18:40

realize that the vision on

18:43

normal live for dementia, already a

18:45

thirty year old innovation. This

18:47

is Jeannette

18:48

Speerring, one of the founders of a community

18:50

in the Netherlands called

18:52

the whole bag. Yes.

18:55

And it's very

18:57

difficult from people from

18:59

abroad to pronounce the

19:01

h. which is very prominent in

19:03

the Dutch language, but that's also

19:05

why we were dubbed dementia

19:07

village because people can't pronounce

19:09

the whole leg. I'm gonna try

19:11

my very best to say this correctly on

19:13

the episode. Now, a dimension village

19:15

is a different model for where

19:18

people might live when they have

19:20

dementia. Jeanette actually used to

19:22

work at a more traditional nursing

19:24

home back in the 1990s. But

19:26

she was looking around and hearing from patients and families

19:29

that things weren't that

19:31

good. People weren't

19:32

really dissatisfied about

19:37

topics like food

19:39

or how they were being

19:40

treated by stuff.

19:43

the the lack of

19:45

respect or

19:46

dignity.

19:49

In nineteen ninety

19:49

three, they decided to try

19:51

and retrofit a nursing home to be more like a

19:53

set of apartments. And I

19:55

always

19:56

compare it with

19:58

and I don't want to offend

19:59

someone, but I've

20:02

compared it with an East German

20:04

concrete block to

20:05

give you any idea of

20:07

how awful it was on the outside. But on

20:09

the inside, it's

20:10

once we transformed it,

20:13

we transformed big words into

20:15

living rooms. We put

20:18

kitchens in it. We

20:20

put a washing machine

20:22

and a drawer

20:24

onto every word while we created

20:27

hosts. And

20:28

Jeanette says they immediately

20:30

saw results. People were happier

20:33

and healthier And from there, Jeanette and the team decided to

20:35

try and really go all in

20:37

on this idea. So in

20:38

two thousand

20:39

eight, they built the Hulkvek.

20:41

Well, you must imagine it's in it's

20:44

in a a normal

20:46

Dutch neighborhood. It's a little

20:48

bit because we are in a rather

20:50

urban environment, not a big city, but a

20:52

little bit urban. And

20:55

there are twenty

20:56

seven houses in

20:58

the neighborhood and

21:01

in

21:01

every house, seven

21:04

people form

21:04

a household. They

21:07

live together. If you

21:09

talk about a household, that means that

21:11

every meal

21:11

is cooked in that household, so

21:14

breakfast, lunch,

21:14

and dinner. So

21:17

every evening, twenty seven different menus

21:19

are on. These

21:21

houses look

21:22

just like regular Dutch

21:24

houses in a regular Dutch

21:27

neighborhood. Each home

21:28

has seven bedrooms, a kitchen,

21:30

a living room, all normal

21:32

stuff. And it's all accessible

21:34

to everybody all the time.

21:36

Residence can use that kitchen, they

21:39

can open the fridge, they can

21:41

take something out, they if they

21:43

are still able, they can make their own

21:45

sandwich, so nothing is locked.

21:48

AND

21:48

DIFFERENT HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARE ACTUATED

21:51

DIFFERENTLY PENDING ON WHO LIVES

21:52

THERE. REMEMBER THERE ARE SEVEN PEOPLE PER HOUSE AND

21:55

I ASKED Like, how do you decide

21:58

who lives together? Good

21:59

question because we'll live in together with

22:02

someone isn't that easy always. And

22:04

how do you do that

22:06

with complete strangers as well?

22:09

The answer

22:10

lies in something they call

22:12

lifestyles. Nowadays,

22:13

we have four lifestyles in

22:15

the whole bag. And

22:17

if

22:17

you live in a certain lifestyle, that

22:20

means that everything

22:22

that is in that household,

22:24

the interior, but also

22:26

the meals, the music,

22:28

the newspaper, which is on

22:30

the table, everything is

22:33

according to

22:34

that lifestyle. So these

22:37

four large cells, the urban,

22:39

the formal, the

22:40

cosmopolitan and the

22:42

traditional large cells, They

22:46

help people

22:48

feel better

22:48

in their own houses which they

22:51

share with six

22:52

others. So in the urban

22:53

and traditional lifestyle homes,

22:55

people are more likely to want

22:57

to drink beer or Geneva, a

22:59

traditional Dutch drink. and so that

23:01

stays stocked in the kitchen. In the cosmopolitan

23:03

and formal lifestyle homes,

23:05

they tend to like to have wine with

23:07

their meals. Also,

23:09

the interiors, you see

23:10

the cosmopolitan lifestyle is

23:12

much more outspoken in

23:14

colors, for example. where the

23:16

traditional lifestyle interior colors are

23:19

much more mute and

23:22

beige, not that outspoken.

23:25

And if you look at the interior of formal

23:28

lifestyle, you see the ten liters,

23:30

but, well, the

23:31

ten liters which fit a

23:33

formal lifestyle. But in

23:35

the urban lifestyle, they also have

23:37

ten years, but they look completely

23:40

different. And

23:42

we have

23:42

wallpaper with big flowers on it, for

23:45

example, whereas in

23:47

the formal lifestyle, we have fairy

23:50

blessed wallpaper.

23:52

Residents

23:52

also have access to the whole

23:55

neighborhood. If you

23:55

step out your front door, you

23:58

will be on

23:59

well, you will be

24:02

outdoors, which sounds normal.

24:04

But for people living

24:05

with dementia

24:07

who are secondly, most

24:07

of the time, a

24:09

locked in facility and

24:11

can't go outside by themselves.

24:13

This is for us, it's normal,

24:15

but it's a rare feature that if you step

24:17

at your

24:18

front door, unaccompanied by

24:20

a nurse or a camera,

24:21

because freedom is one of

24:23

the other assets of the village. If

24:25

you

24:26

step out your fungal, you can

24:29

wonder on the street and through

24:31

the parks, you can

24:33

cross the big square or you can go

24:35

to the theater square. Or

24:38

you can visit the supermarket.

24:40

There is a restaurant where

24:43

you can go

24:43

to there is a

24:46

theater where performances

24:48

are held. In

24:50

total, the

24:51

HOKWOG houses one hundred and eighty

24:54

eight residents. And behind the scenes,

24:56

there is a whole team of people

24:58

helping to make this possible. Each

25:00

home has

25:00

a lead caregiver and

25:03

a supporter. Then there are the

25:05

employees. There are employees of the grocery

25:07

store, the restaurant, doctors,

25:09

occupational therapists, the

25:11

whole shebang. So

25:12

it's it's a whole

25:14

it's a whole organization

25:17

where everyone is on our payroll except

25:19

the hairdresser. But she works

25:21

already definitely

25:21

in Ohio. So she's one

25:23

of us. The hove bag

25:25

is specifically for people

25:28

with late stage dementia. And so residents

25:30

don't tend to stay all

25:32

that long. The average time someone lives

25:34

in the village is about two to two

25:36

and a half years. But

25:38

while they do live

25:38

there, Jeanette says that their lives

25:41

are much better often than

25:43

they were even before they

25:45

arrived. and certainly better than they would

25:47

be in a traditional nursing

25:50

home. I think

25:50

the biggest measure for

25:52

successes with other people, other

25:55

care providers say when

25:56

they come and visit us. And

25:58

that is that they do not

25:59

believe that the people who live in the house of

26:02

ag are

26:02

the same residence, the

26:05

same people with a diagnosed with

26:07

severe dementia, that

26:09

these people are the

26:11

same

26:12

residents

26:14

as

26:14

they have in their facilities,

26:17

their traditional care

26:19

facilities where people are

26:21

drugs, where people are

26:23

confined to a certain place

26:25

in the institute where people

26:27

can't go out their own

26:29

houses and have freedom to walk

26:32

around and to to engage and to

26:34

socialize. So

26:36

sometimes we have to convince

26:38

these

26:38

persons that those people living

26:41

in the hallway are really the

26:43

same restaurants, really

26:46

in that severe

26:47

or that last stage of dementia,

26:49

but that's creating different

26:52

environments, having a different philosophy,

26:55

offering choice and offering freedom

26:58

makes such

26:59

a huge, huge

27:02

difference.

27:02

Now, I

27:04

know

27:04

what some of you are thinking, especially if

27:06

you're Americans. You're probably thinking, well,

27:09

Rose, this sounds great. It

27:11

also sounds really freaking expensive.

27:14

Well,

27:14

I poor

27:15

poor American listeners

27:17

local buckle up. If you are

27:18

diagnosed with dementia by a

27:21

special

27:21

committee, which functions

27:23

all over the Netherlands,

27:24

and you you get that

27:27

permission to

27:27

move into a nursing home, the state,

27:29

the government will pay everything.

27:32

So actually, everyone in the Netherlands

27:35

can afford

27:37

this

27:37

type of care. Okay.

27:39

Those of us in the United States can just take

27:41

like a short moment to weep at

27:43

how nice that sounds. But there

27:45

is also another metric for how expensive this

27:47

model might be, which is how much the hock

27:50

bag gets from the government to

27:52

operate. The budget that

27:53

we get from the government, that hock

27:55

bag gets from the government is the same budget as every

27:58

other nursing home in the

27:59

Netherlands. So we

28:01

do not get extra budget because we

28:03

have created this nursing home.

28:05

Now, this is still a

28:07

nursing home. It still segregates folks

28:09

with dementia away in their own

28:12

little area. I

28:13

mean, it's definitely better,

28:16

but

28:16

also the

28:18

bars in hell, you know? Like,

28:20

being nicer than a nursing home is a better traditional nursing home

28:22

is like, you know, it's a very

28:24

low standard to meet. So I I was

28:27

like, Like, they have, like, a restaurant

28:29

that people go to, that, like, people from

28:31

the community go to. But

28:33

that's not really it's not

28:35

kind of the integration if people can,

28:37

like, visit. People can visit nursing

28:39

homes too. You know? Like, it's it's

28:40

it's

28:42

the people that living in the village

28:45

are still separated from

28:47

society. This is something

28:49

that

28:49

Kate mentioned earlier and something

28:51

that she thinks is wrong. Kate

28:53

thinks that we should have integrated living facilities for people

28:56

with all kinds of disabilities

28:58

and needs. Why

28:59

haven't

29:00

we found ways to

29:03

allow people with dementia who

29:05

are neurodiverse and

29:07

who may have different

29:08

needs. and need cognitive ramps.

29:10

They may not need wheelchair ramps,

29:12

but

29:12

we need cognitive ramps.

29:14

Why aren't we providing

29:17

communities that enable people

29:20

to live more independently

29:22

for longer. And I

29:24

I understand completely from my own

29:27

professional background that there's

29:29

likely gonna be time when I will

29:31

need to be in some

29:32

sort of assisted living. That would

29:34

be especially so if

29:36

I lived on my own. But I, you know, I think

29:39

that we need much, much

29:41

smaller group housing models

29:43

that aren't exclusively for

29:45

people with dementia.

29:46

And I

29:47

asked Jeanette about this, and

29:49

her answer kind of surprised

29:52

me.

29:52

They are completely right

29:54

We are also convinced

29:57

that people should stay part

29:58

of society.

29:59

Even when they are

30:02

diagnosed with dementia, even when the when

30:04

the dementia progresses. But

30:06

certainly enough, society

30:08

isn't ready yet for people living with

30:10

severe dementia because they do not understand

30:13

them.

30:13

They fear people living with dementia.

30:16

So it is not

30:18

that institutions should change

30:20

the foremost by by desegregation.

30:23

It is society

30:25

which

30:25

has to step up.

30:28

to

30:28

embrace people living with dementia

30:30

or whoever is living with a disability,

30:32

by the way, so

30:35

that they can and

30:36

able people to stay part of

30:39

society so that we, as institutions,

30:41

don't have to segregate

30:43

them. So our answer

30:44

kind of brings up a really interesting question.

30:46

It's like a little bit of a chicken and egg

30:49

quandary. Whose responsibility is it

30:51

to change the way that we think

30:53

about? aging. Right now, we have sort of

30:55

a self reinforcing system. We segregate

30:57

folks with dementia because culturally

31:00

people are anxious about having them

31:02

integrated into society. And then by

31:03

segregating them, we reinforce that

31:06

stigma. But how can you push

31:08

back against that if you don't integrate

31:10

folks back into the world? And as

31:12

care providers, is it ethical to

31:14

force people to live in situations where maybe

31:16

they are unwelcome or treated

31:18

poorly? I understand,

31:19

like, there's a

31:20

lot of issues when you're dealing

31:23

with, you know, people with dementia, behavioral

31:26

issues, safety issues.

31:28

Like, you know, people might not behave appropriately.

31:30

They might shout. They

31:32

might curse. They might take all

31:34

their clothes off. Like, those are all things people do.

31:38

But I I think

31:40

that really, like, instead of building a special separate

31:43

place for those people. What we really

31:46

need to do as a society is

31:48

get comfortable. It's that.

31:49

Like, just get comfortable with

31:52

having people with disabilities and

31:54

like dementia because it's a disability around

31:56

to not look away, to

31:59

not isolate people

32:01

and their caregivers when they behave in

32:03

ways that are odd

32:06

or disruptive. You and

32:07

I probably can't make

32:09

a huge difference in the way that

32:11

the nursing home industry is

32:13

run. but we can actually impact

32:17

this. We can think about

32:17

our assumptions and demands

32:20

and the way we react when

32:22

someone behaves in a way that we

32:24

might not expect.

32:26

I wanna

32:26

live in a society where

32:28

people

32:29

with disabilities and seniors

32:31

and kids too, like families

32:33

all exist in public and it's

32:36

normal. like, if you're somewhere and a baby starts

32:38

crying, nobody is like,

32:40

well, you need to go home. You know?

32:42

Like, we're it's like we're

32:44

you

32:44

know,

32:45

caregivers can can go

32:48

out and have lives and

32:50

still do what they need to do,

32:52

where you know, if someone's talking to themselves in public,

32:54

it's not a big deal.

32:56

If someone, you know, if

32:58

if someone with dementia or an intellectual disability,

33:02

is is being disruptive, like people

33:04

just kind of take it in stride.

33:06

Now, we have

33:07

talked a lot about nursing homes.

33:10

the bad ones and the better ones. But there is

33:12

in fact another way

33:14

for care to happen. Another

33:16

place in fact And that is

33:18

in people's homes. The

33:21

thing about ending nursing homes is

33:23

we already have a

33:25

home care system in the United States at

33:28

least. Like,

33:30

we have long term services and

33:32

supports for people at home that are

33:34

funded by the government and

33:36

that involve paid workers going to

33:38

people's homes and caring for

33:40

them. The problem with it

33:42

is that it is incredibly

33:45

underfunded. States are

33:45

not required to pay for at home

33:47

care for anybody. If a

33:49

state isn't

33:50

required to pay for something, they're

33:52

generally not going to. So

33:54

you end up with these huge waiting lists to

33:56

get services and supports at

33:59

home. In some

33:59

cases, at home care can actually be

34:02

far more affordable. And again,

34:04

this is what most people

34:06

want. I just wrote about

34:07

the

34:08

of Georgia has seven thousand people,

34:10

over seven thousand people when they're waiting

34:14

And

34:14

it what it comes down to is

34:16

just that, like, there isn't

34:17

the political will to pay for

34:20

it. It

34:20

is completely possible

34:23

to

34:23

deliver care at

34:24

home for people. We just need

34:27

to put the money in. Of course,

34:29

the US is economic inequities

34:31

and terrible healthcare system have made dying at

34:33

home well challenging too. The New

34:35

Yorker just published an investigative

34:38

report about the ways in which the at home

34:40

hospice industry has become a

34:42

twenty two billion dollar

34:44

industry, rife with exploitation. But

34:48

done well with care

34:50

and dignity in mind rather than

34:52

dollar bills,

34:53

at

34:54

home care is almost always better

34:56

than moving someone into a total

35:00

institution. This is a situation in

35:02

which it's very clear that what we are currently

35:04

doing could be much

35:06

better. In the short run, we could have

35:08

nursing

35:08

homes that are designed and run like

35:12

these dementia villages that make people happier and healthier.

35:14

In the longer run,

35:16

we could reframe our ideas

35:18

of care and the way

35:20

we spend money to provide people

35:22

with the kinds of experiences they

35:25

actually want. And yet, we don't make

35:27

those

35:27

changes. We don't do those

35:30

things. The HOKFEG has been around

35:31

for over ten

35:33

years, and it still treated like some kind of

35:36

wild experiment, some

35:38

newfangled

35:40

thing. What people want is possible and

35:42

doable if funding priorities

35:46

change? So why are

35:48

we stuck with the

35:50

worst possible options?

35:52

The answer is both

35:54

complicated and also kind

35:57

of not. It comes down

35:58

to two main things, capitalism

36:00

and ableism.

36:02

Right now, there are lots of people

36:05

making lots of money off of the way the

36:07

system currently operates. Our economic

36:09

system prioritizes profit

36:12

overall else. And

36:14

because older folks in general don't

36:16

have a ton of political

36:18

power or organizing capacity,

36:20

it's hard to push back on that.

36:22

On top of that, you have a culture that is extremely willing to

36:25

ignore, ostracize, and discriminate

36:27

against disabled folks. Estates

36:30

see this currently with the pandemic, right? So many

36:32

people seem not only willing to

36:35

accept, but gleeful at

36:37

the prospect that the virus might eliminate

36:40

disabled folks at a higher

36:42

rate. And a lot of people

36:44

don't think of older folks

36:46

as disabled. Even older

36:48

adults themselves often resist

36:50

this label. But it's worth

36:52

considering them in the

36:54

same breath. And there's this

36:54

older disability where it's activist who he's

36:57

an older adult now,

37:00

and his name's

37:02

Kelly Buckland. and

37:03

he had this quote

37:05

that I think about all the time,

37:07

which is that nobody lives in a

37:09

nursing home because they're old. they

37:11

they go to the nursing home because they have

37:13

a disability. Like, you end up in the nursing

37:15

home because you need a certain level of care.

37:17

It's not like you turn eighty and, like, automatically

37:19

they admit you. And one

37:21

exciting thing that we're seeing some real alliances between aging

37:24

activists, disability activists,

37:27

and care workers.

37:29

I think if you look

37:30

at the way that organizations

37:32

like the American Association of

37:34

People Disabilities, how how they've

37:36

sort of started to, like, work with

37:39

SCIU and the labor movement. I

37:41

think that is in

37:42

no small part because a lot of

37:44

these bigger disability rights organizations are now

37:46

led by women. who understand that,

37:49

you know, care work is work.

37:51

And I think that's really that's that's

37:53

been a really interesting development in

37:55

the past decade and one I've been really excited to cover as

37:57

a journalist. This

37:59

series has been about a lot

38:02

of things. family

38:02

care, aging, dementia, technology, culture,

38:05

money. And I was thinking

38:06

a little

38:07

bit about why I was

38:09

drawn to this topic

38:12

initially. I have not ever cared for

38:13

anybody personally with dementia and it's

38:16

something that frankly I don't think

38:18

about in my day to

38:20

day life all that

38:22

often. But I think

38:22

that at the same time, it hits on

38:25

so many of the topics that we

38:27

talk about on FlashForward all the time. things

38:29

like surveillance and ethics and policy

38:31

and neuroscience. And it does so

38:34

while looking at a population

38:36

that is largely

38:38

left out of futurism. When you

38:40

see images of the

38:42

future, you rarely see

38:44

older folks.

38:46

You almost never see people using wheelchairs or canes.

38:48

You don't even see a lot of wrinkles

38:50

amidst all the shiny chrome

38:52

and sleek new devices. Aaging

38:55

is left out of futurism unless it is

38:57

being conquered. But of course, we

38:59

will continue to get older

39:01

in the future. is

39:03

how time and biology works.

39:06

Simply ignoring an entire group

39:08

of people because they are inconvenient to

39:12

the storyline, is not

39:14

only unrealistic. It's also

39:18

problematic. Not everybody gets to

39:20

grow old, unfortunately. But we should all

39:22

think about what we want for our

39:24

lives and for our friends and

39:26

family if we get

39:28

that lucky. And I hope that welcome to Vanguard Estates

39:30

and this little series of explainer

39:32

episodes helped you think

39:34

through some of those choices

39:36

and ideas so

39:38

you can work towards a better future.

39:47

FlashForward is

39:52

hosted

39:52

by He Rose Evelyn and produced by

39:54

Aussie lina Schibman. The intro music

39:56

is by Asura and the outro music is

39:59

by Hasselonia. The

39:59

episode art is by Maddie

40:02

Luchansky. This is

40:02

the last episode and are welcome

40:05

to Vanguard State's series. Next,

40:07

we are taking a little break. And

40:09

then in December, flash forward is going

40:11

to release its final three

40:13

episodes ever. That's right.

40:15

The show is ending for good at the end of

40:17

this year. If you're a patron you have heard

40:20

all about these plans, I have in fact

40:22

mentioned them in the credits

40:24

of other episodes. The show's Patreon will close-up shop on

40:26

December thirty first. But if you

40:27

want to keep supporting me, Rose, as I go

40:30

off

40:30

and do my

40:32

next things, you can find out more about how to do that at flash forward

40:34

pod dot com. There is a blog

40:36

post up now with all of

40:40

that information. I hope you enjoyed this series and I really

40:42

hope you enjoy our finale. See

40:44

you in a

40:46

couple weeks.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features