Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:08
Hello,
0:08
and welcome to flash forward.
0:10
This is the fifth and final
0:12
episode looking at all the stuff that inspired
0:14
the welcome to Vanguard Estates fictional
0:17
series. Today, we're gonna talk
0:19
a little bit about nursing homes and why
0:21
it is that while most people want
0:23
to spend their final years at home
0:25
or in a supportive community, that
0:27
doesn't tend to happen. And
0:29
then we're gonna do a little bit of wrap
0:32
up on this whole series and consider
0:34
what we have learned. Oh,
0:36
and by the way, I'm I'm your host. I say that
0:38
on every episode, so I should say it here now.
0:40
But before we go any further, I wanna share something
0:43
really which is that a listener has actually
0:45
created an interactive version of
0:47
welcome to Vanguard Estates with the audio
0:49
all in one place. So if you, like, wanted
0:51
to listen to the series but got frustrated
0:54
by trying to find the various episodes
0:56
or whatnot. I know it's like little confusing where you
0:58
have to scroll through your podcasting app, etcetera,
1:00
etcetera. Now, you
1:01
can play through the audio online.
1:04
I
1:04
am so thankful to Markos for setting that up will
1:06
put a link in the show notes and you can go
1:08
to flash forward pod dot com
1:10
slash vanguard interactive to
1:13
see and hear it. So again,
1:15
thank you, Marcos, for making that so cool.
1:18
I am like so stoked to have it now
1:20
on the site. Okay. Back to our
1:22
regular programming. So
1:24
let's start with the question that
1:27
is the name of this episode.
1:29
Where do you want
1:31
to grow old? Most
1:33
people share the same answer to that question.
1:36
Surveys show that seventy seven percent
1:38
of people over fifty say they want to remain
1:41
in their homes. And that number has
1:43
stayed consistent in polling for over
1:45
a decade. But not
1:47
all of those seventy seven percent of people
1:49
will get their wish. Three point four
1:51
million people over the age of sixty five
1:53
currently live in their children's homes,
1:55
and two point four million live in group
1:57
settings like nursing homes.
1:59
And
1:59
this happens for a bunch of different
2:02
reasons. For some people,
2:04
the homes they currently live in
2:06
would need to be changed. in some
2:08
way in order for it to be safe for them
2:10
to stay. In one survey, about a third
2:12
of all participants said that their homes
2:14
would need to be modified somehow if
2:16
they wanted to keep living in them. That
2:19
includes things like there's no bedroom
2:21
or bathroom on the first floor for them
2:23
to use. Most people
2:25
don't have the money to do that
2:27
kind of major renovation to
2:29
put a bedroom and bathroom on that
2:32
first floor. And that's
2:34
assuming that you own your house
2:36
and can do those kinds of renovations. One
2:39
think tank called the Urban Institute estimate
2:41
that by twenty forty, the number of
2:43
people renting their homes or apartments
2:45
will surge to twelve point nine
2:47
million. and in particular
2:50
those are likely to be black older
2:51
adults. What
2:53
that means is that a lot of people,
2:55
whether they like it or not,
2:57
will wind up in some kind of facility,
3:00
likely a nursing home.
3:02
And there is a reason that most of
3:04
us don't want to end
3:06
our lives in one of these places.
3:10
We know nursing homes are unpleasant
3:12
places to live. it's a punch
3:15
line in the Simpsons that Grandpa
3:17
Simpsons Nursing Home is like a sad, horrible
3:19
place to be. That's Sarah
3:21
Luederman, a reporter at the nineteenth
3:23
who's covered nursing home conditions. There's
3:26
just like this thing that we know about
3:28
them and yet we send our the percent of people
3:30
we love to them anyway.
3:32
The
3:32
quality of nursing homes varies
3:34
wildly, but they're marked by
3:37
some specific elements. And
3:39
one of them is that you can't
3:41
really leave just because
3:43
you want to. Here's Dr. Alana
3:45
Lee Glaser, the Anthropologie professor
3:47
at St. John's University. who you heard last
3:49
week. The
3:50
facilities where I worked, you know,
3:52
you couldn't get off the floor. So
3:54
you need to pass, put a passcode in
3:56
to access the elevator or the stairwells.
3:59
And that's just such
3:59
a high level of containment. It always made me
4:02
feel really uncomfortable and
4:04
envisioning a future where I live in a setting
4:06
like that, you know, and knowing that I am
4:08
unable to leave.
4:10
Many nursing homes have dedicated dementia
4:12
awards. also sometimes called memory
4:15
care units, where they have extra
4:17
security in place. And in sociology
4:19
jargon, these places are considered
4:22
total institutions. The
4:24
total institution is a
4:26
a concept that was proposed by the sociologist,
4:29
Irving Goffman, And
4:31
basically, it's the the
4:33
basic definition is this place where
4:34
a lot of people are
4:37
living in the same place and they work in the
4:39
same place and they live in the same place. And there
4:41
isn't really the separation between
4:43
sort of, like,
4:45
home
4:45
and work
4:47
and that we see
4:49
in most places, they're in the same sort of
4:51
separation spheres. And
4:53
then in the total
4:55
institution,
4:56
people don't have privacy.
4:59
They
4:59
don't have
5:00
freedom of choice. They
5:03
don't choose what
5:04
they're going to do, what they're going
5:06
to eat. Prisons
5:08
are also total institutions.
5:11
These
5:11
are places where when you live there, you
5:14
no longer have the ability to decide
5:16
for yourself what your day
5:18
looks like or what you want to
5:20
do. A disability activist,
5:22
Dave Hingsburger, came up with what he
5:24
calls the burrito test. That
5:26
test goes like this. You wake
5:28
up in the middle of the night and you are craving
5:30
a microwave burrito. Can
5:32
you get up and microwave one
5:34
yourself? If the answer is no,
5:36
you are not allowed to do that. It's
5:39
a total institution. There's
5:40
also like a concurrent concept called
5:43
the right to eat too many doughnuts. which
5:45
is like, you know, people
5:47
have a right to make bad decisions. Like,
5:49
if if I as
5:50
someone who's not living in an institution or
5:53
in a group home or you
5:55
know, with a certain level of
5:56
care, like, if I decide to eat a
5:58
bunch of if I decide to skip work, eat a bunch
6:00
of donuts and take an nap, like, nobody's
6:02
gonna stop me. I might, you know,
6:04
lose my job or or face, you
6:06
know, get have a stomachache,
6:07
like, you know, regular consequences. But
6:09
like, no one's
6:10
gonna stop me.
6:12
In
6:12
most nursing homes, that
6:14
wouldn't be allowed. A nurse would stop
6:17
you. And it doesn't have to just do
6:19
with food. This is about your choices
6:21
generally. You or
6:23
I might be feeling like a little
6:26
blip one day and decide to just spend
6:28
the day in bed. That
6:30
is not a choice that folks who live
6:32
in these places have. There's
6:34
a really excellent older study
6:37
and there's like this one
6:39
passage that he writes about where
6:42
someone wanted to stay in bed
6:44
all day. They didn't wanna have to get out of bed, but
6:46
long term living facilities protocols insisted
6:50
that every patient get out of bed and
6:52
move to a common room or whatever at certain
6:54
point in the day. And he kind of writes
6:57
like along the lines of, you know, this person's human
6:59
rights weren't being trampled
7:01
by, you know, not
7:03
by their wishes to stay in bed, not being respected.
7:06
And it always stuck with me that, you know, in
7:08
fact, like, aren't they? You know, if if what you
7:10
wanna do all day is play around.
7:14
It seems so unfair that
7:16
because of various bureaucratic
7:19
liabilities or bureaucratic values
7:22
that you're not permitted to just
7:24
make that decision for yourself in
7:26
these in certain settings, these
7:28
congregate care care settings.
7:30
Secure dementia units a
7:34
severe form of violation
7:38
of rights of institutionalization and
7:41
worse of segregation.
7:44
That's
7:44
Kate Swaffer again. Not only
7:46
are folks with dementia segregated away,
7:48
conditions in many nursing homes
7:51
are often very bad. We
7:54
talked last week about the shortage of caregivers
7:56
and people willing to do these jobs
7:58
for such low pay. And
8:00
that is having a huge impact on
8:02
the quality of care in these
8:04
facilities.
8:06
We're talking like like one person
8:09
being responsible
8:10
for toiloting,
8:11
feeding, changing, cleaning,
8:15
giving medication to like
8:17
seventy people.
8:18
That's like not something that
8:19
someone could do competently and also
8:21
provide emotional support for those
8:23
people. Like, it's not it's not
8:25
like a thing
8:26
a human being can do.
8:28
And
8:28
so, like, when we have these,
8:30
like, this understaffing, when we have
8:33
these underpaid, undertrained,
8:35
overworked staff
8:38
doing all of this stuff, like,
8:40
it gets really ugly, really quickly.
8:44
During the COVID pandemic, nursing
8:46
homes were hit really,
8:48
really hard. Here is a statistic that
8:50
I always find just shocking.
8:52
According
8:53
to the COVID Tracking Project,
8:56
deaths connected to long term care
8:58
facilities account for thirty
9:00
five percent of US
9:02
COVID nineteen fatalities, even though
9:04
less than one percent of
9:06
the US population lives in
9:08
these places. And this
9:11
continues to be an issue. In October of
9:13
this year, AARP data showed
9:15
that thirty two percent of nursing home
9:17
residents tested positive. for
9:19
COVID-nineteen that month. And
9:21
it's not that COVID has
9:23
suddenly made nursing homes unpleasant.
9:26
For decades, folks living in these
9:28
places have been routinely strapped
9:30
down or drugged. In
9:32
fact, in Australia, there is
9:34
data to say that probably six hundred people
9:36
a year are dying from
9:38
the overuse of antipsychotics in
9:41
Australia, and there's been a
9:43
number of research projects about reducing
9:46
antipsychotics in nursing
9:48
homes globally and yet
9:50
they persistently prescribed
9:52
to to paper with dementia.
9:54
Part of thinking about care is
9:57
our medication interventions in that
9:59
case in
9:59
particular have been disastrous.
10:02
That's
10:02
Dr. Tia Powell again, the psychiatrist
10:04
and bioethicist at Albert
10:06
Einstein College of Medicine.
10:08
We've been using antipsychotic
10:09
medications to
10:12
treat agitation in nursing
10:14
homes. And they're terrible. They cause
10:16
delirium. They have terrible side effects. They
10:18
cause sedation, so you fall, you break a hip,
10:20
and then you're bed bound and game
10:22
over. They cause delirium. They
10:24
do all kinds of
10:24
things. They make a lot of other illnesses worse.
10:26
There have been
10:28
some attempts to make it harder to prescribe
10:30
these things in nursing homes,
10:32
but there is a long way to go.
10:35
There's almost no regulation at all
10:37
for the use of antipsychotic medications,
10:40
insisted living programs, and
10:42
in other places. And even in the acute
10:45
care hospital and our big fancy
10:47
medical research institutions,
10:48
we still use this stuff in its bad
10:50
news. And
10:51
people are finding workarounds.
10:53
Like, oh, yes, schizophrenia. That's why
10:55
we're actually it
10:58
would be reportable in New
10:59
England Journal if you found a ninety year
11:01
old who was first diagnosed with schizophrenia.
11:04
That's kinda not like how
11:05
that works. It would be,
11:07
whoa. That just doesn't happen.
11:09
In
11:10
other places, they've stopped using
11:13
antipsychotics and started using
11:15
other drugs.
11:16
Professor Henry Brodarty, who's one
11:18
of the leaders in dementia in Australia,
11:20
in his witness
11:22
statement to the Royal Commission said that Now
11:25
some doctors are switching from
11:27
antipsychotics as ways
11:30
to sedaterestrained. and
11:33
are starting to use high dose
11:35
and histamines, which also have a
11:37
highly sedative effect.
11:40
Given
11:40
all of this, it won't
11:42
surprise you then that the outcomes
11:44
for living in these places
11:46
are
11:46
not good. People
11:48
who move into nursing homes tend to die
11:50
sooner than those who get to age in place.
11:52
Over thirty percent of residents
11:54
who enter a nursing home facility die
11:57
within the first year. Now,
11:59
when you think about it, this
12:01
is kind of weird.
12:03
Most people don't want to
12:05
live in these places. The conditions
12:07
are bad. They are cesspools for
12:09
disease, they are poorly regulated, and
12:11
as we talked about last week, They're really
12:13
expensive. So
12:15
why do they exist? Why
12:17
do we allow this to happen?
12:19
It
12:20
turns out actually there's a lot of suffering
12:22
that people
12:23
in our society are completely comfortable with
12:25
living with. I
12:26
am officially on the record as being
12:29
opposed to nursing homes
12:30
sort of on principle. I do
12:31
not think that they should exist.
12:33
Sarah agrees. We actually wrote very
12:35
similar stories right around the same time
12:37
in twenty twenty. both arguing for
12:39
the end of nursing homes. And
12:41
one of the things that you hear when
12:43
you talk about this or write about this.
12:45
is
12:46
that there is simply no other
12:48
way for us to handle
12:50
the aging population. There's just like no
12:52
other solution. What else are we
12:54
supposed to do? Nursing homes have been around
12:56
forever for a reason. The
12:58
thing
12:58
is, they have not been around
13:01
forever. It's
13:02
actually really new. That was the thing that
13:04
shocked me when I was doing research for this
13:06
piece. Before
13:07
nursing homes, there were things like rest
13:10
homes, which were small facilities that housed
13:12
thirty to fifty people at a time.
13:14
Those were generally run by philanthropists,
13:17
and they were for folks who had really nobody
13:19
else to turn to. Historically,
13:21
people have
13:23
done care at home. It's
13:25
mostly been family care.
13:28
Those who didn't have that would go to alms
13:30
houses or poor houses, which
13:32
were generally awful.
13:34
people were often forced to work
13:37
for scraps on
13:38
Blackwell's Island, which is now called Rosebel
13:41
Island in New York City, there were hundreds of beds
13:43
that were squeezed together so tightly that
13:45
residents had difficulty getting in and out
13:47
of them.
13:48
During the Great Depression,
13:49
the number of poor people famously skyrocketed,
13:52
and these places could no longer
13:54
keep up. And for a
13:56
long time, the US government
13:58
was not sure what to
13:59
do. It
14:00
wasn't until the nineteen fifties
14:03
that the large institutional spaces
14:05
we know of today became common,
14:07
thanks to a new law in the US called
14:09
the Hill Burton Act, which allowed
14:11
public money to be used to build
14:13
nursing homes. Between
14:15
nineteen sixty and nineteen sixty five, federal
14:17
spending on nursing homes, went up from
14:19
forty seven million to four hundred and
14:21
forty forty nine million a year. So
14:23
it's like
14:26
Sorry. If this is a podcast, you can't see my
14:28
arm going up with the the hand
14:30
motioned up. And
14:33
then
14:33
Medicaid, came to be, which is like the
14:36
biggest wonder of long
14:38
term
14:38
care in the ICs in nineteen sixty five.
14:40
and
14:41
that put even more money in the nursing home
14:43
system. So the nursing home capacity in
14:45
the US basically more
14:48
than doubled in the
14:50
decade between nineteen I get between nineteen sixty
14:52
three and nineteen seventy three. So
14:54
there
14:54
was all of this money going into
14:56
these new institutions, but
14:58
very little oversight. There
15:00
weren't a
15:01
ton of requirements about
15:03
things like building
15:05
codes, whether a
15:07
nurse was available, you
15:09
know, whether narcotics were unlocked cabinets,
15:13
whether
15:13
the food was
15:15
food.
15:19
Yeah. Like, just really there's
15:22
just one account that I read that, like, talked
15:24
about, like, green meat with maggots in the kitchen.
15:26
It was just, like, really gross stuff.
15:28
Eventually, the US passed some basic
15:31
rules about what constituted a
15:33
skilled nursing facility to
15:34
address these glaring errors.
15:37
But
15:37
there are still big problems with
15:39
oversight. and a lot of the current oversight
15:41
relies on nursing homes to
15:43
accurately self report their
15:45
conditions.
15:47
Today, the nursing home industry in the
15:49
US is huge.
15:51
According to the CDC, there were fifteen
15:53
thousand six hundred facilities in
15:55
twenty sixteen. and almost seventy
15:57
percent of them were for profit.
15:59
A report by Grand View Research
16:01
found that the long term care market is
16:03
set to be worth one point seven
16:06
trillion dollars by two thousand and
16:08
thirty. In the United States,
16:10
nursing home lobbyists are powerful and
16:12
have already gotten to work seeking
16:14
immunity from COVID-nineteen related
16:16
lawsuits and asking for billions
16:18
in federal relief funding and
16:20
resisting additional oversights
16:22
and regulations. that might be imposed upon
16:24
them. Now, the point that
16:26
Sarah and I are making here, the argument
16:28
that nursing homes are fairly
16:30
recent and should probably not exist.
16:33
It
16:33
is not an argument to go back to
16:35
free domestic labor.
16:37
I think a lot
16:38
of people misunderstood my argument and think that what
16:40
I'm arguing is that Like, it
16:42
was totally better when unpaid
16:45
family caregivers, mostly almost
16:47
entirely women basically didn't
16:49
have lives and spent all their time
16:51
caring for people. Like,
16:53
that's no. That's that's that's
16:55
bad, obviously. But
16:57
it's not like those are her only two
16:59
options. Right? Either women have to give up
17:01
their jobs and do all this care work for
17:03
or we have these terribly run and
17:05
poorly regulated nursing homes where people
17:07
suffer and die. We actually do
17:09
have other choices. when
17:12
we come back, we're gonna talk about what those
17:15
choices
17:16
are. This episode of FlashForward
17:18
is sponsored by Volante Design.
17:20
If you are looking for gear that makes you
17:22
feel just as badass in real life as you
17:24
do when you get a triple s
17:27
combo kill in a game, look no further than
17:29
Volante design. Okay. Listen, I'll be
17:31
honest that I don't know what that
17:33
means, but I suspect that some of
17:35
you do And if you are a
17:37
person that does know what a triple s
17:39
combo kill is,
17:41
voluntary designs makes really rad
17:43
jackets that can make you legit look
17:45
like your favorite characters from
17:47
Essence Creed, Devil May Cry and Star
17:49
Trek, as well as plenty of other original
17:51
collections like their cyberpunk and
17:53
modern ninja line. Volante
17:55
design jackets are ethically sourced and
17:57
manufactured. They are made for quality, and they
17:59
will last you for years to come. Just
18:01
go to volante design dot
18:03
u s, that's V0ANTE
18:07
design dot u s and use the
18:09
code flash forward for
18:11
ten percent off your entire
18:13
order. That's flash forward all one
18:15
word for ten percent off your
18:17
entire order. Voilante design,
18:19
stay
18:19
at us.
18:20
Okay. So I have said already, multiple
18:23
times now, that I think nursing homes as an
18:25
institution, as a place, are something that
18:27
we should consider a band name. But even
18:29
within the construct of nursing homes, there
18:32
are much better models than the
18:34
standard institution. And
18:36
one
18:36
of these examples can be found in
18:38
the Netherlands. So you must
18:40
realize that the vision on
18:43
normal live for dementia, already a
18:45
thirty year old innovation. This
18:47
is Jeannette
18:48
Speerring, one of the founders of a community
18:50
in the Netherlands called
18:52
the whole bag. Yes.
18:55
And it's very
18:57
difficult from people from
18:59
abroad to pronounce the
19:01
h. which is very prominent in
19:03
the Dutch language, but that's also
19:05
why we were dubbed dementia
19:07
village because people can't pronounce
19:09
the whole leg. I'm gonna try
19:11
my very best to say this correctly on
19:13
the episode. Now, a dimension village
19:15
is a different model for where
19:18
people might live when they have
19:20
dementia. Jeanette actually used to
19:22
work at a more traditional nursing
19:24
home back in the 1990s. But
19:26
she was looking around and hearing from patients and families
19:29
that things weren't that
19:31
good. People weren't
19:32
really dissatisfied about
19:37
topics like food
19:39
or how they were being
19:40
treated by stuff.
19:43
the the lack of
19:45
respect or
19:46
dignity.
19:49
In nineteen ninety
19:49
three, they decided to try
19:51
and retrofit a nursing home to be more like a
19:53
set of apartments. And I
19:55
always
19:56
compare it with
19:58
and I don't want to offend
19:59
someone, but I've
20:02
compared it with an East German
20:04
concrete block to
20:05
give you any idea of
20:07
how awful it was on the outside. But on
20:09
the inside, it's
20:10
once we transformed it,
20:13
we transformed big words into
20:15
living rooms. We put
20:18
kitchens in it. We
20:20
put a washing machine
20:22
and a drawer
20:24
onto every word while we created
20:27
hosts. And
20:28
Jeanette says they immediately
20:30
saw results. People were happier
20:33
and healthier And from there, Jeanette and the team decided to
20:35
try and really go all in
20:37
on this idea. So in
20:38
two thousand
20:39
eight, they built the Hulkvek.
20:41
Well, you must imagine it's in it's
20:44
in a a normal
20:46
Dutch neighborhood. It's a little
20:48
bit because we are in a rather
20:50
urban environment, not a big city, but a
20:52
little bit urban. And
20:55
there are twenty
20:56
seven houses in
20:58
the neighborhood and
21:01
in
21:01
every house, seven
21:04
people form
21:04
a household. They
21:07
live together. If you
21:09
talk about a household, that means that
21:11
every meal
21:11
is cooked in that household, so
21:14
breakfast, lunch,
21:14
and dinner. So
21:17
every evening, twenty seven different menus
21:19
are on. These
21:21
houses look
21:22
just like regular Dutch
21:24
houses in a regular Dutch
21:27
neighborhood. Each home
21:28
has seven bedrooms, a kitchen,
21:30
a living room, all normal
21:32
stuff. And it's all accessible
21:34
to everybody all the time.
21:36
Residence can use that kitchen, they
21:39
can open the fridge, they can
21:41
take something out, they if they
21:43
are still able, they can make their own
21:45
sandwich, so nothing is locked.
21:48
AND
21:48
DIFFERENT HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD ARE ACTUATED
21:51
DIFFERENTLY PENDING ON WHO LIVES
21:52
THERE. REMEMBER THERE ARE SEVEN PEOPLE PER HOUSE AND
21:55
I ASKED Like, how do you decide
21:58
who lives together? Good
21:59
question because we'll live in together with
22:02
someone isn't that easy always. And
22:04
how do you do that
22:06
with complete strangers as well?
22:09
The answer
22:10
lies in something they call
22:12
lifestyles. Nowadays,
22:13
we have four lifestyles in
22:15
the whole bag. And
22:17
if
22:17
you live in a certain lifestyle, that
22:20
means that everything
22:22
that is in that household,
22:24
the interior, but also
22:26
the meals, the music,
22:28
the newspaper, which is on
22:30
the table, everything is
22:33
according to
22:34
that lifestyle. So these
22:37
four large cells, the urban,
22:39
the formal, the
22:40
cosmopolitan and the
22:42
traditional large cells, They
22:46
help people
22:48
feel better
22:48
in their own houses which they
22:51
share with six
22:52
others. So in the urban
22:53
and traditional lifestyle homes,
22:55
people are more likely to want
22:57
to drink beer or Geneva, a
22:59
traditional Dutch drink. and so that
23:01
stays stocked in the kitchen. In the cosmopolitan
23:03
and formal lifestyle homes,
23:05
they tend to like to have wine with
23:07
their meals. Also,
23:09
the interiors, you see
23:10
the cosmopolitan lifestyle is
23:12
much more outspoken in
23:14
colors, for example. where the
23:16
traditional lifestyle interior colors are
23:19
much more mute and
23:22
beige, not that outspoken.
23:25
And if you look at the interior of formal
23:28
lifestyle, you see the ten liters,
23:30
but, well, the
23:31
ten liters which fit a
23:33
formal lifestyle. But in
23:35
the urban lifestyle, they also have
23:37
ten years, but they look completely
23:40
different. And
23:42
we have
23:42
wallpaper with big flowers on it, for
23:45
example, whereas in
23:47
the formal lifestyle, we have fairy
23:50
blessed wallpaper.
23:52
Residents
23:52
also have access to the whole
23:55
neighborhood. If you
23:55
step out your front door, you
23:58
will be on
23:59
well, you will be
24:02
outdoors, which sounds normal.
24:04
But for people living
24:05
with dementia
24:07
who are secondly, most
24:07
of the time, a
24:09
locked in facility and
24:11
can't go outside by themselves.
24:13
This is for us, it's normal,
24:15
but it's a rare feature that if you step
24:17
at your
24:18
front door, unaccompanied by
24:20
a nurse or a camera,
24:21
because freedom is one of
24:23
the other assets of the village. If
24:25
you
24:26
step out your fungal, you can
24:29
wonder on the street and through
24:31
the parks, you can
24:33
cross the big square or you can go
24:35
to the theater square. Or
24:38
you can visit the supermarket.
24:40
There is a restaurant where
24:43
you can go
24:43
to there is a
24:46
theater where performances
24:48
are held. In
24:50
total, the
24:51
HOKWOG houses one hundred and eighty
24:54
eight residents. And behind the scenes,
24:56
there is a whole team of people
24:58
helping to make this possible. Each
25:00
home has
25:00
a lead caregiver and
25:03
a supporter. Then there are the
25:05
employees. There are employees of the grocery
25:07
store, the restaurant, doctors,
25:09
occupational therapists, the
25:11
whole shebang. So
25:12
it's it's a whole
25:14
it's a whole organization
25:17
where everyone is on our payroll except
25:19
the hairdresser. But she works
25:21
already definitely
25:21
in Ohio. So she's one
25:23
of us. The hove bag
25:25
is specifically for people
25:28
with late stage dementia. And so residents
25:30
don't tend to stay all
25:32
that long. The average time someone lives
25:34
in the village is about two to two
25:36
and a half years. But
25:38
while they do live
25:38
there, Jeanette says that their lives
25:41
are much better often than
25:43
they were even before they
25:45
arrived. and certainly better than they would
25:47
be in a traditional nursing
25:50
home. I think
25:50
the biggest measure for
25:52
successes with other people, other
25:55
care providers say when
25:56
they come and visit us. And
25:58
that is that they do not
25:59
believe that the people who live in the house of
26:02
ag are
26:02
the same residence, the
26:05
same people with a diagnosed with
26:07
severe dementia, that
26:09
these people are the
26:11
same
26:12
residents
26:14
as
26:14
they have in their facilities,
26:17
their traditional care
26:19
facilities where people are
26:21
drugs, where people are
26:23
confined to a certain place
26:25
in the institute where people
26:27
can't go out their own
26:29
houses and have freedom to walk
26:32
around and to to engage and to
26:34
socialize. So
26:36
sometimes we have to convince
26:38
these
26:38
persons that those people living
26:41
in the hallway are really the
26:43
same restaurants, really
26:46
in that severe
26:47
or that last stage of dementia,
26:49
but that's creating different
26:52
environments, having a different philosophy,
26:55
offering choice and offering freedom
26:58
makes such
26:59
a huge, huge
27:02
difference.
27:02
Now, I
27:04
know
27:04
what some of you are thinking, especially if
27:06
you're Americans. You're probably thinking, well,
27:09
Rose, this sounds great. It
27:11
also sounds really freaking expensive.
27:14
Well,
27:14
I poor
27:15
poor American listeners
27:17
local buckle up. If you are
27:18
diagnosed with dementia by a
27:21
special
27:21
committee, which functions
27:23
all over the Netherlands,
27:24
and you you get that
27:27
permission to
27:27
move into a nursing home, the state,
27:29
the government will pay everything.
27:32
So actually, everyone in the Netherlands
27:35
can afford
27:37
this
27:37
type of care. Okay.
27:39
Those of us in the United States can just take
27:41
like a short moment to weep at
27:43
how nice that sounds. But there
27:45
is also another metric for how expensive this
27:47
model might be, which is how much the hock
27:50
bag gets from the government to
27:52
operate. The budget that
27:53
we get from the government, that hock
27:55
bag gets from the government is the same budget as every
27:58
other nursing home in the
27:59
Netherlands. So we
28:01
do not get extra budget because we
28:03
have created this nursing home.
28:05
Now, this is still a
28:07
nursing home. It still segregates folks
28:09
with dementia away in their own
28:12
little area. I
28:13
mean, it's definitely better,
28:16
but
28:16
also the
28:18
bars in hell, you know? Like,
28:20
being nicer than a nursing home is a better traditional nursing home
28:22
is like, you know, it's a very
28:24
low standard to meet. So I I was
28:27
like, Like, they have, like, a restaurant
28:29
that people go to, that, like, people from
28:31
the community go to. But
28:33
that's not really it's not
28:35
kind of the integration if people can,
28:37
like, visit. People can visit nursing
28:39
homes too. You know? Like, it's it's
28:40
it's
28:42
the people that living in the village
28:45
are still separated from
28:47
society. This is something
28:49
that
28:49
Kate mentioned earlier and something
28:51
that she thinks is wrong. Kate
28:53
thinks that we should have integrated living facilities for people
28:56
with all kinds of disabilities
28:58
and needs. Why
28:59
haven't
29:00
we found ways to
29:03
allow people with dementia who
29:05
are neurodiverse and
29:07
who may have different
29:08
needs. and need cognitive ramps.
29:10
They may not need wheelchair ramps,
29:12
but
29:12
we need cognitive ramps.
29:14
Why aren't we providing
29:17
communities that enable people
29:20
to live more independently
29:22
for longer. And I
29:24
I understand completely from my own
29:27
professional background that there's
29:29
likely gonna be time when I will
29:31
need to be in some
29:32
sort of assisted living. That would
29:34
be especially so if
29:36
I lived on my own. But I, you know, I think
29:39
that we need much, much
29:41
smaller group housing models
29:43
that aren't exclusively for
29:45
people with dementia.
29:46
And I
29:47
asked Jeanette about this, and
29:49
her answer kind of surprised
29:52
me.
29:52
They are completely right
29:54
We are also convinced
29:57
that people should stay part
29:58
of society.
29:59
Even when they are
30:02
diagnosed with dementia, even when the when
30:04
the dementia progresses. But
30:06
certainly enough, society
30:08
isn't ready yet for people living with
30:10
severe dementia because they do not understand
30:13
them.
30:13
They fear people living with dementia.
30:16
So it is not
30:18
that institutions should change
30:20
the foremost by by desegregation.
30:23
It is society
30:25
which
30:25
has to step up.
30:28
to
30:28
embrace people living with dementia
30:30
or whoever is living with a disability,
30:32
by the way, so
30:35
that they can and
30:36
able people to stay part of
30:39
society so that we, as institutions,
30:41
don't have to segregate
30:43
them. So our answer
30:44
kind of brings up a really interesting question.
30:46
It's like a little bit of a chicken and egg
30:49
quandary. Whose responsibility is it
30:51
to change the way that we think
30:53
about? aging. Right now, we have sort of
30:55
a self reinforcing system. We segregate
30:57
folks with dementia because culturally
31:00
people are anxious about having them
31:02
integrated into society. And then by
31:03
segregating them, we reinforce that
31:06
stigma. But how can you push
31:08
back against that if you don't integrate
31:10
folks back into the world? And as
31:12
care providers, is it ethical to
31:14
force people to live in situations where maybe
31:16
they are unwelcome or treated
31:18
poorly? I understand,
31:19
like, there's a
31:20
lot of issues when you're dealing
31:23
with, you know, people with dementia, behavioral
31:26
issues, safety issues.
31:28
Like, you know, people might not behave appropriately.
31:30
They might shout. They
31:32
might curse. They might take all
31:34
their clothes off. Like, those are all things people do.
31:38
But I I think
31:40
that really, like, instead of building a special separate
31:43
place for those people. What we really
31:46
need to do as a society is
31:48
get comfortable. It's that.
31:49
Like, just get comfortable with
31:52
having people with disabilities and
31:54
like dementia because it's a disability around
31:56
to not look away, to
31:59
not isolate people
32:01
and their caregivers when they behave in
32:03
ways that are odd
32:06
or disruptive. You and
32:07
I probably can't make
32:09
a huge difference in the way that
32:11
the nursing home industry is
32:13
run. but we can actually impact
32:17
this. We can think about
32:17
our assumptions and demands
32:20
and the way we react when
32:22
someone behaves in a way that we
32:24
might not expect.
32:26
I wanna
32:26
live in a society where
32:28
people
32:29
with disabilities and seniors
32:31
and kids too, like families
32:33
all exist in public and it's
32:36
normal. like, if you're somewhere and a baby starts
32:38
crying, nobody is like,
32:40
well, you need to go home. You know?
32:42
Like, we're it's like we're
32:44
you
32:44
know,
32:45
caregivers can can go
32:48
out and have lives and
32:50
still do what they need to do,
32:52
where you know, if someone's talking to themselves in public,
32:54
it's not a big deal.
32:56
If someone, you know, if
32:58
if someone with dementia or an intellectual disability,
33:02
is is being disruptive, like people
33:04
just kind of take it in stride.
33:06
Now, we have
33:07
talked a lot about nursing homes.
33:10
the bad ones and the better ones. But there is
33:12
in fact another way
33:14
for care to happen. Another
33:16
place in fact And that is
33:18
in people's homes. The
33:21
thing about ending nursing homes is
33:23
we already have a
33:25
home care system in the United States at
33:28
least. Like,
33:30
we have long term services and
33:32
supports for people at home that are
33:34
funded by the government and
33:36
that involve paid workers going to
33:38
people's homes and caring for
33:40
them. The problem with it
33:42
is that it is incredibly
33:45
underfunded. States are
33:45
not required to pay for at home
33:47
care for anybody. If a
33:49
state isn't
33:50
required to pay for something, they're
33:52
generally not going to. So
33:54
you end up with these huge waiting lists to
33:56
get services and supports at
33:59
home. In some
33:59
cases, at home care can actually be
34:02
far more affordable. And again,
34:04
this is what most people
34:06
want. I just wrote about
34:07
the
34:08
of Georgia has seven thousand people,
34:10
over seven thousand people when they're waiting
34:14
And
34:14
it what it comes down to is
34:16
just that, like, there isn't
34:17
the political will to pay for
34:20
it. It
34:20
is completely possible
34:23
to
34:23
deliver care at
34:24
home for people. We just need
34:27
to put the money in. Of course,
34:29
the US is economic inequities
34:31
and terrible healthcare system have made dying at
34:33
home well challenging too. The New
34:35
Yorker just published an investigative
34:38
report about the ways in which the at home
34:40
hospice industry has become a
34:42
twenty two billion dollar
34:44
industry, rife with exploitation. But
34:48
done well with care
34:50
and dignity in mind rather than
34:52
dollar bills,
34:53
at
34:54
home care is almost always better
34:56
than moving someone into a total
35:00
institution. This is a situation in
35:02
which it's very clear that what we are currently
35:04
doing could be much
35:06
better. In the short run, we could have
35:08
nursing
35:08
homes that are designed and run like
35:12
these dementia villages that make people happier and healthier.
35:14
In the longer run,
35:16
we could reframe our ideas
35:18
of care and the way
35:20
we spend money to provide people
35:22
with the kinds of experiences they
35:25
actually want. And yet, we don't make
35:27
those
35:27
changes. We don't do those
35:30
things. The HOKFEG has been around
35:31
for over ten
35:33
years, and it still treated like some kind of
35:36
wild experiment, some
35:38
newfangled
35:40
thing. What people want is possible and
35:42
doable if funding priorities
35:46
change? So why are
35:48
we stuck with the
35:50
worst possible options?
35:52
The answer is both
35:54
complicated and also kind
35:57
of not. It comes down
35:58
to two main things, capitalism
36:00
and ableism.
36:02
Right now, there are lots of people
36:05
making lots of money off of the way the
36:07
system currently operates. Our economic
36:09
system prioritizes profit
36:12
overall else. And
36:14
because older folks in general don't
36:16
have a ton of political
36:18
power or organizing capacity,
36:20
it's hard to push back on that.
36:22
On top of that, you have a culture that is extremely willing to
36:25
ignore, ostracize, and discriminate
36:27
against disabled folks. Estates
36:30
see this currently with the pandemic, right? So many
36:32
people seem not only willing to
36:35
accept, but gleeful at
36:37
the prospect that the virus might eliminate
36:40
disabled folks at a higher
36:42
rate. And a lot of people
36:44
don't think of older folks
36:46
as disabled. Even older
36:48
adults themselves often resist
36:50
this label. But it's worth
36:52
considering them in the
36:54
same breath. And there's this
36:54
older disability where it's activist who he's
36:57
an older adult now,
37:00
and his name's
37:02
Kelly Buckland. and
37:03
he had this quote
37:05
that I think about all the time,
37:07
which is that nobody lives in a
37:09
nursing home because they're old. they
37:11
they go to the nursing home because they have
37:13
a disability. Like, you end up in the nursing
37:15
home because you need a certain level of care.
37:17
It's not like you turn eighty and, like, automatically
37:19
they admit you. And one
37:21
exciting thing that we're seeing some real alliances between aging
37:24
activists, disability activists,
37:27
and care workers.
37:29
I think if you look
37:30
at the way that organizations
37:32
like the American Association of
37:34
People Disabilities, how how they've
37:36
sort of started to, like, work with
37:39
SCIU and the labor movement. I
37:41
think that is in
37:42
no small part because a lot of
37:44
these bigger disability rights organizations are now
37:46
led by women. who understand that,
37:49
you know, care work is work.
37:51
And I think that's really that's that's
37:53
been a really interesting development in
37:55
the past decade and one I've been really excited to cover as
37:57
a journalist. This
37:59
series has been about a lot
38:02
of things. family
38:02
care, aging, dementia, technology, culture,
38:05
money. And I was thinking
38:06
a little
38:07
bit about why I was
38:09
drawn to this topic
38:12
initially. I have not ever cared for
38:13
anybody personally with dementia and it's
38:16
something that frankly I don't think
38:18
about in my day to
38:20
day life all that
38:22
often. But I think
38:22
that at the same time, it hits on
38:25
so many of the topics that we
38:27
talk about on FlashForward all the time. things
38:29
like surveillance and ethics and policy
38:31
and neuroscience. And it does so
38:34
while looking at a population
38:36
that is largely
38:38
left out of futurism. When you
38:40
see images of the
38:42
future, you rarely see
38:44
older folks.
38:46
You almost never see people using wheelchairs or canes.
38:48
You don't even see a lot of wrinkles
38:50
amidst all the shiny chrome
38:52
and sleek new devices. Aaging
38:55
is left out of futurism unless it is
38:57
being conquered. But of course, we
38:59
will continue to get older
39:01
in the future. is
39:03
how time and biology works.
39:06
Simply ignoring an entire group
39:08
of people because they are inconvenient to
39:12
the storyline, is not
39:14
only unrealistic. It's also
39:18
problematic. Not everybody gets to
39:20
grow old, unfortunately. But we should all
39:22
think about what we want for our
39:24
lives and for our friends and
39:26
family if we get
39:28
that lucky. And I hope that welcome to Vanguard Estates
39:30
and this little series of explainer
39:32
episodes helped you think
39:34
through some of those choices
39:36
and ideas so
39:38
you can work towards a better future.
39:47
FlashForward is
39:52
hosted
39:52
by He Rose Evelyn and produced by
39:54
Aussie lina Schibman. The intro music
39:56
is by Asura and the outro music is
39:59
by Hasselonia. The
39:59
episode art is by Maddie
40:02
Luchansky. This is
40:02
the last episode and are welcome
40:05
to Vanguard State's series. Next,
40:07
we are taking a little break. And
40:09
then in December, flash forward is going
40:11
to release its final three
40:13
episodes ever. That's right.
40:15
The show is ending for good at the end of
40:17
this year. If you're a patron you have heard
40:20
all about these plans, I have in fact
40:22
mentioned them in the credits
40:24
of other episodes. The show's Patreon will close-up shop on
40:26
December thirty first. But if you
40:27
want to keep supporting me, Rose, as I go
40:30
off
40:30
and do my
40:32
next things, you can find out more about how to do that at flash forward
40:34
pod dot com. There is a blog
40:36
post up now with all of
40:40
that information. I hope you enjoyed this series and I really
40:42
hope you enjoy our finale. See
40:44
you in a
40:46
couple weeks.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More